Next Article in Journal
PLA2 Inhibitor Varespladib as an Alternative to the Antivenom Treatment for Bites from Nikolsky’s Viper Vipera berus nikolskii
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cadherin Protein Is Not Involved in Susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab or Cry1Fa Toxins in Spodoptera frugiperda
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Exposure Anti-Ricin Treatment Protects Swine against Lethal Systemic and Pulmonary Exposures
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Cytocidal Spectrum of Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: From Insects to Human Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/toxins12060355
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority δ-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis, for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae

by
Daniel Valtierra-de-Luis
1,
Maite Villanueva
1,2,
Liliana Lai
1,
Trevor Williams
3 and
Primitivo Caballero
1,2,4,*
1
Departamento de Agronomía, Biotecnología y Alimentación, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
2
Bioinsectis SL, Avda Pamplona 123, 31192 Mutilva, Spain
3
Instituto de Ecología AC, 91073 Xalapa, Mexico
4
Institute for Multidisciplinary Applied Biology Research (IMAB), Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Mutilva, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(6), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12060355
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 22 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: Functional Characterization and Mechanism of Action)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis (Bti) has been widely used as microbial larvicide for the control of many species of mosquitoes and blackflies. The larvicidal activity of Bti resides in Cry and Cyt δ-endotoxins present in the parasporal crystal of this pathogen. The insecticidal activity of the crystal is higher than the activities of the individual toxins, which is likely due to synergistic interactions among the crystal component proteins, particularly those involving Cyt1Aa. In the present study, Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba were cloned from the commercial larvicide VectoBac-12AS® and expressed in the acrystalliferous Bt strain BMB171 under the cyt1Aa strong promoter of the pSTAB vector. The LC50 values for Aedes aegypti second instar larvae estimated at 24 hpi for these two recombinant proteins (Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba) were 299.62 and 279.37 ng/mL, respectively. Remarkable synergistic mosquitocidal activity was observed between Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba (synergistic potentiation of 68.6-fold) when spore + crystal preparations, comprising a mixture of both recombinant strains in equal relative concentrations, were ingested by A. aegypti larvae. This synergistic activity is among the most powerful described so far with Bt toxins and is comparable to that reported for Cyt1A when interacting with Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba or Cry11Aa. Synergistic mosquitocidal activity was also observed between the recombinant proteins Cyt2Ba and Cry4Aa, but in this case, the synergistic potentiation was 4.6-fold. In conclusion, although Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba are rarely detectable or appear as minor components in the crystals of Bti strains, they represent toxicity factors with a high potential for the control of mosquito populations.
Keywords:
Bacillus thuringiensis; Aedes aegypti; minor proteins; synergy; mosquito control; Bti
Key Contribution: Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba are found as minor components in the crystals of some strains of Bacillus thuringienis ser. israelensis. Both proteins have a high insecticidal activity against insects (e.g., Aedes aegypti larvae) and when ingested together they exhibit one of the strongest synergistic activities that have been described so far.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis (Bti) was the first Bt serotype found to be toxic for dipteran species [1]. Bti forms parasporal inclusion bodies composed of insecticidal proteins (δ-endotoxins) that are widely used as the basis for microbial larvicides against dipteran species of medical importance, including mosquitoes, blackflies and chironomids [2,3]. Bti based products are considered to be powerful and highly selective larvicides for the control of disease vectors [4,5,6]. Indeed, Bti has been used to control mosquitoes for more than 35 years with almost no resistance report in vector populations [7,8]. The absence of resistance is likely due to the different modes of action and the synergistic effects of the multiple crystal proteins present in Bti-based products [9,10,11].
The parasporal crystal of Bti contains large amounts of four toxins: Cry4A, Cry4B, Cry11A and Cyt1A [12]. In addition, Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba have also been described in some Bti strains, although these are expressed and accumulate in the crystal in much smaller quantities that the four main components [13,14]. All six of these proteins are encoded in the fully sequenced Bti plasmid pBtoxis [15]. The Cry10Aa protein was cloned and named CryIVC, according to the existing classification at that time, but was described as a protein with a low larvicidal potency against A. aegypti (Diptera; Culicidae) [16]. Later, the cry10Aa gene was identified as part of an operon that comprises two open reading frames (orf1 and orf2) separated by a 66 bp gap [15]. Cloning of the complete operon, linked to the strong promoter of the cyt1A gene, revealed that Cry10Aa was expressed at high levels and exhibited high larvicidal activity, both alone and in combination with Cyt1A [17]. In contrast, although present at relatively low abundance in the Bti crystal [18], Cyt2Ba exhibited activity against A. aegypti larvae, but lower than the better-studied Cyt1Aa protein [19].
The interactions among the Cry and Cyt proteins of Bti have received more attention than any of the other Bt serovars [20,21,22,23,24]. Interactions involving the Cyt1A protein have attracted particular attention given the capacity of this protein to enhance the insecticidal activity of Cry proteins in strains of Bti [9,17,20,24], and those of Bt strains belonging to other subspecies [25]. Conversely, studies on the interactions of Cyt2Ba with other components of the Bti crystal are restricted to a single report of low synergistic activity of Cyt2Ba with the Cry4Aa protein [21].
The objective of this study was to quantify the larvicidal activity of the δ-endotoxins Cry10A and Cyt2Ba, which are minor components of the parasporal crystal of some Bti strains, against A. aegypti. To produce high amounts of these minority proteins, two recombinant Bt strains were constructed. One of these recombinants produced a crystal whose only component were the two Cry10Aa proteins, while the other only produced Cyt2Ba. We provide evidence that these proteins interacted synergistically to a remarkable degree when simultaneously ingested by A. aegypti larvae.

2. Results

2.1. Insecticidal Cry and Cyt Genes Identified in Bti Strain from VectoBac-12AS®

A bioinformatic analysis of the genome of the Bti strain isolated from the commercial product VectoBac-12AS®, revealed that this strain contains a complex of insecticidal genes, including cry genes (cry4Aa, cry4Ba, cry10Aa, cry11Aa, and cry60Aa/cry60Ba) and cyt genes (cyt1Aa, cyt2Ba, and cyt1Ca). Unfortunately, it was not possible to obtain the complete sequence of the cry4Aa and cry4Ba genes, because they appeared distributed in various contigs. The rest of the cry genes shared 100% identity and similarity with some of the gene variants that have been previously described. Thus, cry10Aa was completely identical to cry10Aa3 [15], cry11Aa was identical to cry11Aa1 [26], and cry60Aa/cry60Ba were identical to cry60Aa2/cry60Ba2 [27]. The three cyt genes (cyt1Aa, cyt2Ba, and cyt1Ca) identified in the VectoBac-12AS® strain were also fully identical to cyt1Aa1 [28], cyt2Ba1 [18], and cyt1Ca1 [15], respectively.

2.2. Cloning of Cyt2Ba, Cry10Aa and Cry11Aa

The pairs of primers designed for cyt2Ba, cry10Aa and cry11Aa amplified fragments of 1536, 3813 and 2634 bp, respectively. The cry10A cloned fragment contained two open reading frames (orf1 and orf2) in the nucleotide sequence, codifying for proteins of 680 and 489 amino acids, respectively. The cry11Aa amplicon encoded a protein of 646 amino acids but it also contained the p19 gene located before cry11Aa, in line with the usual order of genes in this operon. The amplicon was cloned in a pSTAB plasmid containing the p20 chaperon, which improves Cry11Aa synthesis and crystal formation [29]. The amplified fragment of cyt2Ba contained a single ORF which codified for a protein of 263 residues. The cry4A and cry4Ba genes, previously described and cloned by Delecluse et al. [30], were used in this study.

2.3. Characterization of Bt Recombinant Strains Expressing cyt2Ba, cry10Aa, cry4Aa, cry4Ba and cry11Aa

Daily microscopical observation of the growth of the recombinant Bt strains in CCY medium confirmed that all of them produced spores and crystals between 36 and 48 h after the medium was inoculated. As expected, vegetative cells of BMB171 strain transformed with an empty plasmid produced endospores but no crystals.
SDS-PAGE showed that the recombinant BMB171-Cry10Aa expressed two proteins with molecular masses of approximately 68 and 56 kDa, which corresponded to the predicted sizes of the proteins encoded by orf1 and orf2, respectively, of the cry10Aa operon (Figure 1, lane 3). Samples of spores and crystals from the rest of the recombinant strains (BMB171-Cyt2Ba, 4Q2-81-Cry4Aa, 4Q2-81-Cry4Ba and BMB171-Cry11Aa) generated characteristic major bands of approximately 29, 134, 128, and 73 kDa, respectively (Figure 1). The electrophoretic mobility of all these bands correlated well with the molecular mass of the proteins Cyt2Ba (lane 2), Cry4Aa (lane 4), Cry4Ba (lane 5) and Cry11Aa (lane 6).

2.4. Mosquitocidal Activity of the δ-Endotoxins Produced by Bti

Single-concentration bioassays involving an estimated LC30 concentration of inoculum in all cases were performed on mixtures of Cyt2Ba with each of the Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry10Aa and Cry11Aa proteins. The results of these assays indicated that A. aegypti second instar larvae treated with combinations of Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba and Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba experienced high mortality compared to the mortality values observed in insects treated with each of the toxins separately (Table 1). In contrast, no evidence of potentiation of larval mortality was observed for mixtures of Cry4Ba+Cyt2Ba or Cry11Aa+Cyt2Ba. For this reason, the 1:1 mixtures of Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba and of Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba were selected for subsequent concentration-mortality studies.
Table 2 shows the raw mortality data of a series of concentrations for Cry10Aa, Cyt2Ba and the combination of both. Analogously, Table 3 shows the raw mortality data of a series of concentrations for Cry4Aa, Cyt2Ba and the combination of both.
Regression lines were performed for the individual toxins and the mixture of toxins (Figure 2) which were then used to estimate median lethal concentrations (LC50) (Table 4).
Recombinant Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba proteins exhibited a high insecticidal activity against A. aegypti second instar larvae when inoculated individually. The LC50 values estimated for Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba were 299.62 ng/mL and 279.37 ng/mL, respectively. The VectoBac-12AS® wild-type strain, incorporated into the bioassays as a positive control, had an LC50 value of 1.02 × 10−1 ng/mL and the BMB171 strain with the empty plasmid resulted in no mortality (Table 4). The slopes of the regression lines corresponding to Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba did not differ significantly (F1,8 = 0.620, p = 0.454), whereas the slope of the mixture of Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba was significantly lower than that of the individual toxins (F2,12 = 7.359, p = 0.008). The observed LC50 value for Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba was 4.22 ng/mL whereas the expected LC50 value was 289.27 ng/mL, assuming additive action of each of the toxins [31]. The estimated potentiation of Cyt2Ba and Cry10Aa proteins when ingested together and in the same relative proportions, was 68.6-fold (Table 4).
In contrast, the slopes of the regressions of the individual Cyt2Ba and Cry4Aa toxins differed significantly (F1,8 = 11.405, p = 0.010). The LC50 value for Cry4Aa was estimated at 34.63 ng/mL. The observed LC50 value for the binary combination of Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba was 13.41 ng/mL, whereas the expected LC50 value was 61.62 ng/mL, assuming additive action of each of the toxins [31]. These results indicate potentiation in the Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba protein mixture by a factor of 4.6 (Table 4).

3. Discussion

The δ-endotoxins that constitute the major parasporal crystal components of Bti strains (Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry11Aa and Cyt1Aa) are the best studied of the Bt crystal proteins, both in terms of the insecticidal properties of individual proteins and the interactions among them in the digestive tract of susceptible mosquito species. The present study provides evidence that additional proteins, such as Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, which are usually present as minor components in Bti strains, are also important toxicity factors that act in a highly synergistic manner when these proteins are inoculated simultaneously in A. aegypti larvae. Cyt2Ba was previously described as a synergy factor for Cry4Aa and in this study we quantified the effects of the interaction on larval mosquito mortality [21].
The insecticidal activity of Cry10Aa in fourth instar larvae of A. aegypti was previously estimated at LC50 = 2061 ng/mL [17], which is about 7-fold higher than the value that we estimated in second instar larvae of the same species. A decrease in the susceptibility of larvae to infection by pathogens with increasing growth stage is common in insects [32], including their susceptibility to Bt toxins [22,33,34].
Several previous studies have described the larvicidal activity of Cyt2Ba protein in mosquito species belonging to the genera Culex, Aedes and Anopheles [19,35,36], although for a given toxin concentration the mortality that was recorded in Cyt2Ba-treated A. aegypti larvae was lower than that produced by the Cyt1Aa protein [19]. The estimated 24 h LC50 value of Cyt2Ba in second instar larvae of A. aegypti obtained in this study was approximately 27-fold lower than the value estimated by others [36]. This may be due to differences in the origin of the mosquito population and history of exposure to Bt toxins, and the fact that Wirth et al. [36] used lyophilized powdered inoculum rather than the freshly-prepared spore + crystal preparations that we employed.
The high potential of Bti proteins against mosquito larvae is mainly attributed to the interactions that occur among the component toxins. Although present at low abundance, Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba contribute to the insecticidal activity of Bti by potentiation of toxin interactions [5]. Cry10Aa shows synergistic activity with Cyt1Aa [17] and Cry4Aa [37], whereas Cyt2Ba shows synergistic interaction with Cry4Aa [21] and L. sphaericus [36] in A. aegypti. When large amounts of these proteins were produced in an acrystalliferous Bt strain in the present study, very high levels of toxicity against A. aegypti larvae were obtained.
The LC50 value obtained here for the Cry10Aa/Cyt2Ba mixture was about 19 times lower than the value described for the Cry10Aa/Cyt1Aa mixture. This degree of potentiation is one of the highest observed so far for Bti crystal proteins, only comparable to that described for Cyt1A with Cry4Aa and Cry11Aa [38], or Cry4Ba in mixtures with Cyt2Aa2 from Bt darmstadiensis against A. aegypti larvae [39]. It seems, therefore, that Cyt2 proteins have a greater involvement in toxin synergy than has been attributed to date.
The molecular mechanisms underlying synergistic or other combinatorial effects between Bt insecticidal proteins have been the subject of several studies, although none have focused specifically on Cyt2Ba. The synergistic interaction of Cyt1Aa and Cyt2Aa with Cry4Ba appears to involve binding to the Cry protein through the domain II loops [9,40]. For the interaction between Cyt1Aa and Cry11Aa, specific charged residues have been identified on the Cyt1Aa protein that are involved in binding to Cry11Aa prior to insertion in the midgut epithelial cell membrane [41], although others have proposed that Cyt1Aa is a membrane-bound receptor that uses the exposed charged residues to bind Cry11Aa, thereby facilitating the interaction of the Cry protein with the target cell membrane [42,43]. Oligomerization of the Cyt1Aa toxin is essential for its toxicity in A. aegypti [44].
Bti has high larvicidal activity against mosquitoes, although its repeated use can lead to the appearance of resistance. The major components of the crystal, such as Cyt1A, Cry11A, or Cry4 are likely to be the main targets of such resistance. In this study, we demonstrated that Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, minor components of the parasporal crystal, have a high mosquitocidal potency and marked synergistic activity when present in a mixture. The optimization of culture conditions that result in improved production of Cry10A and Cyt2Ba may offer a rapid means to produce more effective Bti-based mosquitocidal products.

4. Conclusions

The toxicities of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba against A. aegypti are comparable to the major toxins of Bti and show one of the strongest potentiation effects observed for Bti crystal components to date. This potentiation was much stronger than occurred between Cyt2Ba and Cry4Aa. Further study of the minor crystal components of Bti is likely to provide additional opportunities for the development of safe and effective tools for the biological control of mosquito vectors of medical importance.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Bacterial Strains and Plasmids

B. thuringiensis ser. israelensis (Bti) was isolated from the commercial insecticide VectoBac-12AS® (Kenogard, Barcelona, Spain). Escherichia coli XL1 blue was used for transformation. The recombinant vector pSTAB [45] was used as the protein expression vector, engineered with the gene of interest. The acrystalliferous Bt strain BMB171 was used as the host strain for protein expression [46]. Bt recombinant strains 4Q2-81 pHT606:cry4Aa and 4Q2-81 pHT611:cry4Ba were kindly provided by Dr. Colin Berry (Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK) [30]. The Bt strains were grown in CCY medium containing 13 mM KH2PO4, 26 mM K2HPO4, 10 mL/L Nutrient stock solution (comprising L-glutamine, casein hydrolysate, casitone, yeast extract and glycerol), 1 ml/L metal salts solution [47] at 28 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm. All E. coli strains were cultured at 37 °C with continuous shaking (200 rpm) in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl, pH 7.0). When required for selective growth, LB medium was supplemented with 20 µg/mL erythromycin (Em) and 100 µg/mL ampicillin (Amp).

5.2. Insect Culture

A laboratory colony of A. aegypti was started using eggs obtained from Dr. Susana Vilchez, (Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain). The colony was maintained, under controlled environmental conditions (25 ± 1 °C and 85% RH, and a 16 h:8 h light: dark photoperiod), in the insectary facilities of the Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Aplicada (IMBA), Universidad Pública de Navarra, Spain. Adults of both sexes were maintained in BugDorm-1 insect rearing cages (MegaView Science, Taichung, Taiwan) and had continuous access to 20% sucrose solution and intermittent access (3 h/day) to defibrinated horse blood (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to complete their gonotrophic cycle. Larvae were reared in 250 mL glass beakers (40–50 larvae/beaker) with 100 mL distilled water and brewer’s yeast (1 mg/mL) as food.

5.3. Total DNA Extraction and Genomic Sequencing

Genome sequencing was performed to ensure that our Bti clone contained all the expected plasmids and genes, some of which may be lost during laboratory culture. Total genomic DNA (chromosomal + plasmid) was extracted from VectoBac-12AS® strain, following the protocol for DNA isolation from Gram-positive bacteria using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). A DNA library was prepared from total DNA and was subsequently sequenced in an Illumina NextSeq500 Sequencer (Genomics Research Hub Laboratory, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK).

5.4. Identification of Cry and Cyt Insecticidal Genes in VectoBac-12AS®

Genomic raw sequence data were processed and assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench 10.1.1. Reads were trimmed, filtered by low quality and reads of less than 50 bp were eliminated. Processed reads were assembled de novo using stringent criteria of at least 95 bp overlap and 95% identity. Reads were then mapped back to the contigs for assembly. Genes were predicted using GeneMark [48].
To assist in the identification of potential insecticidal proteins, local BLASTP [49] was deployed against a database built in our laboratory comprising the amino acid sequences of known Bt toxins available at http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt [50], as well as other protein toxins of interest.

5.5. Amplification, Cloning and Sequencing of Cyt2Ba, Cry11Aa and Cry10Aa

Primers were designed to amplify the full-length coding sequence of cyt2Ba, p19-cry11Aa (including p19 and cry11Aa genes) and the cry10Aa operon including orf1 and orf2 (Table 5). Primer sequences included XbaI and PstI restriction sites for cyt2Ba, as well as SalI and PstI restriction sites for p19-cry11Aa and SalI and PaeI restriction sites for cry10Aa. PCR reactions were performed, from total genomic DNAs, using Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, UK) and amplicons were gel-purified using NucleoSpin Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Purified products were then ligated into pJET1.2/blunt plasmid (CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Ligation mixtures were transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue using standard procedures [51]. Colony-PCR was applied in order to check positive clones from which plasmid DNA was purified, using the NucleoSpinR plasmid kit (Macherey-Nagel Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, pJET plasmids were verified by sequencing (STABVida, Caparica, Portugal), digested with the appropriate combination of restriction enzymes, electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel and ligated into pre-digested pSTAB vector using the Rapid DNA ligation kit (Thermo Scientific) to obtain the recombinant plasmids pSTAB-cyt2Ba and pSTAB-cry10Aa. To clone cry11Aa the amplicon was ligated in a pSTAB in which p20 gene was previously introduced, to obtain the recombinant plasmid pSTAB-p19-cry11Aa-p20. Ligation products were then electroporated into E. coli XL1 blue cells following standard protocols [51]. Positive clones were verified by colony-PCR and plasmids were purified and verified by restriction endonuclease digestion and electrophoresis. Once pSTAB-cyt2Ba, pSTAB-cry10Aa and pSTAB-p19-cry11Aa-p20 were obtained, they were introduced into the acrystalliferous Bt strain BMB171.
Bacillus electrocompetent cells were generated as described previously [52]. Briefly, bacteria were grown in 300 mL of Brain heart infusion broth (Pronadisa) at 28 °C under shaking conditions (200 rpm) until the culture reached an OD600 nm of 0.4. Glycine was then added to the culture at 2% and bacterial cells were incubated for another hour, at 28 °C under shaking conditions (200 rpm). Bacterial cells were kept on ice for 5 min, centrifuged at 9000× g (4 °C) for 10 min and the pellet was washed three times with F buffer (272 mM sucrose, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM K2HPO4, 0.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.2). Cells were then resuspended in 600 μL of ice-cold F buffer and stored in aliquots of 50 μL at −80 °C. Plasmids were transformed into the BMB171 strain by electroporation, as described previously [53]. Positive clones were selected by colony-PCR. BMB171 was also transformed with an empty plasmid as a negative control.

5.6. Expression of Cyt2Ba, Cry10Aa, Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba and Cry11Aa Recombinant Proteins and SDS-PAGE Analysis

Wild-type Bti and recombinant Bt strains were grown at 28 °C, under shaking conditions (200 rpm), in CCY medium supplemented with 20 µg/mL erythromycin, if required. Crystal formation was observed daily under the optical microscope. After 2–3 days, when ~95% of the cells had lysed, the mixture of spores and crystals was collected by centrifugation at 10,000× g, for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed once with saline solution (1 M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA) and three times with 10 mM KCl. The spore + crystal mixture was finally resuspended in 10 mM KCl and kept at 4 °C until used. Samples of spores and crystals were mixed with 2x sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), boiled at 100 °C for 5 min, and then subjected to electrophoresis as previously described [54], using Criterion TGX™ 4–20% Precast Gel (Bio-Rad). Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Bio-Rad) and then distained in 30% ethanol and 10% acetic acid. For protein quantification, a 10 µL volume of spore and crystal suspension was solubilized in vitro in 1 mL of alkaline solution (50 mM Na2CO3, 10 mM DTT, pH 11.3) for 2 h at 37 °C. The protein concentration of each preparation was measured by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.

5.7. Mosquitocidal Activity of the δ-Endotoxins Produced by Bti

The toxicity of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba was determined by bioassay against A. aegypti second instar larvae. Concentration-mortality bioassays were performed following a modified method described previously [33]. Groups of 10–15 second instar larvae were placed in one well of a 6-well cell culture plate (Costar) and they were exposed to one concentration of Bt (spores+crystals). Each well contained 5 mL of Bt suspension with the corresponding toxin concentration and 0.5 mg of brewer’s yeast as food. Toxin concentrations were 2000, 666, 222, 74, 24.7 and 8.2 ng/mL for Cry10Aa; 4000, 1333, 444, 148, 49.4 and 16.4 ng/mL for Cyt2Ba and 4 × 10−1, 2 × 10−1, 1 × 10−1, 5 × 10−2, 2.5 × 10−2, 1.2 × 10−2 ng/mL for Bti (VectoBac-12AS®) as the positive control. Each bioassay was performed at least three times, depending on the toxin. Control insects were mock-infected. Insects were incubated at 25 °C and 16 h:8 h L:D photoperiod. Mortality was recorded at 24 h post-treatment. The concentration-mortality raw data are represented in Table 2 and Table 3. Graphical representation of logit regressions for the individual toxins are summarized in Figure 2. These regressions were used to estimate the median lethal concentration (LC50) for the toxins.
To study the synergistic larvicidal activity of Cyt2Ba in binary mixtures with other components of the Bti crystal, a series of preliminary bioassays were made, using a single protein concentration (below 30% mortality). The binary combinations studied, as well as the concentration of proteins used in each case, are shown in Table 1. For those binary combinations that resulted in the highest mortality of inoculated insects, quantitative bioassays were performed in order to determine the potentiation between Cyt2Ba and other toxins. Concentration-mortality bioassays were performed for Cry4Aa at concentrations of 486, 162, 54, 18, 6, 2 ng/mL. Mixtures of Cyt2Ba with either Cry10Aa or Cry4Aa in equal proportions were tested at concentrations of 300, 60, 12, 2.4, 4.8 × 10−1 and 9.6 × 10−2 ng/mL, and 54, 27, 13.5, 6.74, 3.36 and 1.68 ng/mL, respectively. Each bioassay was performed between five and ten times. In all other aspects, the bioassay procedure and data curation was as described above. Graphical representation of logit regressions for all toxin mixtures are summarized in Figure 2. These regressions were used to estimate the median lethal concentration (LC50) for the mixture of the toxins.

5.8. Statistical Analysis

Concentration-mortality data were subjected to logit regression to estimate the median lethal concentration (LC50) for individual toxins and the mixture of toxins. The significance of treatment and interaction terms was determined by sequential removal of terms from the complete regression model. The observed and expected LC50 values for the individual toxins and the toxin mixture in A. aegypti were used to evaluate the interaction of Cyt2Ba with Cry10Aa and Cry4Aa. To calculate the expected LC50 values for the toxin mixture under the null hypothesis of no interaction the “simple similar action” model was used [31]. This model assumes that concentration-response regression lines for different components of a mixture are parallel and is suitable for testing synergism in chemically similar compounds such as Bt toxins. Because Cyt2Ba and Cry4Aa regression lines are not parallel the synergism factor calculated is only correct for the LC50 single point.
The expected LC50 was calculated as follows:
LC 50 ( m ) = [ r A LC 50 ( A ) + r B LC 50 ( B ) ] − 1
where LC50(m) is the expected LC50 of the mixture of toxin A and toxin B, LC50(A) is the observed LC50 for toxin A alone, LC50(B) is the observed LC50 for toxin B alone and rA and rB represent the relative proportions of toxin A and toxin B in the mixture, respectively. All statistical procedures were performed using R software (v.3.5.1).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V.-d.-L., M.V. and P.C.; Data curation, D.V.-d.-L.; Formal analysis, D.V.-d.-L. and T.W.; Funding acquisition, P.C.; Investigation, D.V.-d.-L., M.V. and L.L.; Methodology, D.V.-d.-L. and M.V.; Project administration, P.C.; Resources, P.C.; Software, D.V.-d.-L.; Supervision, M.V., T.W. and P.C; Validation, D.V.-d.-L. and M.V.; Visualization, D.V.-d.-L. and M.V.; Writing—original draft, D.V.-d.-L. and M.V.; Writing—review & editing, D.V.-d.-L., M.V., T.W. and P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTI2018-095204-B-C22). D.V.-d.-L. received a doctoral grant from Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. L.L. received a doctoral grant from the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement N° 801586.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Colin Berry (Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK) for providing Bt recombinant strains 4Q2-81 pHT606:cry4Aa and 4Q2-81 pHT611:cry4Ba used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Goldberg, L.J.; Margalith, J. A bacterial spore demonstrating rapid larvicidal activity against Anopheles sergentii, Uranotaenia unguiculata, Culex univitattus, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. Mosq. News 1977, 1, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
  2. Federici, B.A.; Park, H.; Bideshi, D.K. Overview of the basic biology of Bacillus thuringiensis with emphasis on genetic engineering of bacterial larvicides for mosquito control. Open Toxinol. J. 2010, 3, 154–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Margalith, Y.; Ben-Dov, E. Biological control by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. In Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection; Recheigl, J.E., Recheigl, N.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lacey, L.A. Bacillus thuringiensis serovariety israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2007, 23, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Ben-Dov, E. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and its dipteran-specific toxins. Toxins 2014, 6, 1222–1243. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Boyce, R.; Lenhart, A.; Kroeger, A.; Velayudhan, R.; Roberts, B.; Horstick, O. Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) for the control of dengue vectors: Systematic literature review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2013, 18, 564–577. [Google Scholar]
  7. Paris, M.; Tetreau, G.; Laurent, F.; Lelu, M.; Despres, L.; David, J.P. Persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) in the environment induces resistance to multiple Bti toxins in mosquitoes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vasquez, M.I.; Violaris, M.; Hadjivassilis, A.; Wirth, M.C. Susceptibility of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) field populations in cyprus to conventional organic insecticides, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and methoprene. J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cantón, P.E.; Reyes, E.Z.; De Escudero, I.R.; Bravo, A.; Soberón, M. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cry4Ba to Cyt1Aa has an important role in synergism. Peptides 2011, 32, 595–600. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wirth, M.C.; Park, H.W.; Walton, W.E.; Federici, B.A. Cyt1A of Bacillus thuringiensis delays evolution of resistance to Cry11A in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wirth, M.C.; Georghiou, G.P.; Federici, B.A. CytA enables CryIV endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis to overcome high levels of CryIV resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 10536–10540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ibarra, J.E.; Federici, B.A. Isolation of a relatively nontoxic 65-kilodalton protein inclusion from the parasporal body of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. J. Bacteriol. 1986, 165, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, S.G.; Eckblad, W.; Lee, A.B. Diversity of protein inclusion bodies and identification of mosquitocidal protein in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1985, 126, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garduno, F.; Thorne, L.; Walfield, A.M.; Pollock, T.J. Structural relatedness between mosquitocidal endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Berry, C.; Ben-dov, E.; Jones, A.F.; Murphy, L.; Quail, M.A.; Holden, M.T.G.; Harris, D.; Zaritsky, A.; Parkhill, J. Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the toxin-coding plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5082–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Thorne, L.; Garduno, F.; Thompson, T.; Decker, D.; Zounes, M.; Wild, M.; Waldfield, A.; Pollock, T.J. Structural similarity between the Lepidoptera- and Diptera-specific insecticidal endotoxin genes of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. “kurstaki” and “israelensis.”. J. Bacteriol. 1986, 166, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hernández-Soto, A.; Del Rincón-Castro, M.C.; Espinoza, A.M.; Ibarra, J.E. Parasporal body formation via overexpression of the Cry10Aa toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, and Cry10Aa-Cyt1Aa synergism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 4661–4667. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guerchicoff, A.; Ugalde, R.A.; Rubinstein, C.P. Identification and characterization of a previously undescribed cyt gene in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 2716–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Juárez-Pérez, V.; Guerchicoff, A.; Rubinstein, C.; Delecluse, A. Characterization of Cyt2Bc toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. medellin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar]
  20. Crickmore, N.; Bone, E.J.; Williams, J.A.; Ellar, D.J. Contribution of the individual components of the δ-endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 131, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manasherob, R.; Itsko, M.; Sela-Baranes, N.; Ben-Dov, E.; Berry, C.; Cohen, S.; Zaritsky, A. Cyt1 Ca from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis: Production in Escherichia coli and comparison of its biological activities with those of other Cyt-like proteins. Microbiology 2006, 152, 2651–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Otieno-Ayayo, Z.N.; Zaritsky, A.; Wirth, M.C.; Manasherob, R.; Khasdan, V.; Cahan, R.; Ben-Dov, E. Variations in the mosquito larvicidal activities of toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Poncet, S.; Delecluse, A.; Klier, A.; Rapoport, G. Evaluation of synergistic interactions among CryIVA, CryIVB, and CryIVD toxic components of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis crystals. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1995, 66, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, D.; Johnson, J.J.; Federici, B.A. Synergism of mosquitocidal toxicity between CytA and CryIVD proteins using inclusions produced from cloned genes of Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 13, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wirth, M.C.; Georghiou, G.P.; Malik, J.I.; Abro, G.H. Laboratory selection for resistance to Bacillus sphaericus in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) from California, USA. J. Med. Entomol. 2000, 37, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Donovan, W.P.; Dankocsik, C.; Gilbert, M.P. Molecular characterization of a gene encoding a 72-kilodalton mosquito-toxic crystal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 4732–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Anderson, I.; Sorokin, A.; Kapatral, V.; Reznik, G.; Bhattacharya, A.; Mikhailova, N.; Burd, H.; Joukov, V.; Kaznadzey, D.; Walunas, T.; et al. Comparative genome analysis of Bacillus cereus group genomes with Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 250, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Waalwijlc, C.; Dullemans, A.M.; Van Workum, M.E.S.; Visser, B. Molecular cloning and the nucleotide sequence of the Mr 28 000 crystal protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 5753–5763. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, D.; Federici, B.A. Improved production of the insecticidal CryIVD protein in Bacillus thuringiensis using cryIA(c) promoters to express the gene for an associated 20 kDa protein. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 42, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delecluse, A.; Poncet, S.; Klier, A.; Rapoport, G. Expression of cryIVA and cryIVB genes, independently or in combination, in a crystal-negative strain of Bacillus thuningiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 3922–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tabashnik, B.E. Evaluation of synergism among Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 3343–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stiles, B.; Paschke, J.D. Midgut pH in different instars of three Aedes mosquito species and the relation between pH and susceptibility of larvae to a nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1980, 35, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McLaughlin, R.E.; Dulmage, H.T.; Alls, R.; Couch, T.L.; Dame, D.A.; Hall, I.M.; Rose, R.I.; Versoi, P.L. U.S. standard bioassay for the potency assessment of Bacillus thuringiensis serotype H-14 against mosquito larvae. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1984, 30, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zehnder, G.W.; Gelernter, W.D. Activity of the M-ONE formulation of a new strain of Bacillus thuringiensis against the colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Relationship between susceptibility and insect life stage. J. Econ. Entomol. 1989, 82, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nisnevitch, M.; Cohen, S.; Ben-Dov, E.; Zaritsky, A.; Sofer, Y.; Cahan, R. Cyt2Ba of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis: Activation by putative endogenous protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 344, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wirth, M.C.; Delecluse, A.; Walton, W.E. Cyt1Ab1 and Cyt2Ba1 from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. medellin and B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis synergize Bacillus sphaericus against Aedes aegypti and resistant Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3280–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Delécluse, A.; Bourgouin, C.; Klier, A.; Rapoport, G. Specificity of action on mosquito larvae of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis toxins encoded by two different genes. MGG Mol. Gen. Genet. 1988, 214, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khasdan, V.; Ben-Dov, E.; Manasherob, R.; Boussiba, S.; Zaritsky, A. Toxicity and synergism in transgenic Escherichia coli expressing four genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 798–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Promdonkoy, B.; Promdonkoy, P.; Panyim, S. Co-expression of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba and Cyt2Aa2 in Escherichia coli revealed high synergism against Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 252, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lailak, C.; Khaokhiew, T.; Promptmas, C.; Promdonkoy, B.; Pootanakit, K.; Angsuthanasombat, C. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba toxin employs two receptor-binding loops for synergistic interactions with Cyt2Aa2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 435, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. López-Diaz, J.A.; Cantón, P.E.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A. Oligomerization is a key step in Cyt1Aa membrane insertion and toxicity but not necessary to synergize Cry11Aa toxicity in Aedes aegypti larvae. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 3030–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Perez, C.; Fernandez, L.E.; Sun, J.; Folch, J.L.; Gill, S.S.; Soberon, M.; Bravo, A. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cyt1Aa synergizes Cry11Aa toxin by functioning as a membrane-bound receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18303–18308. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Pérez, C.; Muñoz-Garay, C.; Portugal, L.C.; Sánchez, J.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A. Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis Cyt1Aa enhances activity of Cry11Aa toxin by facilitating the formation of a pre-pore oligomeric structure. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2931–2937. [Google Scholar]
  44. Anaya, P.; Onofre, J.; Torres-Quintero, M.C.; Sánchez, J.; Gill, S.S.; Bravo, A.; Soberón, M. Oligomerization is a key step for Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt1Aa insecticidal activity but not for toxicity against red blood cells. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 119, 103317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Park, H.W.; Ge, B.; Bauer, L.S.; Federici, B.A. Optimization of Cry3A yields in Bacillus thuringiensis by use of sporulation-dependent promoters in combination with the STAB-SD mRNA sequence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3932–3938. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Li, L.; Yang, C.; Liu, Z.; Li, F.; Yu, Z. Screening of acrystalliferous mutants from Bacillus thuringiensis and their transformation properties. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2000, 40, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stewart, S.D.; Adamczyk, J.J.; Knighten, K.S.; Davis, F.M. Impact of Bt cottons expressing one or two insecticidal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on growth and survival of Noctuid (Lepidoptera) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Borodovsky, M.; McIninch, J. GENMARK: Parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Comput. Chem. 1993, 17, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
  49. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Crickmore, N.; Zeigler, D.R.; Feitelson, J.; Schnepf, E.; Van Rie, J.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Dean, D.H. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Harbor, C.S., Ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dominguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Villanueva, M.; Fernandez, A.B.; Caballero, P. A strain of Bacillus thuringiensis containing a novel cry7Aa2 gene that is toxic to Leptinotarsa desemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Insects 2019, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, J.C. Electrotransformation of Staphylococci. Electroporation Protoc. Microorg. 1995, 47, 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  54. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 225, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 12 00355 g001 550
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE gel showing the protein profiles of the recombinant Bt strains and the strain present in VectoBac-12AS®. Lane M, molecular mass marker; lane 1, BMB171 acrystalliferous strain with an empty plasmid; lane 2, BMB171-Cyt2Ba; lane 3, BMB171-Cry10Aa; lane 4, 4Q2-81-Cry4Aa; lane5, 4Q2-81-Cry4Ba; lane 6, BMB171-Cry11Aa; lane 7, wild-type Bti strain from VectoBac-12AS®. Arrows indicate major protein bands.
Figure 1. SDS-PAGE gel showing the protein profiles of the recombinant Bt strains and the strain present in VectoBac-12AS®. Lane M, molecular mass marker; lane 1, BMB171 acrystalliferous strain with an empty plasmid; lane 2, BMB171-Cyt2Ba; lane 3, BMB171-Cry10Aa; lane 4, 4Q2-81-Cry4Aa; lane5, 4Q2-81-Cry4Ba; lane 6, BMB171-Cry11Aa; lane 7, wild-type Bti strain from VectoBac-12AS®. Arrows indicate major protein bands.
Toxins 12 00355 g001
Toxins 12 00355 g002 550
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the logit regression lines for the individual toxins and the toxin combinations. (a) Regression lines for Cyt2Ba, Cry10Aa and Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba. (b) Regression lines for Cyt2Ba, Cry4Aa and Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the logit regression lines for the individual toxins and the toxin combinations. (a) Regression lines for Cyt2Ba, Cry10Aa and Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba. (b) Regression lines for Cyt2Ba, Cry4Aa and Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba.
Toxins 12 00355 g002
Table
Table 1. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with individual Bti δ-endotoxins and the binary combinations Cyt2Ba/Cry10Aa, Cyt2Ba/Cry4Aa, Cyt2Ba/Cry4Ba and Cyt2Ba/Cry11Aa.
Table 1. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with individual Bti δ-endotoxins and the binary combinations Cyt2Ba/Cry10Aa, Cyt2Ba/Cry4Aa, Cyt2Ba/Cry4Ba and Cyt2Ba/Cry11Aa.
Treatment 1Concentration (ng/mL)Mortality (% ± SD)
Cry10Aa4026 ± 5
Cyt2Ba4031 ± 8
Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba (1:1)8093 ± 6
Cry4Aa1031 ± 10
Cyt2Ba1028 ± 23
Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba (1:1)20100 ± 0
Cry4Ba0.0232 ± 18
Cyt2Ba0.0210 ± 9
Cry4Ba+Cyt2Ba (1:1)0.0443 ± 19
Cry11Aa1.540 ± 16
Cyt2Ba1.521 ± 14
Cry11Aa+Cyt2Ba (1:1)346 ± 21
1 Control insects experienced no mortality in all cases.
Table
Table 2. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with Cry10Aa, Cyt2Ba and combination of both.
Table 2. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with Cry10Aa, Cyt2Ba and combination of both.
Cry10AaCyt2BaCry10Aa+Cyt2Ba
ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)
200039/5078 ± 2%400084/9291.3 ± 10%300115/12492.7 ± 9%
66630/5060 ± 10%133364/8575.3 ± 17%6086/11475.4 ± 9%
22223/4156.1 ± 2%44439/9441.5 ± 9%1275/13555.6 ± 11%
7412/4427.3 ± 12%14828/7835.9 ± 7%2.453/13140.5 ± 6%
24.76/4613 ± 17%49.422/8625.6 ± 6%0.4834/11629.3 ± 6%
8.21/422.4 ± 3%16.421/8425 ± 13%0.09623/12019.2 ± 14%
Control insects experienced no mortality in all cases.
Table
Table 3. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with Cry4Aa, Cyt2Ba and combination of both.
Table 3. Mortality of A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h after inoculation with Cry4Aa, Cyt2Ba and combination of both.
Cry4AaCyt2BaCry4Aa+Cyt2Ba
ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)ng/mLDead/TotalMortality (% ± SD)
48663/7090 ± 11%400084/9291.3 ± 10%54139/16385.3 ± 13%
16253/7174.6 ± 17%133364/8575.3 ± 17%27111/15571.6 ± 17%
5442/7060 ± 13%44439/9441.5 ± 9%13.587/20043.5 ± 14%
1827/7337 ± 11%14828/7835.9 ± 7%6.7458/14240.8 ± 24%
613/6420.3 ± 10%49.422/8625.6 ± 6%3.3611/10210.8 ± 16%
27/719.9 ± 7%16.421/8425 ± 13%1.685/736.8 ± 8%
Control insects experienced no mortality in all cases.
Table
Table 4. Logit regression of concentration-mortality results of wild-type (VectoBac-12AS®) and recombinant proteins and their mixtures in A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h.
Table 4. Logit regression of concentration-mortality results of wild-type (VectoBac-12AS®) and recombinant proteins and their mixtures in A. aegypti second instar larvae at 24 h.
Treatment (a)RegressionLC50
Observed		FL (95%) (b)LC50
Expected (c)		 FL (95%) (b)
Slope ± SEIntercept ± SE(ng/mL)LowerUpper(ng/mL)Synergistic Factor (d)PotencyLowerUpper
Cyt2Ba0.59 ± 0.13−3.33 ± 0.79279.37190.20410.38--1--
Cry10Aa0.74 ± 0.09−4.26 ± 0.53299.62245.06366.34--0.930.781.12
Cry4Aa0.78 ± 0.02−2.77 ± 0.0934.6329.7340.34--8.076.4010.17
Cry10Aa+Cyt2Ba (e)0.45 ± 0.05−0.64 ± 0.144.223.255.50289.2768.5566.2058.5274.61
Cry4Aa+Cyt2Ba (e)1.22 ± 0.17−3.17 ± 0.4613.4112.5514.3361.624.6020.8315.1528.63
VectoBac-12AS®1.51 ± 0.293.44 ± 0.731.02 × 10−19.34 × 10−21.11 × 10−1--2.73 × 1032.03 × 1033.69 × 103
(a) Inocula comprised spore+crystal mixtures. Control insects experienced no mortality in all cases. (b) FL: Fiducial limits (95%). (c) Expected LC50 calculated by the method of Tabashnik (1992). (d) Synergism factor defined as the ratio of the expected LC50 and the observed LC50. (e) Toxins were present in equal amounts in the experimental inocula.
Table
Table 5. Sequences of PCR and sequencing primers.
Table 5. Sequences of PCR and sequencing primers.
Primer NamePrimer SequenceReference
Cyt2B-Fw-XbaI5′-TTCTAGAGATAATGAAGGAGGGGAGTC-3′This study
Cyt2B-Rv-PstI5′-CCTGCAGCAAAATTAAATTGCTGAGTTACTATAATAAC-3′This study
Cry10A-Fw-SalI5′-ATGTCGACTTGCAACAGAAAAGAGTTGTGTC-3′[17]
Cry10A-Rv-PaeI5′-GAGCATGCACATTTCCCCACAATTTTCA-3′[17]
Cry10A-test-Fw5′-CGAAATTGTCAGACATAGAGAG-3′This study
Cry10A-test-Rv5′-GAATTACCAAGTCTCCACCTG-3′This study
p20-Fw-PstI5′-CCTGCAGGGATAAAATTGGAGGATAATTGATG-3′This study
p20-Rv-PaeI5′-GGCATGCGTTTCCAGTGCATTCAATTTAC-3′This study
p19-Fw-SalI5′-GTGTCGACGTTTTTTAAAATTGCATAGAAGGG-3′This study
Cry11A-Rv-PstI5′-CTCTGCAGGTGCTAACATGACTTCTACTTTAG-3′This study
Cry11A-test5′-GGTCATAATTTATGAATAAAAATATGAC-3′This study
Restriction enzyme sites are underlined.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valtierra-de-Luis, D.; Villanueva, M.; Lai, L.; Williams, T.; Caballero, P. Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority δ-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis, for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae. Toxins 2020, 12, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12060355

AMA Style

Valtierra-de-Luis D, Villanueva M, Lai L, Williams T, Caballero P. Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority δ-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis, for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae. Toxins. 2020; 12(6):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12060355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valtierra-de-Luis, Daniel, Maite Villanueva, Liliana Lai, Trevor Williams, and Primitivo Caballero. 2020. "Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority δ-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis, for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae" Toxins 12, no. 6: 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12060355

APA Style

Valtierra-de-Luis, D., Villanueva, M., Lai, L., Williams, T., & Caballero, P. (2020). Potential of Cry10Aa and Cyt2Ba, Two Minority δ-endotoxins Produced by Bacillus thuringiensis ser. israelensis, for the Control of Aedes aegypti Larvae. Toxins, 12(6), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12060355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop