Next Article in Journal
An Endless Endeavor: The Evolution and Challenges of Multi-Level Coastal Governance in the Global South
Next Article in Special Issue
Co-Inoculation of Bacillus spp. for Growth Promotion and Iron Fortification in Sorghum
Previous Article in Journal
Does Being a Scout Affect Confinement Due to COVID-19? A Comparative Exploratory Descriptive Study with Spanish Adolescents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inoculation of ACC Deaminase-Producing Brevibacterium linens RS16 Enhances Tolerance against Combined UV-B Radiation and Heat Stresses in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Synergistic Action of Three Piper Plant Extracts and Biofertilizer for Growth Promotion and Biocontrol of Blast Disease in Red Rice

Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10412; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810412
by Ni Luh Suriani 1,*, Dewa Ngurah Suprapta 2, Agung Wiwiek Indrayani 3, Susila Herlambang 4, Ni Made Delly Resiani 5, Hind A. AL-Shwaiman 6, Manal M. Al Khulaifi 6, Abdallah M. Elgorban 6, Rahul Datta 7, Sri Gunawan 8 and Ali Tan Kee Zuan 9
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10412; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810412
Submission received: 8 August 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 14 September 2021 / Published: 18 September 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

There are some minor changes that should be added to the text. Please add full explanation of PGPR to the abstract. Limitations of the study should be described. Please correct references because there are duplicated citations (30 and 54, 50 and 51).

Author Response

Response to Review 1 Report (Round 1)

  • There are some minor changes that should be added to the text. Please add full explanation of PGPR to the abstract.

Authors response: Full explanation of PGPR is now added in the abstract, introduction, Results and Discussion (highlighted in yellow)

  • Limitations of the study should be described.

Authors response: Added in the discussion. Last three lines highlighted in green color

  • Please correct references because there are duplicated citations (30 and 54, 50 and 51).

Authors response: Duplicated references have been replaced

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Congratulations on this manuscript. Please check my comments and also those parts that I just highlighted (without comments). Good luck!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Response to Review 2 Report (Round 1)

All the corrections as marked (comments) in the pdf files by reviewer 2, have been revised as per the suggestions

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for correcting some of the comments/suggestions. However, there are some places where you did not address the comments. I kindly request you to please check both the versions and do the necessary corrections to make this manuscript ready for publishing. All the best! You are almost there.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer 2 Report Round 2

 Thank you for correcting some of the comments/suggestions. However, there are some places where you did not address the comments. I kindly request you to please check both the versions and do the necessary corrections to make this manuscript ready for publishing. All the best! You are almost there.

 

Authors response:  The authors are thankful to the reviewer for very excellent Reviewing of the paper. The comments and suggestions helped in the significant improvement of the MSS.

All the corrections as suggested in marked pdf file have been done.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop