Next Article in Journal
Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions in T-2 Toxin Studied Using Solution and Solid-State NMR
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Fungicides, Application of Nozzle Types, and the Resistance Level of Wheat Varieties in the Control of Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol
Previous Article in Journal
Anthrax Lethal Toxin-Mediated Disruption of Endothelial VE-Cadherin Is Attenuated by Inhibition of the Rho-Associated Kinase Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of the Trichoderma brevicompactum tri5 Gene: Effect on the Expression of the Trichodermin Biosynthetic Genes and on Tomato Seedlings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 3
Issue 10
10.3390/toxins3101294
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity in Fusarium graminearum from a Major Wheat-Producing Region of Argentina

by
Cora Lilia Alvarez
1,†,
Stefania Somma
2,†,
Robert H. Proctor
3,
Gaetano Stea
2,
Giuseppina Mulè
2,
Antonio F. Logrieco
2,
Virginia Fernandez Pinto
1 and
Antonio Moretti
2,*
1
Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
2
Institute of Sciences of Food Production, CNR, Via Amendola 122/0, 70126 Bari, Italy
3
Bacterial Foodborne Pathogen and Mycology Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, ARS, USDA, Peoria, IL 61604, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxins 2011, 3(10), 1294-1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3101294
Submission received: 6 July 2011 / Revised: 19 August 2011 / Accepted: 30 September 2011 / Published: 20 October 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trichothecenes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Fusarium graminearum species complex (FGSC) is a group of mycotoxigenic fungi that are the primary cause of Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat worldwide. The distribution, frequency of occurrence, and genetic diversity of FGSC species in cereal crops in South America is not well understood compared to some regions of Asia, Europe and North America. Therefore, we examined the frequency and genetic diversity of a collection of 183 FGSC isolates recovered from wheat grown during multiple growing seasons and across a large area of eastern Argentina, a major wheat producing region in South America. Sequence analysis of the translation elongation factor 1−α and β-tubulin genes as well as Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) analyses indicated that all isolates were the FGSC species F. graminearum sensu stricto. AFLP analysis resolved at least 11 subgroups, and all the isolates represented different AFLP haplotypes. AFLP profile and geographic origin were not correlated. Previously obtained trichothecene production profiles of the isolates revealed that the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol chemotype was slightly more frequent than the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol chemotype among the isolates. These data extend the current understanding of FGSC diversity and provide further evidence that F. graminearum sensu stricto is the predominant cause of FHB in the temperate main wheat-growing area of Argentina. Moreover, two isolates of F. crookwellense and four of F. pseudograminearum were also recovered from wheat samples and sequenced. The results also suggest that, although F. graminearum sensu stricto was the only FGSC species recovered in this study, the high level of genetic diversity within this species should be considered in plant breeding efforts and development of other disease management strategies aimed at reducing FHB.

1. Introduction

Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe) (teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein.)) is considered the main cause of Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) worldwide [1]. The disease is of significance because it reduces yield and quality of grains and also results in mycotoxin contamination of wheat kernels, primarily with trichothecenes [2], that have adverse effects on animal and human health [3]. The most common trichothecenes produced by F. graminearum are deoxynivalenol (DON), its acetylated derivatives 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3ADON) and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15ADON), and nivalenol (NIV), and its acetylated derivative 4-acetyl-nivalenol (4ANIV or fusarenone X) [2]. Three trichothecene production profiles (chemotypes) predominate in this species: the production of NIV and 4ANIV (NIV chemotype); the production of DON and 3ADON (3ADON chemotype); and the production of DON and 15ADON (15ADON chemotype) [4]. Surveys of trichothecenes in wheat grains infected with F. graminearum indicate that the 3ADON and 15ADON chemotypes predominate in North America, South America and Europe. The NIV chemotype is more common in Europe than America [5,6], however, NIV strains have recently been found in North America [7]. Previous reports from Argentinean strains of F. graminearum isolated from wheat have shown controversial results: Ramirez et al. [8] reported that all the strains produced DON and a few of them produced 3ADON; Lori et al. [9] reported that the strains produced DON, 3ADON and NIV; finally Fernandez Pinto et al. [10] reported the production of DON, 3ADON, NIV and mainly 15ADON. A recent report of the mycotoxin production in F. graminearum strains from different regions in the great production area of wheat in Argentina has shown that strains producing DON and 15ADON are as frequent as those producing DON and both acetylated derivatives, 3ADON and 15ADON. In addition, NIV and DON were produced simultaneously by 23.6% of the isolates, although DON was always produced in higher quantities in these isolates [11]. The co-occurrence of DON and NIV in the same isolates is surprising since the genetic basis of DON and NIV chemotypes has been established to be due to differences in TRI13 and TRI7 [12]. These genes are non-functional in DON-producing isolates so it is unclear how DON and NIV could both be produced by a single isolate. Similarly, the co-occurrence of 3ADON and 15ADON in the same isolates is surprising since the genetic basis of 3ADON and 15ADON chemotypes is due to different forms of TRI8 in 3ADON and 15ADON-producing strains [13].
Recognition by morphological characters sometimes is not enough for accurate identification of fungal isolates at the species level. In the last decade, genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) was used to investigate genetic diversity and species limits within F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) [14]. Based on DNA sequences of 13 genes, FGSC was resolved in 13 species: Fusarium acacia-mearnsii, Fusarium aethiopicum, Fusarium asiaticum, Fusarium austroamericanum, Fusarium boothii, Fusarium brasilicum, Fusarium cortaderiae, Fusarium gerlachii, F. graminearum sensu stricto, Fusarium meridionale, Fusarium mesoamericanum, Fusarium ussurianum, and Fusarium vorosii [15,16,17,18]. Therefore, a correct identification of FGSC species is a critical point in order to correctly predict and evaluate the potential mycotoxigenic risk related to the occurrence of each species on wheat. The most geographically widespread species of the FGSC is F. graminearum sensu stricto, which predominates on wheat in North and South America and in Europe [19,20,21,22]. On other hand, a recent report from South America has shown the occurrence on wheat also of another species of FGSC, F. meridionale [23].
In Argentina, wheat is cultivated in a 6,000,000 ha area that is divided into five regions (designated I to V, Figure 1) according to agrometeorological conditions.
Toxins 03 01294 g001 1024
Figure 1. Map showing the sample fields in the main wheat cultivation area in Argentina. Arabic numerals represent the locations of the 37 fields from which wheat was harvested and isolates were recovered. Wheat cropping area is distributed according to agrometeorological conditions into five regions (I to V, with region II and V divided in two subregions named North (N) and South (S)).
Figure 1. Map showing the sample fields in the main wheat cultivation area in Argentina. Arabic numerals represent the locations of the 37 fields from which wheat was harvested and isolates were recovered. Wheat cropping area is distributed according to agrometeorological conditions into five regions (I to V, with region II and V divided in two subregions named North (N) and South (S)).
Toxins 03 01294 g001
Regions II and V are further divided into North (N) and South (S) based on differing climatic conditions in each. The regions/sub-regions IIS, IV and VS are considered the main production area because in these regions the production area is the widest in Argentina, the wheat cultivation is more intense and yields are greatest. Sub-region IIS covers almost the entire northern half of the province of Buenos Aires and the extreme South of the province of Santa Fe; region IV covers the south east of the province of Buenos Aires; and sub-region VS covers the far east of the province of La Pampa and the east and south east of the province of Buenos Aires. The temperature and humidity decrease along subregions IIS, IV and VS, with more extreme conditions in region VS [24]. Within these extended areas, where FHB epidemics occur often due mainly to favourable weather conditions [25], F. graminearum sensu stricto has been reported to be the main cause of FHB only in two localities of Buenos Aires province [20]. However, the results, reported by Sampietro et al. [26], demonstrated that the F. graminearum complex diversity in Argentina is greater than previously assessed since F. meridionale and F. boothi were isolated at a high concentration from maize grains cultivated in a wide area in northwest Argentina.
The main objectives of this study were:
  • deepen and broaden the genetic characterization of strains of the FGSC isolated in multiple seasons from wheat kernels in a wider wheat cropping area from Buenos Aires Province in Argentina than previously studied, by using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence analyses of translation elongation factor 1−α (TEF1) and β-tubulin (TUB2) genes;
  • evaluate the genetic variability of a wide population of FGSC by using AFLP;
  • assess the main FGSC species occurring on wheat in Argentina, comparing it to the contradictory data previously reported from different cereals.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification

Thirty-seven wheat samples from the main wheat production area of Argentina were analyzed. Each sample was from different localities selected over all the Buenos Aires province area and randomly collected from wheat harvested in 2001, 2003 and 2004 (Figure 1). Samples were at least 1 kg in size and not sorted by grain quality (all grades included). For the isolation of the internal mycoflora, 100 kernels from each sample were surface disinfested in a 10% sodium hypochlorite for 1 minute, rinsed in sterile distilled water, then in 70% ethyl alcohol, and dried on a filter paper. The kernels were plated on a Fusarium-selective medium composed of potato dextrose agar (PDA) containing 0.2 g/L of pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) and incubated for 5 days at 25 °C under fluorescent light (12 h photoperiod) [27]. Putative Fusarium isolates recovered from the wheat kernels were purified by single-spore isolation. Morphological identification was determined with cultures grown on the low nutrient medium SNA (Spezieller Nahrstoffarmer Agar) with filter paper as described by Leslie and Summerell [27].
The 189 fungal isolates used in this study are listed in Table 1 together with data on their geographic origin and the year in which the corresponding wheat samples were harvested.
Table
Table 1. Locality and year of isolation of 189 Fusarium strains from Buenos Aires regions of Argentina used in this study.
Table 1. Locality and year of isolation of 189 Fusarium strains from Buenos Aires regions of Argentina used in this study.
Sample Fields *Geographical RegionYearStrains ITEM Number **
27-PergaminoIIN20018544-8545-8546-8547-8548
2-ArrecifesIIS20018310-8311
12-Coronel VillegasIIS20018386-8387
24-Nueve de JulioIIS20018467-8468-8471-8473-8475-8476-8477-8478-8479-8480-8481-8482-8483-8485-8486-8487-8488-8492-8493-8497-8502-8504-8505-8510-8512-8513-8514-8516-8517-8526-8531-8538
29-SaladilloIIS20018552
31-San PedroIIS20018559-8560-8561-8562-8563
35-SaltoIIS20018602-8603-8604
5-BelgranoIIS20038325-8327-8329-8330-8334-8335
8-CardalesIIS20038339-8340-8341
25-PehuajoIIS20038540
1-ArecoIIS20048308
6-BolivarIIS20048337
7-BragadoIIS20048338
10-Carlos CasaresIIS20048357-8361-8362-8363
11-25 de MayoIIS20048364-8365-8366-8367-8368-8369-8370-8371-8372-8373-8374-8375-8376-8377-8379-8380-8381-8382-8589
15-General PintoIIS20048412-8413
17-General ViamonteIIS20048417
19-H YrigoyenIIS20048420
21-LincolnIIS20048425-8426
33-Trenque LauquenIIS20048583-8585
37-SuipachaIIS20048564 ***
16-General PueyrredonIV20018414-8415-8416
22-LoberiaIV20038427-8428-8429-8430-8432-8433
3-AzulIV20048313-8314-8315-8316-8318-8319-8320-8321
4-BalcarceIV20048322-8323-8324
9-CardenauIV20048342-8343-8344-8345-8346-8347-8348-8349-8350-8351-8352-8353-8354-8355-8356
13-General AlvaradoIV20048388-8393-8394-8395-8396-8397-8398-8399-8401-8402-8404-8405-8406-8407
14-General LamadridIV20048408-8409-8410
20-LapridaIV20048421-8422-8423-8424
23-NecocheaIV20048435-8436-8438-8439-8440-8441-8444-8446-8447-8448-8453-8454-8456-8458-8460-8461-8462-8463-8464
30-San CayetanoIV20048555-8556-8558
32-TandilIV20048574-8576-8581-8582-8566 ***-8567 ***-8569 ***
36-Coronel SuarezVS20038383 ****-8384 ****
18-GuaminiVS20048418-8419
26-PellegriniVS20048542
28-SaavedraVS20048549
34-ConhelloVS20048591-8600-8601
* The numbers show the location of the sample fields in Figure 1; ** Reference number of the Fungal Collection of Institute of Sciences of Food Production, Research National Council (ISPA-CNR), Bari, Italy; *** F. pseudograminearum; **** F. crookwellense.
To aid in FGSC species identifications, we employed the following reference strains used as out-group in AFLP analyses, which were kindly provided by D. Geiser (The Penn State University): NRRL 2903 for F. austroamericanum (syn. Lineage 1); NRRL 26916 for F. boothi (syn. Lineage 3); NRRL 25797 for F. mesoamericanum (syn. Lineage 4); NRRL 26754 for F. acaciae-mearnsii (syn. Lineage 5); NRRL 13818 for F. asiaticum (syn. Lineage 6); NRRL 28336 and NRRL 5883 for F. graminearum (syn. Lineage 7); NRRL 29297 for F. cortaderiae (syn. Lineage 8) [14,15]. All strains were deposited in the culture collection of the Institute of Sciences of Food Production, Bari, Italy (ITEM) [28]. All 189 strains from wheat kernels in Argentina (53 isolated in 2001, 18 in 2003, and 118 strains isolated in 2004) were subjected to gene sequencing and AFLP analysis.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Fungal isolates were grown for 48 h in shake cultures (125 rpm) at 25 °C in 100 mL of Wikerham’s medium (4% D-glucose, 0.5% peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% malt extract). The resulting mycelium was vacuum-filtered on Whatman N° 4 filter paper, washed with distilled water, frozen, and lyophilised. About 25-30 mg of lyophilised mycelium was ground and used to prepare genomic DNA with the E.Z.N.A. Fungal DNA Miniprep Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Doraville, GA). Extracted DNA was dissolved in 100 μL of sterile water and stored at −20 °C. DNA concentrations were estimated by comparison with a known concentration of a DNA ladder following agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3. Mating Type Analysis

A multiplex PCR was used to detect the mating type genes of the isolates. The primers used to amplify the Mating type 1 (MAT1-1) idiomorph were M12-1: 5'-ATGGATACCTCCTTCAGTTTC-3' and M12-2: 5'-GATCATCCGGCTCCTCAGGGT C-3'; and the primers used to amplify the Mating type 2 (MAT1-2) idiomorph were M21-1: 5'-ATGAGCACCCTTATGTTGATG-3' and M21-2: 5'-TCAGACGTTGTTTTTGCTGAGC-3' [14]. PCR was performed in a final volume of 20 μL, using 5 ng of DNA, 0.3 μL of each primer (10 mM), 0.4 μL of dNTPs (10 mM) and 0.1 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase (Hot Master, 5 U/μL). The thermal cycler parameters were: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C; 40 cycles of 35 s at 94 °C, 55 s at 54 °C, 2 min at 72 °C; and a final extension for 7 min at 72 °C. The expected amplicon sizes were 1500 bp and 800 bp for MAT1-1 and MAT1-2, respectively.

2.4. DNA Sequencing

Sequence analysis of TEF1 and TUB2 genes employed PCR conditions and primers described by O’Donnell et al. [14]. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm that a ~700 bp fragment was amplified for TEF1 and a ~1300 bp fragment was amplified for TUB2. Fragments were purified by filtration through Shepadex G-50 (Sigma) prior to DNA sequencing. Sequence analysis was carried out with the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were aligned in ClustalW [29] by using default settings with MEGA software [30]. Aligned sequence data were subjected to maximum-parsimony (MP) analysis by using the Close-Neighbor-Interchange algorithm with 10 random-addition replicates with the MEGA 4 software. Clade validation was assessed by bootstrap analysis [31], using heuristic searches with 1000 replicates. Previously generated TEF1 and TUB2 sequences obtained from the National Center for Bioechnology Information (NCBI) [32] were also included to allow comparative analysis.

2.5. AFLP Analysis

AFLP analysis was performed with the AFLPTM Microbial Fingerprint Kit (Applied Biosystems, Fostercity, CA). Restriction enzymes EcoRI and MseI (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) were used to digest 10 ng of genomic DNA from each isolate, and DNA fragments were ligated with T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom) to double-stranded restriction site-specific adaptors supplied by the kit (AFLPTM Microbial Fingerprint). The selective reactions used three primer combinations: EcoRI+AC/MseI+CC, EcoRI+AT/MseI+CG and EcoRI+G/MseI+CT, where the EcoRI primers were labeled with FAM, NED and JOE fluorescent dyes (Applied Biosystems), respectively. After amplification, the products were mixed with deionized formamide and the GeneScan-500 (Rox) size standard (Applied Biosystems), and then separated by capillary electrophoresis on ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer. Raw data were analyzed using GeneScan Collection software (version 3.1.2, Applied Biosystems), and AFLP patterns were analyzed with Genotyper software (Applied Biosystems). AFLP peaks ranging from 150 to 500 bp in length and with peak height limit of at least 200. Bands of the same size in different samples were assumed to be homologous and to represent the same allele. Bands of different sizes were considered independent loci with two alleles (present and absent). AFLP data of 183 Fusarium Argentinean isolates and 8 reference strains of the FGSC were exported in a binary matrix, in which “1” represented the presence of the peak and “0” its absence. Statistical software NTSYS (version 2.02, Exeter software, Setauket, NY) was used for cluster analysis by using DICE similarity coefficient and the un-weighted pair group method (UPGMA). The trees were generated by using the sequential agglomerative hierarchical nested clustering program (SAHN; Exeter software, Setauket, NY). Each DNA sample was subjected to AFLP analysis in at least two independent experiments and yielded the same AFLP profile each time it was run. Strains with >98 AFLP band similarity were considered to belong to the same haplotype.

3. Results

3.1. Strain Isolation and Identification

One hundred eighty-nine isolates of Fusarium were recovered from wheat kernels that were harvested from across the major wheat-producing region of Argentina during the 2001, 2003 and 2004 growing seasons. All isolates were subjected to PCR to analyze for the presence of the MAT-1 and MAT-2 idiomorphs. The PCR yielded amplicons for both idiomorphs from 183 isolates and an amplicon for only the MAT-2 idiomorph from the remaining six isolates (ITEM 8364, 8366, 8367, 8369, 8383 and 8384). To identify the species to which each isolate belongs, fragments of the TEF1 and TUB2 genes were also amplified and sequenced and then subjected to BLAST analysis against the Fusarium-ID database [33]. This analysis indicated that the isolates with MAT-2 only were either F. crookwellense (ITEM 8383 and 8384) or F. pseudograminearum (ITEM 8364, 8366, 8367 and 8369), whereas isolates with both idiomorphs were F. graminearum sensu stricto (Table 1).

3.2. DNA Sequence-Base Phylogenetic Analysis

The TEF1 and TUB2 sequences from a subset of isolates were also subjected to phylogenetic analysis. This analysis employed sequences from 72 randomly selected isolates identified as F. graminearum sensu stricto (Table 1) as well as two isolates identified as F. pseudograminearum (ITEM 8366 and 8367), and one identified as F. crookwellense (ITEM 8384). In addition, as reference, sequences for FGSC species were downloaded from NCBI and included in the analysis [13,15]. One-thousand-four-hundred-sixty-five phylogenetic trees were formed with TEF1 (Consistency index, Ci: 0.88 and Retention Index, Ri: 0.96) (Figure 2). Similar phylogram was obtained with TUB2 sequences. The 72 F. graminearum wheat isolates from Argentina formed a distinct clade with reference strains of F. graminearum sensu stricto that was distinct from the other FGSC species included in the analysis. These results further support the identity of the majority of isolates from Argentinean wheat as F. graminearum sensu stricto.
Toxins 03 01294 g002 1024
Figure 2. One of the 1465 most-parsimonious phylograms inferred from translation elongation factor gene sequences. The phylogenetic tree is composed by 72 randomly selected sequences of F. graminearum Argentinean strains, 2 of F. pseudograminearum, 1 of F. croockwellense and the strains used to define species inside FGSC [15,17], combined with sequences of the eleven species of the FGSC complex [17] registered in NCBI database. Branches that received >50% bootstrap values were indicated.
Figure 2. One of the 1465 most-parsimonious phylograms inferred from translation elongation factor gene sequences. The phylogenetic tree is composed by 72 randomly selected sequences of F. graminearum Argentinean strains, 2 of F. pseudograminearum, 1 of F. croockwellense and the strains used to define species inside FGSC [15,17], combined with sequences of the eleven species of the FGSC complex [17] registered in NCBI database. Branches that received >50% bootstrap values were indicated.
Toxins 03 01294 g002

3.3. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

DNA sequence data generated in the present study for phylogenetic analysis belonging to the 75 strains of F. graminearum sensu stricto (72), F. pseudograminearum (2), and F. crookwellense (1) have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers from JN687849 to JN687923.

3.4. AFLP Analysis

Isolates identified as F. graminearum sensu stricto were also subjected to AFLP analysis. The AFLP protocol generated a total of 232 reproducible loci ranging in size from 150 to 500 bp; 57 loci were generated with the EcoRI-AC/MseI-CC primer combination, 52 loci with the EcoRI-AT/MseI-CG combination, and 123 loci with the EcoRI-G/MseI-CT combination. Twelve loci were uninformative and were excluded from the UPGMA analysis and determination of DICE similarity coefficient. Based on the UPGMA-generated dendrogram, the isolates of F. graminearum sensu stricto isolated from wheat as well as the reference strains for this species formed a cluster that was distinct from the other six FGSC species included in the analysis (Figure 3a,b).
Toxins 03 01294 g003 1024
Figure 3. Dendrogram generated with AFLP data of 183 F. graminearum Argentinean strains and Fusarium graminearum complex standard isolates, generated by NTSYS software with DICE similarity index. Strains are signed with the ITEM number preceded by the field number. Subclusters from A1 to A11 are reported in the figure.
Figure 3. Dendrogram generated with AFLP data of 183 F. graminearum Argentinean strains and Fusarium graminearum complex standard isolates, generated by NTSYS software with DICE similarity index. Strains are signed with the ITEM number preceded by the field number. Subclusters from A1 to A11 are reported in the figure.
Toxins 03 01294 g003
The analysis also indicated that 152 (83%) of the F. graminearum sensu stricto isolates were highly similar to one another and to reference strains NRRL 28336 and NRRL 5883 for this species; the DICE similarity coefficients for the 152 isolates and two reference strains were >0.85 (Figure 3a,b). Although Argentinean isolates were grouped in one main cluster, the dendrogram indicates that most of isolates could be grouped in at least 11 sub-clusters, named in Figure 3a,b from A1 to A11. Among them, 10 isolates branched as a single member. A clear cluster made of 10 strains, mainly isolated from the fields, numbers 3 and 4 of the IV region, was formed. The resolved sub-clusters were not correlated with geographical origin, year of harvest or chemotype. No isolate with the same haplotype was found; therefore no isolate was a clonal one. The other 17 isolates of F. graminearum sensu stricto analyzed were less similar to one another as well as the other 152 isolates; they exhibited similarity coefficients of <0.84. In particular, among this group of strains, ITEM 8428 branched at a similarity value of 0.70, being the most distant from all the other strains (DICE similarity coefficient >0.77). This relatively low level of similarity among the 17 isolates was comparable to levels of similarity among some FGSC species; i.e., the DICE similarity coefficient for F. austroamericanum versus F. cortaderiae and for F. acaciae-mearnsii versus F. asiaticum were ~0.79 and ~0.75 respectively.

4. Discussion

Previous studies on the genetic diversity of F. graminearum sensu stricto from wheat in Argentina have been limited. In one study [20], the genetic diversity of 113 isolates recovered from wheat from two locations and during one growing season was examined by AFLP analysis. However, the profile of trichothecene production was not determined. In a second study [11], trichothecene production profiles were examined for 144 isolates from multiple locations across a large area of the major wheat-producing region of Argentina. However, the genetic diversity of the strains was not examined. In the current study, we examined the species identity and genetic diversity (via AFLP analysis) of the collection of 144 isolates noted above, plus 39 additional isolates, for which trichothecene production was previously determined [11]. Our analysis provides further evidence that F. graminearum sensu stricto is the predominant species of the FGSC in the temperate wheat production region of Argentina. This is the same species that predominates in North America and Europe [15,21,22,34,35] and that has been reported elsewhere in South America [20,23]. However, many reports have also shown that other FGSC species can often co-occur with F. graminearum sensu stricto in the same geographical areas, as it was reported in New Zealand and China [36,37]. Recent reports [26] indicated that the FGSC species F. meridionale and F. bothii predominate on maize in north western, subtropical Argentina, whereas F. graminearum sensu stricto predominates on maize and wheat in the temperate regions of Argentina. The co-occurrence of potentially interfertile but phylogenetically distinct FGSC species could promote interbreeding between the species and, therefore, formation of new genotypes that could affect pathogenicity, host range, or toxin production. The homogeneity of the Argentinean population of FGSC from wheat reported here and previously [20] could provide an advantage with respect to disease management, plant breeding strategies and quarantine regulations. However, the occurrence of other FGSC species in Argentina should be verified by analyzing other potential host plants, such as maize, barley, and other small cereals. In particular, the occurrence of F. cortaderiae, considered by O’Donnell et al. [15] to have a South American origin, should be evaluated.
From the preliminary AFLP analysis, the high number of polymorphic loci estimated within the 183 field isolates of F. graminearum sensu stricto from Argentina, indicate that the genetic diversity within this species is relatively high. Moreover, the high percentage of haplotypes occurring within the field population of F. graminearum highlighted a high degree of genotypic diversity. In particular, the occurrence of two strains, ITEM 8432 and 8428, provided of a low level of similarity with respect to the whole set of strains, due to both unique loci and relatively unique combinations of some loci, increased the genetic/genotypic diversity of the population here investigated. However, these data agree with the data shown by Ramirez et al. [20] that found a high level of genetic exchange between two populations of F. graminearum sensu stricto isolated from two different localities in Argentina and considered them potentially part of a larger randomly mating population. Moreover, this genotypic variability could be explained by out-crossing, which appears to be common in F. graminearum in South and North America [8,22,38] and by gene flow, since the potential long distance dispersal of spores of F. graminearum has been well documented [39]. In this study, we utilized two different approaches, AFLP analysis and analysis of DNA sequence of two genes, to gain insight into evolutionary relationships within a population of FGSC isolated from wheat in Argentina. Phylogenetic analysis based on comparisons of TEF1 and TUB2 sequences assigned all strains analyzed to F. graminaerum sensu stricto. The sequence data are consistent with AFLP data that grouped the Argentinean isolates with the two ex type strains of F. graminearum sensu stricto and delineated them from ex-type strains of six other FGSC species. Our AFLP data indicate that the level of diversity among some F. graminearum sensu stricto isolates was greater than the level of diversity between the two FGSC species F. austroamaricanum and F. cortaderiae (Figure 3a,b). However, since phenetic criteria such as percent identity of AFLP are considered less reliable and biologically meaningful than GCPSR [15], these data must be evaluated carefully.
The mycotoxin production of 115 out of the 183 strains, was the object of a previous study [11] that showed that DON was produced by most of the isolates. Isolates producing 15ADON were more common than those producing 3ADON. It is interesting to underline that both 3ADON and 15ADON strains of F. graminearum sensu stricto here reported do not seem to be genetically distinct entities since they occur along the entire length of the AFLP-generated dendrogram. Although this is in contrast with O’Donnell et al. [16] that showed 3ADON and 15ADON isolates of F. graminearum sensu stricto from USA as genetically distinct populations, our data agree with previous studies based on AFLP that could not resolve into separate clades 3ADON and 15ADON isolates [20,21,39].

5. Conclusions

This report contributes to an improved understanding of the genetic diversity within F. graminearum sensu stricto across an extended wheat-cropping area of Argentina. This information will be useful for monitoring any future changes in the pathogen related to trichothecene production and for adopting strategies to control Fusarium Head Blight in Argentina. Finally, although only a few strains were isolated, our results provide the first report of F. pseudograminearum and F. crookwellense on wheat in Argentina.

Acknowledgments

We thank Vincenzo Ricci for its valuable technical assistance. We thank Instituto Italo-LatinoAmericano for supporting Cora L Alvarez studies at ISPA-CNR, Bari, Italy.

References

  1. Xu, X.M.; Berrie, A. Epidemiology of mycotoxigenic fungi associated with Fusarium ear blight and apple blue mould: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Desjardins, A.E. Fusarium mycotoxins. Chemistry, Genetics and Biology; American Phythopathological Society Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, J.W.; Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497–516. [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller, J.D.; Greenhalgh, R.; Wang, Y.Z.; Lu, M. Trichothecene chemotype of three Fusarium species. Mycologia 1991, 83, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yli-Mattila, T. Ecology, and evolution of toxigenic Fusarium species in cereals in northern Europe and Asia. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 92, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmale, D.G.; Wood-Jones, A.K.; Cowger, C.; Bergstrom, G.C.; Arellano, C. Trichothecene genotypes of Gibberella zeae from winter wheat fields in the eastern USA. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gale, L.R.; Harrison, S.A.; Ward, T.J.; O’Donnell, K.; Milus, E.A.; Gale, S.W.; Kistler, H.C. Nivalenol-type populations of Fusarium graminearum and F. asiaticum are prevalent on wheat in southern Louisiana. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ramírez, M.L.; Reynoso, M.M.; Farnochi, M.C.; Chulze, S. Vegetative compatibility and mycotoxin chemotypes among Fusarium graminearum (Gibberella zeae) isolates from wheat in Argentina. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 115, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lori, G.A.; Carranza, M.R.; Violante, A.; Rizzo, I.; Alippi, H.E. Fusarium spp. en trigo, capacidad toxicogenica y quimiotaxonomia de las cepas aisladas en la Argentina. Agronomie 1992, 12, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández Pinto, V.; Terminiello, L.; Basilico, J.C.; Ritieni, A. Natural occurrence of nivalenol and mycotoxigenic potential of Fusarium graminearum strains in wheat affected by Head Blight in Argentina. Braz. J.Microbiol. 2008, 39, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alvarez, C.L.; Azcarate, P.M.; Fernández Pinto, V. Toxigenic potential of Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto isolates from wheat in Argentina. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lee, T.; Han, Y.-K.; Kim, K.-H.; Yun, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-W. Tri13 and Tri7 determine deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-producing chemotypes of Gibberella zeae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2148–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alexander, N.J.; McCormick, S.P.; Waalwijk, C.; van der Lee, T.; Proctor, R.H. The genetic basis for 3-ADON and 15-ADON trichothecene chemotypes in Fusarium. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. O’Donnell, K.; Kistler, H.C.; Tacke, B.K.; Caspar, H.H. Gene genealogies reveal global phylogeographic structure and reproductive isolation among lineages of Fusarium graminearum, the fungus causing wheat scab. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 7905–7910. [Google Scholar]
  15. O’Donnell, K.; Ward, T.J.; Geiser, D.M.; Kistler, H.C.; Aoki, T. Genealogical concordance between the mating type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004, 41, 600–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. O’Donnell, K.; Ward, T.J.; Aberra, D.; Kistler, H.C.; Aoki, T.; Orwig, N.; Kimura, M.; Bjørnstad, A.; Klemsdal, S.S. Multilocus genotyping and molecular phylogenetics resolve a novel head blight pathogen within the Fusarium graminearum species complex from Ethiopia. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1514–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Starkey, D.E.; Ward, T.J.; Aoki, T.; Gale, L.R.; Kistler, H.C.; Geiser, D.M.; Suga, H.; Tóth, B.; Varga, J.; O’Donnell, K. Global molecular surveillance reveals novel Fusarium head blight species and trichothecene toxin diversity. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2007, 12, 1745–1776. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yli-Mattila, T.; Gagkaeva, T.; Ward, T.J.; Aoki, T.; Kistler, H.C.; O’Donnell, K. A novel Asian clade within the Fusarium graminearum species complex includes a newly discovered cereal head blight pathogen from the Russian Far East. Mycologia 2009, 101, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Laday, M.; Juhàsz, A.; Mulè, G.; Moretti, A.; Szècsi, A.; Logrieco, A. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and lineage determination of European isolates of Fusarium graminearum (Gibberella zeae). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramirez, M.L.; Reynoso, M.M.; Farnochi, M.C.; Torres, A.M.; Leslie, J.F.; Chulze, S.N. Population genetic structure of Gibberella zeae isolated from wheat in Argentina. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zeller, K.A.; Bowden, R.L.; Leslie, J.F. Diversity of epidemic populations of Gibberella zeae from small quadrats in Kansas and North Dakota. Phytopathology 2003, 93, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zeller, K.A.; Bowden, R.L.; Leslie, J.F. Population differentiation and recombination in wheat scab populations of Gibberella zeae from the United States. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Scoz, L.B.; Astolfi, P.; Reartes, D.S.; Schmale, D.G., III; Moraes, M.G.; Del Ponte, E.M. Trichothecene mycotoxin genotypes of Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto and Fusarium meridionale in wheat from southern Brazil. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Trigo Argentino Home Page. Available online: www.trigoargentino.com.ar (accessed on 20 October 2011).
  25. Moschini, R.C.; Pioli, R.; Carmona, M.; Sacchi, O. Empirical predictions of wheat head blight in the Northern Argentinean Pampas Region. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1541–1545. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sampietro, D.A.; Díaz, C.G.; Gonzalez, V.; Vattuone, M.A.; Ploper, L.D.; Catalan, C.A.; Ward, T.J. Species diversity and toxigenic potential of Fusarium graminearum complex isolates from maize fields in northwest Argentina. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 145, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Leslie, J.F.; Summerell, B.A. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  28. ITEM Collection. Agri-Food Toxigenic Fungi Culture Collection. Available online: www.ispa.cnr.it/Collection (accessed on 20 October 2011).
  29. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamura, K.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar]
  32. NCBI Home Page. Available online: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 20 October 2011).
  33. Geiser, D.M.; del Mar Jimenez-Gasco, M.; Kang, S.; Makalowska, I.; Veeraraghavan, N.; Ward, T.J.; Zhang, N.; Kuldau, G.A.; O’Donnell, K. FUSARIUM-ID v.1.0: A DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gagkaeva, T.Y.; Yli-Mattila, T. Genetic Diversity of Fusarium graminearum in Europe and Asia. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ward, T.J.; Clear, R.M.; Rooney, A.P.; O’Donnell, K.; Gaba, D.; Patrick, S.; Starkey, D.E.; Gilbert, J.; Geiger, D.M.; Nowicki, T.W. An adaptive evolutionary shift in Fusarium head blight pathogen populations is driving the rapid spread of more toxigenic Fusarium graminearum in North America. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Monds, R.D.; Cromey, G.; Lauren, D.R.; di Menna, M.; Marshall, J. Fusarium gramineraum, F cortaderiae and F pseudogramineraum in New Zealand: Molecular phylogenetic analysis, mycotoxin chemotypes and co-existence of specie. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 410–420. [Google Scholar]
  37. Qu, B.; Li, H.P.; Zhang, J.B.; Huang, T.; Wu, A.B.; Zhao, C.S.; Caarter, J.; Nicholson, P.; Liao, Y.C. Geographic distribution and genetic diversity of Fusarium gramineraum and F. asiaticum on wheat spikes throughout China. Plant Pathol. 2007, 57, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gale, L.R.; Chen, L.F.; Hernick, C.A.; Katamura, A.; Kistler, H.C. Population analysis of Fusarium graminearum from wheat fields in Eastern China. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Schmale, D.G., III; Leslie, J.F.; Zeller, K.A.; Saleh, A.A.; Shields, E.J.; Bergstrom, G.C. Genetic structure of athmospheric populations of Gibberella zeae. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alvarez, C.L.; Somma, S.; Proctor, R.H.; Stea, G.; Mulè, G.; Logrieco, A.F.; Pinto, V.F.; Moretti, A. Genetic Diversity in Fusarium graminearum from a Major Wheat-Producing Region of Argentina. Toxins 2011, 3, 1294-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3101294

AMA Style

Alvarez CL, Somma S, Proctor RH, Stea G, Mulè G, Logrieco AF, Pinto VF, Moretti A. Genetic Diversity in Fusarium graminearum from a Major Wheat-Producing Region of Argentina. Toxins. 2011; 3(10):1294-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3101294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alvarez, Cora Lilia, Stefania Somma, Robert H. Proctor, Gaetano Stea, Giuseppina Mulè, Antonio F. Logrieco, Virginia Fernandez Pinto, and Antonio Moretti. 2011. "Genetic Diversity in Fusarium graminearum from a Major Wheat-Producing Region of Argentina" Toxins 3, no. 10: 1294-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3101294

APA Style

Alvarez, C. L., Somma, S., Proctor, R. H., Stea, G., Mulè, G., Logrieco, A. F., Pinto, V. F., & Moretti, A. (2011). Genetic Diversity in Fusarium graminearum from a Major Wheat-Producing Region of Argentina. Toxins, 3(10), 1294-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins3101294

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop