Foot Problems and Their Associations with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals Using Day Services: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
2.2. Sampling and Participants
2.3. Study Instruments
2.4. Measurement
2.5. Equipment
2.5.1. Foot Look
2.5.2. Toe Grip Machine
2.5.3. Thermometer
2.6. Study Preparation
2.7. Study Setting
2.8. Ethics
2.9. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Prevalence of Foot Conditions in Older People
4.2. Foot Item Variables Correlate with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed
4.3. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Menz, H.B.; Lord, S.R. The contribution of foot problems to mobility impairment and falls in community-dwelling older people. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2001, 49, 1651–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muchna, A.; Najafi, B.; Wendel, C.S.; Schwenk, M.; Armstrong, D.G.; Mohler, J. Foot problems in older adults (associations with incident falls, frailty syndrome, and sensor-derived gait, balance, and physical activity measures). J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2018, 108, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Menz, H.B. Chronic foot pain in older people. Maturitas 2016, 91, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mitty, E. Nursing care of the aging foot. Geriatr. Nurs. 2009, 30, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, J.E.; Link, C.L.; Felson, D.T.; Crincoli, M.G.; Keysor, J.J.; McKinlay, J.B. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 159, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stolt, M.; Suhonen, R.; Puukka, P.; Viitanen, M.; Voutilainen, P.; Leino-Kilpi, H. Foot health and self-care activities of older people in home care. J. Clin. Nurs. 2012, 21, 3082–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, L.; Abbas, O. Common nail changes and disorders in older people: Diagnosis and management. Can. Fam. Physician 2011, 57, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Menz, H.B.; Morris, M.E.; Lord, S.R. Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: A prospective study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2006, 61, 866–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clegg, A.; Young, J.; Iliffe, S.; Rikkert, M.O.; Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013, 381, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kojima, G.; Iliffe, S.; Taniguchi, Y.; Shimada, H.; Rakugi, H.; Walters, K. Prevalence of frailty in Japan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, H.; Lee, E.; Jang, I.Y. Frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statement from the Japan Geriatics Society. The Japan Geratrics Society, 2014. Available online: https://www.jpn-geriat-soc.or.jp/info/topics/pdf/20140513_01_01.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2021).
- World Bank Group. Poplulation Ages 65 and above (% of Total Population). 2018. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?end=2018&start=1960&view=chart (accessed on 25 August 2019).
- Tokyo Fire Department. To Prevent Accidents in Daily Life of the Elderly. 2018. Available online: http://www.tfd.metro.tokyo.jp/hp-kouhouka/pdf/300912.pdf (accessed on 8 July 2020).
- Consumer Affairs Agency, Government of Japan. Life-Threatening Danger. 2019. Available online: http://www.caa.go.jp/notice/caution/life (accessed on 30 August 2020).
- Spink, M.J.; Menz, H.B.; Fotoohabadi, M.R.; Wee, E.; Landorf, K.B.; Hill, K.D.; Lord, S.R. Effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention to prevent falls in community dwelling older people with disabling foot pain: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2011, 342, d3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Watanabe, S.; Harada, T.; Hiruma, M.; Iozumi, K.; Katoh, T.; Mochizuki, T.; Naka, W.; Japan Foot Week Group. Epidemiological survey of foot diseases in Japan: Results of 30 000 foot checks by dermatologists. J. Dermatol. 2010, 37, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fujii, K.; Stolt, M.; Komoda, T.; Nishikawa, M. Effects of nurse and care worker-led foot-care program on older people’s foot conditions: Before and after intervention study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021, 7, 23779608211058492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koda, H.; Kai, Y.; Murata, S.; Osugi, H.; Anami, K.; Fukumoto, T.; Imagita, H. Relationship Between Muscle Strength Asymmetry and Body Sway in Older Adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2018, 26, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, K. Effect of foot care interventions for older adults using day care services. Nurs. Open. 2019, 6, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yamashita, K.; Umezawa, J.; Nomoto, Y.; Ino, S.; Ifukube, T.; Koyama, H.; Kawasumi, M. The role of toe-gap force for the evaluation of falling risk on the elderly. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; Magjarevic, R., Nagel, J.H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 405–408. [Google Scholar]
- Uritani, D.; Fukumoto, T.; Matsumoto, D. Intrarater and Interrater Reliabilities for a Toe Grip Dynamometer. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2012, 24, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uritani, D.; Fukumoto, T.; Matsumoto, D.; Shima, M. The relationship between toe grip strength and dynamic balance or functional mobility among community-dwelling Japanese older adults: A cross-sectional study. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2016, 24, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, K.; Umezawa, J.; Nomoto, Y.; Ino, S.; Ifukube, T.; Koyama, H.; Kawasum, M.; Saito, M. Evaluation of falling risk by toe-gap force on aged. Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng. 2002, 38, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsuyuguchi, R.; Kurose, S.; Seto, T.; Takao, N.; Fujii, A.; Tsutsumi, H.; Otsuki, S.; Kimura, Y. The effects of toe grip training on physical performance and cognitive function of nursing home residents. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2019, 38, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriacchi, T.P.; Ogle, J.A.; Galante, J.O. Walking speed as a basis for normal and abnormal gait measurements. J. Biomech. 1977, 10, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbee, C.E.; Buddhadev, H.H.; Chalmers, G.R.; Suprak, D.N. The effects of hallux valgus and walking speed on dynamic balance in older adults. Gait Posture 2020, 80, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bohannon, R.W.; Williams, A.A. Normal walking speed: A descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2011, 97, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jordan, K.; Challis, J.H.; Newell, K.M. Walking speed influences on gait cycle variability. Gait Posture 2007, 26, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeung, P.Y.; Chan, W.; Woo, J. A community-based Falls Management Exercise Programme (FaME) improves balance, walking speed and reduced fear of falling. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2015, 16, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Health and Welfare Bureau for the Elderly, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Long-Term Care Inusrance System of Japan. 2016. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2019).
- Fujii, K.; Komoda, T.; Maekawa, A.; Nishikawa, M. Foot care knowledge and practices among Japanese nurses and care workers in home care and adult service center: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2020, 19, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overview of Actual Statistics on Long-Term Care Benefits. 2018. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kaigo/kyufu/18/index.html (accessed on 20 September 2020).
- CheckMarket. Sample Size Calculator. 2021. Available online: https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/#sample-size-calculator (accessed on 20 August 2019).
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akagawa, S.; Johnson, P.C.D.; Schielzeth, H. The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. R. Soc. Interface 2017, 14, 20170213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Selya, A.S.; Rose, J.S.; Dierker, L.C.; Hedeker, D.; Mermelstein, R.J. A practical guide to calculating Cohen’sf 2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cohen, J.A. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Pinney, S.J.; Lin, S.S. Current c oncept review: Acquired adult flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2006, 27, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Japaneses Society for Surgery of the Foot. Terminology of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 3rd ed.; Japaneses Society for Surgery of the Foot: Tokyo, Japan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Madanat, A.; Sheshah, E.; Badawy, E.L.B.; Abbas, A.; Al-Bakheet, A. Utilizing the Ipswich Touch Test to simplify screening methods for identifying the risk of foot ulceration among diabetics: The Saudi experience. Prim. Care Diabetes 2015, 9, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, S.; Kerry, C.; Atkins, H.; Rayman, G. The Ipswich Touch Test: A simple and novel method to screen patients with diabetes at home for increased risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Med. 2014, 31, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Sullivan, S.B.; Schmitz, T.J. Physical Rehabilitation: Assessment and Treatment, 5th ed.; Davis Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Sriyani, K.A.; Wasalathanthri, S.; Hettiarachchi, P.; Prathapan, S. Predictors of diabetic foot and leg ulcers in a developing country with a rapid increase in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bristow, I.R.; Spruce, M.C. Fungal foot infection, cellulitis and diabetes: A review. Diabet. Med. 2009, 26, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fawcett, R.S.; Linford, S.; Stulberg, D.L. Nail abnormalities: Clues to systemic disease. Am. Fam. Physician 2004, 69, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kang, B.C.; Kim, Y.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Chang, M.J.; Choi, H.D.; Li, K.; Shin, W.G. Optimizing EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) for pharmacies. Skin. Res. Technol. 2014, 20, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serup, J. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: Clinical scoring systems. Skin. Res. Technol. 1995, 1, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.; Haneef, N.S. Nail changes and disorders among the elderly. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2005, 71, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quach, L.; Galica, A.M.; Jones, R.N.; Procter-Gray, E.; Manor, B.; Hannan, M.T.; Lipsitz, L.A. The nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls: The maintenance of balance, independent living, intellect, and zest in the elderly of Boston study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59, 1069–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coughlin, M.J.; Jones, C.P. Hallux valgus: Demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007, 28, 759–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, K. The prevalence and self-identification of foot conditions in older adults using home visiting nursing stations and their relations with walking ability. J. Educ. Health Sci. 2018, 64, 167–180. [Google Scholar]
- Soma, M.; Murata, S.; Kai, Y.; Nakae, H.; Satou, Y.; Murata, J.; Miyazaki, J. Examinations of factors influencing toe grip strength. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 3131–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tasaka, S.; Matsubara, K.; Nishiguchi, S.; Fukutani, N.; Tashiro, Y.; Shirooka, H.; Nozaki, Y.; Hirata, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Matsushita, T.; et al. Association between floating toe and toe grip strength in school age children: A cross-sectional study. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 2322–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Uritani, D.; Sakamoto, C.; Fukumoto, T. Effect of floating toes on knee and trunk acceleration during walking: A preliminary study. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2017, 29, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nix, S.; Smith, M.; Vicenzino, B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2010, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baumgartner, R.N.; Waters, D.L.; Gallagher, D.; Morley, J.E.; Garry, P.J. Predictors of skeletal muscle mass in elderly men and women. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1999, 107, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Sidani, S.; Cooper-Brathwaite, A.; Metcalfe, K. Feasibility, acceptability and effects of a foot self-care educational intervention on minor foot problems in adult patients with diabetes at low risk for foot ulceration: A pilot study. Can. J. Diabetes 2013, 37, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, J.B. “Capillary band width,” the “nail (band) sign”: A clinical marker of microvascular integrity, inflammation, cognition and age. A personal viewpoint and hypothesis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 283, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, C.; Quine, S. Nurses’ knowledge, assessment skills, experience, and confidence in toenail management of elderly people. Geriatr. Nurs. 1996, 17, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichterfeld, A.; Lahmann, N.; Blume-Peytavi, U.; Kottner, J. Dry skin in nursing care receivers: A multi-centre cross-sectional prevalence study in hospitals and nursing homes. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016, 56, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisman, S.; Sinclair, R. Fungal nail infection: Diagnosis and management. BMJ 2014, 348, g1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fletcher, C.L.; Hay, R.J.; Smeeton, N.C. Onychomycosis: The development of a clinical diagnostic aid for toenail disease. Part, I. Establishing discriminating historical and clinical features. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 150, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scher, R.K. Onychomycosis is more than a cosmetic problem. Br. J. Dermatol. 1994, 130, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uritani, D.; Fukumoto, T.; Matsumoto, D.; Shima, M. Reference values for toe grip strength among Japanese adults aged 20 to 79 years: A cross-sectional study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2014, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Anzai, E.; Nakajima, K.; Iwakami, Y.; Sato, M.; Ino, S.; Ifukube, T.; Yamashita, K.; Ohta, Y. Effects of foot arch structure on postural stability. Clin. Res. Foot Ankle. 2014, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Hagedorn, T.J.; Dufour, A.B.; Riskowski, J.L.; Hillstrom, H.J.; Menz, H.B.; Casey, V.A.; Hannan, M.T. Foot disorders, foot posture, and foot function: The Framingham foot study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scott, G.; Menz, H.B.; Newcombe, L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture 2007, 26, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansuategui, E.J.; Hijmans, J.M.; Smits, S.; Van der Woude, L.H.V.; Postema, K. Age-related differences in women’s foot shape. Maturitas 2016, 94, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Menz, H.B.; Morris, M.E. Clinical determinants of plantar forces and pressures during walking in older people. Gait Posture 2006, 24, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwa, M.; Imoto, T.; Kida, A.; Iwase, M.; Yokochi, T. Age-related reduction and independent predictors of toe flexor strength in middle-aged men. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2017, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Todros, S.; Biz, C.; Ruggieri, P.; Pavan, P.G. Experimental analysis of plantar fascia mechanical properties in subjects with foot pathologies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdemir, A.; Hamel, A.J.; Fauth, A.R.; Piazza, S.J.; Sharkey, N.A. Dynamic loading of the plantar aponeurosis in walking. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2004, 86, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, R.H.; Gross, M.T. Toe flexors strength and passive extension range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in individuals with plantar fasciitis. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2003, 33, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Digiovanni, B.F.; Nawoczenski, D.A.; Malay, D.P.; Graci, P.A.; Williams, T.T.; Wilding, G.E.; Baumhauer, J.F. Plantar fas-cia-specific stretching exercise improves outcomes in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2006, 88, 1775–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mickle, K.J.; Munro, B.J.; Lord, S.R.; Menz, H.B.; Steele, J.R. ISB clinical biomechanics award 2009: Toe weakness and deformity increase the risk of falls in older people. Clin. Biomech. 2009, 24, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imai, A.; Takayama, K.; Satoh, T.; Katoh, T.; Yokozeki, H. Ingrown nails and pachyonychia of the great toes impair lower limb functions: Improvement of limb dysfunction by medical foot care. Int. J. Dermatol. 2011, 50, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, T.; Yamashita, K.; Rinoie, C.; Takase, Y.; Sato, M.; Yamada, K.; Sawa, Y. Improvements in lower-limb muscle strength and foot pressure distribution with foot care in frail elderly adults: A randomized controlled trial from Japan. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mickle, K.J.; Munro, B.J.; Lord, S.R.; Menz, H.B.; Steele, J.R. Gait, balance and plantar pressures in older people with toe de-formities. Gait Posture 2011, 34, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rosenbaum, D.; Hautmann, S.; Gold, M.; Claes, L. Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture 1994, 2, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, A.J.; Menz, H.B.; Keenan, A.M. The influence of walking speed on plantar pressure measurements using the two-step gait initiation protocol. Foot 2004, 14, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balanowski, K.R.; Flynn, L.M. Effect of painful keratoses debridement on foot pain, balance and function in older adults. Gait Posture 2005, 22, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Potter, J.; Potter, M.J. Effect of callus removal on peak plantar pressures. Foot 2000, 10, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Springett, K.P.; Whiting, M.F.; Marriott, C. Epidemiology of plantar forefoot corns and callus, and the influence of dominant side. Foot 2003, 13, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menz, H.B.; Zammit, G.V.; Munteanu, S.E. Plantar pressures are higher under callused regions of the foot in older people. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2007, 32, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, M.J.; Cavanagh, P.R.; Thomas, G.; Johnson, M.M.; Murray, H.; Boulton, A.J.M. The effect of callus removal on dynamic plantar foot pressures in diabetic patients. Diabet. Med. 1992, 9, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, J.; Clark, P.; Klenerman, L. The importance of the toes in walking. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1990, 72, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wen, J.; Ding, Q.; Yu, Z.; Sun, W.; Wang, Q.; Wei, K. Adaptive changes of foot pressure in hallux valgus patients. Gait Posture 2012, 36, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nix, S.E.; Vicenzino, B.T.; Smith, M.D. Foot pain and functional limitation in healthy adults with hallux valgus: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2012, 13, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uritani, D.; Fukumoto, T.; Matsumoto, D.; Shima, M. Associations between toe grip strength and hallux valgus, toe curl ability, and foot arch height in Japanese adults aged 20 to 79 years: A cross-sectional study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2015, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saito, R.; Okamoto, S.; Nakazawa, R.; Sakamoto, M. Relationship between foot alignment and floating toes classified in static and dynamic conditions in females. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2019, 31, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Misu, S.; Doi, T.; Asai, T.; Sawa, R.; Tsutsumimoto, K.; Nakakubo, S.; Yamada, M.; Ono, R. Association between toe flexor strength and spatiotemporal gait parameters in community-dwelling older people. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2014, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Summary of the National Lifestyle Survey. 2016. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa16/dl/16.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2020).
Item | Definition of Measurement | Measurement | Scale Definition for This Study’s Analysis | Related References (Examples) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arch deformities | Abnormal arch (e.g., high arch, flatfoot) | Examiner assessed by visualization in the following cases: Wider foot width with broken lateral arch Flat feet with a low arch Foot with a high arch | Exists/does not exist | Flatfoot [39,40] |
Ingrown toenails | Corners of nails growing into the skin | Examiner’s assessment | Exists/does not exist | Ingrown toenails [40] |
Sensitivity of toe (1st, 3rd, and 5th) | Foot sensation; usually, if the subject feels numbness in two or more than three toes, it is considered abnormal | Examiner touched the participant’s toes and asked whether they could feel it (Ipswich touch test) | Participants have/do not have sensation (if the participant did not feel, then sensation was impaired) | Ipswich touch test [41,42] |
Foot circulation | Palpable posterior tibial arteries | Examiner palpated the pulsing artery halfway between the medial malleolus posterior border and the Achilles tendon | Examiner was able to palpate the pulse or was not able to palpate it | Posterior tibial arteries [40] |
Edema | Pitting edema | The skin was pressed over the tibia, and the compressed area was examined after the release of pressure: +1 for a barely detectable indentation, +2 for a slight indentation (15 s to rebound), +3 for a deeper indentation, +4 for a deeper indentation that takes more than 30 s to rebound | Above +2 was counted as edema in this study | [43] |
Skin color | Skin color (red, white, purple, etc.) | Examiner’s assessment | Normal or abnormal skin color (red, purple, white, etc.) | [44] |
Toe deformities | - | Existence of mallet toes, hammer toes, claw toes, hallux valgus, and lesser toe deformities | Number of deformed toes | [5] |
Skin lesions | Hyperkeratotic skin lesions (area of thickened skin caused by repeated friction or pressure). Corns are usually hard and painful when pushed | Examiner’s assessment | Number of skin lesions | [1] |
Maceration between toes | Peeling and fissuring between the toes, lighter in color, sometimes white | Examiner’s assessment | Number of instances | [6,45] |
Nail color change | Lack of nail color such as white or yellow | Examiner’s assessment | Number of affected toenails | [46] |
Long nails | Beyond the tip of the toe | Examiner’s assessment | Number of affected toenails | NA |
Thickened nail | Nail is excessively thick | Examiner’s assessment | Number of toenails >2 mm in thickness | [5] |
Skin dryness | Corneal layer water loss | Overall dry skin score (ODS *) EEMCO guideline Note: Specified symptom sum score excluded in this study | Exist or does not exist, then classified into a score of 0–4, 0 means no exist | [47,48] |
Suspected or existing nail fungal infection | Already diagnosed or suspected from nail color | Examiner’s assessment | Number of affected toenails | [49] |
Walking speed | 4 m walking speed | Measured by examiners or research assistants | Seconds | [50] |
Hallux valgus | Degree of hallux valgus | Examiners’ assessment was based on Foot Look (machine) images. The hallux valgus angle was categorized into HVA ≤ 15°, 15° < HVA ≤ 20°, 20° < HVA ≤ 40°, and HVA > 40° | Degrees | [51] |
Toe-spreading width ** | Toe muscle weakness and decreased range of motion | Examiners measured the width using tape. The distance between the first and second toe was measured midway along their length, and the same was done between the second and fifth toe. The subject was then asked to spread the toes as far as possible, and the difference was calculated. In this research, the distance between the first and second toes was measured. | cm | [52] |
Toe grip strength | The toe strength reading was displayed on the machine when a participant gripped the bar using the toes at maximal force for 3 s | Examiners or research assistants measured with a toe grip dynamometer (T.K.K.3364 Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd.) Unit of toe grip strength was kg | kg | [53] |
Floating toes | Toes that are not completely in contact with the ground | Examiners assessed based on Foot Look (machine) images | Number of toes that are not completely in contact with the ground | [54,55] |
Men | Women | |||||||||||||||||
Support level | Care level | Support level | Care level | |||||||||||||||
n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | p-value | n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | p-value | |||||
Age | 17 | 83.4 | 4.9 | 27 | 80.4 | 7.1 | 0.137 | 53 | 83.2 | 6.3 | 63 | 85.5 | 6.1 | 0.049 | ||||
Item | Support level | Care level | Support level | Care level | ||||||||||||||
(n = 17) | (n = 27) | (n = 53) | (n = 63) | |||||||||||||||
n | Median | 25% | 75% | n | Median | 25% | 75% | p-value | n | Median | 25% | 75% | n | Median | 25% | 75% | p-value | |
Barthel Index | 17 | 95 | 90 | 100 | 24 | 85 | 71.3 | 100 | 0.071 | 52 | 95 | 90 | 100 | 62 | 95 | 85 | 100 | 0.89 |
Men | Women | |||||||||||||||||
Support level | Care level | Support level | Care level | |||||||||||||||
Item | n | Rate | n | Rate | p-value | n | Rate | n | Rate | p-value | ||||||||
Diabetes | 7 | 41.20% | 5 | 18.50% | 0.164 | 7 | 13.20% | 7 | 11.10% | 0.78 | ||||||||
Hypertension | 8 | 47.10% | 13 | 48.10% | 1 | 24 | 45.30% | 22 | 34.90% | 0.341 | ||||||||
Kidney disease | 1 | 5.90% | 1 | 3.70% | 1 | 1 | 1.90% | 1 | 1.60% | 1 | ||||||||
Arteriosclerosis obliterans | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11.10% | 0.272 | 1 | 1.90% | 0 | 0.00% | 0.457 | ||||||||
Heart disease | 3 | 17.60% | 4 | 14.80% | 1 | 11 | 20.80% | 14 | 22.20% | 1 | ||||||||
Brain disease | 2 | 11.80% | 16 | 59.30% | 0.002** | 4 | 7.50% | 9 | 14.30% | 0.377 | ||||||||
Rheumatism | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3.70% | 1 | 3 | 5.70% | 0 | 0.00% | 0.092 | ||||||||
Hyperlipidaemia | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3.70% | 1 | 3 | 5.70% | 6 | 9.50% | 0.506 | ||||||||
Lung disease | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3.70% | 1 | 4 | 7.50% | 0 | 0.00% | 0.041* | ||||||||
Incontinence | 1 | 5.90% | 2 | 7.40% | 1 | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 6.30% | 0.124 |
Men | Women | |||||||||||||||||
Support Level | Care Level | Support Level | Care Level | |||||||||||||||
n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | p-value | n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | p-value | |||||
4-meter walking speed (second) | 16 | 6.00 | 2.20 | 21.00 | 8.60 | 4.30 | 0.039 * | 48 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 51 | 7.9 | 3.8 | 0.000 ** | ||||
Skin temperature (foot) | 15 | 33.60 | 1.40 | 23.00 | 33.60 | 2.10 | 0.998 | 47 | 34.2 | 1.7 | 58 | 34.2 | 1.8 | 0.944 | ||||
Right toe grip strength | 16 | 7.00 | 5.10 | 26.00 | 4.30 | 3.50 | 0.048 * | 52 | 4 | 2.7 | 62 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 0.509 | ||||
Left toe grip strength | 16 | 6.30 | 3.20 | 26.00 | 4.10 | 3.20 | 0.038 * | 52 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 62 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.588 | ||||
Men | Women | |||||||||||||||||
Item | Support level | Care level | Support level | Care level | ||||||||||||||
(n = 17) | (n = 27) | (n = 53) | (n = 63) | |||||||||||||||
n | Median | 25% | 75% | n | Median | 25% | 75% | p-value | n | Median | 25% | 75% | n | Median | 25% | 75% | p-value | |
Widths of opening toes (1st and 2nd), right foot | 17 | 1 | 0.4 | 2.35 | 27 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.014 * | 52 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 62 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.005 ** |
Widths of opening toes (1st and 2nd), left foot | 17 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 2.15 | 27 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.048 * | 53 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 62 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.007 ** |
Men | Women | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support Level (n = 17) | Care Level (n = 27) | Support Level (n = 53) | Care Level (n = 63) | ||||||||
Item | n | Rate | n | Rate | p-Value | n | Rate | n | Rate | p-Value | |
Right foot | Floating toe | 9 | 39.1% | 14 | 60.9% | 1.000 | 37 | 47.4% | 41 | 52.6% | 0.841 |
Toe deformities | 8 | 47.1% | 23 | 85.2% | 0.015 * | 46 | 86.8% | 54 | 85.7% | 1.000 | |
Skin lesions (corns and calluses) | 1 | 5.9% | 3 | 11.1% | 1.000 | 11 | 20.8% | 7 | 11.1% | 0.200 | |
Maceration between toes | 1 | 5.9% | 2 | 7.4% | 1.000 | 2 | 3.8% | 6 | 9.5% | 0.287 | |
Nail color change | 15 | 88.2% | 23 | 85.2% | 1.000 | 42 | 79.2% | 54 | 85.7% | 0.461 | |
Arch deformities | 12 | 70.6% | 20 | 74.1% | 1.000 | 44 | 83.0% | 60 | 95.2% | 0.037 * | |
Long nails | 11 | 64.7% | 18 | 66.7% | 1.000 | 40 | 75.5% | 53 | 84.1% | 0.255 | |
Thickened nails | 10 | 58.8% | 17 | 63.0% | 1.000 | 32 | 60.4% | 42 | 66.7% | 0.562 | |
Ingrown nails | 4 | 23.5% | 5 | 18.5% | 0.716 | 19 | 35.8% | 17 | 27.0% | 0.321 | |
Skin dryness | 15 | 88.2% | 23 | 85.2% | 1.000 | 45 | 84.9% | 59 | 93.7% | 0.139 | |
Edema | 16 | 94.1% | 27 | 100.0% | 0.386 | 50 | 94.3% | 61 | 96.8% | 0.659 | |
Skin color change | 17 | 100.0% | 27 | 100.0% | 1.000 | 51 | 96.2% | 63 | 100.0% | 0.207 | |
Suspected or existing nail fungal infection | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 52 | 98.1% | 60 | 95.2% | 0.624 | |
Hallux valgus angle | |||||||||||
HVA ≤ 15° | 14 | 87.5% | 22 | 91.7% | 0.455 | 34 | 64.2% | 40 | 70.2% | 0.863 | |
15° < HVA ≤ 20° | 1 | 6.3% | 2 | 8.3% | 8 | 15.1% | 7 | 12.3% | |||
20° < HVA ≤ 40° | 1 | 6.3% | 0 | 0% | 9 | 17.0% | 9 | 15.8% | |||
HVA > 40° | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 3.8% | 1 | 1.8% | |||
Left foot | Floating toe | 8 | 33.3% | 16 | 66.7% | 1.000 | 39 | 45.9% | 46 | 54.1% | 1.000 |
Toe deformities | 10 | 58.8% | 18 | 66.7% | 0.749 | 40 | 75.5% | 55 | 87.3% | 0.146 | |
Skin lesions (corns and calluses) | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 3.7% | 1.000 | 12 | 22.6% | 12 | 19.0% | 0.653 | |
Maceration between toes | 1 | 5.9% | 1 | 3.7% | 1.000 | 1 | 1.9% | 5 | 7.9% | 0.217 | |
Nail color change | 14 | 82.4% | 22 | 81.5% | 1.000 | 37 | 69.8% | 50 | 79.4% | 0.284 | |
Arch deformities | 11 | 64.7% | 17 | 63.0% | 1.000 | 42 | 79.2% | 54 | 85.7% | 0.461 | |
Long nails | 10 | 58.8% | 20 | 74.1% | 0.334 | 36 | 67.9% | 47 | 74.6% | 0.536 | |
Thickened nails | 10 | 58.8% | 16 | 59.3% | 1.000 | 24 | 45.3% | 36 | 57.1% | 0.263 | |
Ingrown nails | 5 | 29.4% | 12 | 44.4% | 0.360 | 21 | 39.6% | 25 | 39.7% | 1.000 | |
Skin dryness | 17 | 100.0% | 25 | 92.6% | 0.515 | 46 | 86.8% | 49 | 77.8% | 0.235 | |
Edema | 8 | 47.1% | 16 | 59.3% | 0.539 | 21 | 39.6% | 30 | 47.6% | 0.454 | |
Skin color change | 13 | 76.5% | 18 | 66.7% | 0.735 | 43 | 81.1% | 41 | 65.1% | 0.063 | |
Suspected or existing nail fungal infection | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 52 | 98.1% | 60 | 95.2% | 0.624 | |
Hallux valgus angle | |||||||||||
HVA ≤ 15° | 11 | 73.3% | 21 | 87.5% | 0.482 | 37 | 71.2% | 33 | 56.9% | 0.086 | |
15° < HVA ≤ 20° | 2 | 13.3% | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 3.8% | 10 | 17.2% | |||
20° < HVA ≤ 40° | 2 | 13.3% | 1 | 4.2% | 12 | 23.1% | 15 | 25.9% | |||
HVA > 40° | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 1.9% | 0 | 0% | |||
Weight distribution | Left | 5 | 31.3% | 11 | 47.8% | 17 | 34.0% | 22 | 40.7% | ||
Right | 7 | 43.8% | 11 | 47.8% | 0.171 | 21 | 42.0% | 28 | 51.9% | 0.064 | |
Both | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4.3% | 12 | 24.0% | 4 | 7.4% |
n | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Right_floating toe | (n = 26) | 19 | 73.1% |
Right_toe deformities | (n = 26) | 21 | 80.8% |
Right_skin lesions (corns and calluses) | (n = 26) | 3 | 11.5% |
Right_arch deformities | (n = 26) | 22 | 84.6% |
Right_thickend nails | (n = 26) | 16 | 61.5% |
Right_ingrown nails | (n = 26) | 10 | 38.5% |
Right_suspected or existing nail fungal infection | (n = 26) | 25 | 96.2% |
Left_floating toe | (n = 26) | 18 | 69.2% |
Left_toe deformities | (n = 26) | 19 | 73.1% |
Left_skin lesions (corns and calluses) | (n = 26) | 5 | 19.2% |
Left_arch deformities | (n = 26) | 20 | 76.9% |
Left_thickend nails | (n = 26) | 17 | 65.4% |
Left_ingrown nails | (n = 26) | 9 | 34.6% |
Left_suspected or existing nail fungal infection | (n = 26) | 25 | 96.2% |
Right_HVA ≤ 15° | (n = 25) | 19 | 76.0% |
Right_15° < HVA ≤ 20° | (n = 25) | 4 | 16.0% |
Right_20° < HVA ≤ 40° | (n = 25) | 2 | 8.0% |
Right_HVA > 40° | (n = 25) | 0 | 0.0% |
Left_HVA ≤ 15° | (n = 23) | 17 | 73.9% |
Left_15° < HVA ≤ 20° | (n = 23) | 3 | 13.0% |
Left_20° < HVA ≤ 40° | (n = 23) | 3 | 13.0% |
Left_HVA > 40° | (n = 23) | 0 | 0.0% |
Men | Women | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support Level (n = 17) | Care Level (n = 27) | Support Level (n = 53) | Care Level (n = 63) | |||||||
n | Rate | n | Rate | p-Value | n | Rate | n | Rate | p-Value | |
Right foot | ||||||||||
Sensitivity of the first toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 52 | 98.1% | 62 | 98.4% | 1.000 |
Sensitivity of the third toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 52 | 98.1% | 62 | 98.4% | 1.000 |
Sensitivity of the fifth toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 52 | 98.1% | 62 | 98.4% | 1.000 |
Palpable posterior tibial arteries | 10 | 58.8% | 8 | 29.6% | 0.068 | 25 | 47.2% | 36 | 57.1% | 0.351 |
Left foot | ||||||||||
Sensitivity of the first toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 53 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 1.000 |
Sensitivity of the third toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 53 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 1.000 |
Sensitivity of the fifth toe | 16 | 94.1% | 25 | 92.6% | 1.000 | 53 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 1.000 |
Palpable posterior tibial arteries | 9 | 52.9% | 11 | 40.7% | 0.539 | 26 | 49.1% | 32 | 50.8% | 1.000 |
95% Confidence Interval | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Dependent Variable | Independent Variable | Partial Regression Coefficient | Lower Limit | Upper Limit | Standardized Partial Regression Coefficient | p-Value |
Toe grip strength | Right toe grip strength | Constant term | 8.97 | 6.36 | 11.58 | <0.001 ** | |
(n = 136) | Right arch deformity | −1.87 | −3.32 | −0.42 | −0.21 | 0.012 * | |
Right suspected or existing fungal infection of nails | −2.52 | −4.86 | −0.19 | −0.17 | 0.034 * | ||
Right nail thickness | −1.14 | −2.23 | −0.06 | −0.17 | 0.040 * | ||
Left toe grip strength (n = 135) | Selected independent variable | - | - | - | - | - | |
Walking speed | Walking test (s) | Constant value | 5.16 | 3.79 | 6.52 | <0.001 ** | |
(n = 119) | Right corns and calluses | 1.89 | 0.23 | 3.56 | 0.20 | 0.026 * | |
Right toe deformity | 1.63 | 0.13 | 3.13 | 0.19 | 0.033 * |
Walking Test (s) | |||
---|---|---|---|
n | r | p-Value | |
R toe grip strength | 131 | −0.197 | 0.024 * |
L toe grip strength | 131 | −0.329 | 0.000 * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fujii, K.; Maekawa, A.; Komoda, T.; Kawabe, N.; Nishimura, R.; Sakakibara, Y.; Fukumoto, T.; Stolt, M. Foot Problems and Their Associations with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals Using Day Services: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurs. Rep. 2023, 13, 697-720. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13020062
Fujii K, Maekawa A, Komoda T, Kawabe N, Nishimura R, Sakakibara Y, Fukumoto T, Stolt M. Foot Problems and Their Associations with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals Using Day Services: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nursing Reports. 2023; 13(2):697-720. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13020062
Chicago/Turabian StyleFujii, Kashiko, Atsuko Maekawa, Takuyuki Komoda, Nozomi Kawabe, Ryouhei Nishimura, Yasunori Sakakibara, Takahiko Fukumoto, and Minna Stolt. 2023. "Foot Problems and Their Associations with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals Using Day Services: A Cross-Sectional Study" Nursing Reports 13, no. 2: 697-720. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13020062
APA StyleFujii, K., Maekawa, A., Komoda, T., Kawabe, N., Nishimura, R., Sakakibara, Y., Fukumoto, T., & Stolt, M. (2023). Foot Problems and Their Associations with Toe Grip Strength and Walking Speed in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals Using Day Services: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nursing Reports, 13(2), 697-720. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13020062