Next Article in Journal
Reprogramming Effects of Postbiotic Butyrate and Propionate on Maternal High-Fructose Diet-Induced Offspring Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Security, Nutritional Supply, and Nutrient Sources in Rural Burkina Faso
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction Effect of Phase Angle and Age on Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Costs among Midwestern Adult Food-Pantry Users by Food-Security Status
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 7
10.3390/nu15071681
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime

by
Wasiuddin Najam
1,*,
Temitope Ibiyemi
1,
Sajia Aziz
2,
Rafiuddin Najam
3,
Wanjiku N. Gichohi-Wainaina
1 and
Wilna Oldewage-Theron
1,4,*
1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
2
School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
3
School of Public Policy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
4
Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(7), 1681; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071681
Submission received: 26 February 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 30 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Insecurity, Diet Quality and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite the severity of food insecurity in Afghanistan, little is known about the factors contributing to household food insecurity (HFI) under the Taliban regime. Therefore, this paper investigated the social determinants of severe HFI in rural areas of Afghanistan. We used the fifth-round survey of 6019 rural households from 25 provinces, collected between July and August 2022 by the Food and Agriculture Organization. We used binary logistic regression to examine the association between household characteristics and HFI. The majority of household heads were male (97.8%) with no education (62.8%). The findings showed that female-headed households had significantly higher odds of severe HFI. Household heads with any level of formal education had significantly reduced odds of severe HFI, while the odds of severe HFI was not different among those with religious/informal household-head education compared to those with no education. Likewise, engagement in any type of agricultural activity decreased the odds of severe HFI. Additionally, household income per member was negatively, while household size was positively associated with severe HFI. In summary, interventions to alleviate HFI among rural households should prioritize income-generating opportunities and skills targeting households with female heads, low levels of household-head education, larger size, no agricultural activities, and low income.

1. Introduction

A household suffers from food insecurity when the household members are unable to consistently access safe, nutritious, and sufficient food that is essential for maintaining a healthy and active lifestyle [1]. Food insecurity is a significant global challenge, affecting millions of individuals and households globally [2]. The global prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity was approximately 2.3 billion people in 2021, which is about 29.3% of the world population, an increase of an additional 350 million individuals since 2019 [2]. Several factors, including political instability [3], climate variability and extremes [4], and downturns of the economy [5], as well as the COVID-19 pandemic that further exacerbated the food insecurity situation, have contributed to the high prevalence of global food insecurity [2].
Food insecurity has been a major issue in Afghanistan for decades [6,7]. Food availability and access have been impacted by multiple factors, and poor nutrition indices indicate challenges in the utilization pillar of food insecurity; however, the stability pillar has been a particularly strong pillar that has influenced food insecurity in Afghanistan [6]. Prior to the year 2000, the prolonged political instability and conflict in Afghanistan negatively affected food production, supply, and access across the country, which contributed to the high prevalence of food insecurity among Afghans [6]. As a result, the country suffered “extremely alarming hunger” in 2000 based on the Global Hunger Index [7]. This situation was addressed to some extent by the enormous support from various countries and international organizations following the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001 and the rise of a new government [8]. Nonetheless, the Afghan people have continued to suffer from a persistently high rate of food insecurity and hunger [7,9]. In the years after 2014, following the completion of the United States of America (USA)-led coalition combat mission in Afghanistan [10] along with the political transition, political turmoil and insecurity increased in the country. This situation negatively impacted the food security status in the country, as evidenced by the three-year average prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity that increased from 45.1% between 2014 and 2016 to 70% between 2019 and 2021 in Afghanistan [9].
After almost 20 years of conflicts, on 15 August 2021, the Taliban regained power once again [11]. This led to the withdrawal of international forces, disruption, and closure of international organizations, a decline in monetary aid, and introduction of sanctions such as freezing the Afghanistan government’s assets to the Taliban regime by the USA [12], which led to a high unemployment rate and decreased household income, particularly among individuals with formal education [13,14]. These conditions have further exacerbated the challenge of food insecurity, mainly household food availability and access [14]. As a result, the food insecurity status has worsened in the country, with nearly 19 million people (47% of the population) experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity between September and October 2021, compared to the 11.15 million people (36% of the population) between August and October 2020 [15].
The majority of the Afghan population resides in rural settings, where agricultural activities are the main source of income [16,17,18]. Therefore, in addition to political instabilities and disruption in economic activities, environmental factors (e.g., drought, plant diseases, flood, earthquake) also contribute to the increasing prevalence of food insecurity in Afghanistan [16,19,20,21,22]. According to recent reports, in 2022, 83% and 96% of rural farmers reported reductions in the planted area and agricultural production, respectively, mainly due to lack of water and plant diseases [16]. Since agricultural activities are one of the main income sources for the majority of Afghan rural households, natural disasters cause higher financial stress and lower total income, which may exacerbate the already high prevalence of food insecurity [16].
Currently, Afghanistan is suffering one of the most catastrophic humanitarian crises in the world, with 47% of the population facing high levels of acute food insecurity [15]. In particular, 84% of rural households were facing moderate and severe food insecurity in 2022, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which utilized the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) [16]. The prevalence of food insecurity is reported to be higher among female-headed households [14]. The Taliban’s decisions, particularly the ban on women’s right to work and attend institutions of secondary and higher education, violates basic human rights and has led to the suspension and interruption of several non-governmental organizations’ operations, which were critical in delivering aid such as monetary and food assistance and services to communities in Afghanistan [23]. As a result, many people lost their source of income, which will deepen the poverty rate and magnify the prevalence of food insecurity for years to come.
Interventions are needed to improve household living conditions, particularly access to food, to address the existing crisis in Afghanistan. Hence, it requires a comprehensive understanding of the theoretical foundation for developing interventions [24], which includes understanding the characteristics of the population that the intervention is targeted to, as well as other key factors that may impact implementation success, as noted by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [25]. Therefore, understanding the significant factors that increase the likelihood of food insecurity is of utmost importance to develop effective interventions and policies aimed at improving food insecurity status.
Globally, previous studies demonstrated that living in low-income countries, rural areas, larger households, and being female, having low education levels, and low income levels increase the likelihood of experiencing food insecurity [26,27,28]; however, participating in agricultural activities, in countries where agriculture is considered the main source of income, can reduce the chance of experiencing food insecurity [29,30]. Similar trends were observed in previous studies conducted in the rural areas of Afghanistan prior to the Taliban takeover in 2021 [31,32]. They suggested that households with a female head and larger size were negatively, while education attainment, income and involvement in agricultural activities were positively associated with household food security [31,32].
While the recent crisis of food insecurity in Afghanistan has received increased attention from the international community, the factors that play a significant role in HFI after the Taliban takeover remain poorly understood. Hence, we aim to fill this gap by examining social determinants (household-head gender, head education, size, agricultural activity, and income per member) of severe HFI in rural areas of Afghanistan to assist the international community and policymakers in effectively targeting vulnerable populations during the ongoing crisis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study used the data from the fifth-round household survey of the Data in Emergencies (DIEM)-Monitoring system in Afghanistan, which were collected cross-sectionally between 23 July and 26 August 2022 [33].

2.2. Data in Emergencies Monitoring System

The DIEM-Monitoring system was established under the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. The main purpose of the DIEM-Monitoring system is to collect data from households and key informants in countries prone to multiple shocks [34]. Therefore, the DIEM-Monitoring system conducts household surveys in Afghanistan to monitor agricultural livelihoods and food security.

2.3. Study Population, Setting, and Data Collection

The DIEM methodology was published previously [16]. The sample included rural households that were randomly selected using two-step cluster sampling and probability proportional to size. The total number of households interviewed was 6019, which is a representative sample of rural households in 25 out of 34 provinces that include all 8 regions of Afghanistan (Figure 1). The DIEM data captured household-level information with face-to-face interviews among rural households using the Kobo Toolbox. The Kobo Toolbox is a toolkit used to collect and manage data in challenging environments and humanitarian emergencies such as the current situation in Afghanistan.

2.4. Measures

2.4.1. The Food Insecurity Experience Scale

The outcome used in this study was HFI status. The FIES was used to measure the food insecurity status of households in the 30 days prior to data collection [35]. The FIES was developed by the FAO for measuring the severity of food insecurity as a latent trait due to the lack of money or other resources. Table 1 represents the FIES questionnaire, which consists of 8 questions with binary yes or no response options, and each question belongs to either a mild, moderate, or severe category of food insecurity. The total FIES score is 8, for which an affirmative and a negative response receive a value of 1 and 0, respectively. The Voices of the Hungry project of the FAO suggested that the raw score can be divided into four categories: food secure (0 score), mildly food insecure (1–3 score), moderately food insecure (4–6 score), and severely food insecure (7–8 score) [36].

2.4.2. Covariates

Sociodemographic information was collected using the household level questionnaire in face-to-face interviews. Although there are various social determinants associated with HFI, the determinants provided by the DIEM dataset include household-head gender, head education, size, agricultural activity, and income. Household-head gender was categorized as male or female, and household-head education level was recorded as none/did not complete primary school, completed primary school, completed secondary school, completed higher education (university/college) degree, or religious or informal education. Likewise, household agricultural activity was grouped into 4 categories (none, livestock production, crop production, both livestock and crop production). Household size was recorded in numbers. Finally, the total household income was reported, and to estimate the household income per member, we divided the total household income by total household size.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The R language within the R-Studio environment (version 2022.12.0+353) was used to perform all the statistical analyses. To objectively verify the validity and reliability of the FIES data, the Rasch model was implemented using the “RM.weights” package. The Rasch model helps ensure that the FIES is a valid and reliable measure of food insecurity and provides a way to objectively evaluate the scale’s properties and its ability to accurately capture the experiences of those facing food insecurity [35]. The weighted infit statistics from the Rasch model analysis were used to assess the validity and reliability of the FIES in measuring food insecurity. The ideal infit statistic is 1.0, with a broadly acceptable range of 0.7–1.3 [35]. The weighted infit statistics for the FIES data in our study were within the acceptable range of 0.7–1.2, which verified that the FIES is a reliable and valid measure to assess food insecurity in this population. To estimate the prevalence of food insecurity, we have used the deterministic classification, in line with the FAO’s Voices of Hungry recommendation [37].
All the analyses were conducted using the “Survey” package and accounted for the complex sampling design and weight to obtain population-representative findings. The household income per member was transformed by taking the natural logarithm of the household income per member plus one, which accounts for taking the logarithm of values that are equal to zero, to normalize the right-skewed distribution of data. The household size was presented as mean and standard error (SE), while the household income per member was presented as mean ± SE and median (Q1–Q3). The categorical data were presented as proportion and SE. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of severe HFI, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. For all regression analyses, household-head gender, head education, agricultural activity, size, and the natural log of household income per member were used as independent variables. Based on the FAO recommendation for using the FIES as a dependent variable [36], each household was assigned to one of the two categories of food insecurity according to their FIES raw score: 0 = food secure to moderate HFI (0–6 score) and 1 = severe HFI (7–8 score). The generalized variance inflation factor (VIF) [38], which takes into account the degrees of freedom, demonstrated no multicollinearity in the multivariate logistic regression model. The logistic regression coefficients are represented as odds ratios (95% confidence interval) [OR (95% CI)], and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Households Characteristics

The household characteristics of rural households are summarized in Table 2, which indicates that the households were predominantly male-headed (97.8%), and 62.8% of household heads had no education or did not complete primary school. Additionally, on average, the rural households had 9.5 members. In terms of agricultural activities, 13.1% and 46.6% of the households participated in livestock and crop production, respectively, while 27.2% had both crop and livestock production. Shockingly, 22% of households reported no income, and the mean household income per member was AFN 2021 (USD ~22.7) in the past three months.

3.2. Food Insecurity Experience Scale

Figure 2 represents the weighted proportion of responses to the FIES questionnaire. Alarmingly, every household (99.2%) reported that they worried about not having enough food to eat. Likewise, 76.2% reported not having any food to eat, while 65.53% and 44.6% indicated that they sleep hungry at night and went an entire day and night without eating anything, respectively. The prevalence of food insecurity based on deterministic classification demonstrated that 95% of the rural households experienced moderate or severe food insecurity, while severe food insecurity was reported by 63% of the households.

3.3. Social Determinants of Household Food Insecurity

3.3.1. Univariate Analysis of Social Determinants of Severe Household Food Insecurity

Table 3 shows the univariate logistic regression results for the social determinants of severe HFI. The findings suggest that female-headed households had higher odds [OR (95% CI) = 2.67 (1.56–4.56)] of severe HFI than male-headed households. Household heads with primary or secondary education levels had lower odds of severe HFI relative to those with no education/incomplete primary education; however, those with college/university education or religious/informal education are not significantly different compared to the reference group. Households with any forms of agricultural activities had lower odds of severe food insecurity compared to households with no agricultural activities. Finally, the natural log of household income per member in the past three months was a significant predictor of severe HFI [OR (95% CI) = 0.91 (0.88–0.93)].

3.3.2. Multivariate Analysis of Social Determinants of Severe Household Food Insecurity

Table 4 represents the results of region-adjusted social determinants of severe HFI from a multivariate logistic regression model. The results indicated that the odds of severe HFI is higher among female-headed households. Likewise, as household size increased by one additional member, the odds of severe food insecurity increased by 1.03 (1.004–1.06) times. Moreover, our findings indicate that if the household head had any level of formal education, the odds of severe food insecurity were reduced compared to those with no education/did not complete primary school. Engagement in any form of agricultural activities reduces the likelihood of severe food insecurity in a household, compared to those with no agricultural activities. Finally, similarly to the results reported in the univariate model, the natural log of household income per member in the past three months was a significant predictor of severe HFI [OR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.89–0.95)].

4. Discussion

In this study, the majority of households are headed by males (97.8%), among which 62.8% are uneducated. Rural households are mainly involved in agricultural activities, with 46.6% of households engaged in crop production. Also, one out of five rural households (22%) reported no income generation in the past three months prior to data collection. Moreover, our findings suggest that more than nine out of ten households (95%) living in rural areas suffer from moderate or severe levels of food insecurity, while severe food insecurity was reported by six out of ten (63%) rural households.
According to the FAO, prior to the Taliban takeover, the three-year average prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity in Afghanistan was 70% between 2019 and 2021 [9]. The evidence suggests that the prevalence of food insecurity increased since 2021. In October 2021, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) reported that 47% of Afghans were experiencing acute levels of food insecurity, which increased from 36% in October 2020, and 35% in May 2020 [15]. Likewise, according to the World Food Programme (WFP), the rate of inadequate food consumption in Afghanistan increased markedly, from 81% just before 15 August 2021, to 97% in October 2021, and it remained between 92% and 98% from September 2021 until May 2022 [40]. Considering the high prevalence of food insecurity in Afghanistan, this study aimed to assess the social determinants of rural HFI, with specific focus on household-head gender, head education, size, agricultural activity, and income, one year after the Taliban returned to power.

4.1. Household-Head Gender

Our findings shows that female-headed households had higher odds of experiencing severe HFI than male-headed households. The findings align with other studies conducted in developing countries around the world [41,42,43,44]. Similarly, to our findings, a recent study by Santos et al. 2022, in a low-income district of Lima, Peru, showed that female-headed households had higher odds of food insecurity relative to male-headed households [43]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 141 articles by Negesse and colleagues from Ethiopia, a country facing dire food insecurity due to economic instability, conflict, drought, and extreme poverty, just like Afghanistan, also reported that female-headed households in Ethiopia also had higher odds [OR (95% CI) = 1.94 (1.26–3.01)] of suffering from food insecurity compared to male-headed households [42]. A growing body of evidence in different parts of the world suggests that female-headed households are more susceptible to food insecurity due to gender-based discrimination [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. This can be explained by the limited access for women to income-generating resources, education, and skills, and they are more likely to be vulnerable to major shocks and disasters (drought, flood, wars, and economic meltdown) [45,48,49].
Prior reports in Afghanistan indicated that female-headed households were more likely to experience frequent food insecurity than male-headed households [50,51]. There have been increased restrictions imposed on women in the country in the wake of the Taliban regime [52]. Women face more stringent regulations with respect to securing jobs outside the home and inter-city travel with male chaperones, and have been subjected to more gender-based discrimination [52,53]. These events have threatened the food security status of women and female-headed households in Afghanistan. Hence, given the existing conditions, female-headed households are more vulnerable to food insecurity than households headed by males.

4.2. Household-Head Education

Our findings demonstrated an inverse association between household-head education and severe HFI status. Compared to those with no education/did not complete primary school, those who completed primary, secondary, and college/university education had reduced odds of experiencing severe HFI. There is well-established evidence from numerous studies that households with more educated heads are less likely to suffer from food insecurity in developing and low-income countries [26,27,28,29,31,32,43,54,55]. This might be because the educational attainment of household heads is associated with more job opportunities, increased skill development, higher off-farm income, improved sanitation, nutrition knowledge, and health decisions, all of which can improve household food security status [55,56,57]. Furthermore, increased household-head education can improve agricultural productivity and income [55,56]. Most of the households in our study are involved in agricultural activities, and previous research has also suggested that educated farmers are more likely to utilize advanced farming technologies and strategies and diversify their income-generating sources in a time of need, which advances the food security status of households [55,56,58,59].
Our study did not find a relationship between household-heads with religious or informal education and experience of severe HFI, despite the reported favoritism in the allocation of monetary aid, job opportunities, and other income-generating activities toward Taliban supporters, many of whom are people with informal religious education [60,61]. However, we opine that it is also possible that respondents with religious education may under-report their level of food insecurity, due to their strong religious beliefs, and consider it a social stigma, which might explain the non-significant findings among this population. Previous studies also suggest that people with religious beliefs may find it challenging to acknowledge the feeling of anxiety or worry in their lives, as they attribute events, whether positive or negative, to the supreme power of God [62,63].

4.3. Household Size

Afghanistan has a higher-than-global-average household size [64], and multigenerational households, in which adult children live with their parents or in-laws throughout their life, are common [65]. Our findings indicate a positive association between household size and severe HFI. Other studies among developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East have reported similar results [31,43,56,66]. In Pakistan, Shahzad and co-authors denoted that having a large family size is a significant predictor of food insecurity among low-income households in Punjab [41]. Likewise, another study by Ahmadzai and Aryobi (2021) among rural households in the Paktia province of Afghanistan found that household size is a significant predictor of food security status, where larger households are more likely to be food insecure than those with fewer members [31]. A common challenge of food-insecure households is the distribution of insufficient and limited food. Often, household food intake is distributed based on the gender, age, and dietary needs of the youngest in the household [67,68]. Thus, an increase in household size introduces an extra burden on food consumption and food security status.

4.4. Household Agricultural Activity

Food security status was positively influenced by household agricultural activity in our study. Households engaged in agricultural activity in the form of crop, livestock, or both crop and livestock production are less likely to experience severe HFI. This finding is similar to several studies that have shown that engaging in agricultural activity can improve food security status in developing countries [29,69,70,71,72]. A study by Pawlak and Kolodziejczak (2020) found that increasing agricultural activities is a key driver of improving food availability and access in rural areas of developing countries [29]. Another study in rural communities of Madagascar found that the likelihood of household food insecurity decreased with increased agricultural activity [71]. Our study findings might be attributed to the fact that engaging in agricultural activity can improve food security by increasing production and availability of foods, increasing income, and reducing poverty [29,69].
Our finding is also supported by a secondary analysis of households in Northern Ghana [69], which is one of the nation’s poorest regions. Danso-Abbeam et al. (2021) revealed that engaging in both crop and livestock production improved household food security status [69]. In addition to providing income variety for farmers engaged in mixed farming, the evidence has shown that livestock production can decrease the risks associated with crop production [72,73,74]. Livestock production also provides a buffer against climatic and economic instability [70,75]. Hence, engaging in any form of agricultural activity favors households in Afghanistan to be more food secure, relative to those with no agricultural activities.

4.5. Household Income

Poverty is a direct factor that impairs access to food and leads to food insecurity [66]. Poor households have limited and restricted ability to purchase the needed variety of foods to support a healthy and active life [31]. Our study also revealed that a one-unit increase in the natural log of household income per capita in the past three months was associated with an 8% reduction in the odds of severe HFI. The findings are consistent with previous studies conducted in low and middle-income countries, which show that poor households with reduced income have limited food access and are more susceptible to food insecurity [28,31,67,76,77]. Before the Taliban takeover, a study in the Paktia province of Afghanistan found that household income was the most significant predictor of food security status among rural households [31]. Another study among farming households in the Takhar province of Afghanistan found that both household farm income and non-agricultural income significantly positively influenced the food security status of respondents [32].
The economic situation in Afghanistan deteriorated after the Taliban takeover, impairing household income [12,60,78]. Before the Taliban takeover, monetary aid from the international community accounted for a large percentage of the government budget, [79,80] which enabled the former Afghan government to provide services in hard-to-reach areas; however, under the Taliban government, such monetary aid, for the most part, has been reduced or abandoned due to sanctions on the Taliban regime [12,79]. Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of workers lost their jobs, and the country’s currency depreciated [78,81]. There has also been a hike in food and fuel prices, which further exacerbates the food insecurity rate in the country [12]. Inflation, particularly food inflation, reached a 14-year record high in June/July 2022 [82]. A recent report by the World Bank showed that food prices increased by 24.9% in July 2022, compared to July 2021 [83]. Likewise, compared to the prices a year ago, in May 2022, the WFP reported a 45% increase in wheat, a 49% increase in wheat flour, and a 20% increase in rice prices, some of the country’s common staple foods [15].

4.6. Strengths and Limitations

This study has several strengths. First, it featured a large nationally representative sample that was randomly selected from rural households in Afghanistan. Second, this is the first study, to our knowledge, examining how the investigated social determinants are associated with severe HFI in Afghanistan after the Taliban regained power in 2021. This will provide valuable insights for international organizations aiming to address HFI in Afghanistan. Lastly, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to provide a better understanding of the food insecurity determinants. The cross-sectional design of the study, which provides information related to a particular time of the year, might be considered a limitation. Another limitation could be the low proportion of female-headed households in the study sample, as results cannot be generalizable to all female-headed households. However, the randomly selected nature of the sample allows us to rectify this concern, which demonstrates a similar proportion of female-headed households to previous studies in rural areas of Afghanistan [31,32]. Furthermore, Afghanistan is a male-dominated society, where males are generally the household head [65].

5. Conclusions

Food insecurity remains a major concern among rural households in Afghanistan, with 63% experiencing severe HFI based on deterministic classification of FIES. Our findings suggest that all investigated social determinants, including household-head gender, head education, size, agricultural activity, and income are associated with severe HFI. Households headed by people with formal education, along with households involved in agricultural activity, and those with higher income per family member are less likely to suffer from severe HFI. However, female-headed and larger-sized households are more likely to experience severe HFI.
Interventions and strategies by international organizations to alleviate severe food insecurity among rural households should prioritize income-generating opportunities and skills targeting households with female heads, low levels of household-head education, larger numbers of members, no agricultural activity, and low income. The consistency of our results with prior studies highlights the relevance of successful interventions in other contexts that could be adapted to address the ongoing crisis in Afghanistan.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.N. and W.O.-T.; methodology, W.N., W.O.-T. and R.N.; validation, W.N.; formal analysis, W.N.; data curation, W.N.; writing—original draft preparation, W.N., T.I. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, W.O.-T., W.N.G.-W. and R.N.; visualization, W.N. and R.N.; supervision, W.O.-T., R.N. and W.N.G.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was exempted by the Institutional Review Board of Texas Tech University due to the use of publicly available de-identified data (IRB2023-101).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data, except detailed household size (obtained under strict use permission by the authors from the DIEM), are publicly available and can be accessed here: [https://data-in-emergencies.fao.org/pages/data, accessed on 11 December 2022].

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the DIEM team, particularly Paige McGreevy and Filippo Fossi, for their help with accessing the data and answering our questions related to the methodology of the survey.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. Food Security: Concepts and Measurement. In Trade Reforms and Food Security: Conceptualizing the Linkages; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. Food Security and Nutrition around the World. In The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022; FAO, IFAD, WFP: Rome, Italy; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shemyakina, O. War, Conflict, and Food Insecurity. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2022, 14, 313–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brown, M.E.; Antle, J.M.; Backlund, P.; Carr, E.R.; Easterling, W.E.; Walsh, M.K.; Ammann, C.; Attavanich, W.; Barrett, C.B.; Bellemare, M.F.; et al. Climate Change, Global Food Security, and the U.S. Food System; U.S. Global Change Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Drewnowski, A. Food Insecurity Has Economic Root Causes. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 555–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Clarke, P. Food Security and War in Afghanistan. Development 2000, 43, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. GHI. Global Hunger Index Scores by 2022 GHI Rank. Global Hunger Index. Available online: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/ranking.html (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  8. Clare, A. Aid to Afghanistan since 2001. Parliament of Australia. Available online: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2122/AidAfghanistanSince2001 (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  9. FAO. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/2 (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  10. The White House. Statement by the President on the End of the Combat Mission in Afghanistan. The White House. Available online: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/12/28/statement-president-end-combat-mission-Afghanistan (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  11. Thomas, C. Taliban Government in Afghanistan: Background and Issues for Congress. 2021. Available online: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R46955.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  12. Manullang, A.J. The Breakdown of Food Security in Taliban Ruled Afghanistan. 2021. Available online: https://www.pcdstudiescenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Analysis-18.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  13. Kumar, R.; Ahad, Z. A Year of Taliban Takeover: The Missing Women in Afghan Workforce. Aljazeera. Available online: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/11/a-year-of-taliban-takeover-the-missing-women-in-afghan-workforce (accessed on 27 March 2023).
  14. UN. Afghanistan: Food Insecurity and Malnutrition Threaten ‘an Entire Generation’|UN News. United Nations. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1113982 (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  15. IPC. Afghanistan. Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. Available online: https://www.ipcinfo.org/ipcinfo-website/where-what/asia/afghanistan/en/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  16. FAO. Afghanistan: DIEM–Data in Emergencies Monitoring Brief, Round 5 Results and Recommendations; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. The World Bank. Unlocking the Potential of Agriculture for Afghanistan’s Growth; World Bank. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/afghanistan/publication/unlocking-potential-of-agriculture-for-afghanistan-growth (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  18. UN. Afghanistan’s Farmers, Herders Desperate for Seed, Food and Cash|UN News. United Nations. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/11/1106212 (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  19. ReliefWeb. Afghanistan: Drought-2021–2023. OCHA. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/disaster/dr-2021-000022-afg (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  20. Hagen, E.; Teufert, J.F. Flooding in Afghanistan: A Crisis. In Threats to Global Water Security; Jones, J.A.A., Vardanian, T.G., Hakopian, C., Eds.; NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. FAO. Afghanistan: The Impact of the June 2022 Earthquake on Khost and Paktika Provinces; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ReliefWeb. Afghanistan: Flash Floods-May 2022. OCHA. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/disaster/ff-2022-000209-afg (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  23. Liakos, C.; Popalzai, E.; Ashrafzadeh, S.; Tawfeeq, M.; Kottasová, I.; CNN. Major Foreign aid Groups Suspend Work in Afghanistan after Taliban Bars Female Employees. CNN. Available online: https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/25/asia/afghanistan-ngos-suspend-programs-taliban-work-ban-intl/index.html (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  24. Nilsen, P. Making Sense of Implementation Theories, Models and Frameworks. Implement. Sci. 2015, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Damschroder, L.J.; Aron, D.C.; Keith, R.E.; Kirsh, S.R.; Alexander, J.A.; Lowery, J.C. Fostering Implementation of Health Services Research Findings into Practice: A Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Science. Implement. Sci. 2009, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Smith, M.D.; Kassa, W.; Winters, P. Assessing Food Insecurity in Latin America and the Caribbean Using FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Food Policy 2017, 71, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Smith, M.D.; Rabbitt, M.P.; Coleman-Jensen, A. Who Are the World’s Food Insecure? New Evidence from the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale. World Dev. 2017, 93, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Omidvar, N.; Ahmadi, D.; Sinclair, K.; Melgar-Quiñonez, H. Food Security in Selected Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Countries: An Inter-Country Comparison. Food Secur. 2019, 11, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pawlak, K.; Kołodziejczak, M. The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Modi, R. The Role of Agriculture for Food Security and Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa. In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy; Shaw, T.M., Mahrenbach, L.C., Modi, R., Yi-Chong, X., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan UK: London, UK, 2019; pp. 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmadzai, W.K.; Aryobi, H.G. Natural and Socio-Economics Factors Affecting the Household Food Security in Rural Area of Paktia Province, Afghanistan. Asian J. Agric. Ext. Econ. Sociol. 2021, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Samim, S.A.; Hu, Z.; Stepien, S.; Amini, S.Y.; Rayee, R.; Niu, K.; Mgendi, G. Food Insecurity and Related Factors among Farming Families in Takhar Region, Afghanistan. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. FAO. Afghanistan: DIEM-Monitoring Assessments. FAO Data in Emergencies Hub. Available online: https://data-in-emergencies.fao.org/pages/data (accessed on 17 December 2022).
  34. FAO. Data in Emergencies Hub. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://data-in-emergencies.fao.org/pages/monitoring (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  35. Cafiero, C.; Viviani, S.; Nord, M. Food Security Measurement in a Global Context: The Food Insecurity Experience Scale. Measurement 2018, 116, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. FAO. Voices of the Hungry: Analyse the Data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/in-action/voices-of-the-hungry/resources/background/en/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  37. Viviani, S. Manual for the Implementation of the FAO Voices of the Hungry Methods to Estimate Food Insecurity. 2016. Available online: https://www.sesric.org/imgs/news/1752_Manual_on_RM_Weights_Package_EN.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  38. Fox, J.; Monette, G. Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1992, 87, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. UN. UN Operational Rates of Exchange-Rates. United Nations. Available online: https://treasury.un.org/operationalrates/OperationalRates.php (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  40. WFP. Afghanistan Food Security Update: Round Nine; Afghanistan Food Security; World Food Program: Rome, Italy, 2022; Available online: https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000140735/download/ (accessed on 24 February 2023).
  41. Akadiri, S.S.; Nwaka, I.D.; Jenkins, G.P. Are Female-Headed Households Less Food Secure? Evidence from Nigeria and Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the Allied Social Science Association Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 5–7 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Negesse, A.; Jara, D.; Temesgen, H.; Dessie, G.; Getaneh, T.; Mulugeta, H.; Abebaw, Z.; Taddege, T.; Wagnew, F.; Negesse, Y. The Impact of Being of the Female Gender for Household Head on the Prevalence of Food Insecurity in Ethiopia: A Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis. Public Health Rev. 2020, 41, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santos, M.P.; Brewer, J.D.; Lopez, M.A.; Paz-Soldan, V.A.; Chaparro, M.P. Determinants of Food Insecurity among Households with Children in Villa El Salvador, Lima, Peru: The Role of Gender and Employment, a Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shahzad, M.A.; Qing, P.; Rizwan, M.; Razzaq, A.; Faisal, M. COVID-19 Pandemic, Determinants of Food Insecurity, and Household Mitigation Measures: A Case Study of Punjab, Pakistan. Healthcare 2021, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hatcher, A.M.; Page, S.; Aletta van Eck, L.; Pearson, I.; Fielding-Miller, R.; Mazars, C.; Stöckl, H. Systematic Review of Food Insecurity and Violence against Women and Girls: Mixed Methods Findings from Low- and Middle-Income Settings. PLOS Glob. Public Health 2022, 2, e0000479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, N.M.; de Bairros, F.S.; Pattussi, M.P.; Pauli, S.; Neutzling, M.B. Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Household Food Insecurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 902–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Botreau, H.; Cohen, M.J. Gender Inequality and Food Insecurity: A Dozen Years after the Food Price Crisis, Rural Women Still Bear the Brunt of Poverty and Hunger. In Advances in Food Security and Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 5, pp. 53–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Broussard, N.H. What Explains Gender Differences in Food Insecurity? Food Policy 2019, 83, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adekola, G.; Adereti, F.O.; Koledoye, G.; Owombo, P.T. Gender Discrimination in Agricultural Land Access: Implications for Food Security in Ondo State, Nigeria. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 2013, 5, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. CARE International. Economic and Food Crisis in Afghanistan: The Impacts on Women and Girls. CARE International. Available online: https://www.care-international.org/resources/economic-and-food-crisis-afghanistan-impacts-women-and-girls (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  51. UN Women. In Focus: Women in Afghanistan One Year after the Taliban Takeover. UN Women. Available online: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/in-focus/2022/08/in-focus-women-in-afghanistan-one-year-after-the-taliban-takeover (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  52. Dawi, A. Women in Afghanistan Facing Numerous Taliban Restrictions in 2022. VOA. Available online: https://www.voanews.com/a/women-in-afghanistan-facing-numerous-taliban-restrictions-in-2022/6868501.html (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  53. WFP. WFP Data Shows Almost 100% of Households Headed by Women in Afghanistan Not Getting Enough Food (for the Media)|World Food Programme. World Food Program. Available online: https://www.wfp.org/videos/wfp-data-shows-almost-100-households-headed-women-afghanistan-not-getting-enough-food-media (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  54. Honarvar, M.R.; Gholami, M.; Abdollahi, Z.; Ghotbabadi, F.S.; Lashkarboluki, F.; Najafzadeh, M.; Mansouri, M.; Veghari, G.; Behnampour, N. Household Food Insecurity and Associated Factors in the Northeast of Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study: Household Food Security in Northern Iran. BMC Nutr. 2023, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kara, A.M.; Kithu, L.M. Education Attainment of Head of Household and Household Food Security: A Case for Yatta Sub-County, Kenya. Am. J. Educ. Res. 2020, 8, 558–566. [Google Scholar]
  56. Drammeh, W.; Hamid, N.A.; Rohana, A.J. Determinants of Household Food Insecurity and Its Association with Child Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of the Literature. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J. 2019, 7, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rahut, D.B.; Jena, P.R.; Ali, A.; Behera, B.; Chhetri, N.B. Rural Nonfarm Employment, Income, and Inequality: Evidence from Bhutan. Asian Dev. Rev. 2015, 32, 65–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reimers, M.; Klasen, S. Revisiting the Role of Education for Agricultural Productivity. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 95, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ninh, L.K. Economic Role of Education in Agriculture: Evidence from Rural Vietnam. J. Econ. Dev. 2021, 23, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. UN. AfghAfghanistan: 500,000 Jobs Lost since Taliban Takeover|UN News. United Nations News. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1110052 (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  61. Siddique, A.B. Afghans Accuse the Taliban Of Misappropriating Foreign Aid. RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Available online: https://www.rferl.org/a/31157800.html (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  62. Sabry, W.; Vohra, A. Role of Islam in the Management of Psychiatric Disorders. Indian J. Psychiatry 2013, 55, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pieper, C.N. Why the Hardship? Islam, Christianity, and Instrumental Affliction. Open Theol. 2020, 6, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Papadopoulos, A. These Are the Countries with The Largest Household Size, 2020. CEOWORLD Magazine. Available online: https://ceoworld.biz/2020/02/19/these-are-the-countries-with-the-largest-household-size/ (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  65. Evason, N. Afghan Culture-Family. Cultural Atlas. Available online: http://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/afghan-culture/afghan-culture-family (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  66. Akerele, D.; Momoh, S.; Aromolaran, A.B.; Oguntona, C.R.B.; Shittu, A.M. Food Insecurity and Coping Strategies in South-West Nigeria. Food Secur. 2013, 5, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Abo, T.; Kuma, B. Determinants of Food Security Status of Female-Headed Households: The Case of Wolaita Sodo Town, South Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Footpr. 2015, 3, 8–24. [Google Scholar]
  68. Deressa, T.T.; Hassan, R.M.; Ringler, C.; Alemu, T.; Yesuf, M. Determinants of Farmers’ Choice of Adaptation Methods to Climate Change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Danso-Abbeam, G.; Dagunga, G.; Ehiakpor, D.S.; Ogundeji, A.A.; Setsoafia, E.D.; Awuni, J.A. Crop–Livestock Diversification in the Mixed Farming Systems: Implication on Food Security in Northern Ghana. Agric. Food Secur. 2021, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Asante, B.O.; Villano, R.A.; Battese, G.E. Evaluating Complementary Synergies in Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in Ghana. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2019, 47, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Herrera, J.P.; Rabezara, J.Y.; Ravelomanantsoa, N.A.F.; Metz, M.; France, C.; Owens, A.; Pender, M.; Nunn, C.L.; Kramer, R.A. Food Insecurity Related to Agricultural Practices and Household Characteristics in Rural Communities of Northeast Madagascar. Food Secur. 2021, 13, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Haq, S.U.; Shahbaz, P.; Abbas, A.; Batool, Z.; Alotaibi, B.A.; Traore, A. Tackling Food and Nutrition Insecurity among Rural Inhabitants: Role of Household-Level Strategies with a Focus on Value Addition, Diversification and Female Participation. Land 2022, 11, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Herrero, M.; Thornton, P.K.; Notenbaert, A.M.; Wood, S.; Msangi, S.; Freeman, H.A.; Bossio, D.; Dixon, J.; Peters, M.; van de Steeg, J.; et al. Smart Investments in Sustainable Food Production: Revisiting Mixed Crop-Livestock Systems. Science 2010, 327, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Bell, L.W.; Moore, A.D.; Thomas, D.T. Diversified Crop-Livestock Farms Are Risk-Efficient in the Face of Price and Production Variability. Agric. Syst. 2021, 189, 103050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gil, J.D.B.; Cohn, A.S.; Duncan, J.; Newton, P.; Vermeulen, S. The Resilience of Integrated Agricultural Systems to Climate Change. WIREs Clim. Chang. 2017, 8, e461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sani, S.; Kemaw, B. Analysis of Households Food Insecurity and Its Coping Mechanisms in Western Ethiopia. Agric. Food Econ. 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Niankara, I. Heads of Households&rsquo; Educational Attainment and Households Food Insecurity and Monetary Poverty in Burkina Faso: A Joint Semi-Parametric Bivariate Modeling Approach. Preprints 2018, 2018020156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Bulos, N. Afghanistan’s Money is Crumbling to Pieces Like Its Economy—Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. Available online: https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2022-09-27/afghanistan-money-bills-falling-apart-economic-crisis (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  79. Turak, N. Donors Pledging Billions in Aid to Afghanistan Face a Challenge: Navigating the Taliban. CNBC. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/17/aid-funding-for-afghanistan-at-risk-of-taliban-misuse-corruption.html (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  80. Lawder, D. Taliban Rule Presents Aid Agencies with Moral, Fiscal Dilemma|Reuters. Reuters. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/world/taliban-rule-presents-aid-agencies-with-moral-fiscal-dilemma-2021-08-24/ (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  81. Mccarthy, J.; Reinhart, R. Afghanistan’s Failing Economy Taking Afghans with It. Gallup. Available online: https://news.gallup.com/poll/390008/afghanistan-failing-economy-taking-afghans.aspx (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  82. WFP. The Global Food Crisis: Impact on the Asia Pacific Region. World Food Programme. Available online: https://www.wfp.org/publictions/global-food-crisis-impact-asia-pacific-region (accessed on 17 March 2023).
  83. The World Bank. Food Security Update. 2023. Available online: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/40ebbf38f5a6b68bfc11e5273e1405d4-0090012022/related/Food-Security-Update-LXXVIII-February-09-2023.pdf (accessed on 24 February 2023).
Nutrients 15 01681 g001 550
Figure 1. Provinces within the regions of Afghanistan included in the study sample.
Figure 1. Provinces within the regions of Afghanistan included in the study sample.
Nutrients 15 01681 g001
Nutrients 15 01681 g002 550
Figure 2. Weighted percentages of responses to the FIES questions.
Figure 2. Weighted percentages of responses to the FIES questions.
Nutrients 15 01681 g002
Table
Table 1. FIES Questionnaire.
Table 1. FIES Questionnaire.
QuestionsSeverity of Food Insecurity
1During the last 30 days, was there a time when you or others in your household were worried about not having enough food to eat because of lack of money or other resources?Mild
2During the last 30 days, was there a time when you or others in your household were unable to eat healthy and nutritious food because of lack of money or other resources?Mild
3During the last 30 days, was there a time when you or others in your household ate only a few kinds of foods because of lack of money or other resources?Mild
4During the last 30 days, was there a time when you or others in your household had to skip a meal because of lack of money or other resources to get food?Moderate
5During the last 30 days, was there a time when you or others in your household ate less than you thought you should because of lack of money or other resources?Moderate
6In the past 30 days, was there ever no food to eat of any kind in your house because of lack of resources to get food?Moderate
7In the past 30 days, did you or any household member ever go to sleep at night hungry because there was not enough food?Severe
8In the past 30 days, did you or any household member ever go a whole day and night without eating anything at all because there was not enough food?Severe
Table
Table 2. Weighted characteristics of the households.
Table 2. Weighted characteristics of the households.
CharacteristicsOverall
(N = 6019)
MeanSE
Household-Head Gender (%) Male97.80.003
Household-Head Education
(%) 		None/Did not complete primary school62.80.0098
Completed primary school13.10.006
Completed secondary school10.70.007
Completed college/university9.50.007
Religious/informal education3.80.003
Household Size Range 9.50.077
Household Agricultural Activity (%) No Agricultural Activity13.20.007
Livestock Production13.10.008
Crop Production46.60.011
Crop and Livestock Production27.20.009
Household Income per Member in past 3 months * Mean (SE)AFN 2021
(USD ~22.7)		50.43
Median (Q1–Q3)AFN 1500
(USD ~16.8)		583–2857
* Afghani (AFN) to United State dollar (USD) is based on the conversion rate on 1 August 2022 [39].
Table
Table 3. Univariate analysis of social determinants of severe household food insecurity.
Table 3. Univariate analysis of social determinants of severe household food insecurity.
VariablesSevere Household Food Insecurity
OR (95% CI)p Values *
Household-Head GenderMale1
Female2.67 (1.56–4.56)0.0003
Household-Head EducationNone/Did not complete primary school1
Completed primary school0.63 (0.50–0.78)<0.0001
Completed secondary school0.60 (0.47–0.78)0.0001
Completed college/university0.77 (0.57–1.04)0.09
Religious/informal education only1.02 (0.74–1.41)0.89
Household Size1.04 (1.01–1.06)0.004
Household Agricultural ActivityNo Agricultural Activity1
Livestock Production0.44 (0.31–0.62)<0.0001
Crop Production0.47 (0.35–0.63)<0.0001
Crop and Livestock Production0.42 (0.31–0.58)<0.0001
Natural Log of Household Income Per Member in Past 3 Months0.91 (0.88–0.93)<0.0001
*p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Table
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of social determinants of severe household food insecurity.
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of social determinants of severe household food insecurity.
VariablesSevere Household Food Insecurity
OR (95% CI)p Values *
Household-Head GenderMale1
Female2.47 (1.40–4.35)0.001
Household-Head EducationNone/Not complete primary school1
Completed primary school0.68 (0.52–0.89)0.006
Completed secondary school0.62 (0.44–0.88)0.007
Completed college/university0.65 (0.45–0.92)0.02
Religious/informal education only0.99 (0.70–1.39)0.95
Household Size 1.03 (1.003–1.06)0.03
Household Agricultural ActivityNo Agricultural Activity1
Livestock Production0.63 (0.43–0.94)0.02
Crop Production0.59 (0.43–0.80)0.0009
Crop and Livestock Production0.50 (0.36–0.69)<0.0001
Natural Log of Income Per Household Member in Past 3 Months0.92 (0.89–0.95)<0.0001
* p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The model is adjusted for regions of Afghanistan.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Najam, W.; Ibiyemi, T.; Aziz, S.; Najam, R.; Gichohi-Wainaina, W.N.; Oldewage-Theron, W. Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071681

AMA Style

Najam W, Ibiyemi T, Aziz S, Najam R, Gichohi-Wainaina WN, Oldewage-Theron W. Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime. Nutrients. 2023; 15(7):1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071681

Chicago/Turabian Style

Najam, Wasiuddin, Temitope Ibiyemi, Sajia Aziz, Rafiuddin Najam, Wanjiku N. Gichohi-Wainaina, and Wilna Oldewage-Theron. 2023. "Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime" Nutrients 15, no. 7: 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071681

APA Style

Najam, W., Ibiyemi, T., Aziz, S., Najam, R., Gichohi-Wainaina, W. N., & Oldewage-Theron, W. (2023). Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime. Nutrients, 15(7), 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071681

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop