Next Article in Journal
Diet Intervention Study through Telemedicine Assistance for Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Selenium Deficiency Partially Mimics the Metabolic Effects of Arsenic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/nu13082895
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Where Do Online Games Fit into the Health Behaviour Ecology of Emerging Adults: A Scoping Review

by
David Micallef
*,
Linda Brennan
,
Lukas Parker
,
Bruno Schivinski
and
Michaela Jackson
School of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne 3000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(8), 2895; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082895
Submission received: 25 June 2021 / Revised: 13 August 2021 / Accepted: 19 August 2021 / Published: 23 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Online video games are a common pastime for emerging adults (EAs). EAs are an age group that is of interest in health communication because habits formed during this life stage can cause or prevent disease later in life. Guided by three research questions, this scoping review identifies the current state of research into socio-ecological influences on physical activity and diet behaviours of EAs. The review also examines the role that online video games play within this behavioural ecology. In total, 112 articles were found that focused on behavioural ecological influences for physical activity and diet behaviour among EAs. Seven of these articles focused on the impact of online video games, although only in conjunction with their influence on physical activity, identifying a gap in understanding the influence of online games on diet. Results show that online video games are currently under-researched in terms of impacts on physical activity and diet despite the prevalence of the use of these games within the EA cohort.

1. Introduction

Emerging adulthood, defined as the life stage between the ages of 18 to 25 years, is the peak time of online video game usage [1,2]. In Australia, 67% of emerging adults (EAs) play video games for an average of 89 min per day [1]. As a result of increasingly high-speed internet connectivity, online games—video games played through computer networks—have become a popular form of game play. Online games range from simple single-player games to large virtual worlds featuring thousands of players at once [3]. Despite these considerable usage statistics, online games and associated channels, such as streaming and eSports, are not regularly used in health communication [4]. These channels have, however, become a part of advertising and marketing strategies for technology, lifestyle and food brands wanting to engage EAs [5]. The purpose of this scoping review is to explore the current literature into the health behavioural ecology of EAs and understand the current state of research into online games and their relationship with diet and activity as a part of this ecosystem.

1.1. The Importance of Addressing EA Health Behaviour

Chronic health conditions arising from inadequate diets and lack of physical activity are a global health problem [6,7,8]. Emerging adulthood is a critical point in the prevention of future chronic disease because EAs build lifelong habits during this period [9,10,11]. EAs show a drastic reduction in levels of physical activity during emerging adulthood as compared to their adolescence [12,13]. They also eat less fresh fruit and vegetables and consume more energy-dense-nutrition-poor (EDNP) foods such as fast food and sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages [8,14]. The combination of less physical activity, worsening diets, and the importance of this life stage in setting future habits make understanding EAs’ health behaviours important for health promotion professionals globally.
During emerging adulthood, EAs go through major transitions in both their social and physical environments. Socially, EAs make new friends as they enter further education, new living situations, or the workforce, and become less reliant on the networks formed during high school or the influence from parents [10,15]. There are also numerous changes in the physical environment for EAs. For example, EAs often transition to new study environments and/or new workplaces, are likely to move out of their parental home [10,11], and are exposed to new environments with unhealthy food options [16]. EAs are also more likely to move in and out of relationships multiple times during this life stage [10]. The combination of these elements increases the complexity of EAs’ lived experiences and therefore presents challenges for health professionals and communicators seeking to understand these experiences and establish healthful behaviours.

1.2. EAs Live in Behavioural Ecologies: Behavioural Ecological Models (BEMs)

Understanding what influences EAs’ daily activities is critical to the development of interventions or campaigns that support their healthy lives. To help understand the complexity of EAs’ lived experiences, behavioural ecological models (BEMs) are useful frameworks because they permit an insight into the myriad of external and internal factors that affect an individual’s behaviour [17]. BEMs take a systems thinking approach to social issues and seek to understand the influences of and connections between actors in an ecological system of behaviours [18]. Systems thinking approaches take into account behavioural ecologies and are beneficial in the dissemination of health information and the implementation of social marketing interventions for health. This is because they aim to consider, account for, and target multiple actors within this ecology [19].
The scoping review used a four-level BEM model [20] to categorize influences on EAs’ behaviours [21]. These levels include: (1) macro-level socio-cultural influences, such as societal mores and traditions; (2) meso-level community influences, such the media and the regulatory environment; (3) meso-level local influences such as communities, workplaces and neighbourhoods; and (4) micro-level individual influences such as family, peers, and individual characteristics, such as pre-dispositions and background
Research into EAs’ behaviours has been focused on behaviour change theories whereby EAs are considered as rational decision makers about lifestyle and health (e.g., Allom, et al. [22]; Hamilton and White [23]). However, the BEM suggests that there are many other bi-directional influences at work across the four levels of the model, as well as positing that social influences predominate due to their proximity to the individual. A BEM framework moves beyond behaviour change theories and helps to understand the context in which EAs are performing the behaviours that we are aiming to change [24,25]. In the context of physical activity and diet, the BEM can help identify the broad range of influences that EAs contend with when living their lives.
EAs engage within their behavioural ecologies differently to other life stages due to the range of instabilities in their lives, from changes to personal relationships and support networks to changes to their physical environments [10]. EAs also engage with digital environments differently to other age groups and have been difficult to reach with health communication [26]. Further, in a rapidly changing digital environment, reaching EAs with the appropriate technology, application, or platform is also quickly changing [27]. For example, EAs have moved away from television in comparison to other age groups, opting for streaming and on-demand services. They also have the highest usage of social media among any age group [28]. The high use of digital media, including video games, is also linked to the health of EAs, with studies showing that increased screen time can have an impact on body mass index and dietary behaviours [29].

1.3. Online Games as Part of the Behavioural Ecologies of EAs

Online games have spurred the emergence other activities that complement online game play. These activities include eSports, multi-player online games played as a form of competition between professional players either as individuals or teams [30]. There has also been a similar emergence of game streaming, the broadcast of live video game play in a matter similar to the broadcast of live sports through game streaming platforms such as YouTube or Twitch [3].
Whilst emerging adulthood is the peak for video game usage across all age groups [1,2], little appears to be known about how these games and associated activities exist within the behavioural ecology of EAs’ lived experiences. For example, are games a virtual behavioural ecology? If yes, are the elements of the ecology commensurate with other behavioural ecologies? Do games influence EAs’ engagement across and within their behavioural ecology? If so, how? And importantly, in understanding the influence of games as a form of behavioural ecology, can health communicators leverage online games to enhance health outcomes for EAs?

1.4. The Current Study

To answer these questions, we undertook a scoping study using the Arksey and O’Malley [31] framework. Scoping studies are an appropriate methodology when exploring the depth and breadth of a research in a particular field [31]. Scoping studies are particularly necessary when not much is known about the phenomenon in question [29], and where there are no a priori hypotheses to test with more formal meta-analyses or systematic reviews [31]. Scoping reviews aim to map existing research, include a greater range of study designs, and provide a descriptive overview rather than synthesize available research [31,32].
While a significant amount of research is conducted in health settings [7], it is not known what research is being conducted throughout the behavioural ecosystem. As recently outlined by Nagata, et al. [33], important gaps in knowledge should be addressed to advance this important field of research, including examinations of current scholarly literature. Whilst a scoping review into the link between video games and physical health has been conducted by Huard Pelletier et al. [29], to the best of the authors’ knowledge this is the first scoping review to look at online games as part of a broader ecology of physical activity and diet behaviour of EAs.
Considering that, the objective of this scoping review is to identify recent research into the influences that impact physical activity and diet for EAs, specifically with a view to ascertaining the impact of online video games on EAs healthful behaviours. Three research questions guided our scoping review:
  • RQ1—To what extent has academic and grey literature explored the behavioural ecological influences of physical activity and diet behaviour of emerging adults?
  • RQ2: To what extent has this literature explored online video games as an influence of physical activity and diet behaviour of emerging adults?
  • RQ3: Where do online video games fit into the health behaviour ecologies of emerging adults?

2. Materials and Methods

For this scoping review we used the five-stage (steps) procedure suggested by Arksey and O’Malley [31]: (i) identify the research question; (ii) identify relevant studies; (iii) select studies using the PRISMA protocol; (iv) chart the data; and (v) collate, summarize and report the results.
In Step 1, the research questions were developed and used to guide the research process. A coding frame for each of the aspects of the BEM was adapted from Parker and Brennan’s work [24,34]. The final coding frame and definitions are provided in Appendix A.
In Step 2, the search terms “emerging adults” and (“physical activity” OR diet) and varying search terms based on the BEM coding frame were used to identify articles on the following six databases: ProQuest (including PsycInfo and Social Science databases), EBSCO (including AMED, Business Source Complete and SPORTDiscus) and Google Scholar. These databases were chosen because they gave a cross section of health and social science literature. Separate searches were also run to identify literature for “computer game*” OR “online game*” OR “video game*” and their variations. The full list of search terms and the results by database are provided in Appendix B. The search was limited to title, abstract, and keywords for the time period of 2010 to 2020 to restrict searches to the most recent literature. In addition, only articles available in English and in full-text form were searched. The initial search identified 146,450 articles. Due to the large number of results, study identification was limited to reviewing the most relevant results from searches. The coding frame was used to identify relevant literature related to the study questions based on a review of the title, keywords, and abstract. A total of 220 articles were identified in this step.
In Step 3, a second review of titles, abstracts, keywords, and methodologies was conducted to identify literature relevant to the study questions and remove titles that did not meet the study relevance criteria. For example, whilst the term “young people” was used as part of the search criteria, a review of methodology was essential at this stage to ensure that studies included participants in the 18–25 age group. Similarly, studies that focused on health but which did not measure physical activity or diet or did not focus on healthy participants were not included. The full-text was not reviewed at this stage. The PRISMA protocol was used as the basis for classifying the studies [35] but was adapted to reflect the methodology. Studies were included if they focused on EAs’ physical activity or diet behaviours or were broader population studies that also included EAs. A total of 111 studies were excluded during this step as they did not include EAs or were not relevant to external influences on physical activity and diet. Therefore, the selection process identified a total of 108 relevant studies. This included the proceedings of two conferences and one thesis due to their relevance to the influence of physical activity and diet behaviour.
A further four articles outside of the original date range were identified through citation searching and were included due to their relevance to the research question, bringing the total to 112. Figure 1 outlines the PRISMA flowchart for the selection of studies.
For the charting of data (Step 4), the full-text was reviewed, and data were manually extracted from the selected studies and imported into Microsoft Excel. Data extracted included the publication details (authors, journal, year of publication, keywords), abstract, study aim, methodology, country of study, population count, and demographics (age and gender or sex where specified). A quality assessment was implemented to explore the validity, results, and relevance of the articles [36]. This was necessary considering the varying age ranges identified that included the study population of 18–25, and the differing definitions of emerging adulthood.
To critically appraise the articles, the hierarchy of evidence framework for assessing healthcare [37] was used as it considers the effectiveness, feasibility, and appropriateness of the study. In addition, articles were assessed based on Brennan et al.’s [21] levels of evidence required for decision making. The combination of the two frameworks meant the study used a well-known quality appraisal system to assess study design combined with a consideration of the direct relevance of the evidence to emerging adulthood. Articles were individually assessed based on both frameworks. No articles were excluded based on the quality appraisal; the investigators used the quality assessment rating in the analysis of findings relevant to EAs, outlined in the results section of this paper.
A coding frame was developed to identify influences on the physical activity and diet behaviour of EAs, grouped by the levels of the BEM. Following charting, studies were analysed (Step 5) through a manual review of the full text, with each influence marked in its relevant category in the database. The final coding frame is provided in Appendix A. Studies often identified multiple influences. In these instances, studies were coded under multiple categories. For example, Amuta, et al. [38]’s qualitative exploration of family, health professional, and peer advice on physical activity was rated under each of these corresponding categories of peer, parents, and health professional. To confirm the analysis, two investigators independently screened a selection (n = 10) of included studies against the coding frame. All conflicts were discussed until a joint consensus was reached on the categorization. In addition, the main findings of each study relevant to the influences of physical activity and diet behaviour of EAs were manually entered into the database to allow a textual analysis of findings related to influences. Further analysis was conducted on the participant size of studies, age, the methodological approaches, and the country of origin of the studies.

3. Results

The scoping review identified a total of n = 112 studies focused on the physical activity and diet behaviour of EAs that attributed behaviours to an external influence. Table 1 tabulates all the studies included in the scoping review, their key characteristics, and their analysis according to the BEM. A supplementary reference list (Supplementary Materials) has been provided that corresponds to the ID numbers listed in Table 1. The review identified 39 studies that looked at both physical activity and diet, 43 studies focusing solely on physical activity, and 30 studies focusing solely on diet. The data highlighted a stronger focus on physical activity, which predominantly focused on measuring levels of exercise in relation to physical activity guidelines. Most studies were published between 2015 and 2020 (n = 86; 76.8%), with the most articles in 2020 (n = 20; 17.8%). The majority were published in the United States (n = 47; 41.9%), followed by Australia (n = 20; 17.8%), the United Kingdom (n = 12; 10.7%), and Canada (n = 9; 8.0%). Figure 2 provides a yearly breakdown of identified studies for the initial search timeline.
Studies included a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with quantitative studies including cross-sectional and longitudinal research. Some literature reviews were also included, as well as grey literature (n = 3; 2.7%) [39,40,41]. For empirical studies, the study populations ranged from n = 18 [42] to n = 33,097 [43] and included a range of ages from 13 to 69. Whilst the research question focused on EAs aged 18–25, results identified multiple definitions of the age range for EAs, as well as studies that intersected or included the 18–25 age group. Studies included female, male, and some non-binary participants.

3.1. RQ1. Behavioural Ecological Influences on Health

When analysing the frequency of influences based on the group levels of the BEM, individual influences were the focus of a majority of studies (n = 151). This was followed by local influences (n = 129), community influences (n = 96), and socio-cultural influences (n = 49). At the single influence level, studies had a strong focus on the university/school experience for EAs (n = 72; 64.3%), followed by the influence of peers (n = 68; 60.7%), the influence of parents and family (n = 35; 31.3%), the impact of social norms (n = 31; 27.7%), and the impacts of social media (n = 30; 26.8%).
Health professionals were the least studied group (n = 5; 4.5%), followed by cultural norms (n = 8; 7.1%). An overview of the influences identified by the scoping review is presented in Figure 3. It should be noted that most studies (n = 105; 93.7%) measured multiple influences, resulting in the total frequency of influences being higher than the total number of studies (n = 112).
For socio-cultural influences, research into the influence of physical activity and diet behaviour most often identified the impact that social norms (n = 31; 27.7%) have on the behaviour of EAs, followed by gender norms (n = 10; 8.9%) and cultural norms (n = 8; 7.1%). There was interplay between socio-cultural influences and other influences in the BEM, with all studies that identified the impact of socio-cultural influences also identifying influences at other levels of the model, primarily at the individual level. As an example, Bruening, et al. [44] and Munt et al. [16] found that EAs often feel a societal expectation to eat unhealthily in certain situations, such as birthdays or holiday periods, which are often reinforced by either peers or family members. Similarly, Sogari, et al. [45] identified that EAs often feel a societal pressure to look a certain way and feel an obligation to be seen to be healthy around peers. This was mirrored across other research of socio-cultural influences, highlighting that current research explores this level of influence in conjunction with other influences in EAs behavioural ecology. In addition, the scoping review identified further impacts on EA behaviour based on gender and sexuality. For example, diet and exercise behaviour may be impacted by societal expectations on how much women are supposed to eat or how they are supposed to look [16,46]. Similarly, gay men report a pressure to maintain a certain body weight and shape that drives their eating and exercise routines [43,47].
Research into the influences at the community level focused on social media (n = 30; 26.8%) and health promotion by governments (n = 28; 25%), as well as the influence of media (n = 14; 12.5%), advertising (n = 14; 12.5%), and celebrities (n = 10; 8.9%). Research often focused on exploring how EAs engage with these influences through digital media. For example, Goodyear, et al. [48] and Sbaffi and Zhao [49] explored how EAs navigate official sources of information from government and health providers, as well as unofficial sources of information from peers, celebrities, and broader community social media posts. There were consistent findings that EAs are sophisticated consumers of health information online [48,50], suffer from exposure to the sophisticated digital presences of the food industry [51,52], and that government health messages are not tailored enough to influence EA behaviour [52,53]. They also actively seek out information and advice on health and food choices from celebrities and micro-celebrities [54].
There were common findings in the dual role that social media plays as an enabler and a barrier to physical activity and diet for EAs [48,53]. For example, food-related social media can encourage unhealthy eating, but can also motivate healthful behaviours when EAs see images of healthy food [55]. In answering the research question, research at this level of the BEM is heavily focused on how EAs interact with popular media and the influencers that reach EAs through these mediums.
Local influences have been heavily studied in relation to physical activity and diet, with a total of 129 local level influences identified (see Figure 3). Research in this field is heavily skewed towards the impact of the study environment or studies that are solely focused on EAs in a university setting, with 72 (64.3%) out of 112 studies focused on the education environment. For example, Diehl and Hilger [56] and Gropper et al. [13] identified the decrease in health outcomes for EAs in the shift from secondary to tertiary education. Laska, et al. [57] and Berg, et al. [58] identified even worse health outcomes for EAs attending two-year versus four-year colleges due to less exposure to campus health services and demographic differences. Studies also identified the impact of interactions with the food environment (n = 21; 18.8%) and the physical activity environment (n = 18; 16.1%). For example, Kapinos, et al. [59] identified the impact that environmental elements, such as the availability and proximity of food options, as well as the availability of physical activity facilities, has on EAs’ physical activity and diet behaviour. This is further influenced by the wider availability and lower cost of fast-food options [45,60]. EAs living in low-socio-economic status (SES) neighbourhoods experience an increased negative impact, with increased availability of fast food and less access to green spaces, which further limits physical activity [61].
At the local level, studies looking into the impact of the workplace (n = 13; 11.6%) focused primarily on the longitudinal effects of being in employment. For example, Bell and Lee [62], Kwan, et al. [63], and Li et al. [8] all identified that EAs in employment fared better than unemployed EAs in terms of physical activity. One study was identified that looked into the workplace factors that could influence healthy or unhealthy behaviours in EAs. Watts, et al. [64] identified the impact that workplace food practices, such as the availability of EDNP food and beverages, can have on EAs’ healthy behaviours. Limited studies were also identified examining the impact of health practitioners (n = 5; 4.5%). Studies measuring this influence focused on how EAs access information from health practitioners online, rather than measuring direct interventions through visits with health practitioners.
At the individual level, EAs’ physical activity and diet behaviour was heavily studied, with 151 individual influences identified in the scoping review. The research was concentrated on the influence of peers (n = 68; 60.7%), followed by family (n = 35; 31.3%), the home environment (n = 26; 23.2%), and intimate partners (n = 22; 19.6%). Peers were shown to play an increasing role in influencing physical activity and diet behaviour, including how much exercise EAs undertake [65] and the type of food they eat [66]. Peers were found to play a role as motivators [67] and social supports for behaviours [8,68]. However, they can also influence negative behaviours related to diet and exercise [44,45]. The role of parents in influencing these behaviours was less clear. Some studies found that parental influence is less impactful than peers for EAs [66,69,70], while others showed that parents continued to be a stronger influence [8,15,71]. Parental influence was also intertwined with the influence of the home environment, with those still living at home having more access to fresh fruit and vegetables—which are seen as more expensive choices for EAs living away from their parents [44,54,56,72]
The role of intimate partners also has a complex relationship in the influence of physical activity and diet behaviour of EAs. Current intimate partners or the prospect of attracting a romantic or sexual partner can be a strong motivator for exercise and a healthy diet [69,73]. EAs entering relationships, however, have worse health outcomes than their single peers [74], with women faring worse than men [62,75].

3.2. RQ2. Extent of Research into the Influence of Online Games on Physical Activity and Diet

When looking at the extent of research into the influence of online games, seven studies (6.3%) were identified that looked at online games’ impact on the health behaviour ecology of EAs. Table 2 provides an outline of these seven studies, their key characteristics, and the intersections with other influences according to the BEM. All seven studies were focused on physical activity and employed a range of study methods including literature reviews (n = 2), quantitative studies (n = 3), and randomized controlled trials (n = 2). No studies were identified that focused on diet. Empirical studies were conducted in the USA (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), Singapore (n = 1), and Hong Kong (n = 1), and populations ranged from n = 305 [76] to n = 1315 [39]. None of the studies looked at the impact of online games on dietary behaviours.
When looking at the focus of the studies, three examined the impact of exergames on physical activity behaviour [76,77,78] and two looked into the impact of the augmented reality game Pokémon Go on physical activity [39,79]. While physical activity is a secondary outcome of augmented reality games like Pokémon Go, exergames incorporate exercising as a primary part of gameplay and include peer-based competitions and interactions with the home environment [78]. EAs, however, do not engage with exergames for the primary purpose of physical activity, with the games often failing to maintain EAs’ interest in the long term [79].
Two studies identified positive impacts of playing video games for EAs. For example, playing sports video games has been found to have an association with participation is real life sports clubs [80]. The longitudinal study found a predictive effect between playing sports video games and increased participation in sports clubs. Non-sport video games were not found to have a similar effect on sport participation. Adachi and Willoughby [80] concluded that EAs’ increased levels of self-esteem from playing sports video games was behind the long-term association with playing sports in real life. EAs playing games online with a range of known and unknown peers can also lead to positive outcomes. For example, Adachi and Willoughby [81] literature review identified that engaging online in cooperative or competitive play can have positive benefits in the way that EAs relate with peers they meet online. This effect was seen regardless of whether EAs were playing violent or non-violent video games.
In answer to the research question, the scoping review identified only a limited set of research into the impact of online games on EAs’ physical activity behaviour, with no results identified on the impact of online games on diet.

3.3. RQ3. Where Do Online Games Fit in EAs’ Health Behavioural Ecologies?

When considering where online games fit into EAs’ health behaviour ecology, the scoping review identified intersections at multiple levels of the BEM, including at the individual level (n = 3), the local level (n = 8), and community influences (n = 1).
Peers (n = 3) were the only influence identified at the individual level, as online gameplay supports the interaction of EAs with both known peers and peers who EAs meet through online competitive or cooperative gameplay [39,78,81]. The large proportion of studies focused on EAs in tertiary education was mirrored in the studies identified about online games, with four out of the seven studies focused on university students. However, at the local level of the BEM, EAs’ interaction with the physical activity environment (n = 4) was also heavily studied. This identified positive links between sports games and sports club participation [80,81] and the exploration of local environments through the augmented reality game Pokémon Go leading to physical activity [39,79].
When comparing the analysis of online game influences with the broader analysis into the body of research reviewed in RQ1, there are a number of gaps highlighted by the results. Out of 17 types of influences identified across this scoping review, four types of influences intersect with online games. None of the research about online games focused on the influence of diet, and no research examined the impact of socio-cultural influences, while only one study included the impact of a community influence [39]. This suggests that while the current results may situate online games at either the individual or local influence level of the BEM, and the extant research is quite limited.

4. Discussion

Emerging adulthood is an important stage in establishing lifelong healthy habits. Humans perform their daily lives in behavioural ecologies [53]. Thus, the objective of this scoping review was to identify current research into the influences that impact EAs’ physical activity and diet behaviours using a behavioural ecological model to understand where online games fit into EAs’ behavioural ecologies.

4.1. Understanding the Ecology of EAs’ Physical Activity and Diet Behaviour

The findings of this scoping review were consistent with Arnett’s depiction of disruption during this life stage, especially at the individual and local levels of influence [10]. The disruption of social and support networks was a common factor, with newfound peers becoming a major influence on physical activity and diet behaviour [65]. Emerging adulthood is a key stage to assert independence and find a group of peers and a sense of belonging. This makes the influence of peers a critical consideration for research or intervention design to support healthy behaviour.
Influences at other levels of the BEM had ties to individual influences, most often peers, indicating that bi-directional influences are in operation. For example, EAs identified that societal expectations often cause them to eat unhealthily in certain social situations or to feel pressure/expectations to act a certain way (in relation to eating and exercise) [44,45]. It was not discernible whether influences were the result of societal mores or direct influence from peers. The disruption to work, study, and living situations exposes EAs to new physical activity and food environments (i.e., meso-level influences) [59]. However, whether an EA chooses a healthy or an unhealthy option is a complex interplay between access, proximity, cost, and individual influences. For example, connection with sporting groups (local level influence) acts as a protective measure that keeps EAs active and engaged with sport [72,82]. However, group participation can also have negative outcomes on EAs through higher levels of binge-drinking (peer influence) and the advertising, sponsorship, and availability of unhealthy foods at sports facilities (local and community influences) [83]. This interplay highlights that while understanding individual influences is important, working with the full ecology of health behaviour through tools such as the BEM may give greater insights that can support future research and intervention design.
Whilst this review has been focused on identifying research into the influence of online games and where gaming fits in the health ecology of EAs, the scoping review has also identified other gaps in the field. For example, research focused heavily on EAs who are currently in education. Only one study looked into the influence of the workplace [64] and no studies provided any insights into EAs who did not enter education or employment, suggesting gap in both research and interventions for a population that is potentially in greater need. Limited evidence was also found of studies examining the role of health professionals in directly influencing the physical activity and diet behaviours of EAs.
Similarly, eight studies in the scoping review identified an influence based on cultural norms. However, the majority of the cultural influences identified were secondary to the main purpose of the study. For example, Baiocchi-Wagner and Talley [84] and Guntzviller, et al. [85] studies measuring the role of parental influence found that EAs from cultures that traditionally place a lot of value in the role of elders had stronger levels of parental influence. Uijtdewilligen et al. [75] hinted at cultural differences in the research population but did not study cultural influences directly. Conversely, Walker et al.’s study into the health of Indigenous Australian EAs took a direct approach at understanding the cultural influences that impacted Indigenous Australians’ health [42]. There is further opportunity to explore the role that cultural norms continue to play in EAs’ behaviours, especially through the shift between parental/family and peer influences during this life stage.

4.2. Understanding the Influence of Online Games

Considering the high level of usage of online games for EAs, there is substantial potential to study the impacts of online games on EAs’ physical activity and diet behaviour.
There are a number of intersections between online games and influences at different levels of the BEM, such as the intersection of physical activity environments [39,80] with peer relationships [81]. There are other intersections that were not explored. For example, many online games place the user in a vast and immersive virtual world where food and physical activity behaviours are a common part of their character’s and avatar’s experience [86]. However, no research was identified on the impact of these behaviours in virtual worlds on EAs’ physical activity and diet behaviours. In contrast, in-game health behaviours have been shown to have an impact on real-world behaviour. For example, Cranwell, et al. [87] study on the impact of tobacco and alcohol use in video games showed a correlation between exposure to these virtual behaviours and actual use. Furthermore, no relationships were found on the influence of food advertising in online games, even though the use of online games, eSports, and game streaming platforms is now a common part of the marketing strategies for brands wanting to engage with EAs [5]. Intersections were also not found between online games and socio-cultural influences, even though the broader scoping review found other mediums such as social media, mainstream or traditional media, and advertising intersect with social, cultural, and gender norms in relation to physical activity and diet.
There is no apparent research on game-specific microcelebrities and their influence on physical activity and diet behaviour for EAs, despite the growth of this sector in recent years [5]. Microcelebrities are social media users who amass large followings through the personal content that they share [4]. Game-specific microcelebrities use streaming platforms such as Twitch to stream their gameplay live to audiences that can reach into the millions. Microcelebrities have been shown to have a level of influence with their audience that can mimic the influence of peers [4]. Lee et al. [4] study identified that mental health disclosures by microcelebrities on Twitch had positive impacts on the mental health help-seeking behaviour of their audience. They identified a lack of research into how powerful influencer channels may be used to engage audiences with positive health messages. Research identified in this scoping review focused on the influence of celebrities and social media influencers. Further investigation into game-specific microcelebrities may identify a new channel of reaching EAs, especially men, who are under-represented in microcelebrity channel posts about physical activity, nutrition, and diet [88].
Online games provide EAs the opportunity to engage with their peers in virtual worlds, whether they be known peers that they also engage with offline or new peers that they know only online. Through the competitive and cooperative nature of online games, players form teams and social groups to engage with the games. There is an opportunity for future research to explore whether there is a potential to leverage these virtual peer relationships to encourage healthful dietary behaviours and physical activity. Recent work by Parkinson, et al. [89] identifies a framework for the use of online third places to support the improvement of wellbeing. With an increasing number of massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs) allowing the establishment of branded, interactive services, there is an opportunity for future research to explore the potential for these spaces to move beyond information channels and engage EAs in healthful behaviours.

4.3. Limitations

This scoping review describes and analyses the current body of knowledge on the physical activity and diet behaviour influences of EAs. The review identified that there is a large amount of research, and while it was carefully conducted, the method of the study meant it was not feasible to go through all the research in this field. There may be other relevant studies that may have not been included because they did not fit the search strategy or selection criteria of this review. Initial database searches identified a large number of articles (n = 146,450) however, the methodology did not allow for an analysis of duplicates in searches. Much research is not written in English and was therefore not included. The research was further restricted to the years 2010 to 2020 to capture the most up to date insights concerning EAs, especially as online games is a relatively recent phenomenon enabled by new technologies. The studies on online games and digital media usage were also based on the collection of data prior to 2020. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of digital environments has been well-reported, and current EA usage statistics are likely to be much higher than those reported in this scoping review. However, given that the rapid rise in COVID-19-related research was likely to skew the results, the research team opted to exclude 2021 from the review.

5. Conclusions

The importance of emerging adulthood in the prevention of future disease has resulted in a large focus of research on understanding EAs’ behaviours. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review that uses a behavioural ecological model to identify key influences on EAs’ lived experiences. This scoping review identified a large body of relevant research that seeks to understand different influences and the impact of these influences on physical activity and diet behaviour. While research has explored a number of key areas of the behavioural ecology, research into the influence of online games on the healthy behaviour of EAs is limited. Considering the high usage of this medium by EAs, this suggests an opportunity for further investigation into the intersection between online games and health behaviours such as diet and activity, and how these may be engaged for the purpose of health communication. This review has identified a number of opportunities for future research, especially in relation to the application of online games to education about health and diet.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu13082895/s1, Supplementary Reference List – articles included in scoping review.

Author Contributions

D.M.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; L.B.: validation, supervision, writing—reviewing & editing; L.P.: validation, supervision, writing—reviewing & editing; B.S.: validation, supervision, writing—reviewing & editing; M.J.: validation, supervision, writing—reviewing & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. Professor Brennan is part funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1115496).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Coding Frame

Table
Table A1. Coding frame to categorise scoping review studies according to behaviour and the BEM.
Table A1. Coding frame to categorise scoping review studies according to behaviour and the BEM.
CategoryDefinitionReference
Behaviour
Physical ActivityStudies focused on the measurement of movement to expend energy (physical activity) or planned activity to improve or maintain physical fitness (exercise)[90]
DietStudies measured the types of food that a person eats (diet) and/or the consumption of food based on dietary guidelines (nutrition)
Individual influences
PeerStudies identified the influence of a person in the same social group and/or demographic with which the person regularly interacts
PartnerStudies identified the influence of a person the individual is romantically or sexually involved with, or the influence of their behaviour based on a desire to attract a future romantic or sexual partner.
Home environmentStudies identified the influence exerted by the conditions of the environment in which a person lives, such as availability of cooking facilities, or ease of access to healthy or unhealthy food inside the home.
Parents and familyStudies identified the influence of the parent/child relationship or of relatives
Local influences
WorkplaceIdentifies the influence of a place of employment
School/universityStudy identifies the impact of the study environment, or the study is solely based on students in a school or tertiary education setting
Food environmentStudy identified the influence of local infrastructure that exposes individuals to healthy or unhealthy food choices such as the availability of fast-food restaurants.[59]
Health professionalStudy mentions the influence of a doctor or a health practitioner
Physical activity environmentStudy identifies the influence of local and community spaces that encourage physical activity, such as parks, walking tracks and the sporting facilities and clubs [59]
Community influences
Social mediaIdentified the influence of any web-based communication channel, most commonly well-known platforms like Facebook, Instagram and YouTube.[91]
Celebrities/micro-celebritiesStudy identified the influence of a mainstream public person (celebrity) or an individual who has gained a large following through social media (microcelebrity) in impacting behaviour. [4,92]
Government/health promotionStudy identified the influence of health information and health interventions, most commonly issued by government, health promotion or related agencies
MediaThe influence by popular culture through traditional media such as film and television.
AdvertisingStudy identified the influence of the advertising of food and drink or the advertising of social norms relating to eating, drinking and activity[93]
Socio-cultural influences
Culture Study identifies the influence of behaviour expectations based on belonging to an ethnic or cultural group
Social normsStudy identifies the influence of behaviour based on societal expectations (not directly related to ethnic groups or gender norms)[94]
Gender Study identified the influence of behaviour based on gender norms
Online games and eSports
Games and eSportsThe influence of computer games and organized online games activities and competitions (esports)[5]

Appendix B. Search Terms

Table
Table A2. Scoping review search terms and result totals.
Table A2. Scoping review search terms and result totals.
DatabaseSearch Level 1Search Level 2 (AND)Search Level 3 (AND)Date RangeResults
ProQuest“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 974,915		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 74,937		influence* OR “social influences” OR peer OR parent OR partner OR environment OR work* OR school OR university OR “social media” OR advertising OR “health communication” OR “video game*” OR “online game*” OR “computer game*” OR government OR “social norm” OR celebrity OR microcelebrity OR “physical activity environment” OR obesogenic OR “food environment”2010–202067,649
ProQuest“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 974,915		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 74,937		“video game*” OR “online game*” OR “computer game*”2010–2020381*not counted in totals as included above
EBSCO“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 247,227		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 8355		influence* OR “social influences” OR peer OR parent OR partner OR environment OR work* OR school OR university OR “social media” OR advertising OR “health communication” OR “video game*” OR “online game*” OR “computer game*” OR government OR “social norm” OR celebrity OR microcelebrity OR “physical activity environment” OR obesogenic OR “food environment”2010–20203801
EBSCO“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 247,227		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 8355		“video game*” OR “online game*” OR “computer game*”2010–202070*not counted in totals as included above
Google Scholar“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 676,000		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 23,500		influence* OR “social influences” OR peer OR parent OR partner OR environment OR work* OR school2010–202018,600
Google Scholar“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 676,000		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 23,500		university OR “social media” OR advertising OR “health communication”2010–202019,200
Google Scholar“physical activity” OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 676,000		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 23,500		video game* OR “online game*” OR “computer game*”2010–202017,100
Google Scholar“physical activity“OR exercise OR fitness OR “physical exercise” OR diet OR nutrition
n = 676,000		“young adult*” OR “emerging adult*” OR “young people”
n = 23,500		government OR “social norm” OR celebrity OR microcelebrity OR “physical activity environment” OR obesogenic OR “food environment”2010–202020,100
Totals *
Proquest67,649
EBSCO3801
Google Scholar75,000
* Searches were conducted in December 2020 and total number may vary in consecutive searches.

References

  1. Brand, J.E.; Todhunter, S.; Jervis, J. Digital Australia 2018; IGEA: Eveleigh, NSW, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. García, J.; Murillo, C. Sports video games participation: What can we learn for esports? Sport Bus. Manag. Int. J. 2020, 10, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Taylor, T.L.A. Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee, Y.-H.; Yuan, C.W.; Wohn, D.Y. How Video Streamers’ Mental Health Disclosures Affect Viewers’ Risk Perceptions. Health Commun. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Elasri-Ejjaberi, A.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, S.; Aparicio-Chueca, P. Effect of eSport sponsorship on brands: An empirical study applied to youth. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2020, 20, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. WHO. Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Corder, K.; Winpenny, E.; Love, R.; Brown, H.E.; White, M.; Van Sluijs, E. Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 53, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, K.; Liu, D.; Haynie, D.; Gee, B.; Chaurasia, A.; Seo, D.-C.; Iannotti, R.J.; Simons-Morton, B.G. Individual, social, and environmental influences on the transitions in physical activity among emerging adults. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Langdon, J.; Johnson, C.; Melton, B. Factors contributing to the uptake and maintenance of regular exercise behaviour in emerging adults. Health Educ. J. 2016, 76, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arnett, J.J. Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson, M.C.; Story, M.; Larson, N.I.; Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Lytle, L.A. Emerging Adulthood and College-aged Youth: An Overlooked Age for Weight-related Behavior Change. Obesity 2008, 16, 2205–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Larson, N.; Chen, Y.; Wall, M.; Winkler, M.R.; Goldschmidt, A.B.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Personal, behavioral, and environmental predictors of healthy weight maintenance during the transition to adulthood. Prev. Med. 2018, 113, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gropper, H.; John, J.M.; Sudeck, G.; Thiel, A. The impact of life events and transitions on physical activity: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Poobalan, A.S.; Aucott, L.S.; Clarke, A.; Smith, W.C.S. Diet behaviour among young people in transition to adulthood (18–25 year olds): A mixed method study. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 2013, 2, 909–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Belanger, N.M.; Patrick, J.H. The Influence of Source and Type of Support on College Students’ Physical Activity Behavior. J. Phys. Act. Health 2018, 15, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Munt, A.E.; Partridge, S.R.; Allman-Farinelli, M. The barriers and enablers of healthy eating among young adults: A missing piece of the obesity puzzle: A scoping review. Obes. Rev. 2016, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development Experiments by Nature and Design; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brennan, L.; Previte, J.; Fry, M.-L. Social marketing’s consumer myopia: Applying a behavioural ecological model to address wicked problems. J. Soc. Mark. 2016, 6, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ford, L.A.; Crabtree, R.D.; Hubbell, A. Crossing Borders in Health Communication Research: Toward an Ecological Understanding of Context, Complexity, and Consequences in Community-Based Health Education in the U.S.–Mexico Borderlands. Health Commun. 2009, 24, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hovell, M.; Wahlgren, D.; Adams, M. The logical and empirical basis for the behavioral ecological model. In Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research, 2nd ed.; DiClemente, R.J., Crosby, R.A., Kegler, M., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 415–449. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brennan, L.; Aleti, T.; Nguyen, D.; Binney, W.; Parker, L. Social Marketing and Behaviour Change: Models, Theory and Applications; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Allom, V.; Mullan, B.; Cowie, E.; Hamilton, K. Physical Activity and Transitioning to College: The Importance of Intentions and Habits. Am. J. Health Behav. 2016, 40, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hamilton, K.; White, K.M. Extending the theory of planned behavior: The role of self and social influences in predicting adolescent regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2008, 30, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parker, L.; Brennan, L.; Nguyen, D. 9—Social marketing: Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. In Ethical and Social Marketing in Asia; Nguyen, B., Rowley, C., Eds.; Chandos Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 161–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stokols, D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am. Psychol. 1992, 47, 6–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Klassen, K.M.; Borleis, E.S.; Brennan, L.; Reid, M.; McCaffrey, T.A.; Lim, M.S. What People “Like”: Analysis of Social Media Strategies Used by Food Industry Brands, Lifestyle Brands, and Health Promotion Organizations on Facebook and Instagram. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018, 20, e10227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ben Oumlil, A.; Balloun, J.L. Millennials’ attitude toward advertising: An international exploratory study. Young Consum. Insight Ideas Responsible Mark. 2019, 21, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sensis. Yellow Social Media Report 2020—Consumers. Available online: http://www.sensis.com.au (accessed on 4 February 2021).
  29. Pelletier, V.H.; Lessard, A.; Piché, F.; Tétreau, C.; Descarreaux, M. Video games and their associations with physical health: A scoping review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2020, 6, e000832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hallmann, K.; Giel, T. eSports‚ Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pham, M.T.; Rajić, A.; Greig, J.D.; Sargeant, J.M.; Papadopoulos, A.; McEwen, S.A. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res. Synth. Methods 2014, 5, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nagata, J.M.; Iyer, P.; Chu, J.; Baker, F.C.; Pettee Gabriel, K.; Garber, A.K.; Murray, S.B.; Bibbins-Domingo, K.; Ganson, K.T. Contemporary screen time modalities among children 9–10 years old and binge-eating disorder at one-year follow-up: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2021, 54, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Parker, L.; Brennan, L.; Wafa, S.N.; Thi, T.N.L.; Phan-Le, N.T.; Chin, S. Ethical and social marketing in Asia: A multi-country perspective. In Ethical Approaches to Marketing; Strong, C.A., Ed.; De Gruyter: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 59–81. [Google Scholar]
  35. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Evans, D. Hierarchy of evidence: A framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J. Clin. Nurs. 2003, 12, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Amuta, A.O.; Jacobs, W.; Barry, A.E. An Examination of Family, Healthcare Professionals, and Peer Advice on Physical Activity Behaviors among Adolescents at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. Health Commun. 2016, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koivisto, J.; Malik, A.; Gurkan, B.; Hamari, J. Getting Healthy by Catching Them All: A Study on the Relationship Between Player Orientations and Perceived Health Benefits in an Augmented Reality Game. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 8–11 January 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hafiz, A.; Gallagher, A.; Hill, A. The influence of social networks in increasing fruit and vegetables consumption in university students: A randomised controlled study. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2018, 77, E19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gallacher-Parousis, F. Exploring the Factors Influencing Emerging Adults Decision to Engage in Physical Activity. Ph.D. Thesis, Northcentral University, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Walker, T.; Molenaar, A.; Palermo, C. A qualitative study exploring what it means to be healthy for young Indigenous Australians and the role of social media in influencing health behaviour. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2020, 32, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Laska, M.N.; VanKim, N.A.; Erickson, D.J.; Lust, K.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Rosser, B.R.S. Disparities in Weight and Weight Behaviors by Sexual Orientation in College Students. Am. J. Public Health 2015, 105, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bruening, M.; Huberty, J.; Skelton, K.; Brennhofer, S.; Voytyuk, M. Social Mechanisms for Weight-related Behaviors among Emerging Adults. Health Behav. Policy Rev. 2017, 4, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sogari, G.; Velez-Argumedo, C.; Gómez, M.I.; Mora, C. College Students and Eating Habits: A Study Using an Ecological Model for Healthy Behavior. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Higgs, S.; Thomas, J. Social influences on eating. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2016, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. VanKim, N.A.; Porta, C.M.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Laska, M.N. Lesbian, gay and bisexual college student perspectives on disparities in weight-related behaviours and body image: A qualitative analysis. J. Clin. Nurs. 2016, 25, 3676–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Goodyear, V.A.; Armour, K.M.; Wood, H. Young people and their engagement with health-related social media: New perspectives. Sport, Educ. Soc. 2018, 24, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sbaffi, L.; Zhao, C. Modeling the online health information seeking process: Information channel selection among university students. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2019, 71, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lupton, D. ‘Better understanding about what’s going on’: Young Australians’ use of digital technologies for health and fitness. Sport, Educ. Soc. 2018, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Freeman, B.; Kelly, B.; Vandevijvere, S.; Baur, L. Young adults: Beloved by food and drink marketers and forgotten by public health? Health Promot. Int. 2016, 31, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Barklamb, A.M.; Molenaar, A.; Brennan, L.; Evans, S.; Choong, J.; Herron, E.; Reid, M.; McCaffrey, T.A. Learning the Language of Social Media: A Comparison of Engagement Metrics and Social Media Strategies Used by Food and Nutrition-Related Social Media Accounts. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brennan, L.; Klassen, K.; Weng, E.; Chin, S.; Molenaar, A.; Reid, M.; Truby, H.; McCaffrey, T.A. A social marketing perspective of young adults’ concepts of eating for health: Is it a question of morality? Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lambert, M.; Chivers, P.; Farringdon, F. In their own words: A qualitative study exploring influences on the food choices of university students. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2018, 30, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Vaterlaus, J.M.; Patten, E.V.; Roche, C.; Young, J.A. #Gettinghealthy: The perceived influence of social media on young adult health behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 45, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Diehl, K.; Hilger, J. Physical activity and the transition from school to university: A cross-sectional survey among university students in Germany. Sci. Sports 2016, 31, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Laska, M.N.; Sevcik, S.M.; Moe, S.G.; Petrich, C.A.; Nanney, M.S.; Linde, J.A.; Lytle, L.A. A 2-year young adult obesity prevention trial in the US: Process evaluation results. Health Promot. Int. 2015, 31, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Berg, C.J.; An, L.C.; Ahluwalia, J.S. Dietary Fat Intake and Exercise Among Two- and Four-Year College Students: Differences in Behavior and Psychosocial Factors. Community Coll. J. Res. Pract. 2013, 37, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kapinos, K.A.; Yakusheva, O.; Eisenberg, D. Obesogenic environmental influences on young adults: Evidence from college dormitory assignments. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2014, 12, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Molenaar, A.; Choi, T.S.T.; Brennan, L.; Reid, M.; Lim, M.S.C.; Truby, H.; McCaffrey, T.A. Language of Health of Young Australian Adults: A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Health, Wellbeing and Health Promotion via Online Conversations. Nutrients 2020, 12, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Lippert, A.M. Stuck in Unhealthy Places. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2016, 57, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bell, S.; Lee, C. Emerging adulthood and patterns of physical activity among Young Australian women. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2005, 12, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kwan, M.Y.; Cairney, J.; Faulkner, G.; Pullenayegum, E.E. Physical Activity and Other Health-Risk Behaviors during the Transition Into Early Adulthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2012, 42, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Watts, A.W.; Laska, M.; Larson, N.I.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Millennials at work: Workplace environments of young adults and associations with weight-related health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2015, 70, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. King, K.A.; Vidourek, R.A.; English, L.; Merianos, A.L. Vigorous physical activity among college students: Using the health belief model to assess involvement and social support. Arch. Exerc. Health Dis. 2014, 4, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pelletier, J.E.; Graham, D.J.; Laska, M.N. Social Norms and Dietary Behaviors among Young Adults. Am. J. Health Behav. 2014, 38, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Cuberos, R.C.; Ortega, F.Z.; Molero, P.P.; Knox, E.; Bolados, C.C.; Garófano, V.V.; Molina, J.J.M. Relationship between Healthy Habits and Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport among University Students: A Structural Equation Model. Sustainability 2018, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Leslie, E.; Owen, N.; Salmon, J.; Bauman, A.; Sallis, J.F.; Lo, S.K. Insufficiently Active Australian College Students: Perceived Personal, Social, and Environmental Influences. Prev. Med. 1999, 28, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pugliese, J.A.; Okun, M.A. Social control and strenuous exercise among late adolescent college students: Parents versus peers as influence agents. J. Adolesc. 2014, 37, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Graham, D.J.; Pelletier, J.E.; Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Lust, K.; Laska, M.N. Perceived Social Ecological Factors Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing, Preparation, and Consumption among Young Adults. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 113, 1366–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Harmon, B.E.; Forthofer, M.; Bantum, E.O.; Nigg, C.R. Perceived influence and college students’ diet and physical activity behaviors: An examination of ego-centric social networks. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Walsh, A.; Taylor, C.; Brennick, D. Factors That Influence Campus Dwelling University Students’ Facility to Practice Healthy Living Guidelines. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 2017, 50, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Berzins, T.L.; Gere, J.; Kelly, S.M.; Updegraff, J.A. Associations between social control, motivation, and exercise: How romantic partners influence exercise during young adulthood. J. Health Psychol. 2017, 24, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Paluch, A.E.; Shook, R.P.; Hand, G.A.; O’Connor, D.P.; Wilcox, S.; Drenowatz, C.; Baruth, M.; Burgess, S.; Blair, S.N. The Influence of Life Events and Psychological Stress on Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study. J. Phys. Act. Health 2018, 15, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Uijtdewilligen, L.; Peeters, G.M.E.E.; van Uffelen, J.G.Z.; Twisk, J.W.R.; Singh, A.S.; Brown, W.J. Determinants of physical activity in a cohort of young adult women. Who is at risk of inactive behaviour? J. Sci. Med. Sport 2015, 18, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Navarro, J.; Peña, J.; Cebolla, A.; Baños, R. Can Avatar Appearance Influence Physical Activity? User-Avatar Similarity and Proteus Effects on Cardiac Frequency and Step Counts. Health Commun. 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, B.J.; Lwin, M. Player see, player do: Testing an exergame motivation model based on the influence of the self avatar. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 59, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chan, G.; Arya, A.; Orji, R.; Zhao, Z. Motivational strategies and approaches for single and multi-player exergames: A social perspective. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2019, 5, e230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wong, F.Y. Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2017, 16, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Adachi, P.J.C.; Willoughby, T. Does Playing Sports Video Games Predict Increased Involvement in Real-Life Sports Over Several Years Among Older Adolescents and Emerging Adults? J. Youth Adolesc. 2015, 45, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Adachi, P.J.C.; Willoughby, T. The Link between Playing Video Games and Positive Youth Outcomes. Child Dev. Perspect. 2017, 11, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhan, C.; Heatherington, L.; Klingenberg, B. Disordered eating- and exercise-related behaviors and cognitions during the first year college transition. J. Am. Coll. Health 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Burns, S.; Evans, M.; Jancey, J.; Portsmouth, L.; Maycock, B. Influences of club connectedness among young adults in Western Australian community-based sports clubs. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Baiocchi-Wagner, E.A.; Talley, A.E. The Role of Family Communication in Individual Health Attitudes and Behaviors Concerning Diet and Physical Activity. Health Commun. 2013, 28, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Guntzviller, L.M.; Ratcliff, C.; Dorsch, T.E.; Osai, K.V. How do emerging adults respond to exercise advice from parents? A test of advice response theory. J. Soc. Pers. Relationships 2016, 34, 936–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Stavropoulos, V.; Pontes, H.M.; Gomez, R.; Schivinski, B.; Griffiths, M. Proteus Effect Profiles: How Do they Relate with Disordered Gaming Behaviours? Psychiatr. Q. 2020, 91, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cranwell, J.; Whittamore, K.; Britton, J.; Leonardi-Bee, J. Alcohol and Tobacco Content in UK Video Games and Their Association with Alcohol and Tobacco Use Among Young People. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016, 19, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Pilgrim, K.; Bohnet-Joschko, S. Selling health and happiness how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: Mixed methods research. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Parkinson, J.; Schuster, L.; Mulcahy, R. Online Third Places: Supporting Well-Being Through Identifying and Managing Unintended Consequences. J. Serv. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Carl, J.C.; Kenneth, E.P.; Gregory, M.C. Physical Activity, Exercise, and Physical Fitness: Definitions and Distinctions for Health-Related Research. Public Health Rep. 1985, 100, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  91. Klassen, K.M.; Douglass, C.H.; Brennan, L.; Truby, H.; Lim, M.S.C. Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Jenkins, E.L.; Ilicic, J.; Barklamb, A.M.; McCaffrey, T.A. Assessing the Credibility and Authenticity of Social Media Content for Applications in Health Communication: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e17296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. König, L.M.; Giese, H.; Stok, F.M.; Renner, B. The social image of food: Associations between popularity and eating behavior. Appetite 2017, 114, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Draper, C.E.; Grobler, L.; Micklesfield, L.; Norris, S. Impact of social norms and social support on diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adolescents: A scoping review. Child Care Health Dev. 2015, 41, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 13 02895 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for this study.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for this study.
Nutrients 13 02895 g001
Nutrients 13 02895 g002 550
Figure 2. Year of publication analysis for initial search timeline (2010–2020).
Figure 2. Year of publication analysis for initial search timeline (2010–2020).
Nutrients 13 02895 g002
Nutrients 13 02895 g003 550
Figure 3. Influences of physical activity and diet behaviour of emerging adults (n = number of identified studies). Items in bold indicate the highest influence at each level.
Figure 3. Influences of physical activity and diet behaviour of emerging adults (n = number of identified studies). Items in bold indicate the highest influence at each level.
Nutrients 13 02895 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of scoping review studies—all studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of scoping review studies—all studies.
SRIDYearParticipants/
(Studies)		CountryAge BehaviourIndividual InfluencesLocal InfluencesCommunity InfluencesSocio-Cultural
Influences		OG
PADietPeerPartnerHomeParentsWorkEduFEHPPA EnvSocial MediaCelGovMediaAdvCult NormSocial NormsGender
120171132Canada17–2510000001001000000001
22017Not statedN/AN/A10100000001000000001
3201658Saudi Arabia18–2410000001000100000000
4201435Australia19.46 (mean)01001001100000010000
52016101Australia17–54 10100001000000000100
62017319USA18–2410100101010000000000
7201561Australia18–2411110100000100000100
82013866USA18–2711000100000000001000
920103610Australia18–4611100100000000000100
102020N/AAustraliaN/A01000000000111010000
112014129USANot stated10100001000000000100
1220181043USA18–2410100101000000000000
1320058545Australia18–2710011011000000000010
1420132265USA18–2511100001100001000000
15201819Scotland18–2511100100000101100000
16201798USA17–3510010001000000000000
172004145Canada17–1910000001000000000000
182020195Australia18–2401100000000101110100
192020195Australia18–2401000000000110000000
20201460Canada17–1911101001100000000000
21201752USA18–2411101001100000000100
22202011,462UK16–2410100001000000000000
232020780USA21–5011100000001000000000
242020242Australia18–3001100000001000010100
252020608Spain19–2310110101001000000000
262018490Spain20–2911100001000000000000
27201930 (studies)N/AN/A10100000000000000001
282020317Netherlands18–24 10000001000000000000
29201847USA17–1901000100000000000000
30201967 (studies)UK13–30 10000000000000000000
312016689Germany18–24 10111101000000000000
322019330USA18–2410100001000100000000
33201542 (studies)Worldwide13–1911100100000000000000
34201334Scotland14–1811100000000101000000
35201110 (studies)USA
Australia		13–1901100000000000000110
362015N/AN/A18– 2411000000000111110100
37201830USA18–2410100100000000000000
38201450England19–2611000000100001100000
3820181600UK13–1911000001000111110100
4020191296UK13–1811100001000111110100
4120131201USA19–3001101101110000000000
422020107 (studies)USAN/A10011011000000000000
432017196USA18–2810000101000000001000
44201860Saudi Arabia18–2901001001000101000000
452015200Finland18–5010100000000000000100
46201640USA18–3011110101000000000000
472016N/AN/AN/A10110000000000010110
482015620Australia18–3011111110100000000000
492018N/AN/AN/A11110111111001101100
502019235USA18–2401100001000001100100
51202022 (studies)USA18–3001100000000111000000
5220143825USANot stated01001001100000000000
532015216Korea17–2910100001000000000000
54201289USA16.3 (mean)01100101000000010000
552014480USA18–2410110101000000000100
56201867Canada17–2411100001000000000100
57201823 (studies)Australia18–2401100000000101000000
5820191315USA15–6510100000001100000001
592017499Germany20–2501100001000110000100
602012640Canada24–2710000011000000000000
612012312USA18–4011000001000100000000
62201949Australia18–2511101101100111010110
632017435USA18–2511000101000000000000
6420181120USA14–3111111100101000000000
6520121130USA14–3101111100000000000000
662016441USA18–3511000001100101000000
67201533,097USA18–2911000001000000000010
6819992729Australia15–76 10100111101000000000
692020N/AN/AN/A10000000000001100000
702016322Singapore10–1810000001000000000001
7120162795UK16–2010101111000000000000
722015109USA18+01100001000001100100
73202055Sweden18–2510100000001000000000
74201612,164USA15–1911000000101000000010
75202030Australia16–2510100100010101000000
762011104USA18–4010000001000100000000
772016188Canada17–5501100101010101110000
782017857Canada18–2401111101100001000000
792017111USA18–2201100001000100001100
80202059Australia21–2901001100000001010100
812020166Australia18–2411101100100101110100
82201734 (studies)Australia18–2401111101100100001110
832020305USA18–3710000001000000000001
8420172397Australia18–3401001000000000000000
85201984USA19–3410100001000000000000
862018404USA21–3510011011000000000000
8720141000USA18–2901110101000000000100
8820121201USA17–24+01011011000000000010
892008310Australia18–2401001010000000001000
90201541 (studies)USAN/A11000001000000000000
9120121313Scotland18–2510110101000001000100
922014227USA16–2210100101000000000000
932015N/AN/AN/A01100000000001000100
942011172UK18–2401100001000000000100
95201911,125 (studies)Worldwide18–3001100000000111000000
962020291USA25.5 (mean)11000001000101100000
972017819Canada17–2110101101000000000000
98201921UK19–2101100001000100000100
99201835USA19–2211101101001000010100
1002018185USAN/A11100001000000000000
1012019102USA18–2511000001000010100000
1022017N/AUKN/A11001000101000000000
103201511,695Australia 22–2710010011000000001010
10420192829Netherlands18–4510010011001000000000
105201630USA18–3011110001100001000110
106201534USA18–2511100001000100000000
107202018Australia17–2411100000000100001000
108201848Canada18–3011001001101000000000
10920162287USA18–2711100010101000000000
1102017644Hong Kong18–2410000001001000000001
111202031,067USA22 (mean)10000001000000000000
1122020229USA17–2011000001001000000000
Abbreviations: 1 = Behaviour or influence detected as per coding frame; 0 = Behaviour or influence not detected; SRID = Corresponding paper in Supplementary Reference List; PA = physical activity; Home = Home environment; Edu = Education; FE = Food environment; HP = Health practitioner; PA env = PA environment; Cel = Celebrity/Microcelebrity; Gov = Government/health promotion; Adv = Advertising; Cult norm = Cultural norms; Gender = Gender norms; OG = Online game and eSports; N/A: Element does not apply to the study; Not stated: Element not indicated in study.
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of scoping review studies—online game studies only.
Table 2. Characteristics of scoping review studies—online game studies only.
SRIDYearNo of Participants/(Studies)CountryAge GroupBehaviourIndividual InfluencesLocal InfluencesCommunity InfluencesSocio-Cultural InfluencesOG
PADietPeerPartnerHomeParentsWorkEduFEHPPA envSocial MediaCelGovMediaAdvCult NormSocial NormGender
702016322Singapore10–1810000001000000000001
120171132Canada17–2510000001001000000001
22017Not statedN/AN/A10100000001000000001
1102017644Hong Kong18–2410000001001000000001
27201930 (studies)N/AN/A10100000000000000001
5820191315USA15–6510100000001100000001
832020305USA18–3710000001000000000001
TOTALS70300004004100000007
Abbreviations: 1 = Behaviour or influence detected as per coding frame; 0 = Behaviour or influence not detected; PA = physical activity; Home = Home environment; Edu = Education; FE = Food environment; HP = Health practitioner; PA env = PA environment; Cel = Celebrity/Microcelebrity; Gov = Government/health promotion; Adv = Advertising; Cult norm = Cultural norms; Gender = Gender norms; OG = Online game and eSports; N/A: Element does not apply to the study; Not stated: Element not indicated in study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Micallef, D.; Brennan, L.; Parker, L.; Schivinski, B.; Jackson, M. Where Do Online Games Fit into the Health Behaviour Ecology of Emerging Adults: A Scoping Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082895

AMA Style

Micallef D, Brennan L, Parker L, Schivinski B, Jackson M. Where Do Online Games Fit into the Health Behaviour Ecology of Emerging Adults: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(8):2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Micallef, David, Linda Brennan, Lukas Parker, Bruno Schivinski, and Michaela Jackson. 2021. "Where Do Online Games Fit into the Health Behaviour Ecology of Emerging Adults: A Scoping Review" Nutrients 13, no. 8: 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082895

APA Style

Micallef, D., Brennan, L., Parker, L., Schivinski, B., & Jackson, M. (2021). Where Do Online Games Fit into the Health Behaviour Ecology of Emerging Adults: A Scoping Review. Nutrients, 13(8), 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop