Next Article in Journal
Venom of the Coral Snake Micrurus clarki: Proteomic Profile, Toxicity, Immunological Cross-Neutralization, and Characterization of a Three-Finger Toxin
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation of the Binding Protein of Periplocoside E from BBMVs in Midgut of the Oriental Amyworm Mythimna separata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) through Affinity Chromatography
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Scorpion Toxin Analogue BmKTX-D33H as a Potential Kv1.3 Channel-Selective Immunomodulator for Autoimmune Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Activity of Palythoa caribaeorum Venom on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Mammalian Superior Cervical Ganglion Neurons

by
Fernando Lazcano-Pérez
1,*,
Héctor Castro
2,
Isabel Arenas
2,
David E. García
2,
Ricardo González-Muñoz
3 and
Roberto Arreguín-Espinosa
1,*
1
Departamento de Química de Biomacromoléculas, Instituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
2
Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Biología de Cnidarios, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2016, 8(5), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050135
Submission received: 10 March 2016 / Revised: 19 April 2016 / Accepted: 28 April 2016 / Published: 5 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Toxins and Biological Ion Channels)

Abstract

:
The Zoanthids are an order of cnidarians whose venoms and toxins have been poorly studied. Palythoa caribaeorum is a zoanthid commonly found around the Mexican coastline. In this study, we tested the activity of P. caribaeorum venom on voltage-gated sodium channel (NaV1.7), voltage-gated calcium channel (CaV2.2), the A-type transient outward (IA) and delayed rectifier (IDR) currents of KV channels of the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons of the rat. These results showed that the venom reversibly delays the inactivation process of voltage-gated sodium channels and inhibits voltage-gated calcium and potassium channels in this mammalian model. The compounds responsible for these effects seem to be low molecular weight peptides. Together, these results provide evidence for the potential use of zoanthids as a novel source of cnidarian toxins active on voltage-gated ion channels.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cnidarians comprise approximately 10,000 species within five different classes: Anthozoa (sea anemones, corals, zoanthids), Scyphozoa (jellyfishes), Cubozoa (box jellyfishes), Hydrozoa and Staurozoa [1]. These organisms are mainly carnivorous although some species can use photosynthesis as an alternative feeding source facilitated by symbiont zooxantelles living within their tissues [2]. All cnidarians are considered to be toxic as they possess specialized organelles called nematocysts where they store a venom which is known to contain a complex mixture of compounds including bioactive amines, steroids, glycoproteins and cytolitic proteins [3], together with an extensive variety of neurotoxic peptides acting on voltage-gated channels [4,5].
Cnidarian venoms need to contain neurotoxins in order to paralyze their prey by directly affecting ion channels and receptors, neuromuscular junctions and nerve cell membranes [6]. The best-known cnidarian neurotoxins are the low molecular weight peptides isolated from sea anemones [7]. These compounds can affect a variety of targets such as voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels, Acid Sensing Ion Channel 3 (ASIC3) and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) [8].
There is currently little known about venoms of anthozoan species other than sea anemones. The zoanthids comprise a group of cnidarians characterized by colonies of clonal polyps possessing two rows of tentacles. They are usually found in shallow zones of coral reefs [9]. Their venoms have received little attention although they may be of greater importance. However, extracts and compounds isolated from them exhibit several biological activities [10,11]. Recently, a low molecular weight fraction of the zoanthid Zoanthus sociatus has been shown to be lethal to mice at a concentration of 792 µg/kg and to accelerate KCl-induced lethality [12]. Furthermore, the same fraction was found to be a potential negative modulator of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels inhibiting the release of insulin in pancreatic β-cells [13]. Likewise, a 3.4 kDa peptide isolated from the zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum caused a delay on the sodium current inactivation in voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7 of the superior cervical ganglion neurons of the rat [14]. To our knowledge, no other characterization of zoanthids venoms on voltage-gated ion channels has been carried out.
Therefore, we assessed the biological activity of P. caribaeorum venom (Figure 1) on voltage-gated ion channels (NaV1.7, CaV2.2 and on IA and IDR K+ currents) by means of electrophysiological techniques. Moreover, the molecular weight distribution of the venom peptides was observed by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF-MS) spectrometry. Together, these results show the presence of low molecular weight peptides with activity on voltage-gated ion channels which suggests that zoanthids are useful in searching for novel biomolecules.

2. Results and Discussion

Since cnidarians are carnivorous animals, they need to capture their prey and immobilize them. For this reason, their venoms contain a mixture of toxins that disrupt the function of the nervous system of the prey, for example fish and crustaceans. It is well known that anthozoan neurotoxins, especially those isolated from sea anemones, modulate ion channels on excitable cells. Nevertheless, the activity of zoanthid venoms remains unknown. The MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis showed that the venom contains low molecular weight peptides (within a mass range of 1800 to 9000 Da) (Figure 2).

2.1. Effect of P. caribaeorum Venom on NaV1.7 Sodium Channel Current

Voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV) were the first target discovered for cnidarian neurotoxins [15] and more than 60 sea anemone toxins affecting this channel have been reported to date [8]. Thus, the effect of the venom on NaV1.7 channels in SCG neurons of the rat was examined in this study [16,17,18]. Sodium currents were elicited with a square pulse from −80 to −20 mV every four seconds. Figure 3A shows the superimposed sodium current traces before, during and after application of the venom. The current amplitude was measured as the mean data points between 1.7 and 2 ms after the pulse onset. The venom increased the amplitude during the decay phase and the effect was partially reversed after washout (Figure 3B). As current amplitude depends on cell size, we compared the density of the current dividing the amplitude by the cell capacitance. Current density was significantly larger after venom application compared to control conditions (venom 72.7 ± 17.2 pA/pF; control 26.6 ± 5.06 pA/pF) (n = 9) (Figure 3C).
Sea anemone neurotoxins are the best characterized in terms of mode of action and kinetics [19]. Thus, we also evaluated the effect of the venom on activation and inactivation of the sodium channel (Figure 3D–F). Steady-state inactivation of the sodium current was measured using a double pulse protocol in which a 500 ms conditioning pulse preceded a 5 ms test pulse to −20 mV [20]. The midpoint (Vh) and slope factor (k) were obtained using a Boltzmann function of individual cells. Under control conditions, the Vh average was −66.05 ± 1.5 mV, whereas it was −69.8 ± 1.7 mV after venom application (n = 5). Moreover, k was 8.7 ± 0.5 mV and 8.9 ± 1.2 mV for control and venom conditions, respectively (n = 5). Therefore, venom treatment did not significantly shift steady-state inactivation. For the activation curve, conductance was calculated from current-voltage (I-V) relationship using the equation GNa = INa/(V − VNa), where INa is the peak amplitude of current, V is the membrane potential and VNa is the reversal potential [21]. A Boltzmann equation was used to obtain Vh and k, as follows:
G G max   = { 1 + exp [ V h V k ] } 1
where Gmax is the maximal conductance. Significant differences were not observed at mean values of Vh (−28.1 ± 1.8 and −29.6 ± 1.05 mV for venom and control conditions, respectively) (n = 6). Conversely, when venom was applied, k increased significantly compared to control. (Venom 5.2 ± 0.2 and 3.5 ± 0.2 mV for control conditions) (n = 6).
These results suggest that P. caribaeorum venom contains at least one neurotoxin that slows the inactivation kinetic of the sodium current in SCG neurons. This effect is consistent with the slow inactivation induced by all sea anemone toxins known to date. This finding allows us to think that sodium channel neurotoxins from other cnidarian groups might work the same way [16,22]. In addition, an increase in the slope of the activation curve and a slight shift to the right of peak sodium current were observed. It is likely that the venom has an effect on the movement of the voltage-sensor, modifying not only the inactivation but also the activation process. However, it is not possible to discern whether a different peptide is responsible for this effect.

2.2. Effect of P. caribaeorum Venom on IA and IDR Potassium Currents

A major target for sea anemone toxins are voltage-gated potassium channels [8], therefore, the effect of P. caribaeorum extract was also tested on them. SCG neurons display several outward K+ current components: a transient current (IA), a Ca2+ dependent component and a sustained K+ current that is the delayed rectifier (IDR) [23]. These currents play a key role in the control of excitability, synaptic input, and neurotransmitter release [24,25]. Therefore, the effect of P. caribaeorum venom on IA and IDR was evaluated. IA and IDR were isolated using a voltage pulse protocol every five seconds. This protocol measured the total potassium current (IA + IDR) by a 80 ms pulse to −20 mV after a 1 s conditioning prepulse to −100 mV. Subsequently, the IA was isolated from the total potassium current by a depolarizing 1 s conditioning prepulse to −50 mV. Therefore, the remaining outward current evoked by 80 ms pulse to −20 mV is mostly comprised of IDR. Finally, the IA was calculated by digital subtraction of IDR from total potassium current (Figure 4H) [23]. The current amplitude of IA was measured from the peak, and amplitude of IDR was determined as the mean current value of data points during the last 5 ms test pulse. The venom inhibited 38.8% ± 7.8% the current amplitude of IA without altering I-V relationship (Figure 4A–C,G) (n = 5). Likewise, IDR was inhibited 43.7% ± 5.3% and the voltage dependence was not shifted (Figure 4D–G) (n = 5).
These results indicate that P. caribaeorum venom affects these two different types of potassium currents in a voltage-independent manner. In SCG neurons, IA is produced by KV1.4, KV4.1, KV4.2 and KV4.3 channels [26], while IDR is associated with Kv2 family [27]. Quite a few cnidarian toxins have been tested on KV channels associated with this current. BDS-I and II isolated from the sea anemone Anemonia sulcata were first reported as specific blockers of the fast inactivating potassium channel KV3.4 [28]. However, their specificity was later questioned and it was shown that they inhibit KV3.1 and KV 3.2 channels, which are ascribed to the delayed rectifier current [29]. ShK and APETx1, from Stichodactyla helianthus and Anthopleura elegantissima, respectively, are potent delayed rectifier KV channels inhibitors, however, they have also been shown to inhibit Kv1.4 channels [30,31]. Most sea anemone potassium blockers described to date have been tested on IDR related potassium channels [30].

2.3. Effect of P. caribaeorum Venom on CaV2.2 Calcium Channel Current

The venom was also tested on calcium channels with the rationale that sodium and calcium channels share some structure features and this fraction may have activity on both type of channels [32]. SGC neurons contain mainly CaV2.2 calcium channels and a small fraction of CaV1 (L-type) channels. To eliminate the L-type current component, 5 µM nifedipine was added to the bath solution [33]. CaV2.2 current was elicited with a voltage step from −80 to 0 mV every four seconds and was defined as the component of the current sensitive to 100 µM CdCl2. Figure 5A shows representative calcium current traces before, during and after venom application. Steady-state current amplitude was calculated as the mean value of data points between 5 and 6 ms after the onset of the test pulse. Superfusion of the venom inhibited 65.19% ± 3.52% the calcium current in less than 40 seconds and the effect was partially reversed after washout (n = 5) (Figure 5B). We also examined the effect of P. caribaeorum venom on I-V relationship and activation curve (Figure 5C,D). The extract inhibited current over the wide range of potentials and it showed a significant effect on slope factor of activation curve (5.2 ± 0.7 and 11.1 ± 1.4 mV, under control and venom conditions, respectively) (n = 7). However, the venom did not significantly affect the midpoint of activation (venom Vh = −6.06 ± 2.4 mV, and −7.8 ± 1.5 mV in control conditions) (n = 7). Although the venom of P. caribaeorum did not affect significantly the midpoint of activation of CaV 2.2 calcium channel current, it readily inhibited this channel current influx suggesting an action affecting either the channel pore, i.e., the surface charge, or the voltage-sensor machinery. According to this inhibition and the slope change, these data are in good agreement with a mechanism involving a trapping of the voltage-sensor of the channel. Toxin effects on movement of the voltage-sensor have been reported in calcium channels, e.g., ω-Aga-IVA decreases steepness of P-type calcium channel activation curve [34]. In fact, the voltage-sensor trapping has been proposed as a common mechanism of action of all toxins that alter the voltage-dependence of ion channel gating [22].
Despite almost all venomous animals produce calcium channel blockers, none of these blockers have been isolated from cnidarians [35]. These results clearly showed that the venom of P. caribaeorum inhibits CaV2.2 channels, thus they reveal the first cnidarian venom known inhibiting calcium channels. Procedures are being designed to isolate the molecule eliciting this response.

3. Conclusions

Marine venoms are a rich source of voltage-gated channels modulators. Among these, research on sea anemone venoms has been largely investigated on Nav and Kv channel toxins, which have been shown to be promising tools on pharmacological research. Our results have shown that P. caribaeorum contains voltage-gated ion channel toxins and this opens the possibility to consider zoanthids as a new source of biologically active molecules. Moreover, this study evidences that cnidarians can also produce voltage-gated calcium channel toxins as other groups of animals like spiders and cone snails. Further studies may help in the advance of the knowledge of the action of cnidarian venoms acting on voltage-gated calcium channels.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Venom Extraction

Palythoa caribaeorum organisms were collected by free diving in La Gallega coral reef in Veracruz, México. They were carefully separated from the rock using a chisel and a hammer, avoiding inducing mechanical stress in the polyps. In the laboratory, remaining rock was cleaned from the material, which was then soaked in water to eliminate superficial mucus. In order to extract nematocyst venom, the organisms were carefully squeezed in deionized water to expose hidden polyp tentacles, which were mechanically discharged. The solution was then centrifuged twice at 70,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was lyophilized, and stored at −70 °C prior to use.

4.2. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

The venom was analyzed using MALDI-TOF. 5 µL of a saturated solution of sinapinic acid (>99.0% purity for MALDI-MS, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added to 5 µg of lyophilized venom. 1 µL of this solution was deposited onto the MALDI plate and allowed to dry at room temperature. The spectrum was recorded on linear positive mode on a mass spectrometer (Microflex Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with nitrogen laser λ = 337 nm and a 20 kV acceleration voltage.

4.3. Superior Cervical Ganglion Neuron Culture

Superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons were isolated from 5 week-old male Wistar rats. Animals were obtained from the animal breeding facility of the School of Medicine at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and were handled according to the Mexican Official Norm for Use, Care and Reproduction of Laboratory Animals NOM-062-ZOO-1999. The Research and Ethics Committees of School of Medicine, UNAM, approved the project´s experimental protocol, identification code: 067/2012, at 21 August 2012. Rats were anaesthetized with CO2 and decapitated with a guillotine. After dissection, ganglia were sliced into eight pieces. The tissue was incubated in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with 20 U/mL papain for 20 min at 37 °C. The sample was then transferred into a solution containing 1 mg/mL collagenase type I and 10 mg/mL dispase. This was then incubated for 20 min before mechanically disaggregating the tissue. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 180 g for 3 min and washed twice in Leibovitz’s L-15 medium and once in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), both supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. Cells were then plated on polystyrene culture dishes coated with poly-l-lysine and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were used up to 24 h after plating. L-15 and DMEM culture media were obtained from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA, USA), and all other reagents were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.4. Electrophysiology Recording and Data Analysis

