Next Article in Journal
Biofilm Structural and Functional Features on Microplastic Surfaces in Greenhouse Agricultural Soil
Next Article in Special Issue
Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications for Solar Stills Efficiency Assessment: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Impact Assessment of Changing Landcover on Flood Risk in the Indus River Basin Using the Rainfall–Runoff–Inundation (RRI)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Approach for the Biological Desalination of Major Anions in Seawater Using Three Microalgal Species: A Kinetic Study

by
Madeha O. I. Ghobashy
1,2,*,
Omar Bahattab
1,
Aishah Alatawi
1,
Meshari M. Aljohani
3 and
Mohamed M. I. Helal
4,*
1
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71421, Saudi Arabia
2
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
3
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71421, Saudi Arabia
4
National Research Centre, Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Division, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(12), 7018; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127018
Submission received: 5 May 2022 / Revised: 26 May 2022 / Accepted: 31 May 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022

Abstract

:
The global water shortage alert has been upgraded to a higher risk level. Consequently, a sustainable approach for ecofriendly, energy efficient water desalination is required for agricultural and municipal water reuse. In this study, an energy-efficient biological desalination process was used to treat chloride anions, which are the most abundant anion salt in seawater. Three algal species were studied: Scenedismus arcuatusa (S. arcuatusa), Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris), and Spirulina maxima (Sp. maxima), under different operating conditions (saline concentrations, contact time, high light intensity, and CO2 supply), and two kinetic models were used. It was identified that under a high light intensity and CO2 supply, S. arcuatusa enhanced chloride removal from 32.42 to 48.93%; the daily bioaccumulation capacity (Qe), according to the kinetic models, was enhanced from 124 to 210 mg/g/day; and the net biomass production was enhanced from 0.02 to 0.740 g/L. The EDX analysis proved that salt bioaccumulation may be attributed to the replacement of Ca2+ and Mg2+ with Na+ and K+ through algal cells. The study’s findings provide promising data that can be used in the search for novel energy-efficient alternative ecofriendly desalination technologies based on algae biological systems with biomass byproducts that can be reused in a variety of ways.

1. Introduction

Water is regarded as a critical resource for life on the planet’s surface. Nowadays, water scarcity is a global issue that many countries are grappling with, particularly those located in dry area belts and highly water-stressed regions [1,2]. Statistics indicate that the amount of water worldwide is estimated to be 1386 billion cubic meters. The predominant proportion (97%) is the salt water in seas and oceans, while fresh water constitutes a small percentage of the total (3%), and if we take into account that 69% of this fresh water is frozen water, this means that the water available for human use is approximately 31% of the total fresh water available; of this, 30% is non-renewable groundwater and only about one percent is renewable water (rivers) [3,4].
The Middle East is currently experiencing a water crisis, with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (except for Oman) already being classified as water-scarce countries by the United Nations [5].
Overall, water demand in the Kingdom is estimated to be 25.29 billion m3/year (in 2019), but it is predicted to increase to 25.79 billion m3/year by 2025. Therefore, the KSA has established itself, at the present time, as a global pioneer in the development and application of desalination technologies of saline water, which has now displaced groundwater as the Kingdom’s principal source of drinking water.
Arid countries are currently experiencing a water crisis, which is expected to worsen due to agricultural and industrial development resulting from population growth. The rising of water demand causes a variation in prices and intensified competition for its use. Sea water desalination is an inevitable and significant choice for maintaining the water supply in arid and semi-arid regions, especially coastal ones due to their soil, land, and climate characteristics as well as their lack of surface water and fresh underground water supplies [6,7].
The desalination of sea water is now carried out by various methods and technologies around the world, depending on the amount and quality of water needed [7,8]. Due to rising energy costs, conventional desalination systems, such as multiple effect distillation (MED), reverse osmosis (RO), ion exchange (IX), vapor compression distillation (VCD), membrane distillation (MD) electrodialysis (ED), and multistage flash evaporation (MSF), are energy-intensive and, thus, expensive [9,10,11]. In addition to energy expenses, there are serious issues related to the foregoing desalination systems, including greenhouse gas emissions, the huge release of heat waste, and high brine accumulation in the environment [12]. As a result, there must be a paradigm shift that necessitates new approaches.
Biodesalination is a novel desalination technique based on the absorption (bioaccumulation) and adsorption of salts from saline water by various salt-tolerant living organisms. In comparison to the aforementioned conventional desalination techniques, biological desalination systems consume less energy, have a lower environmental impact, and require less engineering complexity. As a result, they are regarded as a more environmentally friendly for long-term desalination processes [13].
Algae is a common bio-remediated organism that provides high levels of organic removal and pathogen retraction for municipal wastewater treatment [14,15,16], and it can be employed as a biosorption and bioaccumulation agent for industrial uses [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Algae are novel and cost-effective biological techniques for the desalination of seawater, and they produce fresh water for a range of applications [23,24,25]. However, studies related to the use of microalgae for salt removal purposes have limitations. Scenedismus sp. is a commonly used freshwater microalgal species with high tolerance to high salinity stress [26,27]. Furthermore, the algae Scenedismus sp. can survive in changing environmental conditions due to its high reproduction rate and great vitality [28,29]. In [30], the uptake of NaCl and salt tolerance by microalgae was studied, and it was suggested that bioaccumulation (absorption) and biosorption (adsorption) usually happen in most living organisms. Furthermore, their data revealed that maximal bioaccumulation of salt by algae was achieved after 10 running days under different experimental conditions (different algae species, salinities, nutrient levels, etc.).
The removal mechanisms of salt from seawater or metal from industrial wastewater using microalgae can be explained by two pathways: metabolism-dependent and non-metabolism-dependent. Bioaccumulation is a metabolism-dependent process in which salts are incorporated into algae cells. However, the adsorption is non-metabolism-dependent and is related to the physical bonding or adherence of ions and molecules to the surface of the algae [31].
Microalgal biomass propagated through the water and treated wastewater can be harvested and effectively utilized in different bioproducts, for example, biofuels, bioactive compounds, and pharmaceuticals (antibacterial, antiviral, antitumor/anticancer, antihistamine). In addition, microalgae have been used as health food products for humans, feed for livestock and fish, or as high-value chemicals and pigments [14]. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of living algal species as a novel and non-conventional approach to the biodesalination of seawater chloride anions. This evaluation was conducted under different biodesalination conditions (seawater concentration, incubation time, light intensity, and CO2). These conditions were optimized for enhanced seawater biodesalination, and the quantity of the net algal biomass was taken into consideration. The study’s findings can be used to drive the design of a photobioreactor desalination system as well as to support the possibility of recycling algal biomass as a byproduct for multiple beneficial uses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Seawater Sample Collection

Sea water samples were collected from different areas of Tabuk along the Saudi Arabian Red Sea Coast, Figure 1. The sample locations were determined using the Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) with recent Google map images, as shown in Table 1. The water samples were collected in sterilized plastic bottles and kept for further study. They were transferred to the National Research Center Labs, located in Egypt, for analysis.

2.2. Physical and Chemical Analyses of the Collected Samples

Physical and chemical examinations of water samples were carried out using the procedures outlined by the American Public Health Association [32]. pH was assessed via the pH meter model (Jenway 3505), and electrical conductivity (EC, mS/cm) was assessed via the conductivity meter model (Jenway 4510). The total dissolved solids (TDS) was determined by passing a volume of sample through the Whatman membrane filter (0.45), and a known weight of filtrate was evaporated at 105 °C. Total hardness (Calcium and magnesium) was determined using a complexometric technique via direct titration with EDTA solution. Chlorides were assayed using direct titration with AgNO3 solution. Sulfates were assessed via turbidimetric techniques. Nitrites were detected using a colorimetric procedure by the formation of a reddish purple azo-dye. The nitrate concentration was determined with the sodium salicylate method. The total Phosphorous concentration was determined calorimetrically using the stannous chloride method.
All colorimetric measurements were performed using a UV Vis spectrophotometer Agilent Cary series. Sodium and potassium measurements were performed using 240FS AA-Flame Atomic Absorption.

2.3. Algae Species Isolation and Algal Bioassay Procedures for Biodesalination

Three microalgal species, S. arcuatusa, C. vulgaris, and Sp. maxima, as shown in Figure 2, were collected from Nile water. The three algal species were identified using the main references used for phytoplankton identification [33] and were isolated according to [34,35]. The selection of these algae was due to their salt tolerance characteristics [36,37,38]. They were cultivated using BG-11 medium [39]. An algal bioassay procedure was used to assess the algal bioaccumulation and growth response against the seawater strength. A composite seawater sample was mixed from the different locations and tested at various concentrations, namely, 100, 75, 50, and 25%. BG-11 medium was added to promote algal growth. Isolated algae in the logarithmic growth phase were inoculated in 250 mL samples of seawater and then feeded by algal nutrients from the BG-11 culture medium at 24 ± 2 °C under continuous fluorescent light (2.800 ft C foot candle) and shaken once per day to prevent algal cell clumping. A linear relationship (R2 = 0.999) between the weight of dry algae and the value of OD 665 (optical density of 665 nm, which was the maximum absorption wavelength) for the cultivated fresh algae. Based on this linear relationship, the dry algae weight equivalent to fresh algae could be sampled [40]. The salt concentrations were detected at different time intervals throughout the incubation period.

2.4. Biodesalination under High Radiation Light Intensity and CO2 Supply

The bioassay procedures were modified by subjecting the algal culture in the bio-desalination system to a high radiation light intensity and CO2 supply to accelerate algal growth and increase the salt bioaccumulation rate. Thus, this experiment was conducted under a light source of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR; 400 to 700 nm) to achieve intensities of 100–2000 µmol photons per m2 s−1 of PAR with a Source of air and CO2 pump for gas mixing (~5% CO2 of enriched air) (see Figure 3).

2.5. Desalination Rate Assessment of Chlorides

The rate of seawater desalination determined in the bioassay test was evaluated by measuring TDS. Conductivity was used as a surrogate for TDS, because it can be measured easily and quickly with a conductivity meter, as opposed to TDS measurement, which typically involves filtration, drying, and heating steps. TDSi indicates the initial conductivity of seawater before the addition of algae. The algae solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 6 min at the end of each desalination test, and the supernatant was filtered through an 0.45 m filter and analyzed for conductivity (TDSf). The algae residue was dried at 60 °C, and the weight difference was detected to assay the net dry algal mass (m). The removal efficiency (desalination rate and removal rate of NaCl) and the bioaccumulation capacity of the chloride anion were determined by measurement of the initial (NaCli) and final (NaClf) chloride anion concentrations using direct titration against AgNO3 [32]. This was done using methods Equations (1)–(3):
Desalination rate (%) = (1 − DSf/TDSi) × 100
Removal rate of NaCl (%) = (1 − NaClf/NaCli) × 100
Bioaccumulation capacity of NaCl = (NaCli − NaClf)/m

2.6. Application of Kinetic Modeling

In order to calculate daily bioaccumulation and examine the best fitting kinetic model for salt bioaccumulation, two kinetic models, including the pseudo-first order [41], and pseudo-second order equations [42], were applied according to the following two equations:
-
Pseudo First-Order Equation:
log Q e Qq t = log Q e k 1 t 2.303
where k1 (1/day) is the rate constant of a pseudo first-order equation, and Qe (mg/g) and Qt (mg/g) are the concentrations of bioaccumulated chlorides in the living algal cell at equilibrium and at time t (day), respectively. A straight line of ln (Qe − Qt) versus t suggests that this kinetic model is applicable to the data.
-
Pseudo Second-Order Equation:
t Q t = t k 2 Q e 2 + t Q e
where k2 (mg/g day) is the rate constant of a pseudo-second order equation, and Qe (mg/g) is the concentrations of accumulated salts at equilibrium.

2.7. Characterization of Dried Algal Biomass

At the end of the biodesalination experiments, the net algal biomass was collected by filtration through a Whatman membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm. The biomass was washed carefully several times with distilled water to remove any remaining salts from their cells. Then, the biomass was refiltered. The washed biomass was freeze-dried using a Christ alpha 1–2 LD freeze dryer and then crushed and mixed gently with a mortar and then characterized by Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) and Scanning Electron microscopy (SEM).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical and Chemical Characterization of the Collected Samples

A water quality analysis was conducted to obtain quantitative and qualitative descriptions of the chemical and physical characteristics. The seawater in the different study areas was characterized to determine the variation in water salinity among them, and the distribution pattern of the ratios and kinds of anions within the total dissolved salts (TDS) were determined. The results obtained for the physico-chemical parameters of the different locations are presented in Table 2. All turbidity values were less than 1.0 NTU. The TDS in seawater samples fluctuated between 37,730 and 40,810 mg/L. The total hardness (as CO32−), chloride (as Cl) and sulfate (as SO42−) concentrations were in the ranges of 7415–9677, 28,245–29,032, and 2070–2100 mg/L, respectively. All of these anions (CO32−, Cl, and SO42−) represent the major dissolved anion salts in seawater samples [43,44,45,46].
Figure 4 shows the distribution pattern ratio for the major anion salts relative to the total dissolved salts in the study areas. Representative data reveal that the anion salts can be arranged in descending order among the total dissolved salts as follows: Chlorides > carbonates > sulfates. The above data indicate that there are no meaningful differences between the different locations in terms of physicochemical values, and chloride salt is the major anion salt in the total dissolved salts. These findings are in accordance with data presented by [47,48,49,50]. Thus, the chloride anion salt was used in this study as the evaluated parameter to determine the biodesalination efficiency of algae.

3.2. Effect of the Salinity Concentration on the Rate of Chloride Biodesalination

The efficiency of chloride bioaccumulation in the three microalgae species was assessed at different seawater concentrations. Figure 5 reveals that chloride bioaccumulated significantly in the three algal species as the seawater concentration increased. The maximum chloride bioaccumulation yields in C. vulgaris, Sp. Maxima, and S. arcuatusa sp. were 260, 190, and 150 mg/g fresh weight, respectively.
This result had a positive impact on the seawater quality. TDS removal (Figure 6) ranged from 24.2% (9500 mg/L TDS) to 41.5% (33,375 mg/L TDS) in seawater inoculated by Sp. maxima culture, but this removal took a long time (33 days), while C. vulgaris achieved about 39.1% TDS removal after only 22 days at a TDS concentration of 17,080 mg/L, thereby increasing the chloride concentration. Interestingly, a clear correlation between salt tolerance and chloride removal was observed by [36] for the case of C. vulgaris. Additionally, the TDS reduction values caused by C. vulgaris exhibited a positive correlation with the increase in chloride concentration. In [51], it was shown that two species of microalgae, Nannochloropsis culate and Dunaliella tertiolecta, have the ability to decrease the concentration of TDS.

3.3. Effect of the Incubation Period on the Rate of Biodesalination

The effects of the incubation period on biodesalination are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen clearly that the three microalgae exhibited steady increases in the chloride bioaccumulation rate throughout the incubation period until the sixth day with both S. arcuatusa and Sp. Maxima, and until the eighth day with C. vulgaris. The bioaccumulation capacities at these points were 95.9, 74.4, and 64.5 mg/g fresh weight for C. vulgaris, S. arcuatusa, and Sp. maxima, respectively.
The study performed in [52] showed that the bioaccumulation equilibrium achieved by algae ranged from 3.58 to 7.68 per day. After these points, the bioaccumulation rate took longer, and there was no significant change in the bioaccumulation rate compared with the first stage. C. vulgaris showed a better bioaccumulation performance than S. arcuatusa and Sp. maxima. Additionally, S. arcuatusa, and C. vulgaris showed shorter incubation periods (22 days) than Sp. maxima (33 days). At the end of the incubation periods of the three algal species, the total chloride removal proportions were 39.7%, 39.2%, and 32.4% for Sp. maxima, C. vulgaris, and S. arcuatusa, respectively, Figure 8. The maximal bio-accumulation capacity at the end of the incubation period reached 130.5, 114.2, and 107.8 mg/g fresh weight, respectively. In comparison, a study performed by [30] confirmed that full absorption was reached within a relatively short time period, but the removal of salts (only 10%) reached by absorption was not obvious, since over 39% of chloride removal was achieved by bioaccumulation, but this occurred across a longer time frame.

3.4. Effect of High Light Radiation Intensity and CO2 Supply on the Rate of Biodesalination

In order to enhance the bioaccumulation performance of the algae, a new growth condition was applied to the cultured algae in seawater. Since high light radiation of 2000 µmol photons per m2 s−1 of PARm was emitted, air and CO2 were pumped with a gas mixing ratio (~5% CO2 of enriched air). These conditions were applied at a temperature of 32 °C. These conditions were applied to enhance algal growth. S. arcuatusa and C. vulgaris flourished under these conditions, but Sp. maxima failed to grow. Thus, the data illustrated in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 represent the effects of these conditions on the bioaccumulation efficiency of the two algal species S. arcuatusa and C. vulgaris.
The data in Figure 9 show differences in the growth response in the two algal strains. Furthermore, an obvious positive correlation was exhibited between the growth response and the bioaccumulation capacity, where sudden exponential chloride accumulation appeared from the third day until the fifth day. This sudden accumulation behavior was related to the sudden growth response in the same bioaccumulation period. The bioaccumulation reached equilibrium after the fifth day. At the same time, the algal growth continued to undergo exponential growth.
On the ninth day, extra nitrogen and phosphorous were added. This nutrient addition led to more chloride accumulation (increase by 8.7%) and exponential algal growth (increase by 44.3%) until the 12th day. After that the bioaccumulation returned to equilibrium, and the exponential algal growth decreased.
As compared to S. arcuatusa, C. vulgaris exhibited an excellent correlation between chloride bioaccumulation and the algal growth response, but this correlation was accompanied by weak efficiency until the 10th day. After the nutrient addition, on the 10th day, 94.7% and 80% increases in chloride bioaccumulation and algal growth were exhibited, respectively. On the other hand, Figure 10 shows that an obvious inverse correlation between TDS and the bioaccumulation capacity of chloride by S. arcuatusa. This correlation was exhibited in the responses of the two variables. This proves the presence of a strong correlation. This inverse correlation and good consistency were also achieved in C. vulgaris, but not to the same degree, due to the weak efficiency.
Figure 11 shows the differences in the removal efficiency of chloride and TDS before and after addressing the new bioaccumulation conditions. However, these conditions had a negative effect on the performance of C. vulgaris for TDS removal, where an obvious removal efficiency decline occurred for TDS (from 39.07% to 14.4%) and chloride (from 39.24 to 31.13), but the net algal biomass produced was enhanced (from 0.02 to 0.374 g/L). On the contrary, a positive effect on removal efficiency was achieved under these conditions by S. arcuatusa, where TDS and chloride removal were enhanced (from 34.54 to 39.09% and from 32.42 to 48.93%), and an obvious net algal biomass production enhancement occurred (from 0.02 to 0.740 g/L). Different studies have reported that high growth acceleration due to a high light intensity and CO2 supply promote a high bioaccumulation efficiency. According to [53], algae-based bioremediation produces more biomass due to its strong potential to bioaccumulate, degrade, or detoxify xenobiotics and contaminants. In [54], it was discovered that greater light intensities have a considerable effect on algal biomass production, and the culture system swiftly transitions from a mixotrophic-dominated mode to a photoautotrophic-dominated mode. The addition of a larger CO2 injection rate would result in a higher degree of carbon fixation, and the impacts of light and CO2 would accelerate the process of bioaccumulation. In [31], it was stated that the major component for algal productivity is photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) pulsed from the light source, with the best range of photon flux being between 30 and 400 mol/m2 s. Increasing the available amount of CO2 can boost the algal biomass output.
Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that algae are able to complete their life cycles in a wide range of salinity levels with differences existing even within species. The application of these algae and microorganisms or their combination can be an effective way to undergo desalting or reduce the water salinity [23,25,55].

3.5. Kinetic Modeling for Biodesalination

3.5.1. Kinetics of Chloride Bioaccumulation by Algae under Control Conditions

Under the control conditions, the three algal species bioaccumulated the chloride anions along different incubation period time intervals. In order to evaluate the daily bio-accumulation capacity during the incubation period, two kinetic models were applied. The pseudo-first and pseudo-second order kinetic models are shown in Figure 12.
Only the experimental data of C. vulgaris were fitted to the pseudo-first-order model, where the obtained R2 value for chloride bioaccumulation was more than 0.93, but the calculated (Qe) value (177 mg/g/day) was closer to the experimental value (130) than the value for the second order kinetic model (250), which had an R2 value of less than 0.9. However, the obtained R2 values from the pseudo-first-order model for S. arcuatusa and Sp. maxima were 0.875 and 0.739, respectively. These values do not fit with the pseudo-first-order model, but the experimental Qe value of S. arcuatusa (124 mg/g/day) was closer to the calculated (Qe) value (107), while the experimental Qe value of the pseudo-first-order model for Sp. maxima (180 mg/g/day) was not closer to the calculated (Qe) value (114). In [52], it was confirmed that the initial salt uptake by algae followed pseudo first-order kinetics.
All pseudo-second order kinetic models for C. vulgaris, S. arcuatusa, and Sp. maxima were not fitted due to having R2 values of less than 0.9 and experimental and calculated Qe values that did not match those shown in Table 3, except for the case of Sp. maxima, where the calculated (Qe) value (114) was closer to calculated value (133.3), suggesting that the bioaccumulation of chloride anions by C. vulgaris only fits well to the pseudo-first order model. Daily bioaccumulation rates were 177, 124, and 133.3 mg/g/day for C. vulgaris, S. arcuatusa, and Sp. maxima, respectively.

3.5.2. Kinetic Modeling under High Light Intensity and CO2 Supply

Under high light intensity and CO2 supply, the algal species exhibited different bioaccumulation kinetic behaviors. Figure 13 show the pseudo first and second order kinetics after the algal species had been subjected to these conditions. The illustrated data prove that the experimental data from S. arcuatusa alone could be fitted to the pseudo-first-order model, where the R2 value obtained for chloride bioaccumulation was more than 0.95, and the calculated (Qe) value (158 mg/g/day) was slightly closer to the experimental (Qe) value (210). However, for C. vulgaris, neither the R2 value nor the experimental (Qe) values were fitted, because their data did not match the pseudo-first-order equation. In addition, the (Qe) value of C. vulgaris was reduced under these conditions from 177 into 107 mg/g/day, but for S. arcuatusa, there was a noticeable enhancement in Qe from 124 to 210 mg/g/day.
In an investigation of two types of halophytic microalgae by [52], it was found that the initial salt uptake followed pseudo first order kinetics, where the rate constant ranged from −3.58 to −7.68 per day, reaching up to 30% in a single cycle.

3.6. The Effect of Sea Water on Algal Morphological Changes

Some deformation in algal species morphology occurred when they were subjected to seawater conditions. These deformations are shown in Figure 14, representing S. arcuatusa algal cells before and after exposure to high salinity conditions. The most noted deformation features were the shrinkage in cell size and separation of the quadrate jointed cells into scattered solitary cells. Many morphological changes due to water salinity stress have been examined in different studies for algal species such as Chlamydomonas [56], Gracilatia sp. venucosa, Gmcilatia sp. and Ptemcladia capillacea [57], and Kirchneriella sp. [58].

3.7. Characterization of Dried Algal Biomass

3.7.1. Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis (EDX)

The elemental composition of the freeze-dried algal biomass algae was characterized by EDX microanalysis. This technique can help to identify the presence of various elements inside the biomass in order to determine the major elements entrapped in microalgae during the bioaccumulation.
As shown in Table 4, of algal biomass materials, C and O were the most abundant components due to CO2 sequestration during photosynthesis [31]. They were notable increase in Na+ and K+ after biodesalination. In contrast, the Mg2+ and Ca2+ concentrations decreased after biodesalination. This may be attributed to the replacement of Ca2+ and Mg2+ with Na+ and K+ through the algal cells. This finding was confirmed by [36,59].

3.7.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis of Dried Algal Biomass

The dried algal biomass was investigated by SEM (Figure 15) before and after biodesalination to provide more information about the change in topography structure of the algae due to the desalination conditions. It was observed that white batches of salt were accumulated and embedded into the algal biomass. This observation proves the occurrence of the accumulation of salt inside the algal cells.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

In this work, three algal species, S. arcuatusa, C. vulgaris, and Sp. Maxima, were investigated under different operating conditions to explore their biological desalination efficiencies. It was revealed that under a high light intensity and CO2 supply, S. arcuatusa enhanced chloride removal from 32.42 to 48.93%, the daily bio-accumulation capacity (Qe) according to the kinetic models was enhanced from 124 to 210 mg/g/day, and the net biomass production was enhanced from 0.02 to 0.740 g/L. The results of the EDX analysis suggest that the bioaccumulation mechanism mainly depends on the replacement of Ca2+ and Mg2+ with Na+ and K+ through algal cells. The above findings suggest that algae show promise for use in energy-efficient techniques as an alternative ecofriendly desalination technology. It is recommended that the net biomass of desalination be reused to produce high-value byproducts, such as pharmaceuticals and bioactive compounds, biofuels, and chemicals. The above data suggest the need for further work in this area. This work will be the precursor for upscaling photobioreactor systems for seawater desalination and algal biomass production to allow algae to be used for the production of valuable economic products, such as biofuels, pharmaceuticals, bioactive compounds, high-value products, and chemicals. Ultimately, the current and future work related to this study could aid in the development of the NEOM region in the KSA.

Author Contributions

Data curation, M.O.I.G., O.B., A.A., M.M.A. and M.M.I.H.; Formal analysis, M.M.I.H.; Funding acquisition, M.O.I.G.; Investigation, A.A. and M.M.A.; Methodology, M.O.I.G., M.M.A. and M.M.I.H.; Project administration, M.O.I.G.; Resources, O.B.; Software, M.M.I.H.; Supervision, M.O.I.G.; Visualization, O.B.; Writing—review & editing, M.O.I.G. and M.M.I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia, the project number (0011-1442-S).

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work under project number (0011-1442-S).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Raouf, N.; Al-Homaidan, A.A.; Ibraheem, I.B.M. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 19, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Panhwar, M.Y.; Panhwar, S.; Keerio, H.A.; Khokhar, N.H.; Shah, S.A.; Pathan, N. Water quality analysis of old and new Phuleli Canal for irrigation purpose in the vicinity of Hyderabad, Pakistan. Water Pract. Technol. 2022, 17, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bigas, H. The Global Water Crisis: Addressing an Urgent Security Issue; United Nations University—Institute for Water, Environment and Health: Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2012; 176p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, C.; Jiang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Yang, Y.; Hou, L. Sustainably integrating desalination with solar power to overcome future freshwater scarcity in China. Glob. Energy Interconnect. 2019, 2, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samad, N.A.; Bruno, V.L. The urgency of preserving water resources. Environ. News 2013, 21, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. McGinn, P.J.; Dickinson, K.E.; Park, K.C.; Whitney, C.G.; MacQuarrie, S.P.; Black, F.J.; Frigon, J.-C.; Guiot, S.R.; O’Leary, S.J. Assessment of the bioenergy and bioremediation potentials of the microalga Scenedesmus sp. AMDD cultivated in municipal wastewater effluent in batch and continuous mode. Algal Res. 2012, 1, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pittman, J.K.; Dean, A.P.; Osundeko, O. The potential of sustainable algal biofuel production using wastewater resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gorjian, S.; Ghobadian, B. Solar desalination: A sustainable solution to water crisis in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sehn, P. Fluoride removal with extra low energy reverse osmosis membranes: Three years of large scale field experience in Finland. Desalination 2008, 223, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mezher, T.; Fath, H.; Abbas, Z.; Khaled, A. Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies. Desalination 2011, 266, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Odwani, A.; El-Sayed, E.E.F.; Al-Tabtabaei, M.; Safar, M. Corrosion resistance and performance of copper–nickel and titanium alloys in MSF distillation plants. Desalination 2006, 201, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ashwaniy, V.R.V.; Perumalsamy, M. Reduction of organic compounds in petro-chemical industry effluent and desalination using Scenedesmus abundans algal microbial desalination cell. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5961–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, S.; Yang, S.; Jin, X.; Liu, L.; Wu, F. Use of low cost crop biological wastes for the removal of Nitrobenzene from water. Desalination 2010, 264, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Doma, H.; Moghazy, R.; Mahmoud, R. Environmental factors controlling algal species succession in High Rate Algal Pond. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Kamah, H.M.; Badr, S.A.; Moghazy, R.M. Reuse of Wastewater Treated Effluent by Lagoon for Agriculture and Aquaculture Purposes. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2011, 5, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  16. El-Kamah, H.M.; Doma, H.S.; Badr, S.; El-Shafai, S.A.; Moghazy, R.M. Removal of fecal coliform from HFBR effluent via stabilization pond as a post treatment. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1897–1905. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moghazy, R.M.; Labena, A.; Husien, S.; Mansor, E.S.; Abdelhamid, A.E. Neoteric approach for efficient eco-friendly dye removal and recovery using algal-polymer biosorbent sheets: Characterization, factorial design, equilibrium and kinetics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 157, 494–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moghazy, R.M.; Labena, A.; Husien, S. Eco-friendly complementary biosorption process of methylene blue using micro-sized dried biosorbents of two macro-algal species (Ulva fasciata and Sargassum dentifolium): Full factorial design, equilibrium, and kinetic studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Abdelhamid, A.E.; Labena, A.; Mansor, E.S.; Husien, S.; Moghazy, R.M. Highly efficient adsorptive membrane for heavy metal removal based on Ulva fasciata biomass. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moghazy, R.M. Activated biomass of the green microalga Chlamydomonas variabilis as an efficient biosorbent to remove methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions. Water SA 2019, 45, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Abdelhameed, R.M.; Alzahrani, E.; Shaltout, A.A.; Moghazy, R.M. Development of biological macroalgae lignins using copper based metal-organic framework for selective adsorption of cationic dye from mixed dyes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2984–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Badr, S.A.; Ashmawy, A.A.; El-Sherif, I.Y.; Moghazy, R.M. Non-conventional low-cost biosorbents for adsorption and desorption of heavy metals. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3110–3122. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kesaano, M.; Sims, R.C. Algal biofilm based technology for wastewater treatment. Algal Res. 2014, 5, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nagy, A.M.; El Nadi, M.H.; Hussein, H.M. Determination of the best water depth in desalination algae ponds. El Azhar Univ. Fac. Eng. CERM Civ. Eng. 2019, 38, 1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, J.; Jin, H.-F.; Lim, B.-R.; Park, K.-Y.; Lee, K. Ammonia removal from anaerobic digestion effluent of livestock waste using green alga Scenedesmus sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8649–8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Demetriou, G.; Neonaki, C.; Navakoudis, E.; Kotzabasis, K. Salt stress impact on the molecular structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus—The protective role of polyamines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mohammed, A.A.; Shafea, A.A. Growth and some metabolic activities ofScenedesmus obliquus cultivated under different NaCl concentrations. Biol. Plant. 1992, 34, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martínez, M.E.; Sánchez, S.; Jiménez, J.M.; El Yousfi, F.; Muñoz, L. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from urban wastewater by the microalga Scenedesmus obliquus. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 73, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lewis, M.A. Use of freshwater plants for phytotoxicity testing: A review. Environ. Pollut. 1995, 87, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, J.; Gao, L.; Shen, G.; Yang, X.; Li, M. The role of adsorption in microalgae biological desalination: Salt removal from brackish water using Scenedesmus obliquus. Desalination 2020, 493, 114616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moghazy, R.M.; Abdo, S.M.; Mahmoud, R.H. Chapter 7—Algal Biomass as a Promising Tool for CO2 Sequestration and Wastewater Bioremediation: An Integration of Green Technology for Different Aspects; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 149–166. [Google Scholar]
  32. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; APHA: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Streble, H.; Krauter, D. Das Leben im Wassertropfen: Mikroflora und Mikrofauna des Süsswassers. In Ein Bestimmungsbuch; Franckh-Kosmos Verlags-GmbH & Co.: Stuttgart, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Baker, P.D.; Fabbro, L. A Guide to the Identification of Common Blue-Green Algae (Cyanoprokaryotes) in Australian Freshwaters; Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology: Rockhampton, Australia, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  35. Komárek, J. Chlorophyceae (Grunalgen), Ordnung: Chlorococcales. Phytoplankt Susswassers Syst. Biol. 1983, 7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Figler, A.; Dobronoki, D.; Márton, K.; Nagy, S.A.; Bácsi, I. Salt tolerance and desalination abilities of nine common green microalgae isolates. Water 2019, 11, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Almutairi, A.W.; El-Sayed, A.E.-K.B.; Reda, M.M. Evaluation of high salinity adaptation for lipid bio-accumulation in the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3981–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kirrolia, A.; Bishnoi, N.R.; Singh, N. Salinity as a factor affecting the physiological and biochemical traits of Scenedesmus quadricauda. J. Algal Biomass Util. 2011, 2, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
  39. Stanier, R.Y.; Kunisawa, R.; Mandel, M.; Cohen-Bazire, G. Purification and properties of unicellular blue-green algae (order Chroococcales). Bacteriol. Rev. 1971, 35, 171–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gan, X.; Shen, G.; Xin, B.; Li, M. Simultaneous biological desalination and lipid production by Scenedesmus obliquus cultured with brackish water. Desalination 2016, 400, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ho, Y.S.; Ng, J.C.Y.; McKay, G. Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents: Review. Sep. Purif. Methods 2000, 29, 189–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weber, W.J.; Morris, J.C. Kinetics of Adsorption on Carbon from Solution. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 1963, 89, 31–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koyuncu, I.; Sengur, R.; Turken, T.; Guclu, S.; Pasaoglu, M.E. Advances in water treatment by microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and nanofiltration. In Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2015; pp. 83–128. [Google Scholar]
  44. Christ, R.D.; Wernli, R.L., Sr. The ROV Manual: A User Guide for Remotely Operated Vehicles, the Ocean Environment; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 21–52. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vakkilainen, E.K. Steam Generation from Biomass: Construction and Design of Large Boilers; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 180–202. [Google Scholar]
  46. Christ, R.D.; Wernli, R.L., Sr. The ROV Manual: A User Guide for Remotely Operated Vehicles, Vehicle Design and Stability; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nessim, R.B.; Tadros, H.R.Z.; Abou Taleb, A.E.A.; Moawad, M.N. Chemistry of the Egyptian Mediterranean coastal waters. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2015, 41, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kreitler, C.W. Geochemical Techniques for Identifying Sources of Ground-Water Salinization; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  49. Milroy, S. Field Methods in Marine Science: From Measurements to Models; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  50. Telahigue, F.; Agoubi, B.; Souid, F.; Kharroubi, A. Assessment of seawater intrusion in an arid coastal aquifer, south-eastern Tunisia, using multivariate statistical analysis and chloride mass balance. Phys. Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 2018, 106, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shirazi, S.A.; Rastegary, J.; Aghajani, M.; Ghassemi, A. Simultaneous biomass production and water desalination concentrate treatment by using microalgae. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 135, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sahle-Demessie, E.; Aly Hassan, A.; El Badawy, A. Bio-desalination of brackish and seawater using halophytic algae. Desalination 2019, 465, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baghour, M. Algal degradation of organic pollutants. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 565–586. [Google Scholar]
  54. Min, M.; Hu, B.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Mutual influence of light and CO2 on carbon sequestration via cultivating mixotrophic alga Auxenochlorella protothecoides UMN280 in an organic carbon-rich wastewater. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, K.-L.; Ying, T.-Y.; Yiacoumi, S.; Tsouris, A.C.; Vittoratos, E.S. Electrosorption of ions from aqueous solutions by carbon aerogel: An electrical double-layer model. Langmuir 2001, 17, 1961–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shetty, P.; Gitau, M.M.; Maróti, G. Salinity stress responses and adaptation mechanisms in eukaryotic green microalgae. Cells 2019, 8, 1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Yokoya, N.S.; De-Oliveira, E.C. Effects of salinity on the growth rate, morphology and water content of some Brazilian red algae of economic importance. Cienc. Mar. 1992, 18, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ferroni, L.; Baldisserotto, C.; Pantaleoni, L.; Billi, P.; Fasulo, M.P.; Pancaldi, S. High salinity alters chloroplast morpho physiology in a freshwater Kirchneriella species (Selenastraceae) from Ethiopian Lake Awasa. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 1972–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gautam, S.; Kapoor, D. Application of halophilic algae for water desalination. In Handbook of Algal Biofuels; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 167–179. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study Area Map for the five samples collected from Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Asian Red Sea coast (Using Landsat8 OLI 2022, Path/Row 178/39).
Figure 1. Study Area Map for the five samples collected from Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, Asian Red Sea coast (Using Landsat8 OLI 2022, Path/Row 178/39).
Sustainability 14 07018 g001
Figure 2. Microscopic photographs (40× magnification) of algal species used in the biodesalination process: (1) S. arcuatusa; (2) C. vulgaris; and (3) Sp. Maxima.
Figure 2. Microscopic photographs (40× magnification) of algal species used in the biodesalination process: (1) S. arcuatusa; (2) C. vulgaris; and (3) Sp. Maxima.
Sustainability 14 07018 g002
Figure 3. Biodesalination experimental system: (A) the system under control conditions, (B) the system under high light intensity and CO2 conditions.
Figure 3. Biodesalination experimental system: (A) the system under control conditions, (B) the system under high light intensity and CO2 conditions.
Sustainability 14 07018 g003
Figure 4. The distribution pattern showing the ratios of the major anion salts relative to the total dissolved salts at the study areas. (1) Gayal; (2) Sharma, (3) Al-Muwaileh; (4) Duba; (5) Umluj.
Figure 4. The distribution pattern showing the ratios of the major anion salts relative to the total dissolved salts at the study areas. (1) Gayal; (2) Sharma, (3) Al-Muwaileh; (4) Duba; (5) Umluj.
Sustainability 14 07018 g004
Figure 5. The bioaccumulation capacity of chloride anions (Qe) at different seawater concentrations.
Figure 5. The bioaccumulation capacity of chloride anions (Qe) at different seawater concentrations.
Sustainability 14 07018 g005
Figure 6. The bioremoval of TDS at different seawater concentrations.
Figure 6. The bioremoval of TDS at different seawater concentrations.
Sustainability 14 07018 g006
Figure 7. The bioaccumulation of chloride anions by algal species during the incubation period.
Figure 7. The bioaccumulation of chloride anions by algal species during the incubation period.
Sustainability 14 07018 g007
Figure 8. The maximum bioaccumulation capacity and bioremoval rate of chloride anions by the algal species.
Figure 8. The maximum bioaccumulation capacity and bioremoval rate of chloride anions by the algal species.
Sustainability 14 07018 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between the Chloride bioaccumulation capacity (Qe) and the growth response (OD) in (a) S. arcuatusa and (b) C. vulgaris.
Figure 9. Relationship between the Chloride bioaccumulation capacity (Qe) and the growth response (OD) in (a) S. arcuatusa and (b) C. vulgaris.
Sustainability 14 07018 g009
Figure 10. Relationship between the chloride bioaccumulation capacity (Qe) and TDS in (a) S. arcuatusa and (b) C. vulgaris.
Figure 10. Relationship between the chloride bioaccumulation capacity (Qe) and TDS in (a) S. arcuatusa and (b) C. vulgaris.
Sustainability 14 07018 g010
Figure 11. The removal efficiency for TDS and chloride and the net algal biomass in S. arcuatusa and C. vulgaris before and after being subjected to new conditions.
Figure 11. The removal efficiency for TDS and chloride and the net algal biomass in S. arcuatusa and C. vulgaris before and after being subjected to new conditions.
Sustainability 14 07018 g011
Figure 12. Kinetic plots showing (a) pseudo first order and (b) pseudo second order models of the three algal species under control conditions.
Figure 12. Kinetic plots showing (a) pseudo first order and (b) pseudo second order models of the three algal species under control conditions.
Sustainability 14 07018 g012
Figure 13. Kinetic plots showing (a) pseudo first order and (b) pseudo second order models of the algal species under high light intensity and CO2 supply.
Figure 13. Kinetic plots showing (a) pseudo first order and (b) pseudo second order models of the algal species under high light intensity and CO2 supply.
Sustainability 14 07018 g013aSustainability 14 07018 g013b
Figure 14. Microscopic photographs (40× magnification) of S. arcuatusa (a) before and (b) after exposure to high salinity conditions.
Figure 14. Microscopic photographs (40× magnification) of S. arcuatusa (a) before and (b) after exposure to high salinity conditions.
Sustainability 14 07018 g014
Figure 15. SEM micrographs for dried algal biomass (A) before and (B) after bio-desalination.
Figure 15. SEM micrographs for dried algal biomass (A) before and (B) after bio-desalination.
Sustainability 14 07018 g015
Table 1. Sample location ordination with google map images.
Table 1. Sample location ordination with google map images.
StandLocation NameLatitudeLongitudeGoogle Map Image
1Gayal35°02′40.878″ E28°06′21.673″ N Sustainability 14 07018 i001
2Sharma35°28′19.076″ E27°41′10.930″ N Sustainability 14 07018 i002
3Al-Muwaileh35°43′20.724″ E27°19′46.699″ N Sustainability 14 07018 i003
4Duba36°27′22.473″ E26°13′31.834″ N Sustainability 14 07018 i004
5Umluj37°15′08.167″ E25°02′07.936″ N Sustainability 14 07018 i005
Table 2. Physico-chemical analysis at the different locations.
Table 2. Physico-chemical analysis at the different locations.
ParametersUnitsResults
12345
pH 8.68.528.78.58.61
TurbidityNTU0.560.490.20.740.26
Electrical Conductivity (EC)m mohs/cm57.156.253.954.358.3
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)mg/L39,97039,34037,73038,01040,810
Total Hardness (as CO32−)mg/L94757835741575019677
Calcium Hardness (as CaCO3)mg/L30002500250025003000
Magnesium Hardness (as MgCO3)mg/L64755335491550016677
Calciummg/L12001000100010001200
Magnesiummg/L15541280.41179.61200.241602.48
Chlorides (as Cl−1)mg/L28,42529,50528,24528,50529,032
Sulfates (as SO4−2)mg/L20702000207020032100
Nitritemg NO2/L0.00.00.00.00.0
Nitratemg NO3/L0.010.010.010.010.01
Phosphatemg P/L0.00.00.00.00.0
Sodiummg/L13,26813,05912,52412,61713,547
Potassiummg/L11841166111811261209
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of chloride bioaccumulation by the three algal species.
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of chloride bioaccumulation by the three algal species.
Pseudo-First OrderPseudo-Second Order
Qe (mg/g) (Cal)Qe (mg/g)
(Exp.)
K1
(min−1)
R2Qe (mg/g)
(cal.)
Qe (mg/g)
(exp.)
K2 (g/mg/min)R2
C. vulgaris177130.50.1740.937250130.50.000070.0124
S. arcuatusa124.2107.80.1430.875714.3107.89.0650.0016
Sp. maxima180.55114.230.1150.739133.3114.230.000690.7559
Table 4. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) for algal biomass before and after bioaccumulation.
Table 4. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) for algal biomass before and after bioaccumulation.
ElementWeight (%)
BeforeAfter
C66.1966.35
O26.5926.65
Na+0.941.15
K+2.383.32
Mg2+1.530.49
Ca2+2.352.02
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghobashy, M.O.I.; Bahattab, O.; Alatawi, A.; Aljohani, M.M.; Helal, M.M.I. A Novel Approach for the Biological Desalination of Major Anions in Seawater Using Three Microalgal Species: A Kinetic Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127018

AMA Style

Ghobashy MOI, Bahattab O, Alatawi A, Aljohani MM, Helal MMI. A Novel Approach for the Biological Desalination of Major Anions in Seawater Using Three Microalgal Species: A Kinetic Study. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghobashy, Madeha O. I., Omar Bahattab, Aishah Alatawi, Meshari M. Aljohani, and Mohamed M. I. Helal. 2022. "A Novel Approach for the Biological Desalination of Major Anions in Seawater Using Three Microalgal Species: A Kinetic Study" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127018

APA Style

Ghobashy, M. O. I., Bahattab, O., Alatawi, A., Aljohani, M. M., & Helal, M. M. I. (2022). A Novel Approach for the Biological Desalination of Major Anions in Seawater Using Three Microalgal Species: A Kinetic Study. Sustainability, 14(12), 7018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop