Next Article in Journal
Assessing Variability in Children’s Exposure to Contaminants in Food: A Longitudinal Non-Targeted Analysis Study in Miami, Florida
Previous Article in Journal
Cardiotoxicity of Chemotherapy: A Multi-OMIC Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Interaction of Salinity and Rare Earth Elements on the Health of Mytilus galloprovincialis: The Case of Praseodymium and Europium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoX
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/jox15010010
jox-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos

by
Maria Concetta Eliso
1,2,*,†,
Ilaria Corsi
1,
Antonietta Spagnuolo
2,‡ and
Rémi Dumollard
3,‡
1
Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
2
Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, 80121 Naples, Italy
3
Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement (LBDV), Institut de la Mer de Villefranche (IMEV), Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, 80121 Naples, Italy.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010
Submission received: 7 November 2024 / Revised: 3 January 2025 / Accepted: 8 January 2025 / Published: 10 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Ecotoxicology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanoplastics pose a growing threat to marine ecosystems, particularly affecting the early developmental stages of marine organisms. This study investigates the effects of amino-modified polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NH2, 50 nm) on the embryonic development of Phallusia mammillata, a model ascidian species. Both chorionated and dechorionated embryos were exposed to increasing concentrations of PS-NH2 so morphological alterations could be assessed with a high-content analysis of the phenotypes and genotoxicity. PS-NH2 induced the same morphological alterations in both chorionated and dechorionated embryos, with dechorionated embryos being more sensitive (EC50 = 3.0 μg mL−1) than chorionated ones (EC50 = 6.26 μg mL−1). Interestingly, results from the morphological analysis showed two concentration-dependent mechanisms of action: (i) at concentrations near the EC50, neurodevelopmental abnormalities resembling the ones induced by exposure to known endocrine disruptors (EDs) were observed, and (ii) at higher concentrations (15 μg mL−1 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for chorionated and dechorionated embryos, respectively), a nonspecific toxicity was evident, likely due to general oxidative stress. The phenotypes resulting from the PS-NH2 treatment were not related to DNA damage, as revealed by a genotoxicity assay performed on neurula embryos. Our data suggest that PS-NH2-induced toxicity is primarily mediated through oxidative stress, probably triggered by interactions between the positive charges of the PS NPs and the negative charges on the cell membranes. The lack of a protective chorion further exacerbated these effects, highlighting its role in mitigating/protecting against NP-induced damage.

1. Introduction

Plastic pollution is recognized to be a threat of global concern for the marine environment. Approximately 5000 tons of plastic waste was released into the environment globally in 1950–2015, and, as plastic litter ages, it breaks down, forming microplastics (MPs, <5 mm) and nanoplastics (<100 nm), via weathering, sunlight radiation and biodegradation processes [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The formation of smaller particles leads to a modification of the physical–chemical properties, surface area and size, and, once below 1 µm in size, nanoplastics can have high reactivity and biotoxicity Although environmental concentrations of nanoplastics are still unknown, it is well accepted that they are ubiquitous, as recently found in the surface water of the North Atlantic Gyre [7] and in the West Mediterranean Sea [8]. They indeed represent a serious hazard for marine species, in particular in marine coastal areas [9,10,11]. On these grounds, in recent years, several studies have focused on exploring the impact of nanoplastics on marine organisms by using, among a wide variety of polymer compositions, polystyrene nanoparticles (PS NPs) as a proxy for nanoplastic [12] and references therein]. The studies showed that these small particles can affect marine phyto- and zooplankton, resulting in oxidative stress and feeding disruption, among other sub-lethal effects [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Recently, the effects of PS NPs (PS-NH2, 50 nm) on chorionated Ciona robusta embryos have been investigated, revealing impairment in trunk and palps morphogenesis and oxidative stress in the larvae [18]. Furthermore, the development of an Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) exploiting transcriptomic data and sub-lethal endpoints suggested that a Molecular Initiating Event (MIE), the adhesion of PS NPs to the ascidian chorion, an envelope that surrounds the egg and the developing embryo until the hatching of the tadpole larva [26,27,28,29], may act as a physico-chemical barrier against pollutants [19].
Ascidians, which are abundant components in marine meso-zooplankton communities and have an invertebrate embryo that is closely related to vertebrates [30,31,32], represent ideal models for ecotoxicity studies aimed at exploring the effects of a large variety of physical and chemical stressors [33,34]. Here, we investigate the effect of amino-modified PS NPs (PS-NH2, 50 nm) on the embryonic development of another ascidian species, Phallusia mammillata. This marine invertebrate is found exclusively in the Northeast Atlantic and the Mediterranean and it is an emerging ascidian model for developmental and molecular biology studies (e.g., live-cell imaging) since its eggs and embryos are completely transparent [35,36,37,38]. In addition, genomic and transcriptomic resources are available, thus facilitating functional gene studies (https://www.aniseed.cnrs.fr/; accessed on 20 November 2022). In the past years, Phallusia has been used in ecotoxicology for the testing of the embryotoxicity of several Contaminants of Emerging Concerns (CECs), at both morphological and molecular levels [39,40,41,42], and, more recently, high-content analyses of the morphological alterations of Phallusia larvae have been exploited to determine the phenotypic signature of different classes of chemicals such as Endocrine Disruptors (EDs), Nuclear Receptors (NRs), ligands and genotoxic and cytotoxic compounds [43]. In this work, the PS-NH2 was tested on chorionated Phallusia embryos, resembling the natural exposure scenarios, and on dechorionated embryos, to evaluate the effects of direct contact with the growing embryos and unravel the potential protective/mitigation role against NP exposure. Then, high-content-based morphometric analysis of Phallusia larvae allowed us to quantify morphological malformations with neurodevelopmental endpoints. The morphometric analysis was coupled to a genotoxicity assay to explore the possible toxic mechanisms of action.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Amino-Modified PS NPs (PS-NH2)

Unlabeled 50 nm amino-modified PS NPs (PS-NH2, PA02N, lot: 12839) were purchased from Bangs Laboratories Inc. (Fishers, IN, USA) and received as a 100 mg mL−1 stock suspension in deionized water with no added surfactants, according to the manufacturer’s technical sheet. After a brief sonication, as already described in the study of Eliso et al., 2020 [18], intermediate suspensions (10 mg mL−1) were prepared in 0.22 μm filtered milli-Q water (mQW) and stored in sterile vials at 4 °C until use. For the embryotoxicity assay, a PS-NH2 working suspension (1 mg mL−1) was prepared in Natural Sea Water (NSW, salinity 40‰, pH 8) collected from a clean site in the Mediterranean Sea as the exposure media without further sonication. A detailed physico-chemical characterization of PS-NH2 behavior in mQW and NSW media is reported in the study of Eliso et al., 2020 [18]. In particular, in mQW, PS-NH2 confirmed the primary size (50 nm), and the positive surface charge (+47.5 mV), and showed an optimal dispersion (PDI 0.175 ± 0.04) at different time points. Conversely, in NSW, PS-NH2 was found to form large agglomerates (Z-Average of 999.7 ± 54.19 nm) with broader PDI values (>0.400), and a decrease in the ζ-potential values (+7.19 mV) showed the instability of PS NPs in this high-ionic-strength medium [18]. Details on the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis used to determine the structure and composition of the stock suspension are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Animal and Gametes Collection

Adult specimens of Phallusia mammillata were collected in Sète (Hérault, France) and kept at 17 ± 1 °C in circulating natural seawater aquaria. Animals were kept under constant light conditions to avoid uncontrolled spawning of eggs and sperm [44]. The experimental design included two different fertilization protocols: (i) the exposure of embryos with a chorion (chorionated embryos), to mimic the natural exposure condition in the water column; (ii) exposure of embryos without a chorion (dechorionated embryos) according to a protocol already used to screen the toxic effect of several chemicals using the Phallusia larval teratogenic assay [42,43]. For the fertilization of chorionated eggs, eggs and sperm were collected separately by dissecting the gonoducts of several hermaphrodite adults. The sperm was stored at 4 °C until use, while oocytes were collected in tissue culture plates and rinsed twice in 0.22 µm filtered NSW, and immediately fertilized by adding diluted sperm (1:100 in NSW) to the egg suspension. After 10 min of incubation, eggs were rinsed 3 times with NSW. For the fertilization of dechorionated eggs, the protocol was the same, except for the presence of the chorion, which was removed from the eggs before fertilization. To remove the chorion, eggs were incubated in a trypsin solution for 2 h and then washed 3 times using NSW supplemented with TAPS buffer (NSW/TAPS; 0.5 mM) according to the protocol described in the study of Dumollard et al. (2017) [35].

2.3. Embryotoxicity Assay

About 1 h 30 min post-fertilization (hpf), 60 chorionated embryos (~two-cell stage) were added to 6-well plates containing PS-NH2 suspensions in NSW (final volume 6 mL). For the exposure of dechorionated embryos, the 60 embryos were instead transferred at the zygote stage (1-cell stage, around 30 min after fertilization) to avoid the dissociation of 2-cell-stage embryos during the transfer. Both chorionated and dechorionated embryos were exposed to nominal concentrations of PS-NH2 as follows: 2–5–7.5–10–15 μg mL−1 for chorionated embryos, and 2–3–3.5–5–7.5 μg mL−1 for the dechorionated ones. Embryos were then incubated under static conditions in the dark at 18 °C until the hatching larva stage (stage 26) was reached at about 18 hpf. After the incubation period, larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (4% PFA, 0.5 M NaCl, PBS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), washed 3 times in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS 1X) and imaged by transmitted light microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200, Jena, Germany) at 10× magnification for the evaluation of the percentage of normal hatched larvae and the morphometric analysis. As described by Gomes and collaborators (2019) [42], a Phallusia larva is considered normal when it shows a good general embryo morphology, with a proper trunk and palps formation, as well as tail elongation.

2.4. Morphometric Analysis of Larval Development

For the morphometric analysis, bright-field images (Zeiss Axiovert 200) of both chorionated and dechorionated embryos were analyzed with the in-house software Toxicosis8 (Version 1, reference IDDN.FR.001.330013.000.S.P.2018.000.10000, deposited on July 13th 2018; see full description of Toxicosis8 in the study of Gazo et al., 2021 [43]). At least 50 tadpoles were analyzed per treatment. The 5 endpoints quantified were the area of the two pigmented cells (PCs) (Oc/Ot area, μm2), the distance between the two PCs (Oc/Ot distance, μm), the length/width ratio of the trunk, the length of the tail and the presence of well-elongated palps. The resulting data were normalized to each respective control treatment (100%) and plotted in radar charts for better comparison of phenotypes between treatments (see [43] for a full description of the morphometric analysis).

2.5. Genotoxicity Assay

Genotoxicity testing was performed only on dechorionated embryos to better visualize the fluorescent nuclei within the embryos. Embryos at the neurula stage were fixed with a fixation solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.5 M NaCl in PBS) for 1 h at 20 °C on a shaker. By washing them twice with PBS, the fixative was removed. After washing, the samples were incubated in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 3% bovine serum albumin (PBSB) for 1 h at 20 °C on a shaker. The embryos were stained with 1 μg mL−1 Hoechst in PBSB for 1–2 h at 20 °C on a shaker. Finally, the embryos were washed twice with PBSB and transferred on a glass slide. DNA-stained embryos were imaged using epifluorescence microscopy (Zeiss, Axiovert 200) with a 40×/0.8 NA water objective lens, and DNA aberrations (multinucleated cells, micronuclei or DNA bridges) were scored manually. As was performed in the study of Gazo et al., 2021 [43], the number of embryos hosting a DNA aberration was counted. The total number of embryos scored was at least 150 per condition.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism (Version 8.0.1, San Diego, CA, USA). All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The median effective concentration (EC50), corresponding to a 50% reduction in normal hatched larvae, was calculated using a sigmoidal dose−response model according to the following equation:
y = b + (a − b)/1 + 10(LogEC50−x)
where y is the response, b is the response minimum, a is the response maximum, x is the logarithm of effect concentration and EC50 is the concentration of effect giving 50% of the maximum effect. Data were normalized to the control mean percentage of larval abnormality using Abbot’s formula:
P = (Pe − Pc/100 − Pc) × 100
where Pc and Pe are the control and the experimental percentages of response, respectively. For the morphometric analysis, in order to eliminate the effect of external factors, we compared and normalized each endpoint with the corresponding value in the control group obtained on the same day. The raw data (not normalized) from this assay were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test.

3. Results

3.1. PS-NH2 NPs Alter the Normal Larval Development

The results of the embryotoxicity assay were evaluated by looking at the normal larval development on both chorionated and dechorionated embryos after an exposure to PS-NH2 lasting about 18 h (stage 26). Figure 1 shows a dose-dependent response under both tested conditions, with an increased sensitivity of the dechorionated embryos (EC50 = 3.0 µg mL−1) compared to chorionated ones (EC50 = 6.26 µg mL−1).

3.2. Quantitative Analysis of Phenotypes

In addition to the normal larval development, we also evaluated any phenotypic alterations in developing P. mammillata embryos exposed to PS-NH2 and then we quantified them using the software Toxicosis8 [43]. Observation under a light microscope indicated that the morphological defects were mainly related to the development of the trunk. As shown in Figure 2B, most chorionated embryos exposed to 5 μg mL−1 of PS-NH2 showed a generally good morphology of the embryo, comparable to unexposed ones (controls only in NSW) (Figure 2A). At 7.5 μg mL−1, we observed a lack of protrusion of the palps in most larvae and, upon exposure to 10 and 15 μg mL−1 of PS-NH2, the embryos failed to hatch, showing malformations at both the trunk and tail levels. In fact, as shown in Figure 2D,E, the trunk became rounder and the tail shorter compared to the controls (Figure 2D,E).
The phenotypic alterations observed in the dechorionated embryos were comparable to the morphological defects detected on chorionated embryos, with an increased sensitivity at lower exposure concentrations. In fact, a rounder trunk and an inhibition of palps protrusion were already observable in larvae exposed to 2–3 μg mL−1 of PS-NH2 (Figure 3A–F). Moreover, the pigmented sensory organs (PCs, composed of the otolith and ocellus) appeared to be fused already in larvae exposed to 3 µg mL−1 and upwards, indicating that the movement of the otolith towards the ventral side of the sensory vesicle was impaired (Figure 3C–F) [45].
Using the Toxicosis8 software, five morphometric endpoints were quantified in chorionated and dechorionated Phallusia embryos treated with PS-NH2. In chorionated embryos, the most sensitive endpoint was the elongation of the palps, which gradually decreased to 1.8% in larvae exposed to 15 µg mL−1, then the Ot-Oc distance (significantly reduced to 36.9%), tail length (reduced to 58.3%) and the trunk L/W ratio (reduced to 75.3%), whereas Oc-Ot area was not affected (Figure 4A, Table 1). Interestingly, dechorionated embryos displayed phenotypes similar to those of chorionated embryos, as illustrated in the radar chart, which shows almost the same order of affected endpoints: palps > Oc-Ot distance > tail > trunk (Figure 4B, Table 2). The only difference is that naked embryos were more susceptible to PS-NH2 exposure compared to chorionated ones (compare data at 7.5 µg mL−1 in Table 1 and Table 2).

3.3. PS-NH2 NPs Are Not Genotoxic

Recent data on Phallusia embryos indicate that the alteration of palps and trunk elongation are part of the severe malformations associated with DNA damage and genotoxicity [43]. We thus sought to verify whether the phenotypes induced by PS-NH2 treatment could also be related to DNA damage, by staining embryo DNA and scoring DNA aberrations in dechorionated embryos at the neurula stage. Figure 5 shows representative images of control and treated embryos (5 and 7.5 µg mL−1). In the control cultures, almost all analyzed embryos (98.7%) showed well-aligned nuclei of constant size and tightly packed nuclear DNA without DNA aberrations (Figure 5A). The same results were obtained with treated embryos, with 98.3% and 97.5% of embryos having intact DNA at 5 and 7.5 µg mL−1 exposure concentrations, respectively.

4. Discussion

Early life stages of marine invertebrate and fish species are sensitive indicators of environmental pollutants including nanoplastics. Here, we investigated the effects of PS-NH2 on the development of the ascidian P. mammillata by evaluating its impact on embryos, either chorionated or dechorionated, to shed some light on the potential role of the chorion in mitigating the effects of nanoplastics.
Regarding chorionated embryos, the microscopic observations showed morphological alterations mainly at the trunk level; trunks were rounded, and there was a reduction in the protrusion of the palps at exposure concentrations of up to 7.5 μg mL−1. Upon exposure to 10 and 15 μg mL−1, the embryos failed to hatch, showing malformations at both trunk and tail levels. This phenotype is reminiscent of that previously detected on larvae of another ascidian species, Ciona robusta [18], thus suggesting a similar mechanism of action of PS-NH2 in Ciona and Phallusia embryos. Here, we also checked if the direct contact with PS-NH2 could have different or even more devastating effects on chorion-deprived developing embryos. Our data indicate that there are no strong phenotypic differences, at the larval stage, between embryos with and without a chorion, except that dechorionated embryos are more sensitive to PS-NH2 treatment, on the basis of EC50 (3.0 µg mL−1 compared to 6.26 µg mL−1).
Through the use of the Toxicosis8 software, three neurodevelopmental endpoints (Oc/Ot area, Oc/Ot distance, % of embryos with elongated palps) and two general morphogenesis endpoints (trunk L/W ratio and tail length) were analyzed and the results were compared to previous data obtained in a toxicity screening aimed at finding phenotypic signatures in Phallusia embryos associated with xenobiotics [43]. Our study indicates that PS-NH2 was able to affect all endpoints analyzed, regardless of the presence or absence of the chorion. Furthermore, the use of this software allowed us to identify two concentration-dependent mechanisms of action: (i) at concentrations near the EC50, neurodevelopmental abnormalities, resembling the ones induced by exposure to known endocrine disruptors (EDs), were observed, and (ii) at higher concentrations (15 μg mL−1 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for chorionated and dechorionated embryos, respectively), a nonspecific toxicity was evident, likely due to general oxidative stress.
Specifically, in the case of concentrations near the EC50 (6.26 µg mL−1 and 3.0 µg mL−1, respectively, for embryos with and without a chorion), the significantly affected endpoints were trunk L/W ratio and tail length, which reflect the general morphology of the embryo, and Oc/Ot distance, which is a marker of the central nervous system. The mechanism of action seems similar since the endpoints were the same regardless of the presence or absence of the chorion. The higher sensitivity of non-chorionated larvae suggests a protective role of the chorion which limits the interaction of the PS-NH2 with the embryos. Notably, the phenotypic signatures, such as the trunk L/W ratio and Oc/Ot distance at the lowest doses tested, which characterize Phallusia embryos exposed to PS-NH2, were very similar to the ones caused by Rifampicin and SR12813, which are PXR agonists [43]. PXR is known to be involved in mechanisms of defense against endogenous and exogenous molecules, regulating the transcription of enzymes and transporters involved in the metabolism and elimination of potentially harmful compounds [46]. In ascidians, this receptor is expressed in the brain vesicles of embryos and larvae and exposure to its agonist induces significant changes in trunk elongation and PC formation [42]. Our findings suggest a possible interaction between PS NPs and PXRs, although we cannot rule out the possibility that the byproducts released by PS-NH2 [19], rather than PS-NH2, interact with PXR, resulting in the malformations during the embryonic development of ascidians. Actually, as previously shown, styrene monomers and the 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol (DTBP), which is considered an analog of Bisphenol A (BPA), which is known to interact with PXR in the ascidian C. robusta, both leach from the PS-NH2 suspension in NSW [19,47,48]. However, the phenotypic signature of PS NPs in Phallusia also resembles the one of ERR and RXR ligands [43] and only the measurement of the modulation of the activity of these nuclear receptors by PS-NH2 can reveal whether nanoparticles or chemicals leaching from them can affect ascidian nuclear receptors.
On the other hand, the highest concentration of PS-NH2 (15 μg mL−1 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for chorionated and dechorionated embryos, respectively) caused significant effects at the level of all the endpoints studied, except for the Oc/Ot area, suggesting either nonspecific toxicity or DNA damage [43]. However, our study shows that, in PS-NH2-treated embryos, the DNA is intact, without any damage, meaning that no genotoxic effects are associated with the exposure to PS-NH2 up to 15 μg mL−1. The mechanism of toxicity induced by the highest concentration of PS-NH2 may be due to the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) through positive charges that interact with the negatively charged cell membranes [49]. The elevated levels of ROS may, in turn, cause significant decreases in cell viability and changes in membrane integrity [50]. This is in line with our formulated hypothesis on Ciona embryos exposed to PS-NH2 [19]. In fact, the initial event leading to the above morphological changes could be the adhesion of PS-NH2 around the chorion, potentially causing a general condition of oxidative stress. The influence of positive charge on embryonic development is highlighted in studies showing that negatively charged polystyrene nanoparticles (e.g., PS-COOH) exhibit reduced toxicity during the embryogenesis of the sea urchin P. lividus [8] and the ascidian C. robusta [21]. These nanoparticles do not affect larval phenotypes or development, likely due to their tendency for rapid sedimentation. The similar phenotype observed in dechorionated embryos suggests that PS-NH2 elicits comparable responses in both chorionated and dechorionated embryos, with the observed phenotype likely resulting from direct interaction of the nanoparticles with the developing larvae. From this perspective, it would be very interesting to define the Toxicosis phenotypic signature of oxidative stress and compare it with the phenotypic signature of PS-NH2, identified in this study in Phallusia, in order to clarify this issue.

5. Conclusions

Using high-content analysis of embryonic phenotypes, we established the effects of PS-NH2 on the embryogenesis of the ascidian P. mammillata. We compared the effects using chorionated (to reproduce the natural conditions) and dechorionated embryos (to ensure the interaction of PS NPs with the embryo), showing that the morphological alterations are the same but the dechorionated embryos have an increased sensitivity, suggesting the protective role of the chorion against PS-NH2. The quantitative analysis revealed two different phenotypic signatures for both the conditions tested: (i) the concentrations near the EC50 affected trunk L/W ratio, tail length and Oc/Ot distance endpoints, as in the case of PXR agonists; (ii) the highest concentrations of PS-NH2 affected several endpoints, suggesting a nonspecific toxicity of PS NPs probably caused by the general stress of the developing organism. Further studies are, however, fundamental to clarify if their toxic effects are due to their adhesion around the growing embryos, or to their internalization within the cells. Moreover, we cannot exclude that the toxic effects are not related to nanoparticles themselves, but to leachates from PS, like styrene monomers and the DTBP [19], which could act directly on naked embryos or by crossing the chorion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jox15010010/s1, Figures S1 and S2: FTIR spectrum of PS-NH2 vs. FTIR spectrum of polystyrene present in the libraries used for the match and FTIR spectrum of PS-NH2 vs. FTIR spectrum of non-functionalized fluorescent polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs, 100 nm, Polysciences Europe GmbH, Eppelheim, Germany), respectively; Figure S3: Morphometric analysis of phenotypes induced in Phallusia mammillata embryos (A) with a chorion and (B) without a chorion exposed to PS-NH2. Radar charts summarize the following endpoints: ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (μm2); Oc/Ot distance (μm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (μm). All measurements were performed at 22 hpf. The values are normalized to the corresponding value of the same parameter in the control (stage 26) and presented as a percentage of the control value; Figure S4: Genotoxicity assay performed analyzing 7 hpf embryos (neurula stage). (A) Control embryo, (B) embryo with DNA aberration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.D., I.C. and A.S.; methodology, R.D., I.C., A.S. and M.C.E.; formal analysis, M.C.E. and R.D.; investigation, M.C.E.; resources, R.D., I.C. and A.S.; data curation, M.C.E., R.D., I.C. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.E., A.S. and R.D.; writing—review and editing, A.S., R.D., M.C.E. and I.C.; supervision, R.D.; project administration, R.D., A.S. and I.C.; funding acquisition, M.C.E., I.C., A.S. and R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No research ethics committee approval was required to achieve the aims of this study as the experimental work was carried out on an unregulated invertebrate species.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This study was performed within the framework of the project entitled “Ciona robusta (formerly Ciona intestinalis type A) as model system for ecotoxicological studies” co-funded by the University of Siena (Italy) and the Zoological Station Anton Dohrn of Naples. Maria Concetta Eliso received an EMBO Short-Term Fellowship (number 8609) to carry out research in the lab of Rémi Dumollard (Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Institut de la Mer à Villefranche (IMEV), Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Port de la Darse, 06230 Villefranche sur-mer, France). Work in the R.D. laboratory was funded by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique DBM 2021 program and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE34-0006-02). The authors thank Kennedi Davis for her help in the genotoxicity assays. The authors thank Carola Murano for her great help and support in the FTIR analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Andrady, A.L. Microplastics in the Marine Environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 1596–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ekvall, M.T.; Lundqvist, M.; Kelpsiene, E.; Šileikis, E.; Gunnarsson, S.B.; Cedervall, T. Nanoplastics Formed during the Mechanical Breakdown of Daily-Use Polystyrene Products. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gigault, J.; ter Halle, A.; Baudrimont, M.; Pascal, P.-Y.; Gauffre, F.; Phi, T.-L.; El Hadri, H.; Grassl, B.; Reynaud, S. Current Opinion: What Is a Nanoplastic? Environ. Pollut. 2018, 235, 1030–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lambert, S.; Wagner, M. Characterisation of Nanoplastics during the Degradation of Polystyrene. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jahnke, A.; Arp, H.P.H.; Escher, B.I.; Gewert, B.; Gorokhova, E.; Kühnel, D.; Ogonowski, M.; Potthoff, A.; Rummel, C.; Schmitt-Jansen, M.; et al. Reducing Uncertainty and Confronting Ignorance about the Possible Impacts of Weathering Plastic in the Marine Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cole, M.; Lindeque, P.; Halsband, C.; Galloway, T.S. Microplastics as Contaminants in the Marine Environment: A Review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 2588–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ter Halle, A.; Jeanneau, L.; Martignac, M.; Jardé, E.; Pedrono, B.; Brach, L.; Gigault, J. Nanoplastic in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre. Env. Sci Technol 2017, 51, 13689–13697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schirinzi, G.F.; Llorca, M.; Seró, R.; Moyano, E.; Barceló, D.; Abad, E.; Farré, M. Trace Analysis of Polystyrene Microplastics in Natural Waters. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gonçalves, J.M.; Bebianno, M.J. Nanoplastics Impact on Marine Biota: A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 273, 116426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, C.; Liu, Z.; Yu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Han, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H. Emergence of Nanoplastics in the Aquatic Environment and Possible Impacts on Aquatic Organisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 906, 167404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ferreira, I.; Venâncio, C.; Lopes, I.; Oliveira, M. Nanoplastics and Marine Organisms: What Has Been Studied? Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 67, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Corsi, I.; Bellingeri, A.; Eliso, M.C.; Grassi, G.; Liberatori, G.; Murano, C.; Sturba, L.; Vannuccini, M.L.; Bergami, E. Eco-Interactions of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Marine Environment: Towards an Eco-Design Framework. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Della Torre, C.; Bergami, E.; Salvati, A.; Faleri, C.; Cirino, P.; Dawson, K.A.; Corsi, I. Accumulation and Embryotoxicity of Polystyrene Nanoparticles at Early Stage of Development of Sea Urchin Embryos Paracentrotus lividus. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 12302–12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Canesi, L.; Ciacci, C.; Fabbri, R.; Balbi, T.; Salis, A.; Damonte, G.; Cortese, K.; Caratto, V.; Monopoli, M.P.; Dawson, K.; et al. Interactions of Cationic Polystyrene Nanoparticles with Marine Bivalve Hemocytes in a Physiological Environment: Role of Soluble Hemolymph Proteins. Environ. Res. 2016, 150, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Balbi, T.; Camisassi, G.; Montagna, M.; Fabbri, R.; Franzellitti, S.; Carbone, C.; Dawson, K.; Canesi, L. Impact of Cationic Polystyrene Nanoparticles (PS-NH2) on Early Embryo Development of Mytilus galloprovincialis: Effects on Shell Formation. Chemosphere 2017, 186, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Auguste, M.; Balbi, T.; Ciacci, C.; Canonico, B.; Papa, S.; Borello, A.; Vezzulli, L.; Canesi, L. Shift in Immune Parameters After Repeated Exposure to Nanoplastics in the Marine Bivalve Mytilus. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Auguste, M.; Lasa, A.; Balbi, T.; Pallavicini, A.; Vezzulli, L.; Canesi, L. Impact of Nanoplastics on Hemolymph Immune Parameters and Microbiota Composition in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 159, 105017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eliso, M.C.; Bergami, E.; Manfra, L.; Spagnuolo, A.; Corsi, I. Toxicity of Nanoplastics during the Embryogenesis of the Ascidian Ciona robusta (Phylum Chordata). Nanotoxicology 2020, 14, 1415–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Eliso, M.C.; Bergami, E.; Bonciani, L.; Riccio, R.; Belli, G.; Belli, M.; Corsi, I.; Spagnuolo, A. Application of Transcriptome Profiling to Inquire into the Mechanism of Nanoplastics Toxicity during Ciona robusta Embryogenesis. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 318, 120892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Geremia, E.; Muscari Tomajoli, M.T.; Murano, C.; Petito, A.; Fasciolo, G. The Impact of Micro- and Nanoplastics on Aquatic Organisms: Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress and Implications for Human Health—A Review. Environments 2023, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Pérez, E.; Jiang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Jiao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Polystyrene Nanoplastic Induces Oxidative Stress, Immune Defense, and Glycometabolism Change in Daphnia Pulex: Application of Transcriptome Profiling in Risk Assessment of Nanoplastics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Contino, M.; Ferruggia, G.; Indelicato, S.; Pecoraro, R.; Scalisi, E.M.; Salvaggio, A.; Brundo, M.V. Sublethal Effects of Polystyrene Nanoplastics on the Embryonic Development of Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758). Animals 2023, 13, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wan, J.-K.; Chu, W.-L.; Kok, Y.-Y.; Lee, C.-S. Distribution of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems and Their Impacts on Aquatic Organisms, with Emphasis on Microalgae. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; De Voogt, P., Ed.; Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Swizterland, 2018; Volume 246, pp. 133–158. ISBN 978-3-319-97739-3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dedman, C.J.; Christie-Oleza, J.A.; Fernández-Juárez, V.; Echeveste, P. Cell Size Matters: Nano- and Micro-Plastics Preferentially Drive Declines of Large Marine Phytoplankton Due to Co-Aggregation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tallec, K.; Huvet, A.; Di Poi, C.; González-Fernández, C.; Lambert, C.; Petton, B.; Le Goïc, N.; Berchel, M.; Soudant, P.; Paul-Pont, I. Nanoplastics Impaired Oyster Free Living Stages, Gametes and Embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 1226–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Santis, R.; Jamunno, G.; Rosati, F. A Study of the Chorion and the Follicle Cells in Relation to the Sperm-Egg Interaction in the Ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Dev. Biol. 1980, 74, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cotelli, F.; Andronico, F.; Santis, R.; Monroy, A.; Rosati, F. Differentiation of the Vitelline Coat in the ascidianCiona intestinalis: An Ultrastructural Study. Wilhelm Roux’ Arch. 1981, 190, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sato, Y.; Morisawa, M. Loss of Test Cells Leads to the Formation of New Tunic Surface Cells and Abnormal Metamorphosis in Larvae of Ciona intestinalis (Chordata, Ascidiacea). Dev. Genes Evol. 1999, 209, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thompson, H.; Shimeld, S.M. Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Accessory Cells and Chorion During Development of Ciona intestinalis Type B Embryos and the Impact of Their Removal on Cell Morphology. Zool. Sci. 2015, 32, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Satoh, N. A Deep Dive into the Development of Sea Squirts. Nature 2019, 571, 333–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Delsuc, F.; Brinkmann, H.; Chourrout, D.; Philippe, H. Tunicates and Not Cephalochordates Are the Closest Living Relatives of Vertebrates. Nature 2006, 439, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ishida, T.; Satou, Y. Ascidian Embryonic Cells with Properties of Neural-Crest Cells and Neuromesodermal Progenitors of Vertebrates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 8, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rosner, A.; Rinkevich, B. Harnessing Ascidians as Model Organisms for Environmental Risk Assessment. Environments 2024, 11, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beyer, J.; Song, Y.; Lillicrap, A.; Rodríguez-Satizábal, S.; Chatzigeorgiou, M. Ciona Spp. and Ascidians as Bioindicator Organisms for Evaluating Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: A Discussion Paper. Mar. Environ. Res. 2023, 191, 106170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dumollard, R.; Gazo, I.; Gomes, I.D.L.; Besnardeau, L.; McDougall, A. Ascidians: An Emerging Marine Model for Drug Discovery and Screening. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 2056–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sladitschek, H.L.; Fiuza, U.-M.; Pavlinic, D.; Benes, V.; Hufnagel, L.; Neveu, P.A. MorphoSeq: Full Single-Cell Transcriptome Dynamics Up to Gastrulation in a Chordate. Cell 2020, 181, 922–935.e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hotta, K.; Miyasaka, S.O.; Oka, K.; Shito, T.T. Staring into a Crystal Ball: Understanding Evolution and Development of in Vivo Aquatic Organismal Transparency. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 12, 1428976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yasuo, H.; McDougall, A. Practical Guide for Ascidian Microinjection: Phallusia mammillata. In Transgenic Ascidians; Sasakura, Y., Ed.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 1029, pp. 15–24. ISBN 978-981-10-7544-5. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pennati, R.; Groppelli, S.; Zega, G.; Biggiogero, M.; De Bernardi, F.; Sotgia, C. Toxic Effects of Two Pesticides, Imazalil and Triadimefon, on the Early Development of the Ascidian Phallusia mammillata (Chordata, Ascidiacea). Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 79, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Messinetti, S.; Mercurio, S.; Pennati, R. Effects of Bisphenol A on the Development of Pigmented Organs in the Ascidian Phallusia mammillata. Invertebr. Biol. 2018, 137, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Groppelli, S.; Zega, G.; Biggiogero, M.; De Bernardi, F.; Sotgia, C.; Pennati, R. Fluconazole Induces Teratogenic Effects in the Tunicate Phallusia mammillata. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 23, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gomes, I.D.L.; Gazo, I.; Besnardeau, L.; Hebras, C.; McDougall, A.; Dumollard, R. Potential Roles of Nuclear Receptors in Mediating Neurodevelopmental Toxicity of Known Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals in Ascidian Embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2019, 86, 1333–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gazo, I.; Gomes, I.D.L.; Savy, T.; Besnardeau, L.; Hebras, C.; Benaicha, S.; Brunet, M.; Shaliutina, O.; McDougall, A.; Peyrieras, N.; et al. High-Content Analysis of Larval Phenotypes for the Screening of Xenobiotic Toxicity Using Phallusia mammillata Embryos. Aquat. Toxicol. 2021, 232, 105768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lambert, C.C.; Brandt, C.L. The Effect Of Light On The Spawning Of Ciona intestinalis. Biol Bull 1967, 132, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gomes, I.D.L.; Gazo, I.; Nabi, D.; Besnardeau, L.; Hebras, C.; McDougall, A.; Dumollard, R. Bisphenols Disrupt Differentiation of the Pigmented Cells during Larval Brain Formation in the Ascidian. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 216, 105314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Krasowski, M.D.; Ni, A.; Hagey, L.R.; Ekins, S. Evolution of Promiscuous Nuclear Hormone Receptors: LXR, FXR, VDR, PXR, and CAR. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011, 334, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Webster, F.; Gagné, M.; Patlewicz, G.; Pradeep, P.; Trefiak, N.; Judson, R.S.; Barton-Maclaren, T.S. Predicting Estrogen Receptor Activation by a Group of Substituted Phenols: An Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment Case Study. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 106, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Richter, I.; Fidler, A.E. Tunicate Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) Orthologs: Transcript Characterization and Natural Variation. Mar. Genom. 2015, 23, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, X.; Wang, X.; Booth, A.M.; Zhu, L.; Sui, Q.; Chen, B.; Qu, K.; Xia, B. New Insights into the Impact of Polystyrene Micro/Nanoplastics on the Nutritional Quality of Marine Jacopever (Sebastes schlegelii). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 903, 166560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, H.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Duan, Z.; Cui, W.; Shi, Y.; Qin, L. Influence of Functional Group Modification on the Toxicity of Nanoplastics. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 8, 800782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jox 15 00010 g001
Figure 1. Percentage (%) of normal hatched larvae of P. mammillata upon 22 h exposure of chorionated embryos (A) and dechorionated embryos (B) to PS-NH2 in NSW. Bars represent mean ± SD (PS-NH2 N = 240). Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)). EC50 values are shown.
Figure 1. Percentage (%) of normal hatched larvae of P. mammillata upon 22 h exposure of chorionated embryos (A) and dechorionated embryos (B) to PS-NH2 in NSW. Bars represent mean ± SD (PS-NH2 N = 240). Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)). EC50 values are shown.
Jox 15 00010 g001
Jox 15 00010 g002
Figure 2. Light microscopy images of P. mammillata embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH2. (A–E) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed in a chorion: (A) control; (B) 5 μg mL−1; (C) 7.5 μg mL−1; (D) 10 μg mL−1; (E) 15 μg mL−1. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 2. Light microscopy images of P. mammillata embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH2. (A–E) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed in a chorion: (A) control; (B) 5 μg mL−1; (C) 7.5 μg mL−1; (D) 10 μg mL−1; (E) 15 μg mL−1. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Jox 15 00010 g002
Jox 15 00010 g003
Figure 3. Light microscopy images of P. mammillata embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH2. (A–E) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed without a chorion: (A) control; (B) 2 μg mL−1; (C) 3 μg mL−1; (D) 3.5 μg mL−1; (E) 5 μg mL−1; (F) 7.5 μg mL−1. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 3. Light microscopy images of P. mammillata embryos exposed for 22 h to PS-NH2. (A–E) represent the phenotypes for embryos developed without a chorion: (A) control; (B) 2 μg mL−1; (C) 3 μg mL−1; (D) 3.5 μg mL−1; (E) 5 μg mL−1; (F) 7.5 μg mL−1. White and red arrows represent a good and wrong shape of pigmented cells (PCs) and palps (P), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Jox 15 00010 g003
Jox 15 00010 g004
Figure 4. Morphometric analysis of phenotypes induced in P. mammillata embryos (A) with a chorion and (B) without a chorion exposed to PS-NH2 (0; 7.5 and 15 μg mL−1 for chorionated embryos, 0; 3.5 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for dechorionated embryos). The radar charts summarize the following endpoints: ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (µm2); Oc/Ot distance (µm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (µm). All measurements were performed at 22 hpf. The values are normalized to the corresponding value of the same parameter in the control (stage 26) and presented as a percentage of the control value. Complete radar charts of all tested concentrations are shown in Figure S3.
Figure 4. Morphometric analysis of phenotypes induced in P. mammillata embryos (A) with a chorion and (B) without a chorion exposed to PS-NH2 (0; 7.5 and 15 μg mL−1 for chorionated embryos, 0; 3.5 and 7.5 μg mL−1 for dechorionated embryos). The radar charts summarize the following endpoints: ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (µm2); Oc/Ot distance (µm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (µm). All measurements were performed at 22 hpf. The values are normalized to the corresponding value of the same parameter in the control (stage 26) and presented as a percentage of the control value. Complete radar charts of all tested concentrations are shown in Figure S3.
Jox 15 00010 g004
Jox 15 00010 g005
Figure 5. Genotoxicity assay performed analyzing 7 hpf embryos (neurula stage). (A) Control embryo (NSW), (B) 5 μg mL−1; (C) 7.5 μg mL−1. At the bottom of each image, the percentage of embryos not showing DNA aberrations is reported (N control = 152; 5 μg mL−1 = 175; 7.5 μg mL−1 = 160.).
Figure 5. Genotoxicity assay performed analyzing 7 hpf embryos (neurula stage). (A) Control embryo (NSW), (B) 5 μg mL−1; (C) 7.5 μg mL−1. At the bottom of each image, the percentage of embryos not showing DNA aberrations is reported (N control = 152; 5 μg mL−1 = 175; 7.5 μg mL−1 = 160.).
Jox 15 00010 g005
Table 1. Quantitative analysis of the morphological aberrations observed after the exposure of Phallusia mammillata chorionated embryos to different concentrations of PS-NH2. N represents the number of observed embryos at stage 26 (22 hpf). The endpoints analyzed were the ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (μm2); Oc/Ot distance (μm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (μm). Data are presented as means ± S.D. and as % compared to the control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s correction, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Table 1. Quantitative analysis of the morphological aberrations observed after the exposure of Phallusia mammillata chorionated embryos to different concentrations of PS-NH2. N represents the number of observed embryos at stage 26 (22 hpf). The endpoints analyzed were the ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (μm2); Oc/Ot distance (μm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (μm). Data are presented as means ± S.D. and as % compared to the control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s correction, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
TreatmentNOc/Ot Area, μm2,
Mean ± S.E.		Oc/Ot Area % Compared to the ControlOc/Ot
Distance, μm,
Mean ± S.E.		Oc/Ot
Distance % Compared to
the Control		% Elongated Palps,
Means ± S.E.		Elongated Palps % Compared to the ControlTrunk L/W Ratio,
Means ± S.E.		Trunk L/W % Compared to the ControlTail Length, μm,
Means ± S.E.		Tail Length % Compared to the
Control
Ctrl143276.4 ± 60.9-18.8 ± 6.7-100.0 ± 0.0-1.9 ± 0.2-589.7 ± 98.7-
2 µg mL−1 PS-NH285271.0 ± 64.498.019.1 ± 6.3101.386.7 ± 8.286.71.9 ± 0.2104.1553.5 ± 94.093.9
5 µg mL−1 PS-NH2110274.5± 65.099.318.3 ± 8.897.061.8 ± 17.261.82.0 ± 0.2105.2524.4 ± 92.6 ***88.9
7.5 µg mL−1 PS-NH2134267.9 ± 64.696.914.4 ± 10.0 **76.333.5 ± 17.933.51.7 ± 0.4 ***90.5461.4 ± 104.7 ***78.2
10 µg mL−1 PS-NH2105268.8 ± 56.997.311.6 ± 10.4 ***61.723.2 ± 15.9 *23.21.6 ± 0.3 ***85.8436.6 ± 93.5 ***74.0
15 µg mL−1 PS-NH258264.9 ± 67.1 95.86.9 ± 9.5 ***36.91.8 ± 3.7 ***1.81.4 ± 0.3 ***75.3343.6 ± 120.5 ***58.3
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of the morphological aberrations observed after the exposure of Phallusia mammillata dechorionated embryos to different concentrations of PS-NH2. N represents the number of observed embryos at stage 26 (22 hpf). The endpoints analyzed were the ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (μm2); Oc/Ot distance (μm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (μm). Data are presented as means ± S.D. and as % compared to the control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s correction,* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of the morphological aberrations observed after the exposure of Phallusia mammillata dechorionated embryos to different concentrations of PS-NH2. N represents the number of observed embryos at stage 26 (22 hpf). The endpoints analyzed were the ocellus (Oc) + otolith (Ot) area (μm2); Oc/Ot distance (μm); percentage of embryos with palps (%); trunk L/W (length/width) ratio; tail length (μm). Data are presented as means ± S.D. and as % compared to the control. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the control (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s correction,* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
TreatmentNOc/Ot Area, μm2,
Mean ± S.E.		Oc/Ot Area % Compared to the ControlOc/Ot
Distance, μm,
Mean ± S.E.		Oc/Ot
Distance % Compared to the Control		% Elongated Palps,
Means ± S.E.		Elongated Palps % Compared to the ControlTrunk L/W Ratio,
Means ± S.E.		Trunk L/W % Compared to the ControlTail Length, μm,
Means ± S.E.		Tail Length % Compared to the Control
Ctrl137294.9.0 ± 64.0-23.6 ± 7.7-96.3 ± 3.1-1.8 ± 0.3-577.2 ± 94.6-
2 µg mL−1 PS-NH2122256.2 ± 107.486.917.2 ± 10.5 ***72.979.5 ± 19.482.61.6 ± 0.292.9566.0 ± 65.298.1
3.5 µg mL−1 PS-NH256254.5 ± 56.9 **86.312.7 ± 9.8 ***53.811.6 ± 11.512.01.3 ± 0.1 ***76.0537.8 ± 58.5 **93.2
5 µg mL−1 PS-NH2167273.6 ± 83.792.88.6 ± 10.8 ***36.424.7 ± 11.225.71.3 ± 0.2 ***75.3452.7 ± 113.4 *78.4
7.5 µg mL−1 PS-NH2141259.0 ± 100.687.87.8 ± 9.7 ***33.24.4 ± 4.3 ***4.61.3 ± 0.2 ***72.9433.0 ± 97.0 *75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eliso, M.C.; Corsi, I.; Spagnuolo, A.; Dumollard, R. Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos. J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010

AMA Style

Eliso MC, Corsi I, Spagnuolo A, Dumollard R. Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos. Journal of Xenobiotics. 2025; 15(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eliso, Maria Concetta, Ilaria Corsi, Antonietta Spagnuolo, and Rémi Dumollard. 2025. "Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos" Journal of Xenobiotics 15, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010

APA Style

Eliso, M. C., Corsi, I., Spagnuolo, A., & Dumollard, R. (2025). Nanoplastic-Induced Developmental Toxicity in Ascidians: Comparative Analysis of Chorionated and Dechorionated Phallusia mammillata Embryos. Journal of Xenobiotics, 15(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop