Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanism of Ochratoxin A Transport in the Kidney
Next Article in Special Issue
Ricin Toxin Activates the NALP3 Inflammasome
Previous Article in Journal
On the Interaction of Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin with Claudins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deoxynivalenol-Induced Proinflammatory Gene Expression: Mechanisms and Pathological Sequelae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 2
Issue 6
10.3390/toxins2061357
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Revisited Target for Toxins

by
Jeanette I. Webster Marketon
1,2,* and
Esther M. Sternberg
3
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, 201 DHLRI, 473 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University Medical Center, 460 Medical Center Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3
Department of Health and Human Services, Section on Neuroendocrine Immunology and Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 5625 Fishers Lane, Rm. 4N13 (MSC 9401), Bethesda, MD 20892-9401, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2010, 2(6), 1357-1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2061357
Submission received: 15 May 2010 / Accepted: 7 June 2010 / Published: 9 June 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Properties of Well-Characterized Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation and glucocorticoid responses are critical for survival from a number of bacterial, viral and toxic insults, demonstrated by the fact that removal of the HPA axis or GR blockade enhances mortality rates. Replacement with synthetic glucocorticoids reverses these effects by providing protection against lethal effects. Glucocorticoid resistance/insensitivity is a common problem in the treatment of many diseases. Much research has focused on the molecular mechanism behind this resistance, but an area that has been neglected is the role of infectious agents and toxins. We have recently shown that the anthrax lethal toxin is able to repress glucocorticoid receptor function. Data suggesting that the glucocorticoid receptor may be a target for a variety of toxins is reviewed here. These studies have important implications for glucocorticoid therapy.

1. Introduction

Bacterial and viral infections result in a cascade of events called the acute phase response resulting in inflammation, and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis with eventual restoration of host homeostasis. The acute phase response is a general response that occurs following exposure to infection, trauma or other noxious insults including toxins and includes induction of liver proteins, activation of hormonal responses, and local inflammation. Bacterial toxins and venoms are known to induce local inflammation and the acute phase response [1,2,3,4]. For an in depth review on the acute phase response induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) see Berczi (1998) [5].

2. The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis and Glucocorticoid Responses

The brain and immune systems communicate via a bi-directional system through cytokines from the immune system to the brain [6] and through hormonal pathways from the brain to immune cells [7,8]. These hormonal pathways include the HPA axis with a resultant release of glucocorticoids [8] and the sympathetic, parasympathetic, and peripheral nervous systems. This review will focus on the HPA axis and glucocorticoids, but for a review on the autonomic and sympathetic nervous systems see the recent reviews by Bellinger and Rosas-Ballina [9,10]. Following inflammatory, physical, or psychosocial stimulation, corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) is released from the cells of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus into the hypophyseal blood supply. In turn, this stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary gland into the blood stream. At the adrenals, the synthesis and release of glucocorticoids is stimulated by ACTH. Glucocorticoids negatively regulate the HPA axis by feedback mechanisms at the level of the hypothalamus and pituitary (Figure 1). Glucocorticoids (cortisol in humans and corticosterone in rodents) are the body’s natural anti-inflammatory agents. However, immune regulation is not the only function of glucocorticoids, they are also essential for the regulation of several homeostatic mechanisms in the body, including the central nervous system, cardiovascular system and metabolism. The precise mechanism of how glucocorticoids regulate the immune system will not be discussed here in detail, as this has been the subject of another review [8].

2.1. Disruption of the HPA Axis/Glucocorticoid Responses Increases Mortality

Animal models have demonstrated the critical need for an intact HPA axis and glucocorticoid response for survival from a number of insults including bacterial and viral infections and toxins. Removal of endogenous glucocorticoids by adrenalectomy, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist RU486, or interruption of the HPA axis by hypophysectomy, significantly enhances mortality from endotoxin or LPS, Shiga toxin, and normally non-lethal doses of the bacterial superantigen Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Removal of endogenous glucocorticoid responses by RU486 or adrenalectomy also resulted in enhanced Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced fluid secretion and inflammation [20,21]. These effects of loss of HPA axis or GR function could be reversed by exogenous replacement of glucocorticoids. A physiological dose of corticosterone resulted in an inflammatory response following Clostridium difficile toxin A that was equivalent to sham-operated animals, whilst replacement with a high pharmacological corticosterone dose resulted in a reduction of the inflammatory response [20]. Survival rates of BALB/c mice from Shiga toxin 2 were enhanced by 18 hour pre-treatment of either LPS or dexamethasone whereas only one hour of LPS pre-treatment decreased survival rates. This enhanced mortality with one hour pre-treatment of LPS correlated with increased pro-inflammatory mediators, such as TNFα. In fact, pre-treatment with TNFα also decreased survival to Shiga toxin 2. The protection afforded by the 18 hour LPS pre-treatment condition was shown to be due to the increased endogenous corticosterone production secondary to LPS-induced IL-1β activation of the HPA axis [22]. Furthermore, dexamethasone treatment reversed the increased Shiga toxin-induced mortality in adrenalectomized animals [17]. Likewise, administration of exogenous dexamethasone protected adrenalectomized BALB/c mice from bacterial superantigen SEB lethality [18]. Administration of dexamethasone to F344/N rats treated with RU486 similarly prevented mortality from streptococcal bacterial cell walls [19]. Dexamethasone, but not the natural glucocorticoids, corticosterone and deoxycorticosterone, reversed LPS-induced mortality in adrenalectomized animals, suggesting that synthetic glucocorticoids are more effective than endogenous glucocorticoids in protecting against endotoxin/LPS lethality [13,16]. Increased cytokine production, particularly TNFα is the most likely cause of enhanced LPS/endotoxin-induced mortality following removal of endogenous glucocorticoids or HPA axis blockade [13,23]. Increases in cytokine levels (TNFα and IL-6) following LPS/endotoxin administration are enhanced further by HPA axis blockade (adrenalectomy or RU486) and can be reversed by glucocorticoid treatment [12,24]. Finally, the requirement for an intact glucocorticoid response for survival from endotoxin is further demonstrated by the fact that GR over-expression in mice renders them resistant to LPS-induced endotoxic shock [25].
Toxins 02 01357 g001 1024
Figure 1. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Solid arrows depict positive interactions. Broken arrows indicate an inhibitory interaction. Reproduced with permission from Annual Reviews [8].
Figure 1. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Solid arrows depict positive interactions. Broken arrows indicate an inhibitory interaction. Reproduced with permission from Annual Reviews [8].
Toxins 02 01357 g001
In agreement with the above studies which support the role for an intact HPA axis and glucocorticoid response in survival from a toxic insult, we have shown that adrenalectomy increases lethality to anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx) in BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J and the normally LeTx resistant DBA/2J mice [26]. Likewise, RU486 exacerbated lethality in Balb/cJ mice. However, this could not be reversed by dexamethasone or aldosterone administration [26] suggesting that a careful balance of the HPA axis and glucocorticoid response is required for survival from LeTx.

2.2. Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR)

Glucocorticoids exert their many effects through a cytosolic receptor, GR, a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, which also includes the thyroid hormone, mineralocorticoid (MR), estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) [27]. In the absence of ligand, GR is located in the cytoplasm in a protein complex that includes Hsp90 and Hsp70. Upon ligand activation, GR is released from the protein complex, dimerizes, and translocates to the nucleus where it binds to specific DNA sequences called glucocorticoid response elements (GRE) (Figure 2). Thus, GR functions as a ligand-dependent transcription factor [28]. GR is able to upregulate gene expression through direct DNA binding, for example the gluconeogenic enzyme tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) whose promoter contains a consensus GRE sequence [29]. GR can also bind to negative GREs (nGRE) to repress gene activation, such as for the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene [30]. However, GR primarily represses gene transcription by interfering with the action of other signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) (Figure 2), and it is through this mechanism that glucocorticoids exert many of their anti-inflammatory actions [31,32]. GR is essential for life. Mice lacking GR die shortly after birth due to a defect in lung maturation [33]. However, it appears that the anti-inflammatory actions of GR associated with its ability to interfere with other signaling mechanisms may be the most critical for survival. Dimerization knockout mice (GRdim/dim) are viable [34]. In these mice GRE-mediated gene activation, which is entirely dependent on GR dimerization, is removed but GR interactions with NFκB and AP-1, which are independent of dimerization, are still possible.
GR mutations exist and play a role in glucocorticoid resistance [35]. However, there are multiple steps in the GR signaling pathway that if defective could also cause glucocorticoid resistance/insensitivity. Included in these possible mechanisms are the disruption of GR signaling, reduced GR numbers [36], abnormal expression of Hsp90 [37,38,39,40], enhanced expression of the dominant negative splice variant of GR, GRβ [41,42,43,44,45], dysregulation of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11β-HSD) [46], defective GR nuclear translocation [47,48,49], cofactor defects [50,51], increased multidrug resistance (MDR) protein expression [52,53,54,55,56,57,58], reduced histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity [59,60], and p38 phosphorylation of GR [47]. However the role of viral and bacterial infections and toxins in glucocorticoid resistance has been largely neglected. We have recently shown that the anthrax LeTx represses GR function. In addition, it has long been known that bacterial endotoxin or LPS also affects GR function.
Toxins 02 01357 g002 1024
Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrating the mechanism of action of the glucocorticoid receptor. Solid arrows depict positive interactions. Broken arrows indicate inhibitory interactions. Reproduced with permission from Annual Reviews [8].
Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrating the mechanism of action of the glucocorticoid receptor. Solid arrows depict positive interactions. Broken arrows indicate inhibitory interactions. Reproduced with permission from Annual Reviews [8].
Toxins 02 01357 g002

3. Effect of Bacterial Toxins on GR

Bacterial toxins are defined as a toxic substance made by bacteria. Bacterial toxins can be divided into exotoxins, that are generated by the bacteria and are secreted, and endotoxins, that are a part of the bacteria itself. Examples of exotoxins from Gram positive bacterium are clostridia toxins, bacterial superantigens, and the anthrax toxins. Shiga toxin is an exotoxin from a Gram negative bacterium. LPS is an example of an endotoxin. The effect of bacterial toxins on GR function are reviewed below and summarized in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Effect of bacterial toxins on the glucocorticoid receptor.
Table 1. Effect of bacterial toxins on the glucocorticoid receptor.
ToxinEffect on GRReference
Aflatoxin B1Decreases glucocorticoid induction of liver ribonucleic acid synthesis[61]
Decreases nuclear GR ligand binding[62,63]
Decreases glucocorticoid induction of liver enzymes[64,65]
Anthrax lethal toxinRepresses GR-mediated gene activation[66,67]
Clostridial toxinsRepresses GR-induced gene activation[68]
Prevents glucocorticoid repression of cytokine production[68]
Endotoxin/LPSImpairs glucocorticoid regulation of liver enzymes[69,70,71,72]
Decreases GR ligand binding[11,70,71,72,73,74,75]
Decreases GR numbers and affinity in lungs[76]
Increases GR numbers but decreases affinity in bronchial epithelial cell line[77]
Reduces glucocorticoid induction of GR responsive promoter in cell culture[78,79,80]
Increases GR numbers in murine macrophages[81]
No effect on hepatic GR numbers or affinity[82]
Shiga toxinIncreases GR numbers in neutrophils[17]
SuperantigenInduces glucocorticoid resistance[83,84,85]
Impairs GR nuclear translocation[84]
Induces GRβ[83,86,87]

3.1. Anthrax Lethal Toxin

Bacillus anthracis produces three proteins – protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF) and edema factor (EF), which constitute two toxins. LF and PA combined constitute LeTx and EF and PA the edema toxin. We have shown that LeTx is able to repress the GR and other nuclear hormone receptors. LeTx represses glucocorticoid induction of a GR-responsive promoter in Cos7 cells and glucocorticoid induction of the GR-regulated liver enzyme, TAT in a hepatoma cell line and in an animal model [26,66,67] but does not affect GR-mediated gene repression [67]. LeTx also represses ERα, PR, MR and androgen receptor (AR) in a promoter-specific context [66,67]. LeTx is a metalloprotease that is known to cleave and inactivate mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [88,89,90,91,92]. A protease deficient mutant of LeTx did not repress GR-mediated gene activation suggesting that the protease activity was required for the repressive effects on GR [66]. However, LeTx did not alter GR protein levels suggesting that GR itself is not a direct target for LeTx-mediated proteolysis [67]. LeTx acts as a non-competitive inhibitor of GR and has no affect on GR-ligand binding [66]. It does not affect nuclear translocation but does prevent GR-DNA binding [67]. Recently we have shown that LeTx also represses induction of the GR-responsive MMTV promoter by other transcription factors including HNF3, Oct1 and AP-1. This repression was not observed with the protease deficient LeTx mutant and could be prevented by inhibitors of LeTx protease activity. Unlike the effects on GR, LeTx induced proteolysis of these transcription factors but at a much later stage than the well-documented LeTx-mediated proteolysis of MAPKs [93]. These data suggest that LeTx represses multiple transcription factors including GR through different mechanisms.

3.2. Endotoxin/LPS

LPS or endotoxin is the principal component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. LPS signals through the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to activate the MAPK pathways and the NFκB pathway leading to induction of many inflammatory genes [94]. An excessive inflammatory response to LPS can lead to sepsis, septic shock or systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
It has long been known that endotoxin or LPS alters GR-regulated liver enzymes. Since the early 1980s there have been reports of decreased glucocorticoid induction of liver enzymes, including, glucose-6-phosphatase, fructose-1,6-diphosphatase, phosphenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), tryptophan oxygenase (TO) and TAT, by endotoxin [69,70,71,72]. Several studies have shown that endotoxin decreases steroid binding sites in liver cytosol [11,70,72,73]. These effects were not only observed in liver but also in other tissues including murine macrophages [74], kidney, skeletal muscle, spleen, lung, heart tissue [70], canine leukocytes [75] and sheep lungs [76]. Despite the number of studies that found an effect of LPS/endotoxin on GR ligand binding, other studies could find no effect of endotoxin on number or affinity of hepatic GR suggesting that down-regulation of receptors is not involved in endotoxin inhibition of glucocorticoid-induced hepatic genes but acts at a stage downstream of ligand binding [82]. In addition, GR numbers were shown to increase after LPS treatment in murine Raw 264.7 and peritoneal macrophages [81] and in a bronchial epithelial cell line [77]. In cell culture, LPS also inhibited glucocorticoid induction of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in the fibroblast LMCAT cell line [78,79,80]. Although there are some discrepancies, the majority of the data support the hypothesis that endotoxin/LPS represses GR function. Whether this is at the level of ligand binding or further downstream is debated.
It is not entirely clear if the effects of LPS on GR are mediated directly by LPS or through an intermediate factor. Early studies showed that endotoxin-induced downregulation of hepatic GR was mediated by plasma factors [73]. Berry and colleagues described a glucocorticoid-antagonizing factor (GAF) which was released by macrophages following endotoxin challenge [95]. GAF was shown to reduce liver glycogen levels [96] and inhibit PEPCK activity [95,97]. It was described as a 90 kDa glycoprotein [98] but its exact components have never been fully identified and there has been no mention of it in the literature since 1990. However, it should be noted that the glucocorticoid inhibitory properties of GAF are remarkably similar to cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1 and to macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) that are also released from macrophages following endotoxin challenge [99,100,101].
Pro-inflammatory cytokines have also been shown to modulate GR function. IL-1 decreases steroid binding in liver cytosol [102] and in hepatoma cells and also inhibits glucocorticoid induction of PEPCK [103]. A combination of IL-2 and IL-4, or IL-1β and IL-13 reduces GR affinity [77,104,105]. IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IFNγ and TNFα increased GR numbers [77,106,107,108]. IL-1α inhibited dexamethasone induced GR nuclear translocation and GR–mediated gene transcription [106]. IL-13 prevented glucocorticoid suppression of LPS-induced IL-6 [105]. In addition, the effects of LPS on GR could be mediated through induction of other signaling pathways such as NFκB, AP-1 and MAPK, all of which are known to crosstalk with GR. A mutual antagonism exists between the GR signaling pathway and the AP-1 pathway [109,110,111], as well as the NFκB [112] and MAPK pathways. LPS-induced inhibition of corticosterone induction of CAT activity in LMCAT cells could be reversed by p38 MAPK inhibitors [79] suggesting that the LPS effect was mediated though p38 MAPK. Thus, the effects of endotoxin/LPS may not be mediated directly by LPS, but may be a result of the cytokine production following LPS challenge or induction of other signaling pathways.

3.3. Shiga Toxin

Shiga toxins are a family of related toxins with two major groups – Stx1 and Stx2. There are few studies investigating the effect of this toxin on GR. One study did note that Stx2 caused an increase in GR numbers in circulating neutrophils [17]. The reason for, and the consequence of, this increase is unclear.

3.4. Bacterial Superantigens

Bacterial superantigens are a class of antigens which cause non-specific T-cell activation. The bacterial superantigens, SEB, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) and Staphylococcus aureaus enterotoxin E (SEE) induced glucocorticoid resistance (as determined by the anti-proliferative effects of glucocorticoids) in PBMCs [83,84,85]. SEB impairs GR nuclear translocation in PBMCs [84] and also induces expression of GRβ [83,86,87]. In another study TSST-1 was shown to reduce glucocorticoid induction of FKBP51 mRNA, a known GR regulated gene, through a mechanism involving Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [85]. These data suggest that bacterial superantigens interfere with GR signaling.

3.5. Clostridia Toxins

The lethal toxin from Clostridium sordellii (TcsL) and toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) from Clostridium difficile repress GR-mediated gene activation. TcsL also prevents dexamethasone inhibition of LPS-induced TNFα production in splenocytes. This effect is suggested to occur through inhibition of p38 MAPK as these toxins all prevent phosphorylation of p38 MAPK [68].

4. Effect of Mycotoxins and Plant Toxins on GR

Mycotoxins are toxic metabolites produced by fungi. In the early 1970s, the mycotoxin aflatoxin B1 produced by many species of the fungus Aspergillus was shown to inhibit cortisol-stimulated liver ribonucleic acid synthesis [61]. It was suggested that aflatoxin exerted its effects directly on RNA polymerase [113] by decreasing the interactions with chromatin within the same region that is stimulated by glucocorticoids [61]. Others have shown that aflatoxin reduces nuclear GR binding sites [62,63] and inhibits glucocorticoid induction of the liver enzymes, TAT, tryptophan pyrrolase and tyrosine transaminase [64,65]. Interestingly there has been no research performed on the effect of aflatoxin on GR since 1988. In addition, the mycotoxin phomopsin produced by Phomopsis leptostromiformis and the sesquiterpene lactone ivalin from the “vomiting bush” Geigeria have no effect on GR ligand binding capacity in human breast cancer or in rat liver [114,115] but decrease GR binding capacity in MCF7 cells [114]. These data suggest that some mycotoxins and plant toxins may also alter GR function although the mechanism is unknown.

5. Effect of Environmental and Chemical Toxins on GR

The effect of environmental toxins on GR is not well appreciated. There is considerable data suggesting an effect of heavy metals on GR (Table 2). In addition, smoking has recently been described to affect GR function (Table 3).
Table
Table 2. Effect of heavy metals on the glucocorticoid receptor.
Table 2. Effect of heavy metals on the glucocorticoid receptor.
ToxinEffect on GRReference
ArsenicLow dose represses GR-mediated gene activation[116,117,118,119,120]
Inhibits GR ligand binding[121,122,123,124,125]
Extreme low dose enhances GR-mediated gene activation[117,118,119]
Reduces CARM1 binding to GR-regulated promoter[116]
BerylliumInhibits glucocorticoid induction of liver enzymes[126,127]
CadmiumLow dose reduces GR-mediated gene activation[121,128]
High dose enhances GR-mediated activation[121]
Inhibits GR ligand binding in liver[121,124]
Inhibits GR DNA binding in liver[121]
ChromiumExtreme low dose enhances GC-induced liver enzymes[119,129]
Decreases glucocorticoid-induced liver genes[119,129]
LeadInhibits glucocorticoid induction of liver genes[130]
MercuryReduces glucocorticoid induction of liver genes[131]
Decreases GR ligand binding[132]
Enhances interaction between GR and Hsp proteins[133]
Enhances GR-responsive MMTV promoter[134]
SeleniteInhibits GR ligand binding[123,135]
Decreases glucocorticoid induction of GR-regulated genes[85]
ZincReduces GR ligand binding in liver[136]
Enhances GR-responsive MMTV promoter[134]
Table
Table 3. Effect of cigarette smoke on the glucocorticoid receptor.
Table 3. Effect of cigarette smoke on the glucocorticoid receptor.
Effect on GRReference
Reduces GR ligand binding affinity in bronchial epithelial cells[137]
No difference in GR mRNA levels in bronchial epithelial cells[138]
Reduces GRα protein levels in mouse lungs exposed to cigarette smoke[139]
No difference in GRα/β mRNA levels in bronchial epithelial cells[138]
Reduces GR α/β protein levels in PBMCs[140]
Reduces CYP3A5 expression in alveolar macrophages[141]
Inhibits glucocorticoid-induction of ENaC mRNA[142]
Inhibits glucocorticoid repression of cytokine production in BAL macrophages[143]
Inhibits HDAC2 expression and activity[143]

5.1. Heavy Metals

Since the early 1990s, heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, zinc, mercury, chromium, selenium, lead and beryllium have been reported to affect GR function. These are reviewed below.
Arsenic. Arsenic is a well known poisonous metalloid, which together with its compounds arsenide and arsenate are commonly found in pesticides, herbicides and alloys. Arsenic can be found in groundwater and has been associated with increased cancer rates in those areas [144]. Arsenic has a biphasic effect on GR function. Extremely low doses enhance glucocorticoid induction of the endogenous GR regulated genes TAT and PEPCK [117,118,119]. Whereas low doses decrease GR-mediated gene activation of a transiently transfected promoter and of endogenous TAT and PEPCK [116,117,118,119,120]. Arsenic does not affect GR-mediated gene repression [118]. This inhibitory effect on GR-induced transcription does not alter GR nuclear translocation [120], total GR protein levels [117], and does not require dimerization [117]. It does require the GR DNA binding domain and can be abolished by mutations in that region [118]. Arsenic reduces the “open” structure of the nucleosomes on the MMTV promoter in response to dexamethasone and causes changes in post translational modifications of histones [116]. Reduced binding of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase (CARM1), but not GRIP1, was seen in cells treated with arsenic and over-expression of CARM1 reversed the arsenic repression of GR-induced genes [116]. These data suggest that arsenic represses GR receptor function by interfering with CARM1, a coregulator involved in GR-mediated gene activation. In addition, arsenite, an arsenic oxoanion, inhibits GR ligand binding by interacting with the vincinal thiols in the ligand binding region of GR and thereby preventing ligand binding [124,125].
Cadmium. Cadmium is a highly toxic metal which until recently was routinely used either as a pigment or in the steel industry. Due to the associated health and environmental concerns its use is declining. Like arsenic, cadmium exhibits a biphasic effect on GR function. Low doses reduce GR ligand binding capacity and inhibit GR-induction of the GR responsive MMTV promoter and the endogenous GR regulated gene TAT in rat liver [121,128]. However, higher doses enhance glucocorticoid activation of TAT [121]. Cadmium (administered in vivo) reduces GR ligand and DNA binding in rat liver [121]. Interestingly, the same investigators also reported that cadmium reduced GR ligand binding in liver cytosol only in vitro and not in vivo and that the lack of an effect of the in vivo experiments was due to over-expression of Hsp90 [122]. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. Other investigators have also shown that Cadmium (II) can inhibit steroid binding to GR [123,124]. The effects of this cadmium ion on GR appear to act through the redox state of the receptor as they can be reversed by the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT) [124,128]. Cadmium, like arsenite, binds to the vicinal dithiols in the ligand binding region of GR, thereby preventing ligand binding [124]. These data suggest that cadmium affects GR function through interference of GR ligand and DNA binding, possibly due to changes in the redox state of the receptor.
Zinc. GR is a zinc-finger protein which contains two zinc molecules. Zinc is an essential mineral and commonly found in many biological enzymes and transcription factors. However, excessive zinc can result in ataxia, lethargy and copper deficiency. Zinc administration reduces glucocorticoid ligand binding in liver cytosols. As with cadmium, this could be inhibited by the reducing agent DTT, suggesting the involvement of dithiols in the ligand binding region [136]. In 2305 cells, zinc increases dexamethasone induction of the GR-responsive MMTV promoter possibly through a metallothionein‑mediated pathway [134]. Although not well described, zinc may have effects on GR function.
Mercury. Administration of mercury reduces glucocorticoid induction of the endogenous GR regulated gene TAT in rat livers [131]. Mercury decreases GR ligand binding in liver and kidney which could be reversed by DTT, suggesting the involvement of thiol groups [132]. Mercury also increases the interaction between the GR apo-receptor and Hsp70 and Hsp90 [133]. As for Zinc, mercury increases dexamethasone induction of the GR-responsive MMTV promoter in 2305 cells [134].
Other metals. There are a few indications that other heavy metals may also affect GR function. Extremely low levels of chromium enhance dexamethasone induction whereas higher levels repress dexamethasone induction of PEPCK [119,129]. Selenite, a selenium-containing ion, inhibits GR ligand binding and can be reversed by DTT [123,135]. Lead inhibits glucocorticoid induction of TAT in liver hepatoma cells [130] and low concentrations of beryllium inhibit glucocorticoid induction of TAT and ornithine decarboxylase [126,127].
These data suggest that heavy metals can affect GR function. In some cases (arsenite, cadmium (II), zinc, and selenite) the mechanism is through effects on the thiol groups in the ligand binding pocket of GR. The other effects, with the exception of arsenic, have not been well elucidated.

5.2. Cigarette Smoke

The effects of smoking on GR function have recently been described. Cigarette smoke contains components such as tar, ammonia, formaldehyde, cadmium, arsenic, and nicotine. As such it could be considered an environmental toxin and is worthy of review here. Differences in GR numbers/affinity and isoforms have been shown between smokers and non-smokers. Human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) from smokers contained GRs with a lower ligand binding affinity than non-smokers but with no changes in GR numbers [137]. In one study GR mRNA levels were decreased in COPD patients but there was no difference between smokers and non-smokers and no difference in the GRα/β mRNA ratio in bronchial epithelial cells [138]. However, another study showed that smoking reduced the GRα/β protein ratios in PBMCs both in normal healthy volunteers and in asthmatics [140]. In mice exposed to cigarette smoke a decrease in GRα protein was observed in the lungs [139]. Thus, there seems to be reduced GR protein levels in smokers and an increase in the presence of the dominant negative GRβ isoform. In addition, there are studies suggesting that GR-mediated gene regulation is altered with smoking. Smokers with respiratory disease had a lower amount of CYP3A5, a GR regulated gene, in their alveolar macrophages [141]. Cigarette smoke condensate also inhibits dexamethasone induction of ENaC mRNA in HAE cells [142] and cigarette smoke inhibits dexamethasone repression of IL-1β-induced TNFα and IL-8 in BAL macrophages [143]. This effect on GR suppression of cytokines has been suggested to involve histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2). Cigarette smoke reduces expression of HDAC2 and HDAC activity, which correlates with the reduced suppression of IL-1β-induced cytokines [143]. This smoking-induced glucocorticoid insensitivity could be mimicked by HDAC inhibitors and hydrogen peroxide [143] and reversed by inhibition of PI3Kδ [139]. This suggests that smoking, through PI3Kδ, reduces the levels and activity of HDAC2, which, in turn inhibits GR-mediated gene repression.

6. Effect of Toxins on Other Nuclear Hormone Receptors

In addition, to their effect on GR, some toxins have been shown to affect other nuclear receptors and transcription factors. This will not be reviewed here, but the best studied is the effect of endocrine disruptors [145].

7. Clinical Relevance

Some diseases for which glucocorticoids are used have been associated with the presence of toxins. In some of these the use of glucocorticoids are controversial, such as sepsis, and in some, such as asthma, glucocorticoid resistance/insensitivity has been described. Bacterial superantigens have been implicated in Kawasaki disease [146]. This is an autoimmune disease seen largely in children under five. Glucocorticoids have been used in therapy but some studies have shown no benefit over standard immunoglobulin and aspirin therapy [147]. Bacterial superantigens have also been suggested to play a role in rheumatoid arthritis [148], asthma [149], atopic dermatitis [150] and rhinosinusitis [86,87], all of which have been associated with glucocorticoid resistance/insensitivity [87,151,152,153,154]. Clostridia toxins have been associated with septic shock following abortion using the GR antagonist RU486 [155,156,157,158,159].
Glucocorticoids are commonly used for respiratory diseases but their usefulness in COPD, for which smoking is a major risk factor, is limited [138,160,161]. In addition, smoking asthmatics also show glucocorticoid resistance [162,163,164,165,166]. Even in smokers without significant airway disease glucocorticoids had no benefit on airway inflammation [167].
The use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of septic shock has been a matter of controversy since the 1950s. In some instances they have been shown to enhance survival rates whereas in others they have been shown to enhance mortality. The pros and cons of glucocorticoid therapy have recently been reviewed in detail [168] and will not be reviewed here. However, it is generally now accepted that high doses of glucocorticoids are not effective in the treatment of septic shock while prolonged low doses may be beneficial [169] but the latter is still debated [168]. It has been reported that adrenal insufficiency is common particularly in septic shock patients with a low cortisol baseline [170,171]. It is also possible that there are differences in glucocorticoid sensitivity at the level of the receptor during septic shock [172]. In one study, enhanced sensitivity of peripheral leukocytes to glucocorticoids has been noted [173]. In another, a decreased affinity was noted [174]. Therefore the use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of septic shock may be dependent on the stage of the sepsis, the reactivity of the HPA axis, particularly the adrenals, and the sensitivity of GR to the ligand. Taken together these variables make the effects of the therapeutic use of glucocorticoids in septic shock difficult to predict.
Finally, the effect of toxins on GR function in disease states where there is known exacerbation of the HPA axis or during stress have not been well studied. However, it should be noted that in many of these diseases changes in glucocorticoid sensitivity have been reported, including glucocorticoid resistance in asthma [151], prenatal stress effects on HPA axis [175], effects of social stress on asthma [176], which further complicate the system.

8. Conclusions

An intact HPA axis and resultant glucocorticoid release is necessary for host survival from exposure to an infectious or toxin insult. It has now been shown in the case of several toxins, that interruption of the HPA axis, either by hypophysectomy, adrenalectomy, inhibition of glucocorticoid synthesis, or by the use of the GR antagonist RU486, can enhance lethality, and replacement with glucocorticoids can prevent these effects.
Glucocorticoid resistance/insensitivity occurs in many diseases for which glucocorticoids are used as treatment. Much research has focused on the molecular mechanism behind this resistance/insensitivity but one area that has been neglected is the role of infectious agents or toxins in mediating glucocorticoid resistance. We have recently shown that a bacterial toxin, the anthrax lethal toxin, represses GR function. We review here the literature on other toxins and their interactions with GR. Interestingly other bacterial toxins such as endotoxin/LPS and aflatoxin have been shown to repress glucocorticoid induction of liver enzymes and GR ligand binding but the research has not progressed further. This may be due to the fact that this research was primarily done in the 1970s and early 1980s and the gene for GR was only cloned in 1985 [177]. We also review the known literature on environmental toxins including heavy metals and cigarette smoke. The effect of these toxins on GR could have clinical relevance for the usefulness of glucocorticoid therapy in many diseases including sepsis, asthma, and COPD.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Estelle Cormet-Boyaka for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. Pessini, A.C.; de Souza, A.M.; Faccioli, L.H.; Gregorio, Z.M.; Arantes, E.C. Time course of acute-phase response induced by Tityus serrulatus venom and TsTX-I in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2003, 3, 765–774. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barros, S.F.; Friedlanskaia, I.; Petricevich, V.L.; Kipnis, T.L. Local inflammation, lethality and cytokine release in mice injected with Bothrops atrox venom. Mediat. Inflamm. 1998, 7, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, J.; Wang, A.; Ansari, S.; Hershberg, R.M.; McKay, D.M. Colonic bacterial superantigens evoke an inflammatory response and exaggerate disease in mice recovering from colitis. Gastroenterology 2003, 125, 1785–1795. [Google Scholar]
  4. Teixeira Cde, F.; Fernandes, C.M.; Zuliani, J.P.; Zamuner, S.F. Inflammatory effects of snake venom metalloproteinases. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2005, 100, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berczi, I. Neurohormonal host defense in endotoxin shock. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 840, 787–802. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haddad, J.J. On the mechanisms and putative pathways involving neuroimmune interactions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 370, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  7. Marques-Deak, A.; Cizza, G.; Sternberg, E. Brain-immune interactions and disease susceptibility. Mol. Psychiatr. 2005, 10, 239–250. [Google Scholar]
  8. Webster, J.I.; Tonelli, L.; Sternberg, E.M. Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 20, 125–163. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bellinger, D.L.; Millar, B.A.; Perez, S.; Carter, J.; Wood, C.; ThyagaRajan, S.; Molinaro, C.; Lubahn, C.; Lorton, D. Sympathetic modulation of immunity: Relevance to disease. Cell. Immunol. 2008, 252, 27–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosas-Ballina, M.; Tracey, K.J. The neurology of the immune system: Neural reflexes regulate immunity. Neuron 2009, 64, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  11. McCallum, R.E.; Stith, R.D. Endotoxin-induced inhibition of steroid binding by mouse liver cytosol. Circ. Shock 1982, 9, 357–367. [Google Scholar]
  12. Morrow, L.E.; McClellan, J.L.; Conn, C.A.; Kluger, M.J. Glucocorticoids alter fever and IL-6 responses to psychological stress and to lipopolysaccharide. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 264, R1010–R1016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler, L.D.; Layman, N.K.; Riedl, P.E.; Cain, R.L.; Shellhaas, J.; Evans, G.F.; Zuckerman, S.H. Neuroendocrine regulation of in vivo cytokine production and effects: I. In vivo regulatory networks involving the neuroendocrine system, interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J. Neuroimmunol. 1989, 24, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Coelho, M.M.; Souza, G.E.; Pela, I.R. Endotoxin-induced fever is modulated by endogenous glucocorticoids in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 263, R423–R427. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakano, K.; Suzuki, S.; Oh, C. Significance of increased secretion of glucocorticoids in mice and rats injected with bacterial endotoxin. Brain Behav. Immun. 1987, 1, 159–172. [Google Scholar]
  16. Silverstein, R.; Hannah, P.; Johnson, D.C. Natural adrenocorticosteroids do not restore resistance to endotoxin in the adrenalectomized mouse. Circ. Shock 1993, 41, 162–165. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gomez, S.A.; Fernandez, G.C.; Vanzulli, S.; Dran, G.; Rubel, C.; Berki, T.; Isturiz, M.A.; Palermo, M.S. Endogenous glucocorticoids attenuate Shiga toxin-2-induced toxicity in a mouse model of haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2003, 131, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gonzalo, J.A.; Gonzalez-Garcia, A.; Kalland, T.; Hedlund, G.; Martinez, C.; Kroemer, G. Linomide, a novel immunomodulator that prevents death in four models of septic shock. Eur. J. Immunol. 1993, 23, 2372–2374. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sternberg, E.M.; Hill, J.M.; Chrousos, G.P.; Kamilaris, T.; Listwak, S.J.; Gold, P.W.; Wilder, R.L. Inflammatory mediator-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation is defective in streptococcal cell wall arthritis-susceptible Lewis rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 2374–2378. [Google Scholar]
  20. Castagliuolo, I.; Karalis, K.; Valenick, L.; Pasha, A.; Nikulasson, S.; Wlk, M.; Pothoulakis, C. Endogenous corticosteroids modulate Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced enteritis in rats. Amer. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest L. 2001, 280, G539–G545. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mykoniatis, A.; Anton, P.M.; Wlk, M.; Wang, C.C.; Ungsunan, L.; Bluher, S.; Venihaki, M.; Simeonidis, S.; Zacks, J.; Zhao, D.; Sougioultzis, S.; Karalis, K.; Mantzoros, C.; Pothoulakis, C. Leptin mediates Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced enteritis in mice. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 683–691. [Google Scholar]
  22. Palermo, M.; Alves-Rosa, F.; Rubel, C.; Fernandez, G.C.; Fernandez-Alonso, G.; Alberto, F.; Rivas, M.; Isturiz, M. Pretreatment of mice with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or IL-1beta exerts dose-dependent opposite effects on Shiga toxin-2 lethality. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2000, 119, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lazar, G., Jr.; Duda, E.; Lazar, G. Effect of RU 38486 on TNF production and toxicity. FEBS Lett. 1992, 308, 137–140. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hawes, A.S.; Rock, C.S.; Keogh, C.V.; Lowry, S.F.; Calvano, S.E. In vivo effects of the antiglucocorticoid RU 486 on glucocorticoid and cytokine responses to Escherichia coli endotoxin. Infect. Immun. 1992, 60, 2641–2647. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reichardt, H.M.; Umland, T.; Bauer, A.; Kretz, O.; Schutz, G. Mice with an increased glucocorticoid receptor gene dosage show enhanced resistance to stress and endotoxic shock. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 9009–9017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moayeri, M.; Webster, J.I.; Wiggins, J.F.; Leppla, S.H.; Sternberg, E.M. Endocrine perturbation increases susceptibility of mice to anthrax lethal toxin. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 4238–4244. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu, N.Z.; Wardell, S.E.; Burnstein, K.L.; Defranco, D.; Fuller, P.J.; Giguere, V.; Hochberg, R.B.; McKay, L.; Renoir, J.M.; Weigel, N.L.; Wilson, E.M.; McDonnell, D.P.; Cidlowski, J.A. International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The pharmacology and classification of the nuclear receptor superfamily: Glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, progesterone, and androgen receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 782–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Aranda, A.; Pascual, A. Nuclear hormone receptors and gene expression. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 1269–1304. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jantzen, H.M.; Strahle, U.; Gloss, B.; Stewart, F.; Schmid, W.; Boshart, M.; Miksicek, R.; Schutz, G. Cooperativity of glucocorticoid response elements located far upstream of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene. Cell 1987, 49, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Drouin, J.; Trifiro, M.A.; Plante, R.K.; Nemer, M.; Eriksson, P.; Wrange, O. Glucocorticoid receptor binding to a specific DNA sequence is required for hormone-dependent repression of pro-opiomelanocortin gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989, 9, 5305–5314. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kassel, O.; Herrlich, P. Crosstalk between the glucocorticoid receptor and other transcription factors: Molecular aspects. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2007, 275, 13–29. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karin, M.; Chang, L. AP-1-glucocorticoid receptor crosstalk taken to a higher level. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 169, 447–451. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cole, T.J.; Blendy, J.A.; Monaghan, A.P.; Krieglstein, K.; Schmid, W.; Aguzzi, A.; Fantuzzi, G.; Hummler, E.; Unsicker, K.; Schutz, G. Targeted disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene blocks adrenergic chromaffin cell development and severely retards lung maturation. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1608–1621. [Google Scholar]
  34. Reichardt, H.M.; Kaestner, K.H.; Tuckermann, J.; Kretz, O.; Wessely, O.; Bock, R.; Gass, P.; Schmid, W.; Herrlich, P.; Angel, P.; Schutz, G. DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival. Cell 1998, 93, 531–541. [Google Scholar]
  35. Charmandari, E.; Kino, T.; Souvatzoglou, E.; Vottero, A.; Bhattacharyya, N.; Chrousos, G.P. Natural glucocorticoid receptor mutants causing generalized glucocorticoid resistance: Molecular genotype, genetic transmission, and clinical phenotype. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 1939–1949. [Google Scholar]
  36. Leung, D.Y.; Spahn, J.D.; Szefler, S.J. Steroid-unresponsive asthma. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 23, 387–398. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kojika, S.; Sugita, K.; Inukai, T.; Saito, M.; Iijima, K.; Tezuka, T.; Goi, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Mori, T.; Okazaki, T.; Kagami, K.; Ohyama, K.; Nakazawa, S. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance in human leukemic cells: implication of abnormal 90 and 70 kDa heat shock proteins. Leukemia 1996, 10, 994–999. [Google Scholar]
  38. Matysiak, M.; Makosa, B.; Walczak, A.; Selmaj, K. Patients with multiple sclerosis resisted to glucocorticoid therapy: Abnormal expression of heat-shock protein 90 in glucocorticoid receptor complex. Mult. Scler. 2008, 14, 919–926. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ouyang, J.; Jiang, T.; Tan, M.; Cui, Y.; Li, X. Abnormal expression and distribution of heat shock protein 90: Potential etiologic immunoendocrine mechanism of glucocorticoid resistance in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13, 496–500. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qian, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, W.; Lin, Y. Glucocorticoid receptor and heat shock protein 90 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from asthmatics. Chin. Med. J. 2001, 114, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar]
  41. Koga, Y.; Matsuzaki, A.; Suminoe, A.; Hattori, H.; Kanemitsu, S.; Hara, T. Differential mRNA expression of glucocorticoid receptor alpha and beta is associated with glucocorticoid sensitivity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2005, 45, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lewis-Tuffin, L.J.; Cidlowski, J.A. The physiology of human glucocorticoid receptor beta (hGRbeta) and glucocorticoid resistance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1069, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pujols, L.; Mullol, J.; Picado, C. Alpha and beta glucocorticoid receptors: Relevance in airway diseases. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007, 7, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pujols, L.; Xaubet, A.; Ramirez, J.; Mullol, J.; Roca-Ferrer, J.; Torrego, A.; Cidlowski, J.A.; Picado, C. Expression of glucocorticoid receptors alpha and beta in steroid sensitive and steroid insensitive interstitial lung diseases. Thorax 2004, 59, 687–693. [Google Scholar]
  45. Towers, R.; Naftali, T.; Gabay, G.; Carlebach, M.; Klein, A.; Novis, B. High levels of glucocorticoid receptors in patients with active Crohn's disease may predict steroid resistance. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005, 141, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pretorius, E.; Wallner, B.; Marx, J. Cortisol resistance in conditions such as asthma and the involvement of 11beta-HSD-2: A hypothesis. Horm. Metab. Res. 2006, 38, 368–376. [Google Scholar]
  47. Irusen, E.; Matthews, J.G.; Takahashi, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Chung, K.F.; Adcock, I.M. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase-induced glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation reduces its activity: Role in steroid-insensitive asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2002, 109, 649–657. [Google Scholar]
  48. Matthews, J.G.; Ito, K.; Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.M. Defective glucocorticoid receptor nuclear translocation and altered histone acetylation patterns in glucocorticoid-resistant patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 113, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tao, T.; Lan, J.; Lukacs, G.L.; Hache, R.J.; Kaplan, F. Importin 13 regulates nuclear import of the glucocorticoid receptor in airway epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2006, 35, 668–680. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chrousos, G.P. A new "new" syndrome in the new world: Is multiple postreceptor steroid hormone resistance due to a coregulator defect? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 4450–4453. [Google Scholar]
  51. New, M.I.; Nimkarn, S.; Brandon, D.D.; Cunningham-Rundles, S.; Wilson, R.C.; Newfield, R.S.; Vandermeulen, J.; Barron, N.; Russo, C.; Loriaux, D.L.; O'Malley, B. Resistance to multiple steroids in two sisters. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 76, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  52. Diaz-Borjon, A.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Alvarado de la Barrera, C.; Jakez-Ocampo, J.; Ruiz-Arguelles, A.; Llorente, L. Multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) in rheumatic autoimmune disorders. Part II: Increased P-glycoprotein activity in lymphocytes from systemic lupus erythematosus patients might affect steroid requirements for disease control. Joint Bone Spine 2000, 67, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Farrell, R.J.; Kelleher, D. Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Endocrinol. 2003, 178, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  54. Farrell, R.J.; Murphy, A.; Long, A.; Donnelly, S.; Cherikuri, A.; O'Toole, D.; Mahmud, N.; Keeling, P.W.; Weir, D.G.; Kelleher, D. High multidrug resistance (P-glycoprotein 170) expression in inflammatory bowel disease patients who fail medical therapy. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hirano, T.; Onda, K.; Toma, T.; Miyaoka, M.; Moriyasu, F.; Oka, K. MDR1 mRNA expressions in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with ulcerative colitis in relation to glucocorticoid administration. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004, 44, 481–486. [Google Scholar]
  56. Llorente, L.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Diaz-Borjon, A.; Alvarado de la Barrera, C.; Jakez-Ocampo, J.; de la Fuente, H.; Gonzalez-Amaro, R.; Diaz-Jouanen, E. Multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) in rheumatic autoimmune disorders. Part I: Increased P-glycoprotein activity in lymphocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients might influence disease outcome. Joint Bone Spine 2000, 67, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Richaud-Patin, Y.; Vega-Boada, F.; Vidaller, A.; Llorente, L. Multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) in autoimmune disorders IV. P-glycoprotein overfunction in lymphocytes from myasthenia gravis patients. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2004, 58, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Webster, J.I.; Carlstedt-Duke, J. Involvement of multidrug resistance proteins (MDR) in the modulation of glucocorticoid response. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 82, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hew, M.; Bhavsar, P.; Torrego, A.; Meah, S.; Khorasani, N.; Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.; Chung, K.F. Relative corticosteroid insensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in severe asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 134–141. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ito, K.; Yamamura, S.; Essilfie-Quaye, S.; Cosio, B.; Ito, M.; Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.M. Histone deacetylase 2-mediated deacetylation of the glucocorticoid receptor enables NF-kappaB suppression. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  61. Neal, G.E. The effect of aflatoxin B 1 on normal and cortisol-stimulated rat liver ribonucleic acid synthesis. Biochem. J. 1972, 130, 619–629. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kensler, T.W.; Busby, W.F., Jr.; Davidson, N.E.; Wogan, G.N. Aflatoxin inhibition of glucocorticoid finding capacity of rat liver nuclei. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1976, 437, 200–210. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kensler, T.W.; Busby, W.F., Jr.; Davidson, N.E.; Wogan, G.N. Effect of hepatocarcinogens on the binding of glucocorticoid-receptor complex in rat liver nuclei. Cancer Res. 1976, 36, 4647–4651. [Google Scholar]
  64. Horikoshi, N.; Tashiro, F.; Tanaka, N.; Ueno, Y. Modulation of hormonal induction of tyrosine aminotransferase and glucocorticoid receptors by aflatoxin B1 and sterigmatocystin in Reuber hepatoma cells. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wogan, G.N.; Friedman, M.A. Inhibition by aflatonin B-1 of hydrocortisone induction of rat liver tryptophan pyrrolase and tyrosine transaminase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 128, 509–516. [Google Scholar]
  66. Webster, J.I.; Tonelli, L.H.; Moayeri, M.; Simons, S.S., Jr.; Leppla, S.H.; Sternberg, E.M. Anthrax lethal factor represses glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5706–5711. [Google Scholar]
  67. Webster, J.I.; Sternberg, E.M. Anthrax lethal toxin represses glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transactivation by inhibiting GR-DNA binding in vivo. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2005, 241, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  68. Tait, A.S.; Dalton, M.; Geny, B.; D'Agnillo, F.; Popoff, M.R.; Sternberg, E.M. The large clostridial toxins from Clostridium sordellii and C. difficile repress glucocorticoid receptor activity. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3935–3940. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. McCallum, R.E.; Seale, T.W.; Stith, R.D. Influence of endotoxin treatment on dexamethasone induction of hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase. Infect. Immun. 1983, 39, 213–219. [Google Scholar]
  70. Stith, R.D.; McCallum, R.E. General effect of endotoxin on glucocorticoid receptors in mammalian tissues. Circ. Shock 1986, 18, 301–309. [Google Scholar]
  71. Stith, R.D.; McCallum, R.E. Down regulation of hepatic glucocorticoid receptors after endotoxin treatment. Infect. Immun. 1983, 40, 613–621. [Google Scholar]
  72. Vaptzarova, K.I.; Baramova, E.N.; Popov, P.G. Endotoxin inhibition of glucocorticoid enzyme induction and in vivo 3H-dexamethasone labelling of rat liver nuclei. Int. J. Biochem. 1989, 21, 701–705. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hill, M.R.; Stith, R.D.; McCallum, R.E. Monokines mediate decreased hepatic glucocorticoid binding in endotoxemia. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1987, 41, 236–241. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jiayi, D.; Chen, Y.Z. LPS-induced decrease of specific binding of 3H-dexamethasone to peritoneal macrophages of C57BL/6 mice. J. Recept. Res. 1992, 12, 451–462. [Google Scholar]
  75. Li, F.; Xu, R.B. Changes in canine leukocyte glucocorticoid receptors during endotoxin shock. Circ. Shock 1988, 26, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  76. Liu, L.Y.; Sun, B.; Tian, Y.; Lu, B.Z.; Wang, J. Changes of pulmonary glucocorticoid receptor and phospholipase A2 in sheep with acute lung injury after high dose endotoxin infusion. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1993, 148, 878–881. [Google Scholar]
  77. Verheggen, M.M.; van Hal, P.T.; Adriaansen-Soeting, P.W.; Goense, B.J.; Hoogsteden, H.C.; Brinkmann, A.O.; Versnel, M.A. Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor expression in human bronchial epithelial cell lines by IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha and LPS. Eur. Respir. J. 1996, 9, 2036–2043. [Google Scholar]
  78. Basta-Kaim, A.; Budziszewska, B.; Jaworska-Feil, L.; Leskiewicz, M.; Tetich, M.; Kubera, M.; Scharpe, S.; Lason, W. Opposite effects of clozapine and sulpiride on the lipopolysaccharide-induced inhibition of the GR-mediated gene transcription in fibroblast cells. Pol. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 55, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar]
  79. Basta-Kaim, A.; Budziszewska, B.; Jaworska-Feil, L.; Tetich, M.; Kubera, M.; Zajicova, A.; Holan, V.; Lason, W. Effects of lipopolysaccharide and chlorpromazine on glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene transcription and immunoreactivity: A possible involvement of p38-MAP kinase. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004, 14, 521–528. [Google Scholar]
  80. Budziszewska, B.; Basta-Kaim, A.; Kubera, M.; Jaworska, L.; Leskiewicz, M.; Tetich, M.; Otczyk, M.; Zajicova, A.; Holan, V.; Lason, W. Effect of lipopolysaccharide and antidepressant drugs on glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene transcription. Pharmacol. Rep. 2005, 57, 540–544. [Google Scholar]
  81. Salkowski, C.A.; Vogel, S.N. Lipopolysaccharide increases glucocorticoid receptor expression in murine macrophages. A possible mechanism for glucocorticoid-mediated suppression of endotoxicity. J. Immunol. 1992, 149, 4041–4047. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Shackleford, G.M.; Hart, S.F.; Berry, L.J. Endotoxin treatment inhibits glucocorticoid induction of hepatic enzymes at a late induction step. Am. J. Physiol. 1986, 250, E218–E225. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hauk, P.J.; Hamid, Q.A.; Chrousos, G.P.; Leung, D.Y. Induction of corticosteroid insensitivity in human PBMCs by microbial superantigens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000, 105, 782–787. [Google Scholar]
  84. Li, L.B.; Goleva, E.; Hall, C.F.; Ou, L.S.; Leung, D.Y. Superantigen-induced corticosteroid resistance of human T cells occurs through activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK-ERK) pathway. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 114, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar]
  85. Fukushima, H.; Hirano, T.; Oka, K. Staphylococcus aureus-superantigen decreases FKBP51 mRNA expression and cell-response to suppressive efficacy of a glucocorticoid in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Possible implication of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 570, 222–228. [Google Scholar]
  86. Fakhri, S.; Christodoulopoulos, P.; Tulic, M.; Fukakusa, M.; Frenkiel, S.; Leung, D.Y.; Hamid, Q.A. Role of microbial toxins in the induction of glucocorticoid receptor beta expression in an explant model of rhinosinusitis. J. Otolaryngol. 2003, 32, 388–393. [Google Scholar]
  87. Fakhri, S.; Tulic, M.; Christodoulopoulos, P.; Fukakusa, M.; Frenkiel, S.; Leung, D.Y.; Hamid, Q.A. Microbial superantigens induce glucocorticoid receptor beta and steroid resistance in a nasal explant model. Laryngoscope 2004, 114, 887–892. [Google Scholar]
  88. Klimpel, K.R.; Arora, N.; Leppla, S.H. Anthrax toxin lethal factor contains a zinc metalloprotease consensus sequence which is required for lethal toxin activity. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 13, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar]
  89. Duesbery, N.S.; Webb, C.P.; Leppla, S.H.; Gordon, V.M.; Klimpel, K.R.; Copeland, T.D.; Ahn, N.G.; Oskarsson, M.K.; Fukasawa, K.; Paull, K.D.; Vande Woude, G.F. Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. Science 1998, 280, 734–737. [Google Scholar]
  90. Pellizzari, R.; Guidi-Rontani, C.; Vitale, G.; Mock, M.; Montecucco, C. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves MKK3 in macrophages and inhibits the LPS/IFNgamma-induced release of NO and TNFalpha. FEBS Lett. 1999, 462, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pellizzari, R.; Guidi-Rontani, C.; Vitale, G.; Mock, M.; Montecucco, C. Lethal factor of Bacillus anthracis cleaves the N-terminus of MAPKKs: Analysis of the intracellular consequences in macrophages. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2000, 290, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  92. Vitale, G.; Bernardi, L.; Napolitani, G.; Mock, M.; Montecucco, C. Susceptibility of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase family members to proteolysis by anthrax lethal factor. Biochem. J. 2000, 352 Pt 3, 739–745. [Google Scholar]
  93. Kang, Z.; Webster Marketon, J.I.; Johnson, A.; Sternberg, E.M. Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin represses MMTV promoter activity through transcription factors. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 389, 595–605. [Google Scholar]
  94. Lu, Y.C.; Yeh, W.C.; Ohashi, P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 2008, 42, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
  95. Goodrum, K.J.; Berry, L.J. The use of Reuber hepatoma cells for the study of a lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage factor: Glucocorticoid-antagonizing factor. Lab. Invest. 1979, 41, 174–181. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sakaguchi, S.; Ibata, H.; Yokota, K. Participation of calcium ion on depletion mechanism of liver glycogen by purified glucocorticoid antagonizing factor released in blood during endotoxemia. Microbiol. Immunol. 1990, 34, 985–994. [Google Scholar]
  97. Goodrum, K.J.; Berry, L.J. The effect of glucocorticoid antagonizing factor on hepatoma cells. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1978, 159, 359–363. [Google Scholar]
  98. Sakaguchi, S.; Yokota, K. Purification and characteristics of glucocorticoid antagonizing factor in endotoxemia. Microbiol. Immunol. 1987, 31, 509–520. [Google Scholar]
  99. Koj, A. Initiation of acute phase response and synthesis of cytokines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1317, 84–94. [Google Scholar]
  100. Van Amersfoort, E.S.; Van Berkel, T.J.; Kuiper, J. Receptors, mediators, and mechanisms involved in bacterial sepsis and septic shock. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 379–414. [Google Scholar]
  101. Calandra, T.; Bucala, R. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): A glucocorticoid counter-regulator within the immune system. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 17, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  102. Hill, M.R.; Stith, R.D.; McCallum, R.E. Interleukin 1: A regulatory role in glucocorticoid-regulated hepatic metabolism. J. Immunol. 1986, 137, 858–862. [Google Scholar]
  103. Hill, M.R.; Stith, R.D.; McCallum, R.E. Human recombinant IL-1 alters glucocorticoid receptor function in Reuber hepatoma cells. J. Immunol. 1988, 141, 1522–1528. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kam, J.C.; Szefler, S.J.; Surs, W.; Sher, E.R.; Leung, D.Y. Combination IL-2 and IL-4 reduces glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity and T cell response to glucocorticoids. J. Immunol. 1993, 151, 3460–3466. [Google Scholar]
  105. Spahn, J.D.; Szefler, S.J.; Surs, W.; Doherty, D.E.; Nimmagadda, S.R.; Leung, D.Y. A novel action of IL-13: induction of diminished monocyte glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity. J. Immunol. 1996, 157, 2654–2659. [Google Scholar]
  106. Pariante, C.M.; Pearce, B.D.; Pisell, T.L.; Sanchez, C.I.; Po, C.; Su, C.; Miller, A.H. The proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1alpha, reduces glucocorticoid receptor translocation and function. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 4359–4366. [Google Scholar]
  107. Rakasz, E.; Gal, A.; Biro, J.; Balas, G.; Falus, A. Modulation of glucocorticosteroid binding in human lymphoid, monocytoid and hepatoma cell lines by inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Scand. J. Immunol. 1993, 37, 684–689. [Google Scholar]
  108. Salkowski, C.A.; Vogel, S.N. IFN-gamma mediates increased glucocorticoid receptor expression in murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 1992, 148, 2770–2777. [Google Scholar]
  109. Jonat, C.; Rahmsdorf, H.J.; Park, K.K.; Cato, A.C.; Gebel, S.; Ponta, H.; Herrlich, P. Antitumor promotion and antiinflammation: Down-modulation of AP-1 (Fos/Jun) activity by glucocorticoid hormone. Cell 1990, 62, 1189–1204. [Google Scholar]
  110. Schule, R.; Rangarajan, P.; Kliewer, S.; Ransone, L.J.; Bolado, J.; Yang, N.; Verma, I.M.; Evans, R.M. Functional antagonism between oncoprotein c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 1990, 62, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar]
  111. Yang-Yen, H.F.; Chambard, J.C.; Sun, Y.L.; Smeal, T.; Schmidt, T.J.; Drouin, J.; Karin, M. Transcriptional interference between c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor: Mutual inhibition of DNA binding due to direct protein-protein interaction. Cell 1990, 62, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar]
  112. McKay, L.I.; Cidlowski, J.A. Cross-talk between nuclear factor-kappa B and the steroid hormone receptors: Mechanisms of mutual antagonism. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998, 12, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  113. Clifford, J.I.; Rees, K.R. The action of aflatoxin B1 on the rat liver. Biochem. J. 1967, 102, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  114. van Aswegen, C.H.; Lewko, W.M.; Wittliff, J.L. Influence of phomopsin and ivalin on steroid-hormone binding and growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1985, 16, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  115. van Aswegen, C.H.; Wittliff, J.L. Steroid hormone-receptor activity in the presence of a mycotoxic phomopsin toxin and the sesquiterpene ivalin toxin. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1985, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  116. Barr, F.D.; Krohmer, L.J.; Hamilton, J.W.; Sheldon, L.A. Disruption of histone modification and CARM1 recruitment by arsenic represses transcription at glucocorticoid receptor-regulated promoters. PLoS One 2009, 4, e6766. [Google Scholar]
  117. Bodwell, J.E.; Gosse, J.A.; Nomikos, A.P.; Hamilton, J.W. Arsenic disruption of steroid receptor gene activation: Complex dose-response effects are shared by several steroid receptors. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar]
  118. Bodwell, J.E.; Kingsley, L.A.; Hamilton, J.W. Arsenic at very low concentrations alters glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene activation but not GR-mediated gene repression: complex dose-response effects are closely correlated with levels of activated GR and require a functional GR DNA binding domain. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17, 1064–1076. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hamilton, J.W.; Kaltreider, R.C.; Bajenova, O.V.; Ihnat, M.A.; McCaffrey, J.; Turpie, B.W.; Rowell, E.E.; Oh, J.; Nemeth, M.J.; Pesce, C.A.; Lariviere, J.P. Molecular basis for effects of carcinogenic heavy metals on inducible gene expression. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106 Suppl 4, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kaltreider, R.C.; Davis, A.M.; Lariviere, J.P.; Hamilton, J.W. Arsenic alters the function of the glucocorticoid receptor as a transcription factor. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 245–251. [Google Scholar]
  121. Dundjerski, J.; Butorovic, B.; Kipic, J.; Trajkovic, D.; Matic, G. Cadmium affects the activity of rat liver tyrosine aminotransferase and its induction by dexamethasone. Arch. Toxicol. 1996, 70, 390–395. [Google Scholar]
  122. Dundjerski, J.; Kovac, T.; Pavkovic, N.; Cvoro, A.; Matic, G. Glucocorticoid receptor-Hsp90 interaction in the liver cytosol of cadmium-intoxicated rats. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 2000, 16, 375–383. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lopez, S.; Miyashita, Y.; Simons, S.S., Jr. Structurally based, selective interaction of arsenite with steroid receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 16039–16042. [Google Scholar]
  124. Simons, S.S., Jr.; Chakraborti, P.K.; Cavanaugh, A.H. Arsenite and cadmium(II) as probes of glucocorticoid receptor structure and function. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 1938–1945. [Google Scholar]
  125. Stancato, L.F.; Hutchison, K.A.; Chakraborti, P.K.; Simons, S.S., Jr.; Pratt, W.B. Differential effects of the reversible thiol-reactive agents arsenite and methyl methanethiosulfonate on steroid binding by the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 3729–3736. [Google Scholar]
  126. Perry, S.T.; Kulkarni, S.B.; Lee, K.L.; Kenney, F.T. Selective effect of the metallocarcinogen beryllium on hormonal regulation of gene expression in cultured cells. Cancer Res. 1982, 42, 473–476. [Google Scholar]
  127. Ord, M.G.; Stocken, L.A. Enzyme induction in rat liver: the effects of Be2+ in vivo. Biosci. Rep. 1981, 1, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  128. Dunderski, J.; Stanosevic, J.; Ristic, B.; Trajkovic, D.; Matic, G. In vivo effects of cadmium on rat liver glucocorticoid receptor functional properties. Int. J. Biochem. 1992, 24, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar]
  129. McCaffrey, J.; Wolf, C.M.; Hamilton, J.W. Effects of the genotoxic carcinogen chromium(VI) on basal and hormone-inducible phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression in vivo: Correlation with glucocorticoid- and developmentally regulated expression. Mol. Carcinog. 1994, 10, 189–198. [Google Scholar]
  130. Heiman, A.S.; Tonner, L.E. The acute effect of lead acetate on glucocorticoid regulation of tyrosine aminotransferase in hepatoma cells. Toxicology 1995, 100, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  131. Dundjerski, J.; Brkljacic, J.; Elakovic, I.; Manitasevic, S.; Matic, G. Mercury influences rat liver tyrosine aminotransferase activity and induction by dexamethasone. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2006, 26, 187–190. [Google Scholar]
  132. Brkljacic, J.; Milutinovic, D.V.; Dundjerski, J.; Matic, G. Mercury inhibits rat liver and kidney glucocorticoid receptor hormone binding activity. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 2004, 20, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  133. Brkljacic, J.; Milutinovic, D.V.; Dundjerski, J.; Matic, G. Mercury stimulates rat liver glucocorticoid receptor association with Hsp90 and Hsp70. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2004, 18, 257–260. [Google Scholar]
  134. DeMoor, J.M.; Kennette, W.A.; Collins, O.M.; Koropatnick, J. Zinc-metallothionein levels are correlated with enhanced glucocorticoid responsiveness in mouse cells exposed to ZnCl(2), HgCl(2), and heat shock. Toxicol. Sci. 2001, 64, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  135. Tashima, Y.; Terui, M.; Itoh, H.; Mizunuma, H.; Kobayashi, R.; Marumo, F. Effect of selenite on glucocorticoid receptor. J. Biochem. 1989, 105, 358–361. [Google Scholar]
  136. Telford, W.G.; Fraker, P.J. Zinc reversibly inhibits steroid binding to murine glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 238, 86–89. [Google Scholar]
  137. Verheggen, M.M.; Adriaansen-Soeting, P.W.; Berrevoets, C.A.; van Hal, P.T.; Brinkmann, A.O.; Hoogsteden, H.C.; Versnel, M.A. Glucocorticoid receptor expression in human bronchial epithelial cells: effects of smoking and COPD. Mediators Inflamm. 1998, 7, 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  138. Renkema, T.E.; Schouten, J.P.; Koeter, G.H.; Postma, D.S. Effects of long-term treatment with corticosteroids in COPD. Chest 1996, 109, 1156–1162. [Google Scholar]
  139. Marwick, J.A.; Caramori, G.; Stevenson, C.S.; Casolari, P.; Jazrawi, E.; Barnes, P.J.; Ito, K.; Adcock, I.M.; Kirkham, P.A.; Papi, A. Inhibition of PI3Kdelta restores glucocorticoid function in smoking-induced airway inflammation in mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 179, 542–548. [Google Scholar]
  140. Livingston, E.; Darroch, C.E.; Chaudhuri, R.; McPhee, I.; McMahon, A.D.; Mackenzie, S.J.; Thomson, N.C. Glucocorticoid receptor alpha:beta ratio in blood mononuclear cells is reduced in cigarette smokers. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 114, 1475–1478. [Google Scholar]
  141. Hukkanen, J.; Vaisanen, T.; Lassila, A.; Piipari, R.; Anttila, S.; Pelkonen, O.; Raunio, H.; Hakkola, J. Regulation of CYP3A5 by glucocorticoids and cigarette smoke in human lung-derived cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003, 304, 745–752. [Google Scholar]
  142. Xu, H.; Ferro, T.J.; Chu, S. Cigarette smoke condensate inhibits ENaC alpha-subunit expression in lung epithelial cells. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 30, 633–642. [Google Scholar]
  143. Ito, K.; Lim, S.; Caramori, G.; Chung, K.F.; Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.M. Cigarette smoking reduces histone deacetylase 2 expression, enhances cytokine expression, and inhibits glucocorticoid actions in alveolar macrophages. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 1110–1112. [Google Scholar]
  144. Alam, M.G.; Allinson, G.; Stagnitti, F.; Tanaka, A.; Westbrooke, M. Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh groundwater: A major environmental and social disaster. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2002, 12, 235–253. [Google Scholar]
  145. Phillips, K.P.; Foster, W.G. Key developments in endocrine disrupter research and human health. J. Toxicol. Environ Health B. Crit. Rev. 2008, 11, 322–344. [Google Scholar]
  146. Abe, J.; Kotzin, B.L.; Meissner, C.; Melish, M.E.; Takahashi, M.; Fulton, D.; Romagne, F.; Malissen, B.; Leung, D.Y. Characterization of T cell repertoire changes in acute Kawasaki disease. J. Exp. Med. 1993, 177, 791–796. [Google Scholar]
  147. Athappan, G.; Gale, S.; Ponniah, T. Corticosteroid therapy for primary treatment of Kawasaki disease - weight of evidence: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2009, 20, 233–236. [Google Scholar]
  148. Paliard, X.; West, S.G.; Lafferty, J.A.; Clements, J.R.; Kappler, J.W.; Marrack, P.; Kotzin, B.L. Evidence for the effects of a superantigen in rheumatoid arthritis. Science 1991, 253, 325–329. [Google Scholar]
  149. Hauk, P.J.; Wenzel, S.E.; Trumble, A.E.; Szefler, S.J.; Leung, D.Y. Increased T-cell receptor vbeta8+ T cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of subjects with poorly controlled asthma: a potential role for microbial superantigens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999, 104, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  150. Strickland, I.; Hauk, P.J.; Trumble, A.E.; Picker, L.J.; Leung, D.Y. Evidence for superantigen involvement in skin homing of T cells in atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  151. Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.M. Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases. Lancet 2009, 373, 1905–1917. [Google Scholar]
  152. Hagg, P.M.; Hurskainen, T.; Palatsi, R.; Ilves, M.; Oikarinen, A. Increased expression of glucocorticoid receptor beta in lymphocytes of patients with severe atopic dermatitis unresponsive to topical corticosteroid. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 162, 318–324. [Google Scholar]
  153. Loke, T.K.; Sousa, A.R.; Corrigan, C.J.; Lee, T.H. Glucocorticoid-resistant asthma. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2002, 2, 144–150. [Google Scholar]
  154. Silverman, M.N.; Sternberg, E.M. Neuroendocrine-immune interactions in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance. Neuroimmunomodulation 2008, 15, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  155. Cohen, A.L.; Bhatnagar, J.; Reagan, S.; Zane, S.B.; D'Angeli, M.A.; Fischer, M.; Killgore, G.; Kwan-Gett, T.S.; Blossom, D.B.; Shieh, W.J.; Guarner, J.; Jernigan, J.; Duchin, J.S.; Zaki, S.R.; McDonald, L.C. Toxic shock associated with Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium perfringens after medical and spontaneous abortion. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 110, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar]
  156. Fischer, M.; Bhatnagar, J.; Guarner, J.; Reagan, S.; Hacker, J.K.; Van Meter, S.H.; Poukens, V.; Whiteman, D.B.; Iton, A.; Cheung, M.; Dassey, D.E.; Shieh, W.J.; Zaki, S.R. Fatal toxic shock syndrome associated with Clostridium sordellii after medical abortion. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 2352–2360. [Google Scholar]
  157. McGregor, J.A.; Soper, D.E.; Lovell, G.; Todd, J.K. Maternal deaths associated with Clostridium sordellii infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 161, 987–995. [Google Scholar]
  158. Miech, R.P. Pathophysiology of mifepristone-induced septic shock due to Clostridium sordellii. Ann Pharmacother 2005, 39, 1483–1488. [Google Scholar]
  159. Sinave, C.; Le Templier, G.; Blouin, D.; Leveille, F.; Deland, E. Toxic shock syndrome due to Clostridium sordellii: A dramatic postpartum and postabortion disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 35, 1441–1443. [Google Scholar]
  160. Barnes, P.J. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: new opportunities for drug development. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1998, 19, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  161. Van Overveld, F.J.; Demkow, U.; Gorecka, D.; De Backer, W.A.; Zielinski, J. Differences in responses upon corticosteroid therapy between smoking and non-smoking patients with COPD. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2006, 57, 273–282. [Google Scholar]
  162. Pedersen, B.; Dahl, R.; Karlstrom, R.; Peterson, C.G.; Venge, P. Eosinophil and neutrophil activity in asthma in a one-year trial with inhaled budesonide. The impact of smoking. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996, 153, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  163. Chalmers, G.W.; Macleod, K.J.; Little, S.A.; Thomson, L.J.; McSharry, C.P.; Thomson, N.C. Influence of cigarette smoking on inhaled corticosteroid treatment in mild asthma. Thorax 2002, 57, 226–230. [Google Scholar]
  164. Chaudhuri, R.; Livingston, E.; McMahon, A.D.; Thomson, L.; Borland, W.; Thomson, N.C. Cigarette smoking impairs the therapeutic response to oral corticosteroids in chronic asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 1308–1311. [Google Scholar]
  165. Tomlinson, J.E.; McMahon, A.D.; Chaudhuri, R.; Thompson, J.M.; Wood, S.F.; Thomson, N.C. Efficacy of low and high dose inhaled corticosteroid in smokers versus non-smokers with mild asthma. Thorax 2005, 60, 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  166. Livingston, E.; Chaudhuri, R.; McMahon, A.D.; Fraser, I.; McSharry, C.P.; Thomson, N.C. Systemic sensitivity to corticosteroids in smokers with asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 29, 64–71. [Google Scholar]
  167. Cox, G.; Whitehead, L.; Dolovich, M.; Jordana, M.; Gauldie, J.; Newhouse, M.T. A randomized controlled trial on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airways inflammation in adult cigarette smokers. Chest 1999, 115, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar]
  168. Sprung, C.L.; Goodman, S.; Weiss, Y.G. Steroid therapy of septic shock. Crit. Care Clin. 2009, 25, 825–834. [Google Scholar]
  169. Annane, D.; Bellissant, E.; Bollaert, P.E.; Briegel, J.; Confalonieri, M.; De Gaudio, R.; Keh, D.; Kupfer, Y.; Oppert, M.; Meduri, G.U. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: A systematic review. JAMA 2009, 301, 2362–2375. [Google Scholar]
  170. Annane, D.; Maxime, V.; Ibrahim, F.; Alvarez, J.C.; Abe, E.; Boudou, P. Diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in severe sepsis and septic shock. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar]
  171. Maxime, V.; Lesur, O.; Annane, D. Adrenal insufficiency in septic shock. Clin. Chest Med. 2009, 30, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  172. Prigent, H.; Maxime, V.; Annane, D. Science review: mechanisms of impaired adrenal function in sepsis and molecular actions of glucocorticoids. Crit. Care 2004, 8, 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  173. Molijn, G.J.; Spek, J.J.; van Uffelen, J.C.; de Jong, F.H.; Brinkmann, A.O.; Bruining, H.A.; Lamberts, S.W.; Koper, J.W. Differential adaptation of glucocorticoid sensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes in patients with sepsis or septic shock. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 1799–1803. [Google Scholar]
  174. Molijn, G.J.; Koper, J.W.; van Uffelen, C.J.; de Jong, F.H.; Brinkmann, A.O.; Bruining, H.A.; Lamberts, S.W. Temperature-induced down-regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in peripheral blood mononuclear leucocyte in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Clin. Endocrinol. 1995, 43, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
  175. Mastorci, F.; Vicentini, M.; Viltart, O.; Manghi, M.; Graiani, G.; Quaini, F.; Meerlo, P.; Nalivaiko, E.; Maccari, S.; Sgoifo, A. Long-term effects of prenatal stress: changes in adult cardiovascular regulation and sensitivity to stress. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009, 33, 191–203. [Google Scholar]
  176. Haczku, A.; Panettieri, R.A., Jr. Social stress and asthma: The role of corticosteroid insensitivity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125, 550–558. [Google Scholar]
  177. Hollenberg, S.M.; Weinberger, C.; Ong, E.S.; Cerelli, G.; Oro, A.; Lebo, R.; Thompson, E.B.; Rosenfeld, M.G.; Evans, R.M. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature 1985, 318, 635–641. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Webster Marketon, J.I.; Sternberg, E.M. The Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Revisited Target for Toxins. Toxins 2010, 2, 1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2061357

AMA Style

Webster Marketon JI, Sternberg EM. The Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Revisited Target for Toxins. Toxins. 2010; 2(6):1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2061357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Webster Marketon, Jeanette I., and Esther M. Sternberg. 2010. "The Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Revisited Target for Toxins" Toxins 2, no. 6: 1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2061357

APA Style

Webster Marketon, J. I., & Sternberg, E. M. (2010). The Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Revisited Target for Toxins. Toxins, 2(6), 1357-1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2061357

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop