Next Article in Journal
Time-Dependent Changes in the Intestinal Microbiome of Gilts Exposed to Low Zearalenone Doses
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Essential Oil Citral on the Growth, Mycotoxin Biosynthesis and Transcriptomic Profile of Alternaria alternata
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence for Snake Venom Plasticity in a Long-Term Study with Individual Captive Bothrops atrox
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aspergillus flavus as a Model System to Test the Biological Activity of Botanicals: An Example on Citrullus colocynthis L. Schrad. Organic Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fengycin Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Inhibits Fusarium graminearum Growth and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis

1
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Development Center of Science and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100176, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(5), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050295
Submission received: 25 April 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 17 May 2019 / Published: 24 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocontrol Agents and Natural Compounds against Mycotoxinogenic Fungi)

Abstract

:
Fusarium graminearum is a notorious pathogen that causes Fusarium head blight (FHB) in cereal crops. It produces secondary metabolites, such as deoxynivalenol, diminishing grain quality and leading to lesser crop yield. Many strategies have been developed to combat this pathogenic fungus; however, considering the lack of resistant cultivars and likelihood of environmental hazards upon using chemical pesticides, efforts have shifted toward the biocontrol of plant diseases, which is a sustainable and eco-friendly approach. Fengycin, derived from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42, was purified from the crude extract by HPLC and further analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS. Its application resulted in structural deformations in fungal hyphae, as observed via scanning electron microscopy. In planta experiment revealed the ability of fengycin to suppress F. graminearum growth and highlighted its capacity to combat disease incidence. Fengycin significantly suppressed F. graminearum, and also reduced the deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON), 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON), and zearalenone (ZEN) production in infected grains. To conclude, we report that fengycin produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 has potential as a biocontrol agent against F. graminearum and can also inhibit the mycotoxins produced by this fungus.
Key Contribution: Fengycin produced from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 can inhibit F. graminearum growth and pathogenicity and have negative impact on mycotoxins biosynthesis.

1. Introduction

China is the leading producer of wheat worldwide, and Fusarium graminearum is a major causal agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics in the country, affecting various cereal crops, either in the field or upon their storage in humid conditions [1,2]. Infections in the field can occur at any stage, from anthesis to kernel development, and this plant pathogenic fungus mainly infects florets. Under favorable environmental conditions, an infection can be established within 3 to 4 days. F. graminearum produces numerous potentially important mycotoxins. Deoxynivalenol (DON) is the most abundant form of the trichothecenes found in grain and is a sesquiterpenoid. Acetylated derivatives of DON, less toxic than DON, are also found in grains 15-ADON. While trichothecenes are known to be produced during the early stages of the infection process in host plants, the most common non-steroidal estrogenic mycotoxins and Zearalenol (ZEN) is produced at the end of the infection process [3]. Fungus invades and colonizes grains and produces deoxynivalenol [4], which is the most common mycotoxin. Infected seeds show reduced germination and produce weaker seedlings. DON is the final product of the trichothecene biosynthetic pathway. It causes several biological disturbances and acts as an inhibitor during protein synthesis [5]; moreover, it is highly toxic, and thus unfit for the consumption of humans or animals [1,6]. FHB management remains challenging. There are still very few varieties of wheat that are highly resistant to F. graminearum. Synthetic chemicals are effective for controlling FHB in wheat; however, they are inevitably associated with environmental pollution and resistance development in F. graminearum [7]. Therefore, to control FHB in wheat, it is of high urgency to explore alternative management strategies that are not only reliable but also less toxic to the environment.
To date, biocontrol agents have attracted huge scientific attention as they are environmentally friendly [8]. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are evidently promising for suppressing various fungal diseases and stimulating plant growth. Many PGPR strains have been successfully formulated as biopesticides to control plant diseases [9]. Bacillus spp. are the most promising antagonistic PGPR. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (now called B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum FZB42) is a Gram-positive strain and well known for its antagonistic activity, extensive rhizosphere colonization, and plant growth stimulation [10,11]. This strain reportedly produces secondary metabolites that suppress soil-borne plant pathogens; genome analysis of FZB42 revealed 10 gene clusters, covering nearly 10% of the whole genome, and these are responsible for producing secondary metabolites that display antimicrobial and nematocidal activities. These secondary metabolites include three lipopeptides (surfactin, bacillomycin D, and fengycin), three polyketides (macrolactin, bacillaene, and difficidin) [3,4], one siderophore (bacillibactin), one antibacterial dipeptide (bacilysin), and two ribosomally produced and post-translationally modified peptides plantazolicin and amylocyclicin. FZB42 can also synthesize plant hormones, such as indole-3-acetic acid, and produce volatile compounds, such as 2,3-butanediol, to promote plant growth. All these metabolites contribute to the biocontrol properties of FZB42. Moreover, this strain displays strong antagonistic activity against fungi, such as Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinereal [6], F. oxysporum [7], and against bacteria, such as Erwinia amylovora [8] and Xanthomonas oryzae [12]. A recent study demonstrated that bacillomycin D is involved in antagonistic interactions with F. graminearum, provoking physiological and metabolic changes during the antagonism [13]. The living spores of FZB42 have also been used to develop commercial products, such as RhizoVital®. Accordingly, FZB42 seems to be a good candidate for use as a biocontrol agent against plant pathogens in agricultural production systems.
Here we report that fengycin produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 significantly inhibits the growth of F. graminearum and the biosynthesis of the mycotoxins, including deoxynivalenol (DON), 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON), 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON), and zearalenone (ZEN).

2. Results

2.1. Fengycin Produced by B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 mutant AK1S Displayed Antagonistic Activity Against F. graminearum

It has already been reported that both B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 and its crude extract of secondary metabolites could suppress F. graminearum growth. The mutant AK2 and AK1S cultures and their crude extracts showed inhibition activity against F. graminearum growth, as indicated by clear zones in the inoculated bacteria and extracts (Figure 1).
AK2 could produce bacillomycin D and surfactin, but not fengycin; HPLC results indicated that AK2 showed typical peaks for bacillomycin D (from 16 to 20 min) and surfactin (from 40 to 48 min) (Figure 2). MALDI-TOF-MS analysis also confirmed that AK2 could only produce bacillomycin D and surfactin. There were peaks (M + H)+ for molecular ion peaks (M + Na)+ for C14–C15 surfactin at m/z 1044 and 1058, and ion peaks (M + K)+ for C15 surfactin at m/z 1074 (Figure 2). Furthermore, there were molecular ion peaks (M + Na)+ for C15 bacillomycin D at m/z 1067, and ion peaks (M + K)+ for C15–C16 bacillomycin D at m/z 1083 and 1097 (Figure 2).
Among these molecules, all containing the same ion, there was a 14-Da difference in molecular weight, suggesting the presence of varying lengths of fatty acid chains within bacillomycin D (CH2 = 14 Da). AK1S, containing double mutation, could produce fengycin, but not bacillomycin D or surfactin, as confirmed via HPLC analysis, which showed peaks only for fengycin (from 24 to 30 min). MALDI-TOF-MS confirmed this result. There were molecular ion peaks (M+K)+ for Ala-6-C14–C18 fengycin at m/z 1473, 1487, 1501, 1515, and 1529 (Figure 2). Our results indicated that both fengycin and bacillomycin D act as fungicidal factors and cause in vitro suppression of F. graminearum growth. This result coincides with the results of our previous study [13].

2.2. Ultrastructural Changes Caused by Fengycin in F. graminearum Hyphae

To elucidate the mechanism by which fengycin affects F. graminearum hyphal growth, we observed the morphological variations in fungal mycelia using scanning electron microscopy [14]. The micrographs showed that fengycin triggered a range of abnormalities in F. graminearum hyphae; fengycin-treated hyphae showed considerable deformation—they were thin and twisted, and some parts along the hyphal walls were ruptured (Figure 3). On the other hand, the micrographs of the untreated control demonstrated healthy, dense, and cylindrical hyphae.

2.3. Fengycin Reduced F. graminearum Pathogenicity and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis

The results of fengycin application showed that fengycin could markedly reduce F. graminearum pathogenicity on wheat kernels (Figure 4). As DON is not only an important mycotoxin but also an essential virulence factor produced by F. graminearum, we further characterized the effect of fengycin on DON and other mycotoxins, i.e., 3-ADON,15-ADON, and ZEN biosynthesis in F. graminearum. The sterilized wheat kernels were incubated with F. graminearum and then treated with or without 90 μg/mL purified fengycin, and HPLC–MS analysis was performed to analyze mycotoxins production; we noted that fengycin could noticeably reduce DON, 3-ADON, 15-ADON, and ZEN biosynthesis. (Figure 5). Collectively, these results indicate that fengycin could reduce F. graminearum pathogenicity and mycotoxin biosynthesis.

3. Discussion

Apart from the chemical and conventional methods used for controlling diseases in plants, biological control is one of the safest and most effective alternative methods. Various microorganisms have been reported to be effectively used as a part of this method [15]. For example, Bacillus spp. act as effective antifungal and biocontrol organisms [16,17,18]. They produce many antifungal compounds, such as β-1,3-1,4-glucanase, chitinase, and lipopeptides [19,20,21]; such compounds can reportedly reduce or demine the activity of various phytopathogenic organisms.
Based on their structures, cyclic lipopeptides can generally be classified into four major families or groups: surfactin, iturin, fengycin, and locillomycin [22,23]. Fengycin, which has been isolated from members of the Bacillus genus, demonstrates strong antifungal activity and inhibits the growth of several plant pathogens, particularly of many filamentous fungi [4,24]. Likewise, fengycin antagonistically affected the growth of F. graminearum (FG-PH1) in vitro. B. subtilis has achieved a lot of attention as a biocontrol agent for manipulating many soil-borne diseases [25]. In this study, fengycin extracted from B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 played a vital role in inhibiting growth of pathogenic fungus F. graminearum. Our studies have demonstrated that fengycin has an adverse effect on the structure of fungal hyphae and related activity of F. graminearum markedly decreases upon fengycin treatment [19,26,27,28]. The possible mechanism for the antifungal activity of fengycin is that it interacts with sterol and phospholipid molecules in the fungal cell membrane, altering its structure and permeability [29]. Our results, and even those of some previous studies, suggest that fengycin severely damages the plasma membranes and cell walls of F. graminearum hyphae and conidia, consequently causing cell death Fengycin influenced the cell membrane and cellular organs and also inhibited DNA synthesis [30,31]. It can also reportedly cause cell lysis of M. fructicola [31,32].
Current studies revealed that fengycin influences the pathogenicity of F. graminearum in plants. Fengycin caused a significant reduction in F. graminearum virulence, relative to the controls; the lengths of lesions on wheat spikes caused by F. graminearum markedly reduced upon treatment with fengycin. Similar results were also obtained in our previous studies when corn silk was treated with bacillomycin D [13].
Sporulation and germination play an important role in the asexual life cycle of F. graminearum and in spreading of FHB. In this study, fengycin strongly inhibited both the formation and germination of spores. Fengycin damaged the conidia and inhibited conidial germination; when spores of F. graminearum were used as inoculum to infect wheat heads, the severity of disease symptoms was reduced. In addition, considering the adverse effects of fengycin on fungal hyphae, it can inhibit the infection of corn silk by F. graminearum hyphae, as reported by a previous study [13]. Hence, the use of microorganisms producing antifungal compounds that inhibit conidial germination and hyphal growth should be an effective measure for biocontrol of fungal diseases.
Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways have been well characterized in F. graminearum [33,34]. Phosphorylation of the MAPKs FgHOG1 and FgMGV1 positively regulates environmental stress responses and DON biosynthesis [35,36]. Here, we observed that 90 μg/mL fengycin was enough to decrease mycotoxin biosynthesis in F. graminearum. In contradiction to former results, fengycin reduced the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in Fusarium graminearum, while previous studies showed that the lipopeptides, such as Bacillomycin D and surfactin, induce significant fumonisin production in F. verticillioides [37]. Moreover, iturins reportedly induce HOG1 activation in V. dahliae [32]. Our results were similar to Kim et al., showing that the B. amyloliquefaciens JCK-12 has the ability to decrease both fungal growth and mycotoxin production. CLPs successfully inhibited DON production by affecting DON biosynthetic gene expression [38]. Our results also showed that the fengycin reduces the F. graminearum pathogenicity, as well as the most important virulence factor and mycotoxin biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. In summary, we report that fengycin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 has potential as a bio-control agent against wheat pathogen Fusarium graminearum. For future studies, other important derivatives of DON, such as deepoxy-deoxynivalenol, 3-epi-deoxynivalenol, or deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside, could also be studied under the influence of fengycin.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial and Fungal Strains Growth Conditions

In this study two previously constructed mutants, AK2 (Cannot synthesize fengycin) and AK1S (Can synthesize fengycin), from FZB42, were used [13] for activity against F. graminearum PH-1. Solidified Luria–Bertani medium was used to culture the mutants [39] and were activated in Landy medium [40]. Antibiotics ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin were added at the following final concentrations: 100 g/mL, 5 g/mL, and 10 g/mL, respectively. For conidia formation fresh mycelia of PH-1 (50 mg) was taken from the margin of a 72 h grown colony and inoculated in 20 mL mung bean liquid medium [13], followed by incubation at 25 °C for 4 days in a shaker (180 rpm). A hemocytometer was used to count the number of conidia in each flask.

4.2. Anti-fungal Activity Assay

Antifungal activities of AK1S, AK2, and their secondary metabolite extracts were analyzed. Briefly, potato dextrose agar (PDA) was used to measure antifungal activity. A fungal block of 6-mm-diameter was patched at the middle of a PDA plate; 5 µl bacterial suspension (optical density at 600 nm of 2) or their secondary metabolite extracts were inoculated 3 cm away from the fungal block, and the plates were kept at 25 °C for 48 h; later, the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured.

4.3. Purification of Fengycin from AK1S and MALDI-TOF-MS Analysis

Fengycin was purified from AK1S as it could only produce fengycin; there was no possibility of contamination by either surfactin or bacillomycin D. A single colony of AK1S was inoculated into 20 mL LB medium and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. Six milliliters of this culture was then inoculated in a 500-mL flask containing 200 mL of Landy medium, followed by incubation for 2 days at 30 °C. The sample was then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C with Beckman Coulter Avanti J-26S XP centrifuge with JA-10 rotor (Beckman Coulter Brea, CA, USA) and the supernatant was collected. The pH of this cell-free extract was adjusted to 2, followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. This finally resulted in the precipitation of lipopeptides in the supernatant. Methanol was used to re-dissolve the precipitate, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 using 1.0 M NaOH [41]. The supernatant was then passed through a silica gel column using different ratios of methanol and methylene chloride, termed MIX1 to MIX3 (methanol/methylene chloride ratios in MIX1, MIX2, and MIX3 were 1:2, 3:1, and 5:1, respectively). Preparative HPLC was performed for fengycin purification, in which we used a microbore 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a VP 250/21 Nucleodur C18 HTec 5 µm column (Macherey-Nagel, Amtsgericht Düren, Germany); the eluates from MIX2 and MIX3 were collected and further used as mobile phase A, comprised of Acetonitrile with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, and Milli-Q water with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid was used as mobile phase B. A solvent containing 45% mobile phase A and 55% mobile phase B was used at a flow rate of 8 mL/min for purification. For detection, UV absorption at 207 nm was recorded. The purity of fengycin collected from different peaks was detected using a 1200 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 5 µm column. Fengycin was confirmed by the appearance of one large peak at running times between 10 to 40 min. Purity of fengycin was calculated on the bases of the peak area (96.6%), which was used in our further studies. For antifungal activity of elution components from different peaks, they were tested and analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS using a Bruker Daltonik Reflex MALDI-TOF instrument with a 337-nm nitrogen laser for desorption and ionization [42]. The α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid served as the matrix.

4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopic Observation of Hyphal Morphologies

SEM was used to observe the morphological changes in F. graminearum hyphae caused by fengycin (90 µg/mL). To observe the fungal hyphae, they were treated with fengycin and 2.5% glutaraldehyde was used for prefixing. Subsequently, 100 mM phosphate buffer was used to rinse the fixed cells three times for 10 min; the samples were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 3 h and dehydration was done by using an ethanol gradient. Later, the samples were coated with gold particles and electron micrographs were obtained by using a Hitachi Science System Hitachi S-3000N scanning electron microscope at voltage 20 kV (H-7650, Hitachi, 251 Tokyo, Japan).

4.5. Plant Infection and Mycotoxin Production Assay

Wheat spikes were used to assess whether fengycin could adversely affect the pathogenicity of F. graminearum. When wheat reached the anthesis stage, the sixth spikelet from the base of the spike was pointed and inoculated with 10 µL of conidial suspension (105 conidia/mL) containing 90 µg/mL fengycin. Only 10µl conidial suspension with 6.67% (v/v) methanol was used as the control. Three wheat spikes were inoculated for each treatment. The wheat plants were kept at 22 ± 2 °C and under 100% humidity for 2 days and then continued in a glass house. Diseased wheat kernels were examined and counted after 14 days. In order to ascertain the results, the experiment was repeated three times.
For the mycotoxin production assay, 50 g of healthy wheat spikes (wet weight) were surface sterilized by washing with 2% sodium hypochlorite and then inoculated with 1 mL of conidial suspension (106 conidia/mL) containing 90 µg/mL fengycin and 6.67% (v/v) methanol, and incubated at 25 °C for 20 days. One milliliter of conidial suspension (106 conidia/mL) with 6.67% (v/v) methanol served as the control. The experiment was repeated three times with three replicates for each. Mycotoxin extraction and quantification was performed by MycoSep 225 Trich Push Columns (Romer Laboratories Diagnostic (Getzersdorf, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, avoiding the grinding of the starting material. The sample extract residue was dissolved in 400mL methanol/water (30:70). DON was quantified by HPLC according to the protocol followed by [43] with minor modifications. Separation was performed at room temperature by using a C18 reverse α-phase column (120 Å, 5 µm particle size, 4.66 × 150 mm, Acclaim) with an isocratic mobile phase of methanol/water (30:70) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. Eluates were detected using a UV detector set at 220 nm. For quantification of DON, 3-DON, 15-Don, and ZEN, known amounts of pure standard bought from sigma were used as internal standards. Different concentrations of pure compound were analyzed by HPLC, and then the equation depicting the relationship between the concentration and HPLC peak area was obtained, which correlated the peak area to mycotoxin concentration [43].

Author Contributions

A.H. performed all the studies and conducted experiments. Y.X. and M.Z. (Muhammad Zubair) compiled the data and results and A.F., T.M. and J.Y. helped in helped in writing the manuscript. H.W. and J.L. helped with analyzing the data. F.Z., P.L., and C.L. carried out MALDI-TOF MS analyses. X.Z., M.Z. (Mengxuan Zhang), and D.J. performed HPLC analyses; Q.G. and X.G. supervised the whole of the work and the revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [grant number BK20160719] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31601589].

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our gratitude towards native English-speaking scientists of Elixigen Company (Huntington Beach, CA, USA) for editing our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goswami, R.S.; Kistler, H.C. Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 5, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yu, C.; Wang, W.-X.; Zhang, A.-F.; Gu, C.-Y.; Zhou, M.-G.; Gao, T.-C. Activity of the fungicide JS399-19 against Fusarium head blight of wheat and the risk of resistance. Agr. Sci. China 2011, 10, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bily, A.C.; Reid, L.M.; Savard, M.E.; Reddy, R.; Blackwell, B.A.; Campbell, C.M.; Krantis, A.; Durst, T.; Philogene, B.J.; Arnason, J.T.; et al. Analysis of Fusarium graminearum mycotoxins in different biological matrices by LC/MS. Mycopathologia 2004, 157, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guo, Q.; Dong, W.; Li, S.; Lu, X.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Ma, P. Fengycin produced by Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 plays a major role in biocontrol of cotton seedling damping-off disease. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Voss, K.A. A new perspective on deoxynivalenol and growth suppression. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 113, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parry, D.; Jenkinson, P.; McLeod, L. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals—A review. Plant Pathol. 1995, 44, 207–238. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, H.; Yao, J. Characterization of Fusarium graminearum inhibitory lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis IB. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 889–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.H.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Eisenreich, A.; Schneider, K.; Heinemeyer, I.; Morgenstern, B.; Voss, B.; Hess, W.R.; Reva, O. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth–promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lugtenberg, B.; Kamilova, F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koumoutsi, A.; Chen, X.-H.; Vater, J.; Borriss, R. DegU and YczE positively regulate the synthesis of bacillomycin D by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6953–6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bulgarelli, D.; Schlaeppi, K.; Spaepen, S.; van Themaat, E.V.L.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 807–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lugtenberg, B.J.; Dekkers, L.; Bloemberg, G.V. Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2001, 39, 461–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Shi, G.; Wu, L.; Lou, Z.; Huo, R.; Wu, H.; Borriss, R.; Gao, X. Bacillomycin D Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Is Involved in the Antagonistic Interaction with the Plant-Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium graminearum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Epstein, A.K.; Pokroy, B.; Seminara, A.; Aizenberg, J. Bacterial biofilm shows persistent resistance to liquid wetting and gas penetration. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Niu, B.; Vater, J.; Rueckert, C.; Blom, J.; Lehmann, M.; Ru, J.-J.; Chen, X.-H.; Wang, Q.; Borriss, R. Polymyxin P is the active principle in suppressing phytopathogenic Erwinia spp. by the biocontrol rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa M-1. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PG12 for the biological control of apple ring rot. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2016, 115, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. JI, Z.-l.; LING, Z.; ZHANG, Q.-x.; XU, J.-y.; CHEN, X.-j.; TONG, Y.-h. Study on the inhibition of Bacillus licheniformis on Botryosphaeria berengeriana f. sp. piricola and Glomerella cingulata and biocontrol efficacy on postharvest apple diseases. J. Fruit Sci. 2008, 2, 019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, Y.; Han, L.-R.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Mei, R.; Wang, Q. Biological control of apple ring rot on fruit by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 9001. Plant Pathol. J. 2013, 29, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alvarez, F.; Castro, M.; Principe, A.; Borioli, G.; Fischer, S.; Mori, G.; Jofre, E. The plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MEP2 18 and ARP2 3 capable of producing the cyclic lipopeptides iturin or surfactin and fengycin are effective in biocontrol of sclerotinia stem rot disease. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Y.-B.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Q.-b.; Wang, X.; Wang, G. The phosphotransferase system gene ptsI in the endophytic bacterium Bacillus cereus is required for biofilm formation, colonization, and biocontrol against wheat sharp eyespot. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 354, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Yong, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, X.; Li, B.; Li, G.; Liang, W.; Wang, C. Streptomyces rochei A-1 induces resistance and defense-related responses against Botryosphaeria dothidea in apple fruit during storage. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2016, 115, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, C.; Liu, X.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z. Nonribosomal peptide synthase gene clusters for lipopeptide biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis 916 and their phenotypic functions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ongena, M.; Jacques, P. Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 16, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Afsharmanesh, H.; Ahmadzadeh, M.; Javan-Nikkhah, M.; Behboudi, K. Improvement in biocontrol activity of Bacillus subtilis UTB1 against Aspergillus flavus using gamma-irradiation. Crop Prot. 2014, 60, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leclère, V.; Béchet, M.; Adam, A.; Guez, J.-S.; Wathelet, B.; Ongena, M.; Thonart, P.; Gancel, F.; Chollet-Imbert, M.; Jacques, P. Mycosubtilin Overproduction by Bacillus subtilis BBG100 Enhances the Organism’s Antagonistic and Biocontrol Activities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4577–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Falardeau, J.; Wise, C.; Novitsky, L.; Avis, T.J. Ecological and mechanistic insights into the direct and indirect antimicrobial properties of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptides on plant pathogens. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, A.; Mahata, D.; Paul, D.; Korpole, S.; Franco, O.L.; Mandal, S.M. Purification, biochemical characterization and self-assembled structure of a fengycin-like antifungal peptide from Bacillus thuringiensis strain SM1. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, Q.; Bie, X.; Lu, Z.; Lv, F.; Tao, Y.; Qu, X. Effects of fengycin from Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on apoptosis and necrosis in Rhizopus stolonifer. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deleu, M.; Paquot, M.; Nylander, T. Fengycin interaction with lipid monolayers at the air–aqueous interface—Implications for the effect of fengycin on biological membranes. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2005, 283, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tao, Y.; Bie, X.M.; Lv, F.X.; Zhao, H.Z.; Lu, Z.X. Antifungal activity and mechanism of fengycin in the presence and absence of commercial surfactin against Rhizopus stolonifer. J. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, J.; Zhou, T.; He, D.; Li, X.-z.; Wu, H.; Liu, W.; Gao, X. Functions of lipopeptides bacillomycin D and fengycin in antagonism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C06 towards Monilinia fructicola. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Han, Q.; Wu, F.; Wang, X.; Qi, H.; Shi, L.; Ren, A.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, M.; Tang, C. The bacterial lipopeptide iturins induce Verticillium dahliae cell death by affecting fungal signalling pathways and mediate plant defence responses involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 1166–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, C.; Zhang, S.; Hou, R.; Zhao, Z.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, Q.; Zheng, D.; Wang, G.; Liu, H.; Gao, X. Functional analysis of the kinome of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Yu, F.; Yin, Y.; Shim, W.B.; Ma, Z. Protein kinase FgSch 9 serves as a mediator of the target of rapamycin and high osmolarity glycerol pathways and regulates multiple stress responses and secondary metabolism in Fusarium graminearum. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 2661–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, X.; Wang, C.; Xiang, P.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, J.-R. The FgHOG1 pathway regulates hyphal growth, stress responses, and plant infection in Fusarium graminearum. PloS ONE 2012, 7, e49495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hou, Z.; Xue, C.; Peng, Y.; Katan, T.; Kistler, H.C.; Xu, J.-R. A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Blacutt, A.; Mitchell, T.; Bacon, C.; Gold, S. Bacillus mojavensis RRC101 lipopeptides provoke physiological and metabolic changes during antagonism against Fusarium verticillioides. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, K.; Lee, Y.; Ha, A.; Kim, J.-I.; Park, A.R.; Yu, N.H.; Son, H.; Choi, G.J.; Park, H.W.; Lee, C.W.; et al. Chemosensitization of Fusarium graminearum to Chemical Fungicides Using Cyclic Lipopeptides Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strain JCK-12. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Moyne, A.L.; Shelby, R.; Cleveland, T.E.; Tuzun, S. Bacillomycin D: an iturin with antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus. Journal of applied microbiology 2001, 90, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koumoutsi, A.; Vater, J.; Junge, H.; Krebs, B.; Borriss, R. Sequence for the Bacillomycin D synthesis in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. WO2004111240A2, 23 December 2004. [Google Scholar]
  41. 41 Lin, S.C.; Minton, M.A.; Sharma, M.M.; Georgiou, G. Structural and immunological characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vater, J.; Gao, X.; Hitzeroth, G.; Wilde, C.; Franke, P. “Whole cell”-matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry, an emerging technique for efficient screening of biocombinatorial libraries of natural compounds-present state of research. Com. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2003, 6, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Omurtag, G.Z.; Beyoğlu, D. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) in beer in Turkey detected by HPLC. Food Control 2007, 18, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antagonistic activities of AK2 and AKIS against F. graminearum PH-1 (A) and of their secondary metabolite extract (B). CK, control (LB medium or methanol).
Figure 1. Antagonistic activities of AK2 and AKIS against F. graminearum PH-1 (A) and of their secondary metabolite extract (B). CK, control (LB medium or methanol).
Toxins 11 00295 g001
Figure 2. Analysis of lipopeptides produced by AK2 and AKIS using HPLC (A) and MALDI-TOF-MS (B,C).
Figure 2. Analysis of lipopeptides produced by AK2 and AKIS using HPLC (A) and MALDI-TOF-MS (B,C).
Toxins 11 00295 g002
Figure 3. Effect of fengycin (90 µg/mL) on F. graminearum hyphae. F. graminearum hyphae were treated with pure fengycin, and electron micrographs were obtained. The hyphal morphology of F. graminearum was altered by fengycin; in comparison with the control, several deformed hyphal structures were observed in the fengycin-treated sample. Arrowheads indicate abnormal morphology of PH-1 hyphae. Bar: 5 µm.
Figure 3. Effect of fengycin (90 µg/mL) on F. graminearum hyphae. F. graminearum hyphae were treated with pure fengycin, and electron micrographs were obtained. The hyphal morphology of F. graminearum was altered by fengycin; in comparison with the control, several deformed hyphal structures were observed in the fengycin-treated sample. Arrowheads indicate abnormal morphology of PH-1 hyphae. Bar: 5 µm.
Toxins 11 00295 g003
Figure 4. Effects of fengycin on pathogenicity of F. graminearum. Wheat heads were drop inoculated with conidial suspensions of F. graminearum PH-1 and then were treated with 90 µg/mL fengycin. Conidial suspension with 6.67% (v/v) methanol served as the control.
Figure 4. Effects of fengycin on pathogenicity of F. graminearum. Wheat heads were drop inoculated with conidial suspensions of F. graminearum PH-1 and then were treated with 90 µg/mL fengycin. Conidial suspension with 6.67% (v/v) methanol served as the control.
Toxins 11 00295 g004
Figure 5. Effects of fengycin (90 µg/mL) on mycotoxins biosynthesis. Amount of DON (A), 15-ADON (B), 3-ADON (C), and ZEN (D) in infected wheat kernels 21 days after inoculation, with or without fengycin. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistix 8.0 and subjected to one-way ANOVA with significant difference detected by Duncan’s multiple range test. Line bars denote standard errors of three replicate experiments and different letters describe significant differences at p < 0.01 within the same data group.
Figure 5. Effects of fengycin (90 µg/mL) on mycotoxins biosynthesis. Amount of DON (A), 15-ADON (B), 3-ADON (C), and ZEN (D) in infected wheat kernels 21 days after inoculation, with or without fengycin. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistix 8.0 and subjected to one-way ANOVA with significant difference detected by Duncan’s multiple range test. Line bars denote standard errors of three replicate experiments and different letters describe significant differences at p < 0.01 within the same data group.
Toxins 11 00295 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hanif, A.; Zhang, F.; Li, P.; Li, C.; Xu, Y.; Zubair, M.; Zhang, M.; Jia, D.; Zhao, X.; Liang, J.; et al. Fengycin Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Inhibits Fusarium graminearum Growth and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis. Toxins 2019, 11, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050295

AMA Style

Hanif A, Zhang F, Li P, Li C, Xu Y, Zubair M, Zhang M, Jia D, Zhao X, Liang J, et al. Fengycin Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Inhibits Fusarium graminearum Growth and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis. Toxins. 2019; 11(5):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hanif, Alvina, Feng Zhang, Pingping Li, Chuchu Li, Yujiao Xu, Muhammad Zubair, Mengxuan Zhang, Dandan Jia, Xiaozhen Zhao, Jingang Liang, and et al. 2019. "Fengycin Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Inhibits Fusarium graminearum Growth and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis" Toxins 11, no. 5: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050295

APA Style

Hanif, A., Zhang, F., Li, P., Li, C., Xu, Y., Zubair, M., Zhang, M., Jia, D., Zhao, X., Liang, J., Majid, T., Yan, J., Farzand, A., Wu, H., Gu, Q., & Gao, X. (2019). Fengycin Produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 Inhibits Fusarium graminearum Growth and Mycotoxins Biosynthesis. Toxins, 11(5), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop