Next Article in Journal
The Efficacy of Zinc Phthalocyanine Nanoconjugate on Melanoma Cells Grown as Three-Dimensional Multicellular Tumour Spheroids
Previous Article in Journal
Biomimetic Electrospun Self-Assembling Peptide Scaffolds for Neural Stem Cell Transplantation in Neural Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Innovations and Nano-Delivery of Actinium-225: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(9), 2262; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092262
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 30 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy)
Nuclear medicine has emerged as a pivotal player in cancer patient care, revolutionizing the way cancer is detected, diagnosed, monitored, and treated. The specific decay characteristics of the radionuclide determine if the radiopharmaceutical can be used for diagnostic (positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon-emission-computed tomography (SPECT)) or therapeutic (targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT)) purposes. Expression of the molecular target is confirmed during the diagnostic phase, predicting the response to the treatment administered during the therapeutic phase and, afterwards, the effect can be followed-up in downstream diagnostic scans. This concept is called theranostics, see what you treat and treat what you see, and is an excellent example of personalized medicine. As big pharma has stepped into the arena of radiopharmaceuticals for TRT and contributed to the initial success and large investments in this area, a spectacular growth in these radiopharmaceuticals is expected in the near future.
The Special Issue “Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy” delves into the rapidly evolving landscape of this research field, highlighting the progress made in identifying novel molecular targets, vector molecule design, and radiochemistry using established and upcoming radionuclides and dosimetry to achieve a more specific imaging of cancer targets and improve therapeutic efficacy. In this Special Issue, 137 authors have contributed, with thirteen original research articles and four reviews, providing important insights into the field.
One of the focal points of this Special Issue is the exploration of TRT using high-molar-activity samarium-153, produced by combining the neutron activation of samarium-152 and mass separation of the resulting samarium-153 from carrier samarium-152. Vermeulen et al. from the Belgian Nuclear research center have successfully labeled DOTATATE with 153Sm, resulting in [153Sm]Sm-DOTATATE, and successfully evaluated the compound to target somatostatin receptors overexpressed in neuroendocrine tumors [1]. This proof-of-concept study shows the potential of mass-separated samarium-153 and could open doors towards the wider application of mass separation in medical isotope production.
Fonge et al., from the university of Saskatchewan, have successfully developed and evaluated [89Zr]Zr-matuzumab as a PET probe for the diagnosis/monitoring of response to the treatment of a noncompeting anti-EGFR nimotuzumab antibody drug conjugate (ADC) using mouse colorectal cancer (CRC) xenografts [2]. MicroPET/CT imaging and the biodistribution of [89Zr]Zr-matuzumab in mice bearing EGFR-positive xenografts showed a high uptake that could be blocked with the pre-dosing of matuzumab but not with the noncompeting binder nimotuzumab. The simultaneous use of these non-competing antibodies represents a novel approach that holds promise for improving the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR-positive CRC in clinical settings.
Antibodies are interesting vector molecules for the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals, but they have a long blood circulation time and delayed tumor uptake, often limiting their diagnostic applications. Smaller antibody fragments or affibody constructs are excellent platforms for diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals in combination with short-lived PET radionuclides, allowing for good contrast imaging sooner after injection. Dewulf et al., from the university of Antwerp, reported a novel RANKL PET imaging agent, [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-denos-Fab, that allows for fast tumor imaging with improved imaging contrast when compared with its antibody counterpart, showing promise as a potential PET RANKL imaging tool for future clinical applications [3]. Researchers from the university of Uppsala further illustrated the potential of radiolabeled affibody molecules for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with promising results [4,5,6].
Peptide analogs have also shown great promise as vectors for targeted cancer therapy. The research article by Hörmann et al. investigates the impact of N-terminal peptide modifications on the in vitro and in vivo properties of 177Lu-labeled minigastrin analogs targeting CCK2R [7]. This research highlights the importance of molecular design in enhancing the tumor-targeting abilities of peptide analogs, thereby improving the therapeutic potential of radiopeptide-based cancer therapy.
Finally, accurate dosimetry can become a crucial aspect of targeted radionuclide therapy to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing potential side effects. The article “A Review on Tumor Control Probability and Preclinical Dosimetry in TRT” offers a comprehensive review of tumor control probability and preclinical dosimetry techniques, together with their limitations and applications [8]. The conclusion was that additional comprehensive studies at the sub-cellular, cellular, and organ level are essential to experimentally confirm the theoretical basis of TCP models for TRT and to gain further insights into the TRT-specific quantities of these models.
The guest editors of this Special Issue extend their heartfelt gratitude and sincerely appreciate all the authors and reviewers who responded to our invitation. Your willingness to share the outcomes of your outstanding research has greatly enriched this collection, and your contributions have been invaluable in the meticulous evaluation of the manuscripts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vermeulen, K.; Van de Voorde, M.; Segers, C.; Coolkens, A.; Rodriguez Pérez, S.; Daems, N.; Duchemin, C.; Crabbé, M.; Opsomer, T.; Saldarriaga Vargas, C.; et al. Exploring the Potential of High-Molar-Activity Samarium-153 for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy with [153Sm]Sm-DOTA-TATE. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tikum, A.F.; Nambisan, A.K.; Ketchemen, J.P.; Babeker, H.; Khan, M.N.; Torlakovic, E.E.; Fonge, H. Simultaneous Imaging and Therapy Using Epitope-Specific Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibody Conjugates. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dewulf, J.; Hrynchak, I.; Geudens, S.; Pintelon, I.; Vangestel, C.; Sereno, J.; van Dam, P.A.; Abrunhosa, A.J.; Elvas, F.; Van den Wyngaert, T. Improved Characteristics of RANKL Immuno-PET Imaging Using Radiolabeled Antibody Fab Fragments. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Oroujeni, M.; Bezverkhniaia, E.A.; Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Plotnikov, E.V.; Karlberg, I.; Ryer, E.; Orlova, A.; Tolmachev, V.; Frejd, F.Y. Evaluation of an Affibody-Based Binder for Imaging of Immune Check-Point Molecule B7-H3. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y.; Yu, S.; Xu, T.; Bodenko, V.; Orlova, A.; Oroujeni, M.; Rinne, S.S.; Tolmachev, V.; Vorobyeva, A.; Gräslund, T. Preclinical Evaluation of a New Format of 68Ga- and 111In-Labeled Affibody Molecule ZIGF-1R:4551 for the Visualization of IGF-1R Expression in Malignant Tumors Using PET and SPECT. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, Y.; Vorobyeva, A.; Orlova, A.; Konijnenberg, M.W.; Xu, T.; Bragina, O.; Loftenius, A.; Rosander, E.; Frejd, F.Y.; Tolmachev, V. Experimental Therapy of HER2-Expressing Xenografts Using the Second-Generation HER2-Targeting Affibody Molecule 188Re-ZHER2:41071. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hörmann, A.A.; Klingler, M.; Rangger, C.; Mair, C.; Joosten, L.; Franssen, G.M.; Laverman, P.; von Guggenberg, E. Effect of N-Terminal Peptide Modifications on In Vitro and In Vivo Properties of 177Lu-Labeled Peptide Analogs Targeting CCK2R. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Spoormans, K.; Crabbé, M.; Struelens, L.; De Saint-Hubert, M.; Koole, M. A Review on Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Preclinical Dosimetry in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy (TRT). Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bormans, G.; Cleeren, F. Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092262

AMA Style

Bormans G, Cleeren F. Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(9):2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bormans, Guy, and Frederik Cleeren. 2023. "Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy" Pharmaceutics 15, no. 9: 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092262

APA Style

Bormans, G., & Cleeren, F. (2023). Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Pharmaceutics, 15(9), 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15092262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop