Next Article in Journal
Self-Regulation of Motivation and Confinement by COVID-19: A Study in Spanish University Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Enriched Organic Fertilizer (NEO) and Its Effect on Ryegrass Yield and Soil Fauna Feeding Activity under Controlled Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Analyzing the Patterns, Trends and Dynamics of the Land-Use Changes in Azores Region: From 1990 to 2018
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces

1
Department of Environmental Horticulture, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Korea
2
Department of Agriculture, Forest and Bioresources and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5434; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105434
Submission received: 20 April 2021 / Revised: 7 May 2021 / Accepted: 11 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Sustainable Agricultural Crop Production)

Abstract

:
Mushroom cultivation generates a large amount of CO2 that can be used sustainably. The objective of this study was to use actual cultivation and simulation to find a sustainable cultivation method that uses the CO2 generated by king oyster mushrooms for the production of romaine lettuces. A closed cultivation system consisting of one mushroom chamber, three lettuce chambers, and one gas-mixing chamber was used. Two cultivation conditions, non-continuous and continuous, were analyzed. The non-continuous system cultivated 15 lettuces and 12 mushroom bottles at a time every 25 and 16 days, respectively. The continuous system cultivated three lettuces and mushroom bottles every five and four days, respectively, so that each chamber contained mushrooms or lettuces at each growth stage. The CO2 concentrations in the lettuce and mushroom chambers were stably maintained above 1000 μmol∙mol−1 and below 2000 μmol∙mol−1 in the continuous system. Mathematical models were developed to analyze the CO2 concentration in each chamber. The shoot dry weight of lettuces grown in the mixed cultivation were 48.0%, 21.9%, 19.7%, and 18.1% at 10, 15, 20, and 25 days after transplanting, respectively, higher than those in the lettuce-only cultivation. Compared to mushroom-only cultivation, mixed cultivation reduced the accumulated CO2 emissions into the air by 80.6%. Thus, using CO2 from mushrooms to cultivate lettuce in a continuous cultivation system could reduce CO2 emissions into the air and enable mixed cultivation of mushrooms and lettuces, achieving sustainable agriculture.

1. Introduction

Increased CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, which is a driving force of climate change, causes physiological changes in many crops [1]. The impact of elevated CO2 on plants has been highlighted in connection with climate change, but from a physiological point of view, it is also a factor in increasing crop production [2]. For example, it increases the carboxylation efficiency of plants and affects the photosynthetic rate [3]. In greenhouses, enhanced CO2 concentrations are actively used to increase crop yields [4,5]. Most CO2 supply systems in greenhouses involve burning fuel [6]. As a result, many studies have been conducted to find appropriate CO2 concentration levels for various crops grown in greenhouses [7]. However, some portion of the CO2 enriched in a greenhouse is released into the atmosphere through ventilation [8]. Therefore, when using CO2 for crop cultivation, two considerations are needed to enable sustainable cultivation: no use of fossil fuels and no release of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Because mushrooms are aerobic fungi, their respiration during cultivation produces a large amount of CO2 that is generally emitted into the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas [9]. High CO2 concentration suppress the growth of king oyster mushrooms, causing physiological disorder [10], but they positively affect the photosynthesis of plants [11]. Therefore, a previous attempt used the CO2 generated during shiitake mushroom cultivation for lettuce cultivation [12]. However, the amounts of CO2 emitted by the shiitake mushrooms and consumed by the lettuces were not quantified in that report. To accurately analyze the change in CO2 concentration in the cultivation system, mixed cultivation of mushrooms and lettuces must be continued for a long period. Although Jung et al. (2014) measured the change in CO2 concentration according to growth stage and ratio of romaine lettuces to king oyster mushrooms [13], they did not precisely analyze the CO2 behavior. A recent study grew basil plants, shiitake mushrooms, and black soldier fly larvae at the same time, and observed the change in CO2 concentration in each growth chamber [14], but they did not present cultivation methods to precisely control CO2 emission and consumption. To analyze this kind of research, it is important to use crops that can quantitatively represent the photosynthesis or respiration depending on environmental factors. King oyster mushrooms and romaine lettuces are suitable crops because their respiration and photosynthesis are expressed in models, respectively [15,16].
For sustainable cultivation, the amounts of CO2 emitted by mushrooms and consumed by lettuces should be equal over time. To efficiently manage a total cultivation system for both mushrooms and lettuces, it is necessary to quantify the CO2 emitted and consumed and to establish models of CO2 behavior in the cultivation system. One possibility is to use continuous (conveyer) cultivation in which plants at several growth stages are simultaneously grown in the cultivation system [17]. That method produces smaller fluctuations in CO2 concentration than does the non-continuous method, which begins growing all the plants at one time. However, continuous cultivation systems are technically difficult to manage because various environmental variables are associated with one another, and their interactions cannot be tracked with ease [18]. For an adequate investigation of such complicated systems, simulation methods are essential [19]. There have been several attempts to grow multiple organisms simultaneously [12,13,14], but no precise predictions have been attempted by using simulation. Thus, the objective of this study was to use actual cultivation and simulation to find a sustainable way to use the CO2 produced by respiration of king oyster mushrooms to grow romaine lettuces.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Cultivation Conditions

Romaine lettuces (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Asia Heuk Romaine) and king oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii (DC.) Quél) were used for the experiment. Yamazaki’s nutrient solutions with an electrical conductivity of 1.2 dS∙m−1 were applied to the lettuces. The inside temperature and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of the lettuce growth chamber were maintained at 24 °C and 200 μmol∙m−2∙s−1, respectively, with an 8:1:1 ratio of RBW light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The photoperiods in the lettuce growth chamber were set to 16 h (day) and 8 h (night). The mushroom chamber was kept dark using a black cloth and the inside temperature and humidity were maintained at 18 °C and 95%, respectively.

2.2. Mushroom and Lettuce Mixed Cultivation Systems

For simulation and evaluation of the mushroom-only and mixed (lettuce and mushroom) cultivations, a cultivation system consisting of one mushroom chamber, one mixing chamber, and three lettuce chambers (Figure 1) was constructed. The size of the lettuce and mushroom chambers was 400 L (1.0 × 0.8 × 0.5 m) and that of the mixing chamber was 125 L (0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 m). Each chamber was made of acryl plates and sealed. The ventilation number of each chamber was 0.039 h−1, which was negligible in calculating CO2 concentration. Lettuces at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 days after transplanting (DAT) and mushrooms at 3, 7, 11, and 15 days after scratching (DAS) were used for the mixed cultivation system.
Air was circulated between the chambers at a flow rate of 62 L∙min−1 using diaphragm pumps (Boxer 7004, Uno International Ltd., London, UK). CO2 generated in the mushroom chamber was circulated to the lettuce chambers via the mixing chamber. The mixing chamber was designed to exchange air between the chambers and the external air in case the CO2 concentration in the total system become too high or low. The CO2 concentration in each chamber was measured every two minutes using an infrared CO2 sensor (LI-820, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and was recorded using a data logger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA). The pumps between lettuce and mixing chambers, between mushroom and mixing chambers, and between mixing chamber and the external air were operated when the CO2 concentration fell below 1000 μmol∙mol−1 in the lettuce chamber or rose above 2000 μmol∙mol−1 in the mushroom chamber or the mixing chamber. AC/DC controllers (SDM-CD16AC, Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA) were used to control the diaphragm pumps.

2.3. CO2 Behavior Models for the Cultivation Systems

The photosynthetic rates in the lettuce chambers (Equation (1)) were calculated using models of lettuce photosynthesis over time experimentally developed by Jung et al. (2016) [16]. The photosynthetic rate model was determined by the regression analysis based on a rectangular hyperbola equation. The model contains variables to operate at different CO2 levels and growth stages.
P n = a × b × C L n a + b × C L n + c
where a is the photochemical efficiency (μmol∙mol−1), b is the carboxylation conductance (s−1), and c is the dark respiration (μmol∙m−2∙s−1). Values for a , b , and c were obtained by a regression analysis with photosynthetic rates at each growth stage. Therefore, a , b , and c are expressed as exponential functions according to the growth stage, and they are finally organized in the form of Equation (2). The estimated coefficients showed an accuracy of R2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 1.2 μmol∙s−1 [16].
P n = 21.812 × e 0.057 × t × e 0.050 × t × C L n 57.4 × e 0.057 × t + 0.380 × e 0.050 × t × C L n 18.608 × e 0.056 × t
The CO2 emission rate in the mushroom chamber (Equation (3)) was calculated using exponential functions developed by Chanter and Thornley (1978) [20]. The respiration rate model was determined by the regression analysis based on an exponential equation. The model contains variables to operate at different growth stages of mushrooms. The coefficients of the models were experimentally determined by using the mushroom respiration measured in this system.
R = M × W + Y × d W d t
where R is the respiration rate (μmol∙m−2∙s−1), M is the maintenance coefficient (s−1), W is the dry weight (g), and Y is the CO2 production coefficient (g∙g−1). Since the king oyster mushrooms in this study were harvested before reaching the stationary phase, dry weight is expressed as an exponential function to the growth stage, and it is organized in the form of Equation (4). The estimated coefficients showed an accuracy of R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 21.6 μmol∙s−1 [15].
R = 0.016 × e 0.549 × t 48.352
The following equations were used to express the CO2 behavior in the cultivation systems:
V × d C L n d t = ( C X C L n ) × Q L n k × L N n × P n
V × d C M d t = ( C X C M ) × Q M + k × M N × R
V X × d C X d t = ( C M C X ) × Q M + ( C O C X ) × Q X + ( ( C L n C X ) × Q L n )
The parameters and coefficients used in the models are defined in Table 1. The initial CO2 concentrations in the lettuce, mushroom, and mixing chambers were 1000, 500, and 1000 μmol∙mol−1, respectively. The external CO2 concentration was assumed to be 500 μmol∙mol−1, because the CO2 concentration in the building where the experimental system was installed was about 500 μmol∙mol−1.

2.4. Simulation Conditions for the Non-Continuous and Continuous Cultivation

Non-continuous and continuous cultivation systems were analyzed and compared. In the non-continuous system, 15 lettuces and 12 mushroom bottles were placed at a time in the lettuce and mushroom chambers every 25 and 16 days, respectively (Figure 2A). In the continuous system, three mushroom bottles and lettuces were placed in the lettuce and mushroom chambers every 5 and 4 days, respectively, so each chamber contained mushrooms at 4, 8, and 12 DAS or lettuces at 5, 10, 15, and 20 DAT (Figure 2B). In both cases, the mushroom chamber contained 12 bottles of mushrooms, and each lettuce chamber contained 15 lettuces. In the simulation, the air flow rate and photoperiod of each chamber were set to match the conditions in the actual chambers. The photoperiods in the lettuce chambers were set as shown in Table 2 for continuous cultivation to ensure that photosynthesis occurred in two lettuce chambers at all times. Simulations were conducted in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) to estimate the CO2 concentration in each chamber for 50 days.

2.5. Evaluation of Continuous Cultivation

Two experiments were conducted for 5 days and repeated three times. The number of mushrooms and lettuces in each chamber was set to be the same as the previous simulation conditions. First, the shoot fresh and dry weight and leaf area of the lettuces grown in the mixed, continuous cultivation system (Figure 1) and those grown in the lettuce-only chamber, which were where maintained at 400 μmol∙mol−1, were compared at each growth stage. The collected samples were dried in an oven at 70 °C for three days and shoot dry weights were measured. The environmental conditions in the chambers were the same except for CO2 concentration. Second, the accumulated CO2 emissions from the mixing chamber in the mixed, continuous cultivation system (Figure 1) and those from the mushroom-only chamber maintained at a CO2 concentration below 2000 μmol∙mol−1 were compared.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All measured and simulated data were evaluated using the SPSS statistical package (IBM, New York, NY, USA). Data were analyzed with Duncan’s new multiple rage test (DMRT) after an analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Simulated CO2 Behavior in Non-continuous and Continuous Cultivation Conditions

The CO2 concentrations simulated in the mushroom and lettuce chambers for 50 days showed a difference between non-continuous and continuous cultivation (Figure 3). With non-continuous cultivation, the CO2 concentration in the lettuce chambers remained above 1000 μmol∙mol−1 for 400 h. After that, a rapid imbalance depleted the CO2 concentration in the lettuce chambers. The CO2 concentration seemed to be restored at about 600 h, but it was depleted again after 800 h. This was due to the large amount of CO2 consumption by the photosynthesis of the lettuces compared to that produced by the respiration of the mushrooms. With continuous cultivation, on the other hand, the CO2 concentration in the lettuce chambers remained constant at 1000 μmol∙mol−1 throughout the period. Thus, the CO2 concentration with continuous cultivation was well balanced. This result was similar to previously published predictions with wheat and radish [17], implying that a mixed continuous cultivation system is an advantageous method that offers sustainable control of CO2 behavior.

3.2. Evaluation of Continuous Cultivation of Lettuce and Mushroom

The measured and simulated CO2 concentrations in the lettuce and mushroom chambers were compared (Figure 4). The CO2 concentrations in the lettuce chambers were controlled to the set point of 1000 μmol∙mol−1 or higher (Figure 4A–C). In addition, the CO2 concentration in the mushroom chamber stayed below the set point (Figure 4D). The CO2 concentration in the mixing chamber fluctuated more frequently than the simulation had predicted, but no dramatic breakaway was observed (Figure 4E). At night in each lettuce chamber, the measured CO2 concentration was lower than in the simulation. Because the respiration rate of the actual lettuces was lower than that of the simulated lettuces, the CO2 leakage from the chambers used in the experiments was negligible. However, it is believed that the difference between the measured and simulated CO2 concentrations occurred because the leakage from the pipes connecting the chambers was not reflected.
The results confirmed that gas exchange took place through the pre-operation of pumps during the dark period in the lettuce chambers, and the CO2 concentration in the mushroom chamber was well controlled below the set point of 2000 μmol∙mol−1. When the CO2 concentration in mushroom cultivation facilities is below 2400 μmol∙mol−1, the marketable values of king oyster mushrooms is maximized [21]. Therefore, when applying the continuous cultivation method, CO2 concentration should be maintained at appropriate levels.
The shoot fresh and dry weight and leaf area of lettuces grown in the mixed, continuous cultivation system were significantly higher than those grown using lettuce-only cultivation except for leaf area at 25 DAT (Figure 5). The shoot dry weight of lettuces grown in the mixed cultivation were 48.0%, 21.9%, 19.7%, and 18.1% higher at 10, 15, 20, and 25 DAT, respectively, than those in the lettuce-only cultivation. Compared with the shoot fresh weight of lettuce grown at a plant factory for three weeks [22], the lettuce in this experiment showed no physiological disorder. That result is consistent with existing research showing that lettuce grown at a PPFD of 300 μmol∙m−2∙s−1 and enhanced CO2 concentration increased in fresh weight [23]. In addition, the supply of CO2 promotes the growth of lettuce, which shortens the harvest time. Therefore, these results show that lettuce can be grown without fossil fuels using CO2 generated from mushroom respiration.

3.3. Esitmation of Accumulated CO2 Emission into the Air

The accumulated CO2 emissions from the mixing chamber into the air were estimated to be 35 g for five days, but the actual measured value was 48 g (Figure 6). Because CO2 was emitted only when the pumps were operating, the accumulated CO2 emissions over time appeared step-like. With mushroom-only cultivation, the accumulated CO2 emissions were 180 g during the same period. Therefore, the mixed cultivation system reduced CO2 emissions into the air by 80.6%. Thus, using CO2 from mushroom respiration for plant photosynthesis effectively reduces the CO2 released into the atmosphere.
Anthropogenic CO2 emissions continue to increase, resulting in rising global temperatures and sea levels, and acidification of the oceans [24]. According to the climate change scenario, there are some predictions that if anthropogenic CO2 emissions are totally eliminated, global temperatures will not rise [25]. The agricultural sector accounts for about 15% of the total greenhouse gas emissions from human activities [26]. These emissions are mostly due to methane and nitrogen oxides from livestock farming. For sustainable agriculture, it is recommended to minimize soil disturbance, carry out crop rotation, and manage fertilizer and nutrients [27]. However, among the many sub-sectors of agriculture, common carbon reduction strategies often do not work. One example is mushroom cultivation on commercial farms that emit CO2 in high concentrations, and the other is some greenhouse cultivation, which uses high CO2 concentrations to improve crop productivity. Recently, sophisticated respiration and photosynthesis models have been used to represent CO2 emission and consumption [15,16]. Therefore, attempts to reduce CO2 emissions from agricultural activities by using modeling and simulation are required to continue.

4. Conclusions

CO2 concentrations in the lettuce and mushroom chambers were estimated by the simulation of mixed, continuous cultivation. CO2 concentrations in the lettuce and mushroom chambers were experimentally verified and shown to be controlled within allowable ranges. The shoot dry weight of lettuces grown in mixed cultivation were 48.0%, 21.9%, 19.7%, and 18.1% higher at 10, 15, 20, and 25 days after transplanting, respectively, than those in lettuce-only cultivation. With the mixed, continuous cultivation system, CO2 emissions into the atmosphere could be reduced by 80.6% compared with the total CO2 emitted by mushrooms through respiration. Because CO2 is one of the factors responsible for global warming, minimizing CO2 emissions caused by mushroom cultivation will be meaningful. The results in this study enable a reduction in CO2 emissions as well as improvements in plant production, achieving sustainable agriculture and mitigating climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing—review and editing, D.-H.J. and J.-E.S.; formal analysis and data curation, D.-H.J.; supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition, J.-E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the Grand Information Technology Research Center support program (IITP-2020-0-01489), and supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Teng, N.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J. Elevated CO2 induces physiological, biochemical and structural changes in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2006, 172, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiltshire, A.J.; Kay, G.; Gornall, J.L.; Betts, R.A. The impact of climate, CO2 and population on regional food and water resources in the 2050s. Sustainability 2013, 5, 2129–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Reddy, A.R.; Rasineni, G.K.; Raghavendra, A.S. The impact of global elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and plant productivity. Curr. Sci. 2010, 99, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nederhoff, E.M.; Vegter, J.G. Canopy photosynthesis of tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper in greenhouse: Measurements compared to models. Ann. Bot. 1994, 73, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oreggioni, G.D.; Luberti, M.; Tassou, S.A. Agricultural greenhouse CO2 utilization in anaerobic-digestion-based biomethane production plants: A techno-economic and environmental assessment and comparison with CO2 geological storage. Appl. Energy 2019, 242, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chalabi, Z.S.; Biro, A.; Bailey, B.J.; Aikman, D.P.; Cockshull, K.E. Optimal control strategies for carbon dioxide enrichment in greenhouse tomato crops e part II: Using the exhaust gases of natural gas fired boilers. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mortensen, L.M. Review, CO2 enrichment in greenhouses. crop responses. Sci. Hortic. 1987, 33, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuroyanagi, T.; Yasuba, K.; Higashide, T.; Iwasaki, Y.; Takaichi, M. Efficiency of carbon dioxide enrichment in an unventilated greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 119, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thavivongse, S.; Buppachat, M. Grey oyster mushroom for food security versus CO2 emission. J. Environ. Res. Dev. 2013, 7, 1363–1368. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jang, M.J.; Ha, T.M.; Lee, Y.H.; Ju, Y.C. Growth characteristics of variety of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) as affected by number of air exchanges. Prot. Hortic. Plant Fact. 2009, 18, 208–214. [Google Scholar]
  11. Leadley, P.W.; Niklaus, P.A.; Stocker, R. A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 on plant biomass and community structure in a calcareous grassland. Oecologia 1999, 118, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kitaya, Y.; Tani, A.; Kiyota, M.; Aiga, I. Plant growth and gas balance in a plant and mushroom cultivation system. Adv. Space Res. 1994, 14, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jung, D.H.; Kim, C.K.; Oh, K.H.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, M.S.; Shin, J.H.; Son, J.E. Analyses of CO2 concentration and balance in a closed production system for king oyster mushroom and lettuce. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2014, 10, 628–635. [Google Scholar]
  14. Padmanabha, M.; Streif, S. Design and validation of a low cost programmable controlled environment for study and production of plants, mushroom, and insect larvae. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jung, D.H.; Son, J.E. Carbon dioxide emission modeling of king oyster mushroom before and after thinning processes according to temperature and growth stage. J. Bio-Environ. Control. 2021, 30, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jung, D.H.; Kim, D.; Yoon, H.I.; Moon, T.W.; Park, K.S.; Son, J.E. Modeling the canopy photosynthetic rate of romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a plant factory at varying CO2 concentrations and growth stages. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2016, 57, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gitelson, I.I.; Lisovsky, G.M.; MacElroy, R.D. Manmade Closed Ecological Systems; CRC Press: London, UK, 2003; pp. 179–182. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hendrickx, L.; de Wever, H.; Hermans, V.; Mastroleo, F.; Morin, N.; Wilmotte, A.; Janssen, P.; Mergeay, M. Microbial ecology of the closed artificial ecosystem MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative): Reinventing and compartmentalizing the Earth’s food and oxygen regeneration system for long-haul space exploration missions. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Volk, T.; Rummel, J.D. Mass balances for a biological life support system simulation model. Adv. Space Res. 1987, 7, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chanter, D.O.; Thornley, J.H.M. Mycelial growth and the initiation and growth of sporophores in the mushroom crop: A mathematical model. Microbiology 1978, 106, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ryu, J.S.; Kim, M.K.; Cho, S.H.; Yun, Y.C.; Seo, W.M.; Lee, H.S. Optimal CO2 level for cultivation of Pleurotus eryngii. J. Mushroom 2005, 3, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Gerrewey, T.; Vandecruys, M.; Ameloot, N.; Perneel, M.; van Labeke, M.C.; Boon, N.; Geelen, D. Microbe-plant growing media interactions modulate the effectiveness of bacterial amendments on lettuce performance inside a plant factory with artificial lighting. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Esmaili, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Mashal, M.; Ghorbanzadeh, P.; Seif, M.; Gavilan, M.U.; Carrillo, F.F.; Lastochkina, O.; Li, T. CO2 enrichment and increasing light intensity till a threshold level, enhance growth and water use efficiency of lettuce plants in controlled environment. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. 2020, 48, 2244–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gattuso, J.P.; Magnan, A.; Billé, R.; Cheung, W.W.L.; Howes, E.L.; Joos, F.; Allemand, D.; Bopp, L.; Cooley, S.R.; Eakin, C.M.; et al. Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO2 emissions scenarios. Science 2015, 349, 6243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hare, B.; Meinshausen, M. How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? Clim. Chang. 2006, 75, 111–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malhi, G.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaushik, P. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pisante, M.; Stagnari, F.; Grant, C.A. Agricultural innovations for sustainable crop production intensification. Ital. J. Agron. 2012, 7, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of a cultivation system consisting of one mushroom chamber, one CO2 mixing chamber, and three lettuce chambers. The arrows and symbols indicate the air flow and air flow rates, respectively.
Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of a cultivation system consisting of one mushroom chamber, one CO2 mixing chamber, and three lettuce chambers. The arrows and symbols indicate the air flow and air flow rates, respectively.
Sustainability 13 05434 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the non-continuous cultivation (A) and continuous cultivation (B) systems. The total number of lettuces and mushrooms in each chamber at any time is 15 and 12, respectively.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the non-continuous cultivation (A) and continuous cultivation (B) systems. The total number of lettuces and mushrooms in each chamber at any time is 15 and 12, respectively.
Sustainability 13 05434 g002
Figure 3. Simulated CO2 concentrations in the three lettuce chambers and the mushroom chamber with non-continuous cultivation (A) and continuous cultivation (B) for 50 days.
Figure 3. Simulated CO2 concentrations in the three lettuce chambers and the mushroom chamber with non-continuous cultivation (A) and continuous cultivation (B) for 50 days.
Sustainability 13 05434 g003
Figure 4. Measured (red dots) and simulated (blue dots) CO2 concentrations in lettuce chambers 1 (A), 2 (B), and 3 (C); the mushroom chamber (D); and the mixing chamber (E) with continuous cultivation.
Figure 4. Measured (red dots) and simulated (blue dots) CO2 concentrations in lettuce chambers 1 (A), 2 (B), and 3 (C); the mushroom chamber (D); and the mixing chamber (E) with continuous cultivation.
Sustainability 13 05434 g004
Figure 5. Shoot fresh weight (A), shoot dry weight (B), and leaf area (C) of lettuces grown in lettuce-only cultivation (blue) and mixed, continuous cultivation (red). Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 15). An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (ANOVA/Duncan) (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Shoot fresh weight (A), shoot dry weight (B), and leaf area (C) of lettuces grown in lettuce-only cultivation (blue) and mixed, continuous cultivation (red). Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 15). An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (ANOVA/Duncan) (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 05434 g005
Figure 6. Accumulated CO2 emissions into the atmosphere over 5 days. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (ANOVA/Duncan) (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Accumulated CO2 emissions into the atmosphere over 5 days. Bars represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). An asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (ANOVA/Duncan) (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 05434 g006
Table 1. Units and values of parameters and coefficients used in the CO2 behavior models.
Table 1. Units and values of parameters and coefficients used in the CO2 behavior models.
ParameterDescriptionUnitValue
V Volume of the lettuce or mushroom chamberL400
V X Volume of the mixing chamberL125
Q L n Flow rate between the lettuce chamber n and mixing chamberL∙min−162
Q M Flow rate between the mushroom and mixing chambersL∙min−162
Q X Flow rate between the mixing chamber and external airL∙min−162
k Unit conversion factor at 20 ℃ (CO2 μmol∙mol−1 to CO2 g∙L−1)g∙L−1/(μmol∙mol−1) 1.83 × 10−6
L N n Number of lettuces in the chamber n at a specific growth stageea15
M N Number of mushroom bottles in the chamber at a specific growth stageea12
C L n CO2 concentration in the lettuce chamber nμmol∙mol−1
C M CO2 concentration in the mushroom chamberμmol∙mol−1
C X CO2 concentration in the mixing chamberμmol∙mol−1
C O CO2 concentration in the external airμmol∙mol−1500
P n Photosynthetic rate of a lettuce at a specific growth stage in the chamber nμmol∙s−1
R Respiration rate of a mushroom at specific growth stage in the chamberμmol∙s−1
t Days after transplanting (DAT) for lettuce and days after scratching (DAS) for mushroomday
nLettuce chamber number 1, 2, 3
Table 2. Photoperiods in the three lettuce chambers for the continuous cultivation system.
Table 2. Photoperiods in the three lettuce chambers for the continuous cultivation system.
PeriodChamber 1Chamber 2Chamber 3
00:00–08:00DarkLightLight
08:00–16:00LightDarkLight
16:00–24:00LightLightDark
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, D.-H.; Son, J.-E. CO2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105434

AMA Style

Jung D-H, Son J-E. CO2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Dae-Ho, and Jung-Eek Son. 2021. "CO2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105434

APA Style

Jung, D. -H., & Son, J. -E. (2021). CO2 Utilization Strategy for Sustainable Cultivation of Mushrooms and Lettuces. Sustainability, 13(10), 5434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop