Next Article in Journal
A Kernel-Driven BRDF Approach to Correct Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery over Forested Areas with Rugged Topography
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Content in Two Contrasting Climatic Regions by Stacking Machine Learning Models and Rescanning Covariate Space
Previous Article in Journal
A Holistic Analysis for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Applying Geographic Object-Based Random Forest: A Comparison between Protected and Non-Protected Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fine-Resolution Mapping of Soil Total Nitrogen across China Based on Weighted Model Averaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combining Historical Remote Sensing, Digital Soil Mapping and Hydrological Modelling to Produce Solutions for Infrastructure Damage in Cosmo City, South Africa

1
Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
2
University of the Free State, Nelson Mandela Avenue, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa
3
Digital Soils Africa, 2 Alabaster street, Port Elizabeth 6001, South Africa
4
Centre for Water Resources Research, Univ. of Kwa-Zulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3200, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 433; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433
Submission received: 13 December 2019 / Revised: 16 January 2020 / Accepted: 19 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Mapping in Dynamic Environments)

Abstract

:
Urbanization and hydrology have an interactive relationship, as urbanization changing the hydrology of a system and the hydrology commonly causing structural damage to the infrastructure. Hydrological modelling has been used to quantify the water causing structural impacts, and to provide solutions to the issues. However, in already-urbanized areas, creating a soil map to use as input in the modelling process is difficult, as observation positions are limited and visuals of the natural vegetation which indicate soil distribution are unnatural. This project used historical satellite images in combination with terrain parameters and digital soil mapping methods to produce an accurate (Kappa statistic = 0.81) hydropedology soil map for the Cosmo City suburb in Johannesburg, South Africa. The map was used as input into the HYDRUS 2D and SWAT hydrological models to quantify the water creating road damage at Kampala Crescent, a road within Cosmo City (using HYDRUS 2D), as well as the impact of urbanization on the hydrology of the area (using SWAT). HYDRUS 2D modelling showed that a subsurface drain installed at Kampala Crescent would need a carrying capacity of 0.3 m3·h−1·m−1 to alleviate the road damage, while SWAT modelling shows that surface runoff in Cosmo City will commence with as little rainfall as 2 mm·month−1. This project showcases the value of multidisciplinary work. The remote sensing was invaluable to the mapping, which informed the hydrological modelling and subsequently provided answers to the engineers, who could then mitigate the hydrology-related issues within Cosmo City.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Urban sprawl is set to continually put larger developmental pressure on our natural eco-systems, as larger portions of the world’s increasing population will live in cities. Currently, 54% of the world’s population are city dwellers, and this is projected to increase to 66% by 2050 [1], leading to a greater need for infrastructure development in the areas surrounding cities.
The relationship between hydrology and infrastructure development is interactive. The expansion of urban areas can lead to drastic changes in hydrological processes. For example, the generation mechanisms, magnitude, and timing of streamflow could be altered by infrastructure [2,3,4]. On the other hand, these changes in hydrological processes can lead to infrastructural damages when they exceed construction thresholds [5,6]. Lately, the focus in urban development has been on water-sensitive design strategies, which not only aim to protect infrastructure from water damage, but also limit the occurrence of flood events, while striving to maintain pre-development hydrological dynamics [7]. In order to implement water-sensitive design strategies, the hydrological processes before development should be identified, characterized, and quantified.
The study of water movement in soils, or hydropedology [8], utilizes soil properties to characterize the hydrological behavior within the soils. This is possible because water is a primary agent in soil genesis, and directly influences the formation of soil properties, which in turn carry unique signatures as to how they are formed [9,10,11]. Conversely, hydrological processes are significantly influenced by the spatial distribution of soil properties [12], as soil transmits, stores, and reacts with water [13].
To capture the spatial distribution of soil properties, hydropedological studies generally use soil maps [14,15]. However, in urban areas that are already developed, conventional soil maps are impossible to create due to the limited access to undisturbed soil observation positions. Therefore, older developments have double disadvantages, firstly by not being developed in a water-sensitive way, and secondly, when hydrology-related problems present themselves, the conventional methods to create a soil map for a hydropedological study are impossible to carry out. Digital soil mapping (DSM; [16]) provides the answer, as it uses environmental covariates (digital elevation models and satellite images) to predict the soil distribution at unobserved areas, based on the observed soils and their relation to the covariates.
This paper presents how historical remote sensing was used to provide the pre-urban land cover required to use DSM methods to create a soil map for Cosmo City, a suburb in Johannesburg, South Africa. By using Landsat satellite imagery from 2004, before the development commenced, a natural-conditions soil map could be created using DSM methodology. This map was then used as input to model the hydrology of the suburb, which allowed for the identification and prescription of mitigation measures at Kampala Crescent—a road where subsoil water caused serious road damage. Furthermore, the influence of the infrastructure development on the hydrology of the area was quantified by hydrological modelling of the entire suburb. This study differs from previous studies which used remote sensing data for hydrological models [17,18,19], as the Landsat images were used to map the soil, which were the input into the hydrological model, rather than using Landsat images for land cover or surface sealing indications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The study site consisted of Cosmo City, a suburb of Johannesburg (Figure 1), where construction started in 2005. The geology of the study site is granite and gneiss of the Halfway House Granite formation [20], wherein Leptosols, Stagnosols, and Acrisols are the main soil reference groups found [21]. The natural vegetation is the Egoli Granite Grassland [22], however, very little of the natural vegetation remains with the construction of Cosmo City. Topographically, the study site lies on the Highveld of Southern Africa, at heights above sea level between 1400 m and 1540 m [23]. The terrain is hilly, with slopes of up to 12%, but with the majority of hillslopes having an average slope of below 5%. Johannesburg’s climate is typical of the subtropical highland, with hot days during summer (average maximum temperature = 25 °C) and cold nights during winter (average minimum temperature = 4 °C). The mean annual precipitation is 713 mm, mostly from thundershowers during the summer months.

2.2. Methodology

2.2.1. General Survey

Soil observations were made across Cosmo City by making observations by soil auger, profile pits, and spot observations in the area. The observations were made on transects in areas where the soil was deemed to be undisturbed. Within Cosmo City, 61 soil observations were made to refusal or a depth of 3200 mm (Figure 2). Soils were described per horizon with soil texture, structure, color, redox morphology, stone content, and transitions being noted. Observations were classified to the soil family level according to the South African Soil Classification System [24], and to the reference group level of the World Reference Base [25]. Undisturbed samples for soil physical measurements were taken of selected soil horizons. Samples were analyzed for texture with the pipette method, bulk density by weighing a fixed volume sample and Ksat, drained upper limit and saturation point by the core lab infiltration method. At specific locations where undisturbed samples could not be taken (e.g., horizons with a large stone content), Ksat was measured in situ with the Guelph permeameter.

2.2.2. Digital Soil Mapping

To create a soil map, environmental covariates were collected for the entire Halfway House Granite area, to use as ancillary variables in the mapping process. These layers included wet and dry season Landsat 5 images [26], taken on 10 April 2004 (wet season) and 31 July 2004 (dry season) respectively, before construction on Cosmo City began, and the 30 m SRTM DEM [26]. Covariate layers were resampled to have the same grid extent at a resolution of 30 m. Secondary covariate layers were derived from the Landsat 5 and DEM layers in SAGA-GIS [27], which included: slope, profile curvature, planform curvature, aspect, topographic wetness index, flow accumulation, altitude above channel network, relative slope position, and multi resolution index of valley bottom flatness. From the wet and dry season satellite images the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was derived.
For modelling purposes the Cosmo City soil observation database was combined with two other soil observation databases within the Halfway House Granites (Figure 3) [28,29]. This allowed for the soil observation database to be enlarged with 212 observations (70 from Van Zijl and Bouwer 2012 [29] and 142 from Van Zijl et al. (2019)) [28]. Therefore, the final Halfway House Granites database consisted of 273 soil observation points. Hydropedological soil forms [30] were derived from the soil form classifications according to Table 1.
The combined soil database was divided into training and evaluation datasets by stratified random sampling using soil form as a stratifier, with 25% of the observation points of each hydropedological soil form being included into the evaluation dataset. Care was taken to include 25% of each hydropedological soil form of the Cosmo City database into the evaluation set. However, as no shallow responsive observations occur in this dataset, they were not included in the evaluation dataset for Cosmo City. The training dataset consisted of 203 observations, with 70 observations in the evaluation dataset. For the Cosmo City dataset, the training observations totaled 44, while the evaluation observations made up the remaining 17 observations.
The soil map was created by running the multinomial logistic regression (MNLR; [31]) algorithm on the training dataset in R. Map evaluation was conducted with the evaluation dataset, for both the entire Halfway House Granites and the Cosmo City site. An observation was deemed to be correctly mapped if a match was found within the target pixel, or the eight surrounding it [32]. Total evaluation point accuracy, user’s and producer’s accuracy, and the Kappa coefficient were determined for the evaluation dataset to measure whether the map was an acceptable representation of reality. Total evaluation point accuracy is the total number of observations correctly mapped, expressed as a percentage of the total number of evaluation observations. The user’s accuracy reflects the accuracy of the map from the user’s perspective. It is the number of evaluation observations correctly mapped within a specific map unit, expressed as a percentage of the total number of observations found on that specific map unit. The producer’s accuracy reflects the accuracy of a map from the producer’s perspective. It is the number of evaluation observations within a specific class that were correctly mapped, expressed as a percentage of the total number of observations within that specific class. The Kappa coefficient represents how well the map reflects reality when compared to a random designation of mapping units. Kappa coefficient values range between 0 and 1, with values close to 0 indicating that the map is equal to a random designation and values close to 1 indicating that the map represents reality significantly better than a random designation would.

2.2.3. Hydrological Modelling

Kampala Crescent
The lateral fluxes of Kampala Crescent were quantified in Hydrus 2-D v 2.05 [33]. The location of the hillslope together with the conceptual hydrological response model created from the DSM soil map is presented in Figure 4. The material distribution reflects the distribution of the different soil horizons according to the South African soil classification system [24], as presented in the conceptual model. The soil hydraulic properties, measured in the laboratory or in situ with the Guelph permeameter for the different soil horizons, are presented in Table 2 together with the Van Genuchten parameters estimated from the hydraulic properties using Rosetta [34]. For the simulation, the hillslope was first saturated through a zero-pressure head at the surface for 10 days and then reduced to −400 mm for 30 days until seepage from the seepage face at Kampala Crescent ceased. A rain event was simulated by applying 1 day of zero pressure on the surface. Thereafter, the boundary condition at the surface was changed to an “Atmospheric Boundary”, with 6 mm.day−1 of potential evaporation from the surface.
Cosmo City
The effect of urbanization on the hydrology of the Cosmo City area was simulated using the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The SWAT is a widely used small watershed-to-river-basin-scale model. It is typically used to simulate the quality and quantity of surface and ground water and to predict the environmental impact of land use, land management practices, and climate change. Here we used QSWAT+ (version 0.9).
The catchment area was determined from a 30 m DEM and subdivided into nine sub-basins, each with their own monitoring points (Figure 5). The current land use was obtained from the 2013–2014 SA National Land-Cover Map dataset [35]. The land-cover was re-grouped into SWAT land-uses with pre-defined parameters for each use (Figure 6a). For the historic (before urbanization), we reclassified the urban areas to “grassland” and used the associated parameters. Soil information was obtained from the hydropedological survey (Figure 6b). Hydraulic parameters were derived from in situ and laboratory measurements (Table 3).
A nine-year simulation period was selected (1 August 2003–31 December 2012). Climatic data for this period was obtained from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis [36] project done by the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). WeatherGen in SWAT+ Editor used daily precipitation, temperature (minimum and maximum), wind speed, solar radiation, and relative humidity from sta2607s2781e (lat. −25.76, lon. 27.50) to generate daily climatic variables for the simulations. Figure 7 presents the average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures as well as the total monthly rainfall for the simulation period. Results are reported from January 2004, which allowed the model 5 months to settle.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Digital Soil Mapping

The Halfway House Granites hydropedological soil map (Figure 8) achieved an evaluation point accuracy of 80% and a Kappa statistic value of 0.71, indicating a substantial agreement with reality. These results are higher than expected, as lower accuracy was expected due to the urban environment mapped. The map should only be used in areas with a high observation density, such as Cosmo City.
The soil map for Cosmo City (Figure 9) achieved even better results (Table 4), with an evaluation point accuracy of 88% and a Kappa statistic value of 0.82, indicating an almost perfect agreement with reality [37]. The user’s and producer’s accuracies of the map units were all high as well, except for the producer’s accuracy of the shallow recharge soil association, which was only 33%. This was due to there being only three shallow recharge observations. Overall the results for Cosmo City are very satisfactory, and compare very well with maps created with similar methods, such as Van Zijl et al. (2019) [28], 69% point accuracy, Kappa = 0.59; Van Zijl et al. (2012) [38], 69% point accuracy, Kappa = 0.55; MacMillan et al. (2010) [39], 69% point accuracy; Zhu et al. (2008) [40], 76% point accuracy. The Cosmo City map achieved better results, as the observation density was higher than the rest of the Halfway House Granites area, and the satellite images showed the natural state of the area before development commenced. However, due to the relatively low number of evaluation observations the accuracy assessment should only be taken as indicative.

3.2. Modelling Results

3.2.1. Kampala Crescent

The 2-D simulations of Kampala crescent demonstrate that seepage will occur immediately after the rain event from the 9.3 m seepage face (Figure 10). The maximum seepage rate is approximately 32 mm·h−1 and occurs after 6 h of rain. The seepage rate will decline as a 6 mm·day−1 potential evaporation until seepage will cease after approximately 8 days. With a peak discharge rate of 32 mm·h−1 the total volume of seepage water from in the area is approximately 0.3 m3·h−1·m−1 of roadway (with the 9.3 m seepage face). If, for example, 100 m of Kampala Crescent is impacted by the seepage, subsurface drains should have a carrying capacity of 30 m3·h−1 (0.085 L·s−1·m−1).

3.2.2. Cosmo City

The effect of urbanization on the hydrology is clearly shown in Figure 11, which shows the modelling results for the period from November 2011 to November 2012. The total streamflow from the Cosmo catchment increased due to the surface runoff also increasing. This effect is due to the surface sealing occurring with urbanization. Additionally, the deep percolation and lateral flow decreased as less water infiltrated the soil. Specifically important is the observation that, under natural conditions, surface flow was only initiated when monthly rainfall exceeded 50 mm·month−1. However, after urbanization this figure dropped to 2 mm·month−1. This impacts storm water management, as higher flow rates will occur, and they will also occur more frequently.

4. Conclusions

Using historical satellite images from before the Cosmo City suburb was developed, and combining these with DSM methods, a natural-conditions hydropedological soil map could be created for the suburb, with a Kappa statistic value of 0.81. This map could then be used to parameterize both the HYDRUS and SWAT hydrological models. HYDRUS modelling was used to determine the source and magnitude of soil water causing structural damage at the Kampala Crescent, and it was determined that a subsurface drain with a carrying capacity of 30 m3·h−1 (0.085 L.s−1·m−1) should solve the problem. SWAT modelling revealed the effects of the development on the hydrology of the area. The development and subsequent surface sealing of the area caused an increase in runoff and streamflow, but reduced the evapotranspiration, lateral flow, and deep percolation. The hydrological impacts should be considered when designing new urban developments.
This case study demonstrates the value of historic remote sensing data, as well as the power of multidisciplinary work. The remote sensing was invaluable to the mapping, which informed the hydrological modelling, which provided answers to the engineers, who could then mitigate the hydrology-related issues within Cosmo City.

Author Contributions

The authors made the following contributions to the work: Conceptualization, G.v.Z., D.B., S.L., J.v.T., and P.l.R.; Methodology, G.v.Z., D.B., S.L., J.v.T., and P.l.R., Data Acquisition, G.v.Z. and D.B., Formal Analysis, G.v.Z., D.B., S.L. and J.v.L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, G.v.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, J.v.T.; Project Administration, G.v.Z. and D.B., Funding Acquisition, G.v.Z., D.B., P.l.R., and J.v.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Johannesburg Roads Agency.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Johannesburg Roads Agency and Digital Soils Africa who allowed this data to be used for this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, and the funder played no role in the choice of research project; design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN-DESA), Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Walsh, C.J.; Roy, A.; Feminella, J.W.; Cottingham, P.; Groffman, P.M.; Morgan, R.P., II. The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2005, 24, 706–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fox, D.M.; Witza, E.; Blanca, V.; Souliea, C.; Penalver-Navarroa, M.; Dervieux, A. A case study of land cover change (1950–2003) and runoff in a Mediterraean catchment. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dams, J.; Dujardin, J.; Reggers, R.; Bashir, I.; Canters, F.; Batelaan, O. Mapping impervious surface change from remote sensing for hydrological modeling. J. Hydrol. 2013, 485, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Toll, D.G.; Abedin, Z.; Buma, J.; Cui, Y.; Osman, A.S.; Phoon, K.K. The Impact of Changes in the Water Table and Soil Moisture on Structural Stability of Buildings and Foundation Systems: Systematic Review CEE10-005 (SR90); Technical Report; Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. 2012. Available online: http://dro.dur.ac.uk/18298/ (accessed on 15 January 2020).
  6. Dippenaar, M.A.; Van Rooy, J.L. Vadose Zone Characterization for Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Application. In IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings; Shakoor, A., Cato, K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; Volume 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McGrane, S.J. Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: A review. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2016, 61, 2295–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, H.S. Hydropedology: Bridging disciplines, scales, and data. Vadose Zone J. 2003, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ticehurst, J.L.; Cresswell, H.P.; Mckenzie, N.J.; Glover, M.R. Interpreting soil and topographic properties to conceptualize hillslope hydrology. Geoderma 2007, 137, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Tol, J.J.; Le Roux, P.A.L.; Hensley, M. Soil indicators of hillslope hydrology in Bedford catchment. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 2010, 27, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Van Tol, J.J.; Le Roux, P.A.L.; Hensley, M.; Lorentz, S.A. Soil as indicator of hillslope hydrological behaviour in the Weatherley Catchment, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Water SA 2010, 36, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lilly, A.; Boorman, D.B.; Hollis, J.M. The development of a hydrological classification of UK soils and the inherent scale changes. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1998, 50, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, S.J.; McSweeney, K.; Lowery, B. Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a 255 process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma 2001, 103, 249–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Van Tol, J.J.; van Zijl, G.M.; Riddell, E.S.; Fundisi, D. Application of hydropedological insights in hydrological modelling of the Stevenson Hamilton Research Supersite, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Water SA 2015, 41, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Van Zijl, G.M.; Le Roux, P.A.L. Creating a hydrological soil map for the Stevenson Hamilton Supersite, Kruger National Park. Water SA 2014, 40, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. McBratney, A.B.; Mendoça Santos, M.L.; Minasny, B. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 2003, 117, 3–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahiny, A.S.; Clarke, K.C. Simulating hydrologic impacts of urban growth using SLEUTH, multi criteria evaluation and runoff modelling. J. Environ. Inform. 2013, 22, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ohana-Levi, N.; Givati, A.; Alfasi, N.; Peeters, A.; Karnieli, A. Predicting the effects of urbanization on runoff after frequent rainfall events. J. Land Use Sci. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chormanski, J.; Van de Voorde, T.; De Roeck, T.; Batelaan, O.; Canters, F. Improving Distributed Runoff Prediction in Urbanized Catchments with Remote Sensing based Estimates of Impervious Surface Cover. Sensors 2008, 8, 910–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Council for Geoscience. Geological Data 1:250 000; Council for Geoscience: Pretoria, South Africa, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Land Type Survey Staff. Land Types of South Africa: Digital Map (1:250 000 Scale) and Soil Inventory Datasets; ARC-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mucina, L.; Rutherford, M.C. (Eds.) The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland; Strelitzia 19; South African National Biodiversity Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schulze, R.E. South African Atlas of Climatology and Agrohydrology; WRC Report 1489/1/06; Water Research Commission: Pretoria, South Africa, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Soil Classification Working Group. Soil Classification: A Taxonomic System for South Africa; Department of Agricultural Development: Pretoria, South Africa, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  25. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. USGS (United States Geological Survey) Landsat images. Available online: http://landsat.usgs.gov (accessed on 23 November 2018).
  27. Conrad, O.; Bechtel, B.; Bock, M.; Dietrich, H.; Fischer, E.; Gerlitz, L.; Wehberg, J.; Wichmann, V.; Boehner, J. System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4.Geosci. Model Dev. 2015, 8, 1991–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Van Zijl, G.M.; Van Tol, J.J.; Tinnefeld, M.; Le Roux, P.A.L. A hillslope based digital soil mapping approach, for hydropedological assessments. Geoderma 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Zijl, G.M.; Bouwer, D. Soil Observation Dataset from the Halfway House Granites; University of the Free State dataset; University of the Free State: Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Tol, J.J.; Lorentz, S.A. Hydropedological interpretation of soil distribution patterns to characterise groundwater/surface-water interactions. Vadose Zone J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kempen, B.; Brus, D.J.; Heuvelink, G.B.M.; Stoorvogel, J.J. Updating the 1: 50 000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach. Geoderma 2009, 151, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Van Zijl, G.M.; Bouwer, D.; van Tol, J.J.; Le Roux, P.A.L. Functional digital soil mapping: A case study from Namarroi, Mozambique. Geoderma 2014, 219–220, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Šimůnek, J.; Van Genuchten, M.T.; Šejna, M. The HYDRUS Software Package for Simulating Two- and Three-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Media; Technical Manual, Version 1.0; PC Progress: Prague, Czech Republic, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schaap, M.G.; Leij, F.J.; van Genuchten, M.T. ROSETTA: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J. Hydrol. 2001, 251, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Geoterraimage. 2013–2014 South African National Land-Cover Dataset; Report Created for Department of Environmental Sciences; DEA/CARDNO SCPF002: Implementation of Land Use Maps for South Africa; Department of Environmental Affairs: Pretoria, South Africa, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Saha, S.; Moorthi, S.; Pan, H.L.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Nadiga, S.; Tripp, P.; Kistler, R.; Woollen, J.; Behringer, D.; et al. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2010, 91, 1015–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Van Zijl, G.M.; Le Roux, P.A.L.; Smith, H.J.C. Rapid soil mapping under restrictive conditions in Tete, Mozambique. In Digital Soil Assessments and Beyond; Minasny, B., Malone, B.P., McBratney, A.B., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 335–339. [Google Scholar]
  39. MacMillan, R.A.; Moon, D.E.; Coupé, R.A.; Phillips, N. Predictive ecosystem mapping (PEM) for 8.2 million ha of forestland, British Columbia, Canada. In Digital Soil Mapping; Bridging Research, Environmental Application and Operation; Boettinger, J.L., Howell, D.W., Moore, A.C., Hartemink, A.E., Kienast Brown, S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu, A.-X.; Yang, L.; Li, B.; Qin, C.; English, E.; Burt, J.E.; Zhou, C. Purposive sampling for digital soil mapping for areas with limited data. In Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data; Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A.B., Mendonça-Santos, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The location of Cosmo City and Kampala Crescent.
Figure 1. The location of Cosmo City and Kampala Crescent.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g001
Figure 2. Soil observations for the Cosmo City soil observation database.
Figure 2. Soil observations for the Cosmo City soil observation database.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g002
Figure 3. The soil observations of the three Halfway House Granites soil observation databases.
Figure 3. The soil observations of the three Halfway House Granites soil observation databases.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g003
Figure 4. The conceptual hydrological response model for the Kampala Crescent hillslope.
Figure 4. The conceptual hydrological response model for the Kampala Crescent hillslope.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g004
Figure 5. Cosmo City catchment, monitoring points, and sub-basins.
Figure 5. Cosmo City catchment, monitoring points, and sub-basins.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g005
Figure 6. (a) Swat land use classes, converted from 2013/14 land-cover dataset [35] and (b) soil associations obtained from the hydropedological survey.
Figure 6. (a) Swat land use classes, converted from 2013/14 land-cover dataset [35] and (b) soil associations obtained from the hydropedological survey.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g006
Figure 7. Key climatic parameters used in the modelling (average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures and total monthly rainfall).
Figure 7. Key climatic parameters used in the modelling (average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures and total monthly rainfall).
Remotesensing 12 00433 g007
Figure 8. The hydropedological soil forms for the Halfway House Granites area. (SMU: Soil Mapping Unit)
Figure 8. The hydropedological soil forms for the Halfway House Granites area. (SMU: Soil Mapping Unit)
Remotesensing 12 00433 g008
Figure 9. The Cosmo City hydropedological soil map (HSMU: Hydropedological Soil Mapping Unit).
Figure 9. The Cosmo City hydropedological soil map (HSMU: Hydropedological Soil Mapping Unit).
Remotesensing 12 00433 g009
Figure 10. Resultant seepage hydrograph with one hour of rain at peak infiltration rate.
Figure 10. Resultant seepage hydrograph with one hour of rain at peak infiltration rate.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g010
Figure 11. Average monthly modelling results for the Cosmo City suburb. (a) Streamflow, (b) Surface runoff, (c) Deep percolation, and (d) Lateral flow, for the time period November 2011 to November 2012.
Figure 11. Average monthly modelling results for the Cosmo City suburb. (a) Streamflow, (b) Surface runoff, (c) Deep percolation, and (d) Lateral flow, for the time period November 2011 to November 2012.
Remotesensing 12 00433 g011
Table 1. Description of the hydropedological soil map units.
Table 1. Description of the hydropedological soil map units.
Hydropedological Soil FormSoil Forms
(SCWG 1991)
Reference Groups (IUSS 2015)Defining Characteristic
Deep RechargeClovelly, Constantia, Griffin, Hutton, ShortlandsAcrisols, NitisolsSoil profiles showing no signs of wetness in the profile
Shallow RechargeMispah, Glenrosa, MayoLeptosolsShallow soils with chromic colors in the topsoil
Interflow (A/B)Constantia, Kroonstad, Longlands, Sterkspruit, WasbankStagnosols, Planosols, PlinthosolsSigns of wetness between top and subsoil
Interflow (Soil/Bedrock)Avalon, Bainsvlei, Bloemdal, Dresden, Fernwood, Glencoe, Pinedene, Tukulu, WestleighAcrisols, Stagnosols, Arenosols, Plinthosols,Signs of wetness at soil bedrock interface
Saturated ResponsiveKatspruit, RensburgGleysolsGleyed subsoil
Shallow ResponsiveMispah, GlenrosaLeptosolsShallow soil with bleached colors in the topsoil
Table 2. Hydraulic properties and Van Genuchten parameters of dominant soil horizons used in Hydrus simulations.
Table 2. Hydraulic properties and Van Genuchten parameters of dominant soil horizons used in Hydrus simulations.
Hydraulic PropertiesVan Genuchten Parameters
HorizonDbFCDULΘsKsSandSiltClayΘrΘsAlphanKslambda
g·cm−3mm·mm−1mm·mm−1mm·mm−1mm·h−1%%%
Orthic A1.390.20.220.477237.267.611220.10.440.003151.48022370.5
Red Apedal1.420.220.240.46473.956.615290.10.430.002941.427373.90.5
Soft Plinthic1.550.270.350.416239.714460.10.420.002161.20544.10.5
Gleyic1.550.270.350.416127.620530.10.410.002311.20421.20.5
Lithic1.260.090.280.52665.755.414310.10.490.002711.358865.70.5
Saprolite/Bed rock 0.10.260.002581.14970.10.5
Db: Bulk density; Θr: Residual water content; FC: Field Capacity; Θs: Saturated water content; DUL: Drained Upper Limit; Alpha: inverse of air entry; Θs: Saturated water content; n: pore size distribution; Ks: Saturated hydrologic conductivity; Ks: Saturated hydrologic conductivity; lambda: Constant.
Table 3. Selected hydraulic properties for the soil associations in Figure 6b.
Table 3. Selected hydraulic properties for the soil associations in Figure 6b.
Soil AssociationHydrological GroupsLayerDepthBulk DensityWilting PointKsCarbonClaySiltSand
mmg·cm−3mm·mm−1mm·h−1%
Interflow (A/B)C13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
26001.40.0973.90.629.114.756.6
312001.50.0820.546.214.239.7
Interflow (Soil/bedrock)C13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
212001.40.0973.90.629.114.756.6
315001.50.0820.546.214.239.7
Recharge (deep)A13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
212001.60.072840.629.713.257.2
315001.50.0973.90.629.114.756.6
Recharge (shallow)A13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
Responsive (wet)D13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
210001.50.0911.8752.819.627.6
Responsive (shallow)C13001.40.062371.8721.611.167.6
Table 4. Confusion matrix for the Cosmo City hydropedological soil map.
Table 4. Confusion matrix for the Cosmo City hydropedological soil map.
Users Accuracy
Deep RechargeShallow RechargeInterflow (Soil/Bedrock)Interflow (A/B)Saturated ResponsiveTotalCorrect% Accuracy
Producer’s AccuracyDeep Recharge3 33100
Shallow Recharge111 3133
Interflow (Soil/Bedrock) 8 88100
Interflow (A/B) 1 11100
Saturated Responsive 222100
Total4191217
Correct31812 15
% Accuracy7510089100100 88

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

van Zijl, G.; van Tol, J.; Bouwer, D.; Lorentz, S.; le Roux, P. Combining Historical Remote Sensing, Digital Soil Mapping and Hydrological Modelling to Produce Solutions for Infrastructure Damage in Cosmo City, South Africa. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433

AMA Style

van Zijl G, van Tol J, Bouwer D, Lorentz S, le Roux P. Combining Historical Remote Sensing, Digital Soil Mapping and Hydrological Modelling to Produce Solutions for Infrastructure Damage in Cosmo City, South Africa. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(3):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433

Chicago/Turabian Style

van Zijl, George, Johan van Tol, Darren Bouwer, Simon Lorentz, and Pieter le Roux. 2020. "Combining Historical Remote Sensing, Digital Soil Mapping and Hydrological Modelling to Produce Solutions for Infrastructure Damage in Cosmo City, South Africa" Remote Sensing 12, no. 3: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433

APA Style

van Zijl, G., van Tol, J., Bouwer, D., Lorentz, S., & le Roux, P. (2020). Combining Historical Remote Sensing, Digital Soil Mapping and Hydrological Modelling to Produce Solutions for Infrastructure Damage in Cosmo City, South Africa. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030433

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop