Next Article in Journal
Diet, Microbiome, and Cancer Immunotherapy—A Comprehensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Role of Functional Polymorphism of Maternal and Neonatal Vitamin D Binding Protein in the Context of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Cutoffs as Determinants of Maternal-Neonatal Vitamin D Status Profiles in a Sunny Mediterranean Region
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating Effects of Plasma Apolipoprotein E on Ischemic Heart Disease Using Mendelian Randomization Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D Status, Bone Mineral Density, and VDR Gene Polymorphism in a Cohort of Belarusian Postmenopausal Women
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/nu13072216
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lung-Centric Inflammation of COVID-19: Potential Modulation by Vitamin D

by
Hana. M. A. Fakhoury
1,*,†,
Peter R. Kvietys
2,†,
Ismail Shakir
2,
Hashim Shams
2,
William B. Grant
3 and
Khaled Alkattan
4
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, P.O. Box 50927, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, P.O. Box 50927, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
3
Sunlight, Nutrition, and Health Research Center, P.O. Box 641603, San Francisco, CA 94164-1603, USA
4
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, P.O. Box 50927, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2021, 13(7), 2216; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072216
Submission received: 15 June 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 25 June 2021 / Published: 28 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D in the New Decade: Facts, Controversies, and Future Perspectives for Daily Clinical Practice)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
SARS-CoV-2 infects the respiratory tract and leads to the disease entity, COVID-19. Accordingly, the lungs bear the greatest pathologic burden with the major cause of death being respiratory failure. However, organs remote from the initial site of infection (e.g., kidney, heart) are not spared, particularly in severe and fatal cases. Emerging evidence indicates that an excessive inflammatory response coupled with a diminished antiviral defense is pivotal in the initiation and development of COVID-19. A common finding in autopsy specimens is the presence of thrombi in the lungs as well as remote organs, indicative of immunothrombosis. Herein, the role of SARS-CoV-2 in lung inflammation and associated sequelae are reviewed with an emphasis on immunothrombosis. In as much as vitamin D is touted as a supplement to conventional therapies of COVID-19, the impact of this vitamin at various junctures of COVID-19 pathogenesis is also addressed.

1. Introduction

The mechanism of infection, transmission, and clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 are qualitatively similar to those of its predecessor, SARS-CoV [1,2,3]. Notably, both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV highjack angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the membranes of host cells to gain entry [4]. ACE2 is expressed on apical membranes of human respiratory and gastrointestinal epithelial cells [5,6], accounting for proposed means of transmission and clinical manifestations of the current disease, COVID-19. Specifically, human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 may occur via expired air droplets or a fecal–oral route; the former well documented [3], while the latter has been posited [7]. The clinical presentations include respiratory problems (e.g., cough, dyspnea) and to a lesser extent intestinal complaints (e.g., diarrhea) [8,9]. Most infected individuals develop mild symptoms that resolve without the need for hospitalization. However, a small number of patients develop pneumonia and require hospitalization, and eventually recover. Others worsen, progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and require aggressive treatment in intensive care units. The major cause of death is respiratory failure [10,11,12,13], although multiple organ damage and sepsis can occur in severe COVID-19 cases [2,11]. In accordance with the clinical presentation, microscopic analyses of autopsy specimens indicate that lungs bear the greatest pathologic burden [10,14,15,16,17]. The predominant histologic features include diffuse alveolar damage, thrombosis, and inflammatory infiltrates consisting of macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils [10,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Organs remote from the initial site of infection (e.g., heart, kidney, brain) may also exhibit pathology (e.g., thrombi) [10,14,17,24,25]. Of particular significance, thrombi, macrophage recruitment, and diminished T and B lymphocytes are noted in hilar lymph nodes and the spleen [15].
The mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 are the subject of an intense research effort. The information emerging indicates that, in addition to viral virulence, the host’s immune response appears to play a major role. Specifically, an excessive inflammatory response, coupled with an impaired antiviral (e.g., interferon) response, are currently touted as causative [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. A common characteristic of severe COVID-19 patients is lymphopenia; markers of T cell exhaustion are also reported in some [15,27,28,30,33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. An inadequate interferon response would impede the eradication of the virus thereby exacerbating and prolonging the inflammatory response and associated sequelae [27,28,29,42]. As a case in point, a significant contribution to the lethality of COVID-19 is the inflammation-induced formation of microvascular thrombi, referred to as immunothrombosis [43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
Vitamin D can impact numerous pathways involved in host immune responses to viral infections [50,51]. The dietary or skin-derived vitamin D precursors are sequentially hydroxylated to form the active vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. A variety of immune and non-immune cells possess the enzymatic machinery to generate (e.g., CYP27B1) or inactivate (e.g., CYP24A1) vitamin D [50,52,53,54,55]. Vitamin D can exert both genomic and non-genomic effects by binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR). A well-documented genomic function is the generation of the antiviral peptide, LL-37 [50,51,56]. A unique regulatory feature of vitamin D is the ability to induce an appropriate inflammatory response and suppress an excessive one [51].
A significant majority of COVID-19 patients have vitamin D insufficiency, based on cut-off values for 25-OHD ≤ 10–20 ng/mL [57,58,59,60,61]. A recent meta-analysis indicates that low levels of vitamin D (20–30 ng/mL) are associated with a greater susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as severity and mortality of COVID-19 [62]. Conversely, in a multicenter retrospective study, supplemental 25-OHD during the first month of hospitalization reduced in-hospital mortality [63]. Thus, it is not surprising that vitamin D has been touted as a potential therapeutic adjunct to conventional approaches in the treatment of COVID-19 [56,57,60,64]. However, based on some controversial issues [52], caution is recommended pending the outcomes of clinical trials targeting the therapeutic efficacy of vitamin D in COVID-19 patients [60,64].
Herein, a narrative approach will be used to address the role of SARS-CoV-2 in lung inflammation that can lead to the manifestations of severe COVID-19 such as ARDS, coagulopathy, and multiorgan dysfunction. The potential impact of vitamin D at various stages of COVID-19 pathogenesis will be addressed in an evidence-based manner (Figure 1). To this end, the PubMed database was mined for vitamin D/VDR data relevant to the aberrant immune response of COVID-19 and yielded the following. Studies addressing the prophylactic or therapeutic efficacy of vitamin D for the ARDS of COVID-19 are limited [57,63,65,66,67]. A transgenic murine model of COVID-19 that mimics the disease in humans is available [68,69]; however, it has not been used for interventional studies of vitamin D/VDR signaling. An additional issue complicating animal studies is the potential for species-specific inflammatory signaling pathways [50]. Finally, the bulk of the information is derived from cell-based studies using tractable immune cells (e.g., circulating monocytes), which may not reflect the responses in relevant lung cells (e.g., alveolar macrophages). With these limitations in mind, we address the most salient features of vitamin D/VDR signaling relevant to the innate immune response of ARDS. Wherever possible, reviews are cited to direct the reader to relevant original studies.

2. Current Status of Knowledge

2.1. Intrapulmonary Tropism

SARS-CoV-2 productively infects the human nasal and bronchiolar epithelial cells; primarily ciliated epithelia and, to a lesser extent, goblet cells [4,5,12,20,70,71,72,73]. The initial event is an adhesive interaction between the spike (S) protein of the virus with ACE2 on apical membranes of lung epithelia. Subsequently, the S protein is proteolytically activated (e.g., TMPRSS2, furin) allowing for fusion-induced entry [4,74]. After replicating its genome, SARS-CoV-2 preferentially exits via the apical membrane [20,71]. This mode of entry and exit would ensure infection of downstream lung epithelial cells while limiting remote organ involvement. The epithelium remains intact for up to 2–4 days post infection (dpi); progressive infection eventually results in epithelial permeability [71,72]. Of note is that little injury is incurred by SARS-CoV-2 replication within epithelial cells until 3–4 dpi, after which epithelial cell injury and death occur [70,71,72]. Cell death is a result of apoptosis [71,72], presumably as an antiviral defense mechanism [75,76].
Within the alveolar compartment, type II epithelial cells, endothelial cells, as well as macrophages and dendritic cells, express the requisite machinery for SARS-CoV-2 infection (e.g., ACE2, TMPRSS2, and/or furin) [10,15,26,77]. Infection of type II epithelial cells is productive and utilizes an apical entry and exit pathway [78]. Infection results in the upregulation of pro-inflammatory and antiviral transcriptional pathways [73,78]. The pro-inflammatory pathways (e.g., NFκB) are dominant in the early stages of infection (1–2 dpi); whereas antiviral interferon signaling (e.g., STAT) is delayed (3–4 dpi). As the infection progresses, apoptotic pathways become activated [73,78]. Loss of type II pneumocytes is particularly detrimental, since they generate surfactant, reabsorb fluid from the airspace, and serve as progenitors for the repair of epithelial damage [79].
SARS-CoV-2 infection of endothelium is a matter of debate. Capillary organoids are permissive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication [80]. However, lung autopsies of COVID-19 patients are equivocal; some report infection of the endothelium [10], while others highlight the lack of endothelial infection [18,19]. Irrespective of this, endothelial dysfunction and/or injury is common, as evidenced by microvascular thrombi, inflammatory cell infiltration, and capillary sprouting [10,18,19]. A probable scenario holds that endothelial dysfunction contributes to the formation of occlusive emboli resulting in hypoxia, a powerful stimulus for angiogenesis [10].
The major sentinel immune cells of the lung are the alveolar macrophages and dendritic cells. There seems to be little doubt that macrophages can be infected by SARS-CoV-2 [12,24,26,77,81,82,83]. However, as compared to pneumocytes, fewer resident or infiltrated macrophages are infected [18,19]. While phenotypically quite diverse [84], alveolar macrophages are generally classified as either pro-inflammatory (M1) or pro-resolving (M2) [77]. SARS-CoV-2 can infect both M1 and M2 macrophages; M1 being more permissive [82]. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of severe COVID-19 patients is characterized by a diminished resident M2 population in favor of infiltrated M1 macrophages [85]. Of note is that SARS-CoV-2 infection of macrophages does not yield viable progeny [81,82]. Despite an abortive infection, the macrophages can generate pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines. Dendritic cells, major antigen-presenting cells, can also be infected by SARS-CoV-2. As was the case in macrophages, the infection is abortive [81]. Further, their interferon response is diminished; an effect attributed to viral antagonism of signaling pathways (e.g., STAT). Dendritic cells isolated from COVID-19 patients exhibit impaired maturation and functionality, as evidenced by an inability to stimulate CD4 and CD8 T cell proliferation [37].
In summary, SARS-CoV-2 can productively infect nasal, bronchial, and alveolar epithelial cells, while infection of macrophages and dendritic cells is abortive. This cell-specific differential infection (productive vs. abortive) is the same as noted with SARS-CoV [77]. Since nearly peak viral titers are incurred prior to discernible cytopathic effects, epithelial cell death (primarily, apoptosis) is not considered to be a direct effect of the virus; rather, it is attributed to the host immune response [10,70,73,78]. The net effect of SARS-CoV-2 induced alveolar damage (epithelial and endothelial) is a breakdown of the air-blood barrier, thereby limiting oxygen exchange and eventually culminating in respiratory failure.

2.2. Intrapulmonary Tropism: Impact of Vitamin D

Apart from being a receptor for SARS-CoV-2, ACE2 has a homeostatic function in the lungs by regulating the local renin–angiotensin system (RAS) [86,87]. In brief, renin-derived angiotensin I (AngI) is converted to angiotensin II (Ang II) by ACE. Ang II interacts with its receptor (AT1R) which triggers downstream pathways that are detrimental to lung function (e.g., pro-oxidant, pro-inflammatory). As a countermeasure, ACE2 nullifies the effects of Ang II by cleaving it to the heptapeptide Ang 1–7 which interacts with its cognate receptor (MasR) to exert beneficial effects (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory). Thus, an imbalance in the relative activity of the two converting enzymes that favor ACE over ACE2 promotes lung injury and vice-versa. Vitamin D is a negative regulator of the local RAS (increasing ACE2/ACE ratio) and thereby protects against acute lung injury (ALI) in rodents. For example, ALI induced by local (LPS, acid) or remote (peritonitis) challenges increases lung inflammation and injury as well as systemic hypoxia; effects attributed to an increased local RAS and ACE/ACE2 ratio [88,89,90,91]. Vitamin D/VDR signaling suppresses lung inflammation and injury by inhibiting Ang II/AT1R signaling and promoting Ang 1–7/MasR signaling [88,90]. Based on these and other documented effects of vitamin/VDR signaling on the local RAS, vitamin D has been touted as a potential therapeutic approach to treat ARDS of COVID-19 [92]. As a caveat, SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 to infect human lung cells [4,74,78]. Thus, it is unclear how a vitamin D-induced increase in the ACE2/ACE ratio will impact lung injury or disease progression induced by SARS-CoV-2.
At mucosal sites exposed to the external environment (e.g., gut, bronchi), antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent the first line of defense against pathogens [53,93]. LL37 is an AMP that can be detected in isolated lung epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages [94]. The cathelicidin gene encoding LL37 contains a vitamin D response element and can be regulated by vitamin D/VDR signaling [50]. Human bronchial epithelial cells constitutively express the requisite machinery (e.g., CYP27B1, VDR) to ensure intracrine activation of vitamin D/VDR signaling in response to the exogenous inactive vitamin D precursor, 25(OH)D. VDR-induced transcription generates LL37 in isolated human airway epithelial cells even in the absence of infection; however, viral infection has a potentiating effect [54,95,96,97]. The antiviral effects of LL37 include both extracellular (e.g., destruction of the viral envelope) and intracellular (e.g., inhibition of viral replication) modalities [54]. Based on its broad antiviral activity, it has been proposed that the vitamin D–LL37 axis may be effective against SARS-CoV-2 [56]. LL37 may also inhibit binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2. In silico structural studies predict binding sites for LL37 on the viral S protein [98] and in a cell-free system this interaction prevents the binding of the S protein to ACE2 [99]. Of note, in a small safety and efficacy trial in COVID-19 patients, oral administration of L. lactis, genetically modified to produce LL37, was deemed safe and alleviated respiratory symptoms such as cough and shortness of breath [100]. However, the enrolled cohort were only mildly symptomatic and firm conclusions of therapeutic efficacy await controlled larger scale clinical trials.
COVID-19 lung histopathology is characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration and diffuse alveolar damage, with the blood–air barrier defect ultimately causing systemic hypoxia. In general, neither dietary depletion, genetic blockade, nor supplementation of vitamin D appreciably affects the inflammatory status or epithelial integrity of the unstressed lungs of rodents [88,90,101,102,103,104]. However, in models of ALI (e.g., LPS), either vitamin D or VDR deficiency exacerbates lung inflammation, barrier dysfunction, and systemic oxygenation [102,104]; meanwhile, supplementation with vitamin D is protective [88,104,105,106]. Although there are detractors from this paradigm [101,107], these detractors may not be anomalies. Seemingly paradoxical roles of vitamin D are most likely context-dependent (e.g., species, models, cell types) [54,55,96].
A context-dependent vitamin D/VDR signaling is also operative in the immune sentinel cells of the lung, such as alveolar macrophages and dendritic cells. A common cell-based model employs either bone marrow- or monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. Ex vivo induction of human macrophage differentiation in the presence of vitamin D does not appear to affect their polarization to either M1 or M2 phenotypes [108,109]. Further, vitamin D/VDR signaling in differentiated macrophages is either pro- or anti-inflammatory depending on the existing infectious/inflammatory milieu [108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. Consensus holds that, in response to viral infection, macrophage vitamin D/VDR signaling initially activates pro-inflammatory pathways (e.g., increased LL37, IL-8), while a more delayed anti-inflammatory response (e.g., decreased IL-8, increased IL-10) serves to limit immune-mediated injury [54,55,112,114]. With respect to human dendritic cells, supplementation with vitamin D during or after differentiation renders them tolerogenic [53,55,115,116]. Tolerogenic dendritic cells generate an anti-inflammatory milieu by secreting less pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibiting effector T cell function (both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells), and promoting regulatory T cell conversion [55,115,117]. The vitamin D-induced tolerogenic response is delayed, presumably due to a delay in upregulation of CYP27B1 and VDR expression in both dendritic and effector T cells. It has been proposed that this delay allows for the clearance of invading microbes and subsequently quiets the immune response to avoid collateral tissue damage [55].

2.3. The Inflammatory Response

Transcriptomic [118] and proteomic [33,40,85,119,120] analyses of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of COVID-19 patients indicate that a pro-inflammatory environment is present in their lungs. Their BALF contains high levels of chemokines and cytokines, with the former detected earlier in longitudinal sampling [85]. Correspondingly, the BALF was enriched with innate immune cells such as neutrophils, monocytes, and to a lesser extent, dendritic cells [33,40,85,119]. The neutrophils and macrophages exhibited an activated phenotype in comparison to their circulating counterparts. The generation of a pro-inflammatory milieu is most likely initiated by either infected epithelial cells or resident macrophages [18,19,119]. These cells detect specific molecular features of inhaled virions (e.g., RNAs, proteins) referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Different PAMPs are recognized by an array of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that activate various signaling pathways, most of which converge to activate the transcription factor, NFκB [26,27,78]. NFκB transactivates various pro-inflammatory genes, generating chemokines (e.g., IL-8) and cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNFα) [26,27,78,121]. As the infection progresses, leading to tissue injury [15], PRRs on macrophages recognize material released by damaged cells (damage-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs) and mount signaling cascades that also activate NFκB and thereby amplify the inflammation. The PRR/NFκB pathway has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19 [122,123].
A major function of NFκB is to initiate the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome; a multiprotein complex that generates IL-1β. This cytokine lacks a signal sequence, so secretion to extracellular space occurs through pores in the plasma membrane formed by gasdermin D (GSDMD) [124,125]. Multiple GSDMDs are inserted into the plasma membrane and oligomerize to form pores [126], thereby allowing IL-1β to leave the cell. Excessive GSDMD pores can rupture the plasma membrane and induce a lytic form of cell death, termed “pyroptosis” [124,125].
Emerging evidence indicates that an NLRP3 inflammasome is formed in COVID-19 patients and may predict the disease trajectory. Human monocytes infected by SARS-CoV-2 secrete IL-1β and undergo pyroptosis [127,128], indicating that the virus can induce a functional inflammasome. Sera of COVID-19 patients contain active caspase; higher levels are prevalent in more severe cases [127]. Furthermore, lung tissues of fatal cases contain the fully assembled NLRP3 inflammasome [127,129]. The inflammasome components are localized to the resident or recruited monocytes/macrophages and, to a lesser extent, alveolar epithelial cells. It has been proposed that the enhanced lethality of COVID-19 in older patients is a result of age-related hyperactivation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [130].

2.4. The Inflammatory Response: Impact of Vitamin D

A major family of PRRs are the toll-like receptors (TLRs), membrane spanning glycoproteins that can detect viral PAMPs [131] and host DAMPs [122]. SARS-CoV-2, like other coronaviruses, are most likely sensed via their nucleic acids (e.g., ssRNA, dsRNA) by endosomal PRRs (e.g., TLR3 and TLR7). In addition, viral membrane proteins as well as various DAMPs from injured cells can be detected by plasma membrane PRRs (e.g., TLR4). Agonists of TLR3 and TLR4 increase cytokine (e.g., TNFα, IL-1β) production by human lung macrophages, with TLR4 agonists being the most potent [132]. In human monocytes, vitamin D/VDR signaling reduces surface levels of TLR4, while not affecting intracellular TLR3 [133,134]. Thus, while the vitamin D/VDR axis may not impact viral-mediated TLR signaling, it may downregulate DAMP-mediated TLR pathways.
In quiescent cells, NFκB is inhibited by IκB which binds to the NFκB dimer and prevents its translocation to the nucleus [121]. Pro-inflammatory stimuli activate IκB kinase which phosphorylates IκB. Subsequent ubiquitination targets IκB for proteasomal degradation. The loss of IκB frees the NFκB dimer to enter the nucleus and transcribe relevant pro-inflammatory genes. Several lines of evidence indicate that the nuclear translocation of NFκB is impeded by vitamin D/VDR signaling. In VDR deficient fibroblasts, there is a reduction in basal levels of IκB and an increase in nuclear levels of NFκB [135]. Exogenous vitamin D increases IκB and decreases NFκB translocation to the nucleus of human lung epithelial cells or murine macrophages [136,137]. In a similar vein, vitamin D or VDR overexpression inhibits IκB kinase activity in fibroblasts; an effect mediated by the physical interaction of the VDR with the kinase [138]. Finally, VDR can also physically interact with NFκB, as demonstrated in murine tissues [139,140] and macrophages [141]. However, the precise docking sites involved in VDR interactions with IκB kinase and NFκB have not been identified.
Vitamin D/VDR signaling inhibits tissue inflammation and injury mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome in various in vivo murine models [142,143,144]. Loss and gain of function approaches support a role for the vitamin D/VDR pathway to dampen activation and the function of the NLRP3 inflammasome. For example, VDR inhibits caspase activation, generation of mature IL-1β, and GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis in a murine model of kidney injury, as well as human tubular epithelial cells [143,144]. VDR can physically interact with NLRP3 [144,145]; the ligand-binding domain of VDR and the amino-terminal pyrin domain of NLRP3 are required for complex formation [144]. The VDR-NLRP3 interaction prevents the inflammasome function in both murine and human macrophages [144].
An increase in intracellular oxidant stress has been implicated in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [146,147,148]. Oxidant stress occurs when the generation of ROS exceeds the antioxidant capacity of the cell. An important transcription factor that enhances the antioxidant status of cells is Nrf2 [149]. The promoter region of the Nrf2 gene contains a response element that binds VDR [150]. In human epithelial cells, vitamin D/VDR signaling blunts ROS-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by promoting Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus where its transcriptional activity increases cellular antioxidant enzymes [151].

2.5. Immunothrombosis and Remote Organ Dysfunction

Organs remote from the initial site of SARS-CoV-2 infection can exhibit pathology, particularly in severe cases [2,10,14,15,17,24,83,152]. It has been proposed that the excessive inflammatory response within the lungs results in the spill-over of cytokines into the systemic circulation causing a “cytokine storm” syndrome [12,26,29,153,154]. However, a more likely scenario is the generation of a localized cytokine storm within the lungs of COVID-19 patients [120,155].
The subsequent recruitment and hyper-activation of neutrophils results in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [156,157]. NET components have been detected in tracheal aspirates [43,158] of COVID patients. Lung tissue from fatal cases contains NETs in close association with diffuse alveolar damage [43,44,158]. Importantly, NETs decorated with platelets as well as occlusive thrombi have been noted within the lung microvasculature [43,44,45]. These observations are in accordance with immunothrombosis, a process linking innate immunity to thrombosis for defense against pathogens [23,49,159]. However, excessive immunothrombosis leads to occlusion of numerous pulmonary blood vessels and precipitates ARDS.
Whether the immunothrombosis of COVID-19 is confined to the lungs or can impact remote organs is still controversial. Activated neutrophils and platelets, as well as platelet–neutrophil aggregates, are present in the systemic circulation of patients [45,160]. Further, sera from COVID-19 patients can induce NET formation in neutrophils isolated from healthy donors [161]. Circulating markers of fibrin degradation (e.g., D-dimers), and NET remnants are elevated in COVID-19, with higher levels in more severe or fatal cases [45,161]. However, while NET formation has been consistently noted in the lungs of COVID-19, their presence in remote organs has either been noted [45] or not detected [44]. Nonetheless, in fatal cases of COVID-19, microvascular thrombi as well as ischemic infarcts are present in multiple organs [10,14,17,24,152].

2.6. Immunothrombosis and Remote Organ Dysfunction: Impact of Vitamin D

While clinical studies indicate an inverse relationship between vitamin D status and thrombotic events [162], the impact of VDR signaling on specific steps involved in the development of immunothrombosis is less clear. For example, the effects of vitamin D/VDR signaling on the generation of NETs is ambiguous [163,164]. Platelet activation is increased in blood samples from vitamin D deficient individuals [165], while vitamin D inhibits platelet aggregation in vitro [166]. The antithrombin gene has multiple vitamin D response elements, and paricalcitol increases antithrombin expression in, and secretion from, cultured cells [167]. Further, a transcriptomic analysis of data derived from human monocytes identified the thrombomodulin gene as a target of vitamin D/VDR signaling [168]. Collectively, these observations predict an antithrombotic function of vitamin D/VDR signaling. Unexpectedly, however, correcting vitamin D deficiency in otherwise healthy individuals does not consistently affect their blood thrombogenic profile. Vitamin D supplementation of deficient subjects either increases [169] or reduces [170] thrombogenicity.
Further work is warranted to systematically assess the potential benefit of vitamin D in immunothrombosis of COVID-19. This is particularly important since anticoagulants (e.g., heparinoids) are currently advocated to alleviate hypercoagulation in these patients [171] and therapeutic vitamin D may increase the probability of bleeding events [172].

3. Conclusions

The anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects of vitamin D are promising features that suggest efficacy against immunothrombosis of COVID-19. Results of ongoing clinical trials should either validate or refute a beneficial role for vitamin D in alleviating the ARDS of COVID-19 and associated sequelae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.A.F., P.R.K. and K.A.; methodology, H.M.A.F., P.R.K. and W.B.G.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.A.F. and P.R.K.; writing—review and editing, P.R.K., H.M.A.F., I.S., H.S., W.B.G. and K.A.; visualization, H.M.A.F., P.R.K. and I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

W.B.G. receives funding from Bio-Tech Pharmacal, Inc. (Fayetteville, AR, USA). The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Fung, S.-Y.; Yuen, K.-S.; Ye, Z.-W.; Chan, C.-P.; Jin, D.-Y. A tug-of-war between severe acute respiratory syndrome Vitamin D and host antiviral defence: Lessons from other pathogenic viruses. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, D.; Comish, P.; Kang, R. The hallmarks of COVID-19 disease. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Petrosillo, N.; Viceconte, G.; Ergonul, O.; Ippolito, G.; Petersen, E. COVID-19, SARS and MERS: Are they closely related? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lamers, M.M.; Beumer, J.; van der Vaart, J.; Knoops, K.; Puschhof, J.; Breugem, T.I.; Ravelli, R.B.G.; Paul van Schayck, J.; Mykytyn, A.Z.; Duimel, H.Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science 2020, 369, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ziegler, C.G.; Allon, S.J.; Nyquist, S.K.; Mbano, I.M.; Miao, V.N.; Tzouanas, C.N.; Cao, Y.; Yousif, A.S.; Bals, J.; Hauser, B.M. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is an interferon-stimulated gene in human airway epithelial cells and is detected in specific cell subsets across tissues. Cell 2020, 181, 1016–1035.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ding, S.; Liang, T.J. Is SARS-CoV-2 also an enteric pathogen with potential fecal-oral transmission? A COVID-19 virological and clinical review. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, Z.; Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhao, P.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klopfenstein, T.; Kadiane-Oussou, N.J.; Royer, P.Y.; Toko, L.; Gendrin, V.; Zayet, S. Diarrhea: An underestimated symptom in Coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2020, 44, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ackermann, M.; Verleden, S.E.; Kuehnel, M.; Haverich, A.; Welte, T.; Laenger, F.; Vanstapel, A.; Werlein, C.; Stark, H.; Tzankov, A.; et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Ma, X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: Is it “typical” ARDS? Crit. Care 2020, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tay, M.Z.; Poh, C.M.; Renia, L.; MacAry, P.A.; Ng, L.F.P. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Phua, J.; Weng, L.; Ling, L.; Egi, M.; Lim, C.M.; Divatia, J.V.; Shrestha, B.R.; Arabi, Y.M.; Ng, J.; Gomersall, C.D.; et al. Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deshmukh, V.; Motwani, R.; Kumar, A.; Kumari, C.; Raza, K. Histopathological observations in COVID-19: A systematic review. J. Clin. Pathol. 2021, 74, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Q.; Shi, Y.; Cai, J.; Duan, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, H.; Ruan, Q.; Li, J.; Zhao, L.; Ping, Y. Pathological changes in the lungs and lymphatic organs of 12 COVID-19 autopsy cases. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 1868–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lax, S.F.; Skok, K.; Zechner, P.; Kessler, H.H.; Kaufmann, N.; Koelblinger, C.; Vander, K.; Bargfrieder, U.; Trauner, M. Pulmonary arterial thrombosis in COVID-19 with fatal outcome: Results from a prospective, single-center, clinicopathologic case series. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 350–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fox, S.E.; Akmatbekov, A.; Harbert, J.L.; Li, G.; Quincy Brown, J.; Vander Heide, R.S. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: An autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carsana, L.; Sonzogni, A.; Nasr, A.; Rossi, R.S.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Zerbi, P.; Rech, R.; Colombo, R.; Antinori, S.; Corbellino, M.; et al. Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: A two-centre descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schaefer, I.M.; Padera, R.F.; Solomon, I.H.; Kanjilal, S.; Hammer, M.M.; Hornick, J.L.; Sholl, L.M. In Situ detection of SARS-CoV-2 in lungs and airways of patients with COVID-19. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 2104–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Milewska, A.; Kula-Pacurar, A.; Wadas, J.; Suder, A.; Szczepanski, A.; Dabrowska, A.; Owczarek, K.; Marcello, A.; Ochman, M.; Stacel, T.; et al. Replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in human respiratory epithelium. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00957-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klok, F.; Kruip, M.; Van der Meer, N.; Arbous, M.; Gommers, D.; Kant, K.; Kaptein, F.; van Paassen, J.; Stals, M.; Huisman, M. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb. Res. 2020, 191, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Poissy, J.; Goutay, J.; Caplan, M.; Parmentier, E.; Duburcq, T.; Lassalle, F.; Jeanpierre, E.; Rauch, A.; Labreuche, J.; Susen, S.; et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: Awareness of an increased prevalence. Circulation 2020, 142, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Iba, T.; Levy, J.H.; Levi, M.; Connors, J.M.; Thachil, J. Coagulopathy of coronavirus disease 2019. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 48, 1358–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rapkiewicz, A.V.; Mai, X.; Carsons, S.E.; Pittaluga, S.; Kleiner, D.E.; Berger, J.S.; Thomas, S.; Adler, N.M.; Charytan, D.M.; Gasmi, B. Megakaryocytes and platelet-fibrin thrombi characterize multi-organ thrombosis at autopsy in COVID-19: A case series. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 24, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, E.; Zhang, C.; Israelow, B.; Lu-Culligan, A.; Prado, A.V.; Skriabine, S.; Lu, P.; Weizman, O.E.; Liu, F.; Dai, Y.; et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20202135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Merad, M.; Martin, J.C. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: A key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, S.; Channappanavar, R.; Kanneganti, T.D. Coronaviruses: Innate immunity, inflammasome activation, inflammatory cell death, and cytokines. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lucas, C.; Wong, P.; Klein, J.; Castro, T.B.R.; Silva, J.; Sundaram, M.; Ellingson, M.K.; Mao, T.; Oh, J.E.; Israelow, B.; et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature 2020, 584, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fajgenbaum, D.C.; June, C.H. Cytokine Storm. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2255–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Z.; John Wherry, E. T cell responses in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mudd, P.A.; Crawford, J.C.; Turner, J.S.; Souquette, A.; Reynolds, D.; Bender, D.; Bosanquet, J.P.; Anand, N.J.; Striker, D.A.; Martin, R.S.; et al. Distinct inflammatory profiles distinguish COVID-19 from influenza with limited contributions from cytokine storm. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabe3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blanco-Melo, D.; Nilsson-Payant, B.E.; Liu, W.C.; Uhl, S.; Hoagland, D.; Moller, R.; Jordan, T.X.; Oishi, K.; Panis, M.; Sachs, D.; et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 2020, 181, 1036–1045.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ronit, A.; Berg, R.M.G.; Bay, J.T.; Haugaard, A.K.; Ahlstrom, M.G.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Ullum, H.; Rorvig, S.B.; Tjelle, K.; Foss, N.B.; et al. Compartmental immunophenotyping in COVID-19 ARDS: A case series. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 147, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hadjadj, J.; Yatim, N.; Barnabei, L.; Corneau, A.; Boussier, J.; Smith, N.; Péré, H.; Charbit, B.; Bondet, V.; Chenevier-Gobeaux, C.; et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 2020, 369, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Diao, B.; Wang, C.; Tan, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Ning, L.; Chen, L.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; et al. Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Netea, M.G.; Rovina, N.; Akinosoglou, K.; Antoniadou, A.; Antonakos, N.; Damoraki, G.; Gkavogianni, T.; Adami, M.E.; Katsaounou, P.; et al. Complex immune dysregulation in Covid-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 992–1000.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, R.; To, K.K.; Wong, Y.C.; Liu, L.; Zhou, B.; Li, X.; Huang, H.; Mo, Y.; Luk, T.Y.; Lau, T.T.; et al. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs dendritic cell and T cell responses. Immunity 2020, 53, 864–877.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, H.-Y.; Zhang, M.; Yang, C.-X.; Zhang, N.; Wang, X.-C.; Yang, X.-P.; Dong, X.-Q.; Zheng, Y.-T. Elevated exhaustion levels and reduced functional diversity of T cells in peripheral blood may predict severe progression in COVID-19 patients. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 541–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhao, Q.; Meng, M.; Kumar, R.; Wu, Y.; Huang, J.; Deng, Y.; Weng, Z.; Yang, L. Lymphopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Biasi, S.; Meschiari, M.; Gibellini, L.; Bellinazzi, C.; Borella, R.; Fidanza, L.; Gozzi, L.; Iannone, A.; Lo Tartaro, D.; Mattioli, M.; et al. Marked T cell activation, senescence, exhaustion and skewing towards TH17 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zheng, M.; Gao, Y.; Wang, G.; Song, G.; Liu, S.; Sun, D.; Xu, Y.; Tian, Z. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 533–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Manjili, R.H.; Zarei, M.; Habibi, M.; Manjili, M.H. COVID-19 as an acute inflammatory disease. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Middleton, E.A.; He, X.Y.; Denorme, F.; Campbell, R.A.; Ng, D.; Salvatore, S.P.; Mostyka, M.; Baxter-Stoltzfus, A.; Borczuk, A.C.; Loda, M.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood 2020, 136, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Radermecker, C.; Detrembleur, N.; Guiot, J.; Cavalier, E.; Henket, M.; d’Emal, C.; Vanwinge, C.; Cataldo, D.; Oury, C.; Delvenne, P.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps infiltrate the lung airway, interstitial, and vascular compartments in severe COVID-19. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20201012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leppkes, M.; Knopf, J.; Naschberger, E.; Lindemann, A.; Singh, J.; Herrmann, I.; Sturzl, M.; Staats, L.; Mahajan, A.; Schauer, C.; et al. Vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. EBioMedicine 2020, 58, 102925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McDonald, B.; Davis, R.P.; Kim, S.J.; Tse, M.; Esmon, C.T.; Kolaczkowska, E.; Jenne, C.N. Platelets and neutrophil extracellular traps collaborate to promote intravascular coagulation during sepsis in mice. Blood 2017, 129, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yadav, V.; Chi, L.; Zhao, R.; Tourdot, B.E.; Yalavarthi, S.; Jacobs, B.N.; Banka, A.; Liao, H.; Koonse, S.; Anyanwu, A.C. ENTPD-1 disrupts inflammasome IL-1β–driven venous thrombosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2872–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gupta, N.; Sahu, A.; Prabhakar, A.; Chatterjee, T.; Tyagi, T.; Kumari, B.; Khan, N.; Nair, V.; Bajaj, N.; Sharma, M.; et al. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome complex potentiates venous thrombosis in response to hypoxia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4763–4768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Gaertner, F.; Massberg, S. Blood coagulation in immunothrombosis—At the frontline of intravascular immunity. Semin. Immunol. 2016, 28, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bishop, E.L.; Ismailova, A.; Dimeloe, S.; Hewison, M.; White, J.H. Vitamin D and immune regulation: Antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory. JBMR Plus 2021, 5, e10405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Weiss, S.T.; Litonjua, A.A. Vitamin D in host defense: Implications for future research. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 56, 692–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, C. Controversial effects of Vitamin D and related genes on viral infections, pathogenesis, and treatment outcomes. Nutrients 2020, 12, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fakhoury, H.M.A.; Kvietys, P.R.; AlKattan, W.; Anouti, F.A.; Elahi, M.A.; Karras, S.N.; Grant, W.B. Vitamin D and intestinal homeostasis: Barrier, microbiota, and immune modulation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 200, 105663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Teymoori-Rad, M.; Shokri, F.; Salimi, V.; Marashi, S.M. The interplay between Vitamin D and viral infections. Rev. Med. Virol. 2019, 29, e2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cantorna, M.T.; Rogers, C.J.; Arora, J. Aligning the paradoxical role of Vitamin D in gastrointestinal immunity. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2019, 30, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Crane-Godreau, M.A.; Clem, K.J.; Payne, P.; Fiering, S. Vitamin D deficiency and air pollution exacerbate COVID-19 through suppression of antiviral peptide LL37. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Grant, W.B.; Lahore, H.; McDonnell, S.L.; Baggerly, C.A.; French, C.B.; Aliano, J.L.; Bhattoa, H.P. Evidence that Vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients 2020, 12, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Panagiotou, G.; Tee, S.A.; Ihsan, Y.; Athar, W.; Marchitelli, G.; Kelly, D.; Boot, C.S.; Stock, N.; Macfarlane, J.; Martineau, A.R. Low serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25 [OH] D) levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 93, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carpagnano, G.E.; Di Lecce, V.; Quaranta, V.N.; Zito, A.; Buonamico, E.; Capozza, E.; Palumbo, A.; Di Gioia, G.; Valerio, V.N.; Resta, O. Vitamin D deficiency as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020, 44, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ferder, L.; Martín Giménez, V.M.; Inserra, F.; Tajer, C.; Antonietti, L.; Mariani, J.; Manucha, W. Vitamin D supplementation as a rational pharmacological approach in the Covid-19 pandemic. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2020, 319, L941–L948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Griffin, G.; Hewison, M.; Hopkin, J.; Kenny, R.A.; Quinton, R.; Rhodes, J.; Subramanian, S.; Thickett, D. Preventing Vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic: UK definitions of Vitamin D sufficiency and recommended supplement dose are set too low. Clin. Med. 2021, 21, e48–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akbar, M.R.; Wibowo, A.; Pranata, R.; Setiabudiawan, B. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (Vitamin D) level is associated with susceptibility to COVID-19, severity, and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 660420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Limia-Perez, L.; Gomez-Huelgas, R. Calcifediol treatment and hospital mortality due to COVID-19: A cohort study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rhodes, J.M.; Subramanian, S.; Laird, E.; Griffin, G.; Kenny, R.A. Perspective: Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 severity—plausibly linked by latitude, ethnicity, impacts on cytokines, ACE2 and thrombosis. J. Intern. Med. 2021, 289, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bilezikian, J.P.; Bikle, D.; Hewison, M.; Lazaretti-Castro, M.; Formenti, A.M.; Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; Nair, N.; Babalyan, V.; Hutchings, N. Mechanisms in endocrinology: Vitamin D and COVID-19. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 183, R133–R147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Vimaleswaran, K.S.; Forouhi, N.G.; Khunti, K. Vitamin D and covid-19. BMJ 2021, 372, n544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mercola, J.; Grant, W.B. Evidence regarding Vitamin D and risk of COVID-19 and its severity. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Winkler, E.S.; Bailey, A.L.; Kafai, N.M.; Nair, S.; McCune, B.T.; Yu, J. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human ACE2-transgenic mice causes severe lung inflammation and impaired function. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yinda, C.K.; Port, J.R. K18-hACE2 mice develop respiratory disease resembling severe COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chu, H.; Chan, J.F.; Yuen, T.T.; Shuai, H.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Y.; Hu, B.; Yip, C.C.; Tsang, J.O.; Huang, X.; et al. Comparative tropism, replication kinetics, and cell damage profiling of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with implications for clinical manifestations, transmissibility, and laboratory studies of COVID-19: An observational study. Lancet Microbe 2020, 1, e14–e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhu, N.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z.; Liang, C.; Wang, W.; Ye, F.; Huang, B.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Zhou, W.; et al. Morphogenesis and cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human airway epithelial cells. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pizzorno, A.; Padey, B.; Julien, T.; Trouillet-Assant, S.; Traversier, A.; Errazuriz-Cerda, E.; Fouret, J.; Dubois, J.; Gaymard, A.; Lescure, F.X.; et al. Characterization and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal and bronchial human airway epithelia. Cell Rep. Med. 2020, 1, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mulay, A.; Konda, B.; Garcia, G.; Yao, C.; Beil, S.; Sen, C.; Purkayastha, A.; Kolls, J.K.; Pociask, D.A.; Pessina, P.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of primary human lung epithelium for COVID-19 modeling and drug discovery. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pohlmann, S. A multibasic cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for infection of human lung cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ren, Y.; Shu, T.; Wu, D.; Mu, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, M.; Han, Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhou, W.; Qiu, Y.; et al. The ORF3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces apoptosis in cells. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Orzalli, M.H.; Kagan, J.C. Apoptosis and necroptosis as host defense strategies to prevent viral infection. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Abassi, Z.; Knaney, Y.; Karram, T.; Heyman, S.N. The lung macrophage in SARS-CoV-2 infection: A friend or a foe? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huang, J.; Hume, A.J.; Abo, K.M.; Werder, R.B.; Villacorta-Martin, C.; Alysandratos, K.-D.; Beermann, M.L.; Simone-Roach, C.; Lindstrom-Vautrin, J.; Olejnik, J. SARS-CoV-2 infection of pluripotent stem cell-derived human lung alveolar type 2 cells elicits a rapid epithelial-intrinsic inflammatory response. Cell Stem Cell 2020, 27, 962–973.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Olajuyin, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Ji, H.L. Alveolar type 2 progenitor cells for lung injury repair. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Monteil, V.; Kwon, H.; Prado, P.; Hagelkruys, A.; Wimmer, R.A.; Stahl, M.; Leopoldi, A.; Garreta, E.; Hurtado Del Pozo, C.; Prosper, F.; et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell 2020, 181, 905–913.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, D.; Chu, H.; Hou, Y.; Chai, Y.; Shuai, H.; Lee, A.C.-Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, B.; Huang, X. Attenuated interferon and proinflammatory response in SARS-CoV-2–infected human dendritic cells is associated with viral antagonism of STAT1 phosphorylation. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 222, 734–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Boumaza, A.; Gay, L.; Mezouar, S.; Diallo, A.B.; Michel, M.; Desnues, B.; Raoult, D.; La Scola, B.; Halfon, P.; Vitte, J. Monocytes and macrophages, targets of SARS-CoV-2: The clue for Covid-19 immunoparalysis. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, C.; Xie, J.; Zhao, L.; Fei, X.; Zhang, H.; Tan, Y.; Nie, X.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Ren, Y.; et al. Alveolar macrophage dysfunction and cytokine storm in the pathogenesis of two severe COVID-19 patients. EBioMedicine 2020, 57, 102833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Evren, E.; Ringqvist, E.; Willinger, T. Origin and ontogeny of lung macrophages: From mice to humans. Immunology 2020, 160, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Liao, M.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wen, Y.; Xu, G.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, L.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 842–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gheblawi, M.; Wang, K.; Viveiros, A.; Nguyen, Q.; Zhong, J.-C.; Turner, A.J.; Raizada, M.K.; Grant, M.B.; Oudit, G.Y. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 1456–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Groß, S.; Jahn, C.; Cushman, S.; Bär, C.; Thum, T. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2-dependent implications on the cardiovascular system: From basic science to clinical implications. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 144, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Chen, J.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, H. Vitamin D alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via regulation of the renin-angiotensin system. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7432–7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Li, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ping, F.; Liang, M.; Xue, Y.; Xi, C.; Zhou, M.; Jiang, W. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced rat acute lung injury via suppressing the ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling pathways. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Kong, J.; Zhu, X.; Shi, Y.; Liu, T.; Chen, Y.; Bhan, I.; Zhao, Q.; Thadhani, R.; Li, Y.C. VDR attenuates acute lung injury by blocking Ang-2-Tie-2 pathway and renin-angiotensin system. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 2116–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Imai, Y.; Kuba, K.; Rao, S.; Huan, Y.; Guo, F.; Guan, B.; Yang, P.; Sarao, R.; Wada, T.; Leong-Poi, H.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 2005, 436, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Malek Mahdavi, A. A brief review of interplay between vitamin D and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: Implications for a potential treatment for COVID-19. Rev. Med Virol. 2020, 30, e2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Geitani, R.; Moubareck, C.A.; Xu, Z.; Karam Sarkis, D.; Touqui, L. Expression and roles of antimicrobial peptides in innate defense of airway mucosa: Potential implication in cystic fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rivas-Santiago, B.; Hernandez-Pando, R.; Carranza, C.; Juarez, E.; Contreras, J.L.; Aguilar-Leon, D.; Torres, M.; Sada, E. Expression of cathelicidin LL-37 during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in human alveolar macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Brockman-Schneider, R.A.; Pickles, R.J.; Gern, J.E. Effects of Vitamin D on airway epithelial cell morphology and rhinovirus replication. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Hansdottir, S.; Monick, M.M.; Hinde, S.L.; Lovan, N.; Look, D.C.; Hunninghake, G.W. Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: Potential effects on host defense. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 7090–7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Telcian, A.G.; Zdrenghea, M.T.; Edwards, M.R.; Laza-Stanca, V.; Mallia, P.; Johnston, S.L.; Stanciu, L.A. Vitamin D increases the antiviral activity of bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2017, 137, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bharat, K.; Lokhande, T.; Banerjee, K.V.; Swamy, M. An in Silico Scientific Basis for LL-37 as a Therapeutic and Vitamin D as Preventive for Covid-19. ChemRxiv 2020, preprint. [Google Scholar]
  99. Roth, A.; Luetke, S.; Meinberger, D.; Hermes, G.; Sengle, G.; Koch, M.; Streichert, T.; Klatt, A.R. LL-37 fights SARS-CoV-2: The Vitamin D-inducible peptide LL-37 inhibits binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to its cellular receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 In Vitro. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Dong, M.; Luan, Z.; Yan, C.; Jiao, J. Preliminary evaluation of the safety and efficacy of oral human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in the treatment of patients of COVID-19, a small-scale, single-arm, exploratory safety study. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Niederstrasser, J.; Herr, C.; Wolf, L.; Lehr, C.M.; Beisswenger, C.; Bals, R. Vitamin D deficiency does not result in a breach of host defense in murine models of pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 3097–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dancer, R.C.; Parekh, D.; Lax, S.; D’Souza, V.; Zheng, S.; Bassford, C.R.; Park, D.; Bartis, D.G.; Mahida, R.; Turner, A.M.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency contributes directly to the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thorax 2015, 70, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Gorman, S.; Buckley, A.G.; Ling, K.M.; Berry, L.J.; Fear, V.S.; Stick, S.M.; Larcombe, A.N.; Kicic, A.; Hart, P.H. Vitamin D supplementation of initially Vitamin D-deficient mice diminishes lung inflammation with limited effects on pulmonary epithelial integrity. Physiol. Rep. 2017, 5, e13371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shi, Y.Y.; Liu, T.J.; Fu, J.H.; Xu, W.; Wu, L.L.; Hou, A.N.; Xue, X.D. Vitamin D/VDR signaling attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by maintaining the integrity of the pulmonary epithelial barrier. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Zhang, M.; Dong, M.; Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Luo, Y.; Li, Z.; Jin, F. 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 ameliorates seawater aspiration-induced acute lung injury via NF-κB and RhoA/Rho kinase pathways. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Zheng, S.; Yang, J.; Hu, X.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Dancer, R.C.A.; Parekh, D.; Gao-Smith, F.; Thickett, D.R.; Jin, S. Vitamin D attenuates lung injury via stimulating epithelial repair, reducing epithelial cell apoptosis and inhibits TGF-beta induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 113955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chen, H.; Lu, R.; Zhang, Y.G.; Sun, J. Vitamin D receptor deletion leads to the destruction of tight and adherens junctions in lungs. Tissue Barriers 2018, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Dionne, S.; Duchatelier, C.F.; Seidman, E.G. The influence of Vitamin D on M1 and M2 macrophages in patients with Crohn’s disease. Innate Immun. 2017, 23, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Rao Muvva, J.; Parasa, V.R.; Lerm, M.; Svensson, M.; Brighenti, S. Polarization of human monocyte-derived cells with Vitamin D promotes control of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Liang, S.; Cai, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, R. 1, 25-Dihydroxy-Vitamin D3 induces macrophage polarization to M2 by upregulating T-cell Ig-mucin-3 expression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 3707–3713. [Google Scholar]
  111. Chen, L.; Eapen, M.S.; Zosky, G.R. Vitamin D both facilitates and attenuates the cellular response to lipopolysaccharide. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Dauletbaev, N.; Herscovitch, K.; Das, M.; Chen, H.; Bernier, J.; Matouk, E.; Bérubé, J.; Rousseau, S.; Lands, L. Down-regulation of IL-8 by high-dose vitamin D is specific to hyperinflammatory macrophages and involves mechanisms beyond up-regulation of DUSP1. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 4757–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Tulk, S.E.; Liao, K.C.; Muruve, D.A.; Li, Y.; Beck, P.L.; MacDonald, J.A. Vitamin D3 metabolites enhance the NLRP3-dependent secretion of IL-1β from human THP-1 monocytic cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2015, 116, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ryynänen, J.; Carlberg, C. Primary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 response of the interleukin 8 gene cluster in human monocyte- and macrophage-like cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Bscheider, M.; Butcher, E.C. Vitamin D immunoregulation through dendritic cells. Immunology 2016, 148, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vanherwegen, A.S.; Eelen, G.; Ferreira, G.B.; Ghesquiere, B.; Cook, D.P.; Nikolic, T.; Roep, B.; Carmeliet, P.; Telang, S.; Mathieu, C.; et al. Vitamin D controls the capacity of human dendritic cells to induce functional regulatory T cells by regulation of glucose metabolism. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 187, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Švajger, U.; Rozman, P.J. Synergistic effects of interferon-γ and vitamin D3 signaling in induction of ILT-3highPDL-1high tolerogenic dendritic cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhou, Z.; Ren, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, J.; Xiao, Y.; Jia, Z.; Guo, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Jiang, S.; et al. Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 883–890.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Pandolfi, L.; Fossali, T.; Frangipane, V.; Bozzini, S.; Morosini, M.; D’Amato, M.; Lettieri, S.; Urtis, M.; Di Toro, A.; Saracino, L.; et al. Broncho-alveolar inflammation in COVID-19 patients: A correlation with clinical outcome. BMC Pulm. Med. 2020, 20, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, C.; Kang, K.; Gao, Y.; Ye, M.; Lan, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, M.; Yu, K. Cytokine levels in the body fluids of a patient with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A case report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 499–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Carty, M.; Guy, C.; Bowie, A.G. Detection of viral infections by innate immunity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 183, 114316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hariharan, A.; Hakeem, A.R. The role and therapeutic potential of NF-kappa-B pathway in severe COVID-19 patients. Inflammopharmacology 2021, 29, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tsuchiya, K. Inflammasome-associated cell death: Pyroptosis, apoptosis, and physiological implications. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 64, 252–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Broz, P.; Pelegrín, P. The gasdermins, a protein family executing cell death and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Mulvihill, E.; Sborgi, L.; Mari, S.A.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Hiller, S. Mechanism of membrane pore formation by human gasdermin-D. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e98321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Rodrigues, T.S.; de Sa, K.S.G.; Ishimoto, A.Y.; Becerra, A.; Oliveira, S.; Almeida, L.; Goncalves, A.V.; Perucello, D.B.; Andrade, W.A.; Castro, R.; et al. Inflammasomes are activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with COVID-19 severity in patients. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20201707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ferreira, A.C.; Soares, V.C.; de Azevedo-Quintanilha, I.G.; Dias, S.; Fintelman-Rodrigues, N.; Sacramento, C.Q.; Mattos, M.; de Freitas, C.S.; Temerozo, J.R.; Teixeira, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 engages inflammasome and pyroptosis in human primary monocytes. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Toldo, S.; Bussani, R.; Nuzzi, V.; Bonaventura, A.; Mauro, A.G.; Cannata, A.; Pillappa, R.; Sinagra, G.; Nana-Sinkam, P.; Sime, P.; et al. Inflammasome formation in the lungs of patients with fatal COVID-19. Inflamm. Res. Off. J. Eur. Histamine Res. Soc. 2021, 70, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lara, P.C.; Macias-Verde, D.; Burgos-Burgos, J. Age-induced NLRP3 inflammasome over-Activation increases lethality of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in elderly patients. Aging Dis. 2020, 11, 756–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kawasaki, T.; Kawai, T. Discrimination between self and non-self-nucleic acids by the innate immune system. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 344, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Grassin-Delyle, S.; Abrial, C.; Salvator, H.; Brollo, M.; Naline, E.; Devillier, P. The role of toll-like receptors in the production of cytokines by human lung macrophages. J. Innate Immun. 2020, 12, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sadeghi, K.; Wessner, B.; Laggner, U.; Ploder, M.; Tamandl, D.; Friedl, J.; Zügel, U.; Steinmeyer, A.; Pollak, A.; Roth, E.; et al. Vitamin D3 down-regulates monocyte TLR expression and triggers hyporesponsiveness to pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Dickie, L.J.; Church, L.D.; Coulthard, L.R.; Mathews, R.J.; Emery, P.; McDermott, M.F. Vitamin D3 down-regulates intracellular Toll-like receptor 9 expression and Toll-like receptor 9-induced IL-6 production in human monocytes. Rheumatology 2010, 49, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Sun, J.; Kong, J.; Duan, Y.; Szeto, F.L.; Liao, A.; Madara, J.L.; Li, Y.C. Increased NF-κB activity in fibroblasts lacking the vitamin D receptor. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 291, E315–E322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cohen-Lahav, M.; Shany, S.; Tobvin, D.; Chaimovitz, C.; Douvdevani, A. Vitamin D decreases NFκB activity by increasing IκBα levels. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006, 21, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Hansdottir, S.; Monick, M.M.; Lovan, N.; Powers, L.; Gerke, A.; Hunninghake, G.W. Vitamin D decreases respiratory syncytial virus induction of NF-kappaB-linked chemokines and cytokines in airway epithelium while maintaining the antiviral state. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ge, X.; Du, J.; Deb, D.K.; Li, Y.C. Vitamin D receptor inhibits nuclear factor κB activation by interacting with IκB kinase β protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 19450–19458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Chen, Y.H.; Yu, Z.; Fu, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Lv, Z.M.; Xu, D.X. Vitamin D3 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced placental inflammation through reinforcing interaction between vitamin D receptor and nuclear factor kappa B p65 subunit. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Xu, S.; Chen, Y.H.; Tan, Z.X.; Xie, D.D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, H.; Yu, D.X.; Xu, D.X. Vitamin D3 pretreatment regulates renal inflammatory responses during lipopolysaccharide-induced acute kidney injury. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Ma, D.; Zhang, R.N.; Wen, Y.; Yin, W.N.; Bai, D.; Zheng, G.Y.; Li, J.S.; Zheng, B.; Wen, J.K. 1, 25(OH)(2)D(3)-induced interaction of vitamin D receptor with p50 subunit of NF-κB suppresses the interaction between KLF5 and p50, contributing to inhibition of LPS-induced macrophage proliferation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 482, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, H.; Zhong, X.; Li, W.; Wang, Q. Effects of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on experimental periodontitis and AhR/NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in a mouse model. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2019, 27, e20180713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Jiang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Yi, B.; Huang, L.; Hu, Z.; Li, A.; Du, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W. Vitamin D/VDR attenuate cisplatin-induced AKI by down-regulating NLRP3/Caspase-1/GSDMD pyroptosis pathway. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 206, 105789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Rao, Z.; Chen, X.; Wu, J.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Fang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.; et al. Vitamin D receptor inhibits NLRP3 activation by impeding its BRCC3-mediated deubiquitination. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Huang, H.; Hong, J.Y.; Wu, Y.J.; Wang, E.Y.; Liu, Z.Q.; Cheng, B.H.; Mei, L.; Liu, Z.G.; Yang, P.C.; Zheng, P.Y. Vitamin D receptor interacts with NLRP3 to restrict the allergic response. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 194, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Kelley, N.; Jeltema, D.; Duan, Y.; He, Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: An overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Swanson, K.V.; Deng, M.; Ting, J.P. The NLRP3 inflammasome: Molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhao, C.; Zhao, W. NLRP3 Inflammasome—A key player in antiviral responses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Bousquet, J.; Cristol, J.P.; Czarlewski, W.; Anto, J.M.; Martineau, A.; Haahtela, T.; Fonseca, S.C.; Iaccarino, G.; Blain, H.; Fiocchi, A.; et al. Nrf2-interacting nutrients and COVID-19: Time for research to develop adaptation strategies. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2020, 10, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, L.; Yang, R.; Qiao, W.; Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Mao, L.; Goltzman, D.; Miao, D. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D exerts an antiaging role by activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling and inactivation of p16/p53-senescence signaling. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Dai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, D.; Xu, J. Calcitriol inhibits ROS-NLRP3-IL-1β signaling axis via activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling in hyperosmotic stress stimulated human corneal epithelial cells. Redox Biol. 2019, 21, 101093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Song, E.; Zhang, C.; Israelow, B.; Lu-Culligan, A.; Prado, A.V.; Skriabine, S.; Lu, P.; Weizman, O.E.; Liu, F.; Dai, Y.; et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Barnes, B.J.; Adrover, J.M.; Baxter-Stoltzfus, A.; Borczuk, A.; Cools-Lartigue, J.; Crawford, J.M.; Dassler-Plenker, J.; Guerci, P.; Huynh, C.; Knight, J.S.; et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: Neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20200652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J.; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kvietys, P.R.; Fakhoury, H.M.A.; Kadan, S.; Yaqinuddin, A.; Al-Mutairy, E.; Al-Kattan, K. COVID-19: Lung-Centric immunothrombosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, K.W.; Monteleone, M.; Boucher, D.; Sollberger, G.; Ramnath, D.; Condon, N.D.; von Pein, J.B.; Broz, P.; Sweet, M.J.; Schroder, K. Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D-dependent neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, aar6676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Sollberger, G.; Choidas, A.; Burn, G.L.; Habenberger, P.; Di Lucrezia, R.; Kordes, S.; Menninger, S.; Eickhoff, J.; Nussbaumer, P.; Klebl, B.; et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, aar6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Veras, F.P.; Pontelli, M.C.; Silva, C.M.; Toller-Kawahisa, J.E.; de Lima, M.; Nascimento, D.C.; Schneider, A.H.; Caetité, D.; Tavares, L.A.; Paiva, I.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-triggered neutrophil extracellular traps mediate COVID-19 pathology. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 217, e20201129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Nakazawa, D.; Ishizu, A. immunothrombosis in severe COVID-19. EBioMedicine 2020, 59, 102942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Manne, B.K.; Denorme, F.; Middleton, E.A.; Portier, I.; Rowley, J.W.; Stubben, C.; Petrey, A.C.; Tolley, N.D.; Guo, L.; Cody, M.; et al. Platelet gene expression and function in patients with COVID-19. Blood 2020, 136, 1317–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zuo, Y.; Yalavarthi, S.; Shi, H.; Gockman, K.; Zuo, M.; Madison, J.A.; Blair, C.; Weber, A.; Barnes, B.J.; Egeblad, M.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Mohammad, S.; Mishra, A.; Ashraf, M.Z. Emerging role of Vitamin D and its associated molecules in pathways related to pathogenesis of thrombosis. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Agraz-Cibrian, J.M.; Giraldo, D.M.; Urcuqui-Inchima, S. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces formation of neutrophil extracellular trap-like structures and modulates the transcription of genes whose products are neutrophil extracellular trap-associated proteins: A pilot study. Steroids 2019, 141, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chen, C.; Weng, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Lu, C.; Jin, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, A.; Sun, Y. Low-Dose Vitamin D Protects Hyperoxia-Induced Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia by Inhibiting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front. pediatrics 2020, 8, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Park, Y.C.; Kim, J.; Seo, M.S.; Hong, S.W.; Cho, E.S.; Kim, J.-K. Inverse relationship between vitamin D levels and platelet indices in Korean adults. Hematology 2017, 22, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Sultan, M.; Twito, O.; Tohami, T.; Ramati, E.; Neumark, E.; Rashid, G. Vitamin D diminishes the high platelet aggregation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Platelets 2019, 30, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Toderici, M.; de la Morena-Barrio, M.E.; Padilla, J.; Miñano, A.; Antón, A.I.; Iniesta, J.A.; Herranz, M.T.; Fernández, N.; Vicente, V.; Corral, J. Identification of regulatory mutations in SERPINC1 affecting vitamin D response elements associated with antithrombin deficiency. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152159. [Google Scholar]
  168. Koivisto, O.; Hanel, A.; Carlberg, C. Key Vitamin D target genes with functions in the immune system. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Saliba, W.; Awad, K.; Ron, G.; Elias, M. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation on thrombin generation assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. Clin. Appl. Thromb./Hemost. Off. J. Int. Acad. Clin. Appl. Thromb./Hemost. 2016, 22, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Blondon, M.; Biver, E.; Braillard, O.; Righini, M.; Fontana, P.; Casini, A. Thrombin generation and fibrin clot structure after vitamin D supplementation. Endocr. Connect. 2019, 8, 1447–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Leentjens, J.; van Haaps, T.F.; Wessels, P.F.; Schutgens, R.E.G.; Middeldorp, S. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and antithrombotic agents-lessons after 1 year. Lancet Haematol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Keskin, Ü.; Basat, S. The effect of vitamin D levels on gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with warfarin therapy. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis Int. J. Haemost. Thromb. 2019, 30, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 13 02216 g001 550
Figure 1. Impact of vitamin D/VDR signaling at various junctures of lung-centric inflammation and immunothrombosis. Experimentally verified inhibitory pathways are indicated with red dashed arrows while an ambiguous pathway is indicated with a blue dashed arrow. As addressed in the text, VDR signaling inhibits the response of alveolar macrophages to viral infection at the level of (1) NFκB signaling and (2) inflammasome activation, thereby preventing neutrophil recruitment and activation (3). The impact of VDR signaling on NET generation (4) may be context-dependent; VDR can promote or inhibit NETs. VDR signaling inhibits thrombosis (5) by interfering with platelet function and fibrin generation. VDR: Vitamin D Receptor; NETs: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.
Figure 1. Impact of vitamin D/VDR signaling at various junctures of lung-centric inflammation and immunothrombosis. Experimentally verified inhibitory pathways are indicated with red dashed arrows while an ambiguous pathway is indicated with a blue dashed arrow. As addressed in the text, VDR signaling inhibits the response of alveolar macrophages to viral infection at the level of (1) NFκB signaling and (2) inflammasome activation, thereby preventing neutrophil recruitment and activation (3). The impact of VDR signaling on NET generation (4) may be context-dependent; VDR can promote or inhibit NETs. VDR signaling inhibits thrombosis (5) by interfering with platelet function and fibrin generation. VDR: Vitamin D Receptor; NETs: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.
Nutrients 13 02216 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fakhoury, H.M.A.; Kvietys, P.R.; Shakir, I.; Shams, H.; Grant, W.B.; Alkattan, K. Lung-Centric Inflammation of COVID-19: Potential Modulation by Vitamin D. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072216

AMA Style

Fakhoury HMA, Kvietys PR, Shakir I, Shams H, Grant WB, Alkattan K. Lung-Centric Inflammation of COVID-19: Potential Modulation by Vitamin D. Nutrients. 2021; 13(7):2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fakhoury, Hana. M. A., Peter R. Kvietys, Ismail Shakir, Hashim Shams, William B. Grant, and Khaled Alkattan. 2021. "Lung-Centric Inflammation of COVID-19: Potential Modulation by Vitamin D" Nutrients 13, no. 7: 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072216

APA Style

Fakhoury, H. M. A., Kvietys, P. R., Shakir, I., Shams, H., Grant, W. B., & Alkattan, K. (2021). Lung-Centric Inflammation of COVID-19: Potential Modulation by Vitamin D. Nutrients, 13(7), 2216. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072216

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop