Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Question
- RQ1: What are the main patterns observed in the publication of research in this area?
- RQ2: What topics and research areas are addressing older adults?
- RQ3: How have sustainable technologies for older adults evolved?
- RQ4: What research topics require further attention?
2.2. Resources
2.3. Search Process
2.4. Data Collection Analysis
- Type of document (book chapter, paper, conference paper).
- Author: full name and affiliation (in order to identify institutions and countries conducting research into sustainable technologies for older adults).
- Title and abstract (to explore technological trends and methods).
- Keywords assigned (to explore topics and subjects).
- Research area categories (to identify emerging areas).
- Source title (to determine what journals are significant in this area).
- Publication year (to learn about how research in the area has evolved over time).
- Number of citations (to identify relevant studies).
- Funding organization (to identify organizations that fund this type of research).
2.5. Study Limitations
3. Results
3.1. Search Process Result
3.2. Data Analysis Results: Timeline and Publication Sources
3.3. Data Analysis Results: Countries, Institutions and Organizations
3.4. Data Analysis Results: Subjects and Keywords
3.5. Data Analysis Results: Citation Report
3.6. Content Analysis Results. Sustainable Technology and Older Adults
3.6.1. eHealth
eHealth and Information and Communication Technologies
eHealth and the Internet of Things
eHealth and Smart Living
eHealth and Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technology
eHealth and Robotics and Cybernetics
eHealth and Serious Games and Gamification
3.6.2. Daily Activities and Well-Being
Daily Activities and Information and Communication Technologies
Daily Activities and the Internet of Things
Daily Activities and Smart Living
Daily Activities and Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technology
Daily Activities and Robotics and Cybernetics
Daily Activities and Serious Games and Gamification
3.6.3. Policies and Strategic Plans
Policies and Information and Communication Technologies
Policies and the Internet of Things
Policies and Smart Living
Policies and Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Technology
Policies and Robotics and Cybernetics
3.6.4. Transversal Aspects of Technology
- Design methodology. User-centered, inclusive, co-creative design methodologies are recommended for developing successful, sustainable technologies. Reference [27] recommended engaging informal caregivers, as experts, in the design of AAL-related technologies. In the same vein, Ref. [111] studied how older adults can participate in the software development process, to produce more friendly, useful applications for this population. Reference [112] reported how an IoT for Seniors course led to the design of more suitable applications by developers [111].
- Usability and accessibility features. To make technology sustainable, it must be developed taking into account characteristics such as usability (including efficiency, effectiveness, easy-of-use, user satisfaction, etc.) and accessibility (creating technologies—including mainstream and assistive solutions—that everyone, including older adults and people with disabilities, can use in a range of different contexts) [113].The need to develop inclusive ICTs and to employ user-centered methodologies and co-creative methods is explained in [114], where inclusive technologies were designed for and with the help of older adults, balancing ease of use, subtlety and elements of Cognitively Sustainable Design. Human-centered design and methods, which take into account the needs of all the people involved in the care and assistance of the elderly, were also used in the Habitat project [115] to define the most inclusive and less intrusive design solutions for an IoT home assistance platform for elderly users. Co-creative methods are used also in other IoT projects and smart living environments for ageing well, such as the ACTIVAGE project [116]. Digital information and web services are being used increasingly by the population. In particular, the use of Internet to manage bureaucratic procedures (pay taxes, request appointments with the public administration, fill out service request forms, etc.) and access medical information (make medical appointments, consult medical data, etc.) is widespread. Unfortunately, digital barriers exist which impede adequate access by certain groups, such as older adults. This increases the digital divide [117]. Some proposals have been put forward aimed at tailoring health web information services to the needs of elderly and disabled user groups [118]. According to one Ahref report [119], 90.63% of active pages on the web are never visited. This implies a great waste of energy and resources, from the time invested in their creation and indexing to the cost of hosting them on web servers. One reason for the lack of visits is poor readability. This is a factor that especially affects the most vulnerable and isolated groups, such as the elderly. The effort to make effective, sustainable pages can improve such groups’ standard of living and their inclusion in society, but there are still limiting factors caused by aging and a lack of computer skills. As a result, when information is required, more time must often be spent searching on the web. Readability can reduce the time spent locating and understanding information. Other studies have focused on analyzing the attitudes of older adults and people with disabilities towards the use of assistive technologies when they are in need of care. Reference [120], for example, helps us to understand the relationship between individuals’ perceptions of care and the acceptance of assistive technology by different user groups.
- Behavioral patterns. As part of the requirements acquisition phase in technology design methodology, it is important to consider users’ behavioral patterns. Some papers have described surveys conducted to see how older adults relate to their environment and to technology, to allow the development of more accessible software and devices for use by this group [111,112]. In a project for smart cities, Ref. [105] identified social patterns of seniors in order to avoid accidents. In the same vein, the SmartWalk project mentioned earlier identified safe routes in the city [64]. Knowledge of older adults’ consumption and living habits is a prerequisite for the design of appropriate technologies. An interesting approach in this regard is the study of energy consumption in relation to elderly people’s behavioral patterns, as exemplified in the work carried out by [108,121] on transportation habits. Similarly, Wang [47] analyzed the distribution of the elderly population with cell phones, allowing services to be tailored more sustainably. The study by Godfrey [100] showed that this population is very heterogeneous in its habits.
- Stakeholder interaction. Interaction and communication between all the different agents involved can contribute to a technology’s success. In [122] the design of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway to treat hip fractures reduced mortality rates and shortened hospital stays.
- Training in the use of technology. ICTs offer many possibilities for improving the daily lives of adults, but the digital divide can also be a factor of social exclusion for them. Ref. [123] highlighted the importance of lifelong learning and, more specifically, digital literacy for improving the social integration of elderly people. As an example, the study reported the effective digital literacy of a group of 96 seniors in the Faculty of Human Sciences at the UABC in Mexico. Ref. [124] analyzed the impact of ICT policies on social inclusion in several regions with the lowest GDP per capita in Spain using the model developed in the IMPOLIS project. The results of this study validated the IMPOLIS model as a monitoring tool for ICT policies that made it possible to design and redirect measures for reducing the digital divide.
3.7. The Process of Technology Adoption in The Elderly
3.7.1. Technology Adoption
3.7.2. Training in the Use of Technology
3.7.3. Long-Term Use and Limitations to the Use of Technologies
4. Discussion
4.1. What Are the Main Patterns Observed in the Publication of Research in This Area? (RQ1)
4.2. What Topics and Areas of Research Are Addressing Older Adults? (RQ2)
- Goal 3. Good Health and Well-Being
- Goal 8. Decent work and economic growth
- Goal 11. Sustainable cities and communities
4.3. How Have Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults Evolved?(RQ3)
4.4. What Research Topics Require Further Attention? (RQ4)
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Population Ageing 2019; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. Old-Age Income Poverty. In Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators; OECD iLibrary: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Global Health and Ageing; World Health Organization, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. The 2018 Ageing Report: Economic & Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016–2070); Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018; p. 406. [Google Scholar]
- WHO. Dementia. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia (accessed on 9 May 2021).
- Officer, A.; Thiyagarajan, J.A.; Schneiders, M.L.; Nash, P.; de la Fuente-Núñez, V. Ageism, Healthy Life Expectancy and Population Ageing: How Are They Related? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kitchenham, B.; Pearl Brereton, O.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Bailey, J.; Linkman, S. Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2009, 51, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dexheimer, J.W.; Talbot, T.R.; Ye, F.; Shyr, Y.; Jones, I.; Gregg, W.M.; Aronsky, D. A Computerized Pneumococcal Vaccination Reminder System in the Adult Emergency Department. Vaccine 2011, 29, 7035–7041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Graham, A.L.; Burke, M.V.; Jacobs, M.A.; Cha, S.; Croghan, I.T.; Schroeder, D.R.; Moriarty, J.P.; Borah, B.J.; Rasmussen, D.F.; Brookover, M.J.; et al. An Integrated Digital/Clinical Approach to Smoking Cessation in Lung Cancer Screening: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials 2017, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Drobics, M.; Kreiner, K.; Leopold, H. Next Generation ICT Platform to Harmonize Medical, Care and Lifestyle Services. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2015, 399, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ianculescu, M.; Lupeanu, E.; Alexandru, A.; Tudora, E.; Coman, O.A.; Coman, L. A Demand for More Personalized Accessible Medical Informatics in an Aging World. Int. J. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2012, 6, 62–70. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.S.; Shaffrey, C.I.; Ames, C.P.; Lenke, L.G. Treatment of Adult Thoracolumbar Spinal Deformity: Past, Present, and Future. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2019, 30, 551–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bradley, K.; Smith, R.; Hughson, J.-A.; Atkinson, D.; Bessarab, D.; Flicker, L.; Radford, K.; Smith, K.; Strivens, E.; Thompson, S.; et al. Let’s CHAT (Community Health Approaches to) Dementia in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Mozelius, P.; Ahlin, K. Testbed Requirements for Technology Enhanced Stroke Rehabilitation to Support Independent Living. In Proceedings of the ICT4AWE 2019—The 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, Heraklion, Greece, 2–4 May 2019; pp. 174–182. [Google Scholar]
- Lauffenburger, J.C.; Vu, M.B.; Burkhart, J.I.; Weinberger, M.; Roth, M.T. Design of a Medication Therapy Management Program for Medicare Beneficiaries: Qualitative Findings from Patients and Physicians. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 2012, 10, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kastner, M.; Makarski, J.; Hayden, L.; Hamid, J.S.; Holroyd-Leduc, J.; Twohig, M.; MacFarlane, C.; Hynes, M.T.; Prasaud, L.; Sklar, B.; et al. Effectiveness of an EHealth Self-Management Tool for Older Adults with Multimorbidity (KeepWell): Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ Open 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, E.S.; Lee, P.S.S.; Chew, E.A.L.; Muthulingam, G.; Koh, H.L.; Tan, S.Y.; Ding, Y.Y. Video Consultations for Older Adults with Multimorbidity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for an Exploratory Qualitative Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2020, 9, e22679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haux, R.; Gietzelt, M.; Hellrung, N.; Ludwig, W.; Marschollek, M.; Song, B.; Wolf, K.-H. Health-Enabling Technologies for, Pervasive Health Care: A Pivotal Field for Future Medical Informatics Research and Education? Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 150, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chew, H.E.; Faber, J.; Liu, Z.; Madera, V.; Qamar, N. Actualizing a Mobile Integrated System for Geriatric Care. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2013, 192, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Y.; Bai, G. An IOT Architecture for Home-Based Elderly Healthcare. In Proceedings of The International Conference on Management and Engineering (CME 2014); DEStech Publications, Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2014; pp. 329–337. [Google Scholar]
- Papa, A.; Mital, M.; Pisano, P.; Del Giudice, M. E-Health and Wellbeing Monitoring Using Smart Healthcare Devices: An Empirical Investigation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javed, A.R.; Fahad, L.G.; Farhan, A.A.; Abbas, S.; Srivastava, G.; Parizi, R.M.; Khan, M.S. Automated Cognitive Health Assessment in Smart Homes Using Machine Learning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, H.; Rodriguez-Alsina, A.; Gurguí, A.; Martí, E.; Serrano, J.; Carrabina, J. Enhancing Accessibility through Speech Technologies on AAL Telemedicine Services for ITV. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2011, 7040 LNCS, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaschinski, C.; Ben Allouch, S. Voices and Views of Informal Caregivers: Investigating Ambient Assisted Living Technologies. Ambient Intell. 2017, 10217, 110–123. [Google Scholar]
- Tseng, W.S.-W.; Hsu, C.-W. A Smart, Caring, Interactive Chair Designed for Improving Emotional Support and Parent-Child Interactions to Promote Sustainable Relationships Between Elderly and Other Family Members. Sustainability 2019, 11, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chiuchisan, I.; Geman, O.; Prelipceanu, M.; Costin, H.-N. Health Care System for Monitoring Older Adults in a “Green” Environment Using Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2016, 15, 2595–2604. [Google Scholar]
- Abdullah, S.K. Remote Heart Rate Monitor System Using NodeMcu Microcontroller and Easy Pulse Sensor v1.1. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 518. [Google Scholar]
- Moya, A.; Navarro, E.; Jaen, J.; Gonzalez, P. Fuzzy-Description Logic for Supporting the Rehabilitation of the Elderly. Expert Syst. 2020, 37, e12464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feil-Seifer, D.; Mataric, M.J. Defining Socially Assistive Robotics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; ICORR: Northampton, UK, 2005; pp. 465–468. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, P.-J.; Yang, S.-Y.; Wang, C.-S.; Muslikhin, M.; Wang, M.-S. Development of a Chinese Chess Robotic System for the Elderly Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosla, R.; Nguyen, K.; Chu, M.-T. Human Robot Engagement and Acceptability in Residential Aged Care. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2017, 33, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heerink, M.; Albo-Canals, J.; Valenti-Soler, M.; Martinez-Martin, P.; Zondag, J.; Smits, C.; Anisuzzaman, S. Exploring Requirements and Alternative Pet Robots for Robot Assisted Therapy with Older Adults with Dementia. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2013, 8239 LNAI, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Simonov, M.; Delconte, G. Humanoid Assessing Rehabilitative Exercises. Methods Inf. Med. 2015, 54, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carelli, L.; Gaggioli, A.; Pioggia, G.; De Rossi, F.; Riva, G. Affective Robot for Elderly Assistance. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 144, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valenzuela, T.; Okubo, Y.; Woodbury, A.; Lord, S.R.; Delbaere, K. Adherence to Technology-Based Exercise Programs in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2018, 41, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasalich, M.; Lee, A.H.; Jancey, J.; Burke, L.; Howat, P. Sustainability of a Physical Activity and Nutrition Program for Seniors. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2013, 17, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Abril-Jiménez, P.; Rojo Lacal, J.; de los Ríos Pérez, S.; Páramo, M.; Montalvá Colomer, J.B.; Arredondo Waldmeyer, M.T. Ageing-Friendly Cities for Assessing Older Adults’ Decline: IoT-Based System for Continuous Monitoring of Frailty Risks Using Smart City Infrastructure. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2020, 32, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Callari, T.C.; Ciairano, S.; Re, A. Elderly-Technology Interaction: Accessibility and Acceptability of Technological Devices Promoting Motor and Cognitive Training. Work 2012, 41, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gusev, M.; Tasic, J.; Tasic, D.R.; Patel, S.; Patel, D.; Veselinovska, B. Mindgym—IPTV for Elderly People. Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc. Inform. Telecommun. Eng. Lnicst 2014, 100, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carretero, S.; Stewart, J.; Centeno, C. Information and Communication Technologies for Informal Carers and Paid Assistants: Benefits from Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-Levels. Eur. J. Ageing 2015, 12, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leslie, M.; Gray, R.P.; Eales, J.; Fast, J.; Magnaye, A.; Khayatzadeh-Mahani, A. The Care Capacity Goals of Family Carers and the Role of Technology in Achieving Them. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ianculescu, M.; Bica, O. Leveraging the IoT Towards Reshaping the Elderly Healthcare and Ageing Well. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Informatics in Economy (IE 2017): Education, Research & Business Technologies; IE Publishing: Dublin, Ireland, 2017; pp. 212–217. [Google Scholar]
- Liou, J.-C.; Ho, C.-Y. Intelligence IoT(Internal of Things) Telemedicine Health Care Space System for the Elderly Living Alone. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (IEEE ECBIOS 2019), Okinawa, Japan, 31 May–3 June 2019; pp. 13–14. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Pei, T.; Chen, J.; Song, C.; Wang, X.; Shu, H.; Ma, T.; Du, Y. Population Distributions of Age Groups and Their Influencing Factors Based on Mobile Phone Location Data: A Case Study of Beijing, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hema Rajini, N. A Comprehensive Survey on Internet of Things Based Healthcare Services and Its Applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication, ICCMC 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 483–488. [Google Scholar]
- Dande, A.; Bhalerao, D.M. Survey of Detection of Sound Level Using Internet of Things. Sustain. Commun. Netw. Appl. 2020, 39, 452–460. [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson, C.; Walden, P. Digital Wellness Services and Sustainable Wellness Routines. In Information Systems, EMCIS 2017; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 299, pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, J. New Advances and Challenges of Fall Detection Systems: A Survey. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alhassoun, N.S.; Uddin, M.Y.S.; Venkatasubramanian, N. Context-Aware Energy Optimization for Perpetual IoT-Based Safe Communities. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2019, 22, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, N.; Wei, S.; Han, J.; Xie, J.; Gao, Y.; Song, L. LoRa Posture Recognition System Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Internet of Things (ITHINGS) And IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GREENCOM) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCOM) and IEEE Smart Data (SMARTDATA), Atlanta, GA, USA, 14–17 July 2019; pp. 895–902. [Google Scholar]
- Alhassoun, N.S.; Uddin, M.Y.S.; Venkatasubramanian, N. SAFER: An IoT-Based Perpetual Safe Community Awareness and Alerting Network. In Proceedings of the 2017 8th International Green and Sustainable Computing Conference, IGSC 2017; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Der Ananian, C.A.; Mitros, M.; Buman, M.P. Efficacy of a Student-Led, Community-Based, Multifactorial Fall Prevention Program: Stay in Balance. Front. Public Health 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vaziri, D.D.; Aal, K.; Gschwind, Y.J.; Delbaere, K.; Weibert, A.; Annegarn, J.; de Rosario, H.; Wieching, R.; Randall, D.; Wulf, V. Analysis of Effects and Usage Indicators for a ICT-Based Fall Prevention System in Community Dwelling Older Adults. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2017, 106, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, J.-J.; Shih, C.-S.; Wang, W.-D.; Huang, K.-C. IoT Sensing Networks for Gait Velocity Measurement. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 2019, 29, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chien, Y.H.; Lin, F.J. Distributed Semantic Reasoning Enabled by Fog Computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Internet of Things (ITHINGS) And IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GREENCOM) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCOM) and IEEE Smart Data (SMARTDATA), Atlanta, GA, USA, 14–17 July 2019; pp. 1033–1040. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, W.; Xue, Y.; Hao, Q.; Xue, H.; Yang, F. A Service-Oriented System Integration Framework for Community-Based Independent Living Spaces. In Proceedings of the Conference Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Anchorage, AK, USA, 9–12 October 2011; pp. 2626–2631. [Google Scholar]
- Woods, O. Subverting the Logics of “Smartness” in Singapore: Smart Eldercare and Parallel Regimes of Sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuang, F.; Xiaoguo, Y.; Ying, F.H. Construction and Value Study of IT-Based Smart Senior Citizens’ Communities. In Proceedings of the 2014 Sixth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), Zhangjiajie, China, 10–11 January 2014; pp. 190–193. [Google Scholar]
- Johansson, N.; Sandblad, B. VIHO—Efficient IT Support in Home Care Services. IFIP Int. Fed. Inf. Process. 2006, 221, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, X.; Xia, B.; Skitmore, M.; Buys, L.; Zuo, J. Retirement Villages in Australia: A Literature Review. Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J. 2017, 23, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Queiros, A.; Silva, A.G.; Simoes, P.; Santos, C.; Martins, C.; Rocha, N.P.D.; Rodrigues, M. SmartWalk: Personas and Scenarios Definition and Functional Requirements. In Proceedings of the TISHW 2018—2nd International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Sports, Health and Wellbeing, Proceedings, Thessaloniki, Greece, 20–22 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Drahota, A.; Gal, D.; Windsor, J.; Dixon, S.; Udell, J.; Ward, D.; Soilemezi, D.; Dean, T.; Severs, M. Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Flooring to Reduce Injuries from Falls in Elderly Care Units: Study Protocol. Inj. Prev. 2011, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spitalewsky, K.; Rochon, J.; Ganzinger, M.; Knaup, P. Potential and Requirements of IT for Ambient Assisted Living Technologies: Results of a Delphi Study. Methods Inf. Med. 2013, 52, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Rodrigo, A.; Zangróniz, R.; Pastor, J.M.; Sokolova, M.V. Arousal Level Classification of the Aging Adult from Electro-Dermal Activity: From Hardware Development to Software Architecture. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017, 34, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Losardo, A.; Bianchi, V.; Grossi, F.; Matrella, G.; De Munari, I.; Ciampolini, P. Web-Enabled Home Assistive Tools. Everyday Technol. Indep. Care 2011, 29, 448–455. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Song, W. Infrared Human Posture Recognition Method for Monitoring in Smart Homes Based on Hidden Markov Model. Sustainability 2016, 8, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ismail, A.; Abdlerazek, S.; El-Henawy, I.M. Development of Smart Healthcare System Based on Speech Recognition Using Support Vector Machine and Dynamic Time Warping. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, E.J.; Park, S.J. A Framework of Smart-Home Service for Elderly’s Biophilic Experience. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awada, I.A.; Cramariuc, O.; Mocanu, I.; Seceleanu, C.; Kunnappilly, A.; Florea, A.M. An End-User Perspective on the Cami Ambient and Assisted Living Project. In Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), Valencia, Spain, 5 March 2018; pp. 6776–6785. [Google Scholar]
- Andziulis, A.; Bielskis, A.A.; Denisovas, V.; Ramašauskas, O.; Bielskiene, J.; Bielskis, P.; Guseinoviene, E. An Approach of Creating of an Intelligent Mobile Tutoring Eco-Social Laboratory for Assisted Recreation. Elektron. Elektrotechnika 2009, 91, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
- Jobanputra, C.; Bavishi, J.; Doshi, N. Human Activity Recognition: A Survey. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 155, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavrotheodoros, S.; Kaklanis, N.; Votis, K.; Tzovaras, D. A Smart-Home IoT Infrastructure for the Support of Independent Living of Older Adults. In Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations; IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Plagianakos, V., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 520, pp. 238–249. ISBN 978-3-319-92015-3. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, B.; Ma, Y.; Xu, J.-L. Research and Implementation of an Intelligent Medicine Box. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG 2019), Yichang, China, 6–9 September 2019; pp. 203–205. [Google Scholar]
- Dario, P.; Verschure, P.F.M.J.; Prescott, T.; Cheng, G.; Sandini, G.; Cingolani, R.; Dillmann, R.; Floreano, D.; Leroux, C.; MacNeil, S.; et al. Robot Companions for Citizens. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Future Technologies Conference and Exhibition 2011 (FET 11), Budapest, Hungary, 4–6 May 2011; Volume 7, pp. 47–51. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.; Kaloutsakis, G.; Couch, J. Towards Social-Therapeutic Robots: How to Strategically Implement a Robot for Social Group Therapy? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, CIRA, Daejeon, Korea, 15–18 December 2009; pp. 60–65. [Google Scholar]
- Martini, E.; Crea, S.; Parri, A.; Bastiani, L.; Faraguna, U.; McKinney, Z.; Molino-Lova, R.; Pratali, L.; Vitiello, N. Gait Training Using a Robotic Hip Exoskeleton Improves Metabolic Gait Efficiency in the Elderly. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pina, D.S.; Fernandes, A.A.; Jorge, R.N.; Gabriel, J. Designing the Mechanical Frame of an Active Exoskeleton for Gait Assistance. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pandelea, M.; Vladareanu, L.; Radu, C.; Iliescu, M. Anthropomorphic Walking Robots Integration in Smart Green Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS), Heraklion, Greece, 3–5 May 2019; pp. 226–233. [Google Scholar]
- Gates, N.J.; Rutjes, A.W.S.; Di Nisio, M.; Karim, S.; Chong, L.-Y.; March, E.; Martínez, G.; Vernooij, R.W.M. Computerised Cognitive Training for 12 or More Weeks for Maintaining Cognitive Function in Cognitively Healthy People in Late Life. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, J.; Pestana, G. A Framework for Social Well-Being and Skills Management at the Workplace. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rante, H.; Safrodin, M. Learning Batik through Gaming. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Electronics Symposium on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing (IES-KCIC), Bali, Indonesia, 29–30 October 2018; pp. 297–302. [Google Scholar]
- Maynar, M.; Crisostomo, V.; Rodriguez-Florido, M.A. Health and Engineering, Two Ways to Reach a New Social Space. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES 2018), Las Palmas, Spain, 21–23 June 2018; pp. 179–181. [Google Scholar]
- Barland, M.; Delvenne, P.; Rosskamp, B. The Future of Ageing—Stakeholder Involvement on the Future of Care. In Policy-Oriented Technology Assessment Across Europe: Expanding Capacities; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016; pp. 105–113. [Google Scholar]
- Romanopoulou, E.D.; Zilidou, V.I.; Bamidis, P.D. Creating and Sustaining a Social Health Care Ecosystem: The Case of LLM Care Services in Greece. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 20, 40–48. [Google Scholar]
- King, G.; Farmer, J. What Older People Want: Evidence from a Study of Remote Scottish Communities. Rural Remote Health 2009, 9, 1166. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, C.M.; Whelan, B.J.; Normand, C. Formal Home-Care Utilisation by Older Adults in Ireland: Evidence from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Health Soc. Care Commun. 2015, 23, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alameddine, M.; Khodr, H.; Mourad, Y.; Yassoub, R.; Abi Ramia, J. Upscaling the Recruitment and Retention of Human Resources for Health at Primary Healthcare Centres in Lebanon: A Qualitative Study. Health Soc. Care Commun. 2016, 24, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanadhan, S.; Daly, J.; Lee, R.M.; Kruse, G.R.; Deutsch, C. Network-Based Delivery and Sustainment of Evidence-Based Prevention in Community-Clinical Partnerships Addressing Health Equity: A Qualitative Exploration. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penno, E.; Gauld, R. Change, Connectivity, and Challenge: Exploring the Role of Health Technology in Shaping Health Care for Aging Populations in Asia Pacific. Health Syst. Reform 2017, 3, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, A.H.G.; Ang, W.T. Towards an Inclusive Society in Asia: The Invisible Helping Hand. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2008, 3, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kobayashi, T.; Maita, H.; Kato, H. Medical Ecology in near Future of Rapidly Aging Japan: Projected Scenario. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 137, 327–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopeć, W.; Skorupska, K.; Jaskulska, A.; Abramczuk, K.; Nielek, R.; Wierzbicki, A. LivingLab PJAIT: Towards Better Urban Participation of Seniors. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2017; Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1085–1092. [Google Scholar]
- Sodhro, A.H.; Li, Y.; Shah, M.A. Green and Friendly Media Transmission Algorithms for Wireless Body Sensor Networks. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2017, 76, 20001–20025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Sodhro, A.H.; Luo, Z.; Zahid, N.; Nawaz, M.W.; Pirbhulal, S.; Muzammal, M. A Joint Deep Learning and Internet of Medical Things Driven Framework for Elderly Patients. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 75822–75832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gross-Fengels, S.; Fromhold-Eisebith, M. Adapting Transport Related Innovations to Rural Needs: Smart Mobility and the Example of the Heinsberg Region, Germany. Adv. Transp. Policy Plan. 2018, 2, 125–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lya, A.; Lestari, S.; Bachtiar, M.; Halil, E. The Role of E-Government and M-Government in Shaping Jakarta to Be a Smart City. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy and Governance Studies (ICAS-PGS 2017) and the International Conference on Business Administration and Policy (ICBAP 2017); Atlantis Press: Depok, Indonesia, 2017; pp. 131–137. [Google Scholar]
- Godfrey, A. Wearables for Independent Living in Older Adults: Gait and Falls. Maturitas 2017, 100, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duvvuri, V.N.D.; Vegesna, G.V.; Vemagiri, R.; Nambhatla, S.S.; Kakollu, M. Smart Design for Automation System—Dr. Light. Int. J. Forensic Softw. Eng. 2018, 1, 403–408. [Google Scholar]
- Rich, P.; Aarons, G.A.; Takemoto, M.; Cardenas, V.; Crist, K.; Bolling, K.; Lewars, B.; Sweet, C.C.; Natarajan, L.; Shi, Y.; et al. Implementation-Effectiveness Trial of an Ecological Intervention for Physical Activity in Ethnically Diverse Low Income Senior Centers. BMC Public Health 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, J.-A.; Lin, T.-S.; Wang, C.-H.; Liao, M.-S.; Chou, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-T. Integration of an Automatic Agricultural and Livestock Production Management System and an Agriculture and Food Traceability System Based on the Internet of Things Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sensing Technology, ICST, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 4–6 December 2017; pp. 245–251. [Google Scholar]
- Andreoni, G.; Arslan, P.; Costa, F.; Muschiato, S.; Romero, M. Ergonomics and Design for Sustainability in Healthcare: Ambient Assisted Living and the Social-Environmental Impact of Patients Lifestyle. Work 2012, 41, 3883–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bryant, N.; Spencer, N.; King, A.; Crooks, P.; Deakin, J.; Young, S. IoT and Smart City Services to Support Independence and Wellbeing of Older People. In Proceedings of the 2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, SoftCOM, Split, Croatia, 21–23 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Sirmacek, B.; Riveiro, M. Occupancy Prediction Using Low-Cost and Low-Resolution Heat Sensors for Smart Offices. Sensors 2020, 20, 5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kestens, Y.; Winters, M.; Fuller, D.; Bell, S.; Berscheid, J.; Brondeel, R.; Cantinotti, M.; Datta, G.; Gauvin, L.; Gough, M.; et al. INTERACT: A Comprehensive Approach to Assess Urban Form Interventions through Natural Experiments. BMC Public Health 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shi, Z.; Pun-Cheng, L.S.C.; Liu, X.; Lai, J.; Tong, C.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, M.; Shi, W. Analysis of the Temporal Characteristics of the Elderly Traveling by Bus Using Smart Card Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Aerschot, L.; Parviainen, J. Robots Responding to Care Needs? A Multitasking Care Robot Pursued for 25 Years, Available Products Offer Simple Entertainment and Instrumental Assistance. Ethics Inf. Technol. 2020, 22, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pekkarinen, S.; Hennala, L.; Tuisku, O.; Gustafsson, C.; Johansson-Pajala, R.-M.; Thommes, K.; Hoppe, J.A.; Melkas, H. Embedding Care Robots into Society and Practice: Socio-Technical Considerations. Futures 2020, 122, 102593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopec, W.; Nielek, R.; Wierzbicki, A. Guidelines Towards Better Participation of Older Adults in Software Development Processes Using a New SPIRAL Method and Participatory Approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), Gothenburg, Sweden, 27 May–3 June 2018; pp. 49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, C.-C.; Lin, C.-L.; Lou, S.-J. Analysis of the Learning Effectiveness of the STEAM-6E Special Course-a Case Study about the Creative Design of IoT Assistant Devices for the Elderly. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Queirós, A.; Silva, A.; Alvarelhão, J.; Rocha, N.P.; Teixeira, A. Usability, Accessibility and Ambient-Assisted Living: A Systematic Literature Review. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2015, 14, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleinberger, R.; Rieger, A.; Sands, J.; Baker, J. Supporting Elder Connectedness through Cognitively Sustainable Design Interactions with the Memory Music Box. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2019), New Orleans, LA, USA, 20–23 October 2019; pp. 355–369. [Google Scholar]
- Mincolelli, G.; Marchi, M.; Giacobone, G.A.; Chiari, L.; Borelli, E.; Mellone, S.; Tacconi, C.; Cinotti, T.S.; Roffia, L.; Antoniazzi, F.; et al. UCD, Ergonomics and Inclusive Design: The HABITAT Project. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2019, 824, 1191–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fico, G.; Montalva, J.; Medrano, A.; Liappas, N.; Mata-Díaz, A.; Cea, G.; Arredondo, M.T. Co-Creating with Consumers and Stakeholders to Understand the Benefit of Internet of Things in Smart Living Environments for Ageing Well: The Approach Adopted in the Madrid Deployment Site of the Activage Large Scale Pilot. In Proceedings of the IFMBE Proceedings; Eskola, H., Hyttinen, J., Vaisanen, O., Viik, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 65, pp. 1089–1092. [Google Scholar]
- Morato, J.; Ruiz-Robles, A.; Sanchez-Cuadrado, S.; Marzal García-Quismondo, M.A. Technologies for Digital Inclusion: Good Practices Dealing with Diversity; Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development; Passarelli, B., Straubhaar, J., Cuevas-Cerveró, A., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-1-4666-8740-0. [Google Scholar]
- Marschollek, M.; Mix, S.; Wolf, K.-H.; Effertz, B.; Haux, R.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. ICT-Based Health Information Services for Elderly People: Past Experiences, Current Trends, and Future Strategies. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 2007, 32, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soulo, T. 90.63% of Content Gets No Traffic from Google. And How to Be in the Other 9.37%. Available online: https://ahrefs.com/blog/search-traffic-study/ (accessed on 9 May 2021).
- Offermann-van Heek, J.; Ziefle, M. HELP? Attitudes towards Care and Assistive Technologies from the Perspective of People with Disabilities. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2018, 10897 LNCS, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlsson-Kanyama, A.; Lindén, A.-L. Travel Patterns and Environmental Effects Now and in the Future. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 30, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, T.-W.; Fang, C.; Leung, F. The Effectiveness of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Clinical Pathway in Reducing Hospital and Rehabilitation Length of Stay and Improving Short-Term Mortality Rates. Geriatr. Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2013, 4, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Heras Modad, R.G.; Parra Encinas, K.L.; Lopez Arriaga, L.G. Permanent Education for Older Adult. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 5–7 July 2015; pp. 5866–5871. [Google Scholar]
- Caridad-Sebastián, M.; Morales-García, A.M.; García-López, F. Digital Literacy in Spain as a Means of Social Inclusion: Implementation of a Measurement Model Using Indicators. Hist. Y Comun. Soc. 2013, 18, 455–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bueno-Sanchez, L.; Martinez-Molina, S.; de Almeida Cunha, S.M.; Garces, J.; Perez, D.; Quilez, M. Digital Inclusion of Senior Collectives Through Participatory Processes of Co-Creation of Digital Tools: Design of a MOOC. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN19. Proceedings 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 1–3 July 2019; pp. 9295–9298. [Google Scholar]
- Vankova, D. Demography as A Derivative of Education—Public Health Analyses from Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN19. Proceedings 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 1–3 July 2019; pp. 66–72. [Google Scholar]
- Petz, A.; Miesenberger, K. ECDL® PD: 15 Years Later. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2016, 9758, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-J.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chiu, K.-C. Bridging Distances with Life Reviews: A Study on Intergenerational Learning in the History Alive Program. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 101–104. [Google Scholar]
- Fields, J.; Cemballi, A.G.; Michalec, C.; Uchida, D.; Griffiths, K.; Cardes, H.; Cuellar, J.; Chodos, A.H.; Lyles, C.R. In-Home Technology Training Among Socially Isolated Older Adults: Findings from the Tech Allies Program. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Totolo, A.; Renken, J.; Sey, A. The Impact of Public Access Venue Information and Communication Technologies in Botswana Public Libraries. Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 2015, 10, 64–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cohen-Mansfield, J.; Muff, A.; Meschiany, G.; Lev-Ari, S. Adequacy of Web-Based Activities as a Substitute for In-Person Activities for Older Persons during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaja, S.J.; Lee, C.C.; Branham, J.; Remis, P. OASIS Connections: Results from an Evaluation Study. Gerontologist 2012, 52, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ha, N.H.L.; Chua, X.Y.; Musimenta, S.; Akankwasa, E.; Pussayapibul, N.; Toh, H.J.; Ginting, M.L.; Samarasekera, D.D.; Tam, W.J.; Yap, P.L.K.; et al. Enablers and Barriers of a Cross-Cultural Geriatric Education Distance Training Programme: The Singapore-Uganda Experience. Geriatrics 2020, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peek, S.T.M.; Luijkx, K.G.; Vrijhoef, H.J.M.; Nieboer, M.E.; Aarts, S.; Van Der Voort, C.S.; Rijnaard, M.D.; Wouters, E.J.M. Understanding Changes and Stability in the Long-Term Use of Technologies by Seniors Who Are Aging in Place: A Dynamical Framework. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sandbulte, J.; Tsai, C.-H.; Carroll, J.M. Family’s Health: Opportunities for Non-Collocated Intergenerational Families Collaboration on Healthy Living. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 2021, 146, 102559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, C.; Dorner, T.E. Information Technologies for Active and Assisted Living—Influences to the Quality of Life of an Ageing Society. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2017, 100, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qbilat, M.; Iglesias, A.; Belpaeme, T. A Proposal of Accessibility Guidelines for Human-Robot Interaction. Electronics 2021, 10, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lunga, W.; Musarurwa, C. Exploiting Indigenous Knowledge Commonwealth to Mitigate Disasters: From the Archives of Vulnerable Communities in Zimbabwe. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2016, 15, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down: Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; p. 107. [Google Scholar]
Location | Age | 2015 | 2020 | 2040 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
World | <10 | 1,315,380 | 1,342,381 | 1,362,524 | 1,376,017 |
>65 | 607,548 | 727,606 | 1,300,516 | 1,548,854 | |
Africa | <10 | 346,678 | 381,403 | 496,260 | 545,328 |
>65 | 39,729 | 47,096 | 97,501 | 143,103 | |
Asia | <10 | 731,698 | 726,754 | 653,233 | 622,039 |
>65 | 331,498 | 411,604 | 802,394 | 954,680 | |
Europe | <10 | 80,088 | 79,821 | 68,157 | 69,258 |
>65 | 130,515 | 142,905 | 188,280 | 199,896 | |
Latin America | <10 | 105,561 | 103,887 | 91,447 | 85,470 |
>65 | 48,356 | 58,651 | 113,560 | 144,623 | |
North America | <10 | 44,857 | 43,706 | 46,069 | 46,153 |
>65 | 52,787 | 61,901 | 89,894 | 96,278 |
Country | Percentage of Total Population Living in Poverty | Older Adults Poverty (All) | Older Adults Poverty (Male) | Older Adults Poverty (Women) | Difference Total vs. Older Adults | Genre Difference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | 28.8 | 39 | 37.9 | 40.1 | 10.2 | 2.2 |
Mexico | 16.6 | 24.7 | 23.3 | 25.9 | 8.1 | 2.6 |
United States | 17.8 | 23.1 | 19.6 | 25.9 | 5.3 | 6.3 |
Japan | 15.7 | 19.6 | 16.2 | 22.3 | 3.9 | 6.1 |
United Kingdom | 11.9 | 15.3 | 12.5 | 17.7 | 3.4 | 5.2 |
India | 19.7 | 22.9 | 21.9 | 24 | 3.2 | 2.1 |
OECD | 11.8 | 13.5 | 10.3 | 15.7 | 1.7 | 5.4 |
Russia | 12.7 | 14.1 | 8.4 | 17 | 1.4 | 8.6 |
Turkey | 17.2 | 17 | 14.9 | 18.5 | −0.2 | 3.6 |
Germany | 10.4 | 9.6 | 7.4 | 10.6 | −0.8 | 3.2 |
Brazil | 20 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.8 | −12.3 | 0.3 |
Objective | Query Scopus | Query WoS | Justification |
---|---|---|---|
SQ1: Identify topics and related research areas addressing older adults | (ABS (old * W/5 adult *) OR ABS (old * W/5 people) OR ABS (elder * OR “senior citizen *” OR geriatric * OR gerontology) AND NOT ABS (elderberry * OR elderflower *)) | (AB = (old * NEAR adult *) OR AB = (old * NEAR people) OR AB = (elder * OR “senior citizen *” OR geriatric * OR gerontology) NOT AB = (elderberry * OR elderflower *)) | Terms such as ederberr and elederflower has been discarded to avoid retrieving irrelevant documents. |
SQ2: Identify how technology is used in this group and for what purposes | AND (ABS (technol * W/5 sustaina *) OR ABS (digital * W/5 sustaina *) OR ABS (ICT W/15 sustainab *) OR ABS (greentech OR cleantech OR cybernetics OR robotics OR “artificial intelligence” OR “big data” OR informatics OR computer OR software OR IOT)) | AND (AB = (technol * NEAR sustaina *) OR AB = (digital * NEAR sustaina *) OR AB = (ICT NEAR sustainab *) OR AB = (greentech OR cleantech OR cybernetics OR robotics OR “artificial intelligence” OR “big data” OR informatics OR computer OR software OR IOT)) | Terms have been selected based on common technologies used in this group. Technologies such as greentech and cleantech are sustainable. |
SQ3: Identify the extent to which the use of technology contributes to sustainability in a broad sense (technology, people and systems). | AND ((TITLE-ABS-KEY (SUSTAINAB *) OR SUBJAREA(SUSTAINAB *) OR SRCTITLE(SUSTAINAB *)) OR (ABS (“foot print” OR “corporate social responsibility” OR CSR OR greentech OR cleantech))) | AND ((TS = (SUSTAINAB *) OR KP = (SUSTAINAB *) OR SO = (SUSTAINAB *)) OR AB = (“foot print” OR “corporate social responsibility” OR CSR OR greentech OR cleantech)) | The generic term “sustainability” has been used in a broad sense to encompass mainly sustainability applied to technology, but also people’s standard of living and the sustainability of the global systems that support them. |
Source | Scopus | Source | WoS |
---|---|---|---|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science | 15 | Sustainability | 16 |
Sustainability | 13 | BMC Geriatrics | 4 |
Affiliation Scopus | # | Affiliation WoS | # |
---|---|---|---|
Università di Pisa | 4 | CNR | 4 |
Loughborough University | 3 | Univ New South Wales | 4 |
Cumming School of Medicine | 3 | Arizona State Univ | 3 |
Funding Sponsor—Scopus Corpus | # Scopus | # WoS |
---|---|---|
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 7 | - |
United States Department of Health and Human Services | - | 6 |
European Commission | 5 | 9 |
National Natural Science Foundation of China | 4 | 5 |
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council | 3 | 3 |
National Institutes of Health | 3 | 5 |
Source Titles | # | % |
---|---|---|
Sustainability | 41 | 3.53% |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 23 | 1.98% |
Sensors | 21 | 1.81% |
IEEE Access | 18 | 1.55% |
Journal of Cleaner Production | 13 | 1.12% |
Multimedia Tools and Applications | 13 | 1.12% |
Domain of Application | SQ1 Main Research Areas Addressing Older Adults | SQ2 How Technology Is Used and for What Purposes | SQ3 Extent in Which Technology Contributes to Sustainability | # Papers | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
e-Health Actions related to illness prevention, detection and treatment | Monitor patients to detect clinical conditions or send messages to improve treatment adherence Data mining, ML and LA with different purposes: detect patterns globally or automate alarms and personalized messages to patients in key situations for their health. Medical assistance, emergency support and disability support | IoT to sensor and monitor patients in different situations: (1) monitor specific parameters for detection and control of specific pathologies such as diabetes, heart problems. (2) monitor emergency situations such as falls, heart attacks or stroke. Digitalization of medical records ML and LA to analyze data and provide alarms that trigger services based on data from IoT devices or medical records. Assistive robotics to support physical problems derived from an acquired disability or mobility limitations typical of aging (e.g., wheelchair, exoskeleton or robotics arms). | Big data techniques improve pattern detection and personalization of services and allow the application of ML and LA techniques on a larger scale. Improving communication among professionals from different services allow the attendance of pluri-pathological patients Improving the accessibility and usability of HW and SW (computers, mobile phones and specific devices) allows its application to larger groups with special needs, such as the elderly. | 27 | [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] |
Domain of Application | SQ1 Main Research Areas Addressing Older Adults | SQ2 How Technology Is Used and for What Purposes | SQ3 Extent in Which Technology Contributes to Sustainability | # Papers | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daily activities and wellbeing Actions oriented to facilitate autonomy of elderly helping them to perform every day actions on their own. | Monitor patients in their daily routines: physiological needs, physical activity and nutrition. Mental wellbeing fostering communication, learning and gamification Digital literacy to use personal devices (mobile phones, computers and wearables) to support physical and mental wellbeing | IoT and big data to sensor and monitor patients in different situations to promote active and healthy aging Commercial wearables (wristbands, pedometer, mobile phones) with IoT sensors integrated to monitor patients and send them alarms Socially interactive or assistive robotics for emotional support or to prevent dementia. Even though there are many successful prototypes, the technology is not yet mature for mass and sustainable use Gamification with different purposes: learning, mental activity, physical activity or daily routines. | Interoperability and usability of IoT systems and battery duration still need substantial improvement to make some of these technical solutions sustainable. The maturity of educational platforms (MOOCs, LMS) has made it possible to bring education and serious games to this group despite their mobility problems. Increased use of social networking and videoconferencing tools have allowed elderly to stay connected with family and friends, support networks such as neighborhood centers and health services. | 47 | [23,37,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84] |
Domain of Application | SQ1 Main Research Areas Addressing Older Adults | SQ2 How Technology Is Used and for What Purposes | SQ3 Extent in Which Technology Contributes to Sustainability | # Papers | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Policies and Strategic Plans Actions oriented to facilitate the provision of public health, mobility, education and wellbeing services in general and guarantee their sustainability over time. | Create ecosystems with smart facilities and ambient assisted living: smart cities, smart mobility, smart home. Empower users and focus on prevention rather than clinical intervention. Promote individual’s autonomy, peer led and social support networks. Considering users, their needs and limitations and involving them in the design of services is key to achieving mass adoption of easy-to-use products and services. | Big data to monitor users, products, services and systems, detect patterns and make predictions. The massive use of cell phones and the increasing penetration of wearables have provided a large part of the population with tools that can be used for monitoring and communication, but it is necessary to make progress in the privacy and security of the data exchanged. One of the main challenges is the interoperability among platforms, devices and data to achieve common infrastructures for the whole ecosystem. It is also important to reduce cost and improve energy efficiency and device’s lifetime. to provide low-cost products and services. | It is necessary not to focus on partial solutions to very specific problems but to create a global ecosystem that monitors, connects and informs the needs of different stakeholders: policy makers, healthcare providers, social services, technological industry and individuals using product-service-systems approach. Scale economy and TIC support in in the most disadvantaged areas, such as rural areas or developing countries. New ways of distance product and service delivery that considers usability issues in elderly collective. | 46 | [27,47,64,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128] |
Keyword | WoS Total | % WoS 2016–2021 | Scopus Total | % Scopus 2016–2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of Things (IoT) | 25 | 100 | 73 | 98 |
Robotics | 19 | 74 | 44 | 45 |
Sensors | 16 | 88 | 38 | 71 |
Wearables | 7 | 100 | 26 | 100 |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) | 3 | 100 | 17 | 64 |
Big data | 5 | 100 | 8 | 100 |
Automation | 1 | 100 | 17 | 82 |
Human Computer Interaction | 0 | 0 | 12 | 83 |
Assisted living | 1 | 100 | 11 | 82 |
Medical informatics | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Smart city | 4 | 100 | 9 | 100 |
Telemedicine | 5 | 60 | 8 | 62 |
Ambient Assisted Living | 7 | 43 | 10 | 30 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Morato, J.; Sanchez-Cuadrado, S.; Iglesias, A.; Campillo, A.; Fernández-Panadero, C. Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158465
Morato J, Sanchez-Cuadrado S, Iglesias A, Campillo A, Fernández-Panadero C. Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158465
Chicago/Turabian StyleMorato, Jorge, Sonia Sanchez-Cuadrado, Ana Iglesias, Adrián Campillo, and Carmen Fernández-Panadero. 2021. "Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults" Sustainability 13, no. 15: 8465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158465
APA StyleMorato, J., Sanchez-Cuadrado, S., Iglesias, A., Campillo, A., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2021). Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults. Sustainability, 13(15), 8465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158465