Next Article in Journal
Influence of Breastfeeding Factors on Polyamine Content in Human Milk
Next Article in Special Issue
Does Probiotic Consumption Enhance Wound Healing? A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Estimated Salt and Miso Intake with the Prevalence of Obesity in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/nu13093015
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biologic Treatment in Combination with Lifestyle Intervention in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Metabolic Syndrome: Rationale and Methodology of the METABOLyx Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

by
Andreas Pinter
1,*,
Peter Schwarz
2,3,4,
Sascha Gerdes
5,
Jan C. Simon
6,
Anja Saalbach
6,
James Rush
7,
Nima Melzer
8,
Thomas Kramps
8,
Benjamin Häberle
8 and
Maximilian Reinhardt
7
1
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Clinical Research Division University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2
Department for Prevention and Care of Diabetes, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
3
Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, 01307 Dresden, Germany
4
German Center for Diabetes Research, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
5
Psoriasis-Center, Department of Dermatology, Campus Kiel, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
6
Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Leipzig University Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
7
Novartis Pharma AG, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
8
Novartis Pharma GmbH, 90429 Nuremberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(9), 3015; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093015
Submission received: 29 June 2021 / Revised: 19 August 2021 / Accepted: 27 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Association of Nutrition, Obesity and Skin)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inflammatory diseases including psoriasis are associated with metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, including obesity and metabolic syndrome. Obesity is associated with greater psoriasis disease severity and reduced response to treatment. Therefore, targeting metabolic comorbidities could improve patients’ health status and psoriasis-specific outcomes. METABOLyx is a randomized controlled trial evaluating the combination of a lifestyle intervention program with secukinumab treatment in psoriasis. Here, the rationale, methodology and baseline patient characteristics of METABOLyx are presented. A total of 768 patients with concomitant moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and metabolic syndrome were randomized to secukinumab 300 mg, or secukinumab 300 mg plus a tailored lifestyle intervention program, over 24 weeks. A substudy of immunologic and metabolic biomarkers is ongoing. The primary endpoint of METABOLyx is PASI90 response at week 24. Other endpoints include patient-reported outcomes and safety. METABOLyx represents the first large scale clinical trial of an immunomodulatory biologic in combination with a standardized lifestyle intervention.

1. Introduction

Immunology and metabolism were traditionally regarded as two different physiological entities. However, they are evolutionarily very closely connected, as exemplified in simpler organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster, where the fat body carries out both metabolic and immune functions [1]. The role of the human immune system in primarily non-immune processes such as metabolism is now evident, with inflammation understood as a key driver of metabolic processes and diseases, giving rise to the new scientific field of immunometabolism [2]. Conversely, metabolic factors can significantly impact inflammatory processes and diseases. For example, adipose tissue and liver inflammation drive insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes, and endothelial inflammation drives plaque formation in coronary artery disease [3,4].
Psoriasis, as an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, is an ideal model for the study of this interconnection between inflammation and metabolism. As a consequence of systemic inflammation, psoriasis patients have an elevated risk of metabolic and inflammatory comorbidities including obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome [5,6,7]. Metabolic syndrome is defined as a concurrence of abdominal obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension or insulin resistance, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes [8,9]. Insulin resistance, a criterion of the metabolic syndrome, is also observed as a component of psoriasis pathophysiology (the ‘psoriatic march’ concept) [10,11]. This association can also impact the clinical management of psoriasis; for example, higher body weight and body mass index (BMI) are associated with diminished response to biologic treatment and reduced length of remission [12].
Obesity is known to predispose patients to psoriasis, and to amplify psoriatic inflammation, and conversely, psoriatic inflammation exacerbates the metabolic comorbidities of obesity [13,14,15,16]. In obesity, the expanded adipose tissue, in particular the visceral adipose tissue, enters a state of low-grade chronic inflammation, termed meta-inflammation [17,18]. During meta-inflammation, adipose tissue becomes infiltrated by activated immune cell populations, causing the expression of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α or IL-17 [19,20]. The increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the inflamed adipose tissue microenvironment leads to higher local and systemic cytokine concentrations, which can be measured in the serum of obese individuals (Figure 1) [21,22,23]. Both psoriasis and obesity are therefore inflammatory diseases that contribute to systemic inflammation.
Systemic inflammatory processes and metabolic status are also closely linked to bone health. TNFα and IL-17, central to the pathogenesis of psoriasis, are known to impair bone formation [24]. However, the HUNT3 study found no association between psoriasis and bone fracture risk, bone mineral density, T-score or higher prevalence of osteoporosis [25]. Low-grade inflammation mediated by these factors may also influence bone metabolism in obese patients [24]. Procollagen-1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP), a marker of bone and osteoporosis risk, may also be altered in patients with metabolic syndrome, and also in the inflammatory context of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [26,27]. However, little is known of the pathophysiological mechanisms and consequences of P1NP dysregulation in psoriasis. Links between metabolic syndrome and bone metabolism also remain to be fully explored [28].
Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL-17A, a cytokine fundamental to the development of psoriasis [29]. Secukinumab has shown long lasting efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [29,30,31]. Links have been established between obesity and metabolic comorbidities and the outcomes of psoriasis treatment with secukinumab and other biologics [12].
Obesity and other metabolic comorbidities may be factors characterizing patients with inadequate responses to psoriasis treatment. A post hoc analysis of pooled secukinumab phase III trial data revealed that response rates were higher as mean body weight, waist circumference, and BMI decreased [32]. A separate post hoc analysis showed that psoriatic arthritis, metabolic syndrome, obesity, impaired glucose metabolism/insulin resistance, and hyperuricemia were each associated with increased hs-CRP levels at baseline [30]. Metabolic syndrome showed an impact on systemic inflammation similar to psoriatic arthritis [33]. Secukinumab treatment reduced the levels of hs-CRP; however, concomitant obesity attenuated this decline in hs-CRP under treatment [33]. In a pooled analysis, increased levels of the anti-inflammatory adipose tissue hormone adiponectin were associated with metabolic syndrome and obesity; however, psoriasis severity and anti-psoriatic treatment with secukinumab or etanercept had no relevant impact on adiponectin levels [34]. In addition, systemic inflammation and pro-inflammatory IL-17 signalling were shown to persist at the end of treatment in psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome, reducing the length of remission and resulting in earlier relapse compared to psoriasis patients without metabolic syndrome [35].
Hyperuricemia is also increasingly understood as a key cardiovascular risk factor and mediator of endothelial inflammation, and is associated with both psoriasis and obesity [36]. Secukinumab is shown to reduce systemic inflammation as measured by hsCRP [33] and was also found to potentially reduce cardiovascular risk, as assessed by flow-medicated dilation, a measure of endothelial function [37]. However, a study of treatment with secukinumab showed that hypertriglyceridemia was still present in patients despite improved psoriatic disease activity after secukinumab treatment [38].
These previous analyses suggest that treating skin inflammation alone is not sufficient in psoriasis patients with concomitant metabolic syndrome. A treatment approach focused solely on the skin does not address obesity and metabolic factors as significant sources of systemic inflammation, with clinical consequences including high levels of systemic inflammation, lower treatment efficacy for the skin, higher chance of relapse, and higher cardiometabolic risk [33,34,38]. The evidence indicates an opportunity for a holistic treatment strategy for psoriasis patients with metabolic comorbidities, one that addresses skin and joint manifestations, but that also targets metabolic diseases and the inflammation associated with them. Modifiable lifestyle factors, in particular weight reduction strategies, are known to positively impact psoriasis symptoms including reduction in PASI [39]. To date, small studies have shown improvements in response to systemic and biologic treatments with weight loss [40,41]. A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions involving diet and/or exercise and health education in patients with psoriasis concluded that such interventions may reduce the severity of psoriasis, but the quality of evidence was low [42].
The METABOLyx trial (EudraCT no. 2016-001671-79, NCT03440736) was designed to evaluate the impact of combining a lifestyle intervention program with secukinumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and metabolic syndrome in Germany. METABOLyx is the first large scale randomized controlled trial to compare lifestyle interventions as an addition to biologic therapy and to examine effects on cardiometabolic outcomes. Given the known association of psoriasis severity with obesity, the hypothesis of METABOLyx is that the combination of secukinumab with lifestyle intervention would improve both skin symptoms and cardiometabolic status, more than secukinumab alone, by dual targeting of the shared pathophysiology behind both diseases, i.e., systemic inflammation. An extensive biomarker substudy will also form an integral part of the trial, dissecting the mechanisms of inflammation and immune activation and characterizing the metabolic profiles of patients. Serum levels of markers of bone formation will also be measured, and will be interpreted in the context of a standard liver function panel and other biomarkers. The biomarker data will then be correlated with clinical outcome measures, metabolic disease markers, including free fatty acids and triglycerides, and the liver function panel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patients

The METABOLyx trial is a randomized, controlled, multicentre study with two open-label treatment arms. METABOLyx recruited adult (aged ≥ 18 years) patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI > 10) for 6 months or more and concomitant metabolic syndrome at screening as previously defined by international consensus (Table 1) [8]. Patients who did not qualify for dietary changes and increased physical activity because of any medical condition, such as significant cardiac comorbidities or any other medical conditions that would put them at risk when participating in the lifestyle intervention, were excluded from the study. A full list of eligibility criteria and concomitant medication use is given in Appendix A. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The METABOLyx study is being conducted in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study protocol was approved by the ethical review board of participating centres.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to one of two treatment arms in the core study. Patients in arm A will receive secukinumab 300 mg (approved dose; weekly from weeks 0 to 4 then at 4-weekly interval) from week 0 until week 24. Patients in arm B will receive secukinumab 300 mg from week 0 until week 24 and, in addition, participate in a concomitant lifestyle intervention program (Figure 2). Following week 28, there will be an extension period to week 56 where all patients may participate in the lifestyle intervention program (Figure 2), in conjunction with any psoriasis therapy as deemed appropriate by the treating physician. The purpose of this is to collect long-term data up to one year and offer the lifestyle intervention to all patients.
The structured and standardized lifestyle intervention program was designed specifically for the METABOLyx study by an interdisciplinary team, including a nutritionist, psychologist, sports scientist and specialists in internal medicine, diabetology and dermatology, (TUMAINI Institute Dresden, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Germany). The program was developed based on the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions leading to weight loss in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes and its complications [43]. The program goal is to support psoriasis patients with concomitant metabolic syndrome to improve their metabolic status, increase their physical activity level, change their diet and to lose weight. Patients in arm B (or after 24 weeks of secukinumab treatment in arm A) will be individually and regularly supervised over eight scheduled 60-min visits by nominated trainers associated with participating study centres. All trainers receive standardized instruction and work from a manual, covering patient motivation, action planning, interventions including dietary changes, stress management, and relapse prevention. Trainers receive their own on-site or telephone supervision sessions every four weeks. All interventions are evidence-based and tailored to patients’ needs. Patients will receive written standardized educational material on nutrition, physical activity and metabolism, including advice on changing their diet and increasing their physical activity level. Connected digital devices to measure physical activity (Activity SensorAS 80, Beurer or Walking Style VI, Omron) as well as body weight (scale, GS 485, Beurer) are given to patients. The measurement data can be continuously tracked by patients through an app (HealthManager app, Beurer). Patients are also instructed to use study workbooks. Key targets of the lifestyle intervention are given in Table 2. Patient weight, blood pressure, waist circumference and PASI score will be taken at each visit to monitor progress; in addition, lipid profile, hsCRP and HbA1c will be measured at the first and final visits.
The exploratory biomarker substudy will allow comprehensive characterization of the patient´s immunologic and metabolic profile from assessment of the markers detailed in Table 3. Samples for the biomarker substudy will be taken at baseline, week 16 and week 28 from 50 patients in arm A and 50 patients in arm B.

2.2. Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study is the percentage of patients achieving PASI90 at week 28 in each arm (by blinded assessor rating of skin improvement). The hypothesis of METABOLyx is that secukinumab combined with a lifestyle intervention results in a higher PASI 90 response rate in psoriasis patients with metabolic syndrome than secukinumab alone. Secondary endpoints include assessments of absolute reduction in PASI between arms, measures of systemic inflammation including hs-CRP; cardiometabolic markers including fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, HDL, LDL and blood pressure; and weight, BMI and waist circumference. Steps per day as a measure of physical activity will also be recorded as a secondary endpoint. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI), WHO-5 and assessments of itch, pain and scaling will also be recorded. The exploratory endpoints of the biomarker substudy include levels of selected biomarkers (Table 3) throughout treatment and any association with clinical response. Safety assessments will be carried out at each study visit. Adverse events will be reported by investigators and by lifestyle intervention trainers. The adverse event profile of secukinumab is well established for the approved dose [30].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

METABOLyx was designed to demonstrate superiority of secukinumab combined with a lifestyle intervention vs. secukinumab alone in terms of PASI90 response at week 28. A PASI90 response of 81% at week 28 under secukinumab alone in patients with metabolic syndrome is assumed based on analysis of previous Phase III trial data [32]. Evidence on the effect size of lifestyle intervention on PASI response is relatively sparse. Assumptions are based on clinical studies showing an absolute increase of 6% to 27% in PASI75 response to biologic treatment in overweight or obese, moderate to severe psoriasis patients undergoing weight reduction compared to patients not undergoing weight reduction [39,40]. Assuming an absolute increase of 9% in PASI90 response in arm A compared to arm B, 342 patients per arm would provide a power of 90% at a two-sided alpha of 0.05 to demonstrate that the percentage of PASI90 responders at week 28 is higher in the secukinumab combined with lifestyle intervention arm compared to the secukinumab alone arm. Superiority will be tested on an intention to treat (ITT) basis using a logistic regression model with the factors treatment, centre and covariate baseline PASI. The odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value will be given. To compensate for expected drop-outs and/or premature discontinuations, recruitment of 380 patients per arm is planned for this trial. Patients who do not have a valid PASI assessment at week 28 will be regarded as non-responders for the primary analysis. Non-responder imputation will also be applied to all secondary response variables.

3. Results

Patient Baseline Characteristics

A total of 768 patients were enrolled in METABOLyx and randomised to secukinumab 300 mg (Arm A, n = 366) or secukinumab 300 mg plus lifestyle intervention (Arm B, n = 402; difference in numbers due to randomization block size). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, with both groups having a high baseline PASI (19.7) and reporting significant impact on quality of life by DLQI (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The METABOLyx trial was designed to assess whether a combination of secukinumab and a lifestyle intervention improves skin symptoms and cardiometabolic status more than secukinumab alone in patients with psoriasis and concomitant metabolic syndrome. METABOLyx aims to provide a proof-of-concept for the integrated treatment of both psoriasis and metabolic disease. Previous small-scale studies have shown a positive impact of weight loss and lifestyle interventions on psoriasis treatment outcomes and cardiometabolic parameters [39,40,41]. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time an immunomodulatory biologic is combined with a lifestyle intervention in a large scale, randomized and controlled clinical trial of novel design.
Secukinumab is effective in treating psoriatic skin lesions and psoriatic arthritis [30,43]. However, to optimally treat patients with psoriasis and concomitant metabolic syndrome, given the close interconnection of both conditions, an integrated treatment approach addressing all sources of inflammation is needed [12,21,32]. Given the overlapping inflammatory pathophysiology behind psoriasis and cardiometabolic disease, it is hypothesized that secukinumab and lifestyle intervention would act synergistically, improving both conditions to a greater extent than each treatment alone. PASI90 was therefore chosen as the primary clinical endpoint to assess the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on psoriasis severity, with metabolic markers as secondary endpoints. Post hoc analyses have also revealed that while secukinumab treatment lowers levels of systemic inflammation as measured by hs-CRP, this effect is diminished in the presence of obesity and metabolic syndrome [33]. The impact of treatment with secukinumab and other biologics on other cardiometabolic risk factors, such as hypertension, adiponectin levels, dyslipidaemia and hyperuricemia, is also limited in patients with metabolic comorbidities [33,35]. This results in a continued presence of cardiovascular and metabolic risk in these patients despite psoriasis treatment.
Evidence based lifestyle interventions were selected for application in METABOLyx, including dietary intervention, increased physical activity, and face-to-face supervision and coaching. METABOLyx aims for at least 5% body weight loss over 6 months; this was considered achievable if patients are adherent to the intervention program. A previous study of a lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes showed that 50% of patients achieved weight reduction of ≥7% at 6 months, with a self-reported adherence to the program of 74% [43].
While the interplay of proinflammatory factors leading to co-association of psoriasis and obesity is well-established, other factors are likely to contribute additionally to the high rates of obesity observed in psoriasis patients. These include depression, hypercaloric nutrition, alcohol abuse, social isolation and lack of exercise, often associated with lower socioeconomic status [44]. By recording DLQI and other patient-reported outcomes, METABOLyx will provide insight into how some of these quality-of-life factors might be influenced by effective psoriasis treatment with or without lifestyle intervention.
The planned biomarker substudy aims to assess the metabolic and immune profiles of the patients and correlate them with the clinical status and treatment outcomes. The availability of a very large clinical dataset including data on psoriasis severity, treatment efficacy, and comorbidities in 760 patients, in combination with comprehensive molecular phenotyping of their metabolic and immune status, will enable a deeper understanding and the dissection of the interconnection between psoriasis and metabolic disease.
Potential limitations of the METABOLyx study include the necessity of the lifestyle intervention arm being unblinded and open-label. Adherence to lifestyle interventions is challenging and high drop-out rates have been observed in previous studies of lifestyle interventions [42]. To increase adherence to the lifestyle intervention the design of the METABOLyx lifestyle intervention program incorporates regular face-to-face visits with a trainer, to encourage adherence and support patient motivation. In addition, connected digital devices to measure physical activity and body weight, and track data continuously via an app, are part of the study.
Viewing metabolism and the immune system as closely interconnected entities has been applied in various medical specialties in recent years and has contributed to advances in understanding and treatment of various diseases. A central aim of the METABOLyx trial is to apply this idea to psoriasis and translate it into a more integrated and effective treatment strategy. Furthermore, the study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the immune-metabolic intersections that are present in this disease. The combination of secukinumab and a lifestyle intervention program is currently unique, and could have significant implications for clinical management of people with chronic inflammation, psoriasis and/or metabolic syndrome. Ultimately, this could result in an improved treatment strategy for psoriasis patients, taking into account the full complexity of their disease, and could potentially decrease the risk both of the development of aspects of metabolic syndrome and of metabolic complications. In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, where obesity and diabetes are emerging as risk factors for adverse outcomes [45], these interventions become even more relevant.

5. Conclusions

In summary, METABOLyx represents the first assessment of an immunomodulatory biologic in combination with a standardized lifestyle intervention in a large scale, randomized, controlled clinical trial. This integrated approach targets inflammatory processes from multiple angles in order to achieve optimal, holistic treatment in patients who exhibit a complex, interconnected group of diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P., P.S., S.G., J.C.S., A.S., J.R., N.M., T.K. and M.R.; Funding acquisition, T.K. and M.R.; Investigation, A.P., S.G., J.C.S. and A.S.; Methodology, A.P., P.S., S.G., J.C.S., A.S., J.R., N.M. and M.R.; Project administration, N.M., T.K., B.H. and M.R.; Resources, P.S., B.H. and M.R.; Supervision, P.S., T.K., B.H. and M.R.; Writing—Original draft, A.P., P.S., S.G., J.C.S., A.S., J.R., N.M., T.K., B.H. and M.R.; Writing—Review and editing, A.P., P.S., S.G., J.C.S., A.S., J.R., N.M., T.K., B.H. and M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The METABOLyx study is sponsored by Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study is being conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of all participating institutions.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Medical writing assistance was provided by Evelyn Altemeyer of Novartis Ireland Ltd, and funded by Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany, in line with Good Publication Practice guidelines.

Conflicts of Interest

AP has worked as an investigator and/or speaker and/or advisor for following pharmaceutical companies: AbbVie, Almirall-Hermal, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BioNTech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, GSK, Eli-Lilly, Galderma, Hexal, Janssen, LEO-Pharma, MC2, Medac, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, MSD, Novartis, Pascoe, Pfizer, Tigercat Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, Schering-Plough and UCB Pharma. PS. SG has been an advisor and/or received speakers’ honoraria and/or received grants and/or participated in clinical trials of the following companies: AbbVie, Affibody AB, Akari Therapeutics Plc, Almirall-Hermal, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Argenx BV, AstraZeneca AB, Biogen Idec, Bioskin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Foamix, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Hexal AG, Incyte Inc., Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Kymab, Leo Pharma, Medac, MSD, Neubourg Skin Care GmbH, Novartis, Pfizer, Principia Biopharma, Regeneron Pharmaceutical, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Takeda, Trevi Therapeutics, UCB Pharma and Vascular Biogenics. JS has received non-restricted research grants from Novartis as well as speaker and advisory board fees. AS, JR and MR are employees of Novartis Pharma AG. NM, TK and BH are employees of Novartis Pharma GmbH.

Appendix A

METABOLyx full inclusion and exclusion criteria and permitted concomitant medication.

Appendix A.1. Inclusion Criteria

Patients/subjects eligible for inclusion in this study must fulfil all of the following criteria:
  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
  • Men or women of at least 18 years of age at the time of screening.
  • Patients must be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and must be willing and able to comply with all study procedures.
  • Patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy, diagnosed at least 6 months before randomization and baseline value of
    • PASI > 10 and
    • DLQI > 10 and
    • Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by plaque-type psoriasis ≥ 10%
  • Fulfilment of Metabolic Syndrome definition (Alberti et al., 2009), which means fulfilment of ≥3 of the following criteria at screening visit:
    • Fasting (8 h) plasma glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL or ongoing antidiabetic drug treatment (defined as: metformin, DPP4 inhibitors, GLP1 analogues, SGLT2 inhibitors).
    • Abdominal obesity defined by elevated waist circumference Male: ≥94 cm, female: ≥80 cm (except for patients of Asian, South or Central American ethnicity, for whom the cut off values are: Male: ≥90 cm, female: ≥80 cm).
    • Fasting (8 h) triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL or ongoing drug treatment for elevated triglycerides (defined as: fibrates or nicotinic acid).
    • Fasting (8 h) HDL-C < 40 mg/dL in men or <50 mg/dL in women or ongoing drug treatment for reduced HDL-C (defined as: fibrates, nicotinic acid or statins).
    • Resting blood pressure: Systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg or ongoing antihypertensive drug treatment (defined as: ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, angiotensin receptor antagonists (e.g., Valsartan), aldosterone receptor antagonists, diuretics, nitrates, calcium channel blockers (e.g., Verapamil, Nifedipin), Aliskiren, Clonidin, alpha1 receptor antagonists (e.g., Doxazosin), Dihydralazin, Minoxidil, Moxonidin or Methyldopa).
  • Willingness and motivation to actively participate in a lifestyle intervention, which means patients need to be willing to increase physical activity and to change dietary habits.

Appendix A.2. Exclusion Criteria

Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study. No additional exclusions may be applied by the investigator, in order to ensure that the study population will be representative of all eligible patients.
  • Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque-type (e.g., pustular, erythrodermic and guttate psoriasis) at screening.
  • Previous exposure to Secukinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL17A or the IL17A receptor (e.g., Brodalumab, Ixekizumab).
  • Exposure to anti-TNF treatment during 1 year prior to baseline.
  • Drug-induced psoriasis (i.e., new onset or current exacerbation from beta-blockers, calcium channel inhibitors or lithium) at screening.
  • History of hypersensitivity to Secukinumab, trehalas-dihydrate, L-histidine, L-histidinhydrochloride-monohydrate, L-methionine, polysorbate 80, water for injection, or to substances of similar chemical classes.
  • History of latex hypersensitivity.
  • Ongoing participation (including safety follow-up period) in other interventional or non-interventional studies in any dermatological indication
  • Ongoing use of prohibited treatments. Washout periods detailed in the protocol have to be adhered to. Note: administration of live vaccines 6 weeks prior to baseline (visit 2) or during the study period is also prohibited.
  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.
  • Patients with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, if they fulfil one or more of the following conditions:
    • uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, meaning HbA1c > 8.0%,
    • pharmacological therapy with one or more of the following agents: Insulin, sulfonylurea agents/analogues, thiazolidinediones/glitazones.
  • Insufficiently controlled, severe arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 95 mmHg) with urgent need for therapy initiation or foreseeable need for medication change during the duration of the core study.
  • Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrolment, or within 5 half-lives of enrolment, or within 30 days until the expected pharmacodynamic effect has returned to baseline, whichever is longer; or longer if required by local regulations.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test.
  • Active ongoing inflammatory diseases other than psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that might confound the evaluation of the benefit of Secukinumab therapy.
  • Underlying conditions (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal) which in the opinion of the investigator significantly immunocompromises the subject and/or places the subject at unacceptable risk for receiving an immunomodulatory therapy.
  • Significant, progressive or uncontrolled medical problems at baseline which according to the opinion of the Investigator render the subject unsuitable for the trial—also in regard to participation in the lifestyle intervention—or put the subject at increased risk when participating in the trial (e.g., broken leg, congestive heart failure NYHA III/IV, uncontrolled hypertension with systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 95 mmHg, severe uncontrolled asthma).
  • Medical history of myocardial infarction or angina pectoris.
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the Investigator’s opinion, would preclude the participant from adhering to the protocol or completing the study per protocol.
  • Serum creatinine level exceeding 2.0 mg/dL (176.8 μmol/L) at screening
  • Total white blood cell (WBC) count < 2500/μL, or platelets < 100,000/μL or neutrophils < 1500/μL or haemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL at screening.
  • Active systemic infections during the last two weeks (exception: common cold) prior to baseline (visit 2) or any infection that reoccurs on a regular basis.
  • History of an ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease, or evidence of tuberculosis infection as defined by a positive QuantiFERON TB-Gold test (QFT) at screening. Subjects with a positive or indeterminate QFT test may participate in the study if full tuberculosis work up (according to local practice/guidelines) was completed within 12 weeks prior to visit 2 and establishes conclusively that the subject has no evidence of active tuberculosis. If presence of latent tuberculosis is established, then appropriate treatment must have been initiated at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (visit 2) and maintained according to local guidelines.
  • Past medical history record or current infection with HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C prior to baseline (visit 2).
  • History of lymphoproliferative disease or any known malignancy or history of malignancy of any organ system treated or untreated within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases (except for Bowen’s disease, or basal cell carcinoma or actinic keratoses that have been treated with no evidence of recurrence in the past 12 weeks prior to baseline (visit 2); carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-invasive malignant colon polyps that have been removed).
  • Inability or unwillingness to undergo repeated venepuncture (e.g., because of poor tolerability or lack of access to veins).
  • History or evidence of ongoing alcohol or drug abuse, within the last six months before baseline (visit 2).
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of investigational drug for at least 20 weeks after the end of Secukinumab treatment. Basic contraception methods include:
    • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception
    • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
    • Male sterilization (at least 6 m prior to screening). For female subjects on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject
    • Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps).
    • Use of oral, (oestrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate < 1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
    • In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking investigational drug.
    • Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g., age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.

Appendix A.3. Concomitant Medication

It is forbidden to start therapy with one of the following medications during the core study (to Week 28):
  • Cholesterol- or lipid lowering agents (e.g., HMG-CoA-inhibitors/statins, fibrates, nicotinic acid, ezetimibe, colestyramin, colestipol).
  • Antihypertensive drugs (e.g., ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor antagonists, ß-blockers, aldosterone receptor antagonists, diuretics, nitrates, calcium channel blockers (e.g., Verapamil, Nifedipin), Aliskiren, Clonidin, alpha1 receptor antagonists (e.g., Doxazosin), Dihydralazin, Minoxidil, Clonidin, Moxonidin or Methyldopa).
  • Glucose-lowering agents (e.g., Metformin, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 analogues, etc.).
  • If a patient has already been taking one of these medications on a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before baseline (visit 2), he can be enrolled in the study and continue to take them during the study, except for the glucose-lowering agents such as insulin, sulfonylurea agents/analogues and thiazolidinediones/glitazones, which are not allowed during the core study.
Dose adjustments or withdrawal of the following medications should be avoided during the core study:
Cholesterol- or lipid lowering agents (e.g., HMG-CoA-inhibitors/statins, fibrates, nicotinic acid, ezetimibe, colestyramin, colestipol.
There are no treatment restrictions during the extension period.

References

  1. Musselman, L.P.; Fink, J.L.; Grant, A.R.; Gatto, J.A.; Tuthill, B.F., 2nd; Baranski, T.J. A Complex Relationship between Immunity and Metabolism in Drosophila Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 38, e00259-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammation, metaflammation and immunometabolic disorders. Nature 2017, 542, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. He, F.; Huang, Y.; Song, Z.; Zhou, H.J.; Zhang, H.; Perry, R.J.; Shulman, G.I.; Min, W. Mitophagy-mediated adipose inflammation contributes to type 2 diabetes with hepatic insulin resistance. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20201416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, P.Y.; Qin, L.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Dahlman, J.E.; Malagon-Lopez, J.; Gujja, S.; Cilfone, N.A.; Kauffman, K.J.; Sun, L.; et al. Endothelial TGF-beta signalling drives vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 912–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eder, L.; Dey, A.; Joshi, A.A.; Boehncke, W.H.; Mehta, N.N.; Szentpetery, A. Cardiovascular Diseases in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 2019, 95, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Albareda, M.; Ravella, A.; Castello, M.; Saborit, S.; Peramiquel, L.; Vila, L. Metabolic syndrome and its components in patients with psoriasis. SpringerPlus 2014, 3, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Schwarz, P.E.H.; Pinter, A.; Melzer, N.; Barteczek, P.; Reinhardt, M. ERAPSO: Revealing the High Burden of Obesity in German Psoriasis Patients. Dermatol. Ther. 2019, 9, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Alberti, K.G.; Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Cleeman, J.I.; Donato, K.A.; Fruchart, J.C.; James, W.P.; Loria, C.M.; Smith, S.C., Jr. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009, 120, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mehta, N.N.; Shin, D.B.; Joshi, A.A.; Dey, A.K.; Armstrong, A.W.; Duffin, K.C.; Fuxench, Z.C.; Harrington, C.L.; Hubbard, R.A.; Kalb, R.E.; et al. Effect of 2 Psoriasis Treatments on Vascular Inflammation and Novel Inflammatory Cardiovascular Biomarkers: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, e007394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Boehncke, S.; Thaci, D.; Beschmann, H.; Ludwig, R.J.; Ackermann, H.; Badenhoop, K.; Boehncke, W.H. Psoriasis patients show signs of insulin resistance. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 157, 1249–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gelfand, J.M.; Neimann, A.L.; Shin, D.B.; Wang, X.; Margolis, D.J.; Troxel, A.B. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA 2006, 296, 1735–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Puig, L. Obesity and psoriasis: Body weight and body mass index influence the response to biological treatment. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2011, 25, 1007–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Budu-Aggrey, A.; Brumpton, B.; Tyrrell, J.; Watkins, S.; Modalsli, E.H.; Celis-Morales, C.; Ferguson, L.D.; Vie, G.Å.; Palmer, T.; Fritsche, L.G.; et al. Evidence of a causal relationship between body mass index and psoriasis: A mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Armstrong, A.W.; Harskamp, C.T.; Armstrong, E.J. Psoriasis and metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 68, 654–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Campanati, A.; Ganzetti, G.; Giuliodori, K.; Marra, M.; Bonfigli, A.; Testa, R.; Offidani, A. Serum levels of adipocytokines in psoriasis patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors: Results of a retrospective analysis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2015, 54, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Borska, L.; Kremlacek, J.; Andrys, C.; Krejsek, J.; Hamakova, K.; Borsky, P.; Palicka, V.; Rehacek, V.; Malkova, A.; Fiala, Z. Systemic Inflammation, Oxidative Damage to Nucleic Acids, and Metabolic Syndrome in the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Li, C.; Xu, M.M.; Wang, K.; Adler, A.J.; Vella, A.T.; Zhou, B. Macrophage polarization and meta-inflammation. Transl. Res. 2018, 191, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deiuliis, J.; Shah, Z.; Shah, N. Visceral adipose inflammation in obesity is associated with critical alterations in tregulatory cell numbers. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Caër, C.; Rouault, C.; Le Roy, T.; Poitou, C.; Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Torcivia, A.; Bichet, J.-C.; Clément, K.; Guerre-Millo, M.; André, S. Immune cell-derived cytokines contribute to obesity-related inflammation, fibrogenesis and metabolic deregulation in human adipose tissue. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Magalhaes, I.; Pingris, K.; Poitou, C.; Bessoles, S.; Venteclef, N.; Kiaf, B.; Beaudoin, L.; Da Silva, J.; Allatif, O.; Rossjohn, J.; et al. Mucosal-associated invariant T cell alterations in obese and type 2 diabetic patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 1752–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Carrascosa, J.M.; Rocamora, V.; Fernandez-Torres, R.M.; Jimenez-Puya, R.; Moreno, J.C.; Coll-Puigserver, N.; Fonseca, E. Obesity and psoriasis: Inflammatory nature of obesity, relationship between psoriasis and obesity, and therapeutic implications. Actas Dermo-Sifiliogr. 2014, 105, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lasselin, J.; Magne, E.; Beau, C.; Ledaguenel, P.; Dexpert, S.; Aubert, A.; Layé, S.; Capuron, L. Adipose inflammation in obesity: Relationship with circulating levels of inflammatory markers and association with surgery-induced weight loss. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E53–E61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Barter, P.; McPherson, Y.R.; Song, K.; Kesäniemi, Y.A.; Mahley, R.; Waeber, G.; Bersot, T.; Mooser, V.; Waterworth, D.; Grundy, S.M. Serum insulin and inflammatory markers in overweight individuals with and without dyslipidemia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 2041–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Redlich, K.; Smolen, J.S. Inflammatory bone loss: Pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Modalsli, E.H.; Asvold, B.O.; Romundstad, P.R.; Langhammer, A.; Hoff, M.; Forsmo, S.; Naldi, L.; Saunes, M. Psoriasis, fracture risk and bone mineral density: The HUNT Study, Norway. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 176, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Savvidis, C.; Tournis, S.; Dede, A.D. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones 2018, 17, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Xia, F.; Wan, H.; Li, Q.; Jiang, B.; Hu, B.; et al. Bone Turnover Markers and Probable Advanced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men and Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 10, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hernández, J.L.; Olmos, J.M.; Pariente, E.; Martínez, J.; Valero, C.; García-Velasco, P.; Nan, D.; Llorca, J.; González-Macías, J. Metabolic syndrome and bone metabolism: The Camargo Cohort study. Menopause 2010, 17, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zeichner, J.A.; Armstrong, A. The Role of IL-17 in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Psoriasis. J. Clin. Aesthetic Dermatol. 2016, 9 (Suppl. 1), S3–S6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Langley, R.G.; Elewski, B.E.; Lebwohl, M.; Reich, K.; Griffiths, C.E.; Papp, K.; Puig, L.; Nakagawa, H.; Spelman, L.; Sigurgeirsson, B.; et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis--results of two phase 3 trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 326–338. [Google Scholar]
  31. Thaci, D.; Blauvelt, A.; Reich, K.; Tsai, T.F.; Vanaclocha, F.; Kingo, K.; Ziv, M.; Pinter, A.; Hugot, S.; You, R.; et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2015, 73, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pinter, A.; Gerdes, S.; Papavassilis, C.; Reinhardt, M. Characterization of responder groups to secukinumab treatment in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2019, 31, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gerdes, S.; Pinter, A.; Papavassilis, C.; Reinhardt, M. Effects of secukinumab on metabolic and liver parameters in plaque psoriasis patients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gerdes, S.; Pinter, A.; Biermann, M.; Papavassilis, C.; Reinhardt, M. Adiponectin levels in a large pooled plaque psoriasis study population. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2019, 31, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Coimbra, S.; Oliveira, H.; Neuparth, M.J.; Proenca, J.B.; Figueiredo, A.; Rocha-Pereira, P.; Santos-Silva, A. Systemic inflammation and proinflammatory interleukin-17 signalling persist at the end of therapy in patients with metabolic syndrome and psoriasis, reducing the length of remission. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 174, 414–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cassano, N.; Carbonara, M.; Panaro, M.; Vestita, M.; Vena, G.A. Role of serum uric acid in conditioning the association of psoriasis with metabolic syndrome. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2011, 21, 808–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. von Stebut, E.; Reich, K.; Thaçi, D.; Koenig, W.; Pinter, A.; Körber, A.; Rassaf, T.; Waisman, A.; Mani, V.; Yates, D.; et al. Impact of Secukinumab on Endothelial Dysfunction and Other Cardiovascular Disease Parameters in Psoriasis Patients over 52 Weeks. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, H.N.; Huang, Y.H. Changes in metabolic parameters in psoriatic patients treated with secukinumab. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2020, 11, 2040622320944777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Debbaneh, M.; Millsop, J.W.; Bhatia, B.K.; Koo, J.; Liao, W. Diet and psoriasis, part I: Impact of weight loss interventions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gisondi, P.; Del Giglio, M.; Di Francesco, V.; Zamboni, M.; Girolomoni, G. Weight loss improves the response of obese patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis to low-dose cyclosporine therapy: A randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 1242–1247. [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-Mutairi, N.; Nour, T. The effect of weight reduction on treatment outcomes in obese patients with psoriasis on biologic therapy: A randomized controlled prospective trial. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ko, S.H.; Chi, C.C.; Yeh, M.L.; Wang, S.H.; Tsai, Y.S.; Hsu, M.Y. Lifestyle changes for treating psoriasis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 7, CD011972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Knowler, W.C.; Barrett-Connor, E.; Fowler, S.E.; Hamman, R.F.; Lachin, J.M.; Walker, E.A.; Nathan, D.M. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 393–403. [Google Scholar]
  44. Scala, E.; Megna, M.; Amerio, P.; Argenziano, G.; Babino, G.; Bardazzi, F.; Bianchi, L.; Caldarola, G.; Campanati, A.; Cannavò, S.P.; et al. Patients’ demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence the therapeutic decision-making process in psoriasis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, Y.; Chi, J.; Lv, W.; Wang, Y. Obesity and diabetes as high-risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2020, 37, e3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 13 03015 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of psoriasis and obesity. The pathophysiological processes of systemic inflammation that underlie psoriasis and obesity/metabolic syndrome are interconnected via the release of inflammatory mediators from both psoriatic lesions and adipose tissue. IL-17 blockade with secukinumab inhibits aspects of this inflammatory cycle, but lifestyle interventions aimed at reducing obesity and associated inflammation may produce synergistic effects.hsCrp, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of psoriasis and obesity. The pathophysiological processes of systemic inflammation that underlie psoriasis and obesity/metabolic syndrome are interconnected via the release of inflammatory mediators from both psoriatic lesions and adipose tissue. IL-17 blockade with secukinumab inhibits aspects of this inflammatory cycle, but lifestyle interventions aimed at reducing obesity and associated inflammation may produce synergistic effects.hsCrp, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Nutrients 13 03015 g001
Nutrients 13 03015 g002 550
Figure 2. METABOLyx study design. METABOLyx is an open-label randomized controlled trial comparing secukinumab 300 mg (arm A) to secukinumab 300 mg plus a standardized lifestyle intervention (arm B). Primary endpoint is PASI90 response at week 28; secondary endpoints include metabolic syndrome components and safety. An exploratory biomarker substudy will also be conducted to obtain a profile of patients’ metabolic and inflammatory/immune status throughout treatment. During the extension period, lifestyle intervention can be continued by patients who have been in arm B during the core study or can be started by patients who have been in arm A. Participation in the lifestyle intervention during the extension period is not mandatory. Participation in the extension period itself is mandatory. Psoriasis treatment during the extension period can be chosen freely by the investigator.
Figure 2. METABOLyx study design. METABOLyx is an open-label randomized controlled trial comparing secukinumab 300 mg (arm A) to secukinumab 300 mg plus a standardized lifestyle intervention (arm B). Primary endpoint is PASI90 response at week 28; secondary endpoints include metabolic syndrome components and safety. An exploratory biomarker substudy will also be conducted to obtain a profile of patients’ metabolic and inflammatory/immune status throughout treatment. During the extension period, lifestyle intervention can be continued by patients who have been in arm B during the core study or can be started by patients who have been in arm A. Participation in the lifestyle intervention during the extension period is not mandatory. Participation in the extension period itself is mandatory. Psoriasis treatment during the extension period can be chosen freely by the investigator.
Nutrients 13 03015 g002
Table
Table 1. Definition of metabolic syndrome [8].
Table 1. Definition of metabolic syndrome [8].
Patients Meeting 3 Out of the 5 Criteria Meet the Diagnostic Requirements for Metabolic Syndrome
  • Fasting (8 h) plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL or ongoing antidiabetic drug treatment.
  • Abdominal obesity defined by elevated waist circumference: Male: ≥94 cm, female: ≥80 cm (except for patients of Asian, South or Central American ethnicity, for whom the cut off values are: Male: ≥90 cm, female: ≥80 cm).
  • Fasting (8 h) triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL or ongoing drug treatment for elevated triglycerides.
  • Fasting (8 h) HDL-C < 40 mg/dL in men or <50 mg/dL in women or ongoing drug treatment for reduced HDL-C.
  • Resting blood pressure: Systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 and/ or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg or ongoing antihypertensive drug treatment.
Table
Table 2. Lifestyle intervention targets.
Table 2. Lifestyle intervention targets.
Key Components of METABOLyx Lifestyle Intervention Program
▪
Weight reduction ≥ 5%.
▪
Increase in physical activity (to a total of at least 30–60 min of activity day).
▪
Increasing the proportion of fibre in food intake ≥ 15 g.
▪
Reduction in the fat content of daily food intake < 30%.
▪
Reduction of saturated fatty acid intake < 10%.
Table
Table 3. Biomarkers assessed in METABOLyx substudy.
Table 3. Biomarkers assessed in METABOLyx substudy.
ClassificationMarkers Analysed
InflammationIL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-1Ra, IL-18, CD154
Metabolic profileChromatography based full free fatty acid serum profiles, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, proinsulin, adipokine profile (adiponectin, leptin)
Liver statusM30 assay
Bone metabolismP1NP, CTX, RANKL, OPG, sclerostin, sThy-1
IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-1 β, interleukin-1 β; IL-18, interleukin-18; CD154, cluster of differentiation 154; HOMA-IR Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; M30 assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed for the detection of soluble caspase-cleaved keratin 18; P1NP, Procollagen 1 N Terminal Propeptide; CTX, C-terminal telopeptide; RANKL, Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand; sThy-1, soluble Thy-1 cell surface antigen.
Table
Table 4. Baseline characteristics of METABOLyx study population (n = 768).
Table 4. Baseline characteristics of METABOLyx study population (n = 768).
Baseline CharacteristicsSecukinumab 300 mg (A)
(n = 366)		Secukinumab 300 mg + Lifestyle Intervention (B)
(n = 402)
Age, years, mean (SD)50.5 (13.2)50.1 (12.5)
Gender (Male) n (%)263 (71.7)289 (71.7)
Race n (%)
 Caucasian355 (96.7)391 (97.0)
 Other2 (0.5)8 (2.0)
 Asian8 (2.2)1 (0.2)
 Black2 (0.5)2 (0.5)
 Unknown0 (0.0)1 (0.2)
Weight kg, mean (SD)107.13 (22.57)106.74 (20.58)
BMI kg/m2, mean (SD) 34.82 (6.83)34.65 (6.45)
Waist circumference cm, mean (SD)115.54 (15.41)114.99 (14.06)
Cardiovascular history, n (%)
 Hypertension241 (44.9)272 (47.3)
 Dyslipidaemia/Hyperlipidaemia146 (27.2)150 (26.1)
 Type 2 diabetes86 (16.0)78 (13.6)
Baseline PASI, mean (SD)19.76 (8.01)19.72 (7.29)
Baseline DLQI, (0–30) mean (SD)17.18 (6.39)16.79 (6.84)
Prior psoriasis treatment, n (%)
 Topical304 (44.6)330 (46.5)
 Non-biologic systemic therapy176 (25.8)185 (26.1)
 Biologic systemic therapy26 (3.8)25 (3.5)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pinter, A.; Schwarz, P.; Gerdes, S.; Simon, J.C.; Saalbach, A.; Rush, J.; Melzer, N.; Kramps, T.; Häberle, B.; Reinhardt, M. Biologic Treatment in Combination with Lifestyle Intervention in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Metabolic Syndrome: Rationale and Methodology of the METABOLyx Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093015

AMA Style

Pinter A, Schwarz P, Gerdes S, Simon JC, Saalbach A, Rush J, Melzer N, Kramps T, Häberle B, Reinhardt M. Biologic Treatment in Combination with Lifestyle Intervention in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Metabolic Syndrome: Rationale and Methodology of the METABOLyx Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2021; 13(9):3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pinter, Andreas, Peter Schwarz, Sascha Gerdes, Jan C. Simon, Anja Saalbach, James Rush, Nima Melzer, Thomas Kramps, Benjamin Häberle, and Maximilian Reinhardt. 2021. "Biologic Treatment in Combination with Lifestyle Intervention in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Metabolic Syndrome: Rationale and Methodology of the METABOLyx Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial" Nutrients 13, no. 9: 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093015

APA Style

Pinter, A., Schwarz, P., Gerdes, S., Simon, J. C., Saalbach, A., Rush, J., Melzer, N., Kramps, T., Häberle, B., & Reinhardt, M. (2021). Biologic Treatment in Combination with Lifestyle Intervention in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Metabolic Syndrome: Rationale and Methodology of the METABOLyx Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients, 13(9), 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop