Next Article in Journal
A Novel Sprouted Oat Fermented Beverage: Evaluation of Safety and Health Benefits for Celiac Individuals
Next Article in Special Issue
Chronic Dialysis Patients Are Depleted of Creatine: Review and Rationale for Intradialytic Creatine Supplementation
Previous Article in Journal
Reflection of Dietary Iodine in the 24 h Urinary Iodine Concentration, Serum Iodine and Thyroglobulin as Biomarkers of Iodine Status: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Creatine Monohydrate Supplementation Increases White Adipose Tissue Mitochondrial Markers in Male and Female Rats in a Depot Specific Manner
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Convergent Functional Genomics Analysis to Identify Biological Regulators Mediating Effects of Creatine Supplementation

1
Research Division, Dynamical Business & Science Society—DBSS International SAS, Bogotá 110861, Colombia
2
Research Group in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 110311, Colombia
3
Research Group in Physical Activity, Sports and Health Sciences (GICAFS), Universidad de Córdoba, Montería 230002, Colombia
4
kDNA Genomics®, Joxe Mari Korta Research Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
5
Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Science, Messiah University, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, USA
6
Professional Program in Sport Training, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina, Bogotá 111221, Colombia
7
Physiology of Work and Exercise Response (POWER) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
8
Exercise and Performance Nutrition Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, Lindenwood University, Saint Charles, MO 63301, USA
9
School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
10
Edward via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
11
Exercise & Sport Nutrition Laboratory, Human Clinical Research Facility, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(8), 2521; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082521
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creatine Supplementation for Health and Clinical Diseases)

Abstract

:
Creatine (Cr) and phosphocreatine (PCr) are physiologically essential molecules for life, given they serve as rapid and localized support of energy- and mechanical-dependent processes. This evolutionary advantage is based on the action of creatine kinase (CK) isozymes that connect places of ATP synthesis with sites of ATP consumption (the CK/PCr system). Supplementation with creatine monohydrate (CrM) can enhance this system, resulting in well-known ergogenic effects and potential health or therapeutic benefits. In spite of our vast knowledge about these molecules, no integrative analysis of molecular mechanisms under a systems biology approach has been performed to date; thus, we aimed to perform for the first time a convergent functional genomics analysis to identify biological regulators mediating the effects of Cr supplementation in health and disease. A total of 35 differentially expressed genes were analyzed. We identified top-ranked pathways and biological processes mediating the effects of Cr supplementation. The impact of CrM on miRNAs merits more research. We also cautiously suggest two dose–response functional pathways (kinase- and ubiquitin-driven) for the regulation of the Cr uptake. Our functional enrichment analysis, the knowledge-based pathway reconstruction, and the identification of hub nodes provide meaningful information for future studies. This work contributes to a better understanding of the well-reported benefits of Cr in sports and its potential in health and disease conditions, although further clinical research is needed to validate the proposed mechanisms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Creatine (Cr), or alpha-methylguanidinoacetic acid (PubChem CID: 586), and its phosphorylated form, phosphocreatine (PCr), are essential molecules for the optimal functioning of tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands [1]. They provide an evolutionary advantage via several creatine kinase (CK) isozymes that functionally connect places of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis with sites of ATP consumption (the CK/PCr system) [2]; therefore, Cr and PCr are physiologically essential for life through a rapid and localized support of energy- and mechanical-dependent processes (i.e., cell survival, growth, proliferation, differentiation, and migration or motility) [3,4]. For a recent and comprehensive review of the Cr metabolism, please refer to [3].
The CK/PCr system can be enhanced through supplementation with creatine monohydrate (CrM), which is the most studied, safe, and effective nutritional supplement to optimize physical performance [5,6,7,8], with potential benefits in health and disease [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. It seems that the elevation of intracellular PCr concentration causes a greater capacity for phosphagens to contribute to energy metabolism, while working to reduce the accumulation of Pi and H+ and improving Ca2+ handling as important mediators of fatigability in young and older adults [20,21,22,23]. This has previously been reported in vivo and in vitro after CrM supplementation [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Notwithstanding, a cellular environment rich in high-energy phosphates might also trigger downstream signaling pathways that are sensitive to energy changes by activating secondary messengers and protein kinases [30,31]. In this sense, several clinical trials [32,33,34,35] and research in animal models [36,37,38] have revealed that CrM administration regulates the expression of particular genes or proteins using low-throughput screening. In accordance with Kontou et al. [39], individual experiments can only identify targeted regulators (based on prior knowledge), with limited comprehension of how the biological system works. As a result, data integration from multiple experimental studies and public repositories is necessary to understand the function of biological entities (e.g., genes, proteins) and their expression patterns under certain conditions. Additionally, ‘omics’ technologies in conjunction with the advance of bioinformatics tools allow for data integration and the extraction of biologically relevant information, such as identifying biomarkers and regulatory components within a network [40]. Consequently, the use of a systems biology approach guarantees identification, at a systems scale, of the molecular signatures of cellular processes, molecular interactions, and relevant metabolic pathways present in the complex physiological responses or diseases with multi-factorial underpinnings [41,42]. Among the different approaches, convergent functional genomics (CFG) is an interesting methodological approach for the integrative analysis of molecular mechanisms by combining multiple lines of genomic evidence from different species [43]. CFG takes advantage of the conserved nature of metabolic circuits between several species (e.g., rodents and humans) [44] to provide relevant information about the structural and functional changes within the cell when there is not enough available data or the experiments are difficult, if not impossible, to conduct in humans (e.g., those in brain tissue) [45]. While human data increase the clinical relevance (specificity), animal model data increase the ability to identify the signal (sensitivity). Combined together, we enhance our ability to distinguish signals from noise, even with limited cohorts and datasets [46]; therefore, CFG is useful for identifying novel candidate genes and pathways for specific phenotypes [47,48,49,50] and compound-mediated gene regulation [51,52]. It is necessary to point out the complementary features of low- and high-throughput analysis, given that subsequent validation of the identified metabolic hubs requires the high sensitivity, lower noise, and reproducibility of low-throughput techniques (e.g., post-transcriptional regulation assessment, targeted-molecules expression, protein–protein interactions) [53].
In the context of novel models of physiological regulation, the concept of allostasis was developed. This highlights the importance of the anticipation of needs (such as the timely provision of energy and adequate environmental conditions) for the functional and structural stability of cells through adaptive changes [54]. Although efforts have been made to integrate the different points of metabolic regulation to explain the positive effects of CrM supplementation on physical performance [55,56,57] and health or therapeutic benefits [58,59,60], no systems biology analysis has been performed to date. Readers are encouraged to refer to the comprehensive reviews in the Special Issue on “Creatine Supplementation for Health and Clinical Diseases” to learn more about the effects of CrM supplementation [9]. The use of a systems biology approach might contribute to better comprehension of the molecular, cellular, tissue, and systemic effects of CrM and its applications to health and disease; thus, the aim of this study was to perform for the first time a CFG analysis to identify relevant pathways and biological processes mediating the effects of Cr supplementation in health and disease. This secondary analysis of the available data on differentially expressed genes after CrM administration in humans and mice will provide meaningful information for future studies.

2. Methods

2.1. Functional Genomic Analysis

2.1.1. Search and Sources of Evidence

In order to collect the gene expression data, two public repositories (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accessed on 14 January 2021)) and the ArrayExpress Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) (accessed on 14 January 2021) were searched following the PRISMA statement guidelines [61] and international recommendations [62]. The following Boolean algorithm was used in the GEO repository: (“creatine”[MeSH Terms] OR creatine monohydrate[All Fields]) AND supplementation[All Fields], while the free term “creatine” was used in the ArrayExpress Archive. Repositories were accessed on 14 January 2021, although an updated search was conducted prior to manuscript submission. We also contacted corresponding authors (e-mail communication) to obtain missing raw data when no record was found in the repositories.

2.1.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion of gene expression data for the CFG analysis was restricted to the following: (1) original experimental studies that screened for genes differing between Cr and controls; (2) raw data deposited in the NCBI GEO or the ArrayExpress Archive; (3) expression data obtained from any tissue or cell; (4) human or mouse experimental models. The search excluded data obtained from the combination of Cr with other compounds. Information was extracted from each identified record and reported in a table, including the organism, reference, GEO accession number, sample type, numbers of cases and controls, and platform.

2.1.3. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes and Convergence

The GEO2R web application [63] was used to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes in the datasets for human and mouse models (freely available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/, accessed on 18 January 2021). For the analysis with the GEO2R tool, samples from Cr treatment were taken as the experimental group, while untreated samples were taken as the control group. GEO2R provides the following summary statistics as generated by ‘limma’, which performs the top table computation to extract a table of the top-ranked genes, including the adjusted p-values and raw p-values; moderated t-statistics, B-statistics, or log-odds that the gene is differentially expressed; the log2-fold changes between pairs of experimental conditions; and moderated F-statistics (which combines the t-statistics for all the pair-wise comparisons into an overall test of significance for that gene) [64].
A CFG approach was used to identify a list of candidate genes with multiple lines of evidence from humans and mouse models. After the GEO2R analysis, the gene names were extracted from the differentially expressed genes based on the adjusted p-values using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. An online tool developed by Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics at VIB/UGent (Gent, Belgium) (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn) was used to identify convergence in the list of genes from these datasets (accessed on 29 January 2021).

2.1.4. Functional Enrichment Analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the list of genes from the convergent analysis was performed with the gene set enrichment analysis tool for mammalian gene sets from Enrichr, which is a comprehensive resource for curated gene sets that was published in 2013 [65] (http://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr, accessed on 12 May 2021). An exploratory analysis with the DAVID tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 12 May 2021) showed similar results to top terms sorted by p-value ranking using the Enrichr platform, an outcome that was somewhat expected given the use a scoring method similar to both the hypergeometric test and Fisher’s exact test; however, the advantages of Enrichr over other tools are its comprehensiveness, ease of use, interactive visualization of the results, and the calculation of a combined score, which has been demonstrated to recover more of the ‘correct’ terms compared with the other methods (e.g., the over-representation analysis, the Jaccard distance, or the number of overlapping genes) [66]. Enrichr also retrieves the computational predictions of interactions between the list of genes from the convergent analysis and small non-coding microRNAs (known as miRNAs) using the miRTarBase library [67], which contains experimentally validated miRNA–mRNA interactions. We reported the categories ranked as statistically significant based on adjusted p-values using an inherent z-score permutation background correction on Fisher’s exact test. The bioinformatics tools were accessed from 20 February to 12 May 2021.

2.1.5. Upstream Regulatory Pathway Analysis

We utilized the differentially expressed genes from the CFG analysis to infer the upstream regulatory networks using the computational pipeline of the eXpression2Kinases (X2K) Web (freely available at https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/X2K/, accessed on 12 May 2021) [68]. X2K Web is an enhanced algorithm that performs an enrichment analysis to prioritize transcription factors that most likely regulate the observed changes in mRNA expression (ChEA and PWM), which was previously validated by Chen et al. [42]. It then utilizes known protein–protein interactions (PPIs) to connect the identified transcription factors to form a subnetwork. Finally, kinase enrichment analysis (KEA) is performed to prioritize protein kinases known to phosphorylate substrates within the subnetwork of transcription factors and the intermediate proteins that connect them. Top kinases and regulatory proteins (ranked by hypergeometric p-values, which indicate unusual differential expression in the database) were contrasted to individual low-throughput experimental reports available in the literature.

3. Findings

3.1. Selection of Gene Expression Datasets

After retrieving the records using the Boolean algorithm, we obtained 33 datasets from the GEO database, 20 from the ArrayExpress Archive, and one from the hand searching process in Google Scholar. The expression data for one study that assessed changes in muscle transcriptome after Cr supplementation during knee immobilization in healthy young men [69] was not published within a public repository (unsuccessful e-mail communication). After the assessment for inclusion criteria, only four records were suitable for eligibility, although one study was excluded from the analysis because a treatment combination with Cr, tacrine, and moclobemide was carried out. The overall procedure for data extraction is shown in the PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1).
We downloaded the gene expression datasets GSE7877 [70] (human), GSE5140 [71] and GSE42356 [72] (mouse) from the GEO. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the studies and datasets that were included in our CFG analysis.

3.2. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

After the analysis with the GEO2R tool, the differentially expressed genes were selected using the adjusted p < 0.05 as the cut-off. Subsequently, these lists of genes were filtered for duplicates and empty gene names to retrieve 112 genes from GSE5140 (Table S1) and 11 genes from GSE42356 (Table S2). The available expression profile analyzed by Safdar et al. [70] with 34 genes from GSE7877 was used for subsequent analysis (Table S3).

3.3. Analysis of Convergence between Datasets

The results of the convergent analysis are shown in Figure 2. The human and mice datasets converged in polyglutamine-binding protein 1 (PQBP1). This gene encodes a scaffold protein involved in the regulation of transcription, alternative mRNA splicing (via spliceosome), innate immunity, and neuron projection development (UniProtKB-O60828). The list of genes used for the subsequent enrichment analysis encompassed two genes from the converged results and 33 differentially expressed genes from the GSE7877 dataset (Homo sapiens).

3.4. Functional Enrichment Analysis

Functional annotation revealed that the 35 selected genes are involved in the regulation of apoptosis, proliferation–differentiation, and replication–transcription processes. Table 2 shows the functional annotation GO terms (biological process, molecular function, and cellular component) and the prediction analysis of interactions between the input list and miRNAs.

3.5. Upstream Regulatory Pathway Analysis

The upstream pathway analysis resulted in the proto-oncogene c-Fos (FOS), specificity protein 1 (SP1), nuclear transcription factor Y subunit alpha (NFYA), the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and suppressor of zeste 12 (SUZ12) complex, zinc finger MIZ-type containing 1 (ZMIZ1), Myc proto-oncogene protein (MYC), protein max (MAX, also known as Myc-associated factor X), and erythroid transcription factor (GATA1) as the top transcription factors that most likely regulate the observed changes in gene expression after Cr administration. Our kinase enrichment analysis showed that mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 (MAPK14, also known as p38), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), casein kinase II subunit alpha (CSNK2A1, also known as CK2A1), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), protein kinase B (Akt/PKB), and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) are the top signaling pathways that activate kinases known to phosphorylate substrates within our subnetwork of transcription factors and intermediate proteins (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

From a systems biology perspective, the analysis of interactions and characteristics of the system’s components (e.g., molecular system bioenergetics, genome-wide gene-expression profiling, and pathway identification) facilitates the deciphering of the action mechanisms of various system-level properties and biological functions [73]. The CFG approach has been described as a Bayesian way of cross-validating biological findings while reducing uncertainty. In addition, the bioinformatics enrichment of groups of converged genes leads to insights into pathways and mechanisms that may be involved in different phenotypes [74]. This methodology has been successfully utilized, even with limited size cohorts and datasets, in the study of gene associations with chronic fatigue syndrome [50]; biomarker identification for suicidality [48], attention-deficit–hyperactivity disorder [49], stress-related psychiatric disorders [75], and mood disorders [52]; and the discovery of novel candidate genes and signaling pathways for epileptogenesis [47] and retinol or retinoic acid exposure [51]. In order to understand the underlying biological processes and mechanisms mediating the effects of Cr administration, we performed a CFG analysis on differentially expressed genes in humans and mice for the first time. Under the allostasis paradigm (that is, adaptation to changes through mechanisms that alter the set point of metabolic or physiological variables) [76], the CK/PCr system should be seen as an essential mechanism for life (cell survival, growth, proliferation, differentiation, and migration or motility). We previously suggested that the CK/PCr system works as a dynamic biosensor of chemomechanical energy transduction [3] with ‘concurrent reactions with exchange motifs’ [77] that might account for the wide range of diseases after alterations in intracellular Cr concentrations. In agreement with the established regulation of cellular allostasis through a complex balance of subcellular energy production and cellular mechanics [78], our CFG and enrichment analysis showed several biological regulators related to energy metabolism (extra- and intramitochondrial pathways) and cytoskeletal machinery (motor and cytolinker proteins). This makes the CK/PCr system a fractal model that can be used to exemplify the cytoskeleton-mediated, energy-driven, mechanoadaptative processes of the cells. This is the first time an integrative approach has been implemented to elucidate how the enhanced Cr metabolism (via CrM administration) is directly involved in the cellular adaptations through a complex balance of subcellular energy production and cellular mechanics.

4.1. Biological Pathways Mediating Effects

The functional annotation of the 35 selected differentially expressed genes after CrM administration showed that these are involved in anti-apoptotic processes, cell differentiation, and positive regulation of protein phosphorylation cascades. It must be noted that these genes perform functions throughout the cell (nuclear origin of replication recognition complex (nucleus), U5 snRNP (transcription complex), and endosome lumen (vesicles)) through either receptor activation and secondary messengers (G-protein-coupled receptor binding, Rac GTPase binding, and polyubiquitin modification-dependent protein binding) or direct regulation of de novo biosynthesis (miRNA binding and pre-mRNA binding) (Table 2). After transcription factor enrichment analysis, the proteins that most likely regulate the observed changes in gene expression after Cr administration are involved in cell survival, apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and the cytoskeletal structure. To highlight this, among the top ranked transcription factors (Figure 3A) of our analysis we found: (i) FOS is a G0/G1 switch regulatory protein that heterodimerizes with members of the JUN family of transcription factors to form AP-1 complexes and regulate signal transduction, cell proliferation, and differentiation [79]; (ii) SP1 was the first to be cloned and characterized of the specificity protein–Krüppel-like factor (Sp/KLF) family of transcription factors, which are involved in multitude of cellular pathways and processes by regulating tissue- and developmental-stage-specific gene expression [80]; (iii) NFYA is one of the three subunits of a highly conserved and ubiquitously expressed heterotrimeric transcription factor that regulate gene expression at promoter regions [81]; (iv) EZH2 and SUZ12 are essential for the integrity of the polycomb group complexes, the expression of which rises at the G1/S phase transition [82,83]; (v) ZMIZ1 regulates the activity of various transcription factors, including the androgen receptor, Smad3/4, and p53 [84]; and (vi) MYC is implicated in cell growth [85], proliferation, differentiation [86], and cellular adhesion and migration [87,88], and may dimerize with MAX to bind DNA and exert its effects [89].
The analysis of upstream regulatory signaling pathways resulted in MAPKs, CDKs, CSNK2A1, and Akt/PKB being the most representative after Cr administration. Although no clinical research has been conducted to study the changes in CSNK2A1 or CDK expression after Cr supplementation, one would expect a possible regulatory effect given that both proteins play an essential role during cell cycle progression and differentiation [90,91]. It is interesting to note that CK and CSNK2A1 activities vary similarly during muscle cell differentiation, with CSNK2A1 being dispensable for (i) the maintenance of the myogenic identity, (ii) the expression of early myogenic markers and late muscle-specific gene expression, and (iii) the control of myoblast fusion [92]. CSNK2 has been reported to control the Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway [93], which is the principal mechanism for a wide range of growth factors and cytokines where other pathways such as MAPKs and PI3K/Akt are involved [94]. This JAK/STAT pathway activation might regulate somatic growth via binding transcriptional enhancers in the IGF1 locus [95]. In addition, CSNK2A and CDKs share a common target, the integrator of neurotransmitters called dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein-32 (DARPP-32) [96]. DARPP-32 interacts with β-adducin at the cytoskeleton to mediate rapid environmental effects on neurons [97], which might explain its upregulation after Cr treatment to promote differentiation and maturation of neurons [98]. Again, we highlight the dynamic biosensor role of the CK/PCr system in this type of chemomechanical energy transduction process. Recently, CSNK2A has been reported to be a critical element of the Th17/Treg cell balance and differentiation [99], meaning more research is needed to unravel the mechanisms that explain the effects of Cr on chromatin remodeling in immune cells. Since immunity regulation goes beyond the scope of this review, please refer to [15] for a recent comprehensive summary of the current findings and future directions in this regard.
The phosphorylation cascades of MAPKs are key components of extracellular signal transduction, with important roles in cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. The signal begins at the activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and other transmembrane receptors via guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs, such as the son of sevenless [SOS]) that lead to the active form of the small G-proteins Ras [100]. After their activation, the Ras variants interact with MAPK kinase kinases (MAPKKK, also called MAP3Ks or MEKKs, with Raf being the most representative member) to activate MAPK kinase (MAPKK, also known as MEK), then finally MAPKs through scaffold and adaptor proteins such as KSR, JIP, and OSM [101]. There are three main MAPK families with different isoforms, namely the ERKs, the JNKs, and the p38 MAPKs (p38 α/β/γ/δ) [102]. Besides the hormone regulation of RTKs (e.g., growth hormone, IGF-1), the MAPK pathway may be activated by energy-driven mechanosensing [103,104] and osmosensing [105] mechanisms. Alternatively, activation of the IGF-1 receptor may stimulate the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 pathway, which has a crucial role in protein synthesis via RPS6K and 4E-BP1 [106]. Our functional annotation analysis indicated that G-protein-coupled receptor binding (p = 0.002921) and Rac GTPase binding (a subgroup of the Ras superfamily of GTP hydrolases) (p = 0.003855) are among the top molecular functions of the differentially expressed genes that change after Cr administration. It is possible that the experimentally reported activation of MAPKs after Cr administration might be due to mechano- and osmosensing mechanisms driven by the optimization of the CK/PCr system. For instance, CrM supplementation for ten days has resulted in the mRNA overexpression of SPHK1 (osmosensing gene) and various MAPKs in healthy men [70] (Appendix A Figure A1).
Interestingly, the results of our kinase enrichment analysis and the identification of hub nodes (downstream effectors of the MAPK and IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathways) (Figure 3) are in high agreement with the available low-throughput, high-sensitivity experimental in vitro and in vivo evidence after Cr administration, such as qRT-PCR, Western blotting, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Several human and animal studies have shown that Cr brings higher growth hormone concentrations [107]; overexpression of IGF-1 [34,36,108,109]; upregulation and higher activity of Akt/PKB [70,110,111]; downregulation of myostatin and increase in GASP-1 [35]; overexpression of p38α (also called MAPK14) [69,112,113]; overexpression and higher activity of RPS6K and 4E-BP1 [37,38,114]; upregulation of myocyte enhancer factor isoforms [111,115]; overexpression of myogenic regulatory factors, such as MyoD, Myogenin, Myf5, and MRF4/Myf6/Herculin [32,33,36]; and overexpression of myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms [116]. Remarkably, our kinase enrichment analysis (Figure 3C–D) showed high agreement with the protein kinase content after CrM supplementation, as reported by Safdar et al. (Figure A1) [70]. All aforementioned experimental evidence validates the power of the computational prediction of the multi-species convergent analysis, which highlights the need to include this before performing low-throughput experimental analysis. It must be noted that many of the signaling pathways that might be activated after Cr administration (Figure 4) follow ‘concurrent reaction with exchange motifs’, which are characterized by the high level of enzymes transferring phosphorus-containing groups (EC 2.7) [77].

4.2. Creatine and miRNAs

Interesting results were obtained from Enrichr using the miRTarBase data library to analyze the miRNAs interactions. Regarding cancer, recent evidence has suggested that Cr supplementation might have a carcinogenic effect [117]; nevertheless, contrary to this hypothesis, the formation of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines is unrelated to CrM supplementation [118], and even clinical research has demonstrated a potential anti-tumor progression [119]. In fact, downregulation of the CK isozymes and low levels of PCr and Cr are associated with sarcoma and adenocarcinoma progression [120]. Moreover, Cr has been reported to enhance the anti-cancer effects of methylglyoxal in chemically induced muscle cancerous cells in vitro and in sarcoma mouse cells in vivo [121]. In our bioinformatics-assisted review of the Cr metabolism [3], we discussed the observed latency towards reliance on glycolysis at high physical work rates after Cr administration, which might explain the observed reduction in lactate accumulation (possibly via inhibition of phosphofructokinase [122] and pyruvate kinase [123]) and the potential anti-tumor progression of Cr and its derivatives [124,125,126]. In this sense, the human muscle transcriptome analysis performed by Safdar et al. [70] demonstrated that a 10-day CrM supplementation period decreased the phosphofructokinase mRNA content by 21% versus placebo. For a recent review on the role of Cr in T cell anti-tumor immunity and cancer immunotherapy, please refer to Li and Yang [127].
Our enrichment analysis revealed for the first time that Cr administration might impact certain miRNAs that control cancer progression and muscle function. We are aware that more experimental evidence is needed to the identify clinical effects, therapeutic targets, and potential biomarkers in health and disease states, especially in certain cancer phenotypes where a Cr-dependent tumor progression has been proposed based on preclinical data [128]. Table 3 briefly describes the functions of several of the top-ranked miRNAs that were computationally predicted to interact with the list of selected differentially expressed genes altered after CrM administration.
Since most of the identified miRNAs repress cancer progression, it would be appropriate to investigate the effects of CrM administration on these biological elements to evaluate at which point Cr might regulate excessive proliferation. These post-transcriptional gene regulators open a new field of research regarding the therapeutic role of CrM supplementation on health-related conditions. It needs to be noted that the osmosensing activation of MAPK via Sphk1/S1P is related to several miRNAs [142], as well as the notion that the effect of Cr on focal adhesion kinase [38,70] (Figure A1) might control muscle cell differentiation through a small set of miRNAs that are connected to the focal adhesion signaling during muscle regeneration, as was reported recently [143]. Further experimental validation is warranted in the future.

4.3. The Regulation of the Creatine Transporter

In agreement with Santacruz et al. (2015), the elucidation for creatine transporter (CRT, also known as SLC6A8) regulation merits further study given its importance to the optimal function of several human tissues [144]. It needs to be noted that Cr belongs to a set of seven putative systems biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [145], which highlights its remarkable influence on neuron survival and function. Since it is not able to increase itself to the same extent as skeletal muscle, most of the research on enhancing Cr uptake using intermediate compounds (e.g., guanidinoacetate) or derivatives (e.g., Cr ethyl ester, dodecyl Cr ester, cyclocreatine, and Cr gluconate) is focused on the brain [18] and the heart [146]. Additionally, even if intracellular Cr levels increase after CrM (or Cr analogous) supplementation, the uptake is limited by CRT downregulation due to mechanisms that are not fully understood. CrM supplementation has been shown to reduce the maximum rate of CRT activity (Vmax) with no changes in the CRT expression [144,147,148], reinforcing the hypothesis of endosomal internalization.
Based on the results of our CFG and enrichment analysis, we performed a pathway reconstruction using well-characterized and experimentally validated PPIs to identify the possible mechanistic progression for the trafficking regulation of the CRT after CrM supplementation. By combining a knowledge-based approach [149] and the results of our upstream regulatory analysis to build the pathway, we obtained two dose–response and complementary functional networks: (i) a kinase-driven mechanism as a result of the initial Cr-enriched environment (more related to the anterograde trafficking); (ii) a ubiquitin-driven mechanism that controls the excessive Cr uptake (more related to the retrograde trafficking) (Figure 4). A third possible mechanism encompasses the initial upregulation of the full-length CRT by splice variants (SLC6A8C and SLC6A8D), considering that our functional annotation revealed that the differentially expressed genes perform a function in the U5–snRNP complex, which is involved in the pre-mRNA splicing events; however, this will not be further discussed because of the lack of experimental support beyond the study by Ndika et al. [150].
The enhancement of the CK/PCr system (Cr-enriched environment) via CrM supplementation leads to the previously discussed activation of mechano- and energy-sensing pathways, such as MAPKs and IGF-1/PI3K/Akt. The CRT function may be susceptible to regulation by several kinases of these cascades [151]. Two-electrode voltage clamp recordings have revealed that mTOR [152], SGK1/3 [153], and 1-phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase (PIKfyve) [154] enhance Cr uptake. It has been suggested that this process might be mediated by the production of phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate (PI(3,5)P2), which is implicated in cytoskeleton rearrangement and cellular motility and provides spatial and temporal control for membrane trafficking [155]. For example, GLUT-4 translocation is regulated by PI(3,5)P2 concentrations, given that PIKfyve is localized in a subpopulation of highly dynamic vesicles containing this transporter and may be activated by Akt/PKB after triggering the insulin receptor pathway [156]. Additionally, SGK can phosphorylate the E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase NEDD4-like (Nedd4-2), which reduces the ability of Nedd4-2 to interact with target proteins due to the interaction of the phosphorylated form with its scaffolding protein 14-3-3 [157]. This positive feedforward mechanism has been reported in the trafficking regulation of other membrane transporters [158,159]. Interestingly, Klotho protein, a transmembrane protein determinant of aging and life span, upregulates the activity of CRT by stabilizing the carrier protein in the cell membrane [160]. Klotho serves as a powerful regulator of cellular transport across the plasma membrane [161] and is associated with the activation of ERK 1/2 and SGK1 signaling cascades [162]. In recent years, Klotho has been linked to glycolysis inhibition and anti-cancer activity [163], which deserves more research due to its effect on Cr uptake. Further research is also needed to understand the molecular processes that account for the increased CRT expression and Cr uptake after activation of the estrogen-related receptor α [164].
As part of the hormetic dose–response, it is also plausible that the continuous increase in Cr concentration activates cellular responses that negatively regulate Cr uptake via possible ubiquitin-related mechanisms. Zervou et al. (2016) showed that very high Cr concentrations (>160 nmol·mg−1 protein) might lead to impaired energy metabolism in cardiomyocytes of transgenic mice overexpressing CRT, in what the authors defined as a ‘substrate-rich but energy-poor heart’ [165]; thus, similar to other protein carriers, downregulation of the CRT might result from nutrient sensitivity, energy sufficiency, and osmotic changes [166]. Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip), a member of a novel family of proteins termed α-arrestin or arrestin-domain-containing proteins that possess homology to β-arrestins [167], has been identified as the only gene upregulated after saturating cells with Cr in vitro (Figure 2). This seems to be relevant in vivo, since higher mRNA (57.6%) and protein (28.7%) levels of Txnip were found in animal models overexpressing CRT, while Cr-deficient mouse hearts showed lower mRNA (39.71%) expression in comparison to wild-type animals [72]. Thioredoxin (Txn1) is a small and ubiquitously expressed protein, which in conjunction with thioredoxin reductase, reduces free radical oxygen species, protein disulfides, and other oxidants [168]. The Txnip binds to Txn1 to exert critical functions in terms of energy metabolism (e.g., increase redox stress, inhibit cellular glucose uptake, among others) [169]. Notably, the arrestin domains are the crucial structural elements in the metabolic functions of proteins such as Txnip [170], given that they operate as multifaceted protein trafficking adaptors that serve as signaling scaffolds of multiple protein kinases. They bind to membrane cargo proteins and interact with the adaptor protein complex 2, which is the second most abundant component of clathrin-coated vesicles, in order to promote endocytic turnover of their cargos [171]. As the archetypal β-arrestin, Tnxip has two major structural domains: the NH2 domain for protein–protein interaction, with SH3-binding proteins and MAP3Ks [172]; and the COOH domain, with proline-rich motifs that not only bind to both adaptin and clathrin heavy chains but also interact and recruit WW-domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as Nedd4-2, to ubiquitinate proteins and promote internalization to endosomes [173]. In addition, α-arrestins are likely to utilize other mechanisms to mark cargo for internalization by clathrin-independent endocytosis [174]. It must be noted that JNK1, a top-ranked protein kinase from our enrichment analysis, may phosphorylate and activate Nedd4-2 [175,176]. Interestingly, upstream activators of JNK1 such as JAK2 [177], JAK3 [178], and PKC [179] have been reported to be negative regulators of the CRT; therefore, endosomal trafficking of CRT might be highly regulated by Cr concentration and energy sufficiency. Likewise, regulation of GLUT proteins by Txnip depends on glucose and energy-sensing pathways, taking into account that if the AMP/ATP ratio increases, AMPK becomes activated and phosphorylates Txnip to induce its degradation. This results in the repression of GLUT protein endocytosis and promotes glucose uptake to relieve energy stress [180]. Regarding Cr uptake, contradictory findings have been found regarding the regulation of CRT by AMPK [181,182], which deserves more research; the biologically conserved response to the mechanical stress induced by altered osmolarity [166] might also contribute to the control of Cr uptake (as a cellular hyperhydrating agent). Besides the kinase activity and the possible ubiquitination of CRT via Txnip/Nedd4-2, the JNK is considered the main mechanism for osmosensing signal transduction [183]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that SPAK and OSR1 are negative regulators of the CRT [184]. These kinases are part of the osmosensing WNK-SPAK/OSR1 pathway, considered the master regulator of cation-chloride cotransporters [185], such as the CRT. This osmosensing regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis is preserved among several species [186,187,188,189].
It is worth mentioning the successful strategies carried out in recent years to rescue misfolded and endoplasmic-reticulum-trapped CRT variants with the use of pharmacochaperones such as the FDA-approved 4-phenylbutyrate [190]. Several mutations of the CRT may result in transporter malfunction due to misfolding followed by impaired expression or reduced trafficking to the plasmalemma surface. Conformational changes of the CRT might trigger quality control mechanisms involving N-glycosylation (e.g., unfolded protein response) [191]. For a recent comprehensive review on this topic and novel therapeutic strategies related to Cr deficiency syndrome, please refer to [192].

5. Limitations, Strengths, and Future Directions

This study should be interpreted in light of the following limitations and strengths: (i) A very low number of ‘omics’ studies have evaluated the effects of CrM supplementation in humans, meaning future (epi)genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics studies in this area are needed. Specifically, only one human dataset was deposited in the repositories (GEO), showing again that more publicly available datasets are needed to strengthen the current findings; however, the CFG approach has been highlighted for its ability to distinguish signals from noise, even with limited cohorts and datasets [74,193]. (ii) The findings of the CFG, the bioinformatics enrichment analysis, as well as the conclusions from in vitro and in vivo animal models should be interpreted with caution, given they might not fully reflect cellular changes in humans after CrM supplementation but rather represent a mechanistic insight into cellular dynamics and proof-of-concept evidence to develop novel therapeutic strategies through the assessment of pharmacological activators and inhibitors. (iii) Despite the limitations in the number of expression datasets, the results obtained in the enrichment analysis (Enrichr and X2K) were contrasted and supported by low-throughput, high-sensitivity experimental evidence that has identified targeted genes and proteins related to the activated pathways after CrM supplementation in humans. However, experimental validation of candidate genes, protein, and miRNA hubs from our analysis is warranted in the future. (iv) This study is a clear example of the powerful features of the ‘omics’ high-throughput technologies and bioinformatics tools and may represent a workflow for future studies that analyze emergent nutrients with potential applications in sports and health or disease. In fact, understanding the interactions between system components and their regulatory aspects allow following a ‘biologic’ interpretation that is different and much more valuable than the common top-down or bottom-up approaches.
Future studies on identifying biological regulators of CrM supplementation on health and disease include: (i) the changes in miRNAs content (and other regulator non-coding RNAs); for instance, the use of a small-interfering RNA against Txnip resulted in increased Cr uptake [72], meaning further work will contribute to elucidating the mechanisms of the Txnip–CRT interaction and its potential therapeutic use as a next-generation medicine [194]; (ii) the pharmacochaperones (e.g., 4-phenylbutyrate) and their safety and efficacy to treat pathologies associated with the Cr deficiency syndrome; (iii) the implementation of a systems biology approach as a necessary and unavoidable process to study other metabolic networks of high complexity, such as the Cr metabolism; (iv) the integration of (epi)genomics, transcriptomics, phosphoproteomics, and metabolomics analyses (multi-omic analysis). In this sense, a very recent tool called Causal Oriented Search of Multi-Omic Space (COSMOS) [195] was developed to extract mechanistic insights in a more consistent and robust manner. This opens up an exciting field of research with multiple applications in several human conditions.

6. Conclusions

The CK/PCr system acts as a hub for chemomechanical energy transduction (i.e., dynamic biosensor) during the cellular allodynamic states. For the first time, a CFG with enrichment analysis was performed to identify relevant pathways and biological processes mediating the effects of Cr in health and disease. The results of our secondary analysis of available gene expression data showed that several cytoskeleton-mediated, energy-driven, mechanoadaptative processes possibly account for the wide range of effects and diseases after alterations of intracellular Cr concentrations. Additionally, we cautiously suggest two dose–response and complementary functional networks for the negative regulation of CRT after the continuous increase in Cr concentration: (i) a kinase-driven mechanism responsible for anterograde trafficking during the initial Cr-enriched environment; (ii) a ubiquitin-driven mechanism that controls the excessive Cr uptake. In general, Cr metabolism encompasses one of the most complex and dynamic networks, meaning further studies will be expected to outline evidence detailing the positive roles of CrM supplementation in other uncovered areas of health and disease. This work might contribute to a better understanding of the well-reported benefits of Cr in sports and its potential in health and disease, although more research is warranted to validate some of the proposed mechanisms.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu13082521/s1, Table S1: GSE5140 Top genes, Table S2: GSE42356 Top genes, Table S3: GSE7877 Top genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.B. and D.A.F.; methodology, formal analysis and visualization, D.A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.B.; writing—critical review and editing, Y.M., E.S.R., D.A.F., J.R.S., C.M.K., M.D.R. and R.B.K.; project administration, D.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Exercise and Sport Nutrition Laboratory (Texas A&M).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the reported results in this article are available in the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE7877 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7877), GSE5140 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE5140), GSE42356 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE42356). All datasets were accessed on 14 January 2021.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Theo Wallimann for providing comments and suggestions for this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

D.A.B. serves as science product manager for MTX Corporation®, a company that produces, distributes, sells, and does research on dietary supplements (including creatine) in Europe, has acted as a scientific consultant for MET-Rx and Healthy Sports in Colombia, and has received honoraria for speaking about creatine at international conferences. Y.M. declares no conflicts of interest. E.S.R. has conducted industry-sponsored research on creatine and received financial support for presenting on creatine at industry-sponsored scientific conferences. D.A.F. has been previously supported by grants from MinCiencias but not related to creatine. J.R.S. has conducted industry-sponsored research on creatine and other nutraceuticals over the past 25 years. Further, J.R.S has also received financial support for presenting on the science of various nutraceuticals, except creatine, at industry-sponsored scientific conferences. C.M.K. has consulted with and received external funding from companies who sell certain dietary ingredients and has received remuneration from companies for delivering scientific presentations at conferences. M.D.R. has received academic and industry funding related to dietary supplements, served as a non-paid consultant for the industry, and received honoraria for speaking at various conferences. R.B.K. has conducted industry-sponsored research on creatine, received financial support for presenting on creatine at industry-sponsored scientific conferences, and has served as an expert witness on cases related to creatine. Additionally, R.B.K. serves as chair of the “Creatine in Health” scientific advisory board for AlzChem Tostberg GmbH, while D.A.B., E.S.R., J.R.S., C.M.K. and M.D.R. serve as members of this board.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Effects of ten days of CrM supplementation in healthy young men (with no changes in their dietary intake) on protein kinase content using the Kinetworks KPKS 1.0 Protein Kinase screen. PSTK = protein–serine/threonine kinase; PTYK = protein–threonine/tyrosine kinase; PYK = protein–tyrosine kinase; PTK = protein–threonine kinase. Significant increases (red; p < 0.05), trends for increases (green; p < 0.09), and no change (grey) in protein content with CrM supplementation vs. placebo are indicated. Reproduced from Safdar et al. (2008).
Figure A1. Effects of ten days of CrM supplementation in healthy young men (with no changes in their dietary intake) on protein kinase content using the Kinetworks KPKS 1.0 Protein Kinase screen. PSTK = protein–serine/threonine kinase; PTYK = protein–threonine/tyrosine kinase; PYK = protein–tyrosine kinase; PTK = protein–threonine kinase. Significant increases (red; p < 0.05), trends for increases (green; p < 0.09), and no change (grey) in protein content with CrM supplementation vs. placebo are indicated. Reproduced from Safdar et al. (2008).
Nutrients 13 02521 g0a1

References

  1. Wallimann, T. The extended, dynamic mitochondrial reticulum in skeletal muscle and the creatine kinase (CK)/phosphocreatine (PCr) shuttle are working hand in hand for optimal energy provision. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2015, 36, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wallimann, T.; Wyss, M.; Brdiczka, D.; Nicolay, K.; Eppenberger, H.M. Intracellular compartmentation, structure and function of creatine kinase isoenzymes in tissues with high and fluctuating energy demands: The ‘phosphocreatine circuit’ for cellular energy homeostasis. Biochem. J. 1992, 281, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bonilla, D.A.; Kreider, R.B.; Stout, J.R.; Forero, D.A.; Kerksick, C.M.; Roberts, M.D.; Rawson, E.S. Metabolic Basis of Creatine in Health and Disease: A Bioinformatics-Assisted Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wallimann, T.; Harris, R. Creatine: A miserable life without it. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1739–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kreider, R.B.; Kalman, D.S.; Antonio, J.; Ziegenfuss, T.N.; Wildman, R.; Collins, R.; Candow, D.G.; Kleiner, S.M.; Almada, A.L.; Lopez, H.L. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2017, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maughan, R.J.; Burke, L.M.; Dvorak, J.; Larson-Meyer, D.E.; Peeling, P.; Phillips, S.M.; Rawson, E.S.; Walsh, N.P.; Garthe, I.; Geyer, H.; et al. IOC consensus statement: Dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bonilla, D.A.; Kreider, R.B.; Petro, J.L.; Romance, R.; García-Sillero, M.; Benítez-Porres, J.; Vargas-Molina, S. Creatine Enhances the Effects of Cluster-Set Resistance Training on Lower-Limb Body Composition and Strength in Resistance-Trained Men: A Pilot Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antonio, J.; Candow, D.G.; Forbes, S.C.; Gualano, B.; Jagim, A.R.; Kreider, R.B.; Rawson, E.S.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; VanDusseldorp, T.A.; Willoughby, D.S.; et al. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: What does the scientific evidence really show? J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2021, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kreider, R.B.; Stout, J.R. Creatine in Health and Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wallimann, T.; Tokarska-Schlattner, M.; Schlattner, U. The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids 2011, 40, 1271–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wallimann, T.; Hall, C.H.T.; Colgan, S.P.; Glover, L.E. Creatine Supplementation for Patients with Inflammatory Bowl Diseases: A Scientific Rationale for a Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Balestrino, M. Role of Creatine in the Heart: Health and Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smith-Ryan, A.E.; Cabre, H.E.; Eckerson, J.M.; Candow, D.G. Creatine Supplementation in Women’s Health: A Lifespan Perspective. Nutrients 2021, 13, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Clarke, H.; Hickner, R.C.; Ormsbee, M.J. The Potential Role of Creatine in Vascular Health. Nutrients 2021, 13, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bredahl, E.C.; Eckerson, J.M.; Tracy, S.M.; McDonald, T.L.; Drescher, K.M. The Role of Creatine in the Development and Activation of Immune Responses. Nutrients 2021, 13, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jagim, A.R.; Kerksick, C.M. Creatine Supplementation in Children and Adolescents. Nutrients 2021, 13, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Solis, M.Y.; Artioli, G.G.; Gualano, B. Potential of Creatine in Glucose Management and Diabetes. Nutrients 2021, 13, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roschel, H.; Gualano, B.; Ostojic, S.M.; Rawson, E.S. Creatine Supplementation and Brain Health. Nutrients 2021, 13, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muccini, A.M.; Tran, N.T.; de Guingand, D.L.; Philip, M.; Della Gatta, P.A.; Galinsky, R.; Sherman, L.S.; Kelleher, M.A.; Palmer, K.R.; Berry, M.J.; et al. Creatine Metabolism in Female Reproduction, Pregnancy and Newborn Health. Nutrients 2021, 13, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.L.; Wang, X.N.; Fraser, S.F.; Carey, M.F.; Wrigley, T.V.; McKenna, M.J. Effects of fatigue and training on sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ regulation in human skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 912–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sundberg, C.W.; Hunter, S.K.; Trappe, S.W.; Smith, C.S.; Fitts, R.H. Effects of elevated H+ and Pi on the contractile mechanics of skeletal muscle fibres from young and old men: Implications for muscle fatigue in humans. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 3993–4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Cheng, A.J.; Place, N.; Westerblad, H. Molecular Basis for Exercise-Induced Fatigue: The Importance of Strictly Controlled Cellular Ca2+ Handling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sundberg, C.W.; Fitts, R.H. Bioenergetic basis of skeletal muscle fatigue. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2019, 10, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mesa, J.L.M.; Ruiz, J.R.; Gonzalez-Gross, M.M.; Gutierrez Sainz, A.; Castillo Garzon, M.J. Oral Creatine Supplementation and Skeletal Muscle Metabolism in Physical Exercise. Sports Med. 2002, 32, 903–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jones, A.M.; Wilkerson, D.P.; Fulford, J. Influence of dietary creatine supplementation on muscle phosphocreatine kinetics during knee-extensor exercise in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 296, R1078–R1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rico-Sanz, J. Creatine reduces human muscle PCr and pH decrements and Pi accumulation during low-intensity exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 88, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Santos, M.G.; López de Viñaspre, P.; González de Suso, J.M.; Moreno, A.; Alonso, J.; Cabañas, M.; Pons, V.; Porta, J.; Arús, C. Efecto de la suplementación oral con monohidrato de creatina en el metabolismo energértico muscular y en la composición corporal de sujetos que practican actividad fÍsica. Revista Chilena de Nutrición 2003, 30, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pulido, S.M.; Passaquin, A.C.; Leijendekker, W.J.; Challet, C.; Wallimann, T.; Rüegg, U.T. Creatine supplementation improves intracellular Ca2+ handling and survival in mdx skeletal muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1998, 439, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gallo, M.; MacLean, I.; Tyreman, N.; Martins, K.J.B.; Syrotuik, D.; Gordon, T.; Putman, C.T. Adaptive responses to creatine loading and exercise in fast-twitch rat skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 294, R1319–R1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pignatti, C.; D’Adamo, S.; Flamigni, F.; Cetrulllo, S. Molecular Mechanisms Linking Nutrition to Metabolic Homeostasis: An Overview Picture of Current Understanding. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2020, 30, 543–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hurtado-Carneiro, V.; Pérez-García, A.; Alvarez, E.; Sanz, C. PAS Kinase: A Nutrient and Energy Sensor “Master Key” in the Response to Fasting/Feeding Conditions. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hespel, P.; Op’t Eijnde, B.; Leemputte, M.V.; Ursø, B.; Greenhaff, P.L.; Labarque, V.; Dymarkowski, S.; Hecke, P.V.; Richter, E.A. Oral creatine supplementation facilitates the rehabilitation of disuse atrophy and alters the expression of muscle myogenic factors in humans. J. Physiol. 2001, 536, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Willoughby, D.S.; Rosene, J.M. Effects of Oral Creatine and Resistance Training on Myogenic Regulatory Factor Expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Deldicque, L.; Louis, M.; Theisen, D.; Nielens, H.; Dehoux, M.L.; Thissen, J.-P.; Rennie, M.J.; Francaux, M. Increased IGF mRNA in Human Skeletal Muscle after Creatine Supplementation. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2005, 37, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Saremi, A.; Gharakhanloo, R.; Sharghi, S.; Gharaati, M.R.; Larijani, B.; Omidfar, K. Effects of oral creatine and resistance training on serum myostatin and GASP-1. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 317, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Louis, M.; Van Beneden, R.; Dehoux, M.; Thissen, J.P.; Francaux, M. Creatine increases IGF-I and myogenic regulatory factor mRNA in C2C12 cells. FEBS Lett. 2004, 557, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cunha, M.P.; Budni, J.; Ludka, F.K.; Pazini, F.L.; Rosa, J.M.; Oliveira, Á.; Lopes, M.W.; Tasca, C.I.; Leal, R.B.; Rodrigues, A.L.S. Involvement of PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway and Its Downstream Intracellular Targets in the Antidepressant-Like Effect of Creatine. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 53, 2954–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Marzuca-Nassr, G.N.; Fortes, M.A.S.; Guimarães-Ferreira, L.; Murata, G.M.; Vitzel, K.F.; Vasconcelos, D.A.A.; Bassit, R.A.; Curi, R. Short-term creatine supplementation changes protein metabolism signaling in hindlimb suspension. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2019, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kontou, P.I.; Pavlopoulou, A.; Bagos, P.G. Methods of Analysis and Meta-Analysis for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes. In Genet. Epidemiol; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 183–210. [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Laere, S.; Dirix, L.; Vermeulen, P. Molecular profiles to biology and pathways: A systems biology approach. Chin. J. Cancer 2016, 35, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Angione, C. Human Systems Biology and Metabolic Modelling: A Review—From Disease Metabolism to Precision Medicine. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8304260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, E.Y.; Xu, H.; Gordonov, S.; Lim, M.P.; Perkins, M.H.; Ma′ayan, A. Expression2Kinases: mRNA profiling linked to multiple upstream regulatory layers. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Forero, D.A.; González-Giraldo, Y. Convergent functional genomics of cocaine misuse in humans and animal models. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abus. 2019, 46, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Monaco, G.; van Dam, S.; Casal Novo Ribeiro, J.L.; Larbi, A.; de Magalhães, J.P. A comparison of human and mouse gene co-expression networks reveals conservation and divergence at the tissue, pathway and disease levels. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015, 15, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, D.; Levine, J.L.S.; Avila-Quintero, V.; Bloch, M.; Kaffman, A. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Effects of maternal separation on anxiety-like behavior in rodents. Transl. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Niculescu, A.B.; Le-Niculescu, H. Convergent Functional Genomics: What we have learned and can learn about genes, pathways, and mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 35, 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Forero, D.A. Functional Genomics of Epileptogenesis in Animal Models and Humans. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Niculescu, A.B.; Levey, D.F.; Phalen, P.L.; Le-Niculescu, H.; Dainton, H.D.; Jain, N.; Belanger, E.; James, A.; George, S.; Weber, H.; et al. Understanding and predicting suicidality using a combined genomic and clinical risk assessment approach. Mol. Psychiatry 2015, 20, 1266–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bonvicini, C.; Faraone, S.V.; Scassellati, C. Common and specific genes and peripheral biomarkers in children and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2018, 19, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Smith, A.K.; Fang, H.; Whistler, T.; Unger, E.R.; Rajeevan, M.S. Convergent genomic studies identify association of GRIK2 and NPAS2 with chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuropsychobiology 2011, 64, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Falker-Gieske, C.; Mott, A.; Franzenburg, S.; Tetens, J. Multi-species transcriptome meta-analysis of the response to retinoic acid in vertebrates and comparative analysis of the effects of retinol and retinoic acid on gene expression in LMH cells. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Le-Niculescu, H.; Roseberry, K.; Gill, S.S.; Levey, D.F.; Phalen, P.L.; Mullen, J.; Williams, A.; Bhairo, S.; Voegtline, T.; Davis, H.; et al. Precision medicine for mood disorders: Objective assessment, risk prediction, pharmacogenomics, and repurposed drugs. Mol. Psychiatry 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lévesque, A.; Gagnon-Carignan, S.; Lachance, S. From low- to high-throughput analysis. Bioanalysis 2016, 8, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramsay, D.S.; Woods, S.C. Physiological Regulation: How It Really Works. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rawson, E.S.; Persky, A.M. Mechanisms of muscular adaptations to creatine supplementation: Review article. Int. SportMed J. 2007, 8, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bonilla, D.A.; Moreno, Y. Molecular and metabolic insights of creatine supplementation on resistance training. Revista Colombiana de Química 2015, 44, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Farshidfar, F.; Pinder, M.A.; Myrie, S.B. Creatine Supplementation and Skeletal Muscle Metabolism for Building Muscle Mass- Review of the Potential Mechanisms of Action. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 1273–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bender, A.; Klopstock, T. Creatine for neuroprotection in neurodegenerative disease: End of story? Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1929–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rae, C.D.; Bröer, S. Creatine as a booster for human brain function. How might it work? Neurochem. Int. 2015, 89, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Riesberg, L.A.; Weed, S.A.; McDonald, T.L.; Eckerson, J.M.; Drescher, K.M. Beyond muscles: The untapped potential of creatine. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 37, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ramasamy, A.; Mondry, A.; Holmes, C.C.; Altman, D.G. Key Issues in Conducting a Meta-Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Datasets. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; Holko, M.; et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets—Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D991–D995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, E.Y.; Tan, C.M.; Kou, Y.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Meirelles, G.; Clark, N.R.; Ma’ayan, A. Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kuleshov, M.V.; Jones, M.R.; Rouillard, A.D.; Fernandez, N.F.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Koplev, S.; Jenkins, S.L.; Jagodnik, K.M.; Lachmann, A.; et al. Enrichr: A comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W90–W97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Huang, H.-Y.; Lin, Y.-C.-D.; Li, J.; Huang, K.-Y.; Shrestha, S.; Hong, H.-C.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.-G.; Jin, C.-N.; Yu, Y.; et al. miRTarBase 2020: Updates to the experimentally validated microRNA–target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Clarke, D.J.B.; Kuleshov, M.V.; Schilder, B.M.; Torre, D.; Duffy, M.E.; Keenan, A.B.; Lachmann, A.; Feldmann, A.S.; Gundersen, G.W.; Silverstein, M.C.; et al. eXpression2Kinases (X2K) Web: Linking expression signatures to upstream cell signaling networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W171–W179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Hangelbroek, R.; Backx, E.; Kersten, S.; van Duynhoven, J.; Verdijk, L.; van Loon, L.; de Groot, L.; Boekschoten, M. Creatine supplementation during knee immobilization attenuates changes in muscle transcriptome. In Proceedings of the Phenotypes and Prevention: The Interplay of Genes, Life-Style and Gut Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5–8 September 2016; p. 59. [Google Scholar]
  70. Safdar, A.; Yardley, N.J.; Snow, R.; Melov, S.; Tarnopolsky, M.A. Global and targeted gene expression and protein content in skeletal muscle of young men following short-term creatine monohydrate supplementation. Physiol. Genom. 2008, 32, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bender, A.; Beckers, J.; Schneider, I.; Holter, S.M.; Haack, T.; Ruthsatz, T.; Vogt-Weisenhorn, D.M.; Becker, L.; Genius, J.; Rujescu, D.; et al. Creatine improves health and survival of mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2008, 29, 1404–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zervou, S.; Ray, T.; Sahgal, N.; Sebag-Montefiore, L.; Cross, R.; Medway, D.J.; Ostrowski, P.J.; Neubauer, S.; Lygate, C.A. A role for thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip) in cellular creatine homeostasis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 305, E263–E270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Saks, V.; Monge, C.; Guzun, R. Philosophical Basis and Some Historical Aspects of Systems Biology: From Hegel to Noble—Applications for Bioenergetic Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1161–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Bertsch, B.; Ogden, C.A.; Sidhu, K.; Le-Niculescu, H.; Kuczenski, R.; Niculescu, A.B. Convergent functional genomics: A Bayesian candidate gene identification approach for complex disorders. Methods 2005, 37, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cattaneo, A.; Cattane, N.; Scassellati, C.; D’Aprile, I.; Riva, M.A.; Pariante, C.M. Convergent Functional Genomics approach to prioritize molecular targets of risk in early life stress-related psychiatric disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sterling, P. Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 106, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shellman, E.R.; Burant, C.F.; Schnell, S. Network motifs provide signatures that characterize metabolism. Mol. BioSyst. 2013, 9, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, Q.; Qian, W.; Xu, X.; Bajpai, A.; Guan, K.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, R.; Flamini, V.; Chen, W. Energy-Mediated Machinery Drives Cellular Mechanical Allostasis. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shaulian, E.; Karin, M. AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, E131–E136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. O’Connor, L.; Gilmour, J.; Bonifer, C. The Role of the Ubiquitously Expressed Transcription Factor Sp1 in Tissue-specific Transcriptional Regulation and in Disease. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2016, 89, 513–525. [Google Scholar]
  81. Oldfield, A.J.; Henriques, T.; Kumar, D.; Burkholder, A.B.; Cinghu, S.; Paulet, D.; Bennett, B.D.; Yang, P.; Scruggs, B.S.; Lavender, C.A.; et al. NF-Y controls fidelity of transcription initiation at gene promoters through maintenance of the nucleosome-depleted region. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Cao, R.; Zhang, Y. SUZ12 is required for both the histone methyltransferase activity and the silencing function of the EED-EZH2 complex. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fitieh, A.; Locke, A.J.; Motamedi, M.; Ismail, I.H. The Role of Polycomb Group Protein BMI1 in DNA Repair and Genomic Stability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, X.; Thyssen, G.; Beliakoff, J.; Sun, Z. The Novel PIAS-like Protein hZimp10 Enhances Smad Transcriptional Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 23748–23756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Carroll, P.A.; Freie, B.W.; Mathsyaraja, H.; Eisenman, R.N. The MYC transcription factor network: Balancing metabolism, proliferation and oncogenesis. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Smith, K.; Dalton, S. Myc transcription factors: Key regulators behind establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Regen. Med. 2010, 5, 947–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Hong, J.-H.; Kwak, Y.; Woo, Y.; Park, C.; Lee, S.-A.; Lee, H.; Park, S.J.; Suh, Y.; Suh, B.K.; Goo, B.S.; et al. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by the Ndel1-Tara complex is critical for cell migration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Anderson, S.; Poudel, K.R.; Roh-Johnson, M.; Brabletz, T.; Yu, M.; Borenstein-Auerbach, N.; Grady, W.N.; Bai, J.; Moens, C.B.; Eisenman, R.N.; et al. MYC-nick promotes cell migration by inducing fascin expression and Cdc42 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E5481–E5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hurlin, P.J.; Huang, J. The MAX-interacting transcription factor network. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006, 16, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Volodina Iu, L.; Shtil, A.A. Casein kinase 2, the versatile regulator of cell survival. Mol. Biol. 2012, 46, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ding, L.; Cao, J.; Lin, W.; Chen, H.; Xiong, X.; Ao, H.; Yu, M.; Lin, J.; Cui, Q. The Roles of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Cell-Cycle Progression and Therapeutic Strategies in Human Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Salizzato, V.; Zanin, S.; Borgo, C.; Lidron, E.; Salvi, M.; Rizzuto, R.; Pallafacchina, G.; Donella-Deana, A. Protein kinase CK2 subunits exert specific and coordinated functions in skeletal muscle differentiation and fusogenic activity. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 10648–10667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zheng, Y.; Qin, H.; Frank, S.J.; Deng, L.; Litchfield, D.W.; Tefferi, A.; Pardanani, A.; Lin, F.T.; Li, J.; Sha, B.; et al. A CK2-dependent mechanism for activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Blood 2011, 118, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bousoik, E.; Montazeri Aliabadi, H. “Do We Know Jack” About JAK? A Closer Look at JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rotwein, P. Regulation of gene expression by growth hormone. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2020, 507, 110788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Reis, H.J.; Rosa, D.V.F.; Guimarães, M.M.; Souza, B.R.; Barros, A.G.A.; Pimenta, F.J.; Souza, R.P.; Torres, K.C.L.; Romano-Silva, M.A. Is DARPP-32 a potential therapeutic target? Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2007, 11, 1649–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Engmann, O.; Giralt, A.; Gervasi, N.; Marion-Poll, L.; Gasmi, L.; Filhol, O.; Picciotto, M.R.; Gilligan, D.; Greengard, P.; Nairn, A.C.; et al. DARPP-32 interaction with adducin may mediate rapid environmental effects on striatal neurons. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Andres, R.H.; Ducray, A.D.; Huber, A.W.; Pérez-Bouza, A.; Krebs, S.H.; Schlattner, U.; Seiler, R.W.; Wallimann, T.; Widmer, H.R. Effects of creatine treatment on survival and differentiation of GABA-ergic neurons in cultured striatal tissue. J. Neurochem. 2005, 95, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jang, S.W.; Hwang, S.S.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, K.O.; Kim, M.K.; Lee, W.; Kim, K.; Lee, G.R. Casein kinase 2 is a critical determinant of the balance of Th17 and Treg cell differentiation. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017, 49, e375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Braicu, C.; Buse, M.; Busuioc, C.; Drula, R.; Gulei, D.; Raduly, L.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. A Comprehensive Review on MAPK: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Kashef, K.; Lee, C.M.; Xu, H.; Reddy, E.P. Scaffold proteins of MAP-kinase modules. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3185–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Krishna, M.; Narang, H. The complexity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) made simple. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 3525–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gyoeva, F.K. The role of motor proteins in signal propagation. Biochemistry 2014, 79, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hoffman, L.; Jensen, C.C.; Yoshigi, M.; Beckerle, M.; Weaver, V.M. Mechanical signals activate p38 MAPK pathway-dependent reinforcement of actin via mechanosensitive HspB1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 2661–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Munnik, T.; Ligterink, W.; Meskiene, I.I.; Calderini, O.; Beyerly, J.; Musgrave, A.; Hirt, H. Distinct osmo-sensing protein kinase pathways are involved in signalling moderate and severe hyper-osmotic stress. Plant J. 1999, 20, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Drummond, M.J.; Dreyer, H.C.; Fry, C.S.; Glynn, E.L.; Rasmussen, B.B. Nutritional and contractile regulation of human skeletal muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Schedel, J.M.; Tanaka, H.; Kiyonaga, A.; Shindo, M.; Schutz, Y. Acute creatine loading enhances human growth hormone secretion. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2000, 40, 336–342. [Google Scholar]
  108. Poprzecki, S.; Zając, A.; Czuba, M.; Waskiewicz, Z. The Effects of Terminating Creatine Supplementation and Resistance Training on Anaerobic Power and Chosen Biochemical Variables in Male Subjects. J. Hum. Kinet. 2008, 20, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Burke, D.G.; Candow, D.G.; Chilibeck, P.D.; MacNeil, L.G.; Roy, B.D.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Ziegenfuss, T. Effect of creatine supplementation and resistance-exercise training on muscle insulin-like growth factor in young adults. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2008, 18, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Snow, R.; Wright, C.; Quick, M.; Garnham, A.; Watt, K.; Russell, A. The effects of acute exercise and creatine supplementation on Akt signalling in human skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell 2004, 14, 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  111. Al-Khalili, L.; Kramer, D.; Wretenberg, P.; Krook, A. Human skeletal muscle cell differentiation is associated with changes in myogenic markers and enhanced insulin-mediated MAPK and PKB phosphorylation. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2004, 180, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Deldicque, L.; Theisen, D.; Bertrand, L.; Hespel, P.; Hue, L.; Francaux, M. Creatine enhances differentiation of myogenic C2C12 cells by activating both p38 and Akt/PKB pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 293, C1263–C1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Deldicque, L.; Atherton, P.; Patel, R.; Theisen, D.; Nielens, H.; Rennie, M.J.; Francaux, M. Effects of resistance exercise with and without creatine supplementation on gene expression and cell signaling in human skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 104, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Pazini, F.L.; Cunha, M.P.; Rosa, J.M.; Colla, A.R.; Lieberknecht, V.; Oliveira, Á.; Rodrigues, A.L. Creatine, similar to ketamine, counteracts depressive-like behavior induced by corticosterone via PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 6818–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ju, J.S.; Smith, J.L.; Oppelt, P.J.; Fisher, J.S. Creatine feeding increases GLUT4 expression in rat skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 288, E347–E352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Willoughby, D.S.; Rosene, J. Effects of oral creatine and resistance training on myosin heavy chain expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001, 33, 1674–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, L.; Zhu, Z.; Yan, H.; Wang, W.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, G.; Du, J.; Cai, H.; et al. Creatine promotes cancer metastasis through activation of Smad2/3. Cell Metab. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Pereira, R.T.d.S.; Dörr, F.A.; Pinto, E.; Solis, M.Y.; Artioli, G.G.; Fernandes, A.L.; Murai, I.H.; Dantas, W.S.; Seguro, A.C.; Santinho, M.A.R.; et al. Can creatine supplementation form carcinogenic heterocyclic amines in humans? J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 3959–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Kazak, L.; Cohen, P. Creatine metabolism: Energy homeostasis, immunity and cancer biology. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Patra, S.; Bera, S.; SinhaRoy, S.; Ghoshal, S.; Ray, S.; Basu, A.; Schlattner, U.; Wallimann, T.; Ray, M. Progressive decrease of phosphocreatine, creatine and creatine kinase in skeletal muscle upon transformation to sarcoma. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 3236–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pal, A.; Roy, A.; Ray, M. Creatine supplementation with methylglyoxal: A potent therapy for cancer in experimental models. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 2003–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Storey, K.B.; Hochachka, P.W. Activation of muscle glycolysis: A role for creatine phosphate in phosphofructokinase regulation. FEBS Lett. 1974, 46, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Kemp, R.G. Inhibition of muscle pyruvate kinase by creatine phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248, 3963–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bergnes, G.; Yuan, W.; Khandekar, V.S.; O’Keefe, M.M.; Martin, K.J.; Teicher, B.A.; Kaddurah-Daouk, R. Creatine and phosphocreatine analogs: Anticancer activity and enzymatic analysis. Oncol. Res. 1996, 8, 121–130. [Google Scholar]
  125. Campos-Ferraz, P.L.; Gualano, B.; das Neves, W.; Andrade, I.T.; Hangai, I.; Pereira, R.T.; Bezerra, R.N.; Deminice, R.; Seelaender, M.; Lancha, A.H. Exploratory studies of the potential anti-cancer effects of creatine. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1993–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Di Biase, S.; Ma, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.C.; Smith, D.J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Kim, Y.J.; Clarke, N.; et al. Creatine uptake regulates CD8 T cell antitumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 2869–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Li, B.; Yang, L. Creatine in T Cell Antitumor Immunity and Cancer Immunotherapy. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Maguire, O.A.; Ackerman, S.E.; Szwed, S.K.; Maganti, A.V.; Marchildon, F.; Huang, X.; Kramer, D.J.; Rosas-Villegas, A.; Gelfer, R.G.; Turner, L.E.; et al. Creatine-mediated crosstalk between adipocytes and cancer cells regulates obesity-driven breast cancer. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 499–512.e496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, L.; Qiao, Z.; Yu, M.; Yu, B.; Yang, T. miR-1-3p suppresses proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma through targeting SOX9. Onco Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 2149–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Ke, J.; Zhang, B.H.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhong, M.; Ma, W.; Xue, H.; Wen, Y.D.; Cai, Y.D. MiR-1-3p suppresses cell proliferation and invasion and targets STC2 in gastric cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 8870–8877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Li, T.; Wang, X.; Jing, L.; Li, Y. MiR-1-3p Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Tumorigenesis via Targeting Protein Regulator of Cytokinesis 1. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Meyer, S.U.; Thirion, C.; Polesskaya, A.; Bauersachs, S.; Kaiser, S.; Krause, S.; Pfaffl, M.W. TNF-α and IGF1 modify the microRNA signature in skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Cell Commun. Signal. 2015, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Pelka, K.; Klicka, K.; Grzywa, T.M.; Gondek, A.; Marczewska, J.M.; Garbicz, F.; Szczepaniak, K.; Paskal, W.; Wlodarski, P.K. miR-96-5p, miR-134-5p, miR-181b-5p and miR-200b-3p heterogenous expression in sites of prostate cancer versus benign prostate hyperplasia-archival samples study. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Feng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Hong, Q. Circular RNA circDLGAP4 exerts neuroprotective effects via modulating miR-134-5p/CREB pathway in Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tian, X.; Yu, H.; Li, D.; Jin, G.; Dai, S.; Gong, P.; Kong, C.; Wang, X. The miR-5694/AF9/Snail Axis Provides Metastatic Advantages and a Therapeutic Target in Basal-like Breast Cancer. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 1239–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Fu, G.; Lu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, P.; Shen, Q. MiR-320a inhibits malignant phenotype of melanoma cells via targeting PBX3. J. BUON 2020, 25, 2071–2077. [Google Scholar]
  137. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Shao, J.; Xing, G. miR-320a serves as a negative regulator in the progression of gastric cancer by targeting RAB14. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 2652–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Li, H.; Yue, L.; Xu, H.; Li, N.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, R.C. Curcumin suppresses osteogenesis by inducing miR-126a-3p and subsequently suppressing the WNT/LRP6 pathway. Aging 2019, 11, 6983–6998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ding, N.; Sun, X.; Wang, T.; Huang, L.; Wen, J.; Zhou, Y. miR378a3p exerts tumor suppressive function on the tumorigenesis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting Rab10. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Guo, X.B.; Zhang, X.C.; Chen, P.; Ma, L.M.; Shen, Z.Q. miR378a3p inhibits cellular proliferation and migration in glioblastoma multiforme by targeting tetraspanin 17. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 1957–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Krist, B.; Podkalicka, P.; Mucha, O.; Mendel, M.; Sepiol, A.; Rusiecka, O.M.; Jozefczuk, E.; Bukowska-Strakova, K.; Grochot-Przeczek, A.; Tomczyk, M.; et al. miR-378a influences vascularization in skeletal muscles. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Khoei, S.G.; Sadeghi, H.; Samadi, P.; Najafi, R.; Saidijam, M. Relationship between Sphk1/S1P and microRNAs in human cancers. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Luca, E.; Turcekova, K.; Hartung, A.; Mathes, S.; Rehrauer, H.; Krützfeldt, J. Genetic deletion of microRNA biogenesis in muscle cells reveals a hierarchical non-clustered network that controls focal adhesion signaling during muscle regeneration. Mol. Metab. 2020, 36, 100967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Santacruz, L.; Darrabie, M.D.; Mishra, R.; Jacobs, D.O. Removal of Potential Phosphorylation Sites does not Alter Creatine Transporter Response to PKC or Substrate Availability. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 37, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kori, M.; Aydın, B.; Unal, S.; Arga, K.Y.; Kazan, D. Metabolic Biomarkers and Neurodegeneration: A Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. OMICS 2016, 20, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zervou, S.; Whittington, H.J.; Russell, A.J.; Lygate, C.A. Augmentation of Creatine in the Heart. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Brault, J.J.; Abraham, K.A.; Terjung, R.L. Muscle creatine uptake and creatine transporter expression in response to creatine supplementation and depletion. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 94, 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Tarnopolsky, M.; Parise, G.; Fu, M.H.; Brose, A.; Parshad, A.; Speer, O.; Wallimann, T. Acute and moderate-term creatine monohydrate supplementation does not affect creatine transporter mRNA or protein content in either young or elderly humans. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 244, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Qi, Q.; Li, J.; Cheng, J. Reconstruction of metabolic pathways by combining probabilistic graphical model-based and knowledge-based methods. BMC Proc. 2014, 8, S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Ndika, J.D.T.; Martinez-Munoz, C.; Anand, N.; van Dooren, S.J.M.; Kanhai, W.; Smith, D.E.C.; Jakobs, C.; Salomons, G.S. Post-transcriptional regulation of the creatine transporter gene: Functional relevance of alternative splicing. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2014, 1840, 2070–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Santacruz, L.; Jacobs, D.O. Structural correlates of the creatine transporter function regulation: The undiscovered country. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 2049–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Shojaiefard, M.; Christie, D.L.; Lang, F. Stimulation of the creatine transporter SLC6A8 by the protein kinase mTOR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 341, 945–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Shojaiefard, M.; Christie, D.L.; Lang, F. Stimulation of the creatine transporter SLC6A8 by the protein kinases SGK1 and SGK3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 334, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Strutz-Seebohm, N.; Shojaiefard, M.; Christie, D.; Tavare, J.; Seebohm, G.; Lang, F. PIKfyve in the SGK1 Mediated Regulation of the Creatine Transporter SLC6A8. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 20, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Jin, N.; Lang, M.J.; Weisman, L.S. Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate: Regulation of cellular events in space and time. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Berwick, D.C.; Dell, G.C.; Welsh, G.I.; Heesom, K.J.; Hers, I.; Fletcher, L.M.; Cooke, F.T.; Tavare, J.M. Protein kinase B phosphorylation of PIKfyve regulates the trafficking of GLUT4 vesicles. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 5985–5993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Kreindler, J.L.; Wiemuth, D.; Lott, J.S.; Ly, K.; Ke, Y.; Teesdale-Spittle, P.; Snyder, P.M.; McDonald, F.J. Interaction of Serum- and Glucocorticoid Regulated Kinase 1 (SGK1) with the WW-Domains of Nedd4-2 Is Required for Epithelial Sodium Channel Regulation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Dieter, M.; Palmada, M.; Rajamanickam, J.; Aydin, A.; Busjahn, A.; Boehmer, C.; Luft, F.C.; Lang, F. Regulation of Glucose Transporter SGLT1 by Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-2 and Kinases SGK1, SGK3, and PKB. Obes. Res. 2004, 12, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pakladok, T.; Almilaji, A.; Munoz, C.; Alesutan, I.; Lang, F. PIKfyve Sensitivity of hERG Channels. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 31, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Almilaji, A.; Sopjani, M.; Elvira, B.; Borras, J.; Dërmaku-Sopjani, M.; Munoz, C.; Warsi, J.; Lang, U.E.; Lang, F. Upregulation of the Creatine Transporter Slc6A8 by Klotho. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2014, 39, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Sopjani, M.; Dermaku-Sopjani, M. Klotho-Dependent Cellular Transport Regulation. Vitam. Horm. 2016, 101, 59–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Buchanan, S.; Combet, E.; Stenvinkel, P.; Shiels, P.G. Klotho, Aging, and the Failing Kidney. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Liang, L.; Li, J.; Luo, D.; Liu, Q.; Cai, S.; Li, X. Klotho negatively regulated aerobic glycolysis in colorectal cancer via ERK/HIF1alpha axis. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 16, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Brown, E.L.; Snow, R.J.; Wright, C.R.; Cho, Y.; Wallace, M.A.; Kralli, A.; Russell, A.P. PGC-1alpha and PGC-1beta increase CrT expression and creatine uptake in myotubes via ERRalpha. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2937–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Zervou, S.; Yin, X.; Nabeebaccus, A.A.; O’Brien, B.A.; Cross, R.L.; McAndrew, D.J.; Atkinson, R.A.; Eykyn, T.R.; Mayr, M.; Neubauer, S.; et al. Proteomic and metabolomic changes driven by elevating myocardial creatine suggest novel metabolic feedback mechanisms. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1969–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. López-Hernández, T.; Haucke, V.; Maritzen, T. Endocytosis in the adaptation to cellular stress. Cell Stress 2020, 4, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Kang, D.S.; Tian, X.; Benovic, J.L. Role of beta-arrestins and arrestin domain-containing proteins in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 27, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Lee, S.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, R.T. Thioredoxin and Thioredoxin Target Proteins: From Molecular Mechanisms to Functional Significance. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1165–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Patwari, P.; Lee, R.T. An expanded family of arrestins regulate metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Patwari, P.; Chutkow, W.A.; Cummings, K.; Verstraeten, V.L.; Lammerding, J.; Schreiter, E.R.; Lee, R.T. Thioredoxin-independent regulation of metabolism by the alpha-arrestin proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24996–25003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. O’Donnell, A.F.; Schmidt, M.C. AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Spindel, O.N.; World, C.; Berk, B.C. Thioredoxin Interacting Protein: Redox Dependent and Independent Regulatory Mechanisms. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kommaddi, R.P.; Shenoy, S.K. Arrestins and Protein Ubiquitination. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2013, 118, 175–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  174. Prosser, D.C.; Pannunzio, A.E.; Brodsky, J.L.; Thorner, J.; Wendland, B.; O′Donnell, A.F. α-Arrestins participate in cargo selection for both clathrin-independent and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 4220–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Hallows, K.R.; Bhalla, V.; Oyster, N.M.; Wijngaarden, M.A.; Lee, J.K.; Li, H.; Chandran, S.; Xia, X.; Huang, Z.; Chalkley, R.J.; et al. Phosphopeptide Screen Uncovers Novel Phosphorylation Sites of Nedd4-2 That Potentiate Its Inhibition of the Epithelial Na+ Channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 21671–21678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. An, H.; Krist, D.T.; Statsyuk, A.V. Crosstalk between kinases and Nedd4 family ubiquitin ligases. Mol. BioSyst. 2014, 10, 1643–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shojaiefard, M.; Hosseinzadeh, Z.; Bhavsar, S.K.; Lang, F. Downregulation of the creatine transporter SLC6A8 by JAK2. J. Membr. Biol. 2012, 245, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Fezai, M.; Warsi, J.; Lang, F. Regulation of the Na+,Cl- Coupled Creatine Transporter CreaT (SLC6A8) by the Janus Kinase JAK3. Neurosignals 2015, 23, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Dai, W.; Vinnakota, S.; Qian, X.; Kunze, D.L.; Sarkar, H.K. Molecular Characterization of the Human CRT-1 Creatine Transporter Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 361, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wu, N.; Zheng, B.; Shaywitz, A.; Dagon, Y.; Tower, C.; Bellinger, G.; Shen, C.-H.; Wen, J.; Asara, J.; McGraw, T.E.; et al. AMPK-Dependent Degradation of TXNIP upon Energy Stress Leads to Enhanced Glucose Uptake via GLUT1. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Darrabie, M.D.; Arciniegas, A.J.; Mishra, R.; Bowles, D.E.; Jacobs, D.O.; Santacruz, L. AMPK and substrate availability regulate creatine transport in cultured cardiomyocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 300, E870–E876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Li, H.; Thali, R.F.; Smolak, C.; Gong, F.; Alzamora, R.; Wallimann, T.; Scholz, R.; Pastor-Soler, N.M.; Neumann, D.; Hallows, K.R. Regulation of the creatine transporter by AMP-activated protein kinase in kidney epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2010, 299, F167–F177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Galcheva-Gargova, Z.; Derijard, B.; Wu, I.H.; Davis, R.J. An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in mammalian cells. Science 1994, 265, 806–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Fezai, M.; Elvira, B.; Borras, J.; Ben-Attia, M.; Hoseinzadeh, Z.; Lang, F. Negative regulation of the creatine transporter SLC6A8 by SPAK and OSR1. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2014, 39, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Alessi, D.R.; Zhang, J.; Khanna, A.; Hochdorfer, T.; Shang, Y.; Kahle, K.T. The WNK-SPAK/OSR1 pathway: Master regulator of cation-chloride cotransporters. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7, re3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Zwiewka, M.; Nodzyński, T.; Robert, S.; Vanneste, S.; Friml, J. Osmotic Stress Modulates the Balance between Exocytosis and Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1175–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Pedersen, S.F.; Kapus, A.; Hoffmann, E.K. Osmosensory Mechanisms in Cellular and Systemic Volume Regulation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 22, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Morbach, S.; Krämer, R. Osmoregulation and osmosensing by uptake carriers for compatible solutes in bacteria. In Molecular Mechanisms Controlling Transmembrane Transport; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 121–153. [Google Scholar]
  189. Wood, J.M. Bacterial Osmosensing Transporters. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 428, 77–107. [Google Scholar]
  190. El-Kasaby, A.; Kasture, A.; Koban, F.; Hotka, M.; Asjad, H.M.M.; Kubista, H.; Freissmuth, M.; Sucic, S. Rescue by 4-phenylbutyrate of several misfolded creatine transporter-1 variants linked to the creatine transporter deficiency syndrome. Neuropharmacology 2019, 161, 107572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Wang, Q.; Groenendyk, J.; Michalak, M. Glycoprotein Quality Control and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Molecules 2015, 20, 13689–13704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Farr, C.V.; El-Kasaby, A.; Freissmuth, M.; Sucic, S. The Creatine Transporter Unfolded: A Knotty Premise in the Cerebral Creatine Deficiency Syndrome. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2020, 12, 588954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Niculescu, A.B. Convergent functional genomics of stem cell-derived cells. Transl. Psychiatry 2013, 3, e305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Sharma, G.; Doss, C.G.P.; Lee, S.S. Therapeutic miRNA and siRNA: Moving from Bench to Clinic as Next Generation Medicine. Mol. Nucleic Acids 2017, 8, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Dugourd, A.; Kuppe, C.; Sciacovelli, M.; Gjerga, E.; Gabor, A.; Emdal, K.B.; Vieira, V.; Bekker-Jensen, D.B.; Kranz, J.; Bindels, E.M.J.; et al. Causal integration of multi-omics data with prior knowledge to generate mechanistic hypotheses. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021, 17, e9730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Nutrients 13 02521 g001
Figure 2. Convergent analysis of the differentially expressed genes obtained from the three datasets: (A) Venn diagram comparing differentially expressed genes identified in the included datasets (adjusted p < 0.05); (B) list of genes derived from the convergent functional genomics analysis in human and mouse models. Hs: Homo sapiens; Mm: Mus musculus.
Figure 2. Convergent analysis of the differentially expressed genes obtained from the three datasets: (A) Venn diagram comparing differentially expressed genes identified in the included datasets (adjusted p < 0.05); (B) list of genes derived from the convergent functional genomics analysis in human and mouse models. Hs: Homo sapiens; Mm: Mus musculus.
Nutrients 13 02521 g002
Figure 3. Upstream regulatory pathway analysis of the 35 selected differentially expressed genes: (A). transcription factor enrichment analysis; (B) protein–protein interaction expansion; (C) kinase enrichment analysis; (D) eXpression2Kinases network. Figures were obtained from the X2K Web (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/X2K/, accessed on 12 May 2021) after running the upstream pathway analysis of the selected genes as the input gene list.
Figure 3. Upstream regulatory pathway analysis of the 35 selected differentially expressed genes: (A). transcription factor enrichment analysis; (B) protein–protein interaction expansion; (C) kinase enrichment analysis; (D) eXpression2Kinases network. Figures were obtained from the X2K Web (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/X2K/, accessed on 12 May 2021) after running the upstream pathway analysis of the selected genes as the input gene list.
Nutrients 13 02521 g003aNutrients 13 02521 g003b
Figure 4. Bioinformatics- and knowledge-based pathway reconstruction after Cr supplementation. This is a representation of pathways interactions based on the results of our enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes after increasing cellular Cr concentration and the available experimental evidence. This functional network follows the ‘bio-logic’ (integration of bottom-up and top-down directions) of the genotype–outcome interaction. MAPK activation can occur via osmosensing pathways that activate Ras/Raf (e.g., S1P/SPHK1) and mechanosensing pathways that involve mechanical and energy optimization of the cytoskeleton (e.g., Four-and-a-Half Lim 2 is an important mechanosensor that triggers hypertrophy in response to strain and also docks key metabolic enzymes involved in the energy transduction process, such as M-CK, adenylate kinase, and phosphofructokinase). Several subunits of the protein complexes and the architecture of the cytoskeleton are not depicted for readability. We cautiously suggest two dose–response functional pathways for the regulation of the Cr uptake: a kinase-driven mechanism as a result of the initial Cr-enriched environment, which is more related to the anterograde trafficking via endolysosome-specific phosphoinositide compounds (1); and a ubiquitin-driven mechanism that controls the excessive Cr uptake, which is more related to the retrograde trafficking via clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent processes (2). Interlinking protein filaments of the cytoskeleton are represented with lighter-colored lines in the background. See the sections of the manuscript for rationale, citations, and more abbreviations. Dashed arrows represent multiple steps. AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; CK: creatine kinase; GASP-1: growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-associated serum protein-1; GDP: guanosine diphosphate; GH: growth hormone; GLUT: glucose transporter; GRB2: growth factor receptor-bound protein 2; GTP: guanosine triphosphate; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor-1; LST8: target of rapamycin complex subunit LST8; MRFs: myogenic regulatory factors; Nedd4-2: E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase NEDD4-like; OSR1: oxidative-stress-responsive kinase 1; PDK1: phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1; PFK: phosphofructokinase; PI(3,5)P2: phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate; PIKfyve: 1-phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PIP3: phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate; PK: pyruvate kinase; SGK: serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase; SPAK: SPS1-related proline–alanine-rich kinase; RACK1: receptor for activated C kinase 1; RTK: receptor tyrosine kinases; TFs: transcription factors. Source: created by the authors (D.A.B.) with BioRender—https://biorender.com/ (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Figure 4. Bioinformatics- and knowledge-based pathway reconstruction after Cr supplementation. This is a representation of pathways interactions based on the results of our enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes after increasing cellular Cr concentration and the available experimental evidence. This functional network follows the ‘bio-logic’ (integration of bottom-up and top-down directions) of the genotype–outcome interaction. MAPK activation can occur via osmosensing pathways that activate Ras/Raf (e.g., S1P/SPHK1) and mechanosensing pathways that involve mechanical and energy optimization of the cytoskeleton (e.g., Four-and-a-Half Lim 2 is an important mechanosensor that triggers hypertrophy in response to strain and also docks key metabolic enzymes involved in the energy transduction process, such as M-CK, adenylate kinase, and phosphofructokinase). Several subunits of the protein complexes and the architecture of the cytoskeleton are not depicted for readability. We cautiously suggest two dose–response functional pathways for the regulation of the Cr uptake: a kinase-driven mechanism as a result of the initial Cr-enriched environment, which is more related to the anterograde trafficking via endolysosome-specific phosphoinositide compounds (1); and a ubiquitin-driven mechanism that controls the excessive Cr uptake, which is more related to the retrograde trafficking via clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent processes (2). Interlinking protein filaments of the cytoskeleton are represented with lighter-colored lines in the background. See the sections of the manuscript for rationale, citations, and more abbreviations. Dashed arrows represent multiple steps. AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; CK: creatine kinase; GASP-1: growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-associated serum protein-1; GDP: guanosine diphosphate; GH: growth hormone; GLUT: glucose transporter; GRB2: growth factor receptor-bound protein 2; GTP: guanosine triphosphate; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor-1; LST8: target of rapamycin complex subunit LST8; MRFs: myogenic regulatory factors; Nedd4-2: E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase NEDD4-like; OSR1: oxidative-stress-responsive kinase 1; PDK1: phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1; PFK: phosphofructokinase; PI(3,5)P2: phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate; PIKfyve: 1-phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PIP3: phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate; PK: pyruvate kinase; SGK: serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase; SPAK: SPS1-related proline–alanine-rich kinase; RACK1: receptor for activated C kinase 1; RTK: receptor tyrosine kinases; TFs: transcription factors. Source: created by the authors (D.A.B.) with BioRender—https://biorender.com/ (accessed on 10 May 2021).
Nutrients 13 02521 g004
Table 1. Datasets used in the convergent functional genomic analysis.
Table 1. Datasets used in the convergent functional genomic analysis.
OrganismReferenceGEO
Number
DesignCreatineControlPlatform
Human[70]GSE7877Expression profiling of vastus lateralis muscle in a randomized, placebo-
controlled, crossover, double-blind design in young, healthy, non-obese men supplemented with CrM vs. placebo (dextrose) for ten days
1212Buck Institute_Homo sapiens_25K_verC
Mouse[71]GSE5140Analysis of brains of C57Bl/6J animals fed a Cr-supplemented diet for six months67Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Array
Mouse[72]GSE423563T3 fibroblasts overexpressing CRT were treated with 5mM CrM33Illumina MouseWG-6 v2.0 expression beadchip
Table 2. Functional annotation and miRNA enrichment analysis of the list of genes from the convergent analysis.
Table 2. Functional annotation and miRNA enrichment analysis of the list of genes from the convergent analysis.
CategoryGO IDTermAdjusted p-Value
Biological ProcessGO:0030879Mammary gland development0.00538
GO:0043069Negative regulation of programmed cell death0.01899
GO:0045765Regulation of angiogenesis0.03483
GO:0071542Dopaminergic neuron differentiation0.05505
GO:0001934Positive regulation of protein phosphorylation0.05505
Cellular ComponentGO:0005664Nuclear origin of replication recognition complex0.2386
GO:0005682U5 snRNP0.2386
GO:0031904Endosome lumen0.2386
GO:0046540U4/U6 x U5 tri-snRNP complex0.2386
GO:0005637Nuclear inner membrane0.2386
Molecular FunctionGO:0035198miRNA binding0.05290
GO:0036002Pre-mRNA binding0.05290
GO:0048365Rac GTPase binding0.05290
GO:0031593Polyubiquitin-modification-dependent protein binding0.05290
GO:0001664G-protein-coupled receptor binding0.05290
DatabasemiRBase AccessionDescriptionAdjusted p-Value
miRTarBaseMIMAT0000416Mature sequence Homo sapiens miR-1-3p0.0942
MIMAT0000275Mature sequence Homo sapiens miR-218-5p0.1405
MIMAT0000447Mature sequence Homo sapiens miR-134-5p0.1513
MIMAT0022487Mature sequence Homo sapiens miR-56940.1961
MI0000542Stem loop sequence Homo sapiens miR-320a0.2492
Table 3. Information of predicted miRNAs interacting with the list of genes from the CFG analysis.
Table 3. Information of predicted miRNAs interacting with the list of genes from the CFG analysis.
MicroRNARelevant Information
miR-1-3pSuppresses the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma [129] and slows the proliferation and invasion of gastric [130] and lung adenocarcinoma [131].
miR-218-5pSignificantly upregulated during myogenic differentiation after activating the IGF-1 and MAPK/ERK pathways [132].
miR-134-5pLower levels are found in prostate cancer compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia [133]. In addition, it might have neuroprotective effects by regulating the miR-134-5p/CREB pathway in both humans and mice [134].
miR-5694Mediates downregulation of AF9 (a subunit of the super elongation complex and associates with the histone methyltransferases) and provides metastatic advantages in basal-like breast cancer cells [135].
miR-320aAlthough associated with certain types of cancer, it has been shown to inhibit the proliferation and progression of melanoma [136] and gastric adenocarcinoma [137].
miR-200b-3pHigher expression is found in prostate cancer compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia [133].
miR-126a-3pIt targets low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein 1 and blocks WNT signaling, which partially explain the anti-tumor effects of curcumin [138].
miR-378a-3pExhibits tumor-suppressive and anti-metastatic effects in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [139] and glioblastoma multiforme [140]; however, miR-378a might also have a pro-angiogenic effect on myoblasts and control vascularization of skeletal muscle [141].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bonilla, D.A.; Moreno, Y.; Rawson, E.S.; Forero, D.A.; Stout, J.R.; Kerksick, C.M.; Roberts, M.D.; Kreider, R.B. A Convergent Functional Genomics Analysis to Identify Biological Regulators Mediating Effects of Creatine Supplementation. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082521

AMA Style

Bonilla DA, Moreno Y, Rawson ES, Forero DA, Stout JR, Kerksick CM, Roberts MD, Kreider RB. A Convergent Functional Genomics Analysis to Identify Biological Regulators Mediating Effects of Creatine Supplementation. Nutrients. 2021; 13(8):2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bonilla, Diego A., Yurany Moreno, Eric S. Rawson, Diego A. Forero, Jeffrey R. Stout, Chad M. Kerksick, Michael D. Roberts, and Richard B. Kreider. 2021. "A Convergent Functional Genomics Analysis to Identify Biological Regulators Mediating Effects of Creatine Supplementation" Nutrients 13, no. 8: 2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082521

APA Style

Bonilla, D. A., Moreno, Y., Rawson, E. S., Forero, D. A., Stout, J. R., Kerksick, C. M., Roberts, M. D., & Kreider, R. B. (2021). A Convergent Functional Genomics Analysis to Identify Biological Regulators Mediating Effects of Creatine Supplementation. Nutrients, 13(8), 2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop