Next Article in Journal
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Factor Misallocation on the Transformation Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities Based on the Optimization Direction Function Calculation Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Admixture of Holothurian Species in the Hellenic Seas (Eastern Mediterranean) as Revealed by RADseq
Previous Article in Journal
On the Reason to Implement a Sustainable Urban Drainage Nature-Based Solution to Decrease Flood Threat: A Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Different Interspecies Demographic Histories within the Same Locality: A Case Study of Sea Cucumbers, Cuttlefish and Clams in Greek Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Holothurian Fisheries in the Hellenic Seas: Seeking for Sustainability

by
Dimitris Vafidis
1 and
Chryssanthi Antoniadou
2,*
1
Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, 384 46 Nea Ionia Volos, Greece
2
Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9799; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129799
Submission received: 15 May 2023 / Revised: 8 June 2023 / Accepted: 16 June 2023 / Published: 19 June 2023

Abstract

:
In Mediterranean, the exploitation and exportation of holothurians as food is increasing during the last 25 years, with Turkey and Greece as leading countries. In Greece, the fishery is expanding by the development of two métiers; however, official monitoring is missing, creating concerns on the future viability of the industry. To evaluate the status and future perspectives of holothurian fisheries, an extensive field survey has been completed (May 2019–July 2021) covering 162 sites dispersed in the Hellenic Seas. Field data included the assessment of the abundance of holothurians (via 100 m transect replicates), and catch per unit of effort (CNPUE and CBPUE, based on 10-min commercial fishing practices). H. tubulosa, H. poli, H. mammata and H. sanctori were fished in 41.35% of the surveyed stations. H. poli (CNPUE 168 specimens, CBPUE 22.24 kg) and H. tubulosa (CNPUE 127 specimens, CBPUE14.51 kg) were the most common species, forming locally dense populations. Mean annual catch was 275 metric tons (2016–2021) according to the processing of the units’ data; 62% of the production was made by H. tubulosa and 38% by H. poli. Our results suggest the existence of exploitable grounds in the north Aegean, the central Cyclades, and the north Dodecanese, according to the prevalent environmental conditions (organic load) and fishing pressure.

1. Introduction

Holothurians have been traditionally exploited as gastronomic delicacies and medical cures for centuries [1]. Nowadays, 64 species are commercialized, which are mainly distributed in the tropical and sub-tropical zones, and live in shallow coastal sedimentary muddy habitats [2]. Sea cucumber prices are highly variable according to species, size, and origin. However, mean price in the China’s retail market is set around 500 $/kg for the final dried product called “trepang” [3]. The increasing demand from international markets, in combination with the high price and the easiness of collection—often illegal due to the shallow-depth of the fishing grounds—has caused the collapse of about 39% of the natural stocks of tropical sea-cucumber. Moreover, IUCN has assessed 16 commercial holothurians as threatened species [4]. All the above drives the hunting of holothurians towards novel species and grounds, such as the Mediterranean Sea [5,6,7].
By focusing on the Mediterranean, the systematic fisheries of holothurians started in 1996 from Turkey; Greece, Spain, France, and Italy followed thereafter. Annual landings have been estimated to vary from 23 up to 550 metric tons as the maxima quota per country during the period 2010–2018, with Turkey and Greece leading the fishery market [5,6]. However, the above estimations are undocumented. FAO has just started to officially record landings per country within the relevant fishing area zone (i.e., FAO 37).
In the Hellenic Seas, two species of the genus Holothuria constitute the main target, namely H. tubulosa Gmelin, 1793 and H. poli Delle Chiaje, 1824 (Figure 1). The common name of the former is the brown sea cucumber and that of the latter is the black sea cucumber. Another three species of the same genus (H. mammata Grube, 1840, H. sanctori Delle Chiaje, 1823, H. forskali Delle Chiaje, 1823) are also edible and harvested in other Mediterranean countries [7], but not in Greece [5]. However, rather recently, specimens of H. mammata are sold mixed with H. tubulosa from the Greek fleet. According to the Greek fisheries legislation, the genus Hololthuria has been officially exploited as fishing bait since 2002 (Presidential Degree 109/2002 “on bait fishing”). Each fisherman was allowed to collect up to 150 specimens of Holothuria spp. larger than 15 cm in length from November to May, as a banning season was set from June to October. This national legislation has been repealed, and holothurians’ catches are moved from fishing baits to food for human consumption under the Presidential Degree 48/2018 “regulatory measures for fishing Holothuria spp.”. Hence, sea cucumbers are exclusively collected by certified fishermen that use vessels obligated to record daily catches. The collection is allowed only during daytime (1 h after sunrise and 1 h before sunset), by hand and by diving using a surface air-supply apparatus (nargileh) or free dive. The fishing season starts in November and expires at the end of April. Sea cucumbers may be collected from any coastal area of Greece except for: (a) especially restricted areas for fisheries, (b) ports and permanent-anchorage bays, minefields, shipwrecks, ship-routes, and areas restricted due to underwater antiquities, (c) aquaculture facilities, and (d) at a 500 m radial distance from fish-ponds—sea ranches. The daily quota is set at 400 specimens of Holothuria spp. per boat; each specimen must weigh at least 180 g (wet weight). The total catch by species must be recorded in an Integrated Electronic System of Fisheries Records created by the relevant ministry. However, the implementation of the recording system is not yet operational. Finally, there is a precaution for implementing additional management measures at a local or national scale to protect natural stocks, based on recorded annual catches and scientific data.
The fishing fleet activated in the Hellenic Seas ranges between 90–150 vessels which all belong to the small-scale fisheries [8]. The larger part of the fleet is composed of shell-fishers; these divers collect both shells and sea cucumbers. They fish in shallow bays and inlets, always very close to the shore and the port of origin. However, there are also some vessels, constituting of about 15–20% of the fleet, which originate from sponge fishing and now exclusively hunt holothurians. This part of the fleet consists of former sponge fishermen that shifted to sea cucumbers after the collapse in the richness of sponge grounds [9]. They perform large fishing trips moving offshore over the Aegean and the Ionian Seas and operate much deeper that the former. Therefore, the Hellenic Sea cucumber fleet is constituted of two different métiers which follow different fisheries tactics, a fact which should be considered in management efforts.
Considering all the above, the present study aims to evaluate the current status and future perspectives of holothurians’ natural fishery stocks in the Hellenic Seas by combining data from the field and the trepang processing units. More specifically, this work assesses: (i) the different species exploited and commercialized, (ii) the relevant fishery grounds over the Greek territory, and (iii) the density of natural stocks through fishing effort, in order to propose regulatory management options of the fishery, as best practices, based on the original data gathered.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study was carried out in the coastal waters of the Aegean and the Ionian Seas. The selection of specific survey localities was based on published information on the Holothuria spp. distribution [5,10], and on the opinions of fishermen and experts. Accordingly, the north Sporades and the north Aegean islands, the Cyclades plateau, the Dodecanese Island complex, and the Ionian islands were surveyed under multiday fishery trips, as well as the main shallow-water bays where holothurians are fished (Kavala, Thermaikos, Toroneos, Pagasitikos, Amvrakikos and Messiniakos gulfs) under daily trips (Figure 2). Overall, 162 sampling stations were set at 48 different islands and islets and six coastal bays.
Samplings were made from May 2019 to July 2021 in depths down to 25 m by one scientist and one sea-cucumber fisherman using the surface air supply diving method [9] and a licensed small-scale fishery boat. They included a combination of visual censuses to assess abundance through the semi-quantitative ACFOR scale of relative abundance along three replicate 1 × 100 m belt transects [11] by the scientist, and a 10-min collection of sea cucumbers by the fisherman applying standard commercial fishing practices, to assess catch per unit effort (CNPUE), as the total number of specimens caught per hour (N/h) [5,12]. Total catch was weighted on board to the nearest g using an electronic scale, to assess CBPUE. Concurrently, seawater temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen were recorded with an autographic conductivity-temperature-depth sensor, CTD (SeaBird Electronics, Washington, DC, USA).
An analysis of variance was applied to examine spatial differences in CPUE of holothurians using the general linear model [13]. Prior to the analyses, data were tested for normality with the Anderson—Darling test, while the homogeneity of variances was tested with Cohran’s test. The Fisher LSD test was used for post hoc comparisons. ANOVAs were performed using the SPSS software package (IBM SPSS statistics v.25, IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, NY, USA).
As the Greek authorities have not implemented the official recording system for sea cucumber landings yet, the internal holothurian quantities per species trade-in by the ‘Nautilus Seafood’ processing company were collected for the period 2016–2021 and analyzed to construct annual catch. This processing unit covers about the 20% of the internal trade of sea cucumbers fished over the Hellenic Seas.

3. Results

3.1. Diversity, Distribution, and Relative Abundance of Commercial Holothurian Species

Overall, four commercial sea cucumber species were recorded, namely H. tubulosa, H. poli, H. mammata and H. sanctori. These species were found in 67 of the 162 surveyed stations (Figure 3). Holothuria poli and H. tubulosa were the most common species, found in 39 and 37 stations, respectively. On the contrary, H. sanctori and H. mammata were occasionally found and in very low abundance, except for one station at Kalymnos (Therma beach), where the species was assessed as frequent (i.e., population density from 20 to 40 N/100 m2). In this station a thermal spring exists and the sea bottom consists of gravel and rocky plates interspersed in a seagrass meadow, as opposed to all other stations where the seabed is covered by sandy to muddy detritic sediments, mixed with patches of extensive Posidonia oceanica beds, and rocks here are only scattered or founds bordering the shoreline of a bay.
According to the ACFOR scale of relative abundance, H. poli was the most dominant species followed by H. tubulosa. Holothuria poli was present in nine stations (Pr), had sparse (O, R) populations in fifteen stations, and dense (A, C, F) populations in another fifteen stations (Figure 3). Therefore, its natural stocks may be considered as exploitable in those latter fifteen stations, which are mainly located in the Aegean Sea (Thermaikos, Toroneos and Pagasitikos gulfs, Alonissos and Kyra-Panagia islands in the National Marine Park of Alonissos Northern Sporades -NMPANS, Paros, Ios, Serifos and Milos islands in Cyclades, and Patmos, and the Agathonissi islands in the north Dodecanese). Holothuria tubulosa was present in eighteen stations (Pr), had sparse (O, R) populations in eight, and dense (A, C, F) populations in eleven stations (Figure 3). Those latter stations with exploitable stocks are also located in the Aegean Sea (Thermaikos and Toroneos, Kyra-Panagia Island in NMPANS, Paros, Naxos, Ios, and the Milos islands in Cyclades). Holothuria sanctori was recorded at 25 stations, being either present (20 stations) or rare (4 stations), and frequent (F) only in one surveyed station of Kalymnos Island (Dodecanese), whereas H. mammata was only recorded at six stations (Sporades, Cyclades and Dodecanese), being either present or rare in these locations (Figure 3).

3.2. Holothurians Catch per Unit Effort CNPUE CBPUE

Overall, 779 specimens of the species H. tubulosa were caught, ranging from 1 to 221 specimens/10′ dive. Accordingly, CNPUE ranged from 6 to 1326 with an overall mean at 126.97 specimens. The highest CNPUE values were recorded in the Thermaikos Gulf, Kyra-Panagia (Planitis Bay), and the Paros islands (Figure 4A). Over the Dodecanese Island complex, the species had a very low abundance as only three specimens were caught at three different islands (Agathonissi, Leros, Pserimos), all located in the northern sector. CBPUE ranged from 0.67 tο 93.25 kg (Figure 4B) with an overall mean at 14.51 kg. The highest CBPUE values were recorded in Kira Panagia and Thermaikos, followed by the Cyclades islands of Ios, Naxos, and Paros; therefore, H. tubulosa fisheries are profitable in these grounds. CNPUE had much higher values in the Aegean compared with Ionian stations (F = 6.48 p < 0.05). By focusing on the Aegean Sea, significant differences in CNPUE were also found according to the geographic area (F = 5.42 p < 0.05), with increased values in north Aegean gulfs, Cyclades, and north Sporades islands (Figure 5). CBPUE was significantly higher in the Aegean compared with the Ionian stations (F = 9.41 p < 0.01); relevant CBPUE differences between the geographical areas of the Aegean Sea were also significant (F = 4.21 p < 0.05), with a similar trend to CNPUE (Figure 5).
Based on CPUE values (CN and CB) the natural stock of the species is made up of small-sized individuals in the Thermaikos Gulf, as opposed to Kyra Panagia.
Overall, 1375 specimens of H. poli were caught, ranging from 1 to 115 specimens/10′ dive. Accordingly, CNPUE ranged from 6 to 690 with an overall mean at 167.69 specimens. CNPUE was significantly higher in the Aegean compared with the Ionian Sea (F = 12.64 p < 0.01). Focusing on the Aegean, significant differences in CNPUE were also found between geographical areas (F = 4.69 p < 0.05), with increased values found in north Aegean gulfs, north Sporades, and Cyclades islands (Figure 6). CBPUE was higher in the Aegean Seas compared with the Ionian (F = 12.86 p < 0.01). Relevant CBPUE differences between the Aegean geographical areas were also significant (F = 4.23 p < 0.05), with a similar trend ensuing with CNPUE (Figure 6).
The highest CNPUE values were recorded in Kyra-Panagia (Planitis Bay), Paros (Alyki), and Patmos islands, and in the Toroneos Gulf (Figure 7A). CBPUE ranged from 1.05 το 139.94 kg (Figure 7B) with an overall mean at 22.24 kg. The highest CBPUE values were recorded in Paros, Ios, Serifos (Cyclades), Patmos (Dodecanese), Alonissos, Kira Panagia (North Sporades), and the Toroneos Gulf; therefore, H. poli fisheries are profitable in these grounds.
Based on CPUE values (CN and CB) the natural stock of the species is made up of small-sized individuals in Kyra Panagia and the Toroneos gulf, as opposed to all other islands where medium to large-sized individuals prevailed.
Considering both H. sanctori and H. mammata, very few specimens were caught (94 and 56, respectively); fishing effort ranged from 1 to 19 specimens-/10′ dive and from 1 to 9 specimens/10′ dive for the former and the latter species, respectively.
CNPUE of H. sanctori showed increased values in the Aegean compared with the Ionian Sea (F = 5.95 p < 0.05, Figure 8), whereas the relevant differences for CBPUE (Figure 8) were not significant (F = 4.48 p = 0.053). Both CNPUE and CBPUE showed non-significant differences between the subareas of the Aegean Sea (F = 1.57 p = 0.306 and F = 1.37 p = 0.296, respectively). According to CNPUE and CBPUE the highest quota was found in Kalymnos, Pserimos, and Kyra Panagia (Figure 9).
Holothuria mammata was found only in the Aegean Sea. CNPUE showed non-significant differences between the subareas of the Aegean Sea (F = 1.52 p = 0.419). CBPUE of H. mammata had very low values in Cyclades compared to Sporades and Dodecanese islands (Figure 10). The relevant spatial differences were non-significant (F = 22.39 p = 0.066), although the p value was close to the 0.05 significance level. According to CNPUE and CBPUE, the highest quota was found in Leros and Alonissos (Figure 11).

3.3. Annual Sea Cucumber Catch

The mean annual catch of holothurian landings processed in the “Nautilus Seafood” company varies from 16.65 to 137.82 metric tons during the period 2016–2021, with a steady prevalence of the species H. tubulosa (Figure 12). These landings originated mainly from the Cyclades plateau, Paros Island in particular. A vast drop in the production of holothurians is obvious after the 2017–2018 pick. This is due to a temporary ban on the fishing of holothurians in the island of Paros due to local antiphons and, thereafter, to the COVID-19 lockdown effect.
By extrapolating the above data over the Greek territory, the mean annual catch of holothurian landings from the Hellenic Seas is estimated at 275 metric tons; 62% of the production (170 t) is made by the harvesting of the species H. tubulosa and 38% (105 t) by H. poli, respectively.

4. Discussion

Sea cucumber fisheries are of increasing socioeconomic importance in the Hellenic agricultural sector. Holothurians appeared as an alternative biological resource to the decimated sponge fisheries [5,9] and to the suppressed shellfish fisheries [14]. As a result, many small-scale fishery vessels (ranging annually from 90 to 150) shifted to the harvesting of holothurians during the last five years. The active holothurian fleet follows different fishery strategies, either by performing large trips over the Hellenic Seas and hunting holothurians offshore and in the deep, or by diving in very shallow coastal bays right after the port of origin. These different strategies infer, therefore, the existence of two different métiers [8]. Moreover, for over the last century sea cucumbers have been collected by hand or hooks and utilized as bait in long-line fisheries, especially in the Dodecanese island complex [5]. Overall, the exerted fishing pressure on natural holothurian stocks is steadily increasing over the Hellenic Seas and the threat of overexploitation seems to be a reality for prominent Holothuria species or local populations, despite the existing fisheries regulations.
The monitoring of holothurian fishery stocks revealed the exploitation and commercialization of four species of the genus Holothuria, namely H. tubulosa, H. poli, H. mammata, and H. sanctori in the Greek territory. These holothurians were found in 42% of the surveyed area (67 out of the 162 sites). They formed sparse populations in most cases, being absent or rare over the south—southeastern Dodecanese islands. Locally dense populations (i.e., population densities of over 20 holothurians per 100 m2) of specific species appeared in 16% of the surveyed marine area (26 out of the 162 sites). These sites are exclusively located in the Aegean Sea, as the density of holothurians was rather low in the surveyed sites of the Ionian Sea. Therefore, exploitable natural stocks may be inferred in the north Aegean (Thermaikos, Toroneos and Pagasitikos gulfs, Alonissos, Kyra Panagia, and north Sporades islands), the central Cyclades (Paros, Antiparos, Naxos, Ios, Serifos, and Milos islands), and the north Dodecanese (Patmos, Agathonissi, and Kalymnos islands). These marine areas provide favorable environmental conditions for holothurian feeding by holding an increased trophic state due to organic inputs (natural topography, urbanization) or strong marine currents. Holothurians, as typical deposit-feeding animals [15], may flourish only in organically enriched habitats or under currents in the Aegean Sea [5,8,10]. Important stocks may also exist in the Limnos and Ionian islands, though the relative abundance of Holothuria species was much lower. However, the sampling effort devoted to holothurian stocks was also inferior in the Ionian Sea. As previous data on holothurian stocks are available only for the north Dodecanese islands and the Pagasitikos Gulf [5,10], it is evident that much more effort is needed to precisely assess the fishery grounds of holothurians in the Hellenic Seas.
Overall, holothurians follow a patchy pattern of distribution in the Hellenic Seas, with very dense local populations in proximity with extremely sparse or null populations. A similar spatial pattern has also been reported for many species of the genus Holothuria from various Mediterranean and adjacent Atlantic coast areas [16,17,18,19]. This pattern, though not completely understood, has been attributed to habitat topographies, such as sediment granulometry, organic content, vegetation type and coverage, shell, or other biogenic debris. These factors are related with improved alimentary conditions rather than to a massive settlement of holothurian larvae [15,17,20]. Seabed rugosity seems to be of particular importance by setting available benthic refuges and affecting the “homing” behavior of holothurians after their nocturnal movement patterns for feeding. This patchiness is size-dependent as well, with small-sized holothurians of the same or congeneric species aggregating in higher densities in areas of increased rugosity, which are typically found in shallower waters. Under strong hydrodynamics, holothurians are moved in deeper and sustain sparser but larger-sized populations [19].
According to presented results, the species H. poli dominates over the surveyed areas in both the Aegean and the Ionian seas, and especially in shallow habitats. Though this was the general pattern, there were some exceptions. For example, in the Thermaikos Gulf, the species H. tubulosa prevailed over H. poli and in Kyra-Panagia (Planitis Bay, NMPANS) both species coexisted in a similar proportion. It is also worth noting the locally important presence of H. sanctori, especially in sedimentary habitats surrounded by rocky cliffs or mixed with rocky reefs and boulders. Accordingly, this species may be exploited in additional locations with specific habitat characteristics. H. sanctori has been rather recently included in edible Mediterranean holothurians [21,22]. It is exploited in Turkey and other Mediterranean countries, often together with its congeneric H. forskali, and in Spain, experimental cultures of the above species are in progress [23,24]. Despite the commercial importance of H. sanctori, the Greek fishers avoid this species, as its handling is problematic due to the expulsion of adhesive Cuvierian tubules. On the contrary, the presence of H. mammata seems to be restricted in the Hellenic Seas, although it is often included in fishery productions from the Turkish Aegean [6,7].
According to catch per unit effort results (CNPUE, CBPUE), the yield of two species, H. tubulosa and H. poli (>40 N/10′ experimental fisheries quota), may be considered as commercially exploitable in several fishery grounds of the Aegean Sea. The Holothuria sanctori quota may be also exploitable in specific habitats (19 N/10′ experimental fisheries quota), if fishermen start to collect the species and overlook handling difficulties (i.e., Cuvierian tubules) from collection to commercialization. Relevant data for H. mammata were too few. Accordingly, its fishing is unlikely in the Hellenic Seas, despite it covering 22% of the annual sea cucumber production in Turkey [6] and is considered among the most commercially important Mediterranean holothurians [3,25]. The highest reported CNPUE for H. mammata in the study area is 55 individuals. In most Mediterranean areas its populations are sparse, with densities ranging around 12 individuals/100 m2 [19]. The density of H. mammata varies with habitat type and the species prefer rocky sedimentary bottoms with coarse sand [15]. It is, therefore, possible that the species sustain exploitable populations, at least at some of the surveyed areas with suitable habitats, that were overlooked by fishermen during the experimental trials. Professional sea-cucumber fishers target H. tubulosa and H. poli, which are hunted over sandy-muddy bottoms either vegetated or not, as this is the typical and preferred habitat type for those species [10,26,27,28]. Additional monitoring efforts are required, therefore, to assess the population status of H. mammata and its fisheries’ profitability in the Hellenic Seas.
Unfortunately, there are too few previous data on Holothuria fisheries and stock assessments in the Hellenic Seas, impeding our capacity to estimate the current pressure on fisheries. More explicitly, the relevant information is limited to a pilot survey (2006–2008 period) of edible Holothuria (H. tubulosa and H. poli) over the north Dodecanese [5,29] and Pagasitikos Gulf [10,27]. By comparing these studies with current results, the population density of H. tubulosa and H. poli seem to have remained rather stable. In the mesotrophic Pagasitikos Gulf, H. tubulosa had and still has moderate abundance, which is, however, lower than in other Mediterranean areas [10]. In the oligotrophic Dodecanese Island complex, where long-term fishing for holothurian baits was common—though unrecorded, both H. tubulosa and H. poli had an overall low abundance. Local moderately dense populations occurred only in very sheltered natural harbor bays (i.e., Astypalea, Arkoi, Agathonissi) or in proximity to maricultures (i.e., Pserimos), where deposited organic matter is sufficient for feeding [5]. Currently, holothurian stocks remain, overall, in low abundance. Former moderately dense populations have declined in contrast with some sparse populations that have grown (i.e., Patmos). These results suggest spatiotemporal fluctuations in the abundance of holothurians, according to prevalent environmental conditions (organic load) and the activity of fisheries.
The severe impact of fisheries may be indirectly highlighted in the case of the NMPANS marine protected area [30]. Within the strictly protected Zone A area of the park in Planitis Bay (Kyra-Panagia Island), extremely dense populations of the species H. tubulosa and H. poli were found. The surveyed bay is enclaved, and forms two totally sheltered main coves that communicate to the open sea through a very narrow entrance channel. The enclaved marine area is shallow (max depth 16 m) and is one of the biggest Mediterranean natural harbors (0.65 km2). The shoreline of the bay is rocky with muddy sands mixed with shell fragments, sponges, algae, and seagrasses covering the sea bottom. Organic input is increased due to the geomorphology and the extremely small fetch of the bay, as well as due to the intense anchorage of yachts and fishing boats [30]. Therefore, the habitat seems to be particularly favorable for the establishment of sea cucumbers and may function as a natural reservoir ensuring the viability of holothurian populations. Moreover, besides being a biodiversity repository, it may serve as a main source for restocking overfished populations of the Aegean Sea.
The accurate assessment of annual production is a crucial dimension of sustainable exploitation of marine natural resources. Annual production per holothurian species and fishery ground is completely missing over the Greek territory. Besides, the obligation for implementing the Electronic Reporting System (ERS) that could enable theassessment and regulative management of stocks, has been delayed for holothurian fisheries. Accordingly, annual production can be estimated only indirectly, through processing companies and field fishery surveys. Based on the data derived from the “Nautilus Seafood” company landings, the mean annual production of holothurians is estimated to 275 metric tons over the Greek territory and clearly targets H. tubulosa. During the period 2010–2018 a maximum yield of 353 t has been estimated for the Greek fisheries sector [3], which is much lower than the estimated maxima based on the processing company data (689 t). The annual production of holothurians largely fluctuates at both spatial and temporal scales [3,5,6,7,31,32]. To deal with the increased uncertainty of relevant estimations, FAO has just started their attempts to record the annual production of Mediterranean holothurian fisheries.
Considering the discussed results on the current state of holothurian fisheries in the Hellenic Seas, and the difficulties that artisanal sponge and shellfish fisheries face, some additional regulatory management options, as best practices, are examined. Accordingly, the strict delineation of exploitable grounds and the rotation of fisheries within subareas of each ground may be an option for the recovery of holothurian natural stocks. By following the different métiers in holothurian fisheries, the relevant grounds may be diversified to coastal shallow-water gulfs and to offshore island areas. Each type may be separated geographically to a north and a south sector that would be exploited under a two-year rotation period. Daily quota (400 specimens) and the applied hunting methods seems to be adequate, at least for the coastal shallow-water gulfs métier. In the case of the offshore islands’ métier, the daily quota should be substituted by a proportional monthly or annual quota. Offshore fishermen have to face much harsher weather conditions and the actual fishing days are much reduced, causing severe viability problems and increasing the human risk. Moreover, as this métier operates in much deeper waters, the tube length of the breathing apparatus should be enlarged to at least 150 m for safety reasons. Of particular importance is the immediate implementation of the ERS to create data series on daily quotas per area and species. This basic recording is essential for the evaluation of the applied regulative measures. Ideally, ERS data should be combined to field fisheries surveys and to scientific monitoring of the métier’s data for adaptive fishery management towards the viability of holothurians and the conservation of exploited ecosystems.
Another severe issue to deal with is illegal fishing [3,5,33,34]. Non-licensed SCUBA divers are hunting holothurians, especially in shallow-depth coastal areas, such as the Thermaikos gulf. Illegal fishing is practiced quite often in nighttime when the animals are more active and more easily detected by non-specialists. This unfair competition is a global phenomenon in sea cucumber fisheries, and the enhancement of surveillance and the capacity for enforcement seems to be the only solution to halt it [1,2,32,34]. Moreover, illegal hunters are opportunist with short-term interest on the fishery, and so, they are unaware on the future viability of natural stocks. As they collect all kind of holothurians with no size or quantity restrictions, they may easily cause the local depletion of populations. As holothurians are highly susceptible to the “Allee effect” [35] a reproductive failure is quite common in depleted populations beyond a certain threshold due to the sparsity of breeding adults [36,37,38,39]. In such cases, conventional management measures are insufficient for the replenishment of natural stocks and restocking of spawning densities by importing recruits from other source populations may be the only option [37].
The source populations of H. tubulosa and H. poli within the NMPANS marine protected area, is therefore of particular importance for the viability of the species and for the restoration of overfished areas. A shift towards the development of integrated maricultures is an alternative option, especially considering the current progress in the hatchery and rearing of the Mediterranean species H. arguinensis [18,40,41], H. forskali [23,42], H. mammata [43], H. poli [44], and H. tubulosa [45,46]. Even though the aquaculture of Mediterranean Holothuria spp. is not yet operational, the experimental production of larvae and young recruits offer possibilities for restocking and the enhancement of stocks harvested from sea cucumber populations. Hatchery reared holothurians may be released in wild fisheries grounds to safeguard production, as successfully implemented for the species Apostichopus japonicus in Japan and China [47]. However, such management actions should be precautionarily applied to preserve the genetic diversity of existing stocks and only in cases where the breeding of natural populations has failed. Thorough studies emphasized on the species biology of breeding stocks and population diversity at the genetic level are prerequisite before relevant management attempts are carried out. As fishing pressure is steadily increasing for both target-species in Greek sea cucumber fisheries, and signs of overfishing are evident at least in some locations, the Thermaikos Gulf for example, the long-term sustainability of Holothuria fisheries is questionable. The combination of the proposed best practices in holothurian fisheries with restocking action plans for the suppressed natural populations may be the solution to enhance sustainability.

5. Conclusions

This is the first comprehensive survey of holothurian fisheries in the Hellenic Seas. The discussed results demonstrated that the exerted fishing pressure is steadily increasing, threatening prominent Holothuria species or local populations despite the existing regulations. Holothuria tubulosa and H. poli were the target species; they generally form sparse populations interrupted with locally dense aggregations (over 20 holothurians per 100 m2) in areas with increased organic input or under currents. These areas represent exploitable fisheries grounds and are mainly found in the north Aegean, the central Cyclades, and the north Dodecanese. This patchy pattern of distribution conforms to previous studies and, accordingly, seems to be an intrinsic feature of Mediterranean Holothuria populations. The existence of very dense H. tubulosa and H. poli populations within a Marine Protected Area is of particular importance for future sustainability, representing a biodiversity repository strictly protected from fisheries. Holothurians are typical sediment-feeder animals; as keystone species in the trophic ecology of benthic ecosystems, the conservation of viable populations is crucial for the maintenance of a good environmental status in the marine environment. The safeguarding of sustainable breeding populations fulfilling their functional role in benthic ecology and avoiding cascade effects is decisive. The recursive monitoring of the fishery by combining field and ERS data is imperative for the regulatory management of holothurians’ fisheries under the ecosystem-based auspices [32].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V. and C.A.; methodology, D.V. and C.A.; software, C.A.; validation, D.V. and C.A.; formal analysis, C.A.; investigation, D.V.; resources, D.V.; data curation, C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.; writing—review and editing, D.V. and C.A.; visualization, C.A.; supervision, D.V.; project administration, D.V.; funding acquisition, D.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Greek Operational Program for Fisheries and Sea (2014–2020), grant number MIS 5010720. The APC was funded by the same source.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the absence of a relevant framework for the usage of holothurians in marine research; Holothuria spp. is a fishery resource legally allowed to be collected from the wild, the collected specimens were immediately preserved without performing any experimental treatment that could torture the animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kyriakoula Roditi and Chrysoula Apostologamvrou for their help in samplings, and the captains and crews of the small-scale fishery vessels involved in field surveys.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Toral-Granda, V.; Lovatelli, A.; Vasconcellos, M. Sea Cucumbers: A Global Review of Fisheries and Trade; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 516; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2008; pp. 1–317. [Google Scholar]
  2. Purcell, S.W.; Samyn, Y.; Conand, C. Commercially Important Sea Cucumbers of the World; FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 6; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 1–150. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gonzalez-Wangüemert, M.; Domínguez-Godino, J.; Cánovas, F. The fast development of sea cucumber fisheries in the Mediterranean and NE Atlantic waters: From a new marine resource to its over-exploitation. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2018, 151, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Conand, C.; Polidoro, B.; Mercier, A.; Gamboa, R.; Hamel, J.F.; Purcell, S. The IUCN Red List assessment of aspidochirotid sea cucumbers and its implications. Beche-de-mer Inf. Bull. 2014, 34, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Antoniadou, C.; Vafidis, D. Population structure of the traditionally exploited holothurian Holothuria tubulosa in the south Aegean Sea. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2011, 52, 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  6. González-Wangüemert, M.; Aydin, M.; Conand, C. Assessment of sea cucumber populations from the Aegean Sea (Turkey): First insights to sustainable management of new fisheries. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2014, 92, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. González-Wangüemert, M.; Valente, S.; Henriques, F.; Domínguez-Godino, J.; Serrão, E. Setting preliminary biometric baselines for new target sea cucumbers species of the NE Atlantic and Mediterranean fisheries. Fish. Res. 2016, 179, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vafidis, D.; Antoniadou, C. Fisheries Exploitation and Management of Holothurians (Holothuria spp.): Processing (Food and Biotechnological Products) and Stock Sustainability; Technical Report; University of Thessaly: Volos, Greece, 2022; pp. 1–115. [Google Scholar]
  9. Voultsiadou, E.; Dailianis, T.; Antoniadou, C.; Vafidis, D.; Dounas, C.; Chintiroglou, C. Aegean bath sponges: Historical data and current status. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2011, 19, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kazanidis, G.; Antoniadou, C.; Lolas, A.; Neofitou, N.; Vafidis, D.; Chintiroglou, C.; Neofitou, C. Population dynamics and reproduction of Holothuria tubulosa (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata) in the Aegean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 2010, 90, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vafidis, D.; Antoniadou, C.; Voulgaris, K.; Varkoulis, A.; Apostologamvrou, C. Abundance and population characteristics of the invasive sea urchin Diadema setosum (Leske, 1778) in the south Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean). J. Biol. Res. Thessaloniki 2021, 28, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Antoniadou, C.; Vafidis, D. First assessment of Microcosmus sabatieri (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) small-scale artisanal fishery in the South Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Cah. Biol. Mar. 2008, 49, 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  13. Underwood, A.J. Experiment in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 1–504. [Google Scholar]
  14. Damianidis, P.; Karachle, P.; Chintiroglou, C. Population structure of clam Venus verrucosa Linnaeus, 1758 harvested in Thermaikos Gulf, NW Aegean Sea, Greece. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2016, 4, 393–401. [Google Scholar]
  15. Navarro, P.G.; Garcia-Sanz, S.; Barrio, J.M.; Tuya, F. Feeding and movement patterns of the sea cucumber Holothuria sanctori. Mar. Biol. 2013, 160, 2957–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bulteel, P.; Jangoux, M.; Coulon, P. Biometry, bathymetric distribution, and reproductive cycle of the holothuroid Holothuria tubulosa (Echinodermata) in Mediterranean seagrass beds. Mar. Ecol. 1992, 13, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Simunovic, A.; Piccinetti, C.; Bartulovic, M.; Grubelic, I. Distribution and abundance of the species Holothuria tubulosa Gmelin, 1788 and Holothuria forskali Delle Chiaje, 1823 (Holothuria, Echinodermata) in the Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriat. 2000, 41, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Domínguez-Godino, J.A.; González-Wangüemert, M. Habitat associations and seasonal abundance patterns of the sea cucumber Holothuria arguinensis at Ria Formosa coastal lagoon (South Portugal). Aquat. Ecol. 2020, 54, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Félix, P.M.; Pombo, A.; Silva, F.A.; Simões, T.; Marques, T.; Melo, R.; Rocha, C.; Sousa, J.; Venâncio, E.; Costa, J.L.; et al. Modelling the distribution of a commercial NE-Atlantic sea cucumber, Holothuria mammata: Demographic and abundance spatio-temporal patterns. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 675330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tolon, T.; Emiroglu, D.; Gunay, D.; Saygi, H. Effect of sediment grain size on growth performance of juvenile sea cucumber (Holothuria tubulosa). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2015, 15, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Navarro, P.G.; Garcia-Sanz, S.; Tuya, F. Reproductive biology of the sea cucumber Holothuria sanctori (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Sci. Mar. 2012, 76, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Neghli, L.; Mezali, K. Algeria’s sea cucumber fishery: Challenges for a new fishery. Beche-de-mer Inf. Bull. 2019, 39, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  23. Laguerre, H.; Raymond, G.; Plan, P.; Améziane, N.; Bailly, X.; Le Chevalier, P. First description of embryonic and larval development, juvenile growth of the black sea-cucumber Holothuria forskali (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea), a new species for aquaculture in the North-Eastern Atlantic. Aquaculture 2020, 521, 734961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magdy, Μ.; Otero-Ferrer, F.; Courtois de Viçose, G. Preliminary spawning and larval rearing of the sea cucumber Holothuria sanctori (Delle Chiaje, 1823): A potential aquaculture species. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 21, 100846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dereli, H.; Aydın, M. Sea cucumber fishery in Turkey: Management regulations and their efficiency. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2021, 41, 101551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tortonese, E.; Vadon, C. Oursins et Holothuries. In Fiches FAO D’identification Des. Espèces Pour Les. Besoins de la Pêche (Révision 1)—Méditerranée et Mer. Noire. Zone de pêche 37; Fischer, W., Bouchon, M.L., Scneider, M., Eds.; FAO Publications: Rome, Italy, 1987; pp. 743–760. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kazanidis, G.; Lolas, A.; Vafidis, D. Reproductive cycle of the traditionally exploited sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa (Holothuroidea: Aspidochirotida) in Pagasitikos Gulf, western Aegean Sea, Greece. Turk. Zool. Derg. 2014, 38, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boncagni, P.; Rakaj, A.; Fianchin, A.; Vizzini, S. Preferential assimilation of seagrass detritus by two coexisting Mediterranean sea cucumbers: Holothuria polii and Holothuria tubulosa. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2019, 231, 106464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vafidis, D.; Tsagridis, A.; Chintiroglou, C.; Antoniadou, C. Fisheries Exploitation, Processing and Trade of Holothurian Stocks in the South Aegean Sea; Technical Report; University of Thessaly: Volos, Greece, 2008; pp. 1–85. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paraskevopoulos, S. Tourism in protected areas: The case of the National Marine Park of Alonissos-Northern Sporades in Greece. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Stud 2019, 2, 116–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adyin, M. The commercial sea cucumber fishery in Turkey. Beche-de-mer Inf. Bull. 2008, 28, 40–41. [Google Scholar]
  32. Purcell, S.; Lovatelli, A.; Vasconcellos, M.; Ye, Y. Managing Sea Cucumber Fisheries with an Ecosystem Approach; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 516; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010; pp. 1–157. [Google Scholar]
  33. Meloni, D.; Esposito, G. Hygienic and commercial issues related to the illegal fishing and processing of sea cucumbers in the Mediterranean: A case study on over-exploitation in Italy between 2015 and 2017. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2018, 19, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Conand, C. Recent information on worldwide illegal fisheries for sea cucumbers. Beche-de-mer Inf. Bull. 2018, 38, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stephens, P.A.; Sutherland, W.J.; Freckleton, R.P. What is the Allee effect? Oikos 1999, 87, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Uthicke, S.; Benzie, J. Effect of bêche-de-mer fishing on densities and size structure of Holothuria nobilis (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) populations on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 2000, 19, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bell, J.D.; Purcell, S.W.; Nash, W.J. Restoring small-scale fisheries for tropical sea cucumbers. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2008, 51, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pasquini, V.; Giglioli, A.A.; Pusceddu, A.; Addis, P. Biology, ecology and management perspectives of overexploited deposit-feeders sea cucumbers, with focus on Holothuria tubulosa (Gmelin, 1788). Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 2021, 12, 9995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H. The effects of hypoxia and anthropogenic disturbance on the distribution, abundance and recruitment of the sea cucumber Holothuria leucospilota at the mouth of a subtropical bay, China. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 739657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Domínguez-Godino, J.A.; Slater, M.J.; Hannon, C.; González-Wangüermert, M. A new species for sea cucumber ranching and aquaculture: Breeding and rearing of Holothuria arguinensis. Aquaculture 2015, 438, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodriguez, T.; Azevedo e Silva, F.; Sousa, J.; Félix, P.M.; Pombo, A. Effect of enriched substrate on the growth of the sea cucumber Holothuria arguinensis Koehler and Vaney, 1906 juveniles. Diversity 2023, 15, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santos, R.; Dias, S.; Pinteus, S.; Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Tecelao, C.; Pedrosa, R.; Pombo, A. Sea cucumber Holothuria forskali, a new resource for aquaculture? Reproductive biology and nutraceutical approach. Aquac. Res. 2015, 47, 2307–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Domínguez-Godino, J.A.; González-Wangüemert, M. Breeding and larval development of Holothuria mammata, a new target species for aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 1430–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rakaj, A.; Fianchini, A.; Boncagni, P.; Scardi, M.; Cataudella, S. Artificial reproduction of Holothuria polii: A new candidate for aquaculture. Aquaculture 2019, 498, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rakaj, A.; Fianchini, A.; Boncagni, P.; Lovatelli, A.; Scardi, M.; Cataudella, S. Spawning and rearing of Holothuria tubulosa: A new candidate for aquaculture in the Mediterranean region. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sadoul, B.; Caprioli, J.P.; Barrier-Loiseau, C.; Cimiterra, N.; Laugier, T.; Lagarde, F.; Chary, K.; Callier, M.D.; Guillermard, M.O.; Roque d’Orbcastel, E. Is Holothuria tubulosa the golden goose of ecological aquaculture in the Mediterranean Sea? Aquaculture 2022, 554, 738149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lovatelli, A.; Conand, C.; Purcell, S.; Uthicke, S.; Hammel, J.F.; Mercier, A. Advances in sea Cucumbers Aquaculture and Management; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 463; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004; pp. 1–425. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The two target sea cucumber species in Greece, Holothuria tubulosa (left) and H. poli (right) (photo C. Antoniadou).
Figure 1. The two target sea cucumber species in Greece, Holothuria tubulosa (left) and H. poli (right) (photo C. Antoniadou).
Sustainability 15 09799 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the survey location in the Hellenic Seas, where 162 stations were set (source: Google Earth, modified by this research).
Figure 2. Overview of the survey location in the Hellenic Seas, where 162 stations were set (source: Google Earth, modified by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g002
Figure 3. Occurrence of the commercial Holothuria species in the Hellenic Seas (source: created by this research).
Figure 3. Occurrence of the commercial Holothuria species in the Hellenic Seas (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g003
Figure 4. CPUE of H. tubulosa (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Figure 4. CPUE of H. tubulosa (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g004
Figure 5. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. tubulosa in the Hellenic Seas (left graph) and the Aegean Sea (right graph), after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Figure 5. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. tubulosa in the Hellenic Seas (left graph) and the Aegean Sea (right graph), after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g005
Figure 6. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. poli in the Hellenic Seas (left graph) and the Aegean Sea (right graph), after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Figure 6. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. poli in the Hellenic Seas (left graph) and the Aegean Sea (right graph), after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g006
Figure 7. CPUE of H. poli (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Figure 7. CPUE of H. poli (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g007
Figure 8. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. sanctori in the Hellenic Seas, after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Figure 8. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. sanctori in the Hellenic Seas, after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g008
Figure 9. CPUE of H. sanctori (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Figure 9. CPUE of H. sanctori (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g009
Figure 10. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. mammata in the subareas of the Aegean Sea, after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Figure 10. Boxplot of CNPUE and CBPUE of H. mammata in the subareas of the Aegean Sea, after excluding zero-value stations; cross in circle symbol = mean, asterisk symbol = outliers, horizontal within box line = median, box = Q1 to Q3 quartiles, vertical line = whisker (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g010
Figure 11. CPUE of H. mammata (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Figure 11. CPUE of H. mammata (A) CNPUE, (B) CBPUE per sampling site in the Hellenic Seas. Zero-value sites are excluded from the graph (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g011
Figure 12. Total weight of sea cucumbers (H. tubulosa and H. poli) fished in the Hellenic Seas (mainly from the Cyclades Island of Paros) and processed by the “Nautilus Seafood” company, per fishing season (source: created by this research).
Figure 12. Total weight of sea cucumbers (H. tubulosa and H. poli) fished in the Hellenic Seas (mainly from the Cyclades Island of Paros) and processed by the “Nautilus Seafood” company, per fishing season (source: created by this research).
Sustainability 15 09799 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vafidis, D.; Antoniadou, C. Holothurian Fisheries in the Hellenic Seas: Seeking for Sustainability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129799

AMA Style

Vafidis D, Antoniadou C. Holothurian Fisheries in the Hellenic Seas: Seeking for Sustainability. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vafidis, Dimitris, and Chryssanthi Antoniadou. 2023. "Holothurian Fisheries in the Hellenic Seas: Seeking for Sustainability" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129799

APA Style

Vafidis, D., & Antoniadou, C. (2023). Holothurian Fisheries in the Hellenic Seas: Seeking for Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(12), 9799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop