Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Defining Green ERP Systems
2.2. Defining Green IT
3. Theoretical Framework of the Study
3.1. Green ERP System Criteria
- Energy Efficiency: This criterion considers the optimization of the energy consumption of the ERP system in relation to resource use in the data center.
- Feasibility: This quality criterion evaluates the effects of the ERP system development and implementation on sustainable development. In a broad context, aspects related to business travel, asset life cycle, or user behaviors are considered.
- Portability: Refers to the efforts to port ERP software from one hardware platform or software environment to another.
- Usability: This criterion covers the understandability, learnability, and operability of ERP software, addressing the extent to which the system can be used by specific users, to achieve effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a particular context of use.
- Vendor support and reputation [62,63]: This criterion refers to ERP system vendor profiles from the perspective of their environmental values related to energy efficiency of software development, good reputation in using IT-based environmental initiatives, or business processes certified for environment friendliness.
- User practices and attitude [64,65]: User awareness of environmental issues is one on the most important criteria for assessing the sustainable management process of ERP implementation. It refers both to practices and attitudes when dealing with green IT initiatives that lead to behavioral change in using the ERP system (e.g., reducing paper use and printing, applying teleworking and collaboration, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use, and programing computers to automatically power down).
3.2. Green IT Practices
3.2.1. Data Center and Energy Efficiency
- Storage consolidation: The concept of centralizing and sharing storage resources among numerous application servers. Storage consolidation allows organizations to increase the use of IT resources so that energy consumption for data storage can be minimized. Depending on the systems and circumstances involved, storage consolidation can be achieved in many different ways, such as running multiple application schemas in one single database, hosting multiple databases on a single platform, reducing data volume, and eliminating redundant data through de-duplication and compression.
- Server virtualization. Widely adopted as a green IT initiative, virtualization enables data centers to consolidate their physical server infrastructure by hosting multiple virtual servers on a smaller number of more powerful servers, reducing the data center’s energy demands [21]. According to Barroso and Hölze [71], virtual servers use less power and have higher levels of efficiency than standalone servers. Although virtualization technology allows the reduction of power consumption by reducing the overall number of devices, in practice, most data centers’ power consumption continues to rise because the devices are becoming increasingly powerful and use more electricity. However, from a green IT perspective, this technology helps organizations to achieve some of the objectives of their environmental policy.
- Automated power management software: Refers to systems management and automation software that is able to force system shutdowns during hours of inactivity (e.g., evenings and weekends). Software-based solutions can enforce organizational policies regarding the use of power saving features (turn off monitor, turn off hard drive, put system in sleep mode) so that power consumption is minimized during operational hours [72].
- Thin Clients: There are workstations with minimal hardware configurations, which are typically designed with only rudimentary processing and memory functionality. Several applications are hosted on a central server and then transmitted to the thin client via a network communication process or virtualization technology. Using of thin clients could significantly save power because their goal is essentially to act as a simple terminal, without memory resources, central processing unit (CPU), or a full operating system [72]. A report conducted by Info-Tech Research [73] highlighted that a typical computer uses up to a 250-watt power supply, a thin client uses a 4.8-watt power supply, so the reduction in electricity usage is 97.98%.
3.2.2. Asset Life Cycle
- Procurement: Procurement is a major issue faced by green practices related to the use of ICT, involving two crucial points: the nature of the equipment itself, and the nature of the suppliers of the equipment. According to Uddin and Rahman [74], the first may comply with environmental standards, such as Energy Star and the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT), which provide a methodology and guidance for purchasing. The second point is linked to the suppliers’ own green strategies and carbon footprints. These strategies include important purchasing criteria, such as the supplier’s environmental values in the design and manufacture of equipment, its compliance with relevant environmental laws and codes of practice, and whether the supplier reclaims and recycles old equipment from customers [74].
- Recycle and reuse: To reduce the organization’s environmental impact, recycling IT equipment is an appropriate solution to extend their life cycle. Although the periodic replacement of IT equipment is natural, many organizations do this too early, increasing the waste sent to landfills. To harness the green dimension of an ERP system, some initiatives focused on equipment recycling and reuse should be promoted. Thus, recycling can help with recovering valuable materials and may reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with production of new equipment. Reuse avoids the need to extract more valuable resources or expend energy in the manufacture of new equipment [75].
3.2.3. People Practices
- User education: This is the basic step for individuals and organizations that could be adopted to directly help with the greening of the ERP system. Many practices do not involve the purchase of any new technology, but simply refer to techniques and behavior that people should adopt, such as using screensavers, using e-mail, turning off personal computers (PCs) when not in use, recycling printer paper, and printing less [76].
- Printer consolidation: Printers are commonly used devices in any business that consume a large amount of energy and paper. Printers themselves are environmentally unfriendly devices because they are built from materials that are difficult to recycle or are toxic. Therefore, as an important green IT solution, printer consolidation addresses the processes that optimize the organization’s printer fleet to decrease the cost of hardware, consumables (paper, toner, ink), electricity, and maintenance.
- Telecommuting: Given the awareness of global warming caused by greenhouse gases emissions, many companies wish to reduce travel to cut costs and decrease the negative impact of travel on the environment. Telecommunication-related technologies (e.g., teleconferencing and video-conferencing) are common solutions to reduce the need for business travel that could help to green the use of an ERP system. Telecommuting technologies allow working at a distance, and can be used for some remote management processes, document management, and sharing knowledge.
4. Material and Methods
4.1. Data Collection and Sampling
4.2. Research Model and Methods
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. General Information
5.2. Awareness of Software Sustainability
5.3. Awareness of Sustainable Management Process
5.4. Awareness of Green IT Initiatives and Practices
5.4.1. Green IT Solutions to Reduce Energy Consumption Related to ERP Systems
5.4.2. ERP System Vendor Complies with Software Sustainability Criteria during Application Design
5.4.3. IT Procurement Policy
5.4.4. Awareness of IT Equipment Recycling and Reuse
- The null hypothesis: Green IT practices are not positively related to the sustainable development of ERP systems.
- The alternative hypothesis (H1): Green IT practices are positively related to the sustainable development of ERP systems.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
1. General Information | |
1.1 Education | |
Bachelors | Postgraduate course |
Masters | PhD |
1.2 Position in organization | |
Chief Information Officer (CIO) Chief Technology Officer (CTO) | IT manager ERP project manager Business manager |
1.3 Economic sector of your organization | |
Manufacturing | Pharmaceuticals |
Telecommunication | Utilities |
2. Software Sustainability Criteria | |
1—Strongly disagree; 2—Disagree; 3—Fairly disagree; 4—Neutral; 5—Fairly agree 6—Agree; 7—Strongly agree | |
2.1 Optimization of resource use during ERP software tasks considers renewable energy sources. | |
2.2 There are specific sustainability requirements for practices and tools used in the ERP system. | |
2.3 The portability of ERP software on another hardware or software platforms increases energy efficiency conditions. | |
2.4 Energy use issues have an influence on feasibility of ERP system. | |
2.5 General sustainability policies affect the usability of the ERP system (to be learned, used, and executed under specific conditions). | |
2.6 The usability and feasibility of the ERP system are affected by the need for lower energy use. | |
2.7 The quality of the ERP software architecture (i.e., the system’s components, their relationship, the rules governing its conceptual design) determines the sustainability of the ERP system. | |
3. Sustainable management process to implement ERP system | |
1—Strongly disagree; 2—Disagree; 3—Fairly disagree; 4—Neutral; 5—Fairly agree 6—Agree; 7—Strongly agree | |
3.1 Top management support is a critical success factor when developing sustainability policies for the implementation of an ERP system. | |
3.2 There is a relationship between environmental IT initiatives and sustainability strategy to fulfill the requirements of the ERP system through eco-responsible IT practices. | |
3.3 We prefer ERP system vendors that have a good reputation for using IT-based environmental initiatives. | |
3.4 The organization selects an ERP system vendor that is able to position the products and services in terms of energy consumption and lower costs. | |
3.5 There is an awareness of users to change their behavior during ERP software tasks (reducing paper, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use). | |
4. Green IT initiatives and practices toward more sustainable ERP system | |
1—Strongly disagree; 2—Disagree; 3—Fairly disagree; 4—Neutral; 5—Fairly agree 6—Agree; 7—Strongly agree | |
4.1 Green IT solutions are the best way to enhance the potential of the ERP system in promoting sustainable business practices by reducing emissions, waste, and costs. | |
4.2 The problem of addressing ERP system in a greener manner is linked to green IT initiatives adopted at the organization level. | |
4.3 The main goal of optimizing IT infrastructure related to using an ERP system is to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. | |
4.4 There are initiatives to help motivate employees to adopt environmental practices related to the use of the ERP system (e.g., switching off computer, screensavers, printer consolidation). | |
4.5 Telecommuting technologies (e.g., teleconferencing, video-conferencing) should be introduced as common practices in using your own ERP system, in order to make it more environmentally friendly. | |
4.6 To reduce the energy consumption related to the ERP system, the following green IT solutions are used (please specify): | |
Storage consolidation | Automated Power Management |
Server virtualization | Thin Clients |
4.7 Is your organization aware of whether the ERP system vendor complies with the software sustainability criteria in the design of ERP applications? | Yes No Missing |
4.8 Does your organization have an IT procurement policy with the aim of limiting the environmental impact of purchases through initiatives that help to make more informed choices when purchasing new equipment? | Yes No Missing |
4.9 Is your organization aware of equipment recycling and reuse, according to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) regulations? | Yes No Missing |
Appendix B
Item No. | Item | Level of Agreement (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SD/D/FD | N | FA/A/SA | ||
Manufacturing Sector | ||||
2.1 | Optimization of resource use during ERP software tasks considers renewable energy sources. | 41 | 23 | 36 |
2.2 | There are specific sustainability requirements for practices and tools used in the ERP system. | 57 | 31 | 12 |
2.3 | The portability of ERP software on another hardware or software platforms increases energy efficiency conditions. | 26 | 63 | 11 |
2.4 | Energy use issues have an influence on feasibility of ERP system. | 17 | 0 | 83 |
2.5 | General sustainability policies affect the usability of the ERP system (to be learned, used, and executed under specific conditions). | 79 | 12 | 9 |
2.6 | The usability and feasibility of the ERP system are affected by the need for lower energy use. | 58 | 36 | 6 |
2.7 | The quality of ERP software architecture (i.e., the system’s components, their relationship, the rules governing its conceptual design) determines the sustainability of the ERP system. | 4 | 0 | 96 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 6.84 | 4 | 6.14 | |
Telecommunication sector | ||||
2.1 | Optimization of resource use during ERP software tasks considers renewable energy sources. | 24 | 17 | 59 |
2.2 | There are specific sustainability requirements for practices and tools used in the ERP system. | 9 | 35 | 56 |
2.3 | The portability of ERP software on another hardware or software platforms increases energy efficiency conditions. | 0 | 31 | 69 |
2.4 | Energy use issues have an influence on feasibility of ERP system. | 3 | 54 | 43 |
2.5 | General sustainability policies affect the usability of the ERP system (to be learned, used, and executed under specific conditions). | 0 | 21 | 79 |
2.6 | The usability and feasibility of the ERP system are affected by the need for lower energy use. | 48 | 3 | 49 |
2.7 | The quality of ERP software architecture (i.e., the system’s components, their relationship, the rules governing its conceptual design) determines the sustainability of the ERP system. | 17 | 0 | 83 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 8.58 | 13.68 | 37.23 | |
Pharmaceuticals sector | ||||
2.1 | Optimization of resource use during ERP software tasks considers renewable energy sources. | 34 | 12 | 54 |
2.2 | There are specific sustainability requirements for practices and tools used in the ERP system. | 26 | 5 | 69 |
2.3 | The portability of ERP software on another hardware or software platforms increases energy efficiency conditions. | 19 | 29 | 52 |
2.4 | Energy use issues have an influence on feasibility of ERP system. | 11 | 72 | 17 |
2.5 | General sustainability policies affect the usability of the ERP system (to be learned, used, and executed under specific conditions). | 49 | 19 | 32 |
2.6 | The usability and feasibility of the ERP system are affected by the need for lower energy use. | 51 | 7 | 42 |
2.7 | The quality of ERP software architecture (i.e., the system’s components, their relationship, the rules governing its conceptual design) determines the sustainability of the ERP system. | 5 | 11 | 84 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 11.05 | 8.78 | 19.83 | |
Utilities sector | ||||
2.1 | Optimization of resource use during ERP software tasks considers renewable energy sources. | 58 | 21 | 21 |
2.2 | There are specific sustainability requirements for practices and tools used in the ERP system. | 83 | 0 | 17 |
2.3 | The portability of ERP software on another hardware or software platforms increases energy efficiency conditions. | 95 | 1 | 4 |
2.4 | Energy use issues have an influence on feasibility of ERP system. | 54 | 10 | 36 |
2.5 | General sustainability policies affect the usability of the ERP system (to be learned, used, and executed under specific conditions). | 38 | 0 | 62 |
2.6 | The usability and feasibility of the ERP system are affected by the need for lower energy use. | 56 | 16 | 28 |
2.7 | The quality of ERP software architecture (i.e., the system’s components, their relationship, the rules governing its conceptual design) determines the sustainability of the ERP system. | 18 | 8 | 74 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 13.66 | 1.90 | 8.22 |
Appendix C
Items No. | Items | Level of Agreement (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SD/D/FD | N | FA/A/SA | ||
Manufacturing Sector | ||||
3.1 | Top management support is a critical success factor when developing sustainability policies for the implementation of an ERP system. | 29 | 9 | 62 |
3.2 | There is a relationship between environmental IT initiatives and sustainability strategy to fulfill the requirements of the ERP system through eco-responsible IT practices. | 24 | 2 | 74 |
3.3 | We prefer ERP system vendors that have a good reputation for using IT-based environmental initiatives. | 48 | 5 | 47 |
3.4 | The organization selects an ERP system vendor that is able to position the products and services in terms of energy consumption and lower costs. | 53 | 5 | 42 |
3.5 | There is an awareness of users to change their behavior during ERP software tasks (reducing paper, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use). | 34 | 13 | 53 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 4.56 | 0.82 | 6.75 | |
Telecommunication sector | ||||
3.1 | Top management support is a critical success factor when developing sustainability policies for the implementation of an ERP system. | 13 | 3 | 84 |
3.2 | There is a relationship between environmental IT initiatives and sustainability strategy to fulfill the requirements of the ERP system through eco-responsible IT practices. | 27 | 0 | 73 |
3.3 | We prefer ERP system vendors that have a good reputation for using IT-based environmental initiatives. | 24 | 21 | 55 |
3.4 | The organization selected an ERP system vendor that is able to position the products and services in terms of energy consumption and lower costs. | 45 | 14 | 41 |
3.5 | There is an awareness of users to change their behavior during ERP software tasks (reducing paper, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use). | 13 | 0 | 87 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 10.37 | 3.23 | 28.9 | |
Pharmaceuticals sector | ||||
3.1 | Top management support is a critical success factor when developing sustainability policies for the implementation of an ERP system. | 17 | 4 | 79 |
3.2 | There is a relationship between environmental IT initiatives and sustainability strategy to fulfill the requirements of the ERP system through eco-responsible IT practices. | 14 | 2 | 84 |
3.3 | We prefer ERP system vendors that have a good reputation for using IT-based environmental initiatives. | 39 | 0 | 61 |
3.4 | The organization selected an ERP system vendor that is able to position the products and services in terms of energy consumption and lower costs. | 62 | 0 | 38 |
3.5 | There is an awareness of users to change their behavior during ERP software tasks (reducing paper, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use). | 42 | 12 | 46 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 9.86 | 1.02 | 17.45 | |
Utilities sector | ||||
3.1 | Top management support is a critical success factor when developing sustainability policies for the implementation of an ERP system. | 23 | 18 | 59 |
3.2 | There is a relationship between environmental IT initiatives and sustainability strategy to fulfill the requirements of the ERP system through eco-responsible IT practices. | 13 | 24 | 63 |
3.3 | We prefer ERP system vendors that have a good reputation for using IT-based environmental initiatives. | 31 | 0 | 69 |
3.4 | The organization selected an ERP system vendor that is able to position the products and services in terms of energy consumption and lower costs. | 52 | 0 | 48 |
3.5 | There is an awareness of users to change their behavior during ERP software tasks (reducing paper, using screensavers, turning off the system when not in use). | 47 | 33 | 20 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 4.03 | 1.82 | 6.29 |
Appendix D
Item No. | Item | Level of Agreement (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SD/D/FD | N | FA/A/SA | ||
Manufacturing Sector | ||||
4.1 | Green IT solutions are the best way to enhance the potential of the ERP system in promoting sustainable business practices by reducing emissions, waste, and costs. | 12 | 9 | 79 |
4.2 | The problem of addressing ERP system in a greener manner is linked to green IT initiatives adopted at the organization level. | 39 | 21 | 40 |
4.3 | The main goal of optimizing IT infrastructure related to using an ERP system is to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. | 42 | 13 | 45 |
4.4 | There are initiatives to help motivate employees to adopt environmental practices related to the use of ERP system (e.g., switching off computer, screensavers, printer consolidation). | 63 | 27 | 10 |
4.5 | Telecommuting technologies (e.g., teleconferencing, video-conferencing) should be introduced as common practices in using your own ERP system, in order to make it more environmentally friendly. | 74 | 11 | 15 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 5.58 | 1.96 | 4.59 | |
Telecommunication sector | ||||
4.1 | Green IT solutions are the best way to enhance the potential of the ERP system in promoting sustainable business practices by reducing emissions, waste, and costs. | 24 | 8 | 68 |
4.2 | The problem of addressing ERP system in a greener manner is linked to green IT initiatives adopted at the organization level. | 19 | 17 | 64 |
4.3 | The main goal of optimizing IT infrastructure related to using an ERP system is to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. | 14 | 5 | 81 |
4.4 | There are initiatives to help motivate employees to adopt environmental practices related to the use of the ERP system (e.g., switching off computer, screensavers, printer consolidation). | 21 | 10 | 69 |
4.5 | Telecommuting technologies (e.g., teleconferencing, video-conferencing) should be introduced as common practices in using your own ERP system, in order to make it more environmentally friendly. | 9 | 4 | 87 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 7.39 | 3.74 | 31.36 | |
Pharmaceuticals sector | ||||
4.1 | Green IT solutions are the best way to enhance the potential of the ERP system in promoting sustainable business practices by reducing emissions, waste, and costs. | 36 | 19 | 45 |
4.2 | The problem of addressing ERP system in a greener manner is linked to green IT initiatives adopted at the organization level. | 19 | 6 | 75 |
4.3 | The main goal of optimizing IT infrastructure related to using an ERP system is to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. | 31 | 0 | 69 |
4.4 | There are initiatives to help motivate employees to adopt environmental practices related to the use of the ERP system (e.g., switching off computer, screensavers, printer consolidation). | 16 | 25 | 59 |
4.5 | Telecommuting technologies (e.g., teleconferencing, video-conferencing) should be introduced as common practices in using your own ERP system, in order to make it more environmentally friendly. | 43 | 16 | 41 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 8.21 | 3.74 | 16.37 | |
Utilities sector | ||||
4.1 | Green IT solutions are the best way to enhance the potential of the ERP system in promoting sustainable business practices by reducing emissions, waste, and costs. | 23 | 20 | 57 |
4.2 | The problem of addressing ERP system in a greener manner is linked to green IT initiatives adopted at the organization level. | 41 | 2 | 57 |
4.3 | The main goal of optimizing IT infrastructure related to using an ERP system is to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. | 16 | 15 | 69 |
4.4 | There are initiatives to help motivate employees to adopt environmental practices related to the use of the ERP system (e.g., switching off computer, screensavers, printer consolidation). | 67 | 5 | 28 |
4.5 | Telecommuting technologies (e.g., teleconferencing, video-conferencing) should be introduced as common practices in using your own ERP system, in order to make it more environmentally friendly. | 13 | 26 | 61 |
Level of agreement score of the economic sector (%) | 5.44 | 2.31 | 9.24 |
References
- Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyer, R.H.W.; Peterson, N.D.; Arora, P.; Caldwell, K. Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward. Sustainability 2016, 8, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartlett, R.P., III. Shareholder Wealth Maximization as Means to an End. Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 2014, 38, 255. [Google Scholar]
- Ajami, S.; Arab-Chadegani, R. The effects of applying information technology on job empowerment dimensions. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2014, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simba, D.O.; Mwangu, M. Application of ICT in strengthening health information systems in developing countries in the wake of globalization. Afr. Health Sci. 2004, 4, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Vom Brocke, J.; Seidel, S.; Los, P.; Watson, R. Green IS-Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2013, 4, 295–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, S.; Wang, X.; Sarker, S. Unpacking Green Is: A Review of the Existing Literature and Directions for the Future. In Green Business Process Management; vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 15–37. [Google Scholar]
- Butler, T. Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.D.; Sundaram, D. Sustainable Business Transformation. In Proceedings of the AMCIS, Detroit, MI, USA, 4–8 August 2011; Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis 2011_submissions/356 (accessed on 16 March 2019).
- Sarkar, A.N. Promoting Eco-innovations to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-industry and Green Growth. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 2, 171–224. Available online: https://www.ecsdev.org/images/ V2N1/sarkar% 20171-224.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2019).
- Venhoeven, L.A.; Bolderdjik, J.W.; Steg, L. Why Acting Environmentally-Friendly Feels Good: Exploring the Role of Self Image. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Needhidasan, S.; Samuel, M.; Chidambaram, R. Electronic waste-an emerging threat to the environment of urban India. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhorr, Y.; Eliskandarani, E.; Elsarrag, E. Approaches to Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions in The Built Enviroenment: Low Carbon Cities. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2014, 3, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erickson, L.E. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality: Two global challenges. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Teehan, P.; Kandlikar, M. Comparing Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Modern Computing and Electronics Products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3997–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Gadow, K. Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change; Bravo, F., LeMay, V., Jandl, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 3–4, pp. 385–387. [Google Scholar]
- Hilty, L.; Bieser, J. Opportunities and Risks of Digitalization for Climate Protection in Switzerland. University of Zurich, Informatics and Sustainability Research Group, October 2017. Available online: https://www.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-141128 (accessed on 19 February 2019).
- European Commission. A Clean Planet for all. A European Strategic Long-Term Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773&from=EN (accessed on 19 February 2019).
- World Economic Forum. Why Energy Efficiency is Key to Sustainable Development; World Economic Forum, 2015; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/why-energy-efficiency-is-key-to-sustainable-development/ (accessed on 27 February 2019).
- Ranjit, B.; Xin, R.L. Green IT adoption: A process management approach. Int. J. Account. Inf. Manag. 2012, 20, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murugesan, S. Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. IEEE It Prof. Rev. 2008, 1, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murugesan, S. On Harnessing Green IT and Cloud Computing. SetLabs Brief. Infosys Spec. Issue Green IT 2011, 9, 39–49. Available online: http://infosys.com/ infosys-labs/publications/setlabs-briefings/ Pages/green-IT.aspx (accessed on 27 June 2018).
- Molla, A. GITAM: A model for the adoption of Green IT. In Proceedings of the 19th ACIS, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3–5 December 2008; pp. 658–668. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis 2008/64 (accessed on 18 March 2019).
- Philipson, G. A Green ICT Framework: Understanding and Measuring Green ICT; Connection Research Services Pty Ltd. (ABN 47 092 657 513): St. Leonards, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Klemes, J.J. A roadmap for Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Implementation (part III). J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 1325–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Nakib Noofal, A.M.M.; Hu, W. Using Management Information Systems (MIS) to Boost Corporate Performance. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Adm. 2015, 1, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
- Monk, E.; Wagner, B. Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning, 4th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 16–27. [Google Scholar]
- Aloini, D.; Dulmin, R.; Mininno, V. Risk Management in ERP Project Introduction: Review of the Literature. Inf. Manag. 2007, 44, 547–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, J.; Bostrom, R.P.; Sheth, A. Workflow Management Systems and ERP Systems: Differences, Commonalities, and Applications. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2004, 5, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pohludka, M.; Stverkova, H.; Slusarczyk, B. Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, I.; Jamil, N.A.; Halin, I.A. Green Enterprise Resource Planning and Green Logistics Performance. SIJ Trans. Ind. Financ. Bus. Manag. (IFBM) 2018, 6, 1–6, eISSN: 2321-242X. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staniškis, J.K.; Arbačiauskas, V. Sustainability Performance Indicators for Industrial Enterprise Management. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 2009, 2, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, M.S.; Ebrahim, Z.; Wan Mahmood, W.H.; Ab Rahman, M.N. Sustainable-ERP System: A Preliminary Study on Sustainability Indicators. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 11, 61–74, eISSN: 2289-8107. [Google Scholar]
- Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Shaharoun, A.M.; Ismail, S.; Klemeš, J.J. Sustainable enterprise resource planning: Imperatives and research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 71, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boltena, A.S.; Rapp, B.; Solsbach, A.; G&ómez, J.M. Towards Green ERP Systems: The selection driven perspective. In Proceedings of the 28th EnviroInfo 2014 Conference, Oldenburg, Germany, 10–12 September 2014; pp. 421–429. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0a34/9983ad1db6dd75669d4235ecf53763a6120b.pdf?ga=2.91118810.1934685862.1551426927-1461380949.1551426927 (accessed on 17 March 2019).
- Butler, T.; Daly, M. Environmental Responsibility and Green IT: An Institutional Perspective. In Proceedings of the ECIS 2008, Suzhou, China, 13–17 December 2008; p. 10. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ ecis2008/10 (accessed on 19 March 2019).
- Frost, G.; Jones, S.; Lee, P. The Collection, Integration and Reporting of Sustainability Information within an Organization: State of Practice; University of Sidney: Sidney, Australia; CPA Australia: Sidney, Australia, 2012; Available online: https://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/media/corporate/allfiles/document/professional-resources/sustainability/collection-integration-reporting-sustainability.pdf?la=en (accessed on 3 March 2019).
- Rajan, C.A.; Baral, R. Adoption of ERP system: An empirical study of factors influencing the usage of ERP and its impact on end user. IIMB Manag. Rev. 2015, 27, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weng, H.H.R.; Chen, J.S.; Chen, P.C. Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4997–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Klemes, J.J. Steps towards the Implementation of Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 70, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Malik, M.N.; Khan, H.H.; Klemeš, J.J. Evaluation of the Sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Steps. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2019, 72, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poon, P.L.; Yu, Y.T. Investigating ERP Systems Procurement Practice: Hong Kong & Australian Experiences. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2010, 52, 1011–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dao, V.T.; Langella, I.; Carbo, J. From Green to Sustainability: Information Technology and an Integrated Sustainability Framework. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velte, T.; Velte, A.; Elsenpeter, R. Green IT-Reduce Your Information System’s Environmental Impact While Adding to the Bottom Line, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 133–146. [Google Scholar]
- Molla, A.; Abareshi, A. Green IT Adoption: A Motivational Perspective. In Proceedings of the PACIS, Brisbane, Australia, 7–11 July 2011; Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2011/137/ (accessed on 16 March 2019).
- Molla, A. The Reach and Richness of Green IT: A Principal Component Analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Melbourne, Australia, 2–4 December 2009; pp. 754–764. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, H. Unordered Business Processes, Sustainability and Green IS. In Green Business Process Management; Vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
- Zarrella, E. Sustainable IT—The Case for Strategic Leadership; KPMG: Zürich, Switzerland, 2008; Available online: http://www.greenprof.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Sustainable-IT-The-case-for-strategic-leadership.pdf (accessed on 19 February 2019).
- Harmon, R.R.; Auseklis, N. Sustainable IT services: Assessing the Impact of Green Computing Practices. In Proceedings of the PICMET 2009, Portland, OR, USA, 2–6 August 2009; pp. 1707–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, R.T.; Boudreau, M.C.; Chen, A.J. Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community. MIS Q. 2010, 34, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B.; Korschun, D. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2009, 34, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naumann, S.; Dick, M.; Kern, E.; Johann, T. The GREENSOFT Model: A Reference Model for Green and Sustainable Software and its Engineering. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2011, 1, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albertao, F.; Xiao, J.; Tian, C.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, K.Q.; Liu, C. Measuring the Sustainability Performance of Software Projects. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2010), Shanghai, China, 20–22 November 2010; IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, S.S.; Ahmad, I. A Green Model for Sustainable Software Engineering. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Its Appl. 2013, 7, 55–74. [Google Scholar]
- Kogetsidis, H.; Kokkinaki, A.; Soteriou, V. Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation in the Retail Sector: A Case Study on the Effects of the Implementation of an ERP System in Cyprus. J. Int. Bus. Entrep. Dev. 2008, 3, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubin, D.A.; Esty, D.C. The sustainability imperative. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2010, 88, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- Sahran, S.; Goni, F.A.; Mukhtar, M. ERP Implementation Challenges in Small and Medium Enterprise: A Framework and Case Study. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 139–141, 1636–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somers, T.M.; Nelson, K. The impact of CSFs across the stages of ERP implementation. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 6 January 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umble, E.; Haft, R.; Umble, M. Enterprise Resource Planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 146, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Maheshwari, B.; Kumar, U. An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: Empirical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation 2003, 23, 793–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nah, F.H.F.; Delgado, S. Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation and Upgrade. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2006, 46, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, C.C.; Chien, C.F.; Wang, M.J.J. An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2005, 96, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayaug, Z.; Özdemir, R. An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 2169–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Maheshwari, B.; Kumar, U. Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: A survey of Canadian organizations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molla, A.; Cooper, V.A.; Pittayachawan, S. IT and Eco-sustainability: Developing and validating a Green IT readiness model. In Proceedings of the ICIS 2009, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 15–18 December 2009; p. 141. Available online: http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2009/2373.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2019).
- Bose, R.; Luo, X. Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization-A theoretical perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, B.M.; Bhatia, V. Green IT Maturity Model: How does your Organization Stack Up? SetLabs Brief. Infosys 2011, 9, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
- Foogooa, R.; Bokhoree, C.; Dookhitram, K. Green ICT Maturity Models-Towards a general approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS), Pointe aux Piments, Mauritius, 4–5 December 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Q.; Ji, S. Organizational Green IT Adoption: Concept and Evidence. Sustainability 2015, 7, 16737–16755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Molla, A.; Cooper, V.; Pittayachawan, S. The Green IT Readiness (G-Readiness) of Organizations: An Exploratory Analysis of a Construct and Instrument. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2011, 29, 67–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barroso, L.A.; Hölze, U. The Case for Energy-Proportional Computing. IEEE Comput. Soc. 2007, 40, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), The True Value of Green IT—An EMA Research Report. 2008. Available online: http://ondemand.kaseya.hk/download/en-us/white_papers/EMA.True.Value.Green.Computing.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2019).
- Info-Tech Research Group. Green IT: Why Mid-Size Companies are Investing Now. Toronto, Canada: International Organization for Standardization: Software Engineering. 2009. Available online: https://www-03.ibm.com/press/attachments/GreenIT-final-Mar.4.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2019).
- Uddin, M.; Rahman, A.A. Energy efficiency and low carbon enabler green IT framework for data centers considering green metrics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4078–4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiruthiga, P.; Vinoth Kumar, T. Green Computing-An ecofriendly approach for energy efficiency and minimizing e-waste. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2014, 3, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, E.J. Building Sustainable IT. Cut. IT J. 2008, 21, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Government of Romania. National Strategy for Competitiveness 2015–2020, 2015. Available online: https://lege5.ro/MonitorOficial/monge3tknjrhe/monitorul-oficial-partea-i-nr-756-09-10-2015 (accessed on 27 May 2019).
- Government of Romania. National Strategy of Research, Development, and Innovation 2014–2020, 2014. Available online: https://www.edu.ro/sites/default/files/_fi%C8%99iere/Minister/2016/strategii/strategia-cdi-2020_-proiect-hg.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2019).
- Valoria Business Solutions, Ltd. Study on Managers’ Perception of the Impact of Digitalization on Romanian Companies. 2017. Available online: https://valoria.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Sample_Barometrul-digitalizarii-2017_RO.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2019).
- Mueller, B.; Urbach, N. Understanding the Why, What, and How of Theories in IS Research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2017, 41, 349–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.; Bala, H. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 2013, 37, 21–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulk, M.C. The Evolution of the SEFs Capability Maturity Model for Software. Pilot Issue. Softw. Process: Improv. Pract. 1995, 1, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
Green IT and Topics Addressed | ||
---|---|---|
Green IT framework | Green IT Maturity Model | [43,46] |
Equipment life cycle (Asset lifecycle) | ||
End user computing | ||
IT service management | ||
Enterprise and data center | ||
People practices | ||
Green IT principles and practices | Green IT adoption in management process | [20,21,34,35,51] |
Sustainable enterprise resource planning | ||
Corporate social responsibility and green IT practices | ||
Green IT strategies | Enterprise green IT strategy | [21,36] |
Strategic IT-business alignment | ||
Green IT environmental impact | Green strategies for sustainable development | [22,39,44] |
Economic Sector | Number of Companies | Time Line to Conduct Survey |
---|---|---|
Manufacturing | 7 | March–May 2018 |
Telecommunication | 2 | June–July 2018 |
Pharmaceuticals | 3 | October–November 2018 |
Utilities | 5 | February–March 2019 |
Total | 17 |
Issues in ERP Systems | Groups | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manufacturing | Telecommunication | Pharmaceuticals | Utilities | |||||
Mean | Variance | Mean | Variance | Mean | Variance | Mean | Variance | |
Software sustainability | 0.032 | 0.444 | 0.481 | 0.483 | 0.221 | 0.641 | 0.085 | 0.720 |
Sustainable management process | 0.180 | 0.858 | 0.436 | 0.657 | 0.268 | 0.774 | 0.206 | 0.825 |
Green IT practices | 0.024 | 0.627 | 0.564 | 0.580 | 0.288 | 0.744 | 0.260 | 0.868 |
ANOVA Test—Manufacturing Sector | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F-value | p-value | F-critical |
Between groups | 375.3647059 | 16 | 23.46029 | 37.80513 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Within groups | 1044.4 | 1683 | 0.620559 | |||
Total | 1419.764706 | 1699 | ||||
ANOVA Test—Telecommunication Sector | ||||||
Source of variation | SS | df | MS | F-value | p-value | F-critical |
Between groups | 96.31059 | 16 | 6.019412 | 10.67971 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Within groups | 948.59 | 1683 | 0.56363 | |||
Total | 1044.901 | 1699 | ||||
ANOVA Test—Pharmaceuticals Sector | ||||||
Source of variation | SS | df | MS | F-value | p-value | F-critical |
Between groups | 152.9024 | 16 | 9.556397 | 13.42735179 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Within groups | 1197.81 | 1683 | 0.711711 | |||
Total | 1350.712 | 1699 | ||||
ANOVA Test—Utilities Sector | ||||||
Source of variation | SS | df | MS | F-value | p-value | F-critical |
Between groups | 328.7792 | 16 | 20.5487 | 25.84006 | 0.00001 | 1.649461 |
Within groups | 1351.885 | 1700 | 0.795227 | |||
Total | 1680.664 | 1716 |
Economic Sector | F-Value | p-Value | F-Critical |
---|---|---|---|
Manufacturing | 37.80513 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Telecommunication | 10.67971 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Pharmaceuticals | 13.42735179 | 0.00001 | 1.649522 |
Utilities | 25.84006 | 0.00001 | 1.649461 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ursacescu, M.; Popescu, D.; State, C.; Smeureanu, I. Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164472
Ursacescu M, Popescu D, State C, Smeureanu I. Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective. Sustainability. 2019; 11(16):4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164472
Chicago/Turabian StyleUrsacescu, Minodora, Dan Popescu, Cristina State, and Ion Smeureanu. 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective" Sustainability 11, no. 16: 4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164472
APA StyleUrsacescu, M., Popescu, D., State, C., & Smeureanu, I. (2019). Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective. Sustainability, 11(16), 4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164472