Next Article in Journal
Coleus forskohlii Extract Supplementation in Conjunction with a Hypocaloric Diet Reduces the Risk Factors of Metabolic Syndrome in Overweight and Obese Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Fat Quality Influences the Obesogenic Effect of High Fat Diets
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 7
Issue 11
10.3390/nu7115467
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood

by
Ho-Sun Lee
Epigenetics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Cedex 08, France
Nutrients 2015, 7(11), 9492-9507; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7115467
Submission received: 20 July 2015 / Revised: 18 October 2015 / Accepted: 26 October 2015 / Published: 17 November 2015
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exposure to environmental factors in early life can influence developmental processes and long-term health in humans. Early life nutrition and maternal diet are well-known examples of conditions shown to influence the risk of developing metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases, in adulthood. It is increasingly accepted that environmental compounds, including nutrients, can produce changes in the genome activity that, in spite of not altering the DNA sequence, can produce important, stable and, in some instances, transgenerational alterations in the phenotype. Epigenetics refers to changes in gene function that cannot be explained by changes in the DNA sequence, with DNA methylation patterns/histone modifications that can make important contributions to epigenetic memory. The epigenome can be considered as an interface between the genome and the environment that is central to the generation of phenotypes and their stability throughout the life course. To better understand the role of maternal health and nutrition in the initiation and progression of diseases in childhood and adulthood, it is necessary to identify the physiological and/or pathological roles of specific nutrients on the epigenome and how dietary interventions in utero and early life could modulate disease risk through epigenomic alteration.

1. Introduction

Maternal diet plays a critical role in fetal growth and development. Pregnancy is associated with increased nutritional needs due to the physiological changes of the mother and the metabolic demands of the embryo/fetus (conceptus). Therefore, the conceptus requires increased calories, macronutrients and micronutrients, for growth and development [1]. A growing number of studies focusing on the developmental origin of health and disease have identified links between early nutrition and disease, consistent with the “developmental origins of health and disease” (DOHaD) hypothesis [2]. This hypothesis postulates that early life development is critically sensitive to inadequate nutrition and other environmental factors, leading to permanent changes in development that can influence the health of an individual in later life and the risk of disease [2,3].
Although causal relationships have not been firmly established, recent advances in epigenetics provide insights into the mechanisms of early life predisposition to adult disease risk. Should some of the epigenetic mechanisms underlie developmental plasticity in the DOHaD and disease-related outcomes result from disruptions of the epigenome induced by the fetal environment, this emerging field may provide critical insights into the role of early life events on disease programming in childhood and adulthood [4]. Epigenetic modifications are stable during cell division, and they regulate gene activity states over cell generations [5]. During development, epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation, histone modification and microRNA expression, undergo substantial reconfiguration, which affects the genes and pathways that are essential for both early life development and later life physiological functions. Experimental studies supported the notion that prenatal nutritional constraints may induce an altered metabolic phenotype in the offspring, which constitute an increased risk of non-communicable diseases, including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, in humans [6,7]. However, the precise mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated.
Here, we review recent evidence on the potential of maternal diet in utero to counteract epigenetic alterations and phenotypic outcomes and discuss its implications on novel strategies for epigenetic chemoprevention during pregnancy.

2. Epigenetic Mechanisms

Epigenetic markers are enzyme-mediated chemical modifications of DNA and of its associated chromatin proteins. These modifications play key roles in regulating genomic functions, without altering the primary DNA sequence, and are transmitted with high fidelity over many cell generations. Such marks influence the transcriptional state and other functional aspects of chromatin. For examples, methylation of DNA and certain residues on the histone H3 N-terminal tail are important for transcriptional gene silencing and the formation of heterochromatin. The main epigenetic mechanisms are DNA methylation, histone modifications and microRNA, which are involved in the propagation of the chromatic structure and genome activity states.

2.1. DNA Methylation

DNA methylation is the most extensively-studied epigenetic modification that is mediated by a group of dedicated enzymes. Changing DNA methylation patterns in key elements of the gene, such as promoters and enhancers, can have a profound effect on gene function. The best characterized examples of methylation-mediated silencing mechanisms are genomic imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation and silencing of retrotransposons [8,9]. Imprinted genes specifically have one or more transcripts that are expressed preferentially or exclusively from one parental allele. This monoallelic expression is likely to be initiated by differential methylation between the oocyte and sperm in differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) at gametes. Soon after fertilization (periconceptional period), this differential methylation leads to additional molecular changes, including allele-specific methylation at somatic DMRs, which ultimately result in expression exclusively from one allele. It is perhaps during these periods of development, then the epigenome undergoing physical depletion, followed by renewal and being in a highly dynamic state of flux, that any endogenous or exogenous influences may be most likely to induce persistent changes in methylation. Maintenance of DNA methylation is mediated by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), and this process is relatively well understood at a biochemical level. In contrast, much remains to be learned about the establishment of DNA methylation (de novo methylation) and the mechanisms underlying its deregulation. In contrast, much remains to be learned about the establishment of DNA methylation (de novo methylation) and the mechanisms underlying its deregulation. Demethylation of the genome occurs during two developmental periods; during preimplantation development and in primordial germ cells (PGCs). As these mechanisms operate in strictly-defined stages of development, it is possible that these developmental periods (such as the peri-conceptual period) represent particularly sensitive windows of vulnerability. Rapid DNA demethylation of the paternal pronucleus occurs post-fertilization in the zygote, but before cell division and at least partly before DNA replication. This contrasts with the gradual loss of methylation from the maternal genome through the first few cleavage divisions in the embryos. After implantation, global de novo methylation is set up and maintained in somatic tissues. Concerning DNA demethylation mechanism in mammalian genomes, the 5mC hydroxylases TET1 and TET2 are also expressed in PGCs, suggesting the possibility that 5mC could be modified by different mechanisms (e.g., formylation, carboxylation, hydroxylation) in order to initiate active demethylation [10,11]. Thymine DNA glycosylase was also shown to be involved in these mechanisms [12]. Recently, tet3 was shown to be required for paternal and maternal DNA demethylation coupled to DNA replication [13].
DNA methylation is dependent on the one-carbon metabolism pathway, which depends on different enzymes, whose activities, in turn, rely on micronutrients supplied through the diet. Through an ATP-driven reaction, methionine is converted into S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the universal cellular methyl donor. Methyl-tetrahydrofolate (THF) acts as a methyl-group donor for the production of THF and is a precursor for homocysteine conversion to methionine. DNMTs covalently attach methyl groups from SAM to the carbon-5 position of cytosine bases, generating 5mC. Different nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism, such as folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, choline and methionine, play an important role in DNA methylation through their influence on SAM levels and methyltransferase inhibitor S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) levels. Other nutrients and bioactive food components, such as retinoic acid, resveratrol, curcumin, sulforaphane and tea polyphenols, can modulate epigenetic patterns by altering SAM and SAH levels or regulating DNA methylation and histone modifications in specific genes or at the genome-wide level. Some of these nutrients are currently evaluated as optimal maternal nutrition to modulate epigenetic mechanisms [14].

2.2. Histone Modification

Histones are basic proteins that facilitate the packaging of DNA in the nucleus and the regulation of gene expression on cells. Nucleosomes are composed of 147 bp of DNA wrapped around an octamer of core histone proteins, namely H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is also mediated by post-translational modifications, including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitinylation and SUMOylation, at the N-terminal tails of histones, thus contributing to genomic stability, DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoint integrity. Modifications in histone methylation are different between cell types and are associated with fetal development. Methylation of histone tails is not only restricted to lysines, but can also occur at arginine residues on the histone-H3 and -H4 tails (H3R2, H3R8, H3R17, H3R26 and H4R3). Several protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) have been associated with epigenetic regulation, in which PRMTs act as histone methyltransferases or secondary co-regulators of transcription, or facilitate mRNA splicing and stability. There are eleven known PRMTs (PRMT1–PRMT11) that have important roles in chromatin modeling and transcriptional states [15]. Among these, PRMT1 catalyzes the addition of two methyl groups to the same terminal guanidino-nitrogen group of arginine in proteins, resulting in methylation of PGC1-α, which then relays changes in fatty acid oxidation and energy metabolism [16]. Histone methylation can also be reversed by histone demethylases. The histone demethylase, jhdm2a, for example, was identified as a crucial regulator of the genes involved in energy expenditure and fat storage, suggesting that this enzyme may be a key factor in obesity and metabolic syndromes [17]. Histone acetylation is maintained by the interplay of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) [18]. Acetylation of lysine residues at the N-terminus of histone proteins is catalyzed by HATs, including GNAT, CBP/p300 and MYST. Notably, acetylation of lysine residues neutralizes the positive charge on histones, thereby decreasing the interaction of histone N-termini with the negatively-charged phosphate groups of DNA. Such histone modifications allow easier access to transcription factors [18]. Histone deacetylation is catalyzed by HDAC with the acetyl group transferred from the acetylated histone protein to coenzyme A. Recently, a new mechanism suggested that glucose metabolism is linked to chromatin modification and global transcriptional control via the enzyme ATP-citrate lyase and production of acetyl coenzyme A, hence providing additional evidence for a glucose-to-gene link [17]. From this consideration, histone modification may be one of the key mechanisms for controlling adipogenesis and energy homeostasis.

2.3. MicroRNA

The human genome contains only 20,000 protein-coding genes, representing <2% of the total genome, whereas a substantial fraction of the human genome can be transcribed, yielding many short- or noncoding-RNAs (ncRNAs) with limited protein-coding capacity. Among these, the most extensively-studied ncRNAs are microRNAs (miRNAs, 20–22 nt), which are evolutionarily conserved and located within the introns and exons of protein-coding genes (70%) or in intergenic regions (30%). Dietary factors have been shown to modify miRNA expression profiling, notably in maternal nutrition-induced epigenetic modifications in offspring with lipid metabolism, insulin resistance and inflammation [19,20,21]. However, the role of miRNAs in fetal programming remains largely understudied.

3. The Role of Epigenetics in Early Development and Disease

Epigenetic marks are critical for cellular differentiation during development and the differentiation of individual tissues [22]. Epigenetic reprogramming during embryo development induces the most extensive changes to the epigenetic state. The epigenetic state that is set during the reprogramming stages persists at some loci for the lifetime of an individual. Evidence to support a role of epigenetics in developmental programming of disease demonstrated the impact of a suboptimal intrauterine nutritional environment on the epigenome and phenotype of the offspring. For example, nutritional influences on developmental epigenetics were first suggested by studies on agouti mice with the viable yellow agouti (Avy) metastable epiallele (ME), associated with contraoriented intracisternal A particle proviral insertions, which encodes a paracrine signaling molecule. It promotes follicular melanocytes to produce a yellow-rather than black-colored coat, obesity, diabetes and increased susceptibility to tumors. Early life exposures can be “stored” in the cellular memory by inducing lasting changes in gene expression programs and molecular pathways with long-term effects. Consequently, alterations in DNA methylation and histone markers eventually contribute to the development of age-related and lifestyle-related diseases, such as metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, asthma, neurological disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer [1,23,24]. However, details remain largely undefined in human studies.

4. The Impact of Maternal Nutrition on Fetal Programming in Animal Models

Epigenetic effects of maternal nutrition on offspring during early development have been demonstrated using several animal models, including Avy and axin-fused (AxinFu) mice. Supplementation of methyl donors including folate during pregnancy increased DNA methylation of the agouti gene in Avy offspring , leading to low agouti expression and yellow to brown coat color [8]. AxinFu also exhibited epigenetic plasticity to maternal diet. Methyl donor supplementation of female mice during pregnancy induced DNA hypermethylation at AxinFu and, thereby, reduced by half the incidence of kinking in AxinFu/+ offspring [25]. A number of manipulations have also been used to induce offspring intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in animal models, including maternal calorie and protein restriction via epigenetic mechanisms [26,27]. Animal models have been used in an attempt to understand the molecular basis of the relationship between maternal dietary supplementation/deficiency and the development of adult diseases, like metabolic syndrome (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Effect of maternal nutritional exposure in utero on epigenetic modifications in animal studies.
Table 1. Effect of maternal nutritional exposure in utero on epigenetic modifications in animal studies.
NutrientsMechanismOutcomeModelTargetRef.
Methyl donors (1)DNA methylation↓↑ methylation of genes in rennin-angiotensin systemratliver[28]
Histone modificationSirt1 and pmrt1 expression ↓, PGC-1α acetylation ↑ratheart[29]
DNA methylation↓ methylation of PGC-1αratliver[29]
Methyl donors (2)DNA methylation↓ Methylation of Ptpn22 and Pparamousemucosa[30]
CholineDNA methylation↓ methylation of Vegfc and Angpt2 promotermousebrain[31]
Global methylation ↓
DNA methylation↓ methylation of Cdkn3 promotermousebrain[32]
Histone modification (3)H3K9me2 (active) and H3K27me3(repression) ↓ratliver[33]
H3K4me2 ↑ G9a and Suv39h1 (HMT) expression ↓ brain
Histone modification (4)H3K9me2 (active) and H3K27me3(repression) ↑ratliver[33]
H3K4me2 ↓; G9a and Suv39h1(HMT) expression ↑ brain
DNA methylation↑ methylation of IGF2, Dnmt1 expression ↓ratliver[34]
DNA methylationGlobal methylation ↑ratliver[35]
undernutritionDNA methylation↓ methylation of IGF2/h19sheepblood[36]
OverfeedingDNA methylation↑methylation of exon 3 in Pomcmiceblood[37]
DNA methylation↑ methylation within Sp1-related binding sequencesratbrain[38]
High fatHistone modification↑ acetylation of H3K9, H3K18 and H3K14macaqueliver [39]
DNA methylation↓ methylation of dopamine reuptake transporter andmousebrain[40]
μ-opioid receptor and preproenkephalin promoter
Histone modification↓SIRT expression, ↑ acetylation of H3K14macaqueliver[41]
Histone modification↓SIRT expressionratheart[42]
undernutritionDNA methylation↓ methylation of DMRsmousesperm[43]
DNA methylation↓↑methylation of 5′ UTR regionmouseliver[44]
ProteinDNA methylation↑ methylation of Wnt promoterratplacenta[45]
DNA methylationAgtr1b promoterratkidney[46]
Histone modification↓ Dnmt1 expression, ↓ methylation of GR 1 10 promoterratliver[47]
Histone modificationInteraction between Hnf4a enhancer and p2 promoterratliver[48]
pancreatic islets
DNA methylation↑ methylation of IGF2/H19 ICRratliver[49]
Histone modificationDmnt1,3a and Mbd2 expression ↑
DNA methylation↑ methylation of X-receptor promotermouseliver[50]
AlcoholHistone/Protein modification↑ acetylation of PTEN and TRB3, HAT activity ↑ratliver[51]
DNA methylation↑ methylation of Avy allele,mouseblood[52]
DNA methylationGlobal hypomethylationmouseblood[53]
DNA methylation↓ CTCF-binding site 2 of h19mousesperm[54]
Histone modification↑ HDAC (4,5,7) and SIRT2 protein levelratliver[55]
↑ acetyl-foxo1 protein level
(1) Folate, vitamin B12; (2) folate, vit B12, betaine and choline; (3) by choline deficiency; (4) by choline supplementation; Vegfc, VEGF-C; Angpt2, angiopoietin 2; Ppar α, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor α; Agtr1b, angiotensin II receptor, type 1b; Hnf4a, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a; Cdkn3, cyclin-dependent kinase; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; Avy, agouti viable yellow; DMR, differentially methylated region.

4.1. One-Carbon Metabolism-Related Nutrients

Methyl group metabolism has emerged as a metabolic process that has profound effects on diseases [56]. Methyl deficiency and the compensatory increase in Hcy are a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease [57]. For example, impaired activity of one-carbon metabolism enzymes may lead to an aberrant DNA methylation pattern and increased plasma Hcy, which is a toxic derivative that leads to vascular lesions. In addition, it was reported that restriction of folate, methionine and B vitamins during the periconceptional period resulted in altered DNA methylation, insulin resistance and elevated blood pressure observed in adult male offspring [58], as well as gene expression and methylation changes involved in the renin-angiotensin system, mitochondrion metabolism and phospholipid homeostasis [28]. Additionally, deficiencies in folate and vitamin B12 during gestation and lactation produced manifestations of fetal programming, with decreased birth weight, increased central fat mass, liver steatosis and myocardium hypertrophy in pups from deficient rat mothers [16]. The underlying molecular mechanisms are linked to the decreased expression and activity of SIRT1 and PRMT1 and the subsequent hyperacetylation and hypomethylation of PGC1-α [29]. However, methyl donor supplementation in utero also enhanced colitis susceptibility, which was associated with aberrant DNA methylation among genes associated with immunologic processes [30].
Choline may have important roles in fetal brain development, as maternal choline deficiency during pregnancy has been shown to modify the epigenome of the fetal brain. For example, Vegfc and Angpt2 [31], which are involved in angiogenesis signaling, and Cdkn3 [32], for cell proliferation, were hypomethylated in the fetal brain. Additionally, levels of H3K9me2 and H3K27Me3 (repressed) were upregulated in the fetal liver and brain by maternal choline supplementation, whereas levels of H3K4me2 (active) were highest in choline-deficient rats. This was further supported by experiments showing that H3K9me2 levels were correlated inversely with the induction of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) in both murine and human adipogenesis [33]. Prenatal choline deficiency also altered imprinted genes’, like IGF2, methylation and expression through effects on Dnmt1 in liver [34]. However, choline supply has also been shown to modify the DNA methylation and expression of genes involved in methionine and lipid metabolism in Wilson disease [35]. Therefore, the nutrients regulating maternal-fetal one-carbon metabolism may play important roles in the understanding of fetal programming and metabolic diseases.

4.2. Under-/Over-nutrition

Epidemiological studies have linked the impact of maternal nutrition with the etiology of chronic diseases in offspring in their adult life. Nutritional imbalances, such as under- and over-nutrition during critical periods, induce persistent physiological alterations. Maternal undernutrition during early pregnancy, in relation to a low birth weight and uterine growth restriction, may adversely influence offspring metabolism and health. There are several human and animal studies linking suboptimal early nutrition and poor growth in utero with increased risk of coronary disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and obesity in adulthood [59,60]. Some studies suggested that maternal undernutrition may accelerate early postnatal growth by an increased rate of gaining body fat rather than muscle tissue, with the implication that this was triggered by catch-up growth on insulin resistance [1,61]. Researchers investigated the biological process associated with this phenomenon and identified that epigenetic mechanisms can be responsible for this fetal programming. One of the most significant studies was conducted in children who were born to women exposed to severe undernutrition during pregnancy as a result of the Dutch Hunger Winter during World War II. This study reported a reduced methylation of the imprinted gene IGF2 in these individuals in adulthood [62]. Similarly, maternal undernutrition was associated with an increased risk of adult-onset metabolic syndrome, and the most consistently-observed epigenetic association with adiposity has been with that of methylation at the IGF2/H19 imprinting region [36,63]. Higher methylation levels at specific genes, including IL10, LEP, ABCA1, GNASAS and MEG3, were closely linked with nutrition metabolism, cardiovascular function and inflammation [64]. Moreover, alteration in hypothalamic cell proliferation and impaired hypothalamic response have been observed in perinatally-undernourished offspring [65].
With the recent rise in childhood obesity, maternal obesity and excessive gestational weight gain are now considered risk factors of many adverse offspring short- and long-term outcomes through epigenetic mechanisms [66]. Several studies have assessed the relationship between DNA methylation in obesity markers, including RXRα and NOS3, in umbilical cord blood cells with childhood adiposity [67], pre-proopiomelanocortin (POMC) in peripheral blood cells with an increased individual risk for the development of obesity [37], melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) in peripheral blood cells [68] and the androgen receptor (AR) promoter in peripheral blood leukocytes with body mass index (BMI) or fat mass [69]. These studies provided evidence that obesity is associated with altered epigenetic regulation of a number of metabolically-important genes. Maternal over-nutrition is also related to the origin of other metabolic diseases, such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia or insulin resistance and diabetes in offspring [70,71]. Maternal high fat diet (HFD) is associated with changes in hypothalamic regulation of body weight and energy homeostasis by altering the expression of leptin receptor, POMC and neuropeptide Y in offspring [72]. The mechanisms affected by nutritional challenges may alter permanent dysregulation of these hypothalamic circuits, including functional resistance to insulin and leptin, which may underlie permanently increased food intake and overweight status [38]. Further examples include global hyper-acetylation of histone H3 in the offspring [39] and alteration of methylation and expression of genes related to the mesocorticolimbic reward circuitry (dopamine and opioids) by maternal HFD [40]. SIRT1, a member of the HDAC family, promotes fat metabolism in adipocytes by repressing PPARγ, which means that upregulating SIRT1 increases lipolysis, thereby inducing fat loss. Additionally, SIRT1 is involved in the regulation of glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory activity [73,74,75]. Recent data have shown that maternal HFD leads to metabolic programming through increasing the acetylation of histone H3K14 and decreasing SIRT1 expression in fetal liver [41] and heart [42]. Therefore, SIRT1 is supposed to be an epigenetic target of the fetal development for susceptibility to metabolic outcomes.
A number of studies for the transgenerational effect of metabolic diseases have shown the effects of maternal perinatal under-/over-nutrition, even though the mechanisms underlying transgenerational effects of developing programming remain poorly understood. Maternal nutrition imbalance was shown to exhibit transgenerational effects through epigenetic and metabolic changes [76,77]. Recently, maternal malnutrition induced germline DNA methylation in sperms of the first generation in the intrauterine condition, which altered the metabolic phenotype in the second generation [43,44]. Therefore, maternal nutrition state in early life modulates “epigenetic programming” that modifies signals, which continues in later life in lipid metabolism, appetite, the reward pathway in the brain and inflammation, even via transgenerational transmission.

4.3. Protein Deficiency

The metabolism of amino acids, such as glycine, histidine, methionine and serine, plays a key role in supplying methyl donors for DNA and protein synthesis [78]. For example, IUGR rat model’s under gestational protein deficiency showed site-specific hypomethylation of the Wnt2 promoter in the placenta [45]. These findings were supported by the fact that Wnt2 promoter methylation in the placenta is associated with fetal growth. A low protein (LP) diet is associated with impaired fetal growth and the development of obesity, diabetes and hypertension in the offspring [79]; for example, prenatal protein restriction changed the amount of DNA methylation and expression of the agtr1b gene, which is implicated in hypertension [46]. LP maternal diet has also been reported to influence promoter methylation status and expression of the GR and PPAR genes in liver of mice offspring [47] via acetylation of histone H3 and H4 and methylation of H3K4. Both GR and PPARs are important for normal embryogenesis and regulation of blood pressure or lipids in adults [80,81]. These findings were supported by observations that insulin secretion is regulated by histone modifications. Hyperacetylation of H4 and hypermethylation of H3K4 play important roles in the β-cell-specific expression of the insulin gene [82]. Another example is the incidence of type 2 diabetes in rats, for which LP diets were associated with the epigenetic repression of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a (Hnf4a) in pancreatic islets. This gene encodes a transcription factor involved in β-cell differentiation and glucose homeostasis [48], as well as decreased cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a1) expression. LP diet during fetal development resulted in DNA hypermethylation of the H19/IGF2 locus with increased expressions of DNMT1, DNMT3a and methyl CpG binding domain protein 2 in liver of male offspring [49]. Additionally, LP diet was associated with DNA hypermethylation of the liver X-receptor (LXR)α promoter involved in glucose homeostasis and its target genes Abcg5/Abcg8 in fetal liver [50]. Similarly, an increase in mRNA and protein expression of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBPb), a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in energy homeostasis, was found to be altered in LP diet [58].

4.4. Alcohol Exposure

We include maternal alcohol intake in this review, given that alcohol interferes with nutritional supply to the fetal-placental unit and that a nutritionally inadequate maternal diet has been demonstrated to exacerbate the effects of ethanol [83]. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that prenatal ethanol exposure causes deficits in metabolic pathways in offspring, manifesting as increased whole-body adiposity, altered pancreatic beta cell structure, impaired glucose metabolism and insulin resistance [51,84]. A direct link exists between ethanol exposure and aberrations in DNA methylation [52]. Excessive alcohol is known to alter normal folate metabolism and to reduce its bioavailability. It was reported that alcohol-fed rats displayed reduced methionine synthase activity and low levels of both methionine and SAM [85]. Additionally, ethanol appears to enhance the loss of methyl groups, which, in turn, disrupts subsequent SAM-dependent transmethylation reactions [86]. For example, evaluating the effects of in utero ethanol exposure from Days 9–11 of gestation, acute ethanol administration to pregnant mice resulted in lower-than-normal methylation throughout the genome (i.e., in global hypomethylation) of fetal DNA [53]. Furthermore, the ethanol-exposed fetuses displayed significantly reduced levels of DNA methylase activity. Ethanol-induced reductions in DNA methylation affected not only the fetus, but also the placenta of pregnant mice [87]. More recently, researchers found that prenatal alcohol exposure was involved in the gene expression and methylation status of imprinted genes in the sperm of male offspring [54], a finding also observed in heavy alcohol drinkers [88]. Additional studies assessed the effects of alcohol on histone modifications. Prenatal alcohol exposure resulted in increases of histone deacetylase and the reduction of acetylation in foxo1 and PEPCK with glucose intolerance [55]. Yao et al. also reported that hepatic insulin resistance induced by alcohol exposure was associated with reduced acetylation of the TRB3 and PTEN proteins [51]. However, establishing a causality between prenatal alcohol exposure and epigenetic changes is still a challenge.

5. Human Studies with Diet and Its Impact on Epigenomics

Persistent epigenetic differences induced by environmental exposures may underlie such epidemiological observations. The Dutch hunger study on individuals conceived during the famine suggested that this famine was associated with different adverse metabolic phenotypes, such as higher BMI, elevated serum cholesterol or impaired glucose tolerance and increased risk of insulin resistance, depending on the phase of development at exposure [62]. However, such findings were difficult to replicate in other studies. In the Finnish famine cohort, individuals experiencing nutritional deprivation in utero exhibited a rise in mortality in early life, but went on to have a lifespan not significantly different from that of non-exposed individuals [89]. In a recent study on children born to mothers exposed to aflatoxin in Sub-Saharan Africa, maternal exposure to aflatoxin during the early stages of pregnancy was found to be associated with changes in the DNA methylation patterns of the infants [90], reinforcing the notion that exposure during critical periods of fetal development may have an impact on the epigenome and infant development
The importance of one-carbon metabolism in fetal programming was reported through evidence indicating that low maternal vitamin B12 levels correlate strongly with hyperhomocysteine levels and predicted higher offspring adiposity and higher insulin resistance [91,92] in humans. Global methylation and imprinted gene methylation were also modified by one-carbon metabolism [93,94]. Among the nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism, folic acid has been studied widely and is implemented universally for disease prevention (Table 2). In particular, the methylation of imprinted genes like IGF2/H19 DMR was well studied with maternal folate supplementation with ≥400 µg/day [95,96,97]. For the effect of choline supplementation, a higher maternal choline intake (930 vs. 480 mg/day) increased placental CRH and GR methylation and decreased placental CRH transcript abundance, indicating that extra choline during pregnancy decreased placental expression of cortisol-regulating genes [98]. Our group also reported that DHA supplementation with 400 mg/day during pregnancy induced DNA methylation changes in inflammatory genes and LINE-1, especially in infants born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy [99].
Table
Table 2. Intervention studies for maternal nutritional status and epigenetic profile in offspring.
Table 2. Intervention studies for maternal nutritional status and epigenetic profile in offspring.
NutrientsMechanismOutcomeSampleMethodRef.
Folate and Multivitamins (1)DNA methylation↓ methylation of IGF2 2R in girls, ↓ methylation of GTL2-2 in boysCord blood27k Illumina[93]
FolateDNA methylation↓ methylation of LINE1Cord bloodPyrosequencing[94]
DNA methylation↑ methylation of IGF2 DMRCord bloodEpi-typer[95]
DNA methylation↓ methylation of H19 DMR (4 CpGs)Cord bloodPyrosequencing[96]
DNA methylation↓ Methylation of PEG3 and LINE1; ↑ methylation of IGF2Cord bloodPyrosequencing[97]
CholineDNA methylation
Histone modification		↑ methylation of CRH, NR3C1 in placenta; ↓ methylation of CRH, NR3C1 in cord blood leukocyte; ↑ H3K9me2Placenta, cord bloodLC-MS/MS[98]
DHADNA methylation↑ LINE1 methylation ↑ INFγ/IL13 methylation ratioCord bloodPyrosequencing[99]
(1) Zinc and vitamins A, B, C and D; PEG3, paternally-expressed gene 3; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; NR3C1, nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1.
Metastable epialleles are characterized by stochastic exposure and are more likely to be affected by environmental exposure. Waterland et al. used genome-wide methylation-specific analysis for ME screening to identify differences in DNA methylation based on the season of conception (dry/rainy) in rural Gambia. Distinct loci during the rainy season resulted in significantly higher DNA methylation, providing evidence suggesting that environmental changes also affected ME [100,101]. Similarly, Cooper et al. reported sex-specific effects of micronutrient supplementation, with reduced methylation levels at two of the DMRs in imprinted genes, IGF2R in girls and GTL2-2 in boys [93]. High levels of animal proteins and low-carbohydrate diet during pregnancy have been shown to be associated with increases in blood pressure and cortisol in response to stress in adults [102]. Drake et al. reported that maternal unbalanced diet (rich in proteins and low in carbohydrates) in early life correlates with methylation at specific candidate loci some 40 years later in the offspring. The authors also found changes in methylations within GR, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 and IGF2, which were positively associated with increased adiposity and blood pressure in adults [103].
Not only maternal, but also paternal diet may regulate epigenetic modification in the offspring. The Swedish Overkalix cohort study showed that food supply in the adolescence of paternal grandparents correlated with the grandchild’s longevity and susceptibility to the risk of cardiovascular death or diabetic disease. In a Dutch famine study, the offspring of prenatally-undernourished fathers, but not mothers, was heavier and more obese than that of fathers and mothers who had not been undernourished prenatally [104]. The epigenetic gametic inheritance may be a possible explanation indicating the effects of paternal nutrition on developmental programming, which might be a transgenerational phenomenon and can be viewed as a form of epigenetic inheritance [105]. However, such evidence is still lacking in humans.

6. Summary and Conclusions

Distinct programs of gene expression underlying the development of different cell lineages and tissues are executed (with minor exceptions) without changes in the genome (DNA sequence). Epigenetic reprogramming is essential during embryonic and early postnatal development, and epigenetic deregulation is recognized to play a role in the etiology of several developmental syndromes. Current literature clearly shows that the effects of various in utero exposures and maternal nutritional status may have different effects on the epigenome. However, critical windows of exposure that seem to exist during development need to be better defined. Although it is widely agreed that suboptimal maternal nutrition has a negative impact on the health of the offspring, effective intervention strategies aiming to modulate the epigenome and to prevent the development of complex human diseases, as a consequence of nutritional programming, is still challenging. To obtain a better understanding of the role of maternal health and nutrition in the initiation and progression of metabolic and other disorders, it is necessary to identify the common mechanisms and pathways involved in disparate perinatal malnutrition paradigms in order to decipher the physiological and/or pathological roles of specific nutrients.

Abbreviations

DOHaD: developmental origins of health and disease; DMRs: differentially-methylated regions; DNMTs: DNA methyltransferases; PGCs: primordial germ cells; SAM: S-adenosylmethionine; SAH: S-adenosylhomocysteine; HMTs: histone methyltransferases; HATs: histone acetyltransferases; HDACs: histone deacetylases; Avy: viable yellow agouti; Angp2: angioprotein 2; PPARγ: peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor γ; LP: low protein; Cdkn3: cyclin-dependent kinases 3; GR: glucocorticoid receptor; Hnf4a: hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a; Cyp7a1: cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase; LXR: X-receptor; C/EBPb: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; POMC: pre-proopiomelanocortin; MCHR1: hormone receptor 1; HFD: maternal high fat diet; CEP: CREB binding protein; MEs: metastable epialleles; PEG3: paternally-expressed gene 3; CRH: corticotropin releasing hormone; NR3C1: nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.J.; Wu, Z.L.; Li, D.F.; Li, N.; Dindot, S.V.; Satterfield, M.C.; Bazer, F.W.; Wu, G.Y. Nutrition, epigenetics, and metabolic syndrome. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 282–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barker, D.J. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 261, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wadhwa, P.D.; Buss, C.; Entringer, S.; Swanson, J.M. Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A.; Cooper, C.; Thornburg, K.L. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aiken, C.E.; Ozanne, S.E. Transgenerational developmental programming. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vickers, M.H. Early life nutrition, epigenetics and programming of later life disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Balbus, J.M.; Barouki, R.; Birnbaum, L.S.; Etzel, R.A.; Gluckman, P.D., Sr.; Grandjean, P.; Hancock, C.; Hanson, M.A.; Heindel, J.J.; Hoffman, K.; et al. Early-life prevention of non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2013, 381, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waterland, R.A.; Jirtle, R.L. Transposable elements: Targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 5293–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, E.; Beard, C.; Jaenisch, R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 1993, 366, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, H.; Zhang, Y. Reversing DNA methylation: Mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 2014, 156, 45–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ito, S.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Taranova, O.V.; Hong, K.; Sowers, L.C.; Zhang, Y. Role of tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, es-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 2010, 466, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schubeler, D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature 2015, 517, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shen, L.; Inoue, A.; He, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, F.; Zhang, Y. Tet3 and DNA replication mediate demethylation of both the maternal and paternal genomes in mouse zygotes. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chango, A.; Pogribny, I.P. Considering maternal dietary modulators for epigenetic regulation and programming of the fetal epigenome. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2748–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jahan, S.; Davie, J.R. Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTS): Role in chromatin organization. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2015, 57, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gueant, J.L.; Namour, F.; Gueant-Rodriguez, R.M.; Daval, J.L. Folate and fetal programming: A play in epigenomics? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 24, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Portha, B.; Fournier, A.; Kioon, M.D.; Mezger, V.; Movassat, J. Early environmental factors, alteration of epigenetic marks and metabolic disease susceptibility. Biochimie 2014, 97, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grunstein, M. Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature 1997, 389, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Didelot, X.; Bruce, K.D.; Cagampang, F.R.; Vatish, M.; Hanson, M.; Lehnert, H.; Ceriello, A.; Byrne, C.D. Maternal high fat diet during pregnancy and lactation alters hepatic expression of insulin like growth factor-2 and key micrornas in the adult offspring. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pan, S.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, R.; Yang, X. Microrna-130b and microrna-374b mediate the effect of maternal dietary protein on offspring lipid metabolism in meishan pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 1731–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Alejandro, E.U.; Gregg, B.; Wallen, T.; Kumusoglu, D.; Meister, D.; Chen, A.; Merrins, M.J.; Satin, L.S.; Liu, M.; Arvan, P.; et al. Maternal diet-induced micrornas and mtor underlie beta cell dysfunction in offspring. J. Clin. Invest. 2014, 124, 4395–4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Coppieters, N.; Dragunow, M. Epigenetics in alzheimer’s disease: A focus on DNA modifications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011, 17, 3398–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Easwaran, H.; Tsai, H.C.; Baylin, S.B. Cancer epigenetics: Tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 716–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Waterland, R.A.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Lin, J.R.; Smith, C.A.; Shi, X.; Tahiliani, K.G. Maternal methyl supplements increase offspring DNA methylation at axin fused. Genesis 2006, 44, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fu, Q.; Yu, X.; Callaway, C.W.; Lane, R.H.; McKnight, R.A. Epigenetics: Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) modifies the histone code along the rat hepatic IGF-1 gene. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 2438–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, P.Y.; Ganguly, A.; Rubbi, L.; Orozco, L.D.; Morselli, M.; Ashraf, D.; Jaroszewicz, A.; Feng, S.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Nakano, A.; et al. Intrauterine calorie restriction affects placental DNA methylation and gene expression. Physiol. Genomics 2013, 45, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, G.; Broseus, J.; Hergalant, S.; Donnart, A.; Chevalier, C.; Bolanos-Jimenez, F.; Gueant, J.L.; Houlgatte, R. Identification of master genes involved in liver key functions through transcriptomics and epigenomics of methyl donor deficiency in rat: Relevance to nonalcoholic liver disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gueant, J.L.; Elakoum, R.; Ziegler, O.; Coelho, D.; Feigerlova, E.; Daval, J.L.; Gueant-Rodriguez, R.M. Nutritional models of foetal programming and nutrigenomic and epigenomic dysregulations of fatty acid metabolism in the liver and heart. Pflugers Arch. 2014, 466, 833–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schaible, T.D.; Harris, R.A.; Dowd, S.E.; Smith, C.W.; Kellermayer, R. Maternal methyl-donor supplementation induces prolonged murine offspring colitis susceptibility in association with mucosal epigenetic and microbiomic changes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 1687–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mehedint, M.G.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Maternal dietary choline deficiency alters angiogenesis in fetal mouse hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12834–12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Niculescu, M.D.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Dietary choline deficiency alters global and gene-specific DNA methylation in the developing hippocampus of mouse fetal brains. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Davison, J.M.; Mellott, T.J.; Kovacheva, V.P.; Blusztajn, J.K. Gestational choline supply regulates methylation of histone H3, expression of histone methyltransferases G9a (Kmt1c) and Suv39h1 (Kmt1a), and DNA methylation of their genes in rat fetal liver and brain. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1982–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kovacheva, V.P.; Mellott, T.J.; Davison, J.M.; Wagner, N.; Lopez-Coviella, I.; Schnitzler, A.C.; Blusztajn, J.K. Gestational choline deficiency causes global and IGF2 gene DNA hypermethylation by up-regulation of dnmt1 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31777–31788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Medici, V.; Shibata, N.M.; Kharbanda, K.K.; Islam, M.S.; Keen, C.L.; Kim, K.; Tillman, B.; French, S.W.; Halsted, C.H.; LaSalle, J.M. Maternal choline modifies fetal liver copper, gene expression, DNA methylation, and neonatal growth in the tx-j mouse model of wilson disease. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Williams-Wyss, O.; Zhang, S.; MacLaughlin, S.M.; Kleemann, D.; Walker, S.K.; Suter, C.M.; Cropley, J.E.; Morrison, J.L.; Roberts, C.T.; McMillen, I.C. Embryo number and periconceptional undernutrition in the sheep have differential effects on adrenal epigenotype, growth, and development. American journal of physiology. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 307, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kuehnen, P.; Mischke, M.; Wiegand, S.; Sers, C.; Horsthemke, B.; Lau, S.; Keil, T.; Lee, Y.A.; Grueters, A.; Krude, H. An Alu element-associated hypermethylation variant of the pomc gene is associated with childhood obesity. PLoS Genetics 2012, 8, e1002543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Plagemann, A.; Harder, T.; Brunn, M.; Harder, A.; Roepke, K.; Wittrock-Staar, M.; Ziska, T.; Schellong, K.; Rodekamp, E.; Melchior, K.; et al. Hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin promoter methylation becomes altered by early overfeeding: An epigenetic model of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 4963–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Aagaard-Tillery, K.M.; Grove, K.; Bishop, J.; Ke, X.; Fu, Q.; McKnight, R.; Lane, R.H. Developmental origins of disease and determinants of chromatin structure: Maternal diet modifies the primate fetal epigenome. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008, 41, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vucetic, Z.; Kimmel, J.; Totoki, K.; Hollenbeck, E.; Reyes, T.M. Maternal high-fat diet alters methylation and gene expression of dopamine and opioid-related genes. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 4756–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Suter, M.A.; Chen, A.; Burdine, M.S.; Choudhury, M.; Harris, R.A.; Lane, R.H.; Friedman, J.E.; Grove, K.L.; Tackett, A.J.; Aagaard, K.M. A maternal high-fat diet modulates fetal SIRT1 histone and protein deacetylase activity in nonhuman primates. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 5106–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Borengasser, S.J.; Kang, P.; Faske, J.; Gomez-Acevedo, H.; Blackburn, M.L.; Badger, T.M.; Shankar, K. High fat diet and in utero exposure to maternal obesity disrupts circadian rhythm and leads to metabolic programming of liver in rat offspring. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Radford, E.J.; Ito, M.; Shi, H.; Corish, J.A.; Yamazawa, K.; Isganaitis, E.; Seisenberger, S.; Hore, T.A.; Reik, W.; Erkek, S.; et al. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism. Science 2014, 345, 1255903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Martinez, D.; Pentinat, T.; Ribo, S.; Daviaud, C.; Bloks, V.W.; Cebria, J.; Villalmanzo, N.; Kalko, S.G.; Ramon-Krauel, M.; Diaz, R.; et al. In utero undernutrition in male mice programs liver lipid metabolism in the second-generation offspring involving altered lxra DNA methylation. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Reamon-Buettner, S.M.; Buschmann, J.; Lewin, G. Identifying placental epigenetic alterations in an intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) rat model induced by gestational protein deficiency. Reprod. Toxicol. 2014, 45, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bogdarina, I.; Welham, S.; King, P.J.; Burns, S.P.; Clark, A.J. Epigenetic modification of the renin-angiotensin system in the fetal programming of hypertension. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lillycrop, K.A.; Slater-Jefferies, J.L.; Hanson, M.A.; Godfrey, K.M.; Jackson, A.A.; Burdge, G.C. Induction of altered epigenetic regulation of the hepatic glucocorticoid receptor in the offspring of rats fed a protein-restricted diet during pregnancy suggests that reduced DNA methyltransferase-1 expression is involved in impaired DNA methylation and changes in histone modifications. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 97, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Sandovici, I.; Smith, N.H.; Nitert, M.D.; Ackers-Johnson, M.; Uribe-Lewis, S.; Ito, Y.; Jones, R.H.; Marquez, V.E.; Cairns, W.; Tadayyon, M.; et al. Maternal diet and aging alter the epigenetic control of a promoter-enhancer interaction at the Hnf4a gene in rat pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5449–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gong, L.; Pan, Y.X.; Chen, H. Gestational low protein diet in the rat mediates IGF2 gene expression in male offspring via altered hepatic DNA methylation. Epigenetics 2010, 5, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Van Straten, E.M.E.; Bloks, V.W.; Huijkman, N.C.A.; Baller, J.F.W.; van Meer, H.; Lutjohann, D.; Kuipers, F.; Plosch, T. The liver x-receptor gene promoter is hypermethylated in a mouse model of prenatal protein restriction. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 298, R275–R282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yao, X.H.; Nyomba, B.L. Hepatic insulin resistance induced by prenatal alcohol exposure is associated with reduced PTEN and TRB3 acetylation in adult rat offspring. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 294, R1797–R1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ungerer, M.; Knezovich, J.; Ramsay, M. In utero alcohol exposure, epigenetic changes, and their consequences. Alcohol Res. Curr. Rev. 2013, 35, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  53. Garro, A.J.; McBeth, D.L.; Lima, V.; Lieber, C.S. Ethanol consumption inhibits fetal DNA methylation in mice: Implications for the fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 1991, 15, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stouder, C.; Somm, E.; Paoloni-Giacobino, A. Prenatal exposure to ethanol: A specific effect on the H19 gene in sperm. Reprod. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yao, X.H.; Nguyen, H.K.; Nyomba, B.L. Prenatal ethanol exposure causes glucose intolerance with increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and histone deacetylases in adult rat offspring: Reversal by tauroursodeoxycholic acid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Schalinske, K.L.; Smazal, A.L. Homocysteine imbalance: A pathological metabolic marker. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Blom, H.J.; Smulders, Y. Overview of homocysteine and folate metabolism. With special references to cardiovascular disease and neural tube defects. J. Inherited Metabol. Dis. 2011, 34, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sinclair, K.D.; Allegrucci, C.; Singh, R.; Gardner, D.S.; Sebastian, S.; Bispham, J.; Thurston, A.; Huntley, J.F.; Rees, W.D.; Maloney, C.A.; et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19351–19356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Barker, D.J.; Forsen, T.; Eriksson, J.G.; Osmond, C. Growth and living conditions in childhood and hypertension in adult life: A longitudinal study. J. Hypertens. 2002, 20, 1951–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Forsen, T.; Eriksson, J.G.; Tuomilehto, J.; Osmond, C.; Barker, D.J. Growth in utero and during childhood among women who develop coronary heart disease: Longitudinal study. BMJ 1999, 319, 1403–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zheng, S.; Rollet, M.; Pan, Y.X. Maternal protein restriction during pregnancy induces CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBPβ) expression through the regulation of histone modification at its promoter region in female offspring rat skeletal muscle. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Heijmans, B.T.; Tobi, E.W.; Stein, A.D.; Putter, H.; Blauw, G.J.; Susser, E.S.; Slagboom, P.E.; Lumey, L.H. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17046–17049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hernandez-Valero, M.A.; Rother, J.; Gorlov, I.; Frazier, M.; Gorlova, O. Interplay between polymorphisms and methylation in the H19/ IGF2 gene region may contribute to obesity in mexican-american children. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2013, 4, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tobi, E.W.; Lumey, L.; Talens, R.P.; Kremer, D.; Putter, H.; Stein, A.D.; Slagboom, P.E.; Heijmans, B.T. DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 4046–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Garcia, A.P.; Palou, M.; Sanchez, J.; Priego, T.; Palou, A.; Pico, C. Moderate caloric restriction during gestation in rats alters adipose tissue sympathetic innervation and later adiposity in offspring. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shankar, K.; Harrell, A.; Liu, X.; Gilchrist, J.M.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M. Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring. Am. J. Physiol. Reg. I. 2008, 294, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Godfrey, K.M.; Sheppard, A.; Gluckman, P.D.; Lillycrop, K.A.; Burdge, G.C.; McLean, C.; Rodford, J.; Slater-Jefferies, J.L.; Garratt, E.; Crozier, S.R.; et al. Epigenetic gene promoter methylation at birth is associated with child’s later adiposity. Diabetes 2011, 60, 1528–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Stepanow, S.; Reichwald, K.; Huse, K.; Gausmann, U.; Nebel, A.; Rosenstiel, P.; Wabitsch, M.; Fischer-Posovszky, P.; Platzer, M. Allele-specific, age-dependent and bmi-associated DNA methylation of human mchr1. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Moverare-Skrtic, S.; Mellstrom, D.; Vandenput, L.; Ehrich, M.; Ohlsson, C. Peripheral blood leukocyte distribution and body mass index are associated with the methylation pattern of the androgen receptor promoter. Endocrine 2009, 35, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lillycrop, K.A. Symposium 1: Nutrition and epigenetics effect of maternal diet on the epigenome: Implications for human metabolic disease. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2011, 70, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Pasternak, Y.; Aviram, A.; Poraz, I.; Hod, M. Maternal nutrition and offspring’s adulthood NCD’s: A review. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 26, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, H.; Simar, D.; Lambert, K.; Mercier, J.; Morris, M.J. Maternal and postnatal overnutrition differentially impact appetite regulators and fuel metabolism. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 5348–5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, E.J.; Um, S.J. Sirt1: Roles in aging and cancer. BMB Rep. 2008, 41, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nogueiras, R.; Habegger, K.M.; Chaudhary, N.; Finan, B.; Banks, A.S.; Dietrich, M.O.; Horvath, T.L.; Sinclair, D.A.; Pfluger, P.T.; Tschop, M.H. Sirtuin 1 and sirtuin 3: Physiological modulators of metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2012, 92, 1479–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liang, F.; Kume, S.; Koya, D. SIRT1 and insulin resistance. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2009, 5, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Burdge, G.C.; Hoile, S.P.; Uller, T.; Thomas, N.A.; Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A.; Lillycrop, K.A. Progressive, transgenerational changes in offspring phenotype and epigenotype following nutritional transition. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Radford, E.J.; Isganaitis, E.; Jimenez-Chillaron, J.; Schroeder, J.; Molla, M.; Andrews, S.; Didier, N.; Charalambous, M.; McEwen, K.; Marazzi, G.; et al. An unbiased assessment of the role of imprinted genes in an intergenerational model of developmental programming. PLoS Gen. 2012, 8, e1002605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wu, G. Amino acids: Metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids 2009, 37, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wu, G.; Bazer, F.W.; Datta, S.; Johnson, G.A.; Li, P.; Satterfield, M.C.; Spencer, T.E. Proline metabolism in the conceptus: Implications for fetal growth and development. Amino Acids 2008, 35, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Roszer, T.; Ricote, M. Ppars in the renal regulation of systemic blood pressure. PPAR Res. 2010, 2010, 698730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cole, T.J.; Blendy, J.A.; Schmid, W.; Strahle, U.; Schutz, G. Expression of the mouse glucocorticoid receptor and its role during development. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993, 47, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Chakrabarti, S.K.; Francis, J.; Ziesmann, S.M.; Garmey, J.C.; Mirmira, R.G. Covalent histone modifications underlie the developmental regulation of insulin gene transcription in pancreatic beta cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 23617–23623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shankar, K.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M. Effects of pregnancy and nutritional status on alcohol metabolism. Alcohol Res. Health 2007, 30, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Dobson, C.C.; Mongillo, D.L.; Brien, D.C.; Stepita, R.; Poklewska-Koziell, M.; Winterborn, A.; Holloway, A.C.; Brien, J.F.; Reynolds, J.N. Chronic prenatal ethanol exposure increases adiposity and disrupts pancreatic morphology in adult guinea pig offspring. Nutri. Diabetes 2012, 2, e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Halsted, C.H.; Villanueva, J.A.; Devlin, A.M.; Chandler, C.J. Metabolic interactions of alcohol and folate. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2367S–2372S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Schalinske, K.L.; Nieman, K.M. Disruption of methyl group metabolism by ethanol. Nutr. Rev. 2005, 63, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Haycock, P.C.; Ramsay, M. Exposure of mouse embryos to ethanol during preimplantation development: Effect on DNA methylation in the h19 imprinting control region. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ouko, L.A.; Shantikumar, K.; Knezovich, J.; Haycock, P.; Schnugh, D.J.; Ramsay, M. Effect of alcohol consumption on cpg methylation in the differentially methylated regions of H19 and IG-DMR in male gametes: Implications for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2009, 33, 1615–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Doblhammer, G.; van den Berg, G.J.; Lumey, L.H. A re-analysis of the long-term effects on life expectancy of the great finnish famine of 1866–68. Popul. Stud. (Camb.) 2013, 67, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hernandez-Vargas, H.; Castelino, J.; Silver, M.J.; Dominguez-Salas, P.; Cros, M.P.; Durand, G.; Calvez-Kelm, F.L.; Prentice, A.M.; Wild, C.P.; Moore, S.E.; et al. Exposure to aflatoxin B1 in utero is associated with DNA methylation in white blood cells of infants in the gambia. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 44, 1238–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Yajnik, C.S.; Deshpande, S.S.; Jackson, A.A.; Refsum, H.; Rao, S.; Fisher, D.J.; Bhat, D.S.; Naik, S.S.; Coyaji, K.J.; Joglekar, C.V.; et al. Vitamin B12 and folate concentrations during pregnancy and insulin resistance in the offspring: The pune maternal nutrition study. Diabetologia 2008, 51, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Refsum, H.; Yajnik, C.S.; Gadkari, M.; Schneede, J.; Vollset, S.E.; Orning, L.; Guttormsen, A.B.; Joglekar, A.; Sayyad, M.G.; Ulvik, A.; et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated methylmalonic acid indicate a high prevalence of cobalamin deficiency in asian indians. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 74, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Cooper, W.N.; Khulan, B.; Owens, S.; Elks, C.E.; Seidel, V.; Prentice, A.M.; Belteki, G.; Ong, K.K.; Affara, N.A.; Constancia, M.; et al. DNA methylation profiling at imprinted loci after periconceptional micronutrient supplementation in humans: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 1782–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fryer, A.A.; Nafee, T.M.; Ismail, K.M.K.; Carroll, W.D.; Emes, R.D.; Farrell, W.E. Line-1 DNA methylation is inversely correlated with cord plasma homocysteine in man a preliminary study. Epigenetics 2009, 4, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.; Obermann-Borst, S.A.; Kremer, D.; Lindemans, J.; Siebel, C.; Steegers, E.A.; Slagboom, P.E.; Heijmans, B.T. Periconceptional maternal folic acid use of 400 μg per day is related to increased methylation of the IGF2 gene in the very young child. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hoyo, C.; Murtha, A.P.; Schildkraut, J.M.; Jirtle, R.; Demark-Wahnefried, W.; Forman, M.R.; Iversen, E.S.; Kurtzberg, J.; Overcash, F.; Huang, Z.Q.; et al. Methylation variation at IGF2 differentially methylated regions and maternal folic acid use before and during pregnancy. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Haggarty, P.; Hoad, G.; Campbell, D.M.; Horgan, G.W.; Piyathilake, C.; McNeill, G. Folate in pregnancy and imprinted gene and repeat element methylation in the offspring. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 97, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jiang, X.; Yan, J.; West, A.A.; Perry, C.A.; Malysheva, O.V.; Devapatla, S.; Pressman, E.; Vermeylen, F.; Caudill, M.A. Maternal choline intake alters the epigenetic state of fetal cortisol-regulating genes in humans. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 3563–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lee, H.S.; Barraza-Villarreal, A.; Hernandez-Vargas, H.; Sly, P.D.; Biessy, C.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Romieu, I.; Herceg, Z. Modulation of DNA methylation states and infant immune system by dietary supplementation with omega-3 PUFA during pregnancy in an intervention study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Waterland, R.A.; Kellermayer, R.; Laritsky, E.; Rayco-Solon, P.; Harris, R.A.; Travisano, M.; Zhang, W.J.; Torskaya, M.S.; Zhang, J.X.; Shen, L.L.; et al. Season of conception in rural gambia affects DNA methylation at putative human metastable epialleles. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Silver, M.J.; Kessler, N.J.; Hennig, B.J.; Dominguez-Salas, P.; Laritsky, E.; Baker, M.S.; Coarfa, C.; Hernandez-Vargas, H.; Castelino, J.M.; Routledge, M.N.; et al. Independent genomewide screens identify the tumor suppressor VTRNA2-1 as a human epiallele responsive to periconceptional environment. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Shiell, A.W.; Campbell-Brown, M.; Haselden, S.; Robinson, S.; Godfrey, K.M.; Barker, D.J. High-meat, low-carbohydrate diet in pregnancy: Relation to adult blood pressure in the offspring. Hypertension 2001, 38, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Drake, A.J.; McPherson, R.C.; Godfrey, K.M.; Cooper, C.; Lillycrop, K.A.; Hanson, M.A.; Meehan, R.R.; Seckl, J.R.; Reynolds, R.M. An unbalanced maternal diet in pregnancy associates with offspring epigenetic changes in genes controlling glucocorticoid action and foetal growth. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2012, 77, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Veenendaal, M.V.; Painter, R.C.; de Rooij, S.R.; Bossuyt, P.M.; van der Post, J.A.; Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A.; Roseboom, T.J. Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch famine. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Waterland, R.A.; Travisano, M.; Tahiliani, K.G.; Rached, M.T.; Mirza, S. Methyl donor supplementation prevents transgenerational amplification of obesity. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 2008, 32, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.-S. Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9492-9507. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7115467

AMA Style

Lee H-S. Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood. Nutrients. 2015; 7(11):9492-9507. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7115467

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ho-Sun. 2015. "Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood" Nutrients 7, no. 11: 9492-9507. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7115467

APA Style

Lee, H. -S. (2015). Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood. Nutrients, 7(11), 9492-9507. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7115467

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop