Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Mycotoxin Contamination in Sugarcane Grass and Juice: First Report on Detection of Multiple Mycotoxins and Exposure Assessment for Aflatoxins B1 and G1 in Humans
Previous Article in Journal
Addition of Carbon to the Culture Medium Improves the Detection Efficiency of Aflatoxin Synthetic Fungi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glutathione-Conjugates of Deoxynivalenol in Naturally Contaminated Grain Are Primarily Linked via the Epoxide Group
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/toxins8110342
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Crops and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria

by
Cynthia Adaku Chilaka
1,2,*,
Marthe De Boevre
1,
Olusegun Oladimeji Atanda
3 and
Sarah De Saeger
1
1
Laboratory of Food Analysis, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Applied Food Science and Tourism, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia-Ikot Ekpene Road, Umudike, PMB 7267 Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria
3
Department of Biological Sciences, McPherson University, KM 96 Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, 110117 Seriki Sotayo, Ogun State, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2016, 8(11), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110342
Submission received: 30 September 2016 / Revised: 8 November 2016 / Accepted: 13 November 2016 / Published: 18 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 5th International Symposium on Mycotoxins and Toxigenic Moulds: Challenges and Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Nigeria, maize, sorghum, and millet are very important cash crops. They are consumed on a daily basis in different processed forms in diverse cultural backgrounds. These crops are prone to fungi infestation, and subsequently may be contaminated with mycotoxins. A total of 363 samples comprising of maize (136), sorghum (110), millet (87), and ogi (30) were collected from randomly selected markets in four agro-ecological zones in Nigeria. Samples were assessed for Fusarium mycotoxins contamination using a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Subsequently, some selected samples were analysed for the occurrence of hidden fumonisins. Overall, 64% of the samples were contaminated with at least one toxin, at the rate of 77%, 44%, 59%, and 97% for maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi, respectively. Fumonisins were the most dominant, especially in maize and ogi, occurring at the rate of 65% and 93% with mean values of 935 and 1128 μg/kg, respectively. The prevalence of diacetoxyscirpenol was observed in maize (13%), sorghum (18%), and millet (29%), irrespective of the agro-ecological zone. Other mycotoxins detected were deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and their metabolites, nivalenol, fusarenon-X, HT-2 toxin, and hidden fumonisins. About 43% of the samples were contaminated with more than one toxin. This study suggests that consumption of cereals and cereal-based products, ogi particularly by infants may be a source of exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins.

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by a wide diversity of toxigenic fungi, which often contaminate crops worldwide [1]. These fungi are ubiquitous in nature, and may contaminate crops in the field or during storage, thus producing mycotoxins under favourable environmental conditions. Fusarium fungi are of high significance because of their ability to cause several devastating plant diseases, and being responsible for economic losses and trade barriers, while having potential in producing a wide range of mycotoxins. Fusarium mycotoxins have been linked to several health related problems in animals and humans ranging from acute (such as anorexia and diarrhoea) to chronic disease conditions (such as cancer and immunosuppression) [2,3]. For instance, fumonisins when ingested are carcinogenic, neurotoxic, and hepatotoxic and may possibly lead to death [1,2,4]. Efforts to understand the production and behaviour of mycotoxins, and to protect consumers from mycotoxicoses have led to extensive investigation of these toxins across the globe as well as establishment of regulatory maximum limits by the developed countries. Although it is estimated that several Fusarium mycotoxins do exist in nature, those mostly studied are the fumonisins (FB), trichothecenes (TH), and zearalenone (ZEN). This is due to the high toxic effects they exert on humans and animals, and their frequent occurrence in agricultural products especially cereals and cereal-based food products.
Cereals such as maize (Zea mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), and millet (Pennisetum glaucum) serve as major staple crops consumed especially by the middle and low income earners in Nigeria. These crops are often processed into different food forms including processing of traditional weaning meal in the region. Ogi (also known as akamu) is a fermented cereal-based product used as a major traditional weaning food for infants, food for the convalescent and the elderly as well as consumed by different age groups especially as breakfast meal in Nigeria. It is produced by submerge fermentation of cereal grains (maize, sorghum, or millet) for two to three days followed by wet milling and sieving through a mesh. The fermentation process of ogi is usually initiated by chance inoculation under uncontrolled environmental conditions thereby resulting in variable quality of the final product. Studies have reported the prevalence of Fusarium mycotoxins, particularly TH, ZEN, and FB, in cereal crops and cereal-based products globally [5,6,7,8]. In most cases, these mycotoxins may co-exist in food and food products which often results to a synergistic, additive or antagonistic toxic effect on the host [9]. The mixed effects of mycotoxins have been revealed by the study of Kouadio et al. [10] on the effects of combinations of ZEN, fumonisin B1 (FB1), and deoxynivalenol (DON) on the human intestinal cell line (Caco-2). FB1 in combination with ZEN showed lesser effect on the reduction of cell viability when compared to the combined effect of FB1 with other mycotoxins because of the antagonistic effect of FB1 on ZEN [10]. Similarly, Speijer and Speijer [9] observed the antagonistic effect of DON on T-2 in the inhibition of human lymphocytes proliferation. It is noteworthy to mention that ternary combination of type B TH (fusarenon-X (FUS-X), nivalenol (NIV), and DON) exhibited an antagonistic interaction on the intestinal epithelial cells which is possibly linked to a lower toxicity of FUS-X in the mixture [11]. There exist a potential relationship in the reduction of FUS-X toxicity and the competition between DON and NIV at the substrate binding sites of the de-acetylase thus leading to a reduced deacetylation of FUS-X [11]. Cases of synergistic interaction exhibited by combination of mycotoxins such as ZEN, DON, and FB1 have also been reported [10,12]. Harvey et al. [13] and Kubena et al. [14] demonstrated the synergistic and additive effects resulting to growth depression in pigs and broiler chicks, respectively because of co-occurrence of mixed mycotoxins (DON and FB1). A synergistic interaction between several combinations of type B TH on epithelial cell toxicity has also been recorded [11,15]. Recently, issues of possible co-existence of these Fusarium mycotoxins and their modified forms have become of great concern. Modification of mycotoxins may be triggered by food processing, or matrix related, or through conjugation by either plant, fungi or animal [16,17]. These modified mycotoxins often escape routine analysis leading to underestimation of actual mycotoxin levels in products and may possibly hydrolysed into the parent toxins during digestion [18]. Several studies on the occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals and cereal-based products have reported the natural occurrence and co-occurrence of modified mycotoxins such as DON-3-glucoside (DON-3G), ZEN-4-glucoside (ZEN-14G), and α- and β-zearalenol-4-glucoside (α- and β-ZEL-4G) [5,19]. The possible underestimation of FB concentration in cereals and cereal-based products as a result of presences of hidden FB has been demonstrated [20,21,22]. Hidden FB cannot be directly analysed as they have to be released from the matrix into extractable form (hydrolysed FB) by sample treatment often by alkaline hydrolysis [23,24].
The increasing rate of climate change, which is characterised by significant increase or decrease in temperature and/or alteration of rainfall during planting season in sub-Saharan Africa (especially Nigeria), may have predisposed this region to Fusarium mycotoxins contamination. Evidence of possible occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in Nigeria is revealed by the frequent incidence of major mycotoxin producing Fusarium species such as F. verticillioides, F. graminearum, F. poae, F. proliferatum, and F. sporotrichioides in Nigerian food commodities [25,26]. In spite of this obvious evidence, limited study has been undertaken to ascertain the possible occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins and their modified forms in Nigeria food products. This has resulted to the lack of regulatory maximum levels governing the control of Fusarium mycotoxins in Nigeria. Sub-Saharan African countries including Nigeria solely depend on maximum levels set by the European Union and the Codex Alimentarius Commission on control of Fusarium mycotoxins without considering the feeding habits and other socio-economic dynamics faced by this region. The main objective of the present paper is to investigate the occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins and their modified forms including fumonisin B1, B2, and B3; hidden FB; DON; 3-acetyl-DON (3ADON); 15-acetyl-DON (15ADON); DON-3G; ZEN; α-zearalenol (α-ZEL); β-zearalenol (β-ZEL); ZEN-14G; NIV; FUS-X; T-2 toxin (T-2); HT-2 toxin (HT-2); diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS); and neosolaniol (NEO) in Nigerian cereals—maize, sorghum, millet, and the processed products (ogi).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Fusarium Mycotoxins Contamination in Cereals (Maize, Sorghum, and Millet) and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria

A total of 363 samples comprising maize (n = 136), sorghum (n = 110), millet (n = 87), and ogi (n = 30) were evaluated for the occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins and modified forms including FB1, FB2, FB3, hidden FB, DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, DON-3G, ZEN, α-ZEL and β-ZEL, ZEN-14G, NIV, FUS-X, T-2, HT-2, DAS, and NEO. These samples were collected from randomly selected markets from four agro-ecological zones in Nigeria between September 2015 and October 2015. Out of the 18 Fusarium mycotoxins analysed in the samples, 15 toxins were present in at least one of the samples. Data on the incidence and occurrence level of individual Fusarium mycotoxins in the cereals (maize, sorghum, and millet) and processed products (ogi) are illustrated in Table 1 and Table 2. Over 40% prevalence rate of the mycotoxins was recorded in all sample types, with the individual rate of 77%, 44%, 59%, and 97% for maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi, respectively.
Maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi contained 13, 13, 10, and 14 Fusarium secondary metabolites, respectively, of which only four (FB1, FB2, DON, and ZEN) are regulated by the European Union (EU). Fumonisins were the most dominant mycotoxins occurring at high level and incidence rate in all the food types especially in maize and ogi samples. The sum of fumonisins (FB1 + FB2 + FB3 (FB)) were in the ranges of 32–8508 μg/kg (65%), 45–180 μg/kg (8%), 74–22,064 μg/kg (14%), and 125–3557 μg/kg (93%) in maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi, respectively. Except for sorghum, most of the maize and millet samples in this study exceeded the maximum regulatory limit set for the sum of FB1 and FB2 (1000 μg/kg) by the European Union (EU) [27] suggesting the high exposure of the population to this toxin. A similar high FB incidence rate has been reported in several studies from sub-Saharan Africa [28,29,30,31,32,33,34] at concentrations ranging up to 53,863 μg/kg [30]. High incidence of FB, especially in maize may be explained by the susceptibility of the maize crop to FB producing fungi (F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum) [35]. Sorghum and millet had a much lower incidence rate, however an extreme concentration of FB was recorded in one of the millet samples (22,064 μg/kg). Lower concentrations and incidence rate in sorghum and millet from Ethiopia have previously been reported [36]. However, the reversed trend was observed by Ayalew et al. [37], who recorded higher levels of FB (range: 1370–2117 μg/kg) in sorghum samples. Of the FB, FB1 occurred at a more frequent rate than FB2 and FB3. Although, we observed that some of the millet (n = 4) and maize (n = 16) samples were contaminated with only FB2. Such trend has previously been reported in cereals suggesting the possible contamination of Aspergillus niger, which is a principal producer of FB2 [38]. The study of Ezekiel et al. [39] on sorghum grain confirms the possible occurrence of only FB2 in cereals from Nigeria. The incidence and levels of FB as observed in ogi is of concern. This present study reveals for the first time the occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in ogi from Nigerian market. The maximum concentration and percentage incidence of FB1, FB2, and FB3 detected in ogi samples were 1903 μg/kg (93%), 1,283 μg/kg (87%), and 371 μg/kg (77%), respectively (Table 1). About 83% of the ogi samples exceeded the EU maximum limit of 200 μg/kg for processed maize-based foods for infants and young children [27]. Interestingly, out of the 30 ogi samples analysed, the only two FB negative samples were of sorghum-base. This confirms the previous study that sorghum is less prone to fungal infestation than maize [39]. Although there are no available data on the occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in ogi, studies from the same country reported the occurrence of FB in two fermented traditional cereal-based beverages (kunu-zaki and pito) [39].
The next group of dominating mycotoxins were the TH. They have been associated with the temperate regions, however studies emerging from sub-Saharan Africa have revealed the possible occurrence of these toxins in the tropics. Type B TH DON, 15ADON, DON-3G, and NIV were detected in our samples. DON was present in 16%, 3%, 13%, and 13% of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi samples at a maximum level of 225 μg/kg, 119 μg/kg, 583 μg/kg, and 74 μg/kg, respectively. Interestingly no sample, irrespective of the food type, exceeded the EU maximum limit (1750 μg/kg, maize; 1250 μg/kg, other cereals; and 200 μg/kg, cereal-based infant foods) for DON [27]. Incidence of DON, as observed in this study, was similar to that reported in previous studies on Nigerian cereals [26,40], but much less than that reported in maize by Adetunji et al. [32] and Ediage et al. [34]. The same trend was reported in millet, sorghum, and cereal-based food samples from Burkina Faso [29]. Studies have shown the occurrence of acetylated DON forms and DON-3G in maize and its products [31,41]. Maize samples in our study were negative for 3ADON, 15ADON, and DON-3G. This is in agreement with a previous study on maize from Burkina Faso [29]. Sorghum, millet, and ogi were contaminated with 15ADON, and were negative of 3ADON. The production of acetylated derivatives (15ADON and 3ADON) by F. graminearum have been reported and the potential of the isolates to produce 15ADON or 3ADON as the major isomer is dependent on the geographic origin [42,43]. Although the information on the regional relationship between F. graminearum and the production of 15ADON or 3ADON is still lacking in Africa, Li et al. [44] and Mirocha et al. [42] reported the predominant of 3ADON in New Zealand, Austrialia, and China while 15ADON chemotype is predominant in North America. The glucoside of DON (DON-3G) was observed to contaminate sorghum and ogi samples in the present study. A comparable result on DON-3G in sorghum and millet from Ethiopia have also been reported [36].
Samples of maize (n = 3) and ogi (n = 2) were contaminated with NIV at concentration ranges of 163–271 μg/kg and 136–160 μg/kg, respectively. Occurrence of NIV in Nigerian maize has previously been reported, although at a higher incidence rate (54%) [32]. While similar result in cereal-based products as shown in this study was reported by Castillo et al. [45]. Contrary to the result reported on the occurrence of NIV in sorghum and millet by Chala et al. [36], sorghum and millet were negative for NIV in the present study. The trend observed in this study with NIV was also seen with FUS-X contamination. NEO was not detected in any of the samples analysed.
With regards to type A TH, DAS and HT-2 were present in all the sample types except for the cereal-based products (ogi) which was negative for DAS, while T-2 was negative in all the sample types. DAS was detected in maize, sorghum, and millet at a rate of 13%, 18%, and 29%, respectively (Table 1). The concentrations of DAS in the cereals ranged between 2 μg/kg and 25 μg/kg. The occurrence of DAS in the samples is probably associated with the occurrence of major DAS-producing fungi in this region [25,26]. DAS and HT-2 are synthesised by a wide range of Fusarium species, and they are alleged to be among the most toxic TH occurring in different food products. Several studies have reported the occurrence of DAS in cereals and cereal-based products [46,47]. Despite its association with the temperate weather, previous studies revealed the occurrence of DAS in the tropical regions. Adejumo et al. [26] and Adetunji et al. [32] recorded the occurrence of DAS in Nigerian maize at maximum concentrations of 51 μg/kg (9%) and 30 μg/kg (19%), respectively . Besides maize, DAS has been found to contaminate sorghum and millet from Ethiopia with maximum concentrations of 64.2 μg/kg (mean value, 11.9 μg/kg), and 1.43 μg/kg (mean value, 1.43 μg/kg), respectively [36]. A total of 1%, 8%, 5%, and 3% of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi, respectively, were positive of HT-2 (Table 1). Beside the low incidence rate, none of the cereals or ogi samples exceeded the EU recommendation level of 100 μg/kg and 15 μg/kg for cereal and infant foods, respectively [48].
Other mycotoxins detected in the study include ZEN, α-ZEL, β-ZEL, and ZEN-14G. Recent studies have shown the prevalence of ZEN in food products from sub-Saharan Africa [36,49], however in the present study, ZEN was rarely detected. ZEN was detected in maize, sorghum, and millet at 1%, 1%, and 14%, respectively (Table 1) with the concentrations in all the sample types being less than the EU maximum limit of ZEN, except for millet with 8 samples (9%) exceeding 100 μg/kg [27]. Further, only one sample (3%) of ogi was positive for ZEN with the value exceeding the maximum limit of 20 μg/kg set by EU for processed cereal-based foods for infants and young children [50]. About 1% and 2% of maize were contaminated with α-ZEL and β-ZEL, respectively. Although there exist only limited studies on the occurrence of these metabolites in food products from sub-Saharan Africa, available data show their possible occurrence in Nigerian maize [32,49]. The present study is in agreement with the result of Adetunji et al. [32]. The maximum levels for β-ZEL in sorghum, millet, and ogi were 21 μg/kg, 39 μg/kg, and 20 μg/kg, respectively. Millet samples were negative of α-ZEL while sorghum and ogi had 3% and 7% incidence rate with maximum levels of 33 μg/kg and 22 μg/kg, respectively (Table 1). Chala et al. [36] reported a higher incidence rate of α-ZEL and β-ZEL in sorghum and millet compared to the current study, however, the levels reported by these authors were lower. With regards to ZEN-14G, all food type samples analysed showed positive samples with maximum concentrations of 24 μg/kg (maize), 22 μg/kg (sorghum), 34 μg/kg (millet), and 31 μg/kg (ogi). Occurrence of this modified form of ZEN in cereals and ogi in the current study is supported by a study which detected a wide range of modified forms of ZEN in cereal-based food products [18,19]. Although, there are no recommendation nor regulation limit of ZEN-14G in cereals and cereal-based products because of the non availability of toxicological data, the occurrence of ZEN-14G as observed in the present study is presumed to add additional toxic effect to the host. De Boevre et al. [51] reported the possible hydrolysis of ZEN-14G into its parent form (ZEN) in the digestive tract of mammals suggesting an additional toxicity.

2.2. Fumonisins and Hidden Fumonisins Contamination in Cereals (Maize, Sorghum and Millet) and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria

To determine the occurrence of hidden fumonisins, samples were selected from each food type based on the FB result obtained from the multi-mycotoxin analysis (Table 1). Five FB positive and five FB negative samples of each food type (maize, sorghum, and millet) were selected for analysis. Note that eight positive samples and two negative samples of ogi were used for the analysis because only two samples of ogi were negative. Each of the samples were analysed simultaneously for FB (FB1, FB2, and FB3) as well as total fumonisins after hydrolysis as described in Section 4. Calculation of hidden FB concentration was based on the difference between the concentration of FB and the concentration of total FB after hydrolysis [52]. The maximum FB and total FB concentration in the selected samples of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi samples were 3514 and 4568 μg/kg, 180 and 502 μg/kg, 840 and 3059 μg/kg, and 1496 and 1795 μg/kg, respectively. After hydrolysis, we observed an increment ranging from 1.3 to 5.2 times higher levels of total FB in maize samples. The same trend was observed in sorghum, millet, and ogi samples. Hidden FB have been alleged to occur in processed products especially nixtamalised and thermally processed foods [52,53]. However, recent studies have revealed the occurrence of these toxins in unprocessed food products especially in raw maize samples [20,54] which suggest the possible transformation of FB to bound derivatives by natural phenomena due to plant metabolism [24]. The presence of hidden FB as observed in the current study may pose an additional health risk to consumers especially to the consumers of ogi analysed in this study. FB has been alleged to cause a range of toxic health effect on humans and animals especially in sub-Saharan Africa where cases of very high levels of FB have been recorded. Cases of human oesophageal cancer in South Africa and other parts of the World have been linked to the consumption of food contaminated with FB. Since it is obvious that hidden FB may cause additional toxic effect on the host as observed when low FB contaminated feed was fed to animals [55], the occurrence of hidden FB in cereals and cereal-based products should no longer be neglected especially in Nigeria where these products serve as major staple food.

2.3. Distribution of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Major Cereals across the Different Agro-Ecological Zones of Nigeria

Mycotoxin occurrence and distribution is influenced by different factors including crop species, climatic, and environmental conditions of a given region. The mean and maximum concentrations of individual mycotoxins in the different food types and AEZ are shown in Table 3. Fumonisins contaminations were observed in all the cereal types irrespective of the AEZ. Sudan Savanna (SS) and Northern Guinea Savanna (NGS) zones had the highest incidence rate of FB1 in maize with a highest FB1 concentration of 2443 μg/kg and 8222 μg/kg, respectively, when compared to Southern Guinea Savanna (SGS) and Derived Savanna (DS). A similar trend with FB1 contamination was also seen when the sum of FB (FB1, FB2, and FB3) was considered. This is also similar with the result obtained from the sorghum samples, with the SS zone registering the highest FB1 followed by NGS and SGS. This observation could be linked to the high mycotoxins production potentials of Fusarium fungi in warmer climates [56] and the significant change in climatic conditions in this region characterised by increase in rainfall and longer raining seasons [57]. Among the other mycotoxins detected, DAS was the next most common metabolite contaminating all the food types across the AEZ, although at lower concentrations. While there are no existing regulatory limits set for DAS in food products, DAS has been implicated in a wide range of toxic effects in animals as well as human, ranging from acute to chronic. It has been linked to a human fatal disease (alimentary toxic aleukia), exhibiting several symptoms such as inflammation of the skin, vomiting, and damage to hematopoietic tissues [1,3]. DON also occurred in the respective cereal types across the AEZ, except for the sorghum samples from the SGS zone (Table 3). The highest incidence rate of DON was observed in maize samples from DS zone characterized by a lower temperature and higher average annual rainfall of 25–35 °C and 1300–1500 mm, respectively when compared to the other zones. In millet samples, the NGS zone registered the highest incidence rate of DON. Comparing the incidence of ZEN across the different food types and AEZ, samples from SS zones were negative of ZEN regardless of the cereal type. This result could be related to the prevailing local weather conditions of this region which is between 30 and 40 °C, which is above the optimum temperature of 25 °C for the production of ZEN [58].
In general, it is postulated that Fusarium fungi and subsequent mycotoxins occurrence is higher in colder regions. We observed the trend in the incidence of Fusarium toxins in this study with approximately colder region having multiple mycotoxins (Table 3). Further analysis to assess the significant difference in the distribution of Fusarium mycotoxins across the AEZ was done using the Kruskal Wallis test (Figure 1). With respect to maize, there was a significant difference in FB1 and DAS contamination across the AEZ, whereas in millet samples, DAS contamination was significantly different across the different zones. The less difference observed across the AEZ in the current study may be attributed to the quality of the sampled food products because of the premium placed on high quality (visual observation) food products which arises through sorting and cleaning in order to add more value to the products, thus increasing the market value of the food product.

2.4. Co-Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereals and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria

Occurrence of multiple mycotoxins in food, especially cereals and cereal-based products has been an issue of great concern because of the synergistic and/or additive effects caused by the interaction of these toxins in humans and animals. In this study, we observed that 60%, 19%, 30%, and 93% of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi, respectively, were contaminated with at least two mycotoxins (Figure 2). In maize samples, FB co-existed with DAS at 13%, being the highest level observed, followed by co-occurrence between FB and DON (11%). DAS and DON-3G co-occurred in 16% of sorghum samples, succeeded by DON-3G and HT2, while DAS and ZEN dominated in millet samples followed by DAS and DON. Previous studies have shown the frequent co-contamination of Fusarium toxins in cereal products in sub-Saharan Africa [32,34,36], which is linked to co-occurrence of several species of Fusarium fungi in crops or the potential ability of one Fusarium spp. to produce more than one mycotoxins [59]. However, the rates observed in sorghum and millet in the present study were in contrast with the data reported on co-occurrence of mycotoxins in sorghum (94%) and millet (85%) from South Korean retail markets [60], and may be attributed to the different sampling regions considered for these studies.
Although only limited studies exist on the co-occurrence of DON, ZEN, and their modified forms in sub-Saharan Africa, available data proves the potential of DON co-occurring with its modified forms in cereals from this region [34]. This was not the case in this study. The disparity may be attributed to the differences in sampling protocol. Ediage et al. [34] analysed household samples, while samples from the markets were analysed in the present study. Cereals purchased from the market often are of better quality compared to those from the household or at farmers disposal. Ironically, this is because high-graded cereal grains are often placed for sale by the farmers because of a better market bargain, while they retain the poor quality cereal grains since there are no provisional channels for destruction or diversion of these products.
Interestingly, the processed cereal-based products (ogi) analysed in this study had the highest co-occurrence rate compared to the cereals. This observation could be attributed to many factors (such as poor sanitation during processing). Ogi is fermented under uncontrolled conditions, and as such could be contaminated with any form of organism residing in the environment. Another possible avenue for contamination is the quality of the raw cereal used in the production of ogi. Although reduction of mycotoxin concentrations have been reported during processing of ogi [61], it is important to mention that reduction of mycotoxins during food processing is dependent on the initial concentrations of the raw produce and as such good quality cereal grains should be used for production of ogi. Up to 23% of ogi samples were contaminated with at least five mycotoxins, with the highest co-occurrence existing between FB and DON-3G, and subsequently between FB and DON. DON and DON-3G co-occurred in four of the samples while ZEN, ZEN-14G, α-ZEL, and β-ZEL co-occurred in one sample. This result is affirmed by the previous study on co-occurrence of these metabolites in cereal-based products [5]. However, the rates and concentration levels in their study were higher than the levels observed in this study.

3. Conclusions

The present study showed the occurrence of Fusarium toxins in cereals and cereal-based fermented products (ogi) in Nigeria. Fumonisins were the most dominating Fusarium mycotoxins with some of the samples exceeding the FB regulatory limits set by the EU. Although the levels of other mycotoxins detected in the samples were low, the co-occurrence of these mycotoxins presents a health risk due to the synergistic and/or additive effect, considering the fact that these food products are consumed almost on daily basis. In addition, it is worrisome that the traditional weaning food fed to a large population of infant and growing children in this region contains high levels of FB with a cocktail of other mycotoxins. This phenomenon shows that infants are affected with different variation of toxic effects. Reducing mycotoxins in ogi is important, and mainly determined by the quality of the raw cereal before fermentation. Therefore, there is need to educate the small-scale producers on the risk of mycotoxins and possible ways to reduce or avoid contamination. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that though all cereals were contaminated with varying degrees of toxins, the incidence rate was higher in maize, suggesting sorghum and millet as a possible alternative. These results suggest the need for a national coordinated food safety action plan.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sampling

Nigeria has seven agro-ecological zones (AEZ) (Figure 3) based on the climatic and environmental conditions, out of which four AEZ were selected for sampling which include the Derived Savanna (DS), Southern Guinea Savanna (SGS), Northern Guinea Savanna (NGS), and Sudan Savanna (SS). The sampling sites were considered on the production areas of the crops and products. One state from each AEZ was covered for each crop and product. Maize samples were collected from four AEZ while millet and sorghum were sampled from SGS, NGS, and SS; and ogi samples were collected from DS. Table 4 shows the detailed sampling sites.
The geographical location, temperature, and rainfall pattern of DS, SGS, NGS, and SS are documented by Udoh et al. and Atehnkeng et al. [62,63]. Briefly, the DS is characterized by an annual rainfall distribution and temperature ranging between 1300 mm and 1500 mm, and 25 °C to 35 °C, respectively. The average annual rainfall of SGS is between 1000 mm and 1300 mm with a temperature range of 26 to 38 °C. The NGS has rainfall distribution averaging between 900 mm and 1000 mm annually, and temperatures vary from 28 to 40 °C, while SS is characterised by an annual rainfall distribution between 650 mm and 1000 mm annually, and temperatures varying from 30 to 40 °C.
A total of 363 samples comprising of maize (Zea mays) (n = 136), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) (n = 110), millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (n = 87), and ogi (n = 30) were collected from randomly selected markets between September 2015 and October 2015. All cereal samples were sorted and cleaned and had no visible mould before going to the market. Sampling was carried out as described by Adetunji et al. and European Commission Regulation with some modifications [32,64]. Briefly, the whole content of a traditional bag of 50 kg of maize, sorghum, and millet was considered as a lot. An aggregate sample size of 1 kg was composed of 5 incremental samples. Each incremental portion was about 200 g, and one was taken from different positions in the bag. In the case of ogi, 300 g of sample was collected from the top, middle, and bottom portions of the jute sack of 10 kg ogi, thoroughly mixed together, air dried, and packed in a plastic container. Each sample of the different food products (maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi) was thoroughly homogenised, and a representative portion of 200 g was taken, labelled, and sealed in zip lock bags, and transported to the Laboratory of Food Analysis, Ghent University, Belgium (Ottergemsesteenweg 460, Ghent, Belgium) for further analysis. Prior to analysis, maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi samples were milled to a sieve size of 0.5–1 mm using an IKA M20 universal mill (Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium) and stored at −20 °C.

4.2. Chemicals and Reagents

Methanol (MeOH, LC-MS grade), glacial acetic acid (LC-MS grade), and analytical grade acetonitrile were purchased from Biosolve B.V. (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). Analytical grade acetic acid, ammonium acetate and sodium chloride were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Analytical grade of n-hexane and methanol, Whatman® glass microfiber filters (GFA, 47 mm diameter) were purchased from VWR International (Zaventem, Belgium). Ultrafree®-MC centrifugal filter devices (0.22 μm) were obtained from Millipore (Bredford, MA, USA). C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) columns and MultiSep®226 AflaZon+ multifunctional columns were purchased from Alltech (Lokeren, Belgium) and Romer Labs (Gernsheim, Germany), respectively. Water was purified using a Milli-Q Gradient System (Millipore; Brussels, Belgium). All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
The analytical mycotoxin standards including FB1, FB2, DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM), FUS-X, NIV, HT-2, NEO, ZEN, zearalanone (ZAN), α-ZEL, β-ZEL were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bornem, Belgium). FB3 was obtained from Promec Unit (Tygerberg, South Africa). DAS, DON-3G and T-2 were purchased from Biopure Referenzsubstanze (Tulln, Austria) while ZEN-14G was synthesized via an in-house validated method according to Zill et al. [65]. Stock solutions of FB1, FB2, FB3, DON, 3-ADON, 15-ADON, HT-2, T-2, ZEN, ZAN, α-ZEL, β-ZEL, FUS-X, NIV, NEO, and DAS were prepared in MeOH at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. DOM (50 μg/mL), DON-3G (50.2 μg/mL) and ZEN-14G (100 μg/mL) were obtained as solution in acetonitrile. All stock solutions were stored for 1 year or until the expiration date at −18 °C. The working standard solutions were made by diluting the stock standard solutions in methanol, and were stored at −18 °C for 3 months. From the individual stock and working standard solutions, a standard mixture was prepared in methanol at the following concentrations: FB1, FB2, and DON (40 ng/μL), FB3 (25 ng/μL), 3-ADON (5 ng/μL), 15-ADON (2.5 ng/μL), HT-2, T-2, ZEN, α-ZEL, β-ZEL, ZEN-14G, DON-3G, and NEO (10 ng/μL), FUS-X and NIV (20 ng/μL), and DAS (0.5 ng/μL). The mixture was stored at −18 °C, and renewed every 3 months.

4.3. Sample Extraction

Sample preparation for 17 Fusarium mycotoxins was carried out as described by Monbaliu et al. [66] for multi-mycotoxin analysis. Briefly, 5 g of sample was spiked with internal standards (ZAN and DOM at a concentration of 250 and 150 μg/kg, respectively). DOM was used as internal standard for DON, DON-3G, 3ADON, and 15ADON while ZAN was used for the other mycotoxins. Spiked sample was kept in the dark for 15 min and extracted with acetonitrile/water/acetic acid (79/20/1, v/v/v). The supernatant was passed through a preconditioned C18-SPE column, and the extract was defatted. In order to recover the 17 Fusarium mycotoxins, two clean-up pathways were followed. Firstly, 12.5 mL of the defatted extract was added to 27.5 mL of acetonitrile/acetic acid (99/1, v/v), and passed through a MultiSep®226 AflaZon+ multifunctional column. In the second pathway, 10 mL of defatted extract was filtered using a glass microfilter. Two milliliters of the filtered extract were combined with the Multisep226 eluate and evaporated to dryness. The residue was then redissolved in 150 µL of the mobile phase (water/methanol/acetic acid (94/5/1, v/v/v) + 5 mM ammonium acetate and water/methanol/acetic acid (2/97/1, v/v/v) + 5 mM ammonium acetate in the ratio of 3/2, v/v). The redisolved mixture was then filtered using the Ultrafree® PVDF centrifuge filters and analysed by LC-MS/MS.

4.4. Preparation of the Hydrolysed FB1, FB2, and FB3 Standard

The hydrolysed FB standards were prepared as described by Dall Asta et al. [24]. Briefly, 90 μL standard solution of FB1, FB2, and FB3 (50 μg/mL of each) was prepared in methanol, transferred to a 10 mL sovirel tube, and evaporated to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The residue was redissolved in 2 M NaOH (1 mL), and the reaction was incubated overnight at room temperature. After hydrolysis, the mixture was extracted by liquid-liquid partition using acetonitrile (1 mL). The extraction was repeated two more times using 1 mL fresh acetonitrile. The organic phases were pooled together, evaporated under a nitrogen stream and redissolved in 1 mL of methanol. The reaction yield was checked by LC-MS, by monitoring the conversion of FB to hydrolysed FB and the absence of side-products, and it was found to be higher than 99%. Calibration curves were prepared by proper dilution of the standard solution, assuming the total conversion of the native compounds to the hydrolysed forms.

4.5. Sample Preparation for Hydrolysed Fumonisins

Ten samples from each matrix were selected for analysis of hydrolysed fumonisin; five samples comprising of high FB contaminated samples, while the second five samples were comprised of negative samples. Sample preparation was carried out as described by Dall Asta et al. [24]. Two and half grams of each sample was weighed, and was hydrolysed at room temperature using 50 mL of 2 M NaOH, homogenised with the Ultraturrax for 3 min, and then stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 60 min. Subsequently, 50 mL of acetonitrile was added, and homogenised for 3 min, and 20 mL of the upper organic phase was transferred into a centrifuge tube, and centrifuged for 15 min at 3500 rpm. Then, 4 mL was evaporated, and the residue was redissolved in 1 mL of water/methanol (30/70, v/v), and analysed by LC-MS/MS.

4.6. Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

A Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Micromass Quattro Micro triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for the detection and quantification of mycotoxins in the samples. The data acquisition and processing utilities included the use of the MassLynx™ version 4.1 and QuanLynx® version 4.1 software (Micromass, Manchester, UK). The column used was a Symmetry C18 (150 mm × 2.1 mm i.d. 5 μm) column with a guard column (10 mm × 2.1 mm i.d.) of the same material (Waters, Zellik, Belgium), and was kept at room temperature. The injection volume was 20 μL. Mobile phase consisting of water/methanol/acetic acid (94/5/1, v/v/v) and 5 mM ammonium acetate (mobile phase A), and methanol/water/acetic acid (97/2/1, v/v/v) and 5 mM ammonium acetate (mobile phase B) were used at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min with a gradient elution program. The gradient started at 95% mobile phase A with a linear decrease to 35% in 7 min. Mobile phase A decreased to 25% at 4 min, and an isocratic period of 100%, mobile phase B started at 11 min for 2 min. Initial column conditions were reached at 23 min using a linear decrease of mobile phase B, and the column was reconditioned for 5 min prior to the following injection. The mass spectrometer was operated using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) channels in positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) mode. More information and on the transition of the different mycotoxins are described by De Boevre et al. [41] and Monbaliu et al. [67]. The capillary voltage was 3.2 kV, and nitrogen was used as the desolvation gas. Source and desolvation temperatures were set at 150 and 350 °C, respectively.

4.7. Method Validation

For each matrix, validation parameters including apparent recovery, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and measurement uncertainty were evaluated. Five blank samples of each matrix were spiked in triplicate with the different mycotoxins (FB1, FB2 and FB3, ZEN, α-ZEL, β-ZEL, ZEN-14G, DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, DON-3G, NIV, FUS-X, T-2, HT-2, DAS, NEO) on three different days at concentration levels shown on Table S1. ZAN and DOM were added as internal standards (IS). Matrix-matched calibration (MMC) plots were constructed by applying the least-squares method, and by plotting the relative peak area (peak area of toxin/peak area of IS) against the spiked concentration level of the sample. The linearity was evaluated graphically using a scatter plot, and the linear regression model was tested using a lack-of-fit test. The apparent recovery for each of the mycotoxins was evaluated by dividing the observed value from the MMC curves by the spiked level. The obtained results ranged between 75% and 110%, which is in conformity with the range set in legislation [64].
A precision study with regards to repeatability (intraday precision) and reproducibility (interday precision) within laboratory was performed using five concentration levels, and was calculated using relative standard deviation (RSD). The results are presented in Table S1. LOD and LOQ for individual mycotoxins were obtained from the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio which have been defined and set as 3 and 10, respectively, by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). The LOQs of individual mycotoxins in maize, sorghum, and millet are shown in Table S2.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were processed and calculated using Microsoft office Excel 2007 (Redmond, WA, USA) and the statistical package R version 3.0.3 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Kruskal Wallis statistical test (an alternative to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) under nonparametric test) was used to assess the significance of the differences between the determined mycotoxin concentrations and the different AEZ.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/8/11/342/s1, Table S1: Intraday repeatability (RSDr, %) and interday reproducibility (RSDR, %) (within laboratory) of the individual mycotoxins for maize, sorghum and millet. Table S2: Limits of detection (LOD, µg/kg) and limits of quantification (LOQ, µg/kg) of the individual mycotoxins for maize, sorghum, and millet.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF 01W01014) for the financial support.

Author Contributions

C.A.C. designed the experiments, performed the sampling survey and the experiments. C.A.C. prepared the manuscript. M.D.B., O.O.A. and S.D.S. supervised the research, edited and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bennett, J.W.; Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal, and Human Systems; Task force Report No. 139; Council for Agricultural Science and Technology: Ames, IA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yazar, S.; Omurtag, G.Z. Fumonisins, trichothecenes and zearalenone in cereals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 2062–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. IARC 1993, 56, 1–521. [Google Scholar]
  5. De Boevre, M.; Di Mavungu, J.D.; Landschoot, S.; Audenaert, K.; Eeckhout, M.; Maene, P.; Haesaert, G.; De Saeger, S. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins and their masked forms in food and feed products. World Mycotoxin J. 2012, 5, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodriguez-Carrasco, Y.; Fattore, M.; Albrizio, S.; Berrada, H.; Manes, J. Occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins and their dietary intake through beer consumption by the European population. Food Chem. 2015, 178, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Angelis, E.; Monaci, L.; Pascale, M.; Visconti, A. Fate of deoxynivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins and their glucoside conjugates from flour to bread: An investigation by high-performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 30, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Stanciu, O.; Juan, C.; Miere, D.; Loghin, F.; Mañes, J. Occurrence and co-occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in wheat grains and wheat flour from Romania. Food Control 2016, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Speijers, G.J.A.; Speijers, M.H.M. Combined toxic effects of mycotoxins. Toxicol. Lett. 2004, 153, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kouadio, J.H.; Dano, S.D.; Moukha, S.; Mobio, T.A.; Creppy, E.E. Effects of combinations of Fusarium mycotoxins on the inhibition of macromolecular synthesis, malondialdehyde levels, {DNA} methylation and fragmentation, and viability in Caco-2 cells. Toxicon 2007, 49, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Alassane-Kpembi, I.; Kolf-Clauw, M.; Gauthier, T.; Abrami, R.; Abiola, F.A.; Oswald, I.P.; Puel, O. New insights into mycotoxin mixtures: The toxicity of low doses of Type B trichothecenes on intestinal epithelial cells is synergistic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 272, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luongo, D.; De Luna, R.; Russo, R.; Severino, L. Effects of four Fusarium toxins (fumonisin B1, α-zearalenol, nivalenol and deoxynivalenol) on porcine whole-blood cellular proliferation. Toxicon 2008, 52, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Harvey, R.B.; Edrington, T.S.; Kubena, L.F.; Elissalde, M.H.; Casper, H.H.; Rottinghaus, G.E.; Turk, J.R. Effects of dietary fumonisin B1-containing culture material, deoxynivalenol-contaminated wheat, or their combination on growing barrows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1996, 57, 1790–1794. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Kubena, L.F.; Edrington, T.S.; Harvey, R.B.; Phillips, T.D.; Sarr, A.B.; Rottinghaus, G.E. Individual and combined effects of fumonisin B1 present in Fusarium moniliforme culture material and diacetoxyscirpenol or ochratoxin A in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 1997, 76, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alassane-Kpembi, I.; Puel, O.; Oswald, I.P. Toxicological interactions between the mycotoxins deoxynivalenol, nivalenol and their acetylated derivatives in intestinal epithelial cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rychlik, M.; Humpf, H.U.; Marko, D.; Dänicke, S.; Mally, A.; Berthiller, F.; Klaffke, H.; Lorenz, N. Proposal of a comprehensive definition of modified and other forms of mycotoxins including “masked” mycotoxins. Mycotoxin Res. 2014, 30, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Berthiller, F.; Crews, C.; Dall’Asta, C.; De Saeger, S.; Haesaert, G.; Karlovsky, P.; Oswald, I.P.; Seefelder, W.; Speijers, G.; Stroka, J. Masked mycotoxins: A review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 165–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Broekaert, N.; Devreese, M.; De Baere, S.; De Backer, P.; Croubels, S. Modified Fusarium mycotoxins unmasked: From occurrence in cereals to animal and human excretion. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 80, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. De Boevre, M; Jacxsens, L.; Lachat, C.; Eeckhout, M.; Di Mavungu, D.M.; Audenaert, K.; Maene, P.; Haesaert, G.; Kolsteren, P.; De Meulenaer, B.; et al. Human exposure to mycotoxins and their masked forms through cereal-based foods in Belgium. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 218, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Oliveira, M.S.; Diel, A.C.L.; Rauber, R.H.; Fontoura, F.P.; Mallmann, A.; Dilkin, P.; Mallmann, C.A. Free and hidden fumonisins in Brazilian raw maize samples. Food Control 2015, 53, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dall’Asta, C.; Galaverna, G.; Mangia, M.; Sforza, S.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. Free and bound fumonisins in gluten-free food products. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dall’Asta, C.; Mangia, M.; Berthiller, F.; Molinelli, A.; Sulyok, M.; Schuhmacher, R.; Krska, R.; Galaverna, G.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. Difficulties in fumonisin determination: The issue of hidden fumonisins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 1335–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Galaverna, G.; Dallsta, C.; Mangia, M.A.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. Masked mycotoxins: An emerging issue for food safety. Czech J. Food Sci. 2009, 27, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dall’Asta, C.; Galaverna, G.; Aureli, G.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. A LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of free and masked fumonisins in maize and maize-based products. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ezekiel, C.N.; Odebode, A.C.; Fapohunda, S.O. Zearalenone production by naturally occurring Fusarium species on maize, wheat and soybeans from Nigeria. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 2008, 2, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  26. Adejumo, T.O.; Hettwer, U.; Karlovsky, P. Occurrence of Fusarium species and trichothecenes in Nigerian maize. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 116, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. European Commission (EC). Comission regulation (EC) No 1126/2007 of 28 September 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards Fusarium toxins in maize and maize products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007, L 255, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kpodo, K.; Thrane, U.; Hald, B. Fusaria and fumonisins in maize from Ghana and their co-occurrence with aflatoxins. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 61, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Warth, B.; Parich, A.; Atehnkeng, J.; Bandyopadhyay, R.; Schuhmacher, R.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R. Quantitation of mycotoxins in food and feed from burkina faso and mozambique using a modern LC-MS/MS multitoxin method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 9352–9363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Phoku, J.Z.; Dutton, M.F.; Njobeh, P.B.; Mwanza, M.; Egbuta, M.A.; Chilaka, C.A. Fusarium infection of maize and maize-based products and exposure of a rural population to fumonisin B1 in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2012, 29, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Abia, W.A.; Warth, B.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; Tchana, A.N.; Njobeh, P.B.; Dutton, M.F.; Moundipa, P.F. Determination of multi-mycotoxin occurrence in cereals, nuts and their products in Cameroon by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Food Control 2013, 31, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adetunji, M.; Atanda, O.; Ezekiel, C.N.; Sulyok, M.; Warth, B.; Beltrán, E.; Krska, R.; Obadina, O.; Bakare, A.; Chilaka, C.A. Fungal and bacterial metabolites of stored maize (Zea mays, L.) from five agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. Mycotoxin Res. 2014, 30, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peters, J.; Thomas, D.; Boers, E.; De Rijk, T.; Berthiller, F.; Haasnoot, W.; Nielen, M.W.F. Colour-encoded paramagnetic microbead-based direct inhibition triplex flow cytometric immunoassay for ochratoxin A, fumonisins and zearalenone in cereals and cereal-based feed rapid detection in food and feed. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 7783–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ediage, E.N.; Hell, K.; De Saeger, S. A comprehensive study to explore differences in mycotoxin patterns from agro-ecological regions through maize, peanut, and cassava products: A case study, cameroon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4789–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chilaka, C.A.; de Kock, S.; Phoku, J.Z.; Mwanza, M.; Egbuta, M.A.; Dutton, M.F. Fungal and mycotoxin contamination of South African commercial maize. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 296–303. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chala, A.; Taye, W.; Ayalew, A.; Krska, R.; Sulyok, M.; Logrieco, A. Multimycotoxin analysis of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Garten) from Ethiopia. Food Control 2014, 45, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ayalew, A.; Fehrmann, H.; Lepschy, J.; Beck, R.; Abate, D. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in staple cereals from Ethiopia. Mycopathologia 2006, 162, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Soares, C.; Calado, T.; Venâncio, A. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus niger aggregate isolated from harvested maize in three Portuguese regions. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2012, 30, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ezekiel, C.N.; Abia, W.A.; Ogara, I.M.; Sulyok, M.; Warth, B.; Krska, R. Fate of mycotoxins in two popular traditional cereal-based beverages (kunu-zaki and pito) from rural Nigeria. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Makun, H.A.; Dutton, M.F.; Njobeh, P.B.; Mwanza, M.; Kabiru, A.Y. Natural multi-occurrence of mycotoxins in rice from Niger State, Nigeria. Mycotoxin Res. 2011, 27, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. De Boevre, M.; Di Mavungu, J.D.; Maene, P.; Audenaert, K.; Deforce, D.; Haesaert, G.; Eeckhout, M.; Callebaut, A.; Berthiller, F.; Van Peteghem, C.; et al. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin and some masked metabolites in different cereals and cereal-derived food. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 29, 819–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mirocha, C.J.; Abbas, H.K.; Windels, C.E.; Xie, W. Variation in deoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, and zearalenone production by Fusarium graminearum isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 1315–1316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Abedi-tizaki, M.; Sabbagh, S. Detection of 3-Acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-Acetyldeoxynivalenol and Nivalenol-Chemotypes of Fusarium graminearum from Iran using specific PCR assays a b c d. Plant Knowl. J. 2013, 2, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, H.-P.; Wu, A.-B.; Zhao, C.-S.; Scholten, O.; Löffler, H.; Liao, Y.-C. Development of a generic PCR detection of deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-chemotypes of Fusarium graminearum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 243, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Castillo, M.-Á.; Montes, R.; Navarro, A.; Segarra, R.; Cuesta, G.; Hernández, E. Occurrence of deoxynivalenol and nivalenol in Spanish corn-based food products. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gottschalk, C.; Barthel, J.; Engelhardt, G.; Bauer, J.; Meyer, K. Simultaneous determination of type A, B and D trichothecenes and their occurrence in cereals and cereal products. Food Addit. Contam. 2009, 26, 1273–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sokolović, M.; Šimpraga, B. Survey of trichothecene mycotoxins in grains and animal feed in Croatia by thin layer chromatography. Food Control 2006, 17, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. European Commission (EC). Commission recomendations on the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal products. Off. J. Eur. Union 2013, 56, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  49. Adejumo, T.O.; Hettwer, U.; Karlovsky, P. Survey of maize from south-western Nigeria for zearalenone, α- and β-zearalenols, fumonisin B1 and enniatins produced by Fusarium species. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. European Commission (EC). Commission regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L 364/5, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  51. De Boevre, M.; Graniczkowska, K.; De Saeger, S. Metabolism of modified mycotoxins studied through in vitro and in vivo models: An overview. Toxicol. Lett. 2015, 233, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Park, J.W.; Scott, P.M.; Lau, B.P.-Y.; Lewis, D.A. Analysis of heat-processed corn foods for fumonisins and bound fumonisins. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 1168–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, E.K.; Scott, P.M.; Lau, B.P.Y. Hidden fumonisin in corn flakes. Food Addit.Contam. 2003, 20, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dall’Asta, C.; Falavigna, C.; Galaverna, G.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R. In vitro digestion assay for determination of hidden fumonisins in maize. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12042–12047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shier, W.T. The fumonisin paradox: A review of research on oral bioavailability of fumonisin B1, a mycotoxin produced by Fusarium moniliforme. J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 2000, 19, 161–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shephard, G.S.; Thiel, P.G.; Stockenstrom, S.; Sydenham, E.W. Worldwide survey of fumonisin concentration of corn and corn-based foods. J. AOAC Int. 1996, 79, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Femine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET). Visualizing Trends in 1981–2015 Rainfall in Nigeria. Nigeria Special Report. Available online: www.fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/FEWS NET_Nigeria Rainfall Trends Map Book_20160601 (accessed on 28 September 2016).
  58. Milani, J.M. Ecological conditions affecting mycotoxin production in cereals: A review. Vet. Med. (Praha) 2013, 58, 405–411. [Google Scholar]
  59. Bottalico, A. Fusarium diseases of cereals: Species complex and related mycotoxin profiles in Europe. J. Plant Pathol. 1998, 80, 85–103. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kim, D.-H.; Yoon, B.R.; Jeon, M.-H.; Kim, B.-C.; Cho, B.-I.; Hong, S.-Y.; Hyun, C.S. Simultaneous Determination of Multi-mycotoxins in Cereal Grains by LC-MS/MS. In International Association for Food Protection; IAFP: Portland, OR, USA, 2015; pp. P2–P65. [Google Scholar]
  61. Okeke, C.A.; Ezekiel, C.N.; Nwangburuka, C.C.; Sulyok, M.; Ezeamagu, C.O.; Adeleke, R.A.; Dike, S.K.; Krska, R. Bacterial diversity and mycotoxin reduction during maize fermentation (steeping) for Ogi production. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Udoh, J.M.; Cardwell, K.F.; Ikotun, T. Storage structures and aflatoxin content of maize in five agroecological zones of Nigeria. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2000, 36, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Atehnkeng, J.; Ojiambo, P.S.; Donner, M.; Ikotun, T.; Sikora, R.A.; Cotty, P.J.; Bandyopadhyay, R. Distribution and toxigenicity of Aspergillus species isolated from maize kernels from three agro-ecological zones in Nigeria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. European Commission (EC). Commission regulation (EC) No 401/2006 of 23 February 2006 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L70, 12–34. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zill, G.; Ziegler, W.; Engelhardt, G.; Wallnöfer, P.R. Chemically and biologically synthesized zearalenone-4-β-d-glucopyranoside: Comparison and convenient determination by gradient HPLC. Chemosphere 1990, 21, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sofie, M.; Van Poucke, C.; Detavernier, C.; Dumoultn, F.; Van Velde, M.D.E.; Schoeters, E.; Van Dyck, S.; Averkieva, O.; Van Peteghem, C.; De Saeger, S. Occurrence of mycotoxins in feed as analyzed by a multi-mycotoxin LC-MS/MS method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 66–71. [Google Scholar]
  67. Monbaliu, S.; Van Poucke, C.; Van Peteghem, C.; Van Poucke, K.; Heungens, K.; De Saeger, S. Development of a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for sweet pepper analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 08 00342 g001 550
Figure 1. Differences in Fusarium mycotoxins in maize ((a) fumonisin B1; and (b) diacetoxyscirpenol); and millet ((c) fumonisin B1; and (d) diacetoxyscirpenol) across agro-ecological zones.
Figure 1. Differences in Fusarium mycotoxins in maize ((a) fumonisin B1; and (b) diacetoxyscirpenol); and millet ((c) fumonisin B1; and (d) diacetoxyscirpenol) across agro-ecological zones.
Toxins 08 00342 g001
Toxins 08 00342 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of co-occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi from Nigerian markets.
Figure 2. Percentage of co-occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi from Nigerian markets.
Toxins 08 00342 g002
Toxins 08 00342 g003 550
Figure 3. Map of Nigeria showing the sampling sites of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi.
Figure 3. Map of Nigeria showing the sampling sites of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi.
Toxins 08 00342 g003
Table
Table 1. Mean and maximum concentration (μg/kg) of Fusarium mycotoxins found in cereals and cereal-based products (ogi) from Nigeria.
Table 1. Mean and maximum concentration (μg/kg) of Fusarium mycotoxins found in cereals and cereal-based products (ogi) from Nigeria.
Mycotoxin 1Maize (n = 136)Sorghum (n = 110)Millet (n = 87)Ogi (n = 30)
% + ve Samples 2Mean 3Max 4% + ve SamplesMeanMax% + ve SamplesMeanMax% + ve SamplesMeanMax
FB1655418222864789233318,172935901903
FB254376288524855136093892874721283
FB343117445238460nana77121371
∑FB65935850888318014211322,0649311283557
DON1699225310011913151543136174
15 ADON0na 5na239441111136060
DON-3G0nana2324630nana173044
ZEN165651383814419139933939
ZEN-14G92124319226233433131
α-ZEL12020333330nana72022
β-ZEL220211212113939101920
HT-212020820315363631313
NIV22062710nana0nana7148160
FUS-X11541540nana0nana7133137
DAS133818516295250nana
1 FB1, B2, and B3 = fumonisin B1, B2, and B3; ∑FB = sum of FB1, B2, and B3; DON = deoxynivalenol; 15ADON = 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol; DON-3G = deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside; ZEN = zearalenone; α-ZEL = α-zearalenol; β-ZEL = β-zearalenol; ZEN-14G = zearalenone-14-glucoside; NIV = nivalenol; FUS-X = fusarenon-X; HT-2 = HT-2 toxin; DAS = diacetoxyscirpenol, 2 % + ve Samples = percentage positive samples, 3 Mean = mean concentration, 4 Max = maximum concentration, 5 na = not applicable.
Table
Table 2. Contamination levels of fumonisins, total fumonisins, and hidden fumonisin in selected samples.
Table 2. Contamination levels of fumonisins, total fumonisins, and hidden fumonisin in selected samples.
Food TypeFB (μg/kg)Total FB (μg/kg)Hidden FB (μg/kg)
MedianMeanMaximumMedianMeanMaximumMedianMeanMaximum
Maize (n = 10)3588353514543163645681448012923
Sorghum (n = 10)41611809518250250120323
Millet (n = 10)11827784030277630591794992254
Ogi (n = 10)24753114963916721795117141313
Hidden FB concentration = the difference between the concentration of FB and the concentration of total FB after hydrolysis.
Table
Table 3. Fusarium mycotoxins occurrence in cereals (maize, sorghum, and millet) across the different agro ecological zones of Nigeria.
Table 3. Fusarium mycotoxins occurrence in cereals (maize, sorghum, and millet) across the different agro ecological zones of Nigeria.
Mycotoxin 1Maize (μg/kg)Sorghum (μg/kg)Millet (μg/kg)
DS (n = 30)SGS (n = 36)NGS (n = 40)SS (n = 30)SGS (n = 30)NGS (n = 40)SS (n = 40)SGS (n = 30)NGS (n = 30)SS (n = 27)
Mean 2 (% + ve) 3Max 4Mean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)MaxMean (% + ve)Max
FB1117 (67)366249 (33)876928 (83)8222505 (77)244370 (7)7159 (10)7667 (8)783700 (17)18,17254 (10)84nana
FB2289 (57)1011350 (28)677508 (65)2885295 (70)1107nana41 (3)4155 (3)55417 (37)389256 (13)10344 (7)47
FB3114 (47)353147 (25)445126 (53)44191 (50)213nana31 (3)3146 (3)46nananananana
DON78 (27)14799 (17)18098 (10)151140 (13)225119 (3)11991 (5)92nana140 (7)200171 (20)543118 (11)118
15 ADONna 5nanananananana34 (3)3444 (3)44nananananana11 (4)11
DON-3Gnananananananana12 (27)1630 (40)6322 (3)22nananananana
ZENnananana65 (3)65nana38 (3)38nananana481 (33)1399109 (7)198nana
ZEN-14G20 (23)2421 (6)2223 (8)23nana20 (3)2019 (5)22nana29 (7)3419(7)2023 (4)23
α-ZELnana20 (3)20nananananana33 (8)33nananananananana
β-ZEL20 (3)20nana21 (3)21nana21 (3)21nananananana3939nana
HT-220 (3)20nananananana19 (17)1924 (8)3111 (3)1135 (7)3536 (7)36nana
NIV228 (7)271nananana163 (3)163nananananananananananana
FUS-X154 (3)154nananananananananananananananananana
DAS2 (10)23 (17)63 (18)48 (7)85 (27)134 (13)55 (18)1612 (17)254 (37)63 (33)4
Abbreviation: DS = Derived Savanna; SGS = Southern Guinea Savanna; NGS = Northern Guinea Savanna; SS = Sudan Savanna. 1 FB1, B2, and B3 = fumonisin B1, B2, and B3; DON = deoxynivalenol; 15ADON = 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol; DON-3G = deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside; ZEN = zearalenone; α-ZEL = α-zearalenol; β-ZEL = β-zearalenol; ZEN-14G = zearalenone-14-glucoside; NIV = nivalenol; FUS-X = fusarenon-X; HT-2 = HT-2 toxin; DAS = diacetoxyscirpenol; 2 Mean = mean concentration, 3 % + ve = percentage positive samples, 4 Max = maximum concentration, 5 na = not applicable.
Table
Table 4. Sampling sites of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi from different agro-ecological zones of Nigeria.
Table 4. Sampling sites of maize, sorghum, millet, and ogi from different agro-ecological zones of Nigeria.
Product TypeAEZStateNo. of MarketsNo. of Samples
MaizeSSKano630
NGSKaduna636
SGSNiger840
DSNasarawa630
Total number = 136
SorghumSSKano630
NGSKaduna240
SGSNiger840
Total number = 110
MilletSSSokoto630
NGSKaduna630
SGSNiger827
Total number = 87
OgiDSEkiti530
Total number = 30
Abbreviation: AEZ = agro-ecological zones, SS = Sudan Savanna, NGS = Northern Guinea Savanna, SGS = Southern Guinea Savanna, DS = Derived Savanna.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chilaka, C.A.; De Boevre, M.; Atanda, O.O.; De Saeger, S. Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Crops and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria. Toxins 2016, 8, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110342

AMA Style

Chilaka CA, De Boevre M, Atanda OO, De Saeger S. Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Crops and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria. Toxins. 2016; 8(11):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chilaka, Cynthia Adaku, Marthe De Boevre, Olusegun Oladimeji Atanda, and Sarah De Saeger. 2016. "Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Crops and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria" Toxins 8, no. 11: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110342

APA Style

Chilaka, C. A., De Boevre, M., Atanda, O. O., & De Saeger, S. (2016). Occurrence of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereal Crops and Processed Products (Ogi) from Nigeria. Toxins, 8(11), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8110342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop