Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- Food order fulfilment platforms such as Grab, Baemin, and ShopeeFood;
- (2)
- Crowd shippers who register with the platform to physically pick up the food from stores and deliver it to customers;
- (3)
- Restaurants that are registered as partners with the platform;
- (4)
- Customers who browse the app to look for food, place an order, and pay for the meal, delivery service, and order processing service;
- (5)
- Supporting service providers (e.g., payment service).
- -
- Establish a conceptual model to explain Gen Z customers using FDAs.
- -
- Validate the measurement scale and model and assess the impact of several factors on the continuance usage intention of Gen Z customers using FDAs.
- -
- Propose theoretical and practical implications to stakeholders to help develop the sustainability FDAs market.
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Theoretical Background and Conceptual Model
2.2. Conceptual Model
2.3. Hypotheses Development
2.3.1. Attitude and Continuance Usage Intention
2.3.2. Personal Innovativeness and Attitude
2.3.3. Subjective Norm and Continuance Usage Intention
2.3.4. Perceived Health Risk, Perceived Usefulness of Promotion, and Continuance Usage Intention
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Research Approach
3.2. Instrument Development
3.3. Sampling and Data Collection
3.4. Measurement Scales
3.5. Data Analysis
3.6. Pre-Test
4. Results
4.1. Common Bias Method Test
4.2. Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity
4.3. Hypotheses Testing and Path Analysis
5. Discussion, Implication, and Conclusions
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Contribution and Implication
5.2.1. Theoretical Contribution and Implication
5.2.2. Managerial Contribution and Implication
5.3. Conclusion and Limitation
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Statista. Annual Number of Global Mobile App Downloads 2016–2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271644/worldwide-free-and-paid-mobile-app-store-downloads/ (accessed on 28 August 2023).
- Topics, E. Time Spent Using Smartphones (2023 Statistics). Available online: https://explodingtopics.com/blog/smartphone-usage-stats#time-spent-using-smartphones (accessed on 5 August 2023).
- Ruby, D. 54+ Smartphone Usage Statistics 2023 (Facts & Data). Available online: https://www.demandsage.com/smartphone-usage-statistics/ (accessed on 24 August 2023).
- GSO. The Statistical Yearbook 2021. Available online: https://www.gso.gov.vn/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Sach-Nien-giam-TK-2021.pdf (accessed on 7 August 2023).
- Statista. Number of Mobile App Downloads Worldwide in 2021 and 2022, by Country. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1287159/app-downloads-by-country/ (accessed on 21 August 2023).
- Statista. Online Food Delivery in Vietnam—Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/8508/online-food-delivery-in-vietnam/#topicOverview (accessed on 17 August 2023).
- Works, M. Food Delivery Platforms In Southeast Asia 2023. 2023. Available online: https://momentum.asia/product/food-delivery-platforms-in-southeast-asia-2023/ (accessed on 17 August 2023).
- Zhao, Y.; Bacao, F. What factors determining customer continuingly using food delivery apps during 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic period? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasetyo, Y.T.; Tanto, H.; Mariyanto, M.; Hanjaya, C.; Young, M.N.; Persada, S.F.; Miraja, B.A.; Redi, A.A.N.P. Factors affecting customer satisfaction and loyalty in online food delivery service during the COVID-19 pandemic: Its relation with open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangmee, C.; Kot, S.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Factors determining the behavioral intention of using food delivery apps during COVID-19 pandemics. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1297–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, M.; Park, K. Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-S.; Liang, C.-H.; Liao, S.-Y.; Kuo, H.-Y. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward food delivery platform services. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J.; Choe, J.Y. Exploring perceived risk in building successful drone food delivery services. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 31, 3249–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapoor, A.P.; Vij, M. Technology at the dinner table: Ordering food online through mobile apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 43, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, K. Factors influencing customers’ continuance usage intention of food delivery apps during COVID-19 quarantine in Mexico. Br. Food J. 2021, 124, 833–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.W.; Sung, H.J.; Jeon, H.M. Determinants of continuous intention on food delivery apps: Extending UTAUT2 with information quality. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, L.M.; Shiu, E.; Parry, S. Addressing the cross-country applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB): A structured review of multi-country TPB studies. J. Consum. Behav. 2016, 15, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhalgh, T.; Robert, G.; Macfarlane, F.; Bate, P.; Kyriakidou, O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004, 82, 581–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MacVaugh, J.; Schiavone, F. Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2010, 13, 197–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargo, S.L.; Akaka, M.A.; Wieland, H. Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, J.; Lu, W. Gen Z Is Set to Outnumber Millennials within a Year. 2018. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-20/gen-z-to-outnumber-millennials-within-a-year-demographic-trends#xj4y7vzkg (accessed on 17 August 2023).
- Nguyen, H. The principal talked about generation Z “breathing with technology, living with technology, eating with technology”. Lao Dong. 2021. Available online: https://laodong.vn/giao-duc/hieu-truong-noi-ve-the-he-z-tho-cong-nghe-song-cong-nghe-an-cong-nghe-977194.ldo (accessed on 17 August 2023).
- Vieira, J.; Frade, R.; Ascenso, R.; Prates, I.; Martinho, F. Generation Z and key-factors on e-commerce: A study on the portuguese tourism sector. Adm. Sci. 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djafarova, E.; Bowes, T. ‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 102345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, R. 3 Things You Need to Know about Gen Z and Brand Loyalty. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2022/08/10/3-things-you-need-to-know-about-gen-z-and-brand-loyalty/?sh=3cb6d5c3c4f2 (accessed on 4 August 2023).
- Nguyen, H.V.; Dang, W.; Nguyen, H.; Nguyen, T.N.H.; Nguyen, T.M.N.; Vu, T.D.; Nguyen, N. How does environmental interpretation affect psychological well-being? A study conducted in the context of COVID-19. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. J. Bus. Ventur. 1977, 5, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.V.; Nguyen, N.; Nguyen, B.K.; Lobo, A.; Vu, P.A. Organic food purchases in an emerging market: The influence of consumers’ personal factors and green marketing practices of food stores. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, P.; Tarafder, T.; Pearson, D.; Henryks, J. Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in organic food consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 81, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Chen, J.-L. An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2005, 62, 784–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shalender, K.; Sharma, N. Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oteng-Peprah, M.; De Vries, N.; Acheampong, M. Households’ willingness to adopt greywater treatment technologies in a developing country–Exploring a modified theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model including personal norm. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 254, 109807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adu-Gyamfi, G.; Song, H.; Nketiah, E.; Obuobi, B.; Adjei, M.; Cudjoe, D. Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles. Energy 2022, 251, 123862. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid, S.; Azhar, M.; Sujood. Behavioral intention to order food and beverage items using e-commerce during COVID-19: An integration of theory of planned behavior (TPB) with trust. Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 112–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhartanto, D.; Kartikasari, A.; Najib, M.; Leo, G. COVID-19: Pre-purchase trust and health risk impact on m-commerce experience–Young customers experience on food purchasing. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2022, 34, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Amin, M.; Arefin, M.S.; Alam, M.R.; Ahammad, T.; Hoque, M.R. Using mobile food delivery applications during COVID-19 pandemic: An extended model of planned behavior. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2021, 27, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, H.; Pookulangara, S.; Josiam, B.M. A comprehensive examination of consumers’ intentions to use food delivery apps. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 1737–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, J.Y.; Kim, J.J.; Hwang, J. Innovative marketing strategies for the suc-cessful construction of drone food delivery services: Merging TAM with TPB. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2021, 38, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, W. Investigating motivated consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery services. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 38, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, O. Food delivery apps vowing to provide safety and hygiene. Vietnam. Invest. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Reputa. Vietnamese Food Delivery Market 2020. 2021. Available online: https://apidn.reputa.vn/blog/upload/files/b16c2ad7-510d-46bf-9ef0-4e9324a4446e.pdf (accessed on 17 August 2023).
- Teo, T.; Beng Lee, C. Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 2010, 27, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.S.; Hong, S.; Lee, H. Exploring continued online service usage behavior: The roles of self-image congruity and regret. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, N.; Omar, A.; Ramayah, T. Consumer lifestyles and online shopping continuance intention. Bus. Strategy Ser. 2010, 11, 227–243. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Maghrabi, T.; Dennis, C.; Vaux Halliday, S. Antecedents of continuance intentions towards e-shopping: The case of Saudi Arabia. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2011, 24, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.V.; Vu, T.D.; Nguyen, B.K.; Nguyen, T.M.N.; Do, B.; Nguyen, N. Evaluating the Impact of E-Service Quality on Customer Intention to Use Video Teller Machine Services. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkorful, V.E.; Hammond, A.; Lugu, B.K.; Basiru, I.; Sunguh, K.K.; Charmaine-Kwade, P. Investigating the intention to use technology among medical students: An application of an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. J. Public Aff. 2022, 22, e2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acheampong, R.A.; Siiba, A. Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: The role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors. Transportation 2020, 47, 2557–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElHaffar, G.; Durif, F.; Dubé, L. Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 122556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, T.D.; Nguyen, H.V.; Nguyen, T.M.N. Extend theory of planned behaviour model to explain rooftop solar energy adoption in emerging market. Moderating mechanism of personal innovativeness. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.V.; Vu, T.D.; Greenland, S.; Nguyen, T.M.N.; Vu, V.H. Promoting sustainable renewable energy consumption: Government policy drives record rooftop solar adoption in Vietnam. In Environmental Sustainability in Emerging Markets: Consumer, Organisation and Policy Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 23–45. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y.Y.; Gan, C.L.; Liew, T.W. Do E-wallets trigger impulse purchases? An analysis of Malaysian Gen-Y and Gen-Z consumers. J. Mark. Anal. 2023, 11, 244–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Breiki, M.; Al Abri, A.; Al Moosawi, A.M.; Alburaiki, A. Investigating science teachers’ intention to adopt virtual reality through the integration of diffusion of innovation theory and theory of planned behaviour: The moderating role of perceived skills readiness. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 6165–6187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanafiah, M.H.; Md Zain, N.A.; Azinuddin, M.; Mior Shariffuddin, N.S. I’m afraid to travel! Investigating the effect of perceived health risk on Malaysian travellers’ post-pandemic perception and future travel intention. J. Tour. Futures 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van, T. Fierce Race in Vietnam’s Food Delivery Market: The Game Really Ends? Available online: https://vietnamnet.vn/en/fierce-race-in-vietnams-food-delivery-market-the-game-really-ends-535257.html (accessed on 29 July 2023).
- Yeo, V.C.S.; Goh, S.-K.; Rezaei, S. Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 35, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reisinger, Y.; Mavondo, F. Travel anxiety and intentions to travel internationally: Implications of travel risk perception. J. Travel Res. 2005, 43, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, E.S.-T.; Tsai, M.-C. Effects of the perception of traceable fresh food safety and nutrition on perceived health benefits, affective commitment, and repurchase intention. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 78, 103723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frewer, L.; de Jonge, J.; van Kleef, E. Consumer perceptions of food safety. Med. Sci. 2009, 2, 243. [Google Scholar]
- Anisimova, T.; Mavondo, F.; Weiss, J. Controlled and uncontrolled communication stimuli and organic food purchases: The mediating role of perceived communication clarity, perceived health benefits, and trust. J. Mark. Commun. 2019, 25, 180–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, C.; Choi, H.H.; Choi, E.-K.C.; Joung, H.-W.D. Factors affecting customer intention to use online food delivery services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 48, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angulo, A.M.; Gil, J.M. Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 1106–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PYMNTS. Gen Z Is ‘Generation Digital Health’ as 62% Use Digital Patient Portals. Available online: https://www.pymnts.com/healthcare/2023/gen-z-is-generation-digital-health-as-62percent-use-patient-portals/ (accessed on 26 August 2023).
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Harkness, J.; Pennell, B.E.; Schoua-Glusberg, A. Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. Methods Test. Eval. Surv. Quest. 2004, 453–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista. Frequency of Ordering Food on Food Delivery Apps in Vietnam as of April 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1153956/vietnam-ordering-food-from-food-delivery-apps-frequency/ (accessed on 22 July 2023).
- Association, V.E.-C. Vietnam E-Commerce Business Index Report 2023. Available online: http://en.vecom.vn/vietnam-e-commerce-business-index-report-ebi-2023 (accessed on 8 April 2023).
- Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed.; Upper Saddle River: Bergen, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, N.K.; Kim, S.S.; Patil, A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52, 1865–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, R.; Cote, J.A.; Baumgartner, H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Mark. Sci. 2004, 23, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristic | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 262 | 47.64 |
Female | 288 | 52.36 |
Age | ||
15–18 | 34 | 6.18 |
19–22 | 176 | 32.00 |
22–25 | 236 | 42.91 |
25–28 | 104 | 18.91 |
Education level | ||
High school or less | 57 | 10.36 |
Professional degree | 87 | 15.82 |
College degree | 81 | 14.73 |
University undergraduate degree | 246 | 44.73 |
Postgraduate degree | 79 | 14.36 |
Monthly income | ||
VND <10,000,000 | 241 | 43.82 |
VND 10,000,000–VND 20,000,000 | 218 | 39.63 |
VND 20,000,000–VND 30,000,000 | 58 | 10.55 |
VND 30,000,000–VND 40,000,000 | 25 | 4.55 |
Above VND 40,000,000 | 8 | 1.45 |
Marital status | ||
Married | 158 | 28.73 |
Single | 392 | 71.27 |
Dimensions | Number of Items | Sources |
---|---|---|
Subjective norm | 3 | [54] |
Attitude | 3 | [49] |
Personal innovativeness | 4 | [53] |
Perceived usefulness of promotion | 3 | [9,35] |
Perceived health risk | 3 | [13] |
Continuance usage intention | 4 | [16] |
Criterion | Thresholds | Measurement Model | Structural Model |
---|---|---|---|
χ2/df | <3 | 1.579 | 2.288 |
AGFI | >0.9 | 0.941 | 0.918 |
GFI | >0.9 | 0.956 | 0.937 |
TLI | >0.9 | 0.977 | 0.949 |
CFI | >0.9 | 0.981 | 0.957 |
NFI | >0.9 | 0.951 | 0.926 |
RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.032 | 0.048 |
p-value | <0.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Variable Statement | Fls | CR | AVE | MSV |
---|---|---|---|---|
Personal innovativeness–α = 0.859; Mean = 4.840; SD = 0.783 | ||||
Overall, I like modern, innovative technology services/products and want to use them | 0.781 | 0.859 | 0.604 | 0.370 |
I often search for information about innovative delivery services | 0.787 | |||
I know a lot about advanced technologies in delivery services | 0.832 | |||
I look forward to using services/products with the most advanced technology | 0.704 | |||
Subjective norm—α = 0.766; Mean = 4.645; SD = 0.829 | ||||
People important to me feel good about using FDAs | 0.707 | 0.767 | 0.524 | 0.011 |
For people in my situation, it is common to use FDAs | 0.755 | |||
People expect me to use FDAs | 0.708 | |||
Attitude—α = 0.803; Mean = 4.521; SD = 0.781 | ||||
Using FDAs is a smart solution | 0.766 | 0.807 | 0.583 | 0.339 |
Using FDAs is a good idea | 0.824 | |||
I really enjoy using FDAs | 0.695 | |||
Perceived health risk—α = 0.865; Mean = 4.243; SD = 1.008 | ||||
I worry that eating foods from restaurants on FDAs is harmful | 0.786 | 0.867 | 0.685 | 0.128 |
I worry about my health after eating foods from restaurants on FDAs | 0.837 | |||
I worry that eating foods from restaurants on FDAs is unhealthy | 0.858 | |||
Perceived usefulness of promotion—α = 0.788; Mean = 4.332; SD = 0.801 | ||||
I feel that a discount provided encourages me to use FDAs | 0.758 | 0.789 | 0.556 | 0.394 |
Terms and conditions of promotions are important to me before I use FDAs | 0.742 | |||
I think that promotion expiry date influences me in making an order | 0.736 | |||
Continuance usage intention—α = 0.859; Mean = 4.716; SD = 0.729 | ||||
I intend to continue using FDAs in the future | 0.766 | 0.859 | 0.604 | 0.394 |
I will always try to use FDAs in my daily life | 0.761 | |||
I plan to continue to use FDAs frequently | 0.784 | |||
I have decided to use FDAs for purchasing foods next time | 0.797 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Attitude | 0.763 | |||||
(2) Personal innovativeness | 0.490 | 0.777 | ||||
(3) Continuance usage intention | 0.582 | 0.608 | 0.777 | |||
(4) Perceived health risk | −0.186 | −0.135 | −0.358 | 0.828 | ||
(5) Perceived usefulness of promotion | 0.359 | 0.354 | 0.628 | −0.252 | 0.745 | |
(6) Subjective norm | −0.040 | 0.058 | 0.107 | −0.090 | −0.028 | 0.724 |
Hypothesis | β | t-Value | Findings | |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1: | Attitude → continuance usage intention | 0.486 *** | 10.444 | Accepted |
H2: | Personal innovativeness → attitude | 0.534 *** | 10.369 | Accepted |
H3: | Subjective norm → continuance usage intention | 0.119 ** | 2.856 | Accepted |
H4: | Perceived usefulness of promotion → continuance usage intention | 0.462 *** | 9.368 | Accepted |
H5: | Perceived health risk → continuance usage intention | −0.177 *** | −4.246 | Accepted |
H6: | Perceived health risk → perceived usefulness of promotion | −0.255 *** | −4.923 | Accepted |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vu, T.D.; Nguyen, H.V.; Vu, P.T.; Tran, T.H.H.; Vu, V.H. Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014776
Vu TD, Nguyen HV, Vu PT, Tran THH, Vu VH. Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Sustainability. 2023; 15(20):14776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014776
Chicago/Turabian StyleVu, Tuan Duong, Hoang Viet Nguyen, Phuong Thao Vu, Thi Hoang Ha Tran, and Van Hung Vu. 2023. "Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam" Sustainability 15, no. 20: 14776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014776
APA StyleVu, T. D., Nguyen, H. V., Vu, P. T., Tran, T. H. H., & Vu, V. H. (2023). Gen Z Customers’ Continuance Intention in Using Food Delivery Application in an Emerging Market: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Sustainability, 15(20), 14776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014776