Next Article in Journal
Longitudinal Assessment of Facial Hyperhidrosis Management: Evaluating the Utility and Quality of Life Improvements following Botulinum Toxin Injection
Previous Article in Journal
A Magnetic Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite: Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for High-Efficiency Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods

1
Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
Division of Food, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2024, 16(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16010058
Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 15 January 2024 / Accepted: 15 January 2024 / Published: 20 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)

Abstract

:
Ochratoxin A (OTA), a potent nephrotoxin, is one of the most deleterious mycotoxins, with its prevalence in agricultural crops and their processed foods around the world. OTA is a major concern to food safety, as OTA exposure through dietary intake may lead to a significant level of accumulation in the body as a result of its long half-life (about 35 days). Its potent renal toxicity and high risk of exposure as well as the difficulty in controlling environmental factors OTA production has prompted the need for timely information on practical strategies for the food industry to effectively manage OTA contamination during food processing. The effects of various food processes, including both nonthermal and thermal methods, on the reduction in OTA were summarized in this review, with emphasis on the toxicity of residual OTA as well as its known and unknown degradation products. Since complete removal of OTA from foodstuffs is not feasible, additional strategies that may facilitate the reduction in OTA in food, such as adding baking soda and sugars, was also discussed, so that the industry may understand and apply practical measures to ensure the safety of its products destined for human consumption.
Key Contribution: This review focus on the practical strategies to reduce ochratoxin (OTA) in food products destined for human consumption. Therefore, references and discussion in this review are largely driven by data applicable to humans, with technologies to process commodities commonly contaminated with OTA. Additional approaches to reduce OTA exposure are also suggested.

1. Introduction

Ochratoxin A (OTA, Figure 1) has received considerable attention as one of the most frequently occurring mycotoxins in the world along with aflatoxins, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol, and zearalenone. OTA is a potent renal carcinogen based on experimental animal studies and thus is classified as a Group 2B possible human carcinogen [1,2,3,4]. OTA is also known to be a mutagenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, and immunosuppressive mycotoxin [5,6].
One of the most significant contributing factors in its worldwide occurrence is the diversity of OTA producers—i.e., numerous species in two ubiquitous yet distinctively different two fungal genera of Aspergillus and Penicillium, that are collectively capable of growing and producing OTA at a wide range of temperatures (0–37 °C). Therefore, these fungi and OTA have been found in all major agricultural commodities worldwide, and, due to its heat stability, OTA has been found in an exceptionally wide variety of processed foods including all major cereal grains, beans, coffee, wine, beer, fresh and dried fruits (e.g., grapes, sultanas, raisins, and dates), fruit juices, cocoa, nuts, spices, meats (pork and poultry), milk, infant formula and infant cereals [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In addition, the extremely long half-life of OTA in humans (ca. 35 days) is of significant concern, in that the exposure could exceed safe levels while OTA may be accumulated, remain in the organs and blood, and even be transmitted to milk [18,19].
In common with other major mycotoxins, foods with no OTA may be obtained only by protecting crops from the contamination of toxigenic fungi in the field and during storage [20]. However, this is very difficult as the OTA-producing fungi are ubiquitous in nature worldwide and their contamination and subsequent toxin production may not be prevented. It should be noted that the presence of the toxigenic fungi may not correlate with the level of contamination as the environmental conditions could limit the production of OTA. It is also possible to detect OTA in raw agricultural materials without the presence of or actively growing OTA producers, since chemical processes or environmental changes in the field and storage can inactivate the fungi but not alter OTA that remains in the commodity [21,22]. Once OTA enters the food supply chain, unfortunately, the most attainable strategy to reduce the deleterious effects of OTA is reducing the concentration of toxin during food processing, i.e., before it reaches consumers.
There are two main ways for reducing OTA in foods for human consumption that the food industry can consider: non-thermal and thermal food processing. Regardless of the route, the method of choice should be technically feasible, scalable, and economical. In addition, it must not generate toxic by-products, known and/or unknown, while not causing issues with other food quality parameters such as flavor, taste, color, and nutritional content. Therefore, practical processing technologies that the food industry can adopt to reduce OTA and additional strategies to mitigate its toxicity are discussed in this article.

2. Ochratoxin A (OTA)

2.1. Chemistry

OTA (N-[(3R)-(5-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-oxo-7-isochromanyl) carbonyl]-L-phenylalanine, C20H18ClNO6, MW = 403.8, CAS No. 303-47-9) is a chlorinated isocoumarin with a pentaketide skeleton that links to L-phenylalanine via an amide bond (Figure 1). OTA is a white, crystalline compound, highly soluble in polar organic solvents and slightly soluble in water but insoluble in petroleum esters [5]. OTA is weakly acidic, with pKa values in the ranges of 4.2–4.4 and 7.0–7.3 for the carboxyl group and the phenolic hydroxyl group, respectively [23,24,25]. OTA is fairly stable in foods during thermal processes with its melting point of 169 °C [26,27]. Only a few analogs or degradation products have been identified to date, as shown in Figure 1. These known compounds include 14-decarboxyl OTA and 14-(R)-OTA, detected in commercial roasted coffee beans and coffee drinkers’ blood’s in trace amounts [28]. According to several reports [29,30,31,32], matrix bounded forms such as esters, as well as OTα and OTα amide, were formed when coffee beans were roasted at 240 °C for 9 min. It should be noted that these compounds were detected in roasted coffee, i.e., no other products or processes were subjected to investigate the reaction kinetics and mechanisms.

2.2. Toxicology and Toxicity Mechanism

The major target organ of OTA is the kidney and OTA is classified as a possible human carcinogen, Group 2B [1,2,3,4]. OTA is also known to be a mutagenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic, and immunosuppressive mycotoxin [5,6]. Due to its limited solubility in water and affinity to proteins, OTA binds tightly to blood plasma proteins. Hence, OTA may be reabsorbed in the kidney and recirculated instead of excreted like other xenobiotics, resulting in delayed biotransformation or renal clearance, with a prolonged half-life of about 35 days in humans, the longest of the known xenobiotics for mammals [19,33].
The chemical carcinogenesis or exact mechanism of OTA toxicity has not been understood clearly yet. There are several proposed mechanisms related to OTA toxicity: (a) inhibiting mitochondrial respiration and ATP production [34,35]; (b) the inhibition of protein synthesis [36,37,38,39]; (c) DNA-strand breakages [40,41]; (d) lipid peroxidation [42,43,44]; and (e) oxidative stress [40,41,45,46,47,48]. Based on the toxicological data available to date, oxidative stress appears to be the most plausible underlying mechanism of toxicity of OTA either directly or indirectly [49,50], which would lead to a broader systemic as well as organ-specific toxicities.
The toxicity of OTA has been linked to free radical-mediated oxidative cell damage or oxidative stress. Schaaf et al. [48] suggested that OTA-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) cause proximal tubule cell damage that can lead to a wide range of lesions in cell components. OTA exposure increased not only ROS levels but also oxidative enzymes for detoxification through PXR and AhR pathways [51,52]. OTA is also known to not only reduce the expression of multiple genes related with antioxidant defenses in the body, including Nrf2, which is involved in both the basal expression, but in the induction of genes for detoxification and antioxidant enzymes [46,53,54,55]. It is likely that the reduced expression of these genes results in decreased antioxidant defense and in turn increased oxidative stress and macromolecular damage. In contrast, several reports suggest that antioxidant enzymes such as SOD1, HO1, GPX1, and G6PD can be activated through increased ROS levels and the increased expression of Nrf2 [51,52,56,57]. Nonetheless, it is clear that OTA induces oxidative stress in the kidney and liver: directly via redox cycling and indirectly via reducing cellular defense involving antioxidants. While these two mechanisms could affect each other, reduced cellular defense may amplify the impact on radicals produced. Consequently, greater susceptibility of the kidney toward oxidative stress can explain the target-specific toxicity of OTA [58,59,60].

2.3. Natural Occurrence of OTA

The main organisms involved in the production of OTA are A. ochraceus, A. carbonarius, and P. verrucosum. These ubiquitous fungi are capable of growing and producing OTA at a wide range of temperatures (0–37 °C) and have been found to contaminate agricultural commodities worldwide. Hence, OTA has been found in many raw and processed foods, including cereal grains, beans, coffee, wine, beer, fresh and dried fruits, cocoa, nuts, spices, meats, milk, infant formula, and infant foods, as well as human milk ([7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,61]. Among all, cereal grains are the largest contributor of OTA in the diet, representing about 55% of the total OTA intake [62]. In an European study, the mean quantity found in cereals was 0.22 ng/g, while the calculated average daily intake was 33 ng/day/person [63]. This was followed by coffee, involved a calculated average daily intake of 6 ng/day/person, with a mean quantity of 0.012 ng/g and an overall contribution of 9%.
In a 3-year national survey of breakfast cereals in the Canadian retail market, OTA was found most commonly in oat-based cereals (63%, 17/27) with the highest concentration of 1.4 ng/g [64]. In a Canadian survey, three out of 25 (12%) oat samples exceeded Health Canada’s proposed regulations for OTA [65]. Kuzdraliński et al. [66] also detected OTA ranging 1.0–5.8 ng/g in 42 out of 71 (59%) samples of oats from Poland. Previously, a two-year national survey had been conducted with 489 breakfast cereal samples collected from the U.S. retail markets and reported 201 (42%) were contaminated with OTA in the range of 0.1–9.3 ng/g [14,15,16,67,68]. The levels of OTA in the most breakfast cereal samples were below the EU limit (3 ng/g) except those of 16 oat-based cereals. The occurrence of OTA was highest in oat-based breakfast cereals (142/203, 70%), followed by wheat-based (38/117, 32%), corn-based (15/103, 15%), and rice-based samples (10/66, 15%). Most significantly, the occurrence and range of OTA found in oat-based infant cereals were 59% and 0.6–22.1 ng/g, respectively; of noting, all of the oat-based infant cereal samples containing OTA exceeded the EU limit for infant cereal (0.5 ng/g), with the highest concentration being 22.1 ng/g.
In the case of OTA occurrence in beers, OTA was detected in 12 out of 19 beers (63%) collected from the United States in the range of 0.01–0.27 ng/mL [61]. De Jesus et al. [69] measured the incidence of OTA in wine collected from the United States and reported that OTA had been detected in 35 out of 41 (85%) of the wines in the range of 0.3–8.6 ng/mL. Soto et al. [70] estimated that the OTA intake from wine was 0.18 ng per day, well below the guidance established by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) of 5 ng/kg bw/day, based on a daily consumption of 100 mL/day.
The occurrence of OTA in coffee beans has been described in numerous studies [71,72,73]. According to a survey, OTA was detected in concentrations ranging from 0 to 48 μg/kg in 106 green coffee beans out of 162 samples collected from Africa, America, and Asia [71]. Another study also reported OTA in all the green coffee beans analyzed (n = 47 samples), ranging from 1.3 to 31.5 μg/kg [73]. In addition, the study reported that about 72% of the beans were contaminated with OTA-producing fungi. Martins et al. [72] reported 92% of 60 green coffee beans collected from Brazil were contaminated with OTA-producing fungi and 22 samples (33%) were contaminated with OTA at levels ranging from 0.2 to 7.3 μg/kg. It may also be noted that OTA can frequently be found in ground roasted coffee as well.

2.4. Risk Assessment and Regulations

Due to concerns on the potential risk of OTA having been increasing, especially for infants and young children, authorities in many countries have set measures to monitor/control its level in foods (Table 1). For instance, the EU has set the maximum acceptable limits of OTA for each food group, including cereals and cereal products, roasted coffee, grape juice and wine, dried vine fruit, and foods for infants and young children [74]. Other countries including Brazil, China, India, Korea, and Russia also regulate OTA in foods [75,76,77,78,79]. In Canada, maximum limits for OTA in several commodities and products have been proposed by Health Canada [74]. Future regulation in the U.S. could follow as more information becomes known about the prevalence of this toxin in the country.
Since OTA can contaminate an exceptionally wide variety of agricultural commodities and products, there has been a concern that human exposure may exceed recommended limits [80]. In addition, from processing through storage, OTA is mostly stable in various food products that may be consumed on a daily basis, such as cereal grains, beer, dried fruit (especially raisins), and spices. Although cereals are the main source of OTA (45–50% daily intake), wine is considered the second largest contributor (10–20%) partly due to its consumption frequency [81]. For this reason and due to the relatively long half-life of OTA in human serum, government agencies are increasingly developing regulations to minimize chronic public exposure to the toxin [63]. A more recent risk assessment of OTA based on the two-year nationwide survey data concluded that, in the U.S., OTA exposure is highest among infants and young children consuming oat-based cereals [17].
The maximum tolerable daily intake is very low and is estimated to be between 5.0 and 14.8 ng/kg body weight/day [81]. However, various tolerable intake levels have been estimated through different approaches. For example, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) estimated the level at 100 ng/kg bw/day while the European Commission and Canada provided estimates of 5 ng/kg bw/day and 1.5–5.7 ng/kg bw/day, respectively [82]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has set a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for OTA of 120 ng/kg of body weight [83].
EFSA [84] reported the estimated chronic dietary exposure in mean and 95th-percentile levels ranging 0.6–17.8 and 2.4–51.7 ng/kg bw/day, respectively. Based on the survey, they concluded that the most significant contributors were preserved meat, cheese, and grains and their processed products. Moreover, dried/fresh fruit and fruit juices/nectars were also contributing to the exposure in infants and young children, although to a lesser extent than the three major categories. Consequently, different measures have been implemented or proposed for risk management with varying maximum contamination levels for different commodities in different jurisdictions.

3. Effects of Food Processing

3.1. Non-Thermal Food Processing

Mechanical processes such as sorting and trimming do not destroy OTA but OTA concentrations in foods may be reduced by separation of the part(s) with higher toxin accumulation. There is no operation that destroys mycotoxins in the milling process, but the contamination of mycotoxins including OTA may be redistributed and concentrated in certain milled fractions, such as bran and shorts [85,86]. OTA was found in the highest amounts in germ and bran fractions obtained during the dry milling of wheat, barley, and other cereals [85,86]. Fungal infection generally can lead to damage of the endosperm of grains and results in a higher concentration of mycotoxin being found in smaller particles such as shorts.
As mycotoxins may be bound to cell wall matrix, such as cellulose and protein, mycotoxins may be released by enzymatic hydrolysis through fermentation [87,88]. Therefore, fermentation may cause increased mycotoxin levels in final food products [89,90]. Kupski et al. [91] demonstrated the effect of Rhizopus oryzae and Trichoderma reesei, which are both non-toxigenic microorganisms, on OTA and observed the degradation of OTA by both fungi in the exponential phase of growth (63.5% reduction after 38 h by R. oryzae and 57.7% reduction after 72 h by T. reesei, respectively). The research team reported that OTA degradation had a significant correlation with OTα production and carboxypeptidase A (CPA) activity [91].

3.1.1. Physical Separation and Cleaning

The physical separation and cleaning of agricultural commodities after harvest is important as they remove unwanted materials, such as dust, chaff, and small fragments, from agricultural commodities. Manda et al. [92] tried to determine the effect of shelling in cocoa to reduce OTA levels, since the toxin is mainly concentrated in the shells of cocoa beans (92.8%) in comparison with the nib (7.2%). Thus, removing the shell resulted in a significant reduction in OTA, i.e., 49–100%. Similarly, Amézqueta et al. [93] reported that, during the shelling of 22 cocoa bean samples, more than 95% of OTA was removed from 14 samples (64%), while less than a 50% reduction was observed in only one sample.
Scudamore et al. [86] investigated the effect of cleaning using batches (high level 42.2 ng/g and low level 6.1 ng/g) of whole wheat contaminated with OTA by inoculation with P. verrucosum. The OTA contamination levels in cleaned wheat fell by about 2–3% in both batches, while the concentrations of OTA measured in subsequent wheat were 53 ng/g and 197 ng/g, respectively, and a quantity representing about 200–300 g was recovered from 130 kg whole wheat [86]. A similar OTA reduction of about 2–3%, by cleaning, was observed in barley [94]. In contrast, scouring, which removes the outer parts of the kernel, was much more effective in reducing OTA from wheat contaminated at low levels (i.e., 27–44% reduction from 6.1 ng/g) than those contaminated at higher levels (i.e., 2.6–8.5% from 42.2 ng/g), corroborating the fact that the accumulation of OTA starts from the surface or outer layer [86].
Park et al. [95] determined the effect of washing on OTA reduction in naturally contaminated polished rice and found that about 11.0% of OTA was reduced by water washing (two times of water to rice). Meanwhile, 25.6%, 39.0%, and 42.7% of OTA in rice was removed at one-time washing, two-time washing, and three-time washing, respectively. Mansouri-Nasrabadi et al. [96] also conducted a similar study and reported that about 26% of the OTA in rice was reduced by one-time washing and 39% of OTA was washed by two-time washing, and 43% of OTA decreased by three-time washing. Blanc et al. [97] investigated the effect of cleaning on the reduction in OTA in coffee beans. The coffee bean cleaning process, consists of the elimination of foreign stuffs such as the stones, plant fragments and silverskin of coffee beans by density segregation and air suction, and caused OTA to be reduced by 6.8% from 7.3 ng/g to 6.8 ng/g [97].
A study by Jalili et al. [98] demonstrated the effects of 18 different chemical treatments, including baking soda, acetic acid, and citric acid, which can be used in food systems for OTA reduction in black and white pepper during washing. The peppers were soaked for 2 hr in 2% (v/v) solutions and then washed using water until the pH was 6.0–6.5. The OTA levels in black and white pepper were reduced by about 20.2% and 16.3%, respectively, when washed with only water, while a significant degree of OTA reduction in black and white pepper washed using acetic acid, citric acid, and baking soda was observed [98]. The OTA loss in black pepper washed using acetic acid, citric acid, and baking soda were 25.8%, 26.2%, and 34.5%, respectively, whereas reductions in OTA in white pepper washed by acetic acid, citric acid, and baking soda were 26.7%, 27.7%, and 38.3%, respectively [98]. Decreased OTA levels in whole beans and bean flour by washing for 2 min were observed around 7% and 39%, respectively [99].
Amézqueta et al. [100] tried to remove OTA from cocoa shells using the solvent extractor ASE 200 with chemicals that can be used for food processing for safety, such as baking soda and other salts rather than organic solvents. When the effects aqueous solutions of 2% sodium bicarbonate or 2% potassium carbonate were compared on the reduction in OTA in cocoa shells, a higher OTA reduction was observed with potassium carbonate (83%) than sodium bicarbonate (27%) [100]. By adjustment of the conditions for the solvent extractor ASE 200 with temperature, pressure and time, about 95% of the OTA naturally present in the cocoa shells was removed [100].

3.1.2. Milling

The effect of milling on OTA reduction using P. verrucosum-inoculated wheat batches (high level 42.2 ng/g and low level 6.1 ng/g) was determined by Scudamore et al. [86], and about a 25–33% reduction in OTA in wheat flour was determined. Osborne et al. [101] investigated the effect of milling on the reduction in OTA using two kinds of wheats (soft and hard) inoculated with P. verrucosum. It reached a level of 60 ng OTA/g, and two-thirds of OTA loss in the hard wheat and one-third of OTA loss in soft wheat were observed by milling. Peng et al. [102] measured the fate of OTA during milling using wheat grains inoculated with A. ochraceus, which, at levels of 93.2 ng/g and 248.3 ng/g, led to a concentration reduction of 43.3–55.2% for OTA, after milling.

3.1.3. Fermentation/Brewing

In brewing beer, OTA may be migrated from contaminated grains, i.e., malted barley or adjuncts, into beer during the brewing process [103]. Barley, which is used in beer production, tends to become contaminated with OTA through OTA-producers’ growth and/or OTA production during the storage or malting process [67]. Similar to other mycotoxins, OTA is relatively stable during fermentation, both alcoholic and malolactic, or brewing, and the reduction in OTA may range from 2 to 100% in the malting and cooking of mash, fermentation and boiling of wort, and final fermentation [103,104,105,106]. Chu et al. [105] investigated the stability of OTA during a conventional micro-brewing process by adding OTA to the raw materials at 1 and 10 μg/g, and found about 72–86% of OTA was reduced during the brewing process. Krogh et al. [104] also demonstrated the fate of OTA during malting and brewing processes by the use of naturally contaminated barley as well as by adding the OTA to the raw materials. In that study, it was reported that moderately contaminated barley (420 and 830 μg of OTA/kg) was used for the malting (germination) process and they found no OTA detected in the malt, while about 2–7% of the initial amount of OTA, resulting in a concentration of 11 to 20 μg/L, was detected in the final beer when using heavily contaminated barley, even though the brewing could be carried out only with the addition of bacterial enzymes because of a very low germination [104]. Nip et al. [106] reported that the contamination level of OTA was reduced by about 14–19% by beer brewing. Scott et al. [103] brewed beers using 0.19 ng/mL of added OTA to the wort and fermentation by three strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 8 days, and found that OTA was decreased by fermentation by 2% to 13%, with straight line slopes over the period. Inoue et al. [107] investigated the fate of OTA during beer brewing and found about 85% of OTA was reduced during processing and about 16% of OTA was detected in yeast crop.
While OTA has also been found in musts and grape juices, information on the effects of unit processes used in winemaking on the fate of OTA in wine is not sufficient. OTA is not likely to be produced during the fermentation since alcohol can effectively inhibit fungal growth [108], but the toxin may be carried over from the contaminated grape to remain throughout fermentation process [109]. Freire et al. [110] showed a reduction of 90.72, 92.44 and 88.15% in the OTA levels for white, rose and red wine, respectively. A study by Csutorás et al. [111] showed OTA reduction in the range of 73–90% in different type of wines (red, rose, and white) during 90-day fermentation in macro-scale experiments using different levels of spiked OTA (0.01–4 µg/mL). The greatest reduction in OTA in red wine was archived (90%), followed by rose wine (86%) and white wine (76%) [111]. Cecchini et al. [112] examined the fate of OTA during the fermentation of white and red musts by using alcoholic fermentation yeast strains and OTA-added musts (2 μg/L). This study showed a significant reduction in OTA in white wines (47–52%) and red wines (53–70%), even though the degree of reduction was different by yeast strains [112]. However, OTA degradation products were not found in this study and the authors concluded that OTA reduction during wine fermentation using yeast strains might have been due to binding or adsorption to the cells. Similarly, Meca et al. [113] also demonstrated the reduction effects of 16 yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation and concluded OTA was adsorbed on the external and internal part of the yeast cells.
Yu et al. [114] determined the effect of enzymatic processing on the fate of OTA in grape pomace or OTA in buffer solution. When OTA buffer solution (pH 5.4) was treated with flavozyme, lipase, and carboxypeptidase A at 37 °C for 24 h, 36, 60, and 100% of OTA reduction was observed, respectively, while these enzymes reduced 10.2% (lipase) and 18.3% (carboxypeptidase A) of OTA in grape pomace, and flavozyme did not reduce any OTA [114]. They also showed that this difference was due to the polyphenols in grape pomace that can inhibit different hydrolytic enzymes such as proteaseand lipase [114].
OTA levels in fermented dough were shown to be reduced by about 5.6–12.1% compared with wheat flour [102], whereas Valle-Algarra et al. [87] showed a significant reduction of 29.8–33.5% in OTA during dough fermentation. These different results in OTA reduction by dough fermentation may be related to the method of OTA contamination, as Peng et al. [102] used A. ochraceus inoculated wheat while Valle-Algarra et al. [87] used artificially OTA standard spiked wheat. Milani and Heidari [115] fermented wheat flour dough using sourdough (Lactobacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus, and L. fermentum) and three types of yeast based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae (active dry yeast, instant dry yeast, and compressed yeast), and reported that a reduction in OTA during fermentation varied by the type of fermentation methods in the range of 12.9–27.8%, with the highest OTA reduction in compressed yeast.

3.2. Thermal Food Processing

Mycotoxins are relatively stable compounds during conventional thermal food processing (80–121 °C) such as boiling, frying, and baking, but certain thermal food processing procedures with high temperatures and pressures, e.g., extrusion processing, can effectively reduce mycotoxin levels and their toxicities. In general, there are lots of important factors related to the degradation of and reduction in mycotoxins in food during food processing, such as the type of food matrix, the initial mycotoxin concentration, the heating temperature together with the time employed, the type of heat transfer, the degree of heat penetration, the pH, the moisture content, the nutritional composition such as fiber and fat levels, the type of additives, etc. [116]. For example, Boudra et al. [117] investigated the degradation of OTA in wheat under different temperatures (100, 150, 200, and 250 °C) and moisture conditions for varying times, and found that the half-lives of OTA were 707, 201, 12, and 6 min at 100, 150, 200, and 250 °C, respectively, for dry wheat and 145, 60, and 19 min, respectively, at 100, 150, and 200 °C for wheat heated under wet conditions. However, the complete elimination of OTA was not observed [117]. Dahal et al. [27] also agreed on OTA’s heat stability and reported that the decomposition of OTA was fastest at pH 10 and slowest at pH 4. However, the effects of thermal food processing on the reduction in OTA in food is not well studied so far in comparison with other mycotoxins such as aflatoxins and fumonisins.

3.2.1. Roasting

Roasting, in general, employs dry heat, often above 160 °C, that may result in a substantial reduction in OTA regardless of the matrix. Hence, the thermal stability of OTA during roasting has been of particular interest to the coffee industry for its prevalence and high levels of contamination in coffee beans. According to previous reports, roasting green coffee beans at 150 °C for 2.5 min was not sufficient to result in a significant reduction in OTA [118], while up to a 90% reduction was achieved during an industrial roasting process reaching up to 250 °C for about 5 min [97,119]. In a study conducted by Nehad et al. [120], roasting coffee beans infected with OTA-producing fungus (A. ochraceus) and OTA (30 mg of OTA/kg of coffee beans) at 180 °C for 10 min resulted in a 31% reduction in OTA by using a conventional coffee roaster. In another study with two different concentrations of OTA, i.e., 5.3 and 57.2 μg/kg, produced by culturing A. westerdijkiae on coffee beans, the reduction by roasting varied by 7.4–77.6% in low-level OTA beans (5.3 μg/kg), while the maximum reduction in highly contaminated beans (57.2 μg/kg) reached only up to 15.1% [121].
While the roasting process is one of the most well-studied methods among all thermal processes, the reduction in OTA in coffee beans by roasting above 160 °C can vary significantly, ranging from 0% to 97%, as summarized in Table 2. Nonetheless, it seems that an 80% reduction in OTA during-commercial scale coffee roasting at 220–260 °C is achievable despite its largely heterogeneous nature [97]. Although not common, roasting coffee beans at temperatures above 400 °C resulted in widely varying degrees of reduction, i.e., ranging from 0 to 97% [122]. These data suggest that a significant or near-complete reduction in OTA is possible during roasting but is highly dependent on the processing conditions and the level of contamination.
Coffee is not the only commodity commonly subjected to roasting. Manda et al. [92] investigated the effect of roasting on OTA reduction in cocoa. When cocoa beans, cocoa shells, and cocoa nibs were roasted at 200 °C for 25 min, the decrease in OTA levels in cocoa nibs (about 41%) was higher compared to those in cocoa beans (36%) and cocoa shells (24%). Roasting has also been used for cereal grains to improve characteristics such as texture, crispiness, and volume. Moreover, roasted cereal gains have several beneficial effects such as improving digestibility and reducing anti-nutrient factors through the gelatinization of starch and denaturation of protein, enhancing sensory properties such as color and flavor, and extending shelf-life [135].
Lee et al. [126] reported a reduction in OTA ranging from 1.9 to 17.7% in oat grains artificially contaminated with OTA (100 ng/g) during roasting at 120 °C and 180 °C for 30 min and 60 min. In a subsequent study to understand the role of the food matrix during thermal processing, fiber in particular, Carbon and Lee [127] observed significantly lower reduction in OTA in oat-based samples than in rice, corroborating higher incidence and contamination levels in oat-based products. Similarly, a lower reduction in OTA was observed in brown rice (37%) when compared to white rice (60%) during roasting at 160 °C and 200 °C for up to 30 min, suggesting the outer fibrous layer or bran may provide insulation and inhibit heat transfer.
While roasting is a simple and effective method to reduce OTA in different commodities, the possible formation of degradation products may still be of concern. The degradation products formed during high-temperature roasting (250 °C) include less-toxic diastereomers produced by the partial isomerization of OTA at the C3 position [32]. In general, the disappearance of OTA does not imply an absence or decrease in its toxicity, since the degradation product(s) may still cause adverse effects upon exposure much like their parent compound [136].

3.2.2. Coffee Brewing

Through coffee brewing, it is also possible to reduce OTA contamination levels even it is not significant. Instant coffee brewing using a pressure vessel with hot water at 180 °C showed about a 3% OTA reduction [97]. La Pera et al. [137] demonstrated the fate of OTA during coffee brewing using infusion for 10 min (Turkish coffee making), an Italian moka pot, and a drip brew and Italian moka pot. The latter led to a significant reduction in OTA concentrations of about 51–75%, follow by drip brew (54–73%) infusion for 10 min (17–25%), since the hot water remains in contact with the coffee for a short time. When determining the influence of the brewing process on OTA reduction using a moka, auto-drip, or espresso, the espresso coffee maker showed about a 50% OTA reduction during brewing, followed by moka brewing (32%) and auto-drip (15%) [124]. Malir et al. [138] also conducted a study to demonstrate the reduction in OTA by different methods of brewing such as false Turkish coffee, Turkish coffee, Lungo, Americano, Espresso, Doppio, and Ristretto, and found different degrees of reduction from 34% to 78% depending on the brewing method. Actually, the reduction in OTA in the coffee drink is not because of OTA reduction during the process of coffee brewing, and it might be just a transferal of the OTA content from ground and roasted coffee beans to the coffee drink. It depends on several factors, such as the amount (or volume) of water and ground and roasted coffee beans used and the brewing time (or contact time between the water and ground and roasted coffee beans).

3.2.3. Extrusion

Extrusion, which applies high temperature and pressure with mechanical shear force, is currently used extensively in food industries to produce foodstuffs such as breakfast cereals and infant cereals [139]. Up to now, the effects of this popular and effective food processing method on the destruction of various mycotoxins and the resulting reduction in its toxicity have been well documented [140,141,142], although the reduction effects of extrusion on are not well known so far.
The effects of extrusion processing and conditions on reductions in OTA are summarized in Table 3. According to Scudamore et al. [143], a reduction in OTA in wheat flour during the extrusion process is dependent on the moisture, temperature, and residence time. With a 30% moisture content, the reduction in OTA reached 12% and 24% at 116–120 °C and 133–136 °C, respectively [143]. In barley meal, a reduction in OTA during extrusion ranged 17–86% depending on the varying parameters [144]. The kinetics for OTA reduction by extrusion were also determined to be first-order kinetics, which is a reaction that proceeds at a rate that depends linearly on only one reactant concentration, with the fastest reduction in OTA at 140 °C and a 24% moisture content [144]. A more recent study conducted observed an up to 28% reduction in OTA in oat flakes, with the OTA standard spiked (100 ng/g) by twin-screw extrusion at 180 °C, 20% moisture, 250 rpm screw speed, and a 3 mm die with 193 kJ/kg of specific mechanical energy [145]. The other study showed various reductions in OTA between rice flour (78–82%) and oat flakes (40–43%) with the OTA standard artificially spiked at 100 ng/g by twin-screw extrusion [146].

3.2.4. Other Thermal Food Processing

Previous studies have shown a greater reduction in OTA during the baking of biscuits (~65%) in comparison with the baking of bread (0–40%) [86,129,147]. Vidal et al. [148] discovered that the OTA concentration loss was significantly affected by both the baking temperature and time. While significant differences in OTA reduction were not observed between the two initial concentrations (2 and 3 ng/g of flour), a higher reduction in OTA (64%) was observed at 200 °C for 40 min than 21% at 140 °C for 40 min [148]. OTA in wheat flour was reduced during food processing, and they found 90%, 85%, 80%, and 65% of OTA reduced in cake (baked at 220 °C for 20 min), biscuit (baked at 220 °C for 20 min), bread (baked at 220 °C for 35 min), and pasta (boiling for 15 min), respectively [149]. However, these OTA losses were not only from thermal food processing, but also S. cerevisiae-yeast-fermented dough was used for the bread, and in the biscuits and cake added baking powder containing baking soda was used [149]. A study on the effect of OTA reduction during baking at 200 °C for 20 min was investigated by Milani and Heidari [115] using several different types of doughs fermented with sourdough culture, instant dry yeast, active dry yeast, and compressed yeast, and a reduction in OTA through baking was observed in the range of 5.3–55.6%, with the highest OTA reduction in compressed yeast. Most recent, a study investigated the stability of OTA during the production of rye bread and wheat pizza bases [150] using a rye flour naturally contaminated with OTA (concentration 6.41 ± 0.52 μg/kg) and yeast. Bryla et al. [150] observed that OTA concentrations in the crust decreased in comparison with the fermented dough by 25.6 and 23% for the bread baked at 180 and 240 °C, respectively, and 8.0–25.4% for the pizza bases, depending on the OTA concentration in the dough. The research team also observed the partial degradation of OTA in the crust of the baked products, which was accompanied by slight OTA racemization: 3.5% of the OTA in the crust of the rye bread baked at 240 °C was transformed into 2R′-OTA.
Grape pomace is the residue of grapes after wine making and can be used as an ingredient in food products such as bread and cookies since it contains high amounts of phenolic antioxidants and dietary fiber [151,152,153]. Therefore, Yu et al. (2020) investigated the effect of autoclaving on OTA fate in grape pomace. The autoclaving conditions were at 15 psi and 121 °C for 10, 20, and 30 min, and the reductions in OTA in different varieties of grape pomace were about 19.2–67.6%, 37.6–80.0%, and 43.8–78.0% at 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively [114]. This study also determined the effect of baking at 178 °C for 20 min on OTA fate in a different variety of grape pomace cookies, but what was very interesting was that all cookies showed higher OTA contents in the range of 45.4–69.8% than their corresponding doughs that contained 8.8 ng/g of OTA (dry basis) [114].
Decreased OTA levels in 5 g of whole beans (38 and 48%) and bean flour (27 and 24%) were observed during boiling for 60 min with 25 mL and 40 mL water [99]. In another study, an indirect steaming process, which heated porridges to an 80–85 °C center temperature then maintained them for 10 min for gelatinization, decreased OTA by 59% in rice-based porridges and 14% in oat-based porridges, respectively [134]. OTA in rice can be reduced during ordinary and pressure cooking by 17.3% and 29.0%, respectively [95]. The highest reduction in OTA was observed in cooked rice with excess water (86.6%), followed by normally cooked rice (83.0%) and microwave-oven-cooked rice (82.4%) [154]. Mansouri-Nasrabadi et al. [96] used response surface methodology (RSM) to maximize the degradation of OTA in rice during cooking, measuring the effect of several factors, including the boiling time, salt content, and water-to-rice ratio, on OTA reduction, and then found that the highest OTA loss (76%) was observed at 9.6 min, 3.5% salt, and 4:1 water to rice, respectively.
Some other food processes employing a high temperature and/or pressure showed greater reductions in OTA. The autoclaving of oatmeal (50% water content) resulted in a 74% reduction, while the autoclaving of dry oatmeal or rice cereal (no water added) showed greater losses reaching 87% [131]. Lee et al. [133] determined the effects of direct steam injection (DSI) on the reduction in OTA in oat-based infant cereal; the OTA level in the oat-based infant cereal was reduced by 20% at 85 °C and 28% at 121 °C during the DSI process. DSI is a processing system that exposes a liquid or slurry type of food, such as porridges and infant foods, to a high temperature for short periods of exposure time with high-pressure steam [155]. As the steam (100 °C) had 5.35 times more energy than water (0 °C) and high efficiency in energy transfer through direct contact between the steam and the food matrix [156], the stability of OTA in the oat-based sample was significantly affected by DSI [133]. The OTA levels in rice-based and oat-based porridges during retorting were reduced by 53.8% and 17.2%, respectively [126].
Another report by Lee et al. [133] determined the effects of explosive puffing on OTA in rice and oat grains, i.e., a 15–28% reduction in rice and 38–52% reduction in oats under varying pressures (0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 MPa). The explosive puffing process is a widely used processing system which facilitates the hot-air drying of fruits and vegetables and making snacks [157]. Similar to extrusion processing, explosive puffing processing expands the matrix to a porous structure by the sudden release of pressure generated by superheated steam in a closed chamber [158,159]. Hence, it also could provide an effective measure to reduce OTA levels in foodstuffs and elicit an expected even greater reduction in OTA than extrusion processing, as the explosive puffing process employs a higher temperature and a longer exposure time to high temperature than those of the extrusion process. However, the effect of OTA reduction in oats and rice did not occur as expected. This might be attributed to the high mechanical shear energy, in addition to the high temperature with high pressure, applied in extrusion causing the chemical and molecular transformation of the food components as well as the contaminants.
As OTA in meat products might be reduced by thermal food processing, Pleadin et al. [160] demonstrated the possibility of OTA loss in meat products through the cooking, frying, and baking of several different types of meat sausages including roast, Mediterranean, liver, and blood sausages. About a 7.4% and 12.6% OTA reduction were observed during cooking at 100 °C and frying at 170 °C for 30 min, respectively, while higher OTA reductions were observed during baking for 60 min at 190 °C (70.4%), 200 °C (80.7%), and 220 °C (76.3%) [160]. A study by Josefsson and Möller [161] reported a 20–28% OTA reduction in fried Swedish blood pudding at 150–155 °C for 6–10 min with 5 or 10 mm thickness and a 23–29% OTA loss during frying at 150 °C for 12 min. In the case of kidney, 14–35% OTA reduction was observed when it was boiled at 100 °C for 15 min and then fried at 160 °C for 5 min, while the OTA in adipose tissue, which was fried at 150 °C for 12 min, was not reduced by this heat treatment [161].

3.3. Effects of Additives

Based on the literature and technology available to date, it is virtually impossible to achieve complete reduction in or elimination of OTA. Nonetheless, a significant reduction in OTA can be accomplished by optimizing food processing conditions such as using high temperature and pressure, particularly in combination with practical measures to facilitate the mechanism of reduction or degradation. Therefore, it is plausible to explore additional strategies to enhance the degree of OTA reduction and human exposure.

3.3.1. Baking Soda

As Dahal et al. [27] discovered, OTA is very heat-stable under acidic (pH 4) and neutral conditions, while a significant reduction in OTA was observed under alkaline conditions (pH 10) with thermal treatment. Among lots of food additives, baking soda (NaHCO3), which has been widely used in baking as a leavening agent, is the only alkaline substance that can be added in food processing. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), baking soda is considered to be an ingredient generally recognized as safe (GRAS) (21CFR184.1736) [162,163].
Peng et al. [102] determined that the OTA reduction effects in fermented dough through frying were 11.9–16.1% in fermented dough, while the OTA concentration was increased by about 0.7–2.6% by steaming. However, this might not only be as a result of the type of processing (steaming vs. frying) but by adding baking soda before frying. Research was also performed to measure the OTA reduction in cooked noodle, i.e., when boiling wheat flour with baking soda mixed in, which resulted in a gradual decrease in OTA of 12.8–24.0% [102]. In particular, the amount of added baking soda showed a varying effect during indirect steaming on the reduction in OTA in a more recent study by Lee et al. [134] An interesting finding from this study was that the degradation of OTA in rice-based porridge was increased by the added baking soda, even decreasing with 1% of baking soda (59.4% at no additives; 78.1% at 0.5% baking soda, and 68.7% at 1% baking soda), while added baking soda had a greater impact on the oat-based porridge with increasing added baking soda amounts from 13.6% (no additives) to 57.7% and 72.6% with 0.5% and 1% baking soda, respectively [134].
An increased reduction in OTA in a DSI-treated oat-based sample, artificially spiked with OTA standard, by adding baking soda (0.5% and 1% of solid contents) was observed; this was 36.1% and 43.4% at 85 °C and 44.3% and 51.4% at 121 °C, respectively, compared with 19.8% at 85 °C and 27.9 at 121 °C in a sample without baking soda [133]. In the case of the retorting process, the increased degradation of OTA in an oat-based porridge by adding baking soda was greater than that in rice-based porridge [132]. The reduction in OTA in the oat-based porridge was increased from 17.2% (no additives) to 30.3% (0.5% baking soda) and 47.9% (1% baking soda), respectively, while the reduction in OTA in the rice-based porridge was increased from 53.8% (no additives) to 55.5% (0.5% baking soda) and 66.4% (1% baking soda), respectively [132]. Adding baking soda during the extrusion process also induced the increased degradation of OTA [146]. An interesting finding from this study was that OTA in extruded oat-based snacks was decreased with an added amount of baking soda, while such a reduction was not observed in extruded rice-based snacks [146]. The authors analyzed OTA degradation products including the OTA isomer, OTα, and OTα-amide using HPLC-FLD, and reported that the OTA isomer was significantly increased in the extruded rice-based cereals with baking soda, while OTα and OTα-amide were not detected in both types of products.

3.3.2. Sugars

Despite sugars being common ingredients in most foodstuffs, only a little information related to any of their interactions or effects on the fate of OTA during thermal food processing is available so far. For example, a series of investigations were conducted to characterize the reaction between fumonisin B1 (FB1) and sugars under varying conditions and the toxicity of the reaction products [164,165,166]. An apparent first-order loss of FB1 was observed in a reducing sugar when 6.93 µM FB1 was heated in a model system with 100 mM of glucose or fructose in addition to 50 mM of potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) at 80 °C for 48 h [167]. Several researchers discovered significant findings related to the role of reducing sugars, i.e., the formation of FB1–sugar complexes via the Maillard reaction and reduced toxicity through blocking of the FB1’s amine group by reducing sugars [140,164]. The elucidation of different reaction mechanisms and their significance in food safety is required to provide essential information to set regulatory limits for developing strategies to minimize exposure and toxicity to mycotoxins in foods. While such a Maillard reaction between FB1 and reducing sugars is not applicable to OTA, because the amine group for the reaction is not available in OTA, it is critical to understand the role of sugars on the fate of OTA and/or its reaction mechanisms, including characterization of its reaction products, to develop strategies to reduce the risk of exposure and toxicity from OTA.
Gu et al. [168] investigated the thermal stability of OTA in the presence of sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose). The addition of fructose (1 mg/mL) resulted in significantly greater losses of OTA in comparison with the process with no added sugar at 150 °C for 50 min or 60 min [168]. An apparent first-order loss of OTA was observed when OTA was heated in the presence of sugars, while no reduction was observed without a reducing sugar [168]. Among those sugars, the half-lives (t1/2) and first-order reaction constants indicated that the highest reduction in OTA occurred in the thermal treatment with fructose [168]. Moreover, increased OTα-amide levels, which has no cytotoxicity, and decreased 14-(R)-OTA levels, which has a similar cytotoxicity to OTA, were observed by addition of fructose.
In another study, the reduction in OTA was more effective when oat grains (100 ng of OTA/g) were roasted at 180 °C for 30 min with reducing sugars, i.e., glucose (11%) and fructose (15%), compared with the samples roasted with no added sugar (10%) [126]. The reductions in OTA in indirect steamed rice-based and oat-based porridge previously spiked with 20 ng of OTA/g were 59.4% and 13.6% with no additives, respectively, while greater reductions in OTA in rice-based and oat-based porridge were observed with the addition of fructose, and the highest reduction in OTA was observed at 1% fructose addition in both of the commodities [134]. The reduction in OTA spiked (20 μg/kg of dry weight basis) in retorted rice and oat porridge was 54% and 17%, respectively, while a greater reduction in OTA in oat porridge was observed by adding fructose (41% and 36%, respectively); a decreased reduction in OTA in rice porridge was observed with an increased amount of fructose (39% and 18%, respectively) [134]. This suggests that certain sugars may have greater reactivity toward OTA at a given temperature. And it is puzzling to observe such differences, as they may not be explained by their chemical or physical properties. Therefore, there is a need for further research to elucidate their exact reaction mechanisms and characterizations, including the toxicity of the degradation products.

3.3.3. Salts (NaCl)

While salt is one of the most common ingredients in processed foods, only limited data on its effects are available to date. Mansouri-Nasrabadi et al. [96] demonstrated the effect of salt on the reduction in OTA in rice during cooking and found that the OTA level was decreased with an increased salt content, and the greatest reduction in OTA was observed with the addition of 7% (w/w) of salt.

3.3.4. Organic Acids

Yu et al. [114] examined the effect of organic acids on the reduction in OTA in three grape pomaces of cabernet franc, cabernet sauvignon, and chardonnay, at pH 2 and 37 °C for 24 h. While the results were variable, the reductions in OTA in wine pomace by acetic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, and hydrochloric acid were 59.8, 56.8, −4.4, and 8.1% in cabernet franc, 14.7, 56.8, 67.2, and 62.8% in cabernet sauvignon, and 61.4, 20.2, 46.4, and 25.0% in chardonnay, respectively [114]. Even though the pH was as low as 2 in this study, such low pH levels in foods are rare except lemon juice, beer, vinegar, etc. Hence, more research is necessary to better understand the role of acid in the reduction in OTA, including its reaction mechanism and the possible formation of toxic degradation products.

3.3.5. Adsorbents or Binders

Binders or adsorbents are substances that bind to mycotoxins and prevent absorption during the transition in the gut, and they are mainly studied as feed additives. Consequently, only a limited number of studies are available so far regarding which possible additives can be used during food processing, i.e., for direct human consumption, although they are known to be inert and non-toxic. Mine Kurtbay et al. [169] demonstrated the effects of adsorbents such as bentonite (B), nonylammonium bentonite (NB), dodecylammonium bentonite (DB), KSF-montmorillonite (KSF), and chitosan bead (CB) to reduce the OTA concentration in red wine. The optimum conditions for OTA adsorption from synthetic solutions were at pH 3.5 and at room temperature [169]. In the study, 2.5 ng of OTA/mL of red wine and 250 mg of OTA/mL of synthetic OTA solution were used, and DB and KSF showed the highest adsorption of OTA in the OTA solution (250 mg/mL) while KSF and CB exhibited the highest adsorption of OTA in red wine (2.5 ng/mL) [169]. However, these adsorbents showed a high adsorption capacity for total polyphenols and/or total anthocyanoses. Based on the data, it was concluded that only KSF (250 mg) was effective in adsorbing a high amount of OTA without removing total polyphenols and total anthocyanin from red wine [169].

3.3.6. Combination of Additives

Manda et al. [92] added several additives such as sugar and milk to decrease the OTA content in a cocoa finished product. Roasted and crushed cocoa nibs were ground and mixed with sugar (1:1, w/w) and then 13.4% of cocoa butter and 10.5% of milk were added to the initial mixture [92]. Since no thermal food processing was involved during the mixing steps with the additives, it did not lead to OTA degradation or removal, but rather a dilution of OTA, i.e., about a 51% decrease in the OTA content in the finished product [92].
The combined efficacy of fructose and baking soda during thermal food processing was studied by Lee et al. [132] (Table 4). By adding the two additives in combination with the rice porridge during retorting (0.5% fructose + 0.5% baking soda, w/w), the reduction level of OTA (36%) did not improve in comparison with reduction by adding individual additives at the same concentration—a 56% OTA reduction by adding 0.5% baking soda and 39% reduction by 0.5% fructose [132]. Similarly, in the retorting of oat porridge, the reduction in OTA by the two additives in combination (40%) was not significantly higher than those by the individual treatments—a 30% reduction by 0.5% baking soda and 41% reduction by 0.5% fructose.
Meanwhile, the OTA reduction when adding combined additives showed different trends during the indirect steaming process. The combination of fructose and baking soda (0.5% + 0.5% w/w) in rice porridge led to an increased OTA reduction (79%) than the addition of 0.5% baking soda (78%) and 0.5% fructose (63%) alone [134]. In the same study with oat porridge, the combination of fructose and baking soda (0.5% + 0.5% w/w) led to increased OTA reduction (67%) than 0.5% baking soda (58%) and 0.5% fructose (47%) [134]. Between those two thermal processing technologies of indirect steaming and retorting, the biggest differences were the treatment pressure and treatment time even though the food matrix, solid content and the amount of additives were the same.

3.4. Thermal Degradation Products of OTA

While OTA is produced by filamentous fungi, OTA analogues, including thermal degradation products, may be produced by chemical or biological reactions, such as during food processing or metabolism in the body. The most significant concern with OTA analogs is that their degradation products are generally not detected by the conventional methods to detect OTA due to their altered structures. The degradation products of OTA during thermal food processing or metabolism in the body are not well identified or studied. Moreover, purified standards for most of the identified OTA degradation products are not commercially available. Needless to mention, the identification of OTA degradation products and assessment of their toxicities are crucial to calculate more accurate their overall exposure and toxicity levels in our body through food consumption. It should also be noted that a reduced OTA concentration in final food products may not correlate with a reduction in toxicity. Further investigation into the reduction in OTA during thermal food processing is recommended to establish reliable strategies to minimize exposure to OTA, particularly among infants and young children.
Up till now, only a limited number of OTA analogs (Figure 1 and Table 5), including OTα, OTα-amide, and 14-decarbixyl-OTA, have been identified and confirmed for their toxicity [29,30,31,32]. At first, two OTA thermal degradation products, OTA isomer and decarboxy-OTA, were identified by Cramer et al. [32]. Due to high OTA reduction being observed during coffee bean roasting, the authors identified how this OTA was being lost and whether the toxicity of the beans was going up or down [32]. Among 15 roasted coffee samples collected from Germany, the amount of the OTA isomer formed was up to 25.6% relative to OTA, while decarboxy-OTA was produced in traces [32]. The cytotoxicities of these compounds were evaluated using IHKE cells and this showed less toxicity of the OTA isomer (350 nM) and decarboxy-OTA (no cytotoxicity up to 10 µM) compared with OTA (26.2 nM and 16.3 nM, respectively) [32]. The thermal process may also result in the conjugation of OTA with polysaccharides such as OTA-methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside ester, OTA glucose ester, and OTA cellobiose ester [30]. During coffee brewing, however, some of these esters may be hydrolyzed to release OTA, as a higher amount of OTA was detected in brewed coffee [118]. The formation of OTα amide was previously observed when OTA was exposed to light (470 nm) [170], while OTα was formed by the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of the peptide bond in OTA involving lipases and peptidases [26]. Bittner et al. [29] determined the cytotoxicity of OTA reaction products using immortalized human kidney epithelial (IHKE) cell lines and a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. While OTα and OTα-amide did not affect the viability of the IHKE cells in the tested concentration range up to 50 µM, OTA (IC50 (the half-maximal inhibitory concentration) = 0.5 µM) and 14-(R)-OTA (IC50 = 4.6 µM) showed cytotoxicity toward IHKE cells. According to Cramer et al. (2010), the non-toxicity of OTα and OTα-amide can be attributed to the missing phenylalanine moiety of OTA, which is responsible for the cytotoxicity of OTA and 14-(R)-OTA.
Sueck et al. [171] demonstrated the degradation of OTA and the formation of an OTA isomer during thermal treatment using model heating experiments at 120–260 °C. At 210 °C or above, the formation of the OTA isomer was recorded in less than one minute. While OTA was stable over the entire heating time up to 30 min, with only 3% OTA isomer formed, racemization from OTA to the OTA isomer was observed, with an equilibrium between both compounds being reached in about 20 min [171]. At 30 min at 210, 240, and 260 °C, only 80%, 35%, and 20%, respectively, of the sum of the OTA and OTA isomer were detectable, and screening for decaboxy-OTA and OTα amide revealed them only in trace amounts. The study investigated the incidence of OTA and the OTA isomer in 51 roasted coffee beans collected from France, Germany, and Guatemala, and then reported that OTA was quantified in 96% of the samples in the range of up to 28.4 ng/g, while the OTA isomer was quantifiable in 35% of the samples in the range of up to 3.9 ng/g [171]. Moreover, 30 samples, including 8 of cocoa and 22 of cereal-based products, were also tested, and the OTA isomer was detected in a bread sample and malt coffee powder for the first time.
Since sugars are widely used ingredients in food processing, Gu et al. [168] conducted a study to investigate the fate of OTA during different thermal processes in the presence of sugars, including the formation of degradation products. Sucrose, glucose, and fructose were employed in this study, and fructose was the most effective in reducing OTA when compared to glucose or sucrose. In addition, adding fructose resulted in the highest level of Otα amide, i.e., a non-toxic analog [168]. The most interesting finding in this study was that the OTA isomer was formed at first, then it decreased with an increasing amount of Otα amide [168]. The samples underwent thermal processing with fructose, resulting in a greater amount of OTA degradation products, i.e., mostly Otα amide, when compared to that of the control, in which a more toxic degradation product (OTA isomer) was mainly found [168]. Nonetheless, no OTA isomer, Otα, or Otα amide was detected in roasted oats alone or combined with sugars, glucose and fructose [126].
The knowledge about degradation products, especially those formed during food processing, is limited as they are not regulated or detected by routine analysis for mycotoxins in foods such as ELISA, HPLC, and LC-MS. However, considering the need to protect the public from the potent mycotoxin, more work is required to study OTA and its degradation products and update knowledge of their significance in our rapidly evolving society, in which diverse agricultural commodities and food products are increasingly accessible. It also prompts an urgent need to develop analytical methods to detect degradation products and their toxicities along with the availability of authentic standards.

4. Conclusions

Among all the strategies and technologies studied to date, it would be logical for the industry to consider thermal processes such as roasting for a higher reduction in OTA, not only as a sole processing method but as a pre-treatment to enhance product quality. In addition, advanced techniques such as extrusion may also provide a practical measure with flexibility and efficiency through the optimization of process variables. Certain food additives may be considered as safe yet practical approaches to facilitate the reduction in OTA in foods, particularly when they are employed in thermal processes. While existing food processing techniques offer varying degrees of reduction, the formation of known and unknown by-products should be considered carefully as they may pose a significant concern to public health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J.L.; methodology, H.J.L. and D.R.; formal analysis, H.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J.L.; writing—review and editing, H.J.L. and D.R.; visualization, H.J.L. and H.D.K.; supervision, H.J.L. and D.R.; project administration, H.J.L. and D.R.; funding acquisition, H.J.L. and D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported in part by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant (Agreement No. 2016-67017-24418 and 2019-67018-29688) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NTP, N.T.P. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of ochratoxin A (CAS No. 303-47-9) in F344/N Rats (Gavage studies). Natl. Toxicol. Program Tech. Rep. Ser. 1989, 358, 1–146. [Google Scholar]
  2. IARC. Some naturally occurring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risk Chem. Hum. 1993, 56, 599. [Google Scholar]
  3. IARC. Some Traditional Herbal Medicines, Some Mycotoxins, Naphthalene and Styrene; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Manderville, R.A. Ochratoxin A: An overview on toxicity and carcinogenicity in animals and humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 61–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. El Khoury, A.; Atoui, A. Ochratoxin A: General overview and actual molecular status. Toxins 2010, 2, 461–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Malir, F.; Ostry, V.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Malir, J.; Toman, J. Ochratoxin A: 50 years of research. Toxins 2016, 8, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kuiper-Goodman, T.; Scott, P. Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomed. Environ. Sci. BES 1989, 2, 179–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Speijers, G.; Van Egmond, H. Worldwide ochratoxin A levels in food and feeds. Colloq.-Inst. Natl. Sante Rech. Med Colloq. Semin. 1993, 231, 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucheli, P.; Taniwaki, M. Research on the origin, and on the impact of post-harvest handling and manufacturing on the presence of ochratoxin A in coffee. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iamanaka, B.; Taniwaki, M.; Menezes, H.; Vicente, E.; Fungaro, M. Incidence of toxigenic fungi and ochratoxin A in dried fruits sold in Brazil. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 1258–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chulze, S.; Magnoli, C.; Dalcero, A. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in wine and ochratoxigenic mycoflora in grapes and dried vine fruits in South America. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Trucksess, M.; Scott, P. Mycotoxins in botanicals and dried fruits: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Muñoz, K.; Campos, V.; Blaszkewicz, M.; Vega, M.; Alvarez, A.; Neira, J.; Degen, G.H. Exposure of neonates to ochratoxin A: First biomonitoring results in human milk (Colostrum) from Chile. Mycotoxin Res. 2010, 26, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, H.J.; Ryu, D. Significance of ochratoxin a in breakfast cereals from the united states. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9404–9409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nguyen, K.; Ryu, D. Concentration of ochratoxin A in breakfast cereals and snacks consumed in the United States. Food Control 2014, 40, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cappozzo, J.; Jackson, L.; Lee, H.J.; Zhou, W.; Al-Taher, F.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Ryu, D. Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Infant Foods in the United States. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mitchell, N.J.; Chen, C.; Palumbo, J.D.; Bianchini, A.; Cappozzo, J.; Stratton, J.; Ryu, D.; Wu, F. A risk assessment of dietary Ochratoxin a in the United States. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 100, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Scottt, P.; Kanhere, S.; Lau, B.; Levvis, D.; Hayward, S.; Ryan, J.; Kuiper-Goodman, T. Survey of Canadian human blood plasma for ochratoxin A. Food Addit. Contam. 1998, 15, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Studer-Rohr, I.; Schlatter, J.; Dietrich, D.R. Kinetic parameters and intraindividual fluctuations of ochratoxin A plasma levels in humans. Arch. Toxicol. 2000, 74, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tola, M.; Kebede, B. Occurrence, importance and control of mycotoxins: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1191103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gimeno, A. Micotoxinas, Introducción. XVII Congreso Centroamericano y del Caribe de Avicultura. 2000. Available online: http://www.engormix.com (accessed on 10 March 2008).
  22. Wang, L.; Hua, X.; Shi, J.; Jing, N.; Ji, T.; Lv, B.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y. Ochratoxin A: Occurrence and recent advances in detoxification. Toxicon 2022, 210, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chu, F.S. Studies ion ochratoxins. CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1974, 2, 499–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Galtier, P. Pharmacokinetics of Ochratoxin a in Animals; IARC Scientific Publications: Lyon, France, 1991; pp. 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  25. Valenta, H. Chromatographic methods for the determination of ochratoxin A in animal and human tissues and fluids. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 815, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abrunhosa, L.; Paterson, R.R.; Venâncio, A. Biodegradation of ochratoxin A for food and feed decontamination. Toxins 2010, 2, 1078–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dahal, S.; Lee, H.J.; Gu, K.; Ryu, D. Heat Stability of Ochratoxin A in an Aqueous Buffered Model System. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 1748–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cramer, B.; Osteresch, B.; Munoz, K.A.; Hillmann, H.; Sibrowski, W.; Humpf, H.U. Biomonitoring using dried blood spots: Detection of ochratoxin A and its degradation product 2’R-ochratoxin A in blood from coffee drinkers. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bittner, A.; Cramer, B.; Harrer, H.; Humpf, H.-U. Structure elucidation and in vitro cytotoxicity of ochratoxin α amide, a new degradation product of ochratoxin A. Mycotoxin Res. 2015, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bittner, A.; Cramer, B.; Humpf, H.-U. Matrix binding of ochratoxin a during roasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 12737–12743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cramer, B.; Harrer, H.; Nakamura, K.; Uemura, D.; Humpf, H.-U. Total synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of all ochratoxin A stereoisomers. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cramer, B.; Königs, M.; Humpf, H.-U. Identification and in vitro cytotoxicity of ochratoxin A degradation products formed during coffee roasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5673–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ringot, D.; Chango, A.; Schneider, Y.; Larondelle, Y. Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of ochratoxin A, an update. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2006, 159, 18–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Meisner, H.; Chan, S. Ochratoxin A, an inhibitor of mitochondrial transport systems. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 2795–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wei, Y.; Lu, C.; Lin, T.; Wei, R. Effect of ochratoxin A on rat liver mitochondrial respiration and oxidative phosphorylation. Toxicology 1985, 36, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bunge, I.; Dirheimer, G.; Röschenthaler, R. In vivo in vitroinhibition of protein synthesis in Bacillus stearothermophilus by ochratoxin A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1978, 83, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Creppy, E.; Röschenthaler, R.; Dirheimer, G. Inhibition of protein synthesis in mice by ochratoxin A and its prevention by phenylalanine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1984, 22, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Creppy, E.; Størmer, F.; Kern, D.; Röschenthaler, R.; Dirheimer, G. Effects of ochratoxin A metabolites on yeast phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase and on the growth and in vivo protein synthesis of hepatoma cells. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 1983, 47, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Baudrimont, I.; Ahouandjivo, R.; Creppy, E. Prevention of lipid peroxidation induced by ochratoxin A in Vero cells in culture by several agents. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 1997, 104, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kamp, H.G.; Eisenbrand, G.; Janzowski, C.; Kiossev, J.; Latendresse, J.R.; Schlatter, J.; Turesky, R.J. Ochratoxin A induces oxidative DNA damage in liver and kidney after oral dosing to rats. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2005, 49, 1160–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mally, A.; Pepe, G.; Ravoori, S.; Fiore, M.; Gupta, R.C.; Dekant, W.; Mosesso, P. Ochratoxin A causes DNA damage and cytogenetic effects but no DNA adducts in rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rahimtula, A.; Bereziat, J.; Bussacchini-Griot, V.; Bartsch, H. Lipid peroxidation as a possible cause of ochratoxin A toxicity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988, 37, 4469–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Omar, R.F.; Hasinoff, B.B.; Mejilla, F.; Rahimtula, A.D. Mechanism of ochratoxin A stimulated lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1990, 40, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Omar, R.F.; Rahimtula, A.D.; Bartsch, H. Role of cytochrome P-450 in ochratoxin a-stimulated lipid peroxidation. J. Biochem. Toxicol. 1991, 6, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Baudrimont, I.; Betbeder, A.-M.; Gharbi, A.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Dirheimer, G.; Creppy, E. Effect of superoxide dismutase and catalase on the nephrotoxicity induced by subchronical administration of ochratoxin A in rats. Toxicology 1994, 89, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cavin, C.; Delatour, T.; Marin-Kuan, M.; Holzhäuser, D.; Higgins, L.; Bezencon, C.; Guignard, G.; Junod, S.; Richoz-Payot, J.; Gremaud, E. Reduction in antioxidant defenses may contribute to ochratoxin A toxicity and carcinogenicity. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 96, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Petrik, J.; Žanić-Grubišić, T.; Barišić, K.; Pepeljnjak, S.; Radić, B.; Ferenčić, Ž.; Čepelak, I. Apoptosis and oxidative stress induced by ochratoxin A in rat kidney. Arch. Toxicol. 2003, 77, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schaaf, G.; Nijmeijer, S.; Maas, R.; Roestenberg, P.; De Groene, E.; Fink-Gremmels, J. The role of oxidative stress in the ochratoxin A-mediated toxicity in proximal tubular cells. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2002, 1588, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klaunig, J.E.; Kamendulis, L.M. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 239–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marin-Kuan, M.; Cavin, C.; Delatour, T.; Schilter, B. Ochratoxin A carcinogenicity involves a complex network of epigenetic mechanisms. Toxicon 2008, 52, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, H.J.; Pyo, M.C.; Shin, H.S.; Ryu, D.; Lee, K.-W. Renal toxicity through AhR, PXR, and Nrf2 signaling pathway activation of ochratoxin A-induced oxidative stress in kidney cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 122, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shin, H.S.; Lee, H.J.; Pyo, M.C.; Ryu, D.; Lee, K.-W. Ochratoxin A-induced hepatotoxicity through phase I and phase II reactions regulated by AhR in liver cells. Toxins 2019, 11, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marin-Kuan, M.; Nestler, S.; Verguet, C.; Bezencon, C.; Piguet, D.; Mansourian, R.; Holzwarth, J.; Grigorov, M.; Delatour, T.; Mantle, P. A toxicogenomics approach to identify new plausible epigenetic mechanisms of ochratoxin a carcinogenicity in rat. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 89, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.; Loboda, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Huebbe, P.; Blank, R.; Wolffram, S.; Dulak, J.; Rimbach, G. Effect of ochratoxin A on redox-regulated transcription factors, antioxidant enzymes and glutathione-S-transferase in cultured kidney tubulus cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2665–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.; Wagner, A.; Graeser, A.; Hundhausen, C.; Wolffram, S.; Rimbach, G. Ochratoxin A impairs Nrf2-dependent gene expression in porcine kidney tubulus cells. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2009, 93, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. García-Pérez, E.; Ryu, D.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, H.D.; Lee, H.J. Human Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells (HK-2) as a Sensitive In Vitro System for Ochratoxin A Induced Oxidative Stress. Toxins 2021, 13, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. García-Pérez, E.; Ryu, D.; Lee, C.; Lee, H.J. Ochratoxin a induces oxidative stress in hepg2 cells by impairing the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes. Toxins 2021, 13, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Descamps-Latscha, B.; Witko-Sarsat, V. Importance of oxidatively modified proteins in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 2001, 59, S108–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Beisswenger, P.J.; Drummond, K.S.; Nelson, R.G.; Howell, S.K.; Szwergold, B.S.; Mauer, M. Susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy is related to dicarbonyl and oxidative stress. Diabetes 2005, 54, 3274–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Coşkun, C.; Kural, A.; DÖventaş, Y.; Koldaş, M.; Oezturk, H.; Inal, B.B.; GÜmÜş, A. Hemodialysis and protein oxidation products. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1100, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, K.; Ryu, D. Ultrasonic extraction with ultra-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of ochratoxin A in processed cereal products. J. AOAC Int. 2014, 97, 1384–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vega, M.; Muñoz, K.; Sepúlveda, C.; Aranda, M.; Campos, V.; Villegas, R.; Villarroel, O. Solid-phase extraction and HPLC determination of ochratoxin A in cereals products on Chilean market. Food Control 2009, 20, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bakker, M.; Pieters, M. Risk Assessment of Ochratoxin a in The Netherlands. 2003. Available online: https://rivm.openrepository.com/handle/10029/9185 (accessed on 30 May 2021).
  64. Roscoe, V.; Lombaert, G.; Huzel, V.; Neumann, G.; Melietio, J.; Kitchen, D.; Kotello, S.; Krakalovich, T.; Trelka, R.; Scott, P. Mycotoxins in breakfast cereals from the Canadian retail market: A 3-year survey. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. HC. Information Document on Health Canada’s Proposed Maximum Limits (Standards) for the Presence of the Mycotoxin Ochratoxin a in Foods; F.D. Bureau of Chemical Safety, Health Products and Food Branch, 2009. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/public-involvement-partnerships/information-document-proposed-maximum-limits-standards-presence-mycotoxin-ochratoxin-foods.html (accessed on 15 January 2018).
  66. Kuzdraliński, A.; Solarska, E.; Mazurkiewicz, J. Mycotoxin content of organic and conventional oats from southeastern Poland. Food Control 2013, 33, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kuruc, J.; Hegstad, J.; Lee, H.J.; Simons, K.; Ryu, D.; Wolf-Hall, C. Infestation and quantification of ochratoxigenic fungi in barley and wheat naturally contaminated with ochratoxin A. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Al-Taher, F.; Cappozzo, J.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Lee, H.J.; Jackson, L.; Ryu, D. Detection and quantitation of mycotoxins in infant cereals in the US market by LC-MS/MS using a stable isotope dilution assay. Food Control 2017, 72, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De Jesus, C.L.; Bartley, A.; Welch, A.Z.; Berry, J.P. High incidence and levels of ochratoxin A in wines sourced from the United States. Toxins 2018, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bellver Soto, J.; Fernandez-Franzon, M.; Ruiz, M.-J.; Juan-Garcia, A. Presence of ochratoxin A (OTA) mycotoxin in alcoholic drinks from southern European countries: Wine and beer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7643–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Romani, S.; Sacchetti, G.; Chaves López, C.; Pinnavaia, G.G.; Dalla Rosa, M. Screening on the occurrence of ochratoxin A in green coffee beans of different origins and types. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3616–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Martins, M.; Martins, H.; Gimeno, A. Incidence of microflora and of ochratoxin A in green coffee beans (Coffea arabica). Food Addit. Contam. 2003, 20, 1127–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pardo, E.; Marin, S.; Ramos, A.; Sanchis, V. Occurrence of ochratoxigenic fungi and ochratoxin A in green coffee from different origins. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2004, 10, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. EC. Commission regulation (EC) no 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Setting levels for certain contaminants in food stuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, 364, 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  75. MHRF. National Sanitary and Epidemiological Rules and Regulations Sanpin 2.3.2.1078-01 ‘Hygienic Requirements for Safety and Nutrition Value of Foodstuff’; Russian Federation: Moscow, Russia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  76. ANVISA. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Dispõe Sobre Limites Máximos Tolerados (LMT) Para Micotoxinas em Alimentos. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília, Brazil: 2011. Resolução RDC n. 7, 18/02/2011. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2011/res0007_18_02_2011_rep.html (accessed on 18 January 2020).
  77. MOHC. Gb 7718-2011 National Food Safety Standard General Standard for the Labeling of Prepackaged Foods; Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  78. MOHI. Food Safety and Standard (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulation; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: New Delhi, India; Food Safety and Standards Authority of India: New Delhi, India, 2011; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  79. KFDA. Enforcement Rule of Food Sanitation Act; Food Fode Korea Food and Drug Administration: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  80. Miraglia, M.; Brera, C. Assessment of dietary intake of ochratoxin A by the population of EU member states. Reports on tasks for scientific cooperation. Rep. Experts Particip. Task 3.2.7. 2002, 3, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rousseau, J. Ochratoxin a in wines: Current knowledge-mycotoxins and wine. Vinidea.Net Wine Internet Tech. J. 2004, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  82. Walker, R. Risk assessment of ochratoxin: Current views of the european scientific committee on food, the jecfa and the codex committee on food additives and contaminants. In Mycotoxins and Food Safety; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 249–255. [Google Scholar]
  83. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a Request from the Commission Related to Ochratoxin a in Food; Authority, EFSA: Palma, Italy, 2006; pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  84. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain; Schrenk, D.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.C.; Nebbia, C.S.; et al. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06113. [Google Scholar]
  85. Alldrick, A. The effects of processing on the occurrence of ochratoxin A in cereals. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 27–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Scudamore, K.; Banks, J.; MacDonald, S. Fate of ochratoxin A in the processing of whole wheat grains during milling and bread production. Food Addit. Contam. 2003, 20, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Valle-Algarra, F.M.; Mateo, E.M.; Medina, A.; Mateo, F.; Gimeno-Adelantado, J.V.; Jiménez, M. Changes in ochratoxin A and type B trichothecenes contained in wheat flour during dough fermentation and bread-baking. Food Addit. Contam. 2009, 26, 896–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Simsek, S.; Burgess, K.; Whitney, K.L.; Gu, Y.; Qian, S.Y. Analysis of deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside in wheat. Food Control 2012, 26, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Young, J.C.; Fulcher, R.G.; Hayhoe, J.H.; Scott, P.M.; Dexter, J.E. Effect of milling and baking on deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) content of eastern Canadian wheats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1984, 32, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, H.; Wang, B. Fate of deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside during wheat milling and Chinese steamed bread processing. Food Control 2014, 44, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kupski, L.; Queiroz, M.I.; Badiale-Furlong, E. Application of carboxypeptidase A to a baking process to mitigate contamination of wheat flour by ochratoxin A. Process Biochem. 2018, 64, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Manda, P.; Dano, D.S.; Kouadio, J.H.; Diakite, A.; Sangare-Tigori, B.; Ezoulin, M.J.M.; Soumahoro, A.; Dembele, A.; Fourny, G. Impact of industrial treatments on ochratoxin A content in artificially contaminated cocoa beans. Food Addit. Contam. 2009, 26, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Amézqueta, S.; Gonzalez-Penas, E.; Murillo, M.; Lopez de Cerain, A. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in cocoa beans: Effect of shelling. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Scudamore, K.A. Prevention of ochratoxin A in commodities and likely effects of processing fractionation and animal feeds. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Park, J.W.; Chung, S.-H.; Lee, C.; Kim, Y.-B. Fate of ochratoxin A during cooking of naturally contaminated polished rice. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 2107–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mansouri-Nasrabadi, R.; Milani, J.M.; Nazari, S.S.J. Optimization of washing and cooking processes of rice for Ochratoxin A decrement by RSM. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2523–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Blanc, M.; Pittet, A.; Muñoz-Box, R.; Viani, R. Behavior of ochratoxin A during green coffee roasting and soluble coffee manufacture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 673–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jalili, M.; Jinap, S.; Son, R. The effect of chemical treatment on reduction of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in black and white pepper during washing. Food Addit. Contam. 2011, 28, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Iha, M.; Trucksess, M.; Tournas, V. Effect of processing on ochratoxin A content in dried beans. Food Addit. Contam. 2009, 26, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Amézqueta, S.; Gonzalez-Penas, E.; Lizarraga, T.; Murillo-Arbizu, M.; De Cerain, A.L. A simple chemical method reduces ochratoxin A in contaminated cocoa shells. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 1422–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Osborne, B.; Ibe, F.; Brown, G.; Petagine, F.; Scudamore, K.; Banks, J.; Hetmanski, M.; Leonard, C. The effects of milling and processing on wheat contaminated with ochratoxin A. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Peng, C.; Wang, L.; An, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, H. Fate of ochratoxin A during wheat milling and some Chinese breakfast processing. Food Control 2015, 57, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Scott, P.; Kanhere, S.; Lawrence, G.; Daley, E.; Farber, J. Fermentation of wort containing added ochratoxin A and fumonisins B1 and B2. Food Addit. Contam. 1995, 12, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Krogh, P.; Hald, B.; Gjertsen, P.; Myken, F. Fate of ochratoxin A and citrinin during malting and brewing experiments. Appl. Microbiol. 1974, 28, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chu, F.; Chang, C.; Ashoor, S.H.; Prentice, N. Stability of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A in brewing. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 29, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Nip, W.; Chang, F.C.; Chu, F.; Prentice, N. Fate of ochratoxin A in brewing. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 30, 1048–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Inoue, T.; Nagatomi, Y.; Uyama, A.; Mochizuki, N. Fate of mycotoxins during beer brewing and fermentation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013, 77, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Delage, N.; d’Harlingue, A.; Colonna Ceccaldi, B.; Bompeix, G. Occurrence of mycotoxins in fruit juices and wine. Food Control 2003, 14, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zimmerli, B.; Dick, R. Ochratoxin A in table wine and grape-juice: Occurrence and risk assessment. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Freire, L.; Braga, P.A.; Furtado, M.M.; Delafiori, J.; Dias-Audibert, F.L.; Pereira, G.E.; Reyes, F.G.; Catharino, R.R.; Sant’Ana, A.S. From grape to wine: Fate of ochratoxin A during red, rose, and white winemaking process and the presence of ochratoxin derivatives in the final products. Food Control 2020, 113, 107167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Csutorás, C.; Rácz, L.; Rácz, K.; Fűtő, P.; Forgó, P.; Kiss, A. Monitoring of ochratoxin A during the fermentation of different wines by applying high toxin concentrations. Microchem. J. 2013, 107, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cecchini, F.; Morassut, M.; Moruno, E.G.; Di Stefano, R. Influence of yeast strain on ochratoxin A content during fermentation of white and red must. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Meca, G.; Blaiotta, G.; Ritieni, A. Reduction of ochratoxin A during the fermentation of Italian red wine Moscato. Food Control 2010, 21, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yu, J.; Smith, I.N.; Mikiashvili, N. Reducing Ochratoxin A Content in Grape Pomace by Different Methods. Toxins 2020, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Milani, J.; Heidari, S. Stability of ochratoxin A during bread making process. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kabak, B. The fate of mycotoxins during thermal food processing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Boudra, H.; Le Bars, P.; Le Bars, J. Thermostability of Ochratoxin A in wheat under two moisture conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1156–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Studer-Rohr, I.; Dietrich, D.R.; Schlatter, J.; Schlatter, C. The occurrence of ochratoxin A in coffee. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1995, 33, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Suárez-Quiroz, M.; Louise, B.D.; Gonzalez-Rios, O.; Barel, M.; Guyot, B.; Schorr-Galindo, S.; Guiraud, J.P. The impact of roasting on the ochratoxin A content of coffee. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nehad, E.; Farag, M.; Kawther, M.; Abdel-Samed, A.; Naguib, K. Stability of ochratoxin A (OTA) during processing and decaffeination in commercial roasted coffee beans. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Castellanos-Onorio, O.; Gonzalez-Rios, O.; Guyot, B.; Fontana, T.A.; Guiraud, J.-P.; Schorr-Galindo, S.; Durand, N.; Suárez-Quiroz, M. Effect of two different roasting techniques on the Ochratoxin A (OTA) reduction in coffee beans (Coffea arabica). Food Control 2011, 22, 1184–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Romani, S.; Pinnavaia, G.G.; Dalla Rosa, M. Influence of roasting levels on ochratoxin A content in coffee. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5168–5171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tsubouchi, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Hisada, K.; Sakabe, Y.; Udagawa, S.-i. Effect of roasting on ochratoxin A level in green coffee beans inoculated with Aspergillus ochraceus. Mycopathologia 1987, 97, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Pérez de Obanos, A.; González-Peñas, E.; Lopez de Cerain, A. Influence of roasting and brew preparation on the ochratoxin A content in coffee infusion. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Viani, R. Fate of ochratoxin A (OTA) during processing of coffee. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Lee, H.J. Stability of ochratoxin A in oats during roasting with reducing sugars. Food Control 2020, 118, 107382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Carbon, H.; Lee, H. Varied reduction of ochratoxin A in brown and white rice during roasting. World Mycotoxin J. 2022, 15, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.; Suh, H.J.; Ryu, D. Effects of explosive puffing process on the reduction of ochratoxin A in rice and oats. Food Control 2019, 95, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Osborne, B.G. Reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography determination of ochratoxin a in flour and bakery products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1979, 30, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Milanez, T.; Leitão, M. The effect of cooking on ochratoxin A content of beans, variety ‘carioca’. Food Addit. Contam. 1996, 13, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Trenk, H.L.; Butz, M.E.; Chu, F.S. Production of ochratoxins in different cereal products by Aspergillus ochraceus. Appl. Microbiol. 1971, 21, 1032–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lee, H.J.; Lee, C.; Ryu, D. Effects of baking soda and fructose in reduction of ochratoxin A in rice and oat porridge during retorting process. Food Control 2020, 116, 107325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lee, H.J.; Gu, B.-J.; Ganjyal, G.; Ryu, D. Reduction of ochratoxin A in direct steam injected oat-based infant cereals with baking soda. Food Control 2019, 96, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lee, H.J.; Li, S.; Gu, K.; Ryu, D. Reduction of Ochratoxin A during the Preparation of Porridge with Sodium Bicarbonate and Fructose. Toxins 2021, 13, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gahlawat, P.; Sehgal, S. Phytic acid, saponins, and polyphenols in weaning foods prepared from oven-heated green gram and cereals. Cereal Chem. 1992, 69, 463–464. [Google Scholar]
  136. Karlovsky, P.; Suman, M.; Berthiller, F.; De Meester, J.; Eisenbrand, G.; Perrin, I.; Oswald, I.P.; Speijers, G.; Chiodini, A.; Recker, T. Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination. Mycotoxin Res. 2016, 32, 179–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. La Pera, L.; Avellone, G.; Lo Turco, V.; Di Bella, G.; Agozzino, P.; Dugo, G. Influence of roasting and different brewing processes on the ochratoxin A content in coffee determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Malir, F.; Ostry, V.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Toman, J.; Bazin, I.; Roubal, T. Transfer of ochratoxin A into tea and coffee beverages. Toxins 2014, 6, 3438–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Harper, J.M. A comparative analysis of single and twin-screw extruders. In Food Extrusion Science and Technology; Kokini, J.L., Ho, C., Karwe, M.V., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  140. Humpf, H.U.; Voss, K.A. Effects of thermal food processing on the chemical structure and toxicity of fumonisin mycotoxins. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2004, 48, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cetin, Y.; Bullerman, L.B. Evaluation of reduced toxicity of zearalenone by extrusion processing as measured by the MTT cell proliferation assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 6558–6563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Voss, K.A.; Bullerman, L.B.; Bianchini, A.; Hanna, M.A.; Ryu, D. Reduced toxicity of fumonisin B1 in corn grits by single-screw extrusion. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 2036–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Scudamore, K.; Banks, J.; Guy, R. Fate of ochratoxin A in the processing of whole wheat grain during extrusion. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Castells, M.; Pardo, E.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V.; Marín, S. Reduction of ochratoxin A in extruded barley meal. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1139–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Lee, H.J.; Dahal, S.; Perez, E.G.; Kowalski, R.J.; Ganjyal, G.; Ryu, D. Reduction of ochratoxin A in oat flakes by twin screw extrusion processing. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1628–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ryu, D.; Kowalski, R.J.; Ganjyal, G.; Lee, H.J. Reduction of ochratoxin A in oats and rice by twin-screw extrusion processing with baking soda. Food Control 2019, 105, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Subirade, I. Fate of ochratoxin A during breadmaking. Food Addit. Contam. 1995, 13, 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  148. Vidal, A.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J.; Marín, S. Thermal stability and kinetics of degradation of deoxynivalenol, deoxynivalenol conjugates and ochratoxin A during baking of wheat bakery products. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Bol, E.K.; Araujo, L.; Veras, F.F.; Welke, J.E. Estimated exposure to zearalenone, ochratoxin A and aflatoxin B1 through the consume of bakery products and pasta considering effects of food processing. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 89, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Bryła, M.; Ksieniewicz-Woźniak, E.; Stępniewska, S.; Modrzewska, M.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Szymczyk, K.; Szafrańska, A. Transformation of ochratoxin A during bread-making processes. Food Control 2021, 125, 107950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Smith, I.N.; Yu, J. Nutritional and sensory quality of bread containing different quantities of grape pomace from different grape cultivars. EC Nutr. 2015, 2, 291–301. [Google Scholar]
  152. Yu, J.; Smith, I.N.; Chen, G. Influence of Grape Pomace Inclusion on Physical and Chemical Properties of Corn-Based Extrudates. SDRP J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 3, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Maman, R.; Yu, J. Chemical composition and particle size of grape seed flour and their effects on the characteristics of cookies. J. Food Res. 2019, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hussain, A.; Luttfullah, G. Reduction of aflatoxin-beta/sub 1/and ochratoxin-A levels in polished basmati rice (oryza sativa linn.) by different cooking methods. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2009, 31, 911–915. [Google Scholar]
  155. Lewis, M.; Heppell, N.; Hastings, A. Continuous Thermal Processing of Foods—Pasteurization and Uht Sterilization; Aspen Publishers: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  156. Katofsky, R.E. The Production of Fluid Fuels from Biomass; Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  157. Sullivan, J.; Craig, J., Jr. The development of explosion puffing. Food Technol. 1984, 38, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  158. Hoke, K.; Houška, M.; Průchová, J.; Gabrovská, D.; Vaculová, K.; Paulíčková, I. Optimisation of puffing naked barley. J. Food Eng. 2007, 80, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hui, Y.H.; Evranuz, E.Ö. Handbook of Vegetable Preservation and Processing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  160. Pleadin, J.; Perši, N.; Kovačević, D.; Vulić, A.; Frece, J.; Markov, K. Ochratoxin A reduction in meat sausages using processing methods practiced in households. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2014, 7, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Josefsson, B.E.; Möller, T.E. Heat stability of ochratoxin A in pig products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1980, 31, 1313–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. OECD. Sodium Bicarbonate. (cas no. 144-55-8), Sids Initial Assessment Report for Siam 15; OECD: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  163. FDA. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations Title 21; FDA: Rockville, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  164. Howard, P.C.; Churchwell, M.I.; Couch, L.H.; Marques, M.M.; Doerge, D.R. Formation of N-(carboxymethyl) fumonisin B1, following the reaction of fumonisin B1 with reducing sugars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3546–3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lu, Y.; Clifford, L.; Hauck, C.C.; Hendrich, S.; Osweiler, G.; Murphy, P.A. Characterization of fumonisin B1− glucose reaction kinetics and products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4726–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Fernández-Surumay, G.; Osweiler, G.D.; Yaeger, M.J.; Rottinghaus, G.E.; Hendrich, S.; Buckley, L.K.; Murphy, P.A. Fumonisin B− glucose reaction products are less toxic when fed to swine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4264–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Murphy, P.A.; Hendrich, S.; Hopmans, E.C.; Hauck, C.C.; Lu, Z.; Buseman, G.; Munkvold, G. Effect of processing on fumonisin content of corn. Fumonisins Food 1996, 392, 323–334. [Google Scholar]
  168. Gu, K.; Ryu, D.; Lee, H.J. Ochratoxin A and its reaction products affected by sugars during heat processing. Food Chem. 2021, 348, 129038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mine Kurtbay, H.; Bekçi, Z.; Merdivan, M.; Yurdakoç, K. Reduction of ochratoxin A levels in red wine by bentonite, modified bentonites, and chitosan. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2541–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Cramer, B.; Graf, I.; Lerch, S.; Humpf, H.-U.; Geisen, R. Wavelength-dependent degradation of ochratoxin and citrinin by light in vitro and in vivo and its implications on Penicillium. Toxins 2012, 4, 1535–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Sueck, F.; Hemp, V.; Specht, J.; Torres, O.; Cramer, B.; Humpf, H.-U. Occurrence of the ochratoxin A degradation product 2′ R-ochratoxin a in coffee and other food: An update. Toxins 2019, 11, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 2S′-ochratoxin A (2S′-OTA, generally called OTA, called 14-(S)-ochratoxin A in the past) (1); 2R′-ochratoxin A (2R′-OTA, called 14-(R)-ochratoxin A in the past, as known as OTA isomer) (2); 14-decarboxyl-ochratoxin A (DC-OTA) (3); ochratoxin α (4) and ochratoxin α amide (5); ochratoxin A-methyl-a-D glucopyranoside ester (6); ochratoxin A glucose ester (7); and ochratoxin A cellobiose ester (8).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 2S′-ochratoxin A (2S′-OTA, generally called OTA, called 14-(S)-ochratoxin A in the past) (1); 2R′-ochratoxin A (2R′-OTA, called 14-(R)-ochratoxin A in the past, as known as OTA isomer) (2); 14-decarboxyl-ochratoxin A (DC-OTA) (3); ochratoxin α (4) and ochratoxin α amide (5); ochratoxin A-methyl-a-D glucopyranoside ester (6); ochratoxin A glucose ester (7); and ochratoxin A cellobiose ester (8).
Toxins 16 00058 g001
Table 1. Worldwide regulation of ochratoxin A (OTA).
Table 1. Worldwide regulation of ochratoxin A (OTA).
AuthorityCommodityMax. Level of OTA (ng/g)
EUUnprocessed cereals5.0
All product derived from unprocessed cereals intended for direct consumption3.0
Dried vine fruits (raisins, currents, sultanas)10.0
Roasted coffee beans, ground roasted coffee5.0
Instant coffee10.0
Beer and wine2.0
Grape juice (not concentrated)2.0
Infant cereal-based foods, dietary foods for medical purposes0.5
CodexUnprocessed cereals of wheat, barley, and rye5.0
ChinaGrains and beans5.0
SingaporeBeer, cereal and cereal products, coffee3.0
BrazilCereals and cereal-based products excl. maize and maize derivates10.0
Roasted coffee and soluble coffee10.0
Wine10.0
Cereal-based baby food2.0
Dried fruits10.0
IndiaUnprocessed cereals of wheat, barley, rye20.0
RussiaWheat, barley, rye, oat and rice cereals and cereal products5.0
Specific products for children0.5
KoreaGrain and their processed foods (grinding, cutting, etc.), coffee beans and roasted coffee5.0
Instant coffee10.0
Grape juice, concentrated grape juice as reconstituted, wine2.0
Raisins10.0
Baby foods for infants and young children0.5
MalaysiaCereal-based food for infants and children0.5
Coffee or ground coffee or coffee powder5.0
Instant coffee or soluble coffee, Decaffeinated coffee10.0
IndonesiaCereal (rice, corn, sorghum, wheat) and their products5.0
Coffee5.0
Instant coffee10.0
Table 2. The effects of thermal food processing on ochratoxin A (OTA).
Table 2. The effects of thermal food processing on ochratoxin A (OTA).
Type of Thermal ProcessingMatrixReduction (%)Reference
RoastingCoffee0–12%[123]
Coffee17–86%[119]
Coffee16%[97]
Coffee67%[124]
Coffee86–94%[125]
Oat2–18%[126]
White/brown rice15–60%[127]
Cocoa beans, shells, and nibs24–41%[92]
Explosive puffingOat38–52%[128]
Rice15–28%
BakingWheat20–40%[86]
Wheat0% (bread),
67% (biscuits)
[129]
Pressure cooking or autoclavingBeanUp to 84%[130]
Oatmeal, rice59–89%[131]
RetortingOat17[132]
Rice54
Direct steam injectionOat20–28%[133]
Indirect steamingOat13%[134]
Rice59%
BrewingBeer (barley)14–28%[105]
Coffee0–97%[122]
Coffee0–25%[119]
Coffee15–50%[124]
Table 3. The effects of extrusion on ochratoxin A (OTA) reductions in cereal grains.
Table 3. The effects of extrusion on ochratoxin A (OTA) reductions in cereal grains.
Type of ExtruderMatrixMode of Contamination and LevelMC * (%)Mass Flow (g/min)Temp. (°C)Screw Speed (rpm)Die Size (mm)OTA Reduction (%)Conditions for Maximum OTA ReductionReference
Single-screwBarley mealP. verrucosum; 0.82, 1.43, 0.74 ng/g24, 27, 30-140, 160, 18040–150317.5–86.530% MC, 180 °C, 70 s residence time[144]
Twin-screwWheat flourP. verrucosum; 8.5, 41.1 ng/g30600120, 135200, 250410.6–39.230% MC, 135 °C, 200 rpm[143]
17.5150, 180350, 40048.3–34.517.5% MC, 180 °C, 400 rpm,
P. verrucosum; 14.2 ng/g17.6–25400, 500160, 180, 200350, 400421.3–30.720% MC, 180 °C, 300 rpm, 400 g/min
P. verrucosum; 49.8 ng/g17.6–25400, 500180, 200350, 400431.6–42.217.6% MC, 180 °C, 300 rpm, 500 g/min
Twin-screwOat flakesOTA standard spiking; 100 ng/g20, 25, 3066.7140, 160, 180150, 200, 2501.5, 2, 30–2030% MC, 162 °C, 221 rpm, 3 mm[145]
Twin-screwRice flourOTA standard spiking; 100 ng/g1666.7 120, 150150, 200, 250378.4–82.216% MC, 120 °C, 200 rpm[146]
Oat flakes23160150, 200, 250339.5–42.723% MC, 160 °C, 150 rpm
* MC: moisture content, wet weight basis.
Table 4. The effects of additives during thermal food processing on ochratoxin A (OTA) reduction.
Table 4. The effects of additives during thermal food processing on ochratoxin A (OTA) reduction.
Type of AdditivesType of ProcessingType of MatrixOTA Contamination Method and LevelAmount of Additives (%) *OTA Reduction during Thermal ProcessingReferences
Without AdditivesWith AdditivesEffect of Additives
Baking sodaFryingWheat flourA. ochraceus, 93.2 and 248 ng/g0.446.3 ng/g38.8 ng/g[102]
146.5 ng/g129.0 ng/g
Direct steam injectionOat flourOTA standard spiking, 100 ng/g0.519.8–27.9%36.1–44.3%[133]
143.4–51.4%↓↓
Twin-screw extrusionRice flourOTA standard spiking, 100 ng/g0.577.9–82.2%74.9–78.2%[146]
171.5–77.4%
Oat flakes0.539.5–42.7%56.2–57.7%
164.6–65.4%
RetortingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.553.8%55.5%=[132]
166.4%
Oat flour0.517.2%30.3%
140.8%↓↓
Indirect steamingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.559.4%78.1%[134]
168.7%
Oat flour0.513.6%57.7%↓↓↓↓
172.6%↓↓↓↓
SugarGlucoseRoastingOat grainOTA standard spiking, 100 ng/g110.0%11.4%[126]
Fructose115.2%
FructoseRetortingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.553.8%38.7%[132]
518.2%↑↑↑
Oat flour0.517.2%40.8%↓↓↓
535.5%↓↓
FructoseIndirect steamingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.559.4%62.5%[134]
180.7%↓↓
566.1%
1060.0%=
Oat flour0.513.6%47.3%↓↓↓↓
169.3%↓↓↓↓
547.5%↓↓↓↓
1040.7%↓↓↓
CombinationBaking soda + FructoseRetortingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.5 + 0.553.8%35.8%[132]
Oat flour17.2%39.8%↓↓
Baking soda + FructoseIndirect steamingRice flourOTA standard spiking, 20 ng/g0.5 + 0.559.4%78.6%[134]
Oat flour13.6%67.2%↓↓↓↓
Less than 20% inhibition of reduction
↑↑Less than 50% inhibition of reduction
↑↑↑More than 50% inhibition of reduction
=No reduction
<1 times reduction
↓↓<2 times reduction
↓↓↓<3 times reduction
↓↓↓↓more than 3-times reduction
* w/w, solid basis.
Table 5. Thermal degradation products of ochratoxin A (OTA).
Table 5. Thermal degradation products of ochratoxin A (OTA).
CompoundConditions to FormAnalysisRef.
Initial OTATemp (°C)Time (min)Additive or Matrix
14R-ochratoxin A50 μg175, 200, and 2255, 10, and 20Only OTAHPLC-FLD[32]
13 mg20010Only OTAESI-MS, LC-MS/MS, NMR
14-decarboxy-ochratoxin A50 μg175, 200, and 2255, 10, and 20Only OTAHPLC-FLD
14R-ochratoxin A50 μg2255α-D-glucopyranosideHPLC-FLD[30]
14-decarboxy-ochratoxin A50 μg2255α-D-glucopyranosideHPLC-FLD
OTA-methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside ester50 μg2255α-D-glucopyranosideHPLC-FLD
2.5 mg20030α-D-glucopyranosideESI-MS, NMR
2.0 mg2409CelluloseESI-MS
5 μg/g of coffee2409Whole coffee beansLC-MS/MS
OTA cellobiose ester2.0 mg2409CelluloseESI-MS
5 μg/g of coffee2409Whole coffee beansLC-MS/MS
14R-ochratoxin A100 μg200, 220 and 2409Only OTAHPLC-FLD[29]
14-decarboxy-ochratoxin A100 μg200, 220 and 2409Only OTAHPLC-FLD
ochratoxin α amide100 μg200, 220 and 2409Only OTAHPLC-FLD/FTMS
214.4 mg24020Only OTAESI-MS, NMR, HPLC-ELSD
ochratoxin α100 μg200, 220 and 2409Only OTAHPLC-FLD/FTMS
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.J.; Kim, H.D.; Ryu, D. Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods. Toxins 2024, 16, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16010058

AMA Style

Lee HJ, Kim HD, Ryu D. Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods. Toxins. 2024; 16(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hyun Jung, Hae Dun Kim, and Dojin Ryu. 2024. "Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods" Toxins 16, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16010058

APA Style

Lee, H. J., Kim, H. D., & Ryu, D. (2024). Practical Strategies to Reduce Ochratoxin A in Foods. Toxins, 16(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop