Women Entrepreneurs’ Adoption of Mobile Applications for Business Sustainability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Technology Adoption by Women Entrepreneurs
2.2. Technology Adoption and Entrepreneurship Sustainability
3. Theoretical Background
4. Methodology and Data Collection
5. Results
5.1. Measurement Model
5.2. Structural Model and Hypothesis Testing
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2021).
- Woźniak, M. Sustainable Approach in IT Project Management—Methodology Choice vs. Client Satisfaction. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemba, E. The contribution of ICT adoption to the sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2019, 59, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziemba, E. (Ed.) Towards a Sustainable Information Society: People, Business and Public Administration Perspectives; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, I.; Shim, D. IT Adoption and Sustainable Growth of Firms in Different Industries—Are the Benefits Still Expected? Sustainability 2020, 12, 9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiong, J.; Qureshi, S. A model of ICTs adoption for sustainable development: An investigation of small business in the United States and China. In Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 4197–4206. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/isqafacproc/50 (accessed on 4 October 2021).
- Abed, S.S. Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 53, 102118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhowal, C. Information and Communication Technology (ICT): Opportunities or Threats for Women Entrepreneurs–An Emperical Survey. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3574023 (accessed on 4 October 2021).
- Yoon, C.H.; Costello, F.J.; Kim, C. Assisting Sustainable Entrepreneurial Activities through the Analysis of Mobile IT Services’ Success and Failure Factors. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jin, S.H.; Choi, S.O. The effect of innovation capability on business performance: A focus on IT and business service companies. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al Omoush, K.S.; Al-Qirem, R.M.; Al Hawatmah, Z.M. The degree of e-business entrepreneurship and long-term sustainability: An institutional perspective. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2018, 16, 29–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuryyev, G.; Wang, Y.P.; Achyldurdyyeva, J.; Jaw, B.S.; Yeh, Y.S.; Lin, H.T.; Wu, L.F. Blockchain technology adoption behavior and sustainability of the business in tourism and hospitality SMEs: An empirical study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orobia, L.A.; Tusiime, I.; Mwesigwa, R.; Ssekiziyivu, B. Entrepreneurial framework conditions and business sustainability among the youth and women entrepreneurs. Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep. 2020, 14, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasanna, R.P.I.R.; Jayasundara, J.M.S.B.; Naradda Gamage, S.K.; Ekanayake, E.M.S.; Rajapakshe, P.S.K.; Abeyrathne, G.A.K.N.J. Sustainability of smes in the competition: A systemic review on technological challenges and sme performance. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhagat, R.; Sambargi, S. Evaluation of personal innovativeness and perceived expertise on digital marketing adoption by women entrepreneurs of micro and small enterprises. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2019, 6, 338–351. [Google Scholar]
- Florian, A.; Montero, C.S.; Mbise, E.R. Mobile technology for women entrepreneurs in Iringa, Tanzania: User requirements and architectural design. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE AFRICON, Cape Town, South Africa, 18–20 September 2017; pp. 497–503. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, S.; Gupta, S.D.; Upadhyay, P. Technology adoption and entrepreneurial orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 160, 120236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irene, B.N.O. Technopreneurship: A Discursive Analysis of the Impact of Technology on the Success of Women Entrepreneurs in South Africa. In Digital Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 147–173. [Google Scholar]
- Jose, S. Strategic use of digital promotion strategies among female emigrant entrepreneurs in UAE. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2018, 13, 1699–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komunte, M. Usage of mobile technology in women entrepreneurs: A case study of Uganda. Afr. J. Inf. Syst. 2015, 7, 52–74. [Google Scholar]
- Ajumobi, D.O.; Kyobe, M. Alignment of human competencies with mobile phone technology and business strategies by women-LED SMEs in South Africa. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2017, 80, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Komunte, M.; Rwashana, A.S.; Nabukenya, J. Comparative analysis of mobile phone usage among women entrepreneurs in Uganda and Kenya. Afr. J. Comput. ICT 2012, 5, 74–86. [Google Scholar]
- Kapinga, A.F.; Suero Montero, C.; Mbise, E.R. Mobile marketing application for entrepreneurship development: Codesign with women entrepreneurs in Iringa, Tanzania. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2019, 85, e12073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Srinivasan, N. Mobile Applications: A Game Changer for Rural Women Entrepreneurs? In Unveiling Women’s Leadership; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2015; pp. 126–136. [Google Scholar]
- Mutisya, C.; Kiai, W.; Ndati, N. Extent of Adoption And Usage of Mobile Phone Services in Empowering Women Entrepreneurs in Machakos County, Kenya. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2016, 21, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathye, M.; Prasad, B.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, P.; Sathye, S. Mobile Value Added Services for Inclusive growth: A Study of women micro-Entrepreneurs in Fiji. In Proceedings of the PACIS 2014 Proceedings, Chengdu, China, 24–28 June 2014; pp. 149–162. [Google Scholar]
- Lingyan, M.; Qamruzzaman, M.; Adow, A.H.E. Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2942. [Google Scholar]
- Gichuki, C.N.; Mulu-Mutuku, M. Determinants of awareness and adoption of mobile money technologies: Evidence from women micro entrepreneurs in Kenya. In Women’s Studies International Forum; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2018; Volume 67, pp. 18–22. [Google Scholar]
- Ziemba, E. The contribution of ICT adoption to sustainability: Households’ perspective. Inf. Technol. People 2019, 32, 731–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, M.T.; Sharmin, F. An exploratory investigation of facebook live marketing by women entrepreneurs in bangladesh. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 415–430. [Google Scholar]
- Scuotto, V.; Serravalle, F.; Murray, A.; Viassone, M. The shift towards a digital business model: A strategic decision for the female entrepreneur. In Women Entrepreneurs and Strategic Decision Making in the Global Economy; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 120–143. [Google Scholar]
- Hussain, B.M.; Chen, D. Information & Communication Technology (ICT) Can Change the Way of Women Entrepreneurs Run their Businesses: A Case Study in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI, USA, 19–23 August 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Mustafa, M.; Mazhar, N.; Asghar, A.; Usmani, M.Z.; Razaq, L.; Anderson, R. Digital Financial Needs of Micro-entrepreneur Women in Pakistan: Is Mobile Money the Answer? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4–9 May 2019; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, S.F.A.; Nurunnabi, M.; Hussain, K.; Shan, X. Smartphone-based m-shopping behavior and innovative entrepreneurial tendency among women in emerging Asia. Int. J. Gend. Entrep. 2020, 12, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salam, A. Impact of Digitalization on Woman Entrepreneurs. Int. J. Recent Trends Bus. Tour. 2018, 2, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, S.; Shivani, S. Modified UTAUT2 to Determine Intention and Use of E-Commerce Technology Among Micro & Small Women Entrepreneurs in Jharkhand, India. In International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 688–701. [Google Scholar]
- Sathye, S.; Prasad, B.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, P.; Sathye, M. Factors influencing the intention to use of mobile value-added services by women-owned microenterprises in Fiji. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2018, 84, e12016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suseno, Y.; Abbott, L. Women entrepreneurs’ digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 2021, 31, 717–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, A.; Dutta, S. Empowering Women Entrepreneurs in India With ICT Applications. In Handbook of Research on Women’s Issues and Rights in the Developing World; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 269–280. [Google Scholar]
- Sathya, P.; Prabhakar, S.M. A Study on the use of Whatsapp for E-Commerce by Women Entrepreneurs with Special Reference to Women Clothing and Accessories. Res. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2018, 9, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gnanasaranya, S. Adoption of ICTs by Women Micro-entrepreneurs in Rural Areas-A Study in Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, India. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. Pract. 2017, 5, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
- Iqbal, T. Understanding the Perception of Woman Entrepreneurs and their Adoption of Social Media: Strategies and Challenges in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Entrep. Educ. 2020, 23, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Amue, G.J.; Igwe, S.R.; Abiye, H. ICT entrepreneurship and small business innovation: A mechanism for sustainability. Eur. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Ejemeyovwi, J.O.; Osabuohien, E.S.; Bowale, E.K.; Abuh, O.O.; Adedoyin, J.P.; Ayanda, B. Information and communication technology adoption and innovation for sustainable entrepreneurship. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 2019; p. 022085. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M. Factors versus composites: Guidelines for choosing the right structural equation modeling method. Proj. Manag. J. 2019, 50, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mueller, R.O.; Hancock, G.R. Structural Equation Modelling; Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Constructs | Measuring Items | Validation of the Items |
---|---|---|
Performance Expectancy (PE) | PE1: I would find mobile applications useful in my daily life. PE2: Using mobile applications enables me to accomplish tasks more quickly. PE3: Using mobile applications increases my productivity. | [6] |
Effort Expectancy (EE) | EE1: My interaction with mobile applications would be clear and understandable. EE2: It would be easy for me to become skilful at using mobile applications. EE3: I would find mobile applications easy to use. EE4: Learning how to use mobile applications is easy for me. | [6] |
Social Influence (SI) | SI1: People who influence my behaviour think that I should use mobile applications. SI2: People who are important to me think I should use mobile applications. SI3: In general, people whose opinion I value have supported the use of mobile applications. | [6] |
Facilitating Conditions (FC) | FC1: I have the resources necessary to use mobile applications. FC2: I have the knowledge necessary to use mobile applications. FC3: Mobile applications are not compatible with other systems I use. FC4: I can get help from others when I have difficulties using mobile applications. | [6] |
Behavioural Intention (BI) | BI1: I intend to use mobile applications in the future. BI2: I predict I would use mobile applications in the future. BI3: I plan to use mobile applications frequently. | [6] |
Variable | Group | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|---|
Age | ≥18–20 | 75 | 22.7 |
21–29 | 215 | 65.2 | |
30–39 | 36 | 10.9 | |
40–49 | 3 | 0.9 | |
50 and above | 1 | 0.3 | |
Total | 330 | 100.0 | |
Education | Less than High School | 1 | 0.3 |
High School | 156 | 47.3 | |
Diploma | 25 | 7.6 | |
Bachelor | 137 | 41.5 | |
Postgraduate | 11 | 3.3 | |
Total | 330 | 100.0 |
Variable | Group | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|---|
Mobile applications Experience | Less than 1 year | 149 | 45.2 |
1–2 years | 72 | 21.8 | |
3–5 years | 67 | 20.3 | |
More than 5 years | 42 | 12.7 | |
Total | 330 | 100.0 |
Constructs | Sample | Total Items | Items after Deleting | Cronbach’s Alpha | Reliability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Expectancy | 330 | 3 | 3 | 0.736 | Good |
Effort Expectancy | 330 | 4 | 3 (EE1) | 0.705 | Good |
Social Influence | 330 | 3 | 3 | 0.641 | Moderate |
Facilitating Condition | 330 | 4 | 3 (FC1) | 0.697 | Moderate |
Behavioural Intention | 330 | 3 | 3 | 0.908 | Excellent |
Total Variance Explained | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component | Initial Eigenvalues | Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | ||||
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 5.260 | 37.571 | 37.571 | 5.260 | 37.571 | 37.571 |
2 | 1.447 | 10.334 | 47.905 | |||
3 | 1.288 | 9.197 | 57.102 | |||
4 | 1.067 | 7.625 | 64.727 | |||
5 | 0.867 | 6.190 | 70.917 |
χ2 | df | χ2/df | GFI | AGFI | CFI | NFI | RMSEA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | 3:1 | ≥0.9 | ≥0.8 | ≥0.95 | ≥0.9 | <0.07 | ||
Model GOF | 234.431 | 109 | 2.151 | 0.922 | 0.891 | 0.943 | 0.899 | 0.059 |
χ2 | df | χ2/df | GFI | AGFI | CFI | NFI | RMSEA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | 3:1 | ≥0.9 | ≥0.8 | ≥0.95 | ≥0.9 | <0.07 | ||
Model GOF | 96.334 | 63 | 1.529 | 0.961 | 0.934 | 0.981 | 0.948 | 0.040 |
Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE1 | Performance Expectancy | 0.662 | |||
PE2 | Performance Expectancy | 0.767 | 0.118 | 9.792 | *** |
PE3 | Performance Expectancy | 0.666 | 0.122 | 9.199 | *** |
EE2 | Effort Expectancy | 0.729 | |||
EE3 | Effort Expectancy | 0.582 | 0.100 | 7.707 | *** |
EE4 | Effort Expectancy | 0.607 | 0.118 | 7.643 | *** |
SI1 | Social Influence | 0.516 | |||
SI2 | Social Influence | 0.708 | |||
SI3 | Social Influence | 0.669 | 0.103 | 8.420 | *** |
FC2 | Facilitating Condition | 0.726 | |||
FC3 | Facilitating Condition | 0.720 | 0.111 | 8.046 | *** |
FC4 | Facilitating Condition | 0.603 | 0.096 | 7.273 | *** |
BI1 | Behavioural Intention | 0.855 | |||
BI2 | Behavioural Intention | 0.871 | 0.053 | 19.934 | *** |
BI3 | Behavioural Intention | 0.903 | 0.054 | 20.829 | *** |
Items | L | CR | AVE | SQRT (AVE) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Expectancy | 2.095 | 0.742 | 0.586 | 0.765 |
PE1 | 0.662 | |||
PE2 | 0.767 | |||
PE3 | 0.666 | |||
Effort Expectancy | 1.918 | 0.776 | 0.566 | 0.782 |
EE2 | 0.729 | |||
EE3 | 0.582 | |||
EE4 | 0.607 | |||
Social Influence | 1.377 | 0.743 | 0.561 | 0.779 |
SI1 | 0.516 | |||
SI2 | 0.708 | |||
SI3 | 0.669 | |||
Facilitating Condition | 2.049 | 0.725 | 0.555 | 0.745 |
FC2 | 0.726 | |||
FC3 | 0.720 | |||
FC4 | 0.603 | |||
Behavioural Intention | 2.629 | 0.909 | 0.884 | 0.940 |
BI1 | 0.871 | |||
BI2 | 0.855 | |||
BI3 | 0.903 |
PE | EE | SI | FC | BI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PE | 0.765 | ||||
EE | 0.380 ** | 0.682 | |||
SI | 0.410 ** | 0.380 ** | 0.679 | ||
FC | 0.336 ** | 0.506 ** | 0.429 ** | 0.745 | |
BI | 0.419 ** | 0.467 ** | 0.465 ** | 0.425 ** | 0.940 |
χ2 | df | χ2/df | GFI | AGFI | CFI | NFI | RMSEA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | 3:1 | ≥0.9 | ≥0.8 | ≥0.95 | ≥0.9 | <0.07 | ||
Model GOF | 96.371 | 64 | 1.506 | 0.961 | 0.935 | 0.981 | 0.948 | 0.039 |
H# | Hypothesis | β | S.E. | C.R. | p | Supported | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent Variable | Dependent Variable | ||||||
H1 | PE | BI | 0.17 | 0.112 | 2.286 | 0.022 | YES |
H2 | EE | BI | 0.36 | 0.167 | 2.708 | 0.007 | YES |
H3 | SI | BI | 0.37 | 0.125 | 3.755 | *** | YES |
H4 | FC | BI | −0.05 | 0.154 | −0.405 | 0.686 | NO |
H5 | EE | PE | 0.55 | 0.079 | 5.788 | *** | YES |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abed, S.S. Women Entrepreneurs’ Adoption of Mobile Applications for Business Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111627
Abed SS. Women Entrepreneurs’ Adoption of Mobile Applications for Business Sustainability. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21):11627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111627
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbed, Salma S. 2021. "Women Entrepreneurs’ Adoption of Mobile Applications for Business Sustainability" Sustainability 13, no. 21: 11627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111627
APA StyleAbed, S. S. (2021). Women Entrepreneurs’ Adoption of Mobile Applications for Business Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(21), 11627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111627