Next Article in Journal
The Vaginal Microbiota, Bacterial Biofilms and Polymeric Drug-Releasing Vaginal Rings
Next Article in Special Issue
Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Carprofen in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Broodstock
Previous Article in Journal
Next Step in Gene Delivery: Modern Approaches and Further Perspectives of AAV Tropism Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Bacterial Nanocellulose Membranes Loaded or Not with Nisin as a Complementary Treatment in Surgical Dehorning Wounds in Bovines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxoplasma gondii Proteasome Subunit Alpha Type 1 with Chitosan: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Adjuvant

1
MOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2021, 13(5), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050752
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Revised: 12 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 19 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanobiotechnology Systems-Based Veterinary Formulations)

Abstract

:
As an important zoonotic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) has spread around the world, leading to infections in one-third of the population. There is still no effective vaccine or medicine against T. gondii, and recombinant antigens entrapped within nanospheres have benefits over traditional vaccines. In the present study, we first expressed and purified T. gondii proteasome subunit alpha type 1 (TgPSA1), then encapsulated the recombinant TgPSA1 (rTgPSA1) in chitosan nanospheres (CS nanospheres, rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres) and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA, rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion). Antigens entrapped in CS nanospheres reached an encapsulation efficiency of 67.39%, and rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres showed a more stable release profile compared to rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion in vitro. In vivo, Th1-biased cellular and humoral immune responses were induced in mice and chickens immunized with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion, accompanied by promoted production of antibodies, IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-17, and modulated production of IL-10. Immunization with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion conferred significant protection, with prolonged survival time in mice and significantly decreased parasite burden in chickens. Furthermore, our results also indicate that rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres could be used as a substitute for rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion, with the optimal administration route being intramuscular in mass vaccination. Collectively, the results of this study indicate that rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres represent a promising vaccine to protect animals against acute toxoplasmosis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii), which can cause toxoplasmosis, is a highly neglected parasite that threatens the health of animals and humans around the world [1]. As the main form of transmission, sexual reproduction of T. gondii occurs in felids, resulting in a wide distribution of oocysts in the environment. T. gondii infection can be acquired through ingestion of uncooked food or contaminated water, organ transplantation, blood transfusion, and even maternally by vertical transmission [2,3,4]. Toxoplasmosis can cause abortion in pregnant women, while it is normally asymptomatic in healthy individuals [5]. Effective drug treatments with few side effects are still not been available; thus, efficient vaccines with high biosafety are urgently needed. Anti-T. gondii vaccine development strategies are mainly focused on live attenuated vaccines [6], multi-epitope vaccines [7], DNA vaccines [8], subunit vaccines [9], and live vector-based vaccines [10]. Only one live attenuated vaccine, Ovilis™ Toxovax, has been approved to prevent abortion in sheep [11], but a recent document published by the Food Standards Agency questioned its protectiveness against tissue cyst formation [12].
A successful vaccine should be equipped with properties including high safety, long-term immunogenicity, stability, and low cost [13]. Actually, the major obstacle to effective vaccine development is epitope selection [14]. The selected epitope must be highly immunogenic and less prone to causing allergic or autoimmune reactions [15]. Currently, numerous antigens, such as microneme proteins [16], rhoptry proteins [17], dense granule proteins [18], and surface antigens [19], have been reported in the development of subunit vaccines, but a suitable vaccine for inhibiting the replication of this parasite in humans is still unavailable [20,21]. In eukaryotic cells, most of the intracellular proteins are degraded by lysosomes and proteasomes [22]. As an efficient way to degrade short-lived and structurally aberrant proteins [23,24], the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a crucial role in regulating many cellular processes; these process include cell proliferation, cell apoptosis, cell cycle progress [25], signal transduction [26], immune responses [27], and even normal metabolic activity [28]. The key role of protease activity in cellular homeostasis has been illustrated in a large number of eukaryotes as well as protozoan parasites [29]. Studies have shown that the proteasome plays a leading role in the development into a pathogenic stage [30,31]. The intracellular localization and enzymatic activity of the T. gondii proteasome have been examined [32], and the proteasome predominates in the cytosol, whereas it mostly presents in nucleus and cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. To validate the crucial role of the T. gondii proteasome, free tachyzoites were incubated with proteasome inhibitors (lactacystin), and the results showed that the proteasome inhibitors could block DNA synthesis and the duplication of intracellular parasites [33,34]. Thus, compounds that specifically target protease activity may constitute a basis for a rational anti-T. gondii therapeutic strategy. Of note, the immune protection of the T. gondii proteasome in a vaccine formulation against toxoplasmosis has not been investigated.
Purified proteins generally show weak immunogenic activity and require adjuvant to enhance their immunogenicity [35]. Freund’s adjuvant is commonly used and is considered as one of the most effective adjuvants [36]. However, complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) is unsuitable for humans due to its serious local reactions and toxicity, while incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) is characterized by lower toxicity and is only allowed in veterinary vaccines [37,38]. With the introduction of nanotechnology in the medical field, there have been efforts to enhance the immunogenicity of antigens in vaccine delivery systems [39]. Among the many types of nanoparticles, chitosan (CS) has attracted particular interest. Obtained by full or partial deacetylation of chitin, CS is characterized by biocompatibility, biodegradability, relatively no side effects, and nontoxicity [40]. Furthermore, CS has been demonstrated to be safe in dietary applications in some trials [41], and it has been approved for wound dressings by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [42]. Widely used in therapeutic strategies against pathogenic protozoa and parasites [43], CS has proven to be a promising system for developing vaccines and drugs against T. gondii [44,45]. So far, CS has been used in peptide-based [7], split [46], subunit [47], and DNA vaccines [48]. As an effective and nontoxic delivery system, CS has been extensively used in vaccine development against toxoplasmosis [49].
In the present study, we present a new attempt to combine recombinant T. gondii proteasome subunit alpha type 1 (rTgPSA1) with chitosan nanospheres (CS nanospheres) to develop an anti-T. gondii vaccine. Furthermore, we evaluate CS nanospheres along with IFA emulsion for the immunization of mice and chickens using a low-volume, double-dose protocol through the intramuscular route. This study aims to contribute information on a subunit vaccine against toxoplasmosis in mice and chickens delivered by CS microspheres.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice, Rats, Poultry, Cell Lines, and T. gondii RH Strain

Specific pathogen-free (SPF) BALB/c mice weighing 18–22 g were bought from the Center of Comparative Medicine, Yangzhou University, China, and housed in strictly sterilized rooms (specific pathogen-free). Also acquired from the Center of Comparative Medicine, SPF Sprague Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200–220 g were reared in a specific pathogen-free environment. Commercially available Hy-Line layer chickens (newborn) were purchased from Shuangli Hatchery, Nantong, China. The chickens were reared in Toxoplasma-free conditions. All animals had free access to food and water. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics committee of responsible authority from the College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. The approval ID was PZ2019080 (for mice and rats, approval date: 7 September 2019) and PTA2020006 (for chickens, approval date: 4 June 2020).
Human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells were purchased from the Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy Sciences, Shanghai, China, and maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% double antibiotics (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
Violent T. gondii strains RH (Type I) were preserved at the MOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China. Tachyzoites of T. gondii were amplified through mice following methods described previously [50]. For preparation of chicken immunization doses, tachyzoites were harvested from HFF cells challenged with T. gondii referenced in a previous report [51].

2.2. Cloning and Molecular Characterization of TgPSA1

A Total RNA Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) and reverse transcription kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) were used to obtain the total cDNA from the tachyzoites of T. gondii. Primers were designed according to the conserved domain sequences (CDS) of the TgPSA1 gene (GenBank: AAYL02000522). Synthesized by Tsingke Biological Technology (Nanjing, China), sense and antisense primers 5′-GCTGATATCGGATCC GAATTC ATGCTGGCTGGCGGCC-3′ and 5′-CTCGAGTGCGGCCGC AAGCTT TTAGTCAGCGCGGAGGTCCA-3′ were used to amplify the complete open reading frame (ORF) of TgPSA1 using the cDNA as a template. The underlined sequences respectively represent the restriction endonuclease of EcoRI and HindIII (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). To amplify the TgPSA1 gene, Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) was used. The PCR was conducted with the following conditions in an amplifier (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA): preheating at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles with amplification at 95 °C for 30 s, 64 °C annealing for 30 s, 72 °C extension for 60 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Then, the PCR amplicons were subcloned into the pET32a linear vector (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) using the One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The recombinant plasmid was then transferred to Escherichia coli (E. coli) BL21 (DE3, Invitrogen Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and cultured in Luria Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. The recombinant vector was extracted by using a Plasmid Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), and then sequenced by an ABI PRISM™ 3730 XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Preparation of Purified Recombinant TgPSA1

To produce the recombinant protein of the TgPSA1 gene, E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing pET32a/TgPSA1 vector was grown in LB medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin (37 °C with shaking at 180 rpm) until the OD600 was around 0.5. Then, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added for a final concentration of 1 mM. After 4 h of incubation, the recombinant protein was then purified by a chelating column (Ni-NTA, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The endotoxin was removed from the purified protein (ToxinEraser™ Endotoxin Removal Kit, GeneScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA), the level of endotoxin was determined (ToxinSensor™ Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay Kit, GeneScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and the endotoxin was quantified by a Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), analyzed by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue dye (Solarbio, Beijing, China).

2.4. Immunoblot Analysis of Recombinant and Native TgPSA1

To obtain the polyclonal antibodies against rTgPSA1, two SD rats were first immunized with 200 μg of purified protein mixed with oil adjuvant (complete Freund’s adjuvant; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After two weeks, quartic immunizations were conducted using 200 μg of purified protein mixed with IFA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at one-week intervals. All injections were performed subcutaneously in the back skin through multiple injections. One week after the last immunization, blood was harvested at the eye socket and sera containing polyclonal antibodies were collected. Blank sera as negative control were also collected from rats and kept in the same environment. To obtain the antibodies against T. gondii, two SD rats were challenged with 103 tachyzoites of T. gondii RH strain intraperitoneally. After four weeks, sera containing antibodies against T. gondii were harvested. All sera were kept at −20 °C until use.
To obtain the lysates of T. gondii tachyzoites, a previously described procedure was conducted [52]. Purified rTgPSA1 and T. gondii lysates were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), which had been cut into strips. The membranes were then incubated with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% skim milk (w/v) and 0.5% Tween 20 (v/v) for 2 h at 37 °C with constant shaking. After being washed three times in TBS with 0.5% Tween 20 (v/v, TBST), the membranes were subsequently probed with sera (1:100) at 37 °C for 2 h with constant shaking. After being washed with TBST three times, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled anti-rat IgG (1:5000; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C with constant shaking. Finally, the membranes were washed three times in TBST and detected by freshly prepared 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min.

2.5. Nanosphere Formulation (rTgPSA1/CS) and Physical Characterization

The ionic gelation technique was carried out to prepare nanospheres as described previously with minor modifications [53]. To form a 2 mg/mL CS solution (pH 5.0), the CS (MW 50–190 kDa; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in an aqueous solution of acetic acid (1%, v/v) on a magnetic stirrer (400 rpm) overnight at room temperature; the pH value was then adjusted by using 2 M NaOH solution. For the 2 mg/mL sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) solution, TPP was dissolved in double-distilled water and passed through a 0.22 μm filtering membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
To prepare rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres, a magnetic stirrer was put in an incubator, in which the temperature was 30 °C, and the disturbance of cold flow was avoided. Then, 20 mL CS solution in a container (preheated in a water bath at 37 °C) was placed on a magnetic stirrer stirring at 500 rpm; 4 mL TPP solution was then cautiously added with a plastic pipette tip. After incubation for 10 min, 4 mg recombinant protein was cautiously dripped. Tip sonication (Scientz Biotechnology, Ningbo, China) was then performed in continuous mode for 5 s at 3 s intervals (10 min total) under output power of 50 W. During the ultrasonic treatment process, the mixed solution was cooled in an ice bath. Before centrifugation at 40,000 rpm (15 min at 4 °C), the total volume of the resulting solution was recorded. The supernatant of the solution after centrifugation was collected and its volume measured, and the obtained nanospheres were rinsed and resuspended in double-distilled water. Before freezing for at least 2 h at −80 °C, the obtained nanospheres were passed through a 0.22 μm filtering membrane. The frozen nanospheres were quickly transferred to a vacuum freeze-dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) until completely freeze-dried.
To analyze the encapsulation efficiency, the non-bound protein in the supernatant was quantified by a Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit, and the total amount of recombinant protein in the supernatant could be calculated. The encapsulation efficiency can be evaluated by Formula (1):
Encapsulation   efficiency   ( % ) = Total   protein Free   protein Total   protein × 100 %
To characterize the features of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres, the nanospheres were sent to Nanjing Agriculture University for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation by a Hitachi SU8010 (Tokyo, Japan). Using ImageJ software, version 1.8 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), the average diameter was determined by measuring five arbitrary nanospheres.

2.6. Release Characteristics In Vitro

As described previously [54], the release characteristics of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres in vitro were investigated in PBS (pH 7.4) with minor changes. To form the rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion (water-in-oil emulsion), an equal volume of IFA was added to the recombinant protein solution. This was placed in an ice-water mixture, then tip sonication was performed in continuous mode for 3 s at 3 s intervals (4 min total) under output power of 20 W (with 40% amplitude). After vertexing thoroughly, tip sonication was repeated. The rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion were dispersed at 37 °C on a magnetic stirrer stirring at 180 rpm. At 12-h intervals, supernatant samples were taken out and centrifuged for 1 min at 10,000 rpm. The aqueous solution was stored at −20 °C and the concentration of protein was quantified by using a Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit. The rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres that settled at the bottom and the emulsion that floated on the aqueous solution were collected and resuspended in the original tubes. The cumulative release percentage was calculated by Formula (2). Before calculating, the total volume of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion in the supernatant was measured.
Cumulative   release   ( % ) = Total   volume ×   Protein   concentration Total   amount   of   loaded   protein × 100 %

2.7. Vaccination and Challenging Schedules in Mice

BALB/c mice were randomly divided into five groups (10 mice/group) and immunized intramuscularly in the leg with 100 μg of recombinant protein at different sites. The immunized mice were injected with PBS, pET32a vector protein, rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS (Table 1). The rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion was prepared following the method described in Section 2.6. Two weeks after the first immunization, a booster immunization was performed in the same way.
Two weeks after the second immunization, the immune protection of immunized mice was evaluated by a method described previously [55]. Briefly, all mice in every group were challenged with a lethal dose (200 tachyzoites) of T. gondii RH strain intraperitoneally, and the mortality status of each mouse was observed daily.

2.8. Antibody and Cytokine Assays in Mice

At weeks zero, two, and four, serum from each mouse was collected from the eye socket before immunization and challenge. All harvested sera were kept at −20 °C until use.
To determine the titers of antibodies, standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as described previously, was conducted with minor modifications [56]. Briefly, the wells of the 96-well plate (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA) were coated with 100 μL (100 μg/mL) rTgPSA1 in 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) for 12 h at 4 °C. After being washed three times in PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20), the nonspecific binding sites were blocked with PBST containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 37 °C for 1 h. After being rinsed for 5 min in PBST, the wells were then incubated with sera (diluted 1:100) from immunized mice at 37 °C for 1 h. After subsequent washing in PBST, each well was then incubated with HRP-bound anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, or IgG2a (1:5000; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). The enzymatic activity was revealed by using substrate solution (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine; Tiangen, Beijing, China), and the reaction was stopped with 2 M newly prepared H2SO4. A microplate photometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to quantify the titers of antibodies at an absorbance of 450 nm. Each group had five replications and each replication was measured once.
To determine the levels of cytokines in the sera, commercially available ELISA kits (Senbeijia, Nanjing, China) based on the double-antibody sandwiched method were conducted. According to known concentrations of recombinant mouse cytokines, the concentrations of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and IL-17 were measured. Each group was in five replications and each replication was measured once.

2.9. Determination of Optimal Administration Route

BALB/c mice were randomly divided into 20 groups (5 mice/group). The immunization routes were intraoral, intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous, and each route included blank (equal volume of PBS), control (100 μg pET32a vector protein), rTgPSA1 (100 μg rTgPSA1), rTgPSA1/IFA (rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion containing 100 μg rTgPSA1), and rTgPSA1/CS (rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres containing 100 μg rTgPSA1) groups. For the intraoral group, immunization was administered by the intragastric method. For the intranasal group, each mouse was placed in an anesthetic apparatus and induced with 2% isoflurane with oxygen flow at 1 L/min, and maintained at 1.5%. A 10 μL drip containing 50 μg recombinant protein was then given to each nostril (20 μL/mice). For the intramuscular group, each mouse was immunized in the leg muscles at different sites. For the subcutaneous group, 100 μg recombinant protein was delivered into the back skin, also at different sites. All infected mice were immunized twice at two-week intervals. To evaluate the effect of the administration route on immune protection, all mice were challenged intraperitoneally with a lethal dose of T. gondii RH strain (200 tachyzoites) two weeks after the last immunization, and the mortality status of every mouse was then observed daily.

2.10. Immunization and Challenging Schedules in Chickens

Newborn Hy-Line layer chickens were raised together under Toxoplasma-free conditions. Two weeks later, chickens with similar body weight were randomly divided into six groups (25 chickens/group) and intramuscularly immunized in the leg at different sites. The groups included blank (immunized with PBS or T. gondii), control, rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups (Table 2). Two weeks after the first immunization, the second immunization (four weeks old) was conducted in the same way. Based on previous methods [50], immune protection was investigated with minor modifications. All chickens were challenged with 1 × 107 tachyzoites of T. gondii RH strain intraperitoneally two weeks after the last immunization (six weeks old). The body weight of 10 chickens was recorded, and the growth coefficient was obtained by Formula (3):
Coefficient   of   growth   ( % ) = Final   weight Initial   weight Initial   weight × 100 %

2.11. Antibody and Cytokine Assays in Chickens

At two, four, and six weeks of age, serum from each chicken was collected from the heart before immunization and challenge. All harvested sera were kept at −20 °C until use. The procedure for antibody titers was the same as that described in Section 2.8, whereas the second antibody was changed to HRP-bound anti-chicken IgY (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). There were five replications in each group and each replication was measured once. To determine the cytokine levels in the sera, commercially available ELISA kits (Senbeijia, Nanjing, China) based on a double-antibody sandwiched method were used. According to known concentrations of recombinant chicken cytokines, all concentrations of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17) were measured. There were five replications in each group and each replication was measured once.

2.12. Detection of T Cell Subsets in Spleen Lymphocytes from Chickens

Five animals from each group were sacrificed at two weeks after immunization or challenge (two, four, and six weeks old), and spleen lymphocytes were collected by using a separation solution (TBD, Tianjin, China) as described by Sasai et al. [57]. The spleen lymphocytes were divided into two parts and stained with anti-chicken CD3-FITC, anti-chicken CD4-PE and anti-chicken CD3-FITC, or anti-chicken CD8-PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) in the dark for 30 min at 4 °C, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After being washed three times in PBS, the lymphocytes were run on a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) to calculate the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Before analysis, a lymphocyte subset was gated. All five replications in each group were measured once.

2.13. Detection of T. gondii by Absolute Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Five chickens in each group were sacrificed at two weeks after challenge (eight weeks old), and the cardiac muscle from the tip of the heart was collected. Then, 30 mg of tissue was minced and transferred in a microcentrifuge tube, and genomic DNA was extracted by using a commercial kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The extracts were stored at −20 °C until use.
The 529 bp fragments were amplified by PCR using the primers TOX4 and TOX5 as described by Homan et al. [58]. Purified by a gel extraction kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), the amplicons were cloned into linear PMD19T vectors (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) by the TA cloning method. The recombinant vector was sequenced by the ABI PRISM™ 3730 XL DNA Analyzer. Correctly identified sequences were transferred to E. coli DH5α (Invitrogen Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), and the E. coli were incubated in LB medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin for duplications. A Plasmid Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) was utilized to obtain the cloned vectors. To determine the copy number of obtained vectors, an online tool was used (http://cels.uri.edu/gsc/cndna.html (accessed on 19 May 2021)).
Absolute qPCR for quantification of T. gondii 529 bp fragments was conducted following previous methods [58]. The forward (5′-CACAGAAGGGACAGAAGT-3′) and reverse (5′-TCGCCTTCATCTACAGTC-3′) primers were synthesized by Tsingke Biological Technology (Nanjing, China). For qPCR, 1 μL of a known copy number of cloned vectors and 1 μL of genomic DNA were added to the amplification mixture consisting of 10 μL of 2 × ChamQ SYBR qPCR MasterMix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.4 pmol of each primer, and 0.4 μL of 50 × ROX Reference Dye 2, and the final volume of each reaction was 20 μL. Then, qPCR was conducted on an Applied Biosystems 7500 system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Samples were amplified as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Amplification was followed by a melt-curve analysis between 60 and 95 °C with an increment of 0.05 °C/s. The fluorescence of each sample was collected at the extension step. Before further processing, the melting curves were ensured with one uniform peak at the expected temperature. Each cloned vector and genomic DNA sample was quantified with three biological replicates.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad 6.0 software (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS 25.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and differences between groups were considered significant at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA. Flow cytometric analysis was conducted by CytExpert software (version 2.3, Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). Dunnett’s test was used for comparison between experimental and control groups. Based on the homogeneity of variance, values between the rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. When variance was uneven, Welch’s correction was performed. Survival percentages were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier survival test, and the log-rank model was used for comparison.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of rTgPSA1

The sequence analysis showed that the pET32a/TgPSA1 plasmid was correctly inserted. The ORF of TgPSA1 was 738 bp, which encoded a protein of 246 amino acids with an expected molecular weight of 27.2 kDa. According to the instructions, the recombinant protein expressed by the pET32a vector involved his-tag protein (17.5 kDa). Therefore, the molecular weight of the recombinant protein was 44.7 kDa in theory. After removing the endotoxin from purified rTgPSA1, the endotoxin level of purified rTgPSA1 fell to 0.1 EU/mL. As shown in Figure 1a, SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that the molecular weight of rTgPSA1 was approximately 44 kDa, which matched the theoretical value.

3.2. Immunoblot Analysis of Recombinant and Native TgPSA1

Immunoblot analysis indicated that rTgPSA1 could be detected by the mouse anti-T. gondii sera (Figure 1b), while native TgPSA1 could be recognized by anti-rTgPSA1 polyclonal antibodies (Figure 1c). Compared with the calculated value, the molecular weight of the native TgPSA1 protein was slightly lower. All of these results show that the antigenicity of the recombinant TgPSA1 was satisfactory, and the expressed protein could participate in activating host immunity.

3.3. Physical Characterization and Release Characteristics of rTgPSA1/CS Nanospheres

CS encapsulated rTgPSA1 nanospheres were prepared by the ionic gelation technique, and the encapsulation efficiency was analyzed. The concentration of recombinant protein solution used in the preparation reached 1.0 mg/mL, and the encapsulation efficiency reached 67.39%. After encapsulation of rTgPSA1 protein in CS polymer, the morphology of nanospheres was observed under SEM. The average diameter of encapsulated rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres was around 100 nm (Figure 2).
Based on BCA assay, the release characteristics of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion were further evaluated. The encapsulated nanospheres showed a steadier release profile (Figure 3); only 10.150 ± 1.917% of the antigens were released within the first day, and 1.18–6.00% were slowly released daily over the following 10 days. After the 12th day, the release profile became flat, finally reaching 76.236 ± 2.870%. Meanwhile, the rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion showed an obvious burst release during the first two days, and reached 63.060 ± 2.612% on the third day. After that, a steadier release profile was detected, and the cumulative release was 90.436 ± 2.408% for 16 days.

3.4. Antibody and Cytokine Production in Mice

According to the standard ELISA procedure, the titers of total IgG and isotypes IgG1 and IgG2 in the sera collected from mice were investigated. As shown in Figure 4a, significantly increased levels of total IgG antibodies were found in rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups after the first (week two) and second (week four) immunizations, and mice immunized with rTgPSA1/IFA generated the highest level (p < 0.01) of total IgG after the second immunization (week four). Furthermore, the sera separated from animals also revealed higher titers of IgG1 (Figure 4b) and IgG2a (Figure 4c) after the first and second immunizations. Compared with the blank and control groups, animals immunized with rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, or rTgPSA1/CS generated higher levels (p < 0.001) of isotype IgG1 after the first (week two) and second (week four) immunizations. As for isotype IgG2a, remarkable increases (p < 0.001) were also observed in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups after the first (week two) and second (week four) immunizations. Furthermore, the rTgPSA1/IFA group secreted higher levels (p < 0.05) of isotype IgG2a than the rTgPSA1/CS group.
Strictly according to the instructions, the sera collected from animals after the second immunization (week four) were tested to determine the levels of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17. As demonstrated in Figure 5a,b, obviously higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 were detected in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups. However, all animals from immunized groups generated equivalent IL-10 (p > 0.05; Figure 5c). As for IL-17, shown in Figure 5d, the secretions in animals immunized with rTgPSA1 and rTgPSA1/IFA were enhanced, while those in the rTgPSA1/CS group remained unchanged (p > 0.05).

3.5. Immune Protection against Acute Toxoplasmosis

To investigate the immune protection against acute T. gondii infection, all animals were intraperitoneally immunized with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain) two weeks after the second vaccination. As illustrated in Figure 6, all immunized animals died within 17 days. Significant survival time was observed in mice vaccinated with rTgPSA1 (12.200 ± 0.490 days, p < 0.01), rTgPSA1/IFA (13.700 ± 0.700 days, p < 0.001), and rTgPSA1/CS (11.400 ± 0.476 days, p < 0.001) compared with the blank group (9.300 ± 0.335 days). Longer survival time was also observed in the rTgPSA1 (p < 0.01), rTgPSA1/IFA (p < 0.001) and rTgPSA1/CS (p < 0.001) groups based on the control group (9.100 ± 0.379 days). No significant activity (p > 0.05) was observed in animals immunized with rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS.

3.6. Comparison of Administration Routes

In order to evaluate the ability of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres to induce immune protection via the four pathways, the survival time was recorded in mice challenged with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain). As illustrated in Figure 7, immunization with rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion showed longer survival time through the four investigated routes, while the rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres prolonged survival time only through the intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes. With the intraoral route, immunization with rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion significantly increased the survival duration based on the blank and control groups, while with the intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes, both rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion and rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres significantly prolonged the survival time of mice based on the blank and control groups. No significant difference (p > 0.05) between the rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups was observed in the four investigated routes, and no notable difference (p > 0.05) was evaluated between the blank and control groups using the same administration route.

3.7. Antibody and Cytokine Production in Chickens

According to the ELISA procedure mentioned above, the titers of total IgY in sera collected from chickens were investigated. As shown in Figure 8, statistically higher IgY titers were observed in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups at four and six weeks old. No obvious difference (p > 0.05) was detected between the rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups at any point in time, and the blank group was consistent (p > 0.05) with the control group.
Using the ELISA kits constructed with the double antibody sandwich method, the serum separated from each chicken two weeks after the second immunization (six weeks old) was conducted for levels of IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17.
As demonstrated in Figure 9a, IFN-γ secretion was promoted (p < 0.001) in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups compared with the blank and control groups. As for cytokine IL-4, illustrated in Figure 9b, significant enhancements were evaluated in the sera separated from the rTgPSA1 (p < 0.001), rTgPSA1/IFA (p < 0.001), and rTgPSA1/CS (p < 0.05) groups compared with the blank group. When compared with the control group, statistical increases were also found in the rTgPSA1 (p < 0.001), rTgPSA1/IFA (p < 0.01) and rTgPSA1/CS (p < 0.05) groups.
As illustrated in Figure 9c, the rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion significantly (p < 0.001) promoted higher levels of IL-10 compared to the blank and control groups. High levels were also detected in the chickens immunized with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres, which showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. Noticeably, chickens in the rTgPSA1/IFA group generated higher levels of IL-10 (p < 0.05) than those in the rTgPSA1/CS group. Regarding the secretion of cytokine IL-17 (Figure 9d), only chickens immunized with rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion showed higher levels. In addition, the blank group was consistent with the control group (p > 0.05) in four investigated cytokines.

3.8. Analysis of Cellular Immune Response in Spleen Lymphocytes Separated from Chickens

To determine the percentage of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells after immunization, five chickens from each group were sacrificed and spleen lymphocytes were collected. As illustrated in Figure 10a, the percentage of CD4+ T cells in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups was significantly increased at four and six weeks of age. The independent t-test revealed that the percentage in the rTgPSA1/CS group was significantly higher (p > 0.05) than that in the rTgPSA1/IFA group at 4 weeks of age. As for CD8+ T cells (Figure 10b), increases were also detected in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups after the first (four weeks old) and second (six weeks old) immunizations. The blank group was statistically similar (p > 0.05) to the control group in the investigated T lymphocytes.

3.9. Growth Coefficient and Parasite Burden of Chickens

In order to evaluate the coefficient of growth, the weight of chickens was measured. As shown in Figure 11, the growth rate was significantly suppressed (p < 0.001) in all challenged animals in the six-to-eight-week-old period compared to the blank group without T. gondii challenge. Animals from the rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were observed to have a higher coefficient of growth (p < 0.001) than those from the blank (T. gondii) and control groups, while the rTgPSA1 group showed a higher growth rate (p < 0.05) than the control group. The coefficient of growth for the control group was similar (p > 0.05) to that of the blank group (T. gondii), and the growth of chickens in the rTgPSA1/IFA group was in line with that of the rTgPSA1/CS group (p > 0.05) according to the independent t-test.
In order to carry out a more accurate analysis of the parasite burden, absolute qPCR was conducted to detect the 529 bp fragments of T. gondii in cardiac muscles from chickens at 8 weeks of age. As shown in Figure 12, the parasite burden was statistically inhibited in the rTgPSA1, rTgPSA1/IFA, and rTgPSA1/CS groups compared to the blank and control groups. In addition, no differences (p > 0.05) were obtained in copy numbers of 529 bp fragments between the rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups.

4. Discussion

Currently, various adjuvants are used to develop anti-T. gondii vaccines, and the use of nano- and microspheres has gained popularity [59]. Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [60], poly (d, l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) has been shown to be an effective adjuvant to T. gondii vaccines [61,62]. However, during the preparation of PLGA nanospheres, carcinogenic dichloromethane cannot be avoided. In addition, various nano-adjuvants have been developed for T. gondii vaccines [63,64]. To some degree, all of these reported nano-adjuvants can protect antigens from enzymatic degradation and maintain a stable release of antigens, leading to enhanced immunogenicity. As a newly arising nano-adjuvant, CS can not only effectively induce cell and humoral immune responses [65], but also stimulate innate and adaptive immunity. Moreover, CS possesses a slow-release effect, which could extend the immunogenicity of entrapped antigens and regulate macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) in the host [66,67,68].
Different methods for developing CS nanospheres can affect the encapsulation efficiency, mainly including emulsion cross-linking [7], solvent evaporation [69], spray-drying [70], emulsion precipitation [71], and ionic gelation [53]. To avoid toxic substances, a modified ionic gelation technique was utilized in the present study, and the encapsulation efficiency only reached 67.39%. Further research should optimize the nanosphere protocol to improve the encapsulation efficiency. As a critical attribute, sphere size plays an important role in inducing efficient antigenic uptake by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and making them accessible to the appropriate DC subset [72]. In this study, we formulated recombinant TgPSA1 into CS as an adjuvant and vaccine delivery system. The rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres in our study were spherical in shape and had a uniform diameter of approximately 100 nm, according to the SEM images. Using the same technique, Temsahy et al. [46] produced CS nanospheres with an average diameter of 211.896 ± 67.5812 nm. Such differences could be due to different antigens and methods. Furthermore, negatively charged CS nanospheres are composed of a cationic polymer that can adhere to cell surfaces, leading to a long residence time and continuous antigen release [73]. Thus, the release profile of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres was investigated; the curve showed an initially slow release, which was fastest on approximately the 6th day, and the release profile tended to increase gently after the 12th day. Similar release profiles were also observed for CS nanospheres loaded with multiple antigenic epitopes from T. gondii GRA10 [7].
In resisting the replication of this intracellular parasite, humoral responses and antibodies play important roles [74,75]. In mice, it has been reported that elevated IgG2a is an indicator for a Th1 type immune response, while elevated IgG1 indicates a Th2 type response [55]. In our study, significantly increased total IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgY secretion was observed, and higher titers could be induced after booster immunization. With higher titers of IgG2a than IgG1, rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion induced a Th1-biased immune response in mice. In addition, rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion generated significantly higher total IgG and IgG2a titers than rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres in mice while, in chickens, both rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion generated significantly higher IgY. Our data lend credence to the idea that rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres could induce a Th1-oriented immune response and could be a substitute for IFA to trigger specific antibodies in chickens. Similar observations have also been reported for many CS-based vaccine formulations against T. gondii [7,48,76].
Secreted by natural killer (NK) and T cells, cytokine IFN-γ plays an essential role in resisting T. gondii [77,78] and in mediating innate and adaptive immune responses [79]. In the present study, both rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion induced statistically higher IFN-γ in mice and chickens, and no statistical difference was observed between the two vaccines. Furthermore, excessive secretion of IFN-γ can cause severe inflammation, leading to the death of sick animals [80]. It has been reported that Th2 immunity-related IL-4 and IL-10 are resistant to IFN-γ [81]. Thus, we investigated IL-4 and IL-10 and found that rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsions induced higher IL-4 and lower IL-10 in mice. In chickens, higher IL-4 and IL-10 were triggered by the two vaccines; in addition, rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion induced significantly higher levels of IL-10 than rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres. Th2 immunity could reduce the inflammatory reaction and mortality, and may play a crucial role in prolonging the survival time of animals [82]. To sum up, both rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion elicited high levels of IFN-γ and other Th2 immunity-related cytokines against T. gondii and, in chickens, there are fewer possibilities for rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres to elicit higher IL-10.
Th17 cells can secrete antimicrobial cytokines, including IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22, and play an important role in mediating host protection against parasites [83,84]. IL-17 can enhance the migration of neutrophils to infection sites and participate in immunity to intracellular infections [85]. In the present study, we found that rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could induce remarkably higher levels of IL-17 in mice and chickens, while IL-17 secretions in animals immunized with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres remained unchanged. In mice, rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could induce significantly higher levels of IL-17 compared to rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres. The results indicate that rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could induce higher IL-17 production than rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres. During the development of anti-T. gondii vaccines, the Th17 pathway has received less attention, and further studies are required to elucidate its role in recruiting cells and mediating cytokines.
Composed of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, memory T lymphocytes are crucial in establishing protective immunity against T. gondii [78]. CD4+ T lymphocytes play a significant role in regulating the immune action against T. gondii, while CD8+ T lymphocytes are known as the most important effector T cells [86]. Our data show that both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were significantly expanded in response to rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion in chickens. This observation indicates that both nanospheres and emulsion can induce the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, which may contribute to cytotoxicity against toxoplasmosis. The ability of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres to stimulate T lymphocyte differentiation was similar to that reported in [62] and, in that study, recombinant T. gondii rhoptry 38 and 18 were encapsulated in PLG microparticles.
The survival rate of immunized animals against toxoplasmosis is a convincing way to assess vaccines [87]. Thus, we evaluated the administration route and immune protection in mice. In the present study, we compared the survival time of mice immunized with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion via four vaccination pathways. Through the intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes, rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion significantly prolonged the survival time of mice. As the most common administration route in practice, the intraoral route seems to be the easiest and most convenient option. However, it was not effective for the vaccines used in this study compared with the other routes. In a previous study [88], recombinant ubiquitin-conjugated multi-stage antigen segments (Ad-UMAS) derived from different stages of T. gondii were synthesized to prevent toxoplasmosis and administered through five different routes, and the results indicated that oral and nasal immunizations significantly prolonged survival time after the challenge. However, in the present study, only rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could induce limited immune protection; such differences may be caused by different types of antigens or living environments, or the age of the animals, and require further investigation. In summary, the results indicate that mice immunized with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres or rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion through subcutaneous or intramuscular injection gained a significantly prolonged survival time, and there was no significant change between them.
Based on the outcomes of mice, the subcutaneous administration route attains the longest survival time, but poultry farms in reality always exist on a large scale. Thus, considering the practical reality, the intramuscular route was used in subsequent chicken trials. At commercial chicken farms, people pay more attention to the weight of chickens. Thus, the coefficient of growth was investigated after chickens were challenged with 107 tachyzoites (RH strain) via intraperitoneal injection. The results indicate that a higher coefficient of growth was obtained by immunizing with two vaccines. After T. gondii infection, these smart parasites can disseminate widely by colonizing in leukocytes [89]. To escape immune surveillance, T. gondii could form cysts mainly in brain and muscle tissues [90]. Reports have shown that T. gondii could be detected in cardiac muscles [91,92]. To further clarify the immune protection, the parasite burden was evaluated in cardiac muscles, and a lower parasite burden was obtained after two vaccinations. All of these results demonstrate that both rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion were able to protect chickens against acute toxoplasmosis and increase their body weight.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that immunization with rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could generate partial protection against acute toxoplasmosis, with a prolonged survival time in mice and a lower parasite burden in chickens. The promotion of antibodies and regulation of cytokine secretions suggest that rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion could induce strong humoral immune responses in vaccinated animals. Compared to other administration routes, the intramuscular route is optimal for CS nanospheres in mass vaccination. Furthermore, as a promising vaccine, rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres could substitute for rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion. However, the immune protection mechanisms of TgPSA1 against T. gondii infection in animals are complex, and further studies on this prospective vaccine should focus on its applicability to other hosts and protectivity against other T. gondii strains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, Z.Y.; validation, W.D.; formal analysis, Z.Y.; investigation, Z.Y., W.D., M.T.A. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Y., R.Y., L.X. and X.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y., M.T.A., J.L. (JunLong Liu), J.L. (JianXun Luo), R.Y., L.X. and X.S.; project administration, R.Y., L.X. and X.S.; funding acquisition, J.L. (JunLong Liu) and J.L. (JianXun Luo). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Key Scientific and Technological Project of XPCC (2020AB025), and supported by the State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Regarding the animals included in our research, this study followed the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. The approval ID was PZ2019080 and PTA2020006.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Yanli Yu in Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China for her help on statistical analysis. For the technical assistance, we greatly thank HaiFeng Sun in MOA key laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1257–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hernandez-Cortazar, I.B.; Acosta-Viana, K.Y.; Guzman-Marin, E.; Ortega-Pacheco, A.; Segura-Correa, J.C.; Jimenez-Coello, M. Presence of Toxoplasma gondii in Drinking Water from an Endemic Region in Southern Mexico. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2017, 14, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arora, N.; Sadovsky, Y.; Dermody, T.S.; Coyne, C.B. Microbial Vertical Transmission during Human Pregnancy. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Torgerson, P.R.; Mastroiacovo, P. The global burden of congenital toxoplasmosis: A systematic review. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013, 91, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barakat, A.M.A.; Ahmed, S.O.; Zaki, M.S.; El Fadaly, H.A.; Abd El-Razik, K.A.; El-Hariri, H.M.; Johar, D. New approach to differentiate primary from latent Toxoplasma gondii abortion through immunoglobulin and DNA interpretation. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ramakrishnan, C.; Maier, S.; Walker, R.A.; Rehrauer, H.; Joekel, D.E.; Winiger, R.R.; Basso, W.U.; Grigg, M.E.; Hehl, A.B.; Deplazes, P.; et al. An experimental genetically attenuated live vaccine to prevent transmission of Toxoplasma gondii by cats. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guo, J.; Sun, X.; Yin, H.; Wang, T.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, H.; He, S.; Cong, H. Chitosan Microsphere Used as an Effective System to Deliver a Linked Antigenic Peptides Vaccine Protect Mice Against Acute and Chronic Toxoplasmosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, S.H.; Kang, H.J.; Lee, D.H.; Kang, S.M.; Quan, F.S. Virus-like particle vaccines expressing Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry protein 18 and microneme protein 8 provide enhanced protection. Vaccine 2018, 36, 5692–5700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bastos, L.M.; Macedo, A.G., Jr.; Silva, M.V.; Santiago, F.M.; Ramos, E.L.; Santos, F.A.; Pirovani, C.P.; Goulart, L.R.; Mineo, T.W.; Mineo, J.R. Toxoplasma gondii-Derived Synthetic Peptides Containing B- and T-Cell Epitopes from GRA2 Protein Are Able to Enhance Mice Survival in a Model of Experimental Toxoplasmosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Nie, H.; Fang, R.; Xiong, B.Q.; Wang, L.X.; Hu, M.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhao, J.L. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two recombinant pseudorabies viruses expressing Toxoplasma gondii SAG1 and MIC3 proteins. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 181, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buxton, D.; Innes, E.A. A commercial vaccine for ovine toxoplasmosis. Parasitology 1995, 110 (Suppl. 1), S11–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. AMCSF. Risk Profile in Relation to Toxoplasma in the Food Chain. 2012. Available online: http://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdfs/committee/acmsfrtaxopasm.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  13. Foroutan, M.; Zaki, L.; Ghaffarifar, F. Recent progress in microneme-based vaccines development against Toxoplasma gondii. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2018, 7, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Agallou, M.; Athanasiou, E.; Koutsoni, O.; Dotsika, E.; Karagouni, E. Experimental Validation of Multi-Epitope Peptides Including Promising MHC Class I- and II-Restricted Epitopes of Four Known Leishmania infantum Proteins. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hajissa, K.; Zakaria, R.; Suppian, R.; Mohamed, Z. Epitope-based vaccine as a universal vaccination strategy against Toxoplasma gondii infection: A mini-review. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2019, 6, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, M.M.; Yuan, Z.G.; Peng, G.H.; Zhou, D.H.; He, X.H.; Yan, C.; Yin, C.C.; He, Y.; Lin, R.Q.; Song, H.Q.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 8 (MIC8) is a potential vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 106, 1079–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zheng, B.; Lu, S.; Tong, Q.; Kong, Q.; Lou, D. The virulence-related rhoptry protein 5 (ROP5) of Toxoplasma Gondii is a novel vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis in mice. Vaccine 2013, 31, 4578–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zheng, B.; Lou, D.; Ding, J.; Zhuo, X.; Ding, H.; Kong, Q.; Lu, S. GRA24-Based DNA Vaccine Prolongs Survival in Mice Challenged With a Virulent Toxoplasma gondii Strain. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Pagheh, A.S.; Sarvi, S.; Sharif, M.; Rezaei, F.; Ahmadpour, E.; Dodangeh, S.; Omidian, Z.; Hassannia, H.; Mehrzadi, S.; Daryani, A. Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen 1 (SAG1) as a potential candidate to develop vaccine against toxoplasmosis: A systematic review. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 69, 101414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, N.Z.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; Petersen, E.; Zhu, X.Q. Recent advances in developing vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii: An update. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 1609–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Montazeri, M.; Sharif, M.; Sarvi, S.; Mehrzadi, S.; Ahmadpour, E.; Daryani, A. A Systematic Review of In vitro and In vivo Activities of Anti-Toxoplasma Drugs and Compounds (2006-2016). Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fregno, I.; Molinari, M. Proteasomal and lysosomal clearance of faulty secretory proteins: ER-associated degradation (ERAD) and ER-to-lysosome-associated degradation (ERLAD) pathways. Crit Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 54, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin proteolytic system: From a vague idea, through basic mechanisms, and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Neurology 2006, 66, S7–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Saeki, Y.; Tanaka, K. Assembly and function of the proteasome. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 832, 315–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pagano, M. Cell cycle regulation by the ubiquitin pathway. FASEB J. 1997, 11, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pahl, H.L.; Baeuerle, P.A. Control of gene expression by proteolysis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1996, 8, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Piccinini, M.; Mostert, M.; Rinaudo, M.T. Proteasomes as drug targets. Curr. Drug Targets 2003, 4, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Munoz, C.; San Francisco, J.; Gutierrez, B.; Gonzalez, J. Role of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Systems in the Biology and Virulence of Protozoan Parasites. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 141526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Paugam, A.; Bulteau, A.L.; Dupouy-Camet, J.; Creuzet, C.; Friguet, B. Characterization and role of protozoan parasite proteasomes. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ward, W.; Alvarado, L.; Rawlings, N.D.; Engel, J.C.; Franklin, C.; McKerrow, J.H. A primitive enzyme for a primitive cell: The protease required for excystation of Giardia. Cell 1997, 89, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Makioka, A.; Kumagai, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Takeuchi, T. Entamoeba invadens: Cysteine protease inhibitors block excystation and metacystic development. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 109, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paugam, A.; Creuzet, C.; Dupouy-Camet, J.; Roisin, M.P. Evidence for the existence of a proteasome in Toxoplasma gondii: Intracellular localization and specific peptidase activities. Parasite 2001, 8, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Shaw, M.K.; He, C.Y.; Roos, D.S.; Tilney, L.G. Proteasome inhibitors block intracellular growth and replication of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 2000, 121 Pt 1, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Paugam, A.; Creuzet, C.; Dupouy-Camet, J.; Roisin, P. In vitro effects of gliotoxin, a natural proteasome inhibitor, on the infectivity and proteolytic activity of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol. Res. 2002, 88, 785–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Singh, M.; O’Hagan, D.T. Recent advances in veterinary vaccine adjuvants. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Freund, J.; Casals, J.; Hosmer, E.P. Sensitization and Antibody Formation after Injection of Tubercle Bacilli and Paraffin Oil. Exp. Biol. Med. 1937, 37, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stuart-Harris, C.H. Adjuvant influenza vaccines. Bull. World Health Organ. 1969, 41, 617–621. [Google Scholar]
  38. Freund, J.; Thomson, K.J. A simple, rapid technic of preparing water-in-oil emulsions of penicillin, drugs and biologics. Science 1945, 101, 468–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. van der Lubben, I.M.; Verhoef, J.C.; van Aelst, A.C.; Borchard, G.; Junginger, H.E. Chitosan microparticles for oral vaccination: Preparation, characterization and preliminary in vivo uptake studies in murine Peyer’s patches. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, W.; Meng, Q.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhou, M.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, K. Chitosan Derivatives and Their Application in Biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Illum, L. Chitosan and its use as a pharmaceutical excipient. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15, 1326–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wedmore, I.; McManus, J.G.; Pusateri, A.E.; Holcomb, J.B. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: Experience in current combat operations. J. Trauma 2006, 60, 655–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cheraghipour, K.; Masoori, L.; Ezzatkhah, F.; Salimikia, I.; Amiri, S.; Makenali, A.S.; Taherpour, F.; Mahmoudvand, H. Effect of chitosan on Toxoplasma gondii infection: A systematic review. Parasite Epidemiol. Control. 2020, 11, e00189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, J.J.; Zeng, Z.W.; Xiao, R.Z.; Xie, T.A.; Zhou, G.L.; Zhan, X.R.; Wang, S.L. Recent advances of chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hagras, N.A.; Allam, A.F.; Farag, H.F.; Osman, M.M.; Shalaby, T.I.; Fawzy Hussein Mogahed, N.M.; Tolba, M.M.; Shehab, A.Y. Successful treatment of acute experimental toxoplasmosis by spiramycin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 204, 107717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. El Temsahy, M.M.; El Kerdany, E.D.; Eissa, M.M.; Shalaby, T.I.; Talaat, I.M.; Mogahed, N.M. The effect of chitosan nanospheres on the immunogenicity of Toxoplasma lysate vaccine in mice. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 611–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yu, Z.Q.; Zhou, T.Y.; Luo, Y.X.; Dong, L.; Li, C.J.; Liu, J.L.; Luo, J.X.; Yan, R.F.; Xu, L.X.; Song, X.K.; et al. Modulation Effects of Toxoplasma gondii Histone H2A1 on Murine Macrophages and Encapsulation with Polymer as a Vaccine Candidate. Vaccines 2020, 8, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bivas-Benita, M.; Laloup, M.; Versteyhe, S.; Dewit, J.; De Braekeleer, J.; Jongert, E.; Borchard, G. Generation of Toxoplasma gondii GRA1 protein and DNA vaccine loaded chitosan particles: Preparation, characterization, and preliminary in vivo studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 266, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Islam, N.; Ferro, V. Recent advances in chitosan-based nanoparticulate pulmonary drug delivery. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 14341–14358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, S.; Zhao, G.; Wang, W.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, C.; Hassan, I.A.; Liu, X.; Xu, L.; Yan, R.; et al. Pathogenicity of two Toxoplasma gondii strains in chickens of different ages infected via intraperitoneal injection. Avian Pathol. 2014, 43, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Khan, A.; Grigg, M.E. Toxoplasma gondii: Laboratory Maintenance and Growth. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2017, 44, 20C-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hassan, I.A.; Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Yan, R.; Song, X.; Li, X. Immunoglobulin and cytokine changes induced following immunization with a DNA vaccine encoding Toxoplasma gondii selenium-dependent glutathione reductase protein. Exp. Parasitol. 2014, 146, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fan, W.; Yan, W.; Xu, Z.; Ni, H. Formation mechanism of monodisperse, low molecular weight chitosan nanoparticles by ionic gelation technique. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 90, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Skop, N.B.; Calderon, F.; Levison, S.W.; Gandhi, C.D.; Cho, C.H. Heparin crosslinked chitosan microspheres for the delivery of neural stem cells and growth factors for central nervous system repair. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 6834–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, J.L.; Elsheikha, H.M.; Zhu, W.N.; Chen, K.; Li, T.T.; Yue, D.M.; Zhang, X.X.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhu, X.Q. Immunization with Toxoplasma gondii GRA17 Deletion Mutant Induces Partial Protection and Survival in Challenged Mice. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Tang, X.M.; Yin, G.W.; Qin, M.; Tao, G.R.; Suo, J.X.; Liu, X.Y.; Suo, X. Transgenic Eimeria tenella as a vaccine vehicle: Expressing TgSAG1 elicits protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens and mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sasai, K.; Aita, M.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Miyamoto, T.; Fukata, T.; Baba, E. Dynamics of lymphocyte subpopulation changes in the cecal tonsils of chickens infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Vet. Microbiol. 2000, 74, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Homan, W.L.; Vercammen, M.; De Braekeleer, J.; Verschueren, H. Identification of a 200-to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Skwarczynski, M.; Toth, I. Peptide-based synthetic vaccines. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 842–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Pohlmann, A.R.; Fonseca, F.N.; Paese, K.; Detoni, C.B.; Coradini, K.; Beck, R.C.; Guterres, S.S. Poly(-caprolactone) microcapsules and nanocapsules in drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013, 10, 623–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chuang, S.C.; Ko, J.C.; Chen, C.P.; Du, J.T.; Yang, C.D. Induction of long-lasting protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii in BALB/c mice by recombinant surface antigen 1 protein encapsulated in poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Xu, Y.; Zhang, N.Z.; Wang, M.; Dong, H.; Feng, S.Y.; Guo, H.C.; Zhu, X.Q. A long-lasting protective immunity against chronic toxoplasmosis in mice induced by recombinant rhoptry proteins encapsulated in poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 4195–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, A.R.; Quan, F.S. Virus-Like Nanoparticle Vaccine Confers Protection against Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ducournau, C.; Moire, N.; Carpentier, R.; Cantin, P.; Herkt, C.; Lantier, I.; Betbeder, D.; Dimier-Poisson, I. Effective Nanoparticle-Based Nasal Vaccine Against Latent and Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Sheep. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zaharoff, D.A.; Rogers, C.J.; Hance, K.W.; Schlom, J.; Greiner, J.W. Chitosan solution enhances both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to subcutaneous vaccination. Vaccine 2007, 25, 2085–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sinani, G.; Sessevmez, M.; Gok, M.K.; Ozgumus, S.; Alpar, H.O.; Cevher, E. Modified chitosan-based nanoadjuvants enhance immunogenicity of protein antigens after mucosal vaccination. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 569, 118592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lin, Y.C.; Lou, P.J.; Young, T.H. Chitosan as an adjuvant-like substrate for dendritic cell culture to enhance antitumor effects. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 8867–8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jiang, L.Q.; Wang, T.Y.; Webster, T.J.; Duan, H.J.; Qiu, J.Y.; Zhao, Z.M.; Yin, X.X.; Zheng, C.L. Intracellular disposition of chitosan nanoparticles in macrophages: Intracellular uptake, exocytosis, and intercellular transport. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 6383–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wang, F.Z.; Zhang, M.W.; Zhang, D.S.; Huang, Y.; Chen, L.; Jiang, S.M.; Shi, K.; Li, R. Preparation, optimization, and characterization of chitosan-coated solid lipid nanoparticles for ocular drug delivery. J. Biomed. Res. 2018, 32, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. He, P.; Davis, S.S.; Illum, L. Chitosan microspheres prepared by spray drying. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 187, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. López, R.G.; Pineda, M.G.; Hurtado, G.; León, R.D.; Fernández, S.; Saade, H.; Bueno, D. Chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles prepared in one step by reverse microemulsion precipitation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19636–19650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Bachmann, M.F.; Jennings, G.T. Vaccine delivery: A matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Koppolu, B.P.; Smith, S.G.; Ravindranathan, S.; Jayanthi, S.; Suresh Kumar, T.K.; Zaharoff, D.A. Controlling chitosan-based encapsulation for protein and vaccine delivery. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4382–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Correa, D.; Canedo-Solares, I.; Ortiz-Alegria, L.B.; Caballero-Ortega, H.; Rico-Torres, C.P. Congenital and acquired toxoplasmosis: Diversity and role of antibodies in different compartments of the host. Parasite Immunol. 2007, 29, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Sayles, P.C.; Gibson, G.W.; Johnson, L.L. B cells are essential for vaccination-induced resistance to virulent Toxoplasma gondii. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Naeem, H.; Sana, M.; Islam, S.; Khan, M.; Riaz, F.; Zafar, Z.; Akbar, H.; Shehzad, W.; Rashid, I. Induction of Th1 type-oriented humoral response through intranasal immunization of mice with SAG1-Toxoplasma gondii polymeric nanospheres. Artif. Cell Nanomed. B 2018, 46, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Hou, B.; Benson, A.; Kuzmich, L.; DeFranco, A.L.; Yarovinsky, F. Critical coordination of innate immune defense against Toxoplasma gondii by dendritic cells responding via their Toll-like receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Pifer, R.; Yarovinsky, F. Innate responses to Toxoplasma gondii in mice and humans. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Wagner, A.; Schabussova, I.; Ruttkowski, B.; Peschke, R.; Kur, J.; Kundi, M.; Joachim, A.; Wiedermann, U. Prime-boost vaccination with toxoplasma lysate antigen, but not with a mixture of recombinant protein antigens, leads to reduction of brain cyst formation in BALB/c mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Ching, X.T.; Fong, M.Y.; Lau, Y.L. Evaluation of Immunoprotection Conferred by the Subunit Vaccines of GRA2 and GRA5 against Acute Toxoplasmosis in BALB/c Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bessieres, M.H.; Swierczynski, B.; Cassaing, S.; Miedouge, M.; Olle, P.; Seguela, J.P.; Pipy, B. Role of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL4 and IL10 in the regulation of experimental Toxoplasma gondii infection. J. Eukaryot Microbiol. 1997, 44, 87s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pinzan, C.F.; Sardinha-Silva, A.; Almeida, F.; Lai, L.; Lopes, C.D.; Lourenco, E.V.; Panunto-Castelo, A.; Matthews, S.; Roque-Barreira, M.C. Vaccination with Recombinant Microneme Proteins Confers Protection against Experimental Toxoplasmosis in Mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Korn, T.; Bettelli, E.; Oukka, M.; Kuchroo, V.K. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 485–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mesquita Júnior, D.; Araújo, J.A.; Catelan, T.T.; Souza, A.W.; Cruvinel Wde, M.; Andrade, L.E.; Silva, N.P. Immune system—Part II: Basis of the immunological response mediated by T and B lymphocytes. Rev. Bras. Reumatol. 2010, 50, 552–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kelly, M.N.; Kolls, J.K.; Happel, K.; Schwartzman, J.D.; Schwarzenberger, P.; Combe, C.; Moretto, M.; Khan, I.A. Interleukin-17/interleukin-17 receptor-mediated signaling is important for generation of an optimal polymorphonuclear response against Toxoplasma gondii infection. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Gazzinelli, R.; Xu, Y.; Hieny, S.; Cheever, A.; Sher, A. Simultaneous depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes is required to reactivate chronic infection with Toxoplasma gondii. J. Immunol. 1992, 149, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Zheng, B.; Ding, J.; Chen, X.; Yu, H.; Lou, D.; Tong, Q.; Kong, Q.; Lu, S. Immuno-Efficacy of a T. gondii Secreted Protein with an Altered Thrombospondin Repeat (TgSPATR) As a Novel DNA Vaccine Candidate against Acute Toxoplasmosis in BALB/c Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, T.; Yin, H.; Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Sun, X.; Cong, H. Vaccination with recombinant adenovirus expressing multi-stage antigens of Toxoplasma gondii by the mucosal route induces higher systemic cellular and local mucosal immune responses than with other vaccination routes. Parasite 2017, 24, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Courret, N.; Darche, S.; Sonigo, P.; Milon, G.; Buzoni-Gatel, D.; Tardieux, I. CD11c- and CD11b-expressing mouse leukocytes transport single Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites to the brain. Blood 2006, 107, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Wohlfert, E.A.; Blader, I.J.; Wilson, E.H. Brains and Brawn: Toxoplasma Infections of the Central Nervous System and Skeletal Muscle. Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Alves, B.F.; Oliveira, S.; Soares, H.S.; Pena, H.F.J.; Conte-Junior, C.A.; Gennari, S.M. Isolation of viable Toxoplasma gondii from organs and Brazilian commercial meat cuts of experimentally infected pigs. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dubey, J.R.; Bhaiyat, M.I.; de Allie, C.; Macpherson, C.N.; Sharma, R.N.; Sreekumar, C.; Vianna, M.C.; Shen, S.K.; Kwok, O.C.; Miska, K.B.; et al. Isolation, tissue distribution, and molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from chickens in Grenada, West Indies. J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) SDS-PAGE gel of purified recombinant TgPSA1 (Line 1). Line M: molecular weight (MW) marker proteins. (b) Western blot analysis of recombinant TgPSA1. rTgPSA1 detected by serum from T. gondii-infected rats (Line 1) and healthy rats (Line 2). Line M: MW marker proteins. (c) Western blot analysis of native TgPSA1. Total soluble protein of T. gondii tachyzoites detected by sera from rTgPSA1-immunized rats (Line 1) and healthy rats (Line 2). Line M: MW marker proteins.
Figure 1. (a) SDS-PAGE gel of purified recombinant TgPSA1 (Line 1). Line M: molecular weight (MW) marker proteins. (b) Western blot analysis of recombinant TgPSA1. rTgPSA1 detected by serum from T. gondii-infected rats (Line 1) and healthy rats (Line 2). Line M: MW marker proteins. (c) Western blot analysis of native TgPSA1. Total soluble protein of T. gondii tachyzoites detected by sera from rTgPSA1-immunized rats (Line 1) and healthy rats (Line 2). Line M: MW marker proteins.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of CS nanospheres loaded with rTgPSA1 protein, showing nanosphere morphology, with bar representing (a) 1000 nm and (b) 500 nm.
Figure 2. SEM images of CS nanospheres loaded with rTgPSA1 protein, showing nanosphere morphology, with bar representing (a) 1000 nm and (b) 500 nm.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g002
Figure 3. Release profile of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion in vitro over a 16-day period. Amount of recombinant protein in supernatant was determined by BCA assay. Each sample was tested once. Values represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3. Release profile of rTgPSA1/CS nanospheres and rTgPSA1/IFA emulsion in vitro over a 16-day period. Amount of recombinant protein in supernatant was determined by BCA assay. Each sample was tested once. Values represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g003
Figure 4. Antibody determination of (a) total IgG and isotypes (b) IgG1 and (c) IgG2 in sera from immunized mice at weeks zero, two, and four. Each sample was conducted once. Values were estimated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test and shown as mean of OD450 ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 4. Antibody determination of (a) total IgG and isotypes (b) IgG1 and (c) IgG2 in sera from immunized mice at weeks zero, two, and four. Each sample was conducted once. Values were estimated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test and shown as mean of OD450 ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g004
Figure 5. Cytokine secretions in mice. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to determine levels of (a) IFN-γ, (b) IL-4, (c) IL-10, and (d) IL-17 in mouse serum after the second immunization (week four). Each sample was conducted once. Results were estimated using one-way ANOVA tracked by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 5. Cytokine secretions in mice. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to determine levels of (a) IFN-γ, (b) IL-4, (c) IL-10, and (d) IL-17 in mouse serum after the second immunization (week four). Each sample was conducted once. Results were estimated using one-way ANOVA tracked by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g005
Figure 6. Mouse survival rates subsequently challenged by infection with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain). Results were examined by Kaplan–Meier test and survival curves were tested by log-rank model (n = 5).
Figure 6. Mouse survival rates subsequently challenged by infection with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain). Results were examined by Kaplan–Meier test and survival curves were tested by log-rank model (n = 5).
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g006
Figure 7. Mouse survival times with different administration routes. Two weeks after the last immunization, mice were challenged with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain) and survival time was recorded daily. Results were processed by Kaplan–Meier test and shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 7. Mouse survival times with different administration routes. Two weeks after the last immunization, mice were challenged with 200 newly prepared tachyzoites (T. gondii RH strain) and survival time was recorded daily. Results were processed by Kaplan–Meier test and shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g007
Figure 8. Total IgY antibody calculation in sera of chickens immunized at two, four, and six weeks of age. Each sample was conducted once. Values were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and are shown as means of OD450 ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 8. Total IgY antibody calculation in sera of chickens immunized at two, four, and six weeks of age. Each sample was conducted once. Values were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and are shown as means of OD450 ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g008
Figure 9. Cytokine secretions of chickens. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to determine levels of (a) IFN-γ, (b) IL-4, (c) IL-10, and (d) IL-17 in sera two weeks after second immunization (six weeks old). Each sample was conducted once. Results were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 9. Cytokine secretions of chickens. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to determine levels of (a) IFN-γ, (b) IL-4, (c) IL-10, and (d) IL-17 in sera two weeks after second immunization (six weeks old). Each sample was conducted once. Results were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g009
Figure 10. Flow cytometry analysis of (a) CD4+ and (b) CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen lymphocytes at two, four, and six weeks of age. Five chickens in each group were sacrificed and spleen lymphocytes were collected. Each sample was conducted once. Results were estimated by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 10. Flow cytometry analysis of (a) CD4+ and (b) CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen lymphocytes at two, four, and six weeks of age. Five chickens in each group were sacrificed and spleen lymphocytes were collected. Each sample was conducted once. Results were estimated by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g010
Figure 11. Coefficient of growth in chickens. Ten chickens were weighed at different sampling times. Results were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 10). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 11. Coefficient of growth in chickens. Ten chickens were weighed at different sampling times. Results were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 10). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g011
Figure 12. Copy numbers of 529 bp fragments in cardiac muscles from chickens. Chickens were intraperitoneally injected with 107 tachyzoites of highly virulent T. gondii RH strain at six weeks of age (two weeks after last immunization). After another two weeks (eight weeks old), five chickens in each group were sacrificed and cardiac muscle from the tip of the heart was harvested. Each sample was run in triplicate, and the average value of each chicken was calculated. Results were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Figure 12. Copy numbers of 529 bp fragments in cardiac muscles from chickens. Chickens were intraperitoneally injected with 107 tachyzoites of highly virulent T. gondii RH strain at six weeks of age (two weeks after last immunization). After another two weeks (eight weeks old), five chickens in each group were sacrificed and cardiac muscle from the tip of the heart was harvested. Each sample was run in triplicate, and the average value of each chicken was calculated. Results were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, and values are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values between rTgPSA1/IFA and rTgPSA1/CS groups were compared with the independent t-test. *** p < 0.001 compared with blank or control group.
Pharmaceutics 13 00752 g012
Table 1. Immunization formulations in different mouse groups.
Table 1. Immunization formulations in different mouse groups.
GroupTreatment (Each Mouse)Time for ImmunizationTime for InfectionInfection Dose (Each Mouse)
BlankEqual volume of PBSWeek 0 and 2Week 4200 tachyzoites
Control100 μg pET32a vector protein
rTgPSA1100 μg rTgPSA1
rTgPSA1/IFArTgPSA1/IFA emulsion containing 100 μg rTgPSA1
rTgPSA1/CSrTgPSA1/CS nanospheres containing 100 μg rTgPSA1
BlankEqual volume of PBS
Table 2. Immunization formulations in different chicken groups.
Table 2. Immunization formulations in different chicken groups.
GroupTreatment (Each Chicken)Time for ImmunizationTime for InfectionInfection Dose (Each Chicken)
Blank (PBS)Equal volume of PBSAt 2 and 4 weeks oldAt 6 weeks oldEqual volume of PBS (0 tachyzoite)
Blank (T. gondii)Equal volume of PBS1 × 107 tachyzoites
Control200 μg pET32a vector protein
rTgPSA1200 μg rTgPSA1
rTgPSA1/IFArTgPSA1/IFA emulsion containing 200 μg rTgPSA1
rTgPSA1/CSrTgPSA1/CS nanospheres containing 200 μg rTgPSA1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Z.; Ding, W.; Aleem, M.T.; Su, J.; Liu, J.; Luo, J.; Yan, R.; Xu, L.; Song, X.; Li, X. Toxoplasma gondii Proteasome Subunit Alpha Type 1 with Chitosan: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Adjuvant. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050752

AMA Style

Yu Z, Ding W, Aleem MT, Su J, Liu J, Luo J, Yan R, Xu L, Song X, Li X. Toxoplasma gondii Proteasome Subunit Alpha Type 1 with Chitosan: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Adjuvant. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(5):752. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Zhengqing, Wenxi Ding, Muhammad Tahir Aleem, Junzhi Su, Junlong Liu, Jianxun Luo, Ruofeng Yan, Lixin Xu, Xiaokai Song, and Xiangrui Li. 2021. "Toxoplasma gondii Proteasome Subunit Alpha Type 1 with Chitosan: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Adjuvant" Pharmaceutics 13, no. 5: 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050752

APA Style

Yu, Z., Ding, W., Aleem, M. T., Su, J., Liu, J., Luo, J., Yan, R., Xu, L., Song, X., & Li, X. (2021). Toxoplasma gondii Proteasome Subunit Alpha Type 1 with Chitosan: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Adjuvant. Pharmaceutics, 13(5), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop