The Impact and Mechanism of New-Type Urbanization on New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Theoretical Analysis
4. Research Design
4.1. Model Setup
4.2. Variables and Data
4.2.1. Variables Selection
- (1)
- Dependent variable
- (2)
- Core explanatory variable
- (3)
- Control variables
4.2.2. Data Source and Statistical Description
5. Empirical Results Analysis
5.1. Parallel Trend Test
5.2. Baseline Analysis
5.3. Robustness Analysis
5.3.1. Placebo Test
5.3.2. Other Robustness Tests
5.4. Endogeneity Analysis
5.5. Testing the Impact Mechanism
5.6. Analysis of Heterogeneity
5.6.1. NQPF Level
5.6.2. Characteristics of NTU
6. Discussion
6.1. Interpretation of Findings
6.2. Policy Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shao, C.; Dong, H.; Gao, Y. New Quality Productivity and Industrial Structure in China: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Regulation. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Zhang, Q. Measurement of new qualitative productivity kinetic energy from the perspective of digital and green collaboration-comparative study based on European countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 476, 143787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, F.; Jiang, N.; Kuang, X. Towards an accurate understanding of ‘new quality productive forces’. Econ. Political Stud. 2024, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfahani, M.; Fernald, J.G.; Hobijn, B. World Productivity: 1996–2014. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2024, 16, 160–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, S.; Bajuri, N.H.; Khatib, S.F.A.; Lee, Y. New quality productivity and environmental innovation: The hostile moderating roles of managerial empowerment and board centralization. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, B. The Logic of Productivity Modernization Transformation in Forming New Quality Productive Forces. Econ. Res. J. 2024, 59, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
- Rode, A.; Carleton, T.; Delgado, M.; Greenstone, M.; Houser, T.; Hsiang, S.; Hultgren, A.; Jina, A.; Kopp, R.E.; McCusker, K.E. Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption. Nature 2021, 598, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Ren, G.; Dong, S.; Xue, Y. The synergy between pollution reduction and carbon reduction in Chinese cities and its influencing factors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 106, 105348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Yuan, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S. Does new-type urbanization policy promote green energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Econ. 2023, 124, 106752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Xu, H. Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces. Land Use Policy 2017, 63, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Qin, Y.; Gao, Y. Does new urbanization affect CO2 emissions in China:A spatial econometric analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 96, 104687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Wang, B. How does new-type urbanization affect air pollution? Empirical evidence based on spatial spillover effect and spatial Durbin model. Environ. Int. 2022, 165, 107304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zelinsky, R.B.W. The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban Industrial Growth, 1800–1914: Interpretive and Theoretical Essays. Political Sci. Q. 1966, 83, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, S.; Kutsenko, E.; Boos, V. How different patterns of urbanization affect regional innovation? Evidence from Russia. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2022, 26, 213–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castells, M.; Hall, P.G. Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 1996, 78, 242–245. [Google Scholar]
- Siemiatycki, E. A Smooth Ride? From Industrial to Creative Urbanism in Oshawa, Ontario. Int. J. Urban Reg. 2013, 37, 1766–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, A. New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ’Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 2015, 5, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, L.; Sun, F.; Huang, R. Innovation-based urbanization: Evidence from 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 29, 1283–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Fang, T. Revisiting the Connotation, Characteristics, and Formation Path of New Quality Productive Forces: A Perspective Based on Marx’s Theory of Productivity. J. Zhejiang Gongshang Univ. 2024, 2, 39–51. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Wang, R. New Quality Productive Forces: Index Construction and Spatiotemporal Evolution. J. Xi’an Univ. Financ. Econ. 2024, 37, 31–47. [Google Scholar]
- Han, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, F. Measurement of New Quality Productive Forces and New Drivers of China’s Economic Growth. Quant. Technol. Econ. 2024, 41, 5–25. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Y. Development Level, Regional Differences, and Improvement Path of New Quality Productive Forces. J. Chongqing Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2024, 30, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Guangqin, L.I.; Mengjiao, L.I. Provincial-level New Quality Productive Forces in China: Evaluation, Spatial Pattern and Evolution Characteristics. Econ. Geogr. 2024, 44, 116–125. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Q. How Does High-Level Institutional Opening-Up Affect the Development of New Quality Productive Forces?—From the Perspective of Institutional Innovation in Pilot Free Trade Zones. Xinjiang Soc. Sci. 2024, 5, 55–73, 181. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, X.; Liu, C.; Cheng, P. Institutional Opening-Up Empowering the Development of New Quality Productive Forces: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Financ. Trade Res. 2024, 35, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, T.; Yang, G.; Chen, T. The role of green finance and digital inclusive finance in promoting economic sustainable development: A perspective from new quality productivity. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 370, 122892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, P.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, L. National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zones and New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from 230 Cities. J. Chongqing Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2024, 30, 62–78. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Ran, R.; Wu, W. New energy policy and new quality productive forces: A quasi-natural experiment based on demonstration cities. Econ. Anal. Policy 2024, 84, 1670–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Gu, T.; Shi, Y. The Influence of New Quality Productive Forces on High-Quality Agricultural Development in China: Mechanisms and Empirical Testing. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Wang, J.T.; Peng, Z.S. Study on the Promotional Effect and Mechanism of New Quality Productive Forces on Green Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Shan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Xin, B.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, Y. Study on the coordinated development degree of new quality productivity and manufacturing carbon emission efficiency in provincial regions of China. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B. Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B. How does the new-type urbanisation affect CO2 emissions in China? An empirical analysis from the perspective of technological progress. Energy Econ. 2019, 80, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Wang, G.; Xu, N.; Ji, M.; Zeng, J. Promoting or inhibiting? New-type urbanization and urban carbon emissions efficiency in China. Cities 2023, 140, 104429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Elahi, E.; Meng, X.; Deng, W. A new type of urbanization policy and transition of low-carbon society: A “local- neighborhood” perspective. Land Use Policy 2023, 131, 106709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Jia, Z.; Yang, Z. How new-type urbanization pilots reduce carbon emissions: A technology progress paths perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 401, 136663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, F.; Li, J. Does new-type urbanization help reduce haze pollution damage? Evidence from China’s county-level panel data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 47123–47136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ning, L.; Wang, F.; Li, J. Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities. Res. Policy 2016, 45, 830–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akcigit, U.; Kerr, W.R. Growth through heterogeneous innovations. J. Political Econ. 2018, 126, 1374–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, J.; Gauthier-Loiselle, M. How much does immigration boost innovation? Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2010, 2, 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matray, A. The local innovation spillovers of listed firms. J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 141, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, H. The spatial threshold effect and its regional boundary of new-type urbanization on energy efficiency. Energy Policy 2022, 164, 112866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, D.; Li, G.; Wu, D. Review and Enlightenment of the Influence Mechanism and Practice Research of Urban Amenities on Creative Talents Concentration. Urban Stud. 2021, 28, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Shao, S. The Regional Reallocation and Stock Effects of Labor Force Due to Air Pollution. Econ. Res. J. 2021, 56, 127–143. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, H.; Cao, Y. China’s cities go carbon neutral: How can new-type urbanization policies improve urban carbon performance? Sustain Prod Consump 2023, 42, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, X.; Wu, Z.; Xu, Z. How Does New-Type Urbanization Promote Common Prosperity?—Based on a Quasi-Natural Experiment of New-Type Urbanization Pilots. Inq. Econ. Issues 2023, 6, 108–122. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Gao, X.; Huang, J. Prospects for Major Issues of China’s New Urbanization Development during the “14th Five-Year Plan” Period. J. Manag. World 2020, 36, 7–22. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, B.; Chen, L. Can New-Type Urbanization Mitigate Overcapacity? Quant. Tech. Econ. 2019, 36, 22–41. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Z.; Yu, X.; Li, M. Data Asset Information Disclosure, Institutional Investor Heterogeneity, and Firm Value. Mod. Financ. Econ. (J. Tianjin Univ. Financ. Econ.) 2022, 42, 32–47. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, X.; Zhang, P.; Du, Y. How Do Robots Reshape Urban Labor Markets?—A Perspective on Migrant Work Tasks. Econ. Dyn. 2020, 10, 92–109. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, J.; Xu, N.; Zhang, W.; Ning, X. Can agricultural low-carbon development benefit from urbanization?-Empirical evidence from China’s new-type urbanization pilot policy. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, D.; Wei, W.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X. Data Factor Allocation, Credit Market Competition, and Welfare Analysis. China Ind. Econ. 2022, 8, 25–43. [Google Scholar]
Dimension | Primary Indicators | Indicator Description | Data Source | Trend |
---|---|---|---|---|
New–Quality Labor Force | Technological Productivity | Total workforce of publicly listed companies in strategic and emerging industries, including future sectors | Compiled from annual reports of publicly listed firms | + |
Digital Intelligence Productivity | Employment figures in the information transmission, computer services, and software sectors | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | |
Green Productivity | Workforce in electricity, heat, gas, and water production and supply sectors | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | |
Workforce in water conservancy, environmental management, and public facility sectors | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | ||
New–Quality Labor Objects | Technological Productivity | Share of new material output value as a percentage of regional GDP | Compiled from annual reports of publicly listed firms | + |
Number of companies specializing in new materials | Compiled from annual reports of publicly listed firms | + | ||
Digital Intelligence Productivity | Number of broadband internet subscribers | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | |
Total telecommunications business volume | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | ||
Year-end mobile phone subscriber count | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | ||
Number of artificial intelligence companies | Sourced from Tianyancha | + | ||
Green Productivity | Investment in environmental pollution mitigation | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + | |
Carbon trading, energy use rights trading, and emission rights trading activities | Derived from municipal portal disclosures | + | ||
New–Quality Labor Resources | Technological Productivity | Proportion of scientific research expenditure on local fiscal spending | China Urban Statistical Yearbook | + |
Annual number of invention patent applications | National Patent Office | + | ||
Annual number of utility model patent applications | National Patent Office | |||
Green Productivity | Annual number of green invention patent applications | National Patent Office | + | |
Annual number of green utility model patent applications | National Patent Office | + | ||
Digital Intelligence Productivity | Data element utilization level | Following the approach in the existing literature [49], the logarithm of the average frequency of data-asset-related terms from listed company records, incremented by 1, is aggregated to the prefecture-level city based on the companies’ registered locations | + | |
Existence of a data exchange platform | Assigned a value of 1 if a city has data exchange, otherwise 0 | + | ||
Robot installation density | Drawing on the existing literature [50], the data are derived from the integration of industrial robot installation statistics reported by the International Federation of Robotics (IFR) and industrial enterprise data from China’s Second National Economic Census | + |
Variable | N | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQPF | 3948 | 0.050 | 0.065 | 0 | 0.636 |
NTUPP | 4811 | 0.130 | 0.330 | 0 | 1 |
OD | 4811 | 1.960 | 2.100 | 0 | 15.320 |
INDUSTR | 4811 | 41.810 | 11.910 | 8.580 | 89.520 |
ER | 4811 | 0.620 | 0.190 | 0.060 | 0.990 |
AGDP | 4811 | 10.510 | 0.820 | 7.920 | 13.190 |
FINA | 4811 | 2.430 | 1.350 | 0.560 | 8.980 |
AGG | 4811 | 0.860 | 0.500 | 0.020 | 3.520 |
GOV | 4811 | 0.810 | 0.050 | 0.610 | 0.980 |
PS | 4811 | 5.740 | 0.920 | 1.610 | 7.940 |
INFRA | 4811 | 4.890 | 6.370 | 0 | 75.040 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NTUPP | 0.044 *** | 0.017 *** | 0.012 *** | 0.011 *** |
(10.363) | (15.306) | (10.237) | (9.753) | |
OD | −0.001 *** | −0.001 *** | ||
(−3.809) | (−5.451) | |||
INDUSTR | 0.0001 *** | −0.0001 *** | ||
(8.071) | (−4.388) | |||
ER | −0.002 | −0.009 *** | ||
(−0.806) | (−3.481) | |||
AGDP | 0.012 *** | 0.0001 | ||
(13.209) | (0.086) | |||
FINA | 0.002 *** | −0.002 *** | ||
(4.701) | (−4.679) | |||
AGG | −0.009 *** | −0.006 *** | ||
(−6.233) | (−4.885) | |||
GOV | −0.119 *** | −0.170 *** | ||
(−12.077) | (−17.654) | |||
PS | 0.148 *** | 0.110 *** | ||
(20.075) | (15.302) | |||
INFRA | 0.001 *** | 0.0001 *** | ||
(7.485) | (3.920) | |||
_cons | 0.044 *** | −0.843 *** | 0.048 *** | −0.421 *** |
(38.322) | (−19.791) | (149.478) | (−9.279) | |
Urban fixed effect | NO | YES | YES | YES |
Year fixed effect | NO | NO | YES | YES |
N | 3948 | 3948 | 3948 | 3948 |
r2 | 0.046 | 0.955 | 0.952 | 0.961 |
r2_a | 0.046 | 0.952 | 0.948 | 0.958 |
F | 107.386 | 245.089 | 104.788 | 94.773 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two-Stage DID | Changing the Measurement Method of the Dependent Variable | Exclude Other Policy Pilots | PSM–DID | Excluding Special Samples | |
NTUPP | 0.0130 *** | 0.096 *** | 0.0089 *** | 0.0107 *** | 0.0081 *** |
(3.173) | (2.914) | (8.077) | (9.737) | (11.612) | |
postwen | 0.0056 *** | ||||
(5.073) | |||||
postdt | 0.0084 *** | ||||
(7.181) | |||||
postcx | 0.0079 *** | ||||
(5.099) | |||||
postzh | −0.0030 *** | ||||
(−2.771) | |||||
controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
_cons | - | 0.520 | −0.4113 *** | −0.4324 *** | 0.0086 |
- | (0.428) | (−9.170) | (−9.441) | (0.284) | |
N | 3948 | 4811 | 3948 | 3925 | 3458 |
r2 | - | 0.917 | 0.9622 | 0.9608 | 0.9538 |
r2_a | - | 0.911 | 0.9590 | 0.9575 | 0.9499 |
F | - | 11.310 | 78.4844 | 96.5071 | 54.7572 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
---|---|---|---|
Slope | Relief | Elevation | |
NTUPP | 0.0351 *** | 0.0372 *** | 0.0484 *** |
(3.611) | (4.420) | (4.898) | |
Controls | YES | YES | YES |
N | 3102 | 3102 | 3102 |
r2 | 0.3845 | 0.3635 | 0.2252 |
r2_a | 0.3181 | 0.2949 | 0.1416 |
F | 23.6778 | 23.6289 | 23.0505 |
Kleibergen–Paap rk LM statistic | 248.888 *** | 347.530 *** | 278.927 *** |
[0.000] | [0.000] | [0.000] | |
Cragg–Donald Wald F statistic | 25.753 | 36.605 | 29.017 |
{11.49} | {11.49} | {11.49} |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITG | ARE | |||
NTUPP | 0.1757 *** | 0.0077 *** | 0.0316 *** | 0.0106 *** |
(4.287) | (8.372) | (2.948) | (9.723) | |
ITG | 0.0080 *** | |||
(20.536) | ||||
ARE | 0.0036 ** | |||
(2.079) | ||||
controls | YES | YES | YES | YES |
_cons | −7.1432 *** | −0.2218 *** | 1.2084 *** | −0.4084 *** |
(−4.139) | (−4.840) | (3.233) | (−8.928) | |
N | 3962 | 3102 | 4811 | 3948 |
r2 | 0.6670 | 0.9756 | 0.2081 | 0.9609 |
r2_a | 0.6392 | 0.9730 | 0.1541 | 0.9577 |
F | 27.5873 | 104.0717 | 11.9143 | 86.6288 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
15% | 35% | 55% | 75% | 95% | |
NTUPP | 0.0182 *** | 0.0175 *** | 0.0166 ** | 0.0157 | 0.0142 |
(6.759) | (5.945) | (2.423) | (1.422) | (0.786) | |
Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 3948 | 3948 | 3948 | 3948 | 3948 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | |
---|---|---|---|
NTUPP | 0.0040 *** | 0.0155 *** | 0.0016 |
(4.152) | (9.157) | (1.613) | |
postdt | 0.0501 *** | ||
(6.555) | |||
NTUPP ×postdt | 0.0143 *** | ||
(6.234) | |||
postzh | 0.0008 | ||
(0.752) | |||
NTUPP ×postzh | −0.0112 *** | ||
(−5.438) | |||
postwen | 0.0012 | ||
(0.780) | |||
NTUPP ×postwen | 0.0193 *** | ||
(7.874) | |||
Controls | YES | YES | YES |
_cons | 0.3606 | 0.3818 | 0.3465 |
(1.071) | (1.136) | (1.019) | |
N | 4811 | 4811 | 4811 |
r2 | 0.6346 | 0.6296 | 0.6322 |
r2_a | 0.6095 | 0.6042 | 0.6070 |
F | 31.6781 | 23.7927 | 26.5985 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gao, X.; Yan, X.; Song, S.; Xu, N. The Impact and Mechanism of New-Type Urbanization on New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 2025, 17, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010353
Gao X, Yan X, Song S, Xu N. The Impact and Mechanism of New-Type Urbanization on New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2025; 17(1):353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010353
Chicago/Turabian StyleGao, Xiaotian, Xiangwu Yan, Sheng Song, and Ning Xu. 2025. "The Impact and Mechanism of New-Type Urbanization on New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from China" Sustainability 17, no. 1: 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010353
APA StyleGao, X., Yan, X., Song, S., & Xu, N. (2025). The Impact and Mechanism of New-Type Urbanization on New Quality Productive Forces: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(1), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010353