Next Article in Journal
The Potential Effects of the Ketogenic Diet in the Prevention and Co-Treatment of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, Schizophrenia, and Bipolar Disorder: From the Basic Research to the Clinical Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Postbiotics as Molecules Targeting Cellular Events of Aging Brain—The Role in Pathogenesis, Prophylaxis and Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
The Tryptophan Index Is Associated with Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Community-Based Nested Case–Control Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Therapeutic Effects of Bifidobacterium breve MCC1274 on Alzheimer’s Disease Pathologies in AppNL-G-F Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Narrative Review on Gut Microbiome Disturbances and Microbial Preparations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Implications for Long COVID

by
Joanna Michalina Jurek
1,2,* and
Jesus Castro-Marrero
1
1
Unit of Research in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long COVID, Rheumatology Research Division, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
2
Grup de Recerca GEMMAIR (AGAUR)-Medicina Aplicada (URV), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1545; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111545
Submission received: 29 April 2024 / Revised: 10 May 2024 / Accepted: 17 May 2024 / Published: 21 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diet, Gut Microbiota and Neuropsychiatric Diseases)

Abstract

:
Myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and long COVID are complex, multisystemic and long-term disabling conditions characterized by debilitating post-exertional malaise and other core symptoms related to immune dysregulation resultant from post-viral infection, including mitochondrial dysfunction, chronic neuroinflammation and gut dysbiosis. The reported associations between altered microbiota composition and cardinal symptoms of ME/CFS and long COVID suggest that the use of microbial preparations, such as probiotics, by restoring the homeostasis of the brain–immune–gut axis, may help in the management of symptoms in both conditions. Therefore, this review aims to investigate the implications of alerted gut microbiome and assess the evidence supporting use of microbial-based preparations, including probiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics alone and/or in combination with other nutraceuticals in the management of fatigue, inflammation and neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients with ME/CFS and long COVID.

1. Introduction

Myalgic encephalomyelitis, also referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), is a complex and long-term debilitating condition affecting ~67 million people worldwide, characterized by persistent fatigue not improved by rest or sleep, and post-exertional malaise (PEM) resultant from minor physical or mental activity, consequently leading to declines in cognitive impairment, including problems with concentration, thinking and memory [1,2]. In addition, individuals with ME/CFS may also experience a constellation of other non-specific symptoms of pain, headaches, disrupted sleep, myalgia and arthralgia, orthostatic intolerance, autonomic dysfunction and gastrointestinal (GI) problems that greatly interfere with their ability to function and significantly compromise individual productivity and quality of life [2,3,4]. Although there is no specific diagnostic test available for ME/CFS, the diagnosis of this condition is made through medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests, along with clinical assessment, including use of agreed diagnostic criteria [5], which requires a presence of four key symptoms for a period of at least 6 months, including debilitating fatigability, post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep and cognitive difficulties [6], possibly accompanied by other manifestations, of which the most common are orthostatic intolerance and autonomic dysfunction (e.g., dizziness, palpitations, fainting, nausea when standing or sitting upright); pain (e.g., myalgia, headaches, abdominal pain or joint pain); neuromuscular symptoms (e.g., twitching and myoclonic jerks); flu-like symptoms (e.g., sore throat, tender glands, nausea, chills or muscle aches); and hypersensitivities to temperature, certain foods and sensory exposures of light, noise, touch and smell [7].
Complex and non-specific symptomatology of ME/CFS may lead to many misdiagnoses, with other serious illnesses, including fibromyalgia, primary sleep disorders (sleep apnea), nutritional disorders (iron deficiency, obesity), musculoskeletal conditions, anxiety/depression and GI diseases (celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)) [8]. In addition, recent studies conducted shortly after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that symptoms of ME/CFS are similar to those reported by approximately 87% of patients recovering from acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 [9,10], which significantly interfered with their ability to function and execute daily tasks—a condition referred to as long COVID [10]. Despite a lack of evidence of major injuries in organs caused by the infection, these individuals have been shown to experience 25 out of 29 known ME/CFS symptoms at least once, also including those considered as the key features used by the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS, including reduced daily activity, post-exertional malaise (PEM) and disabling fatigue being the dominant ones [11]. Interestingly, long COVID patients have also reported other dysfunctions that previously were associated with neurologic pain, neurocognitive and psychiatric symptoms (however, with no cases of rash) and olfactory and gustatory dysfunction [11] (Figure 1).
Although having the exact etiology of ME/CFS, long COVID still needs to be determined. Evidence accumulated to date indicates that post-viral syndromes most likely triggered by infectious agents, such as Epstein Barr virus and herpesviruses in ME/CFS [12] and SARS-CoV-2 in long COVID [13], respectively, also share biological abnormalities, with examples of cognitive deficits, including impaired attention and information processing speed, dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis (HPA) and an abnormal immune cytokine profile [14], characterized by high autoantibody titers against neural and autonomic targets [15,16], including neurotransmitter receptors against nuclear and membrane structures, such as cardiolipin and phospholipids, neurotransmitter receptors (e.g., muscarinic M1 acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and ß1- and ß2-adrenergic receptors (AdR) and M2/3 [17]); increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (such as IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-13, IL-16, INF-γ and IL-17, IL-17A) but reduced IL-17F [18,19,20], further linked with severity of mentioned symptoms [21]. In particularly, metabolic abnormalities along with mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired redox balance [22] characterized by increased oxidative toxicity and lowered anti-oxidant defenses were associated with the development of symptoms of pain and hypersensitivity [23] and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms in both ME/CFS [18] and long COVID [24]. Noteworthy, mitochondrial dysfunction, as an important contributor to both ME/CFS and long COVID conditions [25,26] through increasing production of free radicals, can promote chronic inflammation, which, along with aberrant immune responses reported in ME/CFS and COVID-19 [27], attributes to diminished natural killer cell function, T cell exhaustion/abnormalities, overactivation of mast cell along associated with possible viral reactivation, triggered by viral infection/infectious agent may increase risk of autoimmunity and hyperinflammation [28], including systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation [29], which are associated with muscle weakness [30], fatigue and pain [31] and other comorbidities, such as major depression [32], postural tachycardia syndrome [33] and GI conditions, like development allergic reactions and sensitivities to odors, chemicals and foods including alcohol, caffeine, sweeteners and food additives [34]. Some studies suggest that long COVID patients may acquire new food allergies and sensitivities (especially to wheat and gluten), with the incidence of GI symptoms ranging from 3% to 79% [35]. Similarly, GI symptoms are also considered a frequent comorbidity for up to 92% of ME/CFS patients who are co-diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [2], while GI complaints, including abdominal pain and bloating, along with extra-intestinal symptoms of fatigue, headache and cognitive impairments, could be developed due to chronic gut inflammation and compromised intestinal epithelium barrier [36], followed by a significantly increased proportion of mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells [37], which are implicated in the recognition of microbial antigens in the MHC Class I-related molecule [38] and the response to cytokine-induced stimulation during microbial infection [39].
Furthermore, the proposed hypothesis indicates that persistent infection or unviable pathogen residues can stimulate chronic inflammation, as both enteric viruses and bacterial infections can affect the microbiome [40]. Alteration in the composition of the gut microbiota in both long COVID and ME/CFS patients along with reported GI symptoms of nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain [41] may suggest a potential role of gut dysbiosis in the development of both conditions. Research to date have shown that gut dysfunction, characterized by altered intestinal microbiota composition, gut barrier dysfunction and gut inflammation, can be a potential factor in ME/CFS development [3]; whereas, for long COVID patients with persisting symptoms of inflammation and poor cognitive performance for a few months after acute infection, alterations in the gut microbiota along with reduced microbial diversity are linked to disease severity and reported by patients with long COVID symptoms, including lung, all supporting a potential contribution of disturbed gut microbiome in long COVID sequelae [42].
Microbial preparations, not limited to the use of live probiotic strains, but also their by-products alone or in combination with multivitamins and/or other bioactives, such as flavonoids and indigestible dietary fibers (prebiotics), due to their immunomodulatory properties, may offer potential benefits for individuals affected by long COVID and ME/CFS, particularly because both conditions lack effective treatment strategies [43,44]. In addition, there is growing evidence to demonstrate that the intake of live (probiotics) or inactivated microorganisms is confirmed beneficial for human health (if given in appropriate amounts [43]) by promoting gut health and immune homeostasis and may help to reduce inflammation and cognitive dysfunction in ME/CFS [45]. Similarly, combined co-supplementation of both probiotics and prebiotics, in the form of synbiotics such as the blend of the Lactobacillus strain with inulin have been shown to improve health outcomes of individuals with long COVID, leading to reduced cough, fatigue and gut symptoms [46].
Given the possible role of microbiome dysbiosis in shared manifestations reported in long COVID and ME/CFS, along with the beneficial effects of therapeutic interventions with microbial preparations on restoring gut homeostasis, these might serve as a novel approach for the management of shared ME/CFS and long COVID symptoms, including chronic inflammation and cognitive and bowel dysfunctions. The main aim of this review is to investigate the implications of alerted gut microbiome and assess the evidence supporting the use of microbial-based preparations, including probiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics alone and/or in combination with other nutraceuticals in the management of fatigue, inflammation and psychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with ME/CFS and long COVID.

2. Role of the Alerted Gut Microbiome in ME/CFS and Long COVID Pathogenesis

The gut microbiota is a tightly regulated microbial community of more than 1014 microorganisms [47], including a variety of archaea, viruses, fungi and protists, which, in humans, are dominated by the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria [48]. The microbiota works in partnership with the host immune system to fulfill essential roles for optimal health and well-being by directly supporting immunity and metabolism, and through bioactive compounds, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) (e.g., acetate, propionate and butyrate); amino acids (e.g., γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA); and vitamins, acting on the gut–brain axis, which actively modulate digestive and cognitive functions [49]. The gut microbiota is also an essential component of the host’s defense mechanisms against infections, additionally contributing to the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and gut mucosal barrier integrity [50]. Nevertheless, exposure to various factors, including diet, medications/antibiotics and certain lifestyle habits (e.g., smoking and alcohol) can influence gut microbiota composition, leading to the colonization of opportunistic pathogens and intestinal barrier dysfunction. Imbalance of the gut microbiota community, also referred to as gut dysbiosis, is linked to increased intestinal permeability and tight junction dysfunction, allowing the entry of commensal microbes, microbial-derived products and other luminal components [51], which contribute to aberrant immune responses and increase the risk of infections and chronic diseases, including obesity, diabetes type II, IBD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [52].
Reported alterations in the gut composition from patients with ME/CFS and long COVID warrant attention, as they are associated with both conditions’ symptoms of fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), pain, sleep disturbances, mental and GI disturbances and immunological abnormalities [11]. Although these observations may suggest the role of gut dysbiosis in symptom development [53], a specific microbial signature has not yet been found [2]. Investigations of the microbiome dysbiosis have been intensively studied in ME/CFS, with results indicating a potential link between changes in gut composition, including deficient butyrate-producing capacity and bacterial network disturbances, increased immune activation [54,55,56] and symptoms of fatigue symptoms [2,57]. The decreased availability of butyrate, along with other key mediators of the gut–brain axis produced during microbial fermentation, including serotonin and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) via the influence of intestinal permeability, may have considerable impact on the neuro-immunoendocrine system [58]. In addition, studies from physically fit populations have indicated a strong correlation between increased gut microbial diversity, high fecal butyrate levels and extent of physical fitness, characterized by higher VO2 peaks and, consequently, reduced LPS levels and lower inflammation [59], thereby suggesting that the decreased abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria, such as Firmicutes and Actinobacteria [54] along with butyrate-producer bacteria, may result in PEM followed by inactivity and increased LPS-induced inflammation in ME/CFS. In addition, ME/CFS patients, compared with healthy controls, seem to also have higher levels of pro-inflammatory Gram-negative bacteria species, such as Alistipes, Bacteroidetes and Enterobacteriaceae [54,56,60], which may worsen the disease course, leading to an increased severity of fatigue, pain and confusion [54]. In addition, ME/CFS has been associated with the reduction of certain bacteria taxa of the Firmicutes phylum, including Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and Clostridium genera, of which, a decrease in the butyrate-producer Faecalibacterium was considered a potential biomarker with diagnostic value in ME/CFS [56]. Noteworthy, associations between a reduced abundance of Faecalibacterium and increased fatigue perception were found in IBD, cancer and autoimmune patients, such as MS and diabetes type 1 [2], thereby suggesting that the presence of systemic inflammation along with gut microbiota dysbiosis [61] may affect the bidirectional connection with other vital organs [62] and lead to the development of neuropsychiatric and GI symptoms, also reported in ME/CFS. Previous studies have shown that reductions in the Firmicutes Gram-positive bacteria, which include beneficial lactic acid bacteria such as Actinobacteria (e.g., Collinsella and Bifidobacterium spp. Bifidobacteria), at the expense of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, can alter immune response, promote pro-inflammatory cytokine production and increase gut barrier permeability, further leading to chronic inflammation [63], which in the case of ME/CFS, has been implicated in the development of cognitive dysfunctions, sleep problems, mood changes and various physical symptoms like muscle aches, flu-like symptoms and weight changes [45]. Therefore, a reported presence of gut inflammation in ME/CFS may contribute to neuroimmune dysfunction followed by the gradual activation of innate responses in the brain via the vagus nerve and a reduction in energy-consuming activities in ME/CFS [2]. For instance, a reduced abundance of Actinobacteria reported in ME/CFS [64] was previously associated with GI conditions, including IBD and IBS, and neuropsychiatric diseases, such as anxiety/depression. Interestingly, ME/CFS patients who reported IBS and high anxiety/depression symptoms had a significantly lower alpha diversity of gut microbiome compared with healthy controls and IBS-only cohorts, suggesting that comorbid IBS and anxiety/depression may be linked to higher Proteobacteria, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroides and lower Lachnospiraceae abundances relative to controls [65]. This complex crosstalk between the HPA axis, immune factors and the autonomic nervous system highlight the role of a dysregulated gut–brain axis in the establishment of low-grade gut mucosal barrier inflammation, followed by increased visceral hypersensitivity and increased intestinal permeability (also known as leaky gut) in ME/CFS [2].
Previous evidence obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed that gut dysbiosis is associated with the severity of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and long-lasting multisystem complications after disease recovery [66], with a currently growing number of studies reporting changes in the intestinal composition and diversity in long COVID patients who recovered from acute infection. These individuals have been shown to have significant changes in gut composition, characterized by the reduction in commensal species remaining low for up to 30 days, including Eubacterium rectale, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and bifidobacterial species (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium), whereas the richness of the microbial community seems to not recover even after 6 months of convalescence [67,68,69]. Noteworthy, the reduced abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and the decrease in anti-inflammatory species, Alistipes onderdonkii and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, reflected by increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine, including IL-2, IL-7, IL-10 and TNF-α, is strongly associated with disease severity and increased severity of symptoms, including respiratory, neuropsychiatric, gastrointestinal and fatigue issues [70,71]. In addition, an observational study conducted in patients who developed long COVID symptoms 6 months after initial diagnosis (76% of an initial sample of 106 patients) had significantly higher levels of Ruminococcus gnavus and Bacteroides vulgatus and lower levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, which were correlated with persistent respiratory symptoms and neuropsychiatric complaints and fatigue, including Clostridium innocuum and Actinomyces naeslundii. Interestingly, butyrate-producing bacteria, including Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, showed the largest inverse correlations with long COVID symptoms at 6 months [72]. Interestingly, a prospective follow-up study, conducted on symptomatic patients recovered from COVID-19, reported a presence of certain gut microbiota dysbiosis, including significantly reduced bacterial diversities and lower relative abundance of SCFAs producers, such as Eubacterium hallii, Subdoligranulum, Ruminococcus, Dorea, Coprococcus and Eubacterium ventriosum, a year after discharge [73]. Interestingly, individuals experiencing long-term symptoms of physical function impairment, psychiatric disorders (mainly anxiety or depression), lung function reduction and radiographic abnormalities persisted for 12 months in individuals with altered gut microbiota was significantly correlated with clinical indices of the recovery stage, thereby suggesting that gut microbiota may play an important role in long COVID [66].
Taken together, emerging evidence suggests that gut dysbiosis is associated with the regulation of brain activity and cognitive function in ME/CFS and long COVID via the microbiota–gut–immune–brain axis. However, it is unknown to date how the gut microbiome and neuroglia cells might interact with each other and how these interactions might trigger the onset of neurocognitive symptoms (also known as “brain fog”) and post-exertional fatigue in ME/CFS and long COVID. We hypothesize that one of the possible triggers could be dysregulation in the production, transport and functioning of neurotransmitters and their specific receptors (reduced excitability of GABA-ergic and glutamatergic activity within the primary M1 motor cortex) [74,75,76].

3. Use of Probiotic in the Management of ME/CFS and Long COVID Symptoms

Probiotics and prebiotics are the two components in our diet that can affect the microbiome [66]. Probiotics, as live microorganisms that are administered in adequate amounts [77] utilizing the non-digestible fibers of prebiotics, can bring health benefits to the host [66], including improved digestion and immunity, and, by modulating immune signaling pathways and enhancing gut microbiota function within the gut–lung and gut–brain axes [78], reduce common symptoms of infection [79] and increase resistance to the infectious agent. In addition, probiotic preparations can help with the management of neurodegenerative and psychiatric comorbidities related to low mood, sleep problems, depression and anxiety-like symptoms [80,81] and those associated with chronic GI conditions, including IBS [82].
Probiotics have also been evaluated in the context of ME/CFS, as previous studies have shown that they can lead to a significant improvement in anxiety/depression symptoms and promoting overall well-being. In addition, immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of certain probiotic strains have been shown to reduce inflammation and lower oxidative stress in ME/CFS patients [83,84], consequently leading to improved cognitive function and reduced fatigue severity. In addition, metabolites of microbial origin, by acting on the gut–brain axis, can influence brain function [85], with favorable effects on mood and sleep and reduced depression, anger and fatigue [86]. Similar benefits were also observed in hospitalized COVID patients, who, after receiving probiotic supplementation, especially with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains [87], had reduced overall symptoms, including lowered inflammatory reactions, decreased hospitalization duration and recovery time, which may suggest that probiotics may have the potential to reduce mortality resultant from this condition [88].
Examples of studies conducted on both ME/CFS and COVID-19 cohorts investigating the effect of interventions based on probiotic strains in the context of the most common symptoms reported, such as inflammation and fatigue and neuropsychiatric and GI symptoms, are presented in Table 1.

3.1. Effects of Probiotics on Fatigue and Inflammation in ME/CFS and Long COVID

Post-infectious fatigue is a common complication linked with chronic/abnormal inflammation that can significantly decrease physical and mental efficiency, cause depression/anxiety, perturb sleeping patterns and overall decrease quality of life. Evidence to date has demonstrated the beneficial role of probiotics and their metabolites in modulating immunity and reducing inflammation and damage arising from oxidative stress. This can be especially important in reducing severe fatigue and exertion intolerance linked with ongoing chronic inflammation resulting from abnormal immunity and mitochondrial dysfunction [53,98]. Consequently, the use of probiotics in the treatment of ME/CFS and long COVID has been intensively studied, owing to their potential to reduce inflammation and restore immune homeostasis, while promoting immunity and recovery [66] might be beneficial for reducing their shared symptoms of post-infectious fatigue and leading to improved overall health.
Interventions conducted in patients with ME/CFS focused predominantly on the use of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus strains, which consistently demonstrated good efficiency in reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and were accompanied by a reduced perception of fatigue. For example, the use of probiotic treatments with Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota over 8 weeks significantly reduced inflammatory markers in ME/CFS patients [89]; whereas, an oral intake of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 for 8 weeks decreased concentrations of pro-inflammatory markers, including CRP and IL-6, compared with the baseline in 70% of ME/CFS patients, thereby suggesting that B. infantis 35,624 benefits are not limited to mucosal responses and they can exert an effect systemically [99]. In addition, use of multi-strain probiotic formulations, which previously have been shown to counteract antibiotic-resistant pathogens, strengthen mucosal barrier and regulate immune responses, including preparations Lactobacillus rhamnosus combined with Lactobacillus casei (Ramnoselle) and Lactobacillus casei combined with Bifidobacterium lactis (Cytogenex) that were effective after 8 weeks in ameliorating fatigue (Chadler’s score), which has been attributed to reduced inflammation, which was reported as an almost 30% reduction in CRP levels compared with baseline, and enhanced immunity, characterized as a significant increase in IgM (three times over the baseline values) and a reduced CD4/CD8 ratio. It must be noted that the high variability between patients warrants further studies to justify the immunomodulatory potential of a probiotic regime [84]. Nevertheless, the supplementation of a multi-strain probiotic formulation containing Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19, Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFB-1748 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 demonstrated a limited efficacy in reducing fatigue and disability scores among ME/CFS patients, as a 4-week-long treatment followed by 4 weeks of follow-up improved patient scoring on the SF-12 health survey in the area of neurocognitive functioning, there was no significant improvements in fatigue and physical activity scores assessed on the visual analogue scales (VAS) or major changes in the gut microbiota composition [90].
Probiotic supplementation has been shown to have potential in lowering systemic inflammation among patients with both acute infection and long COVID syndrome [100]. To date, interventions with probiotics conducted in COVID-19 patients, including strains Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactiplantacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium bifidum, live Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium longum subsp, Pediococcus acidilactici and Streptococcus thermophilus, have been associated with positive health outcomes, including lowered systemic inflammation and reduction in serum CRP and improvement in respiratory symptoms, particularly cough and shortness of breath, however with no obvious effect on fever, headache or weakness [69]. For example, clinical intervention with a commercial probiotic (SLAB51), known as Sivomixx800® (Ormendes, Switzerland), consisting of Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 32245®, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32246®, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32247®, Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 32241®, Lactobacillus helveticus DSM 32242®, Lactobacillus paracasei DSM 32243®, Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 32244® and Lactobacillus brevis DSM 27961®, has been shown to significantly lower the proportion of long COVID patients reporting fatigue on the FAS scale compared with individuals without the treatment after 3 weeks of treatment. This effect was further attributed to favorable changes in the key metabolites related to glucose metabolism among patients receiving oral bacteriotherapy, who had significantly increased concentrations of serum arginine, asparagine and lactate and lower levels of 3-hydroxyisobutirate than controls [91]. Similarly, treatment with a probiotic consortium of eight live and freeze-dried strains of Streptococcus thermophilus BT01, B. breve BB02, B. animalis subsp. lactis BL03, B. animalis subsp. lactis BI04, L. acidophilus BA05, L. plantarum BP06, L. paracasei BP07 and L. helveticus BD08 (VSL#3®) after 4 weeks significantly reduced fatigue scores on the Chalder fatigue scale (CFS) in long COVID patients compared with placebos, which were maintained for 4-week post-intervention [92]. Furthermore, combining probiotic strains into formulations of multi-ingredient preparations also including bioactive components efficient in reducing inflammation in respiratory infections [101] has been proposed as an efficient strategy in the management of long COVID symptoms. For example, a multi-enzyme formulation (ImmunoSEB) consisting of probiotic (ProbioSEB CSC3), containing a blend of Bacillus coagulans LBSC (DSM 17654), Bacillus subtilis PLSSC (ATCC SD 7280) and Bacillus clausii 088AE (MCC 0538) strains along with Peptizyme SP, including enteric coated serratiopeptidase, bromelain, amylase, lysozyme, peptidase, catalase, papain, glucoamylase and lactoferrin, significantly reduced total physical and mental fatigue scores in patients with COVID-19 compared with placebo. In addition, this supplement was well tolerated, with no adverse events reported. In addition, after the initial 14 supplementations, those patients with mild-to-moderate disease severity reported health benefits, demonstrated as reduced systemic inflammation determined as reduced CRP levels (by 77% in the treatment and by 56% for the placebo, respectively), and enhanced recovery was achieved on day 10 of the intervention compared with the placebo [86]. Similar benefits were also observed with the use of synbiotics combining probiotic strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus paracasei with prebiotic inulin fiber, and a phytochemical-rich whole food blend of citrus sinensis fruit, chamomile (Matricaria recutita L. flower), curcuma longa, pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and resveratrol extracted from Polygonum cuspidatum root, which, after 4 weeks, resulted in an almost two-fold reduction in the mean fatigue scores and a double improvement in the overall well-being scores on the subjective well-being score compared with the placebo [95].
Furthermore, a recent small study conducted on females co-diagnosed with fibromyalgia and ME/CFS were shown to be effective in reducing levels of perceived fatigue and the impact of fibromyalgia on these patients, compared with the baseline after symbiotic (Synbiotic, Gasteel Plus® (Heel Spain, S.A.U.) supplementation, whose formulation was based on probiotics, e.g., Bifidobacterium lactis CBP-001010, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 and Bifidobacterium longum ES1, combined with prebiotics, fructooligosaccharides (200 mg) and micronutrients, including zinc (1.5 mg), selenium (8.25 g) and vitamin D (0.75 g) [96]. In addition, a pilot study investigating the effectiveness of multi-component preparation “OMNi-BiOTiC®STRESS Repair 9” (Institute AllergoSan, Graz, Austria), consisting of probiotics, e.g., Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus acidophilus W22, Lactobacillus paracasei W20, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus plantarum W62 and Bifidobacterium bifidum W23; prebiotic fructooligosaccharides (FOS), such as inulin, enzymes (amylases) and selected micronutrients, including potassium chloride, vitamin B2 (riboflavin 5′-sodium phosphate), vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), manganese sulfate and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), has been shown to be effective in improving fatigue, mood and quality of life in both the probiotic and placebo groups, however with greater improvements reported in the probiotic group after 6 months of treatment [97]. Although the results of these studies suggest that bacteriotherapy in the management of long COVID is promising, the low number of trials, often varying in the duration of treatment and tested formulation of the supplement (probiotic strains used and dose; presence of other bioactives, e.g., vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients) has not provided sufficient evidence to use microbial preparations in the clinical care of patients with post-viral syndromes.
The reported benefits of improved immunity, energy metabolism, respiratory functions and psychiatric well-being suggest that probiotic supplementation has the potential to improve the management of ME/CFS and long COVID. Although the results of conducted trials may suggest that supplementation with single- and multi-strain probiotics may have potential benefits for reducing fatigue and inflammation in ME/CFS and long COVID patients, only a few studies using the preparations of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus demonstrated their good efficiency in reducing inflammatory markers, and their effects on the fatigue scoring scales remains inconsistent, thereby indicating the need for further exploration into the interplay between probiotic bacteria and fatigue and inflammation in ME/CFS and long COVID.

3.2. Effects of Probiotics on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (Psychobiotics)

Psychobiotics, as selected probiotic strains and their preparations, ingested in sufficient amounts may have positive impacts on mental health, including reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety and chronic stress, and improved sleep quality [102], attributed to the ability to modulate the gut–brain axis [103] and/or the production of neuroactive bioactives, such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and serotonin [104]. Although many probiotics have been proposed as potential psychotropic agents, including Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Streptococcus thermophiles, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bacillus coagulans, Clostridium butyricum and others [104,105], depending on the acquired neuropsychiatric condition [105], their effectiveness may vary. In context of post-viral syndromes, such as ME/CFS and long COVID, specific strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have gained interest, as, other than their immunomodulatory effects, they may also be relevant for reducing risk factors associated with these conditions, including low quality of life, disturbed sleep, mood changes, mental fatigue, anxiety/depression and chronic stress. Although none of the psychobiotic formulations were exclusively tested in ME/CFS and long COVID patients, there is growing evidence indicating that the use of probiotic strains might be beneficial for improving neurocognitive function and managing symptoms of stress and anxiety [104] frequently reported by these patients. For example, psychobiotic metabolites acting as neurotransmitters and neurochemicals can influence the brain–gut axis and modulate the stress response via the HPA axis. Stress, proposed as the factor linked with fatigue induction, can cause neuroendocrine deregulation resulting from the activation of the HPA axis and stimulation of glucocorticoid production, which has been characterized as increased cortisol levels and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The chronic activation of the HPA axis can also significantly affect the gut microbiota composition, which has been linked to the presence of mental and physical illnesses. Therefore, the use of microbial preparations, such as psychobiotics aiming to restore gut homeostasis and normalize HPA axis hyperactivity, may help to relieve negative consequences of chronic stress and inflammation implicated in the pathogenesis of ME/CFS and long COVID [104,105].
To date, studies have shown that psychobiotics can help in reducing depressive symptoms and potentially can be used as supportive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD). For example, Clostridium butyricum (CBM588) supplementation along with prescribed antidepressants significantly reduced (e.g., ≥ 50% reduction) a total HAMD-17 score in the Hamilton rating scale for depression and Beck depression inventory (BDI) scores in patients with treatment-resistant MDD compared with the placebo [106]. Similar benefits were reported in the management of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and anxiety-like symptoms with multi-strain preparations, including L. heleveticus Rosell-52 and B. longum Rosell-175 [107], Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus [108], and a multi-strain consortium of L. acidophilus LA5 and B. lactis BB12 [109], which significantly reduced the intensity of anxiety symptoms and improved overall mental health outcomes. Additional benefits attributed to psychobiotic formulations consisting of Lactobacillus fermentum LF16, L. rhamnosus LR06, L. plantarum LP01, and Bifidobacterium longum BL04; Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium bifidum; Lactobacillus helveticus R0052, Bifidobacterium longum R0175 and Lactobacillus plantarum 299 have been shown to significantly improve mood by reducing depressive and angry feelings [110,111], and to reduce the response to stress on the HPA axis [112], observed as reduced salivary cortisol levels [93], all together leading to improved sleep. In particular, the supplementation of Lactobacillus paracasei HII01 in fatigued participants after 12 weeks has been shown to significantly reduce salivary cortisol levels compared with the baseline [93], suggesting potential benefits also for fatigue reduction among patients with post-viral syndromes.
While the use of psychobiotics to modify the gut microbiome has been shown to improve anxiety [107,108] and depression symptoms [106,110,113], and improve mental well-being upon chronic stress [109,114] with additional benefits for sleep quality and neurocognitive functioning [111], the direct application of probiotic strains with psychobiotic properties may have the potential to reduce psychiatric symptoms in ME/CFS and long COVID patients, owing to the reported gut dysbiosis along with aberrant immune responses and persistent systemic inflammation. For example, overlapping psychiatric symptoms between MDD, ME/CFS and long COVID suggest that treatments with certain psychobiotic strains among ME/CFS, such as Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, through lowering inflammation, may help to reduce anxiety and improve cognitive function and overall functioning [89]. Similar benefits were also reported after the use of preparations consisting of Lactobacillus rhamnosus combined with Lactobacillus casei (Ramnoselle) and Lactobacillus casei combined with Bifidobacterium lactis (Cytogenex) significantly improved the capability of these individuals to respond to stressful situations, which has been demonstrated as increased levels of urinary free cortisol (2.4 times), a stress hormone; and DHEA-S (1.4 times), an indicator of psychological illness and stress [115]. As ME/CFS patients usually demonstrate low levels of these hormones [116], the reported increase in normal values may improve individual ability to cope with stressful events, further confirmed as significantly improved mood scores and reduced perception of fatigue on the Beck depression inventory test (BDI) (BDI-I and BDI-II) [84]. Significant reduction in anxiety among ME/CFS patients, reported after probiotic supplementation with L. paracasei spp. paracasei F19, L. acidophilus NCFB 1748 and B. lactis Bb12 strains, also improved their neurocognitive functioning [90].
Available studies from long COVID cohorts investigating the effects of probiotic supplementation on mental health indices are limited, as the majority focus on the management of respiratory or GI symptoms (NCT04420676; NCT04813718) after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or improving immunity (NCT04922918; NCT04734886) [117]. Also, evidence of microbial-based preparations on miscellaneous symptoms still needs to be provided. To date, clinical trials dedicated to neuropsychiatric sequelae investigating the probiotic formulation (VSL#3®) containing eight freeze-dried strains, e.g., Streptococcus thermophilus BT01; B. breve BB02, B. animalis subsp. lactis BL03, B. animalis subsp. lactis BI04, L. acidophilus BA05, L. plantarum BP06, L. paracasei BP07 and L. helveticus BD08, after 28 days (4 weeks), have failed to improve performance and somatization symptoms and psychiatric (e.g., anxiety, depression) outcomes; nevertheless, the significant improvement in fatigue scoring may indicate that certain strains may still benefit patients despite limited effectiveness in modulating the gut–brain axis [92]. Furthermore, other studies, focused on the dietary supplementation aiming to target mental health outcomes in long COVID patients, involved preparations combining probiotic strains with other bioactives with anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, such as prebiotic fibers of fructooligosaccharides (FOS), which, added to a probiotic mixture consisting of L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. rhamnosus, Bacillus breve, B. longum and Streptococcus thermophilus, have been shown to significantly decrease depressive symptoms in moderately depressed patients compared with the placebo [113]. Consequently, evidence obtained from long COVID patients, although limited by the low number of studies, has indicated that interventions with functional microbial preparations, like “OMNi-BiOTiC® STRESS Repair 9”, combining nine probiotic strains, e.g., Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus acidophilus W22, Lactobacillus paracasei W20, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus plantarum W62 and Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, with prebiotic FOS and enzymes (e.g., amylases), minerals (magnesium sulfate, manganese sulfate) and vitamin B2, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 improved symptoms of depression and perceived emotional well-being among 44.3% (n = 27) self-assessed participants over the course of 6 months [97]. Interestingly, benefits of using synbiotics were also reported in a small recent study conducted on women with fibromyalgia co-diagnosed with ME/CFS, who, after 4 weeks of symbiotic intake (Synbiotic, Gasteel Plus® (Heel Spain, S.A.U.), containing probiotic strains of Bifidobacterium lactis CBP-001010, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 and Bifidobacterium longum ES1 combined with prebiotics, FOS (200 mg) and micronutrients, including zinc (1.5 mg), selenium (8.25 g) and vitamin D (0.75 g), had significantly reduced anxiety when compared with the baseline score, followed by improvements in pain perception and sleep quality [96].
Given the reported associations between the alerted gut microbiome composition and the reported psychiatric complications in ME/CFS and long COVID [66], the use of psychobiotics through modulating the gut–brain axis may serve as a potential adjunct treatment to improve mental health outcomes in patients with post-viral syndromes, while also reducing stress, regulating mood and improving neurocognitive functioning [118]. Although these benefits seem to be attributed to the immunomodulatory properties of the microbial metabolites (e.g., SCFAs) [119], the limited number of studies investigating the effects of psychobiotics and their products on neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factors implicated in the central nervous system function [118] indicate a need for exploration before the use of probiotics is incorporated in clinical practice.

3.3. Effects of Probiotics on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in ME/CFS and Long COVID

The presence of certain gut dysbiosis reported in both ME/CFS and long COVID patients suggest that the use of microbial-based preparations (due to positive effects on gut microbiota composition) may be an efficient strategy in the management of GI symptoms in these individuals. Despite the still limited number of studies, the evidence from ME/CFS cohorts with GI complaints suggest that certain probiotic strains, especially Lactobacilli spp., Bifidobacteria spp. and/or their combination, can positively impact the gut microbiota function while promoting intestinal homeostasis, and strengthen the mucosal barrier and normalize the cytokine profile within the gut [3,45,90]. Noteworthy, an anti-inflammatory effect of probiotics by leading to the reduced production of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as CRP, TNF-α and IL-6, may have therapeutic potential for ME/CFS with comorbid IBS [45], leading to reduced IBS-like symptoms in these patients, while improving the quality of life and psychological symptoms [120]. For example, supplementation with a symbiotic formulation (Synbiotic, Gasteel Plus® (Heel Spain, S.A.U.), containing probiotic strains of Bifidobacterium lactis CBP-001010, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036 and Bifidobacterium longum ES1, in addition to prebiotics, fructooligosaccharides (200 mg), zinc (1.5 mg), selenium (8.25 g) and vitamin D (0.75 g), resulted in the better scoring of GI health indices among females co-diagnosed with fibromyalgia and ME/CFS compared with the scores reported at the baseline; nevertheless, these improvements remained not significant [96].
Similarly, for ME/CFS, the use of probiotics aiming to restore gut homeostasis has been a subject of interest, as 22% of individuals with COVID-19 diagnosis may experience certain GI distress, of which loss of appetite, dyspepsia and IBS-like and abdominal pain seem to be the most common [121]. In addition, the observed associations between changes in the composition of gut microbiome, disease severity and inflammation among long COVID patients [122,123] suggests that interventions using microbial preparations may help to reduce GI complaints among long COVID patients and improve their recovery from the disease.
To date, most studies conducted on COVID-19 survivors have shown that probiotic supplementation can improve overall symptoms, inflammatory response and time of hospitalization, with some also indicating beneficial effects on intestinal microbiota, characterized by reduced GI symptoms, e.g., reduced duration of diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting [69]. For example, the supplementation of a multi-strain preparation, including Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 32345, L. acidophilus DSM 32241, L. helveticus DSM 32242, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 32243, L. plantarum DSM 32244, LeviL. brevis DSM 27961, B. lactis DSM 32246 and B. lactis DSM 32247, for 7 days resulted in the reduction in diarrhea and severity of other symptoms accompanying infection (e.g., fever, asthenia, headache, myalgia and dyspnea), followed by an eight-fold reduced risk of respiratory failure among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [94]. Although the use of probiotics might be beneficial for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, studies assessing their efficacy in long COVID are limited. Nevertheless, an intervention with synbiotics consisting of lactobacillus strains (e.g., Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus paracasei) and prebiotic inulin after 30 days led to significant improvements in gut health and reduced GI symptoms (e.g., mild increased bloating and diarrhea), especially in older patients with a more severe course of the disease. In addition, these patients also reported significantly improved symptoms of fatigue, indigestion and cough [46]. Similar benefits were shown after the use of a multi-strain probiotic preparation “OMNi-BiOTiC® STRESS Repair 9”, providing nine bacterial strains, including Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus acidophilus W22, Lactobacillus paracasei W20, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus plantarum W62 and Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, along with prebiotic fructooligosaccharides (FOS), enzymes (amylases), minerals (magnesium sulfate, manganese sulfate) and vitamins (vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin B12), which, after 3 months, led to subjective improvement in GI health, including enhanced digestion, reduced diarrhea, constipation, flatulence and abdominal pain [97]. Finally, a phase 3 clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a probiotic formula (VSL#3®) containing eight strains of lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria (e.g., Streptococcus thermophilus BT01, B. breve BB02, B. animalis subsp. lactis BL03, B. animalis subsp. lactis BI04, L. acidophilus BA05, L. plantarum BP06, L. paracasei BP07 and L. helveticus BD08) was shown to be effective in ameliorating GI symptoms determined by the structured assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms scale (SAGIS) compared with the placebo; however, it had limited effects on acid regurgitation, nausea, vomiting, constipation, epigastric pain and IBS-like symptoms [92].
In summary, research to date indicate that probiotics, especially lactobacillus, may be beneficial in reducing GI symptoms in patients with ME/CFS and long COVID [2,124]. The immunoregulatory properties of probiotics may help to restore the perturbed composition of gut microbiota and dysbiosis, which could reduce symptom severity (linked to the reduced abundance of butyrate producing bacteria [41]). Consequently, the use of live strains of F. prausnitzii and B. pullicaecorum, as potent butyrate producers by increasing SCFA (e.g., butyrate) levels due to its potent immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties) may have to restore gut homeostasis after excessive inflammation and also, by strengthening the intestinal barrier, may prevent a leaky gut syndrome linked to IBS-like symptoms [125] resultant from increased inflammatory response/immune activation due to the leakage of pro-inflammatory endotoxins and pathogens into circulation [126]. In addition, psychobiotic and anti-inflammatory properties of certain strains may help to reduce GI symptoms resulting from psychological distress resultant from the stress-induced gut dysbiosis and activation of the HPA axis [127]. Although these effects still need to be confirmed in patients affected by post-viral syndromes, the supplementation of L. heleveticus Rosell-52 and B. longum Rosell-175 can reduce stress-induced GI discomfort among healthy populations [107]. Furthermore, probiotics have been proposed as a promising intervention for improving the health of patients with post-infectious fatigue, many of whom report GI symptoms such as abdominal pain, constipation/diarrhea or bloating. However, to confirm these effects, further studies are needed because, to date, the low number of these studies along with the overall poor quality of data do not allow to fully understand their role and effectiveness in managing GI symptoms in ME/CFS patients [2].

4. Future Directions

The use of microbial preparations in the management of post-viral syndromes, such as ME/CFS and long COVID, is an area of ongoing research owing to several studies indicating the role of gut dysbiosis, shared in both neuropsychiatric conditions and GI symptoms.
Reported association between low levels of butyrate and reduced abundance of SCFAs producing bacteria at the expense of gut pathogens with persisting GI and neurological symptoms in these individuals highlighted the need for novel strategies for microbiome-tailored disease prevention and treatment. The increased interest and research activity initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on the certain similarity observed in the pathophysiology of both post-viral syndromes, particularly in the gut microbiome, may accelerate the progress in developing evidence-based therapeutic options for ME/CFS [13], such as the use of microbial preparations.
To date, despite limited evidence, clinical trials conducted in the ME/CFS and long COVID cohorts have demonstrated that certain microbial preparations, by restoring intestinal homeostasis, regulating the gut–brain axis and decreasing inflammation, may play a role in the management of ME/CFS and long COVID symptoms and possibly increase the quality of life of patients. Whereas certain lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria strains have been found to be effective in reducing inflammation and fatigue, their effect on the neurological and psychiatric symptoms remains inconsistent, which might be attributable to varying methodologies of the conduced trials and the low number of studies. Nevertheless, the emerging strategy of combining multi-strain probiotics with other functional ingredients previously implicated with anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties, such as prebiotic fibers, vitamins and minerals and other bioactive blends, is a promising approach that may offer significant advantages for not only reducing fatigue but also increasing the well-being of patients with post-viral syndromes.
Among these strategies, formulations combining potent anti-oxidants and enzymes, such as peptidase, bromelain, amylase, lysozyme, peptidase, catalase, papain, glucoamylase and lactoferrin and vitamins and minerals implicated in energy metabolism, anti-oxidant defenses and immunity, including zinc, selenium, vitamin D, vitamin B2 (riboflavin 5′-sodium phosphate), vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), manganese sulfate and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), may help to reduce the severity of fatigue and depression, while increasing energy levels, also improve mood, sleep and overall quality of life. Furthermore, combining probiotics with phytochemical-rich whole plant foods, such as citrus sinensis fruit, chamomile (Matricaria recutita L. flower), curcuma longa and pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) as sources of naturally derived prebiotic fibers, antioxidants and micronutrients, may provide synergistic benefits of promoting gut health and microbial activities, related to the production of microbial metabolites, which, acting systemically, can lead to improvement in overall well-being and enhance recovery. It would be interesting to assess the effectiveness of other microbial-based preparations that include postbiotics, such as microbial cells, their fractions and bioactive metabolites, such as organic acids, bacteriocins and enzymes. While using a live probiotic strain has been tested and acknowledged for its health benefits, especially in the context of immunity, gut and brain health, postbiotics, as nonviable or inactive probiotics and their metabolic by-products, may offer the significant advantage of providing all the benefits, thereby offering a potentially safer and more suitable approach for individuals with chronic inflammatory conditions and/or compromised immunity.
Although further research is needed to fully understand how postbiotics can be beneficial for ME/CFS and long COVID patients, the current evidence suggests that they could be a promising area of study for improving the health of these individuals. In particular, the use of microbial metabolites known as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including acetate, propionate and butyrate, due to their immuno-modulatory properties, has been suggested to be effective in reducing the severity of COVID-19 symptoms, which might also be extended to ME/CFS, in particular for modulating the gut–brain axis and strengthening intestinal barriers [126]. For example, the supplementation of butyrate, in comparison with other SCFAs, acetate and propionate, may be the most advantageous due to its proven immunomodulatory effects, e.g., increasing secretion of mucins and defensins and promoting antiviral defenses, by inducing expression of interferon-gamma and granzyme B, and reducing systemic inflammation [126], thus possibly reducing psychiatric and fatigue symptoms. Despite these promising strategies, there is an emerging need for further studies, which would include controlled clinical trials to determine optimal formulation, doses and treatment durations, which would allow to achieve the most prominent improvements in health determinants of patients with post-viral syndromes while minimizing potential adverse effects.

5. Conclusions

The utilization of microbial-based preparations containing immunomodulatory probiotic strains presents a promising therapeutic approach for addressing the complex pathogenesis of post-viral syndromes, including ME/CFS and long COVID, which are also associated with comorbidities. The evidence obtained from the recent pandemic highlighted the potential of probiotics in ameliorating inflammation and GI disturbances in long COVID; however, the efficacy of these interventions in ME/CFS remains uncertain due to the limited quality of available evidence, with some studies suggesting improvements in anxiety and IBS symptoms.
While considering the pivotal role of immune dysregulation in neuroinflammation of ME/CFS patients, probiotic interventions, by improving the intestinal barriers and favorably modulating the bidirectional communication via the gut–brain axis, may help in mitigating neuropsychiatric symptoms reported in ME/CFS and long COVID. In addition, the implication of gut dysbiosis in the etiology of both conditions, including probiotic-based supplementation aiming to restore gut homeostasis could reduce the severity of symptoms associated with comorbid conditions, such as anxiety/depression, IBD, IBS and insomnia in ME/CFS. However, while these implications are promising, further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms through which microbial-derived preparations may improve the management of ME/CFS and long COVID. Additionally, exploring the potential synergistic effects of combining probiotics/synbiotics with other bioactives with immunomodulatory and anti-oxidative properties, such as CoQ10 and selenium or CoQ10 and lipoid acid, warrants further investigation.
Taken together, a comprehensive approach utilizing a bidirectional communication via the gut–immune–brain axis indicates that dietary supplementation with microbial-based formulations combined with functional bioactives of natural origin may optimize the management of both neuropsychiatric and GI symptoms resultant from chronic inflammation and immuno-metabolic alterations, and should be considered as a part of holistic care offered to patients with ME/CFS and long COVID.

6. Take-Home Messages

  • The changes in gut microbiome reported in ME/CFS and long COVID may serve as sensors and modulators of the gut–brain axis, leading to cognitive and immune-metabolic alterations.
  • The ability of the gut microbiome to modulate neurotransmitters and responses on the HPA axis may explain the reported associations between gut microbiota and symptom severity in ME/CFS and long COVID.
  • Various lifestyle interventions, including diet and supplementation with microbial-based preparations (probiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics) can modulate gut microbiome activity and influence disease status.
  • Prebiotic interventions are the most likely to result in changes to gut microbiome composition, followed by dietary interventions and then probiotic interventions in ME/CFS and long COVID.
  • Further research is needed to validate emerging microbial metabolites and their role in ME/CFS and long COVID management.

Author Contributions

J.M.J. conceptualized the article, wrote the manuscript and designed the tables/figures. J.C.-M. contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Health Carlos III (Madrid, Spain) within the framework of the Strategic Action Plan on Health (Grant number: PI19/00629) and co-funded by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund–ERDF 2014-2020): “A way to build Europe”. Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR) is a member of the CERCA program (Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Germain, A.; Barupal, D.K.; Levine, S.M.; Hanson, M.R. Comprehensive Circulatory Metabolomics in ME/CFS Reveals Disrupted Metabolism of Acyl Lipids and Steroids. Metabolites 2020, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. König, R.S.; Albrich, W.C.; Kahlert, C.R.; Bahr, L.S.; Löber, U.; Vernazza, P.; Scheibenbogen, C.; Forslund, S.K. The Gut Microbiome in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 628741, Erratum in Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 878196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lakhan, S.E.; Kirchgessner, A. Gut inflammation in chronic fatigue syndrome. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mirin, A.A.; Dimmock, M.E.; Jason, L.A. Research update: The relation between ME/CFS disease burden and research funding in the USA. Work 2020, 66, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sandler, C.X.; Lloyd, A.R. Chronic fatigue syndrome: Progress and possibilities. Med. J. Aust. 2020, 212, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jason, L.A.; McManimen, S.; Sunnquist, M.; Brown, A.; Newton, J.L.; Strand, E.B. Examining the institute of medicine’s recommendations regarding chronic fatigue syndrome: Clinical versus research criteria. J. Neurol. Psychol. 2015, 2015 (Suppl. S2). [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Barry, P.W.; Kelley, K.; Tan, T.; Finlay, I. NICE guideline on ME/CFS: Robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Devasahayam, A.; Lawn, T.; Murphy, M.; White, P.D. Alternative diagnoses to chronic fatigue syndrome in referrals to a specialist service: Service evaluation survey. JRSM Short Rep. 2012, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Carfì, A.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F. Gemelli against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients after Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 324, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Komaroff, A.L.; Lipkin, W.I. ME/CFS and Long COVID share similar symptoms and biological abnormalities: Road map to the literature. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1187163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wong, T.L.; Weitzer, D.J. Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)-A Systemic Review and Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Symptomatology. Medicina 2021, 57, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. White, P.D.; Thomas, J.M.; Amess, J.; Crawford, D.H.; Grover, S.A.; Kangro, H.O.; Clare, A.W. Incidence, risk and prognosis of acute and chronic fatigue syndromes and psychiatric disorders after glandular fever. Br. J. Psychiatry 1998, 173, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tate, W.P.; Walker, M.O.; Peppercorn, K.; Blair, A.L.; Edgar, C.D. Towards a better understanding of the complexities of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and long COVID. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mandarano, A.H.; Maya, J.; Giloteaux, L.; Peterson, D.L.; Maynard, M.; Gottschalk, C.G.; Hanson, M.R. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients exhibit altered T cell metabolism and cytokine associations. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 1491–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, E.Y.; Mao, T.; Klein, J.; Dai, Y.; Huck, J.D.; Jaycox, J.R.; Liu, F.; Zhou, T.; Israelow, B.; Wong, P.; et al. Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19. Nature 2021, 595, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ryabkova, V.A.; Gavrilova, N.Y.; Poletaeva, A.A.; Pukhalenko, A.I.; Koshkina, I.A.; Churilov, L.P.; Shoenfeld, Y. Autoantibody correlation signatures in fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Association with symptom severity. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sotzny, F.; Blanco, J.; Capelli, E.; Castro-Marrero, J.; Steiner, S.; Murovska, M.; Scheibenbogen, C. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Evidence for an autoimmune disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2018, 17, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maksoud, R.; Magawa, C.; Eaton-Fitch, N.; Thapaliya, K.; Marshall-Gradisnik, S. Biomarkers for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): A systematic review. BMC Med. 2023, 21, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patarca, R. Cytokines and chronic fatigue syndrome. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 933, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Low, R.N.; Low, R.J.; Akrami, A. A review of cytokine-based pathophysiology of Long COVID symptoms. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1011936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Montoya, J.G.; Holmes, T.H.; Anderson, J.N.; Maecker, H.T.; Rosenberg-Hasson, Y.; Valencia, I.J.; Chu, L.; Younger, J.W.; Tato, C.M.; Davis, M.M. Cytokine signature associated with disease severity in chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, e7150–e7158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Missailidis, D.; Annesley, S.J.; Fisher, P.R. Pathological mechanisms underlying myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hatziagelaki, E.; Adamaki, M.; Tsilioni, I.; Dimitriadis, G.; Theoharides, T.C. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome—Metabolic disease or disturbed homeostasis due to focal inflammation in the hypothalamus? J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2018, 367, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Al-Hakeim, H.K.; Al-Rubaye, H.T.; Al-Hadrawi, D.S.; Almulla, A.F.; Maes, M. Long-COVID post-viral chronic fatigue and affective symptoms are associated with oxidative damage, lowered antioxidant defenses and inflammation: A proof of concept and mechanism study. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Walker, M.O.; Hall, K.H.; Peppercorn, K.; Tate, W.P. The significance of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Med. Res. Arch. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stufano, A.; Isgrò, C.; Palese, L.L.; Caretta, P.; De Maria, L.; Lovreglio, P.; Sardanelli, A.M. Oxidative Damage and Post-COVID Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Cohort of Italian Workers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tahaghoghi-Hajghorbani, S.; Zafari, P.; Masoumi, E.; Rajabinejad, M.; Jafari-Shakib, R.; Hasani, B.; Rafiei, A. The role of dysregulated immune responses in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Virus Res. 2020, 290, 198197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Netea, M.G.; Rovina, N.; Akinosoglou, K.; Antoniadou, A.; Antonakos, N.; Damoraki, G.; Gkavogianni, T.; Adami, M.E.; Katsaounou, P.; et al. Complex immune dysregulation in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Paul, B.D.; Lemle, M.D.; Komaroff, A.L.; Snyder, S.H. Redox imbalance links COVID-19 and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024358118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tanaka, S.; Kuratsune, H.; Hidaka, Y.; Hakariya, Y.; Tatsumi, K.I.; Takano, T.; Kanakura, Y.; Amino, N. Autoantibodies against muscarinic cholinergic receptor in chronic fatigue syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2003, 12, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Freitag, H.; Szklarski, M.; Lorenz, S.; Sotzny, F.; Bauer, S.; Philippe, A.; Kedor, C.; Grabowski, P.; Lange, T.; Riemekasten, G.; et al. Autoantibodies to vasoregulative G-protein-coupled receptors correlate with symptom severity, autonomic dysfunction and disability in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Maes, M.; Twisk, F.N.; Johnson, C. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and chronic fatigue (CF) are distinguished accurately: Results of supervised learning techniques applied on clinical and inflammatory data. Psychiatry Res. 2012, 200, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yamamoto, S.; Ouchi, Y.; Nakatsuka, D.; Tahara, T.; Mizuno, K.; Tajima, S.; Onoe, H.; Yoshikawa, E.; Tsukada, H.; Iwase, M.; et al. Reduction of [11C](+)3-MPB binding in brain of chronic fatigue syndrome with serum autoantibody against muscarinic cholinergic receptor. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fischer, D.B.; William, A.H.; Strauss, A.C.; Unger, E.R.; Jason, L.A.; Marshall, G.D., Jr.; Dimitrakoff, J.D. Chronic fatigue syndrome: The current status and future potentials of emerging biomarkers. Fatigue Biomed. Health Behav. 2014, 2, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Patil, S.; Choudhari, S.; Raka, V.; Narkar, S.; Dahiphale, J.; Gondhali, G. Neurological and systemic manifestations in COVID: Underestimated sequel of COVID’s pandora. World J. Adv. Pharm. Med. Res. 2023, 4, 042–052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Uhde, M.; Indart, A.C.; Green, P.H.; Yolken, R.H.; Cook, D.B.; Shukla, S.K.; Vernon, S.D.; Alaedini, A. Suppressed immune and metabolic responses to intestinal damage-associated microbial translocation in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav. Immun. -Health 2023, 30, 100627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cliff, J.M.; King, E.C.; Lee, J.S.; Sepúlveda, N.; Wolf, A.S.; Kingdon, C.; Bowman, E.; Dockrell, H.M.; Nacul, L.; Lacerda, E.; et al. Cellular immune function in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 422277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Keller, J.; Gomez, R.; Williams, G.; Lembke, A.; Lazzeroni, L.; Murphy, G.M.; Schatzberg, A.F. HPA axis in major depression: Cortisol, clinical symptomatology and genetic variation predict cognition. Mol. Psychiatry 2017, 22, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meierovics, A.; Yankelevich, W.J.; Cowley, S.C. MAIT cells are critical for optimal mucosal immune responses during in vivo pulmonary bacterial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, e3119–e3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Davis, H.E.; McCorkell, L.; Vogel, J.M.; Topol, E.J. Long COVID: Major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, C.; Che, X.; Briese, T.; Ranjan, A.; Allicock, O.; Yates, R.A.; Cheng, A.; March, D.; Hornig, M.; Komaroff, A.L.; et al. Deficient butyrate-producing capacity in the gut microbiome is associated with bacterial network disturbances and fatigue symptoms in ME/CFS. Cell Host Microbe 2023, 31, 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mendes de Almeida, V.; Engel, D.F.; Ricci, M.F.; Cruz, C.S.; Lopes, Í.S.; Alves, D.A.; d’Auriol, M.; Magalhães, J.; Machado, E.C.; Rocha, V.M.; et al. Gut microbiota from patients with COVID-19 cause alterations in mice that resemble post-COVID symptoms. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2249146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Koc, H.C.; Xiao, J.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, G. Long COVID and its management. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 4768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nijs, J.; Crombez, G.; Meeus, M.; Knoop, H.; Van Damme, S.; Van Cauwenbergh, D.; Bleijenberg, G. Pain in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: Time for specific pain treatment? Pain. Physician 2012, 15, E677–E686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Varesi, A.; Deumer, U.S.; Ananth, S.; Ricevuti, G. The emerging role of gut microbiota in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): Current evidence and potential therapeutic applications. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thomas, N.; Gurvich, C.; Huang, K.; Gooley, P.R.; Armstrong, C.W. The underlying sex differences in neuroendocrine adaptations relevant to myalgic encephalomyelitis chronic fatigue syndrome. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2022, 66, 100995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Clément, K. The gut microbiome, diet, and links to cardiometabolic and chronic disorders. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016, 12, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lazar, V.; Ditu, L.M.; Pircalabioru, G.G.; Picu, A.; Petcu, L.; Cucu, N.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Gut microbiota, host organism, and diet trialogue in diabetes and obesity. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fujimura, K.E.; Slusher, N.A.; Cabana, M.D.; Lynch, S.V. Role of the gut microbiota in defining human health. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2010, 8, 435–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Iacob, S.; Iacob, D.G.; Luminos, L.M. Intestinal microbiota as a host defense mechanism to infectious threats. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 426119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kho, Z.Y.; Lal, S.K. The human gut microbiome: A potential controller of wellness and disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 356589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. DeGruttola, A.K.; Low, D.; Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E. Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tisza, B.B.; Iván, G.; Keczeli, V.; Kóró, M.; Szántóri, P.; Varga, Z.G.; Müller, H.; Pribéli, O.; Szabó, Z.; Verzár, Z.; et al. A Review of Possible Supplements to Relieve the Symptoms of Fatigue after COVID-19. J. Med. Public Health 2023, 4, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shukla, S.K.; Cook, D.; Meyer, J.; Vernon, S.D.; Le, T.; Clevidence, D.; Robertson, C.E.; Schrodi, S.J.; Yale, S.; Frank, D.N. Changes in gut and plasma microbiome following exercise challenge in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Navaneetharaja, N.; Griffiths, V.; Wileman, T.; Carding, S.R. A role for the intestinal microbiota and virome in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)? J. Clin. Med. 2016, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nagy-Szakal, D.; Williams, B.L.; Mishra, N.; Che, X.; Lee, B.; Bateman, L.; Klimas, N.G.; Komaroff, A.L.; Levine, S.; Montoya, J.G.; et al. Fecal metagenomic profiles in subgroups of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Microbiome 2017, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Guo, C.; Yi, B.; Wu, J.; Lu, J. The microbiome in post-acute infection syndrome (PAIS). Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 3904–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Silva, C.F.; Motta, J.M.; Teixeira, F.C.; Gomes, A.M.; Vilanova, E.; Kozlowski, E.O.; Borsig, L.; Pavão, M.S. Non-anticoagulant heparan sulfate from the ascidian phallusia nigra prevents colon carcinoma metastasis in mice by disrupting platelet-tumor cell interaction. Cancers 2020, 12, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Estaki, M.; Pither, J.; Baumeister, P.; Little, J.P.; Gill, S.K.; Ghosh, S.; Ahmadi-Vand, Z.; Marsden, K.R.; Gibson, D.L. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of intestinal microbial diversity and distinct metagenomic functions. Microbiome 2016, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Giloteaux, L.; Goodrich, J.K.; Walters, W.A.; Levine, S.M.; Ley, R.E.; Hanson, M.R. Reduced diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Microbiome 2016, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dumas, A.; Bernard, L.; Poquet, Y.; Lugo-Villarino, G.; Neyrolles, O. The role of the lung microbiota and the gut–lung axis in respiratory infectious diseases. Cell. Microbiol. 2018, 20, e12966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Budden, K.F.; Gellatly, S.L.; Wood, D.L.; Cooper, M.A.; Morrison, M.; Hugenholtz, P.; Hansbro, P.M. Emerging pathogenic links between microbiota and the gut–lung axis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, R.X.; Zhou, M.; Ma, H.L.; Qiao, Y.B.; Li, Q.S. The role of chronic inflammation in various diseases and anti-inflammatory therapies containing natural products. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 1576–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Binda, C.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Rizzatti, G.; Gibiino, G.; Cennamo, V.; Gasbarrini, A. Actinobacteria: A relevant minority for the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2018, 50, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Simpson, C.A.; Diaz-Arteche, C.; Eliby, D.; Schwartz, O.S.; Simmons, J.G.; Cowan, C.S. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression: A systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 83, 101943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Alenazy, M.F.; Aljohar, H.I.; Alruwaili, A.R.; Daghestani, M.H.; Alonazi, M.A.; Labban, R.S.; El-Ansary, A.K.; Balto, H.A. Gut microbiota dynamics in relation to long-COVID-19 syndrome: Role of probiotics to combat psychiatric complications. Metabolites 2022, 12, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yeoh, Y.K.; Zuo, T.; Lui, G.C.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, A.Y.; Chung, A.C.; Cheung, C.P.; Tso, E.Y.; Fung, K.S.; et al. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021, 70, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, J.; Hall, S.; Vitetta, L. Altered gut microbial metabolites could mediate the effects of risk factors in COVID-19. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 31, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tian, Y.; Ran, H.; Wen, X.; Fu, G.; Zhou, X.; Liu, R.; Pan, T. Probiotics improve symptoms of patients with COVID-19 through gut-lung axis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1179432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ferreira, C.; Viana, S.D.; Reis, F. Gut microbiota dysbiosis–immune hyperresponse–inflammation triad in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact of pharmacological and nutraceutical approaches. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zuo, T.; Wu, X.; Wen, W.; Lan, P. Gut microbiome alterations in COVID-19. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2021, 19, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liu, Q.; Mak, J.W.; Su, Q.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Lui, G.C.; Ng, S.S.; Zhang, F.; Li, A.Y.; Lu, W.; Hui, D.S.; et al. Gut microbiota dynamics in a prospective cohort of patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Gut 2022, 71, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Chen, P.; Tang, J.; Yang, B.; Li, H.; Liang, M.; Xue, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis correlates with long COVID-19 at one-year after discharge. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2023, 38, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y. Regulation of neurotransmitters by the gut microbiota and effects on cognition in neurological disorders. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ortelli, P.; Ferrazzoli, D.; Sebastianelli, L.; Maestri, R.; Dezi, S.; Spampinato, D.; Saltuari, L.; Alibardi, A.; Engl, M.; Kofler, M.; et al. Altered motor cortex physiology and dysexecutive syndrome in patients with fatigue and cognitive difficulties after mild COVID-19. Eur. J. Neurol. 2022, 29, 1652–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Manganotti, P.; Michelutti, M.; Furlanis, G.; Deodato, M.; Stella, A.B. Deficient GABABergic and glutamatergic excitability in the motor cortex of patients with long-COVID and cognitive impairment. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2023, 151, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shahbazi, R.; Yasavoli-Sharahi, H.; Alsadi, N.; Ismail, N.; Matar, C. Probiotics in treatment of viral respiratory infections and neuroinflammatory disorders. Molecules 2020, 25, 4891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sandionigi, A.; De Giani, A.; Tursi, F.; Michelotti, A.; Cestone, E.; Giardina, S.; Zampolli, J.; Di Gennaro, P. Effectiveness of multistrain probiotic formulation on common infectious disease symptoms and gut microbiota modulation in flu-vaccinated healthy elderly subjects. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 3860896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Farzi, A.; Fröhlich, E.E.; Holzer, P. Gut microbiota and the neuroendocrine system. Neurotherapeutics 2018, 15, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Buglione-Corbett, R.; Deligiannidis, K.M.; Leung, K.; Zhang, N.; Lee, M.; Rosal, M.C.; Moore Simas, T.A. Expression of inflammatory markers in women with perinatal depressive symptoms. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2018, 21, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Aziz, T.; Naveed, M. Integrated genome based evaluation of safety and probiotic characteristics of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 isolated from Tibetan kefir. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1157615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rao, A.V.; Bested, A.C.; Beaulne, T.M.; Katzman, M.A.; Iorio, C.; Berardi, J.M.; Logan, A.C. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2009, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Venturini, L.; Bacchi, S.; Capelli, E.; Lorusso, L.; Ricevuti, G.; Cusa, C. Modification of immunological parameters, oxidative stress markers, mood symptoms, and well-being status in CFS patients after probiotic intake: Observations from a pilot study. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1684198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Williamson, C.B.; Burns, C.M.; Gossard, C.M.; Pizano, J.M.; Dolan, K.E.; Finley, H.J.; Gasta, M.G.; Parker, E.C.; Lipski, E.A. Probiotics and disease: A comprehensive summary—Part 3, Cardiometabolic disease and fatigue syndromes. Integr. Med. Clin. J. 2017, 16, 30. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rathi, A.; Jadhav, S.B.; Shah, N. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of systemic enzymes and probiotics in the resolution of post-COVID fatigue. Medicines 2021, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xu, L.; Yang, C.S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Effective regulation of gut microbiota with probiotics and prebiotics may prevent or alleviate COVID-19 through the gut-lung axis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 895193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sohail, A.; Cheema, H.A.; Mithani, M.S.; Shahid, A.; Nawaz, A.; Hermis, A.H.; Chinnam, S.; Nashwan, A.J.; Cherrez-Ojeda, I.; Awan, R.U.; et al. Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1274122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Roman, P.; Estévez, A.F.; Miras, A.; Sánchez-Labraca, N.; Cañadas, F.; Vivas, A.B.; Cardona, D. A pilot randomized controlled trial to explore cognitive and emotional effects of probiotics in fibromyalgia. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sullivan, Å.; Nord, C.E.; Evengård, B. Effect of supplement with lactic-acid producing bacteria on fatigue and physical activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Nutr. J. 2009, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Santinelli, L.; Laghi, L.; Innocenti, G.P.; Pinacchio, C.; Vassalini, P.; Celani, L.; Lazzaro, A.; Borrazzo, C.; Marazzato, M.; Tarsitani, L.; et al. Oral bacteriotherapy reduces the occurrence of chronic fatigue in COVID-19 patients. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Caprioli, F.; Marinoni, B.; Rimondi, A.; Bottaro, F.; Ciafardini, C.; Amoroso, C.; Muia, M.; Caridi, B.; Noviello, D.; Bandera, A.; et al. The Role of VSL#3Ŵ in the Treatment of Fatigue and Other Symptoms in Long COVID-19 Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study (DELong#3). medRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lalitsuradej, E.; Sirilun, S.; Sittiprapaporn, P.; Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Pintha, K.; Tantipaiboonwong, P.; Khongtan, S.; Fukngoen, P.; Peerajan, S.; Chaiyasut, C. The effects of synbiotics administration on stress-related parameters in Thai subjects: A preliminary study. Foods 2022, 11, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. d’Ettorre, G.; Ceccarelli, G.; Marazzato, M.; Campagna, G.; Pinacchio, C.; Alessandri, F.; Ruberto, F.; Rossi, G.; Celani, L.; Scagnolari, C.; et al. Challenges in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection: The role of oral bacteriotherapy as complementary therapeutic strategy to avoid the progression of COVID-19. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Thomas, R.; Williams, M.; Aldous, J.; Yanagisawa, Y.; Kumar, R.; Forsyth, R.; Chater, A. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating concentrated phytochemical-rich nutritional capsule in addition to a probiotic capsule on clinical outcomes among individuals with COVID-19: The UK Phyto-V study. COVID 2022, 2, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hinchado, M.D.; Quero-Calero, C.D.; Otero, E.; Gálvez, I.; Ortega, E. Synbiotic Supplementation Improves Quality of Life and Inmunoneuroendocrine Response in Patients with Fibromyalgia: Influence of Codiagnosis with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Obermoser, K.; Brigo, N.; Schroll, A.; Monfort-Lanzas, P.; Gostner, J.M.; Engl, S.; Geisler, S.; Knoll, M.; Schennach, H.; Weiss, G.; et al. Positive effects of probiotic therapy in patients with post-infectious fatigue. Metabolites 2023, 13, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jason, L.A.; Natelson, B.H.; Bonilla, H.; Sherif, Z.A.; Vernon, S.D.; Gutierrez, M.V.; O’Brien, L.; Taylor, E. What Long COVID investigators can learn from four decades of ME/CFS research. Brain Behav. Immun. Integr. 2023, 4, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Groeger, D.; O’Mahony, L.; Murphy, E.F.; Bourke, J.F.; Dinan, T.G.; Kiely, B.; Shanahan, F.; Quigley, E.M. Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 modulates host inflammatory processes beyond the gut. Gut Microbes 2013, 4, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tomkinson, S.; Triscott, C.; Schenk, E.; Foey, A. The potential of probiotics as ingestible adjuvants and immune modulators for antiviral immunity and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Pathogens 2023, 12, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khokhlova, E.; Colom, J.; Simon, A.; Mazhar, S.; García-Lainez, G.; Llopis, S.; Gonzalez, N.; Enrique-López, M.; Álvarez, B.; Martorell, P.; et al. Immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties of a novel potential probiotic Bacillus clausii CSI08. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ross, K. Psychobiotics: Are they the future intervention for managing depression and anxiety? A literature review. Explore 2023, 19, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Warda, A.K.; Rea, K.; Fitzgerald, P.; Hueston, C.; Gonzalez-Tortuero, E.; Dinan, T.G.; Hill, C. Heat-killed lactobacilli alter both microbiota composition and behaviour. Behav. Brain Res. 2019, 362, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zielińska, D.; Karbowiak, M.; Brzezicka, A. The Role of Psychobiotics to Ensure Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Current State of Knowledge. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sharma, R.; Gupta, D.; Mehrotra, R.; Mago, P. Psychobiotics: The next-generation probiotics for the brain. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Miyaoka, T.; Kanayama, M.; Wake, R.; Hashioka, S.; Hayashida, M.; Nagahama, M.; Okazaki, S.; Yamashita, S.; Miura, S.; Miki, H.; et al. Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 as adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: A prospective open-label trial. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 41, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Diop, L.; Guillou, S.; Durand, H. Probiotic food supplement reduces stress-induced gastrointestinal symptoms in volunteers: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Nutr. Res. 2008, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Eskandarzadeh, S.; Effatpanah, M.; Khosravi-Darani, K.; Askari, R.; Hosseini, A.F.; Reisian, M.; Jazayeri, S. Efficacy of a multispecies probiotic as adjunctive therapy in generalized anxiety disorder: A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mohammadi, A.A.; Jazayeri, S.; Khosravi-Darani, K.; Solati, Z.; Mohammadpour, N.; Asemi, Z.; Adab, Z.; Djalali, M.; Tehrani-Doost, M.; Hosseini, M.; et al. The effects of probiotics on mental health and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in petrochemical workers. Nutr. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Akkasheh, G.; Kashani-Poor, Z.; Tajabadi-Ebrahimi, M.; Jafari, P.; Akbari, H.; Taghizadeh, M.; Memarzadeh, M.R.; Asemi, Z.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 2016, 32, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Marotta, A.; Sarno, E.; Del Casale, A.; Pane, M.; Mogna, L.; Amoruso, A.; Felis, G.E.; Fiorio, M. Effects of probiotics on cognitive reactivity, mood, and sleep quality. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 427235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ait-Belgnaoui, A.; Colom, A.; Braniste, V.; Ramalho, L.; Marrot, A.; Cartier, C.; Houdeau, E.; Theodorou, V.; Tompkins, T. Probiotic gut effect prevents the chronic psychological stress-induced brain activity abnormality in mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2014, 26, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ghorbani, Z.; Nazari, S.; Etesam, F.; Nourimajd, S.; Ahmadpanah, M.; Jahromi, S.R. The effect of symbiotic as an adjuvant therapy to fluoxetine in moderate depression: A randomized multicenter trial. Arch. Neurosci. 2018, 5, e60507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Andersson, H.; Tullberg, C.; Ahrné, S.; Hamberg, K.; Lazou Ahrén, I.; Molin, G.; Sonesson, M.; Håkansson, Å. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v reduces cortisol levels in human saliva during examination induced stress: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Int. J. Microbiol. 2016, 2016, 8469018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lennartsson, A.K.; Theorell, T.; Kushnir, M.M.; Bergquist, J.; Jonsdottir, I.H. Perceived stress at work is associated with attenuated DHEA-S response during acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 1650–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Morris, G.; Anderson, G.; Maes, M. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal hypofunction in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome as a consequence of activated immune-inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative pathways. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 6806–6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lau, H.C.; Ng, S.C.; Yu, J. Targeting the Gut Microbiota in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Hype or Hope? Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Thye, A.Y.; Law, J.W.; Tan, L.T.; Pusparajah, P.; Ser, H.L.; Thurairajasingam, S.; Letchumanan, V.; Lee, L.H. Psychological Symptoms in COVID-19 Patients: Insights into Pathophysiology and Risk Factors of Long COVID-19. Biology 2022, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Del Toro-Barbosa, M.; Hurtado-Romero, A.; Garcia-Amezquita, L.E.; García-Cayuela, T. Psychobiotics: Mechanisms of action, evaluation methods and effectiveness in applications with food products. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Corbitt, M.; Campagnolo, N.; Staines, D.; Marshall-Gradisnik, S. A systematic review of probiotic interventions for gastrointestinal symptoms and irritable bowel syndrome in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Choudhury, A.; Tariq, R.; Jena, A.; Vesely, E.K.; Singh, S.; Khanna, S.; Sharma, V. Gastrointestinal manifestations of long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2022, 15, 17562848221118403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Bhattacharya, M.; Dhama, K.; Lee, S.S. Altered gut microbiota patterns in COVID-19: Markers for inflammation and disease severity. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 2802–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lymberopoulos, E.; Gentili, G.I.; Budhdeo, S.; Sharma, N. COVID-19 severity is associated with population-level gut microbiome variations. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 963338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sfera, A.; Osorio, C.; Hazan, S.; Kozlakidis, Z.; Maldonado, J.C.; Zapata-Martín del Campo, C.M.; Anton, J.J.; Rahman, L.; Andronescu, C.V.; Nicolson, G.L. Long COVID and the Neuroendocrinology of Microbial Translocation Outside the GI Tract: Some Treatment Strategies. Endocrines 2022, 3, 703–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Geirnaert, A.; Calatayud, M.; Grootaert, C.; Laukens, D.; Devriese, S.; Smagghe, G.; De Vos, M.; Boon, N.; Van de Wiele, T. Butyrate-producing bacteria supplemented in vitro to Crohn’s disease patient microbiota increased butyrate production and enhanced intestinal epithelial barrier integrity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Homayouni-Rad, A.; Soleimani, R.A.; Khani, N. Can postbiotics prevent or improve SARS-CoV-2? Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2023, 19, 756–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Johnson, D.; Thurairajasingam, S.; Letchumanan, V.; Chan, K.G.; Lee, L.H. Exploring the role and potential of probiotics in the field of mental health: Major depressive disorder. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of symptoms reported in ME/CFS and long COVID. Based on [11].
Figure 1. Comparison of symptoms reported in ME/CFS and long COVID. Based on [11].
Nutrients 16 01545 g001
Table 1. Summary of studies investigating use of microbial-based preparations for management of symptoms in ME/CFS and long COVID.
Table 1. Summary of studies investigating use of microbial-based preparations for management of symptoms in ME/CFS and long COVID.
Participants (n)Intervention
(Dose)
DurationOutcomesReferences
ME/CFS patients
(n = 83)
Single probiotic:
Lactobacillus casei Shirota
8 weeksReduced anxiety scores,
changed fecal composition
[89]
ME/CFS patients
(n = 83)
Single probiotic:
Bifidobacterium infantis 35624
8 weeksReduced inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6)[89]
ME/CFS patients
(n = 9)
Probiotic protocol:
Enterelle (given in week 1, 4–8):
Saccharomyces cerevisiae sub. Boilardii MTCC-5375, Saccharomyces cerevisiae sub. Boilardii SP92, Enterococcus faecium UBEF41, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA14
Bifiselle (given in week 2):
Bifidobacterium lactis BL04, Bifidobacterium breve BB03, Bifidobacterium bifidum BB06, Bifidobacterium longum BL05
Citogenex (given in week 4–8): Saccharomyces spp. extract titrated in 1–3 beta glucans, Vitamin C, Lactobacillus casei LC11, Bifidobacterium lactis BL04, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA14
Ramnoselle (given in week 3, 4–8): Lactobacillus acidophilus LA14, Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR32, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001
2 caps/a day
Each strain > 1 × 109 CFU
8 weeksReduction of fatigue on Chadler’s scale,
improvement in physical and mental conditions,
overall increase in quality of life on SF-36 score,
improvement in mood on PCS score,
reduced depression symptoms on BDI-I and II scores,
reduced inflammation (CRP),
improvement in immune defense (increase in IgM, reduction in CD4/CD8 ratio),
inconsistent effects on oxidative status.
[84]
ME/CFS (n = 15)Multistrain probiotic:
Lactobacillus F19
Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFB 1748
Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12
4 × 108 CFU/mL4 weeksImprovement in neurocognitive functions measured as the VAS mean, inconsistent effects on fatigue, mental and physical health,
no major changes in GI microbiota.
[90]
Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 24)Multistrain probiotic (SLAB51; Sivomixx800®):
Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 32245®, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32246®, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32247®, Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 32241®, Lactobacillus helveticus DSM 32242®, Lactobacillus paracasei DSM 32243®, Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 32244®, Lactobacillus brevis DSM 27961®
3 equal doses of a total of 2.400 × 1011 CFU billion bacteria per day23 daysReduced fatigue on FAS score,
minor changes in metabolomic profile, increased levels of arginine, asparagine, lactate, and decreased levels of 3-hydroxy-isobutyrate following probiotic intake.
[91]
Long COVID patients (n = 19)Multistrain probiotic (VSL#3®):
Streptococcus thermophilus BT01, Bifidobacterium breve BB02, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL03, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BI04, Lactobacillus acidophilus BA05, Lactobacillus plantarum BP06, Lactobacillus paracasei BP07, Lactobacillus helveticus BD08
2 sashets a day, a total of 4.5 × 1011 CFU per sachet 4 weeksReduced fatigue (Chalder fatigue scale),
significant improvement in physical functioning on SF-36 scale,
reduction in GI symptoms on SAGIS score,
no significant difference in specific symptoms of acid regurgitation, nausea and vomiting, constipation, epigastric pain and IBS symptoms vs. placebo,
no effects on psychiatric symptoms of anxiety, depression, performance and somatization symptoms on SCL-12 scale.
[92]
Fatigue subjects
(n = 9)
Single probiotic:
Lactobacillus paracasei HII01
4 × 1010 CFU/g12 weeksDecreased salivary levels of cortisol,
no effects on DHEA-S concentrations, decreased ratio of cortisol/DHEA-S
[93]
Hospitalized COVID-19 patients
(n = 28)
Multistrain probiotic (Sivomixx®):
Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 32345, Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 32241, Lactobacillus helveticus DSM 32242, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DSM 32243, Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 32244, Lactobacillus brevis DSM 27961, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32246, Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 32247
2.5 × 1010 CFU/a day 1 weekAmelioration of diarrhea within 3–7 days,
reduction in other symptoms, including fever, asthenia, headache, myalgia and dyspnea within 2 days,
improvement in respiratory function, 8-fold reduced risk of respiratory failure.
[94]
Multi-ingredient microbial preparations
Long COVID patients (n = 100)ImmunoSEB formulation:
Probiotics-ProbioSEB CSC3:
Bacillus coagulans LBSC (DSM 17654), Bacillus subtilis PLSSC (ATCC SD 7280), Bacillus clausii 088AE (MCC 0538)
Bioactives: Peptizyme SP:
enteric coated serratiopeptidase, bromelain, amylase, lysozyme, peptidase, catalase, papain, glucoamylase, lactoferrin
4 capsules a day:
1 capasule:
ImmunoSEB: 500 g/capsule +
ProbioSEB CSC3: 5 × 1010 CFU/capsule
2 weeksSignificant reduction in fatigue determined by the CFQ-11 score (87% of patients were fatigue free at the end of the intervention),
significant reduction in all individual measures of physical fatigue (tiredness, need to rest, drowsiness, ability to do things, energy level, muscle strength and feeling of weakness),
significant reduction in mental fatigue (concentration, focus and memory),
no adverse events reported, including nausea, vomiting or diarrhea, at any stage of the study.
[86]
Long COVID patients (n = 126)Phytochemical-rich concentrated food capsule:
Probiotic:
Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactococcus lactis
Lactobacillus paracasei
Prebiotic:
Inulin fibre
Bioactives:
Citrus Sinensis fruit, Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L. flower), Curcuma Longa, Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.), resveratrol (Polygonum cuspidatum root)
1 capsule given twice a day
Probiotic: 10 × 1010 CFU/total in capsule
Prebiotic: 200 mg/capsule
Phytochemical-rich whole food capsule (PC):
Citrus Sinensis fruit: 400 mg, inc. 70 mg of bioflavonoids,
Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L. flower): 1000 mg,
Curcuma Longa: 23.8 mg of curcuminoid,
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): 1 g, incl. 10 mg ellagic acid,
Polygonum cuspidatum root: 100 mg of resveratrol
2 weeks2-fold reduction in fatigue measured on the Chalder fatigue scale vs. placebo,
reduction in other symptoms associated with infection, including cough,
improved overall well-being measured on SWB score.
[95]
Fibromyalgia patients co-diagnosed with ME/CFS (n = 15)Synbiotic (Gasteel Plus®) formulation:
Probiotics:
Bifidobacterium lactis CBP-001010, Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036
Bifidobacterium longum ES1
Prebiotic:
Fructooligosaccharides
Bioactives:
Zinc, Selenium,
Vitamin D
Each synbiotic bar (300 mg):
Probiotic: 1 × 109 CFU/total in bar
Prebiotic: 200 mg/bar
Bioactives:
Zinc: 1.5 mg
Selenium: 8.25 mg
Vitamin D: 0.75 g
2 weeksNo changes in the objective perception of activity/sedentarism and sleep,
significant improvement in depression, stress, anxiety and fatigue in FM patients,
significant improvement in anxiety and fatigue in FM patients with ME/CFS,
reduced inflammation (decrease in IL-8, increase in IL-10) among FM patients,
increased ratio of cortisol/DHEA in all participants,
overall no significant benefits for improved pain, sleep quality or gastrointestinal health of the participants.
[96]
Long COVID patients (n = 70)“OMNi-BiOTiC®STRESS Repair 9” formulation:
Probiotics:
Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus acidophilus W22, Lactobacillus paracasei W20, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus plantarum W62, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23
Prebiotic:
Fructooligosaccharides, inulin
Bioactives:
Enzymes (amylases), Potassium chloride, Manganese sulfate, Vitamins B2, B6, and B12
Each sachet: 3 g
Probiotic: 7.5 × 109 CFU/total in sachet
Prebiotic: N/A
Bioactives:
Enzymes (amylases),
Potassium chloride,
Manganese sulfate,
Vitamins B2, B6 and B12
24 weeksSignificant reduction in fatigue on the FSS score vs. placebo,
significant improvement in the severity of depression,
significant improvement in quality of life, including physical functioning and general health,
improvement in digestion and reduction in GI complaints,
no effect on immune parameters
[97]
CFU—colony forming unit; n—number of participants.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurek, J.M.; Castro-Marrero, J. A Narrative Review on Gut Microbiome Disturbances and Microbial Preparations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Implications for Long COVID. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111545

AMA Style

Jurek JM, Castro-Marrero J. A Narrative Review on Gut Microbiome Disturbances and Microbial Preparations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Implications for Long COVID. Nutrients. 2024; 16(11):1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurek, Joanna Michalina, and Jesus Castro-Marrero. 2024. "A Narrative Review on Gut Microbiome Disturbances and Microbial Preparations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Implications for Long COVID" Nutrients 16, no. 11: 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111545

APA Style

Jurek, J. M., & Castro-Marrero, J. (2024). A Narrative Review on Gut Microbiome Disturbances and Microbial Preparations in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Implications for Long COVID. Nutrients, 16(11), 1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop