Next Article in Journal
Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Bibliometric and Patent Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Testing S. sonnei GMMA with and without Aluminium Salt-Based Adjuvants in Animal Models
Previous Article in Journal
DNA Damage by Radiopharmaceuticals and Mechanisms of Cellular Repair
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulmonary Application of Novel Antigen-Loaded Chitosan Nano-Particles Co-Administered with the Mucosal Adjuvant C-Di-AMP Resulted in Enhanced Immune Stimulation and Dose Sparing Capacity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhancing Immunogenicity of a Thermostable, Efficacious SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Formulation through Oligomerization and Adjuvant Choice

Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(12), 2759; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15122759
by Mohammad Suhail Khan 1,†, Virginie Jakob 2,†, Randhir Singh 3,†, Raju S. Rajmani 1, Sahil Kumar 4, Céline Lemoine 2, Harry Kleanthous 5,‡, Rajesh P. Ringe 4, Patrice M. Dubois 2,* and Raghavan Varadarajan 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(12), 2759; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15122759
Submission received: 25 October 2023 / Revised: 30 November 2023 / Accepted: 3 December 2023 / Published: 12 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Adjuvant Technologies for Next-Generation Vaccines)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors elegantly and carefully examined the influences of oligomerization, adjuvant effects, and temperature stresses of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 upon both retained antigenicity and immunogenicity. This work is of prime interest for general vaccine formulations as it will allow maximizing storage conditions, stability and retained immunogenicity of protein-based vaccines.

The work explored various adjuvants and identified liposomal encapsulation (L) in the presence of a TLR4 ligand (M) together with squalene 21 (Q), overall illustrated as a trimeric RBD-LMQ as the ideal formulation for the intended long storage at elevated temperature. The conclusions are adequately defined and firmly supported. This work will be of great value for the community.

This manuscript is highly recommended with only minor revisions as follows"

The abbreviations used throughout are not easy to follow and should be avoided in the abstract to ease overall comprehension and appreciation. Volumes (ml vs mL) are not consistent throughout, particularly in the early section and should be homogenized. Also, R_M and R_T does not seem to be consistent with the RBD_M and RBD_T. The authors should avoid potential confusion in this regard.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The proposed costimulatory activity of the QS-21 imine binding was through CD2 not the T cell receptor which is generally taken to mean the antigen binding receptor. It would help the reader to be more explanatory.

 

Give the vaccination site more precisely-thigh?

 

Describe the mouse corona virus challenge procedure in methods.

 

What are midpoint titers and why weren't endpoint titers used ?

 

Many readers will need to know that IgG2c is the C57 equivalent of IgG2a and accordingly a Th1 marker.

 

The Th2 cytokine response produced by Immunisation with alum salt was low while the IgG1 antibody response was, as expected, high. This would suggest the ability to detect these cytokines was low or the culture system wasn't optimised for these responses. Comment on this with respect to the poor Th2 cytokine responses reported for the other adjuvants. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop