Next Article in Journal
Effect of Dietary Fatty Acids on MicroRNA Expression Related to Metabolic Disorders and Inflammation in Human and Animal Trials
Previous Article in Journal
A Cross-Sectional Audit of Nutrition and Health Claims on Dairy Yoghurts in Supermarkets of the Illawarra Region of New South Wales, Australia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/nu13061836
Review Report
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Need and Importance of Nutrition Informatics in India: A Perspective

Nutrients 2021, 13(6), 1836; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061836
by Ashish Joshi 1,*, Ann Gaba 2, Shyamli Thakur 3 and Ashoo Grover 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2021, 13(6), 1836; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061836
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript (nutrients-1200645) presented for review is quite interesting.  I don’t sure but probably not for every reader. Authors only inform about Nutrition Informatics in India. It will be more interesting if the authors try to do a SWOT analysis of the different types of Nutrition Informatics in India, and pointed the direction for India in this topic and possible solutions.

I recommend the article for publication but after major revision.

In the whole manuscript, there is a lack of chapter numbers.

References

Authors, Please check the correctness of the citation of references by requirements of the Nutrients Journal. In my opinion, now it is not correct. For example, 55 and 56 are probably the same reference, 59 and 60 are the same situation, but without information about the date of access.

The font of the reference number is not well written.

Despite my comments, I recommend this manuscript for publication but after depth revision, because this form is not acceptable. I believe it addresses an important area of research in an international context and proper nutrition in India.

Best of luck with your paper and be safe!

Reviewer

Author Response

The authors would like to thank both reviewers for their time in reading this manuscript, and their thoughtful comments pertaining to our work.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors - 

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to review your communication brief. Good work on this effort. My comments are provided in the PDF. Good luck!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors would like to thank both reviewers for their time in reading this manuscript, and their thoughtful comments pertaining to our work.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The authors have changed sections Introduction and Discussion of the planned paper in line with my and other reviewer suggestions. Moreover, the authors corrected English and many details in the manuscript. In my opinion, now the manuscript is clear and better understand than the previous version.

I would like to thank the authors for considering my comments and applaud them for the major revisions to improve their manuscript. Especially thank you for the interesting SWOT analysis.

Now, I have the pleasure to recommend the manuscript for publication without correction.

Reviewer

Back to TopTop