Next Article in Journal
Acetamiprid Affects Destruxins Production but Its Accumulation in Metarhizium sp. Spores Increases Infection Ability of Fungi
Next Article in Special Issue
Integration of Complete Plasmids Containing Bont Genes into Chromosomes of Clostridium parabotulinum, Clostridium sporogenes, and Clostridium argentinense
Previous Article in Journal
[D-Leu1]MC-LR and MC-LR: A Small–Large Difference: Significantly Different Effects on Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) Growth and Phototropic Response after Single Contact during Imbibition with Each of These Microcystin Variants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Foodborne Botulism: Clinical Diagnosis and Medical Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/toxins12090586
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity of the Genomes and Neurotoxins of Strains of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Associated with Foodborne, Infant and Wound Botulism

by
Jason Brunt
1,2,*,
Arnoud H. M. van Vliet
3,
Andrew T. Carter
2,
Sandra C. Stringer
2,
Corinne Amar
4,
Kathie A. Grant
4,
Gauri Godbole
4 and
Michael W. Peck
2,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, UK
2
Gut Health and Food Safety, Quadram Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK
3
School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, UK
4
Gastrointestinal Pathogens Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(9), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090586
Submission received: 2 August 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 11 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Challenges in Foodborne Botulism Outbreaks)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes are closely related bacteria responsible for foodborne, infant and wound botulism. A comparative genomic study with 556 highly diverse strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (including 417 newly sequenced strains) has been carried out to characterise the genetic diversity and spread of these bacteria and their neurotoxin genes. Core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis revealed two major lineages; C. botulinum Group I (most strains possessed botulinum neurotoxin gene(s) of types A, B and/or F) and C. sporogenes (some strains possessed a type B botulinum neurotoxin gene). Both lineages contained strains responsible for foodborne, infant and wound botulism. A new C. sporogenes cluster was identified that included five strains with a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1. There was significant evidence of horizontal transfer of botulinum neurotoxin genes between distantly related bacteria. Population structure/diversity have been characterised, and novel associations discovered between whole genome lineage, botulinum neurotoxin sub-type variant, epidemiological links to foodborne, infant and wound botulism, and geographic origin. The impact of genomic and physiological variability on the botulism risk has been assessed. The genome sequences are a valuable resource for future research (e.g., pathogen biology, evolution of C. botulinum and its neurotoxin genes, improved pathogen detection and discrimination), and support enhanced risk assessments and the prevention of botulism.
Keywords:
Clostridium botulinum; Botulism; Neurotoxins; Clostridium sporogenes; Genomes; Foodborne; Infant; Wound
Key Contribution: Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes are closely related bacteria responsible for foodborne, infant and wound botulism. Core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of 556 highly diverse strains of these bacteria characterised population structure/diversity and discovered novel associations between genomic lineage, botulinum neurotoxin sub-type variant, epidemiological links to foodborne, infant and wound botulism, and geographic origin.

1. Introduction

Clostridium botulinum Group I (also known as proteolytic C. botulinum) and Clostridium sporogenes are closely related mesophilic bacteria that share genotypic and physiological characteristics, including a highly proteolytic nature and the ability to form spores of high thermal resistance. C. botulinum Group I is one of four distinct groups within the species C. botulinum, a polyphyletic taxon united only by the ability to form the highly potent botulinum neurotoxin [1,2,3,4,5]. C. sporogenes has often been perceived as a non-toxic close relative of C. botulinum Group I [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. It is an important cause of food spoilage [14,15,16], and used as a surrogate for C. botulinum Group I in food sterilisation tests [7,14,15,17,18,19,20]. Recent findings, however, show that C. sporogenes is not merely a non-toxic form of C. botulinum Group I [8,10,21,22,23,24,25]. Genetic analysis has revealed that both C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes contain strains that either form or do not form botulinum neurotoxin. Most strains of C. botulinum Group I (but not all) form botulinum neurotoxin, whilst some (but not most) C. sporogenes strains also form botulinum neurotoxin [8,10,22,24,25]. If C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes are considered separate species, then C. sporogenes represents another distinct bacterium that forms botulinum neurotoxin [22,24,25,26].
Strains of C. botulinum Group I (and to a lesser extent C. sporogenes) are a major cause of the three most frequent types of botulism in humans (foodborne, infant and wound botulism) and are also responsible for botulism in animals [4,5,27,28,29,30]. Foodborne botulism is a severe, and often lethal, neuroparalytic intoxication potentially caused by the consumption of as little as 50 ng of botulinum neurotoxin [5,31]. Spores of C. botulinum Group I are the target of the Botulinum cook (121 °C/3 min) given to low acid canned foods [4,5]. Foodborne botulism outbreaks have been associated with a failure to apply the Botulinum cook to canned or bottled foods, and also with temperature abuse of products intended to be stored chilled [3,5,32,33,34,35,36]. The commercial implications of foodborne botulism outbreaks can be significant [4,5], and continued extreme vigilance is important to ensure that the incidence of foodborne botulism is minimised. Infant and wound botulism are both infections in which the bacterium multiplies and forms botulinum neurotoxin in the body. Infant botulism results from the absorption of botulinum neurotoxin formed by the bacterium following colonization of the intestinal tract of infants under twelve months. Honey has been identified as one source of the bacterial spores. Wound botulism ensues following the formation of botulinum neurotoxin by the bacterium multiplying in a wound. Initial cases were associated with traumatic injury, but over the last few decades there has been an increase in cases associated with injectable drug abuse [5,27,37,38].
Botulinum neurotoxins are zinc metalloproteases that ultimately reach the nerve cell cytoplasm where they specifically cleave SNARE proteins involved in release of the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, resulting in a severe and often deadly flaccid muscle paralysis known as botulism [39,40]. More than a century ago, two distinct botulinum neurotoxin serotypes were identified using specific antisera to neutralise botulinum neurotoxin in animal tests [27,41,42]. Burke referred to these as serotypes A and B [41]. Today, many botulinum neurotoxin serotypes and more than 40 botulinum neurotoxin sub-types are recognised [43,44,45,46]. A majority of botulinum neurotoxin sub-types have been identified through the sequencing of genes encoding botulinum neurotoxins, and the derivation of the amino acid sequence. Most sub-types differ by at least 2.6% in amino acid sequence from another sub-type [45,46], and sub-types of botulinum neurotoxins serotypes A and B have been shown to exhibit distinct functional and toxicological properties [47,48,49,50,51]. Each botulinum neurotoxin sub-type comprises a series of variants with unique amino acid sequence.
The strains examined in the present study possess up to three neurotoxin genes, and form up to three neurotoxins of type A, B and/or F. Strains with two neurotoxin genes form either one active toxin (e.g., type A(B) strains possess a type A and type B neurotoxin gene, but only form type A neurotoxin) or two active toxins (e.g., type Bf strains form a greater amount of type B neurotoxin than type F neurotoxin). In the present study, strains are referred to by their type or sub-type of botulinum neurotoxin gene(s), e.g., type A strains possess a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin type A, B5F2 strains possess genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-types B5 and F2. The botulinum neurotoxin is accompanied by accessory proteins (notably, non-toxic-non-haemagglutinin (NTNH)) in a series of toxin complexes that are encoded by genes located in either a ha cluster or an orfX cluster. The ha cluster includes genes encoding the neurotoxin (all type B neurotoxins and some type A neurotoxins), NTNH, three haemagglutinins, and a positive regulator. The orfX cluster includes genes encoding the neurotoxin (all type F neurotoxins and other type A neurotoxins), NTNH, a positive regulator, and four open reading frames of unknown function [3,43,44,45,46]. The neurotoxin gene(s) in C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes can be located on the chromosome or a plasmid.
The purpose of the present study was to provide insights into the genetic diversity and spread of strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes and their neurotoxin genes. The genomes of 417 newly sequenced highly diverse strains (isolated from 24 countries and six continents over a period of more than one hundred years) has been supplemented with 139 genomes publicly available in Genbank. This represents the most comprehensive comparative genomic study of these bacteria currently undertaken. Furthermore, the 556 genome sequences also represent a valuable resource, contributing to future genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and systems biology endeavours such as dissecting the evolution of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes and their neurotoxin genes, the analysis of spore properties, regulation of neurotoxin formation, and other characteristics important for pathogen transmission, and also the targeting of PCR assays to detect, trace and discriminate strains [15,17,52,53,54,55,56]. These findings may add to future risk assessments and to the prevention of botulism in humans and animals.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Overview of Diversity of Genomes and Neurotoxins

Publication of genome sequences of C. botulinum Group I began with that of strain ATCC 3502 (Hall A strain 174) [57], and at the start of this work there were 139 genomes publicly available in Genbank. This sequence information has accelerated studies into the diversity and phylogenetic relationship of strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes [5,22,24,25,29,46,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Sequencing of botulinum neurotoxin genes/clusters has provided insight into the diversity and evolution of encoded neurotoxin serotypes, sub-types and variants [45]. In the present study, the genomic diversity, phylogenetic relationship and botulinum neurotoxin genes/clusters have been characterised for 556 strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (Table S1). This includes 417 newly sequenced strains, and considerably increases the number of publicly available genome sequences for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. The strains were from a wide geographical area (24 countries from Europe (predominantly the UK), Asia, Africa, Australasia, north America and south America; Figure 1). Seventy-three strains were associated with foodborne botulism, 70 strains with infant botulism, and 82 strains with wound botulism (Table S1). A further 139 strains were non-clinical isolates not associated with botulism in humans, and the status of the remaining isolates is unknown.
This study has included a number of isolates associated with UK cases of foodborne, infant and wound botulism, and also some UK non-clinical isolates (Table S1). Botulism incidents reported in the UK between 1989 and 2019 are summarized in Table 1, with details of initial cases described previously [64,65,66]. Recent cases of foodborne botulism have often been associated with the consumption of imported food and have been associated with strains possessing genes encoding botulinum toxin sub-types A1, B1, B2 and B5F2 (Table 1). Sporadic cases of infant botulism continue to be recorded and are usually associated with known risk factors such as weaning, contact with dusty environment during travel and feeding honey to the infant. Strains possessing genes encoding botulinum toxin sub-types A2, B2, B5 and B5F2 have been associated with infant botulism between 1989 and 2019 (Table 1). There have been several outbreaks of wound botulism related to injectable drug use, with the first UK case reported in 2000. Several wound botulism outbreaks often involving multiple patients are indicated in some years. The most recent outbreak of wound botulism in Scotland in injectable drug users occurred due to a large contaminated batch of heroin [67]. A1B5, A5B2, A5B3 and B3 strains have been associated with wound botulism (Table 1). A single case of adult colonization botulism was recorded in 2018 (Table 1).
The 556 strains were assigned to one of two major lineages (C. botulinum Group I or C. sporogenes) based on an analysis of core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) following whole genome sequencing, and in silico multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) following the scheme of Jacobson et al. [68]. Each lineage comprised a series of distinct clusters (Figure 2). This is consistent with observations made previously that have largely been carried out on a smaller number of and/or less diverse strains [3,5,7,8,22,24,25,29,43,44,46,58,60,62,68]. The genome of 95% (429 out of 452) of strains assigned to the C. botulinum Group I lineage possessed a botulinum neurotoxin gene or genes, while the genome of only 19% (20 out of 104) of strains assigned to the C. sporogenes lineage possessed a botulinum neurotoxin gene. This assignation resulted in a few strains now being designated as C. botulinum Group I and not C. sporogenes, or vice-versa. For example, strains 2345, AM370, and B2 450 were all previously described as C. botulinum Group I on the basis of their ability to form botulinum neurotoxin [8,25,29,59], but in the present study are located within the C. sporogenes lineage as their genome closely aligns with that of other strains of C. sporogenes.
Clusters of strains can be identified in the two lineages, with most clusters dominated by strains possessing genes that encode the same botulinum neurotoxin sub-type(s). There are also, however, examples of genes encoding the same botulinum neurotoxin sub-type(s) being located in different genomic backgrounds, indicating frequent horizontal movement of botulinum neurotoxin genes between clusters (Figure 2). A majority of genomes (354) possessed a single gene encoding a botulinum neurotoxin (type A, 183 strains; type B, 154 strains; type F, 17 strains), while 89 strains possessed two genes encoding botulinum neurotoxins, and the genome of six strains included three genes encoding botulinum neurotoxins. The present study did not determine whether the presence of a neurotoxin gene was associated with formation of botulinum neurotoxin. The genomes of 107 strains did not possess a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin. The genomes of all strains were searched using an approach previously used to discover a novel putative botulinum neurotoxin gene in Enterococcus [69], but this failed to reveal genes that might encode previously undescribed botulinum neurotoxin serotypes or sub-types. Novel botulinum neurotoxin sub-type variants were identified, each with unique coding (and predicted amino acid) sequence.
Toxins 12 00586 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogeny of genomes of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. Two major lineages (C. botulinum Group I (shown in black) and C. sporogenes (shown in red)) were identified. The phylogenetic tree was created by comparison of core single nucleotide polymorphisms identified using ParSNP program [70], Treegraph v2 [71], MEGA7 [72] and Figtree were used to annotate and visualize the phylogenetic tree. Accessory genes were identified using BLAST using reference sequences for the ha and orfX neurotoxin cluster configurations. The distance bar (0.05) represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site for a given branch, based on the number of SNPs found in the core genome. Details of individual sequences and strains are given in Tables S1 and S2, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. Newly sequenced strains are indicated (in black) as “new” in the right-hand column.
Figure 2. Phylogeny of genomes of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. Two major lineages (C. botulinum Group I (shown in black) and C. sporogenes (shown in red)) were identified. The phylogenetic tree was created by comparison of core single nucleotide polymorphisms identified using ParSNP program [70], Treegraph v2 [71], MEGA7 [72] and Figtree were used to annotate and visualize the phylogenetic tree. Accessory genes were identified using BLAST using reference sequences for the ha and orfX neurotoxin cluster configurations. The distance bar (0.05) represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site for a given branch, based on the number of SNPs found in the core genome. Details of individual sequences and strains are given in Tables S1 and S2, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. Newly sequenced strains are indicated (in black) as “new” in the right-hand column.
Toxins 12 00586 g002

2.2. Diversity and Phylogeny of C. botulinum Group I type A Strains and Their Botulinum Neurotoxin Genes

Eight sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type A (A1 to A8) are currently recognised. These sub-types have an amino acid difference of 2.9–15.6%, and within sub-type differences of 0.1–2.5% [45]. The genome of 271 strains examined in the present study contained a type A neurotoxin gene. For 183 strains, the type A neurotoxin gene was the only neurotoxin gene present, with 88 strains containing an additional neurotoxin gene(s) (Figure 2). Type A neurotoxin genes were located in strains within the C. botulinum Group I lineage, but not the C. sporogenes lineage (Figure 2). Strains possessing a gene encoding the same type A neurotoxin sub-type were located together in a series of discrete clusters. However, strains within these individual clusters were often more closely related to strains with other neurotoxin genes or no neurotoxin gene, than to strains in other clusters with the same sub-type A neurotoxin gene (Figure 2). The presence of genes encoding the same botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A gene in different genomic backgrounds indicates horizontal transfer of type A botulinum neurotoxin genes between clusters.
The genome of 84 strains examined in the present study encoded a gene for botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A1 (Figure 2). Genes encoding sub-type A1 neurotoxin were the only botulinum neurotoxin genes located in either a ha or orfX neurotoxin gene cluster. Three major variant groupings of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A1 were recognised, and these were encoded by A1B5 strains, A1 (ha) strains and A1 (orfX) strains (Figure 3, Table S3). This is as reported previously [3,22,45], with no new major variant grouping identified. Core genome SNP analysis separated strains with a sub-type A1 neurotoxin gene into five clusters within C. botulinum Group I. Two clusters contained A1B5 strains, two clusters contained A1 (ha) strains, while all A1 (orfX) strains were located in a single cluster (Figure 2). A1B5 strains possessed a genome that encoded a sub-type A1 neurotoxin (central sub-type A1 variant group in Figure 3 and Table S3) located in an orfX neurotoxin gene cluster, and also a putative sub-type B5 neurotoxin. Eighteen strains belonged to one cluster and MLST ST-4 or ST-6, while two strains belonged to the second cluster and MLST ST-10 (Figure 2, Table S2). Previous studies found that many other A1B5 strains also belonged to ST-4 [68,73]. A1B5 strains were associated with foodborne botulism in Ireland (in 2006) and USA, infant botulism in UK (in 1978) and USA, and wound botulism in UK (in 2009) (Table 1 and Table S1) [65].
Sixty-three A1 (ha) strains possessed a single gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin belonging to the upper sub-type A1 variant group in Figure 3 and Table S3 (in a ha neurotoxin gene cluster). These strains were separated into two distinct clusters by core genome SNP analysis (Figure 2). A majority of strains (54) belonged to one cluster and MLST ST-1 or ST-9, while a minority of strains (seven) were present in a second cluster and MLST ST-19 (Figure 2, Table S2). Strains were associated with foodborne botulism, including the 2011 UK outbreak involving three children who consumed korma sauce (Table 1) [74], and various incidents in the USA, but not with wound or infant botulism. Non-clinical isolates with genes encoding this variant were from Sweden, Kazakhstan, USA and Netherlands (Table S1). Mazuet et al. [29] reported on a number of similar sub-type A1 (ha) strains that belonged to MLST ST-1 or ST-19 and were associated with foodborne botulism or animal botulism in France. The fifth cluster comprised three closely related strains (Figure 2), with a gene encoding sub-type A1 neurotoxin (lower sub-type A1 variant in Figure 3 and Table S3) in an orfX neurotoxin cluster (A1 (orfX) strains). Two of the three strains were associated with foodborne botulism, and the third is a non-clinical isolate (Figure 2). The present study concurred with previous reports that A1 (orfX) strains were more closely related to strains of other sub-types (e.g., A4B5, B5F2) than to other sub-type A1 strains [8,25,60,75,76].
A gene encoding sub-type A2 neurotoxin was present in 128 strains (Figure 3), some of which were associated with foodborne or infant botulism, but not wound botulism (Figure 2 and Figure 3). All sub-type A2 neurotoxin genes were located in an orfX neurotoxin gene cluster. Some strains contained additional type B or type F neurotoxin gene(s) (Figure 2). Sub-type A2 strains separated into six clusters within C. botulinum Group I (Figure 2). A majority of strains shared a common genomic background (upper cluster in Figure 2), and a gene encoding the most frequently recorded sub-type A2 botulinum neurotoxin variant (upper variant group in Figure 3, Table S3). These strains belonged to MLST ST-2, ST-22 and ST-26 (Table S2). Sub-type A2 strains examined in the present and a previous study principally belonged to ST-2 and ST-26 [77]. However, an additional fifteen strains examined in the present study with more distant genomic backgrounds according to core genome SNP analysis and MLST analysis (ST-7, ST-28, ST-38, ST-61, ST-85) (Figure 2, Table S2) also possessed a gene encoding this sub-type A2 neurotoxin variant. The gene encoding this sub-type A2 neurotoxin variant has therefore moved between distantly related C. botulinum Group I strains by horizontal gene transfer. Strains with this sub-type A2 variant gene were associated with foodborne botulism, all of the infant botulism cases associated with sub-type A2 strains, and there were also non-clinical isolates. This included strain Mauritius that was associated with an outbreak of foodborne botulism in the UK in 1955 following consumption of pickled fish prepared in the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius [66], and strains responsible for five cases of infant botulism in the UK (Table 1) [65,78], and infant botulism in Japan and USA [79]. Non-clinical isolates included strains from Argentina [23,25], and two strains isolated in our laboratory in 2015 from soil samples from Uganda (Stringer SC and Peck MW, unpublished results). Strain CDC 53174 that was isolated from stool sample in Uganda and our two sub-type A2 strains from Uganda (IFR 15/031 and 16/622) all belong to ST-28 [77]. The first reported outbreak of foodborne botulism in Uganda involved a strain of C. botulinum Group I type A [80]. Few strains of C. botulinum have been isolated from Africa, and it is noteworthy that the genomic background and neurotoxin sub-type variant align with that found in other strains from around the world.
All but one of the 44 strains with a genome encoding the second most frequently recorded sub-type A2 botulinum neurotoxin variant (second variant group in Figure 3, Table S3) shared a common genomic background, as revealed by core genome SNP analysis (Figure 2). The strains were isolated from several countries including UK, Denmark, Norway, Canada and Japan, with none known to be associated with botulism (Figure 2, Table S1). Single, distantly related, strains possessed genomes encoding each of the other two sub-type A2 botulinum neurotoxin variants. A strain associated with an outbreak of foodborne botulism involving mascarpone cheese in Italy in 1996 [59] encoded the sole example of the third sub-type A2 variant (third variant group in Figure 3, Table S3). A strain associated with an outbreak of foodborne botulism involving home-canned meat in Italy in 1993 [59] provided the only example of the fourth sub-type A2 botulinum neurotoxin variant (fourth variant group in Figure 3, Table S3). These strains appeared to be more closely related to strains with other botulinum neurotoxin genes, than to each other or to other strains that possessed a gene encoding botulinum sub-type A2 neurotoxin (Figure 2).
Core genome SNP analysis and MLST analysis showed that strains with a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A3 were present in two distinct C. botulinum Group I clusters (Figure 2). Strains in the upper cluster (Figure 2) were non-clinical isolates from Argentina [23,25]. These strains belonged to MLST ST-2 or ST-25 (Table S2), and possessed a gene encoding the lower variant of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A3 in Figure 3 (Table S3). Three further sub-type A3 strains from Argentina also belonged to ST-25 [77]. Strains in the lower cluster (Figure 2) included isolates derived from the first reported foodborne botulism outbreak in the UK at Loch Maree in 1922 [66,81], and also included a UK non-clinical isolate. These strains belonged to MLST ST-3 (Table S2), and possessed a gene encoding a second variant of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A3 (upper variant in Figure 3, Table S3). Strains within each of these two sub-type A3 genomic clusters were more closely related to strains with other botulinum neurotoxin genes, than to strains in the other sub-type A3 genomic cluster. Botulinum neurotoxin sub-types A3 and A4 were encoded by genes located in an orfX neurotoxin gene cluster. Two closely related strains, as determined by core genome SNP analysis and MLST analysis (ST-7) possessed a genome encoding botulinum neurotoxins sub-type A4 and sub-type B5 (Figure 2). Both strains were associated with infant botulism; strain 657 in Texas in 1976 [82], and strain SRR8527662 in Ireland in 2014 (Table S1). A single variant of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type A4 was identified (Figure 3).
Wound botulism was first reported in the UK in 2000. Cases of wound botulism reported between 2000 and 2004 were mainly associated with isolates forming type A neurotoxin, with a few isolates forming type B neurotoxin [64,83]. A detailed analysis of isolates implicated in UK wound botulism cases between 2000 and 2019 has shown that sub-type A5 strains were responsible for a number of time-separated wound botulism outbreaks (Table 1). All UK cases of wound botulism were associated with injectable drug abuse, with the drugs and associated strains believed to originate in Asia [8,83]. Genes encoding the sub-type A5 neurotoxin and a truncated sub-type B2 or B3 neurotoxin were co-located in a ha neurotoxin gene cluster, as described previously [8,29,84,85,86]. The truncated B2 and B3 genes were of similar length. Two variants of sub-type A5 neurotoxin were identified (Figure 3). Strains either contained genes encoding sub-type A5 neurotoxin belonging to the upper variant group in Figure 3 and a truncated sub-type B2 neurotoxin, or sub-type A5 neurotoxin belonging to the lower variant group in Figure 3 and a truncated B3 neurotoxin. The A5B2 strains were associated with wound botulism cases in the UK between 2004 and 2013 (Table 1), wound botulism in Switzerland in 2000, and foodborne botulism in France in 2011 [29]. Core genome SNP analysis and MLST analysis established that most A5B2 strains (including all associated with wound botulism) were closely related, and belonged to MLST ST-47 (Figure 2, Table S2). Two A5B2 strains (including one associated with foodborne botulism) were more distantly related according to core genome SNP analysis and belonged to different MLST sequence types (ST-46 and ST-86). The A5B3 strains were associated with wound botulism cases in the UK between 2000 and 2012, and were closely related, based on core genome SNP analysis and belonged to MLST ST-16 (Figure 2, Table S2).

2.3. Diversity and Phylogeny of C. botulinum Group I type B Strains and Their Botulinum Neurotoxin Genes

The eight sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type B (B1 to B8) are less diverse than those of type A or type F, with an amino acid difference of 1.6–7.1%, and within sub-type differences from 0.1–2.1% [45]. The genome of 239 strains examined in the present study contained a type B neurotoxin gene (Figure 2); with 154 strains containing only a type B neurotoxin gene, and 85 strains containing an additional type A or type F neurotoxin gene (Figure 2). All type B neurotoxin genes were located in a ha neurotoxin gene cluster. Strains with genomes encoding botulinum neurotoxin type B belonged to the C. botulinum Group I lineage or the C. sporogenes lineage (Figure 2). Strains with a similar genomic background often possessed the same sub-type B neurotoxin gene but were also closely related to strains with other or no neurotoxin genes (Figure 2). The same sub-type B botulinum neurotoxin gene was also located in strains with distant genomic backgrounds, providing evidence for horizontal gene transfer.
The genome of 37 strains of C. botulinum Group I or C. sporogenes included a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1 (Figure 2), and it was the only botulinum neurotoxin gene in these strains. Core genome SNP analysis revealed that these strains formed four clusters (Figure 2), that did not entirely align with the four sub-type B1 neurotoxin variants (Figure 4, Table S3). The upper C. botulinum Group I cluster in Figure 2 includes closely related strains that belonged to MLST ST-30 (Table S2) and were associated with foodborne or infant botulism in the USA (Table S1). These strains possessed a gene encoding the same variant of sub-type B1 (second variant in Figure 4, Table S3). Strains in the second C. botulinum Group I cluster belonged to MLST ST-34 (Figure 2, Table S2), and were associated with foodborne botulism outbreaks in USA and UK non-clinical isolates. These strains possessed a gene encoding one of two sub-type B1 variants (either upper variant or lower variant (Figure 4)). Strains located within the C. sporogenes lineage exclusively possessed a gene encoding the third sub-type B1 variant (Figure 4, Table S3), and separated into two clusters, both distantly related to sub-type B1 strains within the C. botulinum Group I lineage (Figure 2).
Core genome SNP analysis revealed that the 119 strains that possessed a sub-type B2 neurotoxin gene fell into eleven clusters that were very widely distributed amongst both the C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes lineages, and that these strains were often closely related to strains with another botulinum neurotoxin gene or no botulinum neurotoxin gene (Figure 2). The validity of these clusters was supported by MLST analysis (Table S2). The presence of a sub-type B2 neurotoxin gene in many different genomic backgrounds indicates significant horizontal transfer of this botulinum neurotoxin gene between distantly related strains of both C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. Genes encoding sub-type B2 neurotoxin have been identified in isolates from around the world, including strains associated with foodborne, infant and wound botulism (Figure 2). Some of these strains contained additional neurotoxin-encoding genes (Figure 2). Most strains possessed a gene encoding a complete sub-type B2 neurotoxin, although some strains possessed a gene encoding a truncated sub-type B2 neurotoxin. Strains with genes encoding a complete sub-type B2 neurotoxin (lower variant grouping in Figure 4, Table S2) formed six clusters in C. botulinum Group I and two clusters in C. sporogenes (Figure 2). Fourteen isolates were from foodborne botulism outbreaks, including a 1998 UK outbreak associated with the consumption of home-preserved bottled mushrooms in oil brought back from Italy [66], a 2012 UK outbreak associated with consumption of olives from Italy (Table 1), and 2013 French outbreak associated with the consumption of home-canned beans [29]. Eighteen isolates were associated with infant botulism including three cases reported in the UK (Table 1) and one case in Greece [65]. Two further isolates were from wound botulism cases in Italy [59]. Non-clinical isolates included two strains isolated in our laboratory from Ugandan soil samples (Stringer SC and Peck MW, unpublished results), and other non-clinical isolates from UK, Poland, Spain, and USA (Table S1). Some strains possessed genes encoding a truncated sub-type B2 neurotoxin and a complete sub-type A5 neurotoxin co-located in a ha neurotoxin gene cluster (Figure 2). Closely related variants of the truncated sub-type B2 neurotoxin were identified (upper grouping in Figure 4). Core genome SNP analysis established that these strains formed three clusters, with most strains closely related and belonging to MLST ST-47, including those associated with UK cases of wound botulism between 2004 and 2013 (Table 1), and a single strain associated with wound botulism in Switzerland in 2000 (Figure 2, Table S2). Two additional strains (including one associated with foodborne botulism in France in 2011 [29]) were more distantly related according to core genome SNP analysis (Figure 2) and belonged to different MLST sequence types (ST-46 and ST-86).
Thirty-nine strains that possessed an entire or truncated sub-type B3 neurotoxin gene fell into three clusters within the C. botulinum Group I lineage, but not the C. sporogenes lineage (Figure 2). Most of these strains were associated with wound botulism (Figure 2). The upper cluster (Figure 2) contained A5B3 strains, with the gene encoding a truncated variant of the sub-type B3 neurotoxin (third variant in Figure 4, Table S3) co-located with a sub-type A5 neurotoxin gene in an ha cluster. These strains were associated with UK outbreaks of wound botulism in 2000, 2004, 2006, and 2012 (Table 1). The central cluster in Figure 2 contained 26 strains with a gene encoding an entire sub-type B3 neurotoxin belonging to one of the upper two variants in Figure 4 (Table S3). These strains were associated with outbreaks of wound botulism in UK (2006, 2009, 2010, 2014, 2015, and 2016; Table 1) and in Germany (2016). The 2016 wound botulism outbreaks in Germany and the UK will be described elsewhere in further detail [87]. The lower cluster in Figure 2 contained four strains with a gene encoding an entire sub-type B3 neurotoxin (lower variant in Figure 4, Table S3), and one A2B3 strain with genes encoding an entire sub-type B3 neurotoxin (fourth variant in Figure 4, Table S3) and neurotoxin sub-type A2. The B3 strains were associated with wound botulism in UK in 2009 (Table 1), and the A2B3 strain with foodborne botulism in Italy [59].
The 31 strains with an entire B5 neurotoxin gene were separated into three clusters within the C. botulinum Group I lineage, but not the C. sporogenes lineage (Figure 2). All but two of these strains contained an additional botulinum neurotoxin gene. The upper and centre clusters revealed by SNP analysis (Figure 2) contain A1B5 strains. These strains contained genes potentially encoding the sub-type B5 neurotoxin (upper sub-type B5 variant in Figure 4) and a sub-type A1 neurotoxin. Strains were associated with foodborne botulism in Ireland (2006) and the USA, infant botulism in the UK (1978) and USA, and wound botulism in UK (2009) [65]. In some A1B5 strains the encoded sub-type B5 neurotoxin is formed in small quantities, but biologically active sub-type B5 neurotoxin is not formed by a majority of strains [8,46,73,79]. These strains are referred to as A1b5 or A1(B5), respectively. The lower cluster revealed by SNP analysis (Figure 2) contained 11 strains that possessed a gene encoding one of two variants of sub-type B5 neurotoxin (centre and lower variants in Figure 4, Table S3). This included B5, A2B5, A4B5 and B5F2 strains. Most of these strains were involved in infant botulism cases in UK (in 2012 and 2013; Table 1), Ireland (2014), Sweden and USA [8,25,46,66,82], but one B5F2 strain was associated with the largest UK outbreak of foodborne botulism (in 1989) involving the consumption of commercially-prepared hazelnut yoghurt (Table 1) [66,88].
The three strains that possessed a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B6 were located in a single cluster within the C. sporogenes lineage (see below for further details), with no strains belonging to the C. botulinum Group I (Figure 2). Previously, Smith et al. reported on eight sub-type B6 strains, with five strains found in the C. sporogenes lineage and three strains in the C. botulinum Group I lineage [23]. The genome of seven strains contained a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B7. Core genome SNP analysis assigned these strains to two clusters within C. botulinum Group I (Figure 2). The upper cluster contained six sub-type B7 strains and all belonged to MLST ST-34. Six (different) sub-type B7 strains associated with infant botulism in the eastern USA also belonged to MLST ST-34 [89]. The lower cluster contained a single A2B7 strain that had been associated with foodborne botulism in Italy [59]. Variants were identified of botulinum neurotoxin sub-types B6 and B7 (Figure 4).

2.4. Diversity and Phylogeny of C. botulinum Group I Type F Strains and Their Botulinum Neurotoxin Genes

Botulinum neurotoxin type F is highly diverse, with eight sub-types (F1 to F8) that differ by up to 36.2% of amino acid residues. Within sub-type differences are from 0.1–1.7% of amino acid residues [45]. Strains forming type F neurotoxin are less frequently associated with botulism than strains forming type A or B neurotoxin, and strains examined in the present study were associated with foodborne or infant botulism, but not wound botulism (Figure 2). A gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin type F was located in the genome of 33 strains within the C. botulinum Group I lineage (but none within the C. sporogenes lineage), including 17 strains with only a type F neurotoxin gene, and 16 strains with additional botulinum neurotoxin gene or genes (Figure 2). All genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin type F were located in an orfX neurotoxin gene cluster. Core SNP analysis revealed that all strains possessing a gene encoding neurotoxin sub-type F1 clustered together (Figure 2) and belonged to MLST ST-88 (Table S2). All sequences of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F1 were identical (Figure 5), including isolates derived from the first foodborne botulism outbreak associated with C. botulinum Group I type F that occurred in Denmark [90], and environmental (non-clinical) isolates. Strains possessing a gene encoding neurotoxin sub-type F2 clustered together (Figure 2) and belonged to MLST ST-7 and ST-14 (Table S2). Genomes of these strains contained genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-types F2 and B5, with two closely related variants of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F2 identified (Figure 5, Table S3). These strains were associated with foodborne botulism in UK (1989, Hazelnut yoghurt), and infant botulism in UK (2013), Sweden and USA [8,25,66,88].
All strains of C. botulinum Group I with genomes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-types F4 and/or F5 were non-clinical isolates from Argentina [25,56]. These strains formed five clusters (two each for F4 and F5 strains, and one including both F4 and F5 strains), indicating spread of these neurotoxin genes amongst bacteria with a diverse genomic background (Figure 2). The three clusters for strains with genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F4 comprised: A2F4 (one strain); A2F4 and A2F4F5 (eight strains); and F4 (one strain). All the sequences of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F4 were identical (Figure 5). The three clusters for strains with genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F5 comprised: A2F4F5 (six strains); A2F5 (one strain); and F5 (one strain). All the sequences of botulinum neurotoxin sub-type F5 were identical (Figure 5, Table S3).

2.5. Diversity and Phylogeny of Strains within the C. sporogenes Lineage and Their Botulinum Neurotoxin Genes

One hundred and four isolates were assigned to the C. sporogenes lineage according to core genome SNP analysis (Figure 2). This included several strains previously designated as C. botulinum Group I, on the basis of their ability to form botulinum neurotoxin. Whilst the genome of a majority of isolates assigned to the C. sporogenes lineage lacked a botulinum neurotoxin gene, the genome of twenty isolates possessed a gene that encoded botulinum neurotoxin of either sub-type B1, B2 or B6. These genes have previously been reported in strains of C. sporogenes [8,22,23,24,25]. Examples of strains of C. sporogenes possessing a botulinum neurotoxin gene that were associated with foodborne, infant and wound botulism are given in Table 2, whilst other strains possessing a botulinum neurotoxin gene had no known association with botulism. Strains of C. sporogenes with a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin type B were isolated over a wide geographical area (Table S1).
All sub-type B1, B2 and B6 botulinum neurotoxin genes were located in a ha neurotoxin gene cluster (Figure 2). The variant of sub-type B1 neurotoxin encoded by C. sporogenes (third variant in Figure 4, Table S3) can be distinguished from the three variants of sub-type B1 neurotoxin encoded in the genome of strains of C. botulinum Group I (Figure 4). The variant of sub-type B2 neurotoxin encoded by most C. sporogenes strains is identical to that encoded by many strains of C. botulinum Group I (Figure 4). However, one variant is uniquely encoded by C. sporogenes strain B2 450 (CB1071), and an unusual divergent variant is encoded only by C. sporogenes strain ATCC 51387 (CB1056) (Figure 4). In the present study, genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B6 were located in C. sporogenes, but not C. botulinum Group I (Figure 2). Genetic analysis carried out previously and also in the present study showed that the botulinum neurotoxin genes encoded by C. sporogenes are primarily carried on a plasmid [8,22,24,25,44,91,92]. These strains may lose their ability to form botulinum neurotoxin, and this phenomenon has been examined further in the present study with strain 2345, where the genome sequences of the original toxic strain (CB0594) and a non-toxic isolate derived in our laboratory (CB0595) have been compared. In the original toxic strain (CB0594), the neurotoxin gene is located on a plasmid very homologous to pCBH of strain Prevot 594 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/CP006901.1). This is a large plasmid (257 kb), and CB0594 has eight contigs mapping onto that plasmid, for a total of 240 kb (including the 15 kb contig with the neurotoxin gene cluster). All of these are missing in CB0595, indicating that the inability to form neurotoxin is due to plasmid loss. An important, but unresolved question, is why do most C. botulinum Group I strains possess a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin, but only few C. sporogenes strains? The answer may be low neurotoxin gene stability (as noted for strain 2345). A further important question is whether a non-toxigenic strain of C. sporogenes (or C. botulinum Group I) may acquire a type B neurotoxin gene through horizontal gene transfer.
The C. sporogenes lineage separates into three clusters, each containing isolates that possess and lack a gene encoding a botulinum neurotoxin (Figure 2). Some of these isolates have been previously reported to belong to the C. sporogenes lineage [23,25]. Isolates in the upper C. sporogenes cluster, that possessed a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B2, had been associated with foodborne botulism involving ham in France (Table 2, Figure 2). Interestingly, the sub-type B2 strain F11 that was associated with animal (cattle) botulism in France also belonged to MLST ST-54 [29], as did nine sub-type B2 strains and two non-toxic strains that are located in the upper C. sporogenes cluster in the present study (Figure 2). The central C. sporogenes cluster included isolates that possessed a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1, B2 or B6, and had been involved in foodborne botulism (Australia), infant botulism (Australia and USA), and wound botulism (Italy) (Table 2, Figure 2). Two strains (Osaka05 and Okayama2011) not included in the present study, that were associated with infant botulism in Japan and formed sub-type B6 neurotoxin, were distantly related to strains of C. botulinum Group I and also belong to the C. sporogenes lineage [7,24,25,46,92]. Interestingly, the lower C. sporogenes cluster has not been described previously and contains five isolates with a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1. It is more distantly separated from the first two clusters (Figure 2). Strains R1125/03 and R1135/03 were associated with a fatal outbreak of foodborne botulism in the UK in 2003 involving the consumption of a home-prepared meat dish (“bigos”) brought from Poland (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 2). Two Polish men shared this meal; one developed botulism in the UK and subsequently died, while the second was diagnosed with botulism in Poland [66]. Also present in the lower cluster is strain 2113/01, a non-clinical UK isolate from an unopened can of infant formula that possessed a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1 [93,94]. Jacobson et al. [68] reported on four additional strains located in MLST STs associated with the C. sporogenes lineage. Three strains (14842, 14843 and 14844) belonged to ST-5, and one strain (A207) belonged to ST-17. Those belonging to ST-5 were reported to be A(B) strains with a unique neurotoxin cluster arrangement, while the ST-17 strain was reported to form sub-type A1 neurotoxin [68]. It was noted that these strains were distinct from the other C. botulinum Group I strains analysed [68]. The present study and previous work [24] both place ST-5 and ST-17 within the C. sporogenes lineage.

2.6. Impact of Genomic and Physiological Variability on the Botulism Risk

Bacterial genomics, the identification of distinct lineages and clusters, and the characterisation of strains within distinct lineages/clusters can make an important contribution to improved risk assessments and the prevention of botulism. Several clusters identified in the present study demonstrate a bias in terms of association with foodborne, infant or wound botulism, or are dominated by non-clinical (environmental) isolates (Figure 2). For example, many strains in the upper cluster of sub-type A2 strains are associated with infant botulism, while all strains in the lower cluster of sub-type A2 strains are non-clinical (environmental) isolates (Figure 2). Strains associated with foodborne botulism were widely distributed amongst many clusters, while strains associated with wound botulism were located in a relatively limited number of clusters (Figure 2). From this it might be inferred that strains possessing botulinum neurotoxin-encoding genes in certain clusters present a greater risk of botulism, or even certain types of botulism, than strains in other clusters. However, it could also be the case that the patterns observed merely represent opportunity, and that all strains that form botulinum neurotoxin have a similar potential to cause foodborne, infant or wound botulism. Investigating this further is not part of the present study but represents an important area for future endeavours that could include genome-wide association studies allied with physiological studies to dissect the mechanisms key to pathogenicity and pathogen transmission.
There are, however, two pieces of evidence that suggest that strains within the C. botulinum Group I lineage currently present a greater botulism risk than strains within the C. sporogenes lineage. Firstly, a greater fraction of strains within the C. botulinum Group I lineage have been associated with foodborne, infant and wound botulism, and secondly a greater proportion of strains in the C. botulinum Group I lineage possess a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin (Figure 2). However, detailed information on physiological differences between neurotoxin-forming strains in the C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes lineages is presently lacking, and it is conceivable that circumstances may arise in the future (e.g., new approaches to food processing) that favour strains in the C. sporogenes lineage. A detailed analysis of the physiological differences between neurotoxin-forming strains in the C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes lineages is needed to establish whether it is necessary to conduct separate risk assessments for neurotoxigenic strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes.
C. botulinum Group I spores are of high thermal resistance and the target of the Botulinum cook (121 °C/3 min) given to low acid canned foods. For many decades, C. sporogenes has been used as a surrogate for C. botulinum Group I in food sterilisation tests [7,14,17,19]. In particular, spores of the nontoxigenic putrefactive anaerobe strain PA3679 are reported to have a higher thermal resistance than spores of C. botulinum Group I and are widely used in the validation of thermal processes in the food industry. This strain is generally referred to as a strain of C. sporogenes and does not possess a botulinum neurotoxin gene. There appear to be several versions of strain PA3679. Weigand et al. reported their version to align with C. sporogenes strains, while Brown et al. reported that their version was more closely related to strains of C. botulinum Group I than to strains of C. sporogenes [14,24]. Further studies carried out on a number of isolates labelled “PA3679” confirmed strain heterogeneity. While some isolates (e.g., 1961-62, 2007) had low spore thermal resistance and genetically resembled C. sporogenes, other isolates (e.g., Camp, UW, FDA, 1961-64) had high spore thermal resistance and genetically resembled C. botulinum Group I [7,19]. In the present study, strain PA3679 isolate Camp (CB1254) was located in the C. botulinum Group I lineage (Figure 2); thus, this isolate appears to be a non-toxigenic strain of C. botulinum Group I rather than a strain of C. sporogenes.
Clostridium spores include a large store of pyridine-2, 6-dicarboxylic acid (DPA) in a 1:1 chelate with calcium ions within their core which promotes spore thermal resistance [95]. DPA uptake into the spore core is regulated by the spoVA operon [96,97]. Recently a spoVA2mob operon on a transposon identified in Bacillus was associated with a raised DPA content and an increase in spore thermal resistance [98]. Strain PA3679 isolate Camp had a second spoVA operon, and this was identified as one factor contributing to the elevated thermal resistance of spores of this strain [12]. In the present study, bioinformatic analysis revealed that a second spoVA operon (spoVA2) was present in 56% of strains in the C. botulinum Group I lineage, but only 3% of strains in the C. sporogenes lineage (Table S2, Figure S1), potentially alluding to a high spore thermal resistance for many strains in the C. botulinum Group I lineage. Strains with a second spoVA operon (spoVA2) formed five clusters in the C. botulinum Group I lineage and one cluster in the C. sporogenes lineage (Table S2, Figure S1). When conducting challenge tests or validating thermal processes for C. botulinum, it is therefore prudent to select appropriate strains from C. botulinum Group I and/or C. sporogenes that takes account of genomic/physiological variability. Toxic and non-toxic strains have been identified in both lineages. The use of strains located within the C. sporogenes lineage may not be appropriate for thermal death studies.

2.7. Pan-genome Comparison of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes Genomic Clusters and Identification of C. botulinum Group I- and C. sporogenes-specific Genes

The 556 genomes examined in this study separated into a distinct C. botulinum Group I lineage, consisting of 452 genomes, and a C. sporogenes lineage that comprised two previously known clusters of 94 genomes and an additional new cluster of ten genomes (Figure 2). In a previous study, Williamson et al. [56] provided primers to distinguish C. botulinum Group I from C. sporogenes. When tested in silico against all genomes used in the present study, the primer pair correctly distinguished the previously known C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes clusters, but failed to correctly identify the additional (lower) C. sporogenes cluster, as strains within this cluster were positive for the C. botulinum PCR product (10/10) and negative for the C. sporogenes PCR product (9/10). Similarly, Weigand et al. [24] performed genome analysis for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes, and identified 11 candidate genes for a species-specific PCR. These were also tested against the 452 C. botulinum Group I and 104 C. sporogenes genomes used in the present study. None of the primer sets was able to correctly amplify all genomes tested; the nifS primers detected all C. sporogenes genomes, but also amplified 29 of the C. botulinum Group I genomes, whereas the spoVB primers correctly identified 452 C. botulinum Group I and 94 C. sporogenes genomes, but failed to amplify the additional (lower) C. sporogenes cluster. As both genes were present in all genomes, it might be that the efficiency could be improved by the selection of new primers. The other nine genes [24], performed less well, either amplifying a larger number of C. botulinum genomes (thiHG), or not or only partially amplifying the new C. sporogenes cluster.
Pangenome analysis was used to search for genes for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. The pangenome of the combined 556 genomes was generated using Prokka-annotated genome sequences and the Roary software package [99], followed by identification of lineage-specific genes defined. The pangenome consisted of 18,731 annotated features, with 2420 annotated features present in >95% of the genomes (core genome). The distribution of genes linked to the position in the core genome-based phylogenetic tree is shown in Figure 6A. Due to the different sizes of the groups, lineage specificity was initially set at present in ≥90% (over-represented) or present in ≤10% (under-represented) for C. botulinum Group I, and ≥80%/≤20% for the larger 94-genome C. sporogenes cluster, and ≥70%/≤30% for the smaller 10-genome C. sporogenes cluster. This identified 224 features over-represented in C. botulinum, and 79 features over-represented in C. sporogenes. The relative position of features specific for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes were plotted using the complete genomes of C. botulinum Group I strain ATCC 19397 and C. sporogenes strain NCIMB 10696 (Figure 6B), and these features were spread throughout the chromosome, similar to the two C. botulinum Group II lineages [2].
Of the over-represented features for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes, 35 showed a perfect distribution for C. botulinum and 14 did likewise for C. sporogenes. These were further tested at the nucleotide level using BLAST, resulting in 13 genes specific for C. botulinum Group I and four genes specific for C. sporogenes, defined by >99% specificity (Table S4). These genes comprise candidates for a future PCR assay to distinguish C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes, but the development and testing of such an assay falls outside the scope of this study.

3. Conclusions

This comparative genomic investigation of 556 highly diverse strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (including 417 newly sequenced strains) has analysed population diversity, structure, and spread, and established novel relationships between whole genome lineage, botulinum neurotoxin sub-type variant, association with foodborne, infant and wound botulism, epidemiology, and geographic origin. The impact of genomic and physiological variability on the botulism risk has been evaluated. Strains had up to three botulinum neurotoxin genes (of types A, B and/or F), but no novel botulinum neurotoxin genes (serotypes or sub-types) were discovered. This may suggest a limited number of unknown botulinum neurotoxin genes (serotypes or sub-types) within the genomes of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes. The present study described novel botulinum neurotoxin sub-type variants, each with a unique amino acid sequence. Core genome SNPs analysis identified two major lineages; C. botulinum Group I (most strains possessed neurotoxin gene(s) of types A, B and/or F) and C. sporogenes (some strains possessed a type B neurotoxin gene). Both lineages contained strains responsible for foodborne, infant and wound botulism. An additional new C. sporogenes cluster was discovered that included five strains with a gene encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-type B1. There was significant evidence of horizontal transfer of botulinum neurotoxin genes between distantly related bacteria. Each lineage also included strains that lacked a botulinum neurotoxin-encoding gene. The pan-genome of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes contained 18,731 annotated features, with a core genome of 2420 annotated features (present in >95% of genomes), and 224 and 79 features over-represented in the genomes of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes, respectively. There were no integration hotspots, with lineage-specific features located throughout the genomes. The genome sequences are also a valuable resource to future research endeavours, for example, on pathogen biology, the evolution of bacteria and their neurotoxin genes, and improved pathogen detection and discrimination. When investigating outbreaks of human or animal botulism or carrying out surveillance studies, it is vital to establish the C. botulinum Group and lineage of the bacterium involved, and the associated botulinum neurotoxin(s). The increased availability of whole genome sequences for C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (this study) and C. botulinum Group II (previously [2]) gives a greater value to genetic tests. Improved PCR tests can be used to rapidly detect and identify the bacterium present, its lineage, and botulinum neurotoxin gene(s). While the genome sequences enable enhanced isolate discrimination and detailed epidemiological investigation. This may support enhanced risk assessments and prevent and/or minimise botulism outbreaks.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes

The genomes of 556 strains were examined (417 newly sequenced strains and 139 genomes from public sources, Table S1). The newly sequenced strains were isolated in the authors’ laboratory or kindly provided by colleagues (B. Dorner, T. Grenda, C. Hatheway, V. Broussolle, A. East, P. McClure, T. Roberts, H. Tranter, J. Crowther, P. Barrett, L. Taylor and M. Wictome; Table S1). The strains were isolated over a period of more than 100 years, from 24 countries throughout Europe, Asia, Africa, Australasia, north America and south America (Figure 1). Seventy-three strains were isolated following outbreaks of foodborne botulism, 70 strains were associated with infant botulism, 82 strains were associated with wound botulism, and 139 strains were non-clinical isolates not associated with human botulism (Table S1). The status of the remaining strains is unknown. Based on their genome sequence, 452 strains were assigned to C. botulinum Group I and 104 strains to C. sporogenes. This led to some strains now being considered as C. botulinum Group I and not C. sporogenes, or vice-versa. Most of the strains assigned to C. botulinum Group I possessed a botulinum neurotoxin gene or genes, while some of the strains assigned to C. sporogenes possessed a botulinum neurotoxin gene. The strains possessed up to three botulinum neurotoxin genes (Table 3). In this study, strains are referred to by their type or sub-type of botulinum neurotoxin gene(s). Thus, for example, B5F2 strains possess genes encoding botulinum neurotoxin sub-types B5 and F2. It was not established whether all neurotoxin genes were associated with formation of botulinum neurotoxin.

4.2. Genomic DNA Preparation and Whole Genome Sequencing

DNA extraction was performed by following the traditional Gram-positive cell lysis procedures [2]. Whole genome sequencing of the C. botulinum gDNA samples was carried out at the Earlham Institute, UK [2]. Briefly, libraries were assembled with 1ng of DNA. Libraries were constructed using unique 9 bp dual index combinations allowing samples to be multiplexed. Libraries were pooled then sequenced with a 2 × 250 bp read metric on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer.

4.3. Genome Assembly and Quality Control

Shovill version 1.0.4 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill) with the Spades 3.13.0 assembler module [100] were used to assemble genome sequences, with contigs smaller than 200 bp and coverage lower than five-fold excluded. Assembly metrics were obtained using QUAST version 4.6 [101] with genome size, N50, L50 and number of contigs used for quality assessment of the assemblies. Genome assemblies were annotated using Prokka version 1.13 [102]. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) was done using mlst version 2.16.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst) and the sequence profiles from the C. botulinum PubMLST homepage (https://pubmlst.org/cbotulinum/). The Genbank/SRA accession numbers for genome assemblies, FASTQ reads, and source information are provided in Table S1.

4.4. Identification of Botulinum Neurotoxin Sub-Types and Accessory Protein Configuration

The Prokka annotated features were searched with representatives of the A, B, C, D, E, F, G, FA, X and Ebont/J toxins [45,69] as described in Brunt et al. [2]. Gene sequences representing incomplete, fragmented and inactivated toxin genes were manually extracted from the individual genome sequences, and frameshifts/stop codons manually repaired to obtain the amino acid sequences for comparison. Toxins were assigned to specific sub-types by alignment of the amino acid sequences with the toxin reference types [45] using the MUSCLE module of MEGA7 [72], and subsequent generation of a Neighbour-Joining tree and clustering with reference toxins, with Gaps/Missing data set to pairwise deletion. Accessory genes were identified using BLAST using reference sequences [3].

4.5. Pangenome Analyses, Target Gene Identification and in silico PCR

The pangenome of C. botulinum Group I and closely related C. sporogenes was identified using Roary version 3.13 [99] and was based on the Prokka-annotated genome assemblies, with 80% and 90% BLAST cut-off percentages, and paralog clustering both switched off and on [103], as described previously for C. botulinum Group II [2]. Briefly, the Roary-outputs were analysed using Scoary [104] with a Bonferroni corrected p-value cut-off of 0.05. For C. botulinum Group I, genes were considered over- or under-represented if either present in ≥90% of the tester group and less than ≤10% of the comparator group, or vice versa. However, due to the different group size, lineage specificity was initially set at ≥80%/≤20% for the larger 94-genome C. sporogenes cluster, and ≥70%/≤30% for the smaller 10-genome C. sporogenes cluster. The plots for the pangenome distribution were generated with roary plots (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/Roary/tree/master/contrib/roary_plots). In silico PCR was performed using MIST [105].

4.6. Core Genome SNPs Analysis and Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees were generated using core genome SNPs and the ParSNP program [70] with settings described previously [106]. Phylogenetic trees were annotated using Figtree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) and MEGA7 [72].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/12/9/586/s1, Figure S1 (Presence of second spoVA operon (spoVA2) in strains of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (genome phylogeny as in Figure 2, further details Table S2)), Table S1 (Genome sequences of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes used in this study), Table S2 (Strain ID Figure 2), Table S3 (Strain ID Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5), Table S4 (Candidates genes for PCR assay to distinguish C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes).

Author Contributions

M.W.P. conceptualized and secured funding for this study; C.A., G.G. and K.A.G. provided additional strains for use in this study and epidemiological data on botulism in the UK; M.W.P. verified the origin of the strains; J.B., A.T.C. and S.C.S. cultured the bacterial strains, confirmed their purity and properties, and prepared DNA for whole genome sequencing; A.H.M.v.V. carried out the analysis of genomic data and data visualisation, with input from J.B.; A.H.M.v.V. submitted genome sequence data to GenBank; J.B. and M.W.P. prepared the original draft manuscript, and co-ordinated manuscript finalisation with all authors reviewing, editing and providing critical feedback. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme on Gut Health and Food Safety [grant number BB/J004529/1].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bruggemann, H.; Wollherr, A.; Mazuet, C.; Popoff, M. Clostridium botulinum. In Genomes of Foodborne and Waterborne Pathogens; Fratamico, P., Liu, Y., Kathariou, S., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; Volume 13, pp. 185–212. ISBN 978-1555814571. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunt, J.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; Stringer, S.C.; Carter, A.T.; Lindström, M.; Peck, M.W. Pan-genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum Group II (Non-Proteolytic C. botulinum) associated with foodborne botulism and isolated from the environment. Toxins 2020, 12, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Carter, A.T.; Peck, M.W. Genomes, neurotoxins and biology of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Group II. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 166, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Johnson, E.A. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers; Doyle, M.P., Buchanan, R.L., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 441–464. [Google Scholar]
  5. Peck, M.W. Biology and genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2009, 55, 183–265, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bradbury, M.; Greenfield, P.; Midgley, D.; Li, D.; Tran-Dinh, N.; Vriesekoop, F.; Brown, J.L. Draft genome sequence of Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679, the common nontoxigenic surrogate for proteolytic Clostridium botulinum. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 1631–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Butler, R.R.; Schill, K.M.; Wang, Y.; Pombert, J.F. Genetic characterization of the exceptionally high heat resistance of the non-toxic surrogate Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Carter, A.T.; Paul, C.J.; Mason, D.R.; Twine, S.M.; Alston, M.J.; Logan, S.M.; Austin, J.W.; Peck, M.W. Independent evolution of neurotoxin and flagellar genetic loci in proteolytic Clostridium botulinum. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Collins, M.; East, A. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the food-borne pathogen Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 84, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dobritsa, A.P.; Kutumbaka, K.K.; Samadpour, M. Reclassification of Eubacterium combesii and discrepancies in the nomenclature of botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridia: Challenging Opinion 69. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3068–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakano, K.; Terabayashi, Y.; Shiroma, A.; Shimoji, M.; Tamotsu, H.; Ashimine, N.; Ohki, S.; Shinzato, M.; Teruya, K.; Satou, K.; et al. First complete genome sequence of Clostridium sporogenes DSM 795T, a nontoxigenic surrogate for Clostridium botulinum, determined using PacBio single-molecule real-time technology. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e00832-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Olsen, I.; Johnson, J.L.; Moore, L.V.H.; Moore, W.E.C. Rejection of Clostridium putrificum and conservation of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1995, 45, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peck, M.W.; Stringer, S.C.; Carter, A.T. Clostridium botulinum in the post-genomic era. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brown, J.L.; Tran-Dinh, N.; Chapman, B. Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679 and its uses in the derivation of thermal processing schedules for low-acid shelf-stable foods and as a research model for proteolytic Clostridium botulinum. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Brunt, J.; Cross, K.L.; Peck, M.W. Apertures in the Clostridium sporogenes spore coat and exosporium align to facilitate emergence of the vegetative cell. Food Microbiol. 2015, 51, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. McClure, P.J. Spore-forming bacteria. In Food Spoilage Microorganisms, 122th ed.; Blackburn, C.D.W., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 579–623. [Google Scholar]
  17. Brunt, J.; Plowman, J.; Gaskin, D.J.; Itchner, M.; Carter, A.T.; Peck, M.W. Functional characterisation of germinant receptors in Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes presents novel insights into spore germination systems. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Diao, M.M.; André, S.; Membré, J.M. Meta-analysis of D-values of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum and its surrogate strain Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 174, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schill, K.M.; Wang, Y.; Butler, R.R.; Pombert, J.F.; Reddy, N.R.; Skinner, G.E.; Larkin, J.W. Genetic diversity of Clostridium sporogenes PA 3679 isolates obtained from different sources as resolved by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and High-Throughput Sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Taylor, R.H.; Dunn, M.L.; Ogden, L.V.; Jefferies, L.K.; Eggett, D.L.; Steele, F.M. Conditions associated with Clostridium sporogenes growth as a surrogate for Clostridium botulinum in nonthermally processed canned butter. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 2754–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fillo, S.; Giordani, F.; Anselmo, A.; Fortunato, A.; Palozzi, A.M.; De Santis, R.; Ciammaruconi, A.; Spagnolo, F.; Anniballi, F.; Fiore, A.; et al. Draft genome sequence of Clostridium botulinum B2 450 strain from wound botulism in a drug user in Italy. Genome Announc. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Peck, M.W.; van Vliet, A.H. Impact of Clostridium botulinum genomic diversity on food safety. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 10, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Smith, T.J.; Xie, G.; Williamson, C.H.D.; Hill, K.K.; Fernández, R.A.; Sahl, J.W.; Keim, P.; Johnson, S.L. Genomic characterization of newly completed genomes of Botulinum neurotoxin-producing species from Argentina, Australia, and Africa. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020, 12, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weigand, M.R.; Pena-Gonzalez, A.; Shirey, T.B.; Broeker, R.G.; Ishaq, M.K.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Raphael, B.H. Implications of genome-based discrimination between Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes strains for bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 5420–5429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Williamson, C.H.; Sahl, J.W.; Smith, T.J.; Xie, G.; Foley, B.T.; Smith, L.A.; Fernandez, R.A.; Lindström, M.; Korkeala, H.; Keim, P.; et al. Comparative genomic analyses reveal broad diversity in botulinum-toxin-producing Clostridia. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Smith, T.; Williamson, C.H.D.; Hill, K.; Sahl, J.; Keim, P. Botulinum neurotoxin-producing bacteria. Isn’t It time that we called a species a species? mBio 2018, 9, e01469-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hatheway, C.L. Toxigenic clostridia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 3, 66–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Johnson, A.L.; McAdams-Gallagher, S.C.; Aceto, H. Outcome of adult horses with botulism treated at a veterinary hospital: 92 cases (1989–2013). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mazuet, C.; Legeay, C.; Sautereau, J.; Ma, L.; Bouchier, C.; Bouvet, P.; Popoff, M.R. Diversity of Group I and II Clostridium botulinum Strains from France Including Recently Identified Subtypes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 1643–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rasetti-Escargueil, C.; Lemichez, E.; Popoff, M.R. Public health risk associated with botulism as foodborne zoonoses. Toxins 2019, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Smith, L.D.S.; Sugiyama, H. Botulism: The Organism, Its Toxins, the Disease, 2nd ed.; Charles C Thomas Pub Ltd.: Springfield, IL, USA, 1988; p. 171. [Google Scholar]
  32. Juliao, P.C.; Maslanka, S.; Dykes, J.; Gaul, L.; Bagdure, S.; Granzow-Kibiger, L.; Salehi, E.; Zink, D.; Neligan, R.P.; Barton-Behravesh, C.; et al. National outbreak of type a foodborne botulism associated with a widely distributed commercially canned hot dog chili sauce. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 56, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Marshall, K.M.; Nowaczyk, L.; Raphael, B.H.; Skinner, G.E.; Rukma Reddy, N. Identification and genetic characterization of Clostridium botulinum serotype A strains from commercially pasteurized carrot juice. Food Microbiol. 2014, 44, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McCarty, C.L.; Angelo, K.; Beer, K.D.; Cibulskas-White, K.; Quinn, K.; de Fijter, S.; Bokanyi, R.; St Germain, E.; Baransi, K.; Barlow, K.; et al. Large outbreak of botulism associated with a church potluck meal--Ohio, 2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2015, 64, 802–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peck, M.W.; Goodburn, K.E.; Betts, R.P.; Stringer, S.C. Assessment of the potential for growth and neurotoxin formation by non-proteolytic Clostridium botulinum in short shelf-life commercial foods designed to be stored chilled. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peck, M.W.; Webb, M.D.; Goodburn, K.E. Assessment of the risk of botulism from chilled, vacuum/modified atmosphere packed fresh beef, lamb and pork held at 3 °C–8 °C. Food Microbiol. 2020, 91, 103544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chatham-Stephens, K.; Fleck-Derderian, S.; Johnson, S.D.; Sobel, J.; Rao, A.K.; Meaney-Delman, D. Clinical features of foodborne and wound botulism: A systematic review of the literature, 1932–2015. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 66, S11–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dabritz, H.A.; Hill, K.K.; Barash, J.R.; Ticknor, L.O.; Helma, C.H.; Dover, N.; Payne, J.R.; Arnon, S.S. Molecular epidemiology of infant botulism in California and elsewhere, 1976–2010. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1711–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rossetto, O.; Pirazzini, M.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum neurotoxins: Genetic, structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rummel, A. The long journey of botulinum neurotoxins into the synapse. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2015, 107, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burke, G.S. Notes on Bacillus botulinus. J. Bacteriol. 1919, 4, 555–570.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Leuchs, J. Beiträge zur kenntnis des toxins und antitoxins des Bacillus botulinus. Z. Für Hyg. Und Infekt. 1910, 65, 55–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hill, K.K.; Smith, T.J. Genetic diversity within Clostridium botulinum serotypes, botulinum neurotoxin gene clusters and toxin subtypes. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hill, K.K.; Xie, G.; Foley, B.T.; Smith, T.J. Genetic diversity within the botulinum neurotoxin-producing bacteria and their neurotoxins. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2015, 107, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Peck, M.W.; Smith, T.J.; Anniballi, F.; Austin, J.W.; Bano, L.; Bradshaw, M.; Cuervo, P.; Cheng, L.W.; Derman, Y.; Dorner, B.G.; et al. Historical perspectives and guidelines for Botulinum neurotoxin subtype nomenclature. Toxins 2017, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Smith, T.J.; Hill, K.K.; Raphael, B.H. Historical and current perspectives on Clostridium botulinum diversity. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 166, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kaji, R. Clinical differences between A1 and A2 botulinum toxin subtypes. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2015, 107, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kohda, T.; Nakamura, K.; Hosomi, K.; Torii, Y.; Kozaki, S.; Mukamoto, M. Characterization of the functional activity of botulinum neurotoxin subtype B6. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 61, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Moritz, M.S.; Tepp, W.H.; Inzalaco, H.N.; Johnson, E.A.; Pellett, S. Comparative functional analysis of mice after local injection with botulinum neurotoxin A1, A2, A6, and B1 by catwalk analysis. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2019, 167, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pellett, S.; Tepp, W.H.; Whitemarsh, R.C.; Bradshaw, M.; Johnson, E.A. In vivo onset and duration of action varies for botulinum neurotoxin A subtypes 1-5. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2015, 107, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Whitemarsh, R.C.; Tepp, W.H.; Bradshaw, M.; Lin, G.; Pier, C.L.; Scherf, J.M.; Johnson, E.A.; Pellett, S. Characterization of botulinum neurotoxin A subtypes 1 through 5 by investigation of activities in mice, in neuronal cell cultures, and in vitro. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 3894–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Brunt, J.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; van den Bos, F.; Carter, A.T.; Peck, M.W. Diversity of the Germination Apparatus in Clostridium botulinum Groups I, II, III, and IV. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Derman, Y.; Söderholm, H.; Lindström, M.; Korkeala, H. Role of csp genes in NaCl, pH, and ethanol stress response and motility in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kirk, D.G.; Dahlsten, E.; Zhang, Z.; Korkeala, H.; Lindstrom, M. Involvement of Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502 sigma factor K in early-stage sporulation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 4590–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wang, S.; Brunt, J.; Peck, M.W.; Setlow, P.; Li, Y.Q. Analysis of the germination of individual Clostridium sporogenes spores with and without germinant receptors and cortex-lytic enzymes. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Williamson, C.H.D.; Vazquez, A.J.; Hill, K.; Smith, T.J.; Nottingham, R.; Stone, N.E.; Sobek, C.J.; Cocking, J.H.; Fernandez, R.A.; Caballero, P.A.; et al. Differentiating botulinum neurotoxin-producing Clostridia with a simple, multiplex PCR assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00806-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sebaihia, M.; Peck, M.W.; Minton, N.P.; Thomson, N.R.; Holden, M.T.; Mitchell, W.J.; Carter, A.T.; Bentley, S.D.; Mason, D.R.; Crossman, L.; et al. Genome sequence of a proteolytic (Group I) Clostridium botulinum strain Hall A and comparative analysis of the clostridial genomes. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 1082–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Fillo, S.; Giordani, F.; Anniballi, F.; Gorgé, O.; Ramisse, V.; Vergnaud, G.; Riehm, J.M.; Scholz, H.C.; Splettstoesser, W.D.; Kieboom, J.; et al. Clostridium botulinum group I strain genotyping by 15-locus multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 4252–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Giordani, F.; Fillo, S.; Anselmo, A.; Palozzi, A.M.; Fortunato, A.; Gentile, B.; Tehran, D.A.; Ciammaruconi, A.; Spagnolo, F.; Pittiglio, V.; et al. Genomic characterization of Italian Clostridium botulinum group I strains. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 36, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Timme, R.; Raphael, B.H.; Zink, D.; Sharma, S.K. Whole-genome single-nucleotide-polymorphism analysis for discrimination of Clostridium botulinum group I strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2125–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lindström, M.; Hinderink, K.; Somervuo, P.; Kiviniemi, K.; Nevas, M.; Chen, Y.; Auvinen, P.; Carter, A.T.; Mason, D.R.; Peck, M.W.; et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of two predominant Nordic group I (proteolytic) Clostridium botulinum type B clusters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2643–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Raphael, B.H.; Joseph, L.A.; McCroskey, L.M.; Luquez, C.; Maslanka, S.E. Detection and differentiation of Clostridium botulinum type A strains using a focused DNA microarray. Mol. Cell. Probes 2010, 24, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Umeda, K.; Wada, T.; Kohda, T.; Kozaki, S. Multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Clostridium botulinum type B isolates in Japan: Comparison with other isolates and genotyping methods. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 16, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Akbulut, D.; Grant, K.A.; McLauchlin, J. Development and application of Real-Time PCR assays to detect fragments of the Clostridium botulinum types A, B, and E neurotoxin genes for investigation of human foodborne and infant botulism. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2004, 1, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Grant, K.A.; Nwarfor, I.; Mpamugo, O.; Mithani, V.; Lister, P.; Dixon, G.; Nixon, G.; Planche, T.; Courtney, M.; Morgan, J.; et al. Report of two unlinked cases of infant botulism in the UK in October 2007. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. McLauchlin, J.; Grant, K.A.; Little, C.L. Food-borne botulism in the United Kingdom. J. Public Health 2006, 28, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Trayner, K.M.A.; Weir, A.; McAuley, A.; Godbole, G.; Amar, C.; Grant, K.; Penrice, G.; Roy, K. A pragmatic harm reduction approach to manage a large outbreak of wound botulism in people who inject drugs, Scotland 2015. Harm Reduct. J. 2018, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jacobson, M.; Lin, G.; Whittam, T.; Johnson, E. Phylogenetic analysis of Clostridium botulinum type A by multi-locus sequence typing. Microbiology 2008, 154, 2408–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Brunt, J.; Carter, A.T.; Stringer, S.C.; Peck, M.W. Identification of a novel botulinum neurotoxin gene cluster in Enterococcus. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Treangen, T.J.; Ondov, B.D.; Koren, S.; Phillippy, A.M. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Stover, B.C.; Muller, K.F. TreeGraph 2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Raphael, B.H.; Shirey, T.B.; Lúquez, C.; Maslanka, S.E. Distinguishing highly-related outbreak-associated Clostridium botulinum type A(B) strains. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Browning, L.M.; Prempeh, H.; Little, C.; Houston, C.; Grant, K.; Cowden, J.M. An outbreak of food-borne botulism in Scotland, United Kingdom, November 2011. Eurosurveillance 2011, 16, 20036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Gonzalez-Escalona, N.; Sharma, S.K. Closing Clostridium botulinum group I genomes using a combination of short- and long-reads. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hill, K.K.; Smith, T.J.; Helma, C.H.; Ticknor, L.O.; Foley, B.T.; Svensson, R.T.; Brown, J.L.; Johnson, E.A.; Smith, L.A.; Okinaka, R.T.; et al. Genetic diversity among Botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridial strains. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 818–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Lúquez, C.; Raphael, B.H.; Joseph, L.A.; Meno, S.R.; Fernández, R.A.; Maslanka, S.E. Genetic diversity among Clostridium botulinum strains harboring bont/A2 and bont/A3 genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8712–8718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Abdulla, C.O.; Ayubi, A.; Zulfiquer, F.; Santhanam, G.; Ahmed, M.A.; Deeb, J. Infant botulism following honey ingestion. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Franciosa, G.; Floridi, F.; Maugliani, A.; Aureli, P. Differentiation of the gene clusters encoding botulinum neurotoxin type A complexes in Clostridium botulinum type A, Ab, and A(B) strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7192–7199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Viray, M.A.; Wamala, J.; Fagan, R.; Luquez, C.; Maslanka, S.; Downing, R.; Biggerstaff, M.; Malimbo, M.; Kirenga, J.B.; Nakibuuka, J.; et al. Outbreak of type A foodborne botulism at a boarding school, Uganda, 2008. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 2297–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Leighton, G.R. Botulism and Food Preservation: (The Loch Maree Tragedy); Collins Sons & Company: Glasgow, Scotland, 1923. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hatheway, C.L.; McCroskey, L.M.; Lombard, G.L.; Dowell, V.R. Atypical toxin variant of Clostridium botulinum type B associated with infant botulism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1981, 14, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Brett, M.; Hallas, G.; Mpamugo, O. Wound botulism in the UK and Ireland. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Carter, A.T.; Pearson, B.M.; Crossman, L.C.; Drou, N.; Heavens, D.; Baker, D.; Febrer, M.; Caccamo, M.; Grant, K.A.; Peck, M.W. Complete genome sequence of the proteolytic Clostridium botulinum type A5 (B3’) strain H04402 065. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 2351–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Dover, N.; Barash, J.R.; Arnon, S.S. Novel Clostridium botulinum toxin gene arrangement with subtype A5 and partial subtype B3 botulinum neurotoxin genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 2349–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Jacobson, M.J.; Lin, G.; Tepp, W.; Dupuy, J.; Stenmark, P.; Stevens, R.C.; Johnson, E.A. Purification, modeling, and analysis of botulinum neurotoxin subtype A5 (BoNT/A5) from strain A661222. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Dorner, M.B.; Grant, K.A.; Godbole, G.; Marcus, U.; Desai, M.; Brunt, J.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; Stringer, S.C.; Peck, M.W.; Smith, T.J.; et al. Wound botulism among people who inject drugs in Germany and the United Kingdom in 2016–2017: A continuing problem. 2020. in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  88. O’Mahony, M.; Mitchell, E.; Gilbert, R.J.; Hutchinson, D.N.; Begg, N.T.; Rodhouse, J.C.; Morris, J.E. An outbreak of foodborne botulism associated with contaminated hazelnut yoghurt. Epidemiol. Infect. 1990, 104, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Halpin, J.L.; Dykes, J.K.; Katz, L.; Centurioni, D.A.; Perry, M.J.; Egan, C.T.; Lúquez, C. Molecular characterization of Clostridium botulinum harboring the bont/B7 gene. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Dolman, C.E.; Murakami, L. Clostridium Botulinum Type F with Recent Observations on Other Types. J. Infect. Dis. 1961, 109, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Franciosa, G.; Maugliani, A.; Scalfaro, C.; Aureli, P. Evidence that plasmid-borne botulinum neurotoxin type B genes are widespread among Clostridium botulinum serotype B strains. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Kenri, T.; Sekizuka, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Iwaki, M.; Komiya, T.; Hatakeyama, T.; Nakajima, H.; Takahashi, M.; Kuroda, M.; Shibayama, K. Genetic characterization and comparison of Clostridium botulinum isolates from botulism cases in Japan between 2006 and 2011. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6954–6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Brett, M.M.; McLauchlin, J.; Harris, A.; O’Brien, S.; Black, N.; Forsyth, R.J.; Roberts, D.; Bolton, F.J. A case of infant botulism with a possible link to infant formula milk powder: Evidence for the presence of more than one strain of Clostridium botulinum in clinical specimens and food. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Johnson, E.A.; Tepp, W.H.; Bradshaw, M.; Gilbert, R.J.; Cook, P.E.; McIntosh, E.D. Characterization of Clostridium botulinum strains associated with an infant botulism case in the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2602–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Paidhungat, M.; Setlow, B.; Driks, A.; Setlow, P. Characterization of spores of Bacillus subtilis which lack dipicolinic acid. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 5505–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Li, Y.; Davis, A.; Korza, G.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.-Q.; Setlow, B.; Setlow, P.; Hao, B. Role of a SpoVA protein in dipicolinic acid uptake into developing spores of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Velásquez, J.; Schuurman-Wolters, G.; Birkner, J.P.; Abee, T.; Poolman, B. Bacillus subtilis spore protein SpoVAC functions as a mechanosensitive channel. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 92, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Berendsen, E.M.; Boekhorst, J.; Kuipers, O.P.; Wells-Bennik, M.H.J. A mobile genetic element profoundly increases heat resistance of bacterial spores. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2633–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Page, A.J.; Cummins, C.A.; Hunt, M.; Wong, V.K.; Reuter, S.; Holden, M.T.; Fookes, M.; Falush, D.; Keane, J.A.; Parkhill, J. Roary: Rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3691–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Van Vliet, A.H.M. Use of pan-genome analysis for the identification of lineage-specific genes of Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnw296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Brynildsrud, O.; Bohlin, J.; Scheffer, L.; Eldholm, V. Rapid scoring of genes in microbial pan-genome-wide association studies with Scoary. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Kruczkiewicz, P.; Mutschalll, S.; Barker, D.; Thomas, J.; Van Domselaar, G.; Gannon, V.P.J.; Carrillo, C.D.; Taboada, E.N. MIST: A tool for rapid in silico generation of molecular data from bacterial genome sequences. In Bioinformatics 2013: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms; SciTePress: Setúbal, Portugal, 2013; pp. 316–323. [Google Scholar]
  106. Pornsukarom, S.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; Thakur, S. Whole genome sequencing analysis of multiple Salmonella serovars provides insights into phylogenetic relatedness, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence markers across humans, food animals and agriculture environmental sources. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 12 00586 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographical locations and heat map of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes strains included in the present study. A total of 359 strains were attributed to a geographical location. Further details about individual isolates are given in Table S1. For each specified country, the detected botulinum neurotoxin genes for isolates are indicated (in black; with NT = no toxin gene), and the types of botulism are shown in colour (N = non-clinical; I = infant botulism; U = unknown; F = foodborne botulism; W = wound botulism).
Figure 1. Geographical locations and heat map of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes strains included in the present study. A total of 359 strains were attributed to a geographical location. Further details about individual isolates are given in Table S1. For each specified country, the detected botulinum neurotoxin genes for isolates are indicated (in black; with NT = no toxin gene), and the types of botulism are shown in colour (N = non-clinical; I = infant botulism; U = unknown; F = foodborne botulism; W = wound botulism).
Toxins 12 00586 g001
Toxins 12 00586 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type A. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of five type A neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 271 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Figure 3. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type A. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of five type A neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 271 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Toxins 12 00586 g003
Toxins 12 00586 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type B. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of six type B neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 239 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Figure 4. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type B. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of six type B neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 239 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Toxins 12 00586 g004
Toxins 12 00586 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type F. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of five type F neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 39 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Figure 5. Phylogeny of sub-types of botulinum neurotoxin type F. The toxin protein sequences were aligned with the Muscle module of MEGA7 [72] algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the Neighbour-Joining method. Variants of five type F neurotoxin sub-types were identified. Scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. A total of 39 amino acid sequences were analysed. White blocks represent absence of information regarding source. Black blocks represent reference neurotoxins [45]. Further details about individual sequences and isolates are given in Table S3, where they appear in the same order as in this Figure. The sources of the isolates are given in Table S1.
Toxins 12 00586 g005
Toxins 12 00586 g006 550
Figure 6. Pan-genome comparison of the C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes lineages (Figure 2). (A) Graphical representation of feature distribution linked to the SNP-based phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). (B) The lineage-specific genes are distributed throughout the genome, as shown using representative genomes for the C. botulinum Group I lineage (ATCC 19397) and the C. sporogenes lineages (NCIMB 10696). Dark blue circles represent C. botulinum Group I lineage features, and red circles represent C. sporogenes lineage features.
Figure 6. Pan-genome comparison of the C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes lineages (Figure 2). (A) Graphical representation of feature distribution linked to the SNP-based phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). (B) The lineage-specific genes are distributed throughout the genome, as shown using representative genomes for the C. botulinum Group I lineage (ATCC 19397) and the C. sporogenes lineages (NCIMB 10696). Dark blue circles represent C. botulinum Group I lineage features, and red circles represent C. sporogenes lineage features.
Toxins 12 00586 g006
Table
Table 1. Summary of botulism cases recorded in the UK between 1989 and 2019. a Confirmed case: diagnosis of botulism confirmed by laboratory testing (detection of botulinum toxin by bioassay or gene by PCR). Probable case: a clear clinical diagnosis of botulism, laboratory tests either not undertaken or negative (e.g., suboptimal or delayed sampling). b Early UK cases of foodborne botulism and infant botulism were summarized previously [65,66]. c unknown. d not tested in the present study. e Clostridium botulinum Group II sub-type B4 [2]. f Clostridium butyricum. g Wound botulism (injectable drug use) data include the number of confirmed cases, with number of probable cases in parenthesis. The number of confirmed cases for each botulinum toxin type from the outbreak investigation, and the number of sequenced isolates for each botulinum toxin gene sub-type are shown in parentheses.
Table 1. Summary of botulism cases recorded in the UK between 1989 and 2019. a Confirmed case: diagnosis of botulism confirmed by laboratory testing (detection of botulinum toxin by bioassay or gene by PCR). Probable case: a clear clinical diagnosis of botulism, laboratory tests either not undertaken or negative (e.g., suboptimal or delayed sampling). b Early UK cases of foodborne botulism and infant botulism were summarized previously [65,66]. c unknown. d not tested in the present study. e Clostridium botulinum Group II sub-type B4 [2]. f Clostridium butyricum. g Wound botulism (injectable drug use) data include the number of confirmed cases, with number of probable cases in parenthesis. The number of confirmed cases for each botulinum toxin type from the outbreak investigation, and the number of sequenced isolates for each botulinum toxin gene sub-type are shown in parentheses.
YearConfirmed Cases (Probable Cases) aBotulinum Toxin Type(s) From Outbreak InvestigationBotulinum Toxin Gene Sub-type(s) Detected in This StudyComments
Foodborne botulism b
198927BB5F2Commercial hazelnut yoghurt
19982BB2Bottled mushrooms (Italy)
20031BB1Sausage (Poland)
20041un cnt dHummus
20041AntRecent travel to Georgia
20051B entHome preserved pork (Poland)
20101BntRecent travel to Algeria
20113AA1Commercial korma sauce
20121BB2Olives (Italy)
20131unntMushroom (Poland)
20161BntTuna (Italy)
Infant botulism b
19891BntTravel to Yemen, fed honey
19931BB2Travel to Spain
19941AntFed honey, weaning
20011BntWeaning, infant formula milk
20071AA2Weaning
20071BB2Weaning
20091AA2Fed honey
20091AA2Fed honey
20101E fntFed honey, kept terrapins
20111AA2Fed honey
20111AA2Fed honey
20111BB2Breast and bottle fed, dusty home
20121BB5Travel, dusty hostel rooms
20131BfB5F2Fed honey
20131BfB5F2Weaning
20171BntTravel to Western USA
20181BntWeaning
Intestinal colonisation botulism
20181unntBowel obstruction, several co-morbidities
Wound botulism g
20003 (2)AA5B3(1)
20013 (1)Ant
200214 (6)A(12), B(2)nt
20037 (8)A(6), AB(1)nt
200415 (26)A(13), B(1), AB(1)A5B2(33), A5B3(1)
20056 (22)A(5), B(1)A5B2(2)
20069 (21)A(6), B(1), AB(2)A5B2(1), A5B3(4), B3(1)
20073A(3)A5B2(2)
20084A(1)nt
200912 (8)A(4), B(7), un(1)A1B5(3), B3(5)
20103A(1), B(1), un(1)A5B2(1), B3(2)
20121 (2)AA5B3(1)
20132 (2)A (1), B (1)A5B2(1)
20142 (3)BB3(3)
201519 (28)B(16), un(2)B3(13)Large outbreak related to batch of contaminated heroin
20165 (2)BB3(1)
20171 (1)Bnt
20182 (2)Bnt
20191 (1)Bnt
Table
Table 2. Examples of strains within the C. sporogenes lineage associated with outbreaks of botulism.
Table 2. Examples of strains within the C. sporogenes lineage associated with outbreaks of botulism.
StrainC. sporogenes Cluster *Botulinum Neurotoxin GeneType of BotulismCountry (Year)Reference
Prevot 594upperB2Foodborne (ham)France (1951)[46]
2345upperB2Foodborne (ham)France (1961)[29]
CDC 1632centreB1InfantUSA (1977)[91]
B2 450centreB2Wound (drug abuse)Italy (2009)[59]
AM370centreB6Foodborne (salted fish)Australia (1979)[25]
AM1195centreB6InfantAustralia (1987)[25]
R1125/03lowerB1Foodborne (meat)UK (2003)[66]
R1135/03lowerB1Foodborne (meat)UK (2003)[66]
* According to Figure 2.
Table
Table 3. Neurotoxin genes present in the genomes of isolates of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (see Table S1 for further details of the isolates).
Table 3. Neurotoxin genes present in the genomes of isolates of C. botulinum Group I and C. sporogenes (see Table S1 for further details of the isolates).
Botulinum Neurotoxin Gene Sub-TypeNumber of Strains Included in This Study
A164
A1 B520
A2114
A2 B21
A2 B31
A2 B51
A2 B71
A2 F43
A2 F51
A2 F4 F56
A39
A4 B52
A5 B244
A5 B38
B137
B273
B2 FA1
B330
B52
B5 F26
B63
B76
F114
F41
F51
F81
none107
TOTAL556

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brunt, J.; van Vliet, A.H.M.; Carter, A.T.; Stringer, S.C.; Amar, C.; Grant, K.A.; Godbole, G.; Peck, M.W. Diversity of the Genomes and Neurotoxins of Strains of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Associated with Foodborne, Infant and Wound Botulism. Toxins 2020, 12, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090586

AMA Style

Brunt J, van Vliet AHM, Carter AT, Stringer SC, Amar C, Grant KA, Godbole G, Peck MW. Diversity of the Genomes and Neurotoxins of Strains of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Associated with Foodborne, Infant and Wound Botulism. Toxins. 2020; 12(9):586. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brunt, Jason, Arnoud H. M. van Vliet, Andrew T. Carter, Sandra C. Stringer, Corinne Amar, Kathie A. Grant, Gauri Godbole, and Michael W. Peck. 2020. "Diversity of the Genomes and Neurotoxins of Strains of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Associated with Foodborne, Infant and Wound Botulism" Toxins 12, no. 9: 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090586

APA Style

Brunt, J., van Vliet, A. H. M., Carter, A. T., Stringer, S. C., Amar, C., Grant, K. A., Godbole, G., & Peck, M. W. (2020). Diversity of the Genomes and Neurotoxins of Strains of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Clostridium sporogenes Associated with Foodborne, Infant and Wound Botulism. Toxins, 12(9), 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop