Thermodynamic Fundamentals for Fuel Production Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Pure rapeseed oil,
- A mixture of 85% rapeseed oil and 15% unleaded petrol,
- A mixture of 70% rapeseed oil and 30% unleaded petrol,
- A mixture of 85% rapeseed oil and 15% ethanol,
- A mixture of 70% rapeseed oil and 30% ethanol.
2.1. Nomenclature
2.2. Description of the Program
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Effect of Temperature
3.1.1. Rapeseed Oil
3.1.2. Mixtures of Rapeseed Oil and Unleaded Petrol
3.1.3. Mixtures of Rapeseed Oil and Ethyl Alcohol
3.2. The Effect of Fuel Composition
3.2.1. The Effect of Addition of Unleaded Petrol
3.2.2. The Effect of Ethanol Addition
4. Results
- An increase in rapeseed oil content in the mixture caused an increase in the self-ignition delay and a drop in the maximum pressure, especially at lower initial temperature values in the test chamber,
- In the case of rape oil and gasoline mixtures, the effect of the additive depended on its concentration in the mixture,
- In the case of mixtures containing 15% by weight of U95, a self-ignition delay was observed, and the maximum pressure dropped,
- In the case of a higher mass fraction of U95, up to 30%, a further increase in the self-ignition delay was observed as well as a slight increase in the maximum pressure in the test chamber,
- The practical implication of the performed research was that the additive apparently extending the range of fuel characteristics does not always bring a positive result on the fuel behavior. Both the chemical composition as well as concentrations of components have to be carefully studied before the mixture is used as a fuel,
- Since both additives investigated have a low cetane number, it can be expected that the choice of the additive with a higher cetane number might lead to a wider spectrum of conditions at which the mixture would show better performance than the neat rapeseed oil. This assumption has to be studied separately,
- Injection pressure and fuel viscosity have a fundamental effect on the air/fuel mixture creation, which affects combustion processes and also might affect exhaust composition and toxicity as well as fuel consumption.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Küüt, A.; Ilves, R.; Küüt, K.; Raide, V.; Ritslaid, K.; Olt, J. Influence of European Union Directives on the Use of Liquid Biofuel in the Transport Sector. Procedia Eng. 2017, 187, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krzywonos, M.; Skudlarski, J.; Kupczyk, A.; Wojdalski, J.; Tucki, K. Forecast for transport biofuels in Poland in 2020–2030. Przemysł Chem. 2015, 94, 2218–2222. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni, E.; Christidis, P.; Thunis, P.; Trombetti, M. Evaluating the impact of “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans” on urban background air quality. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herran, D.S.; Tachiiri, K.; Matsumoto, K. Global energy system transformations in mitigation scenarios considering climate uncertainties. Appl. Energy 2019, 243, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, D.; Balogh, P.; Gabnai, Z.; Popp, J.; Oláh, J.; Bai, A. Economic Analysis of Pellet Production in Co-Digestion Biogas Plants. Energies 2018, 11, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energy and Economy. Electric Power Research Institute and Galvin Electricity Initiative. Available online: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/ (accessed on 28 April 2019).
- Kosowski, K.; Tucki, K.; Piwowarski, M.; Stępień, R.; Orynycz, O.; Włodarski, W.; Bączyk, A. Thermodynamic Cycle Concepts for High-Efficiency Power Plans. Part A: Public Power Plants 60+. Sustainability 2019, 11, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucki, K.; Orynycz, O.; Wasiak, A.; Świć, A.; Wichłacz, J. The Impact of Fuel Type on the Output Parameters of a New Biofuel Burner. Energies 2019, 12, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosowski, K.; Tucki, K.; Piwowarski, M.; Stępień, R.; Orynycz, O.; Włodarski, W. Thermodynamic Cycle Concepts for High-Efficiency Power Plants. Part B: Prosumer and Distributed Power Industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Electromobility Will Boost the Economy. Available online: https://financialobserver.eu/poland/ (accessed on 16 August 2019).
- Samson, I.; Sikora, M.; Bączyk, A.; Mączyńska, J.; Tucki, K. Technologies used to enhance the biogas and biomethane yield: A review. Przemysł Chem. 2017, 96, 1605–1611. [Google Scholar]
- Rietmann, N.; Lieven, T. How policy measures succeeded to promote electric mobility—Worldwide review and outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuelsson, K.; Giusti, M.; Peterson, G.D.; Legeby, A.; Brandt, S.A.; Barthel, S. Impact of environment on people’s everyday experiences in Stockholm. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 171, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Guo, X.; Xiao, B. What causes growth of global greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from 40 countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 661, 750–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Air Pollution: Our Health Still Insufficiently Protected. Available online: http://publications.europa.eu (accessed on 20 March 2019).
- Fernández-Dacosta, C.; Shen, L.; Schakel, W.; Ramirez, A.; Kramer, G.J. Potential and challenges of low-carbon energy options: Comparative assessment of alternative fuels for the transport sector. Appl. Energy 2019, 236, 590–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, M.; Tainter, J.A.; Strumsky, D. Productivity of innovation in biofuel technologies. Energy Policy 2019, 124, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demand for UCOME in Europe Falling as other Low GHG Fuels Step up the Pace. Available online: https://www.spglobal.com/ (accessed on 03 July 2019).
- Clean Transport; Urban Transport. Alternative Fuels for Sustainable Mobility in Europe. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/cpt_en (accessed on 28 April 2019).
- Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; Khanali, M.; Demirbas, A. A comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 174, 579–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattioli, G.; Lucas, K.; Marsden, G. Reprint of Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison. Transp. Policy 2018, 65, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, H.A.; Alminshid, A.H.; Aljaafari, H.A.S. Promising evolution of biofuel generations. Subject review. Renew. Energy Focus 2019, 28, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the Reduction of National Emissions of Certain Atmospheric Pollutants, Amending Directive 2003/35/EC and Repealing Directive 2001/81/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed on 28 April 2019).
- National Environmental Protection Program until 2020 (with a Prospect until 2030). Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/srodowisko (accessed on 28 April 2019).
- Kuklinska, K.; Wolska, L.; Namiesnik, J. Air quality policy in the U.S. and the EU—A review. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2015, 6, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, F.M.; Gómez-Losada, A.; Pires, J.C.M. Impact of the implementation of Lisbon low emission zone on air quality. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 365, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucki, K.; Mruk, M.; Orynycz, O.; Botwińska, K.; Gola, A. Toxicity of Exhaust Fumes (CO, NOx) of the Compression-Ignition (Diesel) Engine with the Use of Simulation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucki, K.; Mruk, R.; Orynycz, O.; Wasiak, A.; Botwińska, K.; Gola, A. Simulation of the Operation of a Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with Various Biofuels and Its Contribution to Technology Management. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sustainable Production of Next Generation Biofuels From Waste Streams. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/200420/factsheet/en (accessed on 16 August 2019).
- Wang, T.; Lin, B. Fuel consumption in road transport: A comparative study of China and OECD countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kupczyk, A.; Mączyńska, J.; Redlarski, G.; Tucki, K.; Bączyk, A.; Rutkowski, D. Selected Aspects of Biofuels Market and the Electromobility Development in Poland: Current Trends and Forecasting Changes. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustapha, W.F.; Kirkerud, J.G.; Bolkesjø, T.F.; Trømborg, E. Large-scale forest-based biofuels production: Impacts on the Nordic energy sector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 187, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krzywonos, M.; Tucki, K.; Wojdalski, J.; Kupczyk, A.; Sikora, M. Analysis of Properties of Synthetic Hydrocarbons Produced Using the ETG Method and Selected Conventional Biofuels Made in Poland in the Context of Environmental Effects Achieved. Rocz. Ochr. Środowiska 2017, 19, 394–410. [Google Scholar]
- Mączyńska, J.; Krzywonos, M.; Kupczyk, A.; Tucki, K.; Sikora, M.; Pińkowska, H.; Bączyk, A.; Wielewska, I. Production and use of biofuels for transport in Poland and Brazil—The case of bioethanol. Fuel 2019, 241, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leong, W.H.; Lim, J.W.; Lam, M.K.; Uemura, Y.; Ho, Y.C. Third generation biofuels: A nutritional perspective in enhancing microbial lipid production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 950–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasiak, A. Modeling Energetic Efficiency of Biofuels Production. In Green Energy and Technology, 1st ed.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 29–47. ISBN 978-3-319-98430-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasiak, A.; Orynycz, O. Computer modelling of the influences of subsystems’ interactions on energetic efficiency of biofuel production systems. In Proceedings of the ITM Web of Conferences, Lublin, Poland, 23–25 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Karthickeyan, V. Effect of combustion chamber bowl geometry modification on engine performance, combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fuelled diesel engine with its energy and exergy analysis. Energy 2019, 176, 830–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharehghani, A.; Mirsalim, M.; Hosseini, R. Effects of waste fish oil biodiesel on diesel engine combustion characteristics and emission. Renew. Energy 2017, 101, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curran, H.J. Developing detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for fuel combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 57–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, B.K.; Sahoo, N.; Saha, U.K. Thermodynamic analysis of a variable compression ratio diesel engine running with palm oil methyl ester. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 65, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.N.; Bharj, R.S. Study of physical-chemical properties for 2nd generation ethanol-blended diesel fuel in India. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2019, 12, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Jia, M.; Wang, P.; Chang, Y.; Yi, P.; Liu, H.; He, Z. Construction of a decoupling physical–chemical surrogate (DPCS) for practical diesel fuel. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 149, 536–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Liang, X. Influence of Different Fuels Physical Properties for Marine Diesel Engine. Energy Procedia 2017, 142, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeom, J.K.; Jung, S.H.; Yoon, J.H. An experimental study on the application of oxygenated fuel to diesel engines. Fuel 2019, 248, 262–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Ma, J.; Dong, F.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Ma, G.; Zheng, Z.; Yao, M. Experimental investigation of the effects of diesel fuel properties on combustion and emissions on a multi-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 1787–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anantha Raman, L.; Deepanraj, B.; Rajakumar, S.; Sivasubramanian, V. Experimental investigation on performance, combustion and emission analysis of a direct injection diesel engine fuelled with rapeseed oil biodiesel. Fuel 2019, 246, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Q.; Tuomo, H.; Kaario, O.T.; Martti, L. Spray dynamics of HVO and EN590 diesel fuels. Fuel 2019, 245, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Potential for Using Tallow as a Fuel for the Production of Energy. Available online: https://www.sustainability.vic.gov.au/ (accessed on 12 August 2019).
- Bartholomew, D. Vegetable oil fuel. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1981, 58, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bello, E.I.; Mogaji, T.S.; Agge, M. The effects of transesterification on selected fuel properties of three vegetable oils. J. Mech. Eng. Res. 2011, 3, 218–225. [Google Scholar]
- Klimkiewicz, M. The Use of Crude Rapeseed Oil as a Fuel for Diesel Engines; Report on the implementation of the development Project No. R1003703; Faculty of Production Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences: Warsaw, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mruk, R.; Klimkiewicz, M.; Botwińska, K. The studies of combustion processes mixtures of diesel oil with raw rapeseed oil as a part of product design. Logistyka 2015, 5, 397–404. [Google Scholar]
Symbol | Description |
---|---|
volume | |
temperature | |
gas constant | |
individual gas constant | |
the heat of burning fuel | |
specific heat at constant pressure of the gas mixture in the chamber | |
specific heat at a constant volume of the gas mixture in the chamber | |
chamber volume | |
calorific value of fuel | |
z-th instant of time | |
z-1 instant of time | |
z + 1 instant of time | |
Pressure | |
pressure in the chamber at the z-th instant of time after smoothing | |
pressure in the chamber at the z-th instant of time | |
pressure in the chamber in z-1 instant of time | |
chamber pressure in z + 1 instant of time | |
maximum pressure in the chamber | |
gas mass | |
mass of burnt fuel or mass of injected fuel | |
the mass of gas at the instant z | |
mass of gas at z-1 instant of time | |
coefficients, individual for each gas | |
emitted heat | |
mass share of hydrogen in the fuel | |
mass fraction of oxygen in fuel | |
mass fraction of oxygen | |
mass fraction of nitrogen | |
mass fraction of carbon dioxide | |
mass fraction of water vapor | |
mass heat at constant oxygen pressure | |
mass heat at constant nitrogen pressure | |
specific heat at constant carbon dioxide pressure | |
specific heat at constant water vapor pressure | |
mass fraction of oxygen at the z-th instant of time | |
mass fraction of nitrogen at the z-th instant of time | |
mass fraction of carbon dioxide at the z-th instant of time | |
mass fraction of water vapor at the z-th instant of time | |
mass fraction of oxygen at the instant z-1 | |
mass fraction of nitrogen at the instant z-1 | |
mass fraction of carbon dioxide at the instant z-1 | |
mass fraction of water vapor at the instant z-1 |
Fuel | Rapeseed Oil (R) | Ethanol (E) | Unleaded Petrol (U) |
---|---|---|---|
Lower heating value [MJ/kg] | 37.5 | 29.7 | 47.3 |
Hydrogen mass fraction [%] | 11.4 | 13.0 | 14.0 |
Carbon mass fraction [%] | 77.4 | 52.2 | 86.0 |
Oxygen mass fraction [%] | 11.2 | 34.8 | - |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tucki, K.; Mruk, R.; Orynycz, O.; Wasiak, A.; Świć, A. Thermodynamic Fundamentals for Fuel Production Management. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164449
Tucki K, Mruk R, Orynycz O, Wasiak A, Świć A. Thermodynamic Fundamentals for Fuel Production Management. Sustainability. 2019; 11(16):4449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164449
Chicago/Turabian StyleTucki, Karol, Remigiusz Mruk, Olga Orynycz, Andrzej Wasiak, and Antoni Świć. 2019. "Thermodynamic Fundamentals for Fuel Production Management" Sustainability 11, no. 16: 4449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164449
APA StyleTucki, K., Mruk, R., Orynycz, O., Wasiak, A., & Świć, A. (2019). Thermodynamic Fundamentals for Fuel Production Management. Sustainability, 11(16), 4449. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164449