Next Article in Journal
The Role of Environmental and Nutritional Factors in the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Case–Control Study
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Dietary Acid Load and Chronic Kidney Disease in the Chinese Population: A Comprehensive Analysis of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (2009)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084

by
Seyed Khosrow Tayebati
1,*,
Ilenia Martinelli
1,
Michele Moruzzi
1,
Francesco Amenta
1 and
Daniele Tomassoni
2
1
School of Medicinal Sciences and Health Products, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
2
School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(15), 2462; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152462
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 6 June 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024
For the original publication [1] and upon request from the scientific community, the authors have not been able to provide the original data used to assemble Figure 1 and Figure 2. Thus, the authors have repeated the experiment and confirmed the original results. Figure 1 and Figure 2 have been accordingly updated.
A correction has been made to the second sentence in the last paragraph of Section 3.1, which now reads as follows:
Adhesion molecule VCAM-1 expression was not significantly decreased in the rat hippocampus after treatment with choline (Figure 2).
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Tayebati, S.K.; Martinelli, I.; Moruzzi, M.; Amenta, F.; Tomassoni, D. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Immunochemical analysis of the frontal cortex (FC), hippocampus (HIP) and cerebellum (CER) processed with different antibodies (anti-IL-1β, anti-IL-6 and anti-TNF-α). A: vehicle; B: choline-treated; and C: L-alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (GPC)-treated. The densitometric analysis of bands are expressed as ratio between optical density of protein and reference protein (β-actin) where the value of vehicle is set as 1. Data are the mean ± SD of three different experiments. White bar: A vehicle; Black bar: B Choline-treated; Gray bar: C GPC-treated.
Figure 1. Immunochemical analysis of the frontal cortex (FC), hippocampus (HIP) and cerebellum (CER) processed with different antibodies (anti-IL-1β, anti-IL-6 and anti-TNF-α). A: vehicle; B: choline-treated; and C: L-alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine (GPC)-treated. The densitometric analysis of bands are expressed as ratio between optical density of protein and reference protein (β-actin) where the value of vehicle is set as 1. Data are the mean ± SD of three different experiments. White bar: A vehicle; Black bar: B Choline-treated; Gray bar: C GPC-treated.
Nutrients 16 02462 g001
Figure 2. Immunochemical analysis of the frontal cortex (FC), hippocampus (HIP) and cerebellum (CER) processed with different antibodies (anti-VCAM-1 and anti-ICAM-1). A: vehicle; B: choline-treated; and C: GPC-treated. The densitometric analysis of bands are expressed as ratio between the optical density of protein and reference protein (β-actin) where the value of vehicle is set at 1. Data are the mean ± SD of three different experiments. White bar: A vehicle; Black bar: B Choline-treated; Gray bar: C GPC-treated.
Figure 2. Immunochemical analysis of the frontal cortex (FC), hippocampus (HIP) and cerebellum (CER) processed with different antibodies (anti-VCAM-1 and anti-ICAM-1). A: vehicle; B: choline-treated; and C: GPC-treated. The densitometric analysis of bands are expressed as ratio between the optical density of protein and reference protein (β-actin) where the value of vehicle is set at 1. Data are the mean ± SD of three different experiments. White bar: A vehicle; Black bar: B Choline-treated; Gray bar: C GPC-treated.
Nutrients 16 02462 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tayebati, S.K.; Martinelli, I.; Moruzzi, M.; Amenta, F.; Tomassoni, D. Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152462

AMA Style

Tayebati SK, Martinelli I, Moruzzi M, Amenta F, Tomassoni D. Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084. Nutrients. 2024; 16(15):2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow, Ilenia Martinelli, Michele Moruzzi, Francesco Amenta, and Daniele Tomassoni. 2024. "Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084" Nutrients 16, no. 15: 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152462

APA Style

Tayebati, S. K., Martinelli, I., Moruzzi, M., Amenta, F., & Tomassoni, D. (2024). Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084. Nutrients, 16(15), 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop