E-Learning for Continuing Professional Development of University Librarians: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
“Particularly in libraries where in-person instruction is not always feasible, online tutorials can reach more people than a typical instruction team. Tutorials can provide 24/7 access to library information as well as instruction in information literacy skills and electronic library orientation”.
1.1. Statement of Problem and Rationale
1.2. Research Questions
- RQ1.
- What are the factors influencing e-learning for continued professional development (CPD) of working librarians?
- RQ2.
- Which challenges are encountered in e-learning adoption?
- RQ3.
- What are the best practices to design an efficient e-learning portfolio?
2. Materials and Methods
“provided key characteristics of a systematic review are: (a) a clearly stated set of objectives with an explicit, reproducible methodology; (b) a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility criteria; (c) an assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies, for example through the assessment of the risk of bias; and (d) systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics and findings of the included studies”.
2.1. Stage One: Planning
- (1).
- Focused research questions
- (2).
- Search strategy
2.1.1. Search Terms
- Formulation of keywords/constructs/variables from title of the article as main thought.
- Development of a general study objective and choose some words from that showing clear direction of the instant research.
- Usage of keywords used by other researchers in their published studies.
- Relevant terms.
- Employment of Boolean operators “AND” to retrieve combined records of both terms, “OR” to include substitute terms and “NOT” to exclude keywords in search terms for finding the most relevant documents.
- (“E-learning” OR “Factors influencings e-learning” OR “Benefits of online learning” OR “Challenges being encountered for e-learning adoption”)
- AND
- (“Online learning AND continued professional development” OR “Role of different factors in the spread e-learning for CPD” OR “Impact of e-learning” OR “Causes to attend professional development programs” OR “e-learning portfolio” OR “Role of social media application to improve e-learning” OR “Challenges to implement e-learning programs” OR “Digital learning” AND “CPD” OR “Professional learning opportunities” OR “CPD” AND “Digital literacy” OR “Framework to design an e-learning system” OR “E-learning on social media platforms” OR “Digital learning” AND “online continuing education” OR “IT skills” AND “Effective CPD” OR “Career development” AND “Value-added library services” OR “Role of technology in growing e-learning” OR “Role of library leadership” AND “E-learning strategies” OR “E-learning for professional development” AND “Sustainable e-learning professional development” OR “Professional development model” AND “Effects of professional development” OR “Collaborative e-learning” OR “Challenges for implementing e-learning” OR “Key factors of CPD” OR “E-learning for practicing librarians” AND “CPD of in-service library professionals” OR “E-learning for librarians” AND “CPD for library professionals” OR “Role of transformative leadership for CPD” OR “Best practices to implement e-learning for CPD” OR “Online professional development” OR “Benefits and challenges for adopting e-learning” OR “e-learning for university library professionals” OR “Blended learning continuing professional development” OR “Quality e-learning professional development” OR “Online professional development in librarianship” OR “Librarians’ technological readiness for online professional development” OR “Distance educational professional development” OR “Methods to develop an effective online portfolio” OR “Transformational online professional development” OR “Barriers to e-learning” OR “Continuing professional education in librarianship”)
- NOT
- (“E-learning” NOT “Traditional learning methods”, “Impact of online learning” NOT “Conventional learning”, “E-learning for professional development” NOT “Syllabus based learning”, “e-modules for CPD” NOT “On site learning”).
2.1.2. Literature Resources and Existing Research
2.2. Stage Two: Selection
- (1).
- Search process
- (2).
- Scrutiny and filtering
2.3. Stage Three: Extraction
2.4. Stage Four: Execution
3. Findings
3.1. Geographical Distribution of the Studies
3.2. Factors Influencings E-Learning
3.3. Organizational Survival
3.4. Age of Continuous Changes
3.5. Adoption of Emerging Technologies
3.6. Professional Growth
3.7. Miscellaneous Factors
3.8. Challenges Encountered for E-Learning Adoption
3.9. Technical Difficulties
3.10. Lack of Funds
3.11. Reliance upon Conventional Models
3.12. Overwhelming Workload
3.13. Best Practices to Develop an Effective E-Portfolio
3.14. Allocation of Separate Budget
3.15. Development of E-Learning Unit
3.16. Plentiful Professional Learning Opportunities
3.17. Technical Support
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Limitations
7. Future Research Directions
- This study looked at the role of e-learning for CPD of university librarians through a systematic literature review methodology. Future authors may conduct similar studies on the same topic through quantitative or qualitative or mixed methods.
- Future authors may include blogs, websites, grey literature, dissertations, conference proceedings, and books to conduct a systematic literature review on the effects of e-learning on the sustainable competence development of academic librarians.
- Future researchers may include all types of librarians, including college librarians and medical librarians, to identify the role of e-learning upon their professional development.
- Future investigators may conduct the role of e-learning on CPD using different adult learning theories through empirical methods.
- A quantitative study may also be conducted by future authors for testing the validity of the framework offered through the current study for the establishment of an efficient e-learning portfolio for CPD of library professionals.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bhabal, J. E-learning in LIS education: Case study of SHPT school of library science. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference CALIBER-2008, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India, 28–29 February & 1 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
- SStein, S.J.; Shephard, K.; Harris, I. Conceptions of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by tertiary educators in New Zealand. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2009, 42, 145–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, D.; Ware, M. E-learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learn. Publ. 2003, 16, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abubakar, B.M.; Hassan, B.B. Strategies for Developing an e-Learning Curriculum for Library and Information Sciences (LIS) Schools in the Muslim World: Meeting the Expectations in the Digital Age. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2013, 3, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
- Fourie, I. Twenty-first century librarians: Time for Zones of Intervention and Zones of Proximal Development? Libr. Hi Tech 2013, 31, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hedberg, J.; Ping, L.C. Charting trends for e-learning in Asian schools. Distance Educ. 2004, 25, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slebodnik, M.; Riehle, C.F. Creating Online Tutorials at Your Libraries: Software Choices and Practical Implications. Ref. User Serv. Q. 2009, 49, 33–37, 51. [Google Scholar]
- Cooke, N.A. Professional development 2.0 for librarians: Developing an online personal learning network (PLN). Libr. Hi Tech News 2012, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Massis, B.E. Continuing professional education: Ensuring librarian engagement. New Libr. World 2010, 111, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ecclestone, M. MOOCs as a Professional Development Tool for Librarians. Partnersh. Can. J. Libr. Inf. Pract. Res. 2013, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendrix, B.R.; McKeal, A.E. Case Study: Online Continuing Education for New Librarians. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. Distance Learn. 2017, 11, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coiffe, D.J. Webinars: Continuing Education and Professional Development for Librarians. J. Leadersh. Manag. Sect. 2012, 9, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
- Gruber, A.M. Wired Professional Development: New Librarians Connect Through the Web. Coll. Undergrad. Libr. 2008, 14, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassner, M.; Adams, K.E. Continuing Education for Distance Librarians. J. Libr. Inf. Serv. Distance Learn. 2012, 6, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norman, A.E.C. Librarians’ Leadership for Lifelong Learning. Public Libr. Q. 2012, 31, 91–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igben, M.J.; Akobo, D.I. State of information and communication technology (ICT) in libraries in Rivers State, Nigeria. African J. Libr. Arch. Inf. Sci. 2007, 17, 135–142. [Google Scholar]
- Nebeolise, L.N. The Impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Compliant Librarians on Library Services Delivery in Academic Library: The Case of National Open University of Nigeria (Noun) Library. Int. J. Educ. Benchmark 2018, 10, 118–129. [Google Scholar]
- Anene, I.A.; Idiedo, V.O. Librarians participation in professional development workshops using Zoom in Nigeria. Inf. Dev. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ezeani, C.N.; Eke, H.N.; Ugwu, F. Professionalism in library and information science. Electron. Libr. 2015, 33, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keiser, B.E. Professional Development and Continuing Education. Online 2012, 36, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Fontanin, M. Developing an English course for in-service librarians. Libr. Manag. 2008, 29, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rossi, P.G.; Magnoler, P.; Giannandrea, L. From an e-portfolio model to e-portfolio practices: Some guidelines. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 2008, 25, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hampe, N.; Lewis, S. E-portfolios support continuing professional development for librarians. Aust. Libr. J. 2013, 62, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, A.; Du, J.T. Professional development through social media applications: A study of female librarians in Pakistan. Inf. Learn. Sci. 2017, 118, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M. Professional Development and Networking for Academic Librarians. Int. Res. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 2017, 7, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Sivankalai, S. Academic libraries support e-learning and lifelong learning: A case study. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2021, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Sammour, G.; Schreurs, J.; Al Zoubi, A.Y.; Vanhoof, K. The role of knowledge management and e-learning in professional development. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 2008, 4, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varlejs, J. IFLA Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices; IFLA: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Venturella, K.; Breland, M. Supporting the best: Professional development in academic libraries. J. New Librariansh. 2019, 4, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, D.C.; Auster, E. Factors contributing to the professional development of reference librarians. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 2003, 25, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attebury, R. The Role of Administrators in Professional Development: Considerations for Facilitating Learning Among Academic Librarians. J. Libr. Adm. 2018, 58, 407–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamseer, L.; Moher, D.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015, 349, g7647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gross, J.; Leslie, L. Twenty-three steps to learning Web 2.0 technologies in an academic library. Electron. Libr. 2008, 26, 790–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ai-Ling, Y. Continuous professional development for librarians. J. Persat. Pustak. Malaysia 2009, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Conrad, S.; Shorish, Y.; Whitmire, A.L.; Hswe, P. Building professional development opportunities in data services for academic librarians. IFLA J. 2017, 43, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A. Analysis of training initiatives undertaken for professional development of library professionals in Pakistan. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2014, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anasi, S.N.; Ali, H. Academic librarians’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of adopting e-learning for continuing professional development in Lagos state, Nigeria. New Libr. World 2014, 115, 340–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, L.E.; Taylor, D.M. The role of the academic Library Information Specialist (LIS) in teaching and learning in the 21st century. Inf. Discov. Deliv. 2017, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namaganda, A. Continuing professional development as transformational learning: A case study. J. Acad. Librariansh. 2020, 46, 102152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowen-Chang, P.; Hosein, Y. Continuing professional development of academic librarians in Trinidad and Tobago. Glob. Knowl. Mem. Commun. 2019, 68, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahl, K.; Francis, S.; Tedd, L.A.; Tetrevova, M.; Zihlavnikova, E. Training for professional librarians in Slovakia by distance-learning methods: An overview of the PROLIB and EDULIB projects. Libr. Hi Tech 2002, 20, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S.N. | Author | Year | Country | Journal | Factors Influencing E-Learning | Challenges Being Encountered for E-Learning Adoption | Best Practices to Develop an Effective E-Portfolio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Dahl et al. | 2002 | Slovakia | Library Hi Tech |
| ||
2. | Chan and Auster | 2003 | Canada | Library & Information Science Research |
| ||
3. | Klein and Ware | 2003 | UK | Learned Publishing | Broadband access |
| |
4. | Fontanin | 2008 | Italy | Library Management |
| ||
5. | Rossi et al. | 2008 | Italy | Campus-Wide Information Systems | Add value to the professional skills |
| |
6. | Sammour et al. | 2008 | Belgium | Int. J. Knowledge and Learning |
| ||
7. | Gross and Leslie | 2009 | Australia | The Electronic Library |
|
| |
8. | Ling | 2009 | Malaysia | Journal PPM | Constantly changing environment |
| |
9. | Massis | 2010 | United States | New Library World |
|
| |
10. | Stein | 2011 | New Zealand | British Journal of Educational Technology |
| ||
11. | Fourie | 2012 | South Africa | Library Hi Tech |
| ||
12. | Cooke | 2012 | United States | Library Hi Tech News |
|
|
|
13. | Cassner and Adams | 2012 | United States | Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning | Institutional changes in higher education |
|
|
14. | Norman | 2012 | United States | Public Library Quarterly |
| ||
15. | Ecclestone | 2013 | Canada | Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research | Free higher education to all | ||
16. | Ezeani et al. | 2013 | Nigeria | The Electronic Library |
| ||
17. | Hampe and Lewis | 2013 | Australia | The Australian Library Journal | Affordability |
| |
18. | Ahsan | 2014 | Pakistan | Library Philosophy and Practice |
| ||
19. | Anasi and Ali | 2014 | Nigeria | New Library World |
|
| |
20. | Hendrix and McKeal | 2017 | United States | Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning |
|
| |
21. | Allen and Taylor | 2017 | United States | Information Discovery and Delivery |
| ||
22. | Khan and Du | 2017 | Pakistan | Information and Learning Science | Interactions in virtual spaces |
| |
23. | Aslam | 2017 | Oman | Journal of Library & Information Science |
|
|
|
24. | Conrad at al. | 2017 | United States | International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions |
|
| |
25. | Chang and Hosein | 2018 | Tobago | Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication |
| ||
26. | Attebury | 2018 | United States | Journal of Library Administration |
|
| |
27. | Venturella and Breland | 2019 | United States | Journal of New Librarianship |
|
| |
28. | Namaganda | 2020 | Uganda | The Journal of Academic Librarianship | Empowerment |
| |
29. | Anene | 2021 | Nigeria | Information Development |
|
| |
30. | Sivankalai | 2021 | India | Library Philosophy and Practice |
|
|
Sr. No. | Country | No. of Studies |
---|---|---|
1. | United States | 08 |
2. | Nigeria | 03 |
3. | Canada | 02 |
4. | Italy | 02 |
5. | Pakistan | 02 |
6. | United Kingdom | 01 |
7. | Australia | 01 |
8. | Belgium | 01 |
9. | New Zealand | 01 |
10. | Malaysia | 01 |
11. | Uganda | 01 |
12. | Tobago | 01 |
13. | Oman | 01 |
14. | India | 01 |
15. | Slovakia | 01 |
16. | South Africa | 01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shahzad, K.; Khan, S.A.; Javed, Y.; Iqbal, A. E-Learning for Continuing Professional Development of University Librarians: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010849
Shahzad K, Khan SA, Javed Y, Iqbal A. E-Learning for Continuing Professional Development of University Librarians: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010849
Chicago/Turabian StyleShahzad, Khurram, Shakeel Ahmad Khan, Yasir Javed, and Abid Iqbal. 2023. "E-Learning for Continuing Professional Development of University Librarians: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 15, no. 1: 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010849
APA StyleShahzad, K., Khan, S. A., Javed, Y., & Iqbal, A. (2023). E-Learning for Continuing Professional Development of University Librarians: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(1), 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010849