Does Online Ratings Matter? An Integrated Framework to Explain Gratifications Needed for Continuance Shopping Intention in Pakistan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Uses and Gratification Theory (UGT)
2.2. Cognition-Affect-Behavior Model (CAB)
2.3. UGT and CAB
3. Research Model and Hypotheses Development
3.1. Research Model
3.2. Hypotheses Development
3.2.1. Layout and Functionality
3.2.2. Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanism (PEEIM)
3.2.3. Customer Satisfaction and Continuance Intention
3.2.4. Convenience and Continuance Intention
3.2.5. Moderating Role of Online Ratings
4. Methodology
4.1. Sample and Data Collection
4.2. Measurement Instrument
4.3. Data Analysis Technique
5. Results
5.1. Reliability and Validity
5.2. Model Measurement
5.3. Hypotheses Testing
5.4. Moderation Analysis
6. Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Contribution
- First, numerous studies have employed UGT to conduct consumer behavior [10,24,139]. However, our study empirically investigates the theoretical importance of UGT in carefully examining the distinctive relationship among informative gratification elements, customer satisfaction, convenience, online ratings, and continuance intention.
- Second, our study moves one step forward to examine the influence of informative gratifications on customer satisfaction and convenience simultaneously.
- Third, our study extends the literature by integrating UGT and the CAB model for the first time to investigate the dominant role of informative gratifications on customer satisfaction and convenience and examining these gratifications as a consumer’s cognitive path according to the CAB model. Moreover, we introduced a CAB model that adds in UGT to show an amalgamation of PEEIM and layout and functionality. However, our findings prove the sturdiest impact of layout and functionality on both customer satisfaction and convenience [15,77] but contrary to other studies, PEEIM did not show valid support to our assumptions in Pakistan. This is due to the absence of an effective e-commerce institutional mechanism in Pakistan, which is causing distrust and increasing security concerns in online shopping. Furthermore, it increases consumer’s positive concern with COD and accepting it as a primary mode of payment while shopping online [137]. Therefore, our findings reveal a major drawback in Pakistan’s e-commerce industry, which makes the online environment suspicious and shows a need for an effective e-commerce institutional mechanism that favors customers’ high propensity to consume online shopping. This also opens a way for future researchers to elaborate on the role and importance of PEEIM in Asian countries like Pakistan and its significance in e-commerce development.
- Fourth, the dominating role of PEEIM has been discussed widely as a moderator in many studies [140,141]. However, fewer studies explored the PEEIM role as an independent variable. Besides, our findings also revealed that PEEIM did not have a significant impact on satisfaction and convenience. Moreover, our sample shows that around 50% of people have two to five years’ experience in online shopping but still around 85% of the people shop only 1 to 10 times in a month, which is very low in comparison to a western context. We believe that the absence of PEEIM creates dissatisfaction and inconvenience, which lower the frequency of online shopping in Pakistan and also lower the continuance intention to shop online.
- Fifth, our findings determined that customer satisfaction and convenience could strongly predict continuance intention to shop online in Pakistan [87,88,89,142]. Sixth, our study contributes immensely to the extant literature by suggesting online rating is a robust indicator that positively moderates the relationship of customer satisfaction and convenience with continuance intention [45,120]. Following prior investigations by Trong et al. [45], our results illustrate that online ratings strengthen the relationship between satisfaction, convenience, and continuance intention. Therefore, our empirical findings move one step further by demonstrating the critical role of online ratings in developing stronger continuance intention to shop online and provide guidelines for future researchers to deeply analyze its crucial role in the online shopping context.
- Finally, our post-pandemic data of Pakistani consumers also add novelty to our research, since the pandemic act as a catalyst to e-commerce industries worldwide including Pakistan [143]. According to a report published by Statista [144] in the year 2020, 40% of the respondents from the Middle East, the North African region, and Pakistan encountered the pandemic as the reason behind online shopping. Moreover, 45% of the respondents reported an increase in their online shopping frequency as compared to the start of the pandemic. Therefore, our findings provide useful insights to practitioners to measure the change in online consumer behavior after the pandemic, as most previous studies rely on pre-pandemic data.
6.2. Practical Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Scope
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bilgihan, A. Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: An integrated model of trust, user experience and branding. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 61, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, S.; Clark, M.; Samouel, P.; Hair, N. Online Customer Experience in e-Retailing: An empirical model of Antecedents and Outcomes. J. Retail. 2012, 88, 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beldad, A.; De Jong, M.; Steehouder, M. How shall i trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the an-tecedents of online trust. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Yang, Z.; Jun, M. Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience. J. Serv. Manag. 2013, 24, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, P.; e Silva, S.C.; Ferreira, M.B. How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 44, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blázquez, M. Fashion Shopping in Multichannel Retail: The Role of Technology in Enhancing the Customer Experience. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2014, 18, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, J.; Mortimer, G.; Andrews, L. Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 25, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Homburg, C.; Schwemmle, M.; Kuehnl, C. New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. J. Mark. 2015, 79, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawaf, F.; Tagg, S. The construction of online shopping experience: A repertory grid approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 72, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ijaz, M.F.; Rhee, J. Constituents and Consequences of Online-Shopping in Sustainable E-Business: An Experimental Study of Online-Shopping Malls. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, Y.-H.; Hsu, I.-C.; Lin, C.-C. Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyazaki, A.D.; Fernandez, A. Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping. J. Consum. Aff. 2001, 35, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masri, N.W.; Ruangkanjanases, A.; Chen, S.C. The Effects of Product Monetary Value, Product Evaluation Cost, and Customer Enjoyment on Customer Intention to Purchase and Reuse Vendors: Institutional Trust-Based Mechanisms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearney. Satisfying the Experienced Online Customer, Global E-Shopping Survey. 2001. Available online: http://www.atkearney.com (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Tandon, U.; Kiran, R.; Sah, A.N. The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived risk on customer satisfac-tion in online shopping: An emerging economy case. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2018, 16, 57–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNCTAD. The UNCTAD B2C E-commerce index 2020 Spotlight on Latin America and the Caribbean. In UNCTAD Technical Notes on ICT for Development; UNCTAD: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Bathgate, I.; Omar, M.; Nwankwo, S.; Zhang, Y. Transition to a market orientation in China: Preliminary evidence. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2006, 24, 332–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palvia, P. Editorial Preface: The world IT project: A program on international research and call for participation. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2013, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, M.; Bathgate, I.; Nwankwo, S. Internet marketing and customer satisfaction in emerging markets: The case of Chinese online shoppers. Compet. Rev. 2011, 21, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3, 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rey-Moreno, M.; Felício, J.A.; Medina-Molina, C.; Rufín, R. Facilitator and inhibitor factors: Adopting e-government in a dual model. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 88, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, P.J. An empirical investigation of patients’ acceptance and resistance toward the health cloud: The dual factor per-spective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 63, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, P.; Dhir, A.; Chen, S.; Malibari, A.; Almotairi, M. Why do people purchase virtual goods? A uses and gratification (U&G) theory perspective. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 53, 101376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gogan, I.C.W.; Zhang, Z.; Matemba, E.D. Impacts of gratifications on consumers’ emotions and continuance use inten-tion: An empirical study of Weibo in China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gan, C.; Li, H. Understanding the effects of gratifications on the continuance intention to use WeChat in China: A per-spective on uses and gratifications. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 78, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajfel, H. Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup Behaviour. In Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978; pp. 27–60. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, Y.S.; Hong, S.; Lee, H. Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GSMA. Pakistan: Progressing Towards a Fully Fledged Digital Economy. 2020. Available online: www.gsmaintelligence.com (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Kemp, S. Digital 2021: Indonesia, Datareportal.Com. 2021. Available online: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-indonesia?rq=indonesia (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Ecommercedb. The eCommerce Market in South Africa. 2021. Available online: https://ecommercedb.com/en/markets/za/all (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Khan, M.Z. Pakistan’s e-commerce market growing. Dawn News, 12 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Gan, C. Understanding WeChat users’ liking behavior: An empirical study in China. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 68, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, E.; Blumler, J.G.; Gurevitch, M. Uses and Gratifications Research. Public Opin. Q. 1973, 37, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Haridakis, P.M. The Role of Internet User Characteristics and Motives in Explaining Three Dimensions of Inter-net Addiction. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2009, 14, 988–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leung, L. Net-Generation Attributes and Seductive Properties of the Internet as Predictors of Online Activities and Internet Addiction. CyberPsychology Behav. 2004, 7, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, L. Predicting Internet risks: A longitudinal panel study of gratifications-sought, Internet addiction symptoms, and social media use among children and adolescents. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. Open Access J. 2014, 2, 424–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, I.; LaRose, R.; Eastin, M.S.; Lin, C.A. Internet Gratifications and Internet Addiction: On the Uses and Abuses of New Media. CyberPsychology Behav. 2004, 7, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stafford, T.F.; Stafford, M.R.; Schkade, L.L. Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet. Decis. Sci. 2004, 35, 259–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, W.-C.; Lin, H.-H.; Wang, Y.-S.; Shih, Y.-W.; Cheng, K.-H. Factors affecting users’ continuance intention of mobile social network service. Serv. Ind. J. 2018, 39, 983–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aluri, A.; Slevitch, L.; Larzelere, R. The Influence of Embedded Social Media Channels on Travelers’ Gratifications, Satis-faction, and Purchase Intentions. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2016, 57, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, C.; Joun, Y.; Han, H.; Chung, N. A structural model for destination travel intention as a media exposure: Belief-desire-intention model perspective. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 1338–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Wells, W.D. Attitude toward the Site. J. Advert. Res. 1999, 39, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, W.M.; Ting, D.H. E-shopping: An Analysis of the Uses and Gratifications Theory. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2012, 6, p48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tran, L.T.T.; Pham, L.M.T.; Le, L.T. E-satisfaction and continuance intention: The moderator role of online ratings. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 77, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hausman, A.V.; Siekpe, J.S. The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducoffe, R.H. Advertising value and advertising on the web. J. Advert. Res. 1996, 36, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, E. Use and gratification in e-consumers. Int. Res. 2008, 18, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eighmey, J.; McCord, L. Adding Value in the Information Age: Uses and Gratifications of Sites on the World Wide Web. J. Bus. Res. 1998, 41, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korgaonkar, P.K.; Wolin, L.D. A multivariate analysis of web usage. J. Advert. Res. 1999, 39, 53–68. [Google Scholar]
- Holbrook, M.B. Emotions in the consumption experience: Toward a new model of consumer behavior. In The Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior: Emerging Theories and Applications; Lexington Books: Lanham, MD, USA, 1986; pp. 17–52. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, A.W.-L.; Tsai, W.M.-H. An empirical study of an enjoyment-based response hierarchy model of watching MDTV on the move. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babin, B.J.; Harris, E.G. Consumer Behavior; Cengage Learning: Dallas, TX, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, M.R. Consumer Behavior; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Kao, T.W.D.; Lin, W.T. The relationship between perceived e-service quality and brand equity: A simultaneous equations system approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 57, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, J.; Zhao, L.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S. Evaluating app bundling strategy for selling mobile apps: An ambivalent perspective. Inf. Technol. People 2017, 30, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.H.; Lee, K.P. The Role of Personality Traits and Perceived Values in Persuasion: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective on Online Shopping. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2008, 36, 1379–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiore, A.M.; Kim, J. An integrative framework capturing experiential and utilitarian shopping experience. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2007, 35, 421–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martínez-López, F.J.; Luna, P.; Martinez, F.J. Online shopping, the standard learning hierarchy, and consumers’ inter-net expertise: An American-Spanish comparisonOnline shopping, the standard learning hierarchy, and consumers’ internet expertise: An American-Spanish comparison. Int. Res. 2005, 15, 312–334. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfinbarger, M.; Gilly, M.C. Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. Calif. Manage. Rev. 2001, 42, 34–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliver, R.L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Whence consumer loyalty? J. Mark. 1999, 63, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.H.; Chen, S.W. Consumer perception of interface quality, security, and loyalty in electronic commerce. Inf. Manag. 2009, 46, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, R.; Oh, L.B.; Wang, K. Developing user loyalty for social networking sites: A relational perspective. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2016, 17, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Animesh, A.; Pinsonneault, A.; Yang, S.B.; Oh, W. An odyssey into virtual worlds: Exploring the impacts of technologi-cal and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. Mis Q. 2011, 35, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pham, Q.T.; Tran, X.P.; Misra, S.; Maskeliūnas, R.; Damaševičius, R. Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam. Sustainability 2018, 10, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Harris, L.C.; Goode, M.M. Online servicescapes, trust, and purchase intentions. J. Serv. Mark. 2010, 24, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muylle, S.; Moenaert, R.; Despontin, M. The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zviran, M.; Glezer, C.; Avni, I. User satisfaction from commercial web sites: The effect of design and use. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Wulf, K.; Schillewaert, N.; Muylle, S.; Rangarajan, D. The role of pleasure in web site success. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.Y.; Quyen, P.T.P.; Rivas, A.A.A. How e-servicescapes affect customer online shopping intention: The moderat-ing effects of gender and online purchasing experience. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2017, 15, 689–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manganari, E.E.; Siomkos, G.J.; Rigopoulou, I.D.; Vrechopoulos, A.P. Virtual store layout effects on consumer behavior. Int. Res. 2011, 21, 326–346. [Google Scholar]
- Kandampully, J.; Suhartanto, D. Customer loyalty in the hotel industry: The role of customer satisfaction and image. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2000, 12, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Law, C.H.R.; Wen, I. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2008, 27, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, I.; Fang, Y.; Ramsey, E.; McCole, P.; Ibbotson, P.; Compeau, D. Understanding online customer repurchasing in-tention and the mediating role of trust- An empirical investigation in two developed countries. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2009, 18, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Childers, T.L.; Carr, C.L.; Peck, J.; Carson, S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retail. 2002, 77, 511–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna, D.; Peracchio, L.A.; De Juan, M.D. Cross-Cultural and Cognitive Aspects of Web Site Navigation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2002, 30, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, G.; Brohman, M.K.; Watson, R.T.; Parasuraman, A. Net-based customer service systems: Evolution and revolution in Web site functionalities. Decis. Sci. 2004, 35, 423–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosnjak, M.; Galesic, M.; Tuten, T. Personality determinants of online shopping: Explaining online purchase intentions using a hierarchical approach. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.; Qureshi, I.; Sun, H.; McCole, P.; Ramsey, E.; Lim, K.H. Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms. MIS Q. 2014, 38, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szymanski, D.M.; Hise, R.T. E-satisfaction: An initial examination. J. Retail. 2000, 76, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, B.; Park, J.Y. The Moderating Effect of Online Purchase Experience on the Evaluation of Online Store. Adv. Consum. Res. 2002, 33, 203–212. [Google Scholar]
- Montoya-Weiss, M.M.; Voss, G.B.; Grewal, D. Determinants of Online Channel Use and Overall Satisfaction with a Relational, Multichannel Service Provider. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2003, 31, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2013, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abelson, P.H.; Aronson, R.P.; McGuire, E.; Newcomb, W.; Rosenberg, W.J.; Tannenbaum, M.J. The Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook; Rand-McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Javadi, M.H.M.; Dolatabadi, H.R.; Nourbakhsh, M.; Poursaeedi, A.; Asadollahi, A.R. An Analysis of Factors Affecting on Online Shopping Behavior of Consumers. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2012, 4, 81. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, T. An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 54, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoroso, D.L.; Lim, R. Why Are Filipino Consumers Strong Adopters of Mobile Applications? In Business Technologies in Contemporary Organizations: Adoption, Assimilation, and Institutionalization; IGI Global: Hershey, Pennsylvania, 2015; pp. 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gupta, A.; Yousaf, A.; Mishra, A. How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2020, 52, 102094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemon, K.N.; White, T.B.; Winer, R.S. Dynamic customer relationship management: Incorporating future considera-tions into the service retention decision. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, R.E.; Srinivasan, S.S. E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiou, J.-S. The antecedents of consumers’ loyalty toward Internet Service Providers. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, I.R.D.B.; Agudo, J.C.; Gutiérrez, H.S.M. Determinants of economic and social satisfaction in manufacturer–distributor relationships. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2006, 35, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y. The Role of Mutual Trust in Building Members’ Loyalty to a C2C Platform Provider. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2009, 14, 147–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valaei, N.; Baroto, M.B. Modelling continuance intention of citizens in government Facebook page: A complementary PLS approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 73, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Veeramootoo, N.; Nunkoo, R.; Dwivedi, Y. What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Joo, Y.J.; So, H.J.; Kim, N.H. Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Comput. Educ. 2018, 122, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susanto, A.; Chang, Y.; Ha, Y. Determinants of continuance intention to use the smartphone banking services: An extension to the expectation-confirmation model. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 508–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, S.; Liu, Y.; Yao, R.; Liu, J. An investigation of users’ continuance intention towards mobile banking in China. Inf. Dev. 2014, 32, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, C.H.; Chang, J.J.; Tang, K.Y. Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social Apps: Satis-faction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telemat. Inform. 2016, 33, 342–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, C.; Santos, D.; Oliveira, T. Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Inf. Syst. Front. 2018, 22, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, C.-H. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation–confirmation model in an electronics retail setting. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2016, 29, 866–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, Y.J.; Park, S.; Shin, E.K. Students’ expectation, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use digital textbooks. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 69, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkhani, N.; Soltani, S.; Jamshidi, M.H.M. Examining a hybrid model for e-satisfaction and e-loyalty to e-ticketing on airline websites. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2014, 37, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, J.; Ekinci, Y.; Whyatt, G. Brand equity, brand loyalty and consumer satisfaction. Ann. Tour. Res. 2011, 38, 1009–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gounaris, S.; Dimitriadis, S.; Stathakopoulos, V. An examination of the effects of service quality and satisfaction on cus-tomers’ behavioral intentions in e-shopping. J. Serv. Mark. 2010, 24, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaparro-Peláez, J.; Agudo-Peregrina, Á.F.; Pascual-Miguel, F.J. Conjoint analysis of drivers and inhibitors of e-commerce adoption. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.K.; Lassar, W.M.; Shekhar, V. Convenience and satisfaction: Mediation of fairness and quality. Serv. Ind. J. 2016, 36, 239–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamdasani, P.N.; Yeow, O.G. An exploratory study of in-home shoppers in a concentrated retail market. The case of Singapore. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 1995, 2, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papacharissi, Z.; Rubin, A.M. Predictors of Internet Use. J. Broadcasting Electron. Media 2000, 44, 175–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, C.W.; Lu, H.P. Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: An empirical study based on the value-intention framework. Int. Res. 2007, 17, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamis, A.A.; Stohr, E.A. Parametric search engines: What makes them effective when shopping online for differentiat-ed products? Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 904–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darian, J.C. In-Home Shopping: Are There Consumer Segments? J. Retail. 1987, 63, 163–186. [Google Scholar]
- Seiders, K.; Voss, G.B.; Godfrey, A.L.; Grewal, D. SERVCON: Development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2007, 35, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kollmann, T.; Kuckertz, A.; Kayser, I. Cannibalization or synergy? Consumers’ channel selection in online-offline multi-channel systems. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2012, 19, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filieri, R. What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, U. Perceived credibility of online hotel reviews and its impact on hotel booking intentions. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 31, 3465–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Chang, Y.C. What drives purchase intention on Airbnb? Perspectives of consumer reviews, information quality, and media richness. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1512–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, C.; Yan, L. You touched it and I’m relieved! The effect of online review’s tactile cues on consumer’s purchase intention. J. Contemp. Mark. Sci. 2019, 2, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Li, H.; Wang, F.-K.; He, W.; Tian, Z. How online reviews affect purchase intention: A new model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 72, 463–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, K.L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z. The business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senecal, S.; Nantel, J. The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. J. Retail. 2004, 80, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M.; Ekinci, Y. Do online hotel rating schemes influence booking behaviors? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 49, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen. State of the Media: The Social media Report; Nielsen: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Daraz.pk. What Do We Know about Pakistan’s Ecommerce Industry? Available online: https://www.dawn.com/news/1549691 (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Joseph, F.H., Jr.; William, C.B.; Barry, J.B.; Rolph, E.A. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Picodi. Online Shopping in Pakistan. Available online: https://www.picodi.com/pk/bargain-hunting/online-shopping-in-pakistan (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Maxham, J.G., III; Netemeyer, R.G. Modeling customer perceptions of complaint handling over time: The effects of per-ceived justice on satisfaction and intent. J. Retail. 2002, 78, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruner, C.G. Marketing Scales Handbook: A Compilation of Multi-Item Measures; American Marketing Association: Chicago, IL, USA, 1996; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Amoroso, D.; Lim, R. The mediating effects of habit on continuance intention. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 40, 8–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Advertising Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues. In Handbook of Research on International Advertising; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M. On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2007, 42, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M.; Yuan, K.-H. Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1999, 34, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anjum, S.; Chai, J. Drivers of Cash-on-Delivery Method of Payment in E-Commerce Shopping: Evidence from Pakistan. SAGE Open 2020, 10, 2158244020917392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, P.A.; Gefen, D. Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust. Inf. Syst. Res. 2004, 15, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ray, A.; Dhir, A.; Bala, P.K.; Kaur, P. Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Huang, Q.; Davison, R.M.; Hua, Z. What Drives Trust Transfer? The Moderating Roles of Seller-Specific and General Institutional Mechanisms. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2015, 20, 261–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Chen, X.; Ou, C.X.; Davison, R.M.; Hua, Z. Understanding buyers’ loyalty to a C2C platform: The roles of social capital, satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. Inf. Syst. J. 2015, 27, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, S.I. Comparisons of Competing Models between Attitudinal Loyalty and Behavioral Loyalty. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2011, 2, 149–166. [Google Scholar]
- Digital Policy Team. COVID-19: The Catalyst for Pakistan’s e-Commerce Sector? 2020. Available online: https://digitalpakistan.pk/blog/covid-19-the-catalyst-for-pakistans-e-commerce-sector/ (accessed on 27 July 2021).
- Statista Research Department. Change in Online Shopping Behavior after COVID-19 in the Middle East, North Africa, and Pakistan, by Behavior. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1202926/menap-change-in-online-shopping-behavior-due-to-covid-19/ (accessed on 27 July 2021).
Items | Percentage (%) | |
---|---|---|
Age | 0–15 | 6 |
16–30 | 49.2 | |
31–45 | 33.1 | |
45+ | 11.7 | |
Gender | Male | 59.3 |
Female | 40.7 | |
Education Level | High School | 18 |
Bachelor’s Degree | 30.6 | |
Master’s Degree | 36.9 | |
PhD or above | 14.5 | |
Occupation | Student | 43.5 |
Employee | 36.6 | |
Business Owner | 12.6 | |
Unemployed/Retired | 7.3 | |
Online Shopping Experience | Several Weeks | 10.1 |
Several Months | 14.5 | |
1 year | 12.3 | |
2 years | 35.3 | |
5 years | 20.2 | |
<5 years | 7.6 | |
Online Shopping Frequency | 1–10 | 86.1 |
(times in a month) | 11–20 | 9.5 |
21–30 | 1.6 | |
<30 | 2.8 |
Constructs and Measurement Items | Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|
Layout and Functionality | 0.971 | |
| 0.850 | |
| 0.862 | |
| 0.861 | |
| 0.853 | |
| 0.883 | |
| 0.852 | |
| 0.859 | |
| 0.820 | |
| 0.864 | |
| 0.808 | |
| 0.857 | |
| 0.829 | |
| 0.875 | |
Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms | 0.946 | |
| 0.884 | |
| 0.895 | |
| 0.921 | |
| 0.910 | |
Satisfaction | 0.950 | |
| 0.906 | |
| 0.915 | |
| 0.913 | |
Convenience | 0.946 | |
| 0.894 | |
| 0.893 | |
| 0.879 | |
| 0.872 | |
| 0.871 | |
Continuance Intention | 0.867 | |
| 0.844 | |
| 0.832 | |
| 0.808 | |
Online Ratings | 0.901 | |
| 0.890 | |
| 0.881 | |
| 0.834 |
Constructs | AVE | MSV | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LF | CN | ST | IM | OR | CI | |||
1. Layout and Functionality (LF) | 0.726 | 0.130 | 0.852 | |||||
2. Convenience (CN) | 0.778 | 0.130 | 0.360 *** | 0.882 | ||||
3. Satisfaction (ST) | 0.829 | 0.177 | 0.327 *** | 0.243 *** | 0.911 | |||
4. PEEIM (IM) | 0.815 | 0.034 | −0.184 ** | −0.127 * | −0.031 | 0.903 | ||
5. Online Ratings (OR) | 0.754 | 0.166 | 0.132 * | 0.156 * | 0.281 *** | 0.005 | 0.869 | |
6. Continuance Intention (CI) | 0.686 | 0.177 | 0.186 ** | 0.267 *** | 0.421 *** | −0.070 | 0.408 ** | 0.828 |
Path | Regression Weights | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimates | S.E | C.R | p | |
Hypothesis 1a Satisfaction <--- Layout and Functionality | 0.355 | 0.068 | 5.260 | *** |
Hypothesis 1b Convenience <--- Layout and Functionality | 0.344 | 0.060 | 5.700 | *** |
Hypothesis 2a Satisfaction <--- PEEIM | −0.086 | 0.054 | −1.592 | 0.111 |
Hypothesis 2b Convenience <--- PEEIM | −0.067 | 0.048 | −1.398 | 0.162 |
Hypothesis 3 Continuance Intention <--- Satisfaction | 0.331 | 0.050 | 6.617 | *** |
Hypothesis 4 Continuance Intention <--- Convenience | 0.128 | 0.056 | 2.293 | 0.022 |
Variables | DV---Continuance Intention | DV---Continuance Intention | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
Model 1a | Model 1b | Model 2a | Model 2b | |||||
Coeff | S.E | Coeff | S.E | Coeff | S.E | Coeff | S.E | |
Control Variables | ||||||||
Age | −0.119 | 0.088 | −0.116 | 0.087 | −0.143 | 0.091 | −0.132 | 0.090 |
Gender | 0.043 | 0.139 | 0.062 | 0.138 | −0.066 | 0.144 | −0.088 | 0.143 |
Education Level | 0.119 | 0.072 | 0.124 | 0.071 | 0.173 * | 0.075 | 0.168 | 0.074 |
Main Effects | ||||||||
Satisfaction | 0.403 *** | 0.072 | 0.406 *** | 0.071 | ||||
Convenience | 0.202 ** | 0.072 | 0.246 *** | 0.074 | ||||
Online Ratings | 0.342 *** | 0.072 | 0.393 *** | 0.074 | 0.427 *** | 0.072 | 0.454 *** | 0.072 |
Moderation Effects | ||||||||
Satisfaction X Online Ratings | 0.175 * | 0.070 | ||||||
Convenience X Online Ratings | 0.153 * | 0.064 |
Hypotheses | Result |
---|---|
Hypotheses 1a (H1a).Layout and functionality positively affects Satisfaction. | Supported |
Hypotheses 1b (H1b).Layout and functionality positively affects Convenience. | Supported |
Hypotheses 2a (H2a).PEEIM positively affects Satisfaction. | Not Supported |
Hypotheses 2b (H2b).PEEIM positively affects Convenience. | Not Supported |
Hypotheses 3 (H3).Satisfaction positively affects Continuance intention. | Supported |
Hypotheses 4 (H4).Convenience positively affects Continuance intention. | Supported |
Hypotheses 5 (H5).Online Ratings positively moderate the relationship between satisfaction and continuance intention, and that satisfaction positively influences continuance intention more strongly when online ratings are higher. | Supported |
Hypotheses 6 (H6).Online Ratings positively moderate the relationship between convenience and continuance intention, and that convenience positively influences continuance intention more strongly when online ratings are higher. | Supported |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ghouri, M.W.A.; Tong, L.; Hussain, M.A. Does Online Ratings Matter? An Integrated Framework to Explain Gratifications Needed for Continuance Shopping Intention in Pakistan. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179538
Ghouri MWA, Tong L, Hussain MA. Does Online Ratings Matter? An Integrated Framework to Explain Gratifications Needed for Continuance Shopping Intention in Pakistan. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179538
Chicago/Turabian StyleGhouri, Muhammad Waleed Ayub, Linchen Tong, and Muhammad Ali Hussain. 2021. "Does Online Ratings Matter? An Integrated Framework to Explain Gratifications Needed for Continuance Shopping Intention in Pakistan" Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179538
APA StyleGhouri, M. W. A., Tong, L., & Hussain, M. A. (2021). Does Online Ratings Matter? An Integrated Framework to Explain Gratifications Needed for Continuance Shopping Intention in Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(17), 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179538