Next Article in Journal
Venom Function of a New Species of Megalomyrmex Forel, 1885 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Temperature during Drying and Storage of Dried Figs on Growth, Gene Expression and Aflatoxin Production
Previous Article in Journal
Staphylococcus aureus Infection and Persistence in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Focus on Leukocidin ED
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on the Mechanism of Action of a Citrinin and Anti-Citrinin Antibody Based on Mimotope X27
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Truncated Expression of a Carboxypeptidase A from Bovine Improves Its Enzymatic Properties and Detoxification Efficiency of Ochratoxin A

1
College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2
The Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center of Genetically Modified Organisms, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100083, China
3
Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(11), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110680
Submission received: 8 September 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 24 October 2020 / Published: 29 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Toxin Detection and Prevention Research)

Abstract

:
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a toxic secondary metabolite produced mainly by Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus spp. and commonly found in foodstuffs and feedstuffs. Carboxypeptidase A (CPA) can hydrolyze OTA into the non-toxic product ochratoxin α, with great potential to realize industrialized production and detoxify OTA in contaminated foods and feeds. This study constructed a P. pastoris expression vector of mature CPA (M-CPA) without propeptide and signal peptide. The results showed that the degradation rate of OTA by M-CPA was up to 93.36%. Its optimum pH was 8, the optimum temperature was 40 °C, the value of Km was 0.126 mmol/L, and the maximum reaction rate was 0.0219 mol/min. Compared with commercial CPA (S-CPA), the recombinant M-CPA had an improve stability, for which its optimum temperature increased by 10 °C and stability at a wide range pH, especially at pH 3–4 and pH 11. M-CPA could effectively degrade OTA in red wine. M-CPA has the potential for industrial applications, such as can be used as a detoxification additive for foods and feeds.
Key Contribution: This paper expressed the mature peptide of CPA in P. pastoris GS115 strain, and the recombinant M-CPA had improved thermal stability and acid-base stability. The M-CPA could effectively degrade OTA in red wine.

1. Introduction

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a secondary metabolite of fungi such as Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp., with nephrotoxicity, teratogenicity, hepatotoxicity, and carcinogenicity, classified as a 2B carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). OTA widely contaminates agricultural products like cereals [1], coffee [2], and wine [3]. The European Commission (EC/1881/2006) sets maximum levels of OTA in foodstuffs with the range of 0.5–10 μg/kg [4], and the National Food Safety Standard of China (GB2761-2017) also establishes the OTA limits for grains, beans, wine, and coffee in a range of 2–10 μg/kg [5]. The limits of OTA in feedstuffs are higher than those in foodstuffs. The Hygienical Standard for Feeds of China (GB13078-2017) stipulates an OTA limit of ≤100 μg/kg [6]. The European Commission has issued OTA limits for feed ingredients, and supplementary and compound feeds of pig and poultry at a range of 50–250 μg/kg (EC/576/2006) [7]. As one of the most deleterious mycotoxins, OTA is not easy to remove or destroy during food processing. To mitigate the health risks posed by the OTA contamination in foodstuffs and feedstuffs, several strategies are used to eliminate OTA in food and feed products, including physical methods and chemical methods. However, these methods usually damage nutrients and cause secondary contamination [8]. The biodegradation of OTA by enzymes is a very efficient, specific, and environmentally friendly way that would be a very promising strategy for the control of OTA in foods and feeds [9]. OTA degrading enzymes include carboxypeptidase, amidase, and protease [10,11,12]. Among them, carboxypeptidase A (CPA, EC 3.4.17.1), derived from bovine pancreas, was the first enzyme found to hydrolyze OTA in 1969 [10]. Subsequently, the enzymes from eukaryotic microorganisms were successively mined to degrade OTA. By screening the commercial hydrolases, Stander et al. found a crude lipase (AmanoTM) derived from A. niger with OTA degrading ability [11]. Then, Abrunhosa et al. discovered the crude metalloenzyme of A. niger with OTA hydrolysis activity, and the degradation efficiency reached 99.8% at pH 7.5 [13,14]. Dobritzsch et al. isolated and purified one amidase from the crude lipase of A. niger to degrade OTA, and determined its crystal structure at 2.2 Å resolution [12]. In recent years, carboxypeptidases of degrading OTA were found in bacteria such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [15], Acinetobacter [16], and B. subtilis [17]. Compared with the other OTA degrading enzymes, CPA is an enzyme with rich crystal structures and a clear catalytic mechanism. It can hydrolyze the amide bond of OTA and produce the nontoxic ochratoxin α (OTα) and L-α-phenylalanine (Phe). So, CPA has the application prospect of removing OTA in food and feed products.
CPA was discovered in 1929 [18] and the first crystal of CPA was obtained from Bos taurus pancreas in 1937 [19]. It is a 35 kDa zinc-dependent metal carboxypeptidase, routinely obtained at an industrial scale from porcine or bovine pancreas [20]. It can cut off the C-terminal amino acid (especially aromatic amino acid) residues, but not proline, hydroxyproline, arginine, and lysine residues. CPA is highly specific for excising aromatic amino acids residues from peptides and proteins with a preference for phenylalanine [21]. In addition, the higher hydrolysis rates of peptide were observed in histidine and threonine rather than other amino acids such as serine and aspartic acid. In addition to its natural substrates, CPA also hydrolyzes esters with similar configurations, often with faster reaction rates [22]. This enzyme is naturally synthesized in the form of zymogen with a 12 kDa N-terminal propeptide that covers the catalytic pocket of the enzyme and keeps it inactive until removal of the propeptide by trypsin. Commercial CPA is mainly derived from pancreatic tissues such as bovines and pigs, with high extraction cost. In addition, natural CPA has poor thermal stability, which limits its use in food, medicine, and chemical industry. Therefore, there is a need to obtain a large amount of carboxypeptidase A with high stability and catalytic efficiency in vitro. The CPA zymogen was successfully expressed in Pichia pastoris by Shi et al., with a protein product of 150 mg/L. However, this zymogen needs to be hydrolysis with trypsin to generate mature CPA, then it was used to degrade OTA, with a degradation rate of 72.3% [23]. Can the mature peptide of CPA be expressed directly to omit the step of trypsin cleavage? The propeptide usually acts as an intramolecular chaperone, helping the target protein to fold correctly, and has an important influence on the structure and function of the protein. In the absence of the propeptide, the target protein usually cannot be expressed ideally. For example, when deletion of the propeptide of the lipase from Rhizopus oryzae occurs, and the mature peptide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is expressed, the expression product has no lipase activity, while when expression with the propeptide occurs, the expression product has lipase activity [24]. However, the lipase derived from R. chinensis is different. The propeptide has no significant effect on the main enzymatic properties of R. chinensis lipase [25]. The expression of different truncated sequences (removal of the leader peptide or signal peptide) will have a great impact on the expression, activity, and stability of the protein. So, the expression of the mature peptide of CPA may retain the catalytic activity and stability of the enzyme.
This paper was aiming to obtain recombinant mature Carboxypeptidase A (M-CPA), which has the ability to degrade OTA and improves its thermal and acid–base stability. The propeptide of proCPA was truncated to obtain the mature CPA gene, and the gene was cloned and expressed in P. pastoris GS115 strain, then a 6×His tag was added to the N-terminus of the M-CPA to facilitate purification. Its enzymatic characteristics were tested, including optimal temperature, thermal tolerance, optimal pH, Michaelis constant Km and Vmax, and its ability to detoxify OTA in vitro and red wine was evaluated. The enzymatic activity of M-CPA was compared to commercial CPA (S-CPA) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2. Results

2.1. Construction and Expression of M-CPA in P. pastoris

To achieve the expression of mature CPA with the ability to cleave OTA directly, M-CPA was constructed by deleting the 110 residues (12 kDa) including the signal peptide and propeptide. The amino acid sequences of the CPA and its truncated protein constructed in this study were summarized in Figure 1a. The CPA zymogen contains 417 amino acid residues (47 kDa), including a signal peptide composed of 16 amino acid residues, a leader peptide composed of 94 amino acid residues, and a mature peptide composed of 307 amino acid residues (35 kDa). The protein secretion by the recombinant P. pastoris GS115/pPIC9K/M-CPA reached 303.08 mg/L. The recombinant M-CPA containing six histidine residues in its N-terminal region was then purified using metal affinity chromatography on a Ni-NTA resin column. Each of these histidine-tagged carboxypeptidases bound to the Ni-NTA resin was eluted with imidazole. The remaining imidazole from the elution was removed by dialysis against 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5). After protein purification, bands at approximately 35 kDa were obtained by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1b) and Western blotting (Figure 1c), respectively. The purified proteins were used for further biochemical characterization.

2.2. M-CPA Improved Thermal Stability and Acid-Base Stability

Optimum temperature and thermal tolerance were used to characterize the thermal stability of M-CPA and S-CPA. The optimum temperature of S-CPA (purchased from Sigma) and M-CPA (truncated expression) were determined during assay with 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer and 500 mM sodium chloride hippuryl-L-phenylalanine (HLP) (pH 7.5) as the substrate (Figure 2a). The optimum temperatures of the S-CPA and M-CPA were found to be 30 °C and 40 °C, respectively (Figure 2a). This indicated that the thermal stability of M-CPA was higher than that of S-CPA. The thermal tolerance of the M-CPA and S-CPA was carried out by incubating at different temperatures (30–80 °C) for 10 min (Figure 2b). M-CPA and S-CPA retained 60.25% and 71.4% residual activity at a temperature of 40 °C for 10 min, respectively. Above 50 °C, the thermal tolerance of M-CPA was slightly better than that of S-CPA. However, their activity decreased more than 60% at temperatures above 50 °C and the residual activity only maintained 10% when the temperature was above 70 °C. These results suggested that the thermal stability of M-CPA and S-CPA were both poor.
Various buffers at different pH values were used to evaluate the optimum pH of the S-CPA and M-CPA. The optimum pH values for the enzymatic activity of both were found to be 8.0, and M-CPA showed high enzymatic activity within the pH range of 5–8. Interestingly, the M-CPA exhibited higher relative activity than S-CPA when assayed in pH 3–4, and there were no activities of S-CPA detected at pH below 4.0 (Figure 2c). The activity of both enzymes decreased significantly at pH > 8. S-CPA had only 28.54% relative activity at pH = 11, while recombinant M-CPA had 60.8%, indicating that M-CPA was more resistant to alkali than S-CPA.
Kinetic parameters of both enzymes were obtained by measuring the rates of hydrolysis of HLP at the concentration of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 mmol/L. Km and Vmax values were estimated by the Michaelis–Menten model. A Lineweaver–Burk plot of 1/V0 against 1/[S] was made and the regression equations of M-CPA and S-CPA were y = 5.77x + 45.64 and y = 3.23x + 31.70, respectively (Figure 2d). The Michaelis constant Km values of M-CPA and S-CPA hydrolyzing HLP were 0.126 mmol/L and 0.102 mmol/L, respectively; the maximum rates (Vmax) of HLP hydrolysis were 0.0219 mol/min and 0.0315 mol/min, respectively. These results indicated that the substrate affinity of M-CPA for HLP was slightly lower than that of S-CPA. The deletion of propeptide of CPA at the N-terminal region has a marginal effect on the specific activity.

2.3. Detoxification of OTA by M-CPA

To determine the detoxification rate of M-CPA against OTA, the concentration of OTA was detected by HPLC. The HPLC chromatograms of degradation products of OTA were shown in Figure 3a. The retention times (RT) of OTA and its degradation product was 5.50 min and 2.25 min, respectively. After the treatment of OTA with S-CPA and M-CPA, the peak area of OTA decreased significantly compared with the control group, and the new product appeared at 2.25 min. According to the standard curve of OTA, the detoxification rates of S-CPA and M-CPA were 96.04% and 93.36%, respectively. It has been proved that S-CPA can degrade OTA to OTα [26]. Therefore, the substance appearing at 2.25 min after S-CPA+OTA treatment in Figure 3a should be OTα. Then, the presence of OTα was confirmed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The degradation products of OTA by M-CPA indicated the presence of a peak with a retention time of 4.36 min that had the same mass transition characteristics (m/z 255.0–211.0) of OTα. These data unequivocally identified OTα as the metabolite that resulted from OTA biodegradation by M-CPA.

2.4. M-CPA Effectively Degraded OTA in Red Wine

Because of the high incidence and levels of OTA in wines, it is of great significance to remove OTA from wines [27]. Some surveys showed that red wine generally contains a higher OTA amount than white and rosé wine [28]. So, we evaluated the ability of M-CPA to detoxify OTA in red wine. The biodegradation rate of OTA by M-CPA was significantly higher than that of S-CPA in red wine. Figure 4 showed the concentration of OTA and OTα detected by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and HPLC. The levels of OTA were reduction about 15.7% and 64% after incubation with S-CPA and M-CPA 24 h, respectively. S-CPA losing the ability to degrade OTA in red wine may be due to the presence of ethanol (13.6%) and the low pH (3.54), which may have inhibited the enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of OTA.

3. Discussion

A wide range of food and feed products are contaminated by OTA[1,2,27]. The products that exceed the maximum limits of OTA can only be discarded. The economic loss caused by this is immeasurable. However, a considerable portion of them can be degraded into non-toxic products by biodegradation methods and then put into the market. Enzymatic degradation is considered to be the safest and most effective detoxification method. As an enzyme with clear crystal structures and catalytic mechanisms and capable of degrading OTA [29], CPA is of great significance for the detoxification of OTA in food and feed. However, CPA used in industry is mainly extracted from animals (such as pancreatic tissues of cattle and pigs), which has a relatively high cost, and its thermal stability and acid–base stability are poor. CPA from Rattus norvegicus lost 50% of its enzyme activity at 30 °C for 10 min [30], and bovine CPA was completely inactivated at 55 °C for 30 min [31]. So, natural CPA is not suitable for industrial applications. This paper expressed the mature peptide of CPA in P. pastoris GS115 strain, and the recombinant M-CPA had improved thermal stability and acid–base stability. The M-CPA could effectively degrade OTA in red wine.
The zymogen of CPA from bovine pancreatic was successfully expressed in P. pastoris, and the expressed product has OTA degradation activity after being hydrolyzed by trypsin [23]. However, the use of trypsin to cleave the CPA zymogen causes operational complexity and high cost. In order to express CPA that can directly degrade OTA and improve its stability, the truncated CPA was expressed as mature peptide in P. pastoris. By analyzing the crystal structure of CPA and carrying out molecular dynamics simulation, it was found that the N-terminal sequence of CPA was more flexible, which was not conducive to the stability of the protein. So, we truncated the 110 amino acid residues at the N-terminal, including 11 amino acid residues of the signal peptide and 94 amino acid residues of the propeptide (Figure 1a). Compared with S-CPA, the optimum temperature of M-CPA was increased by 10 °C (Figure 2a). Although their activity decreased more than 60% at temperatures above 50 °C for 10 min, the thermal tolerance of M-CPA was slightly better than that of S-CPA (Figure 2b). Combining the results of the optimum temperature and thermal tolerance experiments, the thermal stability of M-CPA was better than that of S-CPA. The optimum pH of M-CPA and S-CPA were both at 8.0, while M-CPA has better acid–base stability, especially at pH 3–4 and pH 11 (Figure 2c). These results indicated that M-CPA was more suitable for industrial production. The OTA detoxification rates of S-CPA and M-CPA were 96.04% and 93.36%, respectively (Figure 2a). In addition, both of them can degrade OTA into OTα (Figure 3b). M-CPA has a high degradation rate of OTA, compared with that of CPA zymogen, which has a degradation rate of 72.3% and needs to undergo hydrolysis by trypsin to generate mature CPA before reaction [23]. Compared with carboxypeptidases derived from bacteria, M-CPA also has a higher degradation rate. The OTA degradation rates of carboxypeptidases from B. amyloliquefaciens ASAG1 [15], Acinetobacter sp. neg1 [16], and B. subtilis CW14[17] were just 72%, 33%, and 71.3%, respectively.
To test the application potential of M-CPA, we selected a red wine system and a simulated gastrointestinal digestion model to study the degradation of OTA by M-CPA. OTA was reduced about 15.7% and 64%, respectively, after incubation with S-CPA and M-CPA in red wine for 24 h (Figure 4). S-CPA has poor OTA degradation activity, which may be due to the lower pH (3.54) in red wine. This also reflected the acid–base stability of M-CPA. In the simulated gastrointestinal digestion process, the degradation rates of OTA by S-CPA and M-CPA were 20.80% and 71.29%, respectively (Figure S1 and Table S1). This indicated that M-CPA can tolerate acid, alkali, pepsin, and pancreatin in the gastrointestinal digestive environment. Due to its excellent stability, M-CPA has the potential for industrial applications, such as be used as a detoxification additive for foods and feeds or as a biological leaching material for wine to remove OTA.

4. Conclusions

To express CPA that can directly degrade OTA and improve its thermal stability and acid–base stability, this paper expressed the mature CPA in P. pastoris. The degradation rate of OTA by M-CPA up to 93.36%. Compared with S-CPA, the recombinant M-CPA had an improved stability, for which its optimum temperature increased by 10 °C and stability at a wide range pH, especially at pH 3–4 and pH 11. The M-CPA could effectively degrade OTA in red wine. M-CPA may be used as a detoxification additive of foods and feeds.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Chemicals and Strains

The strains P. pastoris GS115 and Escherichia coli HB101 were maintained in our lab. Commercial Carboxypeptidase A (S-CPA, derived from bovine pancreas, C9268-2.5KU), OTA (purity degree 98%), and hippuryl-L-phenylalanine were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The dry red wine was obtained from the Key Laboratory of Viticulture and Vitiology, Ministry of Agriculture of China. The grape variety used to make this wine was Cabernet Sauvignon, producing in Helanshan, Ningxia (38°34′ N, 106°20′ E). The wine was brewed in 2017, with an alcohol content of 13.4% (v/v) and a pH of 3.54.

5.2. Construction of the Expression Plasmid ppic9k/M-cpa

The native CPA gene from bovine (GenBank Accession No. NM_174750; CAA83955.1) without signal peptidase and truncated propeptide sequences was optimized based on the P. pastoris codon usage to reach the highest protein expression, then it was cloned into pPIC9K vector at EcoRⅠand NotⅠsites. The recombinant vector named pPIC9K/M-CPA was then transformed into an E. coli HB101 strain. All of this was synthesized by AuGCT (Beijing, China).

5.3. Transformation and Colony Screening of P. pastoris

The recombinant plasmid DNA was purified from E. coli HB101 using the EasyPure HiPure Plasmid MaxiPrep Kit from TransGen Biotech (Beijing, China). The recombinant plasmids were linearized by Sac I, then transformed into P. pastoris GS115 via electroporation (1.5 kV, 4 ms). Transformants were screened on minimal dextrose (MD) media (1.34% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 1% glycerol, 4 × 10−5 % biotin) plates. The pPIC9K without the insert was used as a negative control. The high expression transformants were screened with Peptone dextrose (YPD) medium plates (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L tryptone, 20 g/L dextrose). Single His+ transformants were, respectively, inoculated into each microtiter well containing 200 μL YPD at 30 °C for 48 h, then 10 μL cultures from each well were correspondingly transformed into clones selected based on their ability to grow on YPD transferred into a new microtiter plate well containing 190 μL YPD. After incubation overnight at 30°C, the previous steps were repeated to create a third microtiter plate. The cells in each well were then resuspended and 10 μL from each well, in order, and were spotted on YPD plates containing geneticin G418 at a final concentration of 0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mg mL. The YPD-geneticin plates were incubated at 30°C for 2–5 days for differentiating the high expression recombinants. The selected yeast transformants were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing.

5.4. Fermentation Conditions

The yeast fermentation in a 100 mL shaking flask was carried out according to the P. pastoris expression manual. A recombinant yeast colony was inoculated in 20 mL of buffered minimal glycerol/methanol-complex (BMGY/BMMY) medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L ammonium sulfate, 3.4 g/L yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH6.0), 400 μg/L biotin,10 g/L glycerol or 5 g/L methanol). After culture at 28 °C for 48 h, the cells were collected by centrifugation and re-suspended in 20 mL of BMMY medium. The initial optical density value of culture at 600 nm was adjusted to 1.0. The incubation temperature was set at 28 °C, the rotation speed was 250 rpm. The methanol with a working concentration of 5 g/L was feed at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 h. During the induction course, supernatants samples were collected at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. Protein expression in samples was analyzed using SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

5.5. Purification of the Recombinant M-CPA

A 6×His tag was introduced to the N-terminus of the target protein. Thus, the recombinant M-CPA was expressed as a His-tagged soluble protein. The cell-free culture supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 6000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and was desalted using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore; 10 kDa MWCO). The protein was purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography as described in the Ni-NTA resin manual from TransGen Biotechnology, Previously equilibrated with buffer A (pH 8.0 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole). The mixture of 10 mL of the supernatant fraction containing the soluble recombinant CPA and resin was incubated for 15 min at 4 °C and applied to an empty column. The column was washed several times with buffer B (pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole). Finally, the recombinant proteins were eluted with buffer C (pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole). Elutes with protein were concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore; 10 kDa MWCO), and then lyophilized by vacuum freezing dryer.

5.6. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis was performed using 12% gel by previously described methods [32]. Proteins were determined by Bradford protein assay kit and bovine serum was used as standard. The first antibody was mouse anti His antibody, and the second antibody was horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled Goat Anti-Mouse IgG. An Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate Kit was used to stain the target protein band.

5.7. Enzymatic Activity Measurements

The enzyme activity determination refers to the method of Tardioli et al. [33]. The initial reaction rate was measured using hippuryl-L-phenylalanine (Sigma) as a substrate. The assay mixture contained the recombinant M-CPA dissolved in the 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer and 500 mM sodium chloride Hippuryl-L-phenylalanine (pH 7.5). Mixing was done by inversion and the absorbance at 254 nm for approximately 5 min was recorded in a spectrophotometer. The fastest linear rate (ΔA254 nm/min) over a 30 s interval for the test and the blank reactions was obtained. The initial enzymatic reaction rate was estimated from the linear region of the absorbance versus time curve. One unit of the enzymes will hydrolyze 1.0 μmole of hippuryl-L-phenylalanine per min at pH 7.5 at 25 °C.
The optimal reaction pH was assessed using several buffers with varying pH values (50 mM acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer, pH 3.0–5.0; 50 mM NaHPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer, pH 6.0–7.5; 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0–9.0; and 50 mM Gly-NaOH buffer, pH 9.0–12.0) at 25 °C.
The optimal temperature of M-CPA and S-CPA were determined using the optimal pH at temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 80 °C. The reaction solution was heated in a water bath at different temperature sfor 10min, and then the absorption value of this solution was tested by adding M-CPA or S-CPA. The calculation formula of relative enzyme activity was as follows: Relative activity = determined activity/activity at optimum temperature × 100%
The thermal tolerance assays were assessed by incubating the enzyme (M-CPA or S-CPA) at different temperatures (30 °C to 80 °C) for 10 min, and the non-heated enzyme (activity of enzyme in 25 °C with substrate) was used as the control (100%). The calculation formula of relative enzyme activity was as follows: Relative activity = determined activity/activity of non-heated enzyme × 100%.
Km and Vmax values were estimated by Michaelis–Menten model, according to the experimental kinetics data for substrate concentration at 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 mmol/L. Km and Vmax can be obtained basing on the Lineweaver–Burk plot. It gives a straight line, with the intercept on the y-axis equal to 1/Vmax, and the intercept on the x-axis equal to the absolute value of 1/Km. The calculation formulas of Km and Vmax are as follows, where [S] refers to the concentration of the substrate.
1 V = K m + [ S ] V max [ S ] = K m V max 1 [ S ] + 1 V max

5.8. Ochratoxin A Degradation Assay

Degradation assays were done by incubating of recombinant M-CPA (5 U/mL) which dissolved in the 1 M NaCl (pH 7.5) with ochratoxin A solution at 37 °C for 24 h. The final concentration of ochratoxin A was 2 μg/mL. Assays with 5 U/mL of carboxypeptidase A (EC 3.4.17.1) and blanks without any enzyme were used as controls. The aqueous phase was acidified to pH = 2 and OTA was re-extracted three times with an equal volume of chloroform after centrifugation at 6000× g for 10 min, the organic phase was transferred to a clean tube, evaporated under nitrogen, and dissolved in 300 μL methanol. The remaining OTA in the supernatants were applied to thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

5.8.1. Thin Layer Chromatography Analysis

The method of TLC analysis was performed according to Shi et al. [23]. A total of 10 μL supernatants of OTA were spotted on silica gel plates. Toluene/ethyl acetate/formic acid (6:3:1 v/v/v) was used as the developing solvent. After 10 min of separating, OTA was chromogenic by the UV light of gel imaging analyzer.

5.8.2. HPLC Analysis

HPLC analysis of OTA and OTα was carried out according to the method described by Hu [17]. Some of the HPLC parameters were different from the method as below: The concentration of OTA and OTα was evaluated with the Water Alliance 2695-2475 UPLC system using a C18 reversed-phase (150 × 4.6 mm and 3.5 mm). A five-point calibration curve (10; 250; 500; 750 and 1000 ng/mL) was prepared with standards of OTA (Sigma). The rate of OTA degradation was calculated using the formula: OTA degradation rate = (1 − OTA peak area in treatment/OTA peak area in control) × 100%.

5.9. LC/MS-MS Methods

OTA and OTα were analyzed by Q Exactive orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, CA, USA). A Cortecs C18 100 × 2.1 mm 1.9 μm column was used for analysis. Mobile phase A was 2 mM ammonium acetate in 100% water. Mobile phase B was isopropanol and acetonitrile (90:10, v:v). A 15-min gradient with a flow rate of 220 μL/min from 5% to 98% mobile B was used.
The detailed mass spectrometer parameters are as follows: ion source, high resolution electrospray ionization (H-ESI); ion mode, anion; spray voltage, 3000 v; flow rate of sheath gas, 35 Arb; flow rate of auxiliary gas, 10 Arb; temperature of ion transfer tube, 320 °C; heater temperature, 300 °C; full scan resolution, 70,000; fragment resolution, 17,500.

5.10. Detoxification of OTA in Red Wine

To evaluate if M-CPA was able to biodegrade OTA in red wine, OTA was supplemented into red wine. OTA standard was added into 300 μL red wine samples with the final concentration of 2 μg/mL. There are three groups, containing an experimental group (5U of M-CPA), a control group (5U of S-CPA) and a blank group. After the tubes were shaken and evenly mixed, they were incubated in a 200 rpm/min shaker at 37 °C for 24 h. The detoxification effect was detected according to the method in Section 5.8.1, and the detoxification rate of recombinant CPA in wine samples was determined according to the method in Section 5.8.2.

5.11. Statistical Analysis

The activity of M-CPA and S-CPA were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The SPSS 20.0 statistical package was used to perform one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine the significantly different (p < 0.05) between multiple samples. The Origin 7.5 software was used for drawing.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/12/11/680/s1, Figure S1: Thin layer chromatography of the recombinant M-CPA tested for OTA degradation during digestion in simulating gastrointestinal tract, Table S1: Detoxification of OTA by M-CPA and S-CPA enzymes against control, during simulating gastrointestinal process.

Author Contributions

Experiment—L.X. and M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; writing—review and editing, Z.L. and M.P.; supervision, Z.L.; project administration, Z.L.; funding acquisition, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31671947.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31671947).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, N. Co-occurrence of citrinin and ochratoxin A in rice in Asia and its implications for human health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 2055–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khaneghah, A.M.; Fakhri, Y.; Abdi, L.; Sengling Cebin Coppa, C.F.; Franco, L.T.; Fernandes de Oliveira, C.A. The concentration and prevalence of ochratoxin A in coffee and coffee-based products: A global systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Fungal Biol. 2019, 123, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dachery, B.; Manfroi, V.; Berleze, K.J.; Welke, J.E. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in grapes, juices and wines and risk assessment related to this mycotoxin exposure. Cienc. Rural 2016, 46, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Eurpean Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, 364, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  5. National Health and Family Planning Commission of China; State Food and Drug Administration of China. Maximum levels of mycotoxins in foods( GB 2761-2017); China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  6. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China; National Standardization Administration of China. Hygienical standard for feeds (GB 13078-2017); China Standard Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  7. Eurpean Commission. Commission recommendation of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding (2006/576/EC). Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, 229, 7–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Agriopoulou, S.; Stamatelopoulou, E.; Varzakas, T. Advances in Occurrence, Importance, and Mycotoxin Control Strategies: Prevention and Detoxification in Foods. Foods 2020, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abrunhosa, L.; Paterson, R.R.; Venancio, A. Biodegradation of ochratoxin a for food and feed decontamination. Toxins 2010, 2, 1078–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pitout, M.J. The hydrolysis of ochratoxin a by some proteolytic enzymes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1969, 18, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stander, M.A.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Henke, E.; Steyn, P.S. Screening of commercial hydrolases for the degradation of ochratoxin A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5736–5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dobritzsch, D.; Wang, H.; Schneider, G.; Yu, S. Structural and functional characterization of ochratoxinase, a novel mycotoxin-degrading enzyme. Biochem. J. 2014, 462, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Abrunhosa, L.; Santos, L.; Venâncio, A. Degradation of ochratoxin A by proteases and by a crude enzyme of Aspergillus niger. Food Biotechnol. 2006, 20, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Abrunhosa, L.; Venancio, A. Isolation and purification of an enzyme hydrolyzing ochratoxin A from Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 1909–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chang, X.J.; Wu, Z.D.; Wu, S.L.; Dai, Y.S.; Sun, C.P. Degradation of ochratoxin A by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ASAG1. Food Addit. Contam. Part A-Chem. 2015, 32, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liuzzi, V.C.; Fanelli, F.; Tristezza, M.; Haidukowski, M.; Picardi, E.; Manzari, C.; Lionetti, C.; Grieco, F.; Logrieco, A.F.; Thon, M.R.; et al. Transcriptional Analysis of Acinetobacter sp. neg1 Capable of Degrading Ochratoxin A. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hu, H.N.; Jia, X.; Wang, Y.P.; Liang, Z.H. Removal of ochratoxin A by a carboxypeptidase and peptides present in liquid cultures of Bacillus subtilis CW14. World Mycotoxin J. 2018, 11, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Waldschmidt-Leitz, E.; Purr, A. Concering proteinase and carboxy-polypeptidase originating from the pancreas. (XVII. Communication concerning the specificity of animal proteinases.). Ber. Der Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1929, 62, 2217–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anson, M.L. Carboxypeptidase. J. Gen. Physiol. 1937, 20, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shushanyan, M.; Khoshtariya, D.E.; Tretyakova, T.; Makharadze, M.; van Eldik, R. Diverse Role of Conformational Dynamics in Carboxypeptidase A-Driven Peptide and Ester Hydrolyses: Disclosing the “Perfect Induced Fit” and “Protein Local Unfolding” Pathways by Altering Protein Stability. Biopolymers 2011, 95, 852–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Szeto, M.W.Y.; Mujika, J.I.; Zurek, J.; Mulholland, A.J.; Harvey, J.N. QM/MM study on the mechanism of peptide hydrolysis by carboxypeptidase A. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2009, 898, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, S.; Zhang, C.; Xu, D.; Guo, H. Catalysis of Carboxypeptidase A: Promoted-Water versus Nucleophilic Pathways. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9259–9267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Shi, L.; Xu, W.T.; Tian, J.J.; Huang, K.L.; Liang, Z.H. The Expression of Bovine Pancreatic Procarboxypeptidase A in the Pichia Pastoris Yeast. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 15, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  24. Takahashi, S.; Ueda, M.; Tanaka, A. Function of the prosequence for in vivo folding and secretion of active Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 55, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, L.; Dong, W.; Yan, X. Expression of the Gene of Pro-and Mature Rhizopus chinensis Lipases and Associated Characteristics. Biotechnol. Bull. 2009, 2, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
  26. Abrunhosa, L.; Serra, R.; Venancio, A. Biodegradation of ochratoxin A by fungi isolated from grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7493–7496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. De Jesus, C.L.; Bartley, A.; Welch, A.Z.; Berry, J.P. High Incidence and Levels of Ochratoxin A in Wines Sourced from the United States. Toxins 2018, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Quintela, S.; Carmen Villaran, M.; Lopez de Armentia, I.; Elejalde, E. Ochratoxin A removal in wine: A review. Food Control 2013, 30, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stander, M.A.; Steyn, P.S.; van der Westhuizen, F.H.; Payne, B.E. A kinetic study into the hydrolysis of the ochratoxins and analogues by carboxypeptidase A. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 302–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bodwell, J.E.; Meyer, W.L. Purification and characterization of carboxypeptidase A from rat skeletal muscle. Biochemistry 1981, 20, 2767–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vertesi, A.; Simon, L.M.; Kiss, I.; Szajani, B. Preparation, characterization and application of immobilized carboxypeptidase A. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1999, 25, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, S.; Guan, S.; Duan, Z.; Han, X.; Zhang, X.; Fan, W.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Ma, H.; Liu, H.; et al. Molecular cloning, codon-optimized gene expression, and bioactivity assessment of two novel fungal immunomodulatory proteins from Ganoderma applanatum in Pichia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 5483–5494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tardioli, P.W.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Guisan, J.M.; Giordano, R.L.C. Design of new immobilized-stabilized carboxypeptidase A derivative for production of aromatic free hydrolysates of proteins. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Expression of mature Carboxypeptidase A (M-CPA) in P. pastoris. (a) Schematic representation of the primary structures of CPA; (b) SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of recombinant M-CPA; (c) Western blot analysis of recombinant M-CPA.
Figure 1. Expression of mature Carboxypeptidase A (M-CPA) in P. pastoris. (a) Schematic representation of the primary structures of CPA; (b) SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of recombinant M-CPA; (c) Western blot analysis of recombinant M-CPA.
Toxins 12 00680 g001
Figure 2. Enzymatic properties of recombinant M-CPA and commercial CPA (S-CPA). (a) The optimum temperature of M-CPA and S-CPA; (b) the thermal tolerance of M-CPA and S-CPA; (c) The optimum pH of M-CPA and S-CPA; (d) enzymatic dynamic response curve of M-CPA and S-CPA.
Figure 2. Enzymatic properties of recombinant M-CPA and commercial CPA (S-CPA). (a) The optimum temperature of M-CPA and S-CPA; (b) the thermal tolerance of M-CPA and S-CPA; (c) The optimum pH of M-CPA and S-CPA; (d) enzymatic dynamic response curve of M-CPA and S-CPA.
Toxins 12 00680 g002
Figure 3. Determination of Ochratoxin A (OTA) and OTα by HPLC and LC-MS/MS, respectively. (a) HPLC chromatogram of degradation products of OTA after incubation with buffered minimal methanol-complex (BMMY) medium (control), S-CPA (ochratoxin α control), and M-CPA, respectively; (b) LC-MS/MS analysis of the degradation products of OTA incubation with S-CPA (above) and M-CPA (below), respectively.
Figure 3. Determination of Ochratoxin A (OTA) and OTα by HPLC and LC-MS/MS, respectively. (a) HPLC chromatogram of degradation products of OTA after incubation with buffered minimal methanol-complex (BMMY) medium (control), S-CPA (ochratoxin α control), and M-CPA, respectively; (b) LC-MS/MS analysis of the degradation products of OTA incubation with S-CPA (above) and M-CPA (below), respectively.
Toxins 12 00680 g003
Figure 4. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) and HPLC analysis of OTA biodegradation in red wine by recombinant M-CPA and S-CPA.
Figure 4. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) and HPLC analysis of OTA biodegradation in red wine by recombinant M-CPA and S-CPA.
Toxins 12 00680 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiong, L.; Peng, M.; Zhao, M.; Liang, Z. Truncated Expression of a Carboxypeptidase A from Bovine Improves Its Enzymatic Properties and Detoxification Efficiency of Ochratoxin A. Toxins 2020, 12, 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110680

AMA Style

Xiong L, Peng M, Zhao M, Liang Z. Truncated Expression of a Carboxypeptidase A from Bovine Improves Its Enzymatic Properties and Detoxification Efficiency of Ochratoxin A. Toxins. 2020; 12(11):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiong, Lu, Mengxue Peng, Meng Zhao, and Zhihong Liang. 2020. "Truncated Expression of a Carboxypeptidase A from Bovine Improves Its Enzymatic Properties and Detoxification Efficiency of Ochratoxin A" Toxins 12, no. 11: 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110680

APA Style

Xiong, L., Peng, M., Zhao, M., & Liang, Z. (2020). Truncated Expression of a Carboxypeptidase A from Bovine Improves Its Enzymatic Properties and Detoxification Efficiency of Ochratoxin A. Toxins, 12(11), 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop