Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Empirical Results
3.1. Extent and Effectiveness of Knowledge Management in Social Work Centers
3.2. Case Study of Slovenian Female Social Workers
4. Discussion
4.1. Theoretical Implications
4.2. Practical Implications
4.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Social Life: Social Sustainability Definition. Available online: http://www.social-life.co/ (accessed on 23 September 2019).
- Woodcraft, S.; Bacon, N.; Caistor-Arendar, L.; Hackett, T. Design for Social Sustainability: A Framework for Creating Thriving New Communities; Social Life: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ajmal, M.M.; Khan, M.; Hussain, M.; Helo, P. Conceptualizing and incorporating social sustainability in the business world. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2018, 25, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staniškiene, E.; Stankevičiute, Ž. Social sustainability measurement framework: The case of employee perspective in CSR-committed organization. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 188, 708–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuthill, M. Strengthening the “social” in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vavik, T.; Keitsch, M.M. Exploring relationships between universal design and social sustainable development: Some methodological aspects of the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bostrom, M. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Pol. 2012, 8, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vries, M.; Nemec, J. Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 2013, 26, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jashapara, A. Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Dalkir, K. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice; Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hicks, R.; Dattero, R.; Galup, S. The five-tier knowledge management hierarchy. J. Knowl. Manag. 2006, 10, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alavi, M.; Leidner, D.E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 107–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, V.; Smith, S.; Keen, J.; West, R.; House, A. Creating and implementing local health and wellbeing policy: Networks, interactions and collective knowledge creation amongst public sector managers. Evid. Policy 2018, 14, 477–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heisig, P. Harmonisation of knowledge management—Comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. J. Knowl. Manag. 2009, 13, 4–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, R. Knowledge capabilities as the focus of organizational development and strategy. J. Knowl. Manag. 2001, 4, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogut, B.; Zander, U. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organ. Sci. 1996, 7, 502–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downes, T.V. An Evaluation of Knowledge Management Practices in Nonprofit Community Services Organizations in Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, H.F. Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. J. Knowl. Manag. 2011, 15, 136–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmee, N.N.; Kassim, N.A.; Abdullah, C.Z.H. Dimensions of Knowledge Management Maturity: Top Management Support and Leadership, People, and Information Technology. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Bharadway, S.S.; Chauhan, S.; Raman, A. Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Knowledge Management Effectiveness in Indian Organizations. J. Decis. Mak. 2015, 40, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anantatmula, V.S. Linking KM effectiveness attributes to organizational performance. VINE 2007, 37, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.W.; Ko, J. HR practices and knowledge sharing behavior: Focusing on the moderating effect of trust in supervisor. Public Pers. Manag. 2014, 43, 586–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariano, S.; Awazu, Y. Artifacts in knowledge management research: A systematic literature review and future research directions. J. Knowl. Manag. 2016, 20, 1333–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. How to deal with knowledge management misalignment: A taxonomy based on a 3D fuzzy methodology. J. Knowl. Manag. 2018, 22, 538–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Esposito, E. Efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge management systems in SMEs. Prod. Plan. Control 2019, 30, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massaro, M.; Dumay, J.; Garlatti, A. Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review. J. Knowl. Manag. 2015, 19, 530–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Špaček, D. Knowledge management in public administration—What can be found in research outputs in the Czech Republic—Preliminary findings. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Current Trends in Public Sector Research, Brno, Czech Republic, 21–22 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Arora, E. Knowledge Management in Public Sector. J. Arts Sci. Commer. 2011, 2, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
