Next Article in Journal
Completing 3D Point Clouds of Thin Corn Leaves for Phenotyping Using 3D Gridding Convolutional Neural Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Ecological Drought Vulnerability from Ecosystem Service Value Perspectives in North China
Previous Article in Journal
Time-Series InSAR with Deep-Learning-Based Topography-Dependent Atmospheric Delay Correction for Potential Landslide Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cyprus Surface Water Area Variation Based on the 1984–2021 Time Series Built from Remote Sensing Products

by
David de Andrade Costa
1,*,
Yared Bayissa
2,
Jader Lugon Junior
3,
Edna N. Yamasaki
4,
Ioannis Kyriakides
5 and
Antônio J. Silva Neto
6
1
Instituto Federal Fluminense, São João da Barra 28200-000, RJ, Brazil
2
Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
Instituto Federal Fluminense, Macaé 27973-030, RJ, Brazil
4
Department of Life Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
5
Department of Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
6
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Energy, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo 28625-570, RJ, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(22), 5288; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225288
Submission received: 29 September 2023 / Revised: 26 October 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published: 9 November 2023

Abstract

:
Cyprus experiences the highest level of water stress among European Union countries due to several interplaying factors such as rainfall variability and increasing water demand. These instigate the nation to build dams on almost all rivers of the island to satisfy the requirements for drinking water and irrigation. Many studies have been primarily conducted on assessing water availability for various uses, particularly for drinking water supply and irrigation. However, there is still a gap/less explored area in terms of a better understanding of changes in surface water over time. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the water surface area variation in Cyprus over the past four decades based on remote sensing products, timeseries analysis and trend detection. The result reveals a statistically significant increasing trend (p < 0.05) in water surface area between 1984–2021. However, following the completion of the final reservoir in 2010, a statistically significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) was observed in the permanent water surface area. This decline is related to both climatic variability and increased water demands. We observed cycles of 6, 8, and 11 years in permanent water. These cycles indicate a recurring pattern of water scarcity, with severe implication already observed on both economic activity and agriculture. The recent decade has witnessed a decline in rainfall, and this is evident through the decrease in vegetation greenness in rainfed agricultural regions, highlighting its impact. Therefore, the findings of this study underscore not only the necessity for the development of infrastructure aimed at conserving water, but also reinforces the need to discuss water use priorities in Cyprus.

1. Introduction

The relationship between humans, ecosystems, hydrological processes, and biogeochemical cycles forms an interconnected global social–ecological system where social and economic needs have intensified the strain on water resources. An increased demand, combined with the depletion of groundwater reserves and freshwater sources, has led to reduced availability, constraining water uses [1,2,3]. The issue of water scarcity poses significant challenges to sustainable development and the safeguarding of essential ecosystem functions [4,5].
Estimates indicate that two to four billion people experience severe water scarcity conditions for at least one month annually [6]. Climate change will exacerbate the already substantial impacts of water scarcity on agriculture, energy production, and many other activities [7]. With projected magnification in both the frequency and severity of droughts and floods [8,9], water shortage is becoming one of the foremost global concerns in relation to food production [10].
Decreased rainfall has a direct impact on declining vegetation greenness, as evidenced by a decrease in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). This decline in NDVI signals reduced vegetation health and productivity, which can have far-reaching ecological and agricultural consequences, including potential food security issues and environmental degradation [11,12].
Water resource management is a global challenge given the complexity in terms of water availability and its uses. For example, while water resources in Northern European countries are generally abundant, Southern Europe often faces scarcity conditions, further affected by high demand for residential supply, irrigation, industrial usage, and tourism [13]. In order to regulate water uses, the European Union has established the Water Framework Directive, aiming at achieving good ecological status for all water bodies by 2027.
Among European countries, Cyprus faces the most severe level of water stress [14,15]. The island experiences severe water scarcity, exacerbated by a combination of factors like high evaporation rates, limited natural reservoirs, and irregular rainfall patterns [16]. Additionally, rapid urbanization and expanding agricultural practices have heightened the demand for water resources. Overall, Cyprus serves as a compelling example of a region actively seeking sustainable solutions to address its specific water resource constraints.
The country traditionally relies on water reservoirs to collect and treat rainwater destined for human consumption [17]. More recently, seawater desalination plants (1997) [18] and the use of recycled water (1998) for irrigation purposes [19,20] were introduced. Furthermore, the island has been surpassing the established ecological threshold by excessively exploiting groundwater resources [21].
Since 1900 up to 2010, Cyprus has constructed a total of 108 dams across nearly all its rivers, earning the country the top position in the European International Commission on Large Dams registry [22]. Several authors have studied these reservoirs, including their thermal stratification [23], the occurrence of fish species [24], water quality [25,26,27] and wetlands (including dams) [28]. On the other hand, a gap identified in the literature is how the water surface changes over the years, not only the reservoirs but all water bodies. Is it possible to observe trends and recurrence cycles?
Monitoring water resources can be an expansive and demanding task when measurements are taken from the environment. Moreover, in situ data are generally a punctual measurement, sometimes outdated or, even worse, unavailable. In this context, satellite products provide a synoptic view of watersheds, enabling periodic detection of changes in land cover and land use, including surface water extent. In the same way, geographic information systems, statistical techniques, and cloud-based services can further enhance the processing capabilities of remote sensing products, allowing for the integration of spatial data and time-series analysis.
In this sense, the objective of this work is to evaluate the water surface variation in Cyprus over almost four decades (1984–2021), before and after the construction of its last dam in 2010. We have addressed those questions by using remote sensing and statistical techniques to analyze an extensive database. Our findings indicate the occurrence of water scarcity cycles and provide insights into water management.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Located in the Mediterranean Sea, the island of Cyprus is positioned (Figure 1) east of Greece (270 km), south of Turkey (70 km), and west of Syria (110 km). Spanning an area of 9251 km2, with 5760 km2 under the jurisdiction of Republic of Cyprus. The island’s coastline stretches for a total length of 772 km.
The morphology of Cyprus is shaped by four prominent landforms: (1) The Troodos Mountains, situated in the central-western part of the island, encompassing the highest peak, Mount Olympus, and reaching an elevation of 1951 m above sea level. (2) Pentadaktylos, running along the northern coast, is a relatively narrow range with peaks reaching altitudes of up to 1000 m. (3) The Mesaoria central plain is located between the Troodos and Pentadaktylos mountain ranges and features low-lying terrain, and (4) along the coastline, there are coastal plains and valleys that extend alongside the shore [29].
Cyprus experiences a Mediterranean climate characterized by distinct seasonal variations in temperature and precipitation, featuring mild winters and hot summers [29]. Precipitation data were obtained from the Water Development Department (WDD), with records available from 1901 to the present. The data were grouped by hydrological year and the climatological average for each 30-year period was calculated.
The hydrological year on the island commences in October, and the wet period lasts until April. Rainfall levels fluctuate depending on the latitude and altitude. In Ammochostos, located at the eastern end of the island, the average annual rainfall stands at 320 mm. However, as one moves westwards, such as in the Paphos district area, the average annual rainfall increases to 540–550 mm. On average, approximately 80% to 85% of the precipitation is returned to the atmosphere, with evapotranspiration rates potentially reaching 95% during drier years [29].

2.2. Remote Sensing Products

Remote sensing techniques are able to delineate the surface water in various ways [30,31,32,33]. Advancements in computing capabilities have played a vital role in shaping this field in the last few years. Furthermore, there are now multiple globally available analysis products that facilitate the examination of changes in surface water area dynamics [34,35]. In this way, the changes in surface water area can serve as an indicator for water storage [36]. Figure 2 illustrates the methodological sequence flow used in this study.
The dataset “Global Surface Water”, derived from remote sensing, was used in this work. The product is derived from Landsat series imagery, covering the period from 1984 to 2021. The dataset is available in Google Earth Engine (GEE) {ee.ImageCollection(“JRC/GSW1_4/YearlyHistory”)}. Each image contains a band with values from 0 to 3 that mean “no data”, “not water”, “seasonal water”, and “permanent water”, respectively. A permanent water surface is characterized by water presence year-round, whereas water is deemed seasonal if the months with water presence are fewer than the months with valid observations [37]. Pekel et al. (2016) report temporal data gaps in some regions because Landsat 5 lacked on-board data recorders, and its data transmissions to ground stations relied on other satellites that experienced failures over time [37]. Consequently, our dataset spans from 1984 to 2021, with missing data in the years 1988, 1989, and from 1991 to 1997 due to unavailable images.
The images were clipped by the administrative boundaries of Cyprus from The Global Administrative Unit Layers provided by The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) from the United Nations, also available at GEE {ee.FeatureCollection(“FAO/GAUL/2015/level0”)}. The surface areas were calculated considering only polygons larger than 1800 m2 (2 Landsat pixels).
Volume area information of the main reservoirs in Cyprus was obtained through the Global Lake Evaporation Volume and Surface area dataset [38] and the Global Reservoir Storage dataset [39]. These sources corroborate one another as well as the Global Surface Water dataset [37], which allowed us to go further by examining trends and periodic occurrences based on not only this database, but also based on in situ precipitation records and NDVI image processing to analyze the impacts on rain feed agricultural fields.
To evaluate possible vegetation responses depending on water availability, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was calculated for the island of Cyprus, using the entire Landsat historical series from 1984 to 2021. Atmospherically corrected surface reflectance products were used to ensure compatibility and consistency of the time series produced, for example for Landsat 8 {ee.ImageCollection(“LANDSAT/LC08/C02/T2_L2”)}.
Remote sensing products were acquired and analyzed within the GEE platform, with JavaScript programming being employed through its web-based code editor interface. Some river basins were chosen based on their land use and coverage according to the Global Land Cover product from the European Space Agency, at 10 m resolution based on Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data. To delineate the river basins, altimetric data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission were used, with a spatial resolution of 30 m {ee.Image(“USGS/SRTMGL1_003”)}. Only the altimetric data were processed using the free software QGIS.

2.3. Timeseries Analysis and Trend Detection

After obtaining and processing remote sensing products to produce a time series of water surface areas, the data were subjected to statistical tests to detect trends, in addition to signal decomposition to detect frequencies.
In order to identify trends in the time series of water surface area and NDVI, we used the nonparametric Mann–Kendall trend test. These tests rely on computing a dimensionless statistic (S). The time series is ordered (x1, x2, …, xn) and Equation 1 is used to compare the relative magnitudes of the observed data after converting them to signals (Equation 2). A positive value of S implies an upward trend, while a negative value signifies a downward trend [40]. The trend strength is proportional to the S magnitude, also confirmed by the p-value (p), indicating how likely it is to observe the data if the null hypothesis is correct. So, we have set a significance level of 0.05 for our analysis.
S = k = 1 n 1 j = k + 1 n s g n   ( x j x k )
s g n   ( x j x k ) =       1 ,   i f   x j x k > 0       0 ,   i f   x j x k = 0 1 ,   i f   x j x k < 0
To assess the normality of a distribution, the Shapiro–Wilk test is utilized, producing a test statistic denoted as W. For non-normal samples, the value of W tends to be small. Along with the test statistic, the test also provides a p-value. If the obtained p-value is less than 0.05, it suggests that the distribution significantly deviates from normality, and the assumption of normal distribution can be rejected [41].
In order to detect frequencies in time series, the Fourier decomposition was used. This technique enables frequency detection from timeseries exhibiting seasonal behavior [42]. Spectral analysis through a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithm is frequently employed in environmental studies due to its ability to reveal periodic events [43]. Also, power spectral density (PSD) obtained from FFT and represented by periodograms is a recommended approach to detect seasonality [44,45]. Similarly, we employed the Evolutive Fourier transform, a spectral analysis technique that segments the signal and allows for the development of the spectrum over time [46]. This method not only facilitates the detection of frequencies, but also provides information about the timing of frequency occurrences.

3. Results

The results are divided into two periods of analysis, from 1984 to 2021 representing the entire time series (with gaps: 1988, 1989, 1991 to 1997, when images were not available) and from 2011 to 2021, representing the period where no other dams have been built in Cyprus. For the year 2021, we produced 209 polygons delimited as water bodies, and 47 of them are in the occupied northern part of Cyprus.
The Mann–Kendall trend test confirms that the permanent water time series (Figure 3A) exhibits a statistically significant upward trend (S = 152 [dimensionless], p < 0.05). This outcome was already expected due to the construction of 18 reservoirs between 1984 and 2021 [45], representing an increase in water surface area. Similarly, the seasonal water time series (Figure 3B) also shows a statistically significant increasing trend (S = 244 [dimensionless], p < 0.05).
On the other hand, a statistically significant decreasing trend (S = −35 [dimensionless], p < 0.05) was verified in permanent water surface area between the years 2011 to 2021 (Figure 3C). Taking into account that the construction of the latest major reservoir was the Solea dam in 2010 [47], it can be concluded that there was no expansion of the water surface resulting from engineering projects since then. In the same period, there is no statistically significant trend (S = 21, p > 0.05), according to the Mann–Kendall trend test for the seasonal water area time series (Figure 3D).
Cyprus reservoirs exhibit high storage variability, which is reflected in the water’s surface area throughout the year. The construction of the five major reservoirs (Table 1) was undertaken to harness the flow of rivers originating from the mountainous Troodos region. However, only a fraction of these reservoirs maintain water levels consistently throughout the entire historical record (Figure 4). Some natural water bodies completely dry out in certain periods, as is the case with the Main Salt Lake. The full list of Cyprus reservoirs and the main contributions to total storage can be found in Appendix A, respectively Table A1 and Figure A1.
Analyzing the largest reservoir in Cyprus reveals a consistent decline in water storage in recent years. This decline is evident in Kouris dam, identified as ID 174665 in the Global Lake Evaporation Volume and Surface Area dataset (Figure 5A) and ID 4468 in the Global Reservoir Storage dataset (Figure 5B). Both sources exhibit a statistically significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) between 2011 and 2018 (the final year of available data), indicating a trend of depletion and insufficient recovery of reservoir levels.
When studying climate events that impact water availability, we need to study the periodicity of these events so that we are prepared for the future. In this sense, three signals with periods at approximately 6, 8, and 11 years were observed for permanent water (1984–2021) (Figure 6A), with a strong signal throughout the series (Figure 6C), as well as 6 and 8 years for seasonal water (Figure 6B,D).
Analyzing the inflow and storage based on measured data (Figure 7), we can identify one of the lowest inflows at the beginning of the historical series in 1990–1991. Six years later, another period of low inflow was recorded, with a minimum in 1996–1997. Eight years after that, another period of low inflow can be observed, starting in 2004–2005 and ending in 2007–2008, and the latter marks 11 years after 1996–1997. From 2007–2008 onwards, another period of very low inflow is recorded in 2013–2014, and another in 2015–2016, exactly six and eight years, respectively, after the previous occurrence. The most recent minimum inflow occurred in 2020–2021, eight years after the minimum in 2013–2014. As expected, the reservoir storage shows a delay (lag) between the reduction in inflow and the decrease in reservoir level (Figure 7). The observed inflow data validate our remote sensing approach coupled with frequency analysis, underscoring the strong agreement between various data sources.
Water reservoirs depend on the precipitation regime, in this sense the climatological norm of precipitation in Cyprus has been systematically decreasing with each update since the beginning of the 20th century (Figure 8). It has decreased from 559 mm annually to 476 mm, a decrease of 18% over the entire observed historical series. Furthermore, an increase in the frequency of years with precipitation below the climatological average can be observed. Since the 1990s, more than half of the years have been classified with below-average climatological precipitation, as well as drought and severe drought events (Figure 8).
Water availability has a huge impact on vegetation. In that regard, the Evretou river basin presents interesting features for analysis, as approximately half of the region consists of preserved forested areas, while the remaining portion is devoted to irrigated agriculture. The Evretou watershed exhibits an increasing trend on mean NDVI values from 1984 to 2021 (Figure 9A), which is linked to the expansion of irrigated areas in the region, as well as afforestation efforts in the higher regions of the basin.
On the other hand, when examining areas classified as rainfed agriculture according to the global land cover product from the European Space Agency, we observed mean NDVI values around 0.21, characterizing a much more arid region than the Evretou basin, whose average NDVI value was 0.33. This result shows the impact of water scarcity on rainfed agriculture. Furthermore, a greater amplitude in the range of maximum NDVI values (Figure 9B) was observed, along with a statistically significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) for the minimum NDVI values, which indicates that dry periods have been intensifying in recent decades with severe impacts on vegetation.
In the last decade (2010–2021), the minimum NDVI values for rain-fed agriculture show a high correlation with the observed reduction in precipitation in the region, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 (p < 0.05). This result was expected for non-irrigated regions, considering that the decrease in water availability directly impacts NDVI. On the other hand, a cross-correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation of r = −0.66 (p < 0.05) between the water surface area and the average NDVI values in the Evretou basin. This indicates that for the irrigated agriculture region, the increase in NDVI values is directly related to the decrease in the water surface area of the reservoirs, meaning that irrigation has been maintained at unsustainable levels in recent years. Similarly, the cross-correlation analysis indicates a negative correlation of r = −0.66 (p < 0.05) with a lag of 1 year, as well as r = −0.80 with a lag of 6 years, which reveals an impact in the following years.

4. Discussion

One of the worst recent water crises faced by Cyprus began in 2006. During this period, an agreement was reached for the transfer of 8 million cubic meters of water from Greece to Cyprus in 2008, with a transportation cost of EUR 35 million [22]. After that, the lowest inflows to the reservoirs were recorded in 2014 and 2016 (Figure 7), which corresponds to 6 and 8 years, respectively, from 2008; and 11 years from 2004–2005. This is in perfect agreement with our results (Figure 3), where we have identified recurrency cycles of approximately 6, 8, and 11 (Figure 6).
Also, the observed decrease in precipitation (18% over the past century—Figure 8) aligns with the literature [51], which describes changes in rainfall patterns in the Euro-Mediterranean region over the course of the 20th century. Therefore, the water surface area variation (Figure 3) is due a combination of climatic issues [8,9] with usage demands [52]. Regarding water uses, residential water supply and tourism account for approximately 30% and 5% of the island’s water demand, respectively. Since 1984, the population of Cyprus has grown by approximately 80%, reaching 918,100 individuals in 2021 [53]. Furthermore, Cyprus receives on average, four times its population in the number of tourists distributed throughout the year.
In order to improve water availability, the Department of Forestry in Cyprus has been actively involved in reforestation efforts, primarily focusing on revitalizing neglected agricultural lands and areas affected by wildfires [54]. While studying a region in Paphos, adjacent to the Evretou watershed, Andronis et al. (2022) identified a decreasing trend in NDVI values between 2013 and 2018, highly correlated with the rise in surface temperature during the same period [55]. Comparing our results for the Evretou watershed during the same period (Figure 9), we also observed a statistically significant downward trend in mean NDVI values (p < 0.05), consistent with their results [55]. This negative trend in the analyzed period is attributed to the precipitation regime, with the years 2014 and 2016 being classified as extremely dry, followed by two years of below-average precipitation in 2017 and 2018 (Figure 4).
Engineering projects have also been employed to enhance water availability, desalination has constituted one key element to address water demand. Starting from the late 1990s, desalinated water of different sources has contributed to increasing water availability [56]. Even so, in Cyprus, large reservoirs are struggling to maintain their minimum levels (Figure 4), as also observed in other reservoirs globally [39]. For example, the Kouris dam (Figure 5), the largest in Cyprus, inaugurated in 1988, had a predicted initial annual mean inflow of 46.3 (Mm3), but data observed between 1971–2000 indicated an average input of 30 Mm3, a reduction of 35%. The same can be observed for many other dams, as shown by a report published from the FAO [57].
Simulations were performed to evaluate future trends in the water resources of Cyprus by focusing on water flux changes in the Kouris catchment, and showed that the present mean annual rainfall can drop between 7% and 25%, for the mild and extreme scenarios of climate changes, RCP2.6 and RCP8.5, respectively [58]. Simulations for the Asprokemos and Kouris dams indicated a water storage decrease, and more severe drought events are expected in the future [59]. In addition, the quality of the water, with constituents such as nitrate, can impose restrictions on the use of water [60,61].
Some authors assert that the water shortage in Cyprus has become a notable concern in recent decades due to prolonged periods of drought and insufficient management actions [17]. Likewise, the academic community has been increasingly discussing flash droughts. Unlike conventional, gradually progressing droughts, flash droughts emerge suddenly and deplete water resources swiftly. This rapid onset can disrupt both ecological and agricultural systems, creating imbalances [62].
When surface water is not available, the over-pumping of groundwater has critical consequences, causing the irreversible depletion of underground aquifers and, in the case of coastal aquifers, their non-reversible salinization [63,64,65]. Groundwater analysis in Cyprus identified sodium, chloride, and sulphate as the dominant ions, with water quality assessments indicating potential restrictions for irrigation purposes due to high salt levels [21]. The Morphou aquifer, the largest coastal aquifer in northwestern Cyprus, exhibits water quality that falls below the acceptable limits set by the World Health Organization in terms of chloride and other chemical parameters [66,67]. In order to tackle the task of balancing water supply and demand, effective water management plays a vital role, aiming to ultimately achieve water security. Generally, water use priorities are not fully understood by decision makers, as well as the risks related to climate change and seasonal variability [68].
Water management involves a range of strategies and measures, such as implementing water conservation practices, adopting efficient irrigation techniques, promoting wastewater treatment and reuse, implementing watershed management plans, and practicing integrated water resources management [16,17,58,69]. These approaches aim to optimize water allocation, improve water use efficiency, and mitigate the risks associated with water scarcity and water-related disasters.
In this way, the River Basin Management Plan is a tool that sets priorities for water use and outlines the actions that should be implemented to ensure both the quantity and quality of water [29]. However, the political conflict in Cyprus is a challenge to be faced [70], mainly on groundwater uses, since water management is not carried out in an integrated manner between the occupied northern part of the island and the Republic of Cyprus.
Determining water scarcity involves evaluating the demand for a specific quality of water and its availability [71]. By considering the availability and demand for water, it becomes feasible to conduct a water balance assessment. In the Republic of Cyprus, the water balance was positive, for the year 2021, allowing accumulation in the reservoirs. However, in the years 2013, 2014, and 2017, the water balance was negative [63], in these cases, there was an overexploitation of underground reserves. It was estimated that the annual water demand in the occupied northern part of Cyprus, primarily driven by agricultural use (80%), exceeded the available supply by up to one-third, before the water pipeline constructed between Turkey and the island [72].
If there is not enough water for irrigation, agricultural activity may become unviable. In this context, it is important to evaluate the suitability of this sector on the island. Given that the agricultural sector is the primary water consumer, implementing precision agriculture techniques is crucial [21]. Similarly, other alternatives should be explored, such as wastewater recovery for irrigation [73].
Some other measures can be implemented to enhance water availability. These include the installation of rainwater collection systems for domestic purposes, the implementation of wastewater recycling initiatives and the expansion of desalination plants. Also, the utilization of renewable energy as a power source for seawater and brackish desalination presents an environmentally viable solution to address the increasing global demand for freshwater while mitigating the adverse effects associated with fossil fuel consumption [74]. Likewise, strategies to decrease water demand include educational campaigns, conservation efforts, and the strategic allocation of new water users [14].

5. Conclusions

Due to the construction of many water reservoirs in Cyprus, a statistically significant increasing trend (p < 0.05) has been observed for the water surface area in the last almost four decades, enabling the social and economic development of the region. Conversely, after the construction of the last reservoir, Solea dam in 2010, a statistically significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) was verified in the permanent water surface area, which indicates that in the near future there may be restrictions on water use in the region. Water surface variation is due to a combination of climatic issues and usage demands. Cycles of approximately 6, 8, and 11 years were observed for permanent water, which indicate recurrent cycles of water scarcity. Therefore, decision makers and the population must increasingly prepare for scarcity events.
The high amplitude in the range of maximum NDVI values along with a statistically significant decreasing trend (p < 0.05) for the minimum NDVI values has indicated that dry periods have been intensifying in recent decades. Therefore, strong impacts have already been observed on rainfed local agriculture, which needs to be discussed in terms of viability and continuity since its replacement by irrigated agriculture is responsible for a large demand for water, which is already scarce.
The techniques used in this work to construct time series together with trend analysis techniques provided a good analysis capacity, based on the convergence of different sources of information showing the reduction in local water availability. The methodology can easily be replicated elsewhere since the use of remote sensing products allows the study of regions without relying on government databases.
Future studies may focus on a more detailed analysis of regions with irrigated agriculture and their relationship with water reservoirs, as well as in rain-fed agriculture areas and their connection to groundwater use, using available site-specific data for validation. To enhance the discussion on the impacts of water scarcity on agriculture, a more refined temporal series of land use and cover in combination with local agricultural production data can be valuable, if available. Additionally, new studies should focus on potential strategies to enhance water resources in the region or actions aimed at adapting to climate change.
Finally, Cyprus can be considered a valuable case for managing water scarcity, anticipating problems and solutions to be faced in many places around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.d.A.C., J.L.J., E.N.Y., I.K. and A.J.S.N.; formal analysis, D.d.A.C. and Y.B.; writing—original draft, D.d.A.C.; writing—review and editing, D.d.A.C., Y.B., J.L.J., E.N.Y., I.K. and A.J.S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this work are available on Google Earth Engine as described in the methodology section.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the following Brazilian agencies: FAPERJ, Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro; CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; and CAPES, Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Finance Code 001). Acknowledgements are also due to the European Erasmus Program, through the University of Nicosia Erasmus Office.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Full list of Cyprus reservoirs.
Table A1. Full list of Cyprus reservoirs.
NameYearRiverHeight (m)Capacity (m3)
Kouklia1900-64,545,000
Lythrodonta (Lower)1945Koutsos (Gialias)1132,000
Kalo Chorio (Klirou)1947Akaki (Serrachis)982,000
Akrounta1947Germasogeia723,000
Galini1947Kampos1123,000
Petra1948Atsas932,000
Petra1951Atsas923,000
Lythrodonta (Upper)1952Koutsos (Gialias)1032,000
Kafizis1953Xeros (Morfou)23113,000
Agios Loukas1955-3455,000
Gypsou1955-3100,000
Pera Pedi1956 2255,000
Kantou1956Tabakhana (Kouris)1534,000
Pyrgos1957Katouris22285,000
Trimiklini1958Kouris33340,000
Morfou1962Serrachis131,879,000
Kioneli1962Almyros (Pediaios)151,045,000
Athalassa1962Kalogyros(Pediaios)18791,000
Lefka1962Setrachos(Marathasa)35368,000
Prodromos Reservoir1962Off - stream10122,000
Ag.Georgios—(Recharge)1962-690,000
Sotira—(Recharge)1962-845,000
Panagia/Ammochostou1962-745,000
KanliKiogiou1963Ghinar (Pediaios)191,113,000
Ammochostou—(Recharge)1963-8165,000
Paralimni—(Recharge)1963-5115,000
Agia Napa—(Recharge)1963-855,000
Ammochostou—(Antiflood)1963-550,000
Ag. Loukas Lake—(Recharge)1964-34,545,000
Kiti1964Tremithos221,614,000
Agios Nikolaos—(Recharge)1964-21,365,000
Paralimni Lake—(Recharge)1964-11,365,000
Argaka1964Makounta41990,000
Ovgos1964Ovgos16845,000
Mia Milia1964Simeas22355,000
Liopetri1964Potamos18340,000
Frenaros—(Recharge)1964-5115,000
Agros1964Limnatis2699,000
Deryineia—(Recharge)1964-623,000
Polemidia1965Garyllis453,400,000
Agia Marina1965Xeros33298,000
Mavrokolympos1966Mavrokolympos452,180,000
Pomos1966Livadi38860,000
Kalopanagiotis1966Setrachos (Marathasa)40363,000
Makrasyka—(Recharge)1966-8195,000
Xylofagou—(Recharge)1966-786,000
Kontea—(Recharge)1966-582,000
Avgorou—(Recharge)1966-368,000
Frenaros—(Recharge)1966-745,000
Sotira—(Recharge)1966-532,000
Achna Mesania—(Recharge)1967-490,000
Lysi—(Recharge)1967-777,000
Agios Georgios—(Recharge)1967-368,000
Germasogeia1968Germasogeia4913,500,000
Sygkrasis1968Merikeros71,115,000
Ormideia—(Recharge)1968-5100,000
Akanthou—(Recharge)1968-645,000
Agios Epiktitos—(Recharge)1968-634,000
Vrysoulles—(Recharge)1969-7140,000
Morfou—(Recharge)1969-5130,000
Xylotymvou—(Recharge)1969-750,000
Protopapades—(Recharge)1970-690,000
Lefkara1973Syrgatis (Pentaschoinos)7113,850,000
Masari—(Recharge)1973Serrachis152,273,000
Palaichori—Kampi1973Akaki (Serrachis)33620,000
Kyperounta No 1 *1974Off-stream750,000
Arakapas1975Germasogeia23129,000
Lympia (new)1977Tremithos12220,000
Pelendri *1980Off-stream18123,000
Eptagoneia No 1 *1980Off-stream1692,000
Chandria *1980Off-stream3570,000
Melini *1980Off-stream2259,000
Agioi Vavatsinias No 1 *1980Off-stream1755,000
Akapnou—Eptagoneia *1981Off-stream9132,000
Kato Mylos *1981Off-stream23104,000
Eptagoneia No 3 *1981Off-stream1265,000
Agioi Vavatsinias1981Vasilikos1953,000
Asprokremmos1982Xeros Potamos5352,375,000
Xyliatos1982Lagoudera (Elia)421,430,000
Arakapas No 1 *1982Off-stream12192,000
Eptagoneia No 2 *1982Off-stream8127,000
Kyperounta No 2 *1983Off-stream27273,000
Lagoudera *1983Off-stream3671,000
Ora *1983Off-stream1862,000
Agridia *1983Off-stream1859,000
Choirokoitia *1984Off-stream16205,000
Dierona *1984Off-stream24159,000
Arakapas No 2 *1984Off-stream12120,000
Farmakas No 2 *1984Off-stream2461,000
Agioi Vavatsinias No 2 *1984Off-stream2543,000
Farmakas No 1 *1984Off-stream1821,000
Kalavasos1985Vasilikos6017,100,000
Dipotamos1985Pentaschoinos6015,500,000
Esso Galata *1985Off-stream2735,000
Evretou1986Stavros tis Psokas7024,000,000
Achna1987Off-stream166,800,000
Aradippou1987Parthenitis1490,000
Kouris1988Kouris110115,000,000
Vyzakia1994Off-stream371,690,000
Melini No 2 *1996Off-stream3697,000
Odou No 2 *1996Off-stream3453,000
Odou No 1 *1996Off-stream3332,000
Arminou1998Diarizos454,300,000
Tsakistra2000Limnitis23100,000
Tamassos2002Pediaios342,800,000
Kannaviou2005Ezousa7518,000,000
Klirou-Malounta-Akaki2007Akaki (Serrachis)382,000,000
Solea2010Off-stream564,500,000
* Ponds with membrane lining (height 10 m). Source: Produced with data available from WDD [48].
Figure A1. Main reservoirs contributing to total storage.
Figure A1. Main reservoirs contributing to total storage.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g0a1

References

  1. Emile, R.; Clammer, J.R.; Jayaswal, P.; Sharma, P. Addressing Water Scarcity in Developing Country Contexts: A Socio-Cultural Approach. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2022, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Gosling, S.N.; Kummu, M.; Flörke, M.; Pfister, S.; Hanasaki, N.; Wada, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, C.; et al. Water Scarcity Assessments in the Past, Present, and Future. Earth’s Futur. 2017, 5, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Busico, G.; Ntona, M.M.; Carvalho, S.C.P.; Patrikaki, O.; Voudouris, K.; Kazakis, N. Simulating Future Groundwater Recharge in Coastal and Inland Catchments. Water Resour. Manag. 2021, 35, 3617–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rosa, L.; Chiarelli, D.D.; Rulli, M.C.; Dell’Angelo, J.; D’Odorico, P. Global Agricultural Economic Water Scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, aaz6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Leal Filho, W.; Totin, E.; Franke, J.A.; Andrew, S.M.; Abubakar, I.R.; Azadi, H.; Nunn, P.D.; Ouweneel, B.; Williams, P.A.; Simpson, N.P. Understanding Responses to Climate-Related Water Scarcity in Africa. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. Four Billion People Facing Severe Water Scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, 1500323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mondal, S.K.; Mishra, A.; Leung, R.; Cook, B. Global Droughts Connected by Linkages between Drought Hubs. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kreibich, H.; Van Loon, A.F.; Schröter, K.; Ward, P.J.; Mazzoleni, M.; Sairam, N.; Abeshu, G.W.; Agafonova, S.; AghaKouchak, A.; Aksoy, H.; et al. The Challenge of Unprecedented Floods and Droughts in Risk Management. Nature 2022, 608, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neira, M.; Erguler, K.; Ahmady-Birgani, H.; AL-Hmoud, N.D.; Fears, R.; Gogos, C.; Hobbhahn, N.; Koliou, M.; Kostrikis, L.G.; Lelieveld, J.; et al. Climate Change and Human Health in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: Literature Review, Research Priorities and Policy Suggestions. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mancosu, N.; Snyder, R.; Kyriakakis, G.; Spano, D. Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production. Water 2015, 7, 975–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bayissa, Y.; Tadesse, T.; Demisse, G. Building A High-Resolution Vegetation Outlook Model to Monitor Agricultural Drought for the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Poděbradská, M.; Wylie, B.K.; Bathke, D.J.; Bayissa, Y.A.; Dahal, D.; Derner, J.D.; Fay, P.A.; Hayes, M.J.; Schacht, W.H.; Volesky, J.D.; et al. Monitoring Climate Impacts on Annual Forage Production across U.S. Semi-Arid Grasslands. Remote Sens. 2021, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sordo-Ward, A.; Granados, I.; Iglesias, A.; Garrote, L. Blue Water in Europe: Estimates of Current and Future Availability and Analysis of Uncertainty. Water 2019, 11, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, E.J. Strategy of Water Distribution for Sustainable Community: Who Owns Water in Divided Cyprus? Sustainability 2020, 12, 8978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elkiran, G.; Ergil, M. The Assessment of a Water Budget of North Cyprus. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1671–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papadaskalopoulou, C.; Giannakopoulos, C.; Lemesios, G.; Zachariou-Dodou, M.; Loizidou, M. Challenges for Water Resources and Their Management in Light of Climate Change: The Case of Cyprus. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 53, 3224–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Loucaides, A.; Koutsakos, E. Fluctuations in Potable Water Quality in Cyprus during the Past Two Decades—The Role of Seawater Desalination. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 2270–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marangou, V.S.; Savvides, K. First Desalination Plant in Cyprus—Product Water Aggresivity and Corrosion Control. Desalination 2001, 138, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Birol, E.; Koundouri, P.; Kountouris, Y. Farmers’ Demand for Recycled Water in Cyprus: A Contingent Valuation Approach. In Wastewater Reuse—Risk Assessment, Decision-Making and Environmental Security; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 267–278. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kathijotes, N.; Panayiotou, C. Wastewater Reuse for Irrigation and Seawater Intrusion: Evaluation of Salinity Effects on Soils in Cyprus. J. Water Reuse Desalin. 2013, 3, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nikolaou, G.; Neocleous, D.; Christophi, C.; Heracleous, T.; Markou, M. Irrigation Groundwater Quality Characteristics: A Case Study of Cyprus. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sofroniou, A.; Bishop, S. Water Scarcity in Cyprus: A Review and Call for Integrated Policy. Water 2014, 6, 2898–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, S.; Kassinos, S.C.; Fatta Kassinos, D.; Akylas, E. Effects of Selective Water Withdrawal Schemes on Thermal Stratification in Kouris Dam in Cyprus. Lakes Reserv. Sci. Policy Manag. Sustain. Use 2008, 13, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zogaris, S.; Chatzinikolaou, Y.; Koutsikos, N.; Economou, A.N.; Oikonomou, E.; Michaelides, G.; Hadjisterikotis, E.; Beaumont, W.R.C.; Ferreira, M.T. Freshwater Fish Assemblages in Cyprus with Emphasis on the Effects of Dams. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 2012, 42, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Hadjimitsis, M.G.; Clayton, C.; Clarke, B.A. Determination of Turbidity in Kouris Dam in Cyprus Utilizing Landsat TM Remotely Sensed Data. Water Resour. Manag. 2006, 20, 449–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Papoutsa, C.G.D. Remote Sensing for Water Quality Surveillance in Inland Waters: The Case Study of Asprokremmos Dam in Cyprus. In Remote Sensing of Environment—Integrated Approaches; InTech: Houston, TX, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tzoraki, O.; Dörflinger, G.; Demetriou, C. Nutrient and Heavy Metal Storage and Mobility within Sediments in Kouris Reservoir, Cyprus. Lakes Reserv. Sci. Policy Manag. Sustain. Use 2017, 22, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Markogianni, V.; Tzirkalli, E.; Gücel, S.; Dimitriou, E.; Zogaris, S. Remote Sensing Application for Identifying Wetland Sites on Cyprus: Problems and Prospects. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2014), Paphos, Cyprus, 7–10 April 2014; Hadjimitsis, D.G., Themistocleous, K., Michaelides, S., Papadavid, G., Eds.; SPIE: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 9229, p. 92291U. [Google Scholar]
  29. LDK; ECOS. River Basin Management Plan of Cyprus for the Implementation of the Directive 2000/60/ΕC.; Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2016.
  30. Soulard, C.E.; Waller, E.K.; Walker, J.J.; Petrakis, R.E.; Smith, B.W. DSWEmod—The Production of High-Frequency Surface Water Map Composites from Daily MODIS Images. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2022, 58, 248–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hamunyela, E.; Hipondoka, M.; Persendt, F.; Sevelia Nghiyalwa, H.; Thomas, C.; Matengu, K. Spatio-Temporal Characterization of Surface Water Dynamics with Landsat in Endorheic Cuvelai-Etosha Basin (1990–2021). ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2022, 191, 68–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jensen, J.R. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective, 2nd ed.; Pearson: Bloomington, MN, USA, 2006; ISBN 9780131889507. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gelli, Y.K.; Costa, D.d.A.; Nicolau, A.P.; da Silva, J.G. Vegetational Succession Assessment in a Fragment of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sogno, P.; Klein, I.; Kuenzer, C. Remote Sensing of Surface Water Dynamics in the Context of Global Change—A Review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, T.; Wang, H.; Hu, S.; You, S.; Yang, X. Long-Term and Bimonthly Estimation of Lake Water Extent Using Google Earth Engine and Landsat Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Donchyts, G.; Winsemius, H.; Baart, F.; Dahm, R.; Schellekens, J.; Gorelick, N.; Iceland, C.; Schmeier, S. High-Resolution Surface Water Dynamics in Earth’s Small and Medium-Sized Reservoirs. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pekel, J.-F.; Cottam, A.; Gorelick, N.; Belward, A.S. High-Resolution Mapping of Global Surface Water and Its Long-Term Changes. Nature 2016, 540, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Zhou, L.; Gao, H. Evaporative Water Loss of 1.42 Million Global Lakes. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Zhao, G.; Allen, G.H.; Gao, H. Diminishing Storage Returns of Reservoir Construction. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hirsch, R.M.; Slack, J.R.; Smith, R.A. Techniques of Trend Analysis for Monthly Water Quality Data. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shapiro, S.S.; Wilk, M.B. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 1965, 52, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Whitfield, P.H. Identification and Characterization of Transient Water Quality Events by Fourier Analysis. Environ. Int. 1995, 21, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rajwa-Kuligiewicz, A.; Bialik, R.J.; Rowiński, P.M. Dissolved Oxygen and Water Temperature Dynamics in Lowland Rivers over Various Timescales. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 2015, 63, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Harris, J.; Loftis, J.C.; Montgomery, R.H. Statistical Methods for Characterizing Ground-Water Quality. Ground Water 1987, 25, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hipel, K.W.; McLeod, A.I. Time Series Modelling of Water Resources and Environmental Systems. Time Ser. Model. Water Resour. Environ. Syst. 1994, 167, 399–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hammer, Ø. PAST 4.12. Reference Manual; University of Oslo: Oslo, Norway, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  47. ECOS; ENM; LEVER. Preliminary Third River Basin Management Plan (2021–2027); Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2021.
  48. Cyprus Water Development Departament (WDD). Catalogue of Reservoirs. Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/wdd/wdd.nsf/page16_en/page16_en?opendocument (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  49. Cyprus Water Development Departament (WDD). Reservoir Storage. Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/wdd/Wdd.nsf/page18_en/page18_en?opendocument (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  50. Cyprus Water Development Departament (WDD). Statistical Informaton about the Annual Rainfall in the Free Areas of Cyprus (Hydrological Year Starting on 1st October). Available online: http://www.cyprus.gov.cy/moa/wdd/wdd.nsf/All/8BDD66D1233F6E2BC2258394002A43AB?OpenDocument (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  51. López-Parages, J.; Rodríguez-Fonseca, B. Multidecadal Modulation of El Niño Influence on the Euro-Mediterranean Rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hoekstra, A.Y. Water Scarcity Challenges to Business. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. CYSTAT Statistival Service of Cyprus. Available online: https://www.cystat.gov.cy/ (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  54. Ciesla, W.M. Forests and Forest Protection in Cyprus. For. Chron. 2004, 80, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Andronis, V.; Karathanassi, V.; Tsalapati, V.; Kolokoussis, P.; Miltiadou, M.; Danezis, C. Time Series Analysis of Landsat Data for Investigating the Relationship between Land Surface Temperature and Forest Changes in Paphos Forest, Cyprus. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Philippou, J. Quality Considerations from Integrating Desalinated Water into Existing Water Infrastructure. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 3519–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Klohn, W. Reassessment of the Island’s Water Resources and Demand. Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment of the Republic of Cyprus, Water Development Department, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Land and Water Development Division. 2002. Available online: https://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/WDD/wdd.nsf/All/C56ECCB0AAAC75B8C225820F00301D11/$file/2_2.pdf?OpenElement (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  58. Cleridou, N.; Benas, N.; Matsoukas, C.; Croke, B.; Vardavas, I. Water Resources of Cyprus under Changing Climatic Conditions: Modelling Approach, Validation and Limitations. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 60, 202–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Papadopoulou, M.P.; Charchousi, D.; Spanoudaki, K.; Karali, A.; Varotsos, K.V.; Giannakopoulos, C.; Markou, M.; Loizidou, M. Agricultural Water Vulnerability under Climate Change in Cyprus. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tzoraki, O.; Dörflinger, G.; Kathijotes, N.; Kontou, A. Nutrient-Based Ecological Consideration of a Temporary River Catchment Affected by a Reservoir Operation to Facilitate Efficient Management. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Costa, D.D.A.; Silva Junior, L.C.S.d.; Azevedo, J.P.S.d.; Santos, M.A.d.; Assumpção, R.d.S.F.V. From Monitoring and Modeling to Management: How to Improve Water Quality in Brazilian Rivers? A Case Study: Piabanha River Watershed. Water 2021, 13, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qing, Y.; Wang, S.; Ancell, B.C.; Yang, Z.-L. Accelerating Flash Droughts Induced by the Joint Influence of Soil Moisture Depletion and Atmospheric Aridity. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cyprus Water Development Departament (WDD). Water Balance. Available online: http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/wdd/Wdd.nsf/page10_en/page10_en?opendocument (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  64. Kazakis, N.; Pavlou, A.; Vargemezis, G.; Voudouris, K.S.; Soulios, G.; Pliakas, F.; Tsokas, G. Seawater Intrusion Mapping Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Hydrochemical Data. An Application in the Coastal Area of Eastern Thermaikos Gulf, Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 543, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mondal, R.; Benham, G.; Mondal, S.; Christodoulides, P.; Neokleous, N.; Kaouri, K. Modelling and Optimisation of Water Management in Sloping Coastal Aquifers with Seepage, Extraction and Recharge. J. Hydrol. 2019, 571, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kassem, Y.; Gökçekuş, H.; Rizza, T. Groundwater Quality Assessment Based on Water Quality Index in Northern Cyprus. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2022, 12, 8435–8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Demir, C.; Fanta, D.; Akıntuğ, B.; Ünlü, K. Modeling Coastal Güzelyurt (Morphou) Aquifer in Northern Cyprus for Mitigation of Groundwater Depletion through Managed Aquifer Recharge. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2022, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kapetas, L.; Kazakis, N.; Voudouris, K.; McNicholl, D. Water Allocation and Governance in Multi-Stakeholder Environments: Insight from Axios Delta, Greece. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ferreira, M.S.; Siqueira, J.G.; Oliveira VP, S.; Costa, D.A. Analysis of municipal public policies for payment for water environmental services through the Public Policy Assessment Index: The state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) as a study model. Agua Territ./Water Landsc. 2023, 23, e6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nachmani, A. Scant Resources: The Problem of Water in Cyprus. Mediterr. Polit. 2000, 5, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rijsberman, F.R. Water Scarcity: Fact or Fiction? Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 80, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mason, M. Hydraulic Patronage: A Political Ecology of the Turkey-Northern Cyprus Water Pipeline. Polit. Geogr. 2020, 76, 102086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mannina, G.; Gulhan, H.; Ni, B.-J. Water Reuse from Wastewater Treatment: The Transition towards Circular Economy in the Water Sector. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 363, 127951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kassem, Y.; Gökçekuş, H.; Iravanian, A.; Gökçekuş, R. Predictive Suitability of Renewable Energy for Desalination Plants: The Case of Güzelyurt Region in Northern Cyprus. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2022, 8, 3657–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The location and topography of the study area. Source: This map was generated by the authors using the open-source software QGIS version 3.24.
Figure 1. The location and topography of the study area. Source: This map was generated by the authors using the open-source software QGIS version 3.24.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g001
Figure 2. Summary of the workflow followed in this study. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is calculated by using remote sensing images from the near infrared band (NIR, 0.85–0.88 µm) and the red band (RED, 0.64–0.67 µm), in the case of Landsat 8.
Figure 2. Summary of the workflow followed in this study. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is calculated by using remote sensing images from the near infrared band (NIR, 0.85–0.88 µm) and the red band (RED, 0.64–0.67 µm), in the case of Landsat 8.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g002
Figure 3. Permanent and seasonal water time series. Gaps from 1988, 1989, 1991 to 1997, when images were not available. Time series presents a normal distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05). (A,B) represent an increasing trend in permanent and seasonal water surface area between 1984 and 2021. (C) indicates a decreasing trend in permanent water surface area in the most recent years from 2010 to 2021. (D) exhibits the seasonal water surface area between 2011 and 2021, without indicating trends.
Figure 3. Permanent and seasonal water time series. Gaps from 1988, 1989, 1991 to 1997, when images were not available. Time series presents a normal distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05). (A,B) represent an increasing trend in permanent and seasonal water surface area between 1984 and 2021. (C) indicates a decreasing trend in permanent water surface area in the most recent years from 2010 to 2021. (D) exhibits the seasonal water surface area between 2011 and 2021, without indicating trends.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g003
Figure 4. Water occurrence for the entire time series (1984–2021). The occurrence of water reaching a hundred percent indicates that every single-pixel observation recorded water on all available images.
Figure 4. Water occurrence for the entire time series (1984–2021). The occurrence of water reaching a hundred percent indicates that every single-pixel observation recorded water on all available images.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g004
Figure 5. Kouris reservoir. (A) Global Reservoir Storage dataset [39]. (B) Global Lake Evaporation Volume dataset and surface area [38]. Tabular data were obtained from the cited database, the ID code to the Kouris dam are, ID 4468 and ID174665, respectively.
Figure 5. Kouris reservoir. (A) Global Reservoir Storage dataset [39]. (B) Global Lake Evaporation Volume dataset and surface area [38]. Tabular data were obtained from the cited database, the ID code to the Kouris dam are, ID 4468 and ID174665, respectively.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g005
Figure 6. Periodograms power spectral density: (A) permanent water (1984–2021); (B) seasonal water (1984–2021). Spectral analysis by Evolutive Fourier transform, sample position is shown on the x axis, frequency (in periods per sample) on the y axis, and power on a logarithmic scale as color scale: (C) permanent water (1984–2021); (D) seasonal water (1984–2021).
Figure 6. Periodograms power spectral density: (A) permanent water (1984–2021); (B) seasonal water (1984–2021). Spectral analysis by Evolutive Fourier transform, sample position is shown on the x axis, frequency (in periods per sample) on the y axis, and power on a logarithmic scale as color scale: (C) permanent water (1984–2021); (D) seasonal water (1984–2021).
Remotesensing 15 05288 g006
Figure 7. Water inflow and water storage in Cyprus reservoirs. Figure produced with data available on WDD [49].
Figure 7. Water inflow and water storage in Cyprus reservoirs. Figure produced with data available on WDD [49].
Remotesensing 15 05288 g007
Figure 8. Annual precipitation. The division of years into dry, normal and wet years are based on annual rainfall percentual deviation of the climatological mean (30 years period) as obtained from WDD [50].
Figure 8. Annual precipitation. The division of years into dry, normal and wet years are based on annual rainfall percentual deviation of the climatological mean (30 years period) as obtained from WDD [50].
Remotesensing 15 05288 g008
Figure 9. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). (A) Evretou watershed dominated by forest and irrigated crops. (B) Rainfed agriculture areas from global land cover/European Space Agency.
Figure 9. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). (A) Evretou watershed dominated by forest and irrigated crops. (B) Rainfed agriculture areas from global land cover/European Space Agency.
Remotesensing 15 05288 g009
Table 1. Characteristics of the five large reservoirs in Cyprus.
Table 1. Characteristics of the five large reservoirs in Cyprus.
NameYearRiverHeight (m)Capacity (m3)LatLong
Kouris1988Kouris110115,000,00034.8533.36
Asprokremmos1982Xeros Potamos5352,375,00034.7332.56
Evretou1986Stavros tis Psokas7024,000,00034.9632.47
Kannaviou2005Ezousa7518,000,00034.9332.59
Kalavasos1985Vasilikos6017,100,00034.8133.26
Dipotamos1985Pentaschoinos6015,500,00034.8933.62
Source: Produced with data available from WDD [48].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costa, D.d.A.; Bayissa, Y.; Lugon Junior, J.; Yamasaki, E.N.; Kyriakides, I.; Silva Neto, A.J. Cyprus Surface Water Area Variation Based on the 1984–2021 Time Series Built from Remote Sensing Products. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225288

AMA Style

Costa DdA, Bayissa Y, Lugon Junior J, Yamasaki EN, Kyriakides I, Silva Neto AJ. Cyprus Surface Water Area Variation Based on the 1984–2021 Time Series Built from Remote Sensing Products. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(22):5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costa, David de Andrade, Yared Bayissa, Jader Lugon Junior, Edna N. Yamasaki, Ioannis Kyriakides, and Antônio J. Silva Neto. 2023. "Cyprus Surface Water Area Variation Based on the 1984–2021 Time Series Built from Remote Sensing Products" Remote Sensing 15, no. 22: 5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225288

APA Style

Costa, D. d. A., Bayissa, Y., Lugon Junior, J., Yamasaki, E. N., Kyriakides, I., & Silva Neto, A. J. (2023). Cyprus Surface Water Area Variation Based on the 1984–2021 Time Series Built from Remote Sensing Products. Remote Sensing, 15(22), 5288. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop