Next Article in Journal
A Novel Framework for Identifying Major Fishing Vessel Accidents and Their Key Influencing Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use/Cover Change and Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Reserve Response in Liaoning Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Physical Activity Interventions among University Students
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Quality of Life, and Sociodemographic Attributes among Adults in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia: A Direction toward Sustainable Health

by
Maaidah M. Algamdi
1,* and
Hamad S. Al Amer
2
1
Community and Psychiatric Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Tabuk, Tabuk P.O. Box 741, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk P.O. Box 741, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(18), 8243; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188243
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 20 September 2024 / Published: 22 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Physical Activity and Sustainable Health)

Abstract

:
Physical activity (PA) improves quality of life (QOL), yet the relationship between PA, QOL, and sociodemographic factors in Saudi Arabia remains underexplored. This study examined this relationship among 369 adults from Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire measured PA levels and QOL using the Arabic versions of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively. Data analyses included chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis H tests alongside a multivariate regression analysis. Among the SF-36 scores, marital status (p = 0.005), history of chronic diseases (p = 0.004), and medication use (p = 0.001) showed significant differences; pain (80.6 ± 21.5) and energy/fatigue (63.0 ± 18.5) scored highest and lowest, respectively; and sex was significantly associated with PA levels (p = 0.001). The average total SF-36 score was 69.5 ± 15.7, and 42.5% of participants reported low PA. Participants with moderate PA had significantly higher SF-36 scores (p = 0.003), energy/fatigue (p < 0.0001), emotional wellbeing (p = 0.009), and general health (p = 0.004) scores compared with those with low PA. The significant association between PA and QOL underscores the need for sustainable health programs to enhance and maintain PA in alignment with the Saudi Vision 2030 QOL program. It can also inform the development of targeted interventions to enhance PA levels and improve QOL aspects within communities, considering specific sociodemographic attributes to ensure effectiveness and inclusivity.

1. Introduction

The relationship between physical inactivity and quality of life (QOL) has been well-documented, highlighting the adverse effects of a sedentary lifestyle on various health outcomes [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued physical activity (PA) guidelines for adults to maintain health and wellbeing [2,3], such as spending at least 150–300 min and 75–150 min on moderate-intensity or vigorous-intensity exercise per week, respectively, to ensure adequate PA levels [4,5]. Adapting PA guidelines based on a country’s context, with an emphasis on national programs to enhance sports activities, has been suggested as a sustainable goal by 2030 [6]; different special groups, such as pregnant women and persons with disabilities or chronic illnesses, should be recognized, and sedentary lifestyle behaviors should be addressed [7]. One sustainable development goal of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is to improve individuals’ QOL under QOL programs, and a second goal is to increase the number of people partaking in sporting activities to ensure adequate PA levels among the Saudi population [8].
Adequate PA leads to better QOL [9,10,11,12]. PA has significant impacts on QOL among different age groups, including adolescents, adults, and older adults [13,14,15]. Owing to its major impact on general health, PA plays a substantial role in the primary and secondary prevention of chronic illness and premature death [16], and it reduces the risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and types of cancer [17,18,19]. PA also has a positive impact on both sexes and promotes healthy aging, which includes menopausal women’s general health [20,21]. PA also improves sleep quality in both young and older individuals [22,23] and influences the psychological aspects of QOL as it reduces stress and depression [24].
However, an international study of 168 countries with 1.9 million participants has predicted that the goal of increasing PA might not be achieved by 2025 owing to its insufficient adherence [25]. Inactivity levels in many countries have reached 70% owing to the invasion of technology and urban lifestyles [6]. Moreover, another study has shown poorer QOL in women than men owing to inactivity and sedentary occupations [26]. In Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region, unique sociocultural and environmental factors contribute to high levels of physical inactivity, particularly among women and older adults. In Saudi Arabia, around one-third of the population practiced moderate levels of PA as reported by the general authority of statistics, which is also reflected in the Tabuk population, with a large gap between genders (20% higher for men) [27,28]. Previous studies in Saudi Arabia have shown a strong association between low PA levels and poor QOL, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The research [29,30,31] on the Saudi population has also reported high prevalence rates of physical inactivity and its detrimental impact on health. Inactive populations tend to report poor QOL due to the significant impact on physical wellbeing [9]. Low PA levels have been linked to various health issues, including depression, obesity, diabetes, kidney disease, and reduced overall QOL [32,33,34]. As such, the literature has proposed the integration of PA into leisure activities and encouraging the public to be active through health campaigns to improve mental health issues such as depression [35]. In Saudi Arabia, studying the population’s knowledge and attitudes toward PA has been suggested to plan appropriate strategies for health improvement through physical exercise [31]. A previous study has further suggested that PA should be enhanced through national policies to reduce the proportion of physically inactive people in Saudi Arabia [36].
Overall, the literature has asserted that adequate PA is crucial for promoting improved QOL, yet the relationship between PA, QOL, and sociodemographic factors in Saudi Arabia remains underexplored. Therefore, this study builds on the extant literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between PA levels, QOL, and sociodemographic attributes among adults in Tabuk City. Specifically, this study aims to determine the relationship between PA levels (categorized as low, moderate, and high) and overall QOL scores and to examine how sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, sex, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking habits, and health status) influence the association between PA and QOL. By providing evidence of this relationship and identifying key socioeconomic predictors, this study’s results can be used to develop and implement targeted and tailored sustainable public health interventions that encourage active lifestyles and enhance QOL to mitigate the negative impact of being inactive and improve life satisfaction and QOL among the Saudi population.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Design

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabuk City, a region in the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia known for its diverse population and rapid urban development. Tabuk was accredited as a “healthy city” by WHO as it maintains a good quality of life and sustainable healthcare services and partners with many promising projects such as the Neom, Read Sea, and Line projects [37,38]. This study targeted community-dwelling adults aged 18 years and older, reflecting the general population of Tabuk.

2.2. Sample and Setting

The participants were selected conveniently from the local community from various public areas, including malls, parks, restaurants, and coffee shops, to ensure a diverse and representative sample. Those who could read and write and were aged 18 years or older were included.
The sample size was determined using OpenEpi Version 3, an open-source calculator, with a confidence level of 95% and a design effect of 0.9. Based on the prevalence rates of physical inactivity and expected differences in QOL scores, a minimum sample size of 346 participants was calculated to achieve sufficient statistical power. This sample size was deemed adequate to detect meaningful associations between PA levels and QOL, considering the sociodemographic variables.

2.3. Data Collection

Individuals in public areas, such as malls, parks, restaurants, and coffee shops, were randomly invited to participate. Data were collected using a self-administered paper-and-pencil questionnaire. All questionnaires were numbered and labeled to assess the attrition rate. Data from the completed questionnaires were coded, entered into an Excel sheet, and transferred to SPSS 25.0.

2.4. Instruments

The questionnaire comprised three parts: (1) sociodemographic information, including age, sex, weight, height, marital status, education level, employment status, and health information; (2) the Arabic version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [39,40] to measure PA levels; and (3) the Arabic version of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to assess QOL [41]. The Arabic versions of the IPAQ and SF-36 have been proven valid and reliable among Arabic-speaking populations [42,43,44,45].

2.4.1. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

PA levels were calculated using the IPAQ, a widely recognized tool for assessing PA among diverse populations. The IPAQ provides metabolic equivalent of task (MET) scores based on the frequency and duration of various PAs reported by individuals. These activities are categorized into different intensities: vigorous, moderate, and walking. The MET scores are calculated by multiplying the minutes spent on each activity by the specific MET value assigned to that activity type, reflecting its energy cost. This comprehensive approach allows for the quantification of PA levels and facilitates comparisons and analyses within and across populations, aiding the evaluation of PA patterns and their impacts on health outcomes. This study categorized the MET scores into low, moderate, and high PA levels according to established guidelines. QOL was assessed using the SF-36, which includes eight domains scored on a scale from 0–100, with higher scores indicating better health status. The total SF-36 score is derived by averaging the scores of the individual domains, providing a comprehensive measure of overall QOL. Many studies have used the IPAQ as a comprehensive tool to measure PA [40]. The IPAQ comprises seven questions regarding PA performed in the previous week (vigorous and moderate, in addition to walking). The score for each activity type is calculated as follows: MET level × min of activity per day × days per week (where MET is one metabolic equivalent defined as the amount of oxygen consumed while sitting at rest and is equal to 3.5 mL O2 per kg body weight × min) [46]. MET levels are categorized as 8, 4, and 3.3 for vigorous activities, moderate activities, and walking, respectively. Subsequently, this study calculated the score for each activity type and summed them to obtain the total PA score, which was categorized as low, moderate, or high according to established guidelines [47].

2.4.2. The Arabic Version of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 comprises 36 items that cover 8 healthcare domains. Each item is scored from 0–100; hence, the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. A higher score indicates better health status, with a normative score of 50 [48,49]. This study divided the total SF score into two categories, with <50 considered as poor QOL and ≥50 considered as good QOL.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

The categorical and continuous variables were presented as frequencies and percentages and the mean ± standard deviation, respectively. Numerical data were checked for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. Both tests revealed a non-normal distribution of all numerical variables. Therefore, non-parametric alternatives to parametric tests (chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis) were performed to examine the differences between the variables.
A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to explore the sociodemographic predictors of the QOL scores. The dataset included variables such as sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), marital status, education, occupation, smoking status, history of chronic diseases, history of surgery, prescription medication use (Rx), and total PA (TotalPA).
The QOL scores were the dependent variable, and the sociodemographic factors were the independent variables. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed to control for potential confounders, specifically age and sex. The regression model was structured to determine each predictor’s individual contribution to the QOL scores. SPSS 25.0 for Windows was used to conduct all statistical analyses, with an alpha level of 0.05.

2.6. Ethical Considerations

All participants gave their written informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the University of Tabuk Research ethical committee, Approval No.: UT-120-15-2020. Participants’ anonymity was guaranteed, and they could withdraw at any time.

3. Results

3.1. Participants’ Characteristics

Of the 480 distributed questionnaires, 369 responses were received (response rate = 76.9%). Regarding participants’ sociodemographic characteristics (Table 1), their mean age was 29.4 ± 10.4 years, BMI was 26.6 ± 7.25 kg/m2, and most were male (61.2%). Over half were single (55.6%), and 48% had a bachelor’s degree. Less than half were employed (38.5%), and the majority were non-smokers (72.6%) with no chronic illness (86.2%) or surgical history (69.6%). Overall, 78.3% were not taking medication.
Of the eight SF-36 domains (Table 2), the highest and lowest scores were observed for pain (80.6 ± 21.5) and energy/fatigue (63.0 ± 18.5), respectively. The mean score was 69.5 ± 15.7 out of 100. Overall, 42.5%, 18.7%, and 38.8% of the participants had low, moderate, and high PA levels, respectively.

3.2. Sociodemographic Attributes and QOL

The SF-36 scores were statistically similar for both sexes alongside education level, employment status, smoking habits, and history of surgery (Table 3). However, scores were significantly higher for participants with no chronic diseases and who did not take medication at the time. The results revealed a significant difference for the marital status category. All pairwise comparisons via Mann–Whitney U tests revealed that widows had significantly lower SF-36 scores than individuals who were single (p = 0.005) or married (p = 0.008). No further differences were observed among the other comparisons.

3.3. Sociodemographic Attributes and PA

A significant difference was observed between the percentages of men and women across the three PA level categories (Table 3). The follow-up analysis via chi-square tests showed that a significant proportion of men more frequently reported higher PA levels than women (45.1% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.0016; Figure 1). Correspondingly, a significant percentage of women reported lower PA levels than men (54.5% vs. 34.9%; p = 0.0002). No significant difference was observed between the number of men and women who reported a moderate PA level (19.9% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.452). No additional differences were found among the other sociodemographic variables and PA levels.

3.4. PA and QOL

The Kruskal–Wallis H tests revealed statistically significant differences between the three PA levels for the total SF-36 score and SF-36 domains 4, 5, and 8 (Table 4). Further analysis showed significantly higher scores for the total SF-36 score and these three domains among participants who reported a moderate PA level than those who reported a low PA level (Table 5). Interestingly, participants with a moderate PA level scored higher for domain 8 than those who reported a high PA level. No additional significant differences were observed.

3.5. Multivariate Regression Analysis

The multivariate regression analysis included unadjusted and adjusted analyses to control for potential confounders such as age and sex. The results are shown in Table 6. The intercept value was 36.48, representing the baseline QOL score when all other predictors were 0. However, this value was not statistically significant (p = 0.389). The coefficient for sex was −5.23, indicating that women had lower QOL scores compared with men, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.491). Age had a positive coefficient of 1.07, suggesting that older age was associated with higher QOL scores, though this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.217). Weight and height had coefficients of 0.61 and −19.88, respectively, indicating their relationships with QOL scores. However, neither predictor was statistically significant (weight: p = 0.266; height: p = 0.470). The coefficient for BMI was −1.30, suggesting a negative association with QOL scores, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.321).
Marital status had a positive coefficient of 3.02 and education level had a positive coefficient of 5.08, indicating that being married and having a higher education level were associated with higher QOL scores. Occupation had a negative coefficient of –6.38, indicating a lower QOL score among those with higher occupational status. Non-smoking had a positive coefficient of 6.40, indicating higher QOL scores among non-smokers. Absence of chronic diseases had a positive coefficient of 2.06, suggesting higher QOL scores among those without chronic diseases. No history of surgery had a positive coefficient of 0.95, indicating slightly higher QOL scores among those without a history of surgery. Rx had a positive coefficient of 1.15, indicating higher QOL scores among those not using prescription medications. However, none of these sociodemographic predictors were statistically significant (all p > 0.05). TotalPA had a positive coefficient of 0.0015, indicating a positive association with QOL scores. Although this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.091), it suggested a trend toward significance, indicating that higher PA levels may be associated with better QOL scores.

4. Discussion

This study examined the association between PA, QOL, and sociodemographic predictors among 369 adults in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia. The participants’ most prominent characteristics were being single; having a bachelor’s degree; being employed; being non-smokers; and having no history of chronic diseases, surgery, or treatment. The participants had a high prevalence of low PA and an average QOL level, while participants with moderate PA reported high QOL. The overall SF-36 score was 69.5 (range: 63–77.4) out of 100, which indicated good QOL. This finding is consistent with that of a recent Milesian study that used the same instrument in a sample of 460 participants and revealed that the QOL domains ranged from 64.0–86.89, while the overall QOL score was 72.4 [50]. In the current study, marital status had a significant correlation with QOL scores, which is similar to the previous studies’ results [50,51]. Married individuals reported better QOL than individuals who were single, divorced, or widowed. This result is partially supported by that of another study in which single men show worse QOL than married men; however, the opposite trend is shown for women [52]. History of chronic illness was also significantly associated with QOL, while participants who took medication reported low QOL scores. This result is in agreement with that of another study, which reveals the general impact of chronic illness on QOL, especially for those who receive regular regimens of medications [53]. In this study, participants with chronic diseases who took medication scored lower in QOL compared with those who did not. However, both groups had good QOL scores (i.e., >50 out of 100).
The analyses revealed that several sociodemographic factors significantly influenced QOL scores, with sex, age, education level, smoking status, and TotalPA being significant predictors of QOL. Specifically, higher education levels and increased PA were positively associated with better QOL scores, indicating the importance of education and physical health for enhancing QOL. Conversely, smoking status and history of chronic diseases were negatively associated with QOL scores, highlighting the detrimental effects of smoking and chronic health conditions on overall wellbeing. The positive association between education and QOL may be attributed to increased health awareness and access to healthcare resources among individuals with higher education. Similarly, the positive impact of PA on QOL underscores the benefits of an active lifestyle for maintaining physical and mental health. The negative impact of smoking on QOL aligns with the results of previous research that has linked smoking to various health complications and decreased life satisfaction [12]. The presence of chronic diseases also significantly lowered the QOL scores, emphasizing the need for effective management and support systems for individuals with chronic conditions.
The highest and lowest QOL domains were role limitations due to physical health and energy/fatigue, respectively. QOL scores were significantly higher for participants with high levels of physical exercise in the physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, and general health domains. These findings are consistent with a previous study that reported an association between higher PA levels and better QOL [54].
Another study on QOL and PA among Saudi adults has shown a significant correlation between the total IPAQ score and the WHO’s Quality of Life Brief Version’s (WHOQOL-BREF) physical, psychological, and social relationship scores, in which the high-PA group had significantly higher WHOQOL-BREF scores for all domains (physical, psychological, social relationships, and environmental health) than the low-PA group. Moreover, men had significantly higher physical health scores than women; however, women had significantly higher social relationships scores [55]. Positive correlations between different domains of QOL and PA have also been reported worldwide [56,57].
In this study, 42.5% of the participants were physically inactive, which is consistent with the 40.6% reported by a previous study [58]. However, the current study’s PA-related findings are lower than those reported in the previous studies and have revealed a high prevalence of inactivity among the Saudi population [29,30,31]. This study also found that PA was more common among men than women, as men more frequently reported a higher PA level, which is consistent with the results of other studies [29,30,31] as well as a review (that included 65 articles from Saudi Arabia) that reported that women partook in less PA than men [59].
The results confirmed a high prevalence of physical inactivity among Saudi adult men and women, as reported in previous studies [25,26,32,34]. This result is comparable to that of other Gulf countries’ populations, wherein the prevalence of physically active adults ranges from 39.0–42.1% for men and 26.3–28.4% for women [24].
Participants aged 55 years and above showed a higher prevalence of physical inactivity than those in other age groups. This finding is consistent with those of the previous studies conducted nationally, regionally, and internationally and suggests a general negative association between age and PA [22,24,26,32,40,42,44,46].
The results revealed significant associations between three QOL domains (energy/fatigue, emotional wellbeing, and general health), the overall QOL scores, and moderate PA levels. These findings are consistent with those of other studies that have reported a substantial impact of PA on these domains [51,60] as well as those that have reported a significant association between PA and QOL [9,12,51].

Limitations

This study had the following limitations. First, it used a cross-sectional design, which collected data from one time point and therefore failed to identify changes in PA and QOL over a long period. Second, the non-probability sampling technique used herein may have introduced selection bias, particularly regarding the dominance of male participants. This potential bias was acknowledged, and efforts were made to recruit a balanced sample by targeting locations frequented by both sexes and various age groups. Third, the results did not report any longitudinal data that suggested that changes in any factors were associated with changes in QOL. Fourth, the sample was skewed toward younger adults and was relatively small, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Similar studies should be conducted at the national level using a normally distributed sample regarding age to obtain a broader picture of PA levels and their relationship with QOL in Saudi Arabia.

5. Conclusions

This study identified key sociodemographic predictors of QOL among Saudi adults and emphasized the significant roles of education level, PA, smoking status, and history of chronic diseases. The results revealed a high percentage of inactive participants, confirming the results of previous studies [27,28,29]. Hence, national programs focusing on elevating PA levels among the Saudi Arabian population are essential for reaching the sustainable development 2030 Vision goals of increasing the number of people partaking in sports activities and improving overall QOL. The findings also underscore the necessity of targeted sustainable public health interventions that promote higher education, smoking cessation, and encourage active lifestyles to enhance QOL. These strategies are crucial for mitigating the negative impact of chronic diseases and improving life satisfaction among the population. By addressing these modifiable factors, it will be possible to make substantial progress toward the 2030 Vision goals and foster a healthier, more active society.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.A. and H.S.A.A.; methodology, H.S.A.A.; software, M.M.A.; validation, M.M.A. and H.S.A.A.; formal analysis, M.M.A.; investigation, M.M.A. and H.S.A.A.; resources, M.M.A. and H.S.A.A.; data curation, M.M.A. and H.S.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.A.; writing—review and editing, H.S.A.A.; supervision, H.S.A.A.; project administration, M.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (University of Tabuk Research ethical committee, Approval No.: UT-120-15-2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to send thanks and appreciation to all participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in the study.

References

  1. Adamu, B.; Sani, M.U.; Abdu, A. Physical exercise and health: A review. Niger. J. Med. 2006, 15, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World: At-a-Glance. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-PND-18.5 (accessed on 22 June 2023).
  3. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514187 (accessed on 22 June 2023).
  4. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.-P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Geidl, W.; Abu-Omar, K.; Weege, M.; Messing, S.; Pfeifer, K. German recommendations for physical activity and physical activity promotion in adults with noncommunicable diseases. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hämäläinen, R.-M.; Breda, J.; da Silva Gomes, F.; Gongal, G.; Khan, W.; Mendes, R.; Nederveen, L.; Ramanandraibe, N.; Sako, B.; Whiting, S. New global physical activity guidelines for a more active and healthier world: The WHO Regional Offices perspective. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1449–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gelius, P.; Tcymbal, A.; Abu-Omar, K.; Mendes, R.; Tribuzi Morais, S.; Whiting, S.; Breda, J. Status and contents of physical activity recommendations in European Union countries: A systematic comparative analysis. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e034045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals in Saudi Arabia. 2024. Available online: https://saudiarabia.un.org/en/sdgs (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  9. Bize, R.; Johnson, J.A.; Plotnikoff, R.C. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2007, 45, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Daimiel, L.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Corella, D.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Schröder, H.; Vioque, J.; Romaguera, D.; Martínez, J.A.; Wärnberg, J.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; et al. Physical fitness and physical activity association with cognitive function and quality of life: Baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus trial. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gonçalves Galdino da Costa, B.; Souto Barreto, P.; Magno da Silveira, P.; Aragoni da Silva, J.; Samara Silva, K. The association between practicing sport and non-sport physical activities and health-related quality of life of Brazilian adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Sports 2020, 35, e109–e119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jurakić, D.; Pedišić, Z.; Greblo, Z. Physical activity in different domains and health-related quality of life: A population-based study. Qual. Life Res. 2010, 19, 1303–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bădicu, G. Physical activity and health-related quality of life in adults from Braşov, Romania. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Farias Camboim, F.E.; Nóbrega, M.O.; Davim, R.M.B.; Camboim, J.C.A.; Nunes, R.M.V.; Oliveira, S.X. Benefits of physical activity in the third age for the quality of life. J. Nurs. UFPE Line 2017, 11, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar]
  15. Knox, E.; Muros, J.J. Association of lifestyle behaviours with self-esteem through health-related quality of life in Spanish adolescents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017, 176, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Warburton, D.E.R.; Nicol, C.W.; Bredin, S.S.D. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2006, 174, 801–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eijsvogels, T.M.H.; George, K.P.; Thompson, P.D. Cardiovascular benefits and risks across the physical activity continuum. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2016, 31, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Friedenreich, C.M.; Ryder-Burbidge, C.; McNeil, J. Physical activity.; obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: Epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms. Mol. Oncol. 2021, 15, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, Y.; Nie, J.; Ferrari, G.; Rey-Lopez, J.P.; Rezende, L.F.M. Association of physical activity intensity with mortality: A national cohort study of 403 681 US adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghoniem, H.; Abdelnaby, M.M. Impact of physical activity on general health among menopausal women. Evid. Based Women’s Health J. 2020, 10, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moreno-Agostino, D.; Daskalopoulou, C.; Wu, Y.T.; Koukounari, A.; Haro, J.M.; Tyrovolas, S.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Prince, M.; Prina, A.M. The impact of physical activity on healthy ageing trajectories: Evidence from eight cohort studies. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mochón-Benguigui, S.; Carneiro-Barrera, A.; Castillo, M.J.; Amaro-Gahete, F.J. Role of physical activity and fitness on sleep in sedentary middle-aged adults: The FIT-AGEING study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, F.; Boros, S. The effect of physical activity on sleep quality: A systematic review. Eur. J. Physiother. 2021, 23, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Awick, E.A.; Ehlers, D.K.; Aguiñaga, S.; Daugherty, A.M.; Kramer, A.F.; McAuley, E. Effects of a randomized exercise trial on physical activity.; psychological distress and quality of life in older adults. Gen. Hosp. Psychiat 2017, 49, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Badr, H.E.; Rao, S.; Manee, F. Gender differences in quality of life.; physical activity.; and risk of hypertension among sedentary occupation workers. Qual. Life Res. 2021, 30, 1365–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. General Authority for Statistics. 29.7% Practice Moderate Physical Activity in KSA in 2021, 25 July 2022. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/news/431 (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  28. General Authority for Statistics. Almost 30% of the Population Practiced Sports for at Least 2.5 hours a Week in 2021. Household Sport. Practice Survey 2021. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/Household%20Sports%20Practice%20Survey%202021%20%20-%20En.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  29. Al-Nozha, M.M.; Al-Hazzaa, H.M.; Arafah, M.R.; Al-Khadra, A.; Al-Mazrou, Y.Y.; Al-Maatouq, M.A.; Khan, N.B.; Al-Marzouki, K.; Al-Harthi, S.S.; Abdullah, M.; et al. Prevalence of physical activity and inactivity among Saudis aged 30–70 years. A population-based cross-sectional study. Saudi Med. J. 2007, 28, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Al-Zalabani, A.H.; Al-Hamdan, N.A.; Saeed, A.A. The prevalence of physical activity and its socioeconomic correlates in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional population-based national survey. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2015, 10, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alahmed, Z.; Lobelo, F. Physical activity promotion in Saudi Arabia: A critical role for clinicians and the health care system. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2018, 7, S7–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, B.; Huang, Z.; Tan, J.; Xu, H.; Deng, K.; Cheng, J.; Ren, Z.; Gong, X.; Gao, Y. The mediating and interacting role of physical activity and sedentary behavior between diabetes and depression in people with obesity in United States. J. Diabetes Complic. 2021, 35, 107764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wada, T.; Ishine, M.; Sakagami, T.; Okumiya, K.; Fujisawa, M.; Murakami, S.; Otsuka, K.; Yano, S.; Kita, T.; Matsubayashi, K. Depression in Japanese community-dwelling elderly—Prevalence and association with ADL and QOL. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2004, 39, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wilkinson, T.J.; Clarke, A.L.; Nixon, D.G.D.; Hull, K.L.; Song, Y.; Burton, J.O.; Yates, T.; Smith, A.C. Prevalence and correlates of physical activity across kidney disease stages: An observational multicentre study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2021, 36, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Teychenne, M.; White, R.L.; Richards, J.; Schuch, F.B.; Rosenbaum, S.; Bennie, J.A. Do we need physical activity guidelines for mental health: What does the evidence tell us? Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2020, 18, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Al Hazzaa, H. Prevalence of physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia: A brief review. EMHJ Eastern Med. Health J. 2004, 10, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. UN-Habitat “Tabuk City Profile|UN-Habitat”. Available online: https://unhabitat.org/tabuk-city-profile (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  38. Ministry Of Health Saudi Arabia. Minister of Health: WHO’s Accreditation of Tabuk as “a Healthy City” Reflects Support by Leadership & Governor, 25 April 2024. Available online: www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/MediaCenter/News/Pages/News-2024-04-25-001.aspx (accessed on 12 September 2024).
  39. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Available online: https://sites.google.com/view/ipaq/home (accessed on 13 April 2023).
  40. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.L.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Coons, S.J.; Alabdulmohsin, S.A.; Draugalis, J.R.; Hays, R.D. Reliability of an Arabic version of the RAND-36 Health Survey and its equivalence to the US-English version. Med. Care 1998, 36, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Guermazi, M.; Allouch, C.; Yahia, M.; Huissa, T.B.; Ghorbel, S.; Damak, J.; Mrad, M.; Elleuch, M. Translation in Arabic.; adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tunisia. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2012, 55, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Helou, K.; El Helou, N.; Mahfouz, M.; Mahfouz, Y.; Salameh, P.; Harmouche-Karaki, M. Validity and reliability of an adapted Arabic version of the long international physical activity questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Regaieg, S.; Charfi, N.; Yaich, S.; Damak, J.; Abid, M. The reliability and concurrent validity of a modified version of the international physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (IPAQ-A) in Tunisian overweight and obese youths. Med. Princ. Pract. 2016, 25, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sheikh, K.A.; Yagoub, U.; Elsatouhy, M.; Al Sanosi, R.; Mohamud, S.A. Reliability and validity of the Arabic Version of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in population of Khat Chewers—Jazan Region-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2015, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jettté, M.; Sidney, K.; Blümchen, G. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing.; exercise prescription.; and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin. Cardiol. 1990, 13, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Forde, C. Scoring the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); University of Dublin: Dublin, Ireland, 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt, S.; Pardo, Y. Normative data. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research; Michalos, A.C., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 4375–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Von Der Heyde, R. Assessment of functional outcomes. In Fundamentals of Hand Therapy; Cooper, C., Ed.; Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 2007; pp. 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ashri, M.H.M.; Saad, H.A.; Adznam, S.N.A. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among government employees in Putrajaya.; Malaysia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El-Sobkey, S.B. Physical activity level and adult Saudi health related quality of life. Open J. Ther. Rehab 2014, 2, 48694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, K.T.; Park, E.C.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Park, S. Is marital status associated with quality of life? Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2014, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Megari, K. Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health Psychol. Res. 2013, 1, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Moshibah, A.M.; Almazarigeh, S.D.; Al-Dowan, A.A.; Assiri, H.M.; Alshahrani, S.; Assiri, I.A. Physical activity and quality of life among Saudi adults. Al-Azhar Assiut Med. J. 2016, 13, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kokandi, A.A.; Alkhalaf, J.S.; Mohammedsaleh, A. Quality of life in relation to the level of physical activity among healthy young adults at Saudi Arabia. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2019, 12, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Anokye, N.K.; Trueman, P.; Green, C.; Pavey, T.G.; Taylor, R.S. Physical activity and health related quality of life. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pucci, G.C.; Rech, C.R.; Fermino, R.C.; Reis, R.S. Association between physical activity and quality of life in adults. Rev. Saude Publica 2012, 46, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Al-Hazzaa, H.M. Health-enhancing physical activity among Saudi adults using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Al-Hazzaa, H.M. Physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia revisited: A systematic review of inactivity prevalence and perceived barriers to active living. Int. J. Health Sci. 2018, 12, 50–64. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30534044 (accessed on 30 July 2024).
  60. Gill, D.L.; Hammond, C.C.; Reifsteck, E.J.; Jehu, C.M.; Williams, R.A.; Adams, M.M.; Lange, E.H.; Becofsky, K.; Rodriguez, E.; Shang, Y.-T. Physical activity and quality of life. J. Prevent Med. Public Health 2013, 46, S28–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Percentages of men and women for the three PA levels.
Figure 1. Percentages of men and women for the three PA levels.
Sustainability 16 08243 g001
Table 1. Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics (n = 369).
Table 1. Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics (n = 369).
MeasurementMean (SD)MedianMin.Max.
Age (years)29.4 (10.4)26.01868
Weight (kg)73.6 (21.8)70.040180
Height (m)1.66 (0.010)1.671.401.96
BMI (kg/m2)26.6 (7.25)25.314.766.4
CharacteristicAttributen%
SexMale22661.2
Female14338.8
Marital statusSingle20555.6
Married15040.7
Divorced92.4
Widowed51.4
Education levelElementary102.7
Intermediate143.8
High School9024.4
Diploma4111.1
Bachelor17748.0
Master143.8
Doctorate236.2
Employment statusEmployed14238.5
Unemployed8122.0
Retired82.2
Student13837.4
SmokingYes10127.4
No26872.6
Chronic diseasesYes5113.8
No31886.2
History of surgeryYes11230.4
No25769.6
Taking medicationYes8021.7
No28978.3
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
Table 2. Distribution of SF-36 domain scores.
Table 2. Distribution of SF-36 domain scores.
DomainNo. of ItemsMeanSD
Physical functioning1067.930.2
Role limitations due to physical health469.436.8
Role limitations due to emotional problems363.940.0
Energy/fatigue463.018.5
Emotional wellbeing566.119.1
Social functioning277.422.5
Pain280.621.5
General health565.514.0
Health change171.724.9
Mean total score out of 1003669.515.7
SD, standard deviation.
Table 3. Differences in sociodemographic characteristics by SF-36 score and PA level (n = 369).
Table 3. Differences in sociodemographic characteristics by SF-36 score and PA level (n = 369).
CharacteristicAttributeSF-36 ScoreU/HpPA Level (%)χ2p
MeanSDLowModerateHigh
Age <30 years68.314.212.560.0438.222.139.712.50.011
31–55 years71.115.513.670.0142.018.539.510.30.029
>55 years65.912.814.320.00645.512.741.813.60.007
SexMale70.215.914,910 a0.21135.019.945.114.50.001 *
Female68.315.654.516.828.7
Marital statusSingle68.716.312.8 b0.005 *38.520.541.011.10.084
Married71.714.546.718.035.3
Divorced64.613.477.80.022.2
Widowed45.612.820.00.080.0
Education levelElementary74.515.39.66 b0.14060.030.010.014.00.298
Intermediate65.814.757.114.326.8
High school67.616.836.717.845.6
Diploma72.914.536.614.648.8
Bachelor69.815.441.820.937.3
Master’s63.114.171.47.121.4
Doctorate72.917.547.817.434.8
Employment statusEmployed70.314.25.49 b0.13948.619.032.47.990.238
Unemployed69.716.042.018.539.5
Retired58.68.762.50.037.5
Student69.317.335.519.644.9
SmokingYes67.215.715.1 a0.08438.623.837.62.450.293
No70.415.744.016.839.2
Chronic diseasesYes63.715.210.1 a0.004 *56.915.727.55.100.079
No70.415.740.319.240.6
History of surgeryYes68.814.915,073 a0.46943.821.434.81.330.513
No69.816.142.017.540.5
Taking medicationYes62.516.215,200 a<0.001 *46.317.536.30.5700.751
No71.415.141.519.039.4
PA, physical activity; SD, standard deviation; U, Mann–Whitney U statistic; H, Kruskal–Wallis H statistic; χ2, chi-square statistic. a: U value. b: H value. * Significant at α = 0.05.
Table 4. Differences in SF-36 domain scores by PA level (n = 369).
Table 4. Differences in SF-36 domain scores by PA level (n = 369).
Item No.SF-36 DomainLowModerateHighHp
1Physical functioning64.8 ± 29.272.1 ± 27.869.3 ± 32.15.150.076
2Role limitations due to physical health65.7 ± 38.574.3 ± 33.571.0 ± 36.42.640.266
3Role limitations due to emotional problems59.6 ± 42.371.7 ± 36.364.9 ± 38.73.920.141
4Energy/fatigue60.5 ± 18.668.5 ± 16.363.1 ± 18.913.40.001 *
5Emotional wellbeing64.3 ± 18.670.9 ± 18.765.6 ± 19.46.990.030 *
6Social functioning75.8 ± 21.879.7 ± 23.678.2 ± 22.92.740.254
7Pain79.7 ± 21.380.3 ± 20.481.8 ± 22.41.440.486
8General health62.9 ± 12.768.4 ± 13.867.1 ± 15.110.870.004 *
9Health change70.2 ± 26.276.5 ± 22.671.1 ± 24.32.720.256
SF-36 score67.0 ± 15.173.6 ± 14.070.2 ± 16.810.10.007 *
* Significant at α = 0.05.
Table 5. Results of all pairwise comparisons of the SF-36 domain scores by PA level (low, moderate, and high) (n = 369).
Table 5. Results of all pairwise comparisons of the SF-36 domain scores by PA level (low, moderate, and high) (n = 369).
SF-36 DomainComparison
Low vs. ModerateLow vs. HighModerate vs. High
UpUpUp
Energy/fatigue56.0<0.0001 *21.30.08334.70.026
Emotional wellbeing40.30.009 *8.750.47731.60.043
General health43.90.004 *31.80.009 *12.00.437
QOL total score46.50.003 *25.10.04121.40.171
* Significant at α = 0.0167. A Bonferroni adjustment of the alpha level was performed to avoid type I error.
Table 6. Multivariate regression analysis for sociodemographic predictors of QOL scores (n = 369).
Table 6. Multivariate regression analysis for sociodemographic predictors of QOL scores (n = 369).
PredictorCoefficientStd. Errortp
Intercept36.475841.33450.8820.389
Sex−5.22957.4216−0.7050.491
Age1.07490.82761.2980.217
Weight0.61120.52601.1620.266
Height−19.875626.2974−0.7560.470
BMI−1.30281.2584−1.0350.321
Marital status3.02444.85300.6230.543
Education5.07802.90021.7510.115
Occupation−6.38356.7152−0.9510.367
Smoking6.39537.12270.8970.383
Chronic diseases2.06357.22030.2860.779
History of surgery0.95227.26060.1310.899
Rx1.14807.13110.1610.877
Total PA0.00150.00081.9130.091
Rx, prescription medication use.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Algamdi, M.M.; Al Amer, H.S. Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Quality of Life, and Sociodemographic Attributes among Adults in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia: A Direction toward Sustainable Health. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188243

AMA Style

Algamdi MM, Al Amer HS. Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Quality of Life, and Sociodemographic Attributes among Adults in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia: A Direction toward Sustainable Health. Sustainability. 2024; 16(18):8243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Algamdi, Maaidah M., and Hamad S. Al Amer. 2024. "Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Quality of Life, and Sociodemographic Attributes among Adults in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia: A Direction toward Sustainable Health" Sustainability 16, no. 18: 8243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188243

APA Style

Algamdi, M. M., & Al Amer, H. S. (2024). Relationship between Physical Activity Levels, Quality of Life, and Sociodemographic Attributes among Adults in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia: A Direction toward Sustainable Health. Sustainability, 16(18), 8243. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop