Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Review of the Literature
2.1. Blockchain and Transparency
2.2. Efficiency and Cost Reduction
2.3. Sustainability and Resilience
3. Methods
3.1. Bibliometric Approach
3.2. Stage 1: Data Collection
- Duplicate removal: duplicate articles were identified and removed.
- Stop-word removal: common, noninformative words (e.g., “the”, “is”, and “and”) were filtered out using a custom stop-word list.
- Punctuation and removal of special characters: all punctuation marks and special characters were removed from the text to avoid noise in the analysis.
- Lowercases: the text was converted to lowercase to standardize the data and prevent case sensitivity from affecting the analysis.
3.3. Stage 2: Evaluation Procedure
3.4. Stage 3: Data Analysis
3.5. Theme Extraction
4. Result and Discussion
4.1. Results
4.1.1. Theme Extraction Results
- Many articles emphasize blockchain’s potential to improve transparency and traceability within supply chains. This theme is particularly prominent in discussions about food safety, pharmaceutical supply chains, and general visibility of the supply chain.
- Example: “Blockchain-based traceability in Agri-Food supply chain management: A Practical Implementation” focuses on how blockchain can enhance traceability in agricultural supply chains by ensuring data integrity and transparency.
- Another significant theme is the impact of blockchain on improving supply chain efficiency and reducing costs. This includes applications in logistics, inventory management, and process automation.
- Example: “Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management” explores how IoT and blockchain integration can streamline operations and reduce costs across supply chains.
- The resilience of supply chains, particularly in the face of disruptions, is a recurring theme. Blockchain is seen as a tool to improve the robustness and recovery of the supply chain through enhanced collaboration and real-time data sharing.
- Example: “Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study” examines how blockchain can enhance supply chain resilience by providing a secure and transparent platform for data exchange.
- The decentralization of supply chains through blockchain technology is frequently discussed, with a focus on reducing the reliance on central authorities and improving data security.
- Example: “Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda” highlights the decentralizing potential of blockchain and its implications for future supply chain configurations.
- Smart contracts are identified as a crucial component of blockchain applications in SCM, enabling automated and secure transactions without the need for intermediaries.
- Example: “A blockchain-based smart contract system for healthcare management” details the use of smart contracts to automate processes and improve data security in healthcare supply chains.
- Sustainability and ethical practices in supply chains are also prominent themes, and blockchain is used to ensure compliance with environmental and social standards.
- Example: “Blockchain Practice Potentials and Perspectives in Greening Supply Chains” discusses how blockchain can support green supply chain initiatives by providing transparent and immutable records of sustainable practices.
4.1.2. Data Analysis
- Tokenization and preprocessing: we tokenized the text data from the abstracts and titles, removed stop words, and performed stemming and lemmatization to normalize the terms.
- Frequency analysis: we conducted a frequency analysis to identify the terms and phrases related to blockchain and SCM that occur the most frequently.
- Co-occurrence matrix: we created a co-occurrence matrix to examine how frequently terms appear together, which helped in identifying the main thematic clusters.
- Topic modeling: using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), we performed topic modeling to uncover the hidden thematic structure within the text data.
- Visualization: we visualized the relationships between the themes using word clouds, co-occurrence networks, and thematic maps.
- NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) was chosen for its robust tools for text preprocessing, including tokenization, stop-word removal, and lemmatization. It is widely used in academic research for natural language processing (NLP) tasks, and its extensive resources for working with large text corpora made it an ideal choice for our study.
- Gensim was used for topic modeling, specifically for latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA). Gensim’s LDA implementation was selected for its efficiency in handling large corpora and its proven reliability in extracting latent themes from unstructured text data. Gensim is also highly customizable, allowing us to fine-tune the parameters for optimal performance.
- Scikit-learn was used for clustering and dimensionality reduction tasks, particularly term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) vectorization, which transformed the corpus into numerical feature vectors. This library was chosen because of its ease of use and wide acceptance in text mining applications.
- Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA): for the LDA topic modeling, the following parameters were used:
- Number of topics: 10 (based on the coherence score and trial runs)
- Alpha: 0.01 (a lower alpha was chosen to allow for fewer, more specific topics)
- Iterations: 1000 (to ensure that the model had sufficient time to converge)
- Random state: 42 (to ensure reproducibility of results) These parameters were fine-tuned through an iterative process, using the coherence score to measure the quality of topics and adjusting the number of topics accordingly until optimal interpretability was achieved.
- Min_df: 2 (terms that appeared in fewer than two documents were excluded).
- Max_df: 0.85 (terms that appeared in more than 85% of the documents were removed to avoid overly common words).
- N-grams: (1,2) (both unigrams and bigrams were included to capture key phrases and combinations of words)
4.1.3. Keyword Clusters
- Keywords: transparency, traceability, food safety, provenance, auditability, data Integrity, supply chain visibility
- Description: this group includes keywords related to improving the visibility and traceability of products within supply chains, ensuring data integrity, and enabling audit trails to track the origin and movement of goods.
- Keywords: efficiency, cost reduction, logistics, inventory management, process automation, smart contracts, business process reengineering
- Description: keywords in this group are associated with improving operational efficiency and reducing costs through process automation, optimized logistics, and the use of smart contracts to streamline transactions.
- Keywords: resilience, risk management, disruption, collaboration, real-time data, supply chain robustness, recovery
- Description: this group focuses on building resilient supply chains that can withstand and recover from disruptions, facilitated by real-time data sharing and improved collaboration among stakeholders.
- Keywords: decentralization, distributed ledger, blockchain, trustless systems, peer-to-peer, security, immutability
- Description: keywords related to the decentralization of supply chain networks, highlighting the benefits of distributed ledger technology in creating secure and trustless systems without the need for central authorities.
- Keywords: smart contracts, automation, self-executive contracts, compliance, legal frameworks, transaction security
- Description: this group includes keywords that highlight the role of smart contracts in automating processes and ensuring compliance within supply chains, providing secure and self-executing agreements between parties.
- Keywords: sustainability, green supply chains, environmental impact, ethical practices, compliance, sustainable sourcing, circular economy
- Description: keywords in this group are associated with sustainable and ethical supply chain practices, focusing on environmental impact, compliance with sustainability standards, and promotion of a circular economy.
4.1.4. Co-Word Analysis
- A co-occurrence matrix was generated using TF-IDF vectors to quantify how frequently terms appeared together within the same article. Terms that frequently co-occur indicate thematic relationships, helping to identify clusters of related research topics.
- To determine significant co-occurrences, a threshold of co-occurrence frequency was established. Only pairs of terms that co-occurred in at least five articles were considered significant. This threshold was chosen to filter out noise and focus on more meaningful relationships between terms.
- The significant co-occurrences were then visualized using network graphs to illustrate the relationships between terms. In these graphs, nodes represent keywords, and edges represent co-occurrences. The thickness of the edges indicates the strength of the co-occurrence relationship, with thicker edges representing more frequent co-occurrences. This network graph provided a clear visual representation of the thematic clusters within the dataset.
- Transparency and Traceability in Blockchain-enabled Supply Chains
- 2.
- Efficiency and Cost Reduction Through Blockchain Technology
- 3.
- Sustainability and resilience in blockchain-enabled supply chains
- 4.
- Challenges of scalability and integration
- The strong connection between “management” and “technology” suggests that effective blockchain integration requires aligned management strategies, especially in overseeing technology adoption and addressing implementation challenges. Organizations should prioritize training and change management programs that prepare employees for blockchain’s integration into SCM workflows.
- The frequent appearance of terms like “traceability”, “transparency”, and “sustainability” within the same cluster highlights blockchain’s role in promoting responsible and transparent supply chain practices. For practical implementation, companies can focus on deploying blockchain in specific stages of the supply chain where transparency is most critical, such as product sourcing and final distribution, to maximize the technology’s benefits in building consumer trust.
- The “challenges” cluster includes terms like “scalability”, “integration”, and “barriers”, pointing to the ongoing technical and operational difficulties in blockchain implementation. This finding suggests that organizations should prioritize collaboration with technology vendors to ensure that their blockchain solutions are scalable and compatible with existing infrastructure.
- Blockchain and Transparency (H1):
- Blockchain and Efficiency (H2):
- Blockchain and sustainability (H3):
- Scalability Challenges and Potential Solutions
- Regulatory Barriers and Compliance Recommendations
- Interoperability Challenges and Integration Recommendations
5. Implications
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Practical Implications
5.3. Practical Framework for Implementing Blockchain Solutions in SCM
- Determine the primary goals for blockchain adoption, such as enhancing traceability, reducing fraud, or increasing efficiency.
- Not all supply chain challenges require blockchain; therefore, assess whether blockchain is the most suitable solution for addressing identified needs. Evaluate alternative technologies to ensure blockchain is the optimal choice.
- Define KPIs that align with the business objectives, which will later guide the assessment of blockchain’s effectiveness in the supply chain.
- Consider adopting energy-efficient consensus mechanisms (e.g., Proof-of-Stake, Proof-of-Authority) for sustainable operations.
- Ensure that the chosen blockchain platform can integrate with existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, using APIs or middleware solutions.
- Select or modify the platform for scalability, particularly if the supply chain involves high transaction volumes.
- Develop a pilot blockchain model focused on a specific segment of the supply chain, such as product traceability in one region or among a small group of suppliers.
- Conduct pilot tests that assess transaction speeds, interoperability, and data security. Measure the pilot’s outcomes against the established KPIs.
- Gather insights from key stakeholders involved in the pilot to identify operational challenges and make necessary adjustments.
- Implement blockchain in phases, gradually extending to additional segments of the supply chain to manage risk.
- Ensure all stakeholders, from suppliers to logistics providers, are trained on the blockchain system to optimize usability and minimize operational disruptions.
- Continuously monitor blockchain operations, troubleshooting any issues related to data integrity, transaction speed, or system interoperability.
- Regularly review blockchain performance relative to the KPIs set during the planning stage, such as cost savings, transparency improvements, or enhanced traceability.
- As blockchain and supply chain technologies evolve, adapt the system by integrating new features (e.g., privacy-preserving mechanisms and scalability solutions).
- Document insights gained from blockchain implementation to provide valuable data for future supply chain innovations. Share findings with stakeholders and researchers to contribute to broader industry knowledge.
6. Conclusions
6.1. Limitations
6.2. Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Francisco, K.; Swanson, D. The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics 2018, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatri, N.; Voas, J. Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Softw. 2018, 35, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
- Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Sharma, R. Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 101967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharabati, A.A.; Jreisat, E.R. Blockchain technology implementation in supply chain management: A literature review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, P.; Choi, T.M.; Somani, S.; Butala, R. Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 142, 102067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feng, H.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, Y.; Rozuar, N.H.M.; Mergeresa, F. The blockchain-enabled technology and carbon performance: Insights from early adopters. Technol. Soc. 2021, 64, 101507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghode, D.; Yadav, V.; Jain, R.; Soni, G. Adoption of blockchain in supply chain: An analysis of influencing factors. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K.; Simske, S.; Treiblmaier, H. Blockchain technologies in logistics and supply chain management: A bibliometric review. Logistics 2021, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Lim, W.M.; Sivarajah, U.; Kaur, J. Artificial intelligence and blockchain integration in business: Trends from a bibliometric-content analysis. Inf. Syst. Front. 2023, 25, 871–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hellani, H.; Sliman, L.; Samhat, A.E.; Exposito, E. On blockchain integration with supply chain: Overview on data transparency. Logistics 2021, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paliwal, V.; Chandra, S.; Sharma, S. Blockchain technology for sustainable supply chain management: A systematic literature review and a classification framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, M.; Green, T.; Patel, S. The Impact of Blockchain on Transaction Costs and Process Efficiency in Supply Chains. J. Supply Chain. Manag. Technol. 2019, 45, 112–126. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, L. The use of blockchain technology in enterprise financial accounting information sharing. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0298210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Kumar, R.; Wong, L. Blockchain and Sustainability: A Critical Review of Environmental Impacts and Opportunities. Sustain. Supply Chain. Rev. 2020, 22, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, A.; Zhang, L.; Roberts, K. Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Management: Key Enablers and Barriers. Int. J. Supply Chain. Innov. 2020, 38, 254–269. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, A.; El-Rayes, N.; Shi, J. Blockchain technology for supply chain management: A comprehensive review. FinTech 2022, 1, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, L.; Huang, D.; Li, M. Privacy and Scalability Challenges in Blockchain-Based Supply Chains: A Review. Int. J. Blockchain Res. 2020, 10, 125–138. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.; Shiwakoti, R.K.; Jarvis, R.; Mordi, C.; Botchie, D. Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2023, 48, 100598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, C.; White, P.; Black, J. Blockchain and Sustainable Supply Chains: Ensuring Transparency and Ethical Sourcing. J. Environ. Supply Chain. Pract. 2021, 31, 215–230. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, A.; Park, A.; Kietzmann, J.; Archer-Brown, C. Beyond Bitcoin: What blockchain and distributed ledger technologies mean for firms. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 163, 105064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njualem, L.A. Leveraging Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Provenance Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.M.; Laskowski, M. Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. 2018, 25, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, A.; Li, H. The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performances. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokhtarpour, R.; Khasseh, A.A. Twenty-six years of LIS research focus and hot spots, 1990–2016: A co-word analysis. J. Inf. Sci. 2020, 47, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Börner, K.; Chen, C.; Boyack, K.W. Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 179–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsagris, M.; Alenazi, A.; Stewart, C. Flexible non-parametric regression models for compositional response data with zeros. Stat. Comput. 2023, 33, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mejía, C.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Kajikawa, Y. Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 2021, 6, 742311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sahoo, S.; Kumar, S.; Sivarajah, U.; Lim, W.M.; Westland, J.C.; Kumar, A. Blockchain for sustainable supply chain management: Trends and ways forward. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 24, 1563–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Sharma, A.; Rana, N.P.; Giannakis, M.; Goel, P.; Dutot, V. Evolution of artificial intelligence research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research topics, trends, and future directions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 192, 122579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narong, D.K.; Hallinger, P. A keyword co-occurrence analysis of research on service learning: Conceptual foci and emerging research trends. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astill, J.; Dara, R.A.; Campbell, M.; Farber, J.M.; Fraser, E.D.; Sharif, S.; Yada, R.Y. Transparency in food supply chains: A review of enabling technology solutions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q. Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts for Logistics Automation: Efficiency and Cost Reduction. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2019, 34, 256–268. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, A.; Gupta, R.; Lee, T. Tracking Carbon Footprints in the Electronics Supply Chain Using Blockchain. Sustain. Manuf. Supply Chain. 2020, 12, 678–690. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez, C.; Santos, L.; Pereira, F. Scalability Issues in Blockchain-Enabled Global Supply Chains: A Case Study in the Automotive Industry. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021, 68, 85–96. [Google Scholar]
- Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fauzi, M.A. Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) in Knowledge Management Studies: Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. 2022, 14, 103–124. [Google Scholar]
- Min, H. Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Bus. Horiz. 2019, 62, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kshetri, N. Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, K.; Zhang, Q.; Ashfaq, M.; Zafar, A.U.; Ahmad, B. Pre-to post-adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Influencing factors and the role of firm size. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2024, 198, 122989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Database | Time Period | Search Field | Keywords of the Search | Citation Topics | Document Type | Languages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scopus | Up to 30 June 2023 | Topic | ‘blockchain’ and ‘supply chain management’, ‘blockchain technology’ and ‘SCM’, ‘decentralized supply chain’, ‘smart contracts in SCM’, ‘blockchain for sustainable supply chains’ | Meso | Article | English |
Rank | Keywords | Occurrences | Total Link Strength |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Blockchain | 323 | 916 |
2 | Supply Chain | 295 | 857 |
3 | Transparency | 266 | 786 |
4 | Efficiency | 247 | 742 |
5 | Smart Contracts | 234 | 726 |
6 | Sustainability | 227 | 713 |
7 | Traceability | 213 | 697 |
8 | Decentralization | 204 | 674 |
9 | Resilience | 191 | 659 |
10 | Automation | 186 | 632 |
11 | Technology | 174 | 627 |
12 | Management | 167 | 611 |
13 | Data Integrity | 158 | 598 |
14 | Logistics | 149 | 586 |
15 | Risk Management | 132 | 572 |
Cluster No and Color | Cluster Label | Number of Keywords | Representative Keywords |
---|---|---|---|
1 (Yellow) | Transparency and Traceability in SCM | 25 | Transparency, traceability, data integrity, visibility, provenance, auditability, product tracking, food safety, pharmaceutical supply chains, digital records, blockchain, supply chain, traceability systems, authenticity, supply chain visibility, data security, tamper-evident, immutable records, audit trails, quality assurance, regulatory compliance, origin verification, transparency enhancement, supply chain transparency |
2 (Green) | Efficiency and Cost Reduction | 20 | Efficiency, cost reduction, logistics, process automation, smart contracts, supply chain optimization, blockchain integration, operational efficiency, cost savings, inventory management, automation, streamlined operations, blockchain applications, supply chain performance, logistics optimization, process reengineering, cost efficiency, business process automation, logistics efficiency, supply chain cost reduction |
3 (Purple) | Supply Chain Resilience and Sustainability | 18 | Resilience, sustainability, supply chain resilience, risk management, sustainable supply chains, blockchain, resilience strategies, supply chain sustainability, disaster recovery, sustainable practices, blockchain for sustainability, environmental impact, ethical sourcing, supply chain robustness, risk mitigation, supply chain sustainability, resilience planning, blockchain-enabled resilience |
4 (Magenta) | Decentralized and Automated Supply Chain Networks | 22 | Decentralization, distributed ledger, peer-to-peer networks, blockchain, decentralized systems, automation, smart contracts, supply chain automation, trustless systems, security, blockchain applications, distributed networks, decentralized supply chains, peer-to-peer transactions, automation in SCM, supply chain security, blockchain-enabled automation, decentralized supply chain management, immutability, data integrity. |
5 (Pink) | Smart Contracts and Blockchain Technology Applications | 20 | Smart contracts, blockchain technology, automated transactions, legal frameworks, compliance, blockchain, smart contract systems, transaction security, contract automation, blockchain applications, secure transactions, SCM applications, blockchain and SCM, automated compliance, blockchain-based systems, supply chain management, blockchain for SCM, transaction integrity, smart contract technology, blockchain-enabled contracts |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Balcıoğlu, Y.S.; Çelik, A.A.; Altındağ, E. Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210032
Balcıoğlu YS, Çelik AA, Altındağ E. Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining. Sustainability. 2024; 16(22):10032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210032
Chicago/Turabian StyleBalcıoğlu, Yavuz Selim, Ahmet Alkan Çelik, and Erkut Altındağ. 2024. "Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining" Sustainability 16, no. 22: 10032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210032
APA StyleBalcıoğlu, Y. S., Çelik, A. A., & Altındağ, E. (2024). Integrating Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of Theme Extraction via Text Mining. Sustainability, 16(22), 10032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210032