Feasibility Evaluation of Replacing River Sand with Copper Tailings
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cement and Primary Copper Tailings
2.2. Test Methods
2.3. MIP and SEM
2.4. Leaching Experiment
3. Results
3.1. Properties of Mixed Fine Aggregate
3.1.1. Testing the Basic Properties of the Mixed Sand
3.1.2. Packing Theory of Solid Particles (Fuller Theory)
3.1.3. Characteristics Analysis of Mixed Sand Gradation
3.2. Compressive Strength
3.3. Drying Shrinkage
3.4. Resistance to Sulfate Attack
3.5. Pore Structure
3.5.1. MIP
3.5.2. Binary Image Analysis Based on SEM
3.6. Leaching Test
4. Conclusions
- The characteristics of mixed fine aggregates were discussed, and it was found that the incorporation of copper tailings mainly increased the number of particles in a small interval near 0.15 mm, making the gradation curve closer to the ideal Fuller curve (n = 0.45), optimized river sand with poor gradation, and its compactness is increased.
- The compressive strength of copper tailings mortar is basically higher than that of the control group T-0% in the 7–90 days curing age, especially T-30%. The shrinkage rate and the sulfate attack resistance increases with the increase of copper tailings.
- The conclusion of binary image analysis is similar to the results of MIP experiment. However, the binary image can more clearly and intuitively express that T-30% have more, smaller, denser, more complex pores. The micro-aggregate effect (account for micron scale) is more obvious in the early stage of hydration, and the decrease of the hydration filling rate (reason for water release) in the later curing.
- This paper verifies the environmental friendliness of copper tailings mortar through leaching tests. However, environmental pollution caused by the loss of heavy metals in the early stage (28 days) of copper tailings mortar maintenance should be avoided.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ince, C. Reusing gold-mine tailings in cement mortars: Mechanical properties and socio-economic developments for the Lefke-Xeros area of Cyprus. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Fisonga, M.; Wang, F.; Mutambo, V. Sustainable utilization of copper tailings and tyre-derived aggregates in highway concrete traffic barriers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 216, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Shen, W.; Wu, M.; Shen, B.; Chen, X. Experimental study on the utilization of copper tailing as micronized sand to prepare high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 244, 118312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, N.; Yuan, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y. Preparation and microstructural characterization of a novel 3D printable building material composed of copper tailings and iron tailings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 249, 118779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince, C.; Derogar, S.; Gürkaya, K.; Ball, R.J. Properties, durability and cost efficiency of cement and hydrated lime mortars reusing copper mine tailings of Lefke-Xeros in Cyprus. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 268, 121070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argane, R.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R.; Bouamrane, A. Reuse of base-metal tailings as aggregates for rendering mortars: Assessment of immobilization performances and environmental behavior. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 96, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shettima, A.U.; Hussin, M.W.; Ahmad, Y.; Mirza, J. Evaluation of iron ore tailings as replacement for fine aggregate in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Mazumdar, S.; Dutt, K.B. Stabilization characteristics of copper mine tailings through its utilization as a partial substitute for cement in concrete: Preliminary investigations. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, Q.Y. Archaeal and bacterial communities in acid mine drainage from metal-rich abandoned tailing ponds, Tongling, China. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 3332–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Liu, W.; Xu, H.; Cui, X.; Zheng, B. Characterizations of heavy metal contamination, microbial community, and resistance genes in a tailing of the largest copper mine in China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 280, 116947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, Q.; Zheng, L.G.; Xia, Y.M. A study of modes of occurrence and pollution characteristics of heavy metals in Shuimuchong tailings of Tongling, Anhui Province. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2018, 37, 993–1001. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, B.S.; Damare, A.; Gupta, R.C. Strength and durability characteristics of copper tailing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 48, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otieno, M.; Ndoro, E. Utilization of kimberlite tailings as aggregates in concrete–strength and selected durability properties. MRS Adv. 2020, 5, 1259–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, E.J.; Zetola, V.; Ramírez, Y.; Montofré, T.L.; Pereira, F. Making Paving Stones from Copper Mine Tailings as Aggregates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- JGJ 52-2006, Standard for Technical Requirements and Test Method of Sand and Crushed Stone for Or-Dinary Concrete; China Architecture& Building Press: Beijing, China, 2006; Available online: https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF.aspx/JGJ52-2006 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
- American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C596-18, Standard Test Method for Drying Shrinkage of Mortar Containing Hydraulic Cement; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, H.; Zhu, H.; Wu, C.; Chen, H.; Liu, J. Study on compressive strength and durability of alkali-activated coal gangue-slag concrete and its mechanism. Powder Technol. 2020, 368, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Song, J. Hydration properties of Portland cement-copper tailing powder composite binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 251, 118882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhavan, A.; Golchin, A. Estimation of arsenic leaching from Zn–Pb mine tailings under environmental conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, C.L.; Hsieh, S.L. The effect of fly ash/slag on the property of reactive powder mortar designed by using Fuller’s ideal curve and error function. Comput. Concr. 2007, 4, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BS EN 12457-1. Characterisation of Waste-Leaching-Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges-Part 1: One Stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 21/kg for Materials with High Solid Content and with Particle Size below 4 mm (without or with Size Reduction). 2002. Available online: https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030017786 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
- Siddique, S.; Jang, J.G. Assessment of molybdenum mine tailings as filler in cement mortar. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onuaguluchi, O.; Eren, O. Recycling of copper tailings as an additive in cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 37, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Xiao, J.Z.; Zhong, P.; Wang, J. Drying shrinkage of mortar manufactured with recycled fine aggregate at vary initial saturation degree. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhan, B.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, W. Damage evolution of cement mortar with high volume slag exposed to sulfate attack. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moro, F.; BöHni, H. Ink-Bottle Effect in Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry of Cement-Based Materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 246, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rani, D.; Rahul, A.V.; Santhanam, M. A multi-analytical approach for pore structure assessment in historic lime mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scrivener, K.L. Backscattered electron imaging of cementitious microstructures: Understanding and quantification. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2004, 26, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mashifana, T.; Sithole, T. Clean production of sustainable backfill material from waste gold tailings and slag. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 308, 127357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Component | Wt. (%) | Heavy Metal Component | Wt. (%) |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 35.04 | CuO | 0.0702 |
MgO | 2.509 | ZnO | 0.0553 |
CaO | 30.67 | SrO | 0.023 |
Al2O3 | 7.66 | ZrO2 | 0.0116 |
Fe2O3 | 17.14 | As2O3 | 0.0066 |
K2O | 1.324 | Ga2O3 | 0.0044 |
Na2O | 0.415 | ||
TiO2 | 0.439 | ||
CuO | 0.0702 | ||
MnO | 0.456 | ||
ZnO | 0.0553 | ||
SO3 | 3.979 |
Serial Number | Cement (g) | Natural River Sand (g) | Copper Tailings (g) | Water (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T-0% | 28.14 | 56.31 | 0 | 15.49 |
T-10% | 28.14 | 50.68 | 5.63 | 15.49 |
T-20% | 28.14 | 45.05 | 11.26 | 15.49 |
T-30% | 28.14 | 39.42 | 16.89 | 15.49 |
T-40% | 28.14 | 33.79 | 22.53 | 15.49 |
Test Items | 0% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loosely packed density (kg/m3) | 1573 | 1624 | 1641 | 1661 | 1690 |
Dense packing density (kg/m3) | 1703 | 1777 | 1840 | 1913 | 1982 |
Fineness (μf) | 2.4 | 2.15 | 1.86 | 1.69 | 1.51 |
JGJ5-2006 | coarse sand: 3.7~3.1 medium sand: 3.0~2.3 fine sand: 2.2~1.6 |
Serial Number | Gradation Index | Evaluation of Fitting Accuracy | |
---|---|---|---|
n | R-Square | RMSE | |
T-0% | 0.289 | 0.637 | 0.275 |
T-10% | 0.328 | 0.740 | 0.219 |
T-20% | 0.321 | 0.771 | 0.196 |
T-30% | 0.347 | 0.817 | 0.171 |
T-40% | 0.369 | 0.856 | 0.145 |
Number | Effective Particle Size | Restricted Particle Size | Non-Uniformity Coefficient | Curvature Coefficient | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
d10 (μm) | d30 (μm) | d60 (μm) | Cu | Cd | |
T-0% | 0.173 | 0.26 | 0.425 | 2.457 | 0.919 |
T-10% | 0.163 | 0.253 | 0.48 | 3.436 | 0.818 |
T-20% | 0.125 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 4.560 | 0.949 |
T-30% | 0.115 | 0.26 | 0.71 | 6.174 | 0.828 |
T-40% | 0.1 | 0.22 | 0.91 | 9.100 | 0.532 |
The Attack of Time | T-0% | T-10% | T-20% | T-30% | T-40% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 days | 1.63 | 8.51 | −1.60 | 6.16 | −3.60 |
120 days | −10.03 | −12.15 | −7.64 | −2.66 | 4.16 |
T-0% | T-30% | T-0% | T-30% | T-0% | T-30% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Curing age (days) | 7 | 7 | 28 | 28 | 90 | 90 |
Total porosity (%) | 20.51 | 20.77 | 18.69 | 19.30 | 14.46 | 16.27 |
Average pore size (μm) | 22.81 | 21.53 | 26.64 | 25.15 | 15.42 | 23.30 |
Most probable pore size (μm) | 77.16 | 40.25 | 40.25 | 40.27 | 26.29 | 62.56 |
Fractal dimension | 2.968 | 3.008 | 2.974 | 2.989 | 3.059 | 2.983 |
T-0% | T-30% | T-0% | T-30% | T-0% | T-30% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Curing age (days) | 7 | 7 | 28 | 28 | 90 | 90 |
Number | 5010 | 4810 | 4363 | 7349 | 2438 | 3602 |
Average area (μm2) | 7.19 | 5.53 | 7.90 | 5.65 | 4.74 | 5.64 |
Total area of pores (μm2) (×104) | 3.60 | 2.66 | 3.45 | 4.15 | 1.16 | 2.03 |
Total area (μm2) (×105) | 8.93 | 9.02 | 8.95 | 8.89 | 9.02 | 9.02 |
Area ratio (%) | 4.05 | 2.95 | 3.86 | 4.67 | 1.28 | 2.25 |
Area ratio based on MIP (%) | 20.51 | 20.77 | 18.69 | 19.30 | 14.46 | 16.27 |
Binary image | Figure 10a | Figure 10b | Figure 11a | Figure 11b | Figure 12a | Figure 12b |
Indexes | T-0% | T-30% | T-0% | T-30% |
---|---|---|---|---|
PH | Temperature | PH | Temperature | |
T-0% | 12.2 | 23.7 | 12.3 | 23.0 |
T-30% | 12.3 | 22.9 | 12.3 | 23.0 |
Heavy Element | Group 1 (mg/g) | Group 2 (mg/L) | Group 3 (mg/L) | Standard 1 | Standard 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRF Result | Mortar for 28 Days | Mortar for 90 Days | |||
Sr | 19.452 | 32 | 0.543 | - | - |
Zr | 8.567 | 1.18 | - | - | - |
Ga | 3.270 | 0.001468 | 0.000872 | - | - |
Cu | 56.100 | 0.005075 | 0.392 | ≤1 mg/L | 5 |
Zn | 44.400 | 0 | - | ≤2 mg/L | 0.1 |
As | 4.998 | 0.000245 | 0.000512 | ≤0.1 mg/L | 5 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cui, L.; Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; Lou, X.; Wang, H. Feasibility Evaluation of Replacing River Sand with Copper Tailings. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147575
Cui L, Wang L, Xu Y, Lou X, Wang H. Feasibility Evaluation of Replacing River Sand with Copper Tailings. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147575
Chicago/Turabian StyleCui, Liyun, Liang Wang, Ying Xu, Xing Lou, and Hao Wang. 2021. "Feasibility Evaluation of Replacing River Sand with Copper Tailings" Sustainability 13, no. 14: 7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147575
APA StyleCui, L., Wang, L., Xu, Y., Lou, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Feasibility Evaluation of Replacing River Sand with Copper Tailings. Sustainability, 13(14), 7575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147575