Next Article in Journal
Allergy—A New Role for T Cell Superantigens of Staphylococcus aureus?
Next Article in Special Issue
Discovery of the Gene Encoding a Novel Small Serum Protein (SSP) of Protobothrops flavoviridis and the Evolution of SSPs
Previous Article in Journal
The Nuclear Remodeling Induced by Helicobacter Cytolethal Distending Toxin Involves MAFB Oncoprotein
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel αIIbβ3 Antagonist from Snake Venom Prevents Thrombosis without Causing Bleeding
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/toxins12030175
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs) from Venomous Snakes: An Overview of the Functional Diversity in a Large and Underappreciated Superfamily

by
Takashi Tadokoro
1,
Cassandra M. Modahl
2,
Katsumi Maenaka
1 and
Narumi Aoki-Shioi
2,3,*
1
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12, Nishi-6, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
2
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Fukuoka University, 19-1, 8-chomeNanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(3), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030175
Submission received: 17 February 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 10 March 2020 / Published: 12 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Identification and Functional Characterization of Novel Venom Components)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The CAP protein superfamily (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs), Antigen 5 (Ag5), and Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) proteins) is widely distributed, but for toxinologists, snake venom CRISPs are the most familiar members. Although CRISPs are found in the majority of venoms, very few of these proteins have been functionally characterized, but those that have been exhibit diverse activities. Snake venom CRISPs (svCRISPs) inhibit ion channels and the growth of new blood vessels (angiogenesis). They also increase vascular permeability and promote inflammatory responses (leukocyte and neutrophil infiltration). Interestingly, CRISPs in lamprey buccal gland secretions also manifest some of these activities, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved function. As we strive to better understand the functions that CRISPs serve in venoms, it is worth considering the broad range of CRISP physiological activities throughout the animal kingdom. In this review, we summarize those activities, known crystal structures and sequence alignments, and we discuss predicted functional sites. CRISPs may not be lethal or major components of venoms, but given their almost ubiquitous occurrence in venoms and the accelerated evolution of svCRISP genes, these venom proteins are likely to have functions worth investigating.
Keywords:
CAP superfamily; ion channel blockage; salivary component; co-factors
Key Contribution: Characterized cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs), including those that have been isolated from snake venoms and other sources, bind various target molecules, but all of them alter cellular signaling. This is a key feature of CRISPs and other proteins of the large CAP superfamily. Crystal structures and amino acid sequence alignments can be used to infer CRISP functional residues involved in binding.

1. Introduction

The CAP protein superfamily (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs), Antigen 5 (Ag5), and Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) proteins), occasionally called the sperm coating protein (SCP) or Tpx-1/Ag5/PR-1/Sc7 (TAPS) family, occurs in a wide range of organisms. This superfamily is defined by a common structural feature, the CAP/PR-1 domain, with a unique α-β-α fold. The CAP/PR-1 domain comprises approximately 150–160 amino acids and includes four signature sequences, as defined in the PROSITE Database (http://www.expasy.ch/prosite/):
CAP1, [GDER][HR][FYWH][TVS][QA][LIVM][LIVMA]Wxx[STN];
CAP2, [LIVMFYH][LIVMFY]xC[NQRHS]Yx[PARH]x[GL]N[LIVMFYWDN];
CAP3 (HNxxR); and
CAP4 (G[EQ]N[ILV]).
Most proteins in this superfamily have only one CAP/PR-1 domain; however, a few species of parasitic helminths have proteins with more than one [1]. The CAP superfamily is extensive. The Pfam database (v32.0) (http://pfam.xfam.org/) contains 20,748 sequences (Pfam ID: PF00188) from 5356 species, ranging from bacteria to eukaryotes, and 39 structures, including a number of identical molecules with different IDs (Protein Data Bank, http://www.rcsb.org/; accessed on 2 January 2020). Sequence information for members of this superfamily continues to grow with the advancement of high-throughput technologies, such as next-generation cDNA sequencing.
Secreted PR-1 proteins were the first known members of the CAP superfamily, described in 1970 from Nicotiana tabacum plants infected with tobacco mosaic virus [2]. The abundance of PR-1 proteins increases in tobacco leaves infected with various pathogens [3]. These early results indicated that PR-1 proteins are involved in plant systemic responses to disease. Overexpression of the PR-1 gene results in increased plant resistance to fungi [4], oomycetes [3,5], and bacteria [6], but not to viruses [7]. Subsequently, PR-1 proteins were found ubiquitously distributed among plants. PR-1 genes are also associated with abiotic stress responses [8,9,10,11,12], though their expression may also be independent of stress responses [13]. The broad-ranging functions of PR-1 proteins require further investigation, especially after the discovery of PR-1 receptor-like kinases, which may be involved in initiation of signaling cascades [14]. The current hypothesis is that PR-1 proteins possess antimicrobial activity, amplifying defense signals via sterols or effector binding.
Ag5 proteins are abundant in insect venoms and saliva, including venoms of vespids and fire ants [15], and in the saliva of blood-feeding ticks [16], flies [17], and mosquitoes [18]. As one of the major allergens in insect venoms, immunoglobulins from human victims cross-react with Ag5s in venoms of yellow jackets, hornets, and paper wasps [15,19,20]. The function of Ag5 in saliva proteomes of hematophagous arthropods may be to regulate the host immune system and to inhibit coagulation during feeding [21,22]. For example, Ag5s from blood-feeding insects, Dipetalogaster maxima and Triatoma infestans, strongly inhibit collagen-induced platelet aggregation by interaction with Cu2+, providing redox potential for catalytic removal of O2, and decreasing inflammation [23].
CRISPs are highly expressed in rodent male reproductive tracts [24,25], with lower levels of expression in neutrophils, plasma, salivary gland, pancreas, ovary, thymus, and colon [26,27]. There has been a lack of consistent nomenclature regarding CRISPs. For example, CRISP-3 localized in seminal plasma is also known as specific granule protein 28 (SGP28), horse seminal plasma protein-3, and Aeg2 (NCBI Gene ID:10321). Three predominantly mammalian CRISPs (CRISP-1 to -3) have been referenced by different names in various studies, and a list of all published nomenclature has been assembled in a review by Adam et al. [28]. Mammalian CRISPs are associated with reproduction, cancer, and immune responses [28,29]. In addition to these activities, CRISPs have been identified as toxins in venom glands of snakes, lizards, spiders, scorpions, and cone snails [30,31,32,33,34]. Interestingly, a CRISP similar to those found in snake venom was also described as a main salivary component of the parasitic Japanese river lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum) [35].
CRISPs first appeared in reptile venoms approximately 170 million years ago in the clade Toxicofera [36,37]. Many CRISP orthologs have been found in lizard and snake venoms [38]. A review of venom proteomes confirmed the presence of CRISPs in viperid, elapid, and colubrid venoms, and their absence in atractaspidid venoms and those of some elapids, such as coral snakes [39]. The abundance of snake venom CRISPs (svCRISPs) in crude venom varies from 0.05% to 10%. The svCRISPs ablomin (Gloydius blomhoffii), triflin (Protobothrops flavoviridis), latisemin (Laticauda semifasciata), and tigrin (Rhabdophis tigrinus) were some of the first characterized, and were also classified as helothermine-like venom proteins (helveprins). Helothermine is a CRISP isolated from the venom of the Mexican beaded lizard (Heloderma horridum) [40]. The most common svCRISP activity has been non-enzymatic inhibition of various membrane channels, but many other activities have also been observed [31,41]. Sensitive “-omic” analyses, predominately transcriptomics and proteomics, have identified a large number of svCRISPs. However, in most cases these proteins have not been isolated or characterized experimentally, and their targets and biological roles remain unknown.
Target binding to alter cellular signaling cascades is a common function of CRISPs and other proteins of the CAP superfamily. In this review, we detail interactions between CAP superfamily proteins and their targets. It is important to view svCRISPs in the larger context of the entire CAP superfamily in order to identify their potential functions in venoms. We review svCRISPs that have been characterized during the past 10 years, examining their molecular surfaces and identifying regions and residues that contribute to their diverse biological activities.

2. Structural Features of Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs)

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains various CAP superfamily tertiary structures. High-resolution crystal structures of svCRISPs reveal a common secondary structure that includes 16 conserved cysteine residues (Figure 1). CRISPs have two main domains, a CAP/PR-1 domain at the N-terminus and a cysteine-rich (CRD)/ion channel regulatory (ICR) domain at the C-terminus, connected by a hinge region. For structure descriptions in this section, we have used residue numbering from triflin and natrin, well-characterized svCRISPs with published structures (Figure 1).

2.1. CAP/PR-1 Domain

Most CRISP structures contain an N-terminal α-β-α sandwich composed of five α-helixes and eight β-sheets, with five conserved cysteine residues among the 162 residues. The crystal structures of CRISP CAP/PR-1 domains show high similarity with CAP/PR-1 domains in P14a, a plant pathogenesis group-1 protein [42], and Ves v5, from yellow hornet venom [19]. A metal-ion-binding site in the CAP/PR-1 domain of CRISPs is also well conserved (His60, Glu75, Glu96, and His115; triflin numbering). Human CRISPs contain a glycosylation site (Asn-X(except Pro)-Ser/Thr) and a glycosylated form exists [43], but very few svCRISPs share this feature [41].

2.2. Hinge Region

About 20 amino acids (positions 163–182) form the hinge region between the CAP/PR-1 and CRD/ICR domains. The hinge region includes two disulfide bonds.

2.3. Cysteine-Rich Domain (CRD)/Ion Channel Regulatory (ICR) Domain

Three disulfide bonds and a few short α-helixes are well conserved in the CRD/ICR domain (positions 183–221). The CRD/ICR domain of svCRISPs may be important for recognizing ion channels. This has been suggested because the ion-binding motif in kaliotoxin (KTX) and margatoxin (an α-KTX) from buthid scorpion venoms [44], as well as in ShTx and BgK from sea anemone venoms [45], have the same tertiary structure. These peptide toxins, comprising approximately 40 amino acid residues, display high affinity for voltage-gated potassium channels and calcium-activated potassium channels, and possible interaction sites with these target channels have been proposed.

3. CRISP Co-Factors

CAP family members perform various physiological functions by binding to small compounds and proteins in the characteristic concavity of the CAP/PR-1 domain. Plant PR-1 proteins and the yeast CAP proteins, Pry1 and Pry2, bind sterols and lipids to inhibit pathogen proliferation. Sterols are essential for eukaryotes and bacteria, and removing them from membrane surfaces of pathogens inhibits their growth and can even kill them [46]. Lipid-related functions of the CAP superfamily have been summarized by Schneiter et al. in two reviews [47,48].
CRISPs bind divalent cations (Zn2+, Ca2+, and Cd2+), heparin, small peptides (substrates for Tex31, a cone snail CRISP [32]), and proteins (receptors). Five crystal structures of svCRISPs (natrin, triflin, pseudetoxin, pseudecin, and stecrisp) have revealed the presence of divalent ions in the CAP/PR-1 domain (Table 1). In crystal structures of the elapid CRISPs, pseudechetoxin and pseudecin, the CRD/ICR domains and the N-terminal domains form a groove that narrows upon Zn2+ binding, consistent with the finding that Zn2+ likely influences target molecule recognition [49]. Two Zn2+-binding sites in natrin are responsible for slight conformational differences with and without Zn2+, detected in 3D structure comparisons [50].
Binding of divalent cations alters CRISP activity. Zn2+ enhances the binding of natrin to heparin, resulting in increased expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells (ECs). It has been proposed that the heparin-binding site is located opposite the Zn2+-binding site in natrin [50]. Ca2+ (1 mM) increases cleavage activity of Tex31 (from Conus textile) 5-fold, but this increase was not observed with Zn2+ or Mg2+ [32]. It is interesting that members of the salivary antigen-5/CAP family from hematophagous insects are Cu2+-dependent antioxidant enzymes in competition assays, although these proteins also bind other divalent metals (Mn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Zn2+) depending on their presence in the buffers used [23]. Thus, there is clear evidence that divalent cations affect bioactivity not only of svCRISPs, but also other members of the CAP superfamily. However, whether conformational changes induced by cation-binding are correlated with their activity requires corroboration.

4. Proteins That Bind to CRISPs

Human CRISP-3 occurs in seminal plasma at high concentrations (14.8 g/mL) [72], but its function remains unknown. CRISP-3 is a promising bio-marker candidate for prostate cancer because the concentration of this protein increases >50-fold in pre-malignant prostate lesions and in primary tumors compared to normal prostatic epithelium [73]. To understand the physiological activity of CRISP-3, molecules with which it interacts have been identified, namely a prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids (PSP94) (also known as a β-microseminoprotein; MSP) [74] and α-1B glycoprotein in human plasma (A1BG) [75]. Both bind to CRISP-3 with high affinity (KD = 6.28 × 10−11 M with PSP94 and KD = 2.8 × 10−9 M with A1BG). Identification of interaction surfaces between CRISP-3 and these binding proteins from mammals has been a focus of attention due to the medical relevance of CRISP-3 [76,77]. However, experimental evidence has been limited to NMR titration and mutagenesis analysis [78,79]. Recently, we determined the structure of a complex between PSP94 and CRISP family proteins that provided insight into CRISP-3 binding [80].
Small serum protein-2 (SSP-2) was identified in the serum of Protobothrops flavoviridis as an endogenous inhibitor against triflin (svCRISP) [81]. We built a binding model by superimposing SSP-2 onto PSP94, because PSP94 and SSP-2 are structurally similar and interact strongly with triflin across species [82]. The previously published PSP94–CRISP-3 model based on NMR titration showed that the N-terminal Greek key motif and the C-terminal β8 strand of PSP94 interact with the N-terminal CAP/PR-1 domain and hinge region of CRISP-3, respectively, in a parallel manner [78]. Our structure is upside-down compared to the other model, but the same surface of PSP94 interacts with the concave CAP/PR-1 domain of triflin (Figure 2A). In addition to the β5 and β8 strands, other key structural elements of PSP94 involved in complex formation are likely to be conserved. In PSP94, the β1 and β8 strands at the N- and C-termini are aligned in a linear manner and form an edged binding surface, whereas the β1 and β5 strands of SSP-2 form the binding surface. SSP-2 has a shorter C-terminal region compared with PSP94, so the N- and C-termini of SSP-2 are located on opposite sides. Consequently, this is in contrast to the N- and C- termini of PSP94, which are located on the same side. We hypothesize that formation of a parallel β-sheet between the SSP-2 β5 strand and the triflin β4 strand may allow the SSP-2 β1 strand to fit into the cavity between the CAP/PR-1 and CRD/ICR domains of triflin, thereby blocking the Zn2+ binding site and stabilizing the interaction. These findings indicate that our model provides significant structural insight into the human PSP94–CRISP-3 complex, which has been debated for many years.
The SSP-2–CRISP-3 complex model reveals that the N-terminal alanine of SSP-2 penetrates the metal-binding site of triflin, and that the CRD/ICR domain is shifted compared to the position of the CRD/ICR domain in triflin. This observation agrees with the conformational change of the CRD/ICR domain in the presence or absence of Zn2+, which has been documented for another svCRISP, pseudecine (Figure 2B). We have evidence that the binding of SSP-2 dramatically suppresses the channel inhibition activity of triflin (unpublished data). The structure of our complex also indicates that the concave region of the triflin CAP/PR-1 domain was fully occupied by the entire SSP-2 molecule, whereas direct interaction at the CRD/ICR domain was limited. Thus, SSP-2 may inhibit activity of several svCRISPs, because the concave region of this family shows great conservation. SSP-2 binding prevents Zn2+ binding to the concave region of the PR-1/CAP domain (Figure 2B). The structure-based alignment of venom CRISPs and human CRISP-3 show that the contact residues identified in our complex are relatively well conserved among CRISPs, suggesting the relevance of the binding ability of PSP94 to a wide range of CRISPs, including svCRISPs. As described above, divalent cations affect some CRISP activities (Section 3). Therefore, binding of the side face of the β-sheets of SSP-2 to both CAP/PR-1 and CRD/ICR domains of triflin might be important for suppression of triflin functions.

5. Isolation and Characterization of Snake Venom CRISPs

Snake venom CRISPs have proven difficult to express recombinantly and to fold properly in bacteria and yeast systems due to their eight disulfide bonds. Therefore, the first step in characterizing svCRISPs is usually to isolate from crude venom. Normal-phase and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), have been used to purify venom CRISPs. The svCRISP natrin from Naja, triflin from Protobothrops flavoviridis, ablomin from G. blomhoffii, latisemin from L. semifasciata, tigrin from R. tigrinus, kaouthin-1 and kaouthin-2 from Naja kaouthia [83], and patagonin from Philodryas patagoniensis were purified by size exclusion chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, or heparin affinity chromatography. Pseudechetoxin from Pseudechis australis, TJ-CRVP from Trimeresurus jerdonii, and NA-CRVPs from Naja atra [84], as well as helothermine from the saliva of Heloderma horridum [40] and Tex31, from a homogenized extract of Conus textile [32], were purified by reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) with an acetonitrile buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid for the final purification step. It is possible that RP-HPLC purification in acidic buffers may affect CRISP activity and tertiary structure, although Tex31 which was purified by this method retained its proteolytic activity. In our own lab, we compared CD spectra of triflin purified by normal-phase and RP-HPLC and found no differences (unpublished). Therefore, we concluded that svCRISPs are very stable, even in strong acids (<pH 2.0).
In our work, two serum CRISPs were discovered in Protobothrops flavoviridis and G. blomhoffii venoms, which we designated as serotriflin and seroablomin, respectively [85]. We also reported complexes between serum CRISPs and other proteins in the blood of snakes. Formation of these complexes is pH-dependent, so they might not be found if acidic RP-HPLC buffers are used, but neutral or basic volatile buffer systems can probably be used.
The greatest challenge with CRISP isolation is that it is difficult to conclude if the biological activity is retained given that, for most, their activities are unknown. So far, no svCRISPs have proven lethal to mammals. A key feature of this family of proteins is that, although they bind various target molecules, all affect cellular signaling.

5.1. Ancestral CRISP Activity

Ito et al. and Xiao et al. characterized CRISPs from buccal glands of lampreys. These proteins included a CRISP from L. japonicum and buccal gland secretion protein-2 (CRBGP-2) from Lampetra japonica [35,51]. Lamprey CRISPs exhibited similar pharmacological effects under almost the same conditions and concentrations as svCRISPs, such as blocked depolarization-induced contraction of rat-tail arterial smooth muscle at 1 μM and suppression of angiogenesis related to EC apoptosis via microfilament disorganization [51,52,53,54], although their selectivity differed from that of svCRISPs [51]. Recombinant PR-1/CAP retained both cytotoxic activity against human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and anti-angiogenic activity. In 2011, a lamprey CRISP was demonstrated as a neutrophil inhibitory factor, and its inhibitory effect was caused by binding to α β 2 integrin receptors [55]. These observations suggested that some physiological activities of svCRISPs have been conserved from ancestral vertebrates.

5.2. Myotoxicity

Patagonin, from Philodryas patagoniensis venom, caused skeletal myotoxicity in murine gastrocnemius muscle, including muscle necrosis, edema, and inflammatory infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes without smooth muscle contraction, as well as proteolytic activity, hemorrhage, and inhibition of platelet aggregation [70]. The authors hypothesized that the molecular mechanism by which patagonin induced muscle necrosis may be associated with binding to ion channels and speculated that this might be a general property of svCRISPs. They also suggested that tigrin (R. tigrinus) may cause skeletal myotoxicity because patagonin and tigrin are both from rear-fanged snakes and have high sequence similarity.

5.3. Ion Channel Inhibition

Several venom CRISPs from viperids and elapids target ion channels [31]. One of the best characterized svCRISPs is natrin, isolated from N. atra, the crystal structure and receptor targets of which are known. Natrin has an inhibitory effect on high-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BKca) Kv1.3 channels, as well as calcium release channel/ryanodine receptors (RyR) [67]. In 2010, Wang et al. demonstrated that <1 M natrin activated ECs to promote monocytic cell adhesion in a heparin sulfate- and Zn2+-dependent manner via increased expression of adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1) and E-selectin as an inflammatory modulator [50]. They proposed that the mechanism involved binding of natrin to heparin in the presence of Zn2+. A cryo-EM study showed that the CRD/ICR domain of natrin is crucial for binding to ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1, a Ca2+ release channel) [68]. However, sequence comparisons among svCRISPs suggest that the amino acid residues 42-44, 57-59, and 63-65 in the CAP/PR-1 domain may also be important for target channel recognition (Figure 1) [49,83]. These regions are putative interaction sites that target ion-channels, and are variable svCRISP residues. Indeed, the CRD/ICR domain of pseudechetoxin, a cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channel blocker, did not inhibit CNG channels alone [49].

5.4. Anti-Protozoal Activity

Crovirin from Crotalus viridis has anti-protozoan activity against Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania amazonensis with low IC50 and LD50 values (1.10–2.38 g/mL), but was non-toxic to mice in an ex vivo assay measuring creatine kinase activity after an injection of 10 μg/mL of crovirin [71]. A considerably higher concentration of crovirin (20 g/mL) displayed limited toxicity to mammalian cells. The mechanism responsible for this activity was not investigated.

5.5. Anti-Angiogenic Activity

A CRISP from Echis carinatus sochureki venom, EC-CRISP, is a negative regulator of angiogenesis. The HPLC fraction did not interact with cancer cells, such as the glioma cell line, LN18, but showed pro-adhesive properties for normal ECs, such as HUVECs. At concentrations of 10–20 g/mL (<1 M), EC-CRISP interacted with ECs without affecting fibronectin, vitronectin, collagen type I, or laminin, and was transported into the cytoplasm. This toxin inhibited the MAPK Erk1/2 signaling pathway induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), but had no effect on two other MAP kinases, p38 and SAPK/JNK [65]. However, the target receptor of ES-CRISP is still unknown.

5.6. Vascular Permeability Regulator

The effect of hellerin, from Crotalus oreganus helleri venom, on vascular permeability was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. Trans-capillary leakage was observed 30 min after mice were subcutaneously injected with hellerin (70 nM), but leakage was approximately half that of the vascular permeability produced by vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A, 50 nM) [64]. Hellerin (2 M) reduced the viability of HUVECs by 50%, and hellerin-treated HUVEC cells had rounded cell shapes and detached from the substrate. In human dermal lymphatic endothelial cells (HDLECs) and human dermal blood endothelial cells (HDBECs), hellerin (675 nM) increased trans-epithelial permeability and decreased the level of F-actin.

5.7. Inflammation Regulator and Protease Activity

The Bothrops jararaca svCRISP, Bj-CRP, did not show proteolytic, hemorrhagic, coagulant, or potassium channel inhibition [63]. However, Bj-CRP increased leukocyte and neutrophil infiltration in mice 1 and 4 hr after i.p. injection, but this activity did not increase over 24 h following the injection. This inflammatory response might be related to the observed increase in IL-6 expression 1 h after injection, but no increase in TNF-, IL-10, or NO was observed. Bj-CRP cleaved C3 and C4 weakly and bound to components C3 and C4, which resulted in increased levels of C3a, C4a, and C5a. These results indicate that Bj-CRP modulates hemolytic activity associated with the complement pathways because >50 g of Bj-CRP reduced hemolytic activity.

6. Functional Sites Identified in CRISPs

CRISPs are highly conserved proteins in snake venoms; however, few svCRISPs have known biological activities (Table 1). Amino acid alignments between CRISPs with known structures and activities would be useful for understanding other CRISPs. CRISP putative functional sites have been proposed based on amino acid sequence conservation and variability. However, it is still necessary to characterize the biological activities of novel CRISPs because structure-function relationships for these toxins are yet to be completely understood.

6.1. Potential Functional Sites Responsible for Protease Activity

Cone snail Tex31, a PR-1 protein, showed proteolytic activity against synthesized peptides such as Ac-KLEKR-pNA. Tex31 is thought to cleave the propeptide region of conotoxin TxVIA as a native substrate [32]. Stecrisp, a svCRISP isolated from Trimeresurus stejnegeri venom, had no proteolytic activity under almost the same conditions. Based on tertiary structures, the authors proposed that Ser80 in Tex31, which is in a loop region, may be in close proximity to the highly conserved divalent cation site (His130 and Glu115 in Tex31), and this forms a catalytic triad responsible for cleavage [32]. Unlike Tex31, the residue at position 80 in stecrisp is proline (Pro80 in the reference [62]).
Patagonin and Lamprey CRISP lacked cleavage activity against fibrinogen [70]. Natrin lacked proteolytic activity against bovine serum albumin (BSA), neurotensin, a Tex31 substrate, or kenetensin [50]. Although Bj-CRP did not cleave azocasein, fibrinogen, or fibrin, it showed low catalytic activity against C3 and C4 [63]. This result might be similar to the general activation of component C3 by C3-convertase, a serine protease. C3-convertase cleaves component C3 to C3a and C3b, at a cleavage site between Arg726 and Ser727 (--LAR726S727NLD--) of component C3 [86]. This cleavage site is similar to the leucine at position P4 of the preferred substrate sequences of Tex31, counting from the C-terminal end. A sequence comparison between Bj-CRP and Tex31 could not be performed because the Bj-CRP sequence is not yet available. There are still many unknown sequences, such as the non-proteolytic patagonin. Thus, functional sites responsible for CRISP proteolytic activity are unclear because of the limited number of reports, and because their proteolytic activity against different substrates has not been comprehensively evaluated. Likewise, protease activity of mammalian, fungal, and plant CAP superfamily proteins is still lacking.

6.2. Potential Domains and Functional Sites Responsible for Ion Channel Inhibition

Seven CRISPs inhibit high-potassium-induced contraction of smooth muscle, with three of these (piscivorin, ophanin, and catrin) demonstrating a weaker effect at 1 µM [61]. Three CRISPs (tigrin, patagonin, and natrin) did not show inhibition when tested (Table 1). The current hypothesis is that suppression of muscle contraction is a result of the restriction of the Ca2+ incurrent by CRISP channel blockade; however, there is no direct evidence to support this. As previously discussed, the CRD/ICR domain is one of the CRISP regions potentially responsible for targeting ion-channels. This has been suggested because this domain is very similar to peptides that block ion channels, including peptide toxins KTX, α-KTX, and ShTx (43). CRD/ICR domain sequences between CRISPs that cause muscle contraction and those that inhibit contractions were compared (Figure 3A). Interestingly, there is a deletion of two residues in tigrin and an insertion of five residues (GAGGT) in lamprey CRISP in this region. These differences are also present only in the surface-exposed ICR motif of the CRD/ICR domain. (Figure 3B). However, there are no significant feature differences among active ion channel inhibitors and those that are inactive. There are likely multiple residues responsible for this activity in the CAP/PR-1 domain and/or hinge region.
Helothermine and natrin bind to ion channel targets with high affinity (<1 µM). These targets include K+ channels, ryanodine receptors [58,67,69], and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels [57]. Not all CRISPs have been identified as having ion channel targets. Bj-CRISP had no effect on 13 voltage-gated potassium channels tested using two-electrode voltage-clamping on Xenopus oocytes. CNG channels were identified as pseudechetoxin and pseudecin targets. Interestingly, these toxins had different affinities, even though they differ by only seven residues. Two basic residues in pseudechetoxin (Lys184 and Arg185) seem to contribute to higher CNG binding affinity; the affinity of pseudechetoxin is 10-fold greater than that of pseudecin, with neutral residues (Asn184 and Tyr185) in this region (Figure 1) [60]. Matsunaga et al. discussed sequence variation in the concave region between the N- and C-terminal domains of svCRISPs. They suggested that variation in svCRISP activity toward different ion channels can be explained by charge distribution differences on the surfaces of svCRISPs [83]; however, there is no experimental evidence identifying the binding sites of these toxins.

7. svCRISP Evolution

CRISPs of toxicoferan reptiles have experienced positive selection, and more in snakes than in lizards [87]. In contrast, mammalian CRISPs appear constrained by negative selection. Episodes of rapid gene divergence are seen for svCRISPs in elapids and rear-fanged colubrids at all codon positions, in comparison to weaker gene divergence in viperid and boid snakes, and anguid, helodermatid, and iguanid lizards [88]. Evolution of toxicoferan CRISPs may be linked to snake predatory behavior. Elapid CRISPs manifest lower levels of positive selection (ω values), potentially due to the presence of highly toxic neurotoxins in these venoms for prey incapacitation. Viperids and rear-fanged colubrids have comparatively fewer toxic venom components, and have CRISPs manifesting higher levels of positive selection. At the protein-level, positive selection was identified at sites on the molecular surface, primarily in the CRD/ICR domain [87]. Future characterizations of CRISP activities with their corresponding functional sites may provide better insight into their role in prey capture and how this impacts their evolution.
Although 1-6 gene copies are observed for CRISPs in snake genomes [89,90], CRISP gene positions in snake genomes appear to be conserved. For genomes of both Naja naja and Crotalus viridis, svCRISP genes are located on chromosome 1 [90,91], potentially close to the centromere. This genome location may promote sequence conservation and may explain why expression of some toxins varies for different snake families, such as is observed for phospholipase A2s and three-finger toxins, but svCRISPs are present at consistent levels in venoms of most venomous snakes.
Expression levels of toxin and non-toxin homologs of svCRISPs have been evaluated for one opisthoglyph and for proteroglyphs and solenoglyphs [89,90,91,92]. At least two CRISP genes are expressed in snake venom glands, but differences in expression levels of each are apparent. Molecular evolution and functionality may not be equal for these two genes. Therefore, interpretations based on genome sequences alone require caution. Expression levels should also be considered to avoid misrepresenting the significance of venom CRISPs.

8. Conclusions and Future Directions

Two decades have passed since the discovery of venom CRISPs [58]. Many are now known and have been investigated in various ways, including protein and nucleotide sequencing, and characterization of molecular weights and isoelectric points. A few have been functionally characterized. However, new technologies generating large amounts of sequence data have completely overwhelmed our capacity to functionally characterize the many venom constituents being reported. This is especially difficult when it has yet to become apparent what biological roles certain toxins provide in venoms, as we can only document the activities for which we assay.
It is possible for toxins to have conserved amino acid sequences, functions, and mechanisms associated with their structures. This information can provide insights into their surface features and even into specific residues involved in binding. Conserved features may preserve selectivity and/or specificity. Structures and functions of CRISPs have been reviewed here, including those from lampreys. Ion channel-blocking activity and/or disruption of EC conditions may be an activity of svCRISPs that has been conserved evolutionarily. Further, it is important to consider co-factors and interacting proteins that regulate these activities in order to comprehensively understand biological effects of svCRISPs. Venom proteins are remarkably stable, with high selectivity and affinity for targets. Exploring toxins, even non-lethal ones like CRISPs, can improve our understanding of how proteins target specific channels, receptors, or substrates. This can be useful for the development of therapeutics, not only to treat snake envenoming, but also other maladies.
svCRISP characterization faces several challenges. The first is that these proteins occur at low levels in crude venoms. Moreover, eight disulfide bonds make them difficult to biosynthesize in large quantities for biological assays or structure determinations. An additional struggle lies in designing proper assays to characterize svCRISP activity, as a wide diversity of activities have been documented. We propose that the range of activities known from the CAP superfamily as a whole should dictate assays to be used in characterizing novel svCRISPs. Functional characterization of CRISPs lags far behind the number of genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic CRISP sequences. An integrated approach to study snake venoms is required. Researchers involved in ‘-omics’ need to collaborate with labs that specialize in structure-function relationships to execute more comprehensive studies. In the future, we encourage toxinologists to characterize svCRISPs functionally.

Author Contributions

N.A.-S. and K.M. conceived and designed the content of this article; C.M.M. analyzed and summarized sequences of the CRISP proteins; T.T. contributed analysis tools and making protein tertiary structures; N.A.-S., C.M.M., T.T. and K.M. wrote this review article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Japan society of the promotion of science grant number 17KK0179 and JBC31025 and N.S was funded by Fukuoka University Foundation (181042 and 197104).

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Manjunatha Kini for help with literature search and helpful comments on the manuscript sequence alignments. We thank Margaret Biswas from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cantacessi, C.; Gasser, R.B. SCP/TAPS proteins in helminths–Where to from now? Mol. Cell. Probes 2012, 26, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Loon, L.C.; Van Kammen, A. Polyacrylamide disc electrophoresis of the soluble leaf proteins from Nicotiana tabacum var. ‘Samsun’ and ‘Samsun NN’. Virology 1970, 40, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alexander, D.; Goodman, R.M.; Gut-Rella, M.; Glascock, C.; Weymann, K.; Friedrich, L.; Maddox, D.; Ahl-Goy, P.; Luntz, T.; Ward, E. Increased tolerance to two oomycete pathogens in transgenic tobacco expressing pathogenesis-Related protein 1a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 7327–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kiba, A.; Nishihara, M.; Nakatsuka, T.; Yamamura, S. Pathogenesis-Related protein 1 homologue is an antifungal protein in Wasabia japonica leaves and confers resistance to Botrytis cinerea in transgenic tobacco. Plant Biotechnol. 2007, 24, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarowar, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, E.N.; Kim, K.D.; Hwang, B.K.; Islam, R.; Shin, J.S. Overexpression of a pepper basic pathogenesis-Related protein 1 gene in tobacco plants enhances resistance to heavy metal and pathogen stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shin, S.H.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, M.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Oh, J.S.; Choi, H.K.; Jung, H.W.; Chung, Y.S. An Acidic PATHOGENESIS-RELATED1 Gene of Oryza grandiglumis is Involved in Disease Resistance Response Against Bacterial Infection. Plant Pathol. J. 2014, 30, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Carr, J.P.; Beachy, R.N.; Klessig, D.F. Are the PR1 proteins of tobacco involved in genetically engineered resistance to TMV? Virology 1989, 169, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hon, W.C.; Griffith, M.; Mlynarz, A.; Kwok, Y.C.; Yang, D. Antifreeze Proteins in Winter Rye Are Similar to Pathogenesis-Related Proteins. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zeier, J.; Pink, B.; Mueller, M.; Berger, S. Light conditions influence specific defence responses in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions: Uncoupling systemic resistance from salicylic acid and PR-1 accumulation. Planta 2004, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seo, P.J.; Lee, A.-K.; Xiang, F.; Park, C.-M. Molecular and Functional Profiling of Arabidopsis Pathogenesis-Related Genes: Insights into Their Roles in Salt Response of Seed Germination. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, W.-X.; Zhang, F.-C.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Song, L.-F.; Wu, W.-H.; Chen, Y.-F. Arabidopsis Di19 Functions as a Transcription Factor and Modulates PR1, PR2, and PR5 Expression in Response to Drought Stress. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1487–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kothari, K.S.; Dansana, P.K.; Giri, J.; Tyagi, A.K. Rice Stress Associated Protein 1 (OsSAP1) Interacts with Aminotransferase (OsAMTR1) and Pathogenesis-Related 1a Protein (OsSCP) and Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Memelink, J.; Linthorst, H.J.M.; Schilperoort, R.A.; Hoge, J.H.C. Tobacco genes encoding acidic and basic isoforms of pathogenesis-Related proteins display different expression patterns. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 14, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Breen, S.; Williams, S.J.; Outram, M.; Kobe, B.; Solomon, P.S. Emerging Insights into the Functions of Pathogenesis-Related Protein 1. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. King, T.P.; Spangfort, M.D. Structure and Biology of Stinging Insect Venom Allergens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2000, 123, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mans, B.J.; Andersen, J.F.; Francischetti, I.M.B.; Valenzuela, J.G.; Schwan, T.G.; Pham, V.M.; Garfield, M.K.; Hammer, C.H.; Ribeiro, J.M.C. Comparative sialomics between hard and soft ticks: Implications for the evolution of blood-Feeding behavior. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Charlab, R.; Valenzuela, J.G.; Rowton, E.D.; Ribeiro, J.M.C. Toward an understanding of the biochemical and pharmacological complexity of the saliva of a hematophagous sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 15155–15160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Calvo, E.; Dao, A.; Pham, V.M.; Ribeiro, J.M.C. An insight into the sialome of Anopheles funestus reveals an emerging pattern in anopheline salivary protein families. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 37, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Henriksen, A.; King, T.P.; Mirza, O.; Monsalve, R.I.; Meno, K.; Ipsen, H.; Larsen, J.N.; Gajhede, M.; Spangfort, M.D. Major venom allergen of yellow jackets, Ves v 5: Structural characterization of a pathogenesis-Related protein superfamily. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2001, 45, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Müller, U.R.; Johansen, N.; Petersen, A.B.; Fromberg-Nielsen, J.; Haeberli, G. Hymenoptera venom allergy: Analysis of double positivity to honey bee and Vespula venom by estimation of IgE antibodies to species-Specific major allergens Api m1 and Ves v5. Allergy 2009, 64, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ribeiro, J.M.C.; Francischetti, I.M.B. Role of arthropod saliva in blood feeding: Sialome and Post-Sialome Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. dos Santos-Pinto, J.R.A.; dos Santos, L.D.; Andrade Arcuri, H.; Castro, F.M.; Kalil, J.E.; Palma, M.S. Using Proteomic Strategies for Sequencing and Post-Translational Modifications Assignment of Antigen-5, a Major Allergen from the Venom of the Social Wasp Polybia paulista. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Assumpção, T.C.F.; Ma, D.; Schwarz, A.; Reiter, K.; Santana, J.M.; Andersen, J.F.; Ribeiro, J.M.C.; Nardone, G.; Yu, L.L.; Francischetti, I.M.B. Salivary Antigen-5/CAP Family Members Are Cu2+-Dependent Antioxidant Enzymes That Scavenge O2− and Inhibit Collagen-induced Platelet Aggregation and Neutrophil Oxidative Burst. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 14341–14361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cameo, M.S.; Blaquier, J.A. Androgen-Controlled specific proteins in rat epididymis. J. Endocrinol. 1976, 69, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kierszenbaum, A.L.; Lea, O.; Petrusz, P.; French, F.S.; Tres, L.L. Isolation, culture, and immunocytochemical characterization of epididymal epithelial cells from pubertal and adult rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78, 1675–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kratzschmar, J.; Haendler, B.; Eberspaecher, U.; Roosterman, D.; Donner, P.; Schleuning, W.-D. The Human Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein (CRISP) Family. Primary Structure and Tissue Distribution of CRISP-1, CRISP-2 and CRISP-3. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 236, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Udby, L.; Cowland, J.B.; Johnsen, A.H.; Sørensen, O.E.; Borregaard, N.; Kjeldsen, L. An ELISA for SGP28/CRISP-3, a cysteine-Rich secretory protein in human neutrophils, plasma, and exocrine secretions. J. Immunol. Methods 2002, 263, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koppers, A.J.; Reddy, T.; O′Bryan, M.K. The role of cysteine-Rich secretory proteins in male fertility. Asian J. Androl. 2011, 13, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibbs, G.M.; Roelants, K.; O′Bryan, M.K. The CAP Superfamily: Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-Related 1 Proteins—Roles in Reproduction, Cancer, and Immune Defense. Endocr. Rev. 2008, 29, 865–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gibbs, G.M.; O′Bryan, M.K. Cysteine rich secretory proteins in reproduction and venom. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2007, 65, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yamazaki, Y.; Morita, T. Structure and function of snake venom cysteine-Rich secretory proteins. Toxicon 2004, 44, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Milne, T.J.; Abbenante, G.; Tyndall, J.D.A.; Halliday, J.; Lewis, R.J. Isolation and Characterization of a Cone Snail Protease with Homology to CRISP Proteins of the Pathogenesis-Related Protein Superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31105–31110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Undheim, E.A.; Sunagar, K.; Herzig, V.; Kely, L.; Low, D.H.; Jackson, T.N.; Jones, A.; Kurniawan, N.; King, G.F.; Ali, S.A.; et al. A proteomics and transcriptomics investigation of the venom from the barychelid spider Trittame loki (brush-Foot trapdoor). Toxins 2013, 5, 2488–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Romero-Gutierrez, T.; Peguero-Sanchez, E.; Cevallos, M.A.; Batista, C.V.F.; Ortiz, E.; Possani, L.D. A Deeper Examination of Thorellius atrox Scorpion Venom Components with Omic Techonologies. Toxins 2017, 9, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ito, N.; Mita, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Matsushima, A.; Watanabe, Y.G.; Hirano, S.; Odani, S. Novel cysteine-Rich secretory protein in the buccal gland secretion of the parasitic lamprey, Lethenteron japonicum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 358, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fry, B.G.; Casewell, N.R.; Wuster, W.; Vidal, N.; Young, B.; Jackson, T.N. The structural and functional diversification of the Toxicofera reptile venom system. Toxicon 2012, 60, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fry, B.G.; Vidal, N.; Norman, J.A.; Vonk, F.J.; Scheib, H.; Ramjan, S.F.R.; Kuruppu, S.; Fung, K.; Blair Hedges, S.; Richardson, M.K.; et al. Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes. Nature 2006, 439, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barua, A.; Mikheyev, A.S. Many Options, Few Solutions: Over 60 My Snakes Converged on a Few Optimal Venom Formulations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 1964–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tasoulis, T.; Isbister, G. A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes. Toxins 2017, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Morrissette, J.; Krätzschmar, J.; Haendler, B.; el-Hayek, R.; Mochca-Morales, J.; Martin, B.M.; Patel, J.R.; Moss, R.L.; Schleuning, W.D.; Coronado, R. Primary structure and properties of helothermine, a peptide toxin that blocks ryanodine receptors. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 2280–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mackessy, S.P.; Heyborne, W.H. Cysteine-Rich secretory proteins in reptile venoms. In Handbook of Venoms and Toxins of Reptiles; Mackessy, S.P., Ed.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 325–334. [Google Scholar]
  42. Niderman, T.; Genetet, I.; Bruyere, T.; Gees, R.; Stintzi, A.; Legrand, M.; Fritig, B.; Mosinger, E. Pathogenesis-Related PR-1 Proteins Are Antifungal (Isolation and Characterization of Three 14-Kilodalton Proteins of Tomato and of a Basic PR-1 of Tobacco with Inhibitory Activity against Phytophthora infestans). Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Anklesaria, J.H.; Pandya, R.R.; Pathak, B.R.; Mahale, S.D. Purification and characterization of CRISP-3 from human seminal plasma and its real-Time binding kinetics with PSP94. J. Chromatogr. B 2016, 1039, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Crest, M.; Jacquet, G.; Gola, M.; Zerrouk, H.; Benslimane, A.; Rochat, H.; Mansuelle, P.; Martin-Eauclaire, M.F. Kaliotoxin, a novel peptidyl inhibitor of neuronal BK-type Ca(2+)-activated K+ channels characterized from Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus venom. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 1640–1647. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Madio, B.; King, G.F.; Undheim, E.A.B. Sea Anemone Toxins: A Structural Overview. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Gupte, M.; Kulkarni, P.; Ganguli, B. Antifungal antibiotics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schneiter, R.; Di Pietro, A. The CAP protein superfamily: Function in sterol export and fungal virulence. Biomol. Concepts 2013, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Darwiche, R.; El Atab, O.; Cottier, S.; Schneiter, R. The function of yeast CAP family proteins in lipid export, mating, and pathogen defense. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 1304–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Suzuki, N.; Yamazaki, Y.; Brown, R.L.; Fujimoto, Z.; Morita, T.; Mizuno, H. Structures of pseudechetoxin and pseudecin, two snake-Venom cysteine-Rich secretory proteins that target cyclic nucleotide-Gated ion channels: Implications for movement of the C-terminal cysteine-Rich domain. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 1034–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Y.-L.; Kuo, J.-H.; Lee, S.-C.; Liu, J.-S.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Shih, Y.-T.; Chen, C.-J.; Chiu, J.-J.; Wu, W.-G. Cobra CRISP Functions as an Inflammatory Modulator via a Novel Zn2+- and Heparan Sulfate-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation of Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37872–37883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Xiao, R.; Li, Q.-W.; Perrett, S.; He, R.-Q. Characterisation of the fibrinogenolytic properties of the buccal gland secretion from Lampetra japonica. Biochimie 2007, 89, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jiang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Duan, D.; Gou, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Xiao, R. Anti-Angiogenic activities of CRBGP from buccal glands of lampreys (Lampetra japonica). Biochimie 2016, 123, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chi, S.; Xiao, R.; Li, Q.; Zhou, L.; He, R.; Qi, Z. Suppression of neuronal excitability by the secretion of the lamprey (Lampetra japonica) provides a mechanism for its evolutionary stability. Pflügers Arch.-Eur. J. Physiol. 2009, 458, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jiang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Gou, M.; Han, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Xiao, R. Data for the inhibition effects of recombinant lamprey CRBGP on the tube formation of HUVECs and new blood vessel generation in CAM models. Data Brief 2016, 6, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Xue, Z.; Bai, J.; Sun, J.; Wu, Y.; Yu, S.Y.; Guo, R.Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Q.W. Novel neutrophil inhibitory factor homologue in the buccal gland secretion of Lampetra japonica. Biol. Chem. 2011, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xiao, R.; Pang, Y.; Li, Q.W. The buccal gland of Lampetra japonica is a source of diverse bioactive proteins. Biochimie 2012, 94, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Nobile, M.; Noceti, F.; Prestipino, G.; Possani, L. Helothermine, a lizard venom toxin, inhibits calcium current in cerebellar granules. Exp. Brain Res. 1996, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nobile, M.; Magnelli, V.; Lagostena, L.; Mochca-Morales, J.; Possani, L.D.; Prestipino, G. The toxin helothermine affects potassium currents in newborn rat cerebellar granule cells. J. Membr. Biol. 1994, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mochca-Morales, J.; Martin, B.M.; Possani, L.D. Isolation and characterization of Helothermine, a novel toxin from Heloderma horridum horridum (Mexican beaded lizard) venom. Toxicon 1990, 28, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yamazaki, Y.; Brown, R.L.; Morita, T. Purification and Cloning of Toxins from Elapid Venoms that Target Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Ion Channels. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 11331–11337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yamazaki, Y.; Hyodo, F.; Morita, T. Wide distribution of cysteine-rich secretory proteins in snake venoms: Isolation and cloning of novel snake venom cysteine-rich secretory proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 412, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guo, M.; Teng, M.; Niu, L.; Liu, Q.; Huang, Q.; Hao, Q. Crystal Structure of the Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein Stecrisp Reveals That the Cysteine-Rich Domain Has a K + Channel Inhibitor-Like Fold. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 12405–12412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lodovicho, M.E.; Costa, T.R.; Bernardes, C.P.; Menaldo, D.L.; Zoccal, K.F.; Carone, S.E.; Rosa, J.C.; Pucca, M.B.; Cerni, F.A.; Arantes, E.C.; et al. Investigating possible biological targets of Bj-CRP, the first cysteine-Rich secretory protein (CRISP) isolated from Bothrops jararaca snake venom. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 265, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Suntravat, M.; Cromer, W.E.; Marquez, J.; Galan, J.A.; Zawieja, D.C.; Davies, P.; Salazar, E.; Sánchez, E.E. The isolation and characterization of a new snake venom cysteine-Rich secretory protein (svCRiSP) from the venom of the Southern Pacific rattlesnake and its effect on vascular permeability. Toxicon 2019, 165, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lecht, S.; Chiaverelli, R.A.; Gerstenhaber, J.; Calvete, J.J.; Lazarovici, P.; Casewell, N.R.; Harrison, R.; Lelkes, P.I.; Marcinkiewicz, C. Anti-Angiogenic activities of snake venom CRISP isolated from Echis carinatus sochureki. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2015, 1850, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Adade, C.M.; Carvalho, A.L.O.; Tomaz, M.A.; Costa, T.F.R.; Godinho, J.L.; Melo, P.A.; Lima, A.P.C.A.; Rodrigues, J.C.F.; Zingali, R.B.; Souto-Padrón, T. Crovirin, a Snake Venom Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein (CRISP) with Promising Activity against Trypanosomes and Leishmania. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brown, R.L.; Haley, T.L.; West, K.A.; Crabb, J.W. Pseudechetoxin: A peptide blocker of cyclic nucleotide-Gated ion channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Wang, J.; Shen, B.; Guo, M.; Lou, X.; Duan, Y.; Cheng, X.P.; Teng, M.; Niu, L.; Liu, Q.; Huang, Q.; et al. Blocking Effect and Crystal Structure of Natrin Toxin, a Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein from Naja atra Venom that Targets the BK Ca Channel. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 10145–10152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, Q.; Wang, Q.-L.; Meng, X.; Shu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Wagenknecht, T.; Yin, C.-C.; Sui, S.-F.; Liu, Z. Structural and Functional Characterization of Ryanodine Receptor-Natrin Toxin Interaction. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 4289–4299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wang, F.; Li, H.; Liu, M.-N.; Song, H.; Han, H.-M.; Wang, Q.-L.; Yin, C.-C.; Zhou, Y.-C.; Qi, Z.; Shu, Y.-Y.; et al. Structural and functional analysis of natrin, a venom protein that targets various ion channels. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 351, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Peichoto, M.E.; Mackessy, S.P.; Teibler, P.; Tavares, F.L.; Burckhardt, P.L.; Breno, M.C.; Acosta, O.; Santoro, M.L. Purification and characterization of a cysteine-Rich secretory protein from Philodryas patagoniensis snake venom. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 150, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Magdaleno, L.; Gasset, M.A.; Varea, J.; Schambony, A.M.; Urbanke, C.; Raida, M.; Töpfer-Petersen, E.; Calvete, J.J. Biochemical and conformational characterisation of HSP-3, a stallion seminal plasma protein of the cysteine-Rich secretory protein (CRISP) family. FEBS Lett. 1997, 420, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kosari, F.; Asmann, Y.W.; Cheville, J.C.; Vasmatzis, G. Cysteine-Rich secretory protein-3: A potential biomarker for prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2002, 11, 1419–1426. [Google Scholar]
  74. Udby, L.; Lundwall, Å.; Johnsen, A.H.; Fernlund, P.; Valtonen-André, C.; Blom, A.M.; Lilja, H.; Borregaard, N.; Kjeldsen, L.; Bjartell, A. β-Microseminoprotein binds CRISP-3 in human seminal plasma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Udby, L.; Sørensen, O.E.; Pass, J.; Johnsen, A.H.; Behrendt, N.; Borregaard, N.; Kjeldsen, L. Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein 3 Is a Ligand of α1B-Glycoprotein in Human Plasma †. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 12877–12886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Reeves, J.R.; Xuan, J.W.; Arfanis, K.; Morin, C.; Garde, S.V.; Ruiz, M.T.; Wisniewski, J.; Panchal, C.; Tanner, J.E. Identification, purification and characterization of a novel human blood protein with binding affinity for prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids. Biochem. J. 2005, 385, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Anklesaria, J.H.; Jagtap, D.D.; Pathak, B.R.; Kadam, K.M.; Joseph, S.; Mahale, S.D. Prostate Secretory Protein of 94 Amino Acids (PSP94) Binds to Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (PAP) in Human Seminal Plasma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ghasriani, H.; Fernlund, P.; Udby, L.; Drakenberg, T. A model of the complex between human β-Microseminoprotein and CRISP-3 based on NMR data. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 378, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Breed, A.A.; Gomes, A.; Roy, B.S.; Mahale, S.D.; Pathak, B.R. Mapping of the binding sites involved in PSP94–CRISP-3 interaction by molecular dissection of the complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 3019–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shioi, N.; Tadokoro, T.; Shioi, S.; Okabe, Y.; Matsubara, H.; Kita, S.; Ose, T.; Kuroki, K.; Terada, S.; Maenaka, K. Crystal structure of the complex between venom toxin and serum inhibitor from Viperidae snake. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Aoki, N.; Sakiyama, A.; Deshimaru, M.; Terada, S. Identification of novel serum proteins in a Japanese viper: Homologs of mammalian PSP94. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hansson, K.; Kjellberg, M.; Fernlund, P. Cysteine-Rich secretory proteins in snake venoms form high affinity complexes with human and porcine β-Microseminoproteins. Toxicon 2009, 54, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Matsunaga, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Hyodo, F.; Sugiyama, Y.; Nozaki, M.; Morita, T. Structural Divergence of Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins in Snake Venoms. J. Biochem. 2009, 145, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jin, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, S.; Li, R.; Wang, W.; Xiong, Y. Purification and cloning of cysteine-Rich proteins from Trimeresurus jerdonii and Naja atra venoms. Toxicon 2003, 42, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Aoki, N.; Sakiyama, A.; Kuroki, K.; Maenaka, K.; Kohda, D.; Deshimaru, M.; Terada, S. Serotriflin, a CRISP family protein with binding affinity for small serum protein-2 in snake serum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Proteins Proteom. 2008, 1784, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Del Tordello, E.; Vacca, I.; Ram, S.; Rappuoli, R.; Serruto, D. Neisseria meningitidis NalP cleaves human complement C3, facilitating degradation of C3b and survival in human serum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Sunagar, K.; Johnson, W.E.; O’Brien, S.J.; Vasconcelos, V.; Antunes, A. Evolution of CRISPs Associated with Toxicoferan-Reptilian Venom and Mammalian Reproduction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 1807–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Manceau, M.; Marin, J.; Morlon, H.; Lambert, A. Model-Based Inference of Punctuated Molecular Evolution. BioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Perry, B.W.; Card, D.C.; McGlothlin, J.W.; Pasquesi, G.I.M.; Adams, R.H.; Schield, D.R.; Hales, N.R.; Corbin, A.B.; Demuth, J.P.; Hoffmann, F.G.; et al. Molecular Adaptations for Sensing and Securing Prey and Insight into Amniote Genome Diversity from the Garter Snake Genome. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 2110–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Suryamohan, K.; Krishnankutty, S.P.; Guillory, J.; Jevit, M.; Schröder, M.S.; Wu, M.; Kuriakose, B.; Mathew, O.K.; Perumal, R.C.; Koludarov, I.; et al. The Indian cobra reference genome and transcriptome enables comprehensive identification of venom toxins. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Schield, D.R.; Card, D.C.; Hales, N.R.; Perry, B.W.; Pasquesi, G.M.; Blackmon, H.; Adams, R.H.; Corbin, A.B.; Smith, C.F.; Ramesh, B.; et al. The origins and evolution of chromosomes, dosage compensation, and mechanisms underlying venom regulation in snakes. Genome Res. 2019, 29, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shibata, H.; Chijiwa, T.; Oda-Ueda, N.; Nakamura, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hattori, S.; Matsubara, K.; Matsuda, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Isomoto, A.; et al. The habu genome reveals accelerated evolution of venom protein genes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 12 00175 g001 550
Figure 1. Amino-acid sequence alignments of Cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs). Highly conserved residues are highlighted in red, and other conserved residues are shown in a red font. Disulfide bridges are indicated below the alignment with black numbers. Identical numbers identify bonded residues. The secondary structure of triflin (PDB ID: 1WVR) is shown above the alignment. Purple triangles indicate conserved residues involved in binding of divalent cations (His60, Glu75, Glu96, and His115 for triflin). Basic residues in pseudetoxin are indicated with a yellow box, whereas the corresponding residues are neutral in pseudecin and are indicated with a blue box.
Figure 1. Amino-acid sequence alignments of Cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs). Highly conserved residues are highlighted in red, and other conserved residues are shown in a red font. Disulfide bridges are indicated below the alignment with black numbers. Identical numbers identify bonded residues. The secondary structure of triflin (PDB ID: 1WVR) is shown above the alignment. Purple triangles indicate conserved residues involved in binding of divalent cations (His60, Glu75, Glu96, and His115 for triflin). Basic residues in pseudetoxin are indicated with a yellow box, whereas the corresponding residues are neutral in pseudecin and are indicated with a blue box.
Toxins 12 00175 g001
Toxins 12 00175 g002 550
Figure 2. Inhibition of the divalent cation binding site by the serum inhibitor Small serum protein-2 (SSP-2). (A) Our complex structure of SSP-2-triflin (PDB ID: 6IMF) clearly indicates that the inhibitor occupies and blocks the conserved divalent cation binding site, which is functionally important. The inset is a focused view of the β1 and β5 strands of SSP-2. Ala1 of SSP-2 and His60 and His 115 of triflin are shown as stick models. (B) The same view of the apo-triflin structure (PDB ID: 1WVR, left), Pseudecin (PDB ID: 2FPF, middle) and natrin (PDB ID: 3MZ8, right) are shown. Divalent cations are bound at the conserved location via histidines, indicated with stick models. Structures were prepared using PyMOL (https://pymol.org/).
Figure 2. Inhibition of the divalent cation binding site by the serum inhibitor Small serum protein-2 (SSP-2). (A) Our complex structure of SSP-2-triflin (PDB ID: 6IMF) clearly indicates that the inhibitor occupies and blocks the conserved divalent cation binding site, which is functionally important. The inset is a focused view of the β1 and β5 strands of SSP-2. Ala1 of SSP-2 and His60 and His 115 of triflin are shown as stick models. (B) The same view of the apo-triflin structure (PDB ID: 1WVR, left), Pseudecin (PDB ID: 2FPF, middle) and natrin (PDB ID: 3MZ8, right) are shown. Divalent cations are bound at the conserved location via histidines, indicated with stick models. Structures were prepared using PyMOL (https://pymol.org/).
Toxins 12 00175 g002
Toxins 12 00175 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparisons between CRD/ICR domain regions of CRISPs that inhibit ion channels and those that do not. (A) Amino-acid sequence alignment of CRD/ICR regions of CRISP family proteins, showing highly conserved residues highlighted in red, and other conserved residues in a red font. Cysteine residues forming disulfide bridges are indicated by black brackets. The secondary structure of triflin (PDB ID: 1WVR) is shown above the alignment. (B) Structural conservation in the CRD/ICR region of snake venom CRISPS (svCRISPs0 that inhibit high-potassium-induced contraction of smooth muscle is shown on a triflin scaffold (PDB ID: 1WVR). Conservation scores were calculated with the Consurf server using default settings. Conservation scores are graded on a nine-point scale, from the most variable positions (turquoise) to the most conserved positions (maroon). The structure was prepared using PyMOL (https://pymol.org/).
Figure 3. Comparisons between CRD/ICR domain regions of CRISPs that inhibit ion channels and those that do not. (A) Amino-acid sequence alignment of CRD/ICR regions of CRISP family proteins, showing highly conserved residues highlighted in red, and other conserved residues in a red font. Cysteine residues forming disulfide bridges are indicated by black brackets. The secondary structure of triflin (PDB ID: 1WVR) is shown above the alignment. (B) Structural conservation in the CRD/ICR region of snake venom CRISPS (svCRISPs0 that inhibit high-potassium-induced contraction of smooth muscle is shown on a triflin scaffold (PDB ID: 1WVR). Conservation scores were calculated with the Consurf server using default settings. Conservation scores are graded on a nine-point scale, from the most variable positions (turquoise) to the most conserved positions (maroon). The structure was prepared using PyMOL (https://pymol.org/).
Toxins 12 00175 g003
Table
Table 1. Targets and biological effects of cysteine-rich secretory proteins from buccal glands or venom.
Table 1. Targets and biological effects of cysteine-rich secretory proteins from buccal glands or venom.
AnimalsNameSpeciesTarget (Interaction Molecules)Biological Effect (or Related Investigation)Accession NumbersRef.
LampreyLamprey CRISP

Buccal gland secretion protein-2
(BGSP-2)

Cysteine-rich buccal gland protein (CRBGP)		Lethenteron japonicum
(Lampetra japonica)		・Voltage-dependent
Na+ channels
・Integrin β2
(CD11s/CD18)		Ca2+ channel blocker-like properties
Anti-angiogenic activities
Permeability
Inhibition of adhesion, proliferation, migration, and invasion of cells (HUVEC; IC50 = 4.0 μM and Hela cell; IC50 = 6.7 μM)
Non-fibrinogenolytic activity
Activity of immunosuppressant
(neutrophil inhibitory factor)
Inhibition of Na+ channels in hippocampal neurons (12 μM)
Inhibition K+ channels in hippocampal neurons (120 μM)		A4PIZ5[35,51,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]
Cone snailTex31Conus textileN.D.ProteinaseQ7YT83[32]
LizardHelothermineHeloderma horridum
salivary secretion		・Ryanodine receptors
・Ca2+ channels
・K+ channels		Lethargy, partial paralysis of rear limbs and lowering of body temperature
Blockage of receptors (Cerebellar Granule Cells)
Inhibition of K+ channels (IC50 = 0.52 μM)
Inhibition of Ca2+ channels (IC50 = 0.25 μM)
Inhibition of skeletal ryanodine receptors (about 1.0 μM )		Q91055[40,57,58,59]
Snake
(Vipers)AblominGloydius blomhoffi.N.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesQ8JI40[60]
PiscivorincAgkistrodon piscivorusN.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesAY181982[61]
CatrinCrotalus atroxN.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesAY181983[61]
TriflinProtobothrops flavoviridisN.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesQ8JI39
1WVR,
6IMF (with inhibitor)		[60]
StecrispTrimeresurus stejnegeri
(Viridovipera stejnegeri)		N.D.No proteolysis activity (unlikeTex31)P60623
1RC9		[62]
Bj-CRPBothrops jararacaComponent C3 and C4Bind and cleaved to component C3 and C4
Lack of effect of K+ channel blockage activity (1.0 μM)
(Kv1.1 to Kv1.6, Shaker-IR, Kv3.1, Kv7.1, Kv7.2, Kv7.4 and Kv10.1)		N.D.
(partial sequence)		[63]
HellerinCrotalus oreganus helleriN.D.To increase trans-epithelial permeability
Cytotoxicity against HUVEC
(cytotoxic concentration CC50 = 2.3 μM)		G9DCH4[64]
EC-CRISPEchis Carinatus SochurekiN.D.Binding to HUVEC cell
Anti-angiogenic Activities (10-20 μg/ml, <1 μM)		P0DMT4[65]
CrovirinCrotalus viridis viridisN.D.Anti-protozoan activity against Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania amazonensisN.D
(partial sequence)		[66]
(Elapid)Pseudechetoxin (PsTx)Pseudechis australisCyclic nucleotide-
gated ion channels		Inhibition of CNGA1 subunit (apparent Ki = 70 nM)
Inhibition of CNGA2 subunits (apparent Ki = 15 nM)		Q8AVA4
2DDA		[49,67]
PseudecinPseudechis porphyriacusCyclic nucleotide-gated ion channelsCa2+ channel blocker-like propertiesQ8AVA3
2DDB, 2EPF(Zn2+)		[49,60]
LatiseminLaticauda semifasciataN.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesQ8JI38[60]
OphaninOphiophagus hannahN.D.Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesAY181984[61]
NatrinNaja Naja atraBkca
Kv1.3
Ryanodine receptors
Heparin		High-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BKCa) channel (34.4 nM)
Inhibition of Kv1.3 (10–200 nM)
Inhibition of ryanodine receptors (1 μM, Kd = 1.5–2.3 nM)
Inflammatory Modulator (<1.0 μM)
Non-proteolytic activity
(BSA, neurotensin, Tex31 substrate, kenetensin)		Q7T1K6
1XX5,
1XTA,
2GIZ
3MZ8 (Zn2+)		[68,69,70]
(Colubrid)TigrinRhabdophis tigrinusN.D.Non-Ca2+ channel blocker-like propertiesQ8JGT9[60]
PatagoninPhilodryas patagoniensisN.D.Non-Ca2+ channel blocker-like properties
Non-fibrinogenolytic activity
Skeletal myotoxic activity (43 and 87 μM)		N.D.
(only N-terminal sequence)		[71]
Tex31 is located in Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) members. N.D.; not determined or did not investigate. Ca2+ channel blocker-like properties; inhibited depolarization-induced contraction of rat-tail arterial smooth muscle. All accession numbers are from UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/) and Protein Data Bank (PDB, https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/sitemap.do).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tadokoro, T.; M. Modahl, C.; Maenaka, K.; Aoki-Shioi, N. Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs) from Venomous Snakes: An Overview of the Functional Diversity in a Large and Underappreciated Superfamily. Toxins 2020, 12, 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030175

AMA Style

Tadokoro T, M. Modahl C, Maenaka K, Aoki-Shioi N. Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs) from Venomous Snakes: An Overview of the Functional Diversity in a Large and Underappreciated Superfamily. Toxins. 2020; 12(3):175. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tadokoro, Takashi, Cassandra M. Modahl, Katsumi Maenaka, and Narumi Aoki-Shioi. 2020. "Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs) from Venomous Snakes: An Overview of the Functional Diversity in a Large and Underappreciated Superfamily" Toxins 12, no. 3: 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030175

APA Style

Tadokoro, T., M. Modahl, C., Maenaka, K., & Aoki-Shioi, N. (2020). Cysteine-Rich Secretory Proteins (CRISPs) from Venomous Snakes: An Overview of the Functional Diversity in a Large and Underappreciated Superfamily. Toxins, 12(3), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop