Mapping Drivers, Barriers, and Trends in Renewable Energy Sources in Universities: A Connection Based on the SDGs
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Bibliometric Analysis
2.3. Content Analysis
3. Overview of the Studied Sample
4. Drivers, Barriers, and Trends of Renewable Energy Sources in Universities
4.1. Drivers
4.2. Barriers and Strategies
4.3. Trends by SDGs
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bin Amin, S.; Chang, Y.; Khan, F.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. Energy security and sustainable energy policy in Bangladesh: From the lens of 4As framework. Energy Policy 2022, 161, 112719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poudyal, R.; Loskot, P.; Nepal, R.; Parajuli, R.; Khadka, S.K. Mitigating the current energy crisis in Nepal with renewable energy sources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 116, 109388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nezhnikova, E.; Papelniuk, O.; Dudin, M. Developing renewable and alternative energy sources to improve the efficiency of housing construction and management. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2019, 9, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, A.; Gedik, E.; Keçebaş, A.; Alkan, M.A. An investigation on renewable energy education at the university level in Turkey. Renew. Energy 2011, 36, 1293–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akindeji, K.T.; Tiako, R.; Davidson, I.E. Use of Renewable Energy Sources in University Campus Microgrid—A Review. IEEE Conference Publication. 2019. IEEE Xplore n.d. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8734352 (accessed on 8 May 2023).
- Babatunde, O.; Munda, J.; Hamam, Y. Off-grid hybrid photovoltaic—Micro wind turbine renewable energy system with hydrogen and battery storage: Effects of sun tracking technologies. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolokotsa, D.; Gobakis, K.; Papantoniou, S.; Georgatou, C.; Kampelis, N.; Kalaitzakis, K.; Vasilakopoulou, K.; Santamouris, M. Development of a web based energy management system for University Campuses: The CAMP-IT platform. Energy Build. 2016, 123, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ávila, L.V.; Beuron, T.A.; Brandli, L.L.; Damke, L.I.; Pereira, R.S.; Klein, L.L. Barriers to innovation and sustainability in universities: An international comparison. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2019, 20, 805–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinaldi, C.; Cavicchi, A.; Spigarelli, F.; Lacchè, L.; Rubens, A. Universities and smart specialisation strategy: From third mission to sustainable development co-creation. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018, 19, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, F.M.; Martínez, J.V.B.; Fonseca, I.L. Modelling and Implementing Smart Universities: An IT Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdés, R.M.A.; Comendador, V.F.G. European Universities Initiative: How Universities May Contribute to a More Sustainable Society. Sustainability 2022, 14, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshuwaikhat, H.M.; Abubakar, I. An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1777–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, L. Assessing Sustainability on Canadian University Campuses: Development of a Campus Sustainability Assessment Framework; Royal Roads University: Victoria, BA, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Velazquez, L.; Munguia, N.; Platt, A.; Taddei, J. Sustainable university: What can be the matter? J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortese, A.D. The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan. High. Educ. 2003, 31, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
- Babatunde, O.; Denwigwe, I.; Oyebode, O.; Ighravwe, D.; Ohiaeri, A.; Babatunde, D. Assessing the use of hybrid renewable energy system with battery storage for power generation in a University in Nigeria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 4291–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ávila, L.V.; Filho, W.L.; Brandli, L.; Macgregor, C.J.; Molthan-Hill, P.; Özuyar, P.G.; Moreira, R.M. Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 1268–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amaral, A.R.; Rodrigues, E.; Gaspar, A.R.; Gomes, Á. A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qazi, A.; Hussain, F.; Rahim, N.A.; Hardaker, G.; Alghazzawi, D.; Shaban, K.; Haruna, K. Towards Sustainable Energy: A Systematic Review of Renewable Energy Sources, Technologies, and Public Opinions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 63837–63851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. Producing a systematic review. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods; Buchanan, D.A., Bryman, A., Eds.; Sage Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 671–689. [Google Scholar]
- Graciano, P.; Lermen, F.H.; Reichert, F.M.; Padula, A.D. The impact of risk-taking and creativity stimuli in education towards innovation: A systematic review and research agenda. Think. Ski. Creat. 2022, 47, 101220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cordeiro, E.R.; Lermen, F.H.; Mello, C.M.; Ferraris, A.; Valaskova, K. Knowledge management in small and medium enterprises: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda. J. Knowl. Manag. 2023, 28, 590–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuakoski, H.S.; Lermen, F.H.; Graciano, P.; Lam, J.S.L.; Mazzuchetti, R.N. Marketing, entrepreneurship, and innovation in port management: Trends, barriers, and research agenda. Marit. Policy Manag. 2023, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thelwall, M. Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? Scientometrics 2017, 113, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derviş, H. Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R Package. J. Sci. Res. 2019, 8, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spens, K.M.; Kovács, G. A content analysis of research approaches in logistics research. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2006, 36, 374–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 62, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, M.; Soto, D.; Modi, V. Cost versus reliability sizing strategy for isolated photovoltaic micro-grids in the developing world. Renew. Energy 2014, 69, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lüthi, S.; Wüstenhagen, R. The price of policy risk—Empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers. Energy Econ. 2012, 34, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcone, P.M.; Lopolito, A.; Sica, E. Policy mixes towards sustainability transition in the Italian biofuel sector: Dealing with alternative crisis scenarios. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017, 33, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zhou, P.; Newton, S.; Fang, J.-X.; Zhou, D.-Q.; Zhang, L.-P. Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method. Energy 2015, 90, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chappin, E.J.; de Vries, L.J.; Richstein, J.C.; Bhagwat, P.; Iychettira, K.; Khan, S. Simulating climate and energy policy with agent-based modelling: The Energy Modelling Laboratory (EMLab). Environ. Model. Softw. 2017, 96, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanif, I. Impact of fossil fuels energy consumption, energy policies, and urban sprawl on carbon emissions in East Asia and the Pacific: A panel investigation. Energy Strat. Rev. 2018, 21, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hesselink, L.X.; Chappin, E.J. Adoption of energy efficient technologies by households—Barriers, policies and agent-based modelling studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 99, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matti, C.; Consoli, D.; Uyarra, E. Multi level policy mixes and industry emergence: The case of wind energy in Spain. Environ. Plan. C Politics Space 2017, 35, 661–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purkus, A.; Gawel, E.; Thrän, D. Addressing uncertainty in decarbonisation policy mixes—Lessons learned from German and European bioenergy policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017, 33, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, L.; Yang, J.; An, Q.; Deng, S.; Zhao, J.; Wang, H.; Li, Z. Effects of load following operational strategy on CCHP system with an auxiliary ground source heat pump considering carbon tax and electricity feed in tariff. Appl. Energy 2017, 194, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Earle, A.G.; Merenda, M.J.; Davis, J.M. Strategy-as-Process in a Technology Venture: A Case Study of Pivots, Pauses, Partners, and Progress. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2019, 9, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasbarro, F.; Rizzi, F.; Frey, M. Sustainable institutional entrepreneurship in practice: Insights from SMEs in the clean energy sector in Tuscany (Italy). Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2018, 24, 476–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fioriti, D.; Giglioli, R.; Poli, D.; Lutzemberger, G.; Micangeli, A.; Del Citto, R.; Perez-Arriaga, I.; Duenas-Martinez, P. Stochastic sizing of isolated rural mini-grids, including effects of fuel procurement and operational strategies. Energy Convers Manag. 2020, 213, 112824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndwali, P.K.; Njiri, J.G.; Wanjiru, E.M. Optimal Operation Control of Microgrid Connected Photovoltaic-Diesel Generator Backup System Under Time of Use Tariff. J. Control. Autom. Electr. Syst. 2020, 31, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrosio, G. Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Modernization vs. repeasantization. Biomass- Bioenergy 2014, 70, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanaka, Y.; Chapman, A.; Tezuka, T.; Sakurai, S. Multiple Streams and Power Sector Policy Change: Evidence from the Feed-in Tariff Policy Process in Japan. Politics Policy 2020, 48, 464–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, T.; Urpelainen, J. When and how can unilateral policies promote the international diffusion of environmental policies and clean technology? J. Theor. Politics 2015, 27, 177–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos-Escudero, A.; Gil-García, I.C.; García-Cascales, M.S.; Molina-Garcia, A. Energy, economic and environmental GIS–based analysis of shallow geothermal potential in urban areas—A Spanish case example. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 75, 103267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, A.; Velasco, L.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q.; Talasila, G.; de Biasi, L.; Kübel, C.; Brezesinski, T.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Hahn, H.; et al. High entropy oxides for reversible energy storage. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maes, D.; Van Passel, S. Interference of regional support policies on the economic and environmental performance of a hybrid cogeneration-solar panel energy system. Energy Policy 2012, 42, 670–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Percebois, J.; Pommeret, S. Efficiency and dependence in the European electricity transition. Energy Policy 2021, 154, 112300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakhani, R.; Doluweera, G.; Bergerson, J. Internalizing land use impacts for life cycle cost analysis of energy systems: A case of California’s photovoltaic implementation. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadzie, J.; Runeson, G.; Ding, G. Assessing determinants of sustainable upgrade of existing buildings: The case of sustainable technologies for energy efficiency. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2020, 18, 270–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harcourt, F.; Angeloudis, A.; Piggott, M.D. Utilising the flexible generation potential of tidal range power plants to optimise economic value. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.-C.; Wang, H.-M.; Huang, H.-L.; Ho, C.-W. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives. Energy Environ. 2020, 31, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Q.; Zhou, K.; Yao, J. A new measure of wind power variability with implications for the optimal sizing of standalone wind power systems. Renew. Energy 2020, 150, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Lin, T.; Xu, Z. Impact of Hydropower on Air Pollution and Economic Growth in China. Energies 2021, 14, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, M.; El-Rayes, K. Multiobjective Optimization Model for Maximizing Sustainability of Existing Buildings. J. Manag. Eng. 2016, 32, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, A.; Dickens, B.; Bruce, T.; Ashton, I.; Johanning, L. Reliability and O&M sensitivity analysis as a consequence of site specific characteristics for wave energy converters. Ocean Eng. 2017, 141, 493–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, S.; Hou, P.; Enevoldsen, P.; Yang, G.; Zhu, J.; Eichman, J.; Jacobson, M.Z. Co-optimized trading of hybrid wind power plant with retired EV batteries in energy and reserve markets under uncertainties. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 117, 105631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szarka, J. Bringing interests back in: Using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies. J. Eur. Public Policy 2010, 17, 836–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streitferdt, V.; Chirarattananon, S.; Du Pont, P. Lessons learned from studying public initiatives to support energy efficiency finance in Thailand from 1992 to 2014. Energy Effic. 2017, 10, 905–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novalia, W.; Rogers, B.C.; Bos, J.J. Incumbency and political compromises: Opportunity or threat to sustainability transitions? Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 2021, 40, 680–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thoyre, A. Neoliberalizing negawatts: Governance of energy efficiency as accumulation strategy. Geoforum 2021, 118, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Boer, J.; Zuidema, C. Towards an integrated energy landscape. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Urban Des. Plan. 2015, 168, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauer, I.; Balischewski, S.; Ziegler, C. Design and operation strategy for multi-use application of battery energy storage in wind farms. J. Energy Storage 2020, 31, 101572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salvador, D.S.; Toboso-Chavero, S.; Nadal, A.; Gabarrell, X.; Rieradevall, J.; da Silva, R.S. Potential of technology parks to implement Roof Mosaic in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arif, A.; Rizwan, M.; Elkamel, A.; Hakeem, L.; Zaman, M. Optimal Selection of Integrated Electricity Generation Systems for the Power Sector with Low Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions. Energies 2020, 13, 4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Qu, M.; Peng, S. Performance evaluation of building integrated solar thermal shading system: Active solar energy usage. Renew. Energy 2017, 109, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, K.Y.; Kim, H.; Li, J.U.; Hyon, C.I.; Kang, I.Y. New architecture and SCADA for stand-alone hybrid (medium-sized asynchronous wind turbine + UPS with battery + photovoltaic array) power system without diesel generator. Wind. Energy 2019, 22, 959–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasbarro, F.; Annunziata, E.; Rizzi, F.; Frey, M. The Interplay Between Sustainable Entrepreneurs and Public Authorities: Evidence from Sustainable Energy Transitions. Organ. Environ. 2017, 30, 226–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’adamo, I.; Di Carlo, C.; Gastaldi, M.; Rossi, E.N.; Uricchio, A.F. Economic Performance, Environmental Protection and Social Progress: A Cluster Analysis Comparison towards Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Nallapaneni, M.K. Europe Moves toward Pragmatic Sustainability: A More Human and Fraternal Approach. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osorio, A.M.; Úsuga, L.F.; Restrepo-Carmona, J.A.; Rendón, I.; Sierra-Pérez, J.; Vásquez, R.E. Methodology for Stakeholder Prioritization in the Context of Digital Transformation and Society 5.0. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perevoznic, F.M.; Dragomir, V.D. Achieving the 2030 Agenda: Mapping the Landscape of Corporate Sustainability Goals and Policies in the European Union. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M. Monitoring the Performance of Sustainable Development Goals in the Italian Regions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 3 July 2024.).
- Gamage, K.A.A.; Munguia, N.; Velazquez, L. Happy sustainability: A future quest for more sustainable universities. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zenchanka, S.; Gorbatchev, N.; Zagoumennov, I.; Frankenberger, F. Sustainability of university campus and SDG 2030: Social aspects. In Handbook of Best Practices in Sustainable Development at University Level 2022; Springer International Publishing: Cham, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva-Da-Nóbrega, P.I.; Chim-Miki, A.F.; Castillo-Palacio, M. A smart campus framework: Challenges and opportunities for education based on the sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawneh, R.; Jannoud, I.; Rabayah, H.; Ali, H. Developing a novel index for assessing and managing the contribution of sustainable campuses to achieve UN SDGs. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Classification | Articles (n) | References | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Research method employed | Mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) | 25 | [31,32,33,34,35,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60] | 59.5% |
Qualitative | 8 | [33,36,37,38,39,61,62,63] | 19.0% | |
Quantitative | 9 | [40,55,64,65,66,67,68,69,70] | 21.4% | |
Type of energy source | Solar | 20 | [31,32,33,35,37,40,44,46,52,55,58,62,63,64,67,68,69] | 47.6% |
Wind | 7 | [38,47,56,60,61,66,70] | 16.7% | |
Geothermal | 4 | [41,48,53,71] | 9.5% | |
Hybrid | 3 | [43,50,65] | 7.1% | |
Biomass | 3 | [34,39,45] | 7.1% | |
Tidal wave | 2 | [54,59] | 4.8% | |
Nuclear | 1 | [51] | 2.4% | |
Hydropower | 1 | [69] | 2.4% | |
Fossil fuels | 1 | [36] | 2.4% | |
Stakeholders | Community | 4 | [31,37,43,65] | 9.5% |
Entrepreneurs | 2 | [41,55] | 4.8% | |
University | 8 | [35,40,44,49,60,62,64,66] | 19.0% | |
NGOs | 1 | [61] | 2.4% | |
Project developers | 1 | [32] | 2.4% | |
Farmers | 1 | [45] | 2.4% | |
Countries | 21 | [33,34,38,46,48,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,63,68,69,70] | 50.0% | |
Politicians | 1 | [39] | 2.4% | |
Entrepreneurs, community, and government | 2 | [47,71] | 4.8% | |
University and community | 1 | [67] | 2.4% |
Cluster | Type of Energy Source | Reference | Main Drivers |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable and renewable energy employed by universities | Solar energy | [44] | Dealing with uncertain links and disturbances that are present in microgrid systems in some universities. |
[67] | Performing future evaluations and analyses of its potential is key to its consolidation and dissemination. | ||
[32] | Validating the data with larger samples through future research. Investigating whether renewable energy policy risk assessment differs by type of investors (e.g., large vs. small companies). | ||
[55] | Engaging in future research to understand the psychological benefits regarding the intention to install solar energy, alongside the mediation of an eco-friendly lifestyle. | ||
[52] | Standardizing ecosystem monetary methods. | ||
[58] | Exploring the integration of additional upgrading measures. Explore land and locations that are being used in large university campuses, with potential for installing solar energy | ||
Other (wind, hydroelectric, tidal, geothermal) | [70] | Identifying the best sustainable conditions for powering consumer. | |
[48] | Conducting further analysis concerning large university buildings through future work. | ||
[51] | Studying the impacts of introducing taxes on carbon generation. | ||
Multiple energy types | [46] | Performing tests through case studies of policies for different issues, varied sectors, and delimitations. | |
[33] | Extending the investigation to include environmental variables and conducting comparative analyses across sectors for a sustainable transition. | ||
[34] | Further studying the relative share of each alternative clean energy resource. | ||
Public policy and external projects to implement sustainable and renewable energy | Public policies | [37] | Relating the modeling of different energy technologies to the adoption barriers beyond those already known. |
[63] | Developing ways to engage the dynamic consciousness of historical relationships about the causes of contradictions in a proactive way to support systemic transformations based on future research. | ||
[36] | Enhancing the influence of energy management policies to ensure sustainable development in the region by integrating civil society into fundamental development and environmental policies. | ||
External projects | [41] | Initiating a multiple-case-study project could do more to suggest a general model of the process previously identified, in addition to conducting a survey for technology entrepreneurs about their experiences with the early stages of the commercialization process. | |
[65] | Seeking to understand exactly how the physical and socioeconomic conditions of the landscape influence the development, success, and possible scaling up of sustainable energy initiatives. | ||
[71] | Conducting investigations across sectors and beyond the European continent. | ||
[43] | Using techniques considering the future uncertainty of electricity-type growth. |
Cluster | Question | References |
---|---|---|
Sustainable and renewable energy employed by universities | What is the energy efficiency regarding the location of the application of a photovoltaic energy grid between the ground, roof, and curtains of capture? | [31,32,52,67] |
What is the feasibility and efficiency of using batteries for electrical energy storage in conjunction with wind systems? | [43,60,66] | |
In what ways can tidal energy be further implemented despite its high cost? | [54,59] | |
What are the alternatives for assisting the supply of energy in periods when no generation occurs due to the lack of incidence of both sun and wind? | [49,66] | |
Considering the application of an energy grid at a university, what would be the advantage of applying a system based on photovoltaic cells? | [31,32,67] | |
Considering the high incidence of tropical winds in Brazil, what are the advantages of creating mini wind grids in universities? | [66,70] | |
Public policies and external projects to implement sustainable and renewable energy | What are the implementation laws, and how do they influence the adoption of renewable energy in universities? | [38,63,64] |
What are the incentive policies for creating new renewable energy generators, and how do they apply to universities? | [37,63,64] | |
What are the monetary aid policies used for renewable energy implementation at universities? | [35,64] | |
If the study site has some energy supply, what are the public policies for this energy transition? | [36,65] | |
How do social beliefs and interests impact the implementation of a renewable energy source? | [46,61,63] | |
What is the influence of public policies to ensure sustainable development in the region by applying renewable energy? | [36,63] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Skrzyzowski, V.d.S.; Farinhas, F.N.; Teixeira, M.C.F.d.C.; Barros, M.V.; Salvador, R.; Neto, S.C.; Lermen, F.H. Mapping Drivers, Barriers, and Trends in Renewable Energy Sources in Universities: A Connection Based on the SDGs. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156583
Skrzyzowski VdS, Farinhas FN, Teixeira MCFdC, Barros MV, Salvador R, Neto SC, Lermen FH. Mapping Drivers, Barriers, and Trends in Renewable Energy Sources in Universities: A Connection Based on the SDGs. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156583
Chicago/Turabian StyleSkrzyzowski, Vinicius dos Santos, Felipe Neves Farinhas, Maria Cecília Ferrari de Carvalho Teixeira, Murillo Vetroni Barros, Rodrigo Salvador, Sebastião Cavalcanti Neto, and Fernando Henrique Lermen. 2024. "Mapping Drivers, Barriers, and Trends in Renewable Energy Sources in Universities: A Connection Based on the SDGs" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156583
APA StyleSkrzyzowski, V. d. S., Farinhas, F. N., Teixeira, M. C. F. d. C., Barros, M. V., Salvador, R., Neto, S. C., & Lermen, F. H. (2024). Mapping Drivers, Barriers, and Trends in Renewable Energy Sources in Universities: A Connection Based on the SDGs. Sustainability, 16(15), 6583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156583