Next Article in Journal
Economic and Environmental Assessment Using Emergy of Sheep Production in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Balantidiasis: A Neglected Tropical Disease Used as a Study Model for a Holistic Approach to Sustainable Development in the Framework of Agenda 2030 Goals
Previous Article in Journal
Do “Stay-at-Home Exercise” Videos Induce Behavioral Changes in College Students? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Future Food Sustainability Can Be Traced Back into Local People’s Socio-Cultural Roots in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/su132111602
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discovery of Polyvalent Myovirus (vB_STM-2) Phage as a Natural Antimicrobial System to Lysis and Biofilm Removal of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Various Food Sources

by
Iman M. A. Abdelhadi
1,
Ahmed R. Sofy
2,*,
Ahmed A. Hmed
2,*,
Ehab E. Refaey
2,
Hany E. Soweha
1 and
Mohamed A. Abbas
1
1
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
2
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo 11884, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11602; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111602
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Revised: 9 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety and Quality of Sustainable Food)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New and natural antimicrobials as an alternative control system are now an urgent need to overcome stubborn bacterial infections. Salmonella Typhimurium has become the most frequent serovar responsible for salmonellosis in humans around the world. The high antimicrobial resistance and biofilm production make this pathogen more dangerous. We aimed to isolate a broad lytic phage to prevent Salmonella infection and reduce its biofilms. Using Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) as a host, seven phages were isolated, and only three phages showed clear lytic plaques, two members of the Siphoviridae family (vB_STS-1 and vB_STS-3) and one of the Myoviridae family (vB_STM-2). The vB_STM-2 phage was the most potent broad lytic phage, infecting 100% of tested Salmonella Typhimurium serovars and non-Salmonella strains. Additionally, the vB_STM-2 phage was thermostable at −20 to 55 °C up to 24 h, while at 65 and 75 °C, a significant (p < 0.05) titer reduction was observed after 7 days. Moreover, the phage seemed to be stable at different pHs (4–11) after one to twelve hours (hrs), while increasing the time made the phage more sensitive to the alkaline medium rather than the acidic medium. Interestingly, the vB_STM-2 phage had the capacity to diminish or eradicate the biofilms of tested Salmonella Typhimurium, e.g., ST-4, ST-19, ST-30, ST-37, ST-45 and ST-49 by 81.2%, 76.4%, 43.6%, 41%, 39.8% and 93.4%, respectively, at a titer concentration of 106 PFU/mL. Eventually, the vB_STM-2 phage showed significant (p < 0.05) efficacy in the elimination of Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) from contaminated chicken breasts at both storage periods with high titer stability. The Salmonella count showed a severe decline from 7.00 ± 0.63 log10 CFU/cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.17 log10 CFU/cm2 on the seventh day of the short-term storage, and from 5.13 ± 0.44 log10 CFU/cm2 to 1.10 ± 0.12 log10 CFU/cm2 on day 27 of the long-term assay. In both periods, the phage titers remained stable, with insignificant (p < 0.05) loss. Therefore, this phage is considered a prime candidate to combat multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and its biofilms.

1. Introduction

Salmonella is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped microorganism that is a member of the well-known bacterial Enterobacteriaceae family [1]. Salmonella can contaminate many types of foods (chicken, livestock, dairy, fruits, and vegetables), increasing the risk of eating contaminated food [2,3,4,5]. Many different serovars of Salmonella cause food poisoning, but the most dominant serovar is Salmonella Typhimurium [6].
Nowadays, Salmonella Typhimurium has become the most frequent serovar to be primarily responsible for salmonellosis in humans worldwide [7,8]. However, this serovar was not known until the mid-1990s, and its isolation from humans and animals has only increased recently [9]. Salmonellosis is a considerable source of enteric disease for humans in many countries worldwide [10,11]. The majority of cases arise from eating contaminated food [12]. Salmonella spp. outlets are responsible for approximately 85% of foodborne diseases annually, leading to more than 100,000 deaths [10]. In addition, it was the most common pathogen associated with hospitalized patients diagnosed with bloodstream infections in Africa and Asia from 2008 to 2018 [13]. Salmonellosis is characterized by many symptoms, including fever, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and inflammatory diarrhea. Symptoms occur within 12 to 72 h and last from 2 to 7 days, with severe infections leading to hospitalization and death [1].
In addition, this bacterium was found to have a great ability to form surface-attached aggregates of communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs), known as biofilm [2]. Biofilm formation by bacteria is undesirable in many fields, including industry, agriculture, and medicine [14]. In short, biofilm increases the survival rate of bacteria from 1 to 1000 times and may weakens the effect of antibiotics or prevent their effects completely [15,16]. Antibiotics are the conventional control strategies to eliminate Salmonella serovars [1], but later resistance to these traditional antibiotics has emerged, which has led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella spp. [17]. Therefore, it was necessary to find a promising alternative to control such resistant infections. Bacteriophages are natural bacteria viruses used as alternative antimicrobial agents (lytic type) to counter such multidrug-resistant bacteria [18].
Phages are highly capable against bacteria contaminating food products [19,20]. Due to their defense mechanisms and high diversity, many studies have reported the isolation and successful use of phages in the control of Salmonella [21,22,23]. Many previous studies have determined that Salmonella phages of a wide host range could control Salmonella, including S. enteritidis or Salmonella Typhimurium [24]. Although phages are usually species-specific [25], some polyvalent phages have been observed, especially among the phages of the Enterobacteriaceae family [26,27]. Phages with polyvalent behavior can infect strains from different genera or species, which is preferable to others [28].
Bacteriophages have been employed to control Salmonella in many foods, such as chicken [29,30], beef [31], pork [32], fruits [33], and dairy products [34].
This study aimed to isolate a lytic polyvalent bacteriophage to control multiple drug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium (the most widely spread serovar) and combat its biofilm.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates Sources in the Study

A total of 23 Salmonella strains presenting a Typhimurium serovar previously isolated from food sources according to Silliker and Taylor [35] and ISO [36] were used in this study (Table 1). In addition, Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) was used as a lawn strain for phage isolation, propagation, and purification. All Salmonella used were previously isolated in the plant viruses and bacteriophage Lab of Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science at Al-Azhar University (Cairo, Egypt). Salmonella isolates were stored in 15% glycerol at −80 °C as testing stocks. For fresh culture, a colony formed by streaking on Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA) obtained from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK) was developed in 5 mL of Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) also obtained from Oxoid, and left in the incubator for 16–18 h at 37 °C.

2.2. Inoculums Preparation of Isolates

Salmonella strains were cultured into a TSB medium and incubated at 37 °C until a mid-logarithmic phase. The cells concentration was adjusted in CFU/mL against 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) [37].

2.3. Confirm the Identification of the Salmonella Typhimurium Used

Confirmation of Salmonella Typhimurium was performed in two major steps. The first step involved the morphological [38], biochemical [39,40], and serological (slide agglutination test) [41,42] characteristics. The second step, Biomerieux VITEK 2 identification system [27,28], automatically confirmed Salmonella Typhimurium.

2.4. Statuses of Antibiotic-Resistant Profiles of Salmonella Typhimurium Used

A total of 23 Salmonella strains presenting Typhimurium serovar were tested to determine the antibiotic-resistant profiles using disc diffusion assay as described by Bauer [43]. This assay was performed with the following tested antibiotics (the most widely used antibiotics in human medicine in Egypt): streptomycin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 mcg), flucloxacillin (5 mcg), tetracycline (30 mcg), levofloxacin (5 mcg), tobramycin (10 mcg), aztreonam (1 mcg), oxacillin (1 mcg), rifamycin (30 mcg), erythromycin (15 mcg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid amc (20 μg), clindamycin (2 mcg), gentamicin (10 mcg), cephradine (30 mcg), ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), and ampicillin (10 mcg) which were obtained from El-Gomhouria co. for trading chemicals and medical appliances (Cairo, Egypt). The resistance or sensitivity of the tested bacteria to the antibiotics used was determined by measuring the growth inhibitory zone around each antibiotic disc after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. The obtained results were designated as S (sensitive), I (intermediate sensitive), and R (resistant) based on the standardized protocols by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) [44].

2.5. Biofilm Forming Capacity of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates

The tissue culture plate method described by Stepanović et al. [45] was used for the qualitative assay of biofilm formation activity of all 23 Salmonella Typhimurium isolates. In this assay, biofilm formation was evaluated in 96-well tissue culture polystyrene plates, with flat bottoms and lids (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). In total, 200 μL of TSB medium supplemented with 0.25% glucose was added into each well, plus 20 μL of 105 CFU/mL bacterial suspension. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the plates were aspirated and washed using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The adsorbed bacteria were fixed by 95% ethanol to the polystyrene wells and then stained using crystal violet (0.1%) after removing the ethanol by washing. The dye was solubilized in 1% w/v SDS, and the optical densities were measured at O.D.570 nm photometrically by an ELISA reader (Sunrise™-TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland) at the Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. The assay was performed in triplicate. The formed biofilm was described as low, moderate, or strong, depending on the interpretation of Stepanović et al. [45].

2.6. Isolation and Purification of Salmonella Typhimurium Phages

2.6.1. Isolation Source

Twenty milliliters (20 mL) of sewage water (9 different samples) was obtained from Kafr El-Sheikh (N 30°56′45″ E 31°06′42″) governorate, Egypt.

2.6.2. Isolation and Enrichment

For the isolation of Salmonella Typhimurium phages, the method described by Bibi et al. [46] was used; 10-mL of centrifuged sewage water (supernatant) was mixed with an equal volume of TSB media (DifcoTM, BD, USA). At the mid-logarithmic phase of the host bacteria (Salmonella Typhimurium; ST-4), 100 μL was added to the mixture of sewage water and media, followed by overnight incubation (shaking at 270 rpm) at 37 °C. At 7000 (× g), the previous mixture after incubation was centrifuged for 10 min.; the pellet was discarded, and through a sterile filter (0.45-μm), the supernatant was filtered and stored at 4 °C in a clean, sterile flask.

2.7. Phage Detection

  • Spot-Assay Technique
According to Capra et al. [47], a spot-test assay was performed. The overlay (4 mL of TSB supplemented with 0.7% agar) layer was prepared. In total, 100 μL of 24 h incubated bacterial culture (host bacterium) was inoculated into the previous layer (soft layer). The soft layer was poured over previously prepared solid trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates (overlay layer). Then, 10 μL from each enriched sample was spotted over the plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After the incubation period, phage activity appeared in the form of zones of complete or partial lysis on the soft layer. In CM phage buffer (0.73 g/L CaCl2. 2 H2O: 2.5 g/L MgSO4. 7 H2O; 0.05 g/L gelatin; 6 mL/L 1 M Tris buffer; pH 7.2), lysis zones were relocated separately under aseptic conditions.
  • Plaque Assay Technique
The double-layer agar method was performed by Sangha et al. [48] to assay phages’ plaque formation. In TSB, ten-fold serial dilutions for phage lysate were performed. Then, 100 μL from each dilution of phage lysate was inoculated to 100 μL from the overnight host’s culture (109 CFU/mL) and left in an incubator for 10 to 15 min. Next, the previous mixture was mixed gently, placed in a 4-mL soft agar medium, and then poured over the TSA plates. Afterward, the plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C, resulting in different plaques, whose sizes and shapes were quantified.
  • Purification, Propagation, and Titration
All these assays were performed by the double overlay method following Sangha et al. [48]. Using a sterile wire loop, an individual plaque was picked and then transferred to TSB inoculated with the bacterial host used in phage isolation (Salmonella Typhimurium; ST-4). To confirm the purity of the phage, the double overlay method was conducted at least three times. Regarding phage propagation, 100 μL of phage was added to 100 μL of bacterial lawn in TSB medium, followed by overnight incubation at 37 °C. Ten overlay agar plates were prepared for each isolate phage, and 3 mL of CM buffer was spread over each plate. In 50 mL clean, sterile tubes, the upper area of the soft layer in the plates was scribbled and transferred. The collected tubes were vortexed (Vortex-Genie-2; Inc., Bohemia, NY, USA) for 5 min after being left for 15 min. Tubes were centrifugated (7000× g/15 min) at 4 °C, the supernatant was filtered and then transferred into a clean, sterile tube to keep at 4 °C. A ten-fold serial dilution of the phage suspension was performed to calculate phage titers, and the resulting plaques were counted by the double overlay method, as previously explained.
  • Host Range Study
Using spot-testing, the host spectra of all isolated phages were studied per Capra et al. [47]. This assay was conducted on the bacterial isolates listed in Table 1, in addition to 13 other strains. The strains other than Salmonella included 5 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (clinical and food sources), 3 of Staphylococcus aureus (food sources), 4 of Escherichia coli (clinical isolates), and 1 of Klebsiella pneumoniae (clinical source). The soft agar layer was inoculated with 100 μL fresh cultured strain and (1.5 × 109 CFU/mL) poured onto the overlay layer (TSA). After solidification, the phage suspension (1 × 107 PFU/mL) was dropped on the soft layer and then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Areas of spot-lysis on the tested strain were considered phage sensitive. The potent phage that showed the broadest host range in the spot test was confirmed by the efficiency of the plating (EOP) method, according to Mirzaei and Nilsson [49]. The test results of the EOP are interpreted in different patterns, namely, inefficient EOP <0.001; low efficiency EOP from 0.001 to <0.2; moderate efficiency EOP from 0.2 to <0.5; and high efficiency EOP from 0.5 to 1.0. The experiments were performed in triplicates with standard deviation (±SD).
  • Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
In total, 1 mL of purified high titer stock phages was centrifuged for 1 h /16,000× g at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in CM phage buffer (20 μL). On the carbon grids (200 mesh) coated with formvar, 5 μL of phage suspension was added and fixed for 2 min. The examined phages were negatively stained (30 s) by 2% uranyl acetate, and the excess dye was removed by paper [50]. At the Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, the samples were examined by electron microscopy (Model Beckman 1010) operated at 60 KV [51].
  • Thermo and pH Stability of vB_STM-2 Phage
At different times (1, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 7 days), the stability of the vB_STM-2 phage was checked at different temperatures (e.g., −20, 4, 25, 37, 55, 65, and 75 °C) as well as pH levels (4, 7, 9, and 11). Both experiments were carried out per Philipson et al. [52] and Jamalludeen et al. [53] for temperature and pH stability. The initial titer of the phage was 7 log10, and any titer changes were detected during the experiments using the double-layer agar method of Sangha et al. [48]. Assays were performed in triplicate with a long standard deviation (± SD).
  • Biofilm Removal Activity of the vB_STM-2 Phage
The antibiofilm activity of the vB_STM-2 phage against the strongest biofilm-producing Salmonella Typhimurium listed in Table 1 was measured. Coincidentally, 6 isolates with codes ST-4, ST-19, ST-30, ST-37, ST-45, and ST-49 were the strongest and were derived from a meat source, i.e., chicken or bovine. According to Bekir et al. [54], the test was performed using 96-well tissue culture polystyrene plates with a flat bottom and a lid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Then, 20 μL of tested bacterial culture (at mid-logarithmic phase) (2 × 106 CFU/mL) was inoculated into 200 μL TSB medium supplemented with 0.25% glucose in the plate wells. In some specific wells of the plate, 100 μL phage suspension (1 × 106 PFU/mL) was added and mixed well (wells of anti-biofilm). Thus, there were wells without phage addition in the plate, which contained bacteria and media (wells of biofilm), and wells to which we did not add the phage or bacteria (wells of negative control). Biofilm reduction by the phage was calculated according to Else et al. [55] and Kostaki et al. [56] by the following equation:
[(C − B) − (T − B)]/[(C − B)] × 100
where C = refers to the optical density (OD620 nm) of the control result, B = refers to the optical density (OD620 nm) of the blank (TSB), and T = refers to the optical density (OD570 nm) of phage-treated wells.

2.8. Bacterial Challenge Measurements

In Broth Medium (Culture Clearing)

Tests of the bacterial challenge were carried out to detect the activity of the vB_STM-2 phage in confronting Salmonella in a liquid medium. In brief, 3 clean flasks, each with 100 mL sterile TSB, were prepared. First, 1 mL (6 log10 CFU/mL) fresh Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) culture was inoculated into only 2 flasks of the three, while the latter remained unchanged. Next, 1 mL phage (8 log10 PFU/mL) was injected into one of the flasks implanted with bacteria (treated flask), while the other implanted one was injected with sterile distilled water (positive control flask). The flasks containing the TSB medium remained a negative control. Finally, the three flasks were placed overnight in an incubator shaker (220 rpm) at 37 °C, with 2 mL of each flask taken at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h to determine the count of Salmonella. For accuracy comparison, 1 mL was examined by spectrophotometry (OD620 nm), while the other was examined by counting (log10) Salmonella on TSA plates. The tests were performed in triplicate with standard deviation (±SD).

2.9. Preparation of the Food Sample Used in the Study

The first step: in a local supermarket, chicken breasts (used as a food model) with a recent production date were purchased, placed in sterile bags, and then transferred in an icebox to the laboratory to carry out the experiment. Using a sterile meat cutting board in the laminar flow, chicken breasts were sliced into small squares (2 × 2 cm) with a clean, sterile knife [57]. These squares were sterilized for 3 h with 70% ethanol, washed three times with sterile water, and then left to dry for half an hour. After drying, all squares were examined on TSA plates according to FDA [58]; any squares that showed microbial growth were excluded, and the remaining squares were used.
The second step: the used squares were divided into 2 sections; each section had 3 groups of squares. The first section was prepared for the short-term experiment (7 days) as follows: in two of the three groups, Salmonella Typhimurium culture (ST-4) was inoculated (7 log10 CFU/cm2), while the third remained the same. The second section was prepared for the long-term experiment (27 days) as follows: similar to the above, Salmonella Typhimurium culture (ST-4) was inoculated (6 log10 CFU/cm2) in 2 groups, while the other remained the same. The two experiments were performed in triplicate with standard deviation (±SD).

2.10. Effectiveness and Stability of the vB_STM-2 Phage in Food Preservation

Short-term assay: one of the two groups inoculated with bacteria from the first section of groups was treated with a phage suspension (8 log10 PFU/cm2) (inoculated, treated group), while the second inoculated group remained without treatment (inoculated, un-treated group). The remaining uninfected third group was not treated (non-inoculated, un-treated group). Squares of the three groups were placed independently in sterile Petri dishes, covered with sterile plastic rubber, and kept at 4 °C. Colonies of Salmonella (log10 CFU/cm2) and titers of phage (PFU/cm2) were counted at days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 7 of the storage period to judge the ability of the phage to inhibit Salmonella, as well as its stability.
Long-term assay: as in the previous experiment, groups of chicken breasts were treated in the same way here but were kept for 27 days at −20 °C. In addition, both the counting of the Salmonella colonies and titers of the phage were carried out at days 0, 2, 7, 14, 21, and 27 of the storage period.

2.11. Recovery of Inoculated Salmonella from Food

On the days specified in both experiments to check the chicken breast squares, they were taken out and left for appropriately an hour at 37 °C. Each sample was placed into a sterile bag containing 2 mL sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The sample was homogenized by a sterile flattened rod and vortexed [59]. The homogenized sample was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000× g [60], the supernatant was discarded to avoid plating the bacteriophage. A pellet containing precipitated bacteria was mixed with sterile peptone water (PW) and then serially diluted (10-fold). Then, 100 μL was spread over TSA and xylose lysine desoxycholate (XLD; Oxoid) agar plates from each dilution. For a day or two, the plates were incubated at 37 °C. After incubation, the suspected Salmonella colonies were counted, and the biochemical/serological tests were performed [35,41].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate with standard deviation (±SD), where three independent samples/assays were taken in each replicate. For bacteria and the phage, the data were converted into log10 form. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.00 (SPSS) was the statistical program used at a probability level of 0.05. One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis. Graphs were produced with GraphPad Prism 8.

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Isolates, Identification, Antibiotic-Resistant and Biofilm Behavior

Suspect Salmonella Typhimurium colonies were 1–2 mm in diameter with an off-white color and circular shape in the TSA plates. The colonies appeared to be red with black centers in some, with 2–3 in some diameter on the XLD plates. The biochemically identified cells with the oxidase, Indole, and Vogues–Proskauer (VP) tests were Gram-negative type rods, with negative interactions. The biochemical tests that showed positive results were urease, methyl red (MR), and a reduction of nitrate to nitrite. The slide agglutination test used to determine the serotype level of Salmonella showed that all isolates were given a positive reaction with both antisera of O (poly O) and polyvalent H (poly H). In the affirmative identification by the Biomerieux VITEK 2 system, the results of the 23 isolates were all Salmonella Typhimurium. The antibiotic sensitivity profile test of Salmonella Typhimurium showed at least six antibiotics (ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, gentamicin, erythromycin, and aztreonam) of different groups, to which all isolates were resistant. Additionally, the 23 Salmonella Typhimurium isolates showed different abilities to form the biofilm, as 10 (43.47%) isolates were strong in their production, seven (30.4%) were of moderate capacity, and the remaining six (26%) isolates showed a weak ability to form it.

3.2. Most Potent Lytic Phages Isolation and Characterization

Using Salmonella Typhimurium (code; ST-4) as a host, seven phages were isolated from sewage water samples. Although the seven isolated phages can lyse their host with different sizes and shapes of the plaques, only three (42.8%) phages showed clear lytic plaques. The three phages with clear plaques were named vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3, and they were the only ones that were purified and propagated (titers ranged from 107 to 1011 PFU/mL). Isolate vB_STM-2 was chosen as the most potent lytic phage, based on the clarity of the plaques. The plaques of the vB_STM-2 phage appeared clear, large in size (approximately ≃ 4.5 mm), and semi-regular circular in shape (Figure 1A). Morphotype characters of the three phages were examined, and the TEM images showed that both vB_STS-1 (Figure 1B) and vB_STS-3 (Figure 1D) were members of the Siphoviridae family. Siphoviruses had an icosahedral head that measures approximately 61.32 nm for vB_STS-1 and 47.62 nm in diameter. Both phages contained a long, non-contractile tail with a length of 167.21 nm for vB_STS-1 and 279.36 nm for vB_STS-3. On the other hand, the vB_STM-2 phage was classified as a myovirus, where it belongs to the Myoviridae family, per the criteria established by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The TEM image of the vB_STM-2 phage (Figure 1C) showed that the phage contained a round head in shape with isometric symmetry (51.27 nm in diameter) and a contractile sheathed tail (94.42 nm in length).

3.3. Selection of a Broad Host Spectrum and Polyvalent Phages

The host range of three lytic phages (vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3) was determined by spot test and EOP to confirm their host range (Table 2). However, the vB_STS-1 and vB_STS-3 phages could lyse most of the Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, and they could not infect any other bacterial strains. The results indicated that vB_STS-1 lysed 65% (15/23) of Salmonella isolates. However, it did not show high EOP except in 5 out of 15 positive spot-tests. The vB_STS-3 phage showed a positive spot test with only 52% (12/23) of Salmonella, with high EOP in two isolates. Phage vB_STM-2 showed important results, in which all Salmonella Typhimurium isolates were lysed, with high EOP in 17 out of 23 Salmonella isolates, plus three non-Salmonella strains. Interestingly, the vB_STM-2 phage showed a polyvalent behavior, as it could infect non-Salmonella strains, including P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. coli, while K. pneumoniae was unable to be infected. Due to the strong lytic ability of the vB_STM-2 phage, polyvalent behavior was chosen to complete the study and the Salmonella challenge experiments.

3.4. Thermo and pH Stability of the vB_STM-2 Phage

The thermal and pH stability of the vB_STM-2 phage was determined to identify the extent of the phage’s resistance to different temperatures (Figure 2A) and pH (Figure 2B).
Thermal stability: the vB_STM-2 phage showed resistance at measured temperatures from −20 to 55 °C up to 24 h. The original activity of the phage was also not adversely affected at 65 °C, where insignificant (p < 0.05) titer reduction was observed at 1.89 ± 0.21 and 2.78 ± 0.33 log10 PFU/mL after 12 and 24 h, respectively. In contrast, a temperature of 65 °C negatively affected the phage significantly (p < 0.05) when incubated for 7 days, and the titer reduction was 4.59 ± 0.36 log10 PFU/mL. Furthermore, a negative effect on the phage titers was observed at 75 °C after 7 days of incubation, whereas 6.01 ± 0.43 log10 PFU/mL was reduced from the initial phage titers (7 log10 PFU/mL).
pH stability: Similarly, the vB_STM-2 phage seemed extremely stable at different pH levels from 4 to 11 after incubation times from 1 to 12 hrs. At other time points, the experiment showed that the vB_STM-2 phage was more sensitive to the alkaline than the acidic medium. At an acidic pH of 4 the phage titers were insignificantly (p < 0.05) reduced by 0.26 ± 0.1 and 0.34 ± 0.03 log10 PFU/mL after 24 h and 7 days. At a pH of 11, the phage lost 3.13 ± 0.41 log10 PFU/mL of infective ability after 24 h, while the titers were collapsed by 6.18 ± 0.47 log10 PFU/mL after 7 days.

3.5. Biofilm Removal Effect of the vB_STM-2 Phage

The effectiveness of the vB_STM-2 phage against the strongest biofilm-producing Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4, ST-19, ST-30, ST-37, ST-45, and ST-49), as listed in Table 1, was quantitively determined (Figure 3G). Salmonella Typhimurium ST-4 (host strain) biofilm (0.979 OD570 nm) was removed by 81.2%, 70.5%, 61% and 34.7%, respectively, at 106, 105, 104, 103 and 102 PFU/mL of phage titers, with no effect on cell growth (1.847 OD620 nm), (Figure 3A). Treatment of Salmonella Typhimurium ST-19 resulted in a reduction in biofilm (1.081 OD570 nm) by 76.4%, 60.3%, and 10% with respective titers of 106, 105, and 104 PFU/mL, while the cell growth remained stable (1.977 OD620 nm) (Figure 3B). The antibiofilm effect of the vB_STM-2 phage on both Salmonella Typhimurium ST-30 and Salmonella Typhimurium ST-37 was closely related, whereas at titers of 106, 105, and 104 PFU/mL, the biofilm was disrupted by 43.6%, 21.2%, and 10.1%, respectively, for Salmonella Typhimurium ST-30 (0.904 OD570 nm) and by 41%, 15.7%, and 9.6%, respectively, for Salmonella Typhimurium ST-37 (1.105 OD570 nm), (Figure 3C,D). For each previous bacterium, no effect on cell growth was observed at the previously used phage titer concentration. Phage vB_STM-2 exhibited moderate to weak strength in the biofilm (0.817 OD570 nm) removal of Salmonella Typhimurium ST-45. The maximum effect reached only 39.8% at a 106 PFU/mL concentration, while it decreased to 28.2% and 15.4% at 105 and 104 PFU/mL, respectively (Figure 3E). Phage vB_STM-2 showed its strongest biofilm removal activity when applied with Salmonella Typhimurium ST-49, and the cell growth (1.811 OD620 nm) remained the same. The biofilm (0.927 OD570 nm) of this bacterium was disrupted by 93.4%, 81%, 73.6% and 59.4% at 106, 105 and 104 PFU/mL of phage titers, respectively (Figure 3F).

3.6. The Ability of the vB_STM-2 Phage as a Natural Antibacterial

Lytic Potency in TSB Medium (Culture Clearance)

The results illustrated in Figure 4A clearly show the efficiency of the vB_STM-2 phage in controlling Salmonella in a liquid medium. The optical density (OD620 nm) of Salmonella Typhimurium culture ST-4 showed 1.65 ± 0.31 OD570 nm at the end of the experiment. On the other hand, the phage-treated culture flask showed no absorbance at any measurement times, except at the first hour (0.10 ± 0.01 OD570 nm) of incubation. In addition, the results obtained from counting the plates confirm the lytic ability of the vB_STM-2 phage. At 3 h of incubation, the colony count was 0.19 ± 0.03 log10 CFU/mL, while no colonies were detected at other times of the experiment (B).

3.7. Control of Salmonella in Food and Phage Stability

In short (7 days) and long (27 days) term assays, both the efficiency and stability of the vB_STM-2 phage were measured in food (chicken breast squares 2 × 2 cm).
Short-term assay: the recoverable log10 of Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) in non-treated phage sections was significantly (p < 0.05) increased by increasing the time. Therefore, the titer was 0.81 ± 0.11 log10 CFU/cm2 on day one, 3.27 ± 0.24 log10 CFU/cm2 on day two, 4.55 ± 0.37 log10 CFU/cm2 on day four, and 7.00 ± 0.63 on the last day. Otherwise, the recoverable log10 of Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) from phage-treated chicken breast cuts was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased, and it was only 0.88 ± 0.17 log10 CFU/cm2 on day 7. In other words, the vB_STM-2 phage reduced Salmonella by 6.12 ± 43 log10 CFU/cm2 on day 7. Nevertheless, the phage showed high stability throughout the experiment times with a recovery titer of 6.87 ± 43 log10 PFU/cm2 on day 7, losing only 1.13 ± 0.16 log10 PFU/cm2 from the initial titer (Figure 5A).
Long-term assay: In this experiment, the duration was increased to 27 days in order to ensure the effectiveness and stability of the vB_STM-2 phage. On days 2 and 27, the log10 recovery of Salmonella from the non-treated chicken breast section was 0.92 ± 0.08 log10 CFU/cm2 and 5.13 ± 0.44 log10 CFU/cm2, respectively. In contrast, there was a highly significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the count of Salmonella recovered from chicken breast cuts treated with phage. At the same two previous times, only 0.11 ± 0.02 log10 CFU/cm2 was recovered on day 2, while 1.10 ± 0.12 log10 CFU/cm2 was recovered on day 27. It is worth noting that the vB_STM-2 phage showed a high stability strength, whereas there was a slight shortage of titers at all times, even on the last day. Accordingly, on day 27, the recovered phage titers were 5.88 ± 0.41 log10 PFU/cm2, and only 2.12 ± 0.22 log10 PFU/cm2 (insignificant) of the original titers were lost (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

The emergency of multiple-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in food has become a major and complex problem for both producers and consumers, posing a serious threat to human public health [17,61,62]. For example, Salmonella Typhimurium has become the most frequent serovar primarily responsible for salmonellosis in humans worldwide [7,8]. Antibiotics are a well-known strategy to control Salmonella [1], but it has acquired resistance to these antimicrobials [17], making it more difficult to resist disease outbreaks [63].
Therefore, this study aimed to search for a safe and effective alternative to control multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and its biofilm by broad-spectrum phage isolation with the string lytic effect.
In this study, Salmonella Typhimurium serovars previously isolated from food sources were confirmed biochemically, serologically, and using the Biomerieux VITEK 2 system. Additionally, all Salmonella Typhimurium serovars used were multi-drug resistant, and nearly half showed strong biofilm production behavior. Many previous studies are in line with our results, where it was found that Salmonella Typhimurium, S. enterica, and S. enteritidis serovars are the most prevalent for the occurrence of salmonellosis outbreaks worldwide [8,64]. Many other studies have also confirmed that the effect of the front-line antibiotics used to arrest Salmonella have become weak or negligible due to bacteria gaining resistance [65,66,67]. In accordance with previous results, antibiotic-resistant genes were common in Salmonella Typhimurium [68]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) announcement that 64.2% of 123 Salmonella Typhimurium strains obtained from pig carcasses were resistant to many antibiotics is concerning [69]. It is worth noting that bacteria may acquire this resistance due to incorrect use, including a lack of need for antibiotics in many cases [70,71,72]. The mechanism by which bacteria can resist the action of antibiotics may be the over-expression of efflux pumps that lead to the active efflux of antibiotics from the bacterial cell and restrict the antibiotics to their target sites by decreasing the selective permeability of the bacterial cell wall. In addition, bacteria may produce target enzymes to circumvent the drug’s antibacterial activity [73,74,75]. Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) was used to isolate phage, as it is the strongest isolate for biofilm production. More than one study states that biofilm is a rising challenge as it gives the pathogen more resistance to antibiotics. Hence, it is difficult to eradicate [76,77,78]. Out of the seven isolated phages, only three (42.8%) phages showed clear lytic plaques, which were named vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3. Among the three isolates, vB_STM-2 belonging to the Myoviridae family was chosen to achieve the desired goal of this study (most potent lytic phage). The results of the lytic activity indicated that 100% of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates and non-Salmonella strains were lysed, including P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. coli. These results align with previous findings in which phages have been developed to deal with MDR Salmonella Typhimurium [32,79]. These findings are in accordance with previous works by Park et al. [26]. Parra and Robeson [27] reported that some polyvalent phages were observed, especially among the phages of the Enterobacteriaceae family. In addition, the study by Malki et al. [28] showed that phages with polyvalent behavior could infect strains from either different genera or species, which is preferable to others. In addition to controlling bacterial resistance by phages, there is recent literature to overcome the problem of bacterial resistance using metal-based antibacterial compounds instead of conventional antibiotics [80].
The previous literature indicated that the Myoviridae family’s phages could potentially control Salmonella [81,82].
Here, vB_STM-2 showed a broad host range of other phages, which is an important charitarian of the use of phages in the treatment of infection, as reported by previous studies [83,84]. In addition, the phage’s polyvalent behavior makes it a preferred choice for use in biocontrol applications [85,86,87].
The differences between phages in their host range may be due to restriction endonucleases changes, non-specific binding receptors [88,89], and the formation of resistance to phage through a variety of mechanisms, known as insensitive bacterial mutants (BIM) [90,91].
In the phage thermal and pH stability study, the vB_STM-2 phage showed durability over a wide range of temperatures and at different pH levels. Consistent with previous studies, phages are stable at various temperatures, pHs, and biotic conditions [92,93]. Additionally, our findings are in agreement with those of Jamalludeen et al. [53]. They decided that most of the phages could resist different pH levels (5–9) without affecting their stability or structure. However, extreme degrees may lead to thickening, deposition, or aggregation of the phages [94].
Our data imply that the vB_STM-2 phage can diminish or eradicate the tested Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4, ST-19, ST-30, ST-37, ST-45, and ST-49) biofilms. In a previous work [82] on Salmonella Typhimurium biofilm, the phage used was able to reduce the biofilm by 44–63%. Here, the removal rate reached 93.4% (e.g., Salmonella Typhimurium ST-49). Concurrent studies confirm the ability of phages to eradicate biofilms in vitro assays [82,95,96]. In a previous study, the biofilms of multi-drug resistant bacteria were overcome by natural antimicrobial agents [86,97]. In an attempt to find an explanation for how the phage attacks the biofilm, it may be due to the phage’s ability to infect cells embedded in biofilm throughout their environment [89]. In addition, the high number of cells within the biofilm protect the phage virions from infection [89]. The mechanism of this action is the penetration of the EPS layers of biofilms, which become less hard [98], less consistent [99,100], or no longer compact [101], and the production of EPS depolymerizes, which can break down the biofilm matrix [102,103].
Our results indicated that the vB_STM-2 phage showed efficiency in inhibiting Salmonella in a phage-treated culture flask (culture clearance). In a liquid medium, phage-treated Salmonella culture showed no absorbance after 3 h of incubation. Following our results, other researchers isolated phages named FGCSSa1, LPST10, LPST18, and LPST23 against Salmonella Typhimurium PT160, which could inhibit growth from growth 2 to 6 hrs [104].
The phage application results showed the efficacy and stability of the vB_STM-2 phage in the elimination of Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) from the chicken breast section with significant (p < 0.05) virion stability. In addition, the severe Salmonella count declined in both the short-term (7 days) and long-term (27 days) assays. Hence, the decrease was from 7 ± 0.63 log10 CFU/cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.17 log10 CFU/cm2 on the seventh day of the short assay, while the count was diminished significantly (p < 0.05) from 5.13 ± 0.44 log10 CFU/cm2 to 1.1 ± 0.12 log10 CFU/cm2 on day 27 of the long-term assay. Interestingly, phage titers remained stable in both periods, with slight insignificant (p < 0.05) losses. Many previous studies on Salmonella have observed that phages could reduce counts in different food matrices [59,105,106,107]. Consistent with our data, a recent study exhibited the stability of phages against Salmonella in chicken breast [82].

5. Conclusions

We can conclude from the obtained results that three phages that showed clear lytic plaques, namely, vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3, were isolated, the most potent of which was vB_STM-2, which belongs to the Myoviridae family. This phage exhibited strong stability at different temperatures and a wide range of pH values. The isolated phage showed high efficacy in reducing Salmonella Typhimurium below the detectable limit throughout liquid media and chicken breast challenges. Additionally, it showed a potential effect in the elimination/reduction of its biofilm. Therefore, this phage is considered a prime candidate for combating multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium and its biofilms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.S., A.A.H. and M.A.A.; data curation, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R. and M.A.A.; formal analysis, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H. and E.E.R.; investigation, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; methodology, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H. and E.E.R.; project administration, A.R.S., A.A.H., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; software, I.M.A.A., A.R.S. and A.A.H.; resources, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; supervision, A.R.S., A.A.H., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; validation, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; visualization, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R., H.E.S. and M.A.A.; writing—original draft, I.M.A.A., A.R.S. and A.A.H.; writing—review and editing, I.M.A.A., A.R.S., A.A.H., E.E.R., H.E.S. and M.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Musyoka, J.N.; Abong’, G.O.; Mbogo, D.M.; Fuchs, R.; Low, J.; Heck, S.; Muzhingi, T. Effects of Acidification and Preservatives on Microbial Growth during Storage of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato Puree. Int. J. Food Sci. 2018, 2018, 8410747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lamas, A.; Regal, P.; Vazquez, B.; Miranda, J.; Cepeda, A.; Franco, C.M. Salmonella and Campylobacter biofilm formation: A comparative assessment from farm to fork. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4014–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abu-Shahba, M.S.; Mansour, M.M.; Mohamed, H.I.; Sofy, M.R. Comparative Cultivation and Biochemical Analysis of Iceberg Lettuce Grown in Sand Soil and Hydroponics with or without Microbubbles and Macrobubbles. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galletti, J.; Tobaldini-Valerio, F.K.; Silva, S.; Kioshima, É.S.; Pereira, L.T.; Bruschi, M.; Negri, M.; Svidzinski, T.I.E. Antibiofilm activity of propolis extract on Fusarium species from onychomycosis. Futur. Microbiol. 2017, 12, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Pobiega, K.; Przybył, J.L.; Żubernik, J.; Gniewosz, M. Prolonging the Shelf Life of Cherry Tomatoes by Pullulan Coating with Ethanol Extract of Propolis During Refrigerated Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 1447–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. CDC. Salmonella Homepage. 2016. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/index.html (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  7. Demirbilek, S.K. Salmonellosis in Animals. In Salmonella—A Re-Emerging Pathogen; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferrari, R.; Rosario, D.K.A.; Neto, A.C.; Mano, S.B.; Figueiredo, E.E.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Worldwide Epidemiology of Salmonella Serovars in Animal-Based Foods: A Meta-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00591-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mueller-Doblies, D.; Speed, K.C.R.; Kidd, S.; Davies, R.H. Salmonella Typhimurium in livestock in Great Britain—Trends observed over a 32-year period. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Majowicz, S.E.; Musto, J.; Scallan, E.; Angulo, F.J.; Kirk, M.; O’Brien, S.J.; Jones, T.F.; Fazil, A.; Hoekstra, R.M. The Global Burden of Nontyphoidal Salmonella Gastroenteritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hernandez, S.M.; Keel, K.; Sanchez, S.; Trees, E.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Adams, J.K.; Cheng, Y.; Ray, A.; Martin, G.; Presotto, A.; et al. Epidemiology of a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhimurium Strain Associated with a Songbird Outbreak. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7290–7298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Guo, C.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Schroeder, C.M.; Pires, S.M.; Ong, K.L.; Hartnett, E.; Naugle, A.; Harman, J.; Bennett, P.; Cieslak, P.; et al. Application of Bayesian Techniques to Model the Burden of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to U.S. Food Commodities at the Point of Processing: Adaptation of a Danish Model. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Marchello, C.S.; Dale, A.P.; Pisharody, S.; Rubach, M.P.; Crump, J.A. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Prevalence of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections among Hospitalized Patients in Africa and Asia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 64, 01974-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. De Carvalho, C.C.C.R. Marine Biofilms: A Successful Microbial Strategy with Economic Implications. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mah, T.-F. Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Futur. Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Jiang, Y.; Geng, M.; Bai, L. Targeting Biofilms Therapy: Current Research Strategies and Development Hurdles. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Agyare, C.; Boamah, V.E.; Zumbi, C.N.; Osei, F.B. Antibiotic Use in Poultry Production and Its Effects on Bacterial Resistance. In Antimicrobial Resistance—A Global Threat; Kumar, Y., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 33–51. ISBN 978-1-78985-783-2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moye, Z.D.; Woolston, J.; Sulakvelidze, A. Bacteriophage Applications for Food Production and Processing. Viruses 2018, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. LeLièvre, V.; Besnard, A.; Schlusselhuber, M.; Desmasures, N.; Dalmasso, M. Phages for biocontrol in foods: What opportunities for Salmonella sp. control along the dairy food chain? Food Microbiol. 2019, 78, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García-Anaya, M.C.; Sepulveda, D.R.; Sáenz-Mendoza, A.I.; Rios-Velasco, C.; Zamudio-Flores, P.B.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H. Phages as biocontrol agents in dairy products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 95, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, F.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, F.; Ren, J.; Sun, J.; Qu, Z.; Zhuge, X.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; et al. Isolation and characterization of a broad-spectrum phage of multiple drug resistant Salmonella and its therapeutic utility in mice. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abhisingha, M.; Dumnil, J.; Pitaksutheepong, C. Efficiency of phage cocktail to reduce Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken meat during low temperature storage. LWT 2020, 129, 109580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Z.; Ma, W.; Li, W.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. A broad-spectrum phage controls multidrug-resistant Salmonella in liquid eggs. Food Res. Int. 2020, 132, 109011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petsong, K.; Benjakul, S.; Vongkamjan, K. Evaluation of storage conditions and efficiency of a novel microencapsulated Salmonella phage cocktail for controlling S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium in-vitro and in fresh foods. Food Microbiol. 2019, 83, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ackermann, H.-W.; Audurier, A.; Berthiaume, L.; Jones, L.A.; Mayo, J.A.; Vidaver, A.K. Guidelines for Bacteriophage Characterization. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1978, 23, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, M.; Lee, J.-H.; Shin, H.; Kim, M.; Choi, J.; Kang, D.-H.; Heu, S.; Ryu, S. Characterization and Comparative Genomic Analysis of a Novel Bacteriophage, SFP10, Simultaneously Inhibiting both Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 78, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Parra, B.; Robeson, J. Selection of polyvalent bacteriophages infecting Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 21, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Malki, K.; Kula, A.; Bruder, K.; Sible, E.; Hatzopoulos, T.; Steidel, S.; Watkins, S.C.; Putonti, C. Bacteriophages isolated from Lake Michigan demonstrate broad host-range across several bacterial phyla. Virol. J. 2015, 12, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Hungaro, H.M.; Mendonça, R.C.S.; Gouvêa, D.M.; Vanetti, M.C.D.; de Oliveira Pinto, C.L. Use of bacteriophages to reduce Salmonella in chicken skin in comparison with chemical agents. Food Res. Int. 2013, 52, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Augustine, J.; Bhat, S.G. Biocontrol of salmonella enteritidis in spiked chicken cuts by lytic bacteriophages φsp-1 and φsp-3. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 55, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bigwood, T.; Hudson, J.A.; Billington, C.; Carey-Smith, G.V.; Heinemann, J.A. Phage inactivation of foodborne pathogens on cooked and raw meat. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hooton, S.P.; Atterbury, R.; Connerton, I.F. Application of a bacteriophage cocktail to reduce Salmonella Typhimurium U288 contamination on pig skin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kocharunchitt, C.; Ross, T.; McNeil, D. Use of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents to control Salmonella associated with seed sprouts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 128, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Modi, R.; Hirvi, Y.; Hill, A.; Griffiths, M.W. Effect of Phage on Survival of Salmonella Enteritidis during Manufacture and Storage of Cheddar Cheese Made from Raw and Pasteurized Milk. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silliker, J.; Taylor, W. Isolation of salmonellae from food samples: Ii. The effect of added food samples upon the performance of enrichment broths. Appl. Microbiol. 1958, 6, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. ISO. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. Amendment 1: Anex d: Detection of Salmonella spp. In Animal Faeces and in Environmental Samples from the Primary Production Stage; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sieuwerts, S.; De Bok, F.; Mols, E.; De Vos, W.; Vlieg, J.V.H. A simple and fast method for determining colony forming units. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Søgaard, M.; Nørgaard, M.; Schønheyder, H.C. First Notification of Positive Blood Cultures and the High Accuracy of the Gram Stain Report. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Douglas, W.; Waltman, R.; Gast, K.; Mallinson, E. Salmonellosis. A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens, 4th ed.; American Association of Avian Pathologists: Kenett Square, PA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bossé, J. Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines. Can. Vet. J. 2000, 39, 183. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kauffman, G. Kauffmann white scheme. J. Acta. Path. Microbiol. Sci. 1974, 61, 385. [Google Scholar]
  42. Santiviago, C.; Toro, C.S.; Bucarey, S.A.; Mora, G.C. A chromosomal region surrounding the ompD porin gene marks a genetic difference between Salmonella typhi and the majority of Salmonella serovars. Microbiology 2001, 147, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Bauer, A. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. NCCLS/CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, MI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stepanović, S.; Vuković, D.; Hola, V.; DI Bonaventura, G.; Djukić, S.; Ćirković, I.; Ruzicka, F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: Overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007, 115, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bibi, Z.; Abbas, Z.; Rehman, S.U. The phage P.E1isolated from hospital sewage reduces the growth of Escherichia coli. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 26, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Capra, M.; Quiberoni, A.; Reinheimer, J. Thermal and chemical resistance of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei bacteriophages. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sangha, K.K.; Kumar, B.V.S.; Agrawal, R.K.; Deka, D.; Verma, R. Proteomic Characterization of Lytic Bacteriophages of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Sewage Affluent of India. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 265298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Mirzaei, M.K.; Nilsson, A.S. Correction: Isolation of Phages for Phage Therapy: A Comparison of Spot Tests and Efficiency of Plating Analyses for Determination of Host Range and Efficacy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Ackermann, H.-W. Bacteriophage Electron Microscopy. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 82, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Accolas, J.-P.; Spillmann, H. The Morphology of Six Bacteriophages of Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1979, 47, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Philipson, L.; Albertsson, P.; Frick, G. The purification and concentration of viruses by aqueous polymer phase systems. Virology 1960, 11, 553–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jamalludeen, N.; Johnson, R.P.; Friendship, R.; Kropinski, A.; Lingohr, E.J.; Gyles, C.L. Isolation and characterization of nine bacteriophages that lyse O149 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Veter Microbiol. 2007, 124, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bekir, K.; Ben Abdallah, F.; Ellafi, A.; Bakhrouf, A. Adherence assays and slime production of Staphylococcus aureus strains after their incubation in seawater microcosms. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Else, T.A.; Pantle, C.R.; Amy, P.S. Boundaries for Biofilm Formation: Humidity and Temperature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5006–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kostaki, M.; Chorianopoulos, N.; Braxou, E.; Nychas, G.-J.; Giaouris, E. Differential Biofilm Formation and Chemical Disinfection Resistance of Sessile Cells of Listeria monocytogenes Strains under Monospecies and Dual-Species (with Salmonella enterica) Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2586–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kusumaningrum, H.D.; Van Asselt, E.D.; Beumer, R.R.; Zwietering, M.H. A Quantitative Analysis of Cross-Contamination of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. via Domestic Kitchen Surfaces. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1892–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. FDA. Bacteriological Analytical Manual; Food and Drug Administration: Arlington, VA, USA, 2002.
  59. Spricigo, D.A.; Bardina, C.; Cortés, P.; Llagostera, M. Use of a bacteriophage cocktail to control Salmonella in food and the food industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 165, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tomat, D.; Casabonne, C.; Aquili, V.; Balagué, C.; Quiberoni, A. Evaluation of a novel cocktail of six lytic bacteriophages against Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in broth, milk and meat. Food Microbiol. 2018, 76, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sofy, A.; Sofy, M.; Hmed, A.; Dawoud, R.; Alnaggar, A.; Soliman, A.; El-Dougdoug, N. Ameliorating the Adverse Effects of Tomato mosaic tobamovirus Infecting Tomato Plants in Egypt by Boosting Immunity in Tomato Plants Using Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Molecules 2021, 26, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sofy, A.; Sofy, M.; Hmed, A.; Dawoud, R.; Refaey, E.; Mohamed, H.; El-Dougdoug, N. Molecular Characterization of the Alfalfa mosaic virus Infecting Solanum melongena in Egypt and the Control of Its Deleterious Effects with Melatonin and Salicylic Acid. Plants 2021, 10, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fong, K.; Mu, K.; Rheault, J.-G.; Levesque, R.C.; Kitts, D.D.; Delaquis, P.; Goodridge, L.; Wang, S. Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants of Antimicrobial-Resistant Salmonella enterica are Altered in their Tetracycline Resistance and Virulence in Caco-2 Intestinal Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Heredia, N.; García, S. Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Browne, A.J.; Hamadani, B.H.K.; Kumaran, E.; Rao, P.; Longbottom, J.; Harriss, E.; Moore, C.; Dunachie, S.; Basnyat, B.; Baker, S.; et al. Drug-resistant enteric fever worldwide, 1990 to 2018: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Xu, X.; Biswas, S.; Gu, G.; Elbediwi, M.; Li, Y.; Yue, M. Characterization of Multidrug Resistance Patterns of Emerging Salmonella enterica Serovar Rissen along the Food Chain in China. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elshaarawy, R.F.; Mustafa, F.H.; Sofy, A.R.; Hmed, A.A.; Janiak, C. A new synthetic antifouling coatings integrated novel aminothiazole-functionalized ionic liquids motifs with enhanced antibacterial performance. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Michael, G.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic nontyphoidal Salmonella: An alarming trend? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2016. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Eng, S.-K.; Pusparajah, P.; Ab Mutalib, N.-S.; Ser, H.-L.; Chan, K.-G.; Lee, L.-H. Salmonella: A review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front. Life Sci. 2015, 8, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Megahed, A.; Dougdoug, K.A.E.; Othman, B.; Lashin, S.; Ibrahim, M.; Sofy, A. A New Egyptian Satellite Strain of Cucumber Mosaic Cucumovirus. Int. J. Virol. 2012, 8, 240–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Megahed, A.; El-Dougdou, K.A.; Othman, B.; Lashin, S.; Ibrahim, M.; Sofy, A. Induction of Resistance in Tomato Plants Against Tomato mosaic tobamovirus Using Beneficial Microbial Isolates. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Stefanucci, A.; Amato, J.; Brancaccio, D.; Pagano, B.; Randazzo, A.; Santoro, F.; Mayol, L.; Learte-Aymamí, S.; Rodriguez, J.; Mascareñas, J.L.; et al. A novel β-hairpin peptide derived from the ARC repressor selectively interacts with the major groove of B-DNA. Bioorganic Chem. 2021, 112, 104836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zare, N.; Makvandi, P.; Ashtari, B.; Rossi, F.; Motahari, A.; Perale, G. Progress in Conductive Polyaniline-Based Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications: A Review. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zare, E.N.; Jamaledin, R.; Naserzadeh, P.; Afjeh-Dana, E.; Ashtari, B.; Hosseinzadeh, M.; Vecchione, R.; Wu, A.; Tay, F.R.; Borzacchiello, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanostructures/PLGA Nanocomposites: Antimicrobial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Their Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 12, 3279–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, X.-H.; Lee, J.-H. Antibiofilm agents: A new perspective for antimicrobial strategy. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tasneem, U.; Yasin, N.; Nisa, I.; Shah, F.; Rasheed, U.; Momin, F.; Zaman, S.; Qasim, M. Biofilm producing bacteria: A serious threat to public health in developing countries. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 01, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sharma, D.; Misba, L.; Khan, A.U. Antibiotics versus biofilm: An emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jung, L.-S.; Ding, T.; Ahn, J. Evaluation of lytic bacteriophages for control of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2017, 16, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Evans, A.; Kavanagh, K.A. Evaluation of metal-based antimicrobial compounds for the treatment of bacterial pathogens. J. Med Microbiol. 2021, 70, 001363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guenther, S.; Herzig, O.; Fieseler, L.; Klumpp, J.; Loessner, M.J. Biocontrol of Salmonella Typhimurium in RTE foods with the virulent bacteriophage FO1-E2. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Islam, M.; Zhou, Y.; Liang, L.; Nime, I.; Liu, K.; Yan, T.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Application of a Phage Cocktail for Control of Salmonella in Foods and Reducing Biofilms. Viruses 2019, 11, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Lu, T.K.; Koeris, M.S. The next generation of bacteriophage therapy. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chan, B.K.; Abedon, S.T. Phage Therapy Pharmacology. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sofy, A.R.; El Haliem, N.F.A.; Refaey, E.E.; Hmed, A.A. Polyvalent Phage CoNShP-3 as a Natural Antimicrobial Agent Showing Lytic and Antibiofilm Activities against Antibiotic-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Strains. Foods 2020, 9, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sofy, A.R.; Aboseidah, A.A.; El-Morsi, E.-S.; Azmy, H.A.; Hmed, A.A. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of New Antimicrobials as an Urgent Need to Counteract Stubborn Multidrug-resistant Bacteria. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 14, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. El-Sheshtawy, H.S.; Sofy, M.R.; Ghareeb, D.A.; Yacout, G.A.; Eldemellawy, M.A.; Ibrahim, B.M. Eco-friendly polyurethane acrylate (PUA)/natural filler-based composite as an antifouling product for marine coating. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 7023–7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bielke, L.; Higgins, S.; Donoghue, A.; Hargis, B.M. Salmonella Host Range of Bacteriophages That Infect Multiple Genera. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 2536–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Pires, D.P.; Oliveira, H.; Melo, L.; Sillankorva, S.; Azeredo, J. Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases: Their diversity and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. O’Flynn, G.; Coffey, A.; Fitzgerald, G.; Ross, R. The newly isolated lytic bacteriophages st104a and st104b are highly virulent against Salmonella enterica. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sofy, A.R.; Mahfouze, S.A.; El-Enany, M.A. Isozyme markers for response of wild potato species to potato spindle tuber viroid egyptian isolate. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013, 27, 1010–1022. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ahmadi, H.; Radford, D.; Kropinski, A.M.; Lim, L.-T.; Balamurugan, S. Thermal-Stability and Reconstitution Ability of Listeria Phages P100 and A511. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sommer, J.; Trautner, C.; Witte, A.K.; Fister, S.; Schoder, D.; Rossmanith, P.; Mester, P.-J. Don’t Shut the Stable Door after the Phage Has Bolted—The Importance of Bacteriophage Inactivation in Food Environments. Viruses 2019, 11, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Jepson, C.D.; March, J.B. Bacteriophage lambda is a highly stable DNA vaccine delivery vehicle. Vaccine 2004, 22, 2413–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Magin, V.; Garrec, N.; Andrés, Y. Selection of Bacteriophages to Control In Vitro 24 h Old Biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Drinking and Thermal Water. Viruses 2019, 11, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Sofy, A.; El-Dougdoug, N.; Refaey, E.; Dawoud, R.; Hmed, A. Characterization and Full Genome Sequence of Novel KPP-5 Lytic Phage against Klebsiella pneumoniae Responsible for Recalcitrant Infection. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sofy, M.R.; Aboseidah, A.A.; Heneidak, S.A.; Ahmed, H.R. ACC deaminase containing endophytic bacteria ameliorate salt stress in Pisum sativum through reduced oxidative damage and induction of antioxidative defense systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 40971–40991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Landers, T.F.; Cohen, B.; Wittum, T.E.; Larson, E.L. A Review of Antibiotic Use in Food Animals: Perspective, Policy, and Potential. Public Health Rep. 2012, 127, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Lee, N.-K.; Paik, H.-D. Status, Antimicrobial Mechanism, and Regulation of Natural Preservatives in Livestock Food Systems. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Juhaimi, F.A.L.; Ghafoor, K.; Özcan, M.M.; Jahurul, M.H.A.; Babiker, E.E.; Jinap, S.; Sahena, F.; Sharifudin, M.S.; Zaidul, I.S.M. Effect of various food processing and handling methods on preservation of natural antioxidants in fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3872–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Harper, D.R.; Parracho, H.M.R.T.; Walker, J.; Sharp, R.J.; Hughes, G.; Werthén, M.; Lehman, S.M.; Morales, S. Bacteriophages and Biofilms. Antibiotics 2014, 3, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pennone, V.; Sanz-Gaitero, M.; O’Connor, P.; Coffey, A.; Jordan, K.; Van Raaij, M.J.; McAuliffe, O.; Gaitero, S.-; Connor, O.; Raaij, V. Inhibition of L. monocytogenes Biofilm Formation by the Amidase Domain of the Phage vB_LmoS_293 Endolysin. Viruses 2019, 11, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Huang, C.; Virk, S.M.; Shi, J.; Zhou, Y.; Willias, S.P.; Morsy, M.K.; Abdelnabby, H.E.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Isolation, Characterization, and Application of Bacteriophage LPSE1 against Salmonella enterica in Ready to Eat (RTE) Foods. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Goodridge, L.D.; Bisha, B. Phage-based biocontrol strategies to reduce foodborne pathogens in foods. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Grant, A.; Hashem, F.; Parveen, S. Salmonella and Campylobacter: Antimicrobial resistance and bacteriophage control in poultry. Food Microbiol. 2016, 53, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Osvaldo, L.O.P.C.; Nohelia, C.D.C.; Karina, R.; Bal, C.C.O.; López-Cuevas, O.; Campo, N.C.-D.; Ramírez, K.; Chaidez, C. Biocontrol of Salmonella Typhimurium growth in tomato surface by bacteriophage P22. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 10, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 13 11602 g001 550
Figure 1. Salmonella Typhimurium phage characterization. (A) Clear, large circular plaques (≃4.5 mm in diameter) were produced on the double-layered agar plate. Electron micrographs at 80,000× of (B) vB_STS-1 phage (Siphovirus), (C) vB_STM-2 phage (Myovirus) and (D) vB_STS-3 phage (Siphovirus).
Figure 1. Salmonella Typhimurium phage characterization. (A) Clear, large circular plaques (≃4.5 mm in diameter) were produced on the double-layered agar plate. Electron micrographs at 80,000× of (B) vB_STS-1 phage (Siphovirus), (C) vB_STM-2 phage (Myovirus) and (D) vB_STS-3 phage (Siphovirus).
Sustainability 13 11602 g001
Sustainability 13 11602 g002 550
Figure 2. Virion stability of the vB_STM-2 phage at different times (1, 2, 4, 12, 24 h and 7 days) (A) Thermal tolerance at (−20, 4, 25, 37, 55, 65 and 75 °C, and (B) pH values of 4, 7, 9 and 11. The two experiments were performed in triplicate with standard deviation (±SD). One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Virion stability of the vB_STM-2 phage at different times (1, 2, 4, 12, 24 h and 7 days) (A) Thermal tolerance at (−20, 4, 25, 37, 55, 65 and 75 °C, and (B) pH values of 4, 7, 9 and 11. The two experiments were performed in triplicate with standard deviation (±SD). One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 11602 g002
Sustainability 13 11602 g003 550
Figure 3. The qualitative anti-biofilm capacity of the vB_STM-2 phage in 96-well microplate against biofilms of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates (A) ST-4, (B) ST-19, (C) ST-30, (D) ST-37, (E) ST-45, (F) ST-49 and (G) 96-wells of tissue culture plates. The vertical wells of the plate on the left are the antibiofilm (phage-treated) wells, while those on the right re the biofilm controls (without adding phage) for these bacteria. One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The qualitative anti-biofilm capacity of the vB_STM-2 phage in 96-well microplate against biofilms of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates (A) ST-4, (B) ST-19, (C) ST-30, (D) ST-37, (E) ST-45, (F) ST-49 and (G) 96-wells of tissue culture plates. The vertical wells of the plate on the left are the antibiofilm (phage-treated) wells, while those on the right re the biofilm controls (without adding phage) for these bacteria. One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 11602 g003
Sustainability 13 11602 g004 550
Figure 4. The lytic ability of the vB_STM-2 phage in the challenge of Salmonella Typhimurium ST-4 serovar in (A) TSB medium (absorbance of OD620 nm) and (B) TSA medium (colonies count CFU/mL). Experiments were performed in triplicate at each time point with a standard deviation (±SD). One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The lytic ability of the vB_STM-2 phage in the challenge of Salmonella Typhimurium ST-4 serovar in (A) TSB medium (absorbance of OD620 nm) and (B) TSA medium (colonies count CFU/mL). Experiments were performed in triplicate at each time point with a standard deviation (±SD). One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 11602 g004
Sustainability 13 11602 g005 550
Figure 5. Efficacy and virion stability of the vB_STM-2 phage in eliminating Salmonella Typhimurium ST-4 serovar after (A) 7 days at 4 °C, and (B) long-term assay (27 days) at −20 °C. One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Efficacy and virion stability of the vB_STM-2 phage in eliminating Salmonella Typhimurium ST-4 serovar after (A) 7 days at 4 °C, and (B) long-term assay (27 days) at −20 °C. One-way ANOVA was used to achieve quantitative analyses with the least significant difference (LSD) test variance analysis at p < 0.05.
Sustainability 13 11602 g005
Table
Table 1. Source, antibiotic-resistance profile, and biofilm characteristics of Salmonella serovars used in this study. Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) was used for phage isolation and propagation. All serovars were involved in the host range determination.
Table 1. Source, antibiotic-resistance profile, and biofilm characteristics of Salmonella serovars used in this study. Salmonella Typhimurium (ST-4) was used for phage isolation and propagation. All serovars were involved in the host range determination.
SerovarsIsolate IDSourceAntibiotic-Resistance ProfileOptical Density of Cell Growth (OD620 nm)Optical Density of Biofilm (OD570 nm)Interpretation
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-4Chicken (Egypt)Resistant1.8470.947Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-7Chicken (Egypt)Resistant0.9980.411Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-9Chicken (Egypt)Resistant0.8760.563Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-14Bovine (Egypt)Resistant1.0220.744Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-16Bovine (Egypt)Resistant0.7730.117Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-19Bovine (Egypt)Resistant1.9771.081Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-21Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant0.7120.108Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-22Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant1.4460.742Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-27Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant1.7840.748Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-30Chicken (Egypt)Resistant1.7090.904Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-33Chicken (Egypt)Resistant0.9930.321Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-35Chicken (EgyptResistant1.0030.411Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-36Chicken (Egypt)Resistant0.8780.103Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-37Chicken (Egypt)Resistant2.0471.105Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-38Chicken (Egypt)Resistant0.7880.119Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-41Bovine (Egypt)Resistant0.9360.366Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-43Bovine (Egypt)Resistant1.1710.773Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-45Bovine (Egypt)Resistant1.6640.817Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-47Bovine (Egypt)Resistant0.8990.541Moderate
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-49Bovine (Egypt)Resistant1.8110.927Strong
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-53Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant0.6590.173Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-55Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant0.7440.196Weak
Salmonella TyphimuriumST-56Dairy products (Egypt)Resistant1.0220.511Moderate
Table
Table 2. Spot test and EOP by the vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3 phages against 23 Salmonella Typhimurium serovars and other bacterial strains.
Table 2. Spot test and EOP by the vB_STS-1, vB_STM-2, and vB_STS-3 phages against 23 Salmonella Typhimurium serovars and other bacterial strains.
BacteriaPhagesBacteriaPhages
vB_STS-1vB_STM-2vB_STS-3vB_STS-1vB_STM-2vB_STS-3
STEOPSTEOPSTEOPSTEOPSTEOPSTEOP
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-4) Host		+M+H+HSalmonella Typhimurium
ST-47		+L+H+L
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-7)		+H+H+MSalmonella Typhimurium
ST-49		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-9)		−N+M−NSalmonella Typhimurium
(ST-53)		+H+H+M
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-14)		−N+H−NSalmonella Typhimurium
(ST-55)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-16)		+H+H+MSalmonella Typhimurium
(ST-56)		+H+H+M
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-19)		+M+H+MP. aeruginosa
(PsaCI-1)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-21)		−N+M+MP. aeruginosa
(PsaCI-2)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-22)		−N+H−NP. aeruginosa
(PsaFI-1)		−N+H−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-27)		+M+H+MP. aeruginosa
(PsaFI-2)		−N+H−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-30)		+H+H−NP. aeruginosa
(PsaFI-1)		−N+H−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-33)		−N+M−NS. aureus
(SaFI-1)		−N+L−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-35)		+H+H+HS. aureus
(SaFI-2)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-36)		−N+M−NS. aureus
(SaFI-3)		−N+L−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-37)		+M+H−NE. coli
(EcCI-1)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-38)		+M+H+ME. coli
(EcCI-2)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-41)		+L+H−NE. coli
(EcCI-3)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-43)		+L+H−NE. coli
(EcCI-4)		−N+M−N
Salmonella Typhimurium
(ST-45)		+M+H+LK. pneumoniae
(KpCI-1)		−N−N−N
The brackets inside the bacterial column in the table indicate the isolate ID, ST: spot-assay technique, +: positive reaction (the isolate caused lysis by the phage), −: negative reaction (the isolate does not cause lysis by the phage), EOP; efficiency of plating, H: high efficiency of plating (0.5–1.0), M: moderate efficiency of plating (0.2–0.4), L: low efficiency of plating (0.001–0.1), N: no efficiency of plating (inefficient) (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelhadi, I.M.A.; Sofy, A.R.; Hmed, A.A.; Refaey, E.E.; Soweha, H.E.; Abbas, M.A. Discovery of Polyvalent Myovirus (vB_STM-2) Phage as a Natural Antimicrobial System to Lysis and Biofilm Removal of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Various Food Sources. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111602

AMA Style

Abdelhadi IMA, Sofy AR, Hmed AA, Refaey EE, Soweha HE, Abbas MA. Discovery of Polyvalent Myovirus (vB_STM-2) Phage as a Natural Antimicrobial System to Lysis and Biofilm Removal of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Various Food Sources. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21):11602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelhadi, Iman M. A., Ahmed R. Sofy, Ahmed A. Hmed, Ehab E. Refaey, Hany E. Soweha, and Mohamed A. Abbas. 2021. "Discovery of Polyvalent Myovirus (vB_STM-2) Phage as a Natural Antimicrobial System to Lysis and Biofilm Removal of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Various Food Sources" Sustainability 13, no. 21: 11602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111602

APA Style

Abdelhadi, I. M. A., Sofy, A. R., Hmed, A. A., Refaey, E. E., Soweha, H. E., & Abbas, M. A. (2021). Discovery of Polyvalent Myovirus (vB_STM-2) Phage as a Natural Antimicrobial System to Lysis and Biofilm Removal of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolates from Various Food Sources. Sustainability, 13(21), 11602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop