Development of a Business Model by Introducing Sustainable and Tailor-Made Value Proposition for SME Clients
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Sharing Economy and Millennials
1.2. Literature Overview
2. Research Hypotheses
- Explore the Western Balkan SME climate for acceptance of the new automotive business strategy.
- Explore the crucial factors for SME that lead to the acceptance of the new automotive business strategy.
- Explore the readiness of SME for the acceptance of the new technology into the automotive sale strategies.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Sample
3.2. Questionnaire
- General data about the company—this part has the questions about the enterprise headquarters, yearly income given in Euros, size of the business and size of the vehicle fleet,
- Management of the vehicle fleet—it contained questions whether the firm has a fleet management department, what is the fleet role and about the importance of the enterprise business,
- Attitude about the possibility of outsourcing the vehicle fleet,
- Key questions about the full-service strategy—questions about the conditions that would make the enterprise convert to the outsource model,
- The importance of vehicle ownership for the enterprise—questions whether enterprise own or rent their vehicles,
- Communication issues—questions about which would be the easiest, the most trusted way to communicate, close deals and make arrangements about fleet management.
3.3. Statistical Analysis
3.4. Variables
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Testing the Difference between Western Balkan Countries
4.2. Testing the Importance of the Fixed Monthly Expenses
- (a)
- Rate to what extent acquisition of the financial means for the renewal of the fleet represents a great challenge for the company.
- (b)
- To what extent regular and irregular expenses of the vehicle maintenance influence the cash flow of the company?
- (c)
- Evaluate how much fixed monthly expense for the vehicle park would facilitate budgeting and planning of the business operations?
4.3. Testing the Readiness for the New Fleet Management Strategy
4.4. Testing the Factors of the Fleet Size and the Vehicle Purpose
4.5. Testing the Factor of Vehicle Ownership
4.6. Testing the Implementation of Internet Technologies
5. Conclusions
- It was found that the whole Western Balkan region is equally interested in the implementation of the outsourcing model of fleet management. This is not surprising since these countries share a similar history, similar culture and finally, similar economic strategies [41].
- For the majority of the SME, renewal of the fleet represents a great challenge, however, results showed that the regular and irregular expenses for the vehicle maintenance do not influence the company’s cash flow. Further, it was found that fixed monthly expense would be beneficial for budgeting and business planning for the most of the examined companies and that it is an important factor in making a decision about fleet management strategy. As predicted, companies with straight business policy invest their resources in proper budgeting, and therefore, they perceive their benefit from the fixed monthly expense [42,43,44].
- Still, our SME sample do not have formed an attitude towards the existence of the outsource partners when it comes to the maintenance of the fleet, probably due to the lack of knowledge about this model.
- Analysis of the factors relevant for acceptance of the new fleet management strategy revealed that vehicle purpose is not a relevant factor for outsourcing and that the companies with large fleets are more likely to outsource maintenance of their fleet. In other words, companies with larger fleets will have more benefits of fleet management because this strategy will cut the costs of car maintenance.
- When it comes to exploration of sharing economy factors, it was found that it is not important to SME that vehicles utilized for business are in the company’s ownership. This result is in accordance with the new trends of the sharing economy [13,14], and new “millennial” mindset, where possession of the vehicle and even the house or apartment is not of the greatest value.
- Analysis of the readiness to accept new internet tools showed that SMEs in the Western Balkan countries are ready for new internet tools. However, when it comes to car purchase process the classic face to face way of communication is more preferable. We supposed that the car purchase in the Western Balkan countries still represent great cost and as such, customers are not ready to completely implement all internet tools. According to our results, buying a car with one click is for now distant future.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Simboli, A.; Raggi, A.; Rosica, P. Life Cycle Assessment of Process Eco-Innovations in an SME, Automotive Supply Network. Sustainability 2015, 7, 13761–13776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kliestik, T.; Kovacova, M.; Podhorska, I.; Kliestikova, J. Searching for Key Sources of Goodwill Creation as New Global Managerial Challenge. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 17, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behun, M.; Gavurova, B.; Tkacova, A.; Kotaskova, A. The impact of the manufacturing industry on the economic cycle of European Union countries. J. Competitiveness 2018, 10, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Held, M.; Weidmann, D.; Kammerl, D.; Hollauer, C.; Mortl, M.; Omer, M.; Lindemann, U. Current challenges for sustainable product development in the German automotive sector: A survey based status assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 195, 869–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Automotive revolution—Perspective towards 2030, How the Convergence of Disruptive Technology-Driven Trends Could Transform the Auto Industry, Advanced Industries 2016. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/high%20tech/our%20insights/disruptive%20trends%20that%20will%20transform%20the%20auto%20industry/auto%202030%20report%20jan%202016.ashx (accessed on 15 October 2018).
- Petersen, B.; Strongin, S. Why Are Some Industries More Cyclical than Others? J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 1996, 14, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codagnone, C.; Martens, B. Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues; Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01. JRC100369; Joint Research Center: European Union; ISBN 1831-9408. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/JRC100369.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2018).
- Owyang, J.; Samuel, A. The New Rules of the Collaborative Economy. Available online: https://www.visioncritical.com/resources/new-rules-collaborative-economy/ (accessed on 15 September 2018).
- Martin, C.J. The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol. Econ. 2016, 121, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondekar, D. Digital Economy in South East Europe; Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: Zagreb, Croatia, 2017; Available online: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/kroatien/13788.pdf (accessed on 18 October 2018).
- Botsman, R.; Rogers, R. What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption; Harper Collins: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780061963544. [Google Scholar]
- Gata, J.E. The Sharing Economy, Competition and Regulation. CPI—Competition Policy International Europe Column. Available online: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/the-sharing-economy-competition-and-regulation/ (accessed on 16 October 2018).
- Grifoni, P.; D’Andrea, A.; Ferri, F.; Guzzo, T.; Angeli Felicioni, M.; Pratico, C.; Vignoli, A. Sharing Economy: Business Models and Regulatory Landscape in the Mediterranean Areas. Int. Bus. Res. 2018, 11, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novikova, O. The Sharing Economy and the Future of Personal Mobility: New Models Based on Car Sharing. TIM Rev. 2017, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, M. Don’t Buy Your Next Volvo. Subscribe To It Instead. Forbes. 25 September 2017. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltaylor/2017/09/25/dont-buy-your-next-volvo-subscribe-to-it-instead/#7c45905665a6 (accessed on 25 October 2018).
- PwC. The Economy Sharing: Consumer Intelligence Series. Available online: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industry/entertainment-media/publications/consumer-intelligence-series/assets/pwc-cis-sharing-economy.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2018).
- Godelnik, R. Millennials and the sharing economy: Lessons from a ‘buy nothing new, share everything month’ project. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 23, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, M. Pareto’s Law. Math. Intell. 2010, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasteva, S.; Sharma, P.; Wagman, L. The 80/20 rule: Corporate support for innovation by employees. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2015, 38, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daly, K. Pareto’s Principle in The Boardroom. NACD Dir. 2016, 42, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Regnerova, O.; Regnerova, M. Sustainable development in “the light and shadow” of globalization. Ekon.- Manazerske Spectr. 2017, 11, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- KPMG. Global Automotive Executive Survey 2017. Available online: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/01/global-automotive-executive-survey-2017.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2018).
- Nair, R.; Miller-Hooks, E. Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations. Transp. Sci. 2011, 45, 524–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, B.; Kietzmann, J. Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy. Organ. Environ. 2014, 27, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perboli, G.; Ferrero, F.; Musso, S.; Vesco, A. Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 2018, 115, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaz, C.; Shoeninger Rauen, T.; Lezana, A. Sustainability and Innovation in the Automotive Sector: A Structured Content Analysis. Sustainability 2017, 9, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moravcikova, D.; Krizanova, A.; Kliestikova, J.; Rypakova, M. Green Marketing as the Source of the Competitive Advantage of the Business. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rennings, K. Redefining innovation: Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaffe, A.B.; Newell, R.G.; Stavins, R.N. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environment policy. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitkiewicz, T.; Grondys, K. Life Cycle Assessment Use for Identification of Environmental Profiles of Different Scenarios for Handling Defective Products. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018, 10, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krings, J.; Bakker, J.; Hoppe, S. Auto industry growth strategies—Fasten your seatbelts. Available online: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/strategythatworks/growth/autoindustry (accessed on 17 September 2018).
- Kliestik, T.; Misankova, M.; Valaskova, K.; Svabova, L. Bankruptcy prevention: New effort to reflect on legal and social changes. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2018, 24, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heer, H.; Nettekoven, Z. The Role of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Development—What Can Be Learned from the German Experience? Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: Zagreb, Croatia, 2017; Available online: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/14056.pdf (accessed on 8 September 2018).
- Weber, T.A. Intermediation in a Sharing Economy: Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Rent Extraction. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2014, 31, 35–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newcombe, T. A Growing Number of Cities Are Directly Benefiting From The Sharing Economy. Digital Communities. Quarterly report 2015. Available online: http://www.govtech.com (accessed on 15 November 2018).
- Kosintseva, A. Business Models of sharing Economy Companies: Exploring Features Responsible for Sharing economy Companies. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Foss, N.; Saebi, T. Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? J. Manag. 2017, 43, 200–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clauss, T. Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Manag. 2017, 47, 385–403. [Google Scholar]
- Cozzolino, A.; Verona, G.; Rothaermel, F. Unpacking the Disruption Process: New Technology, Business Models, and Incumbent Adaptation. J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 55, 1166–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reymen, I.; Berends, H.; Oudehand, R.; Stultiens, R. Decision making for business model development: A process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Manag. 2017, 47, 595–606. [Google Scholar]
- Wells, P. Sustainable business models and the automotive industry: A commentary. IIMB Manag. Rev. 2013, 25, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Orsato, P.J.; Wells, P. The Automobile Industry & Sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 989–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H.-C.; Abe, S. Is two-tailed testing for directional research hypotheses tests legitimate? J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1261–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Bank Group. Higher but fragile growth. Western Balkans Regular Economic Report no.14. 2018. Available online: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/194301538650996304/rev2-WBRER14-WQ-web-ENG.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2018).
- Salikin, N.; Wahab, N.A.; Muhammad, I. Strengths and Weaknesses among Malaysian SMEs: Financial Management Perspectives. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 129, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salazar, A.L.; Soto, R.C.; Mosqueda, R.E. The Impact of Financial Decisions and Strategy on Small Business Competitiveness. Glob. J. Bus. Res. 2011, 6, 93–103. [Google Scholar]
- Rigtering, J.P.; Eggers, F.; Kraus, K.; Chang, M.-L. Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic planning and firm performance: The impact of national cultures. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2018, 11, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benchmarking of Delivery Fleet Replacement Strategies, Management Advisory Report, Report Number DR-MA-15-002. 2015. Available online: https://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/document-library-files/2015/dr-ma-15-002.pdf (accessed on 25 December 2018).
- Barbu, C.; Florea, D.; Ogarcă, R.; Barbu, M. From Ownership to Access: How the Sharing Economy is Changing the Consumer Behavior. Amfiteatru Econ. 2018, 20, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- StatSoft. STATISTICA (version 12); StatSoft: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2012; Available online: http://www.statsoft.com (accessed on 25 December 2018).
χ2(2) = 4.36 p = 0.11 | Did Company Management Consider Outsourcing as the Option for the Fleet Management? | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Don’t Know | Total | |||||
f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | |
Region | 10 | 25.64 | 21 | 53.85 | 8 | 20.51 | 39 | 100.00 |
Serbia | 55 | 37.93 | 76 | 52.41 | 14 | 9.66 | 145 | 100.00 |
Total | 65 | 35.33 | 97 | 52.71 | 22 | 11.96 | 184 | 100.00 |
Item | Mean ± SD | Median | Hypothesis | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
a | 3.39 ± 1.31 | 3 | µ > 3 | 0.0003 |
b | 2.45 ± 1.01 | 2 | µ < 3 | 0.001 |
c | 3.62 ± 1.21 | 4 | µ > 3 | 0.001 |
More than 20 vehicles? χ2(4) = 12.556 p = 0.013 | Evaluate How Important Is it for you the Existence of the Outsource Partners for the Vehicle Fleet Management? | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | |||||||
f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | |
Yes | 12 | 19.35 | 4 | 6.45 | 17 | 27.42 | 11 | 17.74 | 18 | 29.03 | 62 | 100 |
No | 31 | 24.41 | 18 | 14.17 | 39 | 30.71 | 21 | 21.26 | 12 | 9.45 | 127 | 100 |
Total | 43 | 22.75 | 22 | 11.64 | 58 | 29.63 | 32 | 20.11 | 30 | 15.87 | 189 | 100 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bolesnikov, M.; Popović Stijačić, M.; Radišić, M.; Takači, A.; Borocki, J.; Bolesnikov, D.; Bajdor, P.; Dzieńdziora, J. Development of a Business Model by Introducing Sustainable and Tailor-Made Value Proposition for SME Clients. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041157
Bolesnikov M, Popović Stijačić M, Radišić M, Takači A, Borocki J, Bolesnikov D, Bajdor P, Dzieńdziora J. Development of a Business Model by Introducing Sustainable and Tailor-Made Value Proposition for SME Clients. Sustainability. 2019; 11(4):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041157
Chicago/Turabian StyleBolesnikov, Minja, Milica Popović Stijačić, Mladen Radišić, Aleksandar Takači, Jelena Borocki, Dragana Bolesnikov, Paula Bajdor, and Joanna Dzieńdziora. 2019. "Development of a Business Model by Introducing Sustainable and Tailor-Made Value Proposition for SME Clients" Sustainability 11, no. 4: 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041157
APA StyleBolesnikov, M., Popović Stijačić, M., Radišić, M., Takači, A., Borocki, J., Bolesnikov, D., Bajdor, P., & Dzieńdziora, J. (2019). Development of a Business Model by Introducing Sustainable and Tailor-Made Value Proposition for SME Clients. Sustainability, 11(4), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041157