Eco-Value and Public Perceptions for Indigenous Farm Animal Breeds and Local Plant Varieties, Focusing on Greece
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- Recognition and categorization of LPV and IFAB that are cultivated and reared, respectively, in Greece with some references to the Balkans. This part is based on reliable data obtained from scientific content search engines, institutions, and recognized organizations in Greece and other Balkan countries. Measures for the conservation and utilization of LPV and IFAB are also suggested in order to promote agro-biodiversity. The review of relevant literature highlighted conservation and utilization measures that have been (or are still) implemented in Greece and the Balkans;
- Economic, ecological, cultural, and social values that are associated with LPV cultivation and IFAB breeding, which play a crucial role in Greek areas with some references in Balkan territory;
- Impact of the environment on IFAB products: This constitutes an important part of the review process, which focuses on consolidating previous work on the potential effects of environmental factors on IFAB products. This analysis was based on data from articles regarding Greece and other Balkan countries;
- Sustainability assessment of LPV and IFAB products from Greece and other Balkan countries;
- Public perceptions of LPV and IFAB and their products. What do consumers and farmers think about LPV, IFAB, and their products?
- Certification-marking-labeling of LPV and IFAB products together with examples of integrated approaches and small value chains that combine policy and market interventions and involve farmer organizations, networks, clusters, etc. This part of the review seeks to provide insights regarding the influence of certification and labeling in Greek and other Balkan markets.
- Planning the review: The review was designed according to a specific course of work in Internet search engines. This work was concerned with the search, localization, categorization, and synthesis of data from international and occasionally local scientific literature. The research question had to do with how the literature approaches the concepts of LPV and IFAB in Greece and some other Balkan countries;
- Conducting the review: This stage aims for a comprehensive, unbiased search, resulting in a full listing of documents on which the review will be based. The selection of papers and articles for this review started with the search of documents in 5 August 2021 in three databases/searching machines. Scopus preview was the main searching machine of the study https://www.scopus.com/standard/marketing.uri#basic (accessed on 16 May 2022). The two others were the Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/schhp?hl=el&as_sdt=0,5 (accessed on 23 May 2022) and the Web of Science https://www.webofscience.com (accessed on 30 May 2022). All the strings were based on the research sections. At first the terms searched were (“Balkan”, “local varieties”, and “indigenous breed”). Furthermore, for Sections 1 and 2, the strings searched were each Balkan country separately, (“Greece”, “Montenegro”, “Serbia”, “Bulgaria”, etc.), “local varieties“, and “indigenous breed“ or “autochthonous breed”). For Sections 3, 4 and 6, the terms searched were each Balkan country separately (“Greece”, “Montenegro”, “Serbia”, “Bulgaria”, etc.), “agro-products“, “local varieties“ and “indigenous breed“ or “autochthonous breed”). Finally, for Section 5 the strings searched were each Balkan country separately (“Greece”, “Montenegro”, “Serbia”, “Bulgaria”, etc.), “agro-products”, “public perceptions”, “short value chain”, “local varieties”, and “indigenous breed“ or “autochthonous breed”). Although we aimed to search all terms simultaneously in the title, abstract, and keywords, filters, and criteria in each database had to be adapted because they offered different search options. We specifically focused on peer-reviewed sources to guarantee that the papers were carefully assessed. This procedure was performed on all papers. In this process, we rejected documents that did not meet the combination of the criteria;
- Identification, categorization and synthesis of results: at this stage the final synthesis of the information from the selected sources was carried out, simplifying and analyzing the content of the articles and starting with a descriptive coding of the categories. The findings were then discussed to make the final summary on the basis of which a future research agenda is proposed.
3. Results
3.1. Categorization, Registration, Preservation, and Valorisation of LPV and IFAB
3.2. Economic, Ecological, Cultural, and Social Value of IFAB and LPV
3.3. Impact of the Environment on Products Derived from LPVs and IFABs
3.4. Sustainability Assessment of Local Agro-Products
3.5. Public Perceptions regarding IFAB and LPV and Their Agro-Products
3.6. Certification-Marking-Label of LPV and IFAB Agro-Products
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The New Common Agricultural Policy: 2023-27, from European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/new-cap-2023-27_en (accessed on 28 June 2022).
- Joshi, L.; Wibawa, G.; Beukema, H.; Williams, S.; van Noordwijk, M. Technological change and biodiversity in the rubber agroecosystem of Sumatra. In Tropical Agroecosystems; Vandermeer, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 133–155. [Google Scholar]
- Fotiadis, G.; Vrahnakis, M.; Kazoglou, Y.; Tsiripidis, I. Dry grassland types in the Prespa National Park (NW Greece), including the southernmost occurrence of the priority habitat type “Pannonic sand steppes”(code 6260). Hacquetia 2014, 13, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boettcher, P.; Oldenbroek, J.; Sponenberg, D.; Gandini, G.; Martin, J.; Joshi, B. Reviewing the roles of animal genetic resources and options for their conservation. In In Vivo Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources; Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO). Status and Trends of Animal Genetic Resources. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ng620en/ng620en.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2022).
- Giantsis, I.A.; Diakakis, N.E.; Avdi, M. Genetic composition and evaluation of the status of a non-descript indigenous horse population from Greece, the Macedonian Pacer. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 71, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enhancing Agricultural Biodiversity from European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/sustainability/environmental-sustainability/biodiversity_en (accessed on 28 June 2022).
- Köhler-Rollefson, I. Community-based management of animal genetic resources–with special reference to pastoralists. Community-based management of animal genetic resources. In Proceedings of the Workshop Held in Mbabane, Mbabane, Swaziland, 7–11 May 2001; Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) Publisher: Rome, Italy, 2003; pp. 13–26. [Google Scholar]
- Karagiannis, G.; Melfou, K. Efficiency analysis in a sample of PGI bean producers in Greece. Agric. Econ. Rev. 2015, 16, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
- Lukšić, I.; Bošković, B.; Novikova, A.; Vrbensky, R. Innovative financing of the sustainable development goals in the countries of the Western Balkans. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2022, 12, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giantsis, I.A.; Antonopoulou, D.; Dekolis, N.; Zaralis, K.; Avdi, M. Origin, demographics, inbreeding, phylogenetics, and phenogenetics of Karamaniko breed, a major common ancestor of the autochthonous Greek sheep. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argyriadou, A.; Gelasakis, A.I.; Banos, G.; Arsenos, G. Genetic improvement of indigenous Greek sheep and goat breeds. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2020, 71, 2063–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giantsis, I.A.; Diakakis, N.E.; Avdi, M. High Frequencies of TNC and COL5A1 genotypes associated with low risk for superficial digital flexor tendinopathy in Greek indigenous horse breeds compared with warmblood horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 92, 103173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry in Bulgaria. Establishments in the Zootechnical Field Commission Decision of 18 September 2019. Available online: https://www.mzh.government.bg/en/sectors/animal-breeding/zootechnical-issues/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Grittner, N.; Mandić, R.; Urošević, M. Animal Genetic Resources of Serbia: Situation and Perspectives. Pak. J. Zool. 2021, 53, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maxim, A.; Străjeru, S.; Albu, C.; Sandor, M.; Mihalescu, L.; Pauliuc, S.E. Conservation of vegetable genetic diversity in Transylvania-Romania. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statuto, D.; Picuno, P. Valorisation of vernacular farm buildings for the sustainable development of rural tourism in mountain areas of the Adriatic-Ionian macro-region. J. Agric. Eng. 2017, 48, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kebebe, K.E. Understanding Factors Affecting Technology Adoption in Smallholder Livestock Production Systems in Ethiopia: The Role of Farm Resources and the Enabling Environment. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ragkos, A.; Koutouzidou, G.; Christodoulou, C.; Batzios, A. Which orientation for strategies and policies for local animal breeds? The role of ICT and novel technologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Chania, Crete, 21–24 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Roosen, J.; Fadlaoui, A.; Bertaglia, M. Economic evaluation for conservation of farm animal genetic resources. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2005, 122, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schöpke, K.; Swalve, H.H. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics. Animal 2016, 10, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bojkovski, D.; Simčič, M.; Kompan, D. Supports for local breeds in the European region–an overview. PoljoPrivreda 2015, 21, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragkos, A.; Abas, Z. Using the choice experiment method in the design of breeding goals in dairy sheep. Animal 2015, 9, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrovic, M.P.; Petrovic, V.C.; Muslic, D.R.; Maksimovic, N.; Cekic, B.; Ilic, Z.Z.; Kurcubic, V. Strategy for sustainable development and utilization of sheep and goat resources in Serbia. KnE Life Sci. 2017, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lianou, D.T.; Michael, C.K.; Vasileiou, N.G.C.; Liagka, D.V.; Mavrogianni, V.S.; Caroprese, M.; Fthenakis, G.C. Association of Breed of Sheep or Goats with Somatic Cell Counts and Total Bacterial Counts of Bulk-Tank Milk. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christodoulou, V.; Bampidis, V.A.; Sossidou, E.; Ambrosiadis, J. Evaluation of Florina (Pelagonia) sheep breed for growth and carcass traits. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 70, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodovski, P.; Sdraveski, I. Evolution and History of Pelagonia Sheep Breed in the Cross-Boder Area. Project: Protection of Autochthonous Populations of PElagonia SHEep Breed in the Cross-Border Area (PAPESHE). Bitola. 2020. Available online: http://papeshe.vet.auth.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Evolution-and-history-of-the-Pelagonia-sheep-breed-in-the-cross-boder-area-N.-MACEDONIA-D3.4.3.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2022).
- Simos, E.N.; Nikolaou, E.M.; Zoiopoulos, P.E. Yield, composition and certain physicochemical characteristics of milk of the Epirus mountain sheep breed. Small Rumin. Res. 1996, 20, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimov, D.; Vuchkov, A. Sheep genetic resources in Bulgaria with focus on breeds with coloured wool. Genet. Resour. 2021, 2, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juvančič, L.; Slabe-Erker, R.; Ogorevc, M.; Drucker, A.G.; Erjavec, E.; Bojkovski, D. Payments for Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources in Agriculture: One Size Fits All? Animals 2021, 11, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radovan, K.; Vostrý, L.; Vostrá-Vydrová, H.; Candráková, K.; Moravčíková, N. Food Resources Biodiversity: The Case of Local Cattle in Slovakia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vokurkaa, A.; Prša, K.; Pejić, I.; Jurković, Z.; Dugalić, K.; Duralija, B. An Overview of Croatian Autochthonous Varieties of Sweet Cherry. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1020, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skender, A.; Hadžiabulić, S.; Ercisli, S.; Hasanbegović, J.; Dedić, S.; Almeer, R.; Sayed, A.A.; Ullah, R.; Assouguem, A. Morphological and Biochemical Properties in Fruits of Naturally Grown Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas L.) Genotypes in Northwest Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udriste, A.-A.; Iordachescu, M.; Ciceoi, R.; Bădulescu, L. Next- Generation Sequencing of Local Romanian Tomato Varieties and Bioinformatics Analysis of the Ve Locus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basile, B.; Mataffo, A.; Forlani, M.; Corrado, G. Diversity in Morphometric, Pomological, and Fruit-Quality Traits of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) Traditional Varieties: Implications for Landrace Differentiation at Regional Scale. Diversity 2022, 14, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stagnari, F.; Ficcadenti, N.; Manetta, A.C.; Platani, C.; Dattoli, M.A.; Galieni, A. Modulation of Light and Nitrogen for Quality-Traits Improvement: A Case Study of Altino Sweet Pepper. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agolli, M.; Terpo, M.; Terpo, D.; Meçi, E. Tourist-environmental assessment of Përmet District, traditional food processing and the typical products of the area. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavia, N.; Gržinić, J.; Floričić, T. The perception of gastronomic events within the framework of sustainable tourism development. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Sustain. Tour. VI 2014, 187, 277–289. [Google Scholar]
- Alamanos, E.; Kuznesof, S.; Ritson, C. The influence of holidays on wine purchasing behaviour: Marketing and tourism insights based on a holiday experience in Greece. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2016, 18, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merkouropoulos, G.; Mylona, P. Assessment of genetic diversity of Vitis vinifera local cultivars of northern Greece as a means for valorization of vine and wine territories. Territ. Du Vin 2018, 8. Available online: http://preo.u-bourgogne.fr/territoiresduvin/index.php?id=1357 (accessed on 5 May 2022).
- Monteiro, A.N.T.R.; Wilfart, A.; Utzeri, V.J.; Lukač, N.B.; Tomažin, U.; Costa, L.N.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Garcia-Launay, F. Environmental impacts of pig production systems using European local breeds: The contribution of carbon sequestration and emissions from grazing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maraš, V.; Tello, J.; Gazivoda, A.; Mugoša, M.; Perišić, M.; Raičević, J.; Štajner, J.N.; Ocete, R.; Božović, V.; Popović, T.; et al. Population genetic analysis in old Montenegrin vineyards reveals ancient ways currently active to generate diversity in Vitis vinifera. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skalkos, D.; Kosma, I.S.; Chasioti, E.; Skendi, A.; Papageorgiou, M.; Guiné, R.P. Consumers’ Attitude and Perception toward Traditional Foods of Northwest Greece during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, S. Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giantsis, I.A.; Laliotis, G.P.; Stoupa, O.; Avdi, M. Polymorphism of the melatonin receptor 1A (MNTR1A) gene and association with seasonality of reproductive activity in a local Greek sheep breed. J. Biol. Res.-Thessalon. 2016, 23, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henderson, D.C.; Robinson, J.J. Part III Reproductive physiology. The reproductive cycle and its manipulation. In Diseases of Sheep; Blackwell Science: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 43–53. [Google Scholar]
- Aksoy, Y.; Çiçek, Ü.; Şen, U.; Şirin, E.; Uğurlu, M.; Önenç, A.; Kuran, M.; Ulutas, Z. Meat production characteristics of Turkish native breeds: II. meat quality, fatty acid, and cholesterol profile of lambs. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2019, 62, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korunoska, B.; Taseska-Gjorgjijevski, M.; Nedelkovski, D.; Beleski, K.; Gjolevska-Millenkovska, R.; Milanov, G.; Rajcin, V. Examination of the content of some antioxidant substances in some autochthonous grapevine varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) in RN macedonia. J. Agric. Food Environ. Sci. JAFES 2021, 75, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
- Selamovska, A.; Gjamovski, V.; Taseska-Gjorgjijevski, M.; Nedelkovski, D.; Korunoska, B.; Oreshkovikj, K.B.; Djoljevska-Milenkovska, R. Comparative studies of the content of antioxidants in fruits of some autochthonous Cherry varieties. J. Agric. Plant Sci. 2022, 20, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salkić, B.; Cvrk, R.; Imširović, E.; Jašić, A.; Salkić, A. Investigating the phenological and pompological characteristics of indigenous pears in northeast Bosnia. Int. J. Plant. Soil. Sci. 2019, 30, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topalović, A.; Knežević, M.; Gačnik, S.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Detailed chemical composition of juice from autochthonous pomegranate genotypes (Punica granatum L.) grown in different locations in Montenegro. Food Chem. 2020, 330, 127261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matejić, J.S.; Stefanović, N.; Ivković, M.; Živanović, N.; Marin, P.D.; Džamić, A.M. Traditional uses of autochthonous medicinal and ritual plants and other remedies for health in Eastern and South-Eastern Serbia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 261, 113186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zoumpoulis, A.; Peleka, E.; Triantafyllidis, K. Life Cycle Analysis [Chapter]. In Green Chemistry and Technology in Sustainable Development; Kallipos, Open Academic Editions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Chapter 4; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/2324 (accessed on 11 May 2022). (In Greek)
- Xagoraris, M.; Oikonomou, I.; Daferera, D.; Kanakis, C.; Lappa, I.K.; Giotis, C.; Pappas, C.S.; Tarantilis, P.A.; Skotti, E. Quality Evaluation of Winery By-Products from Ionian Islands Grape Varieties in the Concept of Circular Bioeconomy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, E.; Galli, F.; Menozzi, D.; Maye, D.; Touzard, J.M.; Marescotti, A.; Six, J.; Brunori, G. Comparing the sustainability of local and global food products in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menger, A.K.; Hamm, U. Consumers’ knowledge and perceptions of endangered livestock breeds: How wording influences conservation efforts. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 188, 107117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallas, Z.; Varela, E.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Pugliese, C.; Cerjak, M.; Tomažin, U.; Karolyi, D.; Aquilani, C.; Vitale, M.; Gil, J.M. Can innovations in traditional pork products help thriving EU untapped pig breeds? A non-hypothetical discrete choice experiment with hedonic evaluation. Meat Sci. 2019, 154, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlontzos, G.; Kyrgiakos, L.; Duquenne, M.N. What are the main drivers of young consumers purchasing traditional food products? European field research. Foods 2018, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haas, R.; Imami, D.; Miftari, I.; Ymeri, P.; Grunert, K.; Meixner, O. Consumer perception of food quality and safety in western balkan countries: Evidence from albania and kosovo. Foods 2021, 10, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitale, M.; Kallas, Z.; Rivera-Toapanta, E.; Karolyi, D.; Cerjak, M.; Lebret, B.; Lenoire, H.; Pugliesef, C.; Aquilanif, C.; Čandek-Potokarg, M.; et al. Consumers’ expectations and liking of traditional and innovative pork products from European autochthonous pig breeds. Meat Sci. 2020, 168, 108179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragomir, L.; Mazilu, M.; Dobrescu, A.; Malmare, R. Certification and promotion of sustainable tourism: Consumers attitude towards EU Ecolabel. Forum Geogr. 2021, 20, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrea, T.; Mamalis, S.; Melfou, K.; Papanagiotou, P.; Krystallis, A. Exploring the Moderating Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism on Consumer Value Perceptions Towards Own-Country Geographic Indication (GI) Foods. In Proceedings of the 145th Seminar, Parma, Italy, 14–15 April 2015; pp. 1–21, No. 714-2016-48632. [Google Scholar]
- BăLăşescu, M. Solutions for improving the Romanian Consumers Trust in the Authenticity of Traditional Local Food. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Ser. V Econ. Sci. 2017, 10, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
- Ragkos, A.; Papoutsi, G.; Tzouramani, Ε.; Theodoropoulou, Ε.; Bardiounioti, Μ. An integrated framework for highlighting and valuing the values of plant genetic resources. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of Greek Scientific Society for Genetic Improvement of Plants (Gssgip), Patra, Greece, 17–19 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Kizos, T.; Vakoufaris, H. Valorisation of a local asset: The case of olive oil on Lesvos Island. Food Policy 2011, 36, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaspar, P.; Escribano, A.J.; Mesías, F.J.; Escribano, M.; Pulido, A.F. Goat systems of Villuercas-Ibores area in SW Spain: Problems and perspectives of traditional farming systems. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 97, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsoner, T.; Vigl, L.E.; Manck, F.; Jaritz, G.; Tappeiner, U.; Tasser, E. Indigenous livestock breeds as indicators for cultural ecosystem services: A spatial analysis within the Alpine Space. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spilioti, M.; Stahtiaris, S.; Kominakis, A.; Karanikolas, P.; Tsiboukas, K. Advancing the Value of Local Livestock Breeds: The Case of Greek Cheese Ladotyri Mytilinis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2020), Thessaloniki, Greece, 24–27 September 2020; pp. 309–316. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tampaki, M.; Koutouzidou, G.; Ragkos, A.; Melfou, K.; Giantsis, I.A. Eco-Value and Public Perceptions for Indigenous Farm Animal Breeds and Local Plant Varieties, Focusing on Greece. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811211
Tampaki M, Koutouzidou G, Ragkos A, Melfou K, Giantsis IA. Eco-Value and Public Perceptions for Indigenous Farm Animal Breeds and Local Plant Varieties, Focusing on Greece. Sustainability. 2022; 14(18):11211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811211
Chicago/Turabian StyleTampaki, Martha, Georgia Koutouzidou, Athanasios Ragkos, Katerina Melfou, and Ioannis A. Giantsis. 2022. "Eco-Value and Public Perceptions for Indigenous Farm Animal Breeds and Local Plant Varieties, Focusing on Greece" Sustainability 14, no. 18: 11211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811211
APA StyleTampaki, M., Koutouzidou, G., Ragkos, A., Melfou, K., & Giantsis, I. A. (2022). Eco-Value and Public Perceptions for Indigenous Farm Animal Breeds and Local Plant Varieties, Focusing on Greece. Sustainability, 14(18), 11211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811211