Sodium Content in Cereal-Based Products Sold in Italy: How Far Are We from the Global Benchmarks?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Food Product Selection
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Number and Types of Included Products
3.2. Comparison of Sodium Content in Food Subcategories and Benchmarks
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Margherita Dall’Asta | Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy |
Gaetana Paolella | Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy |
Marika Dello Russo | Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy |
Stefania Moccia, | Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy |
Carmela Spagnuolo | Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy |
Daniele Nucci | Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy |
Veronica Pignone | Freelance Nutritionist, San Giorgio del Sannio, Italy |
Emilia Ruggiero | Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy |
Alice Rosi | Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Italy |
Giorgia Vici | School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Italy |
References
- World Health Organization (WHO) Guideline: Sodium Intake for Adults and Children. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241504836 (accessed on 15 June 2022).
- Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; de Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.; Kearney, J.; Knutsen, H.K.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Dietary reference values for sodium. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Health Organization (WHO) Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013–2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506236 (accessed on 15 June 2022).
- Kloss, L.; Meyer, J.D.; Graeve, L.; Vetter, W. Sodium intake and its reduction by food reformulation in the European Union—A review. NFS J. 2015, 1, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Commission Survey on Member States’ Implementation of the EU Salt Reduction Framework. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/df7ef17e-d643-4593-94b3-84bacfa7a76a/language-en (accessed on 15 June 2022).
- Donfrancesco, C.; Lo Noce, C.; Russo, O.; Minutoli, D.; Di Lonardo, A.; Profumo, E.; Buttari, B.; Iacone, R.; Vespasiano, F.; Vannucchi, S.; et al. Trend of salt intake measured by 24-h urine collection in the Italian adult population between the 2008 and 2018 CUORE project surveys. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, R.W.; Dhaun, N.; Bailey, M.A. The impact of excessive salt intake on human health. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022, 18, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strazzullo, P.; D’Elia, L.; Kandala, N.-B.; Cappuccio, F.P. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: Meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 2009, 339, b4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z.; et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, X.; Du, J.; Wu, X.; Cao, W.; Sun, S. Global burden attributable to high sodium intake from 1990 to 2019. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 3314–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, S.; Tan, M.; Wang, C.; Kent, S.; Cobiac, L.; MacGregor, G.A.; He, F.J.; Mihaylova, B. Impact of the 2003 to 2018 Population salt intake reduction program in England. Hypertension 2021, 77, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filippini, T.; Malavolti, M.; Whelton, P.K.; Naska, A.; Orsini, N.; Vinceti, M. Blood pressure effects of sodium reduction. Circulation 2021, 143, 1542–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borrelli, S.; Provenzano, M.; Gagliardi, I.; Michael, A.; Liberti, M.; De Nicola, L.; Conte, G.; Garofalo, C.; Andreucci, M. Sodium intake and chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.A.; Tekle, D.; Rosewarne, E.; Flexner, N.; Cobb, L.; Al-Jawaldeh, A.; Kim, W.J.; Breda, J.; Whiting, S.; Campbell, N.; et al. A Systematic review of salt reduction initiatives around the world: A midterm evaluation of progress towards the 2025 global non-communicable diseases salt reduction target. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 1768–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Global Sodium Benchmarks for Different Food Categories. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025097 (accessed on 15 June 2022).
- Bhat, S.; Marklund, M.; Henry, M.E.; Appel, L.J.; Croft, K.D.; Neal, B.; Wu, J.H.Y. A systematic review of the sources of dietary salt around the world. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Italian Society of Human Nutrition (SINU). Livelli di Assunzione di Riferimento di Nutrienti ed Energia per la Popolazione Italiana; SICS: Milan, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Angelino, D.; Rosi, A.; Dall’Asta, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Martini, D. Evaluation of the nutritional quality of breakfast cereals sold on the Italian market: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) study. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dall’Asta, M.; Rosi, A.; Angelino, D.; Pellegrini, N.; Martini, D. Evaluation of nutritional quality of biscuits and sweet snacks sold on the Italian market: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) study. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 2811–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelino, D.; Rosi, A.; Ruggiero, E.; Nucci, D.; Paolella, G.; Pignone, V.; Pellegrini, N.; Martini, D. Analysis of food labels to evaluate the nutritional quality of bread products and substitutes sold in Italy: Results from the Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) study. Foods 2020, 9, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CREA Linee Guida per una sana Alimentazione Italiana. Revisione 2018. Available online: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2915_allegato.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2022).
- Arcand, J.; Au, J.T.C.; Schermel, A.; L’Abbe, M.R. A Comprehensive analysis of sodium levels in the Canadian Packaged food supply. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 46, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arcand, J.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Benavides Aguilar, K.; L’Abbe, M.; Legetic, B. Sodium levels in packaged foods sold in 14 Latin American and Caribbean countries: A Food Label Analysis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pombo-Rodrigues, S.; Hashem, K.M.; He, F.J.; MacGregor, G.A. Salt and sugars content of breakfast cereals in the UK from 1992 to 2015. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 1500–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Temme, E.; Hendriksen, M.; Milder, I.; Toxopeus, I.; Westenbrink, S.; Brants, H. Salt reductions in some foods in the Netherlands: Monitoring of food composition and salt intake. Nutrients 2017, 9, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pravst, I.; Lavriša, Ž.; Kušar, A.; Miklavec, K.; Žmitek, K. Changes in average sodium content of prepacked foods in Slovenia during 2011–2015. Nutrients 2017, 9, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Strazzullo, P.; Cairella, G.; Campanozzi, A.; Carcea, M.; Galeone, D.; Galletti, F.; Giampaoli, S.; Iacoviello, L.; Scalfi, L. Population based strategy for dietary salt intake reduction: Italian initiatives in the European framework. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, 22, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gressier, M.; Swinburn, B.; Frost, G.; Segal, A.B.; Sassi, F. What is the impact of food reformulation on individuals’ behaviour, nutrient intakes and health status? A systematic review of empirical evidence. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gressier, M.; Sassi, F.; Frost, G. Contribution of reformulation, product renewal, and changes in consumer behavior to the reduction of salt intakes in the UK population between 2008/2009 and 2016/2017. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coyle, D.; Shahid, M.; Dunford, E.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Mckee, S.; Santos, M.; Popkin, B.; Trieu, K.; Marklund, M.; Neal, B.; et al. Estimating the potential impact of Australia’s reformulation programme on households’ sodium purchases. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2021, 4, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyseni, L.; Elliot-Green, A.; Lloyd-Williams, F.; Kypridemos, C.; O’Flaherty, M.; McGill, R.; Orton, L.; Bromley, H.; Cappuccio, F.P.; Capewell, S. Systematic review of dietary salt reduction policies: Evidence for an effectiveness hierarchy? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hope, S.F.; Webster, J.; Trieu, K.; Pillay, A.; Ieremia, M.; Bell, C.; Snowdon, W.; Neal, B.; Moodie, M. A systematic review of economic evaluations of population-based sodium reduction interventions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:ea0f9f73-9ab2-11ea-9d2d-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (accessed on 15 June 2022).
- Jaenke, R.; Barzi, F.; McMahon, E.; Webster, J.; Brimblecombe, J. Consumer acceptance of reformulated food products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of salt-reduced foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3357–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items with Sodium Content above the Benchmark | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subcategories and Types | Total Number of Items | Salt Content (g/100 g) * | Sodium Content (mg Na/100 g) * | Benchmark (mg Na/100 g) ** | n | % |
Cookies/sweet biscuits | 753 | 0.54 (0.37–0.75) | 220 (150–300) | 265 | 254 | 34 |
Tea cookies | 254 | 0.60 (0.40–0.75) | 240 (160–300) | 93 | 37 | |
Short-bread biscuits | 346 | 0.61 (0.48–0.75) | 246 (192–300) | 142 | 41 | |
Cream-filled wafer | 77 | 0.31 (0.25–0.38) | 124 (100–152) | 1 | 1 | |
Covered and/or sandwich cookies | 76 | 0.48 (0.30–0.63) | 190 (118–250) | 18 | 24 | |
Cakes and sponges | 280 | 0.53 (0.39–0.73) | 209 (152–290) | 205 | 143 | 51 |
Cream-filled sponge cake | 74 | 0.37 (0.30–0.50) | 146 (120–200) | 15 | 20 | |
Yogurt plumcake and muffin | 126 | 0.67 (0.51–0.82) | 274 (204–336) | 91 | 72 | |
Sponge cake | 74 | 0.51 (0.41–0.71) | 200 (164–284) | 35 | 47 | |
Cream-filled and/or covered chilled snack | 6 | 0.23 (0.19–0.55) | 92 (78–219) | 2 | 33 | |
Pies and pastries | 107 | 0.36 (0.25–0.50) | 150 (100–200) | 120 | 64 | 60 |
Cream/jam-filled pies | 61 | 0.41 (0.32–0.55) | 164 (128–220) | 46 | 75 | |
Italian traditional pastries | 27 | 0.20 (0.13–0.30) | 80 (52–120) | 6 | 22 | |
Other pastries | 19 | 0.38 (0.18–0.64) | 150 (72–256) | 12 | 63 | |
Crackers/savory biscuits | 808 | 1.80 (1.20–2.25) | 720 (480–900) | 600 | 490 | 61 |
Crackers | 183 | 1.90 (1.50–2.25) | 760 (600–900) | 135 | 74 | |
Breadsticks | 193 | 2.00 (1.80–2.30) | 800 (720–920) | 176 | 91 | |
Rice and corn cakes | 142 | 0.50 (0.30–1.00) | 200 (120–400) | 8 | 6 | |
Taralli | 99 | 2.30 (2.10–2.50) | 920 (840–1000) | 92 | 93 | |
Croutons, bruschetta and “frisella” bread | 96 | 1.80 (1.47–2.50) | 720 (588–1000) | 67 | 70 | |
Rusks | 95 | 1.25 (1.00–1.50) | 500 (400–600) | 12 | 13 | |
Minimally processed breakfast cereals | 49 | 0.01 (0.00–0.03) | 4 (1–12) | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Muesli | 1 | 0.02 (0.02–0.02) | 8 (8–8) | 0 | 0 | |
Flakes | 19 | 0.01 (0.00–0.03) | 4 (1–12) | 0 | 0 | |
Bran cereals | 10 | 0.03 (0.00–0.07) | 10 (0–28) | 0 | 0 | |
Puffed cereals | 18 | 0.01 (0.00–0.01) | 4 (0–4) | 0 | 0 | |
Other cereals | 1 | 0.03 (0.03–0.03) | 12 (12–12) | 0 | 0 | |
Highly processed breakfast cereals | 271 | 0.63 (0.30–1.00) | 252 (120–400) | 280 | 122 | 45 |
Muesli | 67 | 0.30 (0.11–0.53) | 120 (44–212) | 4 | 6 | |
Flakes | 107 | 0.90 (0.48–1.30) | 360 (192–520) | 77 | 72 | |
Bran cereals | 11 | 1.20 (0.59–1.30) | 480 (236–520) | 8 | 73 | |
Puffed cereals | 20 | 0.47 (0.02–1.00) | 186 (6–400) | 7 | 35 | |
Other cereals | 66 | 0.59 (0.38–0.79) | 236 (152–316) | 26 | 39 | |
Sweet and raisin breads | 168 | 0.57 (0.46–0.73) | 228 (184–292) | 310 | 25 | 15 |
Leavened bread | 337 | 1.27 (1.13–1.40) | 508 (452–560) | 330 | 310 | 92 |
Loaf bread | 95 | 1.25 (0.93–1.50) | 500 (372–600) | 76 | 80 | |
Rolls | 70 | 1.30 (1.20–1.30) | 520 (480–520) | 69 | 99 | |
Sliced bread | 172 | 1.25 (1.17–1.40) | 500 (468–560) | 165 | 96 | |
Flatbreads | 144 | 1.67 (1.50–2.00) | 666 (600–800) | 320 | 141 | 98 |
Subcategories | Branded n (%) | Private Label n (%) | Organic n (%) | Conventional n (%) | Gluten Free n (%) | Gluten Containing n (%) | with NC n (%) | without NC n (%) | with HC n (%) | without HC n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cookies/sweet biscuits | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 158 (34) | 96 (33) | 23 (26) | 231 (35) | 11 (22) | 243 (35) | 103 (49) | 151 (28) | 1 (13) | 253 (24) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 307 (66) | 192 (67) | 66 (74) | 433 (65) | 38 (78) | 461 (65) | 109 (51) | 390 (72) | 7 (87) | 492 (76) |
Cakes and sponges | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 67 (41) | 77 (66) | 14 (64) | 130 (50) | 17 (55) | 127 (51) | 28 (60) | 116 (50) | 0 (0) | 144 (52) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 98 (59) | 39 (34) | 8 (36) | 129 (50) | 14 (45) | 123 (49) | 19 (40) | 118 (50) | 2 (100) | 135 (48) |
Pies and pastries | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 32 (59) | 32 (60) | 6 (86) | 58 (58) | 2 (100) | 62 (59) | 7 (78) | 57 (58) | 0 (0) | 64 (60) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 22 (41) | 21 (40) | 1 (14) | 42 (42) | 0 (0) | 43 (41) | 2 (22) | 41 (42) | 0 (0) | 43 (40) |
Crackers/savory biscuits | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 290 (59) | 200 (63) | 48 (25) | 442 (71) | 25 (18) | 465 (70) | 121 (42) | 369 (71) | 23 (58) | 467 (61) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 200 (41) | 118 (37) | 141 (75) | 177 (29) | 114 (82) | 204 (30) | 169 (58) | 149 (29) | 17 (42) | 301 (39) |
Minimally processed breakfast cereals | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 28 (100) | 21 (100) | 36 (100) | 13 (100) | 1 (100) | 48 (100) | 33 (100) | 16 (100) | 8 (100) | 41 (100) |
Highly processed breakfast cereals | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 54 (46) | 68 (44) | 25 (40) | 97 (46) | 9 (64) | 113 (44) | 91 (47) | 31 (39) | 27 (60) | 95 (42) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 64 (54) | 85 (56) | 37 (60) | 112 (54) | 5 (36) | 144 (56) | 101 (53) | 48 (61) | 18 (40) | 131 (58) |
Sweet and raisin breads | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 10 (12) | 15 (18) | 3 (60) | 22 (13) | 0 (0) | 25 (15) | 1 (4) | 24 (17) | 0 (0) | 25 (15) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 74 (88) | 69 (82) | 2 (40) | 141 (87) | 1 (100) | 142 (85) | 27 (86) | 116 (83) | 2 (100) | 141 (85) |
Leavened bread | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 34 (79) | 276 (94) | 176 (90) | 134 (95) | 30 (91) | 280 (92) | 75 (81) | 235 (96) | 2 (100) | 308 (92) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 9 (21) | 18 (6) | 20 (10) | 7 (5) | 3 (9) | 24 (8) | 18 (19) | 9 (4) | 0 (0) | 27 (8) |
Flatbreads | ||||||||||
Na above the benchmark | 32 (94) | 109 (99) | 95 (97) | 46 (100) | 5 (100) | 136 (98) | 12 (86) | 129 (99) | 2 (100) | 139 (98) |
Na equal or below the benchmark | 2 (6) | 1 (1) | 3 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (2) | 2 (14) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 3 (2) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Martini, D.; Strazzullo, P.; Serafini, M.; Porrini, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Angelino, D., on behalf of the SINU Young Working. Sodium Content in Cereal-Based Products Sold in Italy: How Far Are We from the Global Benchmarks? Nutrients 2022, 14, 3088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153088
Martini D, Strazzullo P, Serafini M, Porrini M, Pellegrini N, Angelino D on behalf of the SINU Young Working. Sodium Content in Cereal-Based Products Sold in Italy: How Far Are We from the Global Benchmarks? Nutrients. 2022; 14(15):3088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153088
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartini, Daniela, Pasquale Strazzullo, Mauro Serafini, Marisa Porrini, Nicoletta Pellegrini, and Donato Angelino on behalf of the SINU Young Working. 2022. "Sodium Content in Cereal-Based Products Sold in Italy: How Far Are We from the Global Benchmarks?" Nutrients 14, no. 15: 3088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153088
APA StyleMartini, D., Strazzullo, P., Serafini, M., Porrini, M., Pellegrini, N., & Angelino, D., on behalf of the SINU Young Working. (2022). Sodium Content in Cereal-Based Products Sold in Italy: How Far Are We from the Global Benchmarks? Nutrients, 14(15), 3088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153088