2.1. Sample Snow Particles
It is well known that the mechanical properties of natural snow on the ground, e.g., the bulk density, shear, and compression strengths, largely depend on the size and shape of snow particles, as well as the temperature (see e.g., [
12]). Hence, the following three types of snow (or ice) particles of different size and shape shown in
Figure 3 were used as samples.
Figure 3.
Snow and ice particles. (a) Fresh snow, gathered within 24 hours after snow fall; (b) Granulated snow, gathered from local spots; (c) Chipped ice, made by a commercial refrigerator.
Figure 3.
Snow and ice particles. (a) Fresh snow, gathered within 24 hours after snow fall; (b) Granulated snow, gathered from local spots; (c) Chipped ice, made by a commercial refrigerator.
2.2. Specific Flow Behavior of Snow/Water Slurry Flow in Pipes
Flow pattern of snow/water slurry in a pipe is quite different from conventional non-cohesive solid particle slurries due to the cohesive nature of snow particles in water [
13]. When both the snow fraction,
f, and the flow velocity,
U, are lower than certain respective critical values, depending on sample snow, particles adhere each other to form clusters moving along the upper wall of the pipe (Cluster flow). With a higher fraction, the snow cluster becomes larger, both in diameter and length, and finally forms an axially continuous column (Column flow). Thus, at the highest fractions, the pipe is fully filled by the snow column. These two flow patterns are observed for the chipped ice slurry when the flow velocity is low, in spite of the fact that the cohesion force of the chipped ice is very weak. For the two flow patterns, the cluster and the column move without rotational motion, like a solid body.
When the fraction is lower and the velocity is higher than respective critical values, the cluster (or column) is scattered into particles such as the pseudo-homogeneous flow of conventional non-cohesive solid-particle/water slurry (Dispersed particle flow). In this flow, the particles are well mixed by turbulent eddies. It is noted that the velocities of snow is essentially equal to the mean flow velocity,
U, for all the above flow patterns when the flow remains steady [
14].
In the cluster flow, the cohesion strength is considered to be equal to the value of natural packing, and also in the column flow when the fraction,
f, is lower than the natural packing fraction,
f*. When
f >
f* in the column flow, the cohesion force becomes higher. This effect is clearly observed in a flow discharged from the pipe exit, as shown in
Figure 4, where the continuous column is seen to be broken into solid bars with length two to five times the pipe diameter by the gravity force.
Figure 4.
High snow fraction column flow of fresh-snow/water slurry discharging from pipe exit.
Figure 4.
High snow fraction column flow of fresh-snow/water slurry discharging from pipe exit.
When the flow velocity, U, is kept constant at a low value, the pressure drop per unit length of the pipe, i, increases linearly with the snow fraction and the increasing gradient of i suddenly becomes steep at a certain value of f. The abrupt increase of pressure drop at this critical fraction is considered to correlate with the condition that the fraction attains the value of natural packing f*. That is, beyond this value, the whole pipe cross section is considered to be filled by compressed snow column. The increasing gradient of i below this fraction becomes more gradual with a higher flow velocity, and can become slightly negative when the flow velocity is still higher. For example, in the experiment for a D = 77 mm pipe, the gradient for the granulated-snow/water slurry became slightly negative when U = 3.0 m/s.
It is shown that the flow pattern of snow/water slurry in various diameter pipes is determined by the snow fraction,
f, and a non-dimensional parameter defined as the ratio of flow energy to the energy required to break the snow cluster into particles [
13].
2.3. Blocking Phenomenon of Snow/Water Slurry
When the whole pipeline is smooth, the blocking does not occur even for the compressed snow-column flow, as observed in
Figure 4. The blocking is likely to occur at pipeline elements with high resistance or abrupt change in cross section, e.g., the pump in-take, valve, water separator, and orifice [
10].
Figure 5 shows the plug of chipped ice, formed at a tube orifice, which caused the blocking. In this case, the plug cannot hold its shape when it is put out of the pipe as the cohesion force of coarse chipped ice particles is not so strong. In contrast, the cohesion force of fresh snow is so strong that the fresh snow, flowing out through small holes on the porous wall of inner pipe of water separator, can form “noodles”, as seen in
Figure 6. In this case, a solid plug, as shown in
Figure 7, was formed in the inner perforated plate tube, which caused the blocking.
Figure 5.
Plug of chipped ice formed at a tube orifice.
Figure 5.
Plug of chipped ice formed at a tube orifice.
Figure 6.
Snow noodle formed at porous wall in a water separator.
Figure 6.
Snow noodle formed at porous wall in a water separator.
Figure 7.
Snow plug of fresh snow formed at a water separator.
Figure 7.
Snow plug of fresh snow formed at a water separator.
To obtain the criterion for the blocking at a tube orifice, two tests were carried out. One was the element test, using an apparatus shown in
Figure 8, and, the other, the pipeline blocking test in a vortex-pump and pipeline system, inserted with the tube orifice tested in the element test [
15,
16].
In the element test, an orifice of diameter
dor is attached to an end of a pipe with diameter
D = 52 mm and 985 mm in length, shown in
Figure 8. The sample snow is put uniformly into the whole pipe length with a prescribed fraction. Then, the pipe is immersed in 0 °C water and flow is started at a constant velocity driven by a piston pump. The blocking process is observed and recorded by video. The pressure drop
p2-
p1 and the fraction upstream of the orifice are measured simultaneously, as shown in
Figure 8. In this element test, the snow plug formed at the orifice has a hole (water path) through it as the initial column length is limited and no additional snow is supplied from upstream.
Figure 8.
Element test apparatus for blocking experiments [
15].
Figure 8.
Element test apparatus for blocking experiments [
15].
Figure 9 compares the behaviors of
f and pressure drop
p2-
p1 through the plug for the chipped ice and the fresh snow slurries when the blocking has occurred. In the case of (a) chipped ice, the fraction,
f, jumps to a considerably higher value when the blocking has occurred, and remains constant afterward. In contrast, in the case of (b) fresh snow,
f increases gradually during 15 s before it attains a constant value. Although the change in the pressure drop
p2-
p1 is small in both cases, it would attain a larger value for the fresh snow if snow particles had been supplied continuously as in the case of a slurry flow tube in a pipeline system.
Figure 9.
Behaviors of fraction and pressure drop when blocking has occurred in the element test [
16]. (
a) Chipped ice; (
b) Fresh snow.
Figure 9.
Behaviors of fraction and pressure drop when blocking has occurred in the element test [
16]. (
a) Chipped ice; (
b) Fresh snow.
The conditions of flow velocity and initial fraction for occurrence of blocking, obtained by the element test, are shown in
Figure 10 [
16]. In the case of chipped ice, the blocking occurs at an initial fraction higher than around 10%, independent of the flow velocity. While, in the cases of fresh and granulated snows, the blocking occurs depending both on the initial fraction and the flow velocity. Especially for the fresh snow, the blocking occurs at the lowest initial fraction at flow velocities lower than around 0.1 m/s. The results of the element test showed that the fresh snow is gradually compressed upstream of the orifice to form a solid plug while the coarse solid chipped ice particles block the orifice by arching in the same way as non-cohesive coarse solid particles.
Figure 10.
Blocking conditions of snow/water slurry at an orifice obtained by the element test [
16]. (
a) Chipped ice; (
b) Granulated snow; (
c) Fresh snow.
Figure 10.
Blocking conditions of snow/water slurry at an orifice obtained by the element test [
16]. (
a) Chipped ice; (
b) Granulated snow; (
c) Fresh snow.
In the pipeline blocking test, the same orifice tested above is inserted in a horizontal straight pipe in a pump-pipeline system. It is initially operated at prescribed values of
f and
U. Then, the flow velocity is decreased step-wisely by adjusting the rotation speed of the feeding vortex pump while keeping the fraction constant until the formation of the compressed plug, stopping the flow, is observed at the orifice. Results of fresh snow slurry, thus obtained, are shown in
Figure 11, compared with the results of the element test in
Figure 10c [
16]. They agree fairly well with each other, confirming that the blocking resulting from the compression of fresh snow plug occurs at a tube orifice in pipeline at the same criterion as observed in the element test.
Figure 11.
Blocking condition of fresh-snow/water slurry at a tube orifice in pipeline compared with that of the element test [
16].
Figure 11.
Blocking condition of fresh-snow/water slurry at a tube orifice in pipeline compared with that of the element test [
16].
2.4. Measurement of Compression Strengthening
As shown in the
Section 2.2, the flow behavior of snow/water slurry is dominated by the cohesion force of particles in water. Hence, a technique to measure the cohesion stress
σy of a naturally-packed cylindrical snow column test piece was devised in the NUT-TDC project [
8]. As the results in the previous section indicate that the snow plug leading to the blocking is formed by the effect of “compression strengthening” of snow cluster in water, the technique is modified in this work to measure the compression strengthening behavior of a snow column, as shown in
Figure 12. Procedure of this technique is as follows.
- (1)
The test piece is formed in air by softly and naturally packing the particles in a circular pipe mold.
- (2)
The mold filled with the test piece is placed on the bottom of a vacant cold water bath, and the mold is removed leaving the test piece un-deformed.
- (3)
A ram is set on the upper surface of the test piece without adding load on it.
- (4)
The bath is filled with 0 °C water to fully submerge the test piece.
- (5)
The ram is driven at a prescribed constant velocity V to compress the test piece, and the load w and the volumetric snow fraction f of the test piece are measured until the test piece is completely crushed or the ram stops when w attains beyond the capacity of the driving motor.
For the measurement of
f, the electro-conductometric method [
9] using a pair of circular electrodes surrounded by a dummy annular pair, as shown in the
Figure 12, was devised in this work.
Figure 12.
Constant velocity compression test device.
Figure 12.
Constant velocity compression test device.
Figure 13 shows an example of the compression process. The sample is imitation fresh snow with
dp = 1 mm made by shaving ice. It is seen that the test piece is compressed axially, while the radial deformation remains insignificant, like the case of abrupt loading to measure the cohesion stress
σy. Therefore, the compression ratio
rh at a height
h and the compression stress
σ are defined by neglecting the radial distortion as follows:
h0, d0: initial height and diameter of test piece, respectively.
The result of imitation fresh snow is presented in
Figure 14. In
Figure 14a, the horizontal dotted line shows the value of
σy of fresh snow obtained by the abrupt loading test, which corresponds to the case of very rapid compression, and the solid line shows result of stepwise loading test [
8]. The latter was obtained by adding a load a little smaller than
wy =
σy (π
d02/4) abruptly and step-wisely for every three minutes. Thus, the stepwise loading stands for the quasi-static loading,
i.e., in the case the compression velocity is infinitesimally low.
Figure 13.
Compression process of snow-particle column. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1mm), d0 = 65 mm, h0 = 65 mm. (a) V= 1 mm/s; (b) V= 3 mm/s.
Figure 13.
Compression process of snow-particle column. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1mm), d0 = 65 mm, h0 = 65 mm. (a) V= 1 mm/s; (b) V= 3 mm/s.
Figure 14.
Results of constant velocity compression test. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1 mm). (a) Compression stress vs. compression ratio; (b) Snow fraction vs. compression ratio.
Figure 14.
Results of constant velocity compression test. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1 mm). (a) Compression stress vs. compression ratio; (b) Snow fraction vs. compression ratio.
Figure 14a shows that the compression stress at significantly large compression ratios, say
rh > 0.2, is larger when compression velocity
V is lower, while the fraction at a fixed value of
rh is equal irrespective of
V as seen in
Figure 14b. The increasing gradient of σ at
rh > 0.2 for the lowest compression velocity
V = 1 mm/s is almost equal to that of the stepwise loading test. In
Figure 14b, the dotted curve shows
f calculated for the initial volumetric fraction
f0 = 34% based on the assumption that there is no radial distortion during the compression. The deviation of the measured value of
f from this curve is due to a slight radial expansion of the column and/or collapse at its top part. Since the measured
f ~
rh relationship is virtually unique irrespective of the compression velocity
V, the deformation of the test piece is shown to be independent of
V. The result is re-plotted as
σ vs. f in
Figure 15, in which the phenomenon of compression strengthening is more clearly observed in the fact that the compression stress
σ at an equal fraction
f is larger when the compression velocity
V is lower. Using the results in
Figure 14a, the magnitude of compression strengthening
C.S. is estimated by
Here, Δσ/Δrh is determined as the average gradient of measured rh ~ σ curve at rh = 0.3~0.5 and V1, V2 = 1, 2mm/s.
Figure 15.
Compression stress vs. snow fraction by constant velocity compression test. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1 mm).
Figure 15.
Compression stress vs. snow fraction by constant velocity compression test. Imitation fresh snow (dp = 1 mm).
The cohesive properties of the samples are summarized in
Table 1.
Table 1.
Cohesive properties of snow particles in water.
Table 1.
Cohesive properties of snow particles in water.
| Sample | dP (mm) | f0 (%) | σy (kPa) | C.S. (kPa·s/m) |
---|
a | Fresh snow | 1 | 15~40 | 1.8 | 30 × 103 * |
b | Granulated Snow | 2 | 30~47 | 0.7 | - |
c | Chipped ice | 10 | 52 | <0.3 | - |