Calcium, sodium, and potassium currents were recorded in the whole cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique [21] with an EPC9 amplifier (HEKA Instruments Inc., Holliston, MA, USA) at room temperature (22–25 °C). Borosilicate glass pipettes (Kimble Chase, Vineland, NJ, USA) with a resistance of 1.6–2.2 MΩ were used. Series resistance was 3–7 MΩ and compensated to >60%. Currents were sampled at 100 kHz. Current recordings were filtered at 2.9 kHz. Cells were continuously bathed with control or test solutions at a rate of 2 mL/min. For measuring Na+ currents, the bath solution contained (in mM): 103 TEA-Cl, 60 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 8 glucose, 2.9 MgCl2, and 0.1 CdCl2, pH adjusted to 7.4 with TEA-OH. Pipette solution contained (in mM): 22 TEA-Cl, 140 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 0.1 BAPTA tetracesium, 1 MgCl2, 10 NaCl, 4 Mg2ATP, 0.3 GTP, and 0.1 leupeptin, pH adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH. For Ca2+ currents, the bath solution contained (in mM): 160 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 10 HEPES, 8 Glucose, 5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 0.005 nifedipine and 100 nM TTX, pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Pipette solution contained (in mM): 140 CsCl, 20 TEA-Cl, 10 HEPES, 0.1 BAPTA tetracesium, 1 MgCl2, 4 Mg2ATP, 3 GTP, and 0.1 leupeptin, pH adjusted to 7.4 with KOH. For K+ currents, the bath solution contained (in mM): 163 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2.9 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 8 Glucose, 0.1 CdCl2, and 100 nM TTX, pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Pipette solution contained (in mM): 175 KCl, 5 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 0.1 BAPTA tetrapotassium, 4 Mg2ATP, 0.3 GTP, and 0.1 leupeptin, pH adjusted to 7.4 with KOH. Na+ and Ca2+ currents were recorded in the presence of 100 nM TTX, and 0.1 mM CdCl2 as positive controls, respectively. The P. caribaeorum venom was diluted with bath solution to a final concentration of 1.25 mg/mL.
Data were analyzed using IGOR Pro software (Version 6.1.2.1, WaveMetrics, Portland, OR, USA, 2009). Results were expressed as mean ± standard error mean (SEM) and analyzed using Student’s t tests. Statistical significance was taken to p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Lucero Ríos Ruíz for her help with mass spectrometry analysis and Hortensia Segura Silva for graphical design. Fernando Lazcano-Pérez acknowledges the postgraduate program from Ciencias del Mar y Limnología. This work was financially supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) grant 166472 and PAPIIT grants IN202614 and IN215813.

Author Contributions

F.L.-P., H.C. and I.A. wrote this manuscript and performed the experiments. R.G.-M. did the identification of species and collection of samples. R.A.-E. and D.E.G. revised the manuscript and contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Daly, M.; Brugler, M.R.; Cartwright, P.; Collins, A.G.; Dawson, M.N.; Fautin, D.G.; France, S.C.; McFadden, C.S.; Opresko, D.M.; Rodriguez, E.; et al. The phylum Cnidaria: A review of phylogenetic patterns and diversity 300 years after Linnaeus. Zootaxa 2007, 1668, 127–182. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parker, S.P. Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  3. Watters, M.R. Tropical marine neurotoxins: Venoms to drugs. Semin. Neurol. 2005, 25, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shiomi, K. Novel peptide toxins recently isolated from sea anemones. Toxicon 2009, 54, 1112–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Frazão, B.; Vasconcelos, V.; Antunes, A. Sea anemone (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Actiniaria) toxins: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 1812–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mariottini, G.; Pane, L. The role of Cnidaria in drug discovery. A review on CNS implications and new perspectives. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 2013, 8, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Honma, T.; Shiomi, K. Peptide toxins in sea anemones: Structural and functional aspects. Mar. Biotechnol. 2006, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lazcano-Pérez, F.; Hernández-Guzman, U.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, J.; Arreguín-Espinosa, R. Cnidarian neurotoxic peptides affecting central nervous system targets. In Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem.; 2015. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201531 (accessed on 2 May 2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. Sinniger, F.; Montoya-Burgos, J.I.; Chevaldonné, P.; Pawlowski, J. Phylogeny of the order Zoantharia (Anthozoa, Hexacorallia) based on the mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Mar. Biol. 2005, 147, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lakshmi, V.; Saxena, A.; Pandey, K.; Bajpai, P.; Misra-Bhattacharya, S. Antifilarial activity of Zoanthus species (Phylum Coelenterata, Class Anthzoa) against human lymphatic filaria, Brugia malayi. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 93, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Alencar, D.B.; Melo, A.A.; Silva, G.C.; Lima, R.L.; Pires-Cavalcante, K.M.S.; Carneiro, R.F.; Rabelo, A.S.; Sousa, O.V.; Vieira, R.H.S.F.; Viana, F.A.; et al. Antioxidant, hemolytic, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities of the tropical Atlantic marine zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2015, 87, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Domínguez-Pérez, D.; Diaz-Garcia, C.M.; García-Delgado, N.; Sierra-Gómez, Y.; Castañeda, O.; Antunes, A. Insights into the toxicological properties of a low molecular weight fraction from Zoanthus sociatus (Cnidaria). Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2873–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Diaz-Garcia, C.M.; Sanchez-Soto, C.; Fuentes-Silva, D.; Leon-Pinzon, C.; Dominguez-Perez, D.; Varela, C.; Rodriguez-Romero, A.; Castañeda, O.; Hiriart, M. Low molecular weight compounds from Zoanthus sociatus impair insulin secretion via Ca+2 influx blockade and cause glucose intolerance in vivo. Toxicon 2012, 59, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lazcano-Pérez, F.; Vivas, O.; Román-González, S.A.; Rodríguez-Bustamante, E.; Castro, H.; Arenas, I.; García, D.E.; Sánchez-Puig, N.; Arreguín-Espinosa, R. A purified Palythoa venom fraction delays sodium current inactivation in sympathetic neurons. Toxicon 2014, 82, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Béress, L.; Béress, R.; Wunderer, G. Purification of three polypeptides with neuroand cardiotoxic activity from the sea anemone Anemonia sulcata. Toxicon 1975, 13, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toledo-Aral, J.J.; Moss, B.L.; He, Z.J.; Koszowski, A.G.; Whisenand, T.; Levinson, S.R.; Wolf, J.J.; Silos-Santiago, I.; Halegoua, S.; Mandel, G. Identification of PN1, a predominant voltage-dependent sodium channel expressed principally in peripheral neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Catterall, W.A.; Goldin, A.L.; Waxman, S.G. International union of pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jia, Z.; Jia, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Z.; Jia, Q.; Liang, H.; Zhang, H. Genistein inhibits voltage-gated sodium currents in SCG neurons through protein tyrosine kinase-dependent and kinase-independent mechanisms. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2008, 456, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Norton, R.S. Structure and structure-function relationships of sea anemone proteins that interact with the sodium channel. Toxicon 1991, 29, 1051–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kehl, S.J. Voltage-clamp analysis of the voltage-gated sodium current of the rat pituitary melanotroph. Neurosci. Lett. 1994, 165, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández-Ochoa, E.O.; García-Ferreiro, R.E.; García, D.E. G protein activation inhibits gating charge movement in rat sympathetic neurons. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 292, C2226–C2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Catterall, W.A.; Cestèle, S.; Yarov-Yarovoy, V.; Yu, F.H.; Konoki, K.; Scheuer, T. Voltage-gated ion channels and gating modifier toxins. Toxicon 2007, 49, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Schofield, G.G.; Ikeda, S.R. Potassium currents of acutely isolated adult rat superior cervical ganglion neurons. Brain Res. 1989, 485, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, S.-Q.; Li, W.; Sesti, F. Multiple modes of A-type potassium current regulation. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2007, 13, 3178–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blaine, J.T.; Ribera, A.B. Kv2 channels form delayed-rectifier potassium channels In Situ. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 1473–1480. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Malin, S.A.; Nerbonne, J.M. Elimination of the fast transient in superior cervical ganglion neurons with expression of KV4.2W362F: Molecular dissection of/A. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 5191–5199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, P.W.; Bean, B.P. Kv2 channel regulation of action potential repolarization and firing patterns in superior cervical ganglion neurons and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 4991–5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Diochot, S.; Schweitz, H.; Béress, L.; Lazdunski, M. Sea anemone peptides with a specific blocking activity against the fast inactivating potassium channel Kv3.4. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 6744–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yeung, S.Y.M.; Thompson, D.; Wang, Z.; Fedida, D.; Robertson, B. Modulation of Kv3 subfamily potassium currents by the sea anemone toxin BDS: Significance for CNS and biophysical studies. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 8735–8745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Castañeda, O.; Harvey, A.L. Discovery and characterization of cnidarian peptide toxins that affect neuronal potassium ion channels. Toxicon 2009, 54, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kalman, K.; Pennington, M.W.; Lanigan, M.D.; Nguyen, A.; Rauer, H.; Mahnir, V.; Paschetto, K.; Kem, W.R.; Grissmer, S.; Gutman, G.A.; et al. ShK-Dap22, a Potent Kv1.3-specific Immunosuppressive Polypeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32697–32707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, F.H.; Catterall, W.A. The VGL-chanome: A protein superfamily specialized for electrical signaling and ionic homeostasis. Sci. STKE Signal Transduct. Knowl. Environ. 2004, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Plummer, M.R.; Logothetis, D.E.; Hess, P. Elementary properties and pharmacological sensitivities of calcium channels in mammalian peripheral neurons. Neuron 1989, 2, 1453–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McDonough, S.I. Gating modifier toxins of voltage-gated calcium channels. Toxicon 2007, 49, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sousa, S.R.; Vetter, I.; Lewis, R.J. Venom peptides as a rich source of Cav2.2 channel blockers. Toxins 2013, 5, 286–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum: (A) P. caribaeorum in its natural habitat; (B) Open P. caribaeorum polyps showing tentacles. Scale bar: 10 cm.
Figure 1. The zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum: (A) P. caribaeorum in its natural habitat; (B) Open P. caribaeorum polyps showing tentacles. Scale bar: 10 cm.
Toxins 08 00135 g001
Figure 2. Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) of P. caribaeorum venom.
Figure 2. Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) of P. caribaeorum venom.
Toxins 08 00135 g002
Figure 3. Effect of P. caribaeorum venom on sodium current: (A) Normalized representative sodium current traces before (1), during (2) and after (3) application of venom. Current amplitude was measured between the dotted lines (♦); (B) Time course of sodium current amplitude. The application of venom is indicated within a box. Current changes were compared to the total block observed in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX); (C) Mean current density after venom addition and under control conditions (Ctrl); (D) Voltage protocol used for measuring I-V relations and normalized representative current traces at −30 mV and +20 mV before (black) and during (red) venom exposure; (E) I-V relationship was elicited by voltage steps between −60 and +60 mV in 10 mV increments before and during the venom application; (F) Steady-state inactivation and activation curves under control conditions and after venom application (○ Ctrl and ● Venom). Data points for both activation and inactivation were well fitted to the single Boltzmann equation. * represents p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of P. caribaeorum venom on sodium current: (A) Normalized representative sodium current traces before (1), during (2) and after (3) application of venom. Current amplitude was measured between the dotted lines (♦); (B) Time course of sodium current amplitude. The application of venom is indicated within a box. Current changes were compared to the total block observed in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX); (C) Mean current density after venom addition and under control conditions (Ctrl); (D) Voltage protocol used for measuring I-V relations and normalized representative current traces at −30 mV and +20 mV before (black) and during (red) venom exposure; (E) I-V relationship was elicited by voltage steps between −60 and +60 mV in 10 mV increments before and during the venom application; (F) Steady-state inactivation and activation curves under control conditions and after venom application (○ Ctrl and ● Venom). Data points for both activation and inactivation were well fitted to the single Boltzmann equation. * represents p < 0.05.
Toxins 08 00135 g003
Figure 4. IA and IDR are inhibited by P. caribaeorum venom: (A,D) Representative IA and IDR traces before (1), during (2) and after (3) venom addition; (B,E) Time courses of the venom effect on the amplitude of potassium currents in SCG’s neurons. Exposure to venom is marked with a box; (C,F) Effect of venom superfusion on I-V relationship of IA and IDR; (G) Aggregated data for inhibition of potassium currents (n = 5); (H) IA and IDR K+ currents voltage protocol.
Figure 4. IA and IDR are inhibited by P. caribaeorum venom: (A,D) Representative IA and IDR traces before (1), during (2) and after (3) venom addition; (B,E) Time courses of the venom effect on the amplitude of potassium currents in SCG’s neurons. Exposure to venom is marked with a box; (C,F) Effect of venom superfusion on I-V relationship of IA and IDR; (G) Aggregated data for inhibition of potassium currents (n = 5); (H) IA and IDR K+ currents voltage protocol.
Toxins 08 00135 g004
Figure 5. Cav 2.2 calcium current is inhibited by venom of P. caribaeorum: (A) Superimposed current traces normalized by the cell capacitance before (1), during (2) and after (3) venom application; (B) Time course of the venom effect on calcium current amplitude. The box indicates the time of the venom application; (C) I-V relationship was obtained by depolarizing pulses between −60 mV and +60 mV in 10 mV increments; (D) Activation curve measured at the peak of the tail current and normalized. Solid line is the best Boltzmann fit to data points.
Figure 5. Cav 2.2 calcium current is inhibited by venom of P. caribaeorum: (A) Superimposed current traces normalized by the cell capacitance before (1), during (2) and after (3) venom application; (B) Time course of the venom effect on calcium current amplitude. The box indicates the time of the venom application; (C) I-V relationship was obtained by depolarizing pulses between −60 mV and +60 mV in 10 mV increments; (D) Activation curve measured at the peak of the tail current and normalized. Solid line is the best Boltzmann fit to data points.
Toxins 08 00135 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazcano-Pérez, F.; Castro, H.; Arenas, I.; García, D.E.; González-Muñoz, R.; Arreguín-Espinosa, R. Activity of Palythoa caribaeorum Venom on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Mammalian Superior Cervical Ganglion Neurons. Toxins 2016, 8, 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050135

AMA Style

Lazcano-Pérez F, Castro H, Arenas I, García DE, González-Muñoz R, Arreguín-Espinosa R. Activity of Palythoa caribaeorum Venom on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Mammalian Superior Cervical Ganglion Neurons. Toxins. 2016; 8(5):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazcano-Pérez, Fernando, Héctor Castro, Isabel Arenas, David E. García, Ricardo González-Muñoz, and Roberto Arreguín-Espinosa. 2016. "Activity of Palythoa caribaeorum Venom on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Mammalian Superior Cervical Ganglion Neurons" Toxins 8, no. 5: 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050135

APA Style

Lazcano-Pérez, F., Castro, H., Arenas, I., García, D. E., González-Muñoz, R., & Arreguín-Espinosa, R. (2016). Activity of Palythoa caribaeorum Venom on Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Mammalian Superior Cervical Ganglion Neurons. Toxins, 8(5), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop