Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Genome Characterization of the Virulent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteriophage SA97
Next Article in Special Issue
HCV Drug Resistance Challenges in Japan: The Role of Pre-Existing Variants and Emerging Resistant Strains in Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Differentially-Expressed Pseudogenes in HIV-1 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interferon-Free Hepatitis C Treatment before and after Liver Transplantation: The Role of HCV Drug Resistance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/v7102868
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase; Mode of Action and Resistance

by
Auda A. Eltahla
1,
Fabio Luciani
1,
Peter A. White
2,
Andrew R. Lloyd
1 and
Rowena A. Bull
1,*
1
Systems Medicine, Inflammation and Infection Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
2
School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2015, 7(10), 5206-5224; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102868
Submission received: 10 July 2015 / Revised: 17 September 2015 / Accepted: 17 September 2015 / Published: 29 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HCV Drug Resistance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a pandemic human pathogen posing a substantial health and economic burden in both developing and developed countries. Controlling the spread of HCV through behavioural prevention strategies has met with limited success and vaccine development remains slow. The development of antiviral therapeutic agents has also been challenging, primarily due to the lack of efficient cell culture and animal models for all HCV genotypes, as well as the large genetic diversity between HCV strains. On the other hand, the use of interferon-α-based treatments in combination with the guanosine analogue, ribavirin, achieved limited success, and widespread use of these therapies has been hampered by prevalent side effects. For more than a decade, the HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) has been targeted for antiviral development. Direct acting antivirals (DAA) have been identified which bind to one of at least six RdRp inhibitor-binding sites, and are now becoming a mainstay of highly effective and well tolerated antiviral treatment for HCV infection. Here we review the different classes of RdRp inhibitors and their mode of action against HCV. Furthermore, the mechanism of antiviral resistance to each class is described, including naturally occurring resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in different viral strains and genotypes. Finally, we review the impact of these RAVs on treatment outcomes with the newly developed regimens.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant human pathogen affecting nearly 3% of the world’s population, and is a leading cause of progressive chronic liver disease, potentially culminating in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1]. HCV is a small enveloped virus, 50–80 nm in diameter, with a positive sense, single stranded RNA genome (ssRNA) of ~9600 nucleotides. The RNA molecule contains a single open reading frame (ORF) but lacks a 5ʹ cap. Instead, translation is initiated in the cytoplasm through an internal ribosome entry site [2,3]. A single amino acid precursor polyprotein is translated at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and is then cleaved by host and viral proteases into 10 structural and non-structural (NS) proteins. The structural proteins of HCV are encoded by the 5ʹ terminus of the genome and include the core protein as well as the two glycoproteins, E1 and E2. These are followed by the NS proteins which include p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B [4].
The polymerase of HCV, NS5B, exhibits a high mutation rate of approximately 10−4 substitutions per site [5,6]. This is combined with a very high rate of virion production in infected individuals (1012 virions per day [7]). As a result, within host, the HCV genome exists as a heterogeneous RNA population known as a quasispecies [8]. This heterogeneity contributes to a significant evolutionary advantage and provides the virus with the means to adapt to the host immune response and persist as a chronic infection [9]. At the human population level, HCV has undergone significant evolution resulting in the emergence of seven different genotypes (GT1–GT7) differing by approximately 35% at the nucleotide level [10]. These genotypes are further classified into “subtypes” (a, b, c, etc.), with about 20% inter-subtype divergence across the genome [11,12].

2. The RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRp)

Soon after the discovery of HCV, the analysis of its amino acid sequence predicted the existence of a “replicase” protein based on the identification of a Gly-Asp-Asp (GDD) motif, a signature conserved sequence for RdRps of other RNA viruses [13]. In vitro analysis of the non-structural region of HCV genome also confirmed the biochemical activity of an RdRp that was proposed to mediate genome replication [14].The RdRp was later characterised as a 66 kDa protein and, like most of the HCV non-structural proteins, associates with cellular membranes. For the RdRp, this was mediated by a hydrophobic C-terminal amino acid tail [15]. However, the deletion of this hydrophobic “anchor” had little effect on the enzymatic activity in vitro, and recombinant, soluble RdRp could be produced efficiently in both insect cells and Escherichia coli [16,17,18]. This in turn has enabled extensive structural and functional studies of the RdRp, which has rapidly become the best characterised of the HCV enzymes.
The crystallisation of the HCV RdRp revealed a canonical right-hand like structure, where the active site (GDD motif, also known as motif C) in the palm subdomain is fully encircled by an extensive interaction between the fingers and thumb subdomains [19,20,21] (Figure 1). The HCV RdRp shares some structural homology with other viral RdRps and reverse transcriptases (RTs), including the RdRp from the RNA bacteriophage phi6 [22]. The protein also harbours a conserved aspartic acid motif (motif A) that coordinates the binding of metal ions like Mg2+. The thumb subdomain of the HCV RdRp contains a β-hairpin loop insertion, which protrudes into the active site cavity (Figure 1). This loop is thought to influence the orientation of the newly synthesised RNA, and its position discriminates between different modes of RdRp activity [23]. Interestingly, an allosteric guanosine-5ʹ-triphosphate (GTP)-binding pocket has also been identified in the interface between the fingers and thumb subdomains [24]. The binding of GTP to this site has been implicated in facilitating conformational changes required for a processive RdRp [25].
The RdRp was originally crystallised in a “closed” conformation, which can only accommodate a single strand of RNA in the active site [19,20,21]. However, this did not explain how the enzyme could accommodate the double-stranded RNA being synthesised. In vitro experiments using recombinant RdRp show that the enzyme is capable of two biochemical activities. Firstly, the enzyme can catalyse RNA synthesis in a primer-dependent manner, extending from the 3ʹ-end of an RNA molecule [14,26]. However, the RdRp of HCV is also able to catalyse transcription through a primer-independent, or de novo mechanism, where the polymerase catalyses the formation of a dinucleotide molecule at the 3ʹ-end of the template, which could then be used as a primer [27,28,29]. This mechanism is non-deleterious for the viral genome, that is, the whole genome is copied from start to finish, and this mode of activity for the RdRp is believed to be how genome replication is initiated in vivo [28]. The closed conformation of the RdRp is thought to be associated with this de novo formation of the dinucleotide complementary to the 3ʹ-end of template RNA [30], whereas an open conformation is thought to represent the primer-extension activity of the HCV RdRp, and is associated with the displacement of the β-hairpin loop as well as a C-terminal segment, upstream of the transmembrane domain, called the linker (Figure 1) [23,31].
Viruses 07 02868 g001 1024
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). The secondary structure of the HCV GT1b polymerase (Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession number 3FQL) is shown. The enzyme has a typical RdRp “right hand” structure with fingers (red) and thumb (blue) subdomains encircling the active site within the palm subdomain (green). The enzyme is typically crystallised in the shown “closed” conformation, thought to be associated with de novo RdRp activity, with the β-hairpin from the thumb domain and the C-terminal “linker” shown in yellow extending into the palm domain of the RdRp.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). The secondary structure of the HCV GT1b polymerase (Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession number 3FQL) is shown. The enzyme has a typical RdRp “right hand” structure with fingers (red) and thumb (blue) subdomains encircling the active site within the palm subdomain (green). The enzyme is typically crystallised in the shown “closed” conformation, thought to be associated with de novo RdRp activity, with the β-hairpin from the thumb domain and the C-terminal “linker” shown in yellow extending into the palm domain of the RdRp.
Viruses 07 02868 g001

3. Therapies for HCV in the Past

The aim of treatment for patients chronically infected with HCV is to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA from the blood 12 or 24 weeks after treatment is discontinued [32]. For more than a decade, the standard of care (SOC) involved a combination of pegylated interferon-α (Peg-IFN-α) and ribavirin (RBV) for 24 to 48 weeks, depending on the infecting HCV GT [32,33]. The HCV RNA level of the patient, known as the viral load, is monitored throughout the duration of the treament in order to determine the pattern of response to therapy. Response to such IFN-based therapy varies greatly amongst patients, and is predominantly affected by the HCV genotype and the presence or absence of cirrhosis. Overall, patients infected with GT2 and GT3 HCV are better respondents to the IFN-based therapy, with SVR rates up to 80% [34]. In contrast, the more prevalent GT1 is associated with a poorer response rate with less than 50% of patients achieving SVR [35]. Peg-IFN/RBV treatment is expensive, and almost all patients experience adverse effects [32]. The SOC for GT1 was modified with the licensing of the first generation direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in 2011—protease inhibitors (PI), telaprevir and boceprevir, administered in combination with Peg-IFN/RBV as a triple therapy. In 2014, the landscape for HCV therapy was significantly shifted with the approval of the first pan-genotypic antiviral for HCV; sofosbuvir, targetting the HCV RdRp and opening the door to IFN-free combination DAA therapies [36,37,38,39,40].

4. HCV RdRp as a Target for DAAs

The RdRp has been a prime target for antiviral development, given its vital role in viral replication. Molecules that bind to and inhibit the HCV RdRp fall into two main categories: nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors (Figure 2).
Viruses 07 02868 g002 1024
Figure 2. Direct-acting antivirals targeting the HCV RdRp in clinical development.A summary of DAAs targeting the HCV RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) in different stages of clinical trials is shown along with the developing companies. RdRp inhibitors are divided into nucleoside (NI) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI). Compounds that are in different phases of clinical trials are shown as grey spheres, while those that have been approved for clinical use are shown as green spheres.
Figure 2. Direct-acting antivirals targeting the HCV RdRp in clinical development.A summary of DAAs targeting the HCV RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) in different stages of clinical trials is shown along with the developing companies. RdRp inhibitors are divided into nucleoside (NI) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI). Compounds that are in different phases of clinical trials are shown as grey spheres, while those that have been approved for clinical use are shown as green spheres.
Viruses 07 02868 g002
Nucleos(t)ide inhibitors (NI) are nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, which are incorporated into the nascent genome by the RdRp, and prevent further incorporation of incoming nucleotides [41]. HCV NIs possess a 3ʹ-hydroxyl group, and such molecules are classified as non-obligate chain terminators. It has therefore been proposed that these molecules cause chain termination by steric hindrance exerted through 2ʹ-C-methyl or 2ʹ-fluoro groups [42]. Both nucleoside and nucleotide analogues need to be phosphorylated into a triphosphate form in the cell to be active, however, nucleotide analogues bypass the first phosphorylation step. Since this first phosphorylation step is the rate-limiting stage for activation, nucleotide analogues result in higher concentrations of nucleoside triphosphates in the cell [43]. To reduce systemic exposure of these drugs, HCV NIs are developed as “prodrugs” which can be preferentially cleaved by hepatic enzymes.
As all NIs target the highly conserved active site of the polymerase, these inhibitors tend to be cross-genotypic [44]. Furthermore, although single amino acid mutations are sufficient to confer resistance to this class of inhibitors, these mutations appear to confer a fitness cost to viral replication [45,46]. The NI valopicitabine (NM283) was the first to demonstrate a proof-of-concept for the use of an RdRp inhibitor in the treatment of HCV [47], although its development was halted due to gastrointestinal side-effects [48,49].
The most advanced compound from this class of DAAs is sofosbuvir, which is a prodrug of 2'-F-2'-C-methyluridine monophosphate [50]. Sofosbuvir was initially licensed in 2013 for the treatment of GT1 and GT4 in combination with IFN/RBV, and in combination with RBV for GT2 and GT3. More recently, two IFN-free combination regimens containing sofosbuvir and an NS5A inhibitor or a protease inhibitor with RBV have been approved for GT1 patients after promising phase 3 trials [51,52]. In pre-clinical assessment of sofosbuvir, a Serine to Threonine substitution at position 282 of the RdRp (S282T, Figure 3) conferred a 10-fold resistance against sofosbuvir [53], a phenotype that has been observed for a number of HCV NIs [54]. In vitro analysis of the S282T mutant RdRps revealed that these enzymes have a decreased affinity for nucleoside analogues [54], and this substitution also resulted in a significant loss of replication fitness of HCV as assessed using replicon models [53]. Recent crystal structures of the HCV RdRp have revealed the conformational movement the S282 residue undergoes in order to interact with incoming nucleotide substrates and form a hydrogen bond [55]. Co-crystal structures with the active form of sofosbuvir also revealed the interruption of such molecular changes which keep the enzyme in its inactive apo form and prevent hydrogen bonding [55]. This provides further mechanistic evidence for the ability of S282T to confer resistance to NIs, and cause the loss of replicative fitness. In a recent meta-analysis of several sofosbuvir trials, substitutions at position 316 of the RdRp were found to be associated with failure of response to sofosbuvir, particularly for patients infected with GT1b [56]. Such substitutions were proposed to occupy larger spatial area within the catalytic site and therefore interfere with sofosbuvir entry. The same study also identified L159F and V321A as treatment-associated variants which are also associated with the lack of response to sofosbuvir treatment [56]. Interestingly, however, these variants had a minor effect on the potency of sofosbuvir when examined individually using cell culture models [57].
Viruses 07 02868 g003 1024
Figure 3. Positions of RdRp residues associated with resistance to HCV nucleoside (NI) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI).The secondary structure of the HCV GT1b polymerase is coloured as in Figure 1, shown with the palm domain facing away. Known residues where substitutions confer resistance to NIs and NNIs are highlighted (Table 1).
Figure 3. Positions of RdRp residues associated with resistance to HCV nucleoside (NI) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI).The secondary structure of the HCV GT1b polymerase is coloured as in Figure 1, shown with the palm domain facing away. Known residues where substitutions confer resistance to NIs and NNIs are highlighted (Table 1).
Viruses 07 02868 g003
The NI mericitabine is a prodrug of 2ʹ-F-2ʹ-C-methylcytidine. Addition of mericitabine to Peg-IFN/RBV had only a modest effect on the SVR rates of infected patients when compared to IFN/RBV alone [58,59]. Interestingly while no S282T substitution, which is known to be associated with resistance to mericitabine, was detected in these studies, [45], a follow-up study of partial responders from these trials identified a pair of substitutions, L159F/L320F, near the active site of the RdRp (Figure 3) that, in combination, conferred up to 5.5-fold resistance to mericitabine and sofosbuvir when examined using replicon models [60]. In a recent trial of an IFN-free regimen containing mericitabine for patients with GT1 infection, only 25.0% and 64% of patients with GT1a and GT1b, respectively, reached SVR after 24 weeks [61]. While the majority of viral breakthrough cases in this trial were attributed to NS3 resistance mutations, mericitabine resistance mutations encoding S282T, L159F/L and L320F were detected at a very low frequency (3% of patients) after viral breakthrough, but none with viral relapse [61]. Mericitabine was recently halted from further clinical development.
Other NIs in phase 2 clinical development include VX-135, MK-3682 and ACH-3422 (Figure 2). Recent trials of VX-135 in combination with daclatasvir, an NS5A inhibitor, reported an SVR rate of 90% in patients with GT1 infection, with relapse once again associated with S282T substitutions [62]. A large number of other NIs have been developed, but halted mainly due to toxicity [46,63]. Interestingly, analysis of the off target effects of HCV NIs revealed that a subset of these molecules inhibit the activity of mitochondrial RNA polymerase, providing an explanation for their adverse effects in the clinical setting [64]. Nonetheless, HCV NIs will likely be a major component of future IFN-free, pan-genotype therapies based on the success of sofosbuvir.
Unlike NIs, non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNI) are inhibitors of the RdRp that are non-competitive with regards to the nucleotide substrate. Instead, the binding of these compounds to the RdRp inhibits conformational changes required for polymerase activity [65,66]. HCV NNIs target one of five allosteric sites on the RdRp; two of which are within the thumb subdomain (sites T1 and T2), and two within the palm subdomain (sites P1 and P2). More recently, a fifth site has been identified within the palm domain involving a unique interaction with the β-hairpin extending from the thumb domain (termed site P-β) [67,68] (Figure 1). The first generation of HCV NNIs have reported a relatively low barrier to resistance, with single mutations in the RdRp coding region associated with resistance to all identified HCV NNIs in vitro [69,70,71]. Furthermore, mutations conferring resistance to NNIs were detected in patients infected with all HCV GTs, even without NNI treatment [69]. The first proof-of-concept for the clinical use of HCV NNIs was with the P2 inhibitor nesbuvir [69]. The development of nesbuvir, however, was halted due to the induction of liver enzyme elevation.
T1 inhibitors. Thumb I (T1) is a subdomain to which compounds like benzimidazole and indole derivatives bind (e.g. deleobuvir, BMS-791325 and TMC647055). Deleobuvir (BI 207127) which progressed to phase 3 for the treatment of GT1 patients [72]. Amino acid substitutions P495, P496, and V499 (Figure 3, Table 1) were all associated with resistance to deleobuvir in vitro [73]. In a phase 3 trial of deleobuvir, administered as part of an IFN-free regimen, amino acid substitutions P495L/S/T were most commonly associated with viral breakthrough and relapse [74], and the development of deleobuvir was halted. TMC647055 is another indole derivative currently in phase 2 clinical trials that has been shown to have cross-genotypic activity when examined using in vitro replicon models, with the exception of GT2 [75]. Substitutions at NS5B amino acid residues L392 and P495 were associated with reduced sensitivity to TMC647055, with P495L showing a 371-fold reduction in potency [75]. Another indole derivative, beclabuvir, is currently in phase 3 clinical trials. In vitro characterisation of beclabuvir revealed potent activity against HCV in recombinant enzyme assays and cell culture models, however, reduced potency was also observed against GT2, and variable activity against GT6 viruses [76]. Similar to other molecules binding to T1, P495 substitutions (Figure 3) were associated with increased resistance to beclabuvir [76,77]. However another T1 RAV A421V, was identified upon treatment of GT1 patients with baclabuvir in a phase 2 trial [78]. In another phase 3 trial of an IFN-free regimen containing beclabuvir, a PI and an NS5A inhibitor, around 8% of patients experienced virologic failure which was associated with P495 substitutions in NS5B, in addition to other NS3 and NS5A mutations [79]. Other indole derivatives in development include MBX-700 and MBX-701 (Microbiotix), which are in phase 1, and preclinical development, respectively (Figure 2).
T2 inhibitors. Compounds that have been identified as Thumb II (T2) binders include thiophene-2-carboxylic acids [80] like lomibuvir (VX-222) and GS-9669. Both lomibuvir and GS-9669 have progressed to phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of GT1 infections, however lomibuvir was recently halted from further development. Thiophene-2-carboxylic acids have shown potent antiviral activity in vitro [81] and in vivo [82,83]. Another class of molecules with T2 specificity is dihydropyranones which include PF-00868554 (filibuvir) [84]. Filibuvir has been shown to have potent antiviral activity both in vitro [85] and in vivo against GT1 viruses [86], however the development of this agent was halted for commercial reasons. Resistance to T2 inhibitors, lomibuvir and filibuvir, has been demonstrated in vitro and most commonly associated with RdRp amino acid substitutions at L419, M423, M426 and I482 (Table 1) [85,87,88]. These substitutions have been shown to cause a loss in the binding affinity of these molecules to the RdRp [87]. Interestingly, M423 substitutions did not have a significant impact on the potency of GS-9669 in vitro, however, similar to lomibuvir and filibuvir, resistance was associated with L419M, I482L and R422K [81]. In the clinical setting, amino acid substitutions at positions L419, R422, M423, I482, A486, and V494 (Table 1) were all selected for after monotherapy of patients with GT1 infection using lomibuvir [89]. These substitutions conferred resistance to lomibuvir when examined using the replicon model, but were also associated with reduced replication capacity [89]. In a phase 2 trial of lomibuvir combined with telaprevir (a protease inhibitor), significant viral breakthrough (close to 25%) was observed without Peg-IFN/RBV, and was associated with known lomibuvir resistance variants, including L419S and R422K [89,90]. The study concluded that such regimens (PI/NNI) have an overall low barrier to resistance, and therefore additional agents are required for effective treatment of GT1 infections [90]. Filibuvir administration as monotherapy resulted in 2.3 log10 reduction in HCV RNA in patients infected with GT1, however mutations that encode for M423 substitutions were detected in the majority of patients (76%) after receiving filibuvir at the effective dosage [91]. Of the T2 inhibitors, GS-9669 has shown particularly promising results in two IFN-free regimens for the treatment of both treatment-naïve and experienced patients, with no detectable mutations in a patient that had virologic relapse [83].
P1 inhibitors. Inhibitors that bind to the Palm I (P1) site of the RdRp include some of the most advanced HCV NNIs to date. Benzothiadiazine [92] derivatives, such as, dasabuvir (ABT-333), RG7790 (setrobuvir) and ABT-072 have been identified as RdRp P1 binders. Dasabuvir is the first HCV NNI to be approved for the treatment of patients with GT1 infection. In a phase 3 clinical trial of a combination regimen containing dasabuvir, >95% SVR rates were observed after 12 weeks of treatment [93]. The lack of response to treatment as well as viral relapse, which occurred in a minority of patients at 0.2% and 1.5%, respectively, were associated with the P1 substitution S556G [93]. Similarly, both viral breakthrough and relapse in an IFN-free trial including dasabuvir were associated with substitutions at RdRp residues C316, M414, G554, S556 and D559 (Figure 3, Table 1) [94]. Setrobuvir (also known as RG7790 and ANA598) was recently halted from clinical development after reaching phase 2 clinical trials. In combination with Peg-IFN/RBV, setrobuvir has shown potent antiviral activity for GT1 patients [95]. In IFN-free regimens, an SVR rate of 96% has been reported for GT1b patients, but was lower for GT1a (70% [96]). Resistance to setrobuvir has been associated with variants at residues M414, G554 S556 and D559 (Figure 3) [97,98]. The RdRp P1 site has also been targeted by proline [99] and benzodiazepine [100] derivatives.
P2 and P-β inhibitors. Benzofurans, including nesbuvir, remain the only class of molecules that have been reported to bind the Palm II (P2) site of the HCV RdRp [41,63]. Despite the potential of these inhibitors, very few reports have further described the development of compounds from the same scaffold, and almost all studies examining the P2 RdRp site have focused on the compound Nesbuvir [101]. Nesbuvir demonstrated promising results in vitro [102] and has progressed to phase 2 clinical trials. However, the administration of nesbuvir to HCV infected patients resulted in elevation of liver enzymes, and the compound was halted from further clinical trials [69]. In cell culture models, mutations encoding substitutions at C316, S365 and M414 all conferred resistance to nesbuvir, and this was attributed to reduced affinity of mutant RdRps to the compound [102].
The P-β site of HCV RdRp is the latest site to be identified for NNI binding, after a class of compounds, imidazopyridines, were discovered as palm-binding inhibitors of the RdRp [67]. Resistance analysis of the most advanced compound of this class, GS-9190 (tegobuvir), identified mutations within the palm domain as well as in the β hairpin (Figure 3) which conferred resistance to tegobuvir in HCV replicon models [68]. Later it was found that a metabolite of tegobuvir binds HCV RdRp at the palm domain but interacts with the β-hairpin extending from the thumb domain [67,68]. Resistance to tegobuvir in cell culture models was attributed to RdRp substitutions C316Y, Y448H, Y452H, and C445F (Figure 3) [68]. In the clinical setting, tegobuvir progressed to phase 2 clinical trials. However, the administration of tegobuvir with Peg-IFN/RBV did not have a significant impact on SVR rates when compared to Peg-IFN/RBV alone [103]. In a trial of tegobuvir with a protease inhibitor, GS-9256, the majority of GT1a patients developed double-resistance mutations for these DAAs, with Y448H detected in seven out of eight GT1a patients, while RAVs C316Y and C445F were also detected in two GT1b patients [104]. The clinical development of tegobuvir was recently halted; however, an in vitro study recently demonstrated the potential of tegobuvir as a DAA due to its additive effect when examined with PIs or NNIs in inhibiting replicon models and significantly hindering the development of resistance mutations [105].

5. Mechanism of Action for RdRp NNIs

The mechanism of inhibition for the HCV NNIs appears to vary depending on which of the allosteric sites the inhibitor binds to, although structural studies indicate that most NNIs interfere with conformational changes required for an initiation and elongation competent RdRp [65]. For instance, benzimidazole and indole derivatives (T1), which have been shown to inhibit the initiation of RNA transcription, had no effect once the RdRp-RNA complex was formed, indicating that these molecules act at a step prior to the formation of a productive RdRp-RNA complex, which is time-dependent [77,106,107]. Crystallographic analyses revealed that these molecules prevent the formation of intramolecular contacts between thumb and fingers domain, preventing the formation of a productive RdRp-RNA complex [108]. The mechanism by which T2 binders inhibit the activity has also been examined extensively. T2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the affinity of the RdRp to template RNA [109], and these molecules are thought to bind the closed conformation of the enzyme [110,111]. Interestingly, a two-step interaction model has been reported for lomibuvir whereas a single-reversible model has been reported for filibuvir, giving lomibuvir a longer, more efficient interaction and inhibition of the HCV RdRp when compared to other T2 inhibitors [109]. We recently reported a novel activity for molecules that bind both T2 and P-β sites of the RdRp. Surprisingly, we found these NNI actually enhanced the de novo activity of the RdRp at increased concentrations, but inhibited primer-dependent transcription in a dose-dependent manner when examined using recombinant enzymes [112]. The enhancement of de novo enzyme activity was unexpected given that these molecules were developed as inhibitors of the HCV RdRp. We therefore proposed a model where such molecules stabilise RdRp conformations that are critical for de novo activity, overcoming rate-limiting steps in the initiation of RNA transcription. In the context of P-β binder tegobuvir, this was also surprising given that tegobuvir is known to undergo an intracellular activation step by the host cell before it interacts with and inhibits NS5B [113], and is thought to have no effect on the recombinant RdRp without such activation [109].
Palm binders have been suggested to stabilise the β-hairpin extending into the RdRp active site [114,115]. In accordance with these notions, the binding of the RdRp to the RNA had a minor effect on affinity of benzofurans (P2) towards the RdRp [116], and both benzofurans and benzothiadiazines (P1) have been shown to inhibit the two modes of RdRp activity (de novo and primer-dependent) [117]. Furthermore, benzothiadiazines have been shown to cause the inhibition of phosphodiester bond formation in both primed and de novo [118]. These findings emphasize the importance of different RdRp conformations on the biochemical activity of the enzyme, and the differential effects HCV NNIs have on RdRp conformational changes.

6. Genotype Coverage of RdRp Inhibitors

Historically, the development of the first HCV RdRp inhibitors was focused towards GT1 infections for a number of reasons: Firstly, GT1 remains the predominant genotype in most developed countries (~75%) [119]. Secondly, for decades infections with other genotypes responded better to IFN-based therapies (~80% SVR rate for GT2 and GT3, compared to ~50% for GT1 patients) [34]. Thirdly, until recently, models for in vitro study of HCV were largely limited to the GT1 and GT2 replicon models, and the GT2 infectious model [120]. For the most part, the relative lack of non-GT1 targeted RdRp DAA development has significantly impacted usefulness of these molecules to treat such infections. Antiviral development has therefore focused on the “harder to treat” and more prevalent GT1 infections, with the hope that the newly discovered molecules will have cross-genotypic inhibitory activity. Despite these factors, as HCV NIs target the active site of the RdRp which is highly conserved between genotypes, they have pan-genotypic activity, at least in vitro [44,53]. Surprisingly, however a significant reduction in response to the most advanced NI, sofosbuvir, has been observed in patients with HCV GT3a infection. For reasons not fully understood, when given to patients sofosbuvir was significantly less effective against GT3 compared to all other genotypes [37]. GT3 patients were even less responsive than patients with GT2 infection (62% SVR rate for GT3 vs. 94% for GT2 [39], and 56% for GT3 vs. 97% for GT2 [37]). However, the addition of sofosbuvir to the IFN-based SOC improves response rates for GT3 patients [40]. Extending treatment duration of sofosbuvir in IFN-free regimens to 24 weeks also significantly improves SVR rates for patients with GT3 infection (up to 85%) [36].
A number of reports have detailed the efficacy of all five known classes of HCV NNIs across HCV GTs in vitro [44,112,121,122]. Of all the NNIs that bound the five described allosteric pockets, only benzofurans, which bind to RdRp site P2 (nesbuvir), are cross-genotypic—as demonstrated using recombinant RdRp and replicon models [44,53,112,121,122,123]. T1-binding Indole derivatives like TMC647055 and BMS791325 share a similar inhibitory profile with a notable reduction in potency against GT2 viruses [75]. There is limited data on the efficacy of deleobuvir across HCV genotypes; however, GT1a patients are less responsive to deleobuvir when compared to patients infected with GT1b [74], which is also observed in replicon models of HCV [73]. Benzothiadiazine compounds (P1), also have limited genotype coverage, with limited efficacy against non-GT1 viruses [122,124], and reduced efficacy against GT1b when compared to GT1a in vitro [53] The recently licensed dasabuvir, for example, is >400-fold less potent against all non-GT1 HCV RdRps [125]. Similarly, compounds that bind T2 have limited pan-genotype potency, and are generally restricted to GT1 [81,112]. However, thiophene derivatives retain some activity when examined using GT5a HCV models [44,81,123]. The reduced potency of T2 inhibitors in GT2, GT3 and GT4 is thought to be due to conformational changes in this binding pocket due to substitutions I482L and L419I [81]. Overall, all NNIs of the HCV RdRps in current development have limited cross-genotypic activity. This, combined with their lower barrier to resistance, at least compared to NI, poses significant implications for the use of NNIs in future all-oral, pan-genotypic therapies. Dasabuvir (P1 binder) has indeed shown promise as part of a combination treatment for GT1 patients. Whether other NNIs in the near future will be specifically used for certain genotypes remains unclear.
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of known HCV RdRp variants associated with resistance to NI and NNIs in treatment naïve patients.
Table 1. Prevalence of known HCV RdRp variants associated with resistance to NI and NNIs in treatment naïve patients.
RdRp SiteResistance SubstitutionsPrevalence of Resistant Variants (%)Refs.
GT1aGT1b
NIS96T00[126,127,128,129,130]
L159FNDND
S282T0–0.60–1.1
L320I/F00
V321I0.19–3.12.51–3.3
NNI-T1T389S/ANDND
L392INDND
A421V0–17.840–6.28
P495A/L/S00
P496A/S/T00–0.84
V499A #94.4–1005–14.23
NNI-T2L419M/V/I00–0.9
R422K0–0.560
M423T/I/V0–2.80–0.42
M426T/V0–3.10–6.6
I482L/V/T0–0.20–0.3
A486V00
V494I/A00–0.8
NNI-P1C316Y/N *0–0.1910.88–36.6
M414T/L *0–0.380–1.68
G554D00
S556G0–0.40–8.2
D559G/N0–0.570
NNI-P2S365T/N00
NNI-P-βC445F00–0.42
Y448C/H0–3.10–1.26
Y452H0–3.10.42–3.3
* Also associated with resistance to P2 and P-β binders; # V499A results in a minor reduction of T1 NNI potency; ND, not determined.

7. Prevalence of RAVs in Treatment Naïve Patients

The natural prevalence of RAVs in untreated HCV infections has been analysed by a number of studies, both by population sequencing [126,127,128,129,130], and using next-generation sequencing (NGS) [131,132,133,134]. The majority of these studies, however, focused on infections with GT1 HCV, and the prevalence of RAVs in non-GT1 infections remains poorly characterized. Overall, amino acid variants associated with resistance to NIs in clinical development are rarely observed in untreated HCV patients, even at a very low frequency in the quasispecies population, as determined by NGS [132]. High fitness costs conferred by these resistance mutations are thought to prevent their emergence in untreated populations [57,131]. In addition, the mutational bias of the viral polymerase against transversion events is believed to contribute towards the relative low abundance of NI-associated RAVs, such as S96T and S282T, that require transversion mutations [135].
In contrast to NIs, RAVs associated with NNIs are generally more prevalent due to the relatively low fitness cost associated with these variants and the subsequent higher natural genetic diversity observed in the areas targeted by NNIs (Table 1) [46]. In fact, some of the RAVs against NNIs are naturally present as the dominant variant in GT2a and GT3a infections. These include A499, I419, V424, L482, G556 and F445. HCV NNIs developed against GT1 that have reduced potency against these RAVs have therefore been shown to be less potent against these viruses [112]. For patients infected with GT1, a natural resistance variant at RdRp position 499 has also been observed. The variant A499, which over 96% of GT1a isolates carry, results in a minor shift of the potency of T1 NNIs [130,133,136]. The A499 RAV is also observed as the dominant variant in up to 14% of patients infected with GT1b [126,127,128,130]. Similarly, RdRp variants at position C316, which are associated with resistance to P1, P2 and P-β inhibitors, have been shown to be dominant in 11%–37% of GT1b infections, but are rarely observed in GT1a [126,127,128,130]. Variations in consensus RdRp sequences that are associated with resistance to most other NNIs could also be detected, although at lower frequencies, and depending on the geographical location (Table 1). Furthermore, the prevalence for these RAVs appears to be variable between different GT1 subtypes. For instance, M423 (T2) substitutions are more commonly detected in GT1a infections compared to GT1b, whereas S556 (P1) substitutions is more prevalent in GT1b infections (Table 1). Studies utilising NGS technologies have further analysed the prevalence of HCV RAVs within and between GT1 infections. Results from these studies are concordant with population-based sequencing data for high prevalent variations; however analysis of low abundance variants (present at levels below 20% of the quasispecies) revealed that these RAVs are present, albeit at low frequency, in a large proportion of infections. On average, 30%–40% of infections carried low-abundance resistance variants [131,132,133,134], however, while up to 75% of GT1 patients carried low-abundance variants at positions such as M423, M494 and M423, similar variants were not detected for other positions such as M482 and P496 [131,132], which could be explained by the reduced fitness cost of such variants [127]. The impact of low-abundance RAVs on the outcome of treatment with HCV NNI remains poorly understood, but equivalent variants appeared to have minimal effect on protease inhibitor therapies [137]. As more NNIs move into clinical settings and NGS analysis of the viral quasispecies continues to become more accessible, the effect of low-prevalence variation at resistance sites will become clearer.

8. Conclusions

Understanding the structure and function of the HCV RdRp has led to the development of the most successful antiviral for chronic infections to date. In addition to sofosbuvir, several other NIs and NNIs are in clinical development, and the recently approved NNI dasabuvir is the first of its class to arrive on the market. These compounds differ in their potency, mechanism of action, and genotype coverage. Combined with other promising NS3 and NS5A inhibitors, efficacy will continue to improve across genotypes. At the population level, treatment cost remains a major barrier. Additionally, multiple personal, social, and health infrastructure barriers remain for injecting-drug users to successfully access and complete antiviral therapy. Hence, it remains to be determined whether significant treatment scale-up is affordable, achievable and effective. Finally, as these inhibitors become more accessible, the impact of antiviral resistance will likely become clearer, particularly in regimens containing NNIs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research (ACH2 2015-30). Andrew R. Lloyd and Rowena A. Bull are supported by National Health and Medical Council of Australia (NHMRC) Fellowships (RG121994, 1084706).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohd Hanafiah, K.; Groeger, J.; Flaxman, A.D.; Wiersma, S.T. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: New estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1333–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tsukiyama-Kohara, K.; Iizuka, N.; Kohara, M.; Nomoto, A. Internal ribosome entry site within hepatitis C virus RNA. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, C.; Sarnow, P.; Siddiqui, A. Translation of human hepatitis C virus RNA in cultured cells is mediated by an internal ribosome-binding mechanism. J. Virol. 1993, 67, 3338–3344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Lindenbach, B.D.; Rice, C.M. Unravelling hepatitis C virus replication from genome to function. Nature 2005, 436, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cuevas, J.M.; Gonzalez-Candelas, F.; Moya, A.; Sanjuan, R. Effect of ribavirin on the mutation rate and spectrum of hepatitis C virus in vivo. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 5760–5764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sanjuan, R.; Nebot, M.R.; Chirico, N.; Mansky, L.M.; Belshaw, R. Viral mutation rates. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 9733–9748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Neumann, A.U.; Lam, N.P.; Dahari, H.; Gretch, D.R.; Wiley, T.E.; Layden, T.J.; Perelson, A.S. Hepatitis C viral dynamics in vivo and the antiviral efficacy of interferon-α therapy. Science 1998, 282, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Martell, M.; Esteban, J.; Quer, J.; Genesca, J.; Weiner, A.; Esteban, R.; Guardia, J.; Gomez, J. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) circulates as a population of different but closely related genomes: Quasispecies nature of HCV genome distribution. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 3225–3229. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Vignuzzi, M.; Stone, J.K.; Arnold, J.J.; Cameron, C.E.; Andino, R. Quasispecies diversity determines pathogenesis through cooperative interactions in a viral population. Nature 2005, 439, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Smith, D.B.; Bukh, J.; Kuiken, C.; Muerhoff, A.S.; Rice, C.M.; Stapleton, J.T.; Simmonds, P. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: Updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology 2014, 59, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Simmonds, P.; Bukh, J.; Combet, C.; Deleage, G.; Enomoto, N.; Feinstone, S.; Halfon, P.; Inchauspe, G.; Kuiken, C.; Maertens, G.; et al. Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 2005, 42, 962–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Simmonds, P. Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus—15 Years on. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 3173–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miller, R.H.; Purcell, R.H. Hepatitis C virus shares amino acid sequence similarity with pestiviruses and flaviviruses as well as members of two plant virus supergroups. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1990, 87, 2057–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Behrens, S.-E.; Tomei, L.; de Francesco, R. Identification and properties of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of hepatitis C virus. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Hwang, S.B.; Park, K.-J.; Kim, Y.-S.; Sung, Y.C.; Lai, M. Hepatitis C virus NS5B protein is a membrane-associated phosphoprotein with a predominantly perinuclear localization. Virology 1997, 227, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrari, E.; Wright-Minogue, J.; Fang, J.W.; Baroudy, B.M.; Lau, J.Y.; Hong, Z. Characterization of soluble hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Yamashita, T.; Kaneko, S.; Shirota, Y.; Qin, W.; Nomura, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Murakami, S. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity of the soluble recombinant hepatitis C virus NS5B protein truncated at the C-terminal region. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 15479–15486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eltahla, A.A.; Lackovic, K.; Marquis, C.; Eden, J.S.; White, P.A. A fluorescence-based high-throughput screen to identify small compound inhibitors of the genotype 3a hepatitis C virus RNA polymerase. J. Biomol. Screen 2013, 18, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bressanelli, S.; Tomei, L.; Roussel, A.; Incitti, I.; Vitale, R.L.; Mathieu, M.; De Francesco, R.; Rey, F.A. Crystal structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of hepatitis C virus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96, 13034–13039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lesburg, C.A.; Cable, M.B.; Ferrari, E.; Hong, Z.; Mannarino, A.F.; Weber, P.C. Crystal structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from hepatitis C virus reveals a fully encircled active site. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Ago, H.; Adachi, T.; Yoshida, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Habuka, N.; Yatsunami, K.; Miyano, M. Crystal structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of hepatitis C virus. Structure 1999, 7, 1417–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Butcher, S.J.; Grimes, J.M.; Makeyev, E.V.; Bamford, D.H.; Stuart, D.I. A mechanism for initiating RNA-dependent RNA polymerization. Nature 2001, 410, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mosley, J.W.; Operskalski, E.A.; Tobler, L.H.; Andrews, W.W.; Phelps, B.; Dockter, J.; Giachetti, C.; Busch, M.P. Viral and host factors in early hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2005, 42, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bressanelli, S.; Tomei, L.; Rey, F.A.; de Francesco, R. Structural analysis of the hepatitis C virus RNA polymerase in complex with ribonucleotides. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 3482–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dutartre, H.; Boretto, J.; Guillemot, J.C.; Canard, B. A relaxed discrimination of 2'-O-methyl-GTP relative to GTP between de novo and elongative RNA synthesis by the hepatitis C RNA-dependent RNA polymerase NS5B. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 6359–6368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lohmann, V.; Körner, F.; Herian, U.; Bartenschlager, R. Biochemical properties of hepatitis C virus NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and identification of amino acid sequence motifs essential for enzymatic activity. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 8416–8428. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Luo, G.; Hamatake, R.K.; Mathis, D.M.; Racela, J.; Rigat, K.L.; Lemm, J.; Colonno, R.J. De novo initiation of RNA synthesis by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (NS5B) of hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhong, W.; Uss, A.S.; Ferrari, E.; Lau, J.Y.; Hong, Z. De novo initiation of RNA synthesis by hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5B polymerase. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 2017–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kao, C.C.; Singh, P.; Ecker, D.J. De novo initiation of viral RNA-dependent RNA synthesis. Virology 2001, 287, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Harrus, D.; Ahmed-El-Sayed, N.; Simister, P.C.; Miller, S.; Triconnet, M.; Hagedorn, C.H.; Mahias, K.; Rey, F.A.; Astier-Gin, T.; Bressanelli, S. Further insights into the roles of GTP and the C terminus of the hepatitis C virus polymerase in the initiation of RNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 32906–32918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Scrima, N.; Caillet-Saguy, C.; Ventura, M.; Harrus, D.; Astier-Gin, T.; Bressanelli, S. Two crucial early steps in RNA synthesis by the hepatitis C virus polymerase involve a dual role of residue 405. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 7107–7117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ghany, M.G.; Strader, D.B.; Thomas, D.L.; Seeff, L.B. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1335–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Craxì, A. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 245–264. [Google Scholar]
  34. Manns, M.P.; Wedemeyer, H.; Cornberg, M. Treating viral hepatitis C: Efficacy, side effects, and complications. Gut 2006, 55, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Feld, J.J.; Hoofnagle, J.H. Mechanism of action of interferon and ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C. Nature 2005, 436, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zeuzem, S.; Dusheiko, G.M.; Salupere, R.; Mangia, A.; Flisiak, R.; Hyland, R.H.; Illeperuma, A.; Svarovskaia, E.; Brainard, D.M.; Symonds, W.T. Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in HCV genotypes 2 and 3. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1993–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lawitz, E.; Mangia, A.; Wyles, D.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Hassanein, T.; Gordon, S.C.; Schultz, M.; Davis, M.N.; Kayali, Z.; Reddy, K.R. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lawitz, E.; Lalezari, J.P.; Hassanein, T.; Kowdley, K.V.; Poordad, F.F.; Sheikh, A.M.; Afdhal, N.H.; Bernstein, D.E.; DeJesus, E.; Freilich, B. Sofosbuvir in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive patients with genotypes 1, 2, and 3 hepatitis C infection: A randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Inf. Dis. 2013, 13, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jacobson, I.M.; Gordon, S.C.; Kowdley, K.V.; Yoshida, E.M.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Shiffman, M.L.; Lawitz, E.; Everson, G.; Bennett, M. Sofosbuvir for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 in patients without treatment options. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1867–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gane, E.J.; Stedman, C.A.; Hyland, R.H.; Ding, X.; Svarovskaia, E.; Symonds, W.T.; Hindes, R.G.; Berrey, M.M. Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for hepatitis C. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bartenschlager, R.; Vogt, P.K. Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy; Springer: Berlin, German, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  42. De Clercq, E. The design of drugs for HIV and HCV. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 1001–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Delang, L.; Neyts, J.; Vliegen, I.; Abrignani, S.; Neddermann, P.; de Francesco, R. Hepatitis C virus-specific directly acting antiviral drugs. In Hepatitis C Virus: From Molecular Virology to Antiviral Therapy; Springer: Berlin, German, 2013; pp. 289–320. [Google Scholar]
  44. Herlihy, K.J.; Graham, J.P.; Kumpf, R.; Patick, A.K.; Duggal, R.; Shi, S.T. Development of intergenotypic chimeric replicons to determine the broad-spectrum antiviral activities of hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3523–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pawlotsky, J.M.; Najera, I.; Jacobson, I. Resistance to mericitabine, a nucleoside analogue inhibitor of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Antivir. Ther. 2012, 17, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Scheel, T.K.; Rice, C.M. Understanding the hepatitis C virus life cycle paves the way for highly effective therapies. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lawitz, E.; Nguyen, T.; Younes, Z.; Santoro, J.; Gitlin, N.; McEniry, D.; Chasen, R.; Goff, J.; Knox, S.; Kleber, K. Valopicitabine (NM283) plus PEG-interferon in treatment-naive hepatitis C patients with HCV genotype-1 infection: HCV RNA clearance during 24 weeks of treatment. Hepatology 2006, 44, 223A–223A. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pockros, P.; Jensen, D.; Tsai, N.; Taylor, R.; Ramji, A.; Cooper, C.; Dickson, R.; Tice, A.; Stande, S.; Ipe, D. First SVR data with the nucleoside analogue polymerase inhibitor Mericitabine (RG7128) combined with Peginterferon/Ribavirin in treatment-naive HCV g1/4 patients: interim analysis from the JUMP-C trial. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gane, E.; Pockros, P.; Zeuzem, S.; Marcellin, P.; Shikhman, A.; Bernaards, C.; Yetzer, E.; Shulman, N.; Tong, X.; Najera, I. Interferon-free treatment with a combination of Mericitabine and Danoprevir with or without Ribavirin in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1-infected patients. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, S555–S556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sofia, M.J.; Bao, D.; Chang, W.; Du, J.; Nagarathnam, D.; Rachakonda, S.; Reddy, P.G.; Ross, B.S.; Wang, P.; Zhang, H.R. Discovery of a β-d-2ʹ-deoxy-2ʹ-α-fluoro-2ʹ-β-C-methyluridine nucleotide prodrug (PSI-7977) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 7202–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kowdley, K.V.; Gordon, S.C.; Reddy, K.R.; Rossaro, L.; Bernstein, D.E.; Lawitz, E.; Shiffman, M.L.; Schiff, E.; Ghalib, R.; Ryan, M. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lawitz, E.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Ghalib, R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Younossi, Z.M.; Corregidor, A.; DeJesus, E.; Pearlman, B.; Rabinovitz, M.; Gitlin, N. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: The COSMOS randomised study. Lancet 2014, 384, 1756–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lam, A.M.; Espiritu, C.; Bansal, S.; Steuer, H.M.M.; Niu, C.; Zennou, V.; Keilman, M.; Zhu, Y.; Lan, S.; Otto, M.J. Genotype and subtype profiling of PSI-7977 as a nucleotide inhibitor of hepatitis C virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3359–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Migliaccio, G.; Tomassini, J.E.; Carroll, S.S.; Tomei, L.; Altamura, S.; Bhat, B.; Bartholomew, L.; Bosserman, M.R.; Ceccacci, A.; Colwell, L.F. Characterization of resistance to non-obligate chain-terminating ribonucleoside analogs that inhibit hepatitis C virus replication in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 49164–49170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Appleby, T.C.; Perry, J.K.; Murakami, E.; Barauskas, O.; Feng, J.; Cho, A.; Fox, D.; Wetmore, D.R.; McGrath, M.E.; Ray, A.S. Structural basis for RNA replication by the hepatitis C virus polymerase. Science 2015, 347, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Donaldson, E.F.; Harrington, P.R.; O'Rear, J.J.; Naeger, L.K. Clinical evidence and bioinformatics characterization of potential hepatitis C virus resistance pathways for sofosbuvir. Hepatology 2015, 61, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Svarovskaia, E.S.; Dvory-Sobol, H.; Parkin, N.; Hebner, C.; Gontcharova, V.; Martin, R.; Ouyang, W.; Han, B.; Xu, S.; Ku, K. Infrequent development of resistance in genotype 1–6 hepatitis C virus-infected subjects treated with sofosbuvir in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 1666–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pockros, P.J.; Jensen, D.; Tsai, N.; Taylor, R.; Ramji, A.; Cooper, C.; Dickson, R.; Tice, A.; Kulkarni, R.; Vierling, J.M. JUMP-C: A randomized trial of mericitabine plus pegylated interferon α-2a/ribavirin for 24 weeks in treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1/4 patients. Hepatology 2013, 58, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wedemeyer, H.; Jensen, D.; Herring, R.; Ferenci, P.; Ma, M.M.; Zeuzem, S.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Bzowej, N.; Pockros, P.; Vierling, J. PROPEL: A randomized trial of mericitabine plus peginterferon α-2a/ribavirin therapy in treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1/4 patients. Hepatology 2013, 58, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tong, X.; le Pogam, S.; Li, L.; Haines, K.; Piso, K.; Baronas, V.; Yan, J.M.; So, S.S.; Klumpp, K.; Nájera, I. In vivo emergence of a novel mutant L159F/L320F in the NS5B polymerase confers low-level resistance to the HCV polymerase inhibitors mericitabine and sofosbuvir. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 209, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gane, E.J.; Pockros, P.J.; Zeuzem, S.; Marcellin, P.; Shikhman, A.; Bernaards, C.; Zhou, J.; Yetzer, E.S.; Ballester, R.; Dwyer, C. Mericitabine and ritonavir-boosted danoprevir with or without ribavirin in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1 patients: INFORM-SVR study. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gane, E.; Stedman, C.; Garg, V.; George, S.; Kieffer, T.; Krop, J.; Lawal, A.; Lan, L.; Rubin, R. An interferon-and ribavirin-free 12-week regimen of once-daily VX-135 and daclatasvir in treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, S528–S529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sarrazin, C.; Hezode, C.; Zeuzem, S.; Pawlotsky, J.M. Antiviral strategies in hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, S88–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Arnold, J.J.; Sharma, S.D.; Feng, J.Y.; Ray, A.S.; Smidansky, E.D.; Kireeva, M.L.; Cho, A.; Perry, J.; Vela, J.E.; Park, Y. Sensitivity of mitochondrial transcription and resistance of RNA polymerase II dependent nuclear transcription to antiviral ribonucleosides. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Caillet-Saguy, C.; Simister, P.C.; Bressanelli, S. An objective assessment of conformational variability in complexes of hepatitis C virus polymerase with non-nucleoside inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 414, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Eltahla, A.A.; Lim, K.L.; Eden, J.S.; Kelly, A.G.; Mackenzie, J.M.; White, P.A. Nonnucleoside inhibitors of norovirus RNA polymerase: Scaffolds for rational drug design. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3115–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vliegen, I.; Paeshuyse, J.; de Burghgraeve, T.; Lehman, L.S.; Paulson, M.; Shih, I.H.; Mabery, E.; Boddeker, N.; de Clercq, E.; Reiser, H.; et al. Substituted imidazopyridines as potent inhibitors of HCV replication. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, 999–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shih, I.H.; Vliegen, I.; Peng, B.; Yang, H.; Hebner, C.; Paeshuyse, J.; Purstinger, G.; Fenaux, M.; Tian, Y.; Mabery, E.; et al. Mechanistic characterization of GS-9190 (Tegobuvir), a novel nonnucleoside inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4196–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kneteman, N.M.; Howe, A.Y.; Gao, T.; Lewis, J.; Pevear, D.; Lund, G.; Douglas, D.; Mercer, D.F.; Tyrrell, D.L.J.; Immermann, F. HCV796: A selective nonstructural protein 5B polymerase inhibitor with potent anti-hepatitis C virus activity in vitro, in mice with chimeric human livers, and in humans infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2009, 49, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vermehren, J.; Sarrazin, C. New HCV therapies on the horizon. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Aghemo, A.; de Francesco, R. New horizons in hepatitis C antiviral therapy with direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology 2013, 58, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zeuzem, S.; Asselah, T.; Angus, P.; Zarski, J.P.; Larrey, D.; Müllhaupt, B.; Gane, E.; Schuchmann, M.; Lohse, A.; Pol, S. Efficacy of the protease inhibitor BI 201335, polymerase inhibitor BI 207127, and ribavirin in patients with chronic HCV infection. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Beaulieu, P.; Anderson, P.; Brochu, C.; Bos, M.; Cordingley, M.; Duan, J.; Garneau, M.; Lagrace, L.; Marquis, M.; McKercher, G. Preclinical characterization of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase non-nucleoside inhibitor BI 207127. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zeuzem, S.; Soriano, V.; Asselah, T.; Bronowicki, J.-P.; Lohse, A.W.; Müllhaupt, B.; Schuchmann, M.; Bourlière, M.; Buti, M.; Roberts, S.K. Faldaprevir and deleobuvir for HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Devogelaere, B.; Berke, J.M.; Vijgen, L.; Dehertogh, P.; Fransen, E.; Cleiren, E.; van der Helm, L.; Nyanguile, O.; Tahri, A.; Amssoms, K. TMC647055, a potent nonnucleoside hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitor with cross-genotypic coverage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4676–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lemm, J.A.; Liu, M.; Gentles, R.G.; Ding, M.; Voss, S.; Pelosi, L.A.; Wang, Y.-K.; Rigat, K.L.; Mosure, K.W.; Bender, J.A. Preclinical characterization of BMS-791325, an allosteric inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3485–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rigat, K.L.; Lu, H.; Wang, Y.-K.; Argyrou, A.; Fanslau, C.; Beno, B.; Wang, Y.; Marcinkeviciene, J.; Ding, M.; Gentles, R.G. Mechanism of inhibition for BMS-791325, a novel non-nucleoside inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 33456–33289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. McPhee, D.; Falk, P.; Fracasso, P.; Lemm, J.; Liu, M.; Kirk, M.; Hernandez, D.; Cooney, E.; Hughes, E.; Gao, M. Characterization of viral escape in HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with BMS-791325 and pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Poordad, F.; Sievert, W.; Mollison, L.; Bräu, N.; Levin, J.; Sepe, T.; Lee, S.; Boyer, N.; Bronowicki, J. All-Oral, Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy with Daclatasvir/Asunaprevir/Beclabuvir for Non-Cirrhotic Patients with Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection: Unity-1 Phase 3 SVR12 Results. In Proceedings of 65th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Boston, MA, USA, 2014.
  80. Chan, L.; Das, S.K.; Reddy, T.J.; Poisson, C.; Proulx, M.; Pereira, O.; Courchesne, M.; Roy, C.; Wang, W.; Siddiqui, A. Discovery of thiophene-2-carboxylic acids as potent inhibitors of HCV NS5B polymerase and HCV subgenomic RNA replication. Part 1: Sulfonamides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 793–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Fenaux, M.; Eng, S.; Leavitt, S.A.; Lee, Y.-J.; Mabery, E.M.; Tian, Y.; Byun, D.; Canales, E.; Clarke, M.O.; Doerffler, E. Preclinical characterization of GS-9669, a thumb site II inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cooper, C.; Larouche, R.; Bourgault, B.; Chauret, N.; Proulx, L. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the HCV polymerase inhibitor VCH-222 following single dose administration in healthy volunteers and antiviral activity in HCV-infected individuals. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, S342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gane, E.J.; Stedman, C.A.; Hyland, R.H.; Ding, X.; Svarovskaia, E.; Subramanian, G.M.; Symonds, W.T.; McHutchison, J.G.; Pang, P.S. Efficacy of nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir plus the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir or the NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitor GS-9669 against HCV genotype 1 infection. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, H.; Tatlock, J.; Linton, A.; Gonzalez, J.; Jewell, T.; Patel, L.; Ludlum, S.; Drowns, M.; Rahavendran, S.V.; Skor, H. Discovery of (R)-6-cyclopentyl-6-(2-(2, 6-diethylpyridin-4-yl) ethyl)-3-((5, 7-dimethyl-[1,2,4] triazolo [1, 5-a] pyrimidin-2-yl) methyl)-4-hydroxy-5, 6-dihydropyran-2-one (PF-00868554) as a potent and orally available hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1255–1258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Shi, S.T.; Herlihy, K.J.; Graham, J.P.; Nonomiya, J.; Rahavendran, S.V.; Skor, H.; Irvine, R.; Binford, S.; Tatlock, J.; Li, H. Preclinical characterization of PF-00868554, a potent nonnucleoside inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2544–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jacobson, I.; Pockros, P.; Lalezari, J.; Lawitz, E.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; DeJesus, E.; Haas, F.; Martorell, C. Antiviral activity of filibuvir in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 28 days in treatment naive patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, S382–S383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yi, G.; Deval, J.; Fan, B.; Cai, H.; Soulard, C.; Ranjith-Kumar, C.T.; Smith, D.B.; Blatt, L.; Beigelman, L.; Kao, C.C. Biochemical study of the comparative inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA polymerase by VX-222 and filibuvir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Le Pogam, S.; Kang, H.; Harris, S.F.; Leveque, V.; Giannetti, A.M.; Ali, S.; Jiang, W.R.; Rajyaguru, S.; Tavares, G.; Oshiro, C.; et al. Selection and characterization of replicon variants dually resistant to thumb- and palm-binding nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 6146–6154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jiang, M.; Zhang, E.Z.; Ardzinski, A.; Tigges, A.; Davis, A.; Sullivan, J.C.; Nelson, M.; Spanks, J.; Dorrian, J.; Nicolas, O. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses of hepatitis C virus variants observed in clinical studies of VX-222, a nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5456–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Di Bisceglie, A.M.; Sulkowski, M.; Gane, E.; Jacobson, I.M.; Nelson, D.; DeSouza, C.; Alves, K.; George, S.; Kieffer, T.; Zhang, E.Z. VX-222, a non-nucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor, in telaprevir-based regimens for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 26, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wagner, F.; Thompson, R.; Kantaridis, C.; Simpson, P.; Troke, P.J.; Jagannatha, S.; Neelakantan, S.; Purohit, V.S.; Hammond, J.L. Antiviral activity of the hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitor filibuvir in genotype 1-infected patients. Hepatology 2011, 54, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dhanak, D.; Duffy, K.J.; Johnston, V.K.; Lin-Goerke, J.; Darcy, M.; Shaw, A.N.; Gu, B.; Silverman, C.; Gates, A.T.; Nonnemacher, M.R.; et al. Identification and biological characterization of heterocyclic inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 38322–38327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Feld, J.J.; Kowdley, K.V.; Coakley, E.; Sigal, S.; Nelson, D.R.; Crawford, D.; Weiland, O.; Aguilar, H.; Xiong, J.; Pilot-Matias, T. Treatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Poordad, F.; Lawitz, E.; Kowdley, K.; Everson, G.; Freilich, B.; Cohen, D.; Siggelkow, S.; Heckaman, M.; Menon, R.; Pilot-Matias, T. 12-week interferon-free regimen of ABT-450/R+ ABT-333+ ribavirin achieved SVR 12 in more than 90% of treatment-naive HCV genotype-1-infected subjects and 47% of previous non-responders. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, S549–S550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lawitz, E.; Rodriquez-Torres, M.; Rustgi, V.K.; Hassanein, T.; Rahimy, M.H.; Crowley, C.A.; Freddo, J.L.; Muir, A.; McHutchison, J. Safety and antiviral activity of ANA598 in combination with pegylated interferon α2a plus ribavirin in treatment-naive genotype-1 chronic HCV patients. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jensen, D.; Brunda, M.; Elston, R. Interferon-free regimen containing setrobuvir in combination with ritonavir-boosted danoprevir and ribavirin with or without mericitabine in HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients: Interim results from the ANNAPURNA study. Hepatology 2013, 58 (Suppl. 4), 849A. [Google Scholar]
  97. Thompson, P.A.; Patel, R.; Showalter, R.E.; Li, C.; Applemon, J.R.; Steffy, K. In vitro studies demonstrate that combinations of antiviral agents that include HCV polymerase inhibitor ANA598 have the potential to overcome viral resistance. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1164A. [Google Scholar]
  98. Le Pogam, S.; Seshaadri, A.; Kosaka, A.; Chiu, S.; Kang, H.; Hu, S.; Rajyaguru, S.; Symons, J.; Cammack, N.; Nájera, I. Existence of hepatitis C virus NS5B variants naturally resistant to non-nucleoside, but not to nucleoside, polymerase inhibitors among untreated patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 1205–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gopalsamy, A.; Chopra, R.; Lim, K.; Ciszewski, G.; Shi, M.; Curran, K.J.; Sukits, S.F.; Svenson, K.; Bard, J.; Ellingboe, J.W. Discovery of proline sulfonamides as potent and selective hepatitis C virus NS5b polymerase inhibitors. Evidence for a new NS5b polymerase binding site. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3052–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Nyanguile, O.; Pauwels, F.; van den Broeck, W.; Boutton, C.W.; Quirynen, L.; Ivens, T.; van der Helm, L.; Vandercruyssen, G.; Mostmans, W.; Delouvroy, F.; et al. 1,5-benzodiazepines, a novel class of hepatitis C virus polymerase nonnucleoside inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4420–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Haudecoeur, R.; Peuchmaur, M.; Ahmed-Belkacem, A.; Pawlotsky, J.M.; Boumendjel, A. Structure-activity relationships in the development of allosteric hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors: Ten years of research. Med. Res. Rev. 2013, 33, 934–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Howe, A.Y.; Cheng, H.; Johann, S.; Mullen, S.; Chunduru, S.K.; Young, D.C.; Bard, J.; Chopra, R.; Krishnamurthy, G.; Mansour, T. Molecular mechanism of hepatitis C virus replicon variants with reduced susceptibility to a benzofuran inhibitor, HCV-796. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3327–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lawitz, E.; Jacobson, I.; Godofsky, E.; Foster, G.R.; Filisiak, R. A Phase 2b Trial comparing 24 to 48 weeks treatment with tegobuvir (GS-9190)/PEG/RBV to 48 weeks treatment with PEG/RBV for chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zeuzem, S.; Buggisch, P.; Agarwal, K.; Marcellin, P.; Sereni, D.; Klinker, H.; Moreno, C.; Zarski, J.P.; Horsmans, Y.; Mo, H.; et al. The protease inhibitor, GS-9256, and non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor tegobuvir alone, with ribavirin, or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in hepatitis C. Hepatology 2012, 55, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Vliegen, I.; Paeshuyse, J.; Zhong, W.; Neyts, J. In vitro combinations containing Tegobuvir are highly efficient in curing cells from HCV replicon and in delaying/preventing the development of drug resistance. Antivir. Res. 2015, 120, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tomei, L.; Altamura, S.; Bartholomew, L.; Biroccio, A.; Ceccacci, A.; Pacini, L.; Narjes, F.; Gennari, N.; Bisbocci, M.; Incitti, I.; et al. Mechanism of action and antiviral activity of benzimidazole-based allosteric inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 13225–13231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. McKercher, G.; Beaulieu, P.L.; Lamarre, D.; LaPlante, S.; Lefebvre, S.; Pellerin, C.; Thauvette, L.; Kukolj, G. Specific inhibitors of HCV polymerase identified using an NS5B with lower affinity for template/primer substrate. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Di Marco, S.; Volpari, C.; Tomei, L.; Altamura, S.; Harper, S.; Narjes, F.; Koch, U.; Rowley, M.; De Francesco, R.; Migliaccio, G. Interdomain communication in hepatitis C virus polymerase abolished by small molecule inhibitors bound to a novel allosteric site. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 29765–29770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Winquist, J.; Abdurakhmanov, E.; Baraznenok, V.; Henderson, I.; Vrang, L.; Danielson, U.H. Resolution of the interaction mechanisms and characteristics of non-nucleoside inhibitors of hepatitis C virus polymerase. Antivir. Res. 2013, 97, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Biswal, B.K.; Cherney, M.M.; Wang, M.; Chan, L.; Yannopoulos, C.G.; Bilimoria, D.; Nicolas, O.; Bedard, J.; James, M.N.G. Crystal structures of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genotype 2a of hepatitis C virus reveal two conformations and suggest mechanisms of inhibition by non-nucleoside inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18202–18210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Biswal, B.K.; Wang, M.; Cherney, M.M.; Chan, L.; Yannopoulos, C.G.; Bilimoria, D.; Bedard, J.; James, M.N. Non-nucleoside inhibitors binding to hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase reveal a novel mechanism of inhibition. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 361, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Eltahla, A.A.; Tay, E.; Douglas, M.W.; White, P.A. Cross-genotypic examination of hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitors reveals a novel mechanism of action for thumb binders. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 7215–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Hebner, C.M.; Han, B.; Brendza, K.M.; Nash, M.; Sulfab, M.; Tian, Y.; Hung, M.; Fung, W.; Vivian, R.W.; Trenkle, J.; et al. The HCV non-nucleoside inhibitor Tegobuvir utilizes a novel mechanism of action to inhibit NS5B polymerase function. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Mosley, R.T.; Edwards, T.E.; Murakami, E.; Lam, A.M.; Grice, R.L.; Du, J.; Sofia, M.J.; Furman, P.A.; Otto, M.J. Structure of hepatitis C virus polymerase in complex with primer-template RNA. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 6503–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Powers, J.P.; Piper, D.E.; Li, Y.; Mayorga, V.; Anzola, J.; Chen, J.M.; Jaen, J.C.; Lee, G.; Liu, J.; Peterson, M.G. SAR and mode of action of novel non-nucleoside inhibitors of hepatitis C NS5b RNA polymerase. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 1034–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hang, J.Q.; Yang, Y.; Harris, S.F.; Leveque, V.; Whittington, H.J.; Rajyaguru, S.; Ao-Ieong, G.; McCown, M.F.; Wong, A.; Giannetti, A.M. Slow binding inhibition and mechanism of resistance of non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors of hepatitis C virus. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 15517–15529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tomei, L.; Altamura, S.; Bartholomew, L.; Bisbocci, M.; Bailey, C.; Bosserman, M.; Cellucci, A.; Forte, E.; Incitti, I.; Orsatti, L. Characterization of the inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by nonnucleosides. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gu, B.; Johnston, V.K.; Gutshall, L.L.; Nguyen, T.T.; Gontarek, R.R.; Darcy, M.G.; Tedesco, R.; Dhanak, D.; Duffy, K.J.; Kao, C.C. Arresting initiation of hepatitis C virus RNA synthesis using heterocyclic derivatives. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 16602–16607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zein, N.N. Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Lohmann, V.; Bartenschlager, R. On the History of Hepatitis C Virus Cell Culture Systems: Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 57, 1627–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Yu, M.; Corsa, A.C.; Xu, S.; Peng, B.; Gong, R.; Lee, Y.J.; Chan, K.; Mo, H.; Delaney, W., IV; Cheng, G. In vitro efficacy of approved and experimental antivirals against novel genotype 3 hepatitis C virus subgenomic replicons. Antivir. Res. 2013, 100, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. May, M.M.; Lorengel, H.; Kreuter, J.; Zimmermann, H.; Ruebsamen-Schaeff, H.; Urban, A. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases from different hepatitis C virus genotypes reveal distinct biochemical properties and drug susceptibilities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1814, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wong, K.A.; Xu, S.; Martin, R.; Miller, M.D.; Mo, H. Tegobuvir (GS-9190) potency against HCV chimeric replicons derived from consensus NS5B sequences from genotypes 2b, 3a, 4a, 5a, and 6a. Virology 2012, 429, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Pauwels, F.; Mostmans, W.; Quirynen, L.M.; van der Helm, L.; Boutton, C.W.; Rueff, A.S.; Cleiren, E.; Raboisson, P.; Surleraux, D.; Nyanguile, O.; et al. Binding-site identification and genotypic profiling of hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitors. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 6909–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Maring, C.; Wagner, R.; Hutchinson, D.; Flentge, C.; Kati, W.; Koev, G.; Liu, Y.; Beno, D.; Shen, J.; Lau, Y. Preclinical potency, pharmacokinetic and AMDE characterization of ABT-333, a novel non-nucleoside HCV polymerase inhibitor. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, S347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Paolucci, S.; Fiorina, L.; Mariani, B.; Gulminetti, R.; Novati, S.; Barbarini, G.; Bruno, R.; Baldanti, F. Naturally occurring resistance mutations to inhibitors of HCV NS5A region and NS5B polymerase in DAA treatment-naïve patients. Virol J. 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Gaudieri, S.; Rauch, A.; Pfafferott, K.; Barnes, E.; Cheng, W.; McCaughan, G.; Shackel, N.; Jeffrey, G.P.; Mollison, L.; Baker, R. Hepatitis C virus drug resistance and immune-driven adaptations: Relevance to new antiviral therapy. Hepatology 2009, 49, 1069–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Alves, R.; Queiroz, A.T.L.; Pessoa, M.G.; da Silva, E.; Mazo, D.F.C.; Carrilho, F.J.; Carvalho-Filho, R.; Carvalho, I.M.V.G.D. The presence of resistance mutations to protease and polymerase inhibitors in Hepatitis C virus sequences from the Los Alamos databank. J. Viral. Hepat. 2013, 20, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Kuntzen, T.; Timm, J.; Berical, A.; Lennon, N.; Berlin, A.M.; Young, S.K.; Lee, B.; Heckerman, D.; Carlson, J.; Reyor, L.L. Naturally occurring dominant resistance mutations to hepatitis C virus protease and polymerase inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Bartels, D.J.; Sullivan, J.C.; Zhang, E.Z.; Tigges, A.M.; Dorrian, J.L.; de Meyer, S.; Takemoto, D.; Dondero, E.; Kwong, A.D.; Picchio, G. HCV variants with decreased sensitivity to direct acting antivirals were rarely observed in DAA-naïve patients prior to treatment. J. Virol. 2012, 87, 1544–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Margeridon-Thermet, S.; Le Pogam, S.; Li, L.; Liu, T.F.; Shulman, N.; Shafer, R.W.; Najera, I. Similar prevalence of low-abundance drug-resistant variants in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1a and 1b hepatitis C virus infections as determined by ultradeep pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Applegate, T.L.; Gaudieri, S.; Plauzolles, A.; Chopra, A.; Grebely, J.; Lucas, M.; Hellard, M.; Luciani, F.; Dore, G.J.; Matthews, G.V. Naturally occurring dominant drug resistance mutations occur infrequently in the setting of recently acquired hepatitis C. Antivir. Ther. 2014, 20, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Lauck, M.; Alvarado-Mora, M.V.; Becker, E.A.; Bhattacharya, D.; Striker, R.; Hughes, A.L.; Carrilho, F.J.; O’Connor, D.H.; Pinho, J.R.R. Analysis of hepatitis C virus intrahost diversity across the coding region by ultradeep pyrosequencing. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 3952–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Nasu, A.; Marusawa, H.; Ueda, Y.; Nishijima, N.; Takahashi, K.; Osaki, Y.; Yamashita, Y.; Inokuma, T.; Tamada, T.; Fujiwara, T. Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus in association with antiviral therapy determined by ultra-deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Powdrill, M.H.; Tchesnokov, E.P.; Kozak, R.A.; Russell, R.S.; Martin, R.; Svarovskaia, E.S.; Mo, H.; Kouyos, R.D.; Götte, M. Contribution of a mutational bias in hepatitis C virus replication to the genetic barrier in the development of drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20509–20513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kukolj, G.; McGibbon, G.A.; McKercher, G.; Marquis, M.; Lefèbvre, S.; Thauvette, L.; Gauthier, J.; Goulet, S.; Poupart, M.A.; Beaulieu, P.L. Binding site characterization and resistance to a class of non-nucleoside inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 39260–39267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Schneider, M.D.; Sarrazin, C. Antiviral therapy of hepatitis C in 2014: Do we need resistance testing? Antivir. Res. 2014, 105, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eltahla, A.A.; Luciani, F.; White, P.A.; Lloyd, A.R.; Bull, R.A. Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase; Mode of Action and Resistance. Viruses 2015, 7, 5206-5224. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102868

AMA Style

Eltahla AA, Luciani F, White PA, Lloyd AR, Bull RA. Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase; Mode of Action and Resistance. Viruses. 2015; 7(10):5206-5224. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eltahla, Auda A., Fabio Luciani, Peter A. White, Andrew R. Lloyd, and Rowena A. Bull. 2015. "Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase; Mode of Action and Resistance" Viruses 7, no. 10: 5206-5224. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102868

APA Style

Eltahla, A. A., Luciani, F., White, P. A., Lloyd, A. R., & Bull, R. A. (2015). Inhibitors of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase; Mode of Action and Resistance. Viruses, 7(10), 5206-5224. https://doi.org/10.3390/v7102868

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop