The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Value and Price of Agricultural Land in Czechia
3.2. Comparison of Farmland Prices in Czechia and the European Union
3.3. Comparison of the Number of Farms and Average Farm Areas in Czechia and the European Union
3.4. Investing in Farmland in Czechia
4. Discussion
4.1. Land Market Research in the Czech Republic
- Question no. 1: Are you considering the sale of your farmland given its current market price in Czechia?
- Question no. 2: Under what conditions would you be potentially willing to sell the land?
- Question no. 3: Do you consider the collected rents to be adequate
- ◦
- considering the current market price of the land?
- ◦
- considering the real payment possibilities of agricultural subjects (tenants)?
- “Slowly, the interest of large investors who saw great potential in the price boom is decreasing. Now they focus on searching for high quality land and they are willing to pay the higher price only for this kind of land, “said Jiří Jaklín, the owner of Agro 21, a company that specializes in the trade in farmland. ‘‘If offers for fields of CZK 30 (USD 1.3) per square meter are accumulating on the internet and no one is showing any interest in them, something is wrong’’.
- The company Chemagra, which has been very busy buying land in the past, is more cautious now in their acquisitions. “The sellers’ ideas are often unrealistic. There is no point buying fields for prices we would only get return on in several generations,” says the co-owner of the company, Walter Schrott.
- Large-scale concerns, like the owners of the Creditas Bank and Pavel Hubáček’s investment group Unicapital, also act with caution when buying farmland. In their portfolio they have 8500 hectares of land. Yet, they are still open to further acquisitions and keep buying but focus on areas where they are farming. The group owns, for example, extensive fields in the Bruntálsko region and in the foothills of Beskydy.
- Some investors wager on the growing popularity of organic food, which is more expensive than common agricultural produce. They are ready to invest in land suitable for a period of transition to organic farming. In practice this means two or three years of cleaning the soil of pesticide residues from conventional farming before starting the operation of an organic farm.
4.2. Development of Agricultural Land Prices in Other Scientific Studies
4.3. Evaluation of Hypotheses and Resulting Implications for the Sustainable Development
4.3.1. Recommendations for Investors, Farmers and Agricultural Firms
4.3.2. Recommendations for the Government
4.3.3. Recommendations for Landowners
4.3.4. Research Implications
5. Conclusions
- the capture of nutrients from wastewater,
- the development of biotechnologies that free crops from their dependence on fertilizers,
- alternating the use of farmland for growing crops and grazing.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Marunelu, I. Research on the Small Peasant Individual Households in Romania within the Framework of Sustainable Agriculture. Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 2020, 20, 341–346. [Google Scholar]
- Escoto, B.; Estela, B.; Boza, P.; Feito, M.; Duniesky, M. Sustainable Tourism: A Competitiveness Strategy Perspective in Baja California. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lv, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, J.; Yun, W.; Gao, L.; Li, P. Sustainability Assessment of Smallholder Farmland Systems: Healthy Farmland System Assessment Framework. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sigura, M.; Peccol, E.; Piani, L. High Nature Value Farmland (HNVF) and Ecological Networks: Their Role in the Sustainability of Trans-Border Regions. disP Plan. Rev. 2010, 46, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrano, L.; Sianes, A.; Ariza-Montes, A. Using Bibliometric Methods to Shed Light on the Concept of Sustainable Tourism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brohm, K.A.; Klein, S. The Concept of Climate Smart Agriculture—A Classification in Sustainable Theories. Int. J. Qual. Res. 2020, 14, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernués, A.; Tello-García, E.; Rodríguez-Ortega, T.; Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Casasús, I. Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers. Land Use Policy 2016, 59, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paris Agreement. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en (accessed on 3 April 2020).
- Huettel, S.; Wildermann, L.; Croonenbroeck, C. How do institutional market players matter in farmland pricing? Land Use Policy 2016, 59, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ustaoglu, E.; Collier, M.J. Farmland abandonment in Europe: An overview of drivers, consequences, and assessment of the sustainability implications. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 396–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Wang, P.; Yao, G. Exploring the Dynamic Mechanisms of Farmland Abandonment Based on a Spatially Explicit Economic Model for Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study in Jiangxi Province, China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1260–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burja, V.; Tamas-Szora, A.; Dobra, I.B. Land Concentration, Land Grabbing and Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Romania. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sekac, P.; Salek, M.; Wranova, A.; Kumble, P.; Sklenicka, P. Effect of Water Features Proximity on Farmland Prices in a Landlocked Country: The Consequences for Planning. Soil Water Res. 2017, 12, 8–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jadevicius, A.; Huston, S.; Baum, A.; Butler, A. Two centuries of farmland prices in England. J. Prop. Res. 2018, 35, 72–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lence, S.H. Farmland Prices: Is This Time Different? Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2014, 36, 577–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hýř, M. Cena půdy letí nahoru. Pozor, neprodejte ji zbytečně lacino. Metro, 19 October 2015; 6. [Google Scholar]
- Farmy.cz. Available online: http://farmy.cz/cena-pudy/ (accessed on 18 April 2020).
- European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/news/eu-budget-common-agricultural-policy-after-2020-2018-jun-01_en (accessed on 23 April 2020).
- Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/product?code=apri_lprc (accessed on 13 April 2020).
- Koláčková, G.; Krejčí, I.; Tichá, I. Dynamics of the small farmers’ behaviour—Scenario simulations. Agric. Econ. 2017, 63, 103–120. [Google Scholar]
- Stotten, R.; Maurer, M.; Herrmann, H.; Schermer, M. Different Forms of Accommodation in Agritourism: The Role of Decoupled Farmer-Based Accommodation in the Ötztal Valley (Austria). Sustainability 2019, 11, 2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Markantoni, M.; Strijker, D.; Koster, S. Motives for starting up a side activity in rural areas in The Netherlands. Local Econ. 2014, 29, 723–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Czech Statistical Office (CZSO). Available online: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/61661393/ipccr102318_71.xlsx/2594effb-4672-4456-b73f-654cdb882226?version=1.3 (accessed on 23 April 2020).
- Zhang, J.; Mishra, A.K.; Hirsch, S.; Li, X.S. Factors affecting farmland rental in rural China: Evidence of capitalization of grain subsidy payments. Land Use Policy 2020, 90, 104275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, E.D.; Sherrick, B.J.; Kuethe, T.H. The Changing Roles of Urban Influence and Agricultural Productivity in Farmland Price Determination. Land Econ. 2018, 94, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wineman, A.; Jayne, T.S. Land Prices Heading Skyward? An Analysis of Farmland Values across Tanzania. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2018, 40, 187–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, M.C.; Wu, P.I.; Liou, J.L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.H. The impact of promoting renewable energy in Taiwan—How much hail is added to snow in farmland prices? J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novák, D. Ceny zemědělské půdy narážejí na strop. E15, 16 November 2017; 4. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, D.; Deng, X.; Guo, S.; Liu, S. Labor Migration and Farmland Abandonment in Rural China: Empirical Results and Policy Implications. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levers, C.; Schneider, M.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Estel, S.; Kuemmerle, T. Spatial Variation in Determinants of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prishchepov, A.V.; Müller, D.; Dubinin, M.; Baumann, M.; Radelo, V.C. Determinants of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Post-Soviet European Russia. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, J.; Zeng, M.; Xie, Z.; Wang, S.K. Power of Agricultural Credit in Farmland Abandonment: Evidence from Rural China. Land 2019, 8, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Campbell, J.E.; Lobell, D.B.; Genova, R.C.; Field, C.B. The Global Potential of Bioenergy on Abandoned Agriculture Lands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5791–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumann, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Elbakidze, M.; Ozdogan, M.; Radelo, V.C.; Keuler, N.S.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Kruhlov, I.; Hostert, P. Patterns and Drivers of Post-Socialist Farmland Abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Queiroz, C.; Beilin, R.; Folke, C.; Lindborg, R. Farmland Abandonment: Threat or Opportunity for Biodiversity Conservation? A Global Review. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Li, X. Global Understanding of Farmland Abandonment: A Review and Prospects. J. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 1123–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Xin, L.; Sun, L. Drivers of Cropland Abandonment in Mountainous Areas: A Household Decision Model on Farming Scale in Southwest China. Land Use Policy 2016, 57, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Song, W. Determinants of Cropland Abandonment at the Parcel, Household and Village Levels in Mountain Areas of China: A Multi-Level Analysis. Land Use Policy 2014, 41, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Song, W. Spatial Distribution and Simulation of Cropland Abandonment in Wushan County, Chongqing, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hindls, R.; Hronová, S.; Seger, J.; Fischer, J. Statistika Pro Economy; Professional Publishing: Praha, Czech Republic, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Agro 21. Available online: https://www.agro21.cz/ (accessed on 16 April 2020).
- Zemědělský Svaz ČR. Available online: https://www.zscr.cz/Aktuality (accessed on 26 March 2020).
- Sirotek, J. Půda začíná vydělávat. E15, 1 September 2015; 14–15. [Google Scholar]
- Maitah, M.; Kuzmenko, E.; Smutka, L. Real Effective Exchange Rate of Rouble and Competitiveness of Russian Agrarian Producers. Economies 2016, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krejčí, I.; Moulis, P.; Pitrova, J.; Ticha, I.; Pilar, L.; Rydval, J. Traps and Opportunities of Czech Small-Scale Beef Cattle Farming. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Czech Agrarian Chamber. Available online: http://www.akcr.cz/info/aktuality/ (accessed on 13 March 2020).
- Cotteleer, G.; Gardebroek, C.; Luijt, J. Market Power in a GIS-Based Hedonic Price Model of Local Farmland Markets. Land Econ. 2008, 84, 573–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havel, P. Pachtovné smlouvy proti erozi. 5 plus 2, 31 January 2020; 12. [Google Scholar]
- Ly, N.T. Investice do půdy se přestávají vyplácet. E15, 22 February 2018; 4. [Google Scholar]
- Czech Banking Association (CBA). Available online: https://cbaonline.cz/upload/328-vyrocni-zprava-2018.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2020).
- Severová, L.; Svoboda, R.; Kopecká, L. Investing in Farmland in the Czech Republic As a Growth Factor in Its Price. In Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth, 2016, Vols I–VII, Proceedings of the 28th International Business-Information-Management-Association Conference, Seville, Spain, 9–10 November 2016; Soliman, K.S., Ed.; International Business Information Management Association: Norristown, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 443–450. [Google Scholar]
- Gebeltova, Z.; Malec, K.; Maitah, M.; Smutka, L.; Appiah-Kubi, S.N.K.; Maitah, K.; Sahatqija, J.; Sirohi, J. The Impact of Crop Mix on Decreasing Soil Price and Soil Degradation: A Case Study of Selected Regions in Czechia (2002–2019). Sustainability 2020, 12, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wielewska, I.; Gliniak, M.; Sobczyk, W.; Prus, P. Ecological Education for Sustainable Development of Rural Areas. In Integrated and Sustainable Regional Development Marketing and Sustainable Consumption, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Economic Science for Rural Development (ESRD), Jelgava, Latvia, 27–28 April 2017; Auzina, A., Ed.; Latvia University of Agriculture, Faculty of Economics & Social Development: Jelgava, Latvia, 2017; pp. 250–257. [Google Scholar]
- Prus, P. Sustainable Farming Production and Its Impact on the Natural Environment—Case Study Based on a Selected Group of Farmers. In 8th International Scientific Conference on Rural Development—Bioeconomy Challenges, Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference on Rural Development—Bioeconomy Challenges, Akademija, Lithuania, 23–24 November 2017; Raupeliene, A., Ed.; Aleksandras Stulginskis University: Akademija, Lithuania, 2017; pp. 1280–1285. [Google Scholar]
Type of Land | Market Price Per Hectare | Market Tenure | Profit Including Subsidies | Return on Investment for Owner (Years) |
---|---|---|---|---|
High creditworthiness (e.g., Haná) | 300,000 (USD 13,081) | 6 | 12 | 50 |
Medium creditworthiness (e.g., South Bohemia) | 200,000 (USD 8721) | 4 | 8 | 50 |
Low creditworthiness (e.g., the Jeseníky region) | 150,000 (USD 6541) | 3 | 6 | 50 |
Question | Question Content | Answer | No. of Answers |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Acceptance of current land prices | No | 30 |
2 | Conditions of potential sale | Difficult life situation or unavoidable property sale | 30 |
3a | Rent adequate considering market price of farmland | No | 30 |
3b | Rent adequate considering possibilities of agricultural companies | No | 20 |
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchase price/ha | 86,228 | 102,550 | 115,856 | 119,535 | 128,295 |
Rent/ha | 1421 | 1473 | 1630 | 1783 | 2000 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Seeman, T.; Šrédl, K.; Prášilová, M.; Svoboda, R. The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study). Sustainability 2020, 12, 5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145622
Seeman T, Šrédl K, Prášilová M, Svoboda R. The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study). Sustainability. 2020; 12(14):5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145622
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeeman, Tomáš, Karel Šrédl, Marie Prášilová, and Roman Svoboda. 2020. "The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study)" Sustainability 12, no. 14: 5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145622
APA StyleSeeman, T., Šrédl, K., Prášilová, M., & Svoboda, R. (2020). The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study). Sustainability, 12(14), 5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145622