- Wiig, K. Knowledge management in public administration. J. Knowl. Manag. 2002, 6, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardina, D. Ten characteristics of empowerment-oriented social service organizations. Adm. Soc. Work 2005, 29, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukil, M.I. The impact of Employee Empowerment on Employee Satisfaction and Service Quality: Empirical Evidence from Financial Enteprizes in Bangladesh. Business 2016, 17, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oluikpe, P. Developing a corporate knowledge management strategy. J. Knowl. Manag. 2012, 16, 862–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringel-Bickelmaier, C.; Ringel, M. Knowledge management in international organisations. J. Knowl. Manag. 2010, 14, 524–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, X.; Pandya, K.V. Issues of knowledge management in the public sector. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 2003, 1, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
- Willem, A.; Buelens, M. Knowledge sharing in public sector organizations: The effect of organizational characteristics on interdepartmental knowledge sharing. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2007, 17, 581–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, Z.C.S. Knowledge Management in Social Work: Towards a Conceptual Framework. J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 2007, 25, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCoyd, J.L.M.; Johnson, Y.M.; Munch, S.; LaSala, M. Quantocentric culture: Ramifications for social work education. Soc. Work Educ. 2009, 28, 811–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broadhurst, K.; Hall, C.; White, S.; Pithouse, A. Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. Br. J. Soc. Work 2010, 40, 352–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Ahbabi, S.; Singh, S.K.; Balasubramian, S.; Singh Gaur, S. Employee perception of impact of knowledge management processes on public sector performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 2019, 23, 351–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartnett, H.P.; Tabone, J.K.; Orlsene, L. Aging at Work: The Importance of Understanding Accommodation in Social Work Practice. J. Sociol. Soc. Work 2019, 7, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, N. Social work through an indigenous lens: Reflections on the state of our profession. In Social Work: Making a World of Difference: Social Work Around the World IV in the Year of IFSW’s 50th Jubilee; IFSW: Berne, Switzerland; FAFO: Oslo, Norway, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kuzmanič Korva, D.; Perkovič, M.; Kovač, J.; Rapošta-Tajnšek, P.; Flaker, V. Preoblikovanje Organiziranosti Centrov za Socialno Delo v Republiki Sloveniji; Skupnost CSD Slovenije: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Available online: http://www.mddsz.gov.si/197/delovna_podrocja/sociala/reorganizacija_centrov_za_socialno_delo/ (accessed on 5 April 2019).
- Harlow, E. Why don’t women want to be social workers anymore? New managerialism, postfeminism and the shortage of social workers in social services departments in England and Wales. Eur. J. Soc. Work 2004, 7, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Squires, A.; Jylha, V.; Jun, J.; Ensio, A.; Kinnune, J. A scoping review of nursing workforce planning and forecasting research. J. Nurs. Manag. 2017, 25, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. The 2018 Ageing Report; European Commission: Luxemburg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dimovski, V.; Grah, B.; Colnar, S. Modelling the industrial workforce dynamics and exit in the ageing society. In Proceedings of the 9th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control, Berlin, Germany, 28–30 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. Available online: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/ (accessed on 5 July 2019).
- Eurostat, Eurostat Database: Demographic Balances and Selected Indicators, EUROPOP 2018, Slovenia. Available online: https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/news/Index/8316 (accessed on 8 September 2019).
- Marc, M.; Bartosiewicz, A.; Burzynska, J.; Chmiel, Z.; Januszewicz, P. A nursing shortage-a prospect of global and local policies. Int. Counc. Nurs. 2019, 66, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riege, A.; Lindsay, N. Knowledge management in the public sector: Stakeholder partnership in the public policy development. J. Knowl. Manag. 2006, 10, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortenblad, A. Who is the learning organization for? A stakeholder contingency approach to contextualizing managerial panaceas. In Handbook of Research on Knowledge Management: Adaptation and Context; Ortenblad, A., Ed.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ortenblad, A.; Koris, R. Is the learning organization idea relevant to higher educational institutions? A literature review and a multi-stakeholder contingency approach. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2014, 28, 173–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beddoe, L. Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. Br. J. Soc. Work 2011, 41, 557–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bloice, L.; Burnett, S. Barriers to knowledge sharing in third sector social care: A case study. J. Knowl. Manag. 2016, 20, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services. Available online: https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/sharing_knowledge_improving_practice_changing_lives.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2019).
- Lettieri, E.; Borga, F.; Savoldelli, A. Knowledge management in non-profit organizations. J. Knowl. Manag. 2004, 8, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kianto, A.; Vanhala, M.; Hielmann, P. The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. J. Knowl. Manag. 2016, 20, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- North, K.; Hornung, T. The Benefits of Knowledge Management—Results of the German Award “Knowledge Manager 2002”. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2002, 9, 361–389. [Google Scholar]
- Muchinsky, P.M.; Tuttle, M.L. Employee turnover: An empirical and methodological assessment. J. Vocat. Behav. 1979, 14, 43–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexanderson, K. Vilja, Kunna, Förstå: Om Implementering av Systematisk Dokumentation för Verksamhetsutveckling i Socialtjänsten [Willingness, Comprehension, Capability: About Implementation of Systematic Documentation for Developing Social Work in the Public Social Work Services]. Ph.D. Thesis, Orebro University Library, Orebro, Sweden, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Austin, M.J.; Ciaassen, J.; Vu, C.M.; Mizrahi, P. Knowledge Management: Implications for Human Service Organizations. J. Evid. Based Soc. Work 2008, 5, 361–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, Z.C.S. Knowledge management in social work—The interplay of knowledge sharing platforms. Int. Soc. Work 2014, 57, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Social Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia. Available online: https://www.irssv.si/upload2/Socialni%20polozaj%20v%20Sloveniji%202015_2016_dopolnjeno%20koncno%20porocilo_2.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2019).
- Bjorkenheim, J. Knowledge and social work in health care: The case of Finland. Soc. Work Health Care 2007, 44, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Public Administration. Available online: http://www.mju.gov.si/si/delovna_podrocja/razvoj_projektov_kakovost_javne_uprave_in_kohezijska_politika/strategija_razvoja_javne_uprave/ (accessed on 29 October 2019).
- Bogataj, D.; McDonnell, D.R.; Bogataj, M. Management, financing and taxation of housing stock in the shrinking cities of aging societies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 181, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogataj, D.; McDonnell, D.; Bogataj, M. Reverse mortgage schemes financing urban dynamics using the multiple decrement approach. Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 2015, 135, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogelj, V.; Bogataj, D. Planning and financing the home and facility-based care using the multiple decrement approach. J. Decis. Syst. 2018, 27, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, W.A. Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving. Adm. Sci. Q. 1993, 38, 539–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henttonen, K.; Kianto, A.; Ritala, P. Knowledge sharing and individual work performance: An empirical study of a public sector organization. J. Knowl. Manag. 2016, 20, 749–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, R. Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 1996, 17, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hislop, D.; Bosua, R.; Helms, R. Knowledge Management in Organizations—A Critical Introduction, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, MS, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kogut, B.; Zander, U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2003, 34, 516–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edge, K. Powerful public sector knowledge management: A school district example. J. Knowl. Manag. 2005, 9, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fitch, D. Examination of the child protective services decision-making context with implications for decision support system design. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 2006, 32, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soydan, H. Producing Knowledge for Evidence-Based Practice and the Future of Social Work Research. In Evidence Based and Knowledge Based Social Work: Research Methods and Approaches in Social Work Research; Aarhus University Press: Aarhus, Denmark, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012, 63, 539–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McPhail, B.A. Setting the Record Straight: Social Work is Not a Female-Dominated Profession. Soc. Work 2004, 49, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hoem, J.M. Point estimation of forces of transition in demographic models. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1970, 33, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurminen, M.; Nurminen, T. Multistate worklife expectancies. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2005, 31, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dudel, C.; Lopez Gomez, M.A.; Benavides, F.G.; Myrskylä, M. The length of working life in Spain: Levels, recent trends, and the impact of the financial crisis. Eur. J. Popul. 2018, 34, 769–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dudel, C.; Myrskylä, M. Working Life Expectancy at Age 50 in the United States and the Impact of the Great Recession. Demography 2017, 54, 2101–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pedersen, J.; Bjorner, J.B. Worklife expectancy in a cohort of Danish employees aged 55–65 years—Comparing a multi-state Cox proportional hazard approach with conventional multi-state life tables. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schoen, R. Multistate Transfer Rate Estimation from Adjacent Populations. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2016, 35, 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurminen, M. Worklife expectancies of fixed-term Finnish employees in 1997–2006. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2008, 34, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deshmukh, S. Multiple Decrement Models in Insurance: An Introduction Using R; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Promislow, S.D. Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Slovenian Statistical Office. Delovno Aktivno Prebivalstvo Po Spol, Skd Dejavnost, Leto, Starostni Razred. Available online: https://pxweb.stat.si/pxweb/Dialog/SaveShow.asp (accessed on 15 July 2019).
- Belchior Rocha, H. Social Work Practices and the Ecological Sustainability of Socially Vulnerable Communities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Missimer, M.; Robert, K.H.; Broman, G. A strategic approach to social sustainability—Part 2: A principle-based definition. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brennan, E. Definitions for social sustainability and social work paper. In White Paper Distributed for CSWE Conference; Portland State University: Portland, OR, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Blake, J. Sustainable communities and social work practice learning: Reflections on emergent, learning partnerships. J. Pract. Teach. Learn. 2009, 9, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teater, B.; Devaney, J.; Forrester, D.; Scourfield, J.; Carpenter, J. Quantitative Research Methods for Social Work: Making Social Work Count, 1st ed.; Palgrave: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Dimovski, V.; Penger, S.; Peterlin, J.; Grah, B.; Černe, M.; Klepec, M. Advanced Management and Leadership Practice; Pearson Education Limited: Essex, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Myers, P.S. A Normative Model of Knowledge Management Effectiveness. In Handbook of Research on Knowledge Management: Adaptation and Context; Ortenblad, A., Ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 28–52. [Google Scholar]
- Nishikawa, M. (Re)defining care workers as knowledge workers. Gend. Work Organ. 2011, 18, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehgani, R.; Ramsin, R. Methodologies for developing knowledge management systems: An evaluation framework. J. Knowl. Manag. 2015, 19, 682–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garrido-Moreno, A.; Lockett, N.; Garcia-Morales, V. Paving the way for CRM success: The mediating role of knowledge management and organizational commitment. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbari, N.; Ghaffari, A. Verifying relationship of knowledge management initiatives and the empowerment of human resources. J. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 21, 1120–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosilj Vukšić, V.; Pejić Bach, M.; Garrido-Moreno, A.; Lockett, N.; Garcia-Morales, V. Exploring the role of knowledge management practices in fostering customer relationship management as a catalyst of marketing innovation. Balt. J. Manag. 2015, 10, 393–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tapio Inkinen, H.; Kianto, A.; Vanhala, M. Knowledge management practice and innovation performance in Finland. Balt. J. Manag. 2015, 10, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera, A.; Collins, W.C.; Salgado, J.F. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2006, 17, 245–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bontis, N. Information Bombardment: Rising Above the Digital Onslaught; Institute for Intellectual Capital Research: Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Karamitri, I.; Talias, M.A.; Bellali, T. Knowledge Management practices in healthcare settings: A systematic review. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2015, 32, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bierly, P.E.; Damanpour, F.; Santoro, M.D. The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. J. Manag. Stud. 2009, 46, 481–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Yoo, Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application and team performance. MIS Q. 2010, 34, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penrose, E.T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, MS, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Andreeva, T.; Kianto, A. Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 2012, 617–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ouriques, R.A.B.; Wnuk, K.; Gorschek, T.; Berntsson Svensson, R. Knowledge Management Strategies and Processes in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 2018, 29, 345–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- King, W.R. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Carneiro, A. How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? J. Knowl. Manag. 2000, 4, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eppler, M.; Sukowski, O. Managing Team Knowledge: Core Processes, Tools and Enabling Factors. Eur. Manag. J. 2000, 18, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, A.; Azevedo, C.; Calvo, V. Internal communication in organizations: Practical instruments to help the shift change. J. Educ. Technol. Health 2016, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alavi, M.; Leidner, D. Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1999, 1, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argote, L. Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Manag. Learn. 2011, 42, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senge, P.M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of a Learning Organization; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Resatsch, F.; Faisst, U. Measuring the performance of knowledge management initiatives. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Organizational knowledge, learning and Capabilities, Innsbruck, Austria, 2–3 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Westerlund, M.; Rajala, R. Learning and innovation in inter-organizational network collaboration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2010, 25, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anantatmula, V.S.; Stankosky, M. KM criteria for different types of organisations. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 2008, 4, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Mean | SD | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|
1. Management responsibility | 2.77 | 0.97 | 0.90 |
2. Knowledge creation | 2.87 | 1.10 | 0.84 |
3. Knowledge storage and retrieval | 2.94 | 1.15 | 0.87 |
4. Knowledge transfer | 3.51 | 0.86 | 0.82 |
5. Knowledge implementation | 2.81 | 0.96 | 0.91 |
6. Enhanced collaboration | 3.63 | 0.55 | 0.90 |
7. Enhanced communication | 3.59 | 0.47 | 0.62 |
8. Enhanced learning | 3.58 | 0.61 | 0.86 |
9. Enhanced performance | 3.42 | 0.45 | 0.42 |
Ages | Total | 15–19 | 20–24 | 25–29 | 30–34 | 35–39 | 40–44 | 45–49 | 50–54 | 55–59 | 60–64 | 65+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social workers | 19,373 | 107 | 937 | 1596 | 2157 | 2443 | 2826 | 3050 | 3447 | 2298 | 492 | 20 |
Original | Improved | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Age | SWS | SWT | FPSW | CPE | RE | DE | SWS | SWT | FPSW | CPE | RE | DE |
2017 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 546.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 546.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2018 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 502.32 | 27.30 | 10.92 | 5.46 | 0 | 0 | 524.16 | 10.92 | 5.46 | 5.46 |
2019 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 462.13 | 51.60 | 21.40 | 10.86 | 0 | 0 | 503.19 | 21.08 | 10.87 | 10.86 |
2020 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 425.16 | 73.16 | 31.46 | 16.22 | 0 | 0 | 483.07 | 30.51 | 16.21 | 16.22 |
2021 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 391.15 | 92.22 | 41.12 | 21.51 | 0 | 0 | 463.74 | 39.25 | 21.48 | 21.51 |
2022 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 359.86 | 109.01 | 50.37 | 26.76 | 0 | 0 | 445.19 | 47.35 | 26.69 | 26.76 |
2023 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 331.07 | 123.73 | 59.25 | 31.95 | 0 | 0 | 427.39 | 54.83 | 31.83 | 31.95 |
2024 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 304.58 | 136.57 | 67.75 | 37.09 | 0 | 0 | 410.29 | 61.74 | 36.88 | 37.09 |
2025 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 280.22 | 147.71 | 75.89 | 42.18 | 0 | 0 | 393.88 | 68.09 | 41.85 | 42.18 |
2026 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 257.80 | 157.29 | 83.69 | 47.22 | 0 | 0 | 378.12 | 73.93 | 46.73 | 47.22 |
2027 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 546.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 363.00 | 79.27 | 51.52 | 52.20 |
2028 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 502.32 | 27.30 | 10.92 | 5.46 | 0 | 0 | 348.48 | 84.15 | 56.22 | 57.15 |
2029 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 462.13 | 51.60 | 21.40 | 10.86 | 0 | 0 | 334.54 | 88.60 | 60.83 | 62.03 |
2030 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 425.16 | 73.16 | 31.46 | 16.22 | 0 | 0 | 321.16 | 92.63 | 65.34 | 66.87 |
2031 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 391.15 | 92.22 | 41.12 | 21.51 | 0 | 0 | 308.31 | 96.27 | 69.75 | 71.66 |
2032 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 359.86 | 109.01 | 50.37 | 26.76 | 0 | 0 | 295.97 | 99.55 | 74.06 | 76.41 |
Difference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Age | FPSW | CPE | RE |
2017 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2018 | 46 | 21.84 | −16.38 | −5.46 |
2019 | 47 | 41.06 | −30.52 | −10.53 |
2020 | 48 | 57.91 | −42.65 | −15.25 |
2021 | 49 | 72.59 | −52.97 | −19.64 |
2022 | 50 | 85.33 | −61.66 | −23.68 |
2023 | 51 | 96.32 | −68.90 | −27.42 |
2024 | 52 | 105.71 | −74.83 | −30.87 |
2025 | 53 | 113.66 | −79.62 | −34.04 |
2026 | 54 | 120.32 | −83.36 | −36.96 |
2027 | 45 | 125.82 | −86.19 | −39.64 |
2028 | 46 | 130.28 | −88.20 | −42.08 |
2029 | 47 | 133.79 | −89.50 | −44.30 |
2030 | 48 | 136.47 | −90.16 | −46.31 |
2031 | 49 | 138.40 | −90.27 | −48.14 |
2032 | 50 | 139.65 | −89.89 | −49.78 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Colnar, S.; Dimovski, V.; Bogataj, D. Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226374
Colnar S, Dimovski V, Bogataj D. Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work. Sustainability. 2019; 11(22):6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226374
Chicago/Turabian StyleColnar, Simon, Vlado Dimovski, and David Bogataj. 2019. "Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work" Sustainability 11, no. 22: 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226374
APA StyleColnar, S., Dimovski, V., & Bogataj, D. (2019). Knowledge Management and the Sustainable Development of Social Work. Sustainability, 11(22), 6374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